<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com">
<title>European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy Online First</title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com</link>
<description>European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy RSS Feed -- Online First</description>
<prism:eIssn>2047-9964</prism:eIssn>
<prism:publicationName>European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>2047-9956</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004917v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2026-005160v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2026-004964v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2026-005154v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2026-005143v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2026-005157v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2026-005155v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004850v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2026-005114v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004821v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004735v2?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2026-005095v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004928v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004913v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2026-005089v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2026-005096v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004790v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004808v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2026-005085v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2026-005067v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004927v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2026-005082v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004759v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004749v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004859v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2026-005052v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004741v2?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2026-004940v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004851v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004554v2?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004873v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004825v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2026-005026v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004897v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004675v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004727v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004898v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2026-004975v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004729v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004695v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004861v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004827v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2026-004962v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004877v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004811v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004739v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004915v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004858v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004703v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004767v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004730v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004906v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004639v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004838v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004761v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004721v2?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004779v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004716v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004822v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004665v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004788v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004707v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004693v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004705v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004726v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004732v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004740v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004533v3?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004516v2?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004622v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004664v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004880v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004874v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004586v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004706v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004604v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004673v2?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004668v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004536v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004681v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004648v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004572v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004590v2?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004812v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004797v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004618v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004806v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004656v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004784v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004712v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004562v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004525v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004717v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004713v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004623v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004764v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004606v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004758v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004760v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004755v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004582v2?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004528v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004493v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004630v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004600v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004583v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004698v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004709v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004697v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004663v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2024-004425v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004526v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004635v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004607v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004580v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004597v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004587v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004475v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004564v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004534v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2024-004444v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2024-004462v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004490v1?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://hwmaint.ejhp.bmj.com/homepage/ejhp_95x60.gif" />
</channel>
<image rdf:about="http://hwmaint.ejhp.bmj.com/homepage/ejhp_95x60.gif">
<title>European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy</title>
<url>http://hwmaint.ejhp.bmj.com/homepage/ejhp_95x60.gif</url>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com</link>
</image>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004917v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[On-label paediatric drug product information in Switzerland - the neglected child]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004917v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objectives</st><p>Healthcare professionals who prescribe, prepare, and administer drugs to children must consider age-dependent pharmaceutical aspects. However, information on the age-appropriate use of authorised medicinal products is frequently incomplete within the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC). This study aims to improve the quality and completeness of the information provided by the SmPC for products with paediatric authorisation and to create greater awareness from both regulatory authority and market authorisation holders.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>We created a list of topics that are particularly relevant for safe and effective drug use in paediatrics, but which were identified as either missing or incompletely reported. The list was compiled based on routine experience of clinical pharmacists specialised in paediatrics. Each topic was compared with the reporting obligations imposed by the statutory provisions in Switzerland. The problem of missing information for clinical practice was discussed for selected examples.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>We identified 16 missing or incompletely reported topics: 1) authorised child ages, 2) posology information, 3) age-specific contraindications, 4) update on change in state-of-the-art, 5) dissolution concentration, 6) solvents / diluents compatibility, 7) administration concentrations, 8) osmolarity / pH, 9) reconstitution / dilution stability, 10) shelf-life, 11) route of administration (central or peripheral vein), 12) infusion rates and administration duration, 13) dosing aids, 14) in-filter compatibility, 15) caution in case of extravasation, and 16) taste. Out of the 16 topics, four (25%) are not subject to any reporting obligations, seven (44%) require further clarification regarding the information to be reported under the statutory provisions, and five (31%) are subject to reporting obligations.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>We provide a list of topics as a proposal of indispensable paediatric-specific information that should be available for authorised products. Moreover, it is paramount that the safe and effective use of drugs with paediatric authorisation is appropriately described for all age populations within the label.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Higi, L., Palmero, D., Rudolf von Rohr, T., Timmermann, M., Roussel, M., Gotta, V., Vonbach, P., Ka&#x0308;ser, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-12T09:00:18-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004917</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004917</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 1: Introductory Statements and Governance]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[On-label paediatric drug product information in Switzerland - the neglected child]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2026-005160v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Sodium thiosulfate in calciphylaxis: the importance of accurate dose-unit reporting]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2026-005160v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vazquez-Gomez, S., Caina Lopez, S., Diaz-Fernandez, A., Portela-Sotelo, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-11T09:00:17-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-005160</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-005160</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Sodium thiosulfate in calciphylaxis: the importance of accurate dose-unit reporting]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letter</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2026-004964v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Standard concentrations of intravenous continuous drug infusions: evaluation of adherence, safety and effectiveness in paediatric critical care as quality improvement initiative]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2026-004964v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>To evaluate the introduction of locally configured standard concentration (StdC) intravenous drug infusions in critically ill children.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>This two-year quality improvement retrospective cohort study (2018&ndash;20) examined post-implementation of 47 StdC drugs configured across three weight bands: &lt;5 kg, 5&ndash;20 kg and &gt;20 kg in a 26-bed, multispecialty paediatric intensive care unit. The main outcome measures were (1) adherence to StdC use (non-adherence defined as using a bespoke drug concentration), (2) attempts at dosing above the pre-set infusion rates, known as hard limit events (HLEs), (3) incidents related to infusions and (4) percentage of total fluid allowance available for nutrition.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>In total, 33 224 infusions were administered, with morphine, clonidine and milrinone representing 61%. Most of them (83.6%) were initiated in children in the lower weight bands. Adherence to StdCs was 96% and was similar across weight bands. A total of 204 498 pump programming events were examined, with 418 (0.2%) being HLEs. Only 21 HLEs (0.01%) were considered potentially clinically significant (defined as programming &gt;2.5 times the maximum dose). Following investigation, 20/21 were found likely to be related to training episodes, rather than true errors. Twenty clinical incidents linked to StdC infusions were reported but none caused harm. The mean fluid allowance available for nutrition after accounting for StdC volumes was 38.8% in the &lt;5 kg weight band, and 71% and 67.4% in the other two bands, respectively.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Configured StdCs are effective and safe across all weight bands and allow for partial provision of nutritional needs in fluid-restricted patients. The high adherence rate facilitated pharmacy supplying infusions as Ready-To-Administer (RTA).</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arenas-Lopez, S., Perkins, J., Tibby, S., Nyman, A. G., Aguado-Lorenzo, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-11T09:00:17-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-004964</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-004964</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 4: Clinical Pharmacy Services]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Standard concentrations of intravenous continuous drug infusions: evaluation of adherence, safety and effectiveness in paediatric critical care as quality improvement initiative]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2026-005154v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Artificial intelligence in oncological medication reconciliation: balancing innovation and clinical judgment]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2026-005154v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Misa Garcia, A., Ferro Rodriguez, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-08T09:00:13-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-005154</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-005154</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Artificial intelligence in oncological medication reconciliation: balancing innovation and clinical judgment]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letter</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2026-005143v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Curcumin supplements in patients with breast cancer treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors: a silent pharmacokinetic risk]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2026-005143v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rodriguez Rodriguez, A., Caina Lopez, S., Gonzalez Fernandez, T., Alonso Gago, P. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-03T09:00:18-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-005143</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-005143</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Curcumin supplements in patients with breast cancer treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors: a silent pharmacokinetic risk]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letter</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2026-005157v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Modulation of cytochrome P450 and P-glycoprotein by Ashwagandha (Withania somnifera): implications for CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2026-005157v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rodriguez Rodriguez, A., Caina Lopez, S., Gonzalez Fernandez, T., Alonso Gago, P. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-03T09:00:17-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-005157</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-005157</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Modulation of cytochrome P450 and P-glycoprotein by Ashwagandha (Withania somnifera): implications for CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letter</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2026-005155v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[An experiential learning and example of strengthening academic-hospital and clinical pharmacy practice in a newly established provincial academic institute in Nepal]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2026-005155v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pathak, N., Barma, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-03T09:00:17-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-005155</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-005155</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[An experiential learning and example of strengthening academic-hospital and clinical pharmacy practice in a newly established provincial academic institute in Nepal]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letter</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004850v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Comprehensive PHARmaceutical care programme in patients undergoing ALLOgeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (PHARALLO): protocol for a prospective interventional study with a historical control group]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004850v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is a highly complex procedure involving intensive conditioning regimens, immunosuppressive therapy and extensive supportive care.</p></sec><sec><st>Objective</st><p>To assess the impact of a comprehensive pharmaceutical care programme on medication adherence in allo-HSCT patients. Early survival and clinical and patient-reported outcomes will also be explored.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods and analysis</st><p>Prospective interventional study with a historical control group. The primary outcome is medication adherence. Secondary outcomes will include the incidence of grade I&ndash;IV acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD); acute graft-versus-host disease-free, relapse-free survival (aGRFS); relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) by day+100; hospital readmissions; acute renal and liver failure; engraftment time; drug-related problems (DRPs); pharmaceutical interventions and patient-reported outcomes. Patients will be enrolled over a 12-month period in the intervention group and compared with a historical cohort of patients undergoing allo-HSCT. The intervention will include a structured pharmacist-led programme including: (1) a pre-admission interview, (2) in-hospital follow-up with daily medication review and DRP identification, (3) patient education at discharge and (4) post-transplant pharmaceutical follow-up to day+100.</p></sec><sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st><p>The study protocol was approved by the hospital Clinical Research Ethics Committee (CEIm code: 245/23). Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. Data will be handled in accordance with the EU General Data Protection Regulation (2016/679) and Spanish Organic Law 3/2018 on Data Protection and Digital Rights.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guijarro-Martinez, P., Sanchez-Cuervo, M., Parro-Martin, M. A., Gomez Bayona, E., Luna de Abia, A., Chinea Rodriguez, A., Herrera Puente, P., Hinojo Marin, B., Nova Ruiz, G., Lopez Jimenez, J., Martin-Aragon, S., Alvarez-Diaz, A. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-27T09:00:13-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004850</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004850</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Comprehensive PHARmaceutical care programme in patients undergoing ALLOgeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (PHARALLO): protocol for a prospective interventional study with a historical control group]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Protocol</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2026-005114v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Correspondence on 'Evaluation of the impact of NOAC underdosing and exploration of bleeding risk factors in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation: artificial intelligence-based approach by Protzenko et al]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2026-005114v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mokalikar, U., Jauhari{superscript 2}, R., Rani, A., Singh, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-18T09:00:21-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-005114</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-005114</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Correspondence on 'Evaluation of the impact of NOAC underdosing and exploration of bleeding risk factors in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation: artificial intelligence-based approach by Protzenko et al]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letter</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004821v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Optimising drug therapy and patient safety in patients with ileostomy: development and evaluation of a structured medication analysis approach]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004821v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objectives</st><p>Published descriptions of medication analysis procedures are often insufficiently detailed to ensure reproducibility. This limitation is particularly relevant for patient populations with specific clinical conditions, such as patients with ileostomy, in whom physiological changes can substantially alter drug absorption. Our study aimed to develop and evaluate a structured medication analysis approach tailored to the needs of patients with ileostomies. The approach was designed to support pharmacists in systematically detecting stoma-specific drug-related problems (DRPs) and implementing suitable pharmaceutical interventions.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>This study was a single centred, multiphase mixed-methods study carried out at a tertiary-care teaching hospital. A structured medication analysis approach for patients with ileostomy was developed using a modified Delphi process with an interprofessional expert panel and piloted in an exploratory evaluation of retrospective medication case records from 25 patients. Subsequently, a controlled intervention study was performed using a standardised ileostomy patient case distributed to 40 pharmacists, who were assigned to an intervention group (using the structured approach) or a control group (standard practice). Pharmacists identified DRPs and proposed interventions, which were evaluated using a predefined scoring system.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The final approach, organised into six key domains, was based on the (patho)physiological changes following ileostomy creation and designed as a decision-tree tool to guide systematic medication analysis. A total of 36 pharmacists from 20 institutions completed the case study. The intervention group achieved significantly higher total scores than the control group (mean 11.4 vs 7.3, p&lt;0.001), driven primarily by improved detection of stoma-specific DRPs (6.6 vs 1.6 out of 8, p&lt;0.001).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>The structured medication analysis approach substantially improved the recognition of stoma-specific DRPs and facilitated appropriate pharmaceutical interventions. It offers a reproducible, practice-oriented framework to optimise drug therapy and improve patient safety in individuals with ileostomy, particularly benefiting pharmacists with limited prior experience in this specialised area.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hehenberger, S., Bielitz-Holzer, S., Virgolini, A., Lagoja, I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-18T09:00:21-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004821</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004821</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 5: Patient Safety and Quality Assurance]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Optimising drug therapy and patient safety in patients with ileostomy: development and evaluation of a structured medication analysis approach]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004735v2?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Digitising controlled substance accountability: implementation and use of a dashboard-based monitoring system in an university hospital]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004735v2?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objectives</st><p>Opioids are the cornerstone of severe pain management but they have a strong potential for abuse. To mitigate this risk, hospitals are required to track and account for these controlled substances (CS). Despite widespread adoption of electronic medication administration records (eMAR), nurses also performed paper-based registrations for CS. We hypothesised that a validated dashboard combining dispensing and eMAR data could be implemented for CS accountability. This study describes trends in accountability of dispenses through administrations before, during and after implementation of the dashboard that replaced the paper-based process. Furthermore, we describe its application in analysing signalled discrepancies.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>This implementation study was performed in a university hospital. The dashboard was developed by a multidisciplinary team consisting of hospital pharmacists, pharmacy technicians, nurses and data analysts. Data from 2018 to 2024 were compared in three periods: prior implementation (2018&ndash;2019), during implementation (2020&ndash;2022) and after implementation (2023&ndash;2024) of the dashboard. Monitored CS medications were limited to oral solids. The data for dispenses and administrations were validated against the electronic health record (EHR) and electronic delta calculations were manually recalculated. The dashboard was piloted on a single ward by shadow running the dashboard for 6 months. Processes were optimised before hospital-wide implementation.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The dispense and administration data in the dashboard accurately reflected the registrations in the EHR and all predefined validation criteria were met. Subsequently, the paper process for accounting for CS was successfully digitised, allowing nurses to discontinue the double registration workflow. The CS accountability showed a slight upward trend from 88% prior to implementation to 91% after implementation. Furthermore, use of the dashboard resulted in a more efficient workflow and facilitated evaluation between the pharmacy and the wards, contributing to optimisation of prescribing, administration and the logistical processes.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>The dashboard provided an accurate and reliable reflection of CS-related dispenses and administrations documented in the EHR, supporting its hospital-wide implementation for CS monitoring. The CS accountability dashboard reduced the administrative workload for nurses and the pharmacy and improved traceability.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Botma, F. E., Wilkes, S., Abdulla, A., van der Kuy, H. M., Nijstad, L., Crombag, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-17T09:00:23-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004735</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004735</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Digitising controlled substance accountability: implementation and use of a dashboard-based monitoring system in an university hospital]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-17</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2026-005095v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Universal high-dose meropenem for antimicrobial-resistant Gram-negative infections: evidence or overreach?]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2026-005095v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cabanilla, M. G., Ghanem, B., Jegorovic, B., Lee, T. C., Chahine, E. B., Anderson, D. T., Salgado, N. K., Eudy, J., Singh, H. K., Muyidi, A. A., Astorri, R., Maraolo, A. E., Antoli Royo, A. C., Mena Lora, A. J., Pimentel, B. V., Spellberg, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-14T09:00:14-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-005095</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-005095</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Universal high-dose meropenem for antimicrobial-resistant Gram-negative infections: evidence or overreach?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Editorial</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004928v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prevalence of potentially inappropriate medications at hospital discharge in older adults: comparative study using STOPP version 3, Beers 2023 and PRISCUS 2.0 Criteria]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004928v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objectives</st><p>Potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) are common in older adults and increase the risk of adverse outcomes, particularly at transitions of care such as hospital discharge. The aims of this study were to estimate the prevalence of PIMs at hospital discharge in older patients using STOPP version 3, the 2023 AGS Beers Criteria and PRISCUS 2.0; to describe the most frequently involved therapeutic groups; and to compare the ability of these tools to detect PIMs.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>We conducted a single-centre retrospective study in a tertiary university hospital in Barcelona including patients aged 70 years and older who were admitted to hospital. Sociodemographic, clinical and pharmacological variables were collected. Prevalence of PIMs was calculated separately for each set of criteria and comparative analysis was performed across the three tools.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>We included 638 patients (mean age 86.1 years; 58.3% women). Overall, 75.2% had at least one PIM at discharge. Polypharmacy was highly prevalent (&gt;90%). The most frequent PIMs belonged to Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) group N (45.0%; anxiolytics, antipsychotics, hypnotics and sedatives, and opioid analgesics), followed by ATC group C (18.3%; mainly cardiac therapy agents, loop and thiazide diuretics, and lipid-lowering agents) and ATC group A (16.4%; proton pump inhibitors). PIMs prevalence varied by criteria: 73% (95% CI 69.6% to 76.4%) with STOPP, 56.6% (95% CI 52.7% to 60.4%) with AGS Beers and 55.6% (95% CI 51.8% to 59.5%) with PRISCUS.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>PIMs at hospital discharge are highly prevalent among older patients. Systematic medication review and deprescribing, supported by explicit criteria, are needed to improve prescribing quality and potentially reduce adverse outcomes. Across tools, the STOPP criteria appeared to be the tool that detected more PIMs in this population.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roma, J. R., Arroyo-Huidobro, M., Ladino, A., Pellice, M., Suarez Lombrana, A., Alberdi-Lema, C., Belles, S., Toapanta Gaibor, C. L., Masanes, F., Perez-Castejon, J. M., Soy Muner, D., Pola, N., Rizo, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-14T09:00:14-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004928</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004928</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 4: Clinical Pharmacy Services]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prevalence of potentially inappropriate medications at hospital discharge in older adults: comparative study using STOPP version 3, Beers 2023 and PRISCUS 2.0 Criteria]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004913v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Stability of oxycodone solutions containing S-ketamine or dexmedetomidine]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004913v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objectives</st><p>To determine whether adding <I>S-</I>ketamine or dexmedetomidine to oxycodone affects the microbiological, physical or chemical stability of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) solutions prepared in a hospital pharmacy.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Oxycodone solution (1 mg/mL) and three oxycodone&ndash;<I>S-</I>ketamine mixtures (0.25, 0.50, 0.75 mg/mL) and three oxycodone&ndash;dexmedetomidine mixtures (2.5, 5.0, 10 &micro;g/mL) were compounded under validated European Union Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) Class A/B aseptic conditions and filled into PCA reservoirs. Reservoirs (n=42 for physicochemical studies, n=21 for sterility, n=4 for antimicrobial activity testing) were stored at 2&ndash;8&deg;C for 28 days, then at 20&ndash;25&deg;C for 2 days. Sterility was assessed by membrane filtration according to European Pharmacopoeia Section 2.6.1 (Ph. Eur. 2.6.1). Physical stability was evaluated by visual inspection, pH, weight and osmolality. Chemical stability was assessed using a validated high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection (HPLC-UV) method developed in accordance with US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and International Conferenece on Harmonisation (ICH) Q2(R1) guidelines.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>All antimicrobial activity tests showed growth of the six reference strains, indicating no inhibition by the drug mixtures. All 21 sterility-test reservoirs remained free of turbidity throughout 30 days. No visual changes, precipitation or discolouration were observed. Weight loss was &le;0.3%, pH changes were within the required range of 4.5&ndash;7 and osmolality increased by &lt;1.4% during the study. Measured oxycodone, <I>S-</I>ketamine and dexmedetomidine concentrations remained within &plusmn;5% of initial values, and no degradation products were detected.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Oxycodone PCA solutions containing <I>S-</I>ketamine or dexmedetomidine remained sterile, physically stable and chemically stable for 28 days at 2&ndash;8&deg;C followed by 2 days at room temperature at 20&ndash;25&deg;C. These findings support the potential for extended shelf life and centralised batch preparation of opioid&ndash;adjuvant PCA reservoirs in hospital pharmacy practice.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Va&#x0308;isa&#x0308;nen, P., Ma&#x0308;kela&#x0308;, S., Siren, S., Pohjanoksa, K., Uusalo, P., Scheinin, M., Torniainen, K., Saari, T. I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-13T09:00:15-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004913</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004913</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 3: Production and Compounding]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Stability of oxycodone solutions containing S-ketamine or dexmedetomidine]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2026-005089v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Drug repositioning in Alzheimers disease: a vascular perspective targeting the NO-cGMP pathway]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2026-005089v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Caina Lopez, S., Portela Sotelo, A., Vazquez-Gomez, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-29T09:00:15-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-005089</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-005089</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Drug repositioning in Alzheimers disease: a vascular perspective targeting the NO-cGMP pathway]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letter</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2026-005096v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Medicinal mushrooms and chemotherapy: therapeutic synergy or hidden risk?]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2026-005096v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Misa Garcia, A., Ferro Rodriguez, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-24T09:00:17-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-005096</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-005096</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Medicinal mushrooms and chemotherapy: therapeutic synergy or hidden risk?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letter</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004790v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cost-effectiveness of pharmacy automation in hospital settings: systematic review]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004790v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Medication errors in hospital pharmacies are still a major source of patient injury and healthcare expenditure globally. There has been a growing trend of implementing pharmacy automation technologies to improve the efficiency of work processes and minimise errors. However, there is a lack of evidence on the cost-effectiveness of these technologies. The objective of this systematic review was to assess the cost-effectiveness of pharmacy automation technologies such as automated dispensing cabinets (ADCs), robotic dispensing systems, automated compounding systems, barcode-assisted medication administration (BCMA) and unit-dose dispensing systems (UDDS) compared with traditional manual dispensing systems in inpatient and outpatient hospital pharmacy settings. Literature searches were performed using PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect and Google Scholar on 11 January 2026. The search terms were developed using Boolean operators and key words for pharmacy automation and economic evaluation. Articles were independently screened by two authors using Covidence software and any disagreements were resolved by consensus. The articles were selected based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, focusing on cost-effectiveness outcomes in hospital pharmacy settings. The findings were qualitatively synthesised. A total of 613 articles were screened for title and abstract, and 7 of 118 full-text articles were selected based on the inclusion criteria. The included articles assessed various automation technologies such as ADCs, robots, UDDS, BCMA and LED-guided picking systems in hospital settings in Taiwan, Germany, the Netherlands, Singapore, Denmark and Brazil. Cost-effectiveness analysis showed large error reduction rates, with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios ranging from 2.01 to 386 per error prevented, and large efficiency gains, including time savings of up to 25.68 min per patient and equivalent to 11.7 full-time equivalent nurses. Automation reduced clinical, procedural and potentially harmful errors in comparison to manual systems, thereby supporting better patient safety and efficiency. Pharmacy automation technologies are highly cost-effective and efficient compared with manual dispensing systems. These technologies reduce errors, improve efficiency and can also provide cost savings, thereby providing rationale for their use as a strategy for optimising hospital pharmacy operations.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alshmemri, M. A., Alharbi, A. M., Altowairgi, T. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-22T09:00:17-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004790</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004790</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 5: Patient Safety and Quality Assurance]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cost-effectiveness of pharmacy automation in hospital settings: systematic review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Systematic review</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004808v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Severe hypertriglyceridemia due to lipoprotein lipase deficiency in an infant: pharmacological and nutritional approach]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004808v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This case describes the individualised pharmacological management of a 2-month-old infant with genetically confirmed type I hypertriglyceridemia due to lipoprotein lipase (LPL) deficiency. After the failure of conventional treatment and contraindication to plasmapheresis, intravenous insulin therapy was initiated, followed by subcutaneous insulin and omega-3 fatty acid adjustment. The hospital pharmacist played a key role in selecting off-label treatments, adapting pharmaceutical forms for paediatric use and performing therapeutic reconciliation. The approach was effective and safe, achieving triglyceride levels below 1000 mg/dL and clinical stability. This report contributes practical evidence on alternative treatment strategies for a rare disease with limited therapeutic options in paediatrics, highlighting the importance of a multidisciplinary approach and pharmaceutical care.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Merino Pardo, A., Echavarri De Miguel, M., Algarra Sanchez, E., Canedo Villarroya, E., Cuervas Mons Vendrell, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-22T09:00:17-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004808</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004808</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Severe hypertriglyceridemia due to lipoprotein lipase deficiency in an infant: pharmacological and nutritional approach]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Case report</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2026-005085v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Scarce plasma, rising demand: why pharmacist-led immunoglobulin stewardship matters]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2026-005085v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Battistutta, C., Calzavara, E., Bucciol, C., Nistor, R. A., Tison, T., Mengato, D., Venturini, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-20T09:00:19-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-005085</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-005085</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Scarce plasma, rising demand: why pharmacist-led immunoglobulin stewardship matters]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letter</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2026-005067v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Posaconazole therapeutic drug monitoring in haematologic malignancies: a persistent practice gap]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2026-005067v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cabanilla, M. G., Lara Endara, J. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-17T09:00:18-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-005067</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-005067</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Posaconazole therapeutic drug monitoring in haematologic malignancies: a persistent practice gap]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-17</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letter</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004927v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Y-site compatibility of co-administered continuous infusion solutions in intensive care units: preparatory study on physicochemical compatibility of 28 relevant medicinal products]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004927v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objectives</st><p>Proven compatibility of multiple infusions administered Y-site through the same catheter lumen is crucial in intensive care patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the physicochemical compatibility of typically co-administered medicinal products (e.g. amiodarone, clonidine, dexmedetomidine, flucloxacillin, furosemide, heparin, ketamine, metamizole) for which specific data are lacking.</p></sec><sec><st>Method</st><p>Forty-six binary 1:1 test admixtures of 28 medicinal products and concentrations taken from the German standardised concentration list for continuous infusion in intensive care patients were prepared. Test admixtures were stored at ambient temperature without light protection over a maximum period of 4 hours. Directly after mixing (t0), after 1 hour (t1) and after 4 hours (t4), admixtures were inspected for visible changes, subvisible particles were counted according to Ph. Eur. 2.9.19, pH values were measured and UV spectroscopy was performed at wavelengths 350 nm, 410 nm and 550 nm. Specifications for compatibility were set to no visible change, maximum 0.5 pH deviation from t0 to t4, maximum 0.1 deviation in UV absorbance from t0 to t4 at each wavelength, and subvisible particles &le;6000 (&ge;10 &micro;m) and &le;600 particles (&ge;25 &micro;m) at t0, t1 and t4. Admixtures were categorised as compatible when all specifications were fulfilled or incompatible when at least one specification was not fulfilled.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>In the experimental setting chosen, 30 of the 46 admixtures fulfilled all compatibility specifications set over the 4-hour observation period and were categorised as compatible. Sixteen admixtures, mostly containing dexmedetomidine, flucloxacillin, furosemide, heparin, ketamine and metamizole, failed the predefined specifications and were categorised as incompatible. In seven admixtures immediate precipitation/haze occurred and one became opalescent. Four admixtures showed noticeable deviations in pH and UV absorption.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>Y-site administration of 16 binary admixtures identified as incompatible is not recommended. The preparatory study results are suitable to complete incompatibility-reducing infusion schemes. Clinical pharmacists should implement incompatibility-reducing tools in intensive care patients.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kreysing, L., Mittmann, Z., Kraemer, I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-17T09:00:18-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004927</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004927</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 4: Clinical Pharmacy Services]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Y-site compatibility of co-administered continuous infusion solutions in intensive care units: preparatory study on physicochemical compatibility of 28 relevant medicinal products]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-17</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2026-005082v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Is standard induction with mirikizumab sufficient in refractory ulcerative colitis in real-world practice?]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2026-005082v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Calvo Arbeloa, M., Elcano Aguirre, I., Arrondo Velasco, A., Sarobe Carricas, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-15T09:00:15-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-005082</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-005082</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Is standard induction with mirikizumab sufficient in refractory ulcerative colitis in real-world practice?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letter</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004759v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Medication reconciliation at patient admission in psychiatric setting: prioritisation tool to reduce medication errors (O-PsyConcil)]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004759v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objectives</st><p>This study aims to identify readily available admission variables associated with unintentional medicinal discrepancies (UMDs) in psychiatric settings and to develop a feasible prioritisation rule with robust psychometric performance.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>This observational study collected information on items available at admission for patients admitted to six French psychiatric hospitals between June and August 2021. Based on the international literature and personal experience feedback, a multidisciplinary committee network and a psychiatry-mental health research federation elaborated a list of items potentially valuable for prioritisation and proposed a specific tool for psychiatric settings, named O-PsyConcil. Medication reconciliation (MR) was performed, and UMDs were identified. Items associated with UMDs were investigated through a backward stepwise logistic regression model, calculating adjusted ORs and their 95% CIs. The prioritisation rules were proposed using the more efficient combination in terms of feasibility and psychometric characteristics.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The study included 513 patients (median age 48 years, IQR 33&ndash;68; 48% women). Factors associated with UMDs were comorbidities (OR 1.49 for one more comorbidity; 95% CI 1.23 to 1.82), psychiatric high-risk medications (HRMs) (2.64; 1.68 to 4.16), and somatic HRMs (3.43; 1.70 to 7.06). Based on these results, the prioritisation rule combining one comorbidity and/or one psychotropic HRM and/or one somatic HRM led to assessing 61% of the total population, with median performances of 82% (IQR 78-85%) for sensitivity and 48% (43-52%) for specificity.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>The O-PsyConcil tool demonstrated satisfactory performance, suggesting it could enhance the efficiency of psychiatric MR compared with standard non-prioritised MR.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gawel, E., Haybrard, J., Queuille, E., Salis, A., De Chivre, M., Tessier, S., Colombe, M., Langree, B., Leroy, S., Cestac, P., Bonnet, L., Lapeyre-Mestre, M., Zelmat, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-15T09:00:16-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004759</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004759</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 5: Patient Safety and Quality Assurance]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Medication reconciliation at patient admission in psychiatric setting: prioritisation tool to reduce medication errors (O-PsyConcil)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004749v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Method for analysing individualised parenteral nutrition prescriptions for substitution with a market authorised or standardised parenteral nutrition formula]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004749v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>This study aims to develop a method and a tool to determine whether an individualised parenteral nutrition (PN) prescription for premature newborns can be replaced by a market authorised or standardised PN formula.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>We reviewed available PN formulas in France for premature newborns, including market authorised drugs and standardised formulas from our hospital and those proposed for the French national formulary. We collected data on 280 individualised PN prescriptions produced in our hospital over a 4 month period. Critical nutritional parameters for premature newborns&mdash;administered volume, amino acids, carbohydrates, sodium, potassium, calcium, and phosphorus&mdash;were identified based on European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) guidelines.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>An algorithm was created to compare individualised PN prescriptions to available formulas, proposing an alternative if all critical nutritional intakes did not deviate by more than 15% from the prescribed intakes. The algorithm was then applied to the extracted prescriptions. Out of 280 individualised PN prescriptions, only 23 (5%) concerning six patients had a suitable alternative. The formulas most frequently identified as alternatives were Prem2C (17 occurrences) and Premend (seven occurrences).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>The developed algorithm can be used to audit prescription practices or as a routine tool for pharmaceutical validation. Integrating such a tool into prescription software could provide real-time support for prescribers and pharmacists. The results confirm that while some individualised PN prescriptions can be substituted, individualised PN remains essential for meeting the complex and specific nutritional needs of premature newborns in paediatric intensive care units.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robin, P., Delrieu, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-15T09:00:15-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004749</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004749</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 3: Production and Compounding]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Method for analysing individualised parenteral nutrition prescriptions for substitution with a market authorised or standardised parenteral nutrition formula]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004859v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The secret life of the surgical pharmacy in high risk periods]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004859v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>A pharmacy satellite dedicated to the operating room was implemented in 2020, including new dedicated rooms for emergency operations. Such an organisation requires continuity of care outside of working hours to maintain the quality and safety of patient care.</p><sec><st>Objectives</st><p>The aim of this work was to characterise this implementation through the prism of permanent care service, and to describe the activity of this particularly high risk period.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Prospective data collection was extracted from computerised on-call reports from March 2021 to March 2024. The primary endpoint was the proportion of shifts for continuity of pharmaceutical care affected by emergency operative room requests (considered as at higher risk), before (period 1, until December 2022) and after (period 2, from January 2023) the introduction of the new emergency rooms.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 1109 pharmaceutical after hours shifts were carried out. During period 1, 24% of the shifts (n=156) were involved in at least one call from the operating room. A significant increase was recorded during period 2, involving 31% of pharmaceutical after-hours shifts (n=140) (p=0.012). Most requests were made between 18:00 and 24:00 and during the winter season (p=0.021). On average, two units of medical devices were needed by request (1&ndash;34) and most were re-sterilisable ones (61&ndash;75% of requests). Fifteen per cent of requests were urgent, with the patient already on the operating table, requiring a dispensing time of &lt;1 hour. The average resolution time was 23 min and difficulties in responding to the demand were found in half of them, with potential impact on patients faced with emergency surgery.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>This study allowed better characterisation of the surgical and pharmaceutical activity of a teaching hospital outside of working hours, enabling a better understanding of this period of high iatrogenic risk and reflection on areas for improvement.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chapuis, R., Figeac, C., Filisetti, V., Daikh, A., Py, P., Schmitt, D., Salomez-Ihl, C., Bedouch, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-01T09:00:12-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004859</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004859</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 2: Selection, Procurement and Distribution]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The secret life of the surgical pharmacy in high risk periods]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2026-005052v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Putting FAERS data into perspective: cautionary considerations for comparative safety assessment]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2026-005052v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gkrinia, E. M. M., Belancic, A., Jankovic, S. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-30T09:00:14-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-005052</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-005052</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Putting FAERS data into perspective: cautionary considerations for comparative safety assessment]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Editorial</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004741v2?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Using local clinical rules in a pharmacy service to detect risk prescriptions in older adult hospital inpatients: a proof-of-concept study]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004741v2?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objectives</st><p>Clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) may identify risk prescriptions and prevent adverse drug events (ADEs), but their effectiveness depends on design and implementation. Uppsala University Hospital is developing system-assisted pharmaceutical validation (SAPVAL), a CDSS-based service using clinical rules with clinical pharmacists as first-hand recipients. This proof-of-concept study aimed to assess whether the proposed SAPVAL service could address unmet clinical needs in detecting and managing risk prescriptions by using clinical &lsquo;if-then&rsquo; rules based on guidelines and local expertise in a large Swedish hospital.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A list of clinical if-then rules was adapted following discussions with local clinical experts from different fields. The final set of rules was then determined based on available clinical data. The rules were retrospectively and manually applied to electronic health record (EHR) data from 765 patients aged &ge;65 years in a large Swedish hospital. The generated alerts were analysed descriptively, and their clinical relevance was assessed by a senior clinical pharmacist.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 50 if-then rules were developed and applied to patient data. The participants had a median age of 76 (IQR 71&ndash;82) years. Of the 765 included patients, 145 (19%) triggered at least one alert, resulting in a total of 181 alerts. Nearly half (47%) of these alerts were deemed clinically relevant; and, of these, 72% persisted after 48 hours or until discharge.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>The guideline-based, locally informed clinical rules could identify clinically relevant and persistent risk prescriptions in older adult inpatients in a large Swedish hospital. The findings support the feasibility of SAPVAL as a pharmacist-led CDSS intervention. However, since half of the alerts were assessed to be clinically non-relevant, the study highlights the need for ongoing refinement of rules to improve specificity and service efficiency.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sving, C., Linde, T., Salomonsson, T., Johansson, E., Gillespie, U.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-30T09:00:14-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004741</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004741</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Using local clinical rules in a pharmacy service to detect risk prescriptions in older adult hospital inpatients: a proof-of-concept study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2026-004940v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Towards precision antibiotic therapy: predictors and outcomes of meropenem target attainment]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2026-004940v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Purpose</st><p>This study aimed to measure meropenem trough concentrations, assess their association with outcomes, and develop a clinical prediction score for optimal drug levels.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>In this retrospective single centre cohort study, we analysed 543 meropenem concentrations from 331 patients. Targets were defined as 100% fT&gt;MIC (duration of time the drug concentration remains above the minimum inhibitory concentration) and 100% fT&gt;4<FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT>MIC. A predictive scoring system was developed using logistic regression and validated via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability treatment weighting were applied.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The target was reached in 73.8% of measurements for 100% fT&gt;MIC and 48.8% for 100% fT&gt;4<FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT>MIC. While the clinical cure rates were not different in patients with pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target attainment, microbiological cure rates were higher in case of achieving 100% fT&gt;MIC and 100% fT&gt;4<FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT>MIC (p&lt;0.001). According to the multivariate logistic regression analysis, the best predictors of achieving the meropenem PK/PD target of 100% fT&gt;MIC and &gt;4<FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT>MIC were 6 g/24 hour loading dose, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and age. While a 6 g/24 hour loading dose and older age were associated with higher target attainment, elevated eGFR correlated with lower serum levels. The prediction score derived by using these parameters had a sensitivity of 71.2%, specificity of 67.6%, positive predictive value of 86.1%, negative predictive value of 45.5% and accuracy of 70.2%. There is a trend towards clinical cure and target attainment according to PSM analysis.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Three-quarters of the measurements achieved the PK/PD target of 100% fT&gt;MIC, while half achieved the more stringent target of 100% fT&gt;4<FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT>MIC, highlighting the need for optimised dosing strategies. Target achievement rates can be improved with therapeutic drug monitoring and personalised dosing approaches are needed.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Akman Ar, E. D., Kara, E., Karadogan, E., Ozdede, M., P&#x0131;nar, A., Uzun, O., Metan, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-27T09:00:35-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-004940</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-004940</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 4: Clinical Pharmacy Services]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Towards precision antibiotic therapy: predictors and outcomes of meropenem target attainment]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004851v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Limited sample stability of chenodeoxycholic acid in pharmaceutical quality control]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004851v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The Amsterdam UMC makes chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA) capsules to treat their patients with the rare metabolic disease cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis. During routine quality control analysis of the CDCA active pharmaceutical ingredient according to the European Pharmacopoeia (PhEur), an unknown impurity was found in the test results for related substances. After re-analysis using a fresh sample solution, the impurity was not detected, and it was hypothesised that the impurity was caused by sample instability. Sample stability was investigated using the PhEur high pressure liquid chromatography with refractive index detection (HPLC-RI) test for related substances on different CDCA sample solutions (dissolved in methanol R) stored for 0, 1, 3 and 7 days at 5&deg;C and 25&deg;C. An unknown impurity appeared when stored for 1 day and its concentration increased over time and at a higher temperature, conforming sample instability. It is recommended to perform the test on related substances of CDCA with a fresh sample solution.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bouwhuis, N., Jacobs, B. A. W., Kemper, E. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-23T09:00:21-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004851</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004851</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 3: Production and Compounding]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Limited sample stability of chenodeoxycholic acid in pharmaceutical quality control]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Short report</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004554v2?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Systematic review of independent pharmacist prescribing for the treatment of cardiometabolic factors in chronic non-communicable diseases]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004554v2?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objectives</st><p>Changes in health regulations in many developed countries have expanded prescribing privileges from medical doctors to other health professionals, notably nurses and pharmacists working in hospital and general practice settings. While some of these prescribers operate in a supervised capacity, increasingly there are those who operate as autonomous prescribers. This development will likely increase capacity for addressing common health challenges in the future. In the present systematic review we evaluated the evidence of independent pharmacist prescribing (IPP) in the treatment of metabolic targets associated with chronic non-communicable diseases (cNCDs), which are common, costly and often diminish quality of life.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Published evidence evaluating the effects of IPP on cNCDs was reviewed. English language studies evaluating IPP for adults with these conditions and published since 2000 were included. Two reviewers independently evaluated papers for inclusion, IPP effectiveness and risk of bias.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 11 studies were included, which examined IPP for three metabolic targets related to cNCDs&mdash;namely, blood glucose, blood pressure and cholesterol. Seven randomised controlled trials (RCTs) provided robust support for IPP in the treatment of hypertension compared with usual prescriber care. For diabetes there was modest support for glycaemic control including one RCT and two non-randomised evaluations. For hypercholesterolaemia, there were two RCTs, both of which were not specifically targeted at cholesterol reduction and yielded unclear results.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>Given that hypertension is one of the major risk factors for morbidity and mortality, expansion of care for this condition to include IPPs embedded in both hospital and community settings has marked potential for public health benefit. Although available evidence supports the feasibility of IPP for glycaemic control, more adequate evaluations are needed to determine safety and efficacy. Finally, IPP for hypercholesterolaemia likely requires additional investigation, including studies specifically targeting change in cholesterol.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vowles, K., Garland, C., McCarron, M., Scott, M. G., Harrison, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-19T09:00:13-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004554</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004554</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Systematic review of independent pharmacist prescribing for the treatment of cardiometabolic factors in chronic non-communicable diseases]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Systematic review</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004873v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Manipulating prednisolone tablets for paediatric adjustments - dose accuracy and precision]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004873v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Aim</st><p>To understand dose accuracy after manipulating prednisolone tablets.</p></sec><sec><st>Background</st><p>Prednisolone is a widely used drug for adult patients but also in paediatrics where tablets are manipulated to facilitate smaller doses and/or oral administration.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Prednisolone tablets of 2.5 mg and 5 mg from Orifarm and Alternova, as well as a pharmacy compounded suspension of 1 mg/mL, were tested. Quantification of prednisolone in various fragments and volumes related to the manipulations were carried out using a validated ultra high-pressure liquid chromatography (UHPLC) method.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>When tablets were split into halves and quarters, the accuracy of the best halves and the best quarters were within &plusmn;15%. When the fragments were further dispersed in an oral syringe to aid oral administration, 6% of prednisolone was lost on average. The syringes could be stored for at least 6 hours without any further loss. The more laborious method of first dispersing tablets, followed by withdrawing a fraction, did not improve neither accuracy nor precision compared with simple splitting. But by focusing on some crucial steps, this method could produce doses as low as 0.25 mg with an accuracy of &plusmn;20%. Nevertheless, the accuracy improved to &plusmn;10% when the compounded suspension was used. The precision was also higher.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>When tablets were split into two and four fragments, the accuracy of the largest half and second largest quarter were within a clinically acceptable range. In cases of tapering before discontinuing prednisolone, a higher accuracy might be required, and pharmacy compounded suspensions should then be considered, if available.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Svendsen, R. M. H., Hagesaether, E., Fischer, S. M., Bjerknes, K., Brustugun, J., Tho, I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T22:50:19-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004873</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004873</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 5: Patient Safety and Quality Assurance]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Manipulating prednisolone tablets for paediatric adjustments - dose accuracy and precision]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004825v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effects of pharmacist-conducted medication order verification in a hospital setting: a systematic review]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004825v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Prescribing errors are common in hospital settings and can lead to severe harm to patients. Pharmacist-conducted medication order verification where a pharmacist ensures order appropriateness has been recommended to ensure safe prescribing in hospitals, but systematic scientific evidence of the efficiency is lacking. The objective of this study was to study the effects of pharmacist-conducted medication order verification in hospital settings.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 criteria and was registered in PROSPERO. The final literature search was conducted in February 2024 covering the period 2000&ndash;2023. Only peer-reviewed studies considering the effects of pharmacist-conducted medication order verification in hospital settings were included. Study selection, data extraction and quality assessment were carried out by two individual reviewers. The findings describing the effects of pharmacist-conducted medication order verification were synthesised and categorised according to the Economic, Clinical, and Humanistic Outcomes (ECHO) model.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 35 studies met the inclusion criteria. All of the studies (n=34) reporting clinical outcomes showed positive results. Pharmacist-conducted medication order verification could detect a wide variability in drug-related problems, with dose-related issues being the most common (n=33 studies). The physician acceptance rate in the pharmacist intervention studies (n=27) varied from 26% up to 100%. Of the verifications, 0.8&ndash;45.2% led to a pharmacist intervention. Economic outcomes were reported in seven studies and all showed positive results. None of the included studies reported humanistic outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Pharmacist-conducted medication order verification is associated with prevention of drug-related problems and cost savings in hospital settings. Further research is needed on the quality of pharmacist-conducted medication order verification, high-quality studies investigating the economic benefits, the effects on the patient perspective and outpatient medication prescriptions.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kallio, M. M., Kumpu-Huhtala, A., Kvarnstro&#x0308;m, K., Niittynen, I., Lapatto-Reiniluoto, O., Airaksinen, M., Schepel, L. L., Kuitunen, S. K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T22:50:19-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004825</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004825</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 4: Clinical Pharmacy Services]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effects of pharmacist-conducted medication order verification in a hospital setting: a systematic review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Systematic review</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2026-005026v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Response to: Correspondence on "Evaluation of the impact of NOAC underdosing and exploration of bleeding risk factors in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation: artificial intelligence-based approach" by Protzenko et al]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2026-005026v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Protzenko, D., Berard, C., Hoang, V., Hache, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-16T09:00:16-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-005026</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-005026</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Response to: Correspondence on "Evaluation of the impact of NOAC underdosing and exploration of bleeding risk factors in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation: artificial intelligence-based approach" by Protzenko et al]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letter</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004897v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Evaluation of a pharmacist-led medication review and optimisation service in the management of cardiometabolic disease]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004897v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objectives</st><p>Cardiometabolic disease, including heart failure, type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease, requires consistent implementation of guideline-directed therapies. Pharmacist-led medication reviews may support optimisation of evidence-based treatments, particularly sodium&ndash;glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i). This study assessed the feasibility of a pharmacist-led cardiometabolic medication review and optimisation service for adults with heart failure and/or type 2 diabetes mellitus, with or without concomitant chronic kidney disease. The primary objective was the guideline-recommended initiation of SGLT2i therapy in eligible patients. Secondary objectives were to assess patient engagement, explore medication appropriateness in an illustrative subset and capture patient perceptions of the service.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>This single-centre service evaluation was delivered remotely by a cardiometabolic pharmacist using a structured 7-step medication review process. Patients referred from hospital and primary care services were screened against predefined criteria. Process measures included referral uptake, review completion and initiation of SGLT2i therapy. In an exploratory subset, prescribing appropriateness was examined using the Person-Centred Medicines Appropriateness Index (PCMAI) and pharmacist interventions were classified using the Eadon scale. Estimated potential cost implications were modelled using the Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research economic framework. Patient acceptability was assessed through an anonymous postal questionnaire.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Of 274 referrals, 98 patients were eligible and 75 (77%) completed a pharmacist-led review. Overall, 32/75 patients (43%) were started on SGLT2i therapy according to guideline criteria. In the exploratory subset, PCMAI scores decreased in five patients and 41 pharmacist interventions were Eadon-graded, corresponding to a modelled potential cost avoidance range of &pound;8062&ndash;&pound;17 384. Patient feedback (58% response rate) indicated high acceptability, with respondents highlighting clear communication, opportunity to ask questions and involvement in decision making.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>The pharmacist-led service was feasible to deliver, acceptable to patients and supported the operationalisation of guideline-directed SGLT2i prescribing. Further longitudinal studies are needed to determine clinical and economic outcomes.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Coleman, P., Keenan, B., Monaghan, M., Glass, R., Gardner, S., Fleming, G. F., Scott, M. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-11T09:00:16-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004897</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004897</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 4: Clinical Pharmacy Services]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Evaluation of a pharmacist-led medication review and optimisation service in the management of cardiometabolic disease]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004675v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Stability study including impact of temperature excursions on a new vancomycin eye drop formulation]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004675v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objectives</st><p>Severe bacterial keratitis is likely to require treatment with highly concentrated antibiotic eye drops. Such concentrated eye drops are not marketed, and so hospital pharmacies are required to compound and store them. The aim of the present study was to develop a new fortified 50 mg/mL vancomycin eye drop containing a preservative and to study its physicochemical, microbiological stability and preservative efficacy when stored in adapted conditions and with transient temperature excursions.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Vancomycin concentration was controlled using high-performance liquid chromatography with an ultraviolet detector stability-indicating method, developed and validated in accordance with International Conference on Harmonization guidelines. Limpidity, non-visible particles, pH and osmolality controls were performed. Eye drop sterility and efficacy of antimicrobial preservation with different bacterial strains were also tested. Different temperature excursion times (from 0.5 to 12 hours) were tested.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>After 3 months of freezing at &ndash;20&deg;C followed by 7 days storage at temperature between 2&deg;C and 8&deg;C, vancomycin concentration, visible and non-visible particles, osmolality and pH remained in accordance with the initial specifications. No degradation products appeared. After a transient temperature excursion from &ndash;20&deg;C to 25&deg;C for a maximum of 12 hours, the eye drops remained stable for 7 days between 2&deg;C and 8&deg;C. No microbial contamination occurred when the drops were used daily for 7 days (mimicking patient conditions).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>The new vancomycin eye drop formulation remains stable even in cases of temperature excursion.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cosson, K., Lebreton, V., Gillette, A., Gaume, F., Vrignaud, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-10T09:00:15-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004675</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004675</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 3: Production and Compounding]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Stability study including impact of temperature excursions on a new vancomycin eye drop formulation]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004727v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Impact of CYP2C19 genotyping on clopidogrel therapy adjustments in patients with stroke or TIA]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004727v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>Clopidogrel is an antiplatelet medication routinely used for the prevention of stroke. However, patients with impaired cytochrome P450 (CYP)2C19 enzyme activity exhibit lower levels of the active clopidogrel metabolite, resulting in reduced therapeutic response. At the Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital (ETZ), all patients receiving clopidogrel for stroke prevention undergo CYP2C19 genotyping. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of CYP2C19 genotypes and phenotypes among patients with (recurrent) stroke or TIA and to investigate whether genotyping results influenced clopidogrel therapy or other concomitant medications.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>In this retrospective study, all patients genotyped for CYP2C19 between June 2020 and October 2020 and treated with clopidogrel for stroke prevention were included. Genotyping was performed for the CYP2C19 *2, *3 and *17 alleles. Data were collected on CYP2C19 genotype and phenotype, the indication for clopidogrel, and any therapy adjustments made. Results are presented as proportions (%).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Between June and October 2020, 382 patients with stroke were genotyped for CYP2C19. Phenotypes included the following: extensive metabolisers 64.7% (n=247), intermediate 26.9% (n=103), poor 5.0% (n=19), and ultra-rapid 3.4% (n=13). In patients with impaired metabolism (intermediate metabolisers and poor metabolisers), therapy was adjusted in 94.2% of cases. Among intermediate metabolisers, 68.0% were switched to acetylsalicylic acid (ASA)/dipyridamole, 20.4% to double-dose clopidogrel, 3.9% to ASA monotherapy, and 1.9% to other therapies. For poor metabolisers, 89.2% received ASA/dipyridamole, 5.3% ASA monotherapy and 5.3% other therapies. The phenotypes did not differ between first and recurrent strokes. Additional gene&ndash;drug interactions were seen, especially with proton pump inhibitors and antidepressants.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>In the ETZ cohort, 31.9% of genotyped patients (26.9% intermediate metabolisers and 5% poor metabolisers) had impaired CYP2C19 metabolism. Genotype and phenotype information led to changes in clopidogrel therapy in nearly all of these patients, with the most common adjustment being a switch to ASA and dipyridamole combination therapy.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Keyany, A., Leenders, T., Maat, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-06T09:00:13-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004727</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004727</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 5: Patient Safety and Quality Assurance]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Impact of CYP2C19 genotyping on clopidogrel therapy adjustments in patients with stroke or TIA]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004898v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Support for deprescribing in European clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004898v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Polypharmacy is increasingly common among older adults with chronic diseases, yet clinical practice guidelines mainly emphasise initiating therapies rather than discontinuing them. This imbalance contributes to overprescription, therapeutic inertia and preventable harm.</p></sec><sec><st>Objective</st><p>To assess the prevalence and quality of recommendations for treatment discontinuation in European guidelines for chronic diseases published between 2019 and 2024.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020 standards using the Trip Medical Database. All European clinical practice guidelines on chronic disease management for adults were included, excluding those related to oncology, acute care, paediatrics, obstetrics and palliative care. Data were extracted on the presence, rationale and strength of recommendations for discontinuing or avoiding treatments.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Of 3551 records retrieved, 724 guidelines met inclusion criteria. Only 49 contained any mention of treatment discontinuation, most often linked to toxicity or lack of efficacy. A single guideline&mdash;from the European AIDS Clinical Society&mdash;provided explicit deprescribing algorithms and criteria. Personalised, patient-centred approaches to deprescribing and structured decision frameworks were rarely described.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Deprescribing remains underrepresented in European clinical guidelines. There is an urgent need to shift from a disease-centred model to patient-centred care, with guidelines that provide clear, evidence-based strategies to discontinue medications that no longer offer clinical benefit. Scientific societies should lead to the development of recommendations that promote safe, rational and personalised prescribing, ensuring real benefits for patients while minimising risks. The entire process must be individualised and necessarily involve shared decision-making with patients, families and caregivers.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lopes, D., Passos, O., Santa Cruz, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-05T09:00:12-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004898</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004898</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 5: Patient Safety and Quality Assurance]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Support for deprescribing in European clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Systematic review</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2026-004975v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Correspondence on "Evaluation of the impact of NOAC underdosing and exploration of bleeding risk factors in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation: artificial intelligence-based approach" by Protzenko et al]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2026-004975v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zhou, X., Shi, Y., Ji, H. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-04T09:00:13-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-004975</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-004975</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Correspondence on "Evaluation of the impact of NOAC underdosing and exploration of bleeding risk factors in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation: artificial intelligence-based approach" by Protzenko et al]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letter</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004729v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Stability study of pharmacy compounded high-dose ambroxol hydrochloride capsules for an n-of-1 clinical trial involving Dutch patients with Gaucher disease type 3]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004729v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objectives</st><p>Several studies have investigated the effectiveness of high-dose ambroxol in treating patients with Gaucher disease type 3. Since there are no registered high-dose ambroxol preparations available, information on the development of this preparation can be important to improve access. The pharmacy and clinical pharmacology department of Amsterdam University Medical Center has developed a simple 75 mg ambroxol hydrochloride (HCl) capsule formulation for this purpose. The aim of this study was to investigate the stability of 75 mg ambroxol capsules.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Three batches (n=1000) of 75 mg ambroxol HCl capsules were produced and stored in climate chambers for 6 months under accelerated (40&plusmn;2&deg;C and 75% relative humidity (RH)&plusmn;5% RH) and long-term (25&plusmn;2&deg;C and 60% RH&plusmn;5% RH) conditions. At 0, 3 and 6 months, appearance, identity, related substances, assay, uniformity of dosage units (content uniformity (CU)), dissolution and microbiology were evaluated. The specifications and acceptance criteria were derived from the European Pharmacopoeia and the International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use guidelines.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>All parameters met the predefined specifications from t=0 to t=6 months for both the accelerated and long-term stability studies. There were no visible changes in appearance of the capsule content, no degradation products above 0.05%, and no decrease in ambroxol content. Furthermore, the capsules met the criteria for CU with an acceptance value &le;15.0. The dissolution was rapid, with &ge;80% of ambroxol released from the capsules within 30 min, and no microbiological growth was observed.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>The 75 mg ambroxol HCl capsules are stable for at least 6 months at room temperature. This paper provides guidance to pharmacies for compounding of high-dose ambroxol HCl capsules to ensure the availability of ambroxol for patients in need.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Le, H. L., Bouwhuis, N., Hollak, C. E. M., Wilhelm, A. J., Gerards, A.-L. E., Bijleveld, Y. A., Swart, E. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-26T09:00:14-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004729</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004729</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 3: Production and Compounding]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Stability study of pharmacy compounded high-dose ambroxol hydrochloride capsules for an n-of-1 clinical trial involving Dutch patients with Gaucher disease type 3]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004695v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Assessment of residual stainless steel surface contamination in an anticancer drug preparation microbiological safety cabinet after decontamination with four cleaning solutions]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004695v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objectives</st><p>The preparation of cytotoxic drugs requires high quality levels to limit biocontamination and chemocontamination risks. While standardised measures exist for biocontamination, this is not the case for chemocontamination. Despite precautions, chemocontamination can occur at many stages. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of decontamination solutions following intentional contamination on stainless steel surfaces inside a biosafety cabinet using antineoplastic drugs.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Three sessions were conducted to assess the effectiveness of four decontamination solutions (Surfa&rsquo;Safe, Septalkan, ethanol 70% and Versol water) on areas contaminated with antineoplastic drugs. Ten areas were tested: one negative and one positive control area and eight contaminated areas followed by decontamination: four &lsquo;wet&rsquo; (decontaminated immediately) and four &lsquo;dry&rsquo; areas (decontaminated after 1 hour). The effectiveness of decontamination (Eff<SUB>q</SUB>) and the impact of drying time were analysed using Kruskal&ndash;Wallis and Wilcoxon tests.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Negative controls showed very low levels of contamination. Septalkan and Surfa&rsquo;Safe, both quaternary ammonium-based solutions, were the most effective for decontamination (Eff<SUB>q</SUB> &gt;95%), with greater effectiveness in the &lsquo;wet&rsquo; protocol than in the &lsquo;dry&rsquo; protocol (Surfa&rsquo;Safe: 95.3% vs 97.3%; Septalkan: 95.3% vs 98%). Despite a lower value, decontamination was not statistically significant between the two methods of decontamination (immediate and after drying; p=0.125).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Quaternary ammonium-based solutions appear to be the best options for limiting chemocontamination. Despite the similar effectiveness of Septalkan and Surfa&rsquo;Safe, the latter seems to be a more efficient option for routine use of an appropriate cleaning solution.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Convert, J., Guitton, J., Ranchon, F., Cerutti, A., Herledan, C., Lagarce, F., Rioufol, C., Vantard, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-25T09:00:18-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004695</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004695</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 3: Production and Compounding]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Assessment of residual stainless steel surface contamination in an anticancer drug preparation microbiological safety cabinet after decontamination with four cleaning solutions]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-25</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004861v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Business continuity plans for hospital pharmacies: a Delphi consensus]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004861v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objectives</st><p>Business continuity plans (BCPs) are vital for hospital pharmacies (HPs) seeking to maintain essential operations during crises. Although generic BCPs exist, we found no guidelines for HP BCPs. We sought to use an expert consensus methodology to develop specific recommendations for BCP content for HPs.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>An expert panel comprising hospital chief pharmacists, deputies or quality managers conducted a two-round Delphi study. Participants were recruited from civilian HPs in Switzerland and from two civilian and one military HP in each of Austria, Belgium, France, Germany and Italy. Recommendations were structured around the &lsquo;all-hazards&rsquo; framework and practical examples were developed based on the literature and investigators&rsquo; experiences in disaster simulation. A five-member multidisciplinary steering committee refined the recommendations before each round of voting. Experts rated recommendations on a scale from 1 to 9, and the RAND/UCLA method was used to determine consensus. In Round 2, recommendations without consensus in Round 1, newly proposed recommendations and recommendations with comments in Round 1 requiring rephrasing were submitted.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Of 71 experts contacted, 24 participated, with 18 responding in Round 1 (75% response rate) and 15 responding in Round 2 (83% response rate). Most experts came from Switzerland (78%) and civilian hospitals (94%). Half were chief pharmacists and only 17% had no BCP available in their HP. In Round 1, 41 recommendations were submitted, of which 100% were validated. Eleven recommendations were submitted in Round 2, including one new proposal and 10 rephrased recommendations from Round 1. Experts had to select their preferred version. The new recommendation was validated and all the rephrased recommendations were preferred. The final list comprised 42 recommendations for developing BCPs for HPs.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>Our consensus-based BCP guidelines provide practical recommendations for civilian and military HPs and will help them develop BCPs for future crises and major business disruptions.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Le Bloch, F., Schumacher, L., Kessler, N., von Zeerleder, P.-A., Calcavecchia, F., Bonnabry, P., Widmer, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-17T09:00:16-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004861</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004861</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 5: Patient Safety and Quality Assurance]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Business continuity plans for hospital pharmacies: a Delphi consensus]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-17</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004827v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Physicochemical stability of adenosine at a clinically relevant intracoronary dose to induce hyperaemia]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004827v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objectives</st><p>Since the physicochemical stability of adenosine at clinically relevant concentrations for intracoronary administration is unknown, the solution is typically prepared on site at the time of inducing hyperaemia, once the decision to measure fractional flow reserve for a stenosis is made during cardiac catheterisation. This additional preparation step contributes to both procedural and non-clinical delays and poses practical challenges. To address this gap, the present study evaluated the stability of adenosine admixed with two commonly used diluents stored at three different temperatures.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Adenosine (12 &micro;g/mL) solutions were prepared by aseptic dilution of commercial adenosine injection (3 mg/mL) in 0.9% sodium chloride and 5% dextrose bags, transferred into sterile polypropylene syringes, and stored in the dark at 4&deg;C, 25&deg;C and 35&deg;C for up to 49 days. Stability was assessed at predefined intervals using a validated stability-indicating high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) assay. Physical stability was monitored by pH measurement, visual inspection for colour change and microscopic evaluation of particulate matter.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Throughout the 49-day storage period, no visible particle formation, colour change or notable pH variation (greater than &plusmn;0.15 units) was observed in any of the samples. HPLC analysis confirmed that adenosine remained chemically stable, with more than 97% of the initial concentration retained in both diluents at all three storage temperatures.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>Our findings support the prior preparation of adenosine for intracoronary administration in polypropylene syringes using 0.9% sodium chloride or 5% dextrose as diluents, with storage under tested conditions for up to 49 days. When required, the prepared syringes can be readily used during cardiac catheterisation. This approach would streamline workflow, minimise procedural delays and reduce the workload associated with on-site preparation.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alsharif, F. K. Y., Harmanjeet, H., Wanandy, T., Peterson, G., Bayer, G., Black, A., Patel, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-17T09:00:15-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004827</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004827</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 3: Production and Compounding]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Physicochemical stability of adenosine at a clinically relevant intracoronary dose to induce hyperaemia]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-17</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2026-004962v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Identical but lethal: managing the LASA risk of plastic potassium chloride ampoules through organisational constraints]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2026-004962v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lorenzi, I., Palmerino, S., Spiga, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-16T09:00:15-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-004962</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-004962</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Identical but lethal: managing the LASA risk of plastic potassium chloride ampoules through organisational constraints]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letter</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004877v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Antithrombotic stewardship: whether to stop anticoagulation after atrial fibrillation ablation]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004877v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Hospital pharmacists increasingly receive questions about oral anticoagulation (OAC) discontinuation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who remain arrhythmia-free after ablation. Two recent trials, ALONE-AF and OCEAN, reported low annual stroke rates in selected post-ablation cohorts, suggesting limited added stroke protection from OAC in this group. Both studies have key limitations: selective low-risk patient populations, insufficient power for thromboembolic events, limited external validity to older AF patients, and methodological concerns including ALONE-AF&rsquo;s fragility index and OCEAN&rsquo;s comparator choice. Before OAC discontinuation is considered, multiple criteria should be met: first-time ablation with documented 12 month arrhythmia-free status, low thromboembolic risk, absence of prior cerebrovascular events and access to intensified rhythm monitoring, acknowledging that no validated monitoring strategy currently exists to guide anticoagulation decisions after ablation.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Van der Linden, L. R., Shao, Q., Hellemans, L., Vandenberk, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-13T21:05:10-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004877</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004877</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Antithrombotic stewardship: whether to stop anticoagulation after atrial fibrillation ablation]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Hands on medicines information</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004811v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reducing packaging waste in care units: a national survey]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004811v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objectives</st><p>Ecological transition has become an increasing concern among healthcare professionals, prompting interest in pro-environmental practices. This study aimed to provide evidence-based recommendations to guide healthcare professionals in selecting between single- and double-packaged sterile medical devices (SMD) based on their perceptions and practices.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A survey was co-constructed by the French Pharmaceutical Society of Medical Devices (SPFDM), the French Society for Sterilisation Sciences (SF2S), the French Society for Hospital Hygiene (SF2H), and the National Association of State-Certified Operating Room Nurses (UNAIBODE). The questionnaire was distributed electronically to healthcare professionals working in operating theatres across France.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 130 respondents completed the survey, including 72 operating room and registered nurses (55.5%), 30 pharmacists (23%), 20 managers (15.5%) and eight others (6%). Most participants worked in public health establishments (80.8%) with established waste sorting systems (83.1%), mainly for paper/cardboard, metal and plastic. Daily use of single-pack SMD was reported by 61.5% of respondents, although only 11.3% applied this to implantable MD. Packaging was considered an environmental criterion by 71.5% of participants, mainly based on the number of packages. Safety concerns were prevalent, with 66.9% indicating that single packaging alone was insufficient for SMD. A majority (70.8%) supported transitioning to single-pack MD where appropriate, whereas the trend reversed for implantable SMD, with 60.0% opposing single packaging. Most respondents (75.4%) favoured wider availability of dematerialised records, and 97% supported a pictogram indicating recyclability of SMD packaging.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>This national survey provides valuable insights into SMD packaging practices in French operating theatres. While safety remains the primary concern&mdash;particularly for implantable SMD&mdash;there is strong environmental awareness and willingness to adapt practices when clinical safety is not compromised. Based on these findings, professional societies plan to develop recommendations promoting single-pack SMD where clinically appropriate, while maintaining double packaging for high-risk implantable SMD.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chasseigne, V., Thiveaud, D., Ayraud-Thevenot, S., Lambert, C., Laurent, M., Nativel, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-02T09:00:15-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004811</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004811</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 1: Introductory Statements and Governance]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reducing packaging waste in care units: a national survey]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004739v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Fully validated HPLC-UV detection method associated with colour variation control for evaluation of the stability of 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy polyolefin infusion bags at dose banding]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004739v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objectives</st><p>To develop a fully validated high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) stability-indicating assay for measuring the concentration and physical stability of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) at standardised rounded doses in polyolefin (POF) infusion.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Diluted 5-FU infusion solutions were aseptically prepared by further dilution of a 5-FU stock solution with 0.9% sodium chloride in POF bags, at banded doses between 500 mg and 800 mg. The POF bags were stored under refrigeration (4&deg;C) in the dark (long-term stability conditions) or at room temperature (25&deg;C) in daylight for a short period of 24 hours (simulated in-use conditions).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The long-term stability of 5-FU at selected standardised rounded doses (500&ndash;800 mg) in NaCl 0.9% in POF bags was confirmed for 3 months at 4&deg;C in the dark. Additionally, during the simulated in-use study, no signs of chemical instability were observed.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>A stability-indicating HPLC method was developed to determine 5-FU concentrations in dose-banding conditions associated with colour variation investigations. This study supports a centralised production of 5-FU at standardised dose banding.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guillaume, Y., Andre, C., Lethier, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-30T09:00:13-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004739</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004739</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 2: Selection, Procurement and Distribution]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Fully validated HPLC-UV detection method associated with colour variation control for evaluation of the stability of 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy polyolefin infusion bags at dose banding]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004915v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Evolution of clinical trials and regulatory challenges in Europe: a data-driven perspective]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004915v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tejedor-Tejada, E., Climent Ballester, S., Cores-Rodriguez, I., Ortiz Del Olmo, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-27T09:00:14-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004915</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004915</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Evolution of clinical trials and regulatory challenges in Europe: a data-driven perspective]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Editorial</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004858v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms: descriptive analysis of pharmacovigilance]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004858v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objectives</st><p>Drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) is a rare but potentially fatal adverse drug reaction characterised by cutaneous and systemic involvement. This study aimed to analyse patients with DRESS reported through the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>All DRESS reports submitted to FAERS between 1 January 2003 and 13 October 2025 were extracted. Patient characteristics were analysed descriptively according to severity, sex, age group and suspected drugs.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 26 831 patients with DRESS were identified, of which 99.67% were classified as having a serious adverse reaction. Overall mortality was 6.9% (1846 deaths). Female patients were more frequently affected than male patients. Adults aged 18&ndash;64 years represented the largest group. Allopurinol, lamotrigine and vancomycin were the most frequently suspected drugs, accounting for over 30% of reports.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>DRESS remains a severe adverse drug reaction. Early recognition and continuous pharmacovigilance are essential to reduce associated morbidity and mortality.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Castellana, E., Chiappetta, M. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-22T09:00:44-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004858</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004858</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 5: Patient Safety and Quality Assurance]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms: descriptive analysis of pharmacovigilance]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Short report</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004703v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Patient with severe burns for whom serum cystatin C-based assessment was performed due to suspected errors in serum creatinine-based renal function evaluation: a case report]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004703v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>A 68-year-old male with severe burns was admitted for treatment. During the prolonged hospitalisation, discrepancies were observed between estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) based on serum creatinine (eGFRcre) and actual renal function, as indicated by vancomycin therapeutic drug monitoring. Serum cystatin C measurement revealed a difference between eGFR based on serum cystatin C (eGFRcys) and eGFRcre. The patient experienced drug-induced liver injury, likely due to an inaccurate renal function assessment using serum creatinine. Adjusting drug doses based on eGFRcys improved clinical outcomes. Therefore, eGFRcre may overestimate renal function in patients with decreased muscle mass from prolonged hospitalisation and reduced physical activity. In emergency medicine, especially for patients with conditions affecting muscle mass, eGFRcys may be a more reliable marker for renal function evaluation than eGFRcre. Hence, alternative methods should be considered for assessing renal function in special populations to ensure appropriate drug dosing and prevent adverse effects.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Koreeda, H., Yoshikawa, N., Sasaki, A., Tasaki, K., Itoh, H., Ochiai, H., Ikeda, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-22T09:00:44-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004703</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004703</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Patient with severe burns for whom serum cystatin C-based assessment was performed due to suspected errors in serum creatinine-based renal function evaluation: a case report]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Case report</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004767v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Stratification in pharmaceutical care: a concept analysis]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004767v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>The term stratification is increasingly used in pharmaceutical care to guide the allocation of interventions and optimise patient follow-up. However, its conceptual boundaries remain ambiguous and are frequently conflated with related constructs such as triage, clinical scoring or prioritisation, thereby compromising consistency in implementation. This lack of conceptual clarity hinders the development of standardised tools and limits the comparability and transferability of stratified care models in clinical pharmacy practice.</p></sec><sec><st>Objective</st><p>To clarify the concept of stratification in pharmaceutical care by identifying its defining attributes, antecedents, consequences and empirical referents.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A structured concept analysis was conducted using the Walker and Avant framework. A comprehensive literature search was performed across major biomedical databases covering the period from January 2000 to May 2025. Empirical studies, theoretical articles, conceptual frameworks and models addressing stratification or patient prioritisation in pharmaceutical care and related health services were included. Relevant publications were screened independently by both authors and analysed thematically.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Eleven publications were included in the concept analysis. Four defining attributes of stratification in pharmaceutical care were identified: patient-centred segmentation, prioritisation of care intensity, resource-sensitive allocation and structured re-stratification over time. Key antecedents included increasing clinical complexity, limited pharmacist availability and the need for value-based care. Consequences and empirical referents were also identified, allowing stratification to be distinguished from related constructs such as triage or risk scoring.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>This concept analysis establishes a theory-based conceptual foundation for stratification in pharmaceutical care. Clarifying its meaning may support greater conceptual consistency and inform the development, implementation and evaluation of structured patient prioritisation models across healthcare settings.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Morillo-Verdugo, R., McIntyre, F., Contreras Macias, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-16T09:00:16-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004767</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004767</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 5: Patient Safety and Quality Assurance]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Stratification in pharmaceutical care: a concept analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004730v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Impact of gender and chelation on the ferritin-liver function test relationship in transfusion-dependent {beta}-thalassaemia]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004730v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objectives</st><p>Transfusion-dependent &beta;-thalassaemia (TDT) requires lifelong blood transfusions, resulting in progressive iron overload and liver injury. Serum ferritin is a practical surrogate for iron burden, while liver function tests (LFTs) may reflect hepatic damage. However, the influence of gender and the chelation regimen on the ferritin&ndash;LFT relationship remains underexplored. This study evaluated these associations in a large Iraqi TDT cohort.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted on 323 patients with TDT at the Center of Hereditary Blood Diseases, Karbala, Iraq. Data on demographics, ferritin, LFTs, transfusion history and chelation regimen were collected. Mann-Whitney U test, Fisher&rsquo;s exact test, Spearman&rsquo;s correlation and multiple linear regression were used to explore predictors of ferritin, including interaction terms. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis assessed aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) cut-offs for predicting ferritin&gt;2500 ng/mL.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Median ferritin was 2214ng/mL. AST (=0.581) and ALT (=0.516) showed strong positive correlations with ferritin (p&lt;0.001). Gender-stratified analyses revealed consistent AST&ndash;ferritin associations, with females demonstrating additional links involving bilirubin and alkaline phosphatase (ALP). Patients on deferasirox (DFX)+deferoxamine (DFO) had higher ferritin, AST and ALT than DFX alone (p&lt;0.001). In regression models, AST and DFX+DFO were independent predictors overall, while subgroup models identified bilirubin and interaction effects in females, and bilirubin&ndash;treatment interactions in the DFX+DFO group. ROC analysis showed AST cut-offs were lower in females and combination therapy, though predictive accuracy remained high (AUC&gt;0.79 in all subgroups).</p></sec><sec><st>Discussion</st><p>Gender and the chelation regimen modify the ferritin&ndash;LFT relationship in TDT. AST is a consistent predictor of ferritin across all groups, while bilirubin and interaction terms contribute in specific subgroups. These findings highlight the need for gender- and regimen-specific interpretation of biochemical markers, especially where advanced iron assessment is unavailable.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hussein, R. M., Alrufaei, Z. A., Zmezim, M., Rasheed, M. Q., Muhammad, H. J., Alghurabi, H., Shihan, M. R., Omran, Z. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-14T09:00:23-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004730</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004730</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 4: Clinical Pharmacy Services]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Impact of gender and chelation on the ferritin-liver function test relationship in transfusion-dependent {beta}-thalassaemia]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004906v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Correspondence on "Impact of using different renal function estimation equations on vancomycin dosing" by Gratacos and Soy-Muner]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004906v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zhou, X., Ji, H. J., Yang, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-12T09:00:11-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004906</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004906</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Correspondence on "Impact of using different renal function estimation equations on vancomycin dosing" by Gratacos and Soy-Muner]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letter</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004639v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Association of acamprosate versus gabapentinoids with liver disease progression and alcohol-related admissions in patients with alcohol use disorder]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004639v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Alcohol-related liver disease (ALD) causes approximately one-fifth of all alcohol-related deaths. Only 4% of patients with alcohol use disorder (AUD) receive medications for AUD, such as acamprosate. Medications for AUD may decrease progression of ALD. Challenges in treating AUD include limited primary care physician familiarity with medications. Gabapentinoids are occasionally used but are not approved for AUD treatment, and primary care physicians are familiar with them. This study aimed to examine the association between both therapies and progression of ALD among patients with AUD.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>This was a retrospective propensity score (PS)-matched cohort study using data from the Veterans Affairs healthcare records. Patients with AUD who were started on acamprosate or gabapentinoids after being diagnosed with AUD were identified. The primary outcome was the composite outcome of ALD progression (alcoholic hepatitis, compensated cirrhosis, decompensated cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma). The secondary outcome was alcohol-related admission. A PS encompassing 80 variables was created and patients who used acamprosate and gabapentinoid were matched into pairs. Another PS-matched cohort was created that was restricted to patients who continued their medications for &ge;120 days (persistent cohort).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>24 477 pairs of patients who used acamprosate and gabapentinoid were PS matched. The primary outcome occurred in 15.78% of patients using acamprosate and 13.37% of those using gabapentinoid (OR 1.21; 95% CI 1.15 to 1.27). Alcohol-related admission occurred in 24.73% of patients using acamprosate and 18.01% of those using gabapentinoid (OR 1.50; 95% CI 1.43 to 1.56). Similar outcomes were observed in a PS-matched persistent cohort of 12 258 pairs.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>Gabapentinoids were associated with a decreased risk of ALD progression and alcohol-related admission compared with acamprosate. Gabapentinoids may be a viable tool to decrease progression of ALD in AUD. Further studies are needed to examine whether gabapentinoids are associated with less heavy drinking only or with higher abstinence.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shah, R., Zelneronok, K., Henriquez, R., Mansi, I. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-08T09:00:19-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004639</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004639</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 4: Clinical Pharmacy Services]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Association of acamprosate versus gabapentinoids with liver disease progression and alcohol-related admissions in patients with alcohol use disorder]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004838v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Impact of patient-centred care and population health management on diabetes and hypertension outcomes]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004838v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and hypertension are prevalent global health concerns associated with increased morbidity, mortality and healthcare expenditure. This study evaluated the effectiveness of patient-centred care (PCC) and population health management (PHM) strategies in improving clinical outcomes and medication adherence among patients with co-existing T2DM and hypertension in Hounslow, UK.</p></sec><sec><st>Study design</st><p>Quantitative intervention study.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A total of 221 patients were selected from 6000 attendees at West Middlesex University Hospital&rsquo;s pre-assessment clinic. Participants were allocated into three groups. Study 1 was a randomised controlled pilot trial with 40 patients assigned to either a PCC intervention group (n=20) or a usual care group (n=20) over 6 months. Study 2 involved 41 patients receiving a pharmacist/nurse-led collaborative PCC intervention for 6 months. Study 3 included 140 patients enrolled in a 6-month community-based PHM lifestyle programme integrated with PCC. Data collection involved patient questionnaires and hospital records, focusing on clinical and behavioural outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>In study 1, the PCC group showed a significant reduction in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) (mean decrease 23.2 mmol/mol, 95% CI 4.3 to 42.1) and improved medication adherence compared with controls. The number needed to treat (NNT) was 1.8 (95% CI 1.3 to 7.6). Study 2 participants experienced significant reductions in systolic (27.5 mm Hg) and diastolic (9.1 mm Hg) blood pressure, and HbA1c (23.1 mmol/mol) (all p&lt;0.001). In study 3, 90% of patients with elevated body mass index achieved 5&ndash;10% weight loss, and 82% reported an increase in moderate or higher physical activity levels.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>PCC and PHM integration led to substantial improvements in glycaemic control, blood pressure, weight management and physical activity. These findings support the adoption of community-based PCC models to manage chronic conditions effectively and improve public health outcomes.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Leka, T., Appiah, S., Jones, H., Linnard, D., Garelick, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-08T09:00:19-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004838</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004838</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 4: Clinical Pharmacy Services]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Impact of patient-centred care and population health management on diabetes and hypertension outcomes]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004761v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Drug-drug interactions in adjuvant and neoadjuvant breast cancer therapy]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004761v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>To determine the prevalence, severity and characteristics of potential drug&ndash;drug interactions (DDIs) in a homogeneous cohort of patients with early-stage breast cancer receiving adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>We performed a retrospective observational study of patients treated with systemic chemotherapy at a tertiary hospital. All medications prescribed during chemotherapy were recorded. Potential DDIs were identified using the Lexicomp database and classified by risk level, clinical severity, quality of evidence and mechanism of action. Associations between patient-related factors and DDIs were analysed.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 273 patients were included (median age 52 years) and 56% had at least one comorbidity. Overall, 2842 drugs were prescribed (median 10 per patient), resulting in 2287 potential DDIs. All patients presented at least one DDI; 89% had at least one type D interaction and 14.6% at least one type X interaction. Most DDIs were classified as type C (75.3%), followed by type D (21.7%) and type X (3.0%). The total number of DDIs was significantly associated with age, comorbidity burden and number of prescribed drugs.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Potential DDIs are highly prevalent in patients with early-stage breast cancer receiving chemotherapy, with a substantial proportion involving clinically significant or contraindicated combinations. Polypharmacy, age and comorbidities are key risk factors, highlighting the importance of systematic medication review and interdisciplinary collaboration to improve treatment safety.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Almanchel-Rivadeneyra, M., Alonso Romero, J. L., Tomas-Luiz, A., Diaz Carrasco, M. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-06T09:00:26-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004761</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004761</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 4: Clinical Pharmacy Services]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Drug-drug interactions in adjuvant and neoadjuvant breast cancer therapy]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004721v2?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[German Federal Association of Hospital Pharmacists national survey of clinical pharmacy services in Germany, 2024]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004721v2?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objectives</st><p>Clinical pharmacy care in German hospitals has recently evolved, driven by digitalisation and legal reforms. The only comprehensive overview of clinical pharmacy care in Germany was published in 2019. The current survey aims to update and describe the status quo of clinical pharmacy services in Germany, highlighting developments in this field since the previous publication.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>In 2024, an online survey with 45 questions was carried out among chief pharmacists, organised within the German Federal Association of Hospital Pharmacists (ADKA) e.V. (n=328). The survey collected structural data (eg, beds and workforce), as well as information on the extent and range of clinical pharmacy services.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The survey received 135 responses, resulting in a response rate of 41%. The provision of clinical pharmacy services (CPS) was already well established in 114 pharmacies (85.7%), meaning at least 32.4% of all German hospital pharmacies offer CPS. The average number of full-time equivalents dedicated to these services per hospital pharmacy is 4.3, which is an increase of1.9 full-time equivalents compared with the first survey. Regular visits (at least once a week) are reported in the range of 80% for most surgical disciplines, haematology/oncology and critical care/anaesthesia. The regular patient-centred services were offered daily or 2&ndash;3 times weekly, respectively.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>This follow-up survey provides a comprehensive overview of the developments since the initial survey, offering a detailed analysis of the current status of CPS in German hospitals. A general improvement has been observed regarding the range of services offered, utilisation of workforce resources and frequency of service delivery. Despite this positive development, further measures are necessary to ensure the enhancement and improvement of CPS in all hospitals.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hilgarth, H., Dohm, A., Fischer, A., Knoth, H., Warnke, U.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-06T09:00:26-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004721</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004721</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 4: Clinical Pharmacy Services]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[German Federal Association of Hospital Pharmacists national survey of clinical pharmacy services in Germany, 2024]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004779v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Hospital production of a 1% propofol-cyclodextrin formulation to address drug shortages: a proof of concept]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004779v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objectives</st><p>Drug shortages, particularly in anaesthesia, pose a risk to patient care. Propofol, a widely used anaesthetic, is formulated as an emulsion requiring a complex industrial manufacturing and pharmaceutical supply chain, making propofol vulnerable. Cyclodextrins can enhance the aqueous solubility of lipophilic drugs and may provide an alternative approach. The objective of this study was to develop and evaluate a ready-to-use cyclodextrin-based propofol formulation that could be prepared in a hospital pharmacy using standard equipment.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A 1% (w/v) propofol solution was prepared using hydroxypropyl-&beta;-cyclodextrin (HP-&beta;-CD). The association constant (Ka) was calculated using the Higuchi and Connors method. The solution was sterilised by 0.22 &micro;m filtration or by autoclaving at 121&deg;C for 15 min. Stability was assessed over 90 days at 2&ndash;8&deg;C and 20&ndash;25&deg;C. A validated HPLC-UV method was used to quantify propofol and detect degradation products. Additional quality controls included pH, osmolality, subvisible particles, sterility and endotoxin levels.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The Ka was 1288&plusmn;32 M<sup>&ndash;</sup>&sup1;. A clear 1% (w/v) solution was obtained with 17% (w/v) HP-&beta;-CD and 0.35% (w/v) sodium chloride, without pH adjustment. Both sterilisation methods preserved drug integrity. The formulation remained stable for 3 months under refrigeration. At room temperature, degradation occurred after 14 days.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>This study demonstrates the feasibility of a hospital-based preparation of a sterile injectable propofol solution using cyclodextrins. These results support the role of hospital pharmacies in addressing drug shortages by enabling locally controlled and resilient production capacity.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rousseleau, D., Bouchfaa, M., Negrier, L., Roche, M., Azaroual, N., Lebuffe, G., Danel, C., Odou, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-06T09:00:21-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004779</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004779</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 3: Production and Compounding]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Hospital production of a 1% propofol-cyclodextrin formulation to address drug shortages: a proof of concept]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004716v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Treatment outcomes in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia patients receiving vancomycin: a retrospective study at a tertiary hospital]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004716v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Methicillin-resistant <I>Staphylococcus aureus</I> (MRSA) bacteraemia remains a major clinical challenge with high mortality, despite guideline-recommended vancomycin therapy. Although a ratio of the area under the curve to the minimum inhibitory concentration (AUC/MIC) &ge;400 mg&middot;hour/L is advocated for efficacy, the association between pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target attainment and clinical outcomes remains uncertain.</p></sec><sec><st>Objective</st><p>To determine the in-hospital mortality rate among patients with MRSA bacteraemia receiving vancomycin. The secondary objectives were to (1) evaluate the association between patient characteristics and in-hospital mortality, (2) examine the relationship between in-hospital mortality and secondary treatment outcomes, and (3) assess the impact of vancomycin AUC/MIC target attainment on in-hospital mortality.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary hospital in Malaysia involving adults with MRSA bacteraemia treated from 2014 to 2024. AUC/MIC data were analysed for patients receiving intermittent vancomycin dosing. Multivariable logistic regression identified independent predictors of mortality.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Among 148 patients included, the in-hospital mortality rate was 32.4% (n=48/148). Four factors were independently associated with in-hospital mortality: organ failure (adjusted OR (aOR) 19.28, 95% CI 5.14 to 72.26), recent antibiotic exposure (aOR 5.24, 95% CI 1.90 to 14.51), hypoalbuminaemia &lt;30 g/L (aOR 4.56, 95% CI 1.69 to 13.06) and cerebrovascular disease (aOR 4.24, 95% CI 1.15 to 15.60). Subgroup analysis of patients on intermittent dosing revealed six independent predictors of in-hospital mortality: cerebrovascular disease (aOR 26.9, 95% CI 2.76 to 261.98), hypoalbuminaemia &lt;30 g/L (aOR 10.68, 95% CI 1.54 to 74.29), organ failure (aOR 48.15, 95% CI 4.27 to 542.81), polymicrobial bacteraemia (aOR 24.28, 95% CI 3.09 to 190.64), persistent bacteraemia (aOR 90.08, 95% CI 2.85 to 2845.83) and intensive care unit admission (aOR 0.09, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.91), the latter showing a protective effect. Only 22.2% (n=26/117) achieved the target AUC/MIC, which was not significantly linked to mortality reduction.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Vancomycin AUC/MIC attainment was suboptimal, and mortality was primarily influenced by host factors and disease severity. Early risk stratification and timely intervention are critical to improve outcomes and guide resource prioritisation, particularly in settings with limited access to AUC-guided dosing.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fann, Z. Y., Othman, E., Chong, S. L., Mohd Saffian, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-31T09:00:20-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004716</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004716</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 4: Clinical Pharmacy Services]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Treatment outcomes in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia patients receiving vancomycin: a retrospective study at a tertiary hospital]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-31</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004822v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Response to: Correspondence on 'Stability of alglucosidase alfa in 0.9% sodium chloride for enzyme replacement therapy in patients with Pompe disease: insights from enzyme activity and cellular uptake measurements by Barzel et al]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004822v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barzel, I., Brugma, J. D., Jacobs, E. H., Hoogeveen-Westerveld, M., van der Kuy, H. M., Preijers, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-31T09:00:20-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004822</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004822</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Response to: Correspondence on 'Stability of alglucosidase alfa in 0.9% sodium chloride for enzyme replacement therapy in patients with Pompe disease: insights from enzyme activity and cellular uptake measurements by Barzel et al]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-31</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letter</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004665v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Ciclosporin-related posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in a paediatric haematopoietic stem cell transplant recipient]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004665v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) is a neurological condition associated with seizures, visual disturbances and altered mental status. It is commonly linked to immunosuppressive therapies such as ciclosporin, widely used in recipients of a haematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). Neuroimaging, especially MRI, is the most important diagnostic tool for PRES, as it typically shows bilateral and symmetrical involvement of the occipital and parietal regions with white matter oedema.</p><p>Electroencephalography may be useful for the detection of (non-convulsive) epileptic seizures, status epilepticus and may play a role in the evaluation of encephalopathy. We present the case of a 12-year-old boy who developed PRES during ciclosporin treatment for graft versus host disease prophylaxis following allogeneic HSCT. After early recognition, discontinuation of ciclosporin and appropriate management, full clinical recovery was achieved. This case highlights the importance of early detection and multidisciplinary management to prevent permanent neurological damage in paediatric recipients of a transplant.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aktan, M., Yalc&#x0131;n, N., Demirkan, K., Kuskonmaz, B. B., Okur, F. V., Go&#x0308;cmen, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-31T09:00:20-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004665</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004665</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Ciclosporin-related posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in a paediatric haematopoietic stem cell transplant recipient]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-31</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Case report</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004788v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A pilot study investigating the clinical and financial impact of a pharmacist discharge service in a hospital setting]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004788v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Medication errors during hospital discharge are a leading source of avoidable patient harm and healthcare resource strain. Pharmacist-led medicines reconciliation in hospital has demonstrated benefits in improving patient safety and reducing adverse drug events post-discharge.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim</st><p>The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and financial implications of a pharmacist discharge service on a surgical ward in an Irish hospital setting.</p></sec><sec><st>Method</st><p>A prospective single-centre pilot study was conducted to evaluate the impact of a clinical pharmacist discharge medication reconciliation service. The study was conducted over 8 weeks on a 31-bed surgical ward. Eligible patients were discharged during pharmacy working hours, on &ge;3 medications, with pharmacist admission medicines reconciliation completed. A clinical pharmacist reviewed draft discharge prescriptions and communicated interventions to prescribers prior to discharge. Identified discrepancies were assessed by an expert panel for severity (visual analogue score), probability of adverse drug events and potential remedial healthcare use. Financial impact was estimated using cost avoidance modelling.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Of 50 discharge prescriptions reviewed (646 medications), 184 discrepancies were identified in 40 prescriptions (126 prescribing and 58 communication errors). Most errors (84.8%) were rated as having moderate potential harm; 2.2% were classified as severe. Expert panel assessments indicated that pharmacist interventions prevented adverse drug events likely to result in additional healthcare utilisation by 74.7%. A potential annual net cost benefit of 554 921.53 and a cost-benefit ratio of 52.5 was calculated for the provision of a clinical pharmacist discharge service when all discharge prescriptions from the surgical ward (n=665) are reviewed.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>The results show the clinical and financial benefits of a pharmacist-led discharge medication reconciliation service, resolving high-risk prescribing errors and reducing downstream healthcare utilisation. This represents a highly cost-effective intervention with potential for substantial system-wide savings by enhancing patient safety and resource efficiency at transitions of care.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[MacCarthy, R., Kidd, P., Given, J., Fleming, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-30T09:00:25-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004788</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004788</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 4: Clinical Pharmacy Services]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A pilot study investigating the clinical and financial impact of a pharmacist discharge service in a hospital setting]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004707v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Postoperative delirium or side effects of voriconazole: pharmacists viewpoint]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004707v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>A 78-year-old Han Chinese woman (height 150 cm, weight 55 kg) underwent left knee prosthesis revision and developed an infection during hospitalisation. Subsequently, the patient developed restlessness and hallucinations. A consultation by a psychiatrist diagnosed postoperative delirium, whereas a clinical pharmacist attributed these symptoms to voriconazole-related adverse effects. The patient had an inadequate response to delirium-targeted treatments, and a voriconazole concentration of 5.0 mg/L was measured. Following the pharmacist&rsquo;s recommendation to discontinue the drug, the symptoms resolved within 4 days. The adverse effects were classified as &lsquo;possible&rsquo; according to the Naranjo Adverse Drug Reaction Probability Scale. To our knowledge, this is the first case highlighting the divergent perspectives between specialist physicians and clinical pharmacists during consultations.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Xu, Q., Ma, K., Sang, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-30T09:00:25-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004707</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004707</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Postoperative delirium or side effects of voriconazole: pharmacists viewpoint]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Case report</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004693v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Evaluation of desmopressin in preventing overcorrection of hyponatraemia among patients with renal dysfunction]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004693v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Purpose</st><p>Hyponatraemia is a common cause of hospital admissions, and correcting sodium levels should be done gradually to avoid complications, including osmotic demyelination syndrome. Desmopressin can be used to prevent rapid fluctuations in sodium. While effective, limited evidence exists regarding its use in patients with renal dysfunction, and package inserts recommend avoiding use in patients with a creatinine clearance (CrCl) of &lt;50 mL/min. The aim of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of desmopressin in patients with renal dysfunction compared with those with no renal dysfunction.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single academic medical centre. Adult patients with an initial sodium concentration of &lt;125 mmol/L who received desmopressin were included. The primary outcome was the rate of sodium overcorrection (&gt;8 mmol/L) 24 hours after desmopressin in patients with renal dysfunction (CrCl &lt;50 mL/min) versus those with no renal dysfunction. Secondary outcomes included proportion of patients achieving a 5&ndash;10 mEq/L increase within 24 hours and overcorrection rates at 24 and 48 hours. Data were analysed using the test <sup>2</sup>, t test and Mann&ndash;Whitney U test.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>72 patients were included in the study and 20 had renal dysfunction. The most common desmopressin dosing strategy in both groups was rescue. Baseline sodium was comparable between the groups: 113.8&plusmn;7.5 versus 115.6&plusmn;3.73 mmol/L. However, sodium before desmopressin administration was more elevated in the renal dysfunction group (124.1&plusmn;9.8 vs 129.3&plusmn;7.8 mmol/L; p=0.04) who also received more sodium through intravenous fluids (284.2 vs 90.7 mEq; p=0.001). There was no significant difference in overcorrection by &gt;8 mmol/L, 24 hours post-desmopressin (9.6% vs 20%; p=0.43), but patients with renal dysfunction had higher rates of overcorrection at 24 hours post-admission (11.5% vs 35%; p=0.048).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>This study did not show a significant difference in sodium overcorrection after desmopressin in patients with renal dysfunction. Further studies assessing the safety and efficacy of desmopressin in renal dysfunction are needed.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mabie, K., Smith, B. A., Chase, A., Henry, K. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-30T09:00:25-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004693</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004693</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Evaluation of desmopressin in preventing overcorrection of hyponatraemia among patients with renal dysfunction]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004705v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Acyclovir-induced nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity in a case of viral encephalitis: a case report]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004705v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Viral encephalitis is a hazardous central nervous system disorder requiring immediate antiviral intervention. Acyclovir is the standard treatment for herpes simplex virus (HSV) encephalitis; nevertheless, improper dosing or administration can lead to nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity. This case describes a 54-year-old male patient admitted for an allergic reaction, who thereafter had incoherent speech, instability and involuntary motions suggestive of HSV encephalitis. Intravenous acyclovir treatment was initiated empirically following cerebrospinal fluid examination. On the third day of therapy, the patient exhibited acute renal impairment, accompanied by hallucinations and significant psychomotor agitation. Following the clinical pharmacist&rsquo;s recommendations, the dosage was adjusted and the infusion period was prolonged to at least 1 hour, predicated on an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 20 mL/min/1,73 m&sup2;. Subsequent to these surgeries, renal function and neurological status steadily enhanced, enabling a successful resolution of treatment. This example highlights the crucial role of clinical pharmacists in reducing acyclovir-related toxicities via personalised dosage and infusion management.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dertli, B., Gu&#x0308;zel Karahan, S., Ko&#x0308;seoglu, K., Cak&#x0131;r, A., Salduz, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-30T09:00:25-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004705</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004705</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Acyclovir-induced nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity in a case of viral encephalitis: a case report]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Case report</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004726v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Correspondence on "Stability of alglucosidase alfa in 0.9% sodium chloride for enzyme replacement therapy in patients with Pompe disease: insights from enzyme activity and cellular uptake measurements" by Barzel et al]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004726v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Belancic, A., Javor, E., Skelin, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-23T01:26:04-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004726</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004726</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Correspondence on "Stability of alglucosidase alfa in 0.9% sodium chloride for enzyme replacement therapy in patients with Pompe disease: insights from enzyme activity and cellular uptake measurements" by Barzel et al]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letter</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004732v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ICU Y-site compatibility at standardised infusion concentrations: method-stratified synthesis and practical chart]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004732v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Adults who are critically ill frequently require multiple intravenous infusions through limited vascular access, making Y-site co-infusion unavoidable. However, much of the primary compatibility literature uses concentrations, diluents and visual-only methods that do not reflect contemporary intensive care unit (ICU) practice, risking false reassurance at the bedside.</p></sec><sec><st>Objective</st><p>To create an ICU-specific, concentration-matched Y-site compatibility chart aligned to standardised infusion concentrations and to identify compatible, conditional, incompatible and no-data drug-pairs.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>We performed a PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) guided, method-stratified synthesis (1970&ndash;2025) of in-vitro Y-site evidence from PubMed, Trissel&rsquo;s and Micromedex. Classifications privileged instrumented endpoints (pH, turbidimetry, sub-visible particles, high-performance liquid chromatography) over visual inspection. Drug&ndash;drug pairs were mapped to our tertiary adult ICU formulary; medicines with an established ward standard were deemed ICU standardised. Outcomes: compatible (C), compatible in saline only (Csf), conditional (concentration/diluent dependent; applied only when at least one medicine was ICU standardised), incompatible&mdash;physical (Ie/Ip/It) or chemical (Iq)&mdash;or no data (ND).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Among 4465 mapped drug-pairs, 43.94% were compatible (C 42.37%, Csf 1.57%); 2.53% were conditional; 8.24% were incompatible&mdash;predominantly physical; and 45.29% lacked eligible evidence. High-risk clusters included lipid emulsions (eg, propofol, clevidipine), extreme-pH agents (eg, amiodarone, furosemide), phenytoin and calcium salts. For morphine hydrochloride, evidence was sparse (76% ND, 21% compatible, 1% conditional, 2% incompatible). Amiodarone exemplified concentration non-concordance; with an ICU concentration of 15 mg/mL, 34% of amiodarone drug-pairs had compatibility that was concentration dependent.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>At standardised ICU concentrations, fewer than half of potential Y-site pairings are unequivocally compatible and nearly half have no concentration-matched data. A conservative, method-stratified framework anchored to exact concentration and diluent mitigates risk and exposes evidence gaps. Applying a conservative, method-stratified framework anchored to exact concentration and diluent mitigates risk while revealing priority evidence gaps&mdash;especially for lipid emulsions, calcium-containing solutions, extreme-pH drugs and opioids. Embedding the chart within the electronic prescribing and medicines administration (EPMA) system can deliver checks, standardise line allocation, reduce uncertain Y-site mixing and prioritise dedicated lumens for high-risk agents.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Garreta Fontelles, G., Padilla Castano, H., Lopez Lopez-Cepero, M., Maqueda Palau, M., Barbado Monge, M. d. C., Liron Sanchez, T., Martorell Puigserver, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-21T09:00:22-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004732</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004732</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 5: Patient Safety and Quality Assurance]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ICU Y-site compatibility at standardised infusion concentrations: method-stratified synthesis and practical chart]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004740v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Evaluation of impact of clinical variables on enoxaparin dosing and anti-Xa factor concentration]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004740v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Enoxaparin, a low molecular weight heparin, is widely used for venous thromboembolism treatment and prevention. While routine anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) monitoring is not generally required, it may be valuable in high-risk populations such as patients with obesity or renal impairment.</p></sec><sec><st>Objective</st><p>To evaluate the impact of clinical variables on therapeutic enoxaparin dosing and assess the effectiveness of anti-Xa monitoring in real-world clinical practice.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A retrospective, single-centre, descriptive study was conducted in adults admitted to hospital and receiving therapeutic enoxaparin with correctly timed peak anti-Xa measurements (4 hours after dose) between December 2021 and January 2023. Demographic, clinical and dosing data were extracted from medical records. Predictors of peak anti-Xa concentration were identified using multiple linear regression. Dose&ndash;concentration correlations were examined overall and by obesity status.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 146 patients were included (mean age 67&plusmn;12.3 years; 56.2% male; mean body mass index 29.6&plusmn;7.5 kg/m&sup2;; 30.1% with obesity). Enoxaparin dose (p&lt;0.001) and obesity (p=0.007) were independent predictors of peak anti-Xa concentration; renal impairment and critical illness were not. The correlation between dose and concentration was strong in patients without obesity (r=0.56) but weak in those with obesity (r=0.16). Only 46.6% achieved therapeutic concentrations; 40.4% were subtherapeutic and 12.9% supratherapeutic. Among patients with out-of-range values, dose adjustments were made in 67.9%, but follow-up anti-Xa measurement occurred in only 45.3%; 79.2% of these achieved target concentrations.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>Obesity significantly influences enoxaparin pharmacokinetics, reducing predictability of anti-Xa concentrations with actual body weight dosing. Targeted anti-Xa monitoring in high-risk groups, particularly patients with obesity, and structured dose-adjustment protocols may improve therapeutic achievement and safety.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Torrent-Rodriguez, A., Bastida, C., Soy-Muner, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-15T21:50:45-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004740</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004740</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 4: Clinical Pharmacy Services]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Evaluation of impact of clinical variables on enoxaparin dosing and anti-Xa factor concentration]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004533v3?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Tackling medication errors: how a systems approach improves patient safety]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004533v3?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objectives</st><p>Medication errors are a leading source of preventable harm in healthcare, affecting approximately 1 in 30 patients, with a substantial proportion resulting in severe outcomes. In response, the European Association of Hospital Pharmacists convened a Special Interest Group (SIG) to propose comprehensive and sustainable strategies for reducing these errors across Europe, employing a systems approach.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>89 anonymised medication error reports, and empirical data from the SIG members&rsquo; daily practice, were analysed to identify root causes, classified into system-level and individual errors. Expert subgroups then linked root causes to targeted preventive measures. A literature review was conducted, searching PubMed and Embase databases, to assess existing standards and identify gaps in medication safety practices, which informed the analysis.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Analysis revealed that governance deficiencies and inconsistent implementation of existing legal standards contribute significantly to medication errors. System-level issues, including inadequate oversight, understaffing and insufficient technical infrastructures, along with individual errors from cognitive lapses, were prevalent. The literature review supported these findings and highlighted the variability in medication safety practices across systems, underscoring the importance of strategic improvements in healthcare policies.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Findings highlight the critical need for robust governance, comprehensive policy frameworks and enhanced safety cultures to prevent medication errors. Automation and improved human&ndash;machine interfaces are recommended to mitigate active failures and enhance system reliability. This systems-thinking approach, supported by strengthening legislation and better resource allocation, is essential for reducing medication errors and improving patient safety.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guntschnig, S., Barbosa, R., Jenzer, H., Greening, M., Hayde, J., Heery, H., Iglesias Serrano, M. C., Lajtmanova, K., Rossin, E., Tentova-Peceva, S., Kohl, S., Mulac, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-15T09:00:12-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004533</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004533</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 5: Patient Safety and Quality Assurance]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Tackling medication errors: how a systems approach improves patient safety]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004516v2?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Stability of alglucosidase alfa in 0.9% sodium chloride for enzyme replacement therapy in patients with Pompe disease: insights from enzyme activity and cellular uptake measurements]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004516v2?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objectives</st><p>Enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) with alglucosidase alfa is the cornerstone of treatment for Pompe disease, a rare disorder caused by acid &alpha;-glucosidase (GAA) deficiency. Since 2008, home infusions have been provided in the Netherlands. However, the short shelf-life of the ready-to-administer infusions poses challenges for manufacturing and dispensing pharmacies. This study assessed the stability of ready-to-administer alglucosidase alfa infusions by determining enzyme activity and cellular uptake of two concentrations during 11 days of storage.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Alglucosidase alfa infusions (2 and 4 mg/mL in 0.9% sodium chloride) were prepared and samples were drawn on days 1 to 7 and 11. Enzyme activity was determined using 4-methylumbelliferyl-&alpha;-D-glucoside (4MU-&alpha;Glc) and glycogen as substrates. Additionally, enzyme uptake in cultured fibroblasts was investigated.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>There was no difference in enzyme activity after 11 days as compared with day 1 using 4MU-&alpha;Glc (2 mg/mL: 352 vs 331 nmol/h/mL; 4 mg/mL: 657 vs 662 nmol/h/mL) or glycogen (2 mg/mL: 183 vs 176 nmol/h/mL; 4 mg/mL: 352 vs 357 nmol/h/mL). Uptake of alglucosidase alfa in fibroblasts remained stable over 11 days, with activity ranging from 90 to 104 nmol/h/mL at 2 mg/mL and from 233 to 238 nmol/h/mL at 4 mg/mL. Linear regression analysis confirmed no statistically significant association between time and enzyme activity or uptake.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Ready-to-administer alglucosidase alfa infusion in 0.9% sodium chloride at 2&ndash;4 mg/mL is stable for 11 days when stored at 2&ndash;8&deg;C or &ndash;20&deg;C and protected from light. Extending the stability could enhance efficiency and flexibility for infusion preparation and home delivery, while minimising pharmaceutical waste.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barzel, I., Brugma, J.-D. C., Jacobs, E. H., Hoogeveen-Westerveld, M., van der Kuy, P. H. M., Preijers, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-15T09:00:12-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004516</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004516</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 3: Production and Compounding]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Stability of alglucosidase alfa in 0.9% sodium chloride for enzyme replacement therapy in patients with Pompe disease: insights from enzyme activity and cellular uptake measurements]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004622v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Predicting unplanned hospital revisits among community-dwelling older adults: a dynamic cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004622v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objectives</st><p>Unplanned hospital revisits (UHR) among older adults are common and contribute to adverse clinical outcomes, caregiver burden and increased healthcare costs. We aimed to develop and validate a risk prediction model for UHR in older adults to support early identification.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>We conducted a retrospective cohort study, following the TRIPOD statement, using a Flemish linked database combining primary care and national health insurance data. Adults aged &ge;75 years with an all-cause hospital admission in 2014 were included. The primary outcome was UHR, defined as emergency department visits or unplanned hospital admissions within 6 months post-discharge. We used multivariable logistic regression to identify predictors for UHR and develop a risk prediction model. Model performance was assessed using balanced accuracy. Missing data were handled using multiple imputation by chained equations. The model was validated on a held-out test set and a k-nearest neighbour classifier was used to cross-validate risk categories.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Among 3133 patients, 309 (10%) experienced UHR. The best-performing model had a balanced accuracy of 0.56, with a sensitivity of 58% and a specificity of 54%. Predictors were polypharmacy, male sex, haemoglobin level, number of general practitioner contacts and multimorbidity. Excessive polypharmacy (&gt;9 medications) was associated with a 55% increase in UHR odds. Three UHR risk groups were identified: low-risk (5.1%), medium-risk (8.8%) and high-risk (11.6%).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>UHR are common in older adults, with excessive polypharmacy emerging as a key predictor. The pragmatic model described here provides a valuable tool to stratify older adults into distinct risk groups, identifying a high-risk group that may benefit from targeted interventions.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hias, J., Saud, N., Blocquiaux, L., Hellemans, L., Molenberghs, G., Vaes, B., Rygaert, X., Tournoy, J., Van der Linden, L. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-13T09:00:16-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004622</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004622</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Predicting unplanned hospital revisits among community-dwelling older adults: a dynamic cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004664v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Using Raman spectroscopy to analyse in situ a precipitate appearing in a catheter line after drug co-administration]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004664v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>To use the Raman scattering technique to identify precipitating drug substance(s) in situ.</p></sec><sec><st>Background</st><p>The case originated when a combination of midazolam hydrochloride, clonidine hydrochloride and fentanyl citrate with Numeta G16E was administered in a central venous catheter line. Following an alarm from the syringe pump, a precipitate in the catheter line was visually observed.</p></sec><sec><st>Method</st><p>The actual catheter line, with the precipitate still inside, was removed from the clinic and brought to the laboratory. Raman spectra of the precipitate, both when still inside the catheter line (in situ) and after removal, were recorded and analysed for similarity using our in-house database. Additionally, to validate the method, dry powders of midazolam, clonidine and fentanyl were mixed in the ratio of ~300:1:1. This tailor-made mixture was subjected to Raman analysis with the aim of validating the ability of the method to identify all components in a mixture, even if some of the components were present only in small amounts.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The precipitate was successfully identified as midazolam. Measuring in situ caused some additional peaks in the Raman spectra, attributed to the plastic of the catheter line. The influence of these additional peaks was eliminated by a two-component search or by demixing the spectra. The spectra of the precipitate indicated no traces of either clonidine or fentanyl. The experimental results were in line with the results from the theoretical calculations. The ability of Raman spectroscopy to identify both midazolam and small amounts of clonidine and fentanyl in a powder mixture was successfully demonstrated by scanning the tailor-made mixture.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>Raman spectroscopy in combination with a database was used for rapid and non-invasive bulk identification in situ. However, to confirm or refute small amounts of a second drug substance in the precipitate, a large area scan of the particle on a flat surface is recommended.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hagesaether, E., Karboe, I., Tho, I., Teimori, K., Nilsson, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-13T09:00:16-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004664</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004664</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 5: Patient Safety and Quality Assurance]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Using Raman spectroscopy to analyse in situ a precipitate appearing in a catheter line after drug co-administration]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004880v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Expanded expiry dates: a regulatory opportunity for Europe]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004880v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Caina Lopez, S., Davila Pousa, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-13T09:00:15-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004880</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004880</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Expanded expiry dates: a regulatory opportunity for Europe]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letter</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004874v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Correspondence on 'Appropriateness of antithrombotics in geriatric inpatients with atrial fibrillation: a retrospective cross-sectional study by Vanderstuyft et al]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004874v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kumar, A., Bhatnagar, A., Desai, N. N., Reneus Paul, J., Padhi, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-13T09:00:15-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004874</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004874</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Correspondence on 'Appropriateness of antithrombotics in geriatric inpatients with atrial fibrillation: a retrospective cross-sectional study by Vanderstuyft et al]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letter</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004586v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Pharmaceutical consultation on patients receiving oral antineoplastic agents: a systematic review]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004586v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The management of oncological treatment has evolved substantially with the increasing use of oral antineoplastic agents, which are self-administered by patients or caregivers at home, and require careful monitoring and support. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of pharmaceutical consultations on oncology patients undergoing therapy with oral antineoplastic agents. A systematic literature review was conducted using the PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science databases with the last search on 5 June 2025. Primary observational or experimental studies were sought for inclusion. Eligible studies assessed the outcomes of pharmaceutical consultations for oncology patients receiving oral antineoplastic therapy in a hospital setting, compared with a conventional medication dispensing model. The risk of bias in the included studies was evaluated using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tools, RoB-2 and ROBINS-I. The review was developed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 Statement, and the protocol for the systematic literature review was registered with PROSPERO under the reference CRD42024533367. From the 881 records initially identified, 16 studies were included. A backward reference search led to the inclusion of two additional publications, bringing the total to 18 studies in this systematic review. The main interventions performed by pharmacists during pharmaceutical consultations included patient education on their treatment, management of adverse reactions and drug interactions, and monitoring of adherence to therapy. The studies evaluated a total of 10 variables, demonstrating the benefits of pharmaceutical consultation in all of them. Significant benefits were observed in terms of progression-free survival and quality of life, both of which are crucial in cancer treatment. However, further research is required, particularly involving larger patient samples and studies spanning multiple institutions and countries. To facilitate a comprehensive and comparative evaluation of different pharmaceutical consultation models in oncology, it would be advantageous to standardise methods for assessing their impact.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fernandes, J. P., Advinha, A. M., Oliveira-Martins, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-09T09:00:15-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004586</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004586</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 4: Clinical Pharmacy Services]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Pharmaceutical consultation on patients receiving oral antineoplastic agents: a systematic review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Systematic review</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004706v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Stability of caffeine citrate intravenous dilutions in sodium chloride and glucose solutions]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004706v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objectives</st><p>Caffeine citrate, a methylxanthine derivative, is commonly used in the management of apnoea of prematurity. In clinical settings, particularly in neonatal intensive care units, various dilutions of caffeine citrate in intravenous fluids are required to ensure precise and individualised dosing for extremely low birth weight infants. This study aimed to assess the stability of caffeine citrate solutions at concentrations of 1 mg/mL and 12.5 mg/mL in 0.9% w/v sodium chloride and 5% w/v glucose, stored at room temperature and under refrigeration up to 48 hours.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Caffeine citrate concentrations were measured using a high-performance liquid chromatography method with ultraviolet detection (HPLC-UV). Solutions were stored at room temperature (22&deg;C) and at 8&deg;C for up to 48 hours. Two solvents for caffeine citrate were studied: normal saline (0.9% w/v sodium chloride), and 5% w/v glucose. The calibration curves of the HPLC-UV method were linear over the range of 0.1&ndash;12.5 mg/mL for both types of intravenous fluid. The stability criterion was defined according to International Council for Harmonisation (ICH) M10 (&plusmn;15% of nominal concentration), and compliance with the stricter United States Pharmacopeia (USP) criterion (&plusmn;10%) was also assessed.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>All samples remained within the ICH M10 acceptance limits. Most results also complied with the USP&plusmn;10% threshold; however, three values (12.5 mg/mL in 0.9% w/v sodium chloride at 24 hours refrigerated, and 1 mg/mL in 5% w/v glucose at 24 hours and 48 hours refrigerated) exceeded 110% (112.9%, 111.3%, and 111.4%, respectively).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Caffeine citrate diluted in 0.9% w/v sodium chloride or 5% w/v glucose is chemically stable at concentrations of 1 mg/mL and 12.5 mg/mL for up to 48 hours when stored at room temperature, meeting ICH and USP acceptance criteria in all cases. Caffeine citrate solutions did not meet the USP&plusmn;10% criterion if stored at 8&deg;C for 24 hours.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Szynkaruk, G., Puchalska, M., Kerner, J., Karazniewicz-&#x0141;ada, M., Sobiak, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-08T23:25:41-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004706</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004706</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 4: Clinical Pharmacy Services]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Stability of caffeine citrate intravenous dilutions in sodium chloride and glucose solutions]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004604v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A pharmacist-led intervention to promote the uptake of an infliximab biosimilar by patients and physicians in a university hospital rheumatology unit]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004604v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objectives</st><p>Biosimilars represent an opportunity to reduce healthcare costs. An infliximab biosimilar (b-IFX) was introduced in our hospital in 2017. Our pharmacist-led intervention aimed to improve the adoption rate of b-IFX by rheumatology physicians and outpatients.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>In 2020, pharmacists started educating rheumatologists via medical meetings and online surveys. When the substitution rate plateaued (63%), we initiated a prospective cohort study. A senior pharmacist interviewed patients and gave them oral and written information during their infusions with the originator infliximab (o-IFX). A semi-structured questionnaire assessed patients&rsquo; beliefs, knowledge and experiences to identify barriers to switching to biosimilars. Pharmacists&rsquo; recommendations were transmitted to physicians. Patients were categorised into &lsquo;Switch-failure&rsquo; (&ge;1 b-IFX infusion administered but restarted o-IFX), &lsquo;Switch-refusal&rsquo; (refused the switch) and &lsquo;Switch-omission&rsquo; (switch neither suggested nor made) groups. Pharmacist follow-up continued for 3 years after the interviews, with regular reminders sent to rheumatologists.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>From 1 October 2021 to 31 January 2022, 16 of 18 patients treated using o-IFX were interviewed and three, six and seven patients were categorised into the Switch-failure, Switch-refusal and Switch-omission groups, respectively. Nine patients agreed to switch during their interviews, including one patient in the Switch-failure group. Seven patients refused to switch because they were stable or had previously discontinued b-IFX due to a perceived loss of efficacy. The 3-year post-interview assessment showed that five patients had switched but one had switched back, resulting in annual savings of 44 000 and a final switch rate of 71%, a positive return on investment in pharmacist time. Four accepted switches were not performed due to coordination issues between other healthcare professionals or health-related cancellations. No o-IFX initiations occurred during the study and no rheumatologists refused substitution.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Sustained pharmacist involvement in providing targeted education to prescribers and patients was essential to identifying barriers to change and enhancing the adoption of biosimilars.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Duwez, M., Finckh, A., Bonnabry, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-07T09:00:22-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004604</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004604</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 2: Selection, Procurement and Distribution]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A pharmacist-led intervention to promote the uptake of an infliximab biosimilar by patients and physicians in a university hospital rheumatology unit]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004673v2?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Evaluation of the timing of switch from intravenous to oral antibiotic therapy in community-acquired pneumonia during hospital admission: cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004673v2?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Clinical guidelines recommend switching from intravenous to oral antibiotics in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) once patients are clinically stable because it is safe and cost-effective. However, studies have reported low switching rates in clinical practice. This study aimed to assess current switch practices in the real-world setting.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>The switch from intravenous to oral antibiotic therapy was evaluated in adults (&ge;18 years) admitted to hospital with CAP. The primary outcome was a switch within 72 hours (early switch). Secondary outcomes included duration of hospital stays, readmissions, changes in inflammatory markers and mortality within 30 days after discharge. Furthermore, information on healthcare providers&rsquo; decisions was gathered.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The cohort comprised 214 patients with CAP, of which 187 (87.4%) underwent a switch and 146 (68.2%) of these had an early switch. Early switching was frequent in younger patients (18&ndash;49 years) and those with low Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI I and II). Hospital stay was longer in the late and non-switch groups compared with the early switch group, and the total duration of antibiotic therapy was the highest in the late switch group. No reasons were documented for 76.5% (n=52) of the patients who did not undergo an early switch. Almost no early switches were advised during the weekends.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>A high overall switch rate of 87.4% was observed with a 68.2% early switch rate. Early switch was associated with shorter duration of hospital stay and antibiotic therapy. Reasons for not applying an early switch were underreported, and weekends served as significant barriers to an early switch.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Polus, M., Nagtegaal, J. E., Ramoz Diaz, R., Jong, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-04T09:00:20-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004673</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004673</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 1: Introductory Statements and Governance]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Evaluation of the timing of switch from intravenous to oral antibiotic therapy in community-acquired pneumonia during hospital admission: cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004668v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Physicochemical stability of the nefopam in elastomeric device at 0.2 and 3.33 mg/mL]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004668v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Nefopam is a non-opioid analgesic used for postoperative pain control. For intravenous home use, a portable elastomeric device is often preferred for administration. The nefopam in the device must be stable at 32&deg;C because this device is positioned close to the patient.</p></sec><sec><st>Objectives</st><p>This study aimed to evaluate the physicochemical stability of nefopam solutions at 0.2 and 3.33 mg/mL diluted in 0.9% NaCl in silicone portable elastomeric devices at 32&deg;C in the dark.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Three portable elastomeric devices were prepared for each condition. Chemical stability was assessed by pH measurement and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The method was validated according to the International Conference on Harmonisation Q2(R1). Stability was tested after preparation and after 6 and 24 hours of storage. At each time of analysis, the pH values were measured, and three samples from each device were analysed via HPLC. The solution is chemically stable if it retains more than 90% of its initial concentration, with the appearance of any degradation products monitored, and if the pH variation is less than one unit. Physical stability was evaluated by visual and subvisual inspection using a particle counter following the European Pharmacopoeia guidelines.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Nefopam solutions at both concentrations maintained more than 93% of their initial concentration after 6 and 24 hours at 32&deg;C, with no pH variation exceeding one unit, demonstrating chemical stability. For both concentrations, visual inspection was compliant at each analysis time, and subvisual inspection was consistent at 24 hours. Physical stability was therefore demonstrated for both concentrations after 24 hours.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>The physicochemical stability of nefopam solutions at 0.2 and 3.33 mg/mL was demonstrated for 24 hours at 32&deg;C in portable elastomeric infusion devices. This attribute allows continuous administration at home, particularly in cases of difficulty with oral administration, or minimises the side effects of discontinuous administration.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daval, A., DHuart, E., Blaise, F., Marquet, C., Sobalak, N., Vigneron, J., Le Quinio, P., Tambon, M., Demore, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-04T09:00:20-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004668</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004668</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 5: Patient Safety and Quality Assurance]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Physicochemical stability of the nefopam in elastomeric device at 0.2 and 3.33 mg/mL]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004536v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Environmentally responsible use of hospital infusion systems: a systematic review of the literature]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004536v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>The healthcare sector produces significant amounts of waste and harmful substances and consumes large amounts of energy; hence, it is also involved in the move towards sustainability. Plastics are everywhere in hospitals (especially in medical devices used for infusion) and contribute significantly to greenhouse gas emissions. The objective was to review the scientific literature on ways of making in-hospital infusion practices more environmentally friendly.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>The literature data were reviewed systematically and independently by two investigators and reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Any differences of opinion were resolved by a third investigator. Four online databases (PubMed, Embase, ScienceDirect and Web of Science) were searched for articles published in English or French between 1 January 2004 and 31 December 2024. Only publications that address sustainable development and infusion medical devices were included. The following data were extracted: country, hospital department(s), and the study&rsquo;s objectives, methods, main results and conclusions. The robustness of the selected studies was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>In all, 1938 publications were screened, and eight were included. Four publications concerned overconsumption and/or waste analysis, one compared single-use devices with reusable devices, and three were concerned with intravenous drug administration and wastage. The topics addressed in life cycle assessments were procurement, supply, storage, overconsumption of medical devices, the wastage of intravenous drugs and waste management.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>The results highlighted some areas for improvement at various points in the medical device life cycle&mdash;from manufacturing to recycling. Collaboration between hospital stakeholders is essential for the promotion of environmentally friendly infusion practices.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martin, E., Negrier, L., Lallemant, F., Odou, P., Masse, M., Decaudin, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-01T09:00:20-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004536</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004536</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 5: Patient Safety and Quality Assurance]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Environmentally responsible use of hospital infusion systems: a systematic review of the literature]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Systematic review</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004681v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Stability assessment of preservative-free losartan potassium eye drops compounded for ophthalmic use]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004681v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the physicochemical and microbiological stability of preservative-free losartan potassium (LP) eye drops (0.8 mg/mL) prepared using balanced salt solution (BSS), normal saline (NS) or glucose saline (GS) and stored in sterile polypropylene eye drop bottles under different temperature conditions for 30 days.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Three independent batches of each formulation (BSS, NS and GS) were aseptically prepared in a laminar flow cabinet and stored under three conditions: room temperature (25&plusmn;4&deg;C), refrigeration (4&plusmn;3&deg;C) and freezing (&ndash;20&plusmn;5&deg;C). Three samples from each batch were analysed for each condition and time point. LP concentrations were measured on days 0, 7, 15, 22 and 30 using high-performance liquid chromatography with photodiode-array detection (HPLC-DAD) and ultraviolet (UV) &ndash; visible spectrophotometry. Visual inspection was performed to identify macroscopic changes and physicochemical parameters &mdash; including pH, osmolality and refractive index &mdash; were evaluated. Microbiological quality was assessed on days 0, 10, 20 and 30.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>BSS and NS formulations maintained 90&ndash;110% of their initial LP concentration under all storage conditions. The GS formulation remained stable when refrigerated or frozen but showed a marked decline at 25&deg;C, with turbidity and concentrations falling below 50% by day 20. pH, osmolality and refractive index remained within acceptable physiological ranges for ophthalmic solutions. All samples tested negative for microbial growth.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>LP eye drops prepared with BSS or NS were stable in closed sterile eye drop bottles for at least 30 days under all tested conditions. Frozen and refrigerated conditions are preferred for storage. Because the formulation does not contain preservatives, its use is recommended for no longer than 7 days after opening. GS-based formulations are not recommended for ophthalmic use. The conducted stability study provides hospital pharmacies with data supporting the safe preparation, storage and use of non-commercial ophthalmic formulations.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Garcia-Aguilera, A. M., Aguilera del Real, A. M., Manzano-Sanchez, L., Garcia-Fuentes, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-11-20T09:00:20-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004681</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004681</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 3: Production and Compounding]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Stability assessment of preservative-free losartan potassium eye drops compounded for ophthalmic use]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-11-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004648v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Balancing overpayment from the home and hospital medication budgets in patients using their own medication during admission: the effect of different resupply strategies in the Netherlands]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004648v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Upon admission to the hospital, patients' home medications are often substituted with those from the hospital formulary. An alternative is Patients' Own Medication (POM), allowing patients to bring their own medications from home. If POM runs out or new medications are prescribed, the hospital supplies identical medications for use after discharge. This may cause an imbalance between the home and hospital medication budgets. Using POM in the hospital results in overpayment from the home medication budget. In contrast, using hospital-provided medication after discharge results in overpayment from the hospital medication budget. This imbalance could hinder the implementation of POM. However, hospitals can adjust the amount of medication supplied to offset overpayment from the home medication budget. Therefore, this study simulates the impact of two medication supply strategies on the balance between overpaid costs from the home and hospital medication budgets.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A total of 200 patients (&gt;18 years) were included across two hospitals. In supply strategy 1, both new and resupplied medications were provided for 14 days. In strategy 2, new medications were provided for 14 days, while resupplied medications were provided for 28 to 30 days. The primary outcome was the difference in overpaid costs between the two budgets, calculated per patient per admission.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>For strategy 1 (the provision of resupply medication for 14 days), the median cost difference per patient per admission was -3.48 (range -198.27 to 293.40), indicating a small overpayment by the hospital. When resupply medication was provided for 28 to 30 days, the median overpayment per patient per admission increased slightly to -4.12 (range -315.87 to 293.40).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>Implementing POM results in only a small difference in overpaid costs between home and hospital medication budgets, regardless of the supply strategy. Consequently, this does not hinder the implementation of POM in hospitals.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Verdijk, J. C., van den Bemt, B. J., Melis, E. J., van Onzenoort, H., van Seyen, M., Derijks, H. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-11-12T09:00:16-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004648</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004648</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 2: Selection, Procurement and Distribution]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Balancing overpayment from the home and hospital medication budgets in patients using their own medication during admission: the effect of different resupply strategies in the Netherlands]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-11-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004572v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[NHS Yellow Cover Document integrity performance assessment of two needle-free closed system transfer devices as terminal closure/access for Luer-Lock syringes and IV bags]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004572v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objectives</st><p>To assess the container closure integrity of needle-free Closed System Transfer Device (CSTD) components (ChemoClave and ChemoLock) combined with Luer-Lock (LL) syringes and IV bags as a terminal closure/access device. The UK NHS Yellow Cover Document (YCD) requires containment data for final storage devices of aseptic chemotherapy drugs when prepared in advance in pharmaceutical technical services (PTS). Assessment of both physical and microbial integrity of all combinations was performed: syringe adapter/LL syringes and vented bag adaptor/IV bags. All container combinations were subject to an additional vibrational challenge, with three-axis vibrational data logging representing a typical transportation excursion.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Container integrity testing was performed according to YCD requirements "Protocols for the Integrity Testing of Syringes" for ChemoClave and ChemoLock syringe adapters (CH2000S/CL2000S) and for ChemoClave and ChemoLock vented bag spikes (CH-14/CL-14) as terminal closure devices. Microbiological integrity was assessed according to Method 1, Part 1.4 using <I>Brevundimonas diminuta</I> at 32&deg;C for 14 days. Physical integrity was assessed using the following dye intrusion methods: YCD Method 3 and European Pharmacopoeia 3.2.9 "Rubber closures for containers". Readout for dye intrusion was reported visually and using a spectrophotometer. Positive (n=2) and negative (n=1) controls were assessed according to YCD for both arms of the test.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>ChemoClave and ChemoLock syringe adapters and vented bag spikes/IV bags were shown to be free of microbiological contamination (n=160) and free of dye intrusion (n=80 in total). The data support both ChemoClave and ChemoLock CSTD components as closure for aseptic preparations of pharmaceutical drug products in PTS. 100% closure integrity was demonstrated.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>ChemoClave and ChemoLock CSTD components showed 100% container integrity in accordance with YCD requirements as terminal closure for LL syringes and IV bags in PTS. ChemoClave and ChemoLock syringe adapters and vented bag spike components can be used for the preparation of chemotherapeutic drug products prepared in advance in UK PTS.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilkinson, A. S., Ozolina, L., Bon, R., Walker, K. E., Wallace, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-11-10T22:38:51-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004572</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004572</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 3: Production and Compounding]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[NHS Yellow Cover Document integrity performance assessment of two needle-free closed system transfer devices as terminal closure/access for Luer-Lock syringes and IV bags]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-11-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004590v2?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Impact of using different renal function estimation equations on vancomycin dosing]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004590v2?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objectives</st><p>To assess which of the formulae for estimating renal function (Cockcroft-Gault (CG), Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration CKD-EPI) and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD)) provides the most accurate prediction of minimum vancomycin concentration (Cmin) and to evaluate whether they can be interchanged to optimise vancomycin dosage.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>An observational and retrospective study was undertaken in hospitalised adult patients treated with intravenous vancomycin. Patients with serum creatinine (Scr) &gt;2 mg/dL and &lt;0.5 mg/dL, body mass index &gt;40 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, need for extracorporeal clearance techniques and unstable renal function were excluded. Bayesian analysis was used to obtain individual pharmacokinetic parameters. Vancomycin clearance (CLvan) was calculated by means of CG (eCLvan<SUB>CG</SUB>), CKD-EPI (eCLvan<SUB>CKD-EPI</SUB>) and MDRD (eCLvan<SUB>MDRD</SUB>) and used to obtain Cmin estimates (eCmin). eCmin and observed Cmin were compared using an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). A post-hoc analysis by subgroups (age, sex, weight, Scr and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)) was performed. From each eCLvan, the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated and categorised as AUC &lt;400 mg*hour/L, AUC 400&ndash;600 mg*hour/L and AUC &gt;600 mg*hour/L. The kappa coefficient was applied to study AUC concordance.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 228 patients (69.3% men) were included. eCmin<SUB>CG</SUB> had a statistically significant better agreement with Cmin (ICC &gt;0.7) and showed good agreement in almost all subgroups. Patients with Scr &gt;1.1 mg/dL were the only subgroup in which eCmin<SUB>MDRD</SUB> and eCmin<SUB>CKD-EPI</SUB> had an adequate ICC with no statistically significant differences compared with eCmin<SUB>CG</SUB>. eCmin<SUB>MDRD</SUB> had a similar ICC to eCmin<SUB>CG</SUB> in the eGFR &lt;60 mL/min and age 46&ndash;75 years subgroups. Kappa values showed regular agreement in all subgroups: 0.32 (AUC &lt;400 mg*hour/L), 0.24 (AUC 400&ndash;600 mg*hour/L) and 0.41 (AUC &gt;600 mg*hour/L).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>The CG formula provides the most accurate prediction of vancomycin Cmin. In patients with eGFR &lt;60 mL/min and aged 46&ndash;75 years, MDRD also shows a good predictive capacity. However, in low weight and elderly patients, Cmin predictions are superior with CG. Therefore, renal function estimation equations should not be considered interchangeable for vancomycin dose adjustments.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gratacos, L., Soy-Muner, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-11-09T09:00:17-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004590</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004590</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 4: Clinical Pharmacy Services]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Impact of using different renal function estimation equations on vancomycin dosing]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-11-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004812v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Challenges and opportunities for hospital pharmacists in the management of gene and cell therapies]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004812v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zavaleta-Monestel, E., Arguedas-Chacon, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-11-06T23:37:34-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004812</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004812</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Challenges and opportunities for hospital pharmacists in the management of gene and cell therapies]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-11-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Editorial</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004797v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Hypomagnesaemia with niraparib: the need for comprehensive adverse effect reporting in drug labelling]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004797v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Calvo, M., Tirapu, B., Gimeno, P., Sarobe, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-10-21T23:42:22-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004797</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004797</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Hypomagnesaemia with niraparib: the need for comprehensive adverse effect reporting in drug labelling]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-10-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letter</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004618v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Vedolizumab trough concentrations and clinical outcomes in patients with Crohns disease: a real-world observational study comparing intravenous and subcutaneous administration]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004618v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objectives</st><p>To explore the relationship between vedolizumab trough concentrations and clinical and biochemical remission in patients with Crohn&rsquo;s disease (CD) receiving maintenance therapy, analysing intravenous and subcutaneous administration separately in a real-world clinical setting.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>We conducted a retrospective observational study in 69 patients with CD receiving vedolizumab maintenance therapy. Plasma trough concentrations were measured by ELISA. Clinical remission (Harvey-Bradshaw Index &lt;5) and biochemical remission (faecal calprotectin (FCP) &lt;250 &micro;g/g) were evaluated 6 months after trough level measurement. Patients were stratified according to administration route (intravenous and subcutaneous). Statistical analyses included Mann-Whitney tests, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to determine predictive ability, and multiple linear regression to identify factors associated with vedolizumab exposure.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Median vedolizumab trough concentrations were higher in patients achieving clinical remission compared with those without remission in both intravenous (16.4 vs 10.95 &micro;g/mL, p=0.067) and subcutaneous (37.45 vs 23.05 &micro;g/mL, p=0.134) groups, although differences were not statistically significant. ROC analyses revealed modest predictive capacity for the intravenous group (area under the curve (AUC)=0.676, optimal threshold=11.3 &micro;g/mL, sensitivity=85.7%, specificity=58.3%) and strong predictive ability for the subcutaneous group (AUC=0.813, optimal threshold=25.35 &micro;g/mL, sensitivity=83.3%, specificity=75%). Biochemical remission was not significantly associated with trough concentrations. In multivariable regression analysis, subcutaneous administration, higher albumin and lower FCP were significantly associated with increased vedolizumab concentrations, whereas C-reactive protein (CRP) showed a positive association.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>Vedolizumab trough concentrations were numerically higher in patients achieving clinical remission, with stronger predictive ability for remission in the subcutaneous group. While isolated trough levels alone may not predict remission, interpretation alongside biomarkers and clinical context can inform therapeutic decisions. Further prospective studies are warranted to validate optimal therapeutic thresholds.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Monino-Dominguez, L., Aguado-Paredes, A., Cordero-Ramos, J., Merino-Bohorquez, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-10-21T23:42:22-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004618</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004618</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 4: Clinical Pharmacy Services]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Vedolizumab trough concentrations and clinical outcomes in patients with Crohns disease: a real-world observational study comparing intravenous and subcutaneous administration]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-10-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004806v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Drug-induced acute generalised exanthematous pustulosis: insights from FAERS data on a rare but severe cutaneous adverse reaction]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004806v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Castellana, E., Chiappetta, M. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-10-21T23:42:22-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004806</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004806</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Drug-induced acute generalised exanthematous pustulosis: insights from FAERS data on a rare but severe cutaneous adverse reaction]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-10-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letter</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004656v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Hypoglycaemic coma induced by a falsified semaglutide product: a case report]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004656v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Semaglutide (Ozempic, Rybelsus, Wegovy) is a GLP-1 receptor agonist used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes and, more recently, weight management. Due to its efficacy in weight loss, semaglutide has gained worldwide popularity, particularly the branded version Ozempic, resulting in off-label use by people seeking rapid weight loss. The resulting high demand has led to an increase in falsified products sold by unregulated online marketplaces. We present a case of a 31-year-old woman who was admitted to the emergency room in a hypoglycaemic coma after self-administrating semaglutide (Ozempic) obtained from a website. Toxicological analysis showed that the vial contained insulin instead of semaglutide, therefore leading to severe hypoglycaemia. This case highlights the growing concern regarding falsified medicines sold in the online drug market and the associated risk of severe adverse events. We reported the case to the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA) and local authorities. We propose regulatory measures to mitigate similar incidents in the future.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Antonacci, G., Bortignon, E., Bolognesi, M., Piano, S. S., Cadore, A., Camuffo, L., Venturini, F., Faoro, S., Favretto, D., Romano, A., Mengato, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-10-21T23:42:22-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004656</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004656</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Hypoglycaemic coma induced by a falsified semaglutide product: a case report]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-10-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Case report</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004784v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Transitions of care: integrating pharmacists to prevent harm worldwide]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004784v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zavaleta-Monestel, E., Guiu-Segura, J. M., Arguedas-Chacon, S., Suderlund, L.-A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-10-20T09:00:13-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004784</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004784</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Transitions of care: integrating pharmacists to prevent harm worldwide]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-10-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Editorial</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004712v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Incidence of hypokalaemia in tazobactam/piperacillin-treated patients and identification of risk factors: a retrospective observational study]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004712v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Tazobactam/piperacillin (TAZ/PIPC), widely used for treating various infections, is often discontinued due to hypokalaemia, although the preventive measures remain unclear. This study aimed to identify the incidence, clinical characteristics and associated risk factors for TAZ/PIPC-induced hypokalaemia.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Hospitalised patients receiving TAZ/PIPC therapy for &gt;2 days were included. The primary endpoint was the incidence of hypokalaemia (serum potassium level &le;3 mEq/L) and identification of associated risk factors. Survival classification and regression tree (CART) analyses were used to estimate HR (95% CI) and cut-off values for continuous variables.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Of the 224 patients treated with TAZ/PIPC during the study period, 168 were included. The median time (min&ndash;max) to the incidence of hypokalaemia was 3 (2&ndash;14) days. Hypokalaemia was observed in 30 patients. Survival CART analysis identified baseline serum potassium level (cut-off value of 3.7 mEq/L) and diarrhoea as risk factors.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Monitoring serum potassium levels is recommended after treatment initiation of TAZ/PIPC therapy for patients with baseline serum potassium levels &le;3.7 mEq/L and diarrhoea.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Uchida, K., Higashi, K., Nakagawa, Y., Oda, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-10-17T02:47:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004712</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004712</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 5: Patient Safety and Quality Assurance]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Incidence of hypokalaemia in tazobactam/piperacillin-treated patients and identification of risk factors: a retrospective observational study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-10-17</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004562v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Maintaining the stability of furosemide tablets during enteral feeding tube delivery using PVC and non-PVC tubes, in accordance with hospital protocols]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004562v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objectives</st><p>The administration of solid drugs via enteral feeding tubes is a common practice in hospitals. However, there is a paucity of literature about the stability of the drug and its interaction with medical devices. This study evaluated the sorption and content of furosemide tablets when administered through an enteral feeding tube, simulating a hospital clinical protocol.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>In the laboratory, a high-performance liquid chromatography method for evaluating furosemide in tablets was validated with the simulation of the hospital protocol involving dispersing furosemide tablets in 10 mL of bottled water using syringes. The content was evaluated before and after passage through enteral feeding tubes made of three different materials (polyvinyl chloride&mdash;PVC, polyurethane and silicone). The sorption of furosemide in the tubes was evaluated by infrared spectrophotometry.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The developed analytical method demonstrated selectivity, linearity within the 30&ndash;60 &micro;g/mL range, as well as precision and accuracy. The stability of the furosemide in the syringes was also assessed, and no significant decay in content or formation of degradation products was observed during the 180 min exposure before passing through the enteral feeding tube. The simulation demonstrated that the furosemide content remained stable after passing through PVC (100.90%), polyurethane (98.58%) and silicone (99.56%) tubes. Furthermore, no sorption of furosemide was detected in any of the materials.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>These results confirm the safety and stability of the hospital&rsquo;s protocol for administering furosemide via enteral feeding tube to the patient.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pessoa Farias, M. E., Lima Mesquita, V., Dantas, S. M. C., Silva, A. R. A., Ayala, A. P., de Oliveira, Y. S., Beserra, M. P. P., Fonteles, M. M. d. F., Oliveira, C. L. C. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-10-17T02:46:59-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004562</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004562</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 5: Patient Safety and Quality Assurance]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Maintaining the stability of furosemide tablets during enteral feeding tube delivery using PVC and non-PVC tubes, in accordance with hospital protocols]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-10-17</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004525v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Pharmaceutical validation of peripherally inserted central catheters: four years of implementation]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004525v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objectives</st><p>Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are used in clinical settings for mid- to long-term intravenous therapies, including chemotherapy and antibiotics. However, their use involves risks such as infections, thrombosis or occlusions. Pharmacist-led analysis and validation of PICC requests aims to optimise their use and reduce complications. This study evaluates the sustainability of pharmacist-led PICC analysis and validation in a university hospital and investigates the organisation of PICC management in French healthcare institutions.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A single-centre retrospective observational study was conducted, analysing PICC requests from April 2018 to October 2021. Pharmaceutical interventions (PIs) were categorised based on their targets: applicants, installers or users. A national survey was also conducted to assess PICC practices across French hospitals.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Of the 5503 requests over a 42-month period, 59.9% (3297) required at least one PI, totalling 4406 PIs. Most were directed at installers (69.2%), followed by applicants (18.4%) and users (12.4%). Pharmacists refused 4.1% (223) of requests, mainly due to alternative functional access or contraindications. Despite pharmacist validation, 14.0% (771) of PICC placements were later cancelled by the medical team (ie, transfer of the patient). The national survey revealed limited adoption of pharmaceutical validation, with only two centres (5%) implementing it out of 37 respondents, even though 40 centres (98%) had over 2 years of experience with PICCs.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Pharmacist-led PICCs validation improves patient safety and optimises device use, demonstrating its value and sustainability in clinical practice. The percentage of refusals has remained stable since our pilot study in 2018 in the same centre, probably due to fast staff turnover. Wider implementation of this practice requires addressing resource limitations, raising awareness about the pharmacist&rsquo;s role in managing medical devices, and frequent training.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tournayre, V., Frandon, J., Pitard, M., Chasseigne, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-10-08T09:00:14-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004525</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004525</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 4: Clinical Pharmacy Services]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Pharmaceutical validation of peripherally inserted central catheters: four years of implementation]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-10-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004717v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The future of pharmacy is already here: can we afford not to invest? Reflections from the seventh EAHP Synergy Certification Course 2025 in Bratislava]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004717v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Slimakova, L., Porubcova, S., Miljkovic, N., Polidori, C., Stricova, A., Komjathy, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-10-07T09:00:14-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004717</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004717</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The future of pharmacy is already here: can we afford not to invest? Reflections from the seventh EAHP Synergy Certification Course 2025 in Bratislava]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-10-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Editorial</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004713v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Gender bias in biomedical research]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004713v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Belancic, A., Potocnjak, I., Naudet, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-10-07T09:00:14-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004713</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004713</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Gender bias in biomedical research]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-10-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letter</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004623v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A bibliometric analysis of the application trends of information technology in antimicrobial stewardship within hospitals]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004623v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objectives</st><p>This study uses bibliometric analysis to systematically map research trends, knowledge structure and evolution of information technology (IT) in hospital antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) over the last 20 years.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A Web of Science Core Collection search (2000&ndash;2025) yielded 258 English-language publications on IT applications in hospital AMS. A bibliometric analysis, utilising CiteSpace and Bibliometrix, quantitatively evaluated domain evolution through temporal analysis, network mapping, keyword clustering, burst detection and examination of highly cited publications.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The bibliometric analysis reveals a fluctuating yet overall increasing trend in annual publications, peaking at 49 articles in 2024. The US (131 publications) and European nations demonstrate significant research output (centrality &gt;0.2), with major collaborative networks coalescing around institutions including Harvard University and Imperial College London. Keyword analysis identifies &lsquo;AMS&rsquo; as a core theme, closely associated with technological keywords such as &lsquo;machine learning (ML)&rsquo;, &lsquo;clinical decision support systems (CDSS)&rsquo;, &lsquo;electronic health records (EHR)&rsquo; and &lsquo;artificial intelligence (AI)&rsquo;. Emerging trends suggest a shift in research focus from foundational strategies to data-driven prediction of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and precision interventions. Highly cited literature emphasises the integration of EHR and ML technologies for optimising prescriptions and predicting resistance patterns.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>IT-driven AMS research has shifted from empirical management to data science. Despite EHR integration, and ML and CDSS support, challenges remain in data standardisation, technical deployment and ethics. Future work must emphasise global collaboration, standardisation, design refinement and ethical guidelines, and provide clear algorithm explanations to enhance AMR mitigation.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ding, Y., Lei, M., Yuan, G., Yu, J., Wu, L., Yang, J., Zhang, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-10-07T09:00:14-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004623</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004623</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A bibliometric analysis of the application trends of information technology in antimicrobial stewardship within hospitals]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-10-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004764v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Assessment of antibiotic self-medication practice among public in the northwestern region of Pakistan]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004764v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rohar, A. R., Mashkoor, M. R., Shabbir, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-10-02T09:00:17-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004764</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004764</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Assessment of antibiotic self-medication practice among public in the northwestern region of Pakistan]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-10-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letter</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004606v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Linezolid-induced eyelid angioedema: a case report]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004606v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Linezolid is an antibiotic of the oxazolidinone class which is highly effective in the treatment of serious Gram-positive infections. It is usually well tolerated, but rare adverse reactions like angioedema have been reported. This case report investigates the occurrence of eyelid angioedema induced by linezolid. The patient, a man in his early 70s with sepsis and cellulitis caused by <I>Streptococcus pyogenes,</I> developed bilateral eyelid angioedema after receiving a second dose of linezolid. The drug was discontinued and supportive treatment with methylprednisolone and azelastine eye drops resolved the symptoms within 72 hours. The temporal link between drug administration and eyelid oedema supports linezolid as the likely trigger, confirmed by the Karch&ndash;Lasagna and Naranjo algorithms.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ortiz-Fernandez, P., Almanchel-Rivadeneyra, M., Urbieta-Sanz, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-09-29T09:45:28-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004606</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004606</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Linezolid-induced eyelid angioedema: a case report]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-09-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Case report</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004758v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Unit-dose medications: an unresolved need in hospital pharmacy]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004758v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Caina Lopez, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-09-25T09:00:18-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004758</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004758</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Unit-dose medications: an unresolved need in hospital pharmacy]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-09-25</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letter</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004760v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Antibiotic labels frozen in time: a barrier to effective antimicrobial stewardship?]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004760v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mengato, D., Taci, X., Giunco, E. M., Gardin, S., Cavinato, S., Faoro, S., Gallo, U., Cattelan, A., Venturini, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-09-25T09:00:18-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004760</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004760</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Antibiotic labels frozen in time: a barrier to effective antimicrobial stewardship?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-09-25</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letter</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004755v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Artificial intelligence and innovation in hospital pharmacy: embracing opportunities]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004755v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zavaleta-Monestel, E., Martinez Sesmero, J. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-09-25T09:00:18-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004755</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004755</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Artificial intelligence and innovation in hospital pharmacy: embracing opportunities]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-09-25</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letter</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004582v2?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Critical role of persistence and adherence in multiple sclerosis treatment: the value of cladribine]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004582v2?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Borras Blasco, J., Merino-Bohorquez, V., Ramirez Herraiz, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-09-22T09:00:21-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004582</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004582</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Critical role of persistence and adherence in multiple sclerosis treatment: the value of cladribine]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-09-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letter</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004528v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Medication needs of children and young people for successful transition to adult services (the SUCCESS study): an exploratory cross-sectional observational study]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004528v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>To explore the medication-related knowledge, behaviours and support needs of children and young people (YP) aged 11&ndash;16 years with long-term conditions as they prepare to transition from paediatric to adult healthcare services.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>This exploratory cross-sectional study was co-designed with YP living with chronic conditions, conducted at a district general hospital in Northwest London between April and September 2023. Participants were those aged 11&ndash;16 years admitted to the paediatric ward with long-term conditions requiring regular medication. YP self-completed a questionnaire on medication-related aspects of transition, including knowledge of medication names, dosages, reordering, side effects, adherence and their ability to manage medications independently.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Of 41 eligible YP, 30 completed the questionnaire (73% response rate). Most knew the names and dosages of their medications (24/30) and why they were prescribed (25/30). However, only half (15) knew how their medicines worked, and fewer (10) were aware of potential side effects. Just 12 participants knew how to reorder their medication. Fifteen reported missing doses, mostly due to forgetfulness. Most relied on parents or carers to manage medicines (23), with only four managing independently. YP reported healthcare professionals (17) and family (19) as their main sources of medication information.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>This study suggests that while YP often have good foundational medication knowledge, many lack the deeper understanding and practical skills required for independent self-management. Knowledge of side effects, reordering processes and shared decision-making was limited, areas which could undermine transition readiness if unaddressed. Pharmacists, working as part of the multidisciplinary team, are well placed to support YP through targeted, age-appropriate education and regular review.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Trivedi, A., Mohamad, S., Thoppil, M., Patel, R., Sethi, S., Patel, N., Goddings, A.-L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-09-22T09:00:21-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004528</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004528</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 1: Introductory Statements and Governance]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Medication needs of children and young people for successful transition to adult services (the SUCCESS study): an exploratory cross-sectional observational study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-09-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004493v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Ifosfamide-induced encephalopathy and concomitant use of netupitant/palonosetron in a patient with soft tissue sarcoma: a case report]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004493v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>A woman in her 30s diagnosed with high-grade soft tissue sarcoma with pulmonary metastases began treatment with ifosfamide-epirubicin, netupitant/palonosetron and dexamethasone. Shortly after, she developed dizziness and dysarthria, raising suspicion of ifosfamide-induced encephalopathy. Ifosfamide was immediately discontinued before the first dose was completed, and treatment with methylene blue was initiated the following day as the clinical condition continued to worsen. Due to her clinical condition, she was transferred to the intensive care unit, where she was started on thiamine and dexmedetomidine combined with methylene blue. Three days later, her neurological status improved, allowing methylene blue and thiamine to be discontinued. Several publications have reported cases of ifosfamide-related encephalopathy in patients receiving concomitant aprepitant, a CYP3A4 substrate and inhibitor that may increase the levels of ifosfamide&rsquo;s toxic metabolites. However, no cases of ifosfamide-induced encephalopathy have been reported with the use of netupitant/palonosetron for antiemetic prophylaxis. In light of our patient&rsquo;s condition, it is possible that the concomitant use of ifosfamide and netupitant/palonosetron contributed to an earlier onset and increased severity of ifosfamide-related neurotoxicity.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pinilla Rello, A., Huarte Lacunza, R., Tejada Artigas, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-09-17T09:00:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004493</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004493</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Ifosfamide-induced encephalopathy and concomitant use of netupitant/palonosetron in a patient with soft tissue sarcoma: a case report]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-09-17</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Case report</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004630v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Pharmacist-led stewardship standardised broad-spectrum antibiotic use in a geriatric-heavy neurology ward]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004630v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the impact of clinical pharmacist-led antibiotic stewardship on enhancing the rational use of antibiotics in a geriatric-heavy neurology ward.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A retrospective analysis was conducted on all antibiotic-treated hospitalised cases during the study period, with a total of 123 patients. The study employed a consecutive enrolment design. Of these, 62 cases were managed under a pharmacist-led antibiotic stewardship programme as the intervention group, while the remaining 61 cases served as controls. Primary outcomes included hospitalisation stays, hospitalisation costs, antibiotic consumption, the duration of antibiotic use and the efficacy of antibiotic therapy.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The intervention group exhibited a lower number of defined daily doses (DDDs) per patient between their stay compared with the control group (13.18&plusmn;1.25 DDDs vs 20.03&plusmn;2.15 DDDs, p=0.007). Moreover, the duration of single antibiotic treatment was notably reduced in the intervention group (10.40&plusmn;0.75 days vs 13.16&plusmn;1.16 days, p=0.047), as was the duration of the single longest empirical therapy with broad-spectrum antibiotics (6.77&plusmn;0.55 days vs 10.29&plusmn;1.15 days, p=0.007).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Pharmacist-led antibiotic stewardship effectively optimised antibiotic use in geriatric neurology patients, reducing unnecessary broad-spectrum antibiotic exposure and improving treatment efficiency.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chen, Q., Zhang, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-09-17T09:00:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004630</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004630</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 1: Introductory Statements and Governance]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Pharmacist-led stewardship standardised broad-spectrum antibiotic use in a geriatric-heavy neurology ward]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-09-17</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004600v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Moxifloxacin-induced insomnia with psychotic episodes in a toddler: a case report]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004600v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Moxifloxacin is a fourth-generation fluoroquinolone with a broad spectrum of antibacterial activity. It is commonly used for both local and systemic applications. Data on the safety profile of fluoroquinolones indicate the potential for serious adverse reactions including neurological and psychiatric disturbances. The current case describes the off-label use of moxifloxacin eye drops for nasal administration in a toddler which led to insomnia and symptoms of severe psychosis. Notably, these adverse events resolved completely shortly after discontinuation of treatment. This case highlights a rare and potentially debilitating adverse reaction and underscores the critical importance of clinical judgement when prescribing off-label medicines in the paediatric population.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Getova-Kolarova, V., Hababa-Ivanova, I., Georgieva, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-09-17T09:00:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004600</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004600</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Moxifloxacin-induced insomnia with psychotic episodes in a toddler: a case report]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-09-17</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Case report</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004583v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effectiveness and safety of off-label dupilumab use for the treatment of pemphigoid gestationis: a new case report]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004583v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Pemphigoid gestationis (PG) is a very rare autoimmune disorder that typically occurs during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy. It is characterised by intense pruritus, erythematous plaques and vesicles, primarily affecting the abdomen and extremities. The exact cause remains unclear, but type 2 inflammation and antibodies against the collagen protein BP180 are implicated. Diagnosis is confirmed through clinical findings and specific tests. Traditional treatments include topical and systemic corticosteroids, but they can have significant side effects.</p><p>This case report discusses a 38-year-old woman with PG in her second pregnancy, who experienced the disorder in her first pregnancy with severe symptoms and was treated with corticosteroids and intravenous immunoglobulins but developed serious side effects. In her current pregnancy, dupilumab was introduced at week 30 (off-label use), leading to significant symptom improvement within a week.</p><p>This case supports the potential of dupilumab as a first-line treatment for severe PG, demonstrating safety and efficacy for both mother and baby.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Calvo Arbeloa, M., Arrondo Velasco, A., Jimenez, P. R., Sarobe Carricas, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-09-17T09:00:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004583</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004583</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effectiveness and safety of off-label dupilumab use for the treatment of pemphigoid gestationis: a new case report]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-09-17</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Case report</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004698v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Hospital pharmacists in cardio-oncology: bridging a critical gap in multidisciplinary cancer care]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004698v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zavaleta-Monestel, E., Arguedas-Chacon, S., Cruz-Mora, K., Mora-Jimenez, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-09-04T09:00:15-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004698</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004698</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Hospital pharmacists in cardio-oncology: bridging a critical gap in multidisciplinary cancer care]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-09-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letter</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004709v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Why are we still overlooking adherence in clinical trials? A call to extend medication adherence-enhancing interventions and monitoring beyond real-world practice]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004709v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Belancic, A., Fajkic, A., Potocnjak, I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-08-31T23:33:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004709</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004709</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Why are we still overlooking adherence in clinical trials? A call to extend medication adherence-enhancing interventions and monitoring beyond real-world practice]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-08-31</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letter</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004697v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prescribe less, ask more: the patient-centred pharmacology we need]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004697v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Belancic, A., Fajkic, A., Vitezic, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-08-19T17:32:01-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004697</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004697</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prescribe less, ask more: the patient-centred pharmacology we need]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-08-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letter</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004663v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Safeguarding drug safety: addressing duplicates in pharmacovigilance reporting]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004663v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Castellana, E., Chiappetta, M. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-08-18T09:00:16-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004663</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004663</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Safeguarding drug safety: addressing duplicates in pharmacovigilance reporting]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-08-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letter</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2024-004425v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Optimisation of voriconazole treatment in paediatric patients with Aspergillus flavus fungal endocarditis: a pharmacokinetics case report]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2024-004425v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The case study presented involves a paediatric patient treated with voriconazole for fungal endocarditis caused by <I>Aspergillus flavus</I>. Therapeutic plasma concentrations of voriconazole could not be achieved with the established dosing regimen and administration frequency. In response to this situation, and after successive dose increases and a pharmacogenetic analysis that confirmed the patient was not a CYP2C19 or CYP2C9 rapid or ultra-rapid metaboliser, a new administration frequency of every 8 hours was proposed, with limited evidence, but which allowed achieving target concentrations and patient improvement. This study highlights the importance of voriconazole monitoring, especially in paediatric patients, given the wide variety of factors that can alter its plasma concentrations. The study also calls for future studies to evaluate the utility of an 8 hourly dosing regimen, providing the possibility of avoiding switching voriconazole to another antifungal with less evidence in the paediatric population, a relevant issue in terms of resistance.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rodenas-Rovira, M., Gil-Candel, M., Burgos-Berjillos, I., Montoya-Tamayo, C., Garcia-Pellicer, J., Poveda-Andres, J. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-08-11T09:00:15-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004425</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2024-004425</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Optimisation of voriconazole treatment in paediatric patients with Aspergillus flavus fungal endocarditis: a pharmacokinetics case report]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-08-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Case report</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004526v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Risk factors for unintentional medication discrepancies identified through pharmacy staff-led medication reconciliation to prioritise patients in the emergency department: a rapid review]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004526v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objectives</st><p>This study aimed to identify the risk factors associated with unintentional medication discrepancies identified through pharmacy staff-led medication reconciliation in emergency departments across multiple countries. The long-term goal is to support the development of a model to systematically prioritise patients at high risk in these settings.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>This rapid review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A literature search of the PubMed database was performed on 8 October 2024. Studies were selected based on predefined eligibility criteria defined by the PICO framework- Population: adult emergency patients (aged &ge;18 years) admitted to the emergency department; Intervention: medication reconciliation conducted by pharmacy staff; Comparator: standard medication reconciliation or standard care; Outcome: risk factors for unintentional medication discrepancies identified through pharmacy staff-led medication reconciliation in the emergency department. All included studies were qualitatively assessed.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The literature search yielded 433 citations, of which 15 studies met the eligibility criteria. The included studies primarily investigated patient, medication and setting-related risk factors, encompassing a total of 15 264 patients who received pharmacy staff-led medication reconciliation in emergency departments across seven countries. A consistent pattern of risk factors emerged, including advanced age and polypharmacy. Only one study found that admissions during night-time or weekend hours were significantly associated with medication discrepancies. Differences in health IT systems and reconciliation practices were also noted across countries.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Advanced age and polypharmacy were consistently associated with unintentional medication discrepancies. Future research should address variations in health IT systems and focus on developing robust prioritisation models to optimise medication reconciliation processes and improve patient safety. Increasing pharmacy staff capacity may further support this goal.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dinc, B., Olesen, C., Coric, F., Carlsen, H. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-07-22T09:00:12-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004526</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004526</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 4: Clinical Pharmacy Services]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Risk factors for unintentional medication discrepancies identified through pharmacy staff-led medication reconciliation to prioritise patients in the emergency department: a rapid review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-07-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Systematic review</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004635v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Integrating artificial intelligence into the hospital supply chain to ensure the availability of medications]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004635v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zavaleta-Monestel, E., Arguedas-Chacon, S., Martinez-Vargas, E., Mora-Jimenez, J., Cruz-Mora, K., Villalobos-Madriz, J. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-07-16T09:00:15-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004635</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004635</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Integrating artificial intelligence into the hospital supply chain to ensure the availability of medications]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-07-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letter</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004607v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Drug shortages: A critical challenge in the era of automated intravenous compounding]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004607v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Calvo, M., Tirapu, B., Larrayoz, B., Sarobe, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-07-11T09:00:14-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004607</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004607</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Drug shortages: A critical challenge in the era of automated intravenous compounding]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-07-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letter</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004580v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Drug intoxication: a silent obstacle to organ donation]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004580v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Misa Garcia, A., Ferro Rodriguez, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-07-10T09:00:12-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004580</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004580</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Drug intoxication: a silent obstacle to organ donation]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-07-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letter</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004597v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Women and adverse drug reactions: 56 years of analysis of real-world data collected in the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004597v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Castellana, E., Chiappetta, M. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-10T09:00:14-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004597</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004597</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Women and adverse drug reactions: 56 years of analysis of real-world data collected in the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letter</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004587v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Pharmacological resilience in the context of geopolitical tensions: a European perspective]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004587v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tejedor-Tejada, E., Cores-Rodriguez, I., Cortes Sanchez, C. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-05-05T09:00:14-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004587</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004587</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Pharmacological resilience in the context of geopolitical tensions: a European perspective]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letter</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004475v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Severe coagulation dysfunction and active bleeding induced by cefoperazone/sulbactam in a patient with severe renal insufficiency: a case report]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004475v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Cefoperazone/sulbactam is a third-generation cephalosporin commonly used for severe infections. This case report presents a case of a 68-year-old woman who developed severe coagulation dysfunction and significant active bleeding after starting cefoperazone/sulbactam therapy following aortic dissection surgery. After discontinuing cefoperazone/sulbactam and administering vitamin K1, the patient&rsquo;s coagulation function returned to normal, with no further abnormalities after changing antibiotics. On assessing causality of the adverse drug reaction, the Naranjo scale for cefoperazone/sulbactam was 6. This case highlights the risks of cefoperazone/sulbactam in patients with underlying conditions such as renal insufficiency and malnutrition, emphasising the need for carefully monitoring coagulation parameters and dose adjustment to reduce the occurrence of drug-induced coagulopathy and healthcare-associated complications. Additionally, this case serves as a reminder of the vital contributions that clinical pharmacists make in monitoring and managing medication therapy, stressing the importance of fostering collaboration between clinical pharmacists and other healthcare workers.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chen, J., Li, X., Xiong, X.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-04-18T09:00:11-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004475</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004475</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Severe coagulation dysfunction and active bleeding induced by cefoperazone/sulbactam in a patient with severe renal insufficiency: a case report]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-04-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Case report</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004564v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Update on the hospital pharmacist profile: from clinical practice to management]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004564v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tejedor-Tejada, E., Ortiz Del Olmo, D., Cores-Rodriguez, I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-04-17T09:00:11-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004564</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004564</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Update on the hospital pharmacist profile: from clinical practice to management]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-04-17</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letter</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004534v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Beyond the 5S methodology applied to healthcare management]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004534v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tejedor-Tejada, E., Cores-Rodriguez, I., Ortiz Del Olmo, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-03-31T09:00:14-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004534</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004534</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Beyond the 5S methodology applied to healthcare management]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-03-31</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letter</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2024-004444v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Unit dose drug dispensing systems in hospitals: a systematic review of medication error reduction and cost-effectiveness]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2024-004444v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Medical errors pose significant risks to patient safety and public health. Automated unit dose drug dispensing systems (UDDSs) have emerged as valuable tools to reduce medication errors while optimising economic and logistical resources.</p></sec><sec><st>Objectives</st><p>This systematic review aims to evaluate studies specifically focused on the impact of automated UDDSs in reducing medication errors and streamlining processes.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A literature search was performed on PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, focusing on peer-reviewed articles published between 2019 and 2024. The search, concluded on 24 September 2024, included studies conducted in inpatient hospital settings that assessed automated UDDS effects on medication errors, therapy management and inventory control. Outcomes examined included effects on patient safety, cost-effectiveness and inventory management. Results were synthesised qualitatively.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>From 3346 references, four studies met the inclusion criteria: a cost-effectiveness analysis, an uncontrolled before-and-after study, and two observational studies. UDDS improved medication processes, reducing drug-related problems, medication handling and dispensing time by 50% per patient per day. Integrated with barcode scanning, UDDS lowered medication administration errors (MAEs) from 19.5% to 15.8% and harmful MAEs from 3.0% to 0.3%. Overall, medication errors dropped by 45&ndash;70%, enhancing safety and reducing manual handling risks. UDDS demonstrated cost-effectiveness by significantly reducing MAEs. The study estimated a reduction in MAEs, with a cost-effectiveness ratio of 17.69 per avoided MAE. For potentially harmful MAEs, the cost-effectiveness ratio was estimated at 30.23 per avoided error. These findings suggest substantial long-term savings potential, though the exact magnitude may vary depending on hospital size and implementation specifics</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Automated UDDSs improve patient safety by significantly reducing medication errors and delivering cost savings through better inventory management. Challenges such as high initial costs and workflow adjustments can be mitigated through gradual implementation and staff training. Further integration with other healthcare technologies, such as barcoding, real-time tracking, artificial intelligence (AI)-driven error prevention tools and fully automated restocking systems could enhance UDDS benefits and further support hospital processes.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gallina, M., Testagrossa, M., Provenzani, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-02-26T20:06:41-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004444</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2024-004444</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 5: Patient Safety and Quality Assurance]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Unit dose drug dispensing systems in hospitals: a systematic review of medication error reduction and cost-effectiveness]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-02-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Systematic review</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2024-004462v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Therapeutic drug monitoring of linezolid in a case of pulmonary nocardiosis: a case report]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2024-004462v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This clinical case discusses a man between 60 and 70 years old with lung adenocarcinoma who developed a <I>Nocardia cyriacigeorgica</I> infection. Because it is an intracellular bacterium, we need to start antibiotic treatment and maintain for a year. For initial therapy, sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (SMX/TMP) is the preferred antibiotic, but it can cause side effects, such as liver damage. Linezolid is another valid alternative.</p><p>Pharmacokinetic monitoring of linezolid was essential in managing the patient because the drug can cause significant side effects like myelosuppression. The pharmacist tracked serum levels over 7 months, allowing for dose adjustments that minimised toxicity and ensured effective treatment. Elevated linezolid levels were linked to thrombocytopenia, prompting timely dosage modifications that improved the patient&rsquo;s haemoglobin and platelet counts.</p><p>This case highlights the critical role of pharmacokinetic monitoring in optimising linezolid therapy. The pharmacist&rsquo;s involvement enhanced treatment efficacy, but also safeguarded the patient from serious adverse effects, demonstrating the importance of collaborative healthcare.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Calvo, M., Beunza Sola, M., Tirapu, B., Sarobe Carricas, M., Moreno, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-02-20T09:02:51-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004462</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2024-004462</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Therapeutic drug monitoring of linezolid in a case of pulmonary nocardiosis: a case report]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-02-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Case report</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004490v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Advancing global hospital pharmacy: the enduring impact and call to action of the FIP Basel Statements]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/ejhpharm-2025-004490v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Manasse, H., Zavaleta, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-02-11T09:00:10-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004490</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004490</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Advancing global hospital pharmacy: the enduring impact and call to action of the FIP Basel Statements]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-02-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letter</prism:section>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>