<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com">
<title>European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy Last 6 Issues</title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com</link>
<description>European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy RSS feed -- articles published in the last few days</description>
<prism:eIssn>2047-9964</prism:eIssn>
<prism:publicationName>European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>2047-9956</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/3/197?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/3/199?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/3/206?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/3/213?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/3/219?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/3/224?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/3/232?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/3/239?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/3/244?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/3/249?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/3/254?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/3/260?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/3/266?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/3/272?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/3/278?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/3/284?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/3/287?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/3/290?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/3/293?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/3/293-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A1-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A1-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A2-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A2-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A3-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A3-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A3-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A4-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A4-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A5-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A5-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A6?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A7-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A7-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A8-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A8-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A9-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A9-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A10-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A10-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A11-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A11-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A12-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A12-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A12-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A13-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A13-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A14-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A14-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A15-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A15-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A16-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A16-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A17-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A17-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A18-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A18-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A19-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A19-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A20-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A20-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A21-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A21-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A22-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A22-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A22-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A23-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A23-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A24-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A24-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A25-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A25-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A26-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A26-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A27-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A27-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A28-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A28-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A28-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A29-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A29-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A30-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A30-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A31-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A31-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A32-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A32-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A33-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A33-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A34-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A34-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A35-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A35-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A36-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A36-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A36-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A37-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A37-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A38-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A38-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A39-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A39-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A40-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A40-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A41-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A41-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A41-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A42-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A42-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A43-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A43-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A44-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A44-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A45-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A45-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A46-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A46-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A47-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A47-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A48-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A48-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A49-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A49-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A50-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A50-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A51-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A51-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A52-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A52-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A53-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A53-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A53-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A54-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A54-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A55-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A55-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A56-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A56-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A57-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A57-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A58?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A59-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A59-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A60-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A60-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A61-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A61-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A61-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A62-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A62-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A63?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A64-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A64-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A65-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A65-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A66-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A66-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A67-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A67-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A68-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A68-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A69-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A69-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A70-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A70-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A71?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A72-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A72-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A73-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A73-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A74-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A74-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A75-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A75-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A76-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A76-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A77-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A77-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A78-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A78-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A79-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A79-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A80-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A80-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A81-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A81-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A82-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A82-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A83-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A83-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A83-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A84-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A84-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A85-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A85-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A86-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A86-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A87-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A87-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A88-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A88-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A89-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A89-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A90-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A90-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A91-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A91-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A92-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A92-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A93-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A93-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A94-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A94-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A95-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A95-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A96-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A96-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A97-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A97-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A98-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A98-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A99-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A99-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A100-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A100-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A101-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A101-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A102-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A102-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A103-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A103-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A104-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A104-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A105-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A105-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A106?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A107-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A107-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A108-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A108-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A108-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A109-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A109-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A110-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A110-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A111-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A111-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A112-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A112-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A113-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A113-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A114-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A114-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A115-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A115-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A116-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A116-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A117-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A117-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A118?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A119-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A119-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A120-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A120-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A121-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A121-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A122-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A122-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A122-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A123?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A124-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A124-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A125-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A125-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A126-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A126-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A127-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A127-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A128-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A128-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A129-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A129-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A130-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A130-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A131-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A131-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A132-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A132-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A133-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A133-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A133-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A134-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A134-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A135-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A135-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A136-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A136-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A137-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A137-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A138-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A138-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A139-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A139-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A140-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A140-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A141-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A141-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A141-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A142-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A142-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A143-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A143-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A144-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A144-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A145-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A145-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A146-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A146-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A147-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A147-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A148-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A148-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A149-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A149-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A150-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A150-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A151-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A151-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A152-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A152-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A153-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A153-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A154-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A154-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A155-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A155-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A156-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A156-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A157-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A157-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A158-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A158-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A159-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A159-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A159-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A160-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A160-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A161-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A161-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A162-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A162-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A163-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A163-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A164?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A165-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A165-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A166-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A166-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A167-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A167-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A168-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A168-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A169-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A169-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A170-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A170-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A171-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A171-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A172-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A172-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A173-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A173-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A174-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A174-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A175-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A175-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A176-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A176-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A177-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A177-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A178-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A178-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A179-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A179-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A180-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A180-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A181-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A181-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A182-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A182-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A183-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A183-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A184-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A184-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A185-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A185-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A186-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A186-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A186-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A187-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A187-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A188-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A188-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A189-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A189-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A190-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A190-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A191-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A191-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A192-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A192-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A193-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A193-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A194?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A195?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A196-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A196-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A197-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A197-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A198-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A198-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A199-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A199-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A200-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A200-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A201-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A201-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A202-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A202-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A203-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A203-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A204-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A204-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A205-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A205-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A206-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A206-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A207-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A207-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A208-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A208-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A209-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A209-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A210-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A210-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A211-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A211-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A212-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A212-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A213-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A213-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A214-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A214-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A215-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A215-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A216-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A216-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A217-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A217-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A218-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A218-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A218-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A219-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A219-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A220-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A220-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A221-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A221-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A222-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A222-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A223-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A223-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A224-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A224-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A225-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A225-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A225-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A226-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A226-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A227-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A227-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A228-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A228-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A229-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A229-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A230-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A230-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A231-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A231-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A232-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A232-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A233-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A233-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A234-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A234-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A235-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A235-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A236-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A236-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A237-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A237-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A238-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A238-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A239-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A239-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A240-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A240-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A240-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A241-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A241-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A242-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A242-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A243-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A243-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A244-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A244-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A245-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A245-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A246-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A246-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A247-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A247-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A248-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A248-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A249-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A249-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A250-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A250-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A250-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A251-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A251-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A252?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A253-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A253-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A254-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A254-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A255-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A255-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A256-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A256-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A257-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A257-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A257-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A258-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A258-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A259-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A259-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A260-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A260-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A261-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A261-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A262-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A262-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A262-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A263?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A264-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A264-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A265-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A265-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A266-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A266-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A267-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A267-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A268-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A268-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A269-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A269-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A270-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A270-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A270-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A271-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A271-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A272-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A272-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A273-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A273-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A274-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A274-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A275-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A275-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A276-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A276-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A277-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A277-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A278-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A278-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A279-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A279-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A280-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A280-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A281-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A281-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A282-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A282-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A283-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A283-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A284-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A284-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A285-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A285-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A286-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A286-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A287-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A287-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A288-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A288-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A289-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A289-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A290?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A291-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A291-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A292-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A292-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A293-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A293-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A294-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A294-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A295-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A295-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A296-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A296-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A297-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A297-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A298-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A298-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A299-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A299-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A300-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A300-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A301?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A302-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A302-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A303-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A303-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A304-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A304-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A305-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A305-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A306-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A306-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A307-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A307-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A308-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A308-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A309-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A309-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A310-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A310-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A311-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A311-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A312-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A312-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A313-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A313-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A314-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A314-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A315-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A315-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A316-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A316-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A317-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A317-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A318-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A318-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A319-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A319-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A320-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A320-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A321?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/2/99?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/2/100?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/2/106?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/2/111?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/2/117?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/2/126?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/2/137?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/2/142?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/2/149?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/2/154?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/2/160?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/2/166?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/2/171?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/2/176?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/2/180?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/2/183?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/2/187?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/2/191?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/2/192?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/2/193?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/2/193-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/2/195?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/2/195-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/1/1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/1/2?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/1/7?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/1/13?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/1/19?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/1/22?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/1/29?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/1/37?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/1/45?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/1/50?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/1/56?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/1/62?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/1/67?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/1/73?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/1/80?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/1/86?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/1/90?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/1/94?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/1/98?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/6/493?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/6/495?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/6/501?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/6/508?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/6/514?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/6/522?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/6/528?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/6/534?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/6/539?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/6/544?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/6/550?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/6/557?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/6/564?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/6/572?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/6/580?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/6/585?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/6/589?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/6/590?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/5/397?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/5/399?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/5/407?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/5/413?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/5/421?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/5/427?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/5/432?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/5/439?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/5/444?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/5/450?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/5/456?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/5/461?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/5/468?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/5/474?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/5/479?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/5/485?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/5/488?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/5/491?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/5/491-a?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://hwmaint.ejhp.bmj.com/homepage/ejhp_95x60.gif" />
</channel>
<image rdf:about="http://hwmaint.ejhp.bmj.com/homepage/ejhp_95x60.gif">
<title>European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy</title>
<url>http://hwmaint.ejhp.bmj.com/homepage/ejhp_95x60.gif</url>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com</link>
</image>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/3/197?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Enhancing depression management in older cancer patients: the pharmacists role]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/3/197?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jadhari, R., Pathak, N., Dhungana, S., Acharya, A., Shrestha, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-23T00:45:27-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004682</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004682</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Enhancing depression management in older cancer patients: the pharmacists role]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Editorial</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>197</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>198</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/3/199?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Algorithm-managed dosing and pharmacist-managed dosing of erythropoietin stimulating agents in renal anaemia: a systematic review]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/3/199?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>The goal of this systematic review was to identify and summarise algorithm-managed and pharmacist-managed dosing of erythropoietin stimulating agents (ESA) in patients with renal anaemia and to determine the effects on available outcome parameters.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines for systematic reviews. Studies investigating algorithm-managed and pharmacist-managed dosing of ESA in adult patients with renal anaemia were evaluated for inclusion. No restrictions were set on outcome parameters. Observational and interventional studies available as full-text articles with a control group and follow-up &ge;6 months were eligible for inclusion. Relevant databases were searched from their inception through August 2024. Two independent reviewers evaluated all studies. The risk of bias was assessed by the ROBINS-I and RoB1 tools. The protocol of this study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021243678).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>After screening 140 articles, 17 articles and 4313 patients could be included. Available evidence was of low to moderate quality with a high risk of bias. Data were summarised and tabulated. Meta-analysis was not possible due to the substantial heterogeneity in participants, study design, interventions, comparisons, and outcome parameters. However, standardised metrics could be identified and calculated for haemoglobin and ESA dose. The percentage in target range for haemoglobin varied between 3.5% lower (95% CI &ndash;18.67% to +11.67%) to 32.0% higher (95% CI 14.07% to 49.93%) in the pharmacist-managed group versus the control group (n=1401). The range in reduction in ESA dose was 5.45% (95% CI &ndash;7.97% to +18.87%) to 49.97% (95% CI 20.32% to 79.61%) in the pharmacist-managed group versus the control group (n=2115).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Low-quality data with high risk of bias suggest that pharmacist-managed renal anaemia may improve the percentage of haemoglobin within target range and reduce the ESA dose. However, meta-analysis was impossible due to substantial heterogeneity. Therefore, no definite conclusions could be drawn on the effectiveness of pharmacist-managed dosing of ESA in renal anaemia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD42021243678.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[van den Oever, F. J., Dekker, M. J. E., Vasbinder, E. C., van Gelder, T., Van den Bemt, P. M. L. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-23T00:45:27-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004366</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2024-004366</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 4: Clinical Pharmacy Services]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Algorithm-managed dosing and pharmacist-managed dosing of erythropoietin stimulating agents in renal anaemia: a systematic review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Systematic review</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>199</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>205</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/3/206?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Resolution rate of prescribing errors after advice from a specialised hospital pharmacist or a substitute hospital pharmacist: a retrospective cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/3/206?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Specialised hospital pharmacists, integrated in medical teams on the ward, can improve medication safety. When a specialised hospital pharmacist is temporarily not available, the pharmaceutical care will be conducted by a substitute hospital pharmacist with less specific knowledge about that patient population. Our objective was to compare the resolution rate of prescribing errors between specialised hospital pharmacists and their substitutes. Furthermore, we investigated whether other characteristics of the pharmacists, the prescriber, patient, drug or intervention itself were associated with the resolution rate.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted to assess the resolution of prescribing errors, based on the analysis of electronic prescriptions. A prescribing error was defined as an alert that required intervention of the pharmacist to prevent harm or to optimise therapy. To identify prescribing errors, a medical doctor and hospital pharmacist analysed all alerts that were retained to be checked by a pharmacist. Resolution of a prescribing error was defined as resolution of the error within 24 hours after detection.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>In total, 145 574 medication prescriptions were analysed and 448 prescribing errors were detected. Of these prescribing errors, 94.0% were resolved within 24 hours. No differences were found between the resolution rate of prescribing errors after advice from a specialised hospital pharmacists and their substitutes (94.4% vs 91.9%, p=0145 (<sup>2</sup> test)). Administrative prescribing errors, prescribing errors for patients aged &gt;80 years and prescribing errors handled during weekends showed a relatively low-resolution rate. No other characteristics of the pharmacist, prescriber, patient, the drug involved or the intervention itself were associated with the resolution of the prescribing error.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>In the temporarily absence of a specialised hospital pharmacist, the resolution rate of prescribing errors remains high when advice about prescribing errors is provided by a substitute hospital pharmacist.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilkes, S., Kalfsvel, L., van Rosse, F., Versmissen, J., van der Kuy, H., Zaal, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-23T00:45:27-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004392</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2024-004392</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 4: Clinical Pharmacy Services]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Resolution rate of prescribing errors after advice from a specialised hospital pharmacist or a substitute hospital pharmacist: a retrospective cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>206</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>212</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/3/213?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[How to manage the overwhelming amount of database-detected interactions? A focus group meeting study on the management of database-detected risks of drug interactions]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/3/213?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Database-assisted screening may help detect the risks of drug interactions, but less than 10% of flagged interactions have clinical manifestations, potentially leading to alert fatigue among healthcare providers. To address this issue, this study aimed to develop a concise framework to support the management of database-indicated interaction risks.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A grounded theory approach was used to design, evaluate and develop the framework. Participants included healthcare professionals and laypersons with experience using narrow therapeutic index medications, as well as individuals recommended by them. Two focus group discussions were conducted (N<SUB>1</SUB>=6 and N<SUB>2</SUB>=5), each lasting approximately 2 hours and following the same agenda. In one case, a follow-up one-on-one interview was held because the participant indicated further insights at the end of the session.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Participants identified key decision-making questions for the framework, including the evidence base for interacting drugs, severity and documentation level of the interaction, availability of safer alternatives, and the presence of confounding factors. The framework was considered useful and, following refinement, potentially suitable for clinical implementation. A key insight was that integration into healthcare curricula is essential for achieving long-term impact. Overall, the proposed tool may assist in managing interaction risks in diverse clinical scenarios and reduce alert fatigue among healthcare professionals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Although further clinical validation is needed, the framework provides a foundation for improving the management of database-detected drug interactions.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kleiner, D., Haghverdi, F., Szepe, O., Horvath, I. L., Sebok, S., Csupor, D., Horvath, A., Balogh, A. G., Monostory, K., Kobori, L., Balazs, M., Dank, M., Moczar, C. M., Becze, A., Su&#x0308;le, A., Zelko, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-23T00:45:27-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004478</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004478</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 1: Introductory Statements and Governance]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[How to manage the overwhelming amount of database-detected interactions? A focus group meeting study on the management of database-detected risks of drug interactions]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>213</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>218</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/3/219?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Unused medication among outpatients receiving cost-free medication from a community pharmacy in the Region of Southern Denmark]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/3/219?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To evaluate the extent and nature of unused medication dispensed from the hospital as cost-free medication (CFM), sent to and collected from the community pharmacy (St Thomas Pharmacy) in the Region of Southern Denmark.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>This observational study was conducted over 6 months. In the first 2 months, patients collecting CFM were invited to participate in an unused medication monitoring programme by completing an inclusion questionnaire. Those who consented were followed for four additional months and asked to report on unused medication during subsequent visits. Data on dispensed medication and patient-reported unused medication were collected using structured survey forms and analysed using descriptive statistics.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Thirteen per cent of patients reported unused medication from approximately 100 enrolled participants. Collecting CFM for themselves, the unused medication rate was 15%, compared with 8% among those collecting on behalf of others. No unused medication was reported by first-time collectors. Reported reasons included clinical changes (eg, dose adjustments, treatment discontinuation, adverse effects) and administrative errors (eg, excess quantities, incorrect formulations). The total value of unused medication was estimated at 83 000 Kr (11 100). Extrapolated to the annual distribution volume at the St Thomas Pharmacy, the annual loss from unused medication would be 900 000 Kr (120 000).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The small sample size in this project is a limitation and associated with an uncertain outcome. Unused medication related to CFM is a measurable and economically significant issue, primarily driven by clinical and administrative factors. While reducing pack sizes could help mitigate unused medication, this may increase logistical burdens on patients and healthcare providers. A larger distribution model, such as dispensing through all local community pharmacies under hospital tender agreements, may offer a more efficient solution but would require legislative reform. Broader, multi-site studies are needed to validate findings and inform future policy interventions.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Buck, T. C., Lund, M. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-23T00:45:27-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004615</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004615</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 5: Patient Safety and Quality Assurance]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Unused medication among outpatients receiving cost-free medication from a community pharmacy in the Region of Southern Denmark]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>219</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>223</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/3/224?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Retrospective study of plasma anti-Xa levels in renally impaired patients receiving reduced or non-reduced therapeutic doses of dalteparin]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/3/224?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>In renally impaired patients, guidelines recommend a 25&ndash;50% dalteparin dose reduction with anti-Xa monitoring to reduce bleeding risk. However, pharmacokinetic considerations and results from previous studies dispute the need for dose reduction. Therefore, in our hospitals an alternative dose reduction to 75% or a 100% is used. This study aimed to assess anti-Xa levels to confirm or refute the need for dose reduction and to investigate the association between dose, anti-Xa levels and bleeding events.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>This multicentre retrospective observational study included patients aged &ge;18 years during a 3-year period with an estimated glomerular filtration rate of &lt;60 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup> or on renal replacement therapy, receiving &ge;7500 IU dalteparin daily. Only correctly sampled plasma anti-Xa levels were included and stratified into intensive care unit (ICU) and non-ICU patients. Stratum-adjusted odds ratios were determined to compare the likelihood of achieving adequate anti-Xa levels between a 75% and 100% dose. Bleeding events were classified into minor and major events.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 167 anti-Xa levels were included, with 148 anti-Xa levels belonging to patients receiving a 75% or 100% dose. Anti-Xa levels were highly scattered: 55% below and 6% above the anti-Xa ranges. In all patients the probability that anti-Xa levels fell within the range was higher for patients receiving a 100% dose than for those receiving a 75% dose (OR 2.66, 95% CI 1.24 to 5.70, p=0.012). Eight bleeding events occurred, including one minor event in a patient with an anti-Xa level above range and five events in patients on renal replacement therapy with anti-Xa levels within or below range.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>In renally impaired patients a 100% dalteparin dose increases the likelihood of achieving adequate anti-Xa levels compared with a 75% dose, without leading to over-exposure. The occurrence of bleeding events did not differ between the 75% and 100% dose groups and appeared unrelated to anti-Xa levels. Pre-emptive dose reduction of dalteparin in renally impaired patients is likely to be unnecessary.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pires, K. C., Mitrov-Winkelmolen, L., Le, H. L., Quax, R. A. M., Ruiter, R., Wabbijn, M., Kuijper, T. M., Bosch, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-23T00:45:28-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004452</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2024-004452</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 4: Clinical Pharmacy Services]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Retrospective study of plasma anti-Xa levels in renally impaired patients receiving reduced or non-reduced therapeutic doses of dalteparin]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>224</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>231</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/3/232?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A collaborative telepharmacy model for dispensing and informed delivery from hospital to community pharmacies]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/3/232?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>This study examines the implementation of a collaborative telepharmacy programme in an outpatient pharmaceutical care unit (OPCU) at a tertiary hospital. The programme coordinates between the hospital pharmacy, community pharmacies, a pharmaceutical distributor, and the regional official college of pharmacists to optimise medication dispensing and delivery to outpatients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The programme addressed challenges in operations, logistics, technology, legality, training and information. A protocol was developed defining the collaborative dispensing circuit, including criteria for patient selection and prioritisation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Over 39 months, 13 310 shipments were made to 1039 patients, averaging 17 daily. Each patient received about 13 deliveries. A total of 14 283 medications from 258 specialties were dispensed. The programme saved 512 534 km and 542 164 min (356 days) in travel. Each patient saved approximately 493 km and 522 min, reducing CO2 emissions by 58&ndash;116 kg per patient, or 72&ndash;145 tonnes overall. A survey of 130 patients revealed a 93% preference for this model over home or healthcare facility delivery.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>The implementation of telepharmacy programmes for dispensing hospital medication to community pharmacies marks a significant advancement in patient care. Initially rare, telepharmacy is now widespread, overcoming previous barriers. Programmes show similar effectiveness to home delivery, improving workflow and safety. Future improvements may include remote monitoring tools and video calls. Despite some limitations, such as economic analysis and tracking, telepharmacy has proven beneficial for patients, offering cost savings and enhanced confidentiality.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The collaborative telepharmacy circuit was efficiently and safely implemented, offering an innovative approach that meets the needs and expectations of patients in the OPCU.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vicente-Escrig, E., Solana-Altabella, A., Company-Albir, M. J., Gil-Candel, M., Ferrando-Piqueres, R., Belles-Medall, M. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-23T00:45:28-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004524</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004524</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Editor''s choice, EAHP Statement 4: Clinical Pharmacy Services]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A collaborative telepharmacy model for dispensing and informed delivery from hospital to community pharmacies]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>232</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>238</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/3/239?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Therapeutic options carried out after hypersensitivity reactions to chemotherapy: the value of skin tests]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/3/239?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) to chemotherapy agents constitute a real challenge for cancer treatment. Skin tests (STs) can help risk-stratify patients after initial HSRs and identify cross-reactions between chemotherapeutic agents.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>This study aimed to assess the value of STs in an integrative cancer centre to address the treatment of patients with suspicion of HSRs to platinum salts (carboplatin, oxaliplatin, cisplatin), and taxanes (paclitaxel, docetaxel).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>This single-centre, retrospective study was conducted on data collected from hospital medical records between August 2018 and December 2023. STs (prick tests and intradermal tests) were performed according to the recommendations of the European Network for Drug Allergy and the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. The concordance between the allergist&rsquo;s recommendations and the therapeutic strategies implemented in clinical practice following ST results was evaluated.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Among the 105 patients included (76 females, 29 males), the positive ST rate was 61%. In total, 71% of the reactions to platinum salts (n=82) were identified as allergies versus 26% for taxane reactions (n=23). We found a cross-reactivity of 34.5% for platinum salts and 66.7% for taxanes. The allergist&rsquo;s recommendations were carried out in practice for a total of 56 patients (53%). For 47 patients (45%), a clinical reason justified not following the allergist&rsquo;s recommendations and discontinuing treatment.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This study confirms the relevance of STs to help oncologists guide treatment strategies after a presumed allergy. As part of the allergological work-up, STs help prevent unnecessary changes to chemotherapy lines in patients with unproven allergies and facilitate the identification of alternative treatments following HSRs. In practice in our centre, allergists&rsquo; propositions are carried out as much as possible to guide the re-exposure strategy in patient care.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Blanchet, A., Robert, J., Devys, C., Collet, M., Sorrieul, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-23T00:45:28-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004387</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2024-004387</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Therapeutic options carried out after hypersensitivity reactions to chemotherapy: the value of skin tests]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>239</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>243</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/3/244?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Medication adherence in chronic myeloid leukemia: a hospital pharmacy-level analysis]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/3/244?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>The objective was to evaluate medication adherence levels in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) and to identify factors that may undermine adherence.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>This prospective, cross-sectional study was conducted over a 2-month period among ambulatory patients with CML monitored at one of the country&rsquo;s leading hospitals for diagnosing, treating and monitoring CML in Bulgaria.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Among 70 participants, 91.4% showed high medication adherence, with only 1.4% reporting low adherence. No significant differences in adherence between therapy groups (imatinib vs nilotinib, p=0.1830), gender (p=0.0887) or age groups (p=0.8748) were revealed. Education level was associated with adherence, with lower adherence observed in patients with primary education (p&lt;0.0001). Quality of life, measured using utility values (median=0.8770) and visual analogue scale (mean=80), did not significantly differ based on adherence levels, therapy type or education level. Logistic regression showed that men had 1.9 times higher odds of high adherence compared with women (p&gt;0.05). Patients under 65 had 3.3 times higher odds of adherence compared with those over 65 (p&gt;0.05), and those on imatinib had 22.86% of the adherence odds compared with those on nilotinib. The findings suggest that maintaining high medication adherence is crucial for positive therapeutic outcomes in patients with CML.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Patients with CML in Bulgaria show high medication adherence, likely contributing to their overall quality of life. These findings emphasise the importance of maintaining adherence for optimal treatment outcomes in CML. Future research should explore the factors influencing adherence in this population and assess the role of hospital pharmacists in supporting medication management.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Getova-Kolarova, V., Kamusheva, M., Kokudeva, N., Doneva, M., Getov, I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-23T00:45:28-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004552</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004552</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 4: Clinical Pharmacy Services]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Medication adherence in chronic myeloid leukemia: a hospital pharmacy-level analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>244</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>248</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/3/249?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Maintaining appropriate stocks in an operating room pharmaceutical unit: risk mapping of the supply chain.]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/3/249?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Supply chain management is a major challenge for hospital pharmacists, particularly in minimising stock-outs and their impact on patient care. This study aimed to map the risks associated with the supply chain of sterile medical devices in the operating room using a patient-centred approach.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Risk analysis, conducted using the &lsquo;failure modes and effects analysis&rsquo; approach, took place in 2024. It focused on the sterile medical devices supply chain within an operating room pharmaceutical unit. A multidisciplinary working group developed a risk map for stock discrepancies in four stages: identification of risks, risk rating based on occurrence and severity, listing of control measures and prioritisation of risks.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The risk analysis identified 52 risks across seven subprocesses, with 10% of these risks classified as priority. These priority risks mainly involved the emergency dispensing of equipment in the operating room, the scheduled provision of medical devices through the preparation of case carts, and the storage of products in the pharmaceutical unit. Key areas for improvement included staff training, enhancing software expertise and strengthening quality assurance.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This study presents the first risk map of stock errors for health products in a hospital setting. This approach is applicable to other supply chains in healthcare. Effective risk management depends on a collective effort and the engagement of all stakeholders. Optimising stock management is critical in enhancing the quality and safety of care provided to patients.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Figeac, C., Salomez-Ihl, C., Toth, R., Filisetti, V., Daikh, A., Py, P., Schmitt, D., Bedouch, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-23T00:45:28-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004588</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004588</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 2: Selection, Procurement and Distribution]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Maintaining appropriate stocks in an operating room pharmaceutical unit: risk mapping of the supply chain.]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>249</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>253</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/3/254?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Realising potential and addressing risk: a UK survey of adult hepatology pharmacy services]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/3/254?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>The pharmacy workforce in areas such as critical care and renal services has been well described, but little is known about the UK hepatology pharmacy workforce, service provision and capability. Our objective was to understand the current workforce in terms of staffing levels, skill mix, roles and risks.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>We conducted a multicentre, cross-sectional electronic survey inviting one pharmacy professional response per UK centre providing hepatology pharmacy services. We collated information on workforce, service provision and pharmaceutical care activities provided by pharmacy teams in hepatology specialities.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Seventeen centres responded to this survey, which was composed of five (29%) district general hospitals, two (12%) providing both secondary and tertiary level hepatology services, three (18%) secondary care centres and seven (41%) centres providing tertiary level care. There are a greater number of posts in tertiary level care centres irrespective of inpatient beds covered. Consultant pharmacists were only present in tertiary level care centres. A large portion of pharmacy time is spent on indirect pharmaceutical care, which ranged from 10% to 50%. Overall, 75% of respondents felt that their team&rsquo;s workload was safe, though this was only 45% in district general hospitals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Clinical hepatology pharmacy staffing levels vary across the UK. Recognition and benchmarking are key across all levels of care to ensure this workforce remains sustainable given the increasing incidence of liver disease in the UK.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shah, S., Bullen, C., Howard, D., Jessa, F., Tucker, G., Boothman, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-23T00:45:28-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004625</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004625</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 4: Clinical Pharmacy Services]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Realising potential and addressing risk: a UK survey of adult hepatology pharmacy services]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>254</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>259</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/3/260?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Assessment of potential particulate contamination in intravenous solutions in an adult intensive care unit: a targeted correlation analysis]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/3/260?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Intravenous drug administration is essential in intensive care treatment. However, the risk of particulate contamination in infusion solutions during treatment is often underestimated.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Residual amounts of infusion solutions prepared and administered at the adult intensive care unit were examined for visible and subvisible particles according to the recommendations of the European Pharmacopoeia monographs 2.9.19 and 2.9.20.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Samples from 169 infusion solutions were collected, 149 of which could be analysed. The Pharmacopoeia requirements for visible particles were not fulfilled in 42.9% (n=64/149) of the samples, while the requirements for subvisible particles were not met in 4.7% (n=7/149). A specific correlation between the pharmaceutical drugs or within the infusion set (bottle vs connected infusion line) and particulate contamination was not possible as the sample was too small for a correlation analysis. A Spearman rho analysis showed no correlation between particle contamination and administration mode (subvisible (10 &micro;m): p=0.969, r=&ndash;0.005; subvisible (25 &micro;m): p=0.834, r=&ndash;0.026; visible: p=0.711, r=&ndash;0.047) and particle contamination and dosage form (subvisible (10 &micro;m): p=0.291, r=&ndash;0.092; subvisible (25 &micro;m): p=0.513, r=0.057; visible: p=0.415, r=0.071).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This study showed that residuals of intravenously administered solutions have particulate contaminations. A specific causal factor was not identified.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Remane, Y., Frisch, A., Krainz, J., Vogel, J., Ranft, D., Borella, J., Klaus, V.-C., Petros, S., Bertsche, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-23T00:45:28-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004523</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004523</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 5: Patient Safety and Quality Assurance]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Assessment of potential particulate contamination in intravenous solutions in an adult intensive care unit: a targeted correlation analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>260</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>265</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/3/266?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Physicochemical stability of bevacizumab biosimilar CT-P16 (Vegzelma) concentrate for solution stored in original vials after first opening]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/3/266?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>After patent expiry of the bevacizumab originator product, several biosimilars were approved by the European Medicines Agency. In centralised preparation units, product-specific in-use stability data must be considered. Based on the available data, stability information was missing for the concentrate for solution of the bevacizumab biosimilar CT-P16 (Vegzelma, Celltrion) after first opening and prolonged storage. The aim of the study was to investigate the physicochemical stability of CT-P16 25 mg/mL concentrate for solution stored in punctured original glass vials at two different storage temperatures over a 28-day period.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Three bevacizumab 25 mg/mL vials (CT-P16) were stored punctured either light protected at 2&ndash;8&deg;C or at 25&plusmn;2&deg;C for 28 days. Samples were withdrawn on day 0, 1, 7, 14, 21, 28 and analysed by size-exclusion chromatography (SE-HPLC), ion-exchange chromatography (IE-HPLC), and dynamic light scattering (DLS). In parallel, pH values were measured and test vials visually inspected for visible particles and colour changes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>After the 28-day storage period, the quantitative SE-HPLC analysis indicated bevacizumab concentrations above 95% of the initial concentration in each test vial. IE-HPLC analysis revealed no signs of instability. DLS measurements showed no significant variation in the mean hydrodynamic diameter and no appearance of small-sized aggregates. The pH values of all samples remained constant, and no visible particles or colour changes were observed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>CT-P16 25 mg/mL concentrate was found to be physicochemically stable in the original glass vial after first opening for at least 28 days when stored light protected at 2&ndash;8&deg;C or at 25&plusmn;2&deg;C.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kirsch, L., Linxweiler, H., Thiesen, J., Kraemer, I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-23T00:45:28-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004436</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2024-004436</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 3: Production and Compounding]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Physicochemical stability of bevacizumab biosimilar CT-P16 (Vegzelma) concentrate for solution stored in original vials after first opening]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>266</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>271</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/3/272?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Physicochemical stability of a polysorbate-80-containing solvent compounded in the hospital pharmacy and used to reconstitute a biologic for nebulisation]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/3/272?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To assess the long-term physicochemical stability of a solvent (10 mM phosphate buffer pH 6.5 containing sodium chloride (145 mM) and polysorbate 80 (PS80) 0.02%) used to reconstitute a biologic for nebulisation. The solvent was compounded in the hospital pharmacy and stored in amber glass vials at &ndash;20&deg;C for 1 year.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Samples were analysed immediately on compounding and then 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after storage at &ndash;20&deg;C (immediately after thawing, and also 1 month later keeping the vials at 2&ndash;8&deg;C). The assays included a visual examination, measurement of the pH, osmolality, sub-visible particulate contamination, the concentration of PS80, and the concentration of oleic acid and peroxides (both major markers of PS80 degradation). Quantification of PS80 was challenging due to the substance&rsquo;s molecular heterogeneity and the lack of a good chromophore. The strategy adopted consisted of hydrolysis in a strong base and then liquid-liquid extraction of the oleic acid (PS80&rsquo;s hydrolysis product). The oleic acid content was determined using reversed phase high performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection. The peroxide content was determined spectrophotometrically using a ferrous oxidation with xylenol orange assay.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Over 12 months, there was no significant change in the samples&rsquo; visual appearance, pH and osmolality. The PS80 concentration remained above 90% of the initial value. The subvisible particle counts remained far below the European Pharmacopoeia thresholds. The oleic acid content of the non-hydrolysed samples remained constant, and no peroxide was detected.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>A PS80-containing solvent is stable for 1 year when stored at &ndash;20&deg;C (&plusmn;5&deg;C) in amber glass vials. Moreover, the solvent is stable for up to 1 month after thawing if stored at 2&ndash;8&deg;C.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Negrier, L., Roche, M., Lannoy, D., Berneron, C., Pacqueu, L., Carnoy, C., Guillon, A., Hamze, B., Sirard, J.-C., Decaudin, B., Odou, P., Danel, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-23T00:45:28-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004441</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2024-004441</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 3: Production and Compounding]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Physicochemical stability of a polysorbate-80-containing solvent compounded in the hospital pharmacy and used to reconstitute a biologic for nebulisation]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>272</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>277</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/3/278?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Compatibility and physicochemical stability of ceftriaxone for injection admixed with pantoprazole sodium and ondansetron hydrochloride in different infusion solutions]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/3/278?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>The study aimed to analyse the physicochemical stability and compatibility of ceftriaxone sodium (CEF) (2mg/mL) with pantoprazole sodium (PAN) (0.08mg/mL) and ondansetron hydrochloride (OND) (0.008mg/mL) in different infusion solutions, specifically 0.9% sodium chloride injection (NS) and 5% dextrose injection (5D) under varied temperature conditions, including 2&deg;C to 8&deg;C, 25&deg;C, and 37&deg;C at different time intervals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>This study involved determining the content of CEF, PAN and OND in infusion solutions, NS and 5D under varied temperature conditions, including 2&deg;C to 8&deg;C, 25&deg;C, and 37&deg;C at different time intervals using high performance liquid chromatography, visual description of solution mixture, pH measurement, osmolality, particulate matter (both visible and subvisible), as well as assessing the colour and clarity of the solution (measured by absorbance at 420 nm and % transmittance at 650 nm).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>No significant changes were observed in pH, osmolality, particulate matter, colour and clarity of admixture in NS up to 48 hours at all conditions. CEF, PAN and OND retained more than 90% of their initial concentration at 2&deg;C to 8&deg;C for 48 hours, 25&deg;C for 8 hours, and 37&deg;C for 8 hours. Also, no significant changes were observed in pH and osmolality of admixture in 5D up to 48 hours at all conditions. CEF, PAN and OND retained more than 90% of their initial concentration at 2&deg;C to 8&deg;C for 4 hours, 25&deg;C for less than 2 hours, and 37&deg;C for less than 2 hours.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This study concludes that the physicochemical stability of a ternary admixture containing CEF, PAN and OND is diluent and temperature dependent. NS ensures acceptable stability, whereas 5D causes rapid degradation. For safety and efficacy, NS is recommended, with refrigerated storage preferred. Based on physicochemical stability data, the use of this parenteral admixture with 5D is not recommended.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dobariya, A., Patel, R., Patel, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-23T00:45:28-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004511</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004511</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Compatibility and physicochemical stability of ceftriaxone for injection admixed with pantoprazole sodium and ondansetron hydrochloride in different infusion solutions]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>278</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>283</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/3/284?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Extravasation of enfortumab vedotin: a case report and literature review on antibody-drug conjugates]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/3/284?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Enfortumab vedotin (EV) is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) indicated for advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. We describe a case of EV extravasation in a patient with metastatic bladder cancer. The extravasation area appeared swollen without clinical evidence of acute severe toxicity. Guided by the presence of monomethyl-auristatin E (MMAE) component in EV&rsquo;s structure, prompt management of extravasation includes the administration of a subcutaneous injection of the enzyme hyaluronidase, along with the application of warm compresses and elevation of the affected limb. Due to EV vesicant properties, special precautions should be taken in cases of extravasation. Based on the positive outcomes observed, immediate infiltration of hyaluronidase, application of a warm compress, and limb elevation are recommended. Timely recognition of extravasation and prompt initiation of treatment help to minimise the occurrence of severe complications for patients. Further comprehensive guidelines with clear instructions for managing ADC extravasation are necessary for optimal patient care.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pipitone, S., Vitale, M. G., Baldessari, C., Sabbatini, R., Dominici, M., Porretta Serapiglia, C., Ricchi, L., Rivasi, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-23T00:45:28-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004323</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2024-004323</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Extravasation of enfortumab vedotin: a case report and literature review on antibody-drug conjugates]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Case report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>284</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>286</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/3/287?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Managing refractory cytomegalovirus in an immunosuppressed patient with sarcoidosis: a case report on maribavir therapy]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/3/287?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a common herpesvirus that can cause severe infections in immunocompromised patients. Standard treatments, such as ganciclovir and valganciclovir, are usually effective, but refractory CMV requires alternatives like foscarnet, cidofovir, or immunotherapies. New treatments, such as maribavir, have shown promise for refractory cases. This report discusses a woman in her 50s with sarcoidosis, previously treated with infliximab, leflunomide, and hydroxychloroquine, who developed refractory CMV. Initial treatment with ganciclovir and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) was discontinued due to severe pancytopenia, leading to the initiation of foscarnet. Despite this, CMV viremia persisted, leading to off-label use of maribavir, which reduced the viral load with mild gastrointestinal side effects. The patient also developed haemophagocytic syndrome, complicating her condition.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, she succumbed to an opportunistic infection, leaving the complete efficacy of maribavir unconfirmed. This case highlights the potential of novel antiviral agents and underscores the need for further research on refractory CMV management.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Merono Saura, M. A., Garcia Coronel, M., Rentero-Redondo, L., Urbieta-Sanz, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-23T00:45:28-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004445</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2024-004445</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Managing refractory cytomegalovirus in an immunosuppressed patient with sarcoidosis: a case report on maribavir therapy]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Case report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>287</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>289</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/3/290?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Analysis of a serious adverse reaction of rhabdomyolysis precipitated by a possible interaction of methylprednisolone with atorvastatin: a case report]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/3/290?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>A man in his 80s had been taking atorvastatin for 2 months for hyperlipidaemia. Due to the recurrence of nephrotic syndrome, methylprednisolone, torasemide, benidipine and atorvastatin were prescribed after admission to hospital. While his dyspnoea and oedema improved with diuretic therapy, the patient reported significant muscle soreness 8 days after starting the combined atorvastatin and methylprednisolone. Simultaneously, creatine kinase and myoglobin levels increased significantly. The temporal correlation between the drug combination and symptom onset, coupled with rapid clinical and biochemical improvement after atorvastatin discontinuation, supported a diagnosis of rhabdomyolysis due to a potential drug&ndash;drug interaction between atorvastatin and methylprednisolone, likely exacerbated by hypoproteinaemia. This case highlights the need for clinicians and pharmacists to be vigilant for such drug&ndash;drug interactions, particularly in patients with predisposing conditions like hypoproteinaemia.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Liu, J., Mao, M., Cai, M., Yang, Z.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-23T00:45:28-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004800</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004800</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Analysis of a serious adverse reaction of rhabdomyolysis precipitated by a possible interaction of methylprednisolone with atorvastatin: a case report]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Case report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>290</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>292</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/3/293?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Specialisation School of Hospital Pharmacy, Italy: advancing excellence and fostering global unity]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/3/293?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Falzon, A., Bruno, C., Brunoro, R., Corda, G. M., Fortino, L., Zavaleta, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-23T00:45:28-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004447</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2024-004447</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Specialisation School of Hospital Pharmacy, Italy: advancing excellence and fostering global unity]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>PostScript</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>293</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>293</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/3/293-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Colchicine-enzalutamide interaction: clinical implications and multi-disciplinary management]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/3/293-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cachafeiro Pin, A. I., Grandio Leivas, L., Carames Masana, F., Folgar Torres, A., Naranjo Sanchez, M. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-23T00:45:28-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004459</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2024-004459</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Colchicine-enzalutamide interaction: clinical implications and multi-disciplinary management]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>PostScript</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>293</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>294</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A1-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[NP-001 0.05% atropine for myopia treatment for children in Estonia: development of a protocol to prepare eye drops and the effect and tolerability in a 12-month treatment in East Tallinn Central Hospital]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A1-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Myopia is increasing among children, with 22% of 5th graders and 22% of 10&ndash;14-year-olds affected in Estonia. Myopia raises the risk of serious eye diseases such as myopic macular degeneration, retinal detachment, glaucoma, and cataracts. Low-dose atropine is used off-label to slow myopia progression, with the strongest evidence from Asian populations. In Europe, and especially in Estonia, the effect is still being determined. Currently, there is no approved medication treatment for myopia in Estonia.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To develop a protocol for preparing 0.05% atropine eye drops in a hospital pharmacy cleanroom as the first medical treatment option for myopia in Estonia. Additional objectives were to create affordable unit-dose eye drops, analyse their efficacy and tolerability in Estonian children, obtain health insurance funding, and enhance cooperation between hospital pharmacies nationwide.</p></sec><sec><st>Materials and Methods</st><p>A 12-month prospective study of 34 myopic children (median age 11.8 years; median SER &ndash;5.0 D) was conducted. Patients were treated with 0.05% atropine unit-dose eye drops prepared weekly under class A cleanroom conditions. Refraction was measured at baseline and at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. Side effects were monitored at each visit.</p></sec><sec><st>Results and Impact</st><p>The protocol for preparing 7-day unit-dose eye drops was successfully implemented. After 12 months, mean SER change was only &ndash;0.10 D. Since January 2025, treatment has been reimbursed by the Health Insurance Fund, and prescriptions have increased by over 26% annually. Since June 2025, Pa&#x0308;rnu Hospital Pharmacy also prepares atropine drops, currently treating three patients. All children continue treatment due to excellent outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>What&rsquo;s Next</st><p>Conduct stability studies to extend shelf life beyond 1 week, scale up preparation to reach more patients, and expand production to other hospitals in Estonia. The long-term goal is to ensure wider European availability of 0.05% atropine eye drops.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ojama&#x0308;e, S., Meren, U. H., Palumaa, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.1</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.1</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[NP-001 0.05% atropine for myopia treatment for children in Estonia: development of a protocol to prepare eye drops and the effect and tolerability in a 12-month treatment in East Tallinn Central Hospital]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>National poster winner abstracts</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A1</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A1</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A1-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[NP-002 Impact of pharmacist interventions on hospitalisations in heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A1-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Heart failure (HF) affects 1&ndash;2% of adults in developed countries and is associated with high 30-day post-admission mortality (10%) and readmission (15%) rates. Optimising medical therapy is essential to improve outcomes. Pharmacists embedded within hospital or ambulatory care teams can enhance therapy optimisation and adherence, yet the impact of these interventions on clinical outcomes in HF is incompletely defined. Determining their effect on hospitalisations can inform the design of multidisciplinary HF care programmes.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This study aimed to evaluate the impact of hospital-affiliated pharmacist interventions on all-cause and HF-specific hospitalisations among adult patients with heart failure.</p></sec><sec><st>Materials and Methods</st><p>A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. PubMed and Embase were searched for randomised controlled trials published up to November 2024. Eligible studies compared pharmacist interventions with usual care and reported hospitalisation or mortality outcomes. Interventions delivered in community pharmacies or home-based settings were excluded. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Random-effects models (DerSimonian&ndash;Laird) were used to calculate pooled odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Statistical heterogeneity was quantified using the I<sup>2</sup> statistic and Cochrane&rsquo;s Q test.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Eleven randomised controlled trials were included, enrolling 3576 patients with HF. Pharmacist interventions significantly reduced all-cause hospitalisations compared with usual care (3472 patients, 927 events; OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.49&ndash;0.92, p=0.0119). Similarly, HF-related hospitalisations were reduced (3442 patients, 504 events; OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.48&ndash;0.87, p=0.0038). Heterogeneity was moderate across analyses and sensitivity analyses confirmed robustness. Subgroup analyses suggested greater effectiveness in outpatient programmes and when interventions were longitudinal.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Hospital-based pharmacist interventions substantially reduced all-cause and HF-specific hospitalisations across inpatient and outpatient settings. These results underscore the value of integrating pharmacists within multidisciplinary HF care teams to improve outcomes and reduce re-hospitalisation risk. Future research should clarify the optimal structure and duration of pharmacist involvement.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Van der Linden, L., Beavers, C., Forsyth, P., Vandenbriele, C., Tsuyuki, R., Karapinar-Cark&#x0131;t, F., Van Aelst, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.2</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.2</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[NP-002 Impact of pharmacist interventions on hospitalisations in heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>National poster winner abstracts</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A1</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A2</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A2-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[NP-003 Clinical laboratory pharmacy aspects of precision vancomycin therapy]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A2-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>There is a growing interest in intravenous vancomycin therapy supported by therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). In addition to assaying drug levels, the determination of other clinical laboratory parameters can assist the appropriate interpretation of TDM results.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>Our aim was to review these laboratory parameters and analyse their relevance through case studies of vancomycin monitoring.</p></sec><sec><st>Materials and Methods</st><p>We identified and classified the laboratory parameters valuable for clinical decision making in TDM-guided vancomycin therapy. We evaluated the relevant clinical laboratory practice at Semmelweis University, the availability of the assays, and the significance of the identified laboratory parameters with respect to the outcomes of pharmacokinetic modelling and the clinical management of patients.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The laboratory parameter groups relevant to vancomycin therapy include (A) parameters characterising renal function, (B) additional laboratory parameters required for pharmacokinetic modelling, (C) acute-phase laboratory parameters, (D) parameters indicating acute adverse effects, and (E) microbiological parameters.</p><p>At Semmelweis University, serum creatinine, urea, albumin, C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, and lactate levels can be requested in addition to vancomycin levels as urgent tests, with differences in their availability to various clinical departments. The minimum inhibitory concentration is determined by broth microdilution in the microbiology laboratory. The case studies presented demonstrate that the relationship between renal function and vancomycin pharmacokinetics can be most effectively characterised by calculating creatinine clearance. The calculated 24-hour area under the concentration&ndash;time curve depends strongly on the applied pharmacokinetic model. C-reactive protein concentrations reflected the clinical status reliably, whereas procalcitonin levels were not relevant. Albumin and urea levels were required inputs for a population model incorporated in the TDMx online pharmacokinetic calculator, but their influence on modelling outcomes was negligible.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions and Relevance</st><p>The measurement of the laboratory parameters identified in this study is essential for conducting clinically meaningful vancomycin TDM, as is the integrated interpretation of pharmacokinetic results and those of the clinical laboratory assays.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lovasz, B., Kunz, S., Ko&#x0308;llo, Z., Pesko, G., Karvaly, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.3</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.3</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[NP-003 Clinical laboratory pharmacy aspects of precision vancomycin therapy]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>National poster winner abstracts</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A2</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A2</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A2-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[NP-004 Effect of high-dose intravitreal aflibercept in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration: comparison of real-world outcomes with pharmacokinetic model]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A2-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Aflibercept (AFLI) inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and placental growth factor (PlGF) and is indicated for intravitreal treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Continuous regimens, such as treat and extend (T&amp;E), have shown superior results compared to <I>pro re nata</I> protocols. AFLI bioavailability is thought to follow a logarithmic distribution, remaining effective while ocular concentrations saturate VEGF receptors; below this threshold, free VEGF promotes exudation and tissue damage. Recently, a higher AFLI dose (8 mg/0.07 mL, AFLI8) was approved versus the standard 2 mg/0.05 mL (AFLI2), allowing potentially longer dosing intervals with maintained control, as supported by the PULSAR trial.</p></sec><sec><st>Objective</st><p>To evaluate the correlation between theoretical pharmacokinetic predictions and real-world outcomes (visual acuity, exudation, and central retinal thickness) in patients treated with AFLI8 under a T&amp;E regimen within an early access programme.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Retrospective study of nAMD patients with subfoveal type 1 neovascularisation switched from AFLI2 to AFLI8. Inclusion required &ge;6 months of prior AFLI2 with persistent retinal fluid 4 weeks after the last injection and at least one assessment 2 weeks after AFLI8. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was measured using the Snellen chart; spectral-domain OCT and OCT angiography were performed. A time-dependent pharmacokinetic model (Python-based) estimated intraocular concentrations for AFLI2 and AFLI8, which were compared with clinical outcomes (BCVA, central retinal thickness (CRT) and neovascular activity).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Twenty eyes from 20 patients were included. Before switching, mean number of injections = 8, mean BCVA = 0.22 logMAR, and mean CRT = 283.5 &micro;m. Theoretical intraocular concentrations showed an 18-day difference between doses (p = 0.042), indicating equivalence between 14 days/ AFLI2 and 32 days/ AFLI8. Comparing 2-week/ 2 mg vs 4-week/ 8 mg intervals, no significant differences were found in BCVA (p = 0.317), exudation (p = 0.707), or CRT (p = 0.779). A trend towards CRT reduction (283 -&gt; 255 &micro;m; p = 0.128) and significant improvement in exudative activity at 2 weeks/ 8 mg (p = 0.013) were observed.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>Knowledge of AFLI ocular pharmacokinetics may aid identification of candidates for higher-dose therapy and guide interval extension. The 18-day theoretical increment aligned with clinical outcomes, and early improvement confirmed sustained efficacy without a dose-dependent ceiling effect.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vaz, M., Lourenco, M., Carreira, P., Afonso, J., Brizido, M., Pereira, A. M., Camacho, P., Alcobia, A., Campos, N., Miranda, A., Soares, A., Cabral, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.4</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.4</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[NP-004 Effect of high-dose intravitreal aflibercept in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration: comparison of real-world outcomes with pharmacokinetic model]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>National poster winner abstracts</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A2</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A2</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A3-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[NP-005 Salt or base? Clear labelling of the reference value to prevent dosing errors: a case study]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A3-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>The availability of medicinal products with different reference values in relation to the chemical form of an active ingredient used (as a salt or as a base) poses a risk of errors in dosing and manufacturing. Confusion between caffeine and caffeine citrate, for example, leads to a doubling of the dose. Awareness of this problem varies among those involved in the medication process, and information on the subject is often unclear.</p></sec><sec><st>Objective</st><p>In order to avoid dosing errors using medicinal products with different reference values, relevant monographs were identified in a web-based database for evidence-based drug information during childhood and information on the reference value was added.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>The issue of reference values was discussed in round-table meetings involving an interprofessional group of experts consisting of pharmacists and paediatricians from university children&rsquo;s hospitals and the Paediatrics Committee of the Federal Association of German Hospital Pharmacists (ADKA e.V.). Based on scientific evidence and clinical experience, criteria were established for selecting relevant monographs from the database, including the presence of different salt forms of an active ingredient. A revision process was developed to ensure that reference values are clearly labelled. Monographs with the above-mentioned risk constellation were revised.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>As of January 2025, 102 of the 671 monographs (15.2%) in the database were identified for which a reference value label is relevant. In these cases, the relevant reference values were labelled and their conversion factors were added to the &lsquo;Formulations&rsquo; section of the database. In 80 monographs (11.9%), the reference value was also labelled at the dosage level (e.g. enalapril, sildenafil). The standardised revision of all monographs is ongoing.</p></sec><sec><st>Summary</st><p>The aim of this project is to increase vigilance for the risk of different reference values. Clear labelling in the database contributes to greater safety in prescribing and manufacturing.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Haering-Zahn, J., Kaune, A., Gustav, C., Mo&#x0308;hrle, R., Ahne, G., Feldmann, F., Schubert, S., Neubert, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.5</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.5</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[NP-005 Salt or base? Clear labelling of the reference value to prevent dosing errors: a case study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>National poster winner abstracts</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A3</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A3</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A3-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[NP-006 Hospital pharmacists consulting activities]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A3-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Pharmacotherapy is an integral part of healthcare delivery; however, its inappropriate use can lead to drug-related problems (DRPs), which negatively impact the desired clinical outcomes of pharmacotherapy and the patient&rsquo;s health status. The consulting activities of a pharmacist in a hospital pharmacy play a crucial role in identifying and resolving DRPs, thereby contributing to safer and more effective pharmacotherapy.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The aim of this study was to analyse the occurrence of DRPs in hospitalised patients and to evaluate the effectiveness of pharmaceutical interventions within consulting activities.</p></sec><sec><st>Materials and Methods</st><p>The research was conducted at the Central Slovak Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases in Bansk&aacute; Bystrica between October 2024 and February 2025. Data were obtained through the PROMIS medical information system, with patients selected based on excessive polypharmacy (&ge;10 medications) and the presence of at least one severe drug interaction. DRPs were classified according to the PCNE (Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe) classification system (version 9.1), and pharmaceutical interventions were assessed based on their acceptance and implementation into pharmacotherapy.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>In total, 60 patients were analysed, with 209 DRPs identified. The most common problems included inappropriate drug combinations (n=119), inappropriate treatment in elderly patients (n=38), inappropriate drug dosing (n=15), and unclear drug indications (n=14). Pharmacist interventions were fully accepted and implemented in 57% of cases, accepted but not implemented in 31%, partially implemented in 6%, and implementation status was unknown in the remaining 6%. Statistical analysis demonstrated a highly significant correlation between the number of medications taken and the occurrence of severe drug interactions (p=0.0001).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The results confirm that the consulting activities of a pharmacist in a hospital pharmacy contribute to optimising pharmacotherapy, reducing the risk of DRPs, and increasing the safety of treatment for hospitalised patients.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Holecyova, M., Olbertova, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.6</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.6</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[NP-006 Hospital pharmacists consulting activities]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>National poster winner abstracts</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A3</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A3</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A3-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[NP-007 Population pharmacokinetic model to optimise vedolizumab dosing in haematological patients with refractory gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A3-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Vedolizumab has emerged as a therapeutic alternative for gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease (GI-GVHD) refractory to corticosteroids and ruxolitinib. However, optimal dosing strategies in this population remain unclear.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To develop a population pharmacokinetic (popPK) model for vedolizumab in adult patients with malignant haematological neoplasms (MHN) and refractory GI-GVHD, and to propose a dosing regimen to achieve therapeutic plasma concentrations from the start of treatment.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A prospective multidisciplinary study (January 2021&ndash;February 2025) was conducted in adults with MHN receiving vedolizumab for refractory GI-GVHD. Demographic, clinical, and biochemical data were collected. Patients received an initial 300 mg IV dose; plasma concentrations (VPC) were measured at 72 hours and subsequently as guided by the pharmacist. VPC were quantified by ELISA.</p><p>The popPK model was developed using NONMEM v7.3 with the FOCEI method, and simulations were performed in R v4.3.2. The dosing required to maintain VPC &gt;25 &micro;g/mL (target induction level in ulcerative colitis) was estimated through deterministic simulations.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Fifteen patients (nine females; median age 54 (18&ndash;66) years; weight 71 (40&ndash;100) kg) were included. Underlying MHN included acute myeloid leukaemia (n=7), acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (n=2), myelodysplastic syndrome (n=2), and others (n=4). Vedolizumab was used as third-line therapy in seven patients, fourth-line in three, and &ge;fifth-line in five patients.</p><p>A total of 70 samples (median 4 (2&ndash;10) per patient) yielded a mean (SD) VPC of 36.56 (14.97) &micro;g/mL. A one-compartment model with first-order elimination best described the data. Volume of distribution (Vd) was 5.53 L; clearance (CL) was estimated as:</p><p>CL (L/h) = 0.053 <FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT> ((BSA/1.9)^2.23) <FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT> (1 + 0.022 <FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT> (AGE&ndash;54)).</p><p>Simulations suggested maintaining &gt;25 &micro;g/mL requires 300 mg IV at days 0, 3, and 6, followed by 300 mg every 7 days for BSA &lt;1.5 m<sup>2</sup>, every 5 days for 1.5&ndash;2 m<sup>2</sup>, and every 4 days for BSA &gt;2 m<sup>2</sup>.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>A novel popPK model was developed describing vedolizumab kinetics in haematological patients with refractory GI-GVHD. Body surface area and age were identified as determinants of clearance. Model based dosing may optimise early drug exposure, potentially improving clinical outcomes and response times in this complex patient population.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lopez Alvarez, M., Martin Gutierrez, N., Sanchez Hernandez, J., Lopez Corral, L., Sanchez Arroyo, C., Aparicio Carreno, C., Otero Lopez, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.7</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.7</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[NP-007 Population pharmacokinetic model to optimise vedolizumab dosing in haematological patients with refractory gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>National poster winner abstracts</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A3</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A4</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A4-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[NP-008 Migration of 2,4-di-tert-butylphenol from multi-dose ophthalmic devices into tacrolimus preparations: influence of formulation]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A4-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Contact between medical devices (MDs) and the drugs that they contain can lead to sorption phenomena (sometimes making the concentration administered to the patient uncertain), as well as migration phenomena.<sup>1</sup> Indeed, certain compounds used in the composition of MDs are likely, under certain conditions, to migrate into the preparation and be administered to the patient. Patient exposure to these compounds raises questions about the possible clinical consequences. During in-use assays performed on tacrolimus (TAC) eye drops formulated at 0.2 and 1 mg/ml,<sup>2</sup> variations of TAC concentrations attributable to sorption phenomena were observed, as well as the leaching of an antioxidant additive, 2,4-di-tert-butylphenol (2,4 DTBP), mainly in the 0.2 mg/mL eye drops. These phenomena, observed only when the ophthalmic preparation passed through the dropper system containing a silicone valve, appear to be influenced by galenic parameters.</p></sec><sec><st>Objectives</st><p>The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of different galenic formulation parameters on the migration of 2,4 DTBP and the sorption of TAC.</p></sec><sec><st>Materials and Methods</st><p>An experimental design was established by varying the concentrations of the active substance: TAC (0.04, 0.2, and 1 mg/mL), as well as those of the excipients: polyoxyethylene castor oil (KEL) (32, 80, and 200 mg/ml) and absolute ethanol (EtOH) (10 and 100 mg/ml), as well as the storage temperature (5&deg;C and 25&deg;C). The various formulations were placed in static contact for three days with silicone valves from a multi-dose ophthalmic device constituting the "contact" group and compared to a group without valves constituting the &lsquo;control&rsquo; group. The concentration of 2,4 DTBP and TAC was monitored by liquid chromatography coupled with a UV-visible detector.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>There was no significant difference in TAC concentration between the control and contact groups. However, in all formulations in contact with the valves, 2,4 DTBP was detected and increased over time, whereas it was not detected in the control group samples. The migration capacity of 2,4 DTBP was mainly influenced by the TAC concentration: the higher the TAC concentration, the less 2,4 DTBP was extracted. To a lesser degree, the EtOH concentration promoted migration, while increasing KEL concentration and temperature limited it.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>Our study highlighted the impact of formulation on the leaching of 2,4 DTBP from silicone valves. The decrease of its extraction in the presence of higher TAC concentrations may be related to the sorption of TAC or KEL on the surface of the valves. In the absence of toxicological data on the impact of 2,4 DTBP on the eye at the quantities found, cytotoxicity studies should be performed. In the meantime, manufacturers of delivery devices are encouraged to conduct leachability studies in real-world use situations.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. Lockhart H, Paine FA. Introduction to the packaging of pharmaceuticals and healthcare products. In: Lockhart H, Paine FA, &eacute;diteurs. Packaging of Pharmaceuticals and Healthcare Products. Boston, MA: Springer US; 1996. p. 1-12.</p><p>2. Barrieu M, Chennell P, Yessaad M, Bouattour Y, Wasiak M, Jouannet M, <I>et al</I>. Physicochemical stability of a novel tacrolimus ophthalmic formulation for the treatment of ophthalmic inflammatory diseases. <I>Pharmaceutics. Janv.</I> 2022;<b>14</b>(1):118.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barrieu, M., Chennell, P., Mailhot-Jensen, B., Sautou, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.8</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.8</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[NP-008 Migration of 2,4-di-tert-butylphenol from multi-dose ophthalmic devices into tacrolimus preparations: influence of formulation]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>National poster winner abstracts</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A4</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A4</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A4-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[NP-009 Discontinuation and predictive factors in patients treated with GLP-1 receptor analogues: evidence from Sicilian distribution 'per conto' (DPC) data (2021-2024)]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A4-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Objectives</st><p>In Italy, the prescription of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Analogues (GLP1-RA) reimbursed by the National Health Service (NHS) is regulated by AIFA Note 100, which authorises their use in adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with inadequate glycaemic control (HbA1c &gt;7.0%).</p><p>In Sicily, GLP1-RA for this indication are dispensed exclusively through the distribution &lsquo;per conto&rsquo; (DPC) channel.</p><p>This analysis aims to evaluate one-year persistence to treatment with GLP1-RA in patients with T2DM resident in Sicily and to identify the main predictive factors associated with treatment discontinuation.</p></sec><sec><st>Materials and Methods</st><p>A retrospective study was conducted using dispensing data collected through the DPC channel for the period 2021&ndash;2024.</p><p>Patients with a new prescription of GLP1-RA were selected. New users were defined as individuals who received a first dispensing at least 120 days after the start of the observation period, in order to exclude patients already on treatment and ensure the inclusion exclusively of new users. A minimum follow-up of 12 months from the date of first dispensing was required.</p><p>Persistence at 12 months, defined as the time in days between the first and last dispensing (including the days covered by the final supply) in the absence of a time gap greater than 60 days, was analysed using Kaplan-Meier curves. Statistical analyses included the log-rank test and Cox regression models adjusted for active substance, age, and gender.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 12,468 patients were included, with 3,417 discontinuation events observed at one year. Persistence differed significantly across treatments (log-rank p&lt;0.0001), with the highest values recorded for dulaglutide (78.7%), followed by semaglutide (69.6%), exenatide (49.6%), and liraglutide (39.6%).</p><p>Cox regression analysis (reference: dulaglutide) showed a progressively increasing risk of discontinuation for semaglutide (HR=1.56; p&lt;0.001), exenatide (HR=3.05; p&lt;0.001), and liraglutide (HR=3.65; p&lt;0.001).</p><p>Gender had no significant impact on persistence (p=0.72). Conversely, age proved to be a determining factor: patients aged 45-64 years (HR=0.62) and 65-79 years (HR=0.72) showed higher persistence compared with those aged &ge;80 years (p&lt;0.001).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>This real-world analysis highlights important differences in persistence among GLP1-RA, with a favourable profile for dulaglutide and greater critical issues for liraglutide and exenatide.</p><p>The impact of advanced age suggests the need to adopt a more personalised therapeutic approach, favouring medicines with greater continuity of use and including intensified monitoring strategies in elderly patients or in those treated with active substances associated with a higher risk of discontinuation.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vincenza Adriana, T., Marco, S., Giuseppina, R., Delia, D., Maurizio, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.9</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.9</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[NP-009 Discontinuation and predictive factors in patients treated with GLP-1 receptor analogues: evidence from Sicilian distribution 'per conto' (DPC) data (2021-2024)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>National poster winner abstracts</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A4</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A5</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A5-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[NP-010 Piperacillin/tazobactam - elastomeric pumps in pediatric hematology and oncology]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A5-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Piperacillin/tazobactam is the most used intravenous antimicrobial agent in paediatric haematology and oncology. The drug is typically administered three times daily in both inpatient and outpatient settings. However, due to the wide geographical area of Northern Finland, outpatient treatment is not always feasible.</p></sec><sec><st>Objectives</st><p>This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and benefits of administering piperacillin/tazobactam as continuous infusion via elastomeric pumps in paediatric patients, focusing on hospital stay reduction, improved quality of life, and healthcare resource optimization.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Pump dosing was standardized for children weighing 15&ndash;37.5 kg in 2.5 kg increments, with the attending physician determining the appropriate dose. For children &ge;40 kg, adult pumps containing 12/1.5 g of piperacillin/tazobactam were used. Two different Folfusor elastomeric pump sizes were utilised depending on the dose. Dose-specific batch protocols were developed to eliminate manual calculations and reduce manufacturing errors.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Children weighing &ge;15 kg across the Northern Finland collaboration area were successfully treated with elastomeric pumps. Families reported improved appetite and activity levels in children at home and valued the opportunity to return home earlier. Hospital ward burden decreased due to earlier discharges. Each pump saved one hospital day, with a total of 117 hospital days saved during the pilot period (November 1, 2024 &ndash; April 30, 2025).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Elastomeric pumps, already widely adopted in adult care, demonstrated significant benefits in infection treatment among paediatric haematology and oncology patients. Pumps can be easily customised by size, enabling safe and effective antimicrobial delivery. This approach frees patient beds, reduces healthcare staff workload, and generates financial savings. Most importantly, it enhances the quality of life for children and their families during demanding treatment periods.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. Eiland LS, Benner K, Gumpper KF, <I>et al</I>. ASHP-PPAG guidelines for providing pediatric pharmacy services in hospitals and health systems. <I>Am J Health Syst Pharm</I>. 2018;<b>75</b>:1151&ndash;65. <I>Journal of Biology</I> <b>2</b>:1&ndash;2.</p><p>2. Sentinel event alert 39: Preventing pediatric medication errors. The Joint Comission 11.4.2008. https://jointcomission.org/resources/patient-safety-topics</p><p>1. Kuitunen S, Luukkainen P. Turvallisen la&#x0308;a&#x0308;kehoidon erityispiirteita&#x0308; lapsilla. <I>Duodecim</I> 2021;<b>137</b>:515&ndash;23.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kallio, T., Smolander, E., Mustakallio, J., Jurva, M., Taipale, U., Niinima&#x0308;ki, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.10</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.10</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[NP-010 Piperacillin/tazobactam - elastomeric pumps in pediatric hematology and oncology]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>National poster winner abstracts</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A5</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A5</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A5-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[NP-011 Quality and economic value of returned unused oral targeted anticancer medication and measures to reduce medication waste]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A5-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Use of oral targeted anticancer medications has increased considerably in recent years, leading to substantial healthcare costs. Medication waste has simultaneously become a growing global concern, with environmental, ethical and economic implications. High-cost oncology medicines returned unused by patients represent a potential opportunity for reducing waste through safe redispensing.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The aim of this study was to assess the extent, quality and economic impact of unused, returned targeted anticancer medication at Landsp&iacute;tali &ndash; The National University Hospital of Iceland. Objectives included evaluating treatment use and costs, examining the amount and quality of returned medication, identifying reasons for return, assessing patient and healthcare-professional attitudes toward redispensing, and proposing procedures to minimise medication waste.</p></sec><sec><st>Materials and Methods</st><p>A multifaceted retrospective and prospective study was undertaken. Retrospective data (2020) included economic value and use of PKH and LTP medications. Prospective data (Jan&ndash;Mar 2021) assessed quantity, quality, reasons for return and economic value of unused medication. A questionnaire evaluated attitudes toward waste, redispensing and proposed interventions. Findings informed suggested procedures to reduce waste and support safe redispensing.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>In 2020, 453 treatments were dispensed to 283 patients, with a total economic value of 608 million ISK (4.2 million EUR). During the prospective phase, 2,193 prescription units of unused medication were returned, valued at 24 million ISK (168,000 EUR). Approximately 71% met criteria for potential reuse, indicating possible savings of up to 75%. The most common reasons for return were treatment discontinuation due to adverse effects or cancer progression. Both patients and healthcare professionals showed strong support for reducing waste and for redispensing unused high-cost medication.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Targeted anticancer treatments represent substantial economic investment. Most unused returned medication was of high quality and suitable for redispensing. Positive attitudes among patients and healthcare professionals support implementing structured procedures to reduce medication waste and promote sustainable oncology practice.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Johannsdottir, H., Gunnarsdottir, A. I., Magnusdottir, H., Kristin Gudmundsdottir, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.11</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.11</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[NP-011 Quality and economic value of returned unused oral targeted anticancer medication and measures to reduce medication waste]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>National poster winner abstracts</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A5</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A6</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A6?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[NP-012 Survival of patients with colorectal or pancreatic cancer who received UGT1A1 genotype-guided dosing of irinotecan: a multicentre real-world study]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A6?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>  <I>UGT1A1</I> genotype-guided dosing significantly reduces the incidence of severe toxicity in UGT1A1 poor metabolizer (PM) patients treated with irinotecan (Hulshof <I>et al</I>. Eur J Cancer 2022). However, the impact of <I>UGT1A1</I> genotype-guided irinotecan dosing on survival outcomes remains unknown.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This study evaluated whether upfront 30% dose reductions of irinotecan in UGT1A1 PMs affect survival by comparing progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between PMs treated with an initial 30% dose-reduction and fully dosed intermediate and normal metabolizers (IM/NMs).</p></sec><sec><st>Materials and Methods</st><p>We conducted a retrospective, multicentre cohort study in patients with pancreatic cancer (PC) or colorectal cancer (CRC) treated with <I>UGT1A1</I> genotype-guided irinotecan dosing at six Dutch hospitals between Aug 2017&ndash;Apr 2024. Patients were included in the primary analysis if irinotecan was dosed according to UGT1A1 genotype (i.e. 100%&plusmn;10% dose intensity for IM/NMs and 70%&plusmn;10% for PMs) in at least cycle 1. Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier estimates and multivariable Cox regressions, stratified by tumor type. Safety was also assessed.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>In total, 779 patients were included in the primary analysis, 76 (9.8%) of whom were PMs. PFS and OS rates were comparable over time between PMs and IM/NMs (stratified log-rank test: PFS: <I>P</I> = 0.542; OS: <I>P</I> = 0.419) (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F1">figure 1</cross-ref>). For patients with PC, median PFS was 9.0 months (95%CI: 6.2-11.8) in PMs and 8.3 months (95%CI: 7.2-9.4) in IM/NMs. For patients with CRC, median PFS was 6.2 months (95%CI: 5.1-7.3) in PMs and 6.0 months (95%CI: 5.3-6.7) in IM/NMs. Median OS was not statistically significant between PMs and IM/NMs. The adjusted hazard ratio of PMs <I>vs</I> IM/NMs was 1.015 (95%CI: 0.78-1.32; <I>P</I> = 0.90) for PFS and was 1.10 (95%CI: 0.82-1.48; <I>P</I> = 0.51) for OS, indicating no significant differences in survival outcomes between 30% dose-reduced PMs and fully dosed IM/NMs. Severe toxicity rates were comparable between PMs and IM/NMs.</p><p><fig loc="float" id="F1"><no>Abstract NP-012 Figure 1</no><caption><p>Carbon footprint savings achieved by delivering outpatient medications to community pharmacies</p></caption><link locator="NP-012_F1"></fig></p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Survival of UGT1A1 poor metabolizers is not affected by an upfront 30% dose reduction of irinotecan. Therefore, <I>UGT1A1</I> genotype-guided dosing of irinotecan can be confidently performed and should become the new standard-of-care dosing strategy for irinotecan to improve patient safety.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peeters, S. L., Heersche, N., Bohm, D. M., Bo&#x0308;hringer, S., Guiljam, R., Joosse, M., Osman, A., Hulshof, E. C., de Man, F. M., de With, M., van Hellemond, I. E., Haberkorn, B. C., Verschoor, A. J., Wumkes, M. L., van Schaik, R. H., Thijs, A. M., Gelderblom, H., Guchelaar, H.-J., Mathijssen, R. H., Deenen, M. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.12</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.12</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[NP-012 Survival of patients with colorectal or pancreatic cancer who received UGT1A1 genotype-guided dosing of irinotecan: a multicentre real-world study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>National poster winner abstracts</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A6</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A7</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A7-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[1ISG-001 Environmental impact of pharmaceuticals: a survey on knowledge of patients attending a hospital pharmacy dispensing service]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A7-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>The increasing presence of pharmaceuticals in the environment and, consequently long-term drug exposure, even at low doses, can have a significant impact on safety and health of human beings and animals.</p><p>Customers&rsquo; improper disposal (by trashing or flushing) represents one of the possible ways of access to ecosystems for wasted pharmaceutical products, emphasising the importance of awareness activities, in which hospital pharmacists could play a key role.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The aim of this study was to investigate the knowledge and habits, concerning disposal of household pharmaceutical waste, of hospital pharmacy dispensing service users in a hospital, in order to develop a proper system for raising consciousness about drug pollution.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Data were collected by means of anonymous and voluntary survey, consisting of five multiple choice-items, in a 2-month period. A total of 120 users (34 people of 18-40 years; 60 of 40-65 years; 26 of 65 years and more) answered the questionnaire; the responses were analysed using a spreadsheet and expressed as weighted average of the three age-categories.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>According to the survey, 112/120 of users understand the environmental impact of an incorrect disposal of expired/unused drugs; however, the concept of ecopharmacovigilance is not widespread (only 53/120 of respondents had knowledge of it).</p><p>Survey results showed that the role of digital media (website, social network) in sharing this information was essential in the 18-40 years age group (24/34); the same role was played by traditional media, including television in the 40-65 years age group and the 65 years and more age groups (37/60 and 19/26, respectively).</p><p>The survey also indicates that 104/120 of respondents pay close attention to proper disposal of pharmaceutical waste, dropping them off at designed location, like community pharmacies (19/34 of the 18-40 years age group, 53/60 of the 40-65 years age group and 18/26 of the 65 years and more age group).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Although a relevant percentage of respondents understands the importance of a proper use and disposal of pharmaceutical products, awareness activities, involving hospital pharmacists, are essential in promoting correct behaviours.</p><p>For this purpose, simplified guidelines on the proper disposal of household pharmaceutical waste (drugs, medical device) were developed and made available through a QR code to all users of direct hospital pharmacy dispensing service.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baiamonte, C., Cancellieri, G., Polidori, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.13</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.13</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[1ISG-001 Environmental impact of pharmaceuticals: a survey on knowledge of patients attending a hospital pharmacy dispensing service]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 1: Introductory statements and governance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A7</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A7</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A7-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[1ISG-002 High stability, high risk: the dual challenge of experience retention versus demographic decline in Estonian hospital pharmacies]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A7-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>The long-term continuity of hospital pharmacy services is a critical priority. The Estonian Hospital Pharmacists&rsquo; Society (ESHP) included supporting this sustainability in its 2023-2026 development strategy. Workforce planning is crucial due to recognised challenges in finding new staff, particularly for the pharmacy assistant profession and in regions further from major cities.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The overall aim of the study was to map the current hospital pharmacy workforce. Key objectives included analysing the age composition, reviewing the placement of staff aged over 60, and quantifying the speed of demographic change through a comparative analysis of the 2023 demographic baseline against projections for the year 2025.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>The initial study by ESHP in 2023 encompassed the entire hospital pharmacy workforce (total 108 professionals) across 22 hospital pharmacies. The personnel analysed consisted of 77 pharmacists and 31 pharmacy assistants. The analysis focused on professional tenure (categorised as &lt;5y, 5&ndash;10y, &gt;10y) and age distribution (seven cohorts, up to 71+). To estimate emerging trends and future challenges, the 2023 baseline data were analysed comparatively against demographic projections for the year 2025.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The workforce exhibits high stability, with 71% of pharmacists and 58% of pharmacy assistants having worked in the hospital pharmacy system for more than 10 years. Overall, 57 pharmacists and 22 pharmacy assistants have more than 3years of experience (&gt;3a). The comparison revealed a significant acceleration of ageing trends. In 2023, 31% of all hospital pharmacists were older than 60 years. Pharmacy assistant cohort faces the highest demographic risk, with 47% of pharmacy assistants projected to be 61 years or older by 2025. For pharmacy assistants, the 61&ndash;65 age cohort is projected to rise sharply from 13% in 2023 to 25% in 2025.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The comparison of the 2023 baseline with the 2025 projections reveals a critical contradiction: exceptional professional stability is coupled with an impending, accelerated demographic crisis. The projected high proportion of staff reaching retirement age by 2025, particularly among pharmacy assistants, poses a severe and immediate threat to service continuity. Strategic focus must urgently be directed towards effective succession planning, recruitment, and increasing the overall valuation of hospital pharmacy work, especially in smaller hospitals.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Urbala, M., Saar, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.14</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.14</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[1ISG-002 High stability, high risk: the dual challenge of experience retention versus demographic decline in Estonian hospital pharmacies]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 1: Introductory statements and governance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A7</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A7</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A8-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[1ISG-003 Estimation of the hidden costs of drug preparations in early access authorisation and compassionate use authorisation over 18 months]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A8-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Drug preparations under early access authorisation (EAA) and compassionate use authorisation (CUA) is a key activity of our pharmacy. At the same time we are trying to implement the socio-economic management (SEAM) in our pharmacy.<sup>1</sup>  </p><p>According to this method we need to estimate the hidden costs (HD). HD is the cost of regulation of dysfunctions. They are divided into different types of regulation, including overconsumption and overtime.</p><p>We aimed to estimate the HD in euros () of preparations under EAA and CUA regarding overtime and overconsumption.<sup>1</sup>  </p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>Estimate the HD of our preparations under EAA and CUA over an 18-month period.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>First, the cost of these preparations was worked out according to the number of vials and their unit price.</p><p>This amount was corrected by hourly contribution to value-added on variable costs (HCVAVC), which is the real average cost of 1 hour of human activity within a company (1) to include the human time to prepare.</p><p>Finally, we calculated the HC of non-compliance for our preparations. They include overconsumption and overtime. Knowing our rejection rate (RR) for preparations (which we assumed to be constant in 2025), as well as the average number of vials consumed for a preparation according to our records and the average unit price, we were able to calculate these HC.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>We made 4291 preparations between January 24 and June 2025.</p><p>Our HCVAVC was 47 in 2024. Total time for a preparation was 30 minutes.</p><p>Our RR was 2%, so 85 preparations have to be redone. Three vials were used per preparation and average unit price was 2302, that was 587 000 of overconsumption and 1998  of overtime.</p><p>In total, the HD represented 588 998.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Based on the SEAM we found that the HD represents almost 600 000 mainly due to overconsumption.</p><p>It is essential to structure the training and deepen it; the better trained the hospital&rsquo;s technicians are, the less non-compliance there will be. Plus using more preparation robots is essential to reduce non-compliance and preparation times.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. Cappelletti L, Savall H, Zardet V. Socio-economic approach to management: science-based consulting for sustainability. Springer Nature Switzerland; 2024.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cosme, E., Rieutord, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.15</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.15</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[1ISG-003 Estimation of the hidden costs of drug preparations in early access authorisation and compassionate use authorisation over 18 months]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 1: Introductory statements and governance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A8</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A8</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A8-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[1ISG-004 Cost-effectiveness of bempedoic acid versus ezetimibe in statin-intolerant patients: a payer perspective]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A8-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Statin intolerance represents a significant challenge in cardiovascular risk management, limiting use of first-line lipid-lowering therapies. Ezetimibe is widely used as the standard non-statin option, while bempedoic acid has recently emerged as a novel therapy with proven efficacy in statin-intolerant patients. Evidence on their comparative economic value is limited. Understanding the cost-effectiveness of these options is critical for resource allocation and decision making in hospital pharmacy and payer settings.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of bempedoic acid compared with ezetimibe in statin-intolerant patients using a lifetime Markov model from a payer perspective.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A Markov model with six health states (no cardiovascular disease, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, post-myocardial infarction, post-stroke, death) was developed to simulate outcomes over a lifetime horizon. Patients entered the model at age 65. Transition probabilities were derived from risk equations and life tables. Treatment effects, utility values, and cost parameters were obtained through a structured review of published literature, including randomised controlled trials, meta-analyses, and standard cost databases. Costs included drug acquisition, medical management, and post-event care, adjusted to 2025 values. Both costs and outcomes were discounted at 3% annually. Results were expressed as total costs, life years, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Deterministic sensitivity analysis and price-reduction scenarios were performed.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Ezetimibe generated 10.31 discounted QALYs at a lifetime cost of 166,513 units, while bempedoic acid yielded 11.01 discounted QALYs at 389,310 units. Compared with ezetimibe, bempedoic acid produced an incremental gain of 0.70 QALYs at an additional cost of 222,797 units, resulting in an ICER of 318,282 per QALY. This exceeded the accepted cost-effectiveness threshold. Sensitivity analyses confirmed robustness, with drug acquisition cost as the most influential parameter. Scenario analysis showed that bempedoic acid would become cost-effective only if its price decreased by ~45%, equal to a 28.5% reduction in lifetime costs.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Bempedoic acid provides incremental health benefits compared with ezetimibe in statin-intolerant patients but is not cost-effective at current prices. Substantial price reductions would be required for it to represent value for money. These findings provide evidence to guide hospital pharmacy practice and payer decision making in evaluating lipid-lowering therapies.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sermhattakit, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.16</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.16</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[1ISG-004 Cost-effectiveness of bempedoic acid versus ezetimibe in statin-intolerant patients: a payer perspective]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 1: Introductory statements and governance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A8</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A8</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A9-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[1ISG-005 The impact of leadership in pharmacy management on medication safety in hospital pharmacies]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A9-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Leadership in pharmacy management plays a pivotal role in influencing medication safety and operational efficiency in hospital pharmacies. However, few studies have systematically examined how leadership styles impact medication safety outcomes in these settings. Understanding these relationships is critical for developing strategies that can improve patient safety and workflow within the hospital pharmacy setting.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This study aimed to investigate the relationship between leadership styles in pharmacy management and medication safety outcomes, focusing on the incidence of medication errors, adverse drug events (ADEs), and staff satisfaction.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A cross-sectional study was conducted at five different hospital pharmacies, each managed by a different leadership style (transformational, transactional, laissez-faire, and autocratic). Data was collected on medication errors and ADEs, using incident reports over a 12-month period. Additionally, pharmacy staff satisfaction was measured using a standardised survey. The data were analysed using ANOVA for differences between leadership styles and multiple regression for predicting medication errors based on leadership type.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The analysis showed that pharmacies led by transformational leaders had a 30% lower rate of medication errors (p = 0.02) and a 25% lower rate of ADEs (p = 0.03) compared to pharmacies led by autocratic managers. Additionally, staff satisfaction was 35% higher in transformational leadership settings (p = 0.01). No significant differences were found between other leadership styles.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The findings suggest that transformational leadership in pharmacy management is associated with improved medication safety outcomes and greater staff satisfaction. These results underline the importance of leadership development in pharmacy settings as a strategy for improving patient safety and operational performance.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. Guntschnig S, Barbosa R, Jenzer H, Greening M, Hayde J, Heery H, Iglesias Serrano MC, Lajtmanov&aacute; K, Rossin E, Tentova-Peceva S, Kohl S, Mulac A. Tackling medication errors: how a systems approach improves patient safety. <I>Eur J Hosp Pharm.</I> 2025 Apr 30:ejhpharm-2025-004533. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004533. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 40280735.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dehpanah, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.17</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.17</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[1ISG-005 The impact of leadership in pharmacy management on medication safety in hospital pharmacies]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 1: Introductory statements and governance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A9</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A9</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A9-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[1ISG-006 Closing inequity gaps in access to medical nutrition: a survey to understand barriers]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A9-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>A survey of market access experts of the Medical Nutrition International Industry was undertaken to understand the barriers contributing to inequity in optimal nutritional care in Europe.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>Disease-related malnutrition (DRM), an underdiagnosed, undertreated public health problem that affects 30&ndash;50% of hospital inpatients, results in poor health outcomes and higher costs.<sup>1</sup> Multidisciplinary care, including pharmacists, is essential to ensure optimal nutritional interventions.<sup>2</sup> Pharmacists are vital to multidisciplinary care coordination. Medical nutrition therapy is cost-effective and improves health outcomes, yet inequity exists in access.<sup>1</sup> This survey was conducted to address the limited insight across countries into the major barriers to implementation of equitable nutritional care beyond health technology assessment.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>An online survey was developed by the MNI, and members (n=6) participated between April and December 2024. Additional responses were included (National Industry Groups n=2; additional MNI members n=2). Results covered Croatia, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Portugal, Spain, Switzerland, The Netherlands and the United Kingdom. Quantitative data were reported as percentages and qualitative data as key themes.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Although screening for DRM was reported as being available in 80% of countries surveyed, it was mandatory in only 20% and often poorly implemented. Knowledge of nutritional care was described as inconsistent and specialty-dependent, with 56% reporting access to expert nutrition professionals as limited to hospital settings. Barriers identified included lack of funding, limited workforce availability and nutrition seen as a low priority. Although reimbursement of food for special medical purposes (FSMP) (medical nutrition products for oral or enteral nutrition) was reported by 90% of country respondents it varied by healthcare setting, and 50% reported that obtaining FSMP is &lsquo;difficult/not easy&rsquo;. Awareness of DRM amongst patients was reported as low, with difficulties navigating complex healthcare systems citied by 70% of country respondents as a key contributing factor to inequity.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Knowledge of system-level barriers to nutritional care, beyond HTA, highlights actionable gaps within hospital practice. Hospital pharmacists can act as drivers of change. Through their roles in therapeutic committees, and care coordination, they can help embed medical nutrition into hospital standards and reduce access inequities.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. WHO-ESPEN 2023. https://www.who.int/europe/publications/i/item/WHO-EURO-2023-8931-48703-72392</p><p>2. Cederholm, <I>et al</I>. 2017. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27642056</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>Corporate sponsored research or other substantive relationships:</p><p>MNI represents the companies that were surveyed for this exercise.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Miceli, E., Danel, A., Soini, E., Hartmann, C., Shepelev, J., Dular, A., Rados, I., Gantner, M., Hoceini, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.18</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.18</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[1ISG-006 Closing inequity gaps in access to medical nutrition: a survey to understand barriers]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 1: Introductory statements and governance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A9</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A10</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A10-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[1ISG-007 PCSK9 inhibitor prescriptions not meeting reimbursement criteria: a retrospective study]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A10-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors (PCSK9 inhibitors), including evolocumab, alirocumab, and inclisiran, are potent lipid-lowering agents indicated for patients at high cardiovascular risk. Clinical guidelines recommend achieving LDL-C levels below 55 mg/dL in very high risk populations. However, reimbursement in our national health service is restricted to patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (HeFH) or established cardiovascular disease (ischaemic heart disease, ischaemic cerebrovascular disease, or peripheral arterial disease) who are not adequately controlled (LDL-C &gt;100 mg/dL) despite receiving maximum tolerated statin therapy (atorvastatin 80 mg or rosuvastatin 40 mg), or who are intolerant to at least two different statins.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the rate of PCSK9 inhibitor prescriptions not meeting reimbursement criteria and identify the main reasons for non-initiation treatment in a tertiary care hospital during 2024.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective review was conducted of all PCSK9 inhibitor prescriptions submitted via the electronic prescription and dispensing system during 2024. Medical records were reviewed to collect data on lipid profiles, statin adherence, and prior prescription history. Particular attention was given to verifying high-intensity statin use and documented statin intolerance. Reasons for non-initiation were categorised as absence of high-intensity statin therapy, poor adherence, LDL-C &lt;100 mg/dL, primary prevention without HeFH and others such as needle phobia.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 107 prescriptions were reviewed for 97 patients. After further evaluation, 20 prescriptions (18.7%) from 20 patients did not lead to treatment initiation. The mean age of these patients was 59.7 years (range: 40&ndash;77), with nine females and 11 males. Ten prescriptions came from cardiology, nine from endocrinology, and one from internal medicine. Eleven of them were for evolocumab, eight for alirocumab, and one for inclisiran. Main reasons for non-approval included absence of high-intensity statin therapy (n=7), poor adherence (n=4), LDL-C &lt;100 mg/dL (n=3), primary prevention without HeFH (n=5) and needle phobia (n=1).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Nearly one-fifth of PCSK9 inhibitor prescriptions did not result in treatment initiation due to non-compliance with reimbursement criteria. This result highlights the misalignment between clinical guidelines and regulatory reimbursement policies, which represents a major challenge. Strengthening interdisciplinary collaboration and enhancing prescriber awareness may facilitate appropriate use of lipid-lowering therapies and improve patient outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chaves Martinez, B., Do Pazo Oubina, F., Gomez Zamora, M., Gomez Lobon, A., Padilla Castano, H., Martorell Puigserver, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.19</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.19</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[1ISG-007 PCSK9 inhibitor prescriptions not meeting reimbursement criteria: a retrospective study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 1: Introductory statements and governance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A10</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A10</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A10-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[1ISG-008 Estimation of hidden costs associated with drug returns in clinical trials at a cancer centre pharmacy]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A10-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Clinical trials (CT) are essential to provide access to innovative medicines for patients. Hospital pharmacies play a central role in their management.</p><p>In our pharmacy, the Socio-Economic Management (SEAM) is being implemented to assess and improve both the socio-organisational and economic performance of the pharmacy.<sup>1</sup> SEAM allows the identification and valuation of hidden costs (HC), defined as the cost generated by the regulation of dysfunctions. These dysfunctions can lead for example to overtime, overconsumption resources or excess salary costs.</p><p>We focused on estimating the HC () associated with the management of drug return (DR) from CTs.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To estimate the HC associated with the management of CTs DR at a cancer centre pharmacy.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>31 semi-structured interviews were conducted involving 59 pharmacy staff members to identify dysfunctions in our pharmacy. Some concerned DR from CTs.</p><p>Regulation mechanisms were identified in collaboration with the compliance officer.</p><p>The hourly contribution to value-added on variable costs (HCAVVC), corresponding to the real average cost of 1 hour of human activity,<sup>1</sup> was used to value the time spent managing these dysfunctions.</p><p>HC were calculated by multiplying the time spent regulating each dysfunction by the HCAVVC.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Six key dysfunctions were identified:</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Retrieving EP (overtime &ndash; 1158)</p></li><li><p>Entering return dates (overtime &ndash; 7,081)</p></li><li><p>Storing DR pending accounting (overtime &ndash; 470)</p></li><li><p>Counting DR (overtime &ndash; 57,246)</p></li><li><p>Storing DR and related documents (overtime &ndash; 376)</p></li><li><p>Presenting DR during monitoring visits (overtime &ndash; 963)</p></li></l></p><p>The calculated HCAVVC was 47/hour.</p><p>The total HC associated with DR management was estimated at 67,294 per year, representing approximately 3.5% of the pharmacy&rsquo;s annual CT management costs, equivalent of about a 1.5 full-time clinical research associate.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>This amounted of 67,294 per year, confirming the economic impact of dysfunctions.</p><p>Quantifying and contextualising HC provides a management tool to prioritise corrective actions (CA) according to their economic significance.</p><p>Employees&rsquo; involvement is essential for change management and remains at the heart of SEAM.</p><p>The next assessment will quantify performance gains and validate the benefits of the CA.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. Cappelletti L, Savall H, Zardet V. Socio-economic approach to management: science-based consulting for sustainability. Springer Nature Switzerland; 2024.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cosme, E., Rieutord, A., Dufour, C., Do, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.20</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.20</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[1ISG-008 Estimation of hidden costs associated with drug returns in clinical trials at a cancer centre pharmacy]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 1: Introductory statements and governance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A10</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A11</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A11-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[1ISG-009 Digital inclusion in healthcare: opportunities and gaps]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A11-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>The digital transformation of healthcare is intended to promote universal access through digital health services and telemedicine. However, the digital divide poses a major risk of exclusion, especially among older adults and individuals living in rural areas with a poor internet coverage. Without adequate digital inclusion, the transition may create new barriers rather than removing them.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This study aimed to assess digital literacy among patients receiving direct drug distribution, in order to evaluate if they are ready to adopt current and future digital health services.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Between December 2024 and March 2025, an anonymous multiple choice questionnaire with simple questions was distributed to patients collecting medications from the hospital pharmacy. The survey was approved by the Data Protection Officer.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Of 3,684 patients, 1,804 questionnaires were collected (49%), representative across age groups. Most respondents (74%) were aged 41&ndash;80 years. A complete lack of digital skills combined with absence of caregiver support was reported by 4% (n=69). Among patients &gt;80 years, 16% identified as &lsquo;digitally illiterate,&rsquo; compared with 8% in the 66&ndash;80 group. Full digital autonomy (defined as the independent use of at least one device) was reported by 67% (n=1,207), with a marked decline by age: 96% in 18&ndash;40 years, 79% in 41&ndash;65, 46% in 66&ndash;80, and only 10% in those &gt;80. Partial autonomy, requiring caregiver support, was reported by 20%, with higher prevalence in older adults (&gt;66 years). Combining full and partial autonomy, 87% of respondents demonstrated some ability to use digital tools, primarily smartphones (97%). In total, 234 participants were digitally illiterate; of these, 70% could rely on caregiver support, while only 4% (n=69) were completely excluded from technological assistance.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The majority of patients receiving direct drug distribution demonstrated that can use digital health services. A small minority (mainly those over 80 years) remain at risk of exclusion, although caregiver support mitigates this vulnerability in most cases. This study provides evidence to guide targeted strategies for digital inclusion in healthcare, helping prevent inequities during the ongoing digital transition.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marengo, M., Criaco, F., Marchiaro, C., Pisciotta, A., Soldati, S., Selvini, G., Sillano, S., Miglio, G., Poggio, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.21</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.21</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[1ISG-009 Digital inclusion in healthcare: opportunities and gaps]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 1: Introductory statements and governance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A11</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A11</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A11-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[1ISG-010 Influence of income and nationality on parental satisfaction with pharmaceutical services in paediatric hospital pharmacies]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A11-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Parental satisfaction with pharmaceutical services in paediatric hospitals reflects healthcare quality through communication, accessibility, and medication safety. Factors like nationality and socioeconomic status shape how families perceive these services. Understanding these influences supports equitable, patient-centred pharmacy practices in diverse healthcare setting</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The study aimed to evaluate parental satisfaction with hospital pharmacy services, focusing specifically on the effects of nationality and income status. The objective was to determine whether these demographic factors significantly influenced perceptions of communication, accessibility, and overall satisfaction, and to identify specific service elements where disparities may occur.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A cross-sectional quantitative survey using an adapted Pharmacy Services Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSPSQ 2.0) was distributed to parents of paediatric patients over three months. Satisfaction across five domains-communication, clarity, professionalism, accessibility, and waiting time was rated on a five-point Likert scale. Data were analysed in SPSS to examine associations between parental nationality, income, and satisfaction.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 233 parents completed the survey. The overall satisfaction with hospital pharmacy services was high (mean score 4.57&plusmn; 0.7). Analysis showed statistically significant differences in satisfaction related to both nationality and income. Parents with lower income (&lt; 20,000/year) reported higher appreciation for pharmacist communication (4.4 &plusmn; 0.5) and clarity of verbal instructions (4.3 &plusmn; 0.6) but expressed more concerns about waiting times (3.1 &plusmn; 0.8) and medicine availability (3.2 &plusmn; 0.8). Families with higher income (&gt; 40,000/year) were less satisfied with the organisation of the pharmacy (3.0 &plusmn; 0.7) and longer waiting times (3.0 &plusmn; 0.8), reflecting higher expectations of efficiency and comfort. Non-native parents (28% of the sample) reported more communication difficulties and lower overall satisfaction (3.2 &plusmn; 0.9) compared with native parents (4.0 &plusmn; 0.7, p &lt; 0.01), particularly in understanding medication instructions and navigating the pharmacy process.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Income status and nationality play decisive roles in shaping parental satisfaction with paediatric hospital pharmacy services. Overall satisfaction was higher among parents who reported clear communication and shorter waiting times. These findings highlight the need for tailored interventions that enhance language support for non-native parents and improve efficiency for higher income families. Demographic-sensitive pharmacy service design can promote equity, adherence, trust across diverse paediatric populations.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nikou, K., Kouri, N., Georgi, C., Gkouna, O.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.22</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.22</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[1ISG-010 Influence of income and nationality on parental satisfaction with pharmaceutical services in paediatric hospital pharmacies]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 1: Introductory statements and governance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A11</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A11</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A12-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[1ISG-011 Economic savings derived from participation in melanoma clinical trials]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A12-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>The incidence of melanoma has increased markedly in recent years, prompting intensive research into new therapeutic options. Clinical trials (CTs) not only provide patients with access to innovative treatments but may also generate substantial economic benefits for healthcare systems, as investigational drugs are supplied by sponsors. Assessing these cost savings can help optimise healthcare resource allocation and reinforce the value of clinical research infrastructure within hospitals.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To quantify the economic savings generated by the inclusion of melanoma patients in clinical trials during 2024 and to evaluate their impact on the costs associated with standard treatments.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective observational study was conducted including all melanoma patients enrolled in CTs between January and December 2024 at a tertiary hospital. Economic savings were defined as the avoided cost of standard of care (SoC) drugs replaced by investigational products supplied by sponsors. For each patient, the estimated dose and number of cycles of SoC therapy were calculated based on the duration of participation in the trial. Standard therapies considered were: pembrolizumab (adjuvant, high risk stage II&ndash;IV melanoma); dabrafenib + trametinib (first-line (1L) metastatic BRAF-mutated melanoma); pembrolizumab (second-line (2L) metastatic BRAF-mutated melanoma); and pembrolizumab (1L metastatic BRAF wild-type melanoma). Data were obtained from Pk-ensayos and Farmis-Oncofarm software.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Thirty-seven patients were included across eight active melanoma CTs: 11 in 1L metastatic BRAF wild-type trials, 3 in 1L metastatic BRAF-mutated trials, and 23 in adjuvant studies. The mean number of treatment cycles was seven (range 2&ndash;12). Based on 2024 average drug prices, total economic savings were estimated at 511,054.14, corresponding to a mean of 13,812.28 per patient.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Participation in melanoma clinical trials generates substantial economic savings by reducing the use of costly standard therapies. These findings highlight the dual benefit of clinical research&mdash;improving patient access to innovative treatments and optimising healthcare resource utilisation. Strengthening hospital infrastructures dedicated to clinical research is essential to sustain these benefits and ensure the efficient and safe management of trials</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lopez Bautis, B., Alamino Arrebola, E., Garcia Fernandez, C., Tortajada Goitia, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.23</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.23</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[1ISG-011 Economic savings derived from participation in melanoma clinical trials]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 1: Introductory statements and governance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A12</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A12</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A12-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[1ISG-012 Hospital pharmacy and medical devices: assessing economic performance under flat-rate reimbursement constraints]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A12-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>In Belgium, the reimbursement of medical and implantable devices relies on fixed lump sums defined by the National Institute for Health and Disability Insurance (INAMI). These amounts are not indexed and do not always reflect patient complexity or technological advances. Optimising the use of such reimbursement schemes is crucial for sustainable hospital resource management.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This study aimed to assess the impact of a pharmacist-led intervention on the financial performance of vascular surgery procedures. A secondary objective was to identify variables associated with reimbursement deficits.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A before-after interventional study was conducted from December 2023 to April 2025. The analysis focused on endovascular dilatation procedures (INAMI code 589050&ndash;589061). The study included three phases: baseline financial analysis, pharmacist-led feedback, and post-intervention evaluation. Pharmacists met with vascular surgeons to explain the reimbursement model, present margin data by physician, and highlight price differences among equivalent devices. Primary outcomes were the average financial margin per procedure and the proportion of interventions exceeding the reimbursed amount. Secondary analyses explored associations between selected variables and the likelihood of generating a device-related financial deficit.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Among 199 procedures, 193 were included in the final analysis. Patient and surgery characteristics were comparable between periods. The average margin increased by  59.7 (+23.3%) (p=0,51), and the proportion of negative-margin procedures declined from 31.7% to 27.2% (p=0,53) though not statistically significant. Margins were negatively correlated with procedure duration (p &lt; 0.001*) and number of comorbidities (p = 0.016*), but not with age or sex.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Although statistical significance was not reached, the study revealed encouraging trends. The observed correlation between clinical complexity and lower margins suggests that fixed reimbursement schemes may be inadequate for complex patients. These findings highlight the relevance of hospital pharmacists in promoting cost-awareness and optimising the use of surgical devices.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ennader, N., Collard, O., Tubeuf, S., Van Eijgen, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.24</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.24</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[1ISG-012 Hospital pharmacy and medical devices: assessing economic performance under flat-rate reimbursement constraints]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 1: Introductory statements and governance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A12</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A12</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A12-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[1ISG-013 Cost savings from ustekinumab biosimilar adoption: a 5-year hospital budget impact study]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A12-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>The introduction of the ustekinumab biosimilar (UB) offers a new opportunity for cost savings for healthcare institutions due to the high use and cost of the originator (UO). Assessing the economic impact of UB introduction is essential to support sustainable therapeutic and budgetary decisions in hospitals.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This study aimed to perform a Budget Impact Analysis (BIA) to estimate potential savings resulting from the introduction of UB in a hospital setting, considering its approved indications: plaque psoriasis, active psoriatic arthritis, and Crohn&rsquo;s disease.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A 5-year BIA was conducted under three scenarios: exclusive use of UO, mixed use of UO and UB, and exclusive use of UB. The analysis used 2024 dispensing data (2,100/year) distributed by indication. Direct costs, including VAT, consisting of drug acquisition (tender prices/vial: UO 130 mg 2,225; UO 90 mg 1,800; UB 130 mg and 90 mg 291) and intravenous administration (set 2.5/unit, nurse 30/h, 3 dispensations/nurse). A 5% annual increase in dispensations and a 5% discount from year three were assumed, based on internal data. A stochastic sensitivity analysis with Monte Carlo simulation (n=10,000) was performed on the mixed scenario, varying the switch to UB (60&ndash;100%) and return to UO (0&ndash;20%). Analyses were conducted using R Studio, version 4.3.3.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Over five years, total costs were 42.7 million for UO-only, 22.2 million for mixed use, and 14.2 million for UB-only. This corresponds to savings of about 20.5 million with mixed use and an even greater reduction of about 28.5 million with exclusive UB use, compared to UO-only. Sensitivity analysis estimated a mean cost of about 20.1 million (range 13.9&ndash;26.7 million; standard deviation 2.0 million).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Introducing UB could significantly improve the economic sustainability of hospital pharmaceutical expenditure without compromising therapeutic efficacy. The BIA showed substantial savings even in the mixed use scenario, further increased under exclusive biosimilar adoption. Stochastic sensitivity confirmed robust results, with minimum savings of 16,027,250 in the highest-cost simulation. This study underscores the key role of hospital pharmacists in promoting clinically and economically sustainable decisions within the National Health Service.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mendola, A., Alba, A., Cruciata, N., Leonardi Vinci, D., Polidori, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.25</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.25</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[1ISG-013 Cost savings from ustekinumab biosimilar adoption: a 5-year hospital budget impact study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 1: Introductory statements and governance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A12</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A13</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A13-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[1ISG-014 Hospital pharmacist evaluation of natalizumab biosimilar adoption in multiple sclerosis: budget impact and cost-minimisation analysis]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A13-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Natalizumab is an effective therapy for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS), usually reserved as a second-line treatment due to its high cost. The availability of an intravenous (IV) biosimilar may improve healthcare sustainability, while the subcutaneous (SC) originator offers shorter administration but its patent has not yet expired. Evaluating their economic impact is crucial for evidence-based and sustainable decisions.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To conduct a five-year budget impact analysis (BIA) comparing IV natalizumab biosimilar with the SC originator in a hospital setting, and a cost-minimisation analysis (CMA) to identify the lowest cost option per dispensation, assuming therapeutic equivalence.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>The BIA model considered 1,168 annual dispensations (2024 baseline). Direct costs included drug acquisition (1,090 SC; 873 IV biosimilar), administration (12 SC; 33 IV), monitoring (67 both), and adverse event management (0.30 SC; 0.35 IV). Scenarios were: exclusive SC originator, exclusive IV biosimilar, and mixed (50/50 in year 1; 30/70 thereafter). Sensitivity analysis with 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations varied biosimilar uptake (50&ndash;90%) and annual dispensations (900&ndash;1,300). The CMA compared unit costs to estimate per dispensation savings.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The IV biosimilar cost 975 per dispensation compared with 1,170 for the SC originator, yielding savings of 195 per dispensation. With 1,168 annual dispensations, this corresponded to approximately 228,000 per year and 1.14 million over five years. Over the same time horizon, total costs were 6.83 million for the SC originator, 5.68 million for the IV biosimilar, and 6.07 million for the mixed scenario. Sensitivity analysis of the mixed scenario, based on 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations varying biosimilar uptake (50&ndash;90%) and annual dispensations (900&ndash;1,300), showed an average cost of 5.63 million (SD 0.60 million; range 4.43&ndash;6.93 million).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The CMA identified the IV biosimilar as the cost-minimising option, saving 195 per dispensation compared with the SC originator. The BIA confirmed that exclusive biosimilar use yields the greatest savings, while mixed adoption offers a pragmatic compromise, combining cost reduction with therapeutic continuity and an alternative for patients intolerant to the biosimilar. These evaluations may support sustainable decision making and improve patient access in MS care.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alba, A., Mendola, A., Leonardi Vinci, D., Cruciata, N., Polidori, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.26</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.26</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[1ISG-014 Hospital pharmacist evaluation of natalizumab biosimilar adoption in multiple sclerosis: budget impact and cost-minimisation analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 1: Introductory statements and governance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A13</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A13</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A13-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[1ISG-015 Implementation of digital AIFA registries for reserve antibiotics: a tool for antimicrobial stewardship and prescribing governance in an infectious disease hospital]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A13-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Antimicrobial resistance is a global health emergency requiring integrated strategies of surveillance, stewardship, and prescribing governance. The Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA) has developed monitoring tools to promote the rational use of reserve antibiotics. Cefiderocol was the first active substance included in a digital monitoring registry in 2023. With AIFA Resolution No. 52 of June 30, 2025, this system was extended to other reserve antibiotics&mdash;ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam, and meropenem/vaborbactam&mdash;replacing previous paper-based forms.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This study aimed to evaluate the impact of AIFA registry digitalisation for reserve antibiotics as a tool for prescribing governance and support to antimicrobial stewardship in an Italian infectious disease hospital.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>The observation period was divided into two phases: January&ndash;June 2025 (paper-based forms) and July&ndash;October 2025 (digital registry implementation, AIFA Resolution No. 52/2025). Consumption data were extracted from the Regional Accounting Information System, while clinical and prescribing data were collected from AIFA registries. The hospital pharmacist developed an internal analysis file to assess prescribing appropriateness, integrating clinical and therapeutic information for each patient. The pharmacist also coordinated the retrospective reconciliation of paper records and continuously monitored data consistency.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>During the observation period (January&ndash;October 2025), 137 patients were treated with reserve antibiotics. In the paper-based phase, prescriptions included meropenem/vaborbactam (22 patients), imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam (18), ceftazidime/avibactam (32), and ceftolozane/tazobactam (26). In the digital phase (July&ndash;October 2025), treated patients were 9, 5, 11, and 14 for the same agents, respectively. Retrospective reconciliation of paper forms, later uploaded to the digital registry, showed a 2% discrepancy between original and electronic records, mainly due to incomplete documentation (missing antibiogram or infectious disease consultation). During the paper phase, the hospital pharmacist actively contributed to clinical-therapeutic validation and correction of records, ensuring compliance with AIFA eligibility criteria.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The implementation of AIFA digital registries improved traceability, consistency, and quality of prescribing data. At the international level, programmes such as DARWIN EU and GLASS promote antimicrobial use surveillance, while Italy stands out for its mandatory, digitalised prescribing approach. This system represents an innovative model of clinical pharmaceutical management that integrates innovation, therapeutic safety, and economic sustainability.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pistucci, M., Dauria, M., Morelli, S., Guerritore, M., Musella, F., Dapice, R., Spatarella, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.27</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.27</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[1ISG-015 Implementation of digital AIFA registries for reserve antibiotics: a tool for antimicrobial stewardship and prescribing governance in an infectious disease hospital]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 1: Introductory statements and governance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A13</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A14</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A14-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[1ISG-016 Carbon footprint of a hospital pharmacy department using the ciraig assessment tool : a descriptive study]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A14-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Healthcare institutions are increasingly called upon to quantify and reduce their environmental footprint. Medications and medical devices account for approximately 20&ndash;35% of hospital greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This study aimed to calculate the carbon footprint of the pharmacy department of a mother&ndash;child university hospital using a new tool developed by the International Reference Centre for Life Cycle Assessment and Sustainable Transition (CIRAIG) for the provincial health network.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A descriptive retrospective study was conducted from June to September 2025. The CIRAIG tool is an Excel-based calculator designed to standardise GHG inventories across healthcare institutions. It structures data according to the three scopes of the GHG Protocol: Scope 1 (direct emissions), Scope 2 (indirect energy-related emissions), and Scope 3 (other indirect emissions). The calculator includes 29 thematic modules (eg, energy, procurement, waste, mobility) and integrates emission factors from official databases, including national energy agencies and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Sixth Assessment Report. Data were collected from local administrative and technical sources covering energy consumption, purchasing, transportation, waste, and staff commuting. Financial data were retrieved from institutional management systems, while physical data were obtained from facility management and sustainability departments.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The pharmacy department&rsquo;s total emissions were estimated at 13,549.4 tCO<SUB>2</SUB>e (tonne of carbon dioxide) for fiscal year 2024&ndash;2025. Scope 3 represented 98.2% of total emissions, while Scope 2 and Scope 1 accounted for &lt;0.1% and &lt;1.8%, respectively. Within Scope 3, purchased goods and services (mainly medicines and pharmaceutical supplies) contributed 89.5% of total emissions, employee commuting 6.7%, inhaler use 1.1%, and waste management 0.2%. Exploratory benchmarking ratios were calculated: 27.1 tCO<SUB>2</SUB>e per bed, 139.7 tCO<SUB>2</SUB>e per 1,000 patient-days, 352.2 tCO<SUB>2</SUB>e per million CAD spent on medicines, 25.5 tCO<SUB>2</SUB>e per centrally compounded drug, 5.0 tCO<SUB>2</SUB>e per 1,000 administered doses, and 112.9 tCO<SUB>2</SUB>e per employee.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Using the CIRAIG calculator, hospital pharmacy departments can feasibly quantify their carbon footprint. This approach highlights the predominance of medication procurement in overall emissions and supports the prioritisation of targeted reduction strategies to advance healthcare decarbonisation.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Escoffier, G., Ouellet, G., Bussieres, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.28</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.28</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[1ISG-016 Carbon footprint of a hospital pharmacy department using the ciraig assessment tool : a descriptive study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 1: Introductory statements and governance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A14</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A14</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A14-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[1ISG-017 Evaluation of the appropriateness of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis through a point prevalence survey in a teaching hospital]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A14-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP) plays a crucial role in preventing surgical site infections (SSIs), but deviations from guidelines remain common. Continuous monitoring of prophylactic practices is essential within Antimicrobial Stewardship (AMS) programmes to promote rational antibiotic use and reduce resistance selection.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the appropriateness of SAP in two surgical units of a teaching hospital, identify the main deviations from current guidelines, and provide evidence to support targeted AMS interventions.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A Point Prevalence Survey (PPS) was conducted as part of a single-centre cross-sectional study. Data were collected from adult patients undergoing surgery in the Cardiac Surgery Unit (CSU) and the General Surgery Unit (GSU). SAP appropriateness was assessed by a multidisciplinary team based on six predefined indicators (indication, antibiotic selection, dosage, preoperative timing, intraoperative redosing, postoperative duration), following official guidelines. Associations with postoperative outcomes (SSI, healthcare-associated infections - HAI, length of stay) were analysed.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 93 patients were included (CSU=51; GSU=42). Overall, full adherence to the six indicators was 35.5% (CSU 52.9%, GSU 14.3%; p&lt;0.001). The indication for prophylaxis was appropriate in 96.8% of patients, and antibiotic selection in 81.6%, with cefazolin being the most commonly used agent. Dosage was appropriate in 84.9% of patients, preoperative timing in 59.3%, intraoperative redosing in 42.9%, and postoperative duration in 90.7%. Significant differences emerged between the two units, with higher adherence rates observed in the CSU. After adjustment for surgical unit and ASA score, full appropriateness was associated with lower SSI rates (OR: 0.22, 95% CI 0.01&ndash;1.03), lower HAI rates (OR: 0.72, 95% CI 0.43&ndash;1.22), and shorter hospital stays (&beta; = -1.1 days, 95% CI -3.0 to -0.8).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Full adherence to SAP guidelines was low but associated with improved clinical outcomes. Although antibiotic selection and dosing were largely appropriate, preoperative timing and intraoperative redosing remained critical areas for improvement. The PPS proved to be an effective tool not only for monitoring SAP appropriateness, but also for guiding targeted improvement strategies. Implementation of standardised protocols, real-time auditing, and AMS-driven educational initiatives may foster a progressive enhancement of adherence over time.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Speranti, G., Mengato, D., Giunco, E., Berti, G., Conte, E., Vittadello, F., Carollo, C., Boschetto, M., Baldo, V., Giron, M., Venturini, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.29</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.29</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[1ISG-017 Evaluation of the appropriateness of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis through a point prevalence survey in a teaching hospital]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 1: Introductory statements and governance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A14</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A15</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A15-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[1ISG-018 Clinical effectiveness, quality of life and economic impact of eladocagene exuparvovec in aromatic l-amino acid decarboxylase deficiency: a targeted evidence synthesis]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A15-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase deficiency (AADC deficiency) causes severe motor impairment, oculogyric crises and high care needs. Eladocagene exuparvovec (EL-EX) is an intracerebral AAV2 gene therapy for patients &ge;18 months; long-term benefit and economic impact remain crucial for hospital practice.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To synthesise evidence on clinical outcomes, health-related quality of life, and healthcare resource use and costs (direct and indirect) following EL-EX compared with best supportive care (BSC).</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Targeted review of PubMed/PMC and regulatory/HTA sources through 02 Oct 2025, prioritising peer-reviewed trials and economic evaluations. Study outcomes included motor milestone attainment, oculogyric crises, caregiver and patient HRQoL, safety, survival and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and healthcare resource use and cost drivers.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Open-label trials show clinically meaningful, durable gains in motor function and symptom control. In a prospective series, 67% achieved gross motor milestones by week 48 (PDMS-2); sitting and walking goals occurred in subsets. Oculogyric crises markedly improved. Safety was acceptable.<sup>1</sup> Long-term pooled analyses reported sustained milestone acquisition and caregiver HRQoL gains. Natural-history comparators show minimal milestone attainment with BSC over 5 years, underscoring treatment effect.<sup>2</sup> Economic evaluations from a US perspective reported discounted (3%) incremental QALYs of 20.83 (PDMS-2 MSD approach) and 18.44 (motor milestone), with ICERs of $199,007 and $224,104 per QALY versus BSC, respectively.<sup>3</sup> Scenario/sensitivity analyses were consistent. Models attribute cost offsets to fewer crisis-related admissions/emergency visits, reduced supportive therapies, and lower informal care time, balancing one-time acquisition/procedure costs. Empirical real-world resource use data remain limited. Regulatory/HTA reviews concur on substantial benefits but note uncertainties from small samples and long-term extrapolation; HRQoL was not measured in all trials, informing use of utility vignettes in models.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>EL-EX confers durable benefits in severe AADC deficiency, with sustained motor improvement, fewer oculogyric crises, caregiver-reported HRQoL gains, and acceptable long-term safety. Health-economic models show substantial QALY gains and cost offsets from fewer acute events and lower care intensity, though lifetime costs may increase with longer survival. For hospital pharmacy, findings support multidisciplinary adoption, robust peri-operative management, and prospective tracking of resource use to validate savings and guide budget impact analyses.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. Golikeri A, <I>et al. JAMA</I> 2025. doi:10.1001/jama.2024.28666</p><p>2. Tai CH, <I>et al. Molecular-Therapy</I> 2022. doi.org/10.1016/j.ymthe.2021.11.005</p><p>3. Zhang R, <I>et al. PharmacoEconomics</I> 2025. doi.org/10.1007/s40273-025-01542-8</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Perrotta, N., Fiorito, L., Casini, G., Coluccia, A., Centioni, G., Scopetti, C., Polito, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.30</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.30</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[1ISG-018 Clinical effectiveness, quality of life and economic impact of eladocagene exuparvovec in aromatic l-amino acid decarboxylase deficiency: a targeted evidence synthesis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 1: Introductory statements and governance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A15</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A15</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A15-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[1ISG-019 Cost-effectiveness analysis of osimertinib versus afatinib for EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A15-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is one of the leading causes of death worldwide. In patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been shown to significantly improve prognosis; however, the costs associated with new-generation therapies necessitate cost-effectiveness evaluation.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The primary aim of this study was to assess the economic sustainability of the innovative therapy (osimertinib) compared to the standard of care (afatinib).</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective, observational study was performed, analysing the medical records of adult patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC. The analysis was conducted from the Regional Health Service (SSR) perspective over a 1 year period.</p><p>The dosage evaluated was a daily intake of one tablet for each drug: osimertinib 80 mg (112.25 per tablet ) and afatinib 40 mg (59.87 per tablet). The annual treatment cost for osimertinib was calculated as 40,971.25, and for afatinib, as 21,852.55. The one-year progression-free survival (PFS) data were also analysed, with rates of 72.22% and 48.1%, respectively.</p><p>The Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) was estimated as the increase in cost per unit of effectiveness gained, with a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold set at 50,000 per PFS event. Osimertinib data were obtained from 43 patients undergoing treatment, while Afatinib data were extrapolated from clinical trials.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) estimated for osimertinib versus afatinib was determined to be 78,963.74. This value exceeds the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold, suggesting that osimertinib therapy is not cost-effective within the clinical and economic context of this study. The Number Needed to Treat (NNT) with osimertinib to observe one additional progression-free survival event compared to afatinib was 4.13.</p><p>In a backward sensitivity analysis, setting the WTP at 50,000, the maximum sustainable cost for osimertinib therapy would be 33,958.55 per year, equivalent to 93.04 per tablet.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The analysis suggests that, although osimertinib offers a clinical advantage in terms of PFS, it has a high incremental cost compared to afatinib. Therefore, the treatment is not cost-effective based on the threshold value adopted. However, it is essential to note that additional considerations related to toxicity, quality of life and long-term benefits could influence and potentially modify the overall assessment of the cost-benefit profile.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Casini, G., Fiorito, L., Perrotta, N., Centioni, G., Scopetti, C., Polito, G., Servidio, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.31</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.31</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[1ISG-019 Cost-effectiveness analysis of osimertinib versus afatinib for EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 1: Introductory statements and governance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A15</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A16</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A16-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[2SPD-001 Territorial and size-based analysis of determinants of medication expenditure in nursing homes]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A16-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Life expectancy reached 73,4 years in 2023, increasing the need for elderly care. Nursing home residents typically require medications due to comorbidities, resulting in higher daily consumption compared with community-dwelling older adults.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This study analysed drug consumption in nursing homes across different healthcare management areas.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Data from January-December 2024 obtained from the national healthcare service database were analysed. Nursing homes were classified by size (&lt;25 beds, 25&ndash;100 beds, and &gt;100 beds) and by territory.</p><p>Statistical analyses evaluated relationships among medication pack prices, total drug costs, consumption levels, net expenditure, number of patients and cost per patient.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The study included 75.302 patients from nursing homes: 9% from &lt;25 beds (n = 6.437), 58% from 25-100 beds (n = 43.807), and 33% from &gt;100 beds (n = 25.058).</p><p>The average cost per bed was 1.424,53 and per patient 1.167. The mean cost per medicine pack was 14,47, consistent across the territory (14&ndash;16) and 20,9&ndash;38,2% higher than in community pharmacies (11,58).</p><p>No significant correlation was observed between average pack cost and total costs: &lt;25 beds (r=-0,04), 25-100 beds (r=0,38) and &gt;100 beds (r=0,35). Total costs were driven mainly on the number and complexity of patients rather than pack cost.</p><p>Net expenditure depended on the number of patients and cost per patient. Interannual analysis showed that changes between 2023 and 2024 were explained by increased total cost per patient (&lt;25 beds: r=0,72, 25-100 beds: r=0,65, &gt;100 beds: r=0,80), whereas total 2024 expenditure was strongly associated by number of patients (r=0,99 for all types).</p><p>Drug consumption patterns showed contrasting trends: antibiotic use increased with size (49,85% in &lt;25 beds to 54,60% in &gt;100 beds), while antipsychotic use decreased (49,70% to 44,75%). One-tailed t-tests revealed significant differences between &lt;25 and &gt;100 beds for antibiotics (p=0,031) and antipsychotics (p=0,046), while &lt;25 vs 25-100, and 25-100 vs &gt;100 comparisons were not significant (p&gt;0,05).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Territorial analysis demonstrated significant variability in drug costs across different healthcare management areas, independent of nursing home size. However, drug consumption patterns differed by facility size, with opposite trends observed for antibiotic and antipsychotic use.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Villen Rol, M., Garcia Lopez, V., Guiu Segura, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.32</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.32</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[2SPD-001 Territorial and size-based analysis of determinants of medication expenditure in nursing homes]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 2: Selection, procurement and distribution</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A16</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A16</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A16-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[2SPD-002 Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in Spain: access, financing and economic impact of a potential transition to from hospital pharmacy to community pharmacy dispensing]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A16-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) is a preventive strategy that significantly reduces the risk of HIV infection, although it does not protect against other sexually transmitted infections. Currently, only Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate/Emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) is reimbursed by the NHS in Spain. PrEP is indicated in Spain for men who have sex with men (MSM), transgender women, and sex worker s. In 2021, people who inject drugs, and cisgender men and women at risk of acquiring HIV. Dispensing through community pharmacies could increase accessibility.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To identify PrEP drugs currently approved in different countries and examine their dispensation and financing mechanisms. Additionally, to estimate the economic impact of a potential transition from hospital to community pharmacy dispensing and to explore possible models to enable community pharmacy dispensing.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Information on PrEP approval, access, and financing across countries was collected from publicly available sources, including official health reports, institutional websites, and scientific literature. The economic impact of TDF/FTC in Spain was assessed using tender and retail prices (PVP including VAT) as of August 2025. Potential models for community pharmacy dispensing were also reviewed.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>At the European level, most countries reimburse oral TDF/FTC, although dispensing channels vary. France, Germany, and Portugal allow community pharmacy dispensing, whereas Spain and Italy restrict access to hospital pharmacies. In the United Kingdom, broader access is provided through NHS clinics, which also include tenofovir Alafenamide/Emtricitabine and cabotegravir among available options.</p><p>Based on public procurement data, the average net monthly cost of TDF/FTC in hospital pharmacies is approximately 75% lower than the retail price in community pharmacies (10.61 vs 43.71). With an estimated 30,000 patients in 2025, this difference translates into a potential budget impact of around 993,000 per year.</p><p>Transitioning to community pharmacy dispensing would require regulatory changes, such as drug reclassification of TDF/FTC, potential expansion of prescribing rights, and targeted training for prescribers and pharmacists. Potential implementation models include prescriptions issued in primary care with dispensing through community pharmacies.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Community pharmacy dispensing of PrEP could improve accessibility and align Spain with other European models. However, the transition would entail regulatory adjustments and higher drug costs compared with the current hospital pharmacy system.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Villen Rol, M., Garcia Lopez, V., Guiu Segura, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.33</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.33</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[2SPD-002 Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in Spain: access, financing and economic impact of a potential transition to from hospital pharmacy to community pharmacy dispensing]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 2: Selection, procurement and distribution</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A16</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A17</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A17-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[2SPD-003 Use of foreign medicines to manage drug shortages: economic, resource and safety impact in a tertiary hospital]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A17-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Drug shortages frequently compromise healthcare delivery and patient safety. One mitigation strategy is the importation of foreign medicines by the Spanish Medicines Agency (AEMPS) as substitutes for unavailable national products. These alternatives increase costs and resource demands, potentially generating economic, organisational, and safety impacts for hospitals.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To identify medicines affected by shortages and supplied through foreign imports, and to assess their economic, resource, and safety impact.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective observational study was conducted in the Pharmacy Service of a tertiary hospital from January 2024 to July 2025, including all medicines affected by shortages and replaced with foreign imports. Stock data, national drug prices, and consumption were obtained from the hospital logistics management software (Orion Logis), while foreign medicine prices were provided by the AEMPS. Economic impact was assessed by comparing unit sale prices of national and foreign medicines, considering monthly consumption and months of foreign supply. Resource and safety impacts were jointly evaluated through the need for relabelling foreign medicines when labelling was in a complex language, and through the drafting of informative notes for hospital units in cases of major changes in dose, concentration, or volume.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Forty-one national medicines in shortage were replaced with foreign imports, of which 24 (58.5%) later returned to national supply. The most affected pharmacotherapeutic groups were anti-infectives (31.7%, n=13), psychotropics (17.1%, n=7), cardiovascular drugs (14.6%, n=6), and antineoplastics (9.8%, n=4). In five cases (12.2%), a second substitution with a foreign medicine was required due to recurrent shortages. Economically, the price of foreign medicines was higher in all cases, with a median of 4.3 (1.8&ndash;7.5) times higher. Considering monthly consumption and the shortage period, total expenditure increased by 209,419. Regarding safety and resource impact, four drugs (9.8%) required relabelling due to poorly understandable foreign-language labelling, and six (14.6%) required informative notes for hospital units owing to presentation differences (dose, concentration, or volume) that could pose patient risks.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Managing drug shortages with foreign imports requires a necessary strategy but entails substantial economic and organisational impact, along with safety risks from foreign-language labelling and presentation differences. Larger studies and preventive strategies are needed to mitigate these consequences and optimise hospital pharmacy practice.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roldan Martinez, S., Monteagudo Santolaya, E., Campos Barrachina, J., Gallen Soria, D., Chovi Trull, M., Arnau Blasco, B., Escobar Hernandez, L., Rodenas Rovira, M., Garcia Pellicer, J., Poveda Andres, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.34</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.34</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[2SPD-003 Use of foreign medicines to manage drug shortages: economic, resource and safety impact in a tertiary hospital]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 2: Selection, procurement and distribution</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A17</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A17</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A17-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[2SPD-004 Non-cytotoxic pharmaceutical residues management: development and implementation of environmental management indicators in the pharmacy department]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A17-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Hospitals are major waste generators, to the extent that if the global healthcare sector were a country, it would rank fifth in emissions.<sup>1</sup> This waste, due to its volume and nature, presents challenges such as high variability, hazardousness and complexity in treatment. Pharmaceutical residues are particularly complex and environmentally risky.</p><p>In our setting, healthcare waste is classified into different categories based on its nature and hazardousness. Medicines fall under Group IV (hazardous healthcare waste) and must be disposed of in specific containers, differentiated into cytotoxic and non-cytotoxic.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>As part of the environmental sustainability improvement framework of a third-level hospital&rsquo;s Pharmacy Department (PD), the creation of indicators for weight, volume, and density of non-cytotoxic drugs disposed of in selective containers was proposed. The goal was to assess efficiency and minimisation of waste generation, ensuring proper treatment and reducing environmental exposure.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Indicators were calculated in relation to PD activity. Data on waste weight and volume disposed of in specific containers (2022&ndash;2024) and annual dispensed medication units were collected. Reference values and acceptance limits were defined (mean waste weight 2022&ndash;2023 &plusmn; SD). Indicators included:</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Weight (g/unit dispensed)</p></li><li><p>Volume (cm<sup>3</sup>/unit dispensed)</p></li><li><p>Density (g/cm<sup>3</sup>/year)</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The values for waste disposal indicators were as follows:</p><p><tbl id="T1" loc="float"><tblbdy top-stubs="2"><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Year</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Weight (g/unit dispensed)</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Volume (cm<sup>3</sup>/unit dispensed)</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Density (g/cm<sup>3</sup>)</b> </c></r><r><c cspan="4" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">2022 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.329 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.196 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1.679 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">2023 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.255 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.165 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1.549 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">2024 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.265 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.185 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1.437 </c></r></tblbdy></tbl></p><p>Acceptance Limits:</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Weight: 0.240 &ndash; 0.344 g/unit</p></li><li><p>Volume: 0.158 &ndash; 0.202 cm<sup>3</sup>/unit</p></li><li><p>Density: 1.522 &ndash; 1.706 g/cm<sup>3</sup>  </p></li></l></p><p>The density value for 2024 was below the acceptance limit.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>For each dispensed medication unit, we are generating increasingly voluminous and lighter waste, indicating improper segregation. Items of lower density are being disposed of in the selective pharmaceutical container, even though they should be classified in other groups and treated differently (eg, cardboard packaging, plastic blisters, gloves, masks, paper etc). In this context, measures are being taken to optimise the waste management process: introducing containers to separate and dispose of paper and plastic, providing specific training on healthcare waste handling for PD staff and creating an infographic for proper disposal guidance.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. <I>Health care&rsquo;s climate footprint</I>. Washington, DC: HCWH; 2019.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Placeres, M., Castella, M., Marin, A., Pereda, G., Soy, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.35</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.35</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[2SPD-004 Non-cytotoxic pharmaceutical residues management: development and implementation of environmental management indicators in the pharmacy department]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 2: Selection, procurement and distribution</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A17</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A18</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A18-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[2SPD-005 Impact of next-generation sequencing (NGS) on the selection of targeted therapies in oncology patients]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A18-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) is fundamental to precision oncology, enabling identification of clinically relevant mutations (ESCAT I/II) to guide targeted treatments. Despite its utility, the real-world impact of NGS in routine practice remains unclear. This study assesses the clinical utility of NGS by measuring the actual proportion of patients accessing targeted therapies.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To analyse the clinical utility of NGS in implementing targeted therapies for patients with neoplasms.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Retrospective observational study of all patients undergoing NGS testing in 2024 at a tertiary hospital. Clinically relevant mutations were classified using the ESCAT scale (I/II). Data on treatment implementation were obtained from medical records, molecular pathology reports, and OncoKB .</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Among the 204 patients analysed, 77 (38%) had mutations classified as ESCAT I or II, indicating clinically relevant alterations. These included: ALK (anaplastic lymphoma kinase) (n=3), BRAF (RAF kinase-encoding) (n=2), CTNNB1 (&beta;-catenin-encoding) (n=1), EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor) (n=22), ERBB2 (Erb-B2 tyrosine kinase receptor 2) (n=3), ESR1 (oestrogen receptor) (n=1), IDH (isocitrate dehydrogenase) (n=3), KIT (tyrosine kinase receptor) (n=9), KRAS G12C (Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene) (n=21), MET (hepatocyte growth factor receptor) (n=7), PDGFRA (platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha) (n=2), and RET (tyrosine kinase receptor) (n=3). 79% of patients with actionable mutations (n=61, 30% of the total cohort) received funded targeted therapies in first or subsequent lines (eg, lorlatinib, osimertinib, imatinib, tepotinib, selpercatinib). Additionally, one patient accessed targeted therapy via expanded access (elacestrant), and another through compassionate use (avapritinib). Furthermore, five patients had actionable mutations with non-funded targeted treatments (dabrafenib, amivantamab), and three patients had mutations for which the targeted drug was under funding evaluation (ivosidenib). Finally, six patients had clinically relevant mutations for which no targeted therapy was available.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>NGS proved to be a valuable tool for identifying clinically relevant mutations, enabling the implementation of targeted therapies in 30% of the analysed patients. The majority of patients with actionable mutations (79%) benefited from funded targeted treatments, highlighting the importance of integrating NGS into clinical practice to select the most appropriate therapy for each patient.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Filardo, H., Inclan Conde, M., Fernandez Diaz, E., Gonzalez Mena, A., Gomez Echevarria, N., Belio Aguera, B., Iraolagoitia Fraile, A., Aguirrezabal Arredondo, A., Vara Urruchua, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.36</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.36</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[2SPD-005 Impact of next-generation sequencing (NGS) on the selection of targeted therapies in oncology patients]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 2: Selection, procurement and distribution</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A18</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A18</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A18-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[2SPD-006 Medicine shortages in a vulnerable market - evidence from an 8 year observational study]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A18-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Medicine shortages are a serious obstacle worldwide, particularly in developing countries, which represent small, non-profitable and unattractive markets for medicines, thus highlighting the importance of performing a comprehensive analysis.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To describe and analyse medicine shortages in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) over an 8 year period.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A study was conducted by analysing data on medicine shortages published in the National Register of medicine shortages available on the Agency for Medicinal Products and Medical Devices BiH website from 2018 to 2025. The extracted data were classified using the ATC Classification, the route of administration, duration and reasons for the medicine supply disruptions.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Out of 844 medicine shortages reported during this 8 year period, 66% corresponded to oral medications, and only 20% to intravenous medications. The shortages primarily involved cardiovascular medicines (17%), nervous system therapeutics (16%), antineoplastic agents (12%), followed by medicines affecting the musculoskeletal system (10%) and antimicrobials for systemic use (10%). The highest number of shortages occurred in 2023 (n=192) and 2024 (n=177), which corresponds to the special report published by the European Court of Auditors.<sup>1</sup> The majority of reported shortages (62%) were only temporary, while 38% were permanent, often due to the non-renewal of a marketing authorisation or withdrawal from the market. The highest number of permanent shortages reported in 1 year was in 2019 (n=61; 74%), while the temporary shortages reached their maximum in the last 3 years, 2023 (n=136; 71%), 2024 (n=132; 75%) and 2025 (n=111; 73%). Commercial reasons were identified as the leading cause of medicine supply disruptions during the entire observed period (n=407; 48%).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>A significant increase in reported shortages could be attributed to limited pharmaceutical profitability, inadequate regulatory measures and increased demand for medicines within our economically constrained healthcare system. However, a low number of reported shortages of intravenous medications might imply that marketing authorisation holders have been failing to adequately report existing medicine shortages in hospitals, which highlights the need for a practical framework to address them.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. The European Court of Auditors. Special report 19/2025: Critical shortages of medicines &ndash; EU measures were of added value, but structural problems remain. Available at: https://www.eca.europa.eu/ECAPublications/SR-2025-19/SR-2025-19_EN.pdf.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matic, D., Cetkovic, Z.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.37</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.37</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[2SPD-006 Medicine shortages in a vulnerable market - evidence from an 8 year observational study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 2: Selection, procurement and distribution</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A18</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A19</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A19-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[2SPD-007 Trends in intravitreal therapy prescribing: insights from real-world data (2021-2024)]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A19-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Intravitreal therapies are the standard of care for macular diseases, but real-world practice often differs from clinical trials. The introduction of new agents and rising patient complexity create challenges for healthcare systems. Understanding prescribing trends in routine hospital practice is essential to guide therapeutic decisions and anticipate demand.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To analyse the evolution of intravitreal treatment prescribing patterns in patients with macular diseases between 2021 and 2024, assessing the impact of newly introduced therapeutic options and the increasing complexity of treated patients.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>We conducted a retrospective observational study including all patients who received intravitreal injections between January 2021 and December 2024. Data extraction, integration, and processing were performed using Power BI as part of a multidisciplinary project. Descriptive statistics and simple linear regression were applied to evaluate temporal trends (p&lt;0.05).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 3,223 patients received 31,826 intravitreal injections. Bevacizumab was the most frequently prescribed drug (58.73%, n=18,690), followed by aflibercept (25.99%, n=8,270) and ranibizumab (9.01%, n=2,869).</p><p>The number of treated patients increased from 1,330 in 2021 to 1,911 in 2024 (+43.7%), while total injections rose from 6,134 to 9,345 (+52.3%).</p><p>Between 2023 and 2024, bevacizumab and ranibizumab use decreased by 13.78% and 1.24%, respectively, whereas aflibercept prescriptions increased by 13.38%. Notable findings included a rise in brolucizumab use (from 96 to 311 injections) and the introduction of faricimab (419 injections in 179 patients). Dexamethasone use increased by 14.63%, while fluocinolone remained stable.</p><p>Regarding clinical complexity, treatment lines were distributed as follows: 657 patients in first-line, 411 in second, 180 in third, 70 in fourth, and 26 in fifth-line. The mean number of treatment lines per patient increased from 1.35 (2021) to 1.76 (2024), showing a statistically significant upward trend (annual coefficient: 0.130; 95% CI: 0.048&ndash;0.212; standard error: 0.019; p=0.021).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Findings demonstrate a progressive increase in care demand, accompanied by changes in prescribing trends, with greater adoption of innovative therapies and higher clinical complexity among treated patients. These results underscore the importance of integrating data analytics into daily practice to optimise therapeutic decision making and anticipate the growing healthcare demand in ophthalmology.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rioja, Y., Ribed Sanchez, A., Maria Pilar, M., Ruiz Briones, P., Carrillo Burdallo, A., Maria, M., Prieto Romero, A., Garcia Gonzalez, X., Gomez Costas, D., Manzorro, A. G., Herranz Alonso, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.38</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.38</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[2SPD-007 Trends in intravitreal therapy prescribing: insights from real-world data (2021-2024)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 2: Selection, procurement and distribution</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A19</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A19</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A19-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[2SPD-008 Addressing medication waste and drug disposal in Europe: the clinical pharmacists contribution to global environmental sustainability -results from the disposal study]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A19-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Improper disposal of unused or expired medicines is a global concern as it contaminates water systems and landfills and contributes to antimicrobial resistance. Numerous reports highlight the scale of pharmaceutical waste and link it, among other factors, to medication non-adherence. However, limited evidence exists on how healthcare professionals&mdash;particularly clinical pharmacists&mdash;can support interventions to reduce waste, improve adherence, and promote safe disposal.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This study aimed to investigate real-world practices across Europe related to the management and disposal of unused or expired household medicines. The objective was to identify areas in which clinical pharmacists can contribute to reducing medication waste, fostering proper disposal practices, and minimising environmental impacts.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Stemming from the IHI ENKORE Project, this European online expert survey assessed national legislation, awareness campaigns, and disposal practices for unused household medicines. The survey examined the volume of pharmaceutical waste generated, as well as economic aspects, including costs and financial responsibilities for disposal. Data were analysed to identify cross-country differences and define priority areas where clinical pharmacists can play a significant role.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Valid responses were collected from 33 European countries. In most of them, neither medication packaging nor public campaigns provided patients with information on how to manage unused medicines. On the other hand, most national collection systems for unused drugs involved pharmacists&mdash;obligatory collection in pharmacies was reported in 16 countries, while voluntary in 7. Similarly, in real-world settings, the most common disposal practice was returning unused medicines to community pharmacies (21 countries). However, in 7 countries, the most common method was discarding them in household waste. Consequently, a large proportion of unused medicines were disposed of improperly, leading to environmental pollution.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Unused and expired medicines remain a persistent and costly problem with serious implications for health systems and the environment. With their expertise in medication management, clinical pharmacists are well positioned to address this challenge by counselling patients on proper use, adherence, and&mdash;where appropriate&mdash;safe disposal of unused medicines. Their more frequent involvement can help reduce pharmaceutical waste, limit environmental harm, and strengthen healthcare sustainability. This provides a strong incentive to broaden the scope and availability of clinical pharmacy services across Europe.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>Corporate sponsored research or other substantive relationships:</p><p>I (PK) received speaker&rsquo;s honoraria from Procter &amp; Gamble Company for a presentation over which the paying company had no influence. Additionally, my university received funding from the European Union&rsquo;s Horizon 2020 for the ODIN Project (Grant Agreement N&deg; 101017331) and from IHI for the ENKORE Project (Project Number: 101166707), and CAREPATH Project (Project Number: 101192133) outside this work.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kardas, P., Lewek, P., Agh, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.39</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.39</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[2SPD-008 Addressing medication waste and drug disposal in Europe: the clinical pharmacists contribution to global environmental sustainability -results from the disposal study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 2: Selection, procurement and distribution</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A19</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A20</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A20-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[2SPD-009 Quantitative assessment of manual labelling time in pharmacy dispensing workflows: a multi-site study in the UK and Netherlands]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A20-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>In hospital and retail pharmacy settings, the application of a dispensing label is a legal requirement in many countries. This task is typically performed manually by pharmacy staff as part of the dispensing workflow. There is a notable gap in the literature regarding quantitative data on the time required to perform manual label application. This lack of empirical evidence makes it a challenge to accurately assess the potential impact and value of automating this process.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To quantitatively assess the time required for manual label application within pharmacy dispensing workflows by collecting and analysing timing data from hospital and retail pharmacies. The findings will establish a baseline for workflow efficiency and inform opportunities to optimise operations through automation.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Time in motion data were collected from a sample of 5 hospital and retail pharmacies in the UK and Netherlands during routine dispensing workflows involving manual application of dispensing labels to medication packaging. Duration of the manual label application process, along with the staff grade performing the process and their average annual salary, were recorded. Process steps within the hospital and retail pharmacy workflows were documented to provide contextual insight into operational differences across settings.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Across the five study sites, the average time to manually print and apply a dispensing label was calculated at 12 seconds per medication pack.</p><p>To estimate the potential efficiency gains from removing this manual step, projected annual time savings were calculated for pharmacies. For a pharmacy dispensing 500 packs per day:</p><p>Estimated total time saved = 608.3 hours</p><p>Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) Technician = 0.29 (based on 2,080 working hours/year)</p><p>Estimated salary savings = &pound;9,733 (based on &pound;16/hour technician)</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The findings from this study highlight the measurable time burden associated with manual label application during dispensing. An average of 12 seconds per medication pack may appear minimal in isolation, but when scaled to high-volume dispensing environments, the cumulative time impact becomes significant. For pharmacies dispensing 500 packs per day, the potential annual time savings exceed 600 hours&mdash;equivalent to nearly one-third of an FTE&rsquo;s workload. Establishing this baseline provides an important foundation for assessing the operational benefits and potential return on investment of automated labelling solutions.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>Corporate sponsored research or other substantive relationships:</p><p>Alice Dainty is an employee and shareholder of Becton Dickinson and Company.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dainty, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.40</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.40</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[2SPD-009 Quantitative assessment of manual labelling time in pharmacy dispensing workflows: a multi-site study in the UK and Netherlands]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 2: Selection, procurement and distribution</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A20</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A20</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A20-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[2SPD-010 Hospital pharmacy preparedness for emergencies and disasters: lessons from a national evaluation following a major crisis]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A20-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Hospital pharmacies play a vital role in ensuring continuity of care and maintaining medicine supply during emergencies. On 16 March, a catastrophic nightclub fire that claimed 62 young lives required an immediate and coordinated response from hospital pharmacists in the affected area. The incident exposed gaps in disaster preparedness and highlighted the need for structured planning, rapid decision making, and interprofessional collaboration. Although disaster preparedness has been studied internationally, there are no data on the readiness of hospital pharmacies in our country. This study, conducted by the Association of Hospital Pharmacists (member of EAHP), represents the first national assessment of hospital pharmacy preparedness, providing an evidence base for strengthening system resilience.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The aim was to evaluate the preparedness of hospital pharmacies for emergencies, crises, and disasters. Specific objectives included assessing the presence of institutional protocols, the availability of critical medicines and medical supplies, and the demographic and organisational characteristics of pharmacies and their staff.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A cross-sectional survey was conducted among hospital pharmacists using a structured 25-item questionnaire covering demographics, hospital type and capacity, pharmacy structure, preparedness protocols, and medicine availability rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Descriptive analysis examined respondents by hospital category, position, and preparedness indicators.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Of 35 pharmacists invited, 27 participated. The mean age was 46 years (median 49) with 22 years of experience. Participants represented general (n=9), university (n=9), clinical (n=5), and specialised hospitals (n=5), mostly with 100&ndash;300 beds. Nineteen were heads of pharmacies. Sixteen reported having a preparedness protocol, while eleven did not. Analgesics, antimicrobials, and infusion solutions were adequately stocked, but shortages were noted for intubation supplies (n=4), vasopressors (n=2), antiemetics (n=2), respiratory drugs (n=2), ophthalmological medicines (n=9), and antidotes (n=11).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Hospital pharmacists in our country are experienced but work in institutions with uneven preparedness. The catastrophic fire underscored the urgent need to strengthen disaster response capacity. While essential medicines are generally available, shortages of critical and rarely used drugs remain a key vulnerability. Strengthening hospital pharmacy resilience requires the implementation of standardised protocols, training and coordinated national stockpiling strategies. These measures are essential to ensure a timely, consistent and effective response during future emergencies.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tashkov, T., Lazarova, B., Krstic Nakovska, O., Kovaceva, M., Simonoska Crcarevska, M., Miceva, D., Naumovska, Z.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.41</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.41</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[2SPD-010 Hospital pharmacy preparedness for emergencies and disasters: lessons from a national evaluation following a major crisis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 2: Selection, procurement and distribution</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A20</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A21</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A21-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[2SPD-011 The impact of a just-in-time inventory system on pharmaceutical waste reduction in a tertiary care hospital]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A21-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Pharmaceutical waste remains a significant issue in healthcare, with expired or unused medications contributing to unnecessary costs. A just-in-time (JIT) inventory system, which aims to minimise inventory levels while ensuring timely delivery, has the potential to reduce waste by improving medication management practices in hospitals.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a JIT inventory system in reducing pharmaceutical waste in a tertiary care hospital.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A prospective study was conducted over a 6 month period at a large tertiary care hospital, where a JIT inventory system was implemented for high-turnover medications. Data on medication waste, inventory turnover, and stockouts were collected before and after the JIT system&rsquo;s introduction. Statistical analysis included paired t-tests for waste reduction and Chi-squared tests for stockout frequency.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The introduction of the JIT system resulted in a 25% reduction in pharmaceutical waste (p = 0.04) and a 15% increase in medication turnover (p = 0.03). Stockouts were reduced by 20%, with no significant increase in the number of emergency orders (p = 0.05).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The JIT inventory system significantly reduced pharmaceutical waste and improved medication turnover. These findings support the adoption of JIT systems in hospital pharmacies as a strategy for reducing waste while maintaining medication availability.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. Alanazi MQ, Alkhadhairi EK, Alrumi WH, Alajlan SA. Reducing pharmaceutical and non-pharmaceutical inventory waste in tertiary hospital: impact of ABC-VEN analysis in a zero-waste strategy over 7 years. <I>Risk Manag Healthc Policy</I> 2024 Nov 4;<b>17</b>:2659&ndash;2675. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S467230. PMID: 39525683; PMCID: PMC11545607.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gharehdaghi, Z.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.42</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.42</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[2SPD-011 The impact of a just-in-time inventory system on pharmaceutical waste reduction in a tertiary care hospital]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 2: Selection, procurement and distribution</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A21</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A21</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A21-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[2SPD-012 A survey of disposal practices of unused medications in general public and health promotion hospitals, and management of medications discarded from household by the municipalities]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A21-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Inappropriate disposal of unused medications poses significant environmental and health risks globally. Although the country of study setting has regulations classifying medications as hazardous waste requiring sorting, and provides public disposal guidelines, data on handling practices among general public are limited. Specifically, there is a lack of research examining the practices of the Health Promotion Hospitals (HPHs), and municipalities responsible for community waste management.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This study aimed to identify the disposal practices of unused medications among the general public, HPHs, and municipalities, and to determine factors influencing proper disposal practices among the general public.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Data were collected from three groups: 1) the general public (N=500), 2) all HPHs in the province (N=79), and 3) three municipalities representing sub-district, town, and city levels, respectively. Validated questionnaires were used for the general public and the HPHs. Response to the survey was done through Google forms using the QR code scan. Semi-structured interviews were used for the municipalities. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and multiple logistic regression to explore predictors of proper disposal.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The most common disposal method among the general public was placing unused medications in regular trash bins with intact packaging (65.2%). One-fifth returned them to hospitals including HPHs. Factors significantly associated with appropriate disposal practices were older age (OR 3.98; 95% CI 1.48, 10.69), being female (OR 1.82; 95% CI 1.04, 3.19), and having received disposal information (OR 9.04; 95% CI 5.15, 15.88). Of the HPHs that responded (54/79), the majority reported proper disposal, primarily through hazardous waste receivers, 51% of which were further managed by outsource agency. All participating municipalities lacked specific household medication waste management and relied entirely on HPHs.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The majority of the general public improperly discarded unused medications. Interventions should target younger populations and males, emphasising the influence of access to the disposal guidance. While HPHs demonstrated high compliance, the lack of policies and management system within municipalities highlighted a gap in the comprehensive local medication waste management.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>The study was funded by the Faculty of Pharmacy, Thammasat University. We are grateful to all participating general public, HPHs, and municipalities for their contributions in the study.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kongchat, K., Seangon, N., Jantrakool, N., Pongwecharak, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.43</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.43</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[2SPD-012 A survey of disposal practices of unused medications in general public and health promotion hospitals, and management of medications discarded from household by the municipalities]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 2: Selection, procurement and distribution</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A21</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A21</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A22-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[2SPD-013 Rethinking the transfer of care in a geographically complex area through the establishment of a city-hospital link: the 'retrofficine project]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A22-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Authorised healthcare facilities involved in the transfer of care dispense specific treatments to non-hospitalised patients, often for follow-up or reimbursement purposes. In our hospital pharmacy department, patients travel an average round-trip distance of 50 km to collect their medications.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>We aimed to reduce the environmental impact of this activity, ensure patient safety, and better meet their needs by optimising this pathway.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A review of current practices in France was conducted. We assembled a multidisciplinary working group to address the following challenges:</p><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Improving the patient journey: Facilitate access to retrocessed medications by delivering them directly to local pharmacies, thereby reducing travel for patients, many of whom are elderly.</p></li><li><p>Ensuring safe medication management: Guarantee that treatments initiated or modified in the hospital are dispensed by the hospital pharmacy department (HPD) with appropriate pharmaceutical follow&ndash;up. Only treatment renewals will be eligible for this pathway, with regular communication maintained between the HPD and patients.</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A collaborative methodology was adopted, involving all stakeholders at each stage. Following institutional validation (management, regional health agency, pharmacy inspection, regional healthcare coordination bodies), the project was presented to the Medical Commission of the Establishment.</p><p>The project is based on strengthened collaboration between the hospital pharmacy, community pharmacies, and the logistics of a private partner using an electric vehicle fleet. Specific training was provided to community pharmacists.</p><p>After one month of implementation, the uptake rate for this system is 45%, against a success target of 50%. The project has had an impact at various levels within the HPD:</p><p><l type="ord"><li><p>30% reduction in time spent on planning, stock management, and preparation.</p></li><li><p>Optimisation of off&ndash;peak periods and reduction of dormant stock.</p></li><li><p>Enhanced skills for pharmacy technicians.</p></li><li><p>Increased city&ndash;hospital collaboration through regular exchanges.</p></li></l></p><p>Regarding environmental impact, a 45% uptake results in an estimated annual saving of 12 tonnes of CO<SUB>2</SUB> equivalent.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>This initiative tackles challenges related to organisation, the environment, and society. By integrating sustainable logistics, local proximity, and improved connections between the city and hospital, it aims to improve both care quality and patient services. A survey is currently being conducted to evaluate the satisfaction of patients and community pharmacies.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Plan, A., Cros, T., Protzenko, D., Constans, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.44</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.44</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[2SPD-013 Rethinking the transfer of care in a geographically complex area through the establishment of a city-hospital link: the 'retrofficine project]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 2: Selection, procurement and distribution</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A22</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A22</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A22-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[2SPD-014 Eco-responsible healthcare: optimising surgical kit composition]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A22-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Eco-responsible healthcare practice is one that, while maintaining equal quality and patient safety, has a reduced impact on the environment. Owing to their high environmental footprint, operating rooms are a key area for sustainability interventions.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>In this context, the pharmacy is tasked with reviewing the composition of surgical kits no longer aligned with current practices. This work is carried out with consideration for the three pillars of sustainable development: environmental, economic, and social.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>This project is conducted by a pharmacist and an intern, in collaboration with medical and paramedical teams. Optimal kit compositions are developed and submitted to suppliers. Trials are organised to validate the proposed modifications. Environmental impact is assessed by measuring the amount of waste avoided: unused and discarded medical devices (MDs), and the packaging of &lsquo;satellite&rsquo; MDs. To evaluate economic impact, the new kits&rsquo; prices are compared with current costs, including the prices of the previously referenced kits and the &lsquo;satellite&rsquo; MDs. Finally, users receive a satisfaction survey.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Nine surgical kits were revised. The VASCULAR kit required the most changes, with 10 references to be removed and 10 new ones added. The environmental impact is estimated at 2.2 tonnes of waste avoided annually, including 800 kg from the CARDIAC kit due to optimised drapes. Annual savings of 45000 are estimated. Savings from multiple kits help fund more expensive kits, as a safer CAESAREAN kit. Analysis of the surveys shows 96% (96/100) satisfaction. Numerous exchanges with healthcare providers confirm a positive social impact: time savings, reduced musculoskeletal disorders, and improved safety. However, some limitations appeared: difficulty in standardising practices, storage issues and supply chain disruptions.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Beyond positive ecological impact, the revision of surgical kits offers numerous benefits: enhanced safety, time savings and cost reduction. However, some limitations have emerged and need to be considered.</p><p>The project is strongly supported by our institution&rsquo;s Sustainable Development Steering Committee. Through this initiative, evaluation of additional kits has begun as preparation for the next tender process.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chevalier, M., Sury Lestage, S., Fournier, S., Duverger Darre, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.45</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.45</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[2SPD-014 Eco-responsible healthcare: optimising surgical kit composition]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 2: Selection, procurement and distribution</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A22</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A22</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A22-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[2SPD-015 Treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration using anti-VEGF therapy: a network meta-analysis of therapeutic alternatives]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A22-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) is the leading cause of vision loss in older adults. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapies have substantially improved outcomes in this population. With several agents available, comparative evidence is essential to inform clinical decision making.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To perform a network meta-analysis (NMA) assessing the efficacy and safety of anti-VEGF agents for nAMD.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A PubMed search was conducted to identify phase III randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating ranibizumab, brolucizumab, aflibercept, and faricimab in nAMD. Baseline characteristics included age, sex, race, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and central subfield thickness (CST).</p><p>The primary efficacy endpoint was mean change in BCVA, measured using the ETDRS letter score. Analyses were performed with R v4.4.1. Anti-VEGF agents were compared using aflibercept 2mg Q8W as the reference.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Nine RCTs were included. Populations were comparable: mean age similar across trials, women represented approximately 55% of patients, baseline BCVA ranged 50&ndash;60 letters, and CST 350&ndash;460 &mu;m.</p><p>At week 48, all active regimens yielded similar improvements in BCVA. The greatest numerical gain was observed with aflibercept 2 mg Q4W (SMD 0.93, 95% CI -1.22, 3.07), though not statistically significant. Verteporfin (SMD -19.81, 95% CI -22.77, -16.85), was associated with marked visual decline.</p><p>Regarding safety, the highest odds ratios (OR) for serious ocular adverse events were reported with aflibercept 8 mg Q12W (OR 3.05, 95% CI 0.61, 15.20) and Q16W (OR 2.51, 95% CI 0.48, 13.02), though with wide confidence intervals. Brolucizumab 6 mg Q12W (OR 2.86, 95% CI 1.20, 6.85) was the only regimen with a statistically significant increase in risk. Elevated but uncertain risks were also observed with brolucizumab 3 mg Q12W and ranibizumab 0.5 mg Q4W.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>This NMA confirms that anti-VEGF therapies are significantly more effective than verteporfin photodynamic therapy in preserving visual acuity in nAMD. No major safety differences were observed for most agents, although brolucizumab 6 mg Q12W may carry a higher risk of ocular adverse events. Further long-term studies are needed to clarify comparative outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Moya Mangas, C., Amaro Alvarez, L., Cordero Ramos, J., Marcos Rodriguez, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.46</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.46</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[2SPD-015 Treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration using anti-VEGF therapy: a network meta-analysis of therapeutic alternatives]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 2: Selection, procurement and distribution</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A22</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A23</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A23-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[2SPD-016 Efficacy analysis of perioperative immunotherapy regimens according to smoking status in patients with resectable non-small-cell lung cancer]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A23-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Smoking is a factor that influences the efficacy of cancer treatments. The use of immunotherapeutic agents has emerged as an important therapeutic strategy in the perioperative management of resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (rNSCLC).</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To develop a systematic search and evaluation about efficacy of immunotherapies in rNSCLC based on subgroup analysis according to patient smoking status.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Systematic review was conducted in EMBASE and Pubmed databases until 17 September 2024. Randomised phase III clinical trials on perioperative immunotherapies for rNSCLC with &ge;50 patients were selected. Review records with languages other than English or Spanish were excluded. Progression-free survival (PFS) was the efficacy endpoint evaluated. Analysis of efficacy was performed using aggregated data on immunotherapy regimens. This efficacy analysis differentiated two patient subgroups: current/former smokers and never smokers. Heterogeneous efficacy of immunotherapy regimens between aggregated subgroup of current/former smokers and never smokers was defined as p &lt; 0.1, as these were subpopulation analyses. The calculations were obtained from the hazard ratio values from clinical trials and the variances of their natural logarithms.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 69 search records were found in EMBASE and PubMed databases. Of these, 65 were excluded for the following reasons: 38 studies did not involve immunotherapies, 12 duplicate publications, 11 records without selected clinical trial design, two studies on different pathologies, one evaluated different endpoints and another for using an excluded language. Therefore, four clinical trials were included. A total of 2835 patients were recruited in the selected clinical trials. The immunotherapeutic agents involved in the perioperative regimens for rNSCLC were durvalumab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab and toripalimab. The estimated hazard ratio of immunotherapy regimens for the aggregate subgroup of current/former smokers was 0.55 (95% CI 0.48&ndash;0.64). The calculated hazard ratio of immunotherapy schemes for the aggregate subgroup of never smokers was 0.76 (95% CI 0.52&ndash;1.13). P between subgroups according to smoking status reached a value of 0.12 (no heterogeneous efficacy).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Our study found no difference in the efficacy of perioperative immunotherapy regimens between current/former smokers and never smokers diagnosed with rNSCLC.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>None</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gil-Sierra, M., Briceno-Casado, M., Moreno Ramos, C., Castillejo-Garcia, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.47</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.47</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[2SPD-016 Efficacy analysis of perioperative immunotherapy regimens according to smoking status in patients with resectable non-small-cell lung cancer]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 2: Selection, procurement and distribution</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A23</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A23</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A23-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[2SPD-017 Same outcomes, lower costs: rethinking fixed dosing in immunotherapy]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A23-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Pembrolizumab and nivolumab are monoclonal antibodies whose initial dosing strategies were based on bodyweight, 2 mg/kg every 3 weeks and 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks, respectively. However, fixed dosing (FD), 200 mg every 3 weeks and 240 mg every 2 weeks, was subsequently introduced after showing equivalence.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To describe the cost saving of switching from pembrolizumab and nivolumab FD to weight-based dosing (WBD), as recommended by hospital management, in real-world clinical practice.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective observational study was conducted in a tertiary hospital, including patients who received at least one dose of pembrolizumab or nivolumab between September 2024 and August 2025. Collected data (extracted Farmatools ) from F included patient weight, dosage regimen and number of administrations. FD and WBD followed the official product label. Cost analysis considered vial prices (pembrolizumab 1081.75; nivolumab 641.73), quantities used, and vial optimisation. The cost of WBD was compared with a hypothetical FD scenario, estimating the percentage of patients receiving WBD and potential savings. Differences between groups were assessed using an independent samples Student&rsquo;s t-test.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Pembrolizumab was administered to 287 patients: 223 (weight 69.50 &plusmn; 28.22kg) received fixed doses and 64 (weight 62.61 &plusmn; 14.37kg) received weight-based doses. Annual cost was 3,684,439.82 for fixed dosing and 454,925.32 for weight-based dosing, saving 267,683.32 (6.47%). Weight-based dosing was used in 22.3% of patients. No significant difference in mean bodyweight was found between groups.</p><p>Nivolumab was administered to 108 patients: 64 (weight 62.29 &plusmn; 32.06kg) received fixed doses and 44 (weight 64.95 &plusmn; 14.79kg) received weight-based doses. Annual cost was 1,058,857.64 with fixed dosing and 297,505.63 with weight-based dosing, saving 244,629.48 (18.04%). Weight-based dosing was applied in 40.74% of patients. Although a significant difference in mean bodyweight was found (t=2.81, p &lt; 0.05), the absolute difference was small and likely clinically irrelevant.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Individualised dosing of nivolumab and pembrolizumab can represent a strategy to optimise treatment costs in clinical practice. However, in our institution, the proportion of patients receiving WBD remains suboptimal. Continued education, data sharing, and consensus protocols with prescribers are needed to promote WBD for these monoclonal antibodies, optimising treatment outcomes and reducing healthcare costs.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Munoz Delgado, I., Gonzalez Perez, C., Pacheco Ramos, M., Zamora Barrios, M., Carrasco Piernavieja, L., Dominguez Chafer, J., Retamosa Escolar, A., Corazon Villanueva, J., Benitez Gimenez, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.48</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.48</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[2SPD-017 Same outcomes, lower costs: rethinking fixed dosing in immunotherapy]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 2: Selection, procurement and distribution</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A23</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A24</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A24-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[2SPD-018 Consequences of discontinuing long-acting injectable olanzapine: clinical and pharmacologic monitoring and treatment adjustment]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A24-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Long-acting injectable olanzapine (OLAI) is prescribed to stabilised schizophrenia patients previously treated with oral olanzapine to enhance therapeutic adherence and reduce relapse risk. In April 2025, a shortage of the 300 mg OLAI formulation occurred, followed in May by the 405 mg formulation. This led to drastic rationing and prioritisation based on clinical assessment and recommendations from the French National Agency for Medicines. While benefits of long-acting injections are well established, the consequences of drug shortages remain poorly studied in terms of continuity of care and clinical outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate therapeutic adaptations to the olanzapine shortage and analyse clinical consequences in patients stabilised on OLAI.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A single-centre retrospective cohort study was conducted between May and August 2025. Eligible patients were men and women of all ages from the active caseload of a public psychiatric hospital, either hospitalised or outpatient, stabilised on OLAI 300 mg or 405 mg &ndash; with at least three previous injections. Data were extracted from patient records and nursing reports. Primary outcomes were therapeutic adaptations (oral switch, antipsychotic change, dose adjustment) and clinical course (decompensation/rehospitalisation).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Among the 34 patients, only two (6%) maintained their usual injection dosage. Most required adaptation: 22 (65%) switched to oral olanzapine, 10 (29%) underwent OLAI dose change. Of these, nine later switched to oral olanzapine, and one changed to another antipsychotic. Overall, 31 out of 34 patients switched to oral olanzapine. Among them, seven (21%) experienced decompensation, including one rehospitalisation. After the shortage, only 16 (47%) resumed OLAI.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The shortage led to therapeutic adjustments in nearly all patients, with 21% decompensating, and one readmission. Although the rehospitalisation rate was low (3%), at a national scale, it could represent a major public health burden. These results highlight the vulnerability of psychiatric care pathways to shortages. Limitations include the retrospective, single-centre design, reducing generalisability of the results. Multicentre studies with health-economic analyses are needed to confirm these findings and better estimate the global impact. This study illustrates how a drug shortage can undermine years of clinical stability within weeks, underscoring the need for therapeutic continuity in psychiatry.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gorostis, A., Messerer, L., Bedjidian, S., Sujol, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.49</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.49</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[2SPD-018 Consequences of discontinuing long-acting injectable olanzapine: clinical and pharmacologic monitoring and treatment adjustment]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 2: Selection, procurement and distribution</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A24</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A24</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A24-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[2SPD-019 Indirect comparison of treatments in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A24-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Several systemic treatments are available for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). Most of these therapies have not been directly compared.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To perform indirect comparisons (ICs) between innovative therapeutic alternatives using a common comparator in patients diagnosed with moderate-to-severe AD.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A PubMed review of pivotal randomised clinical trials (RCTs) responsible for the authorisation of selected therapies (abrocitinib, baricitinib, dupilumab, lebrikizumab, tralokinumab and upadacitinib) was conducted. Inclusion criteria: phase III RCTs of treatments cited with a double-blind and placebo-controlled design, which included patients with moderate-to-severe AD. Investigator&rsquo;s Global Assessment score of 0-1 (IGA 0-1, clear to almost clear skin) at 16 weeks were selected as the endpoint to estimate absolute risk reduction (ARR) for each drug. We conducted adjusted ICs using Bucher&rsquo;s method. The regimen with the greatest magnitude of effect was selected as reference therapy. The maximum difference without clinical relevance () was defined as &plusmn;23% according to the average of IGA 0-1 value used in studies to calculate the sample size.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Twelve RCTs were included. All treatments showed benefit over placebo (common comparator). Regarding upadacitinib 30 mg diary (reference therapy), ARRs were: -13.50% (95% CI, -19.98 to -7.02) vs upadacitinib 15 mg diary; -17.65% (95% CI, -25.95 to -9.35) vs abrocitinib 200 mg diary ; -22.9% (95% CI, -29.79 to -16.01) vs dupilumab 300 mg biweekly; -24.10% (95% CI, -31.22 to -16.98) vs lebrikizumab 250 mg biweekly; -32.55% (95% CI, -40.50 to -24.60) vs abrocitinib 100 mg diary; -39.85% (95% CI -46.51 to -33.19) vs baricitinib 4 mg diary: -41.50% (95% CI -47.29 to -35.71) vs tralokinumab 300 mg biweekly; and -44.15% (95% CI -50.44 to -37.86) vs baricitinib 2 mg diary. Statistically significant differences were found between upadacitinib 30 mg daily and the rest of therapies examined. Upadacitinib 30 mg only demonstrated a clinically relevant benefit versus lebrikizumab, abrocitinib 100 mg, tralokinumab, baricitinib 4 mg and 2 mg.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Our ICs provide comparative efficacy data on therapeutic alternatives for moderate-to-severe AD in terms of IGA 0-1. Statistically significant benefit was observed between upadacitinib 30 mg with respect to all treatments, but only relevant clinical superiority over lebrikizumab, abrocitinib 100 mg , tralokinumab, baricitinib 4 mg and 2 mg.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Moreno Ramos, C., Gil-Sierra, M., Briceno-Casado, M., Castillejo-Garcia, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.50</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.50</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[2SPD-019 Indirect comparison of treatments in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 2: Selection, procurement and distribution</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A24</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A25</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A25-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[2SPD-020 Incorporating life cycle assessment (LCA) into the hospital evaluation of monoclonal antibodies: challenges and practical issues illustrated by the case of adalimumab]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A25-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>The carbon footprint of biological drugs remains poorly documented. In situations of market exclusivity, these drugs are often associated with high costs. When competition arises, however, price differences between products may be limited. In this context, incorporating environmental impact as an additional criterion in hospital drug evaluation could provide a meaningful basis for differentiation.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the feasibility of applying life cycle assessment (LCA) to a biological drug, adalimumab, in order to estimate its carbon footprint and to explore the integration of such an approach into hospital referral decisions.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Seven adalimumab products in prefilled pen presentations were analysed (one originator and six biosimilars, at 40 mg and 80 mg doses). The Carebone tool, developed by our institution, was used to perform a life cycle assessment including the production of the active substance, excipients, packaging materials, energy consumption during formulation and packaging, transport, and end of life of packaging. Data were collected from regulatory databases and from documentation provided by pharmaceutical companies.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The carbon footprint of adalimumab pens varies between 515 and 1,887 grams of carbon dioxide equivalent, depending on the product and dosage, with an uncertainty rate ranging from 9% to 30%. The production of the active substance is the main source of emissions (up to 70% of the total), whereas excipients have a negligible impact. The estimates are consistent with available industrial data and with results reported for other injectable devices.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>This study provides the first comprehensive life cycle assessment of adalimumab. It confirms technical feasibility using the Carebone tool, while highlighting challenges related to the lengthy analysis time and to the collection of industrial data. It supports the inclusion of environmental criteria in the evaluation and selection of medicines in hospitals, alongside established clinical and economic considerations.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>The authors acknowledge the contribution of the team involved in the development of the Carebone tool.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Siorat, V., Tano, M., Degrassat Theas, A., Parent De Curzon, O., Paubel, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.51</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.51</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[2SPD-020 Incorporating life cycle assessment (LCA) into the hospital evaluation of monoclonal antibodies: challenges and practical issues illustrated by the case of adalimumab]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 2: Selection, procurement and distribution</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A25</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A25</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A25-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[2SPD-021 Indirect comparison of first-line treatment with tislelizumab, atezolizumab or durvalumab for patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A25-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Despite recent advances, first-line chemoimmunotherapy with PD-L1 inhibitors for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) provides only modest survival benefits. Tislelizumab has been recently approved by the European Commission, but head-to-head comparisons among available immunotherapies are lacking, highlighting the need for indirect analyses to guide optimal treatment selection.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To determine whether tislelizumab, atezolizumab and durvalumab can be considered clinically equivalent therapeutic alternatives (CETAs) in patients with ES-SCLC through an adjusted indirect treatment comparison (ITC) using a common comparator.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A literature search was conducted to identify phase III clinical trials (CTs) involving tislelizumab, atezolizumab or durvalumab in comparable populations, study durations, and endpoints. The primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). An ITC between tislelizumab, atezolizumab and durvalumab was performed using the Bucher method, supported by the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH) ITC calculator. According to ESMO, a hazard ratio (HR) &lt;0.65 (and its inverse, 1.54) is considered clinically meaningful for treatment differences in this setting. Results were graphically analysed, focusing on the relative position of the 95% CI relative to the predefined equivalence margin.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Three CTs were included: RATIONALE-312 (tislelizumab), IMpower133 (atezolizumab) and CASPIAN (durvalumab). The selected trials were phase III, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled studies involving patients with ES-SCLC in first-line treatment and Performance Status 0-1. The individual CTs outcomes in terms of PFS were tislelizumab HR=0.64 (95% CI 0.52-0.78), atezolizumab HR=0.77 (95% CI 0.63-0.96) and durvalumab HR=0.78 (95% CI 0.65-0.94); and in terms of OS 0.75 (95% CI 0.61-0.93), 0.70 (95% CI 0.54-0.91) and 0.73 (95% CI 0.59-0.91) respectively. The results of the ITC are summarised in <cross-ref type="tbl" refid="T1">table 1</cross-ref>. </p><p><tbl id="T1" loc="float"><no>Abstract 2SPD-021 Table 1</no><tblbdy top-stubs="2"><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">ITC  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">PFS HR (95% CI)  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">OS HR (95% CI)  </c></r><r><c cspan="3" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Tislelizumab vs atezolizumab  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.83 (0.62-1.11)  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1.07 (0.77-1.50)  </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Tislelizumab vs durvalumab  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.82 (0.62-1.08)  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1.03 (0.83-1.28)  </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Atezolizumab vs durvalumab  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.99 (0.73-1.33)  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.96 (0.68-1.35)  </c></r></tblbdy><tblfn><p>No statistically significant difference was observed for PFS or OS.</p></tblfn></tbl></p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Tislelizumab, atezolizumab, and durvalumab show no significant differences in PFS or OS. Given similar mechanisms and consistent placebo outcomes, they may be considered CETAs for ES-SCLC first-line treatment, despite potential OS bias from subsequent therapies, particularly in the RATIONALE-312, where a higher proportion of patients received subsequent systemic therapies&mdash;including immunotherapy.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adeva Antona, S., Alegre Del Rey, E., Fenix Caballero, S., Perez Encinas, M., Guerra Gomez, O., Risco Martinez, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.52</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.52</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[2SPD-021 Indirect comparison of first-line treatment with tislelizumab, atezolizumab or durvalumab for patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 2: Selection, procurement and distribution</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A25</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A26</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A26-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[2SPD-022 Cybersecurity risks in the medical device network: are French hospitals prepared?]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A26-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>With the rising frequency of cyberattacks targeting the healthcare sector in France, the medical device (MD) network whether connected or reliant on computerised processes for management, maintenance, and traceability represents a particularly vulnerable target. Such attacks may compromise patient safety and the continuity of care. Despite increasing awareness, the level of preparedness among healthcare institutions (HIs) remains inadequately documented.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This study aimed to assess the organisational and technical measures implemented by healthcare institutions to prevent, detect, and respond to the risks and impacts of a cyberattack on the MD network.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A 3 month audit was conducted using an online questionnaire distributed to public and private hospital pharmacies. The survey was developed based on existing regulatory frameworks and shared experience feedback to evaluate preparedness practices for cyberattacks involving medical devices. Responses were analysed using descriptive quantitative and qualitative methods to identify trends, practice gaps, and common limitations.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Among the 31 responding institutions, one had previously experienced a cyberattack. Data related to medical devices were mainly stored on secure internal servers (57%), while a minority were kept on USB drives and personal computers. Access control was primarily based on password authentication (84%), although in 3% of cases, data remained freely accessible to pharmacy staff. Cyberattack procedures have been formalised in 54% of HIs, under development in 27%, and absent in 19%. Among those with a procedure, only 18% had tested it. Major areas for improvement included limited staff training and difficulties in performing regular data backups. In practice, 52% of pharmacists reported having a defined Business Continuity and Recovery Plan (BCRP). Logistically, 80% of hospital pharmacies declared having sufficient stock levels; however, visibility regarding non-stocked medical devices and consumables remained limited. Key strengths included the implementation of &lsquo;crash boxes&rsquo;, effective territorial cooperation, and regular data backups. Reported limitations involved insufficient IT (information technology) department support, irregular training, limited financial resources, and understaffing.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>This audit reveals varied cybersecurity preparedness for medical devices. Formal procedures exist in some institutions but are poorly implemented. Harmonisation at national and European levels, along with routine integration and staff training, is essential to protect patient safety.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Choulet, E., Belliard, A., Belkaid, N., Cauchetier, E., Pons, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.53</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.53</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[2SPD-022 Cybersecurity risks in the medical device network: are French hospitals prepared?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 2: Selection, procurement and distribution</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A26</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A26</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A26-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[2SPD-023 Implementation of a degraded procedure for the implantable medical devices circuit at Amiens-Picardie University Hospital in the event of an information system outage or cyberattack]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A26-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>The increasing digitalisation of hospitals exposes healthcare institutions to cyberattacks, particularly ransomware, which can paralyse operations and compromise patient safety. The management of implantable medical devices (IMDs) is critical, as their traceability is mandatory for materiovigilance and regulatory compliance. In the event of an information system (IS) outage it is essential to ensure the continuity and security of the IMD circuit.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This work, part of the COPIL DMI action plan, aims to establish a degraded procedure enabling the tracking, traceability, and provision of IMDs when IS systems are inaccessible, due to either a major outage or a cyberattack.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A working group from COPIL DMI was created, bringing together the hospital pharmacy (PUI) team (pharmacists, technicians, RSMQ), operating room managers, the Digital Services Department (DSN), and the hospital quality department. The IMD circuit was analysed, and its critical steps were identified using the FMEA (Failure Mode, Effects, and Criticality Analysis) method. Based on the control points identified, a degraded procedure was developed and tested in a simulated IS outage scenario.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The FMEA highlighted the most critical steps, particularly implant traceability in the electronic patient record (EPR) and order transmission to suppliers. The degraded procedure, based on paper documentation, offline Excel files, and extracted product and supplier references, allowed for minimal continuity of activity. The simulation confirmed that the procedure was functional but also revealed increased risks of errors due to manual data entry and a heavier workload for staff.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>This work emphasises the strong reliance of the IMD circuit on hospital IS and its vulnerabilities during outages or cyberattacks. The degraded procedure and its testing are essential to ensure continuity of care and minimum device traceability. These efforts must be part of an institutional approach involving the PUI and clinical departments. Once validated by COPIL DMI and COVIRIS, the next steps will include the development of a business recovery plan and formalisation of the associated procedures</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gaudefroy, L., Babin, M., Petit, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.54</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.54</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[2SPD-023 Implementation of a degraded procedure for the implantable medical devices circuit at Amiens-Picardie University Hospital in the event of an information system outage or cyberattack]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 2: Selection, procurement and distribution</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A26</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A26</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A27-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[2SPD-024 Implementation of personal digital assistants in the medication dispensing and return processes]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A27-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>The use of novel barcode scanning technologies is crucial for patient safety, process optimisation, and the reduction of medication errors, in addition to providing a financial return for healthcare institutions. The lack of medication traceability within the hospital environment created the need for a mobile solution through the acquisition of barcode scanners and personal digital assistants (PDAs), ensuring that the barcode capture is performed at the point of movement.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To implement PDAs into the medication distribution (dispensing) and medication return processes.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>The processes were evaluated in three phases: planning/acquisition, execution, and evaluation. To measure the results, data were collected on the time dedicated to medication distribution, receiving, and return activities, as well as costs associated with labour and paper consumption, using automated records from the distribution system, pharmacy control spreadsheets, and nursing team audits. Indicators analysed included hours per day spent on each process, cost per hour ratio, number of paper packages used, and detailed reasons for returns, during the period from January to July 2025, covering 551 patient-days. The comparative analysis before and after implementation utilised descriptive statistics and internal validation by a multidisciplinary team.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The patient discharge dispensing and medication verification processes were optimised, resulting in a reduction of 11.8 hours/day (354 hours/month) in labour time, yielding a saving of 1,288.10 in man-hour costs. For medication receiving, there was a reduction of 6.1 hours/day (183 hours/month), resulting in a saving of 1,549.47 in man-hour costs. Paper consumption was significantly reduced from 81 to 30 packages of 500 sheets (January to July 2025). Additionally, the time spent on medication returns decreased by 52% and the accuracy of return reasons was significantly improved.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The adoption of new technologies, such as PDAs and barcode scanners, promotes the optimisation of clinical support processes, resulting in faster patient discharge dispensing, picking verification, and medication receiving. The electronic medication return process performed by the nursing team enhances the accuracy of reasons and streamlines reverse logistics, contributing to more efficient and safer medication management.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lindh, E., Chaves, C., Gomes, L., Pinto, V., Sforsin, A., Couto, K., Satake, F., Escamez, M., Pereira, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.55</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.55</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[2SPD-024 Implementation of personal digital assistants in the medication dispensing and return processes]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 2: Selection, procurement and distribution</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A27</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A27</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A27-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[2SPD-025 Investigating vein-to-vein time in autologous chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies: a real-world analysis]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A27-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Autologous chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies have demonstrated significant clinical benefit in patients with chemo refractory aggressive B-cell lymphomas or myeloma. Emerging evidence suggests that delayed CAR T-cell infusion, including prolonged time from leukapheresis to infusion, known as vein-to-vein time (V2Vt), may adversely impact clinical outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This study aimed to evaluate real-world V2Vt in patients receiving autologous CAR T-cell therapies at a tertiary oncology centre, and to compare differences across available products.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Requests for CAR T-cell therapies and administration records received by the hospital pharmacy were reviewed to determine the number of therapies administered and V2Vt. Treatments administered between 1 January 2021, and 31 December 2024, were included. V2Vt was expressed in days as mean &plusmn; standard deviation and median values for each product. Data normality was assessed using the D&rsquo;Agostino-Pearson omnibus test. Since distributions were not Gaussian, the Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare differences among groups. When the overall test was significant, post hoc pairwise comparisons were performed using Dunn&rsquo;s multiple comparison test (significance level p&lt;0.05). Statistical analyses were conducted using GraphPad Prism 8.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 73 CAR T-cell therapies were administered during the study period, increasing from nine (12%) in 2021 to 36 (49%) in 2024. Specifically, 31 (42%) were axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel), 31 (42%) tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel), and 11 (16%) brexucabtagene autoleucel (brexi-cel). Mean V2Vt was 48&plusmn;19 days (median 42) for axi-cel, 67&plusmn;29 days (median 57) for tisa-cel, and 53&plusmn;35 days (median 41) for brexi-cel. The Kruskal-Wallis test showed a significant overall difference (p=0.002), with Dunn&rsquo;s post hoc test indicating significant differences between axi-cel and tisa-cel (p=0.003), and between tisa-cel and brexi-cel (p=0.035).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>V2Vt varied significantly among CAR T-cell products, with axi-cel showing the shortest mean time. Manufacturing and logistical delays remain key barriers to ensure timely treatment. Decentralised manufacturing and off-the-shelf allogeneic platforms may reduce waiting times and costs. In this evolving scenario, hospital pharmacists play a pivotal role in process optimisation, ensuring timely access to advanced therapies.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. Bryla A, <I>et al</I>. Involvement of the hospital pharmacist in securing the chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell circuit. <I>Eur J Hosp Pharm.</I> 2025 Mar 6:ejhpharm-2024-004454.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gallina, M., Marengo, G., Bonanno, S., Barberi, I., Musso, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.56</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.56</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[2SPD-025 Investigating vein-to-vein time in autologous chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies: a real-world analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 2: Selection, procurement and distribution</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A27</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A27</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A28-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[2SPD-026 Updating the risk control level of the risk map for an automated dispensing process]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A28-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>As part of efforts to secure and ensure the traceability of the drug supply chain, the acquisition of automated machines for producing single doses and doses to be administered has enabled the implementation of the Automated Single-Dose Dispensing (ASDD) process. In accordance with the validation requirements for automated systems, analysis of the supplier documentation enabled the production of an initial version of the risk map (RM) and the development of the acceptance test specifications required for operational qualification (OQ). The OQ tests thus written were used to validate the technical functioning of the equipment in relation to the supplier documentation.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The objective is to verify the control level reported during the development of the RM.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>An analysis of failure modes, their effects, and their criticality was conducted on the entire ASDD process. Each sub-step was examined using an Ishikawa diagram. The risks associated with the method were documented using data from the supplier. The rating was carried out according to the HAS grid, whose control level scale was adapted to the automated context. Level 1 was associated with situations causing the software or equipment to block the action. When the alert message was present but not blocking, the control level assigned was level 2. The lowest level was level 5, indicating a risk that has not yet been controlled. The residual criticality of each risk was thus obtained. For many risks, the level of control was set at 5 due to a lack of data provided by the supplier. The OQ was carried out in relation to this RM.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Sixty-three of the 246 risks included in the RM were modified following the results of the OQ tests. The reassessment of the level of control always resulted in a higher level of control.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>This process of updating the RM&rsquo;s risk management level should not be necessary. It highlights the importance of the supplier providing detailed technical documentation on the behaviour of the software and equipment. Close collaboration between the supplier and customer is essential in order to have a complete risk analysis before the OQ phase.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martelet, C., Cailloce, S., Gerard, E., Boucher, J., Cotteau-Leroy, A., Odou, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.57</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.57</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[2SPD-026 Updating the risk control level of the risk map for an automated dispensing process]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 2: Selection, procurement and distribution</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A28</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A28</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A28-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[2SPD-027 Analysing override patterns in automated dispensing systems in a clinical unit of a tertiary care hospital]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A28-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Decentralised automated dispensing systems (ADS) integrated with electronic prescribing are essential tools for safe medication management in hospitals. However, unjustified use of overrides compromises traceability, therapeutic appropriateness, and patient safety. The Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP) recommends restricting this functionality to justified situations under institutional guidelines, including double verification and documentation.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the appropriateness of overrides in a tertiary care hospital, analyse data from the Grifols Reporting NextGen (GRN) system and identify reasons for direct dispensing via ADS without prior medical prescription.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A descriptive study was conducted in June 2025 in a clinical unit of a tertiary care hospital. Medication dispensed without prescription in a clinical unit was recorded. Variables collected included: justified override, medication not prescribed at any time, medication dispensed prior to prescription, medication dispensed prior to validation, and medication prescribed and validated but with deviation from the established circuit.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Out of 6,845 dispensations via ADS, 401 were overrides (5.86%). Breakdown: 49.63% without prescription, 9.98% prior to prescription without justification, 5.23% prior to validation, 19.45% with incorrect circuit, and 15.71% prior to prescription justified.</p><p>Frequently involved medications included paracetamol, morphine, omeprazole and dexketoprofen. Justification rates varied: morphine 1% ampoules (54.54%), paracetamol 1 g tablets (31.43%), omeprazole 20 mg capsules (0%), omeprazole 40 mg vials (7.14%) and dexketoprofen 25 mg/mL ampoules (15.38%).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The analysis revealed that NPMD exceeded the 5% safety threshold (5.86%), with most cases lacking registered prescriptions or involving circuit deviations. Only 15.71% were justified, indicating a need for improved control and staff training. Recommended actions include mandatory documentation of clinical justification and periodic review of override patterns. These measures aim to optimise ADS use, enhance patient safety, and ensure therapeutic appropriateness.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aguasca Adrover, M., Galindo San Segundo, D., Santandreu Estelrich, M., Chaves Martinez, B., Freites Nava, R., Quinta Franco, I., Catany Catany, J., Manso anda, S., Garcia Ruiz, T., Lopez Lopez-Cepero, M., Martorell Puigserver, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.58</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.58</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[2SPD-027 Analysing override patterns in automated dispensing systems in a clinical unit of a tertiary care hospital]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 2: Selection, procurement and distribution</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A28</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A28</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A28-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[2SPD-028 Implementation of ward-based financial monitoring in healthcare management]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A28-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Clinical pharmacy extends beyond healthcare provision&mdash;it plays a vital role in responsible financial management. This involves not only the cost-effective procurement of medicines but also maintaining realistic departmental expectations. While some hospitals operate with a single central pharmacy budget, others allocate budgets directly to each ward.</p><p>In April 2025, a departmental budget monitoring was introduced, giving each ward a fixed monthly budget and making them accountable for staying within it. This shift allowed us to compare two real-world financial strategies and to examine how budget responsibility can shape both costs and therapeutic decisions.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>Our goal was to implement budgets that accurately reflect each ward&rsquo;s actual drug expenditures, and to assess how departmental budget monitoring affected hospital-wide costs and the therapeutic choices of specific wards. Furthermore, we aimed to evaluate the system&rsquo;s effectiveness.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>To establish the new budgets, we analysed each ward&rsquo;s total drug requirements in 2024 and averaged the 12 month financial costs. Considering changes in drug prices, we added a 10% margin to prevent the new limits from being overly restrictive. This adjusted cost estimation defined the monthly drug budgets from 1 April 2025. For comparability, we examined the deviation between the total medication costs and the available budget over the same 5 month period (April&ndash;August) in both years.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Between April and August 2024, wards exceeded their allocated budgets in four out of five months, with an average overspend of 9.77%. In contrast, during the same period in 2025&mdash;after introducing the new monthly budgets and direct accountability&mdash;departments generally stayed within limits, with orders averaging 3.6% below the set limit. The savings ensured larger safety stocks (6 weeks reserve vs 2 weeks reserve in 2024).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The introduction of ward-based budget management produced significant economic and clinical advantages. Making wards responsible for their own budgets improved cost control and encouraged more deliberate therapeutic choices, while ensuring continuous drug availability and comforting safety stocks. Enhanced collaboration with the pharmacy in selecting cost-effective equivalents strengthened clinical communication and teamwork.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bata, B., Kiss, A., Nagy, E., Szilvay, A., Bor, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.59</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.59</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[2SPD-028 Implementation of ward-based financial monitoring in healthcare management]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 2: Selection, procurement and distribution</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A28</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A29</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A29-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[2SPD-029 Hospital pharmacy-led optimisation of dietetic products and thickeners: a model for sustainable care and cost reduction]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A29-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>The provision of dietetic products, including protein modules, oral nutritional supplements and enteral nutrition, from hospital pharmacy services to long-term care facilities (LTCFs) presents a logistical and economic challenge. Although dietetic support in LTCFs is essential, only few studies have quantified the economic benefits of pharmacist-led optimisation.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To analyse dietetic products and thickeners dispensed in 2024 to eight affiliated private or publicly contracted LTCFs and to evaluate the economic impact of hospital pharmacist interventions in optimising orders and stock management.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective observational study was conducted including all institutionalised patients receiving dietetic products and/or thickeners dispensed during 2024. The hospital pharmacist reviewed monthly active treatments and surplus stocks at each centre, resulting from hospital admissions, therapy modifications, transfers, or deaths. Subsequent orders were adjusted to promote stock rotation and prevent accumulation. Surplus products unfit for local use were reallocated to avoid expiry. Urgent deliveries due to new prescriptions were coordinated to prevent delays.</p><p>Data were collected from outpatient dispensing records, order lists, and monthly stock reports. Dispensed units were analysed, and costs according to our regional centralised procurement framework were compared with their retail price (RP) in community pharmacies. The economic impact of pharmacist interventions was calculated based on avoided shipments, returns, and redistributions.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>390 institutionalised patients received dietetic products and/or thickener and 249 remained on active therapy at year-end. A total of 105.084 units were dispensed at a cost of 191.355,73, compared with an estimated RP of 750.587,50, representing a 74,5% saving (559.231,77). Most frequently dispensed products were high-protein, high-calorie oral nutritional supplements (57,27%), diabetes-specific supplements (19,03%), and renal-specific formulas (8,82%).</p><p>Stock optimisation enabled the reallocation of 977 units (avoiding 9.021,17 RP) and prevented unnecessary dispensing of 21.961 surplus units (155.448,07 RP), resulting in an additional saving of 164.469,24. Overall, the avoided expenditure attributable to pharmacist intervention reached 723.701,01, corresponding to a 79,1% reduction.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Hospital pharmacy-led dispensing of dietetic products to LTCFs represents a successful model of integrated pharmaceutical care requiring close coordination between prescribers, pharmacists, LTCFs, and manufacturers. Integration of hospital pharmacists into the care process optimised resources, reduced costs, prevented product expiry, and maintained nutritional therapy continuity.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Escribano Valenciano, I., Alonso Zazo, F., Gastalver Martin, C., Serna Romero, O., Buendia Bravo, S., Alvarez Atienza, S., Garcia Gordillo, D., Rubio Garcia, M., Iglesias Bolanos, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.60</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.60</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[2SPD-029 Hospital pharmacy-led optimisation of dietetic products and thickeners: a model for sustainable care and cost reduction]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 2: Selection, procurement and distribution</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A29</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A29</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A29-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[2SPD-030 Evaluation of anti-VEGF therapies for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD)]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A29-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) is a leading cause of irreversible vision loss in older adults. Anti-VEGF intravitreal agents have revolutionised management by improving and maintaining visual acuity through inhibition of pathological angiogenesis. Several options are currently available in Spain&mdash;ranibizumab, aflibercept (2 mg and 8 mg), brolucizumab, and faricimab&mdash;each differing in dosing interval, mechanism, and cost. Comparative evaluation of their efficacy, safety, and economic impact is essential for optimising therapeutic decisions in hospital pharmacy settings.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To compare the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of anti-VEGF agents used in nAMD based on pivotal clinical trials and local cost data, supporting evidence-based treatment selection.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A structured literature review of phase III randomised clinical trials was performed (MARINA, ANCHOR, VIEW 1&ndash;2, HAWK, HARRIER, TENAYA, LUCERNE, and PULSAR). Efficacy was assessed by change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA, ETDRS letters). Safety outcomes included ocular and systemic adverse events, serious ocular adverse events, and endophthalmitis rates. Economic evaluation was based on Spanish ex-factory prices (PVL+VAT) considering labelled dosing regimens, with and without vial sharing.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>All anti-VEGF agents demonstrated comparable efficacy to aflibercept 2 mg every 8 weeks, with significant improvement in BCVA versus placebo or verteporfin. No significant differences were found in ocular or systemic adverse events, although brolucizumab 6 mg q12w showed a higher risk of serious ocular events. Aflibercept 8 mg and brolucizumab were associated with lower systemic adverse event rates. Without vial sharing, aflibercept 8 mg prefilled syringe was the most cost-efficient option; with vial sharing, faricimab vials offered the lowest annual treatment cost. All anti-VEGF agents demonstrated comparable efficacy to aflibercept 2 mg every 8 weeks, with significant improvement in BCVA versus placebo or verteporfin. No significant differences were found in ocular or systemic adverse events, although brolucizumab 6 mg q12w showed a higher risk of serious ocular events.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Anti-VEGF therapies present similar efficacy and safety profiles, with differences mainly in dosing intervals and cost efficiency. Economic optimisation depends on hospital logistics and vial use policies.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cordero, J., Moya-Mangas, C., Aguado-Paredes, A., Amaro-Alvarez, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.61</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.61</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[2SPD-030 Evaluation of anti-VEGF therapies for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 2: Selection, procurement and distribution</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A29</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A30</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A30-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[2SPD-031 Transfemoral transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement with the Evoque system: from evaluation to introduction in a regional setting]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A30-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a condition with major clinical impact, associated with disabling symptoms, recurrent hospitalisations, and poor prognosis. Conventional therapeutic options are limited: medical therapy mainly has a palliative role, while cardiac surgery is reserved for a minority of patients due to high operative risk. The advent of transcatheter techniques has expanded therapeutic opportunities. Among these, the EVOQUE system (Edwards Lifesciences, ) is the first CE-marked device specifically designed for transfemoral tricuspid valve replacement, offering a less invasive option for patients with severe symptomatic TR not suitable for surgery.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This study aimed to describe the structured technical and scientific evaluation process that led to the introduction of the EVOQUE system into clinical practice, analysing clinical, organisational, and sustainability aspects.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A multidisciplinary evaluation was conducted to assess the device&rsquo;s technical characteristics, intended use, and clinical rationale, together with the available evidence from pivotal and early feasibility studies. The assessment included expected impacts on care pathways, resource requirements, and procedural logistics. Particular attention was given to defining patient selection criteria, team training needs, and follow-up parameters to ensure consistent procedural quality and monitoring of post-implant outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>In the first five patients treated, the EVOQUE system was successfully implanted, confirming the clinical and procedural feasibility of the technique. Considering the complexity of the procedure and the economic impact of the technology, an innovative outcome-based model was introduced: from the eighth implantation onwards, the device payment is linked to achieving an intra-procedural clinical outcome, defined as a reduction of tricuspid regurgitation to &le; grade 1 confirmed by echocardiography. If this target is not met, a predefined adjustment is applied. This outcome-based approach, applied for the first time to medical devices within a regional governance framework, allows the adoption of high-value technologies while ensuring structured monitoring of effectiveness and economic sustainability.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>This experience demonstrates that innovation can be integrated with safety, appropriateness, and sustainability through a structured evaluation and monitoring pathway. Hospital pharmacists play a central role by linking clinical and technological evaluation with economic management, supporting the rational and effective introduction of advanced medical technologies for patient benefit and the healthcare system.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Palini, S., Oppimitti, J., Stancari, A., Pirini, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.62</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.62</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[2SPD-031 Transfemoral transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement with the Evoque system: from evaluation to introduction in a regional setting]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 2: Selection, procurement and distribution</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A30</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A30</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A30-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[2SPD-032 Greener pharmacy: how reducing medicines waste at discharge can help hospitals achieve their net zero targets]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A30-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Medicines account for 25% of NHS emissions,<sup>1</sup> with oversupply causing waste in terms of expenditure, staff activities and environmental impact, as well as other issues such as patient safety when medicines are stockpiled at home. In 2020, the NHS became the world&rsquo;s first health system to commit to reaching zero emissions. While most medicine waste reduction focuses on primary care, inefficiencies within secondary care also need addressing, as highlighted in the Green Plan.<sup>2</sup>  </p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To assess the impact of an innovative medicines management policy on expenditure, sustainability, and dispensary workload in secondary care.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>The medicines management policy was updated such that rather than 14 days&rsquo; To Take Out (TTO) medication supplied routinely, only &lsquo;sufficient supply&rsquo; was provided (in line with Standard Contract for NHS Providers). &lsquo;Medicines Assessment for Discharge&rsquo; (MA4D), undertaken by ward-based staff (pharmacy and nursing) involved review of all medication already available, including patients own drugs (PODs) at home, or soon to be delivered, before any additional items were dispensed for discharge. Primary outcome: number of discharge medication items avoided per month.</p><p>Secondary outcomes:</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>financial savings (Mean cost of items dispensed multiplied by number avoided);</p></li><li><p>carbon emission savings using a pharmaceutical emission factor (0.581kgCO2e/&pound;)<sup>3</sup>;</p></li><li><p>dispensary workload, estimated at ten minutes processing per item.</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>In the first 5 months, discharge items avoided increased from 18% to 21%. Comparing January 2025 with January 2024 an extra 1 719 items were avoided, saving 290 staff hours (5.74 whole time equivalents). Extrapolated to full year benefits, this equates to an additional &pound;369,542 and 214.7 tonnes CO2e saved across the trust.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The simple tasks involved in MA4D have reduced unnecessary re-dispensing, minimised medicines costs and cut carbon emissions, within a secondary care organisation. The project now forms a key part of the trust&rsquo;s Green Plan. The collaboration between pharmacy and nursing staff to deliver MA4D leads to earlier patient discharge and a safer home environment due to reduced medication duplication.</p><p>The initiative is easily replicable within similar organisations, providing a practical model for hospitals seeking to advance their sustainability goals.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. Delivering-a-net-zero-nhs-july-2022.pdf</p><p>2. How-to-produce-a-green-plan-three-year-strategy-towards-net-zero-june-2021.pdf</p><p>3. UK and England&rsquo;s carbon footprint to 2022 - GOV.UK</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Watson, F., Johnson, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.63</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.63</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[2SPD-032 Greener pharmacy: how reducing medicines waste at discharge can help hospitals achieve their net zero targets]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 2: Selection, procurement and distribution</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A30</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A31</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A31-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[3PC-001 Oral vancomycin: vials vs capsules]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A31-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>The latest guidelines for the management of <I>Clostridioides difficile</I> infection (CDI) indicate, in patients without risk factors for relapse and in the first episode of infection, oral vancomycin 125 mg/6 hours for 10 days. However, there is no commercially available oral vancomycin in Spain, so the options are either vancomycin vials after oral reconstitution, or a compounded formulation of vancomycin capsules.</p><p>Before 2023, only vials were used in our community; thereafter, the use of capsules was prioritised.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and objectives</st><p>Hypothesis: Vial manipulation negatively influences CDI resolution.</p><p>Objective: To analyse whether the pharmaceutical form of vancomycin used for the treatment of CDI influences its effectiveness, measured as the percentage of patients who relapse.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Retrospective observational study. Adult patients receiving oral vancomycin for CDI between 01/07/2023 and 01/07/2025 were included. The following variables were collected: age, vancomycin pharmaceutical form, presence of relapse (3 months post-treatment), subsequent lines of treatment, serum leukocyte, albumin and creatinine levels, and concomitant antibiotic treatment during CDI treatment. The ATLAS score was calculated to estimate the risk of relapse of each patient. When the score is three or higher mortality rate rises to 3.6% and the cure rate decreases to 89.5%.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>We included 107 patients receiving oral vancomycin (53 received capsules and 54 vials). The median age of patients in both groups was similar (70.0 vs 70.4 years). First-line treatment was capsules in the 90.5% of patients and vials in 85.2%. Patients receiving capsules had an average risk of relapse (SCORE ATLAS) of 3.15 points versus 2.70 points in patients receiving vials (p=0.01). Relapse rate was 11.3% for patients treated with capsules versus 24.1% of those receiving vials (p=0.08) (13). Only four patients switched from vancomycin vials to capsules for second-line treatment; the rest used fidaxomicin. At the end, 100% of the CDI cases resolved.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Patients treated with capsules had a higher risk of relapse but also a higher cure rate than patients treated with oral reconstituted vancomycin vials.</p><p>The difference may not have been statistically significant due to the small sample size.</p><p>Handling vancomycin vials could be a risk factor for relapse in the resolution of the CDI.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marin, M., Rodriguez, A., Echeverria, A., Gorricho, J., Gil, A., Goni, O., Sanz, L., Garjon, J., Fernandez, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.64</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.64</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[3PC-001 Oral vancomycin: vials vs capsules]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 3: Production and compounding</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A31</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A31</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A31-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[3PC-002 Compliance of standardised parenteral nutrition with individualised prescriptions in a neonatal intensive care unit]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A31-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Individualised parenteral nutrition (PN) should be limited to specific clinical situations where nutritional needs cannot be adequately addressed by standardised formulations.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the compliance of standardised PN bags with individualised prescriptions for newborns admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Four standardised aqueous formulations (Bags 1&ndash;4) and one lipid emulsion were developed according to international recommendations and institutional expertise. Individualised PN prescriptions issued between January 2024 and August 2025 were analysed. Based on each newborn&rsquo;s weight and prescribed infusion rates, prescriptions were compared with the composition of the standardised bags at different infusion rates (&plusmn;5% and &plusmn;10%). Prescriptions with any parameter deviating more than 5% from the recommended range were excluded. Parameters assessed included protein (g/kg/day), glucose (mg/kg/min), calcium, phosphorus, magnesium (mg/kg/day), sodium, potassium (mEq/kg/day), zinc (&micro;g/kg/day), lipids (g/kg/day), and fat- and water-soluble vitamins (ml/kg/day). Compliance was defined as a maximum deviation of 5% from recommendations.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 381 prescriptions from 44 newborns were screened, with a median gestational age (GA) of 30 weeks (IQR 29&ndash;31). Of these, 252 (66.1%) were excluded. The 129 included prescriptions were prescribed to 27 newborns with a median GA of 29 weeks (IQR 28&ndash;30), postnatal age of 9 days (IQR 6&ndash;14), and weight of 1.180 kg (IQR 1.000&ndash;1.350). Compliance rates for glucose, sodium, and calcium were 93.8%, 98.4%, and 95.3%, respectively, across 20 simulations (four aqueous bags, five infusion rates) and 86.8% for lipids across five simulations (one lipid emulsion, five infusion rates). Median compliance for the remaining components was 15 for phosphorus and magnesium, 10 for amino acids and potassium, five for lipids, three for fat-soluble vitamins, and one for water-soluble vitamins. Zinc compliance was not achieved in any simulation. For all 129 prescriptions, one aqueous bag provided compliance for 7 out of 8 components (except zinc). In 83 prescriptions (64.3%), one lipid emulsion infusion rate ensured compliance for all three components.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Standardisation proved feasible. Adjusting zinc content in aqueous bags would allow full compliance with 100% of prescriptions. For lipid emulsions, compliance was achieved in approximately 64% of cases, with further optimisation of vitamin content required for complete standardisation.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barbosa, R., Fortunato, R., Dinis, S., Araujo, A., Fernandez-Llimos, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.65</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.65</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[3PC-002 Compliance of standardised parenteral nutrition with individualised prescriptions in a neonatal intensive care unit]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 3: Production and compounding</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A31</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A32</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A32-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[3PC-003 Formulation and stability testing of fortified gentamicin eye drops]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A32-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Bacterial eye infections at tertiary hospitals pose serious health challenges and require prompt treatment, often involving the preparation of fortified antibiotic eye drops. Since commercial products are not available, fortified antibiotic eye drops must be prepared in a hospital pharmacy unit, within a laminar-flow hood to maintain aseptic conditions.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate and compare the stability of fortified gentamicin eye drops during four weeks of storage at room temperature and in the refrigerator in relation to the method of preparation and type of solvent.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>We prepared fortified gentamicin eye drops (1.36%) by using two methods: (i) adding a vial of intravenous gentamicin (80 mg/2 mL) to gentamicin eye drops 0.3% (5 mL) prepared in 1.92% boric acid solution and citrate buffer, and (ii) dissolving gentamicin sulphate in 1.92% boric acid solution and citrate buffer. We examined changes in pH, concentration and absorption values over four weeks related to the method of preparation, type of solvent and storage conditions.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Our results demonstrated that the pH remained within stability limits (&lt;10% change from the initial pH value) in all formulations, regardless of method of preparation, solvents or storage temperature. In fortified gentamicin eye drops prepared by dissolving gentamicin sulphate in 1.92% boric acid solution, gentamicin content decreased to almost half of its initial amount (57.2%) after the seventh day of storage, regardless of storage conditions. However, when prepared in citrate buffer, a slight loss of gentamicin content (up to 10%) was observed after 28 days of storage under ambient (25 &deg;C) and refrigerated (2-8 &deg;C) conditions. For formulations obtained by adding an intravenous gentamicin vial to ophthalmic gentamicin solution (0.3%) in 1.92% boric acid solution, the absorption values remained stable for 21 days. In contrast, the stability of formulations in citrate buffer appeared to be no more than 14 days.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Significant differences were found between gentamicin ophthalmic formulations related to their method of preparation and type of solvent, while temperature had no effect on physicochemical characteristics. The optimal gentamicin ophthalmic formulation (1.36%) should be prepared by dissolving gentamicin sulphate in citrate buffer, as it has been proven to be the most stable.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cetkovic, Z., Ribar, M., Jovovic, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.66</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.66</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[3PC-003 Formulation and stability testing of fortified gentamicin eye drops]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 3: Production and compounding</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A32</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A32</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A32-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[3PC-004 Preparation and characterisation of fluorescein sodium ophthalmic strips: how to achieve a standardised amount of fluorescein sodium?]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A32-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Fluorescein sodium ophthalmic strips are sterile paper strips infused with fluorescein sodium dye, used by healthcare professionals to evaluate corneal abrasions and tear film stability, and to measure intraocular pressure. Since fluorescein sodium ophthalmic strips are not commercially available in our market, they must be prepared in the hospital pharmacy unit. However, the method of preparation and the quantity of released fluorescein sodium are not yet standardised.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To standardise the method of preparation of fluorescein sodium ophthalmic strips by comparing the differences in the amount of released fluorescein sodium related to the impregnated surface area.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>One edge of each paper strip is dipped into 10% sterile fluorescein sodium solution, prepared by dissolving fluorescein sodium into sterile water for injection and autoclaved. The paper strips are further air-dried for about 15 minutes in a laminar-flow hood. Using this method, strips with four different fluorescein-impregnated surface areas (15 mm<sup>2</sup>, 25 mm<sup>2</sup>, 35 mm<sup>2</sup>, and 50 mm<sup>2</sup>) were prepared. The quantity of fluorescein sodium extracted from the strips in aqueous solution was determined spectrophotometrically at 492 nm.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>We established a direct correlation between the quantity of fluorescein sodium and the impregnated surface area, as the amounts of fluorescein sodium extracted from the strips with surface area of 15 mm<sup>2</sup>, 25 mm<sup>2</sup>, 35 mm<sup>2</sup> and 50 mm<sup>2</sup> were 235 &mu;g, 366 &mu;g, 617 &mu;g and 1100 &mu;g, respectively. In relation to the standardised amount of fluorescein sodium of 300 &mu;g, the percentages of fluorescein sodium released from the strips of surface area of 15 mm<sup>2</sup>, 25 mm<sup>2</sup>, 35 mm<sup>2</sup> and 50 mm<sup>2</sup> were 78%, 122%, 206% and 367%, respectively. Therefore, only the amount of fluorescein sodium released from the strip of 25 mm<sup>2</sup> met the requirements of USP-NF 2025 monography (100-160% of the labelled amount of fluorescein sodium).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Modification of the impregnated surface area provides the possibility of achieving the desirable amount of released fluorescein sodium, thus reducing excessive dye use and waste, as well as ensuring reliable and consistent results. These results could lead to the optimal use of fluorescein sodium ophthalmic strips for diagnostic purposes and consequently improve patient outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cetkovic, Z., Ribar, M., Jovovic, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.67</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.67</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[3PC-004 Preparation and characterisation of fluorescein sodium ophthalmic strips: how to achieve a standardised amount of fluorescein sodium?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 3: Production and compounding</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A32</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A32</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A33-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[3PC-005 Stability testing of low-concentration atropine formulations for ophthalmic use]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A33-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Myopia causes blurred distance vision due to improper image focus. Low-dose atropine 0.1&ndash;0.5 mg/ml is widely used to prevent myopia progression in children with minimal side effects. In Estonia, only 1 mg/ml drops are available, which must be diluted. This limits the shelf life to 7 days. A stability study was conducted to extend usability.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The aim of the study was to evaluate the physicochemical and microbiological stability of 0.1 mg/ml atropine eye drops prepared extemporaneously in a hospital pharmacy. The study included a 14-week closed-container stability assessment and a 4-week in use stability evaluation.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Quantification of atropine sulfate and related impurities using the HPLC method (EP 11.0)</p></li><li><p>Sterility testing in accordance with EP 11.0</p></li><li><p>Visual evaluation of solution colour and clarity, along with measurements of pH and osmolality (via the freezing point depression method</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Atropine sulfate 0.1 mg/ml eye drops remained sterile throughout both the 14-week stability study and the 4-week in use study.</p><p><tbl id="T1" loc="float"><no>Abstract 3PC-005 Tabel 1</no><caption><p>Average concentration of atropine sulfate (mg/ml)</p></caption><tblbdy top-stubs="2"><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Batch </c><c cspan="2" rspan="1">4-week in use study </c><c cspan="2" rspan="1">14-week stability study </c></r><r><c cspan="5" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Day 0 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Day 28 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Day 0 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Day 98 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">I </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.102 &plusmn; 0.0013  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.098 &plusmn; 0.0009 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.101 &plusmn; 0.0002  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.105 &plusmn;0.0033 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">II </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.102 &plusmn; 0.0006  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.098 &plusmn; 0.0008 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.101 &plusmn; 0.004  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.105&plusmn;0.0014 </c></r></tblbdy></tbl></p><p><tbl id="T2" loc="float"><no>Abstract 3PC-005 Tabel 2</no><caption><p>Average pH of atropine sulfate eye drops during stability studies</p></caption><tblbdy top-stubs="2"><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Batch </c><c cspan="2" rspan="1">4-week in use study </c><c cspan="2" rspan="1">14-week stability study </c></r><r><c cspan="5" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Day 0 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Day 28 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Day 0 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Day 98 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">I </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">5.44 &plusmn; 0.025 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">5.20 &plusmn; 0.010 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">5.47 &plusmn; 0.199 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">5.14 &plusmn; 0.038 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">II </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">5.38 &plusmn; 0.020 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">5.17 &plusmn; 0.021 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">5.57 &plusmn; 0.060 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">5.16 &plusmn; 0.012 </c></r></tblbdy></tbl></p><p><tbl id="T3" loc="float"><no>Abstract 3PC-005 Tabel 3</no><caption><p>Average osmolality of atropine sulfate eye drops</p></caption><tblbdy top-stubs="2"><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Batch </c><c cspan="2" rspan="1">4-week in use (mosm/kgH<SUB>2</SUB>O) </c><c cspan="2" rspan="1">14-week stability (mosm/kgH<SUB>2</SUB>O) </c></r><r><c cspan="5" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Day 0 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Day 28 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Day 0 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Day 98 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">I </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">288 &plusmn; 0.00 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">287 &plusmn; 1.41 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">290 &plusmn; 0.00 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">291 &plusmn; 1.41 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">II </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">289 &plusmn; 1.41 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">289.5 &plusmn; 0.71 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">289 &plusmn; 2.83 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">289 &plusmn; 1.41 </c></r></tblbdy></tbl></p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Hospital pharmacy&ndash;prepared atropine sulfate 0.1 mg/ml eye drops remained sterile throughout a 14-week closed-container stability study and a 4-week in-use period. Stability data from the lowest tested concentration 0.1 mg/ml support extrapolation to 0.5 mg/ml, indicating that an extended shelf life may enhance patient convenience and cost-effectiveness.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Olado, K., Teder, K., Pauklin, M., Laidma&#x0308;e, I., Preem, L., Meos, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.68</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.68</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[3PC-005 Stability testing of low-concentration atropine formulations for ophthalmic use]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 3: Production and compounding</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A33</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A33</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A33-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[3PC-006 Shortage impact analysis in automated compounding devices for parenteral nutrition: a 3 year experience in a tertiary hospital]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A33-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>In parenteral nutrition (PN), where precision and continuity are essential, shortages may have an immediate clinical impact. Automated compounding devices (ACD) ensure safety and traceability but are less flexible, increasing the risk of disruption.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To analyse the decision making process regarding operational and therapeutic management of drug shortages affecting automated PN preparation, in order to support proactive and efficient future strategies.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>An observational, retrospective study (October 2022&ndash;September 2025) was carried out in a tertiary hospital. All incidents involving PN shortages elaborated by two ACD, one for the neonatal/paediatric and the other for adult population, were registered. Collected variables included logistic measures, prescription adjustments, and workflow changes in the robot compounding process.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 17 shortages of eight drugs were recorded. The affected products were calcium gluconate (n=4), adult (n=2) and paediatric amino acids (n=3), potassium acetate (n=3), vitamins (n=2), trace elements (n=1), magnesium sulfate (n=1), and glucose 70% (n=1). Shortages affected both populations, but in nine events the supply was conserved in neonatal/paediatric elaborations, and an alternative drug was looked for adult use due to specific excipient (aluminium in calcium) or concentration requirements (calcium, glucose 70%). Prescription algorithms and vademecum database changes were required in 76.5% and 52.9% of cases, respectively. Starter PN for neonates was affected by 29.4% of the shortages, and home PN by 35.3%. Robot parameter adjustments were necessary in 82.4% of cases. These included changes in product identification, vial density, codes, type of infusion line, recalibration of the flow factor by an external professional and new compounding configuration with the order of addition. Temporary manual compounding was required for adult PN (due to shortages of glucose 70%, paediatric amino acids and calcium gluconate), but not in neonatal/paediatric patients because stock was prioritised for them. Biochemical monitoring was performed for electrolyte alternatives to ensure equivalence, along with weight deviation analysis during processing for quality control.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>PN shortages have a magnified impact in automated compounding, demanding extensive pharmacist intervention to ensure continuity and safety. Our experience highlights the paradox of automation: while improving traceability and safety, it reduces adaptability, making PN services more vulnerable to supply disruptions.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chovi Trull, M., Padilla Lopez, A., Lopez Briz, E., Vazquez Polo, A., Hernandez Albertos, J., Nunez Arribas, I., Campos Barrachina, J., Zapata Ballesteros, M., Garcia Pellicer, J., Poveda Andres, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.69</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.69</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[3PC-006 Shortage impact analysis in automated compounding devices for parenteral nutrition: a 3 year experience in a tertiary hospital]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 3: Production and compounding</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A33</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A34</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A34-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[3PC-007 Impact of sterilising filtration on vitamin A concentration in autologous serum eye drops]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A34-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Autologous serum eye drops are an alternative treatment for pharmacoresistant dry eye diseases, owing to active molecules such as fibronectin, epidermal growth factor, and vitamin A. Sterility is required but cannot be achieved by autoclaving, as these molecules are heat-sensitive. Sterilising filtration is therefore used although it carries a risk of retaining active molecules within or on the filter, potentially reducing their concentration and efficacy.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The general aim was to optimise production of autologous serum eye drops by ensuring microbiological safety without altering their properties. The specific objective was to measure vitamin A concentrations under five conditions: no filtration, and filtration through two materials at two porosities each, to evaluate the impact of filtration.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Blood samples from five healthy volunteers were collected in trace element&ndash;free tubes, allowed to coagulate for 2 hours at room temperature, and centrifuged at 1500 g for 10 minutes at +4&deg;C. The resulting sera were aliquoted under five conditions: no filtration, filtration through polyethersulfone (PES) membranes at 0.22 &micro;m and 0.45 &micro;m, and filtration through cellulose acetate (CA) membranes at 0.22 &micro;m and 0.45 &micro;m, then stored protected from light. Vitamin A concentrations were quantified by high performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet and bar detector detection. Paired samples were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, with a significance threshold of p = 0.05.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>In the absence of filtration, the mean vitamin A concentration for the five volunteers was 57 &plusmn; 7.3 &micro;g/dL. After filtration, concentrations were: C<SUB>PES-0.22</SUB> = 59 &plusmn; 7.0 &micro;g/dL, C<SUB>PES-0.45</SUB> = 59 &plusmn; 7.9 &micro;g/dL, C<SUB>CA-0.22</SUB> = 62 &plusmn; 8.2 &micro;g/dL, and C<SUB>CA-0.45</SUB> = 62 &plusmn; 6.9 &micro;g/dL. Comparisons of filtered vs non-filtered sera yielded p &lt; 0.05, whereas comparisons between materials of identical porosity showed no significant difference (p  0.06).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>For autologous serum eye drops, it is important to ensure that sterilising filtration does not lower active molecule concentrations to levels that could compromise efficacy. For vitamin A, filtration appeared not to affect concentrations. Although not statistically significant, a trend toward differences between PES and CA membranes at identical porosities was observed and will be further investigated in a larger cohort.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Darrigo, M., Coulomb, M., Toure, F., Barny, C., Garnier, A., Tafzi, N., Picard, N., Rocher, M., Faye, P., Labriffe, M., Ratsimbazafy, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.70</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.70</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[3PC-007 Impact of sterilising filtration on vitamin A concentration in autologous serum eye drops]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 3: Production and compounding</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A34</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A34</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A34-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[3PC-008 Decarbonising chemotherapy production: the case of ready-to-use gemcitabine bags]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A34-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>The preparation of injectable cytotoxic drugs in hospital compounding units (HCU) generates greenhouse gas emissions linked to glass vial production, single-use consumables, and waste incineration. Industrial ready-to-use (RTU) polypropylene bags of gemcitabine may reduce this footprint while improving production efficiency. However, few studies have assessed both the environmental and organisational effects of this approach.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To compare the carbon footprint of gemcitabine prepared in HCU versus industrial RTU formats and evaluate their impact on workflow efficiency.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A life cycle assessment (LCA) compliant with ISO 14040 was conducted using Ecovamed 2025 (a private platform assessing the environmental footprint of pharmaceuticals) and Carebone v2.3 (a sustainability tool from the Paris public hospital network). Internal process data refined emission estimates. All marketed RTU doses (1200&ndash;2200 mg) were compared with equivalent compounded preparations, analysing active ingredient, packaging, transport, consumables, and end of life management. Packaging and consumables were weighed, and waste volumes were measured to quantify material savings. Workflow data were extracted from Chimio (software for chemotherapy compounding traceability and time monitoring) between January 2024 and March 2025. The production coverage rate&mdash;the share of treatments prepared with RTU formats&mdash;was calculated using Noxelia, a French AI-based tool optimising hospital pharmacy production workflows.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Approximately 2,000 RTU gemcitabine bags were used, accounting for 82% of total production. Each RTU dose avoided 0.8&ndash;1.7 kg CO<SUB>2</SUB> eq., a 40&ndash;60% reduction versus vial preparation. Major contributors were the replacement of glass vials by polypropylene bags (42%), the elimination of single-use sterile devices (19%), and the reduction of incinerated waste (14%). Measured consumables showed a 120&ndash;160 g weight reduction per dose, corresponding to about 0.8 m<sup>3</sup> less waste per 1,000 bags. The total saving reached 3.6 tonnes CO<SUB>2</SUB> eq. and 0.9 tonnes of waste&mdash;equivalent to 20 inpatient hospital days&mdash;with 250 saved in disposal costs. Preparation time improved by 12% overall (p &lt; 0.05) and 17% for RTU batches.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Industrial RTU gemcitabine provides measurable environmental and organisational benefits without compromising safety or workflow integrity. Scaled to annual use, carbon savings approach 3 tonnes CO<SUB>2</SUB> eq. per site. Extending RTU adoption to other cytotoxics could strengthen decarbonisation and efficiency in hospital pharmacy practice.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>Corporate sponsored research or other substantive relationships:</p><p>A. Plan and D. Protzenko promote the use of dose banding strategies in France through their start-up Noxelia and give lectures on the implementation of dose banding in hospital workflows for SunPharma.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Protzenko, D., Plan, A., Tournamille, J., Lortal, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.71</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.71</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[3PC-008 Decarbonising chemotherapy production: the case of ready-to-use gemcitabine bags]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 3: Production and compounding</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A34</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A34</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A35-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[3PC-009 Economic impact of automation in the preparation of adult parenteral nutrition]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A35-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>The preparation of parenteral nutrition (PN) is an important hospital process. Traditionally, PN preparation has been manual, and it involves challenges such as human error, variability, and resource consumption. As patient needs increase, automation is proposed to improve safety, traceability, and efficiency. However, there is limited evidence on the economic impact of automating PN preparation.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The aim of this study is to evaluate the economic impact of automating adult PN preparation and to identify strategies to minimise costs while ensuring quality and safety.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective study was conducted at a tertiary hospital comparing the direct costs of PN preparation in 2023 (manual) and 2024 (automated). These costs include: Costs for macronutrients, micronutrients, three-chamber bags, and disposable materials (e.g. packaging bags). Infrastructure and personnel costs were considered constant across both years. Results were compared and areas for potential cost reduction were identified.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>In 2023, a total of 7.068 adult PNs were prepared, of which 42% were individualised manual preparations and 58% were three-chamber bags. The direct cost of preparation products was 229.415, and the cost of preparation bags was 10.910, leading to a total cost of 240.325, with an average cost per PN of 34.0.</p><p>In 2024, a total of 7.322 adult PNs were prepared, of which 73% were individualised automated preparations and 27% were three-chamber bags. The direct cost of preparation products was 190.472, the cost of preparation bags was 40.678, and the cost of consumables for repackaging and robot equipment amounted to 114.907, for a total cost of 346.057, with an average cost per PN of 47.2.</p><p>The automation resulted in an additional 13.2 per PN, a 39% cost increase. Proposed cost reduction strategies included using repackaging bags instead of vacuum bottles, optimising repackaging volumes, and introducing a multi-electrolyte solution with potassium.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Automation in PN preparation led to a significant 39% increase in costs. However, implementing corrective strategies, mainly in repackaging, could reduce expenses by approximately 8%. The findings suggest that while automation has clear advantages, targeted interventions could optimise the economic impact and provide a more cost-effective model for PN preparation in hospital settings.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Garcia-Rodicio, S., Sunyer Esquerra, N., Fayet Perez, A., Fuentes Martinez, A., Couso Cruz, A., Martinez Diaz, E., Larrea Urtaran, X., Quinones Ribas, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.72</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.72</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[3PC-009 Economic impact of automation in the preparation of adult parenteral nutrition]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 3: Production and compounding</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A35</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A35</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A35-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[3PC-010 Optimising 99MTC-hynic-psma labelling to achieve a homogeneous isoform profile: a step toward a standardised kit-based formulation]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A35-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is a transmembrane glycoprotein highly expressed in advanced prostate cancer. Radiolabelled PSMA ligands have become key molecular probes for diagnostic imaging.<sup>1</sup> Among them, the technetium-99m-labelled iPSMA compound offers a cost-efficient SPECT alternative to PET tracers. However, the radiolabelling process can produce multiple chemical isoforms, depending on reaction parameters,<sup>2</sup> potentially affecting product uniformity and clinical performance.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To identify radiolabelling conditions that consistently generate a single predominant <sup>99m</sup>Tc-iPSMA isoform with high radiochemical purity (RCP).</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A total of 21 labelling protocols were systematically assessed in triplicate. Experimental variables included buffer composition, presence or absence of stannous chloride (SnCl<SUB>2</SUB>), use of transfer and co-ligands (tricine, EDDA, nicotinic acid), and addition of radiolysis stabilisers such as ascorbic acid or methionine. Reaction mixtures were analysed by radio-HPLC to quantify RCP and the relative proportion of each isoform.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Reactions performed without SnCl<SUB>2</SUB> yielded very low RCP values (&lt;5%), demonstrating its essential reducing role. Use of tricine alone or with antioxidant additives improved labelling efficiency but failed to generate a single species, with the main isoform accounting for only ~75% of total activity and unbound <sup>99m</sup>Tc remaining between 4-6%. Substitution of EDDA with alternative co-ligands, including nicotinic acid, systematically led to the formation of two isoforms in comparable proportions. Among all parameters tested, the buffer system was the most influential. The combination of 0.2 M sodium acetate buffer (pH 7) with EDDA, tricine, SnCl<SUB>2</SUB>, and iPSMA, followed by heating at 95 &deg;C for 15 min, produced the best outcome, yielding an RCP &gt;95% and a single dominant isoform (&gt;92%). Similar results were obtained when the heating time was reduced to 7 min.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>This study defines a robust and reproducible protocol for the preparation of <sup>99m</sup>Tc-iPSMA with high purity and isoform homogeneity. Optimised reaction conditions could be suitable for further development such as kit-based formulation and are currently being adapted for automated synthesis to facilitate clinical translation.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. Mena E, <I>et al. Semin Nucl Med</I>. 2024;<b>54</b>:941&ndash;950.</p><p>2. Ferro-Flores G, <I>et al. Nucl. Med. Biol.</I> 2017;<b>48</b>:36&ndash;44.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chillard, J., Rubira, L., Cadet, M., Torchio, J., Renaud, S., Fersing, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.73</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.73</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[3PC-010 Optimising 99MTC-hynic-psma labelling to achieve a homogeneous isoform profile: a step toward a standardised kit-based formulation]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 3: Production and compounding</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A35</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A35</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A36-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[3PC-011 Comparison of manual vs automated methods in the preparation of parenteral nutrition solutions: a retrospective study]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A36-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Parenteral nutrition (PN) solutions are critical for patients who are unable to receive adequate nutrition orally. Manual compounding of PN solutions is prone to human error, which can lead to severe clinical consequences. Automated compounding systems (ACS) have been introduced as a potential solution to enhance accuracy and safety in PN preparation.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This study aimed to compare the accuracy, safety, and efficiency of manual versus automated compounding of PN solutions in a hospital pharmacy setting</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital, comparing 500 manually prepared PN solutions with 500 prepared using an ACS. Data on compounding errors, preparation time, and staff satisfaction were collected. Errors were classified as major or minor, and preparation time was measured in minutes. Statistical analysis involved Chi-squared tests for error rates and paired t-tests for preparation times.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The ACS group demonstrated a 70% reduction in major errors (p = 0.01) and a 50% reduction in minor errors (p = 0.02) compared to the manual group. Preparation time was 30% shorter in the ACS group (p = 0.03), and staff satisfaction increased by 40% (p = 0.04).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Automated compounding of PN solutions significantly reduces errors and preparation time while improving staff satisfaction. These findings suggest that ACS should be integrated into hospital pharmacy practice for PN preparation to improve patient safety and operational efficiency.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. Perrier Q, Hosni A, Leenhardt J, Desruet MD, Durand M, Bedouch P. Automation of parenteral nutrition: impact on process and cost analysis. <I>Eur J Hosp Pharm.</I> 2024 Aug 22;<b>31</b>(5):468&ndash;473. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2022-003602. PMID: 37068926.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gharehdaghi, Z.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.74</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.74</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[3PC-011 Comparison of manual vs automated methods in the preparation of parenteral nutrition solutions: a retrospective study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 3: Production and compounding</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A36</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A36</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A36-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[3PC-012 Formulation and non-destructive control of immediate-release 3D-printed amitriptyline tablets]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A36-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Three-dimensional (3D) printing of medicines enables precision dosing for patient populations requiring tailored dosage strengths. Compared to traditional extemporaneous compounding, 3D printing offers automated and reproducible production, ensuring accurate dosing and consistent quality. This is particularly relevant for amitriptyline, where flexible dosing is clinically important due to withdrawal risks and CYP2D6 pharmacogenomic variability. 3D printing allows dose customisation, but limited data exist on how formulation parameters affect printability and tablet quality. To guarantee consistent product performance, non-destructive analytical methods are essential for quality control.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The study aims to optimise a formulation for immediate-release 3D-printed amitriptyline tablets and to develop a non-destructive NIR model. The overall goal was to create a suitable base formulation for semi-solid extrusion (SSE) printing and to gain insight in how variations in formulations affect the printability and quality of the tablets.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Formulations containing 5, 15 and 30% (w/w) amitriptyline with 0, 5 and 10% (w/w) glycerol in a Gelucire 48/16 matrix were printed with the DoseRx1 printer. Tablets were evaluated according to the European Pharmacopoeia (EP) for uniformity of mass and dosage units, impurities and dissolution. A 5% drug load tablet was also prepared using crushed commercial amitriptyline tablets. Additionally, a non-destructive NIR-spectroscopy model was developed to predict amitriptyline and glycerol content in the tablets.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>All tablets met the specifications for uniformity of mass and dosage units and impurities. Tablets with higher drug load and higher glycerol content showed lower hardness and required larger nozzle diameters during printing. Dissolution testing showed that higher drug load tablets showed faster drug release. The tablets containing commercial amitriptyline tablets showed a slower dissolution profile compared to the equivalent dosage per tablet using pure API. The NIR model was able to predict both amitriptyline and glycerol content across the tested formulations.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Amitriptyline was successfully 3D-printed in a Gelucire 48/16 matrix. Glycerol improved printability but decreased tablet hardness. Decreasing the amount of matrix (high drug load, pure API) accelerated dissolution. The NIR model made it possible to semi-quantify both amitriptyline and glycerol, supporting its potential as a non-destructive quality control tool. These findings provide a foundation for optimisation of 3D-printed formulations and control strategies.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ahmed, A., Kweekel, D., Schimmel, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.75</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.75</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[3PC-012 Formulation and non-destructive control of immediate-release 3D-printed amitriptyline tablets]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 3: Production and compounding</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A36</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A36</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A36-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[3PC-013 What are the requirements for compounding in Europe? A comparative analysis of national legislation across 12 member states]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A36-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Compounding (magistral and officinal pharmacy preparation) is exempt from EU pharmaceutical legislation (Directive 2001/83/EC, Art. 3), allowing each member state to implement its own rules. Such regulatory diversity may impede patient access to tailor-made medications, which are increasingly important as industry cannot always fulfil the individual patient&rsquo;s needs (eg, in the case of shortages). Yet, a comparative overview of compounding legislation across the EU is lacking &ndash; information that is essential for policymakers seeking to address challenges like shortages and to ensure equitable patient access.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>Therefore, the aim of this study is to examine national legislation to identify and compare requirements EU member states implement for compounding.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>National legislation of 12 countries was compared: Denmark, Latvia, Finland, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Poland, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Italy, Spain and Portugal. For each country, an overview was created describing how and where compounding is defined in its national legislation, and who the responsible regulatory authorities are. In addition, seven compounding requirements were identified and compared between countries.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>All 12 countries provide a definition for magistral formula, while nine countries provide one for officinal formulae. One country offers a third definition: hospital preparation. Four countries require an additional permit or authorisation for a pharmacy to compound, while two countries include permission in the pharmacy licence. Three countries suggest the possibility of compounding if a suitable, licensed alternative is available. The conditions for this requirement differed per country. Three countries have additional rules in place for active ingredients (eg, excluding highly potent, narcotic or psychotropic substances from compounding). All countries permit pharmacy-to-pharmacy delivery under the condition that a written contract exists between parties, or authorisation is granted to the preparing or dispensing pharmacy. Four countries provide a description about the scale of compounding, with two countries setting explicit restrictions preventing large-scale use. Only two countries specify allowance of compounding in special circumstances such as war conditions.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Legislative frameworks for compounding are heterogenous across EU member states, leading to questions about equitable patient access and uncertainties for policy makers. The findings of this study call for more harmonisation.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hoek, J., Neza, D., De Bruin, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.76</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.76</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[3PC-013 What are the requirements for compounding in Europe? A comparative analysis of national legislation across 12 member states]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 3: Production and compounding</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A36</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A37</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A37-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[3PC-014 Manufacturing of suppositories by hand and by a machine: a comparison]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A37-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Automation is being used more frequently in the manufacturing site of hospital pharmacies. With the PharmaPrinter (CurifyLabs, Helsinki, Finland), it is now also possible to manufacture suppositories. Ideally, the machine facilitates production and ensures a reproducibly high quality of the suppositories.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>Suppositories (n=10) were made both, manually (SuH), and mechanically (SuP) and processes and results were compared. We focused on appearance, mass and content of the suppositories, and preparation time.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Suppositories were prepared with 5 mg diclofenac-sodium each (total mass: 1 g). Hardfat was chosen for the handmade suppositories, SuppoBase by CurifyLabs (containing hard fat, polysorbate 80 and colloidal silica) was chosen for the PharmaPrinter. The final suppositories were evaluated for appearance, mass uniformity and content uniformity (Ph. Eur. 2.9.40). Diclofenac-sodium content was assessed by a validated HPLC-UV method, adapted from Ph. Eur., after methanolic extraction. Additionally, production time was reported.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The SuH had a smooth surface and finish. SuP had a smooth surface as well but a hole on the finish and the moulds were not filled completely.</p><p>The masses (mean &plusmn; RSD) were 1.09 g &plusmn; 0.56% (SuH) rsp. 0.97 g &plusmn; 1.06% (SuP) and the contents of diclofenac-sodium (mean &plusmn; RSD) were 4.91 mg &plusmn; 0.84% (SuH) rsp. 4.68 mg &plusmn; 1.3% (SuP). Both met the criteria of mass and content uniformity (AV max. 15).</p><p>Preparation times were 65 min. (SuH) rsp. 48 min. (SuP).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Both techniques resulted in suppositories of good quality, whereas production time was a little shorter for machine production. Explanatory videos from the homepage of CurifyLabs also make it easier for inexperienced manufacturers. During the process the PharmaPrinter reported each mass of the resulting suppository. If there are deviations of &plusmn;10%, the suppository was marked and can therefore be sorted out. The PharmaPrinter can therefore facilitate and automate the production of suppositories.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sauer, S., Pinder, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.77</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.77</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[3PC-014 Manufacturing of suppositories by hand and by a machine: a comparison]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 3: Production and compounding</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A37</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A37</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A37-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[3PC-015 Development of injectable hydroxocobalamin microcapsules for the treatment of homocystinuria and methylmalonic aciduria]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A37-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Methylmalonic acidemia with homocystinuria type CblC is a severe, congenital disorder caused by a defect in vitamin B12 metabolism. Treatment with hydroxocobalamin improves some symptoms but has limited effectiveness on ocular structures due to its poor permeability through the blood-ocular barrier. This results in blindness in most patients, and topical treatment is ineffective due to poor corneal absorption. Despite treatment, patients often suffer a reduced quality of life.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>In this project, a formulation is exposed to solve this problem. The formulation consists of a suspension of drug-loaded microcapsules of PEOT/PBT polymer for extended release by intravitreal administration.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>The methodology used to make the microcapsules was double emulsion-solvent evaporation using ultrasound. The emulsion was W/O/W sign. The microparticles presented an aqueous core with hydroxocobalamin and a sustained release polymeric shell.</p><p>Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed to verify the homogeneity of the outer shell. To obtain microcapsules with an adequate release profile, a rotational mathematical design consisting of 23 different tests and an ANOVA analysis was carried out. The intention was to maximise size homogeneity and encapsulation performance.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The results showed a maximum microcapsule load, better release profile, and greater homogeneity with a lower weight polymer and intermediate agitation speed. Further studies will be needed to assess the in vivo ocular viability of the formulation.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The studies carried out to date indicate that microcapsules have potential in the ocular treatment of this disease. Although the findings are not discouraging, much more evidence is needed to bring this formulation to the clinical setting. It would be interesting to perform longer release profiles and in vivo tests.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. Rickes EL, Brink NG, Koniuszy FR, Wood TR, Folkers K. Crystalline vitamin B12. <I>Science. 16 de abril de</I> 1948;<b>107</b>(2781):396&ndash;7.</p><p>2. Wang Y, Liu C, Fan L, Sheng Y, Mao J, Chao G, <I>et al</I>. Synthesis of biodegradable poly(butylene terephthalate)/poly(ethylene glycol) (PBT/PEG) multiblock copolymers and preparation of indirubin loaded microspheres. <I>Polym Bull. 1 de enero de</I> 2005;<b>53</b>(3):147&ndash;54.</p><p>3. Cuello-Rodr&iacute;guez S, Blanco-Fern&aacute;ndez G, Garc&iacute;a-Otero X, D&iacute;az-Tome V, Otero-Espinar FJ, Seoane-Via&ntilde;o I. Long acting injectables &amp; implants: advances in intraocular drug delivery. <I>Int J Pharm.</I> 2025 Oct 15;<b>683</b>:126058. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2025.126058.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cores-Rodriguez, I., Tejedor-Tejada, E., Bendicho-Lavilla, C., Garcia-Lopez, L., Cuello-Rodriguez, S., Marin-Ventura, L., Fernandez Gonzalez, M., Diaz-Tome, V., Idiazabal-Alfaro, J., Herrero-Bermejo, S., Otero-Espinar, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.78</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.78</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[3PC-015 Development of injectable hydroxocobalamin microcapsules for the treatment of homocystinuria and methylmalonic aciduria]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 3: Production and compounding</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A37</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A38</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A38-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[3PC-016 Enhancing sustainability through insourced semi-automated production of piperacillin/tazobactam ready to administer doses]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A38-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>In 2020, it was reported that piperacillin/tazobactam (PipTaz) is the second most commonly issued antibiotic in acute environments across the country.<sup>1</sup> Locally these doses are produced by nurses on hospital wards. With a 15-minute preparation time per dose and four daily doses per patient, this practice consumes a significant amount of nursing time.</p><p>Earlier this year Regional Government published their 10-year plan,<sup>2</sup> documenting the long-term strategy for the Healthcare Service. A pillar of this report is the innovative implementation of new technologies to transform the healthcare service.</p><p>In this research we look at insourcing the manufacture of PipTaz ready to administer (RTA) doses to Pharmacy Aseptic Services utilising PipTaz multidose bags.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The aim of this research was to determine whether insourcing the manufacture of RTA PipTaz doses to Pharmacy Aseptic Services could provide a sustainable solution.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Manufacturing process development was carried out in accordance with ICH guidelines and Good Manufacturing Practice. Stability studies were carried out following the NHS Yellow Cover Document. Time in motion and production studies were carried out to obtain efficiency data.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A semi-automated manufacturing method utilising the PipTaz multidose pack was developed. This produces a yield of 49 doses in approximately 45 minutes using 51 aseptic manipulations.</p><p>The number of disposable consumables used in the process was reduced from 196 to 3.</p><p>Stability for 21 days after reconstitution when stored at 5&deg;C &plusmn;3&deg;C.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>This research demonstrates that by utilising new technologies including the multidose PipTaz bag; Pharmacy Aseptic Services can insource the manufacture of RTA doses to help overcome downstream issues within the healthcare environment.</p><p>In doing so the manufacturing process sees a reduction in manufacturing time by 81% of aseptic manipulations by 74% and in waste generation by 98% by weight.</p><p>The host site prescribes an average 130,000 doses of intravenous PipTaz each year. This indicates that the sustainable insourcing of manufacturing could be an enabler of meeting the targets outlined in Governmental policy.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. Department of Health and Social Care. Transforming NHS pharmacy aseptic services in England, 2020.</p><p>2. Department of Health and Social Care. Fit for Future: 10-year health plan for England, 2025.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Goodwin, C., Jones, R., Merriman, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.79</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.79</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[3PC-016 Enhancing sustainability through insourced semi-automated production of piperacillin/tazobactam ready to administer doses]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 3: Production and compounding</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A38</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A38</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A38-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[3PC-017 Migration of leachable 2,4-di-tert-butylphenol from preservative-free multidose dropper systems into ophthalmic preparations and assessment of in vitro cytotoxicity]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A38-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Eye drops packaged in preservative-free multidose containers (MDC) eliminate the need to add antimicrobial preservatives, which is a significant advantage due to their local cytotoxicity. However, under certain conditions contact between MDC and the eye drops may lead to the release of compounds such as 2,4-di-tert-butylphenol (2,4 DTBP), thereby contaminating the patients. The potential local toxicity of 2,4 DTBP and the clinical consequences need to be assessed.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The objectives were to determine if and how much 2,4 DTBP migrates into eye drops from the MDC and to assess its cytotoxicity threshold.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Tests simulating the patient&lsquo;s use of eye drops were carried out on seven preparations (tacrolimus = TAC, ciclosporin = CsA, voriconazole = VCZ, atropin, vancomycin, ceftazidime and Costec) packaged in the same kind of MDC. The drops were collected twice a day for 1 month and then analysed by liquid chromatography to detect and quantify 2,4 DTBP. The in vitro cytotoxicity threshold of 2,4 DTBP was determined on L929 mouse fibroblasts, according to the 3- (4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-bromide (MTT) cytotoxicity test of ISO standard 10993-5.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The average amount per drop (&plusmn; standard deviation) varied between the first and last day of drop emission from 47 &plusmn; 13 to 20 &plusmn; 4 ng for TAC, 401 &plusmn; 102 to 32 &plusmn; 4 ng for CsA, and from 235 &plusmn; 45 to 101 &plusmn; 28 ng for VCZ, corresponding to calculated monthly cumulative doses of 1,687 ng, 4,939 ng, and 9,108 ng, respectively. After exposing the cells to various amounts of 2,4 DTBP for 24 hours, all doses above 1,200 ng led to cytotoxicity, as assessed by the morphological and metabolic assays.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The nature of the formulation seems to influence the migration of 2,4 DTBP, as it was only found in eye drops composed of a hydrophobic active ingredient solubilised by a surfactant for TAC and CsA and cyclodextrin for VCZ. None of the daily amounts per drop exceeded the dose of 1,200 ng, but further studies are needed to determine its cumulative toxicity during chronic administration. Adapting the MTT assay to corneal cells would enable a more accurate evaluation of its ocular cytotoxicity.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barrieu, M., Allard, O., Bernard, L., Sautou, V., Chennell, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.80</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.80</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[3PC-017 Migration of leachable 2,4-di-tert-butylphenol from preservative-free multidose dropper systems into ophthalmic preparations and assessment of in vitro cytotoxicity]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 3: Production and compounding</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A38</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A39</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A39-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[3PC-018 Stability assessment of extemporaneous losartan 0.8 mg/ml eye drops]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A39-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Losartan is an angiotensin II receptor antagonist used off-label as eye drops for corneal haze and is being investigated for corneal scarring and other eye disorders. This effect is driven via antifibrotic TGF-&beta; pathway inhibition, reducing myofibroblast differentiation and survival. Given the lack of robust published stability data supporting the use of this extemporaneous preparation, establishing a period of validity is essential to ensure its quality and patient safety.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the physicochemical stability of Losartan 0.8 mg/mL eye drops over a 56-day period under refrigerated storage (2-8 &deg;C) and establish a period of validity for its use in clinical practice.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>The active pharmaceutical ingredient concentration was determined using an Ultraviolet-Visible spectrophotometric method at a wavelength of 227 nm. Method validation included the design of a calibration curve where Losartan standards were prepared from a 100 &micro;g/mL stock solution, dissolved in Balanced Salt Solution (BSS), and measured across six concentrations (2-25 &micro;g/mL). All dilutions were prepared in 0.01 N Hydrochloric Acid (HCl), and the curve demonstrated linearity (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.9997).</p><p>For the stability study, three independent batches of Losartan 0.8 mg/mL in BSS were prepared with an initial pH between 6.7-7.0. Solutions were aseptically prepared by sterile filtration under a biological safety cabinet, filled in low-density polyethylene containers, and stored refrigerated. Triplicate samples from each batch were analysed on Days 0, 7, 14, 28, 42 and 56. All measurements were performed using a 0.01 N HCl blank after a 1:100 dilution in 0.01 N HCl.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Mean initial concentration of the diluted sample was 8.28 &micro;g/mL (corresponding to 0.828 mg/mL in the original solution). The concentration remained highly stable throughout the study, exhibiting no significant change or degradative trend over the 56-day period. At Day 56, the mean residual concentration was 8.14 &micro;g/mL, representing 98.32% of the initial concentration.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Losartan 0.8 mg/mL eye drops formulation demonstrated excellent physicochemical stability over the 56-day period under refrigeration, with the active ingredient concentration remaining highly stable (98.32%). These robust analytical findings provide strong evidence to support a 56-day period of validity. Further studies include monitoring pH and osmolarity throughout the validity period.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. Rathee P, Rathee S, Chaudhary H, Rathee D. Development and validation of a stability indicating UV-spectrophotometric method for the estimation of losartan potassium in bulk and tablet dosage form. <I>Journal of Pharmacy Research</I> 2008;<b>1</b>(2):188&ndash;191.</p><p>2. Wilson SE. Topical losartan: practical guidance for clinical trials in the prevention and treatment of corneal scarring fibrosis and other eye diseases and disorders. <I>Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics</I> 2023;<b>39</b>(3).</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dominguez Chafer, J., Chafer Rudilla, M., Puebla Garcia, V., Fernandez, M. C., Aparicio Carmena, A., Corazon Villanueva, J., De La Torre Ortiz, M., Ybanez Garcia, L., Sanchez-Ocana Martin, N., Munoz Delgado, I., Retamosa Escolar, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.81</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.81</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[3PC-018 Stability assessment of extemporaneous losartan 0.8 mg/ml eye drops]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 3: Production and compounding</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A39</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A39</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A39-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[3PC-019 Development of a method for the quantification of bacterial endotoxins in parenteral vitamin-lipid emulsion preparations using the recombinant C factor]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A39-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Vitamin-lipid emulsions (ELIV) are parenteral nutrition preparations used for neonatal patients. Injectable preparations have to pass the European Pharmacopoeia (EP) guidelines for bacterial endotoxin testing (BET). The assay described in monograph 2.6.14, based on the reaction of limulus amebocyte lysate (LAL), raises ecological, ethical, and economic concerns and may produce false positives. The test in monograph 2.6.32 of the EP, based on the cleavage of a fluorogenic peptide by recombinant factor C (rFC), avoids these problems. However, the presence of lipids, in addition to opacifying the preparation, may interfere with BET quantification by forming a lipid-polysaccharide complex.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The objective was to develop a sample preparation method for quantifying BET in a lipid matrix using the rFC method.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Fluorescence was measured using a plate reader (Agilent BioTek) with the Endozyme II Go kit (Endonext-Biom&eacute;rieux). Each sample was analysed with two sample wells and two control wells at 0.5 EU/mL associated with a calibration curve. According to the PE, the spike recovery (SR) must be between 50 and 200%. Sensitivity was set at 0.005 EU/mL in line with the BET limit concentration (3.3 EU/mL) and the maximum significant dilution calculated from the analysis of 600 ELIV prescriptions. Samples were prepared with or without heating and sonication, varying dilution factor (undiluted, 1/20, 1/40, 1/100 and 1/200) and diluent (NaCl and EPPI with or without addition of polysorbate 20 (PS) at 0.025%, 0.05% or 0.1%). After selecting the optimal parameters, the ELIVs were doped at 0.01, 0.02, 0.03 and 0.05 EU/mL to validate the absence of interference.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Sonication, heating, and dilutions at 1/20 and 1/40 were not enough to remove the interference, unlike dilutions at 1/100 and 1/200 with PS concentrations of 0.05% and 0.025%. Dilutions at 1/100 and 1/200 with EPPI-PS at 0.025% gave an average SR &plusmn; 95% confidence interval (CI95) of 97% &plusmn; 4 and 103% &plusmn; 6, respectively, with an average error percentage &plusmn; CI95 of 31% &plusmn; 6.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>This work validates the BET using the rFC method in ELIVs. This approach opens the way to more environmentally friendly and ethical microbiological monitoring than the LAL method, applicable to other parenteral preparations.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>Corporate sponsored research or other substantive relationships: bioM&eacute;rieux kindly supplied analytic equipment and consumables free of charge.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Allard, O., Barrieu, M., Claves, J., Chennell, P., Jouannet, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.82</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.82</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[3PC-019 Development of a method for the quantification of bacterial endotoxins in parenteral vitamin-lipid emulsion preparations using the recombinant C factor]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 3: Production and compounding</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A39</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A40</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A40-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[3PC-020 Physico-chemical stability study of two acetylcysteine 10% eye drop formulations]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A40-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Acetylcysteine is used in ophthalmology in eye drop formulations as in Spain there are no marked drugs available. These are considered high risk formulations and the available stability information is limited.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To determine the physicochemical stability of two acetylcysteine 10% eye drop formulations prepared in two hospitals.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Acetylcysteine 10% eye drop formulation at Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Insular Materno Infantil (Eye Drop&ndash;M), 6 mL: Flumil 100 mg/mL injectable solution 600 mg/6 mL. Sterile amber glass. Expiration: 9 days.</p></li><li><p>Acetylcysteine 10% eye drop formulation at Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Nuestra Se&ntilde;ora de la Candelaria (Eye Drop&ndash;M), 7.5 mL: Flumil 5 g/25 mL, 3.75 mL, and artificial tears (BSS ) q.s. to 7.5 mL. Sterile eye dropper. Expiration: 14 days.</p></li></l></p><p>Both hospitals provided six samples. Stability was assessed under storage at 5 &deg;C, protected from light. Chemical stability was determined by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography (Acquity, Waters Corporation, ): stationary phase Acquity UPLC BEH column (C18, 2.1 <FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT> 100 mm, 1.7 &mu;m), mobile phase 0.1 M phosphate buffer adjusted to pH 3.0 with phosphoric acid, flow rate 0.5 mL/min, injection volume 10 &mu;L, detection wavelength 214 nm and run time 10 minutes. Acetylcysteine content was analysed in three unopened samples on days 0, 21, and 30, and in three opened samples on days 0, 2, 4, 7, 9, 11, 21, and 30. Results were expressed as a percentage of declared value. pH was measured using a Crison GLP21 pH metre on days 0 and 30 in both opened and unopened samples.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Acetylcysteine concentrations remained above 90% up to day 30 in Eye Drop-C and up to day 11 in Eye Drop-M. No relevant pH variations were observed (Eye Drop-M: day 0 pH 6.51, day 30 pH 6.42; Eye Drop-C: day 0 pH 6.16, day 30 pH 6.07).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Eye Drop-C maintained its stability for 30 days, extending its original expiration date. Eye Drop-M showed an increase in stability from 9 to 11 days. Microbiological stability studies will be conducted to ensure their long-term safety and efficacy.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gandullo Sanchez, E., Crespo Martinez, C., Hernandez Figueroa, A., Suarez Gonzalez, J., Santovena Estevez, A., Roman Gonzalez, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.83</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.83</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[3PC-020 Physico-chemical stability study of two acetylcysteine 10% eye drop formulations]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 3: Production and compounding</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A40</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A40</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A40-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[3PC-021 Drug allergy diagnosis using epicutaneous patch tests: insights from a 2-year retrospective study]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A40-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Drug hypersensitivity reactions are a relevant clinical problem as they limit therapeutic options. Patch testing is a key diagnostic tool for delayed cutaneous hypersensitivity (DCH), but its application is limited by the need for individualised preparation, usually compounded in hospital pharmacies. This study aimed to analyse preparation patterns and clinical results of patch tests (PTs).</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To analyse the composition of epicutaneous PTs prepared in the Pharmacy Department for the diagnosis of DCH to drugs.</p><p>To identify the most frequently requested drugs in order to obtain consumption data and optimise preparation.</p><p>To evaluate patch test outcomes across therapeutic groups.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A 2-year observational, descriptive, and retrospective study (April 2023 &ndash; March 2025) in a tertiary hospital.</p></sec><sec><st>Variables</st><p>demographics (age and sex), data on prepared PTs (preparation date, drug and ATC therapeutic group), and test results after 96 hours (positive/negative).</p><p>Data were obtained from pharmacy compounding records and electronic medical records and later analysed using Excel.</p><p>A descriptive statistical analysis was performed. Categorical variables were expressed as frequencies and percentages, and quantitative variables as measures of central tendency (mean or median depending on the distribution assessed with the Kolmogorov&ndash;Smirnov test) and dispersion. The positivity rate was calculated for each ATC group.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 261 PTs were compounded for 96 patients (58.3% female, mean age 58.9&plusmn;18.7 years). Drugs belonged mainly to anti-infectives (106), cardiovascular (49), and nervous system (39).</p><p>Most frequently tested drugs were amoxicillin (14), furosemide (9) and levofloxacin (8). Based on 6-month stability, the estimated number of units needed per semester for these drugs was 4, 3, and 2, respectively.</p><p>Overall, 21 PTs (8.2%) were positive. The groups with the highest positivity rates were nervous system drugs (20.5%) followed by cardiovascular drugs (14.2%). No drug tested positive more than once.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Compounded patch tests covered a wide range of drugs, mainly anti-infectives and cardiovascular agents, reflecting diverse clinical demand for allergy assessment. Amoxicillin, furosemide, and levofloxacin accounted for nearly one-quarter of preparations.</p><p>The study helped to estimate the number of units needed per semester to ensure availability without wastage.</p><p>Although the overall positivity rate was low, nervous system and cardiovascular drugs showed the highest frequency of delayed hypersensitivity.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martinez-Garcia, A., Gomez-Salazar, E., Pintor Recuenco, M., Perez Menendez-Conde, C., Garcia-Guijas Garcia, C., Rodriguez Sagrado, M., Alvarez-Diaz, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.84</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.84</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[3PC-021 Drug allergy diagnosis using epicutaneous patch tests: insights from a 2-year retrospective study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 3: Production and compounding</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A40</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A40</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A41-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[3PC-022 Mind the gap: comparing risk-based versus system audits on their effectiveness in identifying PIC/S nonconformities]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A41-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Internal audits play a key role in ensuring compliance and continuous improvement within the hospital pharmacy compounding unit. Risk-based internal audits (RBIA) focus on high risk areas to improve efficiency and resource allocation.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>We aimed to determine whether an RBIA program is at least as effective as a compliance-based system audit (SA) program in identifying both total and severe (major or critical) nonconformities of the hospital pharmacy compounding unit.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Compounding processes subject to RBIA were selected through risk analysis using an algorithm validated by the Belgian pharmaceutical association (Algemene Pharmaceutische Bond (APB)). This was followed by a prospective comparison of multiple audits by independent assessors using either the RBIA or SA approach. A multicentre expert Delphi panel classified the nonconform findings by severity, which served as a proxy of audit effectiveness.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>In total, eight audits were conducted by four RBIA and four SA auditors. Both groups audited a median of 75% out of the total 222 standard. RBIA auditors identified significantly more nonconformities than SA auditors, especially those scored critical (p= .049) and major (p= .021).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>This pioneering study demonstrates that risk-based auditing, guided by algorithm-driven risk analysis, is more effective at identifying severe nonconformities within the same timeframe. This results in an increase in regulatory compliance and may improve the quality of the compounding operations and its products.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walgraeve, J., Cortoos, P., Meers, G., Guns, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.85</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.85</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[3PC-022 Mind the gap: comparing risk-based versus system audits on their effectiveness in identifying PIC/S nonconformities]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 3: Production and compounding</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A41</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A41</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A41-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[3PC-023 Simulation of dose banding implementation in the preparation of anticancer drugs]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A41-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>The need to optimise the production of drugs used in cancer treatment, as well as reduce the length of time patients spend in hospital, led to the development of dose banding. This involves preparing batches of pre-established doses. It is important to identify the circumstances in which dose banding can achieve these goals without additional costs to the institution and the environment.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>Simulate the results of implementing dose banding for the preparation of anticancer drugs in a district general hospital.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective study was conducted based on preparations made during 2023. All drugs with more than 250 preparations, which were physically and chemically stable for at least 7 days, were considered. Using the logarithmic method to establish the intervals for each band, five bands were defined to cover 60% of preparations, with differences of less than 5% from the individualised dose. The weekly stock required and the waste due to expiration were calculated.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Four candidate drugs met the criteria: bevacizumab, irinotecan, paclitaxel and trastuzumab. Of the 557 bevacizumab preparations, 322 could be assigned to a defined band, with dose differences ranging from -3.3% to +3.3%. Of the 1,001 irinotecan preparations, 571 could use the defined bands, with dose differences ranging from -3.9% to +4.2%. Of the 1,157 paclitaxel preparations, 619 could use the defined bands, with dose differences ranging from -2.2% to +2.6%. Of the 684 trastuzumab preparations, 404 could use the defined bands, with dose differences ranging from -2.6% to +2.7%. Preparing these four substances in dose banding would result in a waste for expiration of 20 bevacizumab preparations (3.6%), 20 irinotecan (2.0%), 196 paclitaxel (16.6%), and 21 trastuzumab (3.1%).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>A simulation analysis of a dose banding system showed that the potential benefits of dose banding are accompanied by significant waste. Further analysis is required to determine the feasibility of implementing this strategy, considering the drugs involved, the number of bands and the potential gains and losses for patients and the hospital.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. Albert-Mar&iacute; A, Valero-Garc&iacute;a S, Forn&eacute;s-Ferrer V, <I>et al.</I> Exploratory analysis for the implementation of antineoplastic logarithmic dose banding. <I>Int J Clin Pharm</I> 2018;<b>40</b>:1281&ndash;1291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-018-0714-9</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barbosa, C., Araujo, A., Fortunato, A., Fernandez-Llimos, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.86</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.86</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[3PC-023 Simulation of dose banding implementation in the preparation of anticancer drugs]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 3: Production and compounding</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A41</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A41</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A41-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[3PC-024 Stability study of 25% sodium thiosulphate gel for calciphylaxis]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A41-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Calciphylaxis is characterised by calcification of the middle layer of small arteries and arterioles, leading to painful skin lesions that progress to ulcers, mainly in the lower limbs. Thiosulphate acts as an antioxidant and vasodilator, providing rapid pain relief, and as a calcium salt chelator. It is not commercially available in our country and is used mainly as an intravenous magistral formula, although it is also used intralesionally and topically.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>Study the galenic and microbiological stability of a 25% sodium thiosulphate gel formulation.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p><tbl id="T1" loc="float"><tblbdy top-stubs="2"><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Sodium thiosulphate 5H2O Ph. Eur. </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">25.00 g </c></r><r><c cspan="2" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Sodium carmellose Ph. Eur. </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">2.50 g </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Purified water Ph. Eur. q.s </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">100.00 g </c></r></tblbdy></tbl></p><p>Tests performed for galenic stability study:</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Physical and organoleptic characteristics: colour, odour, evanescence, apparent extensibility, apparent consistency and transparency.</p></li><li><p>Existence of aggregates.</p></li><li><p>Existence of exudation.</p></li><li><p>Determination of pH.</p></li></l></p><p>Test performed for microbiological stability study: growth of aerobic (environmental) microorganisms.</p><p>The samples are kept at ambient temperature (TA) (22-25&deg;C) and in a refrigerator (4-8&deg;C) in opaque plastic containers, with checks carried out on days 1, 6, 13, 35, 42, 48 and 51 after preparation.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>TA samples: all maintained their colour (colourless), odour (slightly plastic), evanescence (very high), apparent extensibility (very high), apparent consistency (medium) and transparency (transparent) from day 1 to day 51.</p></li><li><p>Refrigerated samples: all maintained their colour (colourless), odour (practically odourless), evanescence (very high), apparent extensibility (very high), apparent consistency (medium&ndash;high) and transparency (transparent) from day 1 to day 51.</p></li></l></p><p>None of the samples, either at room temperature or refrigerated, showed aggregates or exudation, all maintained a pH of 6.5 (within the maximum stability pH of sodium thiosulphate: 6-8.4) and the aerobic bacteria culture was negative from day 1 to day 51.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Our 25% thiosulphate gel formula has proven to be stable from a galenic and microbiological point of view for at least 51 days at both room temperature and refrigerated.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Loysele, M., Fuentes Irigoyen, R., Anaya Garcia, J., Coiduras Del Olmo, L., Martin Vega, E., Pinilla Lebrero, G., Garcia Martin, E., Lopez Aspiroz, E., Garcia De Santiago, B., Larrubia Marfil, Y., Martinez Hernandez, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.87</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.87</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[3PC-024 Stability study of 25% sodium thiosulphate gel for calciphylaxis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 3: Production and compounding</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A41</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A42</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A42-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[3PC-025 Stability of preservative-free losartan potassium 0.8 mg/ml eye drops compounded in hospital pharmacy practice]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A42-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Losartan potassium (LP) is a selective angiotensin II receptor antagonist widely used for hypertension. Recently, it has attracted interest in ophthalmology due to its potential to reduce subretinal inflammation and protect the optic nerve in diseases such as glaucoma and age-related macular degeneration. Topical losartan 0.8 mg/mL has shown antifibrotic effects and favourable tolerability in preclinical and clinical studies. However, no commercial ophthalmic formulations are available. In hospital settings, LP eye drops are compounded extemporaneously but, without standardised stability or sterility data, they are often assigned short beyond-use dates. Given the strict requirements for ophthalmic preparations (pH, osmolality, clarity, and sterility) it is essential to have stability evidence to ensure safety.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the 30-day physicochemical and microbiological stability of preservative-free losartan potassium 0.8 mg/mL eye drops prepared with balanced salt solution (BSS), normal saline (NS), or glucose saline (GS), and stored in sterile bottles at different conditions: room temperature, refrigerated, and frozen.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Triplicate formulations were prepared and stored at &ndash;20 &deg;C, 4 &deg;C, and 25 &deg;C. Concentration of losartan was analysed on days 0, 7, 15, 22 and 30 by validated HPLC-DAD, supported by UV&ndash;visible spectrophotometry and high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS). Visual clarity, pH, osmolality, and refractive index were monitored. Sterility was assessed using the BACT/ALERT system on days 0, 10, 20 and 30. FTIR was used to investigate turbidity observed in GS samples.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Formulations in BSS and NS retained &ge;96% of initial losartan concentration under all conditions, with no degradation products detected by HRMS. pH (6.5&ndash;7.3), osmolality (~300 mOsm/kg), and refractive index remained stable, and no changes in clarity were observed. GS based formulations remained stable only when refrigerated or frozen; but at 25 &deg;C, turbidity developed by day 15 and concentration dropped below 50% by day 20. FTIR suggested reversible losartan-glucose aggregation. All tested samples remained sterile throughout the days of the study.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>BSS and NS are suitable vehicles for extemporaneous losartan eye drops, supporting 30-day refrigerated or frozen storage. GS should be avoided at room temperature. These findings provide validated evidence to safely extend expiration dates and improve ophthalmic care delivery.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Garcia Aguilera, A., Romero Carreno, E., Gazquez Perez, R., Gomez Sanchez, M., Molina Cuadrado, E., Verdejo Reche, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.88</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.88</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[3PC-025 Stability of preservative-free losartan potassium 0.8 mg/ml eye drops compounded in hospital pharmacy practice]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 3: Production and compounding</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A42</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A42</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A42-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[3PC-026 Physicochemical and microbiological stability study of amikacin in polypropylene syringes for intrathecal administration]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A42-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Intrathecal amikacin is prescribed for the treatment of central nervous system infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria. There is no commercially available formulation for this method of administration.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To establish the aseptic preparation process of a 5 mg/ml sterile amikacin formulation in polypropylene syringes for intrathecal use, and to conduct a stability study to confirm a 48-hour shelf life.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A systematic search was conducted in PubMed and PubChem with no data found regarding the stability of a sterile amikacin solution in polypropylene syringes. A preparation process was established, using AMIKACIN 5 mg/ml 100 ml, Luer Lock 10 ml sterile polypropylene syringes, 0.22 &mu;m syringe filters and sterile female-to-female Luer Lock connectors.</p><p>A batch of two syringes (30 mg/6 ml) was prepared under aseptic conditions. Syringes were then stored in UV-Vis light-protective steribags and refrigerated (2&ndash;8 &deg;C). Final product samples were obtained and analysed at 0, 2, 4, 24, and 48 hours.</p><p>The physicochemical stability was defined as the absence of organoleptic changes (no colour change and no precipitates), pH variation &lt; 0.5 units, and osmolarity between 280&ndash;310 mOsm/L. Regarding chemical stability, the acceptance range was set at 90&ndash;110% recovery of the initial amikacin concentration by particle-enhanced turbidimetric inhibition immunoassay. For microbiological stability, sterility testing was performed according to the European Pharmacopoeia.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Solutions remained clear, without precipitation or colour changes. pH values remained within the acceptable range: 4.37 &plusmn; 0.05 (0 h), 4.28 &plusmn; 0.06 (2 h), 4.21 &plusmn; 0.08 (4 h), 4.27 &plusmn; 0.07 (24 h), and 4.08 &plusmn; 0.11 (48 h). Osmolarity values were 306 &plusmn; 16.97 mOsm/L (24 h) and 292.5 &plusmn; 3.54 mOsm/L (48 h), both within the target range.</p><p>Amikacin recovery percentages were 99.78 &plusmn; 0.99% (2 h), 100 &plusmn; 0.35% (4 h), 95.88 &plusmn; 0.28% (24 h), and 93.49 &plusmn; 0.49% (48 h), remaining within the 90&ndash;110% range.</p><p>Microbiological cultures were negative at all time points.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The 5 mg/ml amikacin formulation in polypropylene syringes met the stability requirements for intrathecal administration. It demonstrated physical, chemical, and microbiological stability for up to 48 hours when stored at 2&ndash;8 &deg;C under light protection.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ferrando Riba, M., Llop Ventura, M., Gene Grasa, J., Panisello Cardona, M., Zapico Muniz, E., Rodriguez Murphy, E., Edo Penarrocha, J., Feliu Ribera, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.89</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.89</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[3PC-026 Physicochemical and microbiological stability study of amikacin in polypropylene syringes for intrathecal administration]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 3: Production and compounding</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A42</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A43</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A43-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[3PC-027 Stability and safety assessment of hospital-compounded anti-angiogenic intravitreal injections]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A43-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Age-related eye diseases, such as macular degeneration, diabetic macular oedema and venous occlusion, have increased significantly in recent decades, driving demand for anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapies. Compounding these agents into prefilled syringes optimises resources, leading to significant savings. Ensuring the physicochemical integrity of each locally produced syringe, prepared from both reference biological product and biosimilars, is essential to maintain efficacy and patient safety throughout the assigned 28-day shelf life.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the stability and environmental impact of hospital compounding of intravitreal injections of aflibercept Eylea (8 and 40 mg/mL), bevacizumab MVASI (25 mg/mL), ranibizumab Ranivisio (0.6 mg/mL) and faricimab Vabysmo (120 mg/mL) stored in silicone-free and oil-free polypropylene syringes (Henke-Ject, ) with low dead space.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Syringes were stored at 2-8&deg;C under light protection and analysed after 0, 7, 28 and 90 days. Analyses, performed in triplicate, included VEGF-binding affinity and biophysical stability tests using dynamic light scattering (DLS) and thermal-ramp analysis (25-100&deg;C) to assess particle size and thermal behaviour. For statistical analysis (p &lt; 0.01) one-way ANOVA was used.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>In 2025, 6015 injections were prepared for 991 patients, resulting in an estimated savings of EUR 1 494 584. No visual changes in colour, opalescence or particles were observed up to 90 days. Ranibizumab showed the best thermal stability (unfolding 75-79&deg;C) with minimal particle variation (2.69-2.84 nm). Bevacizumab remained stable (7.75-7.86 nm; 64-70&deg;C), and aflibercept 40 mg/mL showed better stability than 8 mg/mL (6.61-7.26 nm). Faricimab exhibited early aggregation (peak particle size at 187 nm after 1 week; 42-64&deg;C) and progressive VEGF affinity loss after 7 days. The others showed &le;10% affinity variation within 28 days.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Except for faricimab, all anti-VEGF injections seem to maintain their physical, chemical and biological stability throughout the 28-day shelf life, supporting the reliability of the hospital compounding and storage process. The analytical sensitivity applied enabled early detection of aggregation risk, justifying the decision to shorten faricimab&rsquo;s validity period to one week. Continuous validation after any production change ensures consistent safety and efficacy. The demonstrated cost savings highlight the pharmacist&rsquo;s role in promoting quality, sustainability and rational use of hospital prepared intravitreal preparations.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Silva, C., Canario, C., Silva, A., Resende, B., Ferreira, T., Diogo, C., Cabral, D., Vitor, J., Goncalves, J., Alcobia, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.90</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.90</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[3PC-027 Stability and safety assessment of hospital-compounded anti-angiogenic intravitreal injections]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 3: Production and compounding</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A43</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A43</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A43-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[3PC-028 Analysis of calibration discrepancies in lutetium-177 radiopharmaceuticals in radiopharmacy]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A43-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Lutetium-177 (177Lu) is used in radiopharmaceuticals such as Pluvicto (177Lu-PSMA) for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and Lutathera (177Lu-oxodotreotide) for inoperable or metastatic gastro-enteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. The received doses are calibrated for activity at a given moment, with a tolerance of +/- 10% but discrepancies between announced and measured activities have been repeatedly observed suggesting potential under-calibration.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate calibration discrepancies in 177Lu radiopharmaceutical doses between laboratory-reported and measured values.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>We analysed doses of lutetium-based radiopharmaceuticals received by eight radiopharmacy between January and December 2024. For each vial, the measured activity (in MBq) was compared with the certificate reference activity. Parameters collected included date/time of calibration, date/time of measurement, day of delivery, date of production and production site.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 1 040 deliveries of 177Lu-PSMA (n=754) and 177Lu-oxodotreotide (n=286) during this period were analysed. 32.3% of the vials came from Spain and 67.7% from Italy. The overall mean deviation between measured and reference values was &ndash;7.2%. Taking into account dose calibrator uncertainty (3%), 21.7% of vials (n=226) were under-calibrated beyond the &plusmn;10% tolerance, while 73.8% exceeded a -5% deviation. Doses from Spain showed &gt;10% deviation in 16.4% of cases, representing 24.3% of all non-compliant vials. Italian vials accounted for 75.7% of &gt;10% deviations, corresponding to 24.3% of batches from this origin. The deviation observed also varied according to logistical factors. Vials delivered on Mondays showed a greater average deviation (&ndash;7.9%) compared with those received on Fridays (&ndash;6.5%). No significant difference was observed according to the time elapsed between production and delivery (range: &ndash;6.7% to &ndash;7.3%).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Although most measured values remained within the &plusmn;10% tolerance required for clinical use, a significant proportion of 177Lu doses showed deviations greater than &ndash;5%, raising concerns about systematic under-calibration. Both the origin of vials and delivery schedules appeared to impact these discrepancies, with higher deviations for Italian batches and Monday deliveries. These findings highlight the need for improved harmonisation of calibration procedures, currently under discussion at the European level, to ensure consistent and reliable dosing in 177Lu radiopharmaceutical therapies.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chmielowski, C., Lamesa, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.91</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.91</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[3PC-028 Analysis of calibration discrepancies in lutetium-177 radiopharmaceuticals in radiopharmacy]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 3: Production and compounding</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A43</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A44</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A44-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[3PC-029 Reconstitution of oral powder medications: discrepancies in final volume and concentration compared with the summary of product characteristics]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A44-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Accurate reconstitution of oral powder medications is essential to ensure the correct final drug concentration, particularly in paediatrics and for narrow therapeutic index (NTI) drugs. Discrepancies between theoretical and actual volumes may compromise treatment efficacy and safety. Despite its clinical importance, this aspect is rarely systematically evaluated in routine practice.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the concordance between final volumes obtained after reconstitution of oral powder medications and the theoretical volumes indicated in the package leaflet and Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC).</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>The hospital formulary was reviewed to identify oral powder or granule formulations requiring reconstitution prior to administration.</p><p>Selection criteria included: preparations that must be compounded in the hospital pharmacy; drugs commonly used in paediatrics; and/or NTI drugs.</p><p>Each suspension or solution was reconstituted in triplicate, strictly following the instructions provided in the package leaflet and SmPC. The final volume was measured using graduated cylinders (100 &plusmn; 1 mL and 250 &plusmn; 1 mL). The measured volume was compared with the theoretical value, and the actual drug concentration and percentage error were calculated. An error margin of &plusmn;10% was considered acceptable according to the European Pharmacopoeia.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Seven out of 13 formulations were selected: Amoxicillin 250 mg/5 mL, Amoxicillin&ndash;clavulanic acid 100 mg/mL&ndash;12.5 mg/mL, Azithromycin 40 mg/mL, Erythromycin 100 mg/mL, Linezolid 100 mg/5 mL, Valganciclovir 50 mg/mL, and Mycophenolate mofetil 1g/5 mL.</p><p>Five of the 7 (71.4%) showed no significant deviation (error &le; &plusmn;10%). Erythromycin and linezolid exceeded this margin, showing a mean final volume of 120.17&plusmn;0.76 mL (83.22 mg/mL; mean error 20.17&plusmn;0.76%) and 169.33&plusmn;0.76 mL (17.72 mg/mL; mean error 12.89&plusmn;0.51%), respectively.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The discrepancies observed highlight the importance of verifying the final volume and concentration after reconstitution, especially for paediatric and narrow therapeutic index drugs. Errors greater than &plusmn;10% may represent a significant quality deviation, potentially compromising treatment efficacy and safety. Increasing the number of oral powder formulations analysed would help confirm the clinical significance of these findings and support the need to update leaflet and SmPC information regarding actual final volume and concentration.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Retamosa Escolar, A., Puebla Garcia, V., Campos Fernandez De Sevilla, M., Lopez Cedillo, S., Ybanez Garcia, L., Munoz Delgado, I., Gonzalez Perez, C., Dominguez Chafer, J., Benitez Gimenez, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.92</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.92</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[3PC-029 Reconstitution of oral powder medications: discrepancies in final volume and concentration compared with the summary of product characteristics]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 3: Production and compounding</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A44</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A44</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A44-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[3PC-030 Improving yield and reducing waste: optimising oral liquid packaging to enhance efficiency and sustainability in hospital pharmacy practice]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A44-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Yield determination is critical for evaluating process efficiency, cost control, and regulatory compliance, as mandated by good manufacturing practices. The pharmacy department of a high-complexity, large-scale, public teaching hospital (HCLPTH) operates with a yield target of 97%. However, the oral liquid product line demonstrated performance below this target, recording 95.5% (2022) and 95.9% (2023). Optimising the yield in this production line is fundamental for managing scarce public resources and ensuring product quality within this complex healthcare setting.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To optimise unidose packaging (UP) for oral liquids, increasing production yield and reducing waste.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>The study was conducted in the pharmacy department of an HCLPTH. We included systematic calculations from all production orders for oral liquid medications processed from 2022 to 2024, including the unit production cost. Yield was calculated using the formula: Percentage yield = (Actual yield/Theoretical yield) x 100%. Production cost and the value of losses were calculated, and all financial values were converted to euros (). An Ishikawa diagram (6M analysis) identified packaging with sealing failure as the root cause. In 2024, a market survey for new UP was conducted, followed by the acquisition of samples, pilot batch production, and evaluation of yield and cost. The saving was calculated by the difference between the values of the losses.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The intervention with the new UP resulted in a significant decrease in the average unit cost of critical UP products, decreasing from 0.33 (2022-2023) to 0.10 (2024). Consequently, the overall yield of the oral liquid line rose to 97.7% in 2024, surpassing the 97% target. This optimisation resulted in a 50.7% reduction in volume loss units from 2022 (4,443) to 2024 (2,191). In financial terms, the strategy reversed the waste trend, generating annual savings in losses of over 2,260.68, as the associated loss costs for the general line fell from 3,627.99 (2022) to 1,367.30 (2024), demonstrating an immediate and sustainable financial impact. The process was validated and incorporated into routine operations.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>This strategy significantly enhanced efficiency and sustainability. It is simple, low-cost, and highly replicable in other hospital pharmacy compounding services.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chaves, C., Franca, P., Fukuhara, M., Silva, E., Yamamoto, E., Santos, C., Martins, M., Sforsin, A., Pinto, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.93</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.93</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[3PC-030 Improving yield and reducing waste: optimising oral liquid packaging to enhance efficiency and sustainability in hospital pharmacy practice]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 3: Production and compounding</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A44</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A44</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A45-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[3PC-031 Amphotericin B 5% vaginal emulsion for the treatment of candida krusei: a case report]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A45-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Vaginal fungal infections are a common complication following broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy due to the disruption of the normal vaginal flora. Candida krusei is an uncommon but clinically significant pathogen due to its resistance to conventional antifungal treatments, such as fluconazole.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To present the case of a 90-year-old female patient diagnosed in March 2024 with vaginal candidiasis after using oral antibiotics, in this case, amoxicillin-clavulanate 875 mg/125 mg every 8 hours for 10 days. She underwent treatment with vaginal miconazole and oral fluconazole 150 mg for 3 days without success. The vaginal swab culture revealed Candida krusei, which was resistant to fluconazole but sensitive to amphotericin B. The pharmacy service was asked to develop a 5% amphotericin B vaginal emulsion due to the lack of topical alternatives.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>The galenic development and validation of the formula were achieved by following the procedures described in the <I>National Formulary</I> (PN/L/FF/002/00) and through quality control. Three samples were collected and analysed initially and again after 1 month. The validity period was determined by applying the risk matrix for non-sterile formulations outlined in the &lsquo;Guide to Good Practice in the Preparation of Medicines in Hospital Pharmacy Services&rsquo;. Formula design and clinical data of the patient was obtained from the software CPFarma and OrionClinic respectively.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Due to the hydrophobic nature of amphotericin B, an O/W emulsion was designed. The final formula included: amphotericin B 1.5 g, glycerin 4 g, and Ginebase (emulsion o/w for vaginal application) as vehicle up to 30 g. The galenic validation of the preparation&mdash;organoleptic characteristics (colour, odour, occlusiveness, extensibility, and consistency), homogeneity of particles, and exudation&mdash;was adequate and remained stable. The shelf life was set at 30 days under refrigerated conditions (2-8&deg;C).</p><p>After 14 days of self-application of the vaginal emulsion once daily, the patient experienced a complete resolution of symptoms with no reported adverse effects.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The 5% amphotericin B vaginal emulsion resolved the drug-resistant infection. This case demonstrates the critical role of the hospital pharmacist in managing fungal-resistant infections, such as Candida krusei. The successful treatment with the compounded amphotericin B preparation underscores the importance of microbiological cultures in guiding antifungal therapy.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Garcia Zafra, V., Castejon Grao, I., Macia Soriano, S., Peral Ballester, L., Soriano Irigaray, L., Murcia Lopez, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.94</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.94</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[3PC-031 Amphotericin B 5% vaginal emulsion for the treatment of candida krusei: a case report]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 3: Production and compounding</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A45</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A45</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A45-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[3PC-032 Promoting the role of hospital pharmacists in cancer care: patients perspectives on the chemotherapy preparation process and information tools]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A45-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>The preparation of injectable chemotherapy drugs, although crucial to treatment safety, often remains poorly understood by patients. To improve transparency and promote the role of hospital pharmacists, an information leaflet describing the activities of the Unit for Preparation and Clinical pharmacy in Onco-Haematology (UPCO) was distributed in 2021.</p><p>A first patient survey conducted in 2022 revealed high satisfaction but limited awareness of the pharmacy&rsquo;s contribution to the chemotherapy process. This highlighted the need for enhanced patient education.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The aim of this work was to evaluate the impact of two new communication tools &ndash;an updated leaflet and a short educational film<sup>1</sup> explaining the chemotherapy preparation process from prescription to administration &ndash;on patients&rsquo; understanding and satisfaction, compared with the 2022 survey.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>In 2025, a cross-sectional survey was conducted among outpatients receiving injectable chemotherapy in four day-hospital departments (medical oncology, haematology, neuro-oncology, and hepato-gastroenterology).</p><p>Patients were invited to read the updated leaflet and watch the educational film before completing a questionnaire administered by the pharmaceutical team.</p><p>The survey assessed knowledge of the chemotherapy preparation process, perceived adequacy of the information received, satisfaction with the new communication tools, and overall satisfaction rated on a 1&ndash;10 scale. Responses were collected using a 4-point satisfaction scale (1 = very dissatisfied; 4 = very satisfied) or yes/no questions and were compared with data from the 2022 survey.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Ninety-four patients participated in 2025 compared with 93 in 2022. Mean overall satisfaction remained high (9.1/10 vs 8.9, p=0.88). Over 90% of respondents were satisfied with both the chemotherapy process and the information provided. The proportion of patients who considered the information sufficient significantly increased from 55% in 2022 to 86% in 2025 (p&lt;0.001) following the introduction of the video and updated leaflet.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Patient satisfaction with chemotherapy management and the information provided by the UPCO team remains consistently high. The introduction of dedicated communication tools significantly improved patients&rsquo; understanding of the hospital pharmacy&rsquo;s role in the chemotherapy preparation process. These results underline the relevance of pharmacist-led educational initiatives to strengthen patient engagement, transparency, and trust in cancer care.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lk63LHje0pY</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Convert, J., Soetaert, S., Nabati, A., Hassani, L., Galon, C., Feld, J., Barboteau, C., Combeau, D., Antignac, M., Desnoyer, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.95</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.95</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[3PC-032 Promoting the role of hospital pharmacists in cancer care: patients perspectives on the chemotherapy preparation process and information tools]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 3: Production and compounding</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A45</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A46</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A46-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[3PC-033 Pharmaceutical preparations and waste management: an overview of practices in a hospital compounding unit]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A46-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Sustainable development is a major challenge in hospitals. In compounding units, the nature and volume of waste generated by pharmaceutical preparations require analysis of sorting practices due to their ecological, economic, and regulatory implications.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To quantify and characterise waste produced from sterile (SP) and non-sterile preparations (NSP) within a hospital compounding unit, in order to identify opportunities for more sustainable management.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>An observational study was conducted over 30 working days (August&ndash;September 2025) in a hospital compounding unit producing both SP and NSP. Waste generated during compounding activities was collected and weighed daily using a Terraillon scale (sensitivity &plusmn;0.1 kg). Each item was then classified into one of five waste streams: non-hazardous recyclable waste (NHRW), paper (PAP), household-type waste (HTW), infectious healthcare waste (IHW), and toxic chemical waste (TCW). Sorting compliance and the number of daily preparations were recorded. Data analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 5,800 waste items (2,270 from SP and 3,530 from NSP) were generated over 30 days, with a cumulative weight of 61 kg. During this period, 418 preparations were produced (10 SP and 408 NSP), generating on average 14 items and 147 g of waste per preparation. SP produced considerably more waste (227 items per preparation) than NSP (9). Only two sorting streams were used among the five available: IHW (496 items; 11 kg) and HTW (5,304 items; 50 kg). When reclassified by nature, waste distribution was 72% HTW (4,194), 16% IHW (914), 8% PAP (483), 3% TCW (152), and 1% NHRW (57). A total of 1,128 non-compliances (NCs), representing 20% of all waste, were recorded, mainly in the HTW stream (1,114; 99%). Sorting errors mainly involved PAP (77%), followed by NHRW (11%), TCW (7%), and IHW (5%).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>This study highlights the substantial waste generation associated with compounding activities, particularly during sterile preparations. Waste sorting compliance was only partial, with approximately 20% of items misclassified&mdash;mostly paper incorrectly discarded in the HTW stream. These findings emphasise the need to improve source sorting through clearer waste stream identification, provision of suitable containers, and staff awareness initiatives, to enhance sustainable waste management within the compounding unit.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nuel, J., Cosson, M., Jalabert, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.96</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.96</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[3PC-033 Pharmaceutical preparations and waste management: an overview of practices in a hospital compounding unit]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 3: Production and compounding</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A46</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A46</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A46-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[3PC-034 Managing ancillary supplies for preparation and administration in phase I oncohaematological clinical trials: a challenge to consider]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A46-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Managing ancillary supplies (AS) involves a risk-based approach to select, qualify and track these supplies to ensure they are safe for the preparation and administration of an investigational product (IP).</p><p>Incompatibility of AS used in Phase I clinical trials (CTs), which focus on the safety and dosage of a new treatment, can affect the reliability of the data, patient safety and the validity of the CTs themselves.</p><p>It is crucial to select the appropriate AS that meet the requirements of the trial pharmacy manual and the sponsor, taking into account the priority of using the centre&rsquo;s local AS.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>Identify ongoing CTs in a Phase I Unit that require AS for the preparation and administration of an IP.</p><p>Check whether there are restrictions or not with the Unit&rsquo;s AS, according to the CT requirements.</p><p>Analyse the causes of not being able to use local AS and the sponsor&rsquo;s solution.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Observational, retrospective study, including ongoing CTs at 01 Oct 2025 with IPs that require parenteral route (iv, sc, it...).</p><p>Main data collected were type of AS (diluent bags, syringes, secondary sets, filters, administration sets and closed system transference devices for preparation and administration (CSTDs), permitted or non-permitted use of local AS and causes.</p><p>Data source: preparation sheets.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>108 CTs were identified.</p><p>In 30% of them, the use of any local AS is not permitted; of which 90% are not allowed in at least two types of AS. Regarding the type of AS not permitted in relation to the CTs identified:</p><p><l type="tab"><li><p>&ndash; &nbsp;CSTDs for preparation (22,2%): 54,2% (sponsor supplied a tested reference) and 45,8% (sponsor did not allow their use).</p></li><li><p>&ndash; &nbsp;Administration sets (13,9%): 53,3% (sponsor supplied a tested reference) and 46,7% (sponsor allowed to use a local compatible alternative).</p></li><li><p>&ndash; &nbsp;CSTDs for administration (11,1%): sponsor supplied a tested reference in 100%.</p></li><li><p>&ndash; &nbsp;Filters (8,3%), secondary sets (6%), diluent bags (4,6%) and syringes (1,9%).</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The high variability of AS, local or provided by sponsor, can lead a risk of mistakes due to use of incorrect AS, worker unsafety, lack of knowledge of how to use them, less storage space, and a greater complexity of the CT.</p><p>For later phases/commercialisation, the restriction on AS can be a limiting factor.</p><p>Therefore, sponsors should conduct as extensive testing of references and materials as possible in the early stages.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martin Siguero, A., Laguna Ceba, E., Camara Manzano, M., Donoso Rengifo, C., Lopez Reina, Y., Hernandez Guio, A., Espinal Diana, H., Del Valle Moreno, P., Cortijo San Miguel, K., Gomez, A. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.97</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.97</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[3PC-034 Managing ancillary supplies for preparation and administration in phase I oncohaematological clinical trials: a challenge to consider]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 3: Production and compounding</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A46</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A46</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A47-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[3PC-035 Advantages of centralised faricimab compounding in the pharmacy service: greater safety, lower costs]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A47-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Safety in the compounding of sterile medicines in pharmacy services relies on the implementation of Good Pharmaceutical Practices (GPP), which include appropriate working areas, strict environmental controls, physical separation of activities to prevent cross-contamination and errors, and restricted access for professionals undergoing continuous training.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To assess the benefits of centralised compounding of faricimab syringes under sterile conditions compared to dispensing vials for direct administration in the ophthalmology department (OD), including associated cost savings.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective observational study was conducted in a tertiary hospital between October 2024 and July 2025. Data collected included: syringes prepared in the pharmacy department, those submitted to the microbiology department for microbiological quality control (mQC), and administrations recorded by the OD. Costs of syringes were compared with a hypothetical scenario using vials.</p><p>Syringes were prepared in a horizontal laminar-flow hood following GPP, using the basic ZeroResidual kit (bZRk), which includes sterile, silicone-free, low dead volume, single-use 0.2mL syringes, disposable hypodermic needles, latex-free protective caps, and auxiliary bubble adapters. They were stored in individual light-protective bags, at 2-8&deg;C for up to 28 days.</p><p>Costs of faricimab vial and associated consumables were based on hospital&rsquo;s official purchase price.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>During the study period, 2,545 syringes were prepared from 802 vials, yielding 3.17 syringes from each vial. Given the unit cost of 465.35 for faricimab vials and 30 for bZRk, the estimated cost per syringe was 176.65, representing a 62% reduction per administration. Of the total, 162 syringes were used for mQC, leaving 2,383 available for clinical use.</p><p>In the hypothetical vial-based scenario, the total cost would have been 1,108,929.05, whereas centralised compounding lowered the cost to 449,560.70, achieving savings of 659,368.35.</p><p>The OD reported enhanced safety due to sterile compounding and mQC, greater ease of use, and reduced waiting times compared to on-site preparation.</p><p>Indirect costs arising from preparation by nursing staff were not included, representing a limitation of the study.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Centralised compounding of faricimab syringes led to substantial cost savings in public healthcare, while also enhancing patient safety through sterile preparation and rigorous mQC.</p><p>Additionally, it improved ophthalmologists&rsquo; satisfaction due to its ease of use and reduced patient waiting times.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carrasco Piernavieja, L., Gonzalez-Perez, C., Saenz De Tejada Lopez, M., Garcia Sacristan, A., Martinez Simon, J., Dominguez Chafer, J., De Diego Pena, A., Luengo Gallego, N., Cisneros De La Iglesia, L., Martin Mendoza, J., Benitez Gimenez, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.98</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.98</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[3PC-035 Advantages of centralised faricimab compounding in the pharmacy service: greater safety, lower costs]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 3: Production and compounding</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A47</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A47</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A47-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[3PC-036 Assessing withdrawal and insertion forces in manual sterile compounding: ergonomic insights for automation]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A47-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Manual compounding of sterile preparations may involve repeated manipulations and physical force, particularly during syringe withdrawal and injection, which could contribute to repetitive stress injuries. Measuring these forces may provide objective evidence of the process&rsquo;s physical demands.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To identify the most ergonomically demanding manual preparations by measuring withdrawal and dilution forces, supporting prioritisation for robotic compounding.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>The study was conducted in three hospitals combining manual and automated compounding with the Kiro Oncology robot. Preparations were selected by drug, dose, density and final container.</p><p>Two manual movements were assessed: withdrawal (pulling the syringe plunger to aspirate drug from the vial) and insertion (pushing the plunger to transfer the solution into the final container).</p><p>Additional tests used saline (NS), water for injection (WFI), and 5% dextrose (D5W) with syringes from 1 to 50 mL, to assess force across sizes and solutions.</p><p>A dynamometer with a custom adapter on the syringe plunger was used. Reference force values and risk levels were defined according to UNE-EN1005-3:2002+A1. The maximum reduced isometric force for withdrawal and insertion was 1.83 kg with tasks over 0.92 kg considered ergonomic risks. Measurements were done by trained staff under standardised conditions (syringe with closed system transfer devices).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Nine technicians participated, three from each hospital, (67% women, mean age 43&plusmn;13years), three repetitions/participant (27 measurements):</p><p><tbl id="T1" loc="float"><tblbdy top-stubs="2"><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Vial</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Dose (mg)</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Volume (mL)</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Syringe (mL)</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Final container</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Withdrawal force (Kg) (SD)</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Insertion force (Kg) (SD)</b> </c></r><r><c cspan="7" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Oxaliplatin (100 mg/20 mL) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">200 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">40 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">50 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">IV bag </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">4.22 (1.60) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">5.80 (2.71) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Oxaliplatin (100 mg/20 mL) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">85 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">17 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">20 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">IV bag </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1.81 (0.58) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">3.22 (1.75) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Paclitaxel (300 mg/50 mL) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">300 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">50 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">50 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">IV bag </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">4.77 (1.55) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">5.43 (1.21) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Paclitaxel (300 mg/50 mL) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">100 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">16.7 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">20 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">IV bag </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">2.62 (0.48) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">3.64 (0.90) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Fluorouracil (5000 mg/100 mL) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">4000 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">80 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">50 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Infuser </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">4.20 (1.68) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">9.40 (1.96) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Fluorouracil (5000 mg/100 mL) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">4000 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">80 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">50 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Cassette </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">4.20 (1.68) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">6.77 (4.00) </c></r></tblbdy></tbl></p><p>All manual preparations exceeded the recommended force limit, with no significant differences between aqueous (oxaliplatin) and viscous (paclitaxel) drugs. Force differences were mostly related to syringe volume and final container, with the highest forces recorded during infuser insertion. For NS, WFI, and D5W, only syringes &gt;10 mL exceeded risk thresholds.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Manual compounding frequently exceeds ergonomic limits, especially with large volumes (&gt;20 mL) and infuser transfers. These data support prioritising such tasks for robotic compounding (if available) to reduce musculoskeletal risk.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>Cl&agrave;udia Sabat&eacute; Martinez (Kiro-Grifols)</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ballesteros Cabanas, G., Rivero Coronado, E., Lopez-Cabezas, C., Martin Del Pueyo, A., Camba Silveti, Y., Iglesias Gamio, A., Riestra, A., Gomez, A. M., Cea Hernandez, E., Jimenez Cabrera, S., Mendez Liz, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.99</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.99</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[3PC-036 Assessing withdrawal and insertion forces in manual sterile compounding: ergonomic insights for automation]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 3: Production and compounding</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A47</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A48</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A48-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[3PC-037 Formulation and stability of losartan 0.8 mg/ml eye drops for treatment of corneal haze]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A48-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>The development of corneal haze is associated with pathological wound healing after photorefractive keratectomy, eye injury, and eye infections. Recently, losartan potassium 0.8 mg/mL eye drops administered six times daily (one drop per dose) over a period of 6 months were reported to be effective in treating corneal haze. As there is no authorised medicinal product available, losartan potassium 0.8 mg/mL eye drops must be provided as hospital pharmacy preparation.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>Formulation, preparation, and stability testing of preservative-free losartan potassium 0.8 mg/mL eye drops in Novelia multidose eye drop containers.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>For the preparation of a qualification batch, 130 mg losartan potassium (GMP compliant API) were exactly weighted and dissolved in 163 g of sterile 0.9% sodium chloride infusion solution under cleanroom conditions. 50 mL portions of the solution were drawn up into a 50 mL sterile plastic syringe, a 0.22 &micro;m Minisart PES membrane filter connected and 10 mL portions of the solution filtered into sterile Novelia multidose eye drop containers (nominal volume 10 mL) each, sealed, and labelled. The content of one eye drop container was distributed into aerobic (8 mL) and anaerobic (2 mL) blood culture bottles for rapid sterility testing. 12 eye drop containers were stored at 2-8 &deg;C and samples withdrawn at day 0, 14, 28, and 90 from three systems each. Physicochemical stability was determined in triplicate by quantitative HPLC analysis of intact losartan and by measuring pH and osmolality in parallel.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>At day 28, the losartan concentration amounted to 99.3% &plusmn; 0.9% RSD of the initially measured concentration. pH 6.2 and osmolality 288 mOsmol/kg fulfilled the pharmacopoeia specification of eye drops and remained nearly unchanged over 28 days. Refrigerated storage was chosen because of microbiological reasons and unknown stability at room temperature. The phosphate buffer-free formulation mitigates the risk of corneal calcification.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The preparation of preservative-free losartan potassium 0.8 mg/mL eye drops was successfully implemented. The Novelia multidose eye drop container allows multiple administration of preservative-free solutions and efficient pharmacy preparation. Stability testing of the preparation is ongoing and shelf life proven for at least 1 month.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Linxweiler, H., Reichhold, J., Kra&#x0308;mer, I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.100</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.100</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[3PC-037 Formulation and stability of losartan 0.8 mg/ml eye drops for treatment of corneal haze]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 3: Production and compounding</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A48</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A48</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A48-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[3PC-038 Pharmacy staff perspectives on ergonomic challenges and the role of automation in aseptic compounding]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A48-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Manual compounding of aseptic preparations in hospital pharmacies may involve repetitive movements and physical workloads that may affect staff health. Despite technological advancements, many preparations are still performed manually, highlighting the need to identify ergonomic risks and assess staff perceptions related to this activity.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To collect feedback from pharmacy staff regarding ergonomic challenges, health concerns, and perceptions of automation in aseptic compounding.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A cross-sectional survey was conducted among KIRO-Oncology and Kiro-Isolator users. The questionnaire collected demographic data (age, gender), occupational information (professional category, time dedicated to manual compounding), and self-reported physical health aspects related to work. Additional compounding-related variables included syringe size, final container type, and medicines considered difficult to compound manually or preferred for robotic preparation.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>We received 37 responses from hospital pharmacy professionals, all of them used to combine manual and automated compounding with KIRO-Oncology or Kiro-Isolator robots across six countries: Spain (15), France (11), Latvia (5), Finland (3), Ireland (2), and Poland (1).</p><p>Among respondents, 39.3% were aged 18&ndash;30 years and 46.4% were 31&ndash;41 years; nearly 80% were women; 65% were pharmacy technicians, 27% pharmacists, and the remainder nurses. 73% spent over half of their working time on manual compounding.</p><p>95% reported discomfort or pain during compounding, mainly in the hands, cervical region, and fingers (&gt;15% each). 19% had taken sick leave due to musculoskeletal disorders, with half notifying to the occupational health service. In two-thirds of these cases, medical leave or reassignment exceeded 1 month.</p></sec><sec><st>41% identified the infuser as the most resistant container, followed by the cassette (27%) and prefilled bags (24%). The 50 mL syringe was most frequently used (50%). The drugs considered most difficult to prepare manually were paclitaxel (35%), fluorouracil (13%), and cyclophosphamide (12%), while those preferred for robotic compounding were cyclophosphamide (27%), paclitaxel (24%), fluorouracil (8.2%), carboplatin (7%), and doxorubicin (6%). Participants expressed a preference for using robotic systems for preparations involving large volumes, reconstitutions, elastomers and cassettes, highly contaminating drugs, and those requiring 50 mL syringes. 95% believed robotic compounding could help reduce repetitive stress injuries. Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Manual compounding frequently leads to musculoskeletal discomfort among pharmacy personnel. Implementing ergonomic strategies and expanding robotic compounding for high risk or physically demanding preparations could potentially enhance staff safety and well-being.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>Cl&agrave;udia Sabat&eacute; Martinez (Kiro-Grifols)</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ballesteros Cabanas, G., Rivero Coronado, E., Lopez-Cabezas, C., Martin Del Pueyo, A., Camba Silveti, Y., Iglesias Gamio, A., Riestra, A., Gomez, A. M., Cea Hernandez, E., Jimenez Cabrera, S., Mendez Liz, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.101</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.101</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[3PC-038 Pharmacy staff perspectives on ergonomic challenges and the role of automation in aseptic compounding]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 3: Production and compounding</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A48</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A49</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A49-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[3PC-039 Clinical evaluation of compounding deviations in automated parenteral nutrition: a hospital-based study]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A49-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Automated compounding systems (ACS) for parenteral nutrition (PN) aid the bag preparation process. In our hospital setting, the ACS integrates a nutrient volumes deviation detection system. Identifying these discrepancies is crucial as they may compromise patient safety, causing hydroelectrolytic imbalances, volume alterations, and metabolic dysfunctions.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The objective of this study is to analyse deviations identified during PN bag compounding and to define a standardised clinical decision making procedure involving the hospital pharmacist (HP) and the prescribing physician (PP) for assessing bag suitability.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Data related to bag compounding performed at a hospital between January 2025 and July 2025 were extracted from the ACS software. Data were categorised by production date, clinical ward, patient population (adult/paediatric), compounding deviation type and percentage, and proportion of validated versus rejected bags. For deviations between 2-4%, the HP consulted with the PP to assess bag suitability based on the patient&lsquo;s laboratory parameters and clinical status. Bags with deviations exceeding 4% were systematically discarded and re-compounded.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>During the study period, a total of 1898 nutritional bags were compounded. Of these, 91/1898 (4.8%) showed a filling deviation exceeding 2%. The magnitude of the detected deviation ranged between 2-25% in 79 bags, 25-50% in seven bags, and exceeded 50% in five bags. Following joint decision making between the HP and the PP, considering the patient&lsquo;s laboratory values and clinical conditions, 64/91 bags were deemed suitable for administration as the deviation was not considered clinically significant. The remaining 27/91 bags were rejected. The main reasons for discarded bags were significant variations in sodium quantity (15 bags), excessive concentration of disodium fructose diphosphate in bags for preterm neonates (three bags), and potassium overdosage in paediatric emergency bags (nine bags).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The analysis confirmed that a 2% threshold procedure with systematic multidisciplinary evaluation based on laboratory and clinical parameters effectively ensures safe nutritional therapy. This approach proved essential for vulnerable populations, highlighting the fundamental role of interprofessional collaboration in preventing clinically significant errors in ACS which could affect patient outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cruciata, N., Alba, A., Mendola, A., Maggio, G., Cancellieri, G., Iannelli, M., Polidori, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.102</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.102</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[3PC-039 Clinical evaluation of compounding deviations in automated parenteral nutrition: a hospital-based study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 3: Production and compounding</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A49</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A49</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A49-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[3PC-040 Radiochemical stability of (68Ga)Ga-PSMA in injection syringes: evaluation for safe dose reassignment]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A49-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>(<sup>68</sup>Ga)Ga-PSMA (Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen labelled with Gallium-68) is a radiopharmaceutical (RP) prepared extemporaneously in a multidose vial for multiple dispensations. It is intravenously administered for prostate cancer diagnosis using polypropylene, polyisoprene, or silicone syringes. No data are currently available regarding the stability of this solution in contact with these materials.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This study aimed to assess the stability of (<sup>68</sup>Ga)Ga-PSMA in the injection syringe to determine the maximum allowable time for possible reassignment in case of unforeseen delays, provided that radioactivity remains sufficient.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Radiochemical purity (RCP) was used as the stability marker. RCP values from the multidose vial and from dispensed syringes were compared. Four quality controls (QC) were performed at 30-minute intervals: T0, T30, T60, and T90. The analytical method was thin-layer chromatography (TLC). A 1 &micro;L aliquot was applied on glass microfiber chromatography paper impregnated with silica gel. The mobile phase consisted of methanol and ammonium acetate (50/50, v/v). RCP values obtained at T0 were compared with those at subsequent times using the non-parametric Wilcoxon paired test (&alpha; = 0.05).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Ten (<sup>68</sup>Ga)Ga-PSMA syntheses were analysed. No significant differences in mean RCP were observed between T0 and T30 (p = 0.10) or T60 (p = 0.13). Only RCP at T90 (p = 0.0091) was significantly different from T0. Across all syntheses, RCP coefficients of variation remained below the 2% variability threshold (1.62, 0.14, 0.29, 0.29, 0.27, 0.23, 0.17, 0.66, 0.24, 0.16), confirming temporal stability.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>No degradation of (<sup>68</sup>Ga)Ga-PSMA radiochemical purity was observed up to 60 minutes after dispensation, suggesting sufficient stability for temporary storage in syringes and possible dose reassignment. The significant variation observed at 90 minutes may result from the limited number of syntheses analysed. Further studies on larger datasets are needed to confirm and refine these findings.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>NA </p><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Malie, N., Piquemal, M., Clotagatide, A., Rioufol, C., Deschavannes, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.103</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.103</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[3PC-040 Radiochemical stability of (68Ga)Ga-PSMA in injection syringes: evaluation for safe dose reassignment]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 3: Production and compounding</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A49</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A49</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A50-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[3PC-041 Getting the dose right: evaluating consistency in oral compounding]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A50-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>In daily (hospital) pharmacy practice, extemporaneous compounding remains a vital solution for patients with limited commercial options - especially in paediatric and geriatric care. Yet, ensuring consistent dosing across preparations is a known challenge. To support pharmacists in delivering safe and reliable care, we consolidated previously generated and new stability data and calculated content uniformity across multiple compounded suspensions using a single, standardised vehicle. This approach offers practical insights into dose consistency and helps address long-standing concerns around variability in extemporaneous formulations.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To assess dose uniformity and stability in extemporaneously compounded oral suspensions prepared with SyrSpend SF PH4. By combining results from previously conducted studies, we aim to provide (hospital) pharmacists with a clearer understanding of the accuracy and reliability of these suspensions.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>The analysis included 180 formulations containing 127 active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), with 5,700 samples stored at room temperature and under refrigeration. Formulations were prepared under controlled laboratory conditions using validated compounding procedures and analysed with stability indicating HPLC-UV methods. Method specificity was confirmed through forced degradation. To mimic routine patient use, samples were manually agitated before six aliquots were drawn from the centre of each container at day 0, 7, 14, 30, 60, and 90. Content uniformity was assessed using USP &lt;905&gt; acceptance criteria, adjusted to account for the available sample size. Chemical stability was determined by comparing recovery values to initial concentrations.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>All formulations tested met the acceptance limits of both the United States Pharmacopeia (USP) and the British Pharmacopoeia (BP). Average recovery values were 99.81% at room temperature and 100.21% under refrigeration, with no samples exceeding USP maximum limits. Mean concentrations remained within 90.86% and 109.91% of label claim, indicating accurate and consistent dosing. These findings confirm that SyrSpend SF PH4 maintains content uniformity and chemical stability across a wide range of APIs under different storage conditions.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>This study provides (hospital) pharmacists with a practical, evidence-based framework for dose accuracy in extemporaneous compounding. Demonstrating reliable content uniformity and stability across multiple APIs and storage conditions, it supports safer, more standardised preparation of oral suspensions. These results can strengthen internal quality assurance processes and reinforce confidence in everyday compounding decisions.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>Corporate sponsored research or other substantive relationships:</p><p>Carolina Schettino Kegele, Hudson Polonini and Eli Dijkers are employees of Fagron Group. The University of Athens has been provided a financial compensation to cover the costs of executing part of the stability studies presented in this abstract.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Schettino Kegele, C., Polonini, H., Dijkers, E., Kostakis, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.104</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.104</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[3PC-041 Getting the dose right: evaluating consistency in oral compounding]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 3: Production and compounding</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A50</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A50</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A50-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[3PC-042 Improving cytotoxic safety: comparative evaluation of closed system transfer devices]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A50-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Handling cytotoxic drugs exposes healthcare staff to significant occupational risks. While biological safety cabinets are the standard, situations such as equipment failure or urgent bedside preparation require safe alternatives. Closed system transfer devices (CSTDs) may provide additional protection, but their characteristics differ. A structured evaluation was needed to support the choice of the most appropriate device and to ensure safe, standardised practice.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This study aimed to evaluate and compare four commercially available CSTDs. Specific objectives were to assess the devices&rsquo; safety and usability, and to develop standardised preparation protocols tailored to each cytotoxic drug.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A comparative study using scientific literature and manufacturer data evaluated four CSTDs: Chemfort (Asept), Chemolock (ICU Medical), Qymono (Vygon), and PhaSeal (BD). Each device was assessed across seven criteria: Ergonomics, Safety, Compatibility (NIOSH hazardous drug list), Assembly process, Aseptic duration, Dead volume, and Cost. A global performance score was calculated as the average of all criteria.</p><p>Standardised methotrexate preparation protocols were implemented in the gynaecology unit. A summary table was created in the cytotoxic reconstitution unit (URC), listing cytotoxic agents, their key characteristics, and the corresponding preparation protocol to support safe and consistent practice.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The characteristics of the four CSTDs were consolidated into a comparative table and visualised using a radar chart.</p><p>Based on this multicriteria analysis, Chemfort (Asept) was identified as the most suitable device, offering the best balance of safety, ergonomics, and compatibility with hospital workflows.</p><p>Following this evaluation:</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>A standardised syringe preparation protocol was implemented for methotrexate in the gynaecology/obstetrics department.</p></li><li><p>A cytotoxic drug reference table was developed within the URC, listing each agent&rsquo;s key properties and indicating the appropriate preparation protocol.</p></li></l></p><p>These resources enhance safety, consistency, and usability in cytotoxic drug preparation, improving operational reliability for hospital staff.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>This study confirms that Chemfort is a suitable CSTD for safe cytotoxic drug preparation, with the best technical specifications aligned with the hospital&rsquo;s operational requirements.</p><p>Implementation will be accompanied by close monitoring of user satisfaction, preparation times, economic impact, and long-term sustainability.</p><p>The outcomes of this follow-up will support wider deployment and contribute to continuous improvement in the safety, efficiency, and quality of cytotoxic drug preparation</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Garibotti, M., Abaut, A., Abiven, G., Berthier, P., Marie-Dit-Dinard, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.105</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.105</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[3PC-042 Improving cytotoxic safety: comparative evaluation of closed system transfer devices]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 3: Production and compounding</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A50</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A50</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A51-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-001 Implementation of a value-based telepharmacy model for monitoring severe asthma patients treated with biologics]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A51-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Telepharmacy offers an innovative approach to ensure continuity of care and patient engagement in chronic conditions requiring specialised medications. Severe asthma patients treated with biologics demand close monitoring of clinical outcomes, biomarkers, and quality of life to optimise therapy and resource utilisation.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the usefulness of a dual (in-person and remote) telepharmacy follow-up system for severe asthma patients on biologics by assessing clinical response, biomarkers, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL).</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A multicentre 24&ndash;month prospective follow&ndash;up was conducted in severe asthma patients receiving biologics from three hospitals. Sociodemographic data, comorbidities, and health habits were collected. Clinical and functional parameters included forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), eosinophil count, and immunoglobulin E. HRQoL was assessed using validated questionnaires: Asthma Control Test (ACT), FACIT&ndash;Fatigue, PROMIS&ndash;29, SNOT&ndash;22, TSQM, miniAQLQ, and P3CEQ. Correlations between clinical variables and HRQoL outcomes were analysed.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Thirty&ndash;seven patients (83.3% women, 46&ndash;65 years: 43.3%) were included; 48.7% had comorbidities, mainly hypercholesterolaemia (35.1%). Questionnaire completion rate was 89%, and 37.8% used the telepharmacy chat for queries. Dupilumab was the most frequent biologic (45.2%). Pulmonary function improved: FEV1 increased from 80.1&plusmn;21.0% to 85.3&plusmn;16.4%, and FEV1/FVC from 71.0&plusmn;13.6% to 77.0&plusmn;11.5%. FeNO decreased significantly (55.8&plusmn;46.7 to 27.8&plusmn;21.7 ppb). ACT scores improved from 17.1&plusmn;6.0 to 22.3&plusmn;2.2 (p=0.019). HRQoL improved: mini AQLQ symptoms (4.8&plusmn;1.6 to 6.3&plusmn;0.6, p=0.031), activity limitation (5.2&plusmn;1.6 to 6.8&plusmn;0.2, p=0.030), and emotional function (4.2&plusmn;1.9 to 6.6&plusmn;0.5, p=0.014). FACIT&ndash;Fatigue increased (36.0&plusmn;11.8 to 44.5&plusmn;7.2, p=0.010), and SNOT&ndash;22 scores decreased markedly in patients with nasal polyposis. PROMIS&ndash;29 revealed reduced depression and fatigue, with improved physical functioning. Overall satisfaction with telepharmacy follow&ndash;up was 8.7/10.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Telepharmacy enables efficient dual follow&ndash;up for severe asthma patients on biologics, providing real&ndash;time query resolution and outcome monitoring. Significant improvements were observed in pulmonary function, asthma control, HRQoL, and fatigue, alongside high patient satisfaction. Telepharmacy represents a valuable strategy for value&ndash;based care in severe asthma.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>The authors thank the Asthma Multidisciplinary Unit and the Hospital Pharmacy Department for their support in the implementation of the telepharmacy model. No external funding was received. </p><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mercadal-Orfila, G., Maestre Fullana, M., Bello Crespo, M., Fernandez Cortes, F., Salvador Pareja, S., Herrera Perez, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.106</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.106</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-001 Implementation of a value-based telepharmacy model for monitoring severe asthma patients treated with biologics]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A51</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A51</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A51-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-002 Importance of individualising isankizumab treatment in patients with Crohns disease]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A51-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>The treatment of moderate-to-severe Crohn&rsquo;s disease has evolved with the emergence of new therapeutic targets such as risankizumab. Plasma drug concentrations complement data directly related to patient efficacy and safety.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To estimate the population-based minimum plasma concentration (Cmin) of risankizumab at weeks 12 and 52 and to correlate the degree of attainment of the threshold associated with clinical remission.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Retrospective observational study including adult patients diagnosed with Crohn&rsquo;s disease and treated with risankizumab. The two-compartment model described by Suleiman et al. was implemented using the PKS software by Abbott. Patients receiving risankizumab were selected, and the predicted Cmin at weeks 12 and 52 of treatment was calculated using Bayesian estimation. A threshold associated with clinical remission was set at &gt;60 mcg/mL at week 12 and &gt;10 mcg/mL at week 52, based on the literature reviewed from Suleiman et al., Sequier et al., and Robin et al., as there is no established consensus. The predicted Cmin at week 52 was evaluated using the efficacy data documented in the electronic health records of patients for whom this information was available. Demographic (sex and age), anthropometric (weight), and laboratory (creatinine, faecal calprotectin (FCP), albumin) data were collected from electronic medical records.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>32 patients were included; 57.9% women, with a median age of 53 years (27&ndash;77). The median clinical variables were: weight 70 kg (48&ndash;138); FCP 131mg/kg (12&ndash;537); and albumin 45 g/L (39&ndash;48). At week 12, no patients reached the established threshold, with a median Cmin of 33.2 mcg/mL (25.7&ndash;47.7). At week 52, only three patients achieved an adequate maintenance Cmin, with a global median of 6.5 mcg/mL (3.9&ndash;11). Of the five patients with follow-up data at week 52, 100% required re-induction due to lack of efficacy. All had subtherapeutic levels at both week 12 and week 52 under the dosing regimen specified in the product label. They are currently on an intensified regimen of risankizumab 360 mg subcutaneously every 6 weeks.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The recommended dosing of risankizumab in patients with Crohn&rsquo;s disease does not achieve the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets established in our study and is associated with a lack of response to the drug.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fernandez Canabate, S., Alaejos, A. C., Corrales Paz, M., Jimenez Casaus, J., Roldan Gonzalez, J., Goda Montijano, G., Martinez Fernandez, V., Gil Navarro, I., Gil Valino, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.107</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.107</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-002 Importance of individualising isankizumab treatment in patients with Crohns disease]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A51</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A51</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A52-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-003 Beyond choline: the role of piflufolastat in guiding treatment for recurrent prostate cancer]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A52-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Piflufolastat is a radiopharmaceutical targeting the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), used in positron emission tomography (PET). Its high affinity enables better lesion detection in prostate cancer compared to tracers like choline. This improved diagnostic performance may influence clinical decisions, especially in biochemical recurrence.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To assess the clinical utility and diagnostic performance of piflufolastat in biochemically recurrent prostate cancer and its impact on disease detection and treatment strategies.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective, multicentre, descriptive study was conducted during 2023&ndash;2024, including prostate cancer patients previously treated with radical prostatectomy or curative radiotherapy. Eligible patients had biochemical progression, persistence, or recurrence and were candidates for piflufolastat PET per Central Pharmacy and Therapeutics Commission protocol. Variables included age, Gleason score, initial treatment, PSA prior to imaging, PET-choline and PET-PSMA results (negative, positive, or indeterminate), and post-imaging treatment. Data were obtained from electronic medical records.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Thirty-two patients (mean age: 68 years) were included. Gleason scores were 6 (19%), 7 (70%), 8 (4%), and 9 (7%). Most underwent radical prostatectomy (n=28), four received curative radiotherapy. Mean PSA before imaging: 1.62 ng/ml. Average interval between PET-choline and PET-PSMA: 2.7 months.</p><p>Discordance between the two imaging occurred in 66% of cases. PET-PSMA was positive in 12 patients with negative PET-choline, and indeterminate in three others. Among five indeterminate PET-choline cases, three were positive and two negative on PET-PSMA.</p><p>Treatment decisions varied: among PET-PSMA positive patients, six received androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with apalutamide or enzalutamide, two received the same plus radiotherapy, five underwent Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT), three received ADT and radiotherapy, and one underwent cryotherapy.</p><p>Among PET-PSMA negative patients, four were under active surveillance, one received SBRT, three received ADT and radiotherapy, and one received ADT plus enzalutamide. In indeterminate PET-PSMA cases, two received ADT and apalutamide, two received ADT and radiotherapy, and two were closely monitored.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Piflufolastat PET is a valuable diagnostic tool for assessing recurrence in prostate cancer, especially in patients with negative PET-choline. Its higher sensitivity may influence treatment decisions. However, this study did not show consistent correlation between PET-PSMA findings and therapeutic strategies. Further studies are needed to clarify its impact on clinical outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gragera Gomez, M., Velazquez Vazquez, H., Zambrano Croche, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.108</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.108</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-003 Beyond choline: the role of piflufolastat in guiding treatment for recurrent prostate cancer]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A52</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A52</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A52-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-004 Intravenous drug incompatibility in the ICU of a university hospital: frequency and the influence of nurses years of experience]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A52-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Drug incompatibility occurs when two or more drugs interact in a way that alters their physical or chemical properties, or their therapeutic effects, leading to undesirable outcomes. This can result in changes such as discoloration, precipitation, or reduced efficacy, which can compromise both the safety and effectiveness of the medications involved.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To determine the frequency and types of intravenous drug incompatibilities in the ICU of a university hospital and to assess their correlation with the nursing staff&rsquo;s years of experience.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A clinical pharmacist conducted an observational study over a 3-month period in an intensive care unit to gather data on medication incompatibilities. Information on drug pairs, routes of administration, and observed incompatibilities was documented during the preparation of IV mixtures. The Stabilis 4.0 tool served as the primary reference for identifying incompatibilities, while SPSS 2.0 was utilised for statistical analysis and data processing.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 217 IV preparation and distribution procedures were observed, with 111 Y-site medication mix-ups (51%). Among these, 38 (34%) were incompatible, 21 (19%) compatible, and 52 (47%) had unknown compatibility. Of the 38 incompatibilities, nine (23.7%) involved nurses with &lt;1 year of experience, one (2.6%) with 1&ndash;4 years, six (15.8%) with 4&ndash;5 years, and 22 (57.9%) with &gt;6 years, suggesting increased risk at both low and high experience levels. A Student&rsquo;s t-test showed a significant association between age and error frequency (t = -2.617; p = 0.009), with younger nurses more prone to errors.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Incompatibilities can have serious clinical implications, such as altered therapeutic effects and heightened risk of adverse reactions. This study suggests that errors may resurface over time, potentially due to overconfidence and decreased vigilance, highlighting that both inexperience and excessive familiarity can contribute to incompatibility errors. These findings emphasise the need for staff to maintain focus during drug administration and underscore the importance of ongoing awareness and continuous training programmes.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ali Ahmed Abdulkareem, W., Bayen, A., Mrani Alaoui, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.109</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.109</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-004 Intravenous drug incompatibility in the ICU of a university hospital: frequency and the influence of nurses years of experience]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A52</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A52</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A53-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-005 Clinical, economic and organisational impact of a validation tool on parenteral chemotherapy]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A53-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Anticancer drugs involve complex regimens and narrow therapeutic margins, making it susceptible to drug related problems (DRP). Pharmacists play a critical role in detecting and preventing DRPs. Earlier at the Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel) in 2023 a validation was developed to detect DRPs and support pharmacist interventions (PIs) in parenteral chemotherapy.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This study aims to evaluate the potential clinical, economic and organisational impact of the validation tool for parenteral chemotherapy as part of a quality improvement programme.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective evaluation study of a quality improvement programme was conducted at the chemotherapy preparation unit (CPU) of UZ Brussel for all patients receiving parenteral chemotherapy. Parenteral chemotherapy prescriptions were screened for DRPs and with the resulting PIs were recorded in a register using the Be-CLIPSS classification system. This register was retrospectively reviewed by an expert panel, which assessed the clinical, economic, and organisational impact of each PI using the CLEO tool.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 10.696 parenteral chemotherapy prescriptions were analysed with a significant increase in DRP detection (0.3% vs 1.4%; p &lt;0.001). More clinically significant PIs (19.48%) were detected in the tool supported period. A notable economic benefit of 105.652,99 was observed in the tool supported period and the validation time for parenteral chemotherapy prescriptions decreased significantly, with a median time reduction from 16:11 (07:16-33:45) minutes to 14:50 (6:00-33:00) minutes (p &lt; 0.001).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The validation tool is associated with a positive clinical, economic and organisational impact. The tool significantly improved the detection of drug-related problems and a reduction of validation time.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vanfleteren, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.110</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.110</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-005 Clinical, economic and organisational impact of a validation tool on parenteral chemotherapy]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A53</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A53</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A53-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-006 Use of antineoplastic treatment in oncology patients at the end of life: a retrospective analysis]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A53-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Evaluating the appropriateness of antineoplastic treatment (AT) during end of life care is essential to ensure patient well-being and optimise healthcare resources.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To describe and analyse the use of AT in oncology patients during their last phase of life.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>An observational retrospective study was conducted including oncology patients who received AT in 2024 at our centre. Variables collected included demographics (age, sex, ECOG), diagnosis, treatment characteristics (type, intention, line, duration), and mortality-related data (initiation of AT within 30 days prior to death (30DPD), follow-up by the palliative care unit (PCU), emergency or hospital admissions within the 30DPD, cause and place of death, and ongoing AT within 30 or 14 days of death). Descriptive statistics were applied.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 158 patients (62% male; median age 69 years, IQR 15) were included. The most common diagnoses were lung (29.8%), digestive (24%), and breast (12%) cancer. Treatments received were chemotherapy (70.2%), immunotherapy (22.2%), and targeted therapies (11.4%); 94.3% were administered with palliative intent. PCU follow-up occurred in 54.4% of patients.</p><p>AT was administered within 30DPD in 25.9% (41/158) and within 14 days in 9.5%. New treatments were initiated within 30DPD in 8.9% of cases, mostly as first-line therapy (65%). ECOG &ge;2 was reported in 39% of patients. Median number of treatment cycles was two (IQR 3).</p><p>The main causes of death were disease progression (93.7%) and infectious complications (3.8%). Emergency visits occurred in 77.2% of patients within 30DPD, with 68.3% requiring hospital admission. Death occurred at home (36.2%), long-term care facilities (40.4%), or hospitals (23.4%).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The proportion of patients receiving AT within 14 days of death (9.5%) was below the 10% threshold described in the literature, but initiation of new treatment within 30DPD (8.9%) exceeded the recommended 2%. These findings highlight possible inappropriate resource use, with high rates of emergency care. PCU follow-up (54.4%) was near optimal (55%). ECOG status and limiting treatment lines may help refine decision making in end of life oncology care.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. <b>DOI:</b> 10.1200/JCO.24.00542;</p><p>2. <b>DOI:</b> 10.1200/JCO.2004.08.136;</p><p>3. <b>DOI:</b> 10.1093/jjco/hyn031;</p><p>4. <b>DOI:</b> 10.3390/cancers15133349</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Garcia Navarro, C., Manzaneque Gordon, A., Molas Ferrer, G., Balcells Viles, G., Tenas Ruiz, B., Vazquez Majo, I., Insense Urbano, V., Nicolas Pico, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.111</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.111</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-006 Use of antineoplastic treatment in oncology patients at the end of life: a retrospective analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A53</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A53</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A53-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-007 Atezolizumab in combination with bevacizumab in patients with advanced or unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: effectiveness and safety]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A53-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Atezolizumab-Bevacizumab (ATZ-BVZ) is a first-line treatment approved for adult patients with advanced or unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate effectiveness and safety of ATZ-BVZ and to compare the results with those obtained with the pivotal trial.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>An observational and retrospective study was conducted including all patients treated with ATZ-BVZ from May 2021 to April 2025 in a tertiary hospital.</p><p>The variables studied were demographic data, ECOG, number of cycles received, previous treatments, BCLC (Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer) stage, treatment duration, reasons for discontinuation, and date of death.</p><p>To evaluate effectiveness, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analysed by Kaplan&ndash;Meier method. PFS and OS were expressed in median and 95% confidence interval (95% CI).</p><p>To evaluate safety, adverse reactions (AR) were recorded.</p><p>Data were collected using the electronic clinical records and the oncohaematological prescription program. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS v.22.0.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>We collected 45 patients, of whom 43 were included due to loss to follow-up. The median age was 69 years (56-82). At the start of ATZ-BVZ, 59% had an ECOG 0 (n=25), 41% ECOG 1 (n=18). Previous treatments were sorafenib (n=3) and lenvatinib (n=2).</p><p>The median number of cycles received was 10 (4-54). The reasons for treatment discontinuation were: progression (n=8), death (n=4) and toxicity (n=3): immune-mediated colitis. 58% had BCLC stage C, 28% stage B and 14% stage A.</p><p>PFS and OS in our study were 9.1 months (95% CI:4.46-19.7) and 12.8 months (95% CI 6.79-14.3), respectively. In pivotal trial IMbrave150, PFS was 6.8 months and OS was 19.2 months.</p><p>In our cohort, safety results were comparable to the pivotal study: hypertension 33% vs 29.8%; asthenia 28% vs 20.4%; proteinuria 12% vs 20.1%; bleeding 20% vs 14.9%; infusion reaction 14% vs 11.2%. 6.9% experienced an AR leading to withdrawal of ATZ-BVZ vs 7% in pivotal trial.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The PFS obtained in our study was superior to that reported in the pivotal trial, probably because only 58% of our patients had stage C compared with 85% in IMbrave150.</p><p>The AR identified showed a similar incidence to our study.</p><p>It would be necessary to continue with this study to extend the follow-up time in order to analyse more precisely the effectiveness of the treatment.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Prieto Galindo, R., Torralba Fernandez, L., Garcia Perez, A., Menasalvas Canadilla, O., Gomez Calvo, L., Lopez De Abechuco Ruiz, M., Lopez Alvarez, R., Jimenez Mendez, C., Aguado Barroso, P., Dominguez Barahona, A., Gomez Fernandez, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.112</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.112</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-007 Atezolizumab in combination with bevacizumab in patients with advanced or unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: effectiveness and safety]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A53</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A54</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A54-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-008 Use of orphan drugs in a small country: a 14-year review (2011-2024)]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A54-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Since 2012, an annual registry of orphan drug (OD) use in patients with rare diseases (RD) has been maintained. ODs are essential for treating RDs, but their utilisation, and economic impact represent a challenge for healthcare systems.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The objective was to assess the prevalence and evolution of OD use over a 14-year period and its economic impact on the hospital pharmacy budget (HPB).</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>This was a retrospective, observational, longitudinal study from January 2011 to December 2024, of adult and paediatric patients with RD treated with ODs, both oncologic (excluding CAR-T therapies) and non-oncologic. Data were extracted from the official inpatient and outpatient pharmacy software (Farmatools), using OD classifications validated by ORPHANET (last update: April 2024). Drug prices were based on those published by the national health authorities. Variables analysed included the number and type of ODs (ATC classification), the number of treated patients, drug utilisation, and OD-related costs (percentage of HPB).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>141 patients received treatment with 36 different ODs (97% adults, 3% paediatric). The highest number of patients was recorded in 2015 (n=41). OD use peaked in 2015 and 2020 (15 drugs), with the lowest in 2023&ndash;2024 (five drugs). Overall, 53% of ODs were oncologic and 47% non-oncologic. The most commonly used ODs were daratumumab (14.8%), nintedanib (11.3%), ibrutinib (10%), azacitidine, and bosentan (7.8%). OD distribution by ATC group was dominated by L (n=19), followed by C and A (n=4 each).</p><p>The average economic impact of ODs on the hospital pharmacy budget was 7.93%, ranging from 3.42% (2011) to a peak of 12.90% (2022). Group L represented 64.7% of total OD expenditure, with daratumumab alone accounting for 21.1% of total spending. Paediatric patients represented 11.5% of OD expenditure despite being only 3% of the sample.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Oncologic ODs represented 53% of treatments and accounted for 64.7% of OD-related spending. Daratumumab was the most used and costliest OD, while bosentan was the most frequent non-oncologic OD. The average OD budget impact over 14 years was 7.8%. This long-term project reflects a strong commitment to improving care and visibility for rare diseases, while highlighting the financial challenges of ODs in small healthcare systems.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gea Rodriguez, M., Gil, E., Avellanet, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.113</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.113</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-008 Use of orphan drugs in a small country: a 14-year review (2011-2024)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A54</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A54</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A54-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-009 Pharmaceutical consultations and follow-up for long-term antibiotic therapies]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A54-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Long-term antibiotic therapies require strong patient adherence to ensure efficacy and prevent bacterial resistance. Pharmaceutical consultations (PCs) were implemented to educate patients, address treatment-related concerns, and promote active involvement in home-based care.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This study aimed to evaluate the impact of PCs on the management of patients receiving long-term (&gt;14 days) antibiotic therapies.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A prospective monocentric study was conducted from May 2024 to April 2025. Patients prescribed high risk antibiotics, identified by the infectious diseases mobile team, were referred to hospital pharmacists for a PC. Each patient received an antibiotic information leaflet and the pharmacist&rsquo;s contact details. A satisfaction questionnaire was completed after the consultation. Data were collected and analysed using Microsoft Excel.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 40 PCs were conducted (70% male, median age: 76 years (Q1=59; Q3=79)). Most consultations occurred in surgical wards (45%) and emergency/post-emergency units (18%). The main infection sites were osteomyelitis (30%), endocarditis (18%), surgical site infections (15%), and abscesses (15%). The median antibiotic treatment duration was 39 days (Q1=21; Q3=42), with 65% monotherapies and 35% dual therapies, accounting for 54 prescribed antibiotics.</p><p>The most frequently used antibiotics were sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (24%), levofloxacin (20%), and amoxicillin (19%). A total of 21 pharmaceutical interventions (PIs) were performed during the PCs, with a 90% acceptance rate by prescribers. These interventions mainly addressed the prevention or correction of drug interactions (eg, rifampicin with apixaban, levofloxacin with iron), the management of adverse effects (eg, renal or hepatic toxicity under cotrimoxazole), the optimisation of administration schedules (eg, rifampicin taken on an empty stomach), and adjustments to treatment duration or dosage, including for antibiotics and anticoagulants.</p><p>Three patients contacted the hospital pharmacist after the PC: two for clarification on dosing or duration, and one to report a severe skin reaction to sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim, leading to urgent rehospitalisation and treatment modification. Patient feedback indicated a high level of satisfaction.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Pharmaceutical consultations enhance the safety and effectiveness of long-term antibiotic therapies by improving patient understanding, supporting adherence, and enabling timely intervention when complications arise. They underscore the essential role of hospital pharmacists in multidisciplinary infectious disease management.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Questel, M., Dubert, M., Wemmert, C., Humbert, C., Feral, A., Pons, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.114</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.114</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-009 Pharmaceutical consultations and follow-up for long-term antibiotic therapies]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A54</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A55</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A55-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-010 Real-world effectiveness and safety of fenfluramine in paediatric patients with refractory epileptic syndromes]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A55-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Dravet syndrome (DS) and Lennox&ndash;Gastaut syndrome (LGS) are severe developmental and epileptic encephalopathies with limited therapeutic options. Fenfluramine has shown efficacy in DS and LGS, but evidence in other epileptic syndromes is limited.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the real-world effectiveness and safety of fenfluramine in paediatric patients with refractory epileptic syndromes.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective observational study was conducted including all paediatric patients treated with fenfluramine between January 2021 and July 2025 at a tertiary children&rsquo;s hospital. Demographic, clinical, and treatment variables were collected. Effectiveness was assessed according to seizure frequency and duration at 14-week follow-up. Safety outcomes included adverse drug reactions (ADRs). A multivariable logistic regression was performed to explore predictors of response.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 45 patients were included (62.2% male), with a median age of 8 years (IQR 5&ndash;11). Diagnoses were DS (26.7%), LGS (31.1%), and other epileptic syndromes (42.2%). Before fenfluramine initiation, 23 patients (51.1%) presented more than 10 daily seizures. Concomitant cannabidiol was used in 29% of cases.</p><p>The median fenfluramine dose was 0.44 mg/kg/day at initiation, increasing to 0.56 mg/kg/day at 14 weeks. Overall, 25 patients (55.6%) achieved a clinical response. Among responders, 40% had epileptic syndromes different from DS or LGS, and 40% had previously received cannabidiol. Treatment discontinuation occurred in 24.4% of patients, due to inefficacy (8/11,72.7%) and adverse drug reactions (1/11,9.1%). Logistic regression including age, sex, diagnosis, and cannabidiol co-treatment did not identify significant predictors of response. Reported ADRs were mainly somnolence (28.9%), anorexia (24.4%), diarrhoea (8.9%), and abdominal pain (4.4%), which were generally mild and resolved after dose adjustment.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Fenfluramine appears effective and safe in the treatment of Dravet and Lennox&ndash;Gastaut syndrome and shows promising results in other difficult-to-treat epileptic syndromes. No predictors of response were identified, highlighting the need for larger multicentre studies to better define patient profiles and optimise therapy.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Leal Pino, B., Fernandez Rubio, B., Garcia Rodriguez, M., Merino Pardo, A., Algarra Sanchez, E., Fernandez Romero, L., Abril Cabero, A., Nieto Martil, E., Echavarri De Miguel, M., Riva De La Hoz, B., Pozas Del Rio, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.115</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.115</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-010 Real-world effectiveness and safety of fenfluramine in paediatric patients with refractory epileptic syndromes]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A55</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A55</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A55-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-011 Paediatric drug-resistant epilepsies: efficacy, tolerability, and safety of add-on cannabidiol]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A55-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Epilepsy is a neurological disorder with diverse aetiologies and comorbidities, including neurodevelopmental and autism spectrum disorders. Approximately 50% of paediatric-onset epilepsies are drug-resistant (DRE) including Dravet syndrome (DS), Lennox&ndash;Gastaut syndrome (LGS) and Tuberous Sclerosis Complex (TSC). Dravet Syndrome is characterised by drug-resistant seizures, progressive cognitive and motor deficits and often pathogenic variants in SCN1A gene. Lennox&ndash;Gastaut syndrome typically presents with seizure between 1&ndash;7 years and has genetic or acquired aetiologies. Tuberous Sclerosis Complex (TSC) is a multisystemic disorder with drug-resistant seizures due to <I>TSC1/TSC2</I> mutations.</p><p>In Italy, Cannabidiol (CBD) (Epidyolex) has been approved by AIFA since 2019<sup>1</sup> as add-on therapy for DS and LGS patients older than 2 years (in combination with clobazam) and for TSC patients older than 1 year.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of add-on CBD in paediatric and young adult patients with DRE</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Clinical and pharmacological data of patients treated with add-on CBD at the Regional Paediatric Epilepsy Centre, Salesi Hospital (Ancona, Italy) between September 2019 and December 2023 were analysed. Efficacy was defined as &ge;50% reduction in seizure frequency. Adverse events (AEs) were classified as minor or major. Quality of life (QoL) was assessed through caregiver reports.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Thirty-six patients were included: four with DS, seven with TSC, nineteen with LGS, and six with other DRE. Mean age at add-on CBD initiation was 26 years and 4 months; at treatment onset, 50% of patients were in the paediatric age range (&lt;18 years). The mean treatment duration was 15 months, with an average of 3.25 concomitant antiseizure drugs. Overall, 53% (n=19) achieved a clinically relevant seizure reduction, most of whom (n=13) had LGS. Discontinuation occurred in 47% (n=17), due to lack of efficacy (n=12) or AEs (n=5). Adverse events were reported in 58% of patients, predominantly minor and transient. QoL improvement was reported in 53% of patients, including better sleep quality in 30.5%.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>In this real-world cohort, add-on CBD demonstrated clinically relevant efficacy with acceptable tolerability and safety in paediatric and young adult patients with DRE, particularly in LGS. These findings support its role as a valuable therapeutic option in refractory epilepsies.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. www.aifa.gov.it/documents/20142/1540069/123_EPIDYOLEX_DS_pp_scheda_innovativita_GRADE.pdf</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Polidori, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.116</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.116</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-011 Paediatric drug-resistant epilepsies: efficacy, tolerability, and safety of add-on cannabidiol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A55</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A56</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A56-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-012 Therapeutic drug monitoring of azole antifungals in the paediatric population in tertiary care hospitals]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A56-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Triazole antifungals are broad-spectrum drugs used in children from 2-years-old for treating severe fungal infections and as prophylaxis in high risk haematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Their pharmacokinetics show significant variability, especially in paediatric patients, due to factors like bodyweight and immature liver function, underscoring the need for individualised dosing in this population.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To describe the pharmacokinetic variability of azole antifungals in paediatric patients monitored in tertiary care hospitals, analysing the impact of therapeutic drug monitoring.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Descriptive, retrospective, multicentre study including paediatric patients treated with antifungal agents who had plasma concentrations measured between February 2020-August 2025.</p><p>Trough plasma concentrations were measured at steady state using high performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection (HPLC-UV).</p><p>Therapeutic ranges: voriconazole=1.5-5.5&micro;g/mL, isavuconazole=2-5 &micro;g/mL.</p><p>Collected Data: Gender, age, underlying pathology, type of treatment (empirical, targeted, or prophylaxis), infection treated, presence of isolates (MIC), treatment toxicity, liver function, levels, pharmacist recommendations, physician acceptance.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Plasma concentrations were determined in 94 samples from 31 patients, 65.38% girls, median age 11 (6&ndash;12) years and mainly haematological underlying conditions (80.8%). Voriconazole accounted for 84.04% (N=79) of the samples and isavuconazole 15.96% (N=15). There were no posaconazole samples. Empirical treatments represented 74.5%, targeted 24.5%, and prophylaxis 1.1%. Type of infections: respiratory 81.9%, systemic 6.4%, neurological 5.3%, among others. Aspergillus was most frequently isolated (A.flavus N=3, A.fumigatus N=9, A.terreus N=5), followed by Candida (C.guillermondii N=4, C.krusei N=2), with all isolates being sensitive to treatment.</p><p>For voriconazole, median concentration was 1.28 (0.42-3.03) &micro;g/mL, with 44.3% (35) being subtherapeutic, 44.3% (35) within range, and 11.4% (9) supratherapeutic levels. Of those out-of-range, levels were re-requested in 78.43%, and 73,68% were brought into range and 26,3% were discontinuation.</p><p>44% of supratherapeutic levels presented adverse effects (visual disturbances, hypertransaminasemia), which resolved upon reaching therapeutic range, except for one discontinuation.</p><p>For isavuconazole, median concentration was 2.08 (1.59-3.04) &micro;g/mL, 86.7% (13) within range, 6.7% (1) subtherapeutic, and 6.7% (1) supratherapeutic. Both children with out-of-range levels had their dosing regimen adjusted, achieving adequate levels in next determination.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Voriconazole shows significant pharmacokinetic variability, with more than 50% of plasma levels outside the therapeutic range. This highlights the crucial importance of pharmacokinetic monitoring to reach therapeutic ranges and ensure the effectiveness and safety of treatments in severe paediatric conditions.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Amaro, L., Moya-Mangas, C., Cordero-Ramos, J., Merino-Bohorquez, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.117</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.117</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-012 Therapeutic drug monitoring of azole antifungals in the paediatric population in tertiary care hospitals]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A56</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A56</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A56-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-013 Effectiveness and safety of liposomal irinotecan in the treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer in routine clinical practice]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A56-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC) has a very poor prognosis and limited treatment options. The regimen of liposomal irinotecan in combination with fluorouracil and folinic acid (NALIRI) has proven effective. However, data from real-world clinical practice remain scarce.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the effectiveness and safety profile of NALIRI in patients with mPC under normal clinical practice conditions.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Observational, retrospective, single-centre study. All patients treated with NALIRI between December 2016 and April 2025 were included. Demographic data, location of metastases, previous treatments, functional status (ECOG) at the start of NALIRI, duration of treatment, follow-up time and tolerance were collected. Effectiveness was assessed using RECIST criteria, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), using Kaplan&ndash;Meier curves. Toxicities were classified according to CTCAE v5.0. Data were obtained from electronic medical records and analysed using R software (v4.2.2).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Forty-six patients with a median age of 65.5 years (range:45&ndash;80) were included; 52% were women. Twenty-two percent had undergone surgery. The most common metastases were hepatic (44%), peritoneal (30%), pulmonary (26%), adrenal (11%) and lymph node (9%). In metastatic disease, 40 patients received gemcitabine-nabpaclitaxel as first-line treatment. Seventy-two percent of patients received NALIRI as second-line treatment. The ECOG at the start of treatment with NALIRI was 0 (13%), 1 (65%) and 2 (20%).</p><p>The median follow-up was 5 months (range: 1-19) and the median duration of treatment was 2.5 months (range: 0.5-17). At the end of the study, 35 patients had died. The PFS and OS data were 3.5 months (95% CI:2-5) and 6 months (95% CI:4.4-8), respectively.</p><p>Ninety-four percent of patients experienced some adverse reaction. The most common toxicities were gastrointestinal (67%; five grade 3 cases), haematological (59%; one grade 4 and three grade 3) and asthenia (63%; one grade 4 and five grade 3). Other toxicities included abdominal discomfort (11%), neurotoxicity (15%), stomatitis (17%; two grade 3) and hand-foot syndrome (9%). Dose reductions were performed in 17 patients, treatment delays in 19 and suspensions due to toxicity in 12 cases.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The effectiveness of NALIRI was comparable to that of the NAPOLI-1 trial. NALIRI showed a high incidence of adverse effects, which in many cases required dose adjustments or treatment discontinuation.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rodriguez-Tenreiro Rodriguez, C., Munoz Villasur, M., Caso Gonzalez, A., Diaz Romero, C., Fadon Herrera, C., Gomez Mato, A., Latasa Berasategui, M., Esparrago Fernandez, C., Varela Ferreiro, M., Lozano Blazquez, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.118</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.118</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-013 Effectiveness and safety of liposomal irinotecan in the treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer in routine clinical practice]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A56</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A57</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A57-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-014 Comparative evaluation of infliximab and adalimumab in moderate-to-severe inflammatory bowel disease: quality of life outcomes and the role of treatment adherence]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A57-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), which encompasses ulcerative colitis and Crohn&rsquo;s disease, is a chronic disorder of the gastrointestinal tract with multifactorial aetiology. Its impact significantly compromises patients&rsquo; quality of life, affecting physical, psychological, and social domains. Among the available therapeutic options, anti-TNF&alpha; monoclonal antibodies such as infliximab (IFX) and adalimumab (ADA) are widely used in moderate-to-severe IBD.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The primary objective of this study was to assess quality of life in patients receiving intravenous IFX or subcutaneous ADA. Secondary objectives included comparing quality of life between both therapies and evaluating treatment adherence.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>We conducted a single-centre, prospective, observational study between April and June 2025. Adult patients with a confirmed diagnosis of moderate-to-severe IBD treated with IFX or ADA for at least 1 year were included. Exclusion criteria comprised severe comorbidities, cognitive impairment, or inability to complete questionnaires.</p><p>Quality of life was assessed using the validated IBDQ-9, while adherence was measured through the Morisky 4-item scale for ADA and infusion attendance for IFX. The study was approved by the Institutional Research Ethics Committee, and all participants provided informed consent. Statistical analysis included measures of central tendency and dispersion for quantitative variables, and absolute frequencies for categorical variables. Independent samples t-test was used for mean comparisons, with significance set at p&lt;0.05. Analyses were performed with SPSS v.24. Data sources included electronic medical records and the outpatient dispensing module.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 70 patients were included: 36/70 (51.4%) treated with IFX and 34/70 (48.5%) with ADA. The mean age was 50.9 years (SD=13.4), with Crohn&rsquo;s disease predominating (78.6%). Overall IBDQ-9 scores indicated good quality of life (69.5%, SD=22.1%). No significant differences were observed between therapies (p=0.92), although IFX showed a higher proportion of patients with very good quality of life. Adherence was 100% in IFX versus 85.3% in ADA. Notably, non-adherent ADA patients reported nearly 30% lower quality of life compared to adherent patients.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Patients with IBD treated with IFX or ADA demonstrated overall good quality of life, with no significant differences between therapies. However, treatment adherence emerged as a key determinant, particularly in patients receiving ADA.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Raguan Yanez, G., Fernandez Arberas, N., Fernandez Cebrecos, I., Herrero Fernandez, M., Baldominos Utrilla, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.119</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.119</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-014 Comparative evaluation of infliximab and adalimumab in moderate-to-severe inflammatory bowel disease: quality of life outcomes and the role of treatment adherence]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A57</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A57</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A57-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-015 Pharmacists role in the follow-up of patients treated with PCSK9i inhibitors]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A57-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>The use of pro-protein convertase subtilisine/kexin 9 inhibitors (PCSK9i) for the treatment of hypercholesterolaemia require long-term monitoring. Close follow-up of these treatments is necessary to assess potential treatment intensifications based on levels, risks, and therapeutic ceilings, individualising each case.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate pharmaceutical interventions in patients with hypercholesterolaemia treated with PCSK9i (alirocumab or evolocumab).</p><p>To assess the acceptance rate of the interventions.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Retrospective observational study of pharmaceutical interventions performed in patients with hypercholesterolaemia treated with PCSK9i since the inclusion of these drugs in the hospital guidelines (August 2016&ndash;February 2025) at a tertiary care hospital. Data collected: age, sex, lipid-lowering treatment, adherence, pharmaceutical interventions, treatment changes.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>During the study period, 52 patients receiving PCSK9i treatment were included (28 men) with a median age of 64 years (IQR: 16&ndash;84). The median duration of treatment was 39 months (IQR: 4&ndash;100). In addition to monoclonal antibodies, 62% of patients were on concomitant treatment (statins, ezetimibe, and/or bempedoic acid). Sixty-five percent were statin-intolerant. Adherence to hospital medication collection was 95.4% compared to 78.9% in primary care. Nineteen interventions were carried out in 17 different patients, with an acceptance rate of 89.5%. The most common intervention was an increase in alirocumab dose (68.4%). Other interventions included switching and addition of oral treatments.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Close monitoring by the pharmacy department benefits: </p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Early detection of analytical worsening, therapeutic failures, and patient transgressions. </p></li><li><p>Higher adherence in hospital settings compared to community care. The high acceptance rate of interventions confirms the need for a multidisciplinary approach for better management of these patients.</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benito Ibanez, V., Codonal Demetrio, A., Oca Luis, B., Hernando Martin, C., Pardo Gutierrez, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.120</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.120</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-015 Pharmacists role in the follow-up of patients treated with PCSK9i inhibitors]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A57</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A57</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A58?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-016 Environmental impact of delivering outpatient medications from a hospital pharmacy to community pharmacies: a sustainable dispensing model]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A58?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>In recent years, the number of outpatient medications dispensed in hospital pharmacies has increased considerably. As tertiary hospitals serve large areas, many patients must travel long distances to collect their treatments, generating carbon dioxide (CO<SUB>2</SUB>) emissions, with the consequent environmental impact. Delivering outpatient medications to patients&rsquo; nearest community pharmacies through cooperative distribution networks could promote the reduction of the carbon footprint.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the potential carbon footprint savings achieved by delivering outpatient medications from a hospital pharmacy to patients&rsquo; nearest community pharmacies through a cooperative distribution programme.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>This was a retrospective observational study that included outpatient medication deliveries between a tertiary hospital and community pharmacies that are part of a cooperative distribution programme according to the Official Association of Pharmacists of Barcelona (COFB). The study period ranged from March 2020, when the programme started, to mid-August 2025. Carbon footprints were assessed using the tool &lsquo;Carbon Footprint Calculator&rsquo;<sup>1</sup> and expressed in tonnes of CO<SUB>2</SUB> (tCO<SUB>2</SUB>). The potential carbon footprint savings were evaluated by quantifying the difference between patient travel from home to the hospital and back and the one-way deliveries to community pharmacies, as these deliveries followed the usual routes of wholesaler couriers. Data were obtained from the hospital clinical registry and the COFB online portal.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 26,136 medication deliveries from the hospital to community pharmacies were included: 976 in 2020, 3,013 in 2021, 4,705 in 2022, 6,219 in 2023, 6,738 in 2024, and 4,485 in the first 7.5 months of 2025. These deliveries resulted in progressively increasing annual carbon footprint savings (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F1">figure 1</cross-ref>), from 34.4 tCO<SUB>2</SUB> in 2020 to 239.2 tCO<SUB>2</SUB> in 2024, with 158.6 tCO<SUB>2</SUB> achieved during the first 7.5 months of 2025 (projected to reach 253.8 tCO<SUB>2</SUB> for the full year). The total savings over the study period were 918.5 tCO<SUB>2</SUB>.</p><p><fig loc="float" id="F1"><no>Abstract 4CPS-016 Figure 1</no><caption><p>Carbon footprint savings achieved by delivering outpatient medications to community pharmacies</p></caption><link locator="4CPS-016_F1"></fig></p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Delivering outpatient medications from a hospital pharmacy to patients&rsquo; nearest community pharmacies is associated with substantial carbon footprint savings and supports a more sustainable, environmentally friendly dispensing model.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. Carbon Footprint. Carbon Footprint Calculator. https://www.carbonfootprint.com/calculator.aspx</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martinez-Molina, C., Rial Dominguez, Y., Arranz, N., Echeverria, E., Gonzalez, S., Lopez, B., Martin-Conde, M., Estrada-Campmany, M., Casas-Sanchez, J., Soy Muner, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.121</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.121</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-016 Environmental impact of delivering outpatient medications from a hospital pharmacy to community pharmacies: a sustainable dispensing model]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A58</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A58</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A59-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-017 Measuring patient-reported outcomes in Crohns disease: insights from a telepharmacy project]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A59-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Telepharmacy and ePROMs projects enable systematic monitoring of patients with chronic diseases, including Crohn&rsquo;s disease (CD), through electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (ePROMs). This approach supports real-world evaluation of treatment effectiveness and patient well-being.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To assess the evolution of disease activity, quality of life, fatigue, and work functioning in CD patients treated with biologics or JAK inhibitors (JAKi) over 12 months using ePROMs.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective observational study was conducted in three Spanish hospitals (Jan 2021&ndash;Sept 2024). Adult CD patients receiving biologics/JAKi were included. Clinical data (Harvey-Bradshaw Index (HBI), CRP, faecal calprotectin) and ePROMs (MIBDI, IBDQ-32, IBD-Control, FACIT-Fatigue, WRFQ) were collected at baseline and 12 months. Descriptive and comparative statistics (ANOVA, t-tests, non-parametric tests) were applied with Bonferroni correction.</p><p>Results 118 patients were included (53.0% male, mean age 43.5 &plusmn; 13.0). Most were on anti-TNF therapy (81.0%) and first-line treatment (53.4%). At baseline, 35.3% had moderate-severe disease (HBI), with mean CRP 2.4 &plusmn; 14.3 mg/L and calprotectin 435.5 &plusmn; 460.2 &micro;g/g. After 12 months, improvements were observed across all PROMs. The proportion of patients with inactive disease (MIBDI) increased from 7.6% to 39.1%, and those with great disease control (IBD-Control) rose from 64.6% to 93.6%. Quality of life improved (IBDQ-32: high QoL from 60.3% to 83.3%), and fatigue decreased (FACIT-Fatigue: mild fatigue from 70.2% to 91.4%). Work performance also improved (WRFQ: high performance from 70.0% to 76.8%). However, 43.5% still reported active disease (MIBDI), and 6.4% had poor disease control. Importantly, patients rated their satisfaction with the dual follow-up model (in-person and telematic) at 8.15 out of 10, highlighting its acceptability and perceived value.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Our telepharmacy value-based health project demonstrates the utility of ePROMs in monitoring CD patients. Despite overall improvements, a significant proportion of patients continue to experience disease burden, highlighting the need for individualised care strategies. The high satisfaction with the hybrid care model supports its continued implementation.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>The authors thank the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Multidisciplinary Unit and the Hospital Pharmacy Department for their support in the implementation of the telepharmacy model. No external funding was received.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mercadal-Orfila, G., Salvador Pareja, S., Maestre Fullana, M., Bello Crespo, M., Herrera Perez, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.122</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.122</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-017 Measuring patient-reported outcomes in Crohns disease: insights from a telepharmacy project]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A59</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A59</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A59-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-018 Clinical and economic impact of pharmacokinetic-guided switching from standard half-life to extended half-life factor IX in haemophilia B prophylaxis]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A59-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Extended half-life (EHL) factor IX (FIX) prolongs circulation time compared with standard half-life (SHL) products, potentially enhancing protection and reducing infusion burden for patients with haemophilia B (HB). However, real-world evidence on pharmacokinetic (PK)-guided switching is still limited.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate changes in PK parameters, clinical outcomes and cost during the first year after PK-guided switch from SHL to EHL FIX in patients with severe/moderate HB on prophylaxis.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Multicentre, observational, retrospective, and multidisciplinary study conducted from December 2024 to May 2025 comparing pharmacokinetic and clinical outcome variables 1 year before and after the switch, including associated costs. Clinical data &ndash; annualised total bleeding rate (ABR), annualised joint bleeding rate (AJBR), weekly dose (IU/kg<sup>&ndash;</sup>  <sup>1</sup>), infusion frequency &ndash; were extracted from OrionClinic. PK profiles and PK variables &ndash; half-life, area under the curve (AUC), trough levels &ndash; were obtained using WAPPS-Hemo, whereas economic data (Laboratory Purchase Price without Value-Added Tax) were obtained from Orion-Logis. Quantitative variables were expressed as median (IQR) and qualitative as n (%). Statistical analysis was performed with R.v.4.4.3.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Twenty-one patients (nine paediatric, 12 adults) were included in the study. All PK parameters showed significant improvement, with median improvement ratios for t1/2 and AUC of 4.1 (3.4&ndash;4.8) and 4.2 (2.6&ndash;5.0), respectively, with no age group differences (p&gt;0.05). ABR was significantly reduced (p = 0.009), with resolution of 5 out of 6 (83.3%) target joints. Infusion frequency and weekly dose were reduced by 50.0% (50&ndash;65%; p = 0.0001) and 56.3% (40.0&ndash;65.8%; p = 0.0001), respectively, with a median reduction of 52.1 (26.1&ndash;67.8) injections and 130,357.3 (5,142.9&ndash;203,357.3) IU of FIX per patient per year. Despite lower consumption, the median annual drug cost increased to 28,254.9 (4,432.1&ndash;44,060.8) per patient per year.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>PK-guided switching to EHL FIX prophylaxis markedly improved all PK parameters while reducing treatment burden and improving both efficacy and quality of life in patients with HB. Although our analysis did not demonstrate direct cost savings&mdash;as only drug-related expenses were considered&mdash;this contrasts with haemophilia A, where switching to EHL factors has shown significant economic benefits. Comprehensive real-world studies including indirect costs are warranted to better define the full health-economic impact of EHL FIX therapy.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chovi Trull, M., Megias-Vericat, J., Palanques-Pastor, T., Cid Haro, A., Rodriguez Lopez, M., Palomero Massanet, A., Marcellini Antonio, S., Haya Guaita, S., Garcia Pellicer, J., Poveda Andres, J., Bonanad-Boix, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.123</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.123</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-018 Clinical and economic impact of pharmacokinetic-guided switching from standard half-life to extended half-life factor IX in haemophilia B prophylaxis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A59</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A59</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A60-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-019 Real-world persistence and discontinuation of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies in migraine: 4-year follow-up results]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A60-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway represent a major advance in migraine prevention. Understanding persistence patterns and reasons for discontinuation is essential to optimise patient outcomes and rational use of these high-cost treatments.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the persistence of anti-CGRP mAbs used in migraine prophylaxis and to identify the main reasons for treatment discontinuation.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective observational study was conducted including all treatment episodes defined as unique patient&ndash;consultation pairs with initiation of galcanezumab, fremanezumab or erenumab between 2020 and 2024. Data were collected from nine hospitals. Persistence was analysed using Kaplan&ndash;Meier survival curves, censored at maximum follow-up. Treatment discontinuation was defined as a documented end date. Reasons for suspension were classified into lack of efficacy, adverse events, or clinical improvement. Log-rank tests were applied to compare persistence curves.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 302 treatment episodes from 259 unique patients were included: galcanezumab (n=126), fremanezumab (n=115) and erenumab (n=61). The mean age was 46.3 years (median 48; range 22&ndash;75; IQR 16.5), and 84.4% were women. Regarding treatment line, 75.9% of episodes corresponded to first-line use, 18.2% to second-line, 4.8% to third-line and 1.1% to later lines. Global persistence was 98.1% at 3 months, 91.9% at 6 months, 84.3% at 12 months, 79.1% at 2 years, 74.4% at 3 years and 68.2% at 4 years. By drug, persistence at 12 months was 85.4% for galcanezumab, 81.3% for fremanezumab and 84.2% for erenumab; at 4 years it was 69.2%, 73.5% and 63.9% respectively. Among 65 discontinuations, the main reasons were lack of efficacy (60.0%), adverse events (18.5%) and clinical improvement (3.1%). When stratified by treatment line, nai&#x0308;ve patients showed persistence of 78.6% at 12 months and 64.9% at 36 months, compared with 72.5% and 59.1% in switch patients. Differences were not statistically significant (p=0.78).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>In real-world practice, long-term persistence to anti-CGRP mAbs is high, with galcanezumab and fremanezumab showing favourable persistence up to 4 years, while erenumab demonstrated slightly lower rates. Lack of efficacy was the leading cause of discontinuation. Importantly, no significant differences were found between drugs or between nai&#x0308;ve and switch patients.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mercadal-Orfila, G., Maestre Fullana, M., Bello Crespo, M., Corte Garcia, J., Lopez Sanchez, P., Carriles Fernandez, C., Salvador Pareja, S., Barcelo Sanso, F., Oliver Noguera, A., Herrera Perez, S., Gloria, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.124</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.124</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-019 Real-world persistence and discontinuation of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies in migraine: 4-year follow-up results]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A60</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A60</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A60-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-020 Analysis of ambulatory and hospital treatment of patients with beta blocking agents at the division of paediatrics of tertiary hospital in years 2022 and 2023]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A60-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>In one European country, only two beta blocking agents are approved for use in children: metoprolol for arterial hypertension and propranolol for arrhythmias and haemangiomas. The use of these medications for other indications, or the use of any other beta blocking agents in paediatric patients, is considered off-label. As a result, comprehensive information on suitable dosing and dosage forms for this population remains limited.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This retrospective study was conducted to analyse the use of drugs from ATC group C07 (beta blocking agents) in both ambulatory and hospital patients treated at the Division of Paediatrics in a tertiary hospital during 2022 and 2023. Patients were included in the study if they received at least one beta blocking medicine during this time period of the study.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Data were collected from the hospital information system. They included patient age, duration of beta blocking therapy, the specific drug from ATC group C07, prescribed dose, dosing interval and the main diagnosis classified according to the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision (ICD-10). Descriptive variables were reported as proportions or frequencies; numerical variables were summarised using the median, minimum, and maximum values.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>During the study period, 205 patients received at least one beta blocking agent, most frequently bisoprolol (36.9%) and propranolol (37.3%). Propranolol was more commonly administered to younger patients (&le;11 years of age), whereas bisoprolol was predominantly prescribed to older children (&gt;11 years of age). Beta blocking agents were most often administered in the form of an oral suspension (49%) or tablet (34%). Approximately 60% of the medications were prepared by the hospital&rsquo;s galenic laboratory. The primary treatment indications included congenital malformations of the circulatory system (17.6%) and tachycardia (17.1%). Overall, 80.6% of beta blocker use was off-label.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Beta blocker use in the paediatric population was characterised by frequent off-label prescribing, with clear age-related preferences in medicine selection (propranolol in younger children and bisoprolol in older ones). Most formulations required individualised preparation, often by the hospital&rsquo;s galenic laboratory, reflecting the limited availability of paediatric-appropriate dosage forms.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Skvarc, T., Laptos, T., Kerec Kos, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.125</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.125</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-020 Analysis of ambulatory and hospital treatment of patients with beta blocking agents at the division of paediatrics of tertiary hospital in years 2022 and 2023]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A60</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A60</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A61-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-021 Clinical outcomes and economic evaluation of oritavancin therapy: a real-world study]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A61-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Oritavancin is a lipoglycopeptide active against multidrug-resistant gram-positive cocci. Its prolonged half-life (245 h) enables single-dose administration, potentially reducing hospital stay and costs.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To describe real-world use of oritavancin regarding indications, dosage, effectiveness and safety in clinical practice, and to assess its economic impact when administered at hospital discharge.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective observational study was conducted including all patients treated with oritavancin from September 2023 (date of inclusion in the hospital formulary) to July 2025 in a tertiary hospital. Variables evaluated: age, sex, type of infection, isolated microorganism, treatment indication, dosage, clinical cure (absence of clinical signs of infection), results of microbiological cultures, 30-day mortality, adverse events, hospital stay and economic cost.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Twenty-eight infection cases in 25 patients were analysed. Most were male (80%, n=20) with a median age of 54 (43&ndash;67) years. Main indications were skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) (64.30%, n=18) and osteoarticular infections (OAI) (28.60%, n=8). Targeted therapy based on antibiogram was used in 46.4% (n=13) of cases. The most frequent pathogens were <I>Enterococcus faecalis</I> (14.29%, n=4), <I>Enterococcus faecium</I> (14.29%, n=4), <I>Staphylococcus epidermidis</I> (14.29%, n=4), Methicillin-resistant<I> Staphylococcus aureus</I> (14.29%, n=4) and Methicillin-susceptible <I>Staphylococcus aureus</I> (10.71%, n=3). 85.71% (n=24) of the cases received a single 1200 mg dose, while 14.30% (n=4) received a second 800 mg dose 8-12 days later. 46.43% (n=13) received treatment immediately before discharge.</p><p>Regarding effectiveness, 71.43% (n=20) achieved complete clinical cure, 14.29% (n=4) relapsed, and no 30-day mortality was observed. Post-cure cultures were performed in 21.4% (n=6), all negative. Regarding safety, only one patient developed adverse events in two cases. One case involved general malaise post-infusion, and another a severe infusion-related reaction.</p><p>The treatment cost per patient ranged 1,342&ndash;2,237, whereas avoided hospitalisation costs ranged 4,550&ndash;27,300 from one to six weeks, depending on the diagnosis. Estimated savings for patients receiving oritavancin at discharge ranged 30,074&ndash;337,459.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Oritavancin demonstrated an adequate effectiveness and safety profile with high clinical cure rates and few adverse events, although vigilance is warranted due to potential infusion-related reactions. Beyond its approved indication in SSTIs, it proved effective in OAI. Its administration at discharge enabled substantial cost savings by avoiding prolonged inpatient care. Further studies are needed to confirm its role in antibiotic stewardship and resource optimisation.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roldan Martinez, S., Correa Ballester, M., Monte Boquet, E., Gallen Soria, D., Campos Barrachina, J., Arnau Blasco, B., Chovi Trull, M., Escobar Hernandez, L., Rodenas Rovira, M., Garcia Pellicer, J., Poveda Andres, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.126</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.126</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-021 Clinical outcomes and economic evaluation of oritavancin therapy: a real-world study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A61</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A61</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A61-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-022 Molecular mechanism of curcumin for constipation: a network pharmacology and molecular docking study]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A61-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>To explore the mechanism of curcumin in treating constipation through network pharmacology combined with molecular docking technology.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To explore the mechanism of curcumin in treating constipation through network pharmacology combined with molecular docking technology.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>The method is based on collecting curcumin and constipation targets from multiple databases, establishing a target prediction network for curcumin treatment of constipation, submitting common targets to the STRING database, analysing connectivity using Cytoscape software, conducting gene ontology (GO) functional analysis and Kyoto Encyclopaedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analysis on the top 20 ranked genes, and molecular docking of the obtained targets to study the mechanism of curcumin treatment of constipation.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>As a result, 232 targets related to curcumin, 563 targets related to constipation, and 54 common targets between curcumin and constipation were obtained from the database. GO functional analysis shows that these targets are associated with 635 pathways; KEGG pathway enrichment analysis showed 134 related pathways. The molecular docking results showed that curcumin has good binding ability to targets such as mitogen activated protein kinase 3 (MAPK3), interleukin (IL) 6, serine/threonine kinase 1 (AKT1), vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA), signal transduction and transcription activator 3, albumin, Jun oncogene, tumour necrosis factor (TNF), IL1B, tumour protein p53, C-C motif chemokine ligand 2, and fibronectin 1.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The therapeutic effect of curcumin on constipation is achieved through multiple targets and pathways; Specifically, curcumin may regulate MAPK by binding to core targets MAPK3, IL6, AKT1, VEGFA, and TNF IL6, TNF. Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/protein kinase B and VEGF signalling pathways play a role in treating constipation.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chen, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.127</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.127</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-022 Molecular mechanism of curcumin for constipation: a network pharmacology and molecular docking study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A61</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A61</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A61-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-023 From vancomycin to alternatives: drivers of therapy change in children]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A61-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Vancomycin is a glycopeptide used to treat Gram-positive bacterial infections. Failure to achieve therapeutic levels or toxicity may require switching to alternative treatments. Few studies have been published addressing this situation in the paediatric population.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To describe paediatric patients treated with vancomycin who required switching to another antibiotic, and to assess whether these modifications were justified.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A descriptive, observational, retrospective study was conducted in hospitalised paediatric patients treated with intravenous vancomycin between 01 January 2022 and 31 July 2024, who later switched to another antibiotic for the same indication. Data were obtained from medical records and the prescribing program. Changes were considered justified if vancomycin doses exceeded 75 mg/kg/day without achieving trough levels of 10&ndash;15 mg/mL, in central nervous system infections, or in clinically unstable patients. The protocol was approved by the local ethics committee.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 836 vancomycin treatments were administered to 582 patients. Treatment was changed in 69 cases (62 patients). Median age was 4.4 years (1 month&ndash;19.5 years); 61% were male and 82% had underlying diseases (51 patients), mostly oncohaematological (30). The most frequent indications were bacteraemia (32%), febrile neutropenia (12%), prophylaxis (7%), fever of unknown origin (6%), and pneumonia (6%).</p><p>Vancomycin was switched to linezolid in 40 treatments (58%), daptomycin in 24 (35%), clindamycin in 4 (6%), and ceftaroline in 1. The main reason for switching was failure to reach therapeutic levels (52%, 36 treatments), although 14 were deemed unjustified since maximal dosing had not been attempted (mean dose 62 mg/kg/day). Fifteen treatments (22%) were switched due to sequential step-down to oral therapy, although in three cases a more suitable antibiotic could have been chosen. 14 treatments (20%) were changed due to the patient&rsquo;s clinical condition, although in two cases doses could have been increased. In one case, antibiogram-guided selection was preferable. Four treatments (6%) were changed due to allergy or adverse effects.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Vancomycin is mainly used in preschool children with oncohaematological diseases. Most changes were justified, but serum level monitoring and dose optimisation are crucial before switching. Antibiotic choice should be guided by susceptibility results to ensure appropriate management in paediatric patients.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Riva De La Hoz, B., Echavarri De Miguel, M., Martinez Alvarez, F., Pascual Alonso, C., Carmona Abellan, O., Algarra, E., Merino Pardo, A., Leal Pino, B., Fernandez Romero, L., Garcia Ascaso, M., Cuervas-Mons Vendrell, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.128</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.128</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-023 From vancomycin to alternatives: drivers of therapy change in children]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A61</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A62</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A62-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-025 Hospital pharmacy-led comprehensive medication management: impact on adherence and safety]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A62-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Pharmaceutical care programs are central to hospital pharmacy practice, supporting rational medicine use, adherence, and the detection of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Pharmacist-led interventions have been associated with improved adherence, but long-term evaluations in hospital settings remain limited. Comprehensive medication management (CMM) provides a structured framework to deliver pharmaceutical care, ensuring medicines are appropriate, effective, safe, and used as intended.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the performance of a hospital pharmacy-led CMM program from 2020 to 2025, with emphasis on adherence support, pharmacovigilance, and patient engagement.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>This observational descriptive study analysed the hospital pharmacy CMM database (January 2020&ndash;June 2025). Variables included diagnoses, pharmacotherapy, type of service delivered, and care plan status (completed, suspended, presumed active). Outcomes assessed were enrolment trends, diagnosis distribution, services provided, pharmacotherapy coverage, and patient retention.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 1,344 patients were enrolled between 2020 and 2025, with steady growth: 2020 (6%), 2021 (13%), 2022 (18%), 2023 (17%), 2024 (30%), and 2025 to date (16%). The most frequent diagnoses were osteoporosis (18%), prostate cancer (6%), chronic kidney disease (6%), and rheumatoid arthritis (5%), with other autoimmune diseases accounting for ~7%. About one-third of records lacked a coded diagnosis, reflecting a documentation limitation. The majority of interventions were recorded as control of dispensing (56%), which included pharmacist verification and counselling, complemented by structured follow-up (2%) and SPD support (1%). Care plan outcomes showed 38% completed, 35% suspended, and the remainder (27%, n=356) presumed active. Among these active patients, the median follow-up was 3 months (IQR: 0.5&ndash;6 months), with some exceeding 1 year, demonstrating sustained pharmacist engagement. Pharmacotherapy included 177 unique medicines, frequently high-cost biologics such as denosumab (12%), secukinumab (8%), and epoetin beta (6%).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The hospital pharmacy-led CMM program demonstrated sustained growth, broad therapeutic coverage, and contributions to adherence support and pharmacovigilance. While missing diagnoses and the predominance of dispensing records highlight opportunities to expand structured follow-up, the active cohort analysis confirms meaningful patient retention over time. This model strengthens patient safety and quality of care and may be adapted across healthcare systems to optimise pharmacotherapy outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zavaleta, E., Monge-Bogantes, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.129</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.129</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-025 Hospital pharmacy-led comprehensive medication management: impact on adherence and safety]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A62</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A62</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A62-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-026 Interactions between herbal products and direct oral anticoagulants: agreement between drug interaction databases]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A62-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are used for the prevention of thromboembolic events. They may interact with concomitant substances, including herbal products, with variable severity. Drug interaction databases often provide inconsistent information, leading to uncertainty in clinical decision making.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To assess the level of agreement in the classification of interactions between herbal or food products and DOACs across four drug interaction databases.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A descriptive cross-sectional study was performed to identify potential interactions between herbal or food products and DOACs (apixaban, rivaroxaban, edoxaban, dabigatran) listed in four drug interaction databases (Lexicomp, Medinteract, Micromedex, Drugs.com). Interaction severity was standardised into four categories: Severe, moderate, minor and undetermined.</p><p><tbl id="T1" loc="float"><no>Abstract 4CPS-026 Table 1</no><link locator="4CPS-026_T1"></tbl></p><p>Statistical analyses were performed with STATA BE/17.0. Overall agreement among the four databases was assessed using Gwet&rsquo;s AC with quadratic weights, while Fleiss&rsquo; Kappa with quadratic weights was applied for sensitivity analysis. Agreement levels were interpreted according to Altman&rsquo;s thresholds: &le;0.20 poor, 0.21&ndash;0.40 fair, 0.41&ndash;0.60 moderate, 0.61&ndash;0.80 good, &ge;0.81 excellent.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 1992 potential interactions between DOACs and molecules were identified, of which 149 (7.5%) involved herbal or food products: apixaban 42 (28.2%), dabigatran 42 (28.2%), edoxaban 23 (15.4%), rivaroxaban 42 (28.2%).</p><p>Overall agreement between the four databases was moderate with Gwet&rsquo;s AC (range 0.55&ndash;0.57) but poor with Fleiss&rsquo; Kappa (range 0.05&ndash;0.10).</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Apixaban: Gwet&rsquo;s AC: 0.57. Fleiss&rsquo; Kappa: 0.10.</p></li><li><p>Dabigatran: Gwet&rsquo;s AC: 0.55. Fleiss&rsquo; Kappa: 0.05.</p></li><li><p>Edoxaban: Gwet&rsquo;s AC: 0.56. Fleiss&rsquo; Kappa: 0.08.</p></li><li><p>Rivaroxaban: Gwet&rsquo;s AC: 0.56. Fleiss&rsquo; Kappa: 0.10.</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Drug interaction databases showed inconsistent classification of DOAC&ndash;herbal product interactions, with overall agreement ranging from poor to moderate depending on the statistical method applied. These discrepancies highlight the absence of harmonised criteria and limit the reliability of database alerts. Pharmacists should critically appraise interaction information before making clinical recommendations. Standardisation of classification systems and further research on DOAC&ndash;herbal interactions are needed to strengthen clinical decision support.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Morona Minguez, I., Garcia Martinez, D., Pousada Fonseca, A., Gonzalez Fuentes, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.130</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.130</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-026 Interactions between herbal products and direct oral anticoagulants: agreement between drug interaction databases]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A62</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A63</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A63?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-027 Real-world persistence of risankizumab treatment in its approved indications]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A63?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Risankizumab is an anti-interleukin-23 monoclonal antibody used in psoriasis (PsO), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), Crohn&rsquo;s disease (CD), and ulcerative colitis (UC).</p><p>To evaluate treatment in a real-world setting, drug persistence (time that patients remain on the prescribed drug) is a commonly used measure. Greater drug persistence translates into a lower risk of flares, and better long-term disease control.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>Calculate risankizumab treatment persistence in its different indications: PsO, PsA, CD and UC.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Observational, retrospective and descriptive study including patients with PsO, PsA, CD and UC treated with risankizumab in a tertiary care hospital from March 2021 to July 2025.</p><p>The variables collected were: sex, age, diagnosis, previous treatments, start and end date of risankizumab and reason for discontinuation (primary, secondary failure, adverse reaction, loss to follow-up).</p><p>Drug persistence was assessed at 6, 12, and 24 months, both overall and by indication and line of treatment (early vs later lines (&gt;3 lines)). Excel was used for data analysis.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 113 patients were studied, the median age was 50 (16-84) years, 53.1% of whom were women. Risankizumab prescriptions were for: PsO (58.4%), CD (30.1%), PsA (10.6%), and UC (0.9%). 44.2% of patients were in the fourth-line or beyond.</p><p>During the study 17.6% (n=20) discontinued treatment, with a median duration of 15 (2-28) months. Causes of discontinuation were: loss to follow-up (45%), secondary failure (35%), and primary failure (20%). No patients discontinued treatment due to intolerance.</p><p>Results of drug persistence according to indication and line of treatment are shown in the following table (data UC are not shown because there is only one patient in the study and remains on treatment):</p><p><tbl id="T1" loc="float"><tblbdy top-stubs="2"><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Indication</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Treatment lines</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Drug Persistence</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c></r><r><c cspan="5" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">6 months </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> 12 months </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">24 months </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">PsO </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Earlier-lines </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">90% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> 75% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">40% </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Later lines </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">96% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> 92% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">58% </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">PsA </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Earlier-lines </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">80% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> 60% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0% </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Later lines </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">71% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> 43% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">29% </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">CD </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Earlier-lines </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">77% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> 56% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0% </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Later lines </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">77% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> 47% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0% </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">All indications </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Earlier-lines </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">84% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> 65% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">25% </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Later lines </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">84% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> 70% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">32% </c></r></tblbdy></tbl></p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The greatest treatment persistence was observed in patients with psoriasis, whereas results regarding initiation in early or late treatment lines were contradictory. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zambrano Croche, M., Velazquez Vazquez, H., Torres Zaragoza, L., Ruiz, A. N., Martinez Ortega, L., Suarez Morillas, M., Carmona Carmona, D., Gragera Gomez, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.131</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.131</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-027 Real-world persistence of risankizumab treatment in its approved indications]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A63</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A64</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A64-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-028 Real-world data on the use of cladribine in a tertiary care hospital]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A64-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Cladribine is an immunosuppressive drug used in relapsing&ndash;remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), with an intermittent dosing regimen that allows long-term disease control.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>Evaluate the use of cladribine in a tertiary care hospital.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective analysis was conducted with patients who completed treatment with cladribine between January 2020-August 2025. Baseline patient characteristics, the number of cladribine cycles received, and the need for subsequent disease-modifying treatment (DMT) were recorded.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 103 patients with the described characteristics were included. Baseline characteristics were: 70.87% female, median age 39 years (interquartile range (IQR): 32&ndash;46), and median time from diagnosis to initiation of cladribine of 4.75 years (IQR: 2&ndash;11.75). Information on baseline Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores was available for 47 patients (median 2, IQR: 1&ndash;2.63). Previous DMTs were also recorded (14.56% of patients were nai&#x0308;ve, 56.31% had received one prior DMT). Of the 103 patients, 27.18% required subsequent DMT. Among them, six patients had received only one cycle, most of these cases due to disease progression. 79 patients received two cycles of cladribine; of these, 13 did not require further DMT from the fourth year after treatment initiation, maintaining persistence of the therapeutic effect, while 22 patients did receive subsequent DMT, most commonly (nine patients) due to disease progression. Regarding the time from the start of cladribine treatment to subsequent DMT, eight patients received it at 3 years, nine at 2 years, and five at 1 year. Additionally, 18 patients received three cycles of cladribine, most of them (10 patients) in the fifth year after treatment initiation (mean 4.49 years, standard deviation 0.66). The main reason for the administration of the third cycle was disease progression.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Many patients treated with cladribine maintained long-lasting therapeutic effects, with some continuing without the need for further DMT from the fourth year after treatment initiation. However, a significant proportion of patients required a third cycle or subsequent DMT due to disease progression. These results suggest that cladribine is an effective option for the treatment of RRMS, although continuous monitoring and individualised treatment adjustment are necessary to evaluate and optimise long-term outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Plaza-Arbeo, A., Morales Rivero, B., Barbero-Hernandez, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.132</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.132</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-028 Real-world data on the use of cladribine in a tertiary care hospital]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A64</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A64</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A64-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-029 Long-term use of cladribine in multiple sclerosis]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A64-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Cladribine is an immunosuppressive drug used in relapsing&ndash;remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), with an intermittent dosing regimen that allows prolonged disease control. The maintenance of its long-term effect still requires further studies, as some patients need a third cycle.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>Provide real-world data on the long-term use of cladribine.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective analysis was carried out at a tertiary hospital, including patients treated with cladribine between January 2020-August 2025. Patients who received a third cycle of cladribine or who remained without disease-modifying therapy (DMT) from the fourth year after starting treatment were included.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 31 patients met the inclusion criteria, of whom 18 (58.06%) had received a third cycle. Baseline Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) was available for 14 patients, with a median of 2.5 (interquartile range-IQR-: 1&ndash;3.38). The median age at treatment initiation was 41 years (IQR: 35.5&ndash;50), and 74.19% of the patients were women. The median time from diagnosis to starting cladribine was 9 years (IQR: 3&ndash;14). Of the total patients, three were nai&#x0308;ve, and most of the rest (13 patients) had received one prior DMT. Regarding relapses, only two patients experienced a relapse in the first year of treatment, with complete resolution, which allowed continuation with the second cycle; in the second year, one patient presented a relapse. Currently, 13 patients remain without DMT, five of whom have reached 5 years and eight have reached 4 years since starting cladribine treatment. Of the 18 patients who received a third cycle, most did so in the fifth year (10 patients), while the rest did so in the fourth (six patients) and third year (two patients), with a mean of 4.39 years (standard deviation: 0.70). The most common reason for prescribing the third cycle was clinical progression (seven patients).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Most patients had received at least one prior DMT. More than half of the patients required a third cycle after a maintenance period of effect, most frequently in the fifth year from treatment initiation. However, larger studies are needed to better evaluate the effect and long-term use of cladribine.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Plaza-Arbeo, A., Morales Rivero, B., Barbero-Hernandez, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.133</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.133</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-029 Long-term use of cladribine in multiple sclerosis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A64</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A64</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A65-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-030 Real-world longitudinal outcomes of preventive treatments targeting the CGRP pathway in migraine: hit-6 and midas responder analysis according to the minimal clinically important difference (MCID)]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A65-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are essential to evaluate the real-world impact of preventive therapies in migraine. Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) thresholds allow the identification of meaningful improvements, yet their longitudinal evolution in clinical practice remains underexplored.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To assess the proportion of patients achieving clinically meaningful improvements in HIT-6 (&ge;3 points) and MIDAS (&ge;4.5 points) over 24 months in a real-world migraine cohort, and to characterise patient demographics and treatment exposure.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Prospective observational stud in patients with preventive treatments targeting the CGRP pathway were included . PROMs were collected remotely via a telepharmacy platform at baseline and follow-up (1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months). . Responder analysis was conducted in patients with paired baseline&ndash;follow-up data. Responders were defined as &ge;3-point reduction in HIT-6 or &ge;4.5-point reduction in MIDAS. Proportions of responders were calculated at each timepoint; Chi-squared tests assessed differences across visits.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A cohort of 244 patients with migraine from 10 centres was followed Mean age was 45.2 years (SD 12.3; range 18.0&ndash;75.0; IQR 37.0&ndash;54.0); 82.1% were women. 55% of ePROMs were completed.</p><p>Patients received the following CGRP pathway-targeted preventive treatments: 32.4% galcanezumab, 28.1% erenumab, 24.3% fremanezumab, 8.2% atogepant, 2.5% eptinezumab, 4.5% others.</p><p>The overall response rate to ePROMs was 54.8%.</p><p>HIT-6 responders: 1m 54.8% , 3m 63.6%, 6m 70.7% , 12m 66.7% , 24m 70.4%.</p><p>MIDAS responders: 1m 62.1% , 3m 66.0% (68/103), 6m 71.0% , 12m 68.3% , 24m 68.0%.</p><p>Responder rates remained stable over time, with no statistically significant differences across visits (HIT-6: <sup>2</sup>=6.36, p=0.174; MIDAS: <sup>2</sup>=6.54, p=0.162).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>In this real-world migraine cohort of patients, preventive therapies targeting the CGRP pathway led to sustained clinical improvements, with ~55&ndash;70% of patients achieving MCID in HIT-6 and MIDAS at all follow-up points up to 24 months. These findings support the effectiveness and durability of anti-CGRP therapies in routine clinical practice and underline the value of PROM-based longitudinal monitoring through telepharmacy platforms.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mercadal-Orfila, G., Corte-Garcia, J., Salvador Pareja, S., Maria Antonio, M., Lopez, P., Carmen, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.134</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.134</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-030 Real-world longitudinal outcomes of preventive treatments targeting the CGRP pathway in migraine: hit-6 and midas responder analysis according to the minimal clinically important difference (MCID)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A65</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A65</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A65-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-031 Real-world outcomes of the combination of trifluridine/tipiracil and bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A65-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Colorectal cancer is the third most diagnosed cancer and the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality. While first- and second-line therapeutic regimens are well established, optimal approach after progression remains uncertain.</p><p>Therapy with trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS) and bevacizumab (TAS+BEV) has been evaluated in phase III SUNLIGHT trial, demonstrating improved overall survival (OS) compared with TAS monotherapy in adults with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) previously treated with two lines of therapy.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TAS+BEV in adults with mCRC in routine clinical practice.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>This retrospective, observational, and multicentre study included patients with mCRC treated with TAS+BEV in four hospitals between January 2023 and July 2025.</p><p>Patient data (age, sex, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, KRAS mutation status, prior treatments) were sourced from electronic medical records.</p><p>Efficacy was assessed in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) and OS, using the Kaplan&ndash;Meier method.</p><p>Safety was evaluated through the collection of adverse events (AEs) according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0, documentation of dose reductions, treatment interruptions, and discontinuations due to toxicity.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Fifty patients were included (74% male; median age 68 years (43-86)). All had ECOG 0-1 at baseline and median prior treatment lines was 2 (2-5). KRAS mutations were present in 60%.</p><p>At cut-off date, 24% remained on treatment. Median PFS was 3.9 months (0.27&ndash;27.17), median OS 12.4 months (0.27&ndash;23.6), and 6-month OS was 68.7%.</p><p>Grade &ge;3 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 30% of patients, including neutropenia, anaemia, thrombocytopenia, and asthenia. Two patients developed febrile neutropenia.</p><p>Most frequent AEs of any grade were neutropenia (36%), asthenia (30%), thrombocytopenia (20%) and diarrhoea (16%).</p><p>TAS dose reductions to 30 mg/m<sup>2</sup> were required in 30%, with two requiring a further reduction to 25 mg/m<sup>2</sup> and 30% experienced treatment delays or discontinuations due to AEs.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The findings are clinically relevant but must be interpreted with caution. The median OS (12.4 months) exceeds the results of the pivotal trial (10.8 months), while median PFS (3.9 months) is slightly lower than in SUNLIGHT (5.6 months).</p><p>Safety outcomes were consistent with previous evidence.</p><p>Our findings support and extend existing evidence, although larger studies with longer follow-up are warranted.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ortega, P., Blanco, E., Mielgo, G., Barreras, N., Forte, M., Castillo, E., Becares, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.135</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.135</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-031 Real-world outcomes of the combination of trifluridine/tipiracil and bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A65</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A65</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A66-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-032 Effectiveness and safety of off-label verteporfin photodynamic therapy in chronic central serous chorioretinopathy]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A66-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (cCSC) is a retinal disorder that can lead to persistent subretinal fluid, retinal pigment epithelium alterations, and progressive visual impairment. Off-label photodynamic therapy (PDT) with verteporfin has emerged as a potential treatment for refractory cases, but evidence on its real-world effectiveness remains limited.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of off-label verteporfin PDT in patients with cCSC treated in a tertiary university hospital.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective observational study was conducted among patients with cCSC who received verteporfin PDT (3 mg/m<sup>2</sup>) between January 2021 and March 2024. Demographic variables (age, sex) and clinical parameters (best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), neurosensory retinal detachment (NRD), pigment epithelium detachment (PED), and subretinal fluid (SRF)) were collected. Clinical outcomes were assessed using optical coherence tomography (OCT), fundus examination, and BCVA (decimal scale) at baseline and 2 months post-PDT. Safety was evaluated by the occurrence of adverse reactions (ARs).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 50 eyes from 41 patients (71% men, average age 58 &plusmn; 11.6 years) were analysed. Median BCVA improved from 0.5 (IQR 0.2&ndash;0.7) at baseline to 0.65 (IQR 0.3&ndash;0.9) at follow-up (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, p &lt;0,001), indicating a significant improvement in visual acuity. After verteporfin PDT, BCVA improved in 56.0% (n = 28; 95% CI: 42.3%&ndash;68.8%) of eyes, while 44.0% (n = 22; 95% CI: 31.2%&ndash;57.7%) remained without clinical change. Of the 27 eyes with baseline NRD, 70.4% (n = 19; 95% CI: 51.3%&ndash;84.2%) showed improvement, and 29.6% (n =8; 95% CI: 15.8%&ndash;48.7%) remained unchanged. Of the 13 eyes with PED, 69.2% (n = 9; 95% CI: 42.0%&ndash;87.4%) showed improvement. Of the 21 eyes with SRF, 71.4% (n = 15; 95% CI: 49.7%&ndash;86.3%) achieved fluid reduction following verteporfin PDT. ARs occurred in three patients (6%), with secondary choroidal neovascularisation.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Off-label verteporfin PDT demonstrated statistically significant effectiveness in patients with cCSC, leading to significant improvements in BCVA and anatomical outcomes. A majority of eyes with neurosensory retinal detachment, pigment epithelium detachment, or subretinal fluid showed clinical improvement, with few reported ARs and good tolerability. These results support verteporfin PDT as a valuable therapeutic option to stabilise and improve vision in patients with cCSC.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Julian Martin, R., Serrano Vicente, M., Vicente Iturbe, C., Bello Calvo, R., Abad Sazatornil, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.136</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.136</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-032 Effectiveness and safety of off-label verteporfin photodynamic therapy in chronic central serous chorioretinopathy]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A66</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A66</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A66-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-033 Evaluation of the rational use of inhaled aminoglycosides for ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP): retrospective observational study]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A66-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a frequent and severe complication in critically ill patients, often associated with multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens. Intravenous (IV) antibiotics are limited by poor penetration into the epithelial lining fluid, whereas inhaled aminoglycosides may enhance local antibiotic exposure. However, evidence regarding the clinical effectiveness, rational use, and impact on outcomes of inhaled aminoglycosides in routine hospital practice remains limited.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This study aimed to evaluate the rational use of inhaled aminoglycosides in hospitalised patients with respiratory infections, and to examine the association between pharmacist assessment of prescribing appropriateness and clinical outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>We performed a retrospective review of adult inpatients receiving inhaled aminoglycosides between 2017 and 2023. Demographics, infection details, concomitant IV antibiotics, culture results, resistance profiles, and treatment duration were collected. Pharmacists assessed prescribing rationality based on evidence-based criteria. The primary outcome was bacterial eradication within 28 days. Logistic regression identified predictors of success.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>74 patients received inhaled aminoglycosides, of whom 53 met inclusion criteria. The mean age was 75 years, and amikacin was prescribed in 98% of cases. The average duration of inhaled therapy was 10.5 days, with 66% receiving concomitant intravenous antibiotics and 28% requiring mechanical ventilation. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was isolated in 54.7% of patients, and MDR organisms in 81.1%. At 28 days, bacterial eradication was significantly higher when prescriptions were assessed as rational by pharmacists (92.6% vs 7.4%, p = 0.024). Logistic regression confirmed rational prescribing as an independent predictor of eradication success (AOR 9.36, 95% CI: 1.67&ndash;52.46), while mechanical ventilation was negatively associated (AOR 0.17, 95% CI: 0.04&ndash;0.70). Eradication also showed a significant association with favourable clinical outcomes (78.6% vs 21.4%, p = 0.001).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Inhaled aminoglycosides should be reserved as adjunctive therapy rather than monotherapy, particularly for MDR infections. This study demonstrates that pharmacist assessment of rational prescribing is significantly associated with microbiological and clinical success. Bacterial eradication at 28 days may serve as a practical, reliable endpoint for evaluating antibiotic effectiveness in hospital practice, and supports the integration of structured pharmacist evaluation into antimicrobial stewardship programmes.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wang, P., Suhan, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.137</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.137</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-033 Evaluation of the rational use of inhaled aminoglycosides for ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP): retrospective observational study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A66</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A66</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A67-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-034 Optimising resources with faricimab: real-world utilisation and savings from vial sharing]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A67-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Faricimab (Vabysmo) is increasingly used for retinal diseases in routine clinical practice. Hospital pharmacy departments need real-world evidence on utilisation patterns, persistence, and economic impact to optimise care and resources. This work summarises our centre&rsquo;s experience.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the use of faricimab and its economic impact from the hospital pharmacy perspective.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Observational, descriptive, retrospective study. We included all patients who initiated faricimab between January 2024 and June 2024, and followed them through March 2025. Variables: age, sex, diagnosis, dosing schedule, treatment-nai&#x0308;ve vs pretreated status, and (for pretreated) last prior therapy. We assessed treatment persistence and cost savings from vial sharing under a laminar-flow hood in the Pharmacy. Data were extracted from the SAVAC e-prescribing system and the SELENE electronic health record and analysed in Access.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>We included 116 patients; 53.45% were women, mean age 72.99 &plusmn; 11.22 years. The most frequent diagnosis was age-related macular degeneration (AMD) (68.97%), followed by diabetic macular oedema (DME) (30.17%) and retinal vein occlusion (RVO) (0.86%). Most patients were prescribed monthly dosing (44.83%), then every 2 months (42.24%) and every 3 months (12.93%). Overall, 79.31% (n=92) were pretreated; prior therapies were aflibercept in 71.74% and ranibizumab in 28.26%. At analysis, 72% of patients remained on treatment. Probability of continuing treatment was 78% at 6 months and 70% at 12 months. By diagnosis, persistence differed significantly (p=0.028): for DME, 65% and 60% at 6 and 12 months; for AMD, 82% and 78% at 6 and 12 months. No significant differences were observed between nai&#x0308;ve and pretreated subgroups. Vial sharing during 2024 and Q1-2025 yielded 221,535 in savings (consumables included).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>In our cohort, AMD was the predominant indication, with monthly and bimonthly schedules used most often&mdash;contrasting with pivotal trials where 4-monthly dosing predominated. Most patients had been previously treated, mainly with aflibercept. Persistence at 6 and 12 months was similar overall, with higher persistence in AMD than DME, and more than 70% of patients were still on treatment at data cut-off. Vial sharing in the pharmacy generated substantial cost savings for the health system.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Herreros Fernandez, A., Anez Castano, R., Guzman Laiz, R., Garcia Masegosa, I., Merono Saura, M., Selvi Sabater, P., Caballero Requejo, C., Rentero Redondo, L., Urbieta Sanz, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.138</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.138</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-034 Optimising resources with faricimab: real-world utilisation and savings from vial sharing]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A67</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A67</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A67-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-035 Development of a simple digital system for patient counselling and side effect monitoring in chemotherapy patients]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A67-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Pharmacists are essential in providing care, counselling, and adverse drug reaction (ADR) monitoring for chemotherapy patients. Beyond dispensing, pharmacists help patients understand treatment regimens, manage toxicities, and adhere to therapy. As key members of the multidisciplinary team, pharmacists ensure timely identification and management of ADRs. However, increasing patient volumes and the lack of structured documentation can compromise follow-up and care quality. A practical, user-friendly digital system is needed to strengthen the pharmacist&rsquo;s role in delivering safe and consistent oncology services.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This study aimed to design, implement, and evaluate a no-code digital system supporting pharmacists in patient counselling and side effect monitoring among adults receiving chemotherapy.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>The system was developed using AppSheet (no-code platform) and implemented in a hospital chemotherapy unit from July to December 2024. Pharmacists contributed throughout the development process, defining clinical workflows, structuring the knowledge assessment, and determining ADR documentation standards. The system included modules for patient education, a 15-item quiz to assess knowledge, and ADR reporting with severity grading (1&ndash;4). Pharmacists provided three structured counselling sessions per patient, reinforcing knowledge and capturing ADRs across treatment cycles. Patients with grade 2 ADRs were monitored closely by ward pharmacists, while grade 3 cases prompted collaborative management with physicians. The digital platform reduced repetitive paperwork, enabled systematic follow-up, and allowed pharmacists to devote more time to direct patient care.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 196 patients were enrolled. Knowledge scores improved significantly from 45.6% before counselling to 72.0% after the second session and 91.8% after the third (p &lt; 0.01). Over 80% of patients receiving three sessions achieved scores above 80%. Fatigue (92.9%), anorexia (76.0%), and nausea (60.2%) were the most common ADRs, while hand-foot syndrome (22.2%) was the most frequent severe ADR. Pharmacists&rsquo; structured interventions ensured that all patients with grade &ge;2 ADRs received timely follow-up. Pharmacists reported enhanced efficiency, better communication with physicians, and improved continuity of care.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The digital system reinforced the central role of pharmacists in oncology care. It improved patient knowledge, standardised ADR monitoring, and optimised pharmacy workflows. Wider adoption could advance safe, coordinated, and pharmacist-led supportive care for chemotherapy patients.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Suwannapong, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.139</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.139</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-035 Development of a simple digital system for patient counselling and side effect monitoring in chemotherapy patients]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A67</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A67</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A68-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-036 Evolution of quality of life, disease control, activity, work functioning and treatment satisfaction in chronic urticaria patients treated with biologics]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A68-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Chronic urticaria markedly impairs quality of life through pruritus, angioedema, sleep disturbances and activity limitations. Biologic therapies such as omalizumab and dupilumab are established options for antihistamine-refractory chronic urticaria, but real-world longitudinal data combining patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are scarce. Understanding PROM trajectories in clinical practice is crucial for optimising patient management.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate longitudinal changes in quality of life, disease control, activity, work role functioning and treatment satisfaction using CU-Q2oL, Urticaria Control Test (UCT), Urticaria Activity Score 7 (UAS7), PROMIS-29, Work Role Functioning Questionnaire (WRFQ) and TSQM in patients with chronic urticaria treated with biologics.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Observational prospective multicentre study including 37 patients with chronic urticaria. Mean age was 46 years; 67% were women. Most patients received omalizumab (92.3%), PROMs were collected at baseline, 1 month, 6 months and 12 months. Paired and mixed-effects analyses were applied where feasible.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>At baseline, CU-Q2oL scores indicated substantial burden (pruritus 41.7, daily activities 19.4, sleep 33.2, global impact 24.4). At 1 year, improvements were observed (15.9, 8.7, 25.9 and 17.2, respectively). UCT increased from 8.8 to 12.1, with significant gains from month 1 (p&lt;0.01). UAS7 decreased from 15.6 to 7.3, showing clinically relevant reduction.</p><p>PROMIS-29 showed a significant reduction in fatigue (54.5 -&gt; 48.6, p=0.001), with favourable trends in anxiety (58.8 -&gt; 53.7), depression (52.4 -&gt; 49.0) and physical function (51.0 -&gt; 57.0). Pain interference increased slightly (51.6 -&gt; 55.6).</p><p>WRFQ global score improved from 88.8 at baseline to 98.9 at 12 months, with all domains (work scheduling, output, physical, mental, social demands) approaching maximal functioning, although without statistical significance due to small, paired samples and ceiling effect.</p><p>TSQM at 12 months reflected high treatment satisfaction: convenience 66.7, effectiveness 72.2, side effects 100, global satisfaction 78.6, total 79.4.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>In this real-world multicentre cohort, biologic therapy for chronic urticaria was associated with sustained improvements across multiple PROMs. CU-Q2oL, UAS7 and PROMIS-29 confirmed clinically meaningful benefits, with fatigue showing statistically significant improvement. WRFQ demonstrated near-complete work role functioning and TSQM highlighted high treatment satisfaction. These findings support the effectiveness of biologics in routine care and underscore the importance of PROMs for patient-centred monitoring and therapeutic decisions.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mercadal-Orfila, G., Maestre Fullana, M., Bello Crespo, M., Fernandez Cortes, F., Salvador Pareja, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.140</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.140</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-036 Evolution of quality of life, disease control, activity, work functioning and treatment satisfaction in chronic urticaria patients treated with biologics]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A68</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A68</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A68-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-037 Selection of patients for pharmaceutical medication management: development and implementation of a digital point-based tool in electronic patient journal system]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A68-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Pharmaceutical resources are limited and it is not possible that every patient is seen by a pharmacist for a medication review. Therefore, patients are normally screened by different parameters such as age, reason for inquiry, hospitalisation-time or by physicians&rsquo; request. This leaves a potential group of patients who do not fit these parameters but who could benefit from a pharmaceutical medication review. Because of the limited resources, it is important that pharmacists spend the time on the most relevant patients.</p><p>After the medication review, the pharmacist can make a written or oral intervention for the physician describing medication related problems and possible solutions.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This study aimed to develop an electronic point-based tool for pharmacists to use when selecting relevant patients for medication review. Furthermore, the tool was implemented, and the number of pharmaceutical interventions were evaluated.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>First, pharmacists decided parameters for graduating the patients: kidney function, number of medical treatments, risk-situation-drugs (opioids, blood thinners and antidiabetics), triple-whammy-interaction and anticholinergic burden. These five parameters were based on previous conclusions from medication reviews. Each parameter was given a score and built into an electronic patient journal system (EPJ) for automatic screening. Second, the digital point-based tool was presented and implemented in an emergency department. The pharmacists developed a new workflow prioritising patients with the highest score. Implementation and efficacy were evaluated by the number of pharmaceutical interventions before and after presenting the digital point-based tool.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>In 2024 the group of pharmacists in the emergency department made 3635 medication reviews. Of these the pharmacists found reason for a pharmaceutical intervention in 2046 (56%) cases. After implementation of the digital point-based tool (13 May &ndash;19 September 2025) the pharmacists made 726 medication reviews. Of these the pharmacist found reason for a pharmaceutical intervention in 552 (76%) cases, corresponding to a 20% increase.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Incorporation of the digital point-based tool in EPJ makes it easy to see every patient&rsquo;s point-score and thereby makes patient-prioritisation user-friendly. The increase in rate of interventions (56% to 76%), indicates that the pharmacists are spending more time on pharmacist-relevant patients.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bagger Hansen, K., Hoffmann Hansen, L., Flagstad, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.141</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.141</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-037 Selection of patients for pharmaceutical medication management: development and implementation of a digital point-based tool in electronic patient journal system]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A68</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A68</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A69-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-038 Effectiveness of secukinumab in hidradenitis suppurativa: real-world data]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A69-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, painful, inflammatory skin disease with major impact on quality of life. IL-17 plays a key role in HS pathophysiology, making IL-17 inhibitors, such as secukinumab, a therapeutic option.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To assess the effectiveness of subcutaneous secukinumab 300 mg in HS.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Single-centre, retrospective observational study conducted in a secondary-level hospital (January 2021&ndash;February 2025). Adult patients with HS treated with secukinumab 300 mg as maintenance therapy for &ge;3 months were included.</p><p>Variables: sex, age, body mass index (BMI), smoking status, Hurley stage (clinical severity: I mild, II moderate, III severe), prior biologics, treatment duration, dosing regimen, International HS Severity Score System (IHS4, severity index: &lt;4 mild, 4&ndash;11 moderate, &gt;11 severe), and patient-reported outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>20 patients were included (12 men, 8 women), mean age 41&plusmn;16 years, BMI 31 kg/m2. Smoking status: 45% (9/20) active, 20% (4/20) former, 35% (7/20) non-smokers. All had moderate-to-severe disease (Hurley II&ndash;III) and previous adalimumab exposure.</p><p>Overall, 40% (8/20) discontinued secukinumab due to lack of efficacy after a median of 10 months (range 4&ndash;35). The remaining 60% (12/20) continued treatment: 10 required dose intensification, ie, shortened interval (seven every 2 weeks, three every 3 weeks) and two maintained monthly dosing. Among patients persisting on treatment, 66% (8/12) reported subjective improvement, predominantly under intensified regimens (6/8), with reduced inflammation, drainage, and mean IHS4 reduction of 2.3 points. 33% (4/12) reported no benefit after a median of 11 months (range 6&ndash;33). Median time to dose intensification was 8.6 months (range 0&ndash;31.5; N=14).</p><p>IHS4 evolution (subgroup with available data): baseline 9.3 (range 1&ndash;20; N=10), first follow-up 14 (range 1&ndash;40; N=10) after 7.9 months, and second follow-up 17 (range 1&ndash;40; N=3) after 13.6 months. Median follow-up was 11 months (range 4&ndash;49). Eight patients (40%) required surgery during treatment.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Secukinumab may represent a therapeutic alternative for HS after adalimumab failure. A subgroup of patients, mainly under intensified dosing, experienced clinical improvement and IHS4 reduction. However, high discontinuation rates and worsening severity scores were observed. Standardised and systematic assessment of objective measures, such as IHS4, in routine practice is essential to accurately evaluate effectiveness and optimise treatment decisions.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lasala Aza, C., Laguna Alcantara, A., Garcia Ruiz, M., Sanchez Yanez, E., Moya Carmona, I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.142</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.142</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-038 Effectiveness of secukinumab in hidradenitis suppurativa: real-world data]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A69</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A69</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A69-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-039 Effectiveness of gepants in naive patients versus patients previously treated with anti- CGRP monoclonal antibodies]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A69-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>The commercialisation of gepants for the treatment of chronic migraine (CM) and high-frequency episodic migraine (HFEM) has allowed the therapeutic arsenal for this pathology to be increased. However, doubts arise as to whether their effectiveness will be the same in naive patients compared to patients previously treated with anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To compare the effectiveness and safety of gepants (atogepant and rimegepant) in patients diagnosed with CM and HFEM naive versus those previously treated with anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Retrospective observational study on patients treated with gepants, comparing naive patients to those pre-treated with anti-CGRP antibodies. The main effectiveness variables included changes in the mean monthly migraine days (MMD) and the percentages of patients achieving &ge;50% or 30-49% reduction in MMD after at least 12 weeks of treatment. Safety variables were treatment discontinuation rates and the main adverse events reported in patients who received at least one dose of gepant. Clinical and treatment data were collected from electronic health records (Selene ) and the external prescription module (Farmatools). Statistical analysis involved descriptive measures and t-tests to evaluate differences in RStudio (v. 2023.09.1).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Between March 2024 and June 2025, 192 patients were selected. The 92.7% were women (178/192) and the mean age was 47 years (SD=12.6). Effectiveness was evaluated in 181 patients: 72.4% (131/181) naive and 27.6% (50/181) pre-treated, with 13 and 17 baseline MMD, respectively. After 12 weeks, MMD decreased to 7 for naive and 8 for pre-treated patients, with a non-statistically significant difference of 1 day (p=0.42). In the naive-group MMD&ge;50% was 58.8% (77/131) and MMD30-49% was 14.5% (19/131). Pre-treated-group MMD&ge;50% was 64% (32/50) and MMD30-49% was 10% (5/50). Safety analysis included 192 patients. The 3.7% (5/135) naive and 15.8% (9/57) pre-treated patients discontinued the treatment. The reasons were: lack of response (60% (3/5) naive; 88.9% (8/9) pre-treated), adverse effects (40% (2/5) naive; 66.7% ( 6/9) pre-treated) and both reasons (55.6% (5/9) pre-treated). The most common side effects were constipation, nausea, and weight loss.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Gepants used in the treatment of migraine appear to reduce migraine days similarly in naive and pre-treated patients. Regarding safety, both groups demonstrate an adequate safety profile, despite a higher rate of treatment discontinuation observed in pretreated patients.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Redondo-Arranz, R., Puivecino-Moreno, C., Caselles-Gil, J., Herrero-Munoz, N., Gil Moreno, C., Garcia-Rebolledo, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.143</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.143</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-039 Effectiveness of gepants in naive patients versus patients previously treated with anti- CGRP monoclonal antibodies]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A69</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A69</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A70-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-040 Multi-factor model for renal risk prediction in patients initiating dolutegravir: development, validation and application prototype]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A70-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Dolutegravir is a core component of modern HIV therapy, but long-term renal safety remains a clinical concern. Conventional monitoring based solely on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) may not reliably identify patients at high risk of clinically significant decline. Early risk stratification is critical for optimising surveillance and preventing irreversible kidney injury. A validated, multi-factor prediction tool integrated into a clinical application may enhance decision support in routine care.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The aim was to develop and validate a multi-factor model for predicting renal function decline in patients initiating dolutegravir, and to design a prototype application for real-time patient risk classification.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective cohort of adults initiating dolutegravir-based therapy between 2021 and 2023 was analysed. Patients were randomly divided into a training dataset (n=880) and a validation dataset (n=220). Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of a &ge;25% decline in eGFR, calculated by the CKD-EPI equation. Model performance was compared with a model based on baseline eGFR alone using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). A prototype application was developed to embed the validated model for clinical use.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>In total, 1,100 patients were included; 17.8% experienced a &ge;25% reduction in eGFR. Five independent predictors were identified: age &gt;40 years, body mass index &gt;23 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, CD4 count &lt;400 cells/&micro;L, baseline eGFR &lt;90 mL/min/1.73m<sup>2</sup>, and alanine aminotransferase &gt;40 U/L. The five-factor model demonstrated superior predictive performance compared with baseline eGFR alone (AUC 0.780; 95% CI 0.716&ndash;0.844 vs AUC 0.651; 95% CI 0.571&ndash;0.730). The application prototype enabled rapid patient-level classification and displayed tailored monitoring recommendations.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The validated five-factor model improved renal risk prediction compared with eGFR alone. Its translation into a prototype application demonstrates a feasible approach to support hospital pharmacists and clinicians in proactive surveillance of patients receiving dolutegravir. Prospective validation and workflow integration will be required to confirm clinical impact and promote adoption in practice.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>The authors thank the leadership team, Department of Pharmacy, HIV/AIDS clinic, and medical staff of Pakchongnana Hospital for their support, as well as the Faculty of Pharmacy, Thammasat University.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Suriya, S., Wanitchakorn, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.144</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.144</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-040 Multi-factor model for renal risk prediction in patients initiating dolutegravir: development, validation and application prototype]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A70</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A70</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A70-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-041 Proactive prescription screening and pharmacist interventions: enhancing safety in hospitalised patients]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A70-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Drug-related problems (DRPs) are a major concern in hospitalised patients, as medication errors can occur at any stage, including prescribing. The previous inpatient pharmacy system lacked continuous follow-up, resulting in inappropriate prescribing such as incorrect antibiotic dosing, contraindicated or duplicate medications, and use without proper indications. Several incidents were reported with severity levels C and D. To address this, pharmacists implemented a proactive monitoring system using the IPD paperless program (KPHIS) to review laboratory results and medication profiles every 5 days, consulting physicians as needed to resolve identified DRPs.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of a proactive prescription screening system by pharmacists on the detection of drug-related problems (DRPs) and on the clinical impact of pharmacist interventions in hospitalised patients.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A prospective research and development study was conducted in the ICU, internal medicine and surgery and orthopaedics wards from 1 October 2024, to 30 April 2025. DRPs were categorised according to the Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe classification (PCNE) classification. The impact of pharmacist intervention (PIs) based on standard pharmacist assessments, was evaluated using the clinical, economic, and organisational (CLEO) tool.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>During the study period, 1,838 patients were screened. 135 DRPs were detected and managed, representing 7.34% of all cases. The types of DRPs were treatment effectiveness (65.19%), other (23.70%), and treatment safety (11.11%). The top three possible causes of DRPs were drug selection (46.67%), dose selection (32.59%), and patient transfer-related issues (12.59%). The severity of the problems was categorised as C and D in 68.89% and 14.07% of cases, respectively. The overall acceptance rate by physicians was 97.39%. Eighteen pharmacist interventions (PIs, 13.33%) had major clinical impact and 74 PIs (54.81%) had moderate clinical impact. A positive economic impact was observed in 57.78% of cases, leading to savings in drug costs.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The proactive prescription screening system implemented by pharmacists effectively detected and managed DRPs in hospitalised patients. Pharmacist interventions had high physician acceptance, significant clinical impact, and contributed to drug cost savings. These findings highlight the important role of pharmacists in improving patient safety and optimising therapy.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pan-In, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.145</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.145</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-041 Proactive prescription screening and pharmacist interventions: enhancing safety in hospitalised patients]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A70</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A70</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A71?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-042 From risk stratification to follow-up: prevalence and management of cardiovascular events associated with trastuzumab]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A71?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Treatment with trastuzumab may be associated in 10-20% of cases with the development of left ventricular dysfunction and progression to heart failure. Baseline cardiovascular risk (CR) stratification using the Heart Failure Association&ndash;International Cardio-Oncology Society (HFA-IC-OS) algorithm allows the identification of profiles of greater vulnerability before starting therapy.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To analyse the relationship between baseline CR stratification according to the HFA-ICOS algorithm and the occurrence of cardiovascular events in patients treated with trastuzumab, as well as to describe the measures taken.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Retrospective observational study in HER2-positive cancer patients treated with trastuzumab as the only cardiotoxic anti-HER2 agent in a tertiary hospital between January2024-June2025.</p><p>Prior to treatment, demographic, clinical, and cardiac imaging variables were recorded, as well as comorbidities, lifestyle risk factors, and history of cardiotoxicity from previous or concomitant treatments. Baseline CR was stratified into low, moderate, high, or very high.</p><p>A cardiovascular event was defined as a decrease in LVEF &ge;10 points from baseline and/or a drop below 50%. After the event, management included cycle delay, initiation of cardiological treatment, or intensification of follow-up.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The cohort included 81 patents (70 women, 11 men) whose mean age at baseline was 65 years (range: 29-89), in whom trastuzumab was used as treatment for breast cancer (82%) and gastroesophageal cancer (18%).</p><p>Baseline risk distribution, clinical factors, and comorbidities, together with the relationship with previous and current treatments and cardiological evaluation, were analysed, and specific risk subgroups were identified. The results are summarised in <cross-ref type="tbl" refid="T1">table 1</cross-ref>.</p><p>During follow-up, 21% of patients experienced cardiovascular events, with a higher prevalence in those with high or very high baseline risk (73%). After the event occurred, different measures were taken according to clinical need: one-third of patients began cardiological treatment, almost half postponed the cycle, and all were reevaluated with LVEF before the next cycle.</p><p><tbl id="T1" loc="float"><no>Abstract 4CPS-042 Table 1</no><link locator="4CPS-042_T1"></tbl></p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The fact that 40% of patients were classified as high or very high risk, together with the occurrence of a significant number of cardiovascular events, reinforces the need to link baseline stratification with clinical management. These findings demonstrate the usefulness of the HFA-ICOS algorithm in identifying risk profiles, prioritising cardiological surveillance, and guiding clinical decisions that ensure the continuity of cancer treatment.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Moreno Banegas, J., Cordoba Sotomayor, M., Lopez, A. M., Abril, M. T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.146</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.146</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-042 From risk stratification to follow-up: prevalence and management of cardiovascular events associated with trastuzumab]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A71</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A71</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A72-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-043 A digital assistant for self-reporting medication allergy history (ChaRM-A): discrepancies between medication allergy history documentation by patients supported by a digital assistant and pharmacy technicians]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A72-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Electronic personal health records (ePHRs) increasingly allow patients to manage their own medical data. Integration of a digital assistant (DA; ie, a conversational agent) into ePHRs may be of added value as a supportive tool to help better engage patients and improve patients&rsquo; experience of entering (complex) data. Previously, the use of a DA for self-reporting of medication history (ChaRM) showed positive results. Consequently, an additional prototype was developed that supports patients in documenting their medication <I>allergy</I> history (ChaRM-A).</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the accuracy of self-reported medication allergy histories guided by ChaRM-A compared to pharmacy technicians.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A prospective, observational study was conducted from February-May 2025. Outpatients &ge;18 years, scheduled for a visit to the outpatient medication reconciliation department, were randomly selected for participation. Patients performed medication allergy history taking in an online standalone environment with ChaRM-A support. Subsequently, a pharmacy technician conducted medication reconciliation including medication allergy history taking (usual care). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with a discrepancy between the two composed medication allergy lists. Secondary outcomes were the nature and prevalence of the discrepancies, their clinical relevance and potential risk factors. Data were analysed through descriptive statistics and regression analysis.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Forty-five patients (median age 66 years (IQR 57-76), range 19-88 years) documented their medication allergy history with support of ChaRM-A. The median time they needed was 2 minutes and 27 seconds (IQR 01:33-04:39). Sixteen (35.6%) patients did not have any allergies. The other 29 patients documented &ge;1 allergy and 28 (96.6%) of them had &ge;1 discrepancy (median 1 discrepancy per patient (IQR 1-4), range 1-10). In total, 70 discrepancies were found: 37.1% documentation deviations, 35.7% omissions and 27.1% additions. Most discrepancies (n=61, 87.1%) were classified as unharmful. The number of discrepancies per patient was significantly associated with the number of allergies per patient (p=0.03 (95% CI: 1.03-1.94)).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Although numerous discrepancies were found between medication allergy histories self-reported by patients with a DA and pharmacy technicians, their clinical relevance was low, indicating that a DA may safely support patients. Optimisation of the DA and additional research is needed to fully support patients in self-reporting medication allergies.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Heeren, S., Apaydin, B., Derissen, E., Schoonman, G., Tenfelde, K., Van Der Lee, C., De Wit, J., Maat, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.147</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.147</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-043 A digital assistant for self-reporting medication allergy history (ChaRM-A): discrepancies between medication allergy history documentation by patients supported by a digital assistant and pharmacy technicians]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A72</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A72</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A72-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-044 Comparison of the effectiveness of atogepant combined with botulinum toxin versus atogepant monotherapy in the prevention of chronic migraine]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A72-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Chronic migraine (CM) is a highly disabling neurological disorder with limited preventive options. Atogepant, an oral calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist, has demonstrated effectiveness in CM prevention. Botulinum toxin (BTX) is an established preventive treatment for CM, but evidence regarding the combined use of BTX and atogepant remains limited.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To compare the effectiveness of botulinum toxin plus atogepant (BTX-ATO) versus atogepant monotherapy (ATOm) in patients with CM.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Observational, retrospective, multicentre study conducted in two tertiary hospitals in patients with CM treated with atogepant for at least 3 months. The cohorts compared were patients treated with BTX-ATO versus ATOm. The main variable was the difference in the change in mean monthly migraine days (MMD) at 3 months compared with baseline between the two cohorts. Secondary variables included the proportion of patients achieving &ge;50% reduction in MMD at 3 months (MMD &ge;50%), as well as 30&ndash;49% and 0&ndash;29% reductions, between cohorts.</p><p>Demographic, clinical, and treatment data were obtained from the Electronic Health Record (Selene) and the electronic prescribing programme (Farmatools). Statistical analysis included descriptive measures, the Mann&ndash;Whitney U test and the Chi-squared test to compare differences, using Python (3.12.7) for data processing and analysis.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 45 patients were included, 91.11% (41/45) were women with a mean age of 47.42 years(SD = 11.0). The BTX-ATO cohort included 29 patients (64.4%) and the ATOm cohort 16 patients (35.6%), with baseline MMD of 20 and 21 days, respectively. After 3 months, MMD decreased to 13 days in the BTX-ATO cohort and 14 days in the ATOm cohort, with an absolute difference of 1 day between cohorts (p = 0.329). The proportion of patients achieving MMD&ge;50% was 41.4% (12/29) with BTX-ATO and 25.0% (4/16) with ATOm. MMD 30&ndash;49% was achieved by 6.9% (2/29) with BTX-ATO and 12.5% (2/16) with ATOm, while MMD 0&ndash;29% was 51.7% (15/29) and 62.5% (10/16), respectively. No statistically significant differences were found in secondary variables (p = 0.507).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Results suggest that the effectiveness of atogepant in chronic migraine, in terms of reducing monthly migraine days, is comparable between patients receiving combination therapy with botulinum toxin and those receiving atogepant monotherapy. Further prospective studies are needed to determine the potential added value of combination therapy.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Redondo-Arranz, R., Puivecino-Moreno, C., Sanchez-Lobon, I., Herrero-Munoz, N., Gil Moreno, C., Garcia-Rebolledo, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.148</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.148</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-044 Comparison of the effectiveness of atogepant combined with botulinum toxin versus atogepant monotherapy in the prevention of chronic migraine]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A72</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A72</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A73-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-045 Optimisation of antiemetic therapy based on individual response in colorectal cancer patients treated with moderately emetogenic chemotherapy]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A73-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To describe the pharmacist-led follow-up and optimisation of antiemetic therapy in colorectal cancer patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy, quantifying adjustments and their impact on symptom control.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A prospective study was conducted between January and June 2024 in a regional hospital. Patients with colorectal cancer who received at least three cycles of moderately emetogenic chemotherapy were included.</p><p>Follow-up was carried out in the Oncohaematology Pharmaceutical Care Clinic through structured clinical interviews after each cycle. Clinical and therapeutic information was obtained from the electronic medical record (Diraya) and the prescribing and validation system (Farmis-Oncofarm).</p><p>All patients initially received the full NCCN-recommended regimen on day 1 of chemotherapy. From subsequent cycles, treatment was personalised, simplifying regimens and mainly using corticosteroids as maintenance, leading to less medication than international guidelines recommend.</p><p>Efficacy was assessed as complete response (CR), defined as no vomiting and no rescue, and total control (TC), defined as absence of nausea, vomiting, and rescue.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 52 colorectal cancer patients were included, with a median age of 63.5 years (41&ndash;82); 59.6% were male and 3.8% had diabetes. The most frequent regimens were XELOX (28.8%), FOLFOX &plusmn; Bevacizumab (28.8%), FOLFIRI &plusmn; aflibercept/bevacizumab/cetuximab (30.8%), and Irinotecan &plusmn; Cetuximab (7.7%). At study closure, 67.3% were off antiemetic therapy.</p><p>Regarding treatment adjustments, 88.5% (46) reduced the regimen, while 5.8% (3) required intensification with palonosetron/netupitant. Nausea occurred in 7.7% (4) and vomiting in 3.8% (2). Overall, CR was achieved in 94.2% (49) and TC in 92.3% (48). After intensification, all patients achieved CR and TC. Notably, no patient receiving XELOX required rescue antiemetics.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Individualised antiemetic optimisation in colorectal cancer patients treated with moderately emetogenic chemotherapy enabled substantial regimen reduction while maintaining high rates of symptom control. Although all patients began with full NCCN protocols, later cycles were managed with simplified, corticosteroid-based approaches, resulting in markedly less medication without loss of efficacy. That all patients with reduction achieved CR and nearly all TC, while others required intensification to reach these outcomes, highlights the value of structured pharmacist-led follow-up. The excellent tolerability of XELOX, with no need for rescue therapy, suggests this subgroup could benefit from simplified initial antiemetic protocols.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Trujillano, A., Rodriguez Del Burgo, M., Valdivia Garcia, F., Gallego Galisteo, M., Campos Davila, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.149</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.149</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-045 Optimisation of antiemetic therapy based on individual response in colorectal cancer patients treated with moderately emetogenic chemotherapy]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A73</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A73</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A73-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-046 Evaluation of antibiotic use in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with pneumonia and sepsis: retrospective observational before-after study]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A73-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Early and adequate empiric antibiotic therapy is essential in the treatment of pneumonia and sepsis and may influence the clinical outcome.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This retrospective before-after study aimed to appraise the impact of local ASP (written guidelines and antibiotic restriction) on antibiotic (AB) use and clinical outcomes in patients requiring intensive care due to pneumonia and sepsis.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>This study was conducted as a single-centre retrospective observational study in the ICU of a pulmonology department of a tertiary care centre. Data collection for the pre-intervention period occurred from 1 January 2018 to 31 May 2022, while the ASP period data was collected from 1 June to 28 March 2024.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The patients admitted to the ICU with pneumonia and sepsis were mainly men (58/101, 57.4% and 84/128, 65.6%), the need for intensive care increased with age, and most of the patients belonged to 65+ age group in both study phases (68.3% and 58.6%). The majority of the patients had four or more comorbidities (57.4% and 40.6%). In-hospital mortality was relatively high (42.6% and 41.4%), most of the patients losing their lives already in the ICU (33/43, 76.7% and 37/53, 69.8%). Significant increase in guideline-adherent agent selection (34.5%) and use of combination therapy (35.0%) was observed, while the use of fluoroquinolones decreased significantly (-31.1%). Despite the significant decrease in the number of patients using restricted ABs (-53.3%), a significant increase was observed in the average AB exposure (form median 2.0 to 2.7 DDD/patient/day) and direct AB costs (10.5%) in the ICU. The inappropriate AB therapy was relatively low in the presence of MDRs in both phases (5.9% and 15%). However, the decrease in the use of restricted ABs and the increase in AB exposure/patient/day in the ICU were not associated with worse clinical outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>ASP implementation in the ICU resulted in a significant improvement in the appropriate use of ABs, but a significant increase in the AB exposure/patient/day. Although, all these have not been accompanied by better clinical outcomes, ASP may hold the promise to improve AMR with a sustained long-term effect.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>Supported by the University of Debrecen Program for Scientific Publication.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Szilagyi, Z., Beniczky, Z., Vasko, A., Varga, E., Bacskay, I., Lekli, I., Somodi, S., Fesu&#x0308;s, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.150</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.150</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-046 Evaluation of antibiotic use in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with pneumonia and sepsis: retrospective observational before-after study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A73</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A73</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A74-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-047 Evaluation of the empiric antibiotic use pattern and outcomes in patients admitted at ICU with pneumonia and sepsis with different respiratory support]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A74-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Empiric antibiotic therapy is essential in the treatment of pneumonia and sepsis requiring respiratory support. However, the antibiotic selection remains a challenge for prescribers.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This retrospective observational study aimed to evaluate the empiric antibiotic prescription pattern and clinical outcomes in patients with pneumonia and sepsis with different respiratory support.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>The study was conducted between June 2018 and February 2024 at the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of a Pulmonology Department of a tertiary care medical centre in Hungary. During the intensive care therapy were used different types of respiratory support. In the group I of patients was used high flow nasal oxygen (HFNO), or low flow nasal oxygen (LFNO), or non-rebreather mask (NRM) and classic non-invasive ventilation (NIV), while patients in the group II required invasive mechanical ventilation. Guideline-adherence (agent selection, dosage), presence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens, antibiotic exposure, and clinical outcomes (LOS-length of stay, 30-day mortality) were compared between the two groups of patients. Fisher&rsquo;s exact test and t-test were applied to compare categorical and continuous variables, respectively. p&lt;0.05 was considered to be significant.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Comparing the two groups we have not found significant differences in empiric guideline-adherent agent selection (51/115, 44.3% and 52/114, 45.6%). However, overall guideline-adherence was significantly higher in case of invasive ventilation (11.1% vs 1.7%, p&lt;0.05). Guideline-adherent agents have not result in significantly better 30-day mortality rate in either of the groups. Group I has shown significantly lower antibiotic exposure and better clinical outcomes than Group II. Significant difference was found between groups (I vs II) in the presence of MDR pathogens (14.3% vs 49.6%, p&lt;0.001), antibiotic exposure (ICU: median 11.5 vs 21 DDD/patient, p&lt;0.001 and total: median 19 vs 27 DDD/patient p&lt;0.05), ICU-LOS (median 5 vs 11 days,%, p&lt;0.001), total LOS (median 11 vs 15 days,%, p&lt;0.001), and 30-day mortality (14.8% vs 68.4%, p&lt;0.001). Moreover, the presence of MDR pathogens significantly increased ICU-LOS, antibiotic exposure, and 30-day mortality rate.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Among invasively ventilated patients MDR pathogens occurred more frequently increasing significantly antibiotic exposure, length of stay, and 30-day mortality rate. However, guideline-adherent antibiotic therapy has not resulted in better clinical outcomes at ICU.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Szilagyi, Z., Vasko, A., Beniczky, Z., Varga, E., Bacskay, I., Somodi, S., Lekli, I., Fesu&#x0308;s, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.151</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.151</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-047 Evaluation of the empiric antibiotic use pattern and outcomes in patients admitted at ICU with pneumonia and sepsis with different respiratory support]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A74</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A74</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A74-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-048 Can intradialytic parenteral nutrition improve nutritional parameters in haemodialysis patients?]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A74-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Haemodialysis patients are at high risk of malnutrition, linked to worse clinical outcomes and increased morbidity and mortality. ESPEN and KDOQI guidelines recommend intradialytic parenteral nutrition (IDPN) for patients intolerant to oral or enteral diet and not meeting nutritional requirements. Nevertheless, evidence regarding the effectiveness of IDPN remains limited and is mostly derived from small cohorts.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the impact of IDPN on nutritional and biochemical parameters at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Observational, retrospective, multidisciplinary study conducted in a tertiary hospital including adult patients receiving IDPN for &gt;6months (2021-January 2025)</p><p>Data collected: demographics and anthropometric parameters, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), calories and protein intake at baseline, and nutritional and biochemical parameters: glucose, total protein (TP), serum albumin (Alb), C-reactive protein (CRP), CRP/Alb ratio, creatinine, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), triglycerides, cholesterol, and urea.</p><p>Qualitative variables were expressed as absolute and relative frequencies, and quantitative variables as median and interquartile range. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for comparisons between related samples.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Seven patients were included: 4 (57.1%) female; median age of 67 years (63-65). The median weight was 54.6kg (45.5-62.3), BMI 19.3kg/m<sup>2</sup> (16.7-22.9) and CCI 5 (5-8). Patients received IDPN three times per week, with a median of 16.5kcal/kg/day (14.6-18.8) and 1.2g of protein/kg/day (1-1.3).</p><p>Serum albumin increased during follow-up, reaching statistical significance between months 3 and 6 (p=0.043). BMI, TP, and cholesterol increased, while CRP and CRP/Alb ratio decreased, indicating favourable but non-significant trends.</p><p>Other parameters remained stable without significant changes.</p><p><tbl id="T1" loc="float"><no>Abstract 4CPS-048 Table 1</no><tblbdy top-stubs="2"><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Parameter</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Month 0</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Month 3</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Month 6</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>P (0-</b>  <b>3)</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>P (0-</b>  <b>6)</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>P (3-6)</b> </c></r><r><c cspan="7" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Weight (kg)  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">54.6 (45.5-62.3)  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">50.5 (43-60)  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">57.3 (46-68.8)  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.686  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.345  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.144  </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">BMI (kg/m<sup>2</sup>)  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">19.3 (16.7-22.9)  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">17.0 (16-25.5)  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">20.8 (16.9-26.5)  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.686  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.345  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.144  </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Glucose (mg/dL)  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">92 (86-121)  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">128 (85-181)  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">136 (119-347)  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.345  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.144  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.225  </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">TP (g/L)  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">50.4 (46.5-74)  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">53.8 (52.5-55)  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">70 (53.9-86.1)  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.180  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1.000  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1.000  </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Albumin (g/dL)  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">2.74 (2.56-3.64)  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">3.30 (3.21-3.37)  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">3.41 (3.39-3.65)  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.237  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.116  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.043  </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">CRP (mg/L)  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">26.3 (4.9-44.8)  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">15.5 (5.3-117.5)  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">6 (2.5-279)  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.500  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1.000  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.655  </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">CRP/Alb ratio  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">8.41 (1.35-18.9)  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">4.13 (1.5-39.9)  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1.75 (0.7-82.2)  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.500  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1.000  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.655  </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Urea (mg/dL)  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">92 (60-174)  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">105 (75-153)  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">101.8 (63-107)  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.753  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.686  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.500  </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Creatinine (mg/dL)  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">6.38 (3.8-11.5)  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">6.06 (5.7-9.4)  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">5.59 (1.6-7.1)  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.345  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.593  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.225  </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">GFR (ml/min)  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">8.5 (6-11.5)  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">6.0 (4-12)  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">7 (5-13)  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.092  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.593  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1.000  </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Triglycerides (mg/dL)  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">117 (86-143)  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">116 (98-213)  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">115 (97-574)  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.465  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.465  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.225  </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Cholesterol (mg/dL)  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">115 (84-133)  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">143.5 (83-265)  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">175 (115-245)  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.225  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.068  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.500  </c></r></tblbdy></tbl></p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Consistent with previous evidence and limited by a small cohort, our findings suggest progressive nutritional improvement.</p><p>However, further studies with larger cohorts are warranted to confirm these results</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gil Bardaji, R., Miedes-Aliaga, J., Joaquin Ortiz, C., Ferrer Estopinan, L., Ramos Rodas, A., Codina-Jimenez, C., Puente De La Vega Gonzales, C., Rodriguez-Gonzalez, C., Garcia-Xipell, S., Coll-Vinent Olle, M., Alvarez-Martins, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.152</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.152</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-048 Can intradialytic parenteral nutrition improve nutritional parameters in haemodialysis patients?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A74</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A75</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A75-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-049 Formulation matters: organoleptic acceptability drives adherence to calcium/vitamin D supplements]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A75-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Adherence to calcium/vitamin D (Ca/VitD) supplementation is generally poor, despite its clinical relevance. Beyond patient-related factors, formulation attributes may influence persistence. In Spain, numerous presentations coexist; identifying which characteristics affect adherence could optimise prescriptions and minimise discontinuations.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To estimate adherence to Ca/VitD supplementation in adults and to identify patient, treatment, and formulation factors associated with adherence.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A cross-sectional study was conducted in adults with at least one Ca/VitD dispensation in the health area of a tertiary hospital in Madrid (2022&ndash;2025) and &gt;3 months of treatment. A random sample of at least 350 patients was estimated. Demographic, therapeutic, and formulation-related variables were collected, along with Likert scales (1&ndash;5) for taste, texture, and overall organoleptic assessment. Adherence was defined as fulfilment of three criteria: self-reported adherence &gt;90%, positive Morinsky-Green test, and &gt;90% of estimated dispensations done. Univariable logistic regressions and a stepwise multivariable analysis were performed.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 360 patients were included: 65% women, median age 71.9 years (IQR=58.6&ndash;83.1), with 8.5 chronic medications (IQR=4&ndash;13). Formulations were 50% chewable, 38.9% orodispersible, and 11.1% effervescent. Adverse events occurred in 15.3% of patients, all gastrointestinal. Overall adherence was 34.7% (95% CI=30&ndash;39.8%), compared with 70.8% self-reported (95% CI=65.9&ndash;75.3%).</p><p>In univariable analysis, adherence increased with a higher number of chronic medications (OR=1.08; 95% CI=1.04&ndash;1.12), higher overall organoleptic assessment (OR per 1-point increase=1.43; 95% CI=1.17&ndash;1.76), formulations with polyols versus other sweeteners (OR=6.05; 95% CI=3.36&ndash;10.87), chewable tablets (OR=2.38; 95% CI=1.48&ndash;3.89), and female sex (OR=3.16; 95% CI=1.99&ndash;5.00). Negative predictors were longer treatment duration in months (OR=0.99; 95% CI=0.98&ndash;0.99), Ca dose &gt;500 mg (OR=0.20; 95% CI=0.12&ndash;0.35), adverse events (OR=0.15; 95% CI=0.06&ndash;0.40), and concomitant antiresorptives (OR=0.56; 95% CI=0.34&ndash;0.91).</p><p>The best multivariable model (AUC=0.83) identified the following significant predictors (p&lt;0.05): &ge;10 chronic medications, polyol-containing formulations, female sex, and maximum overall assessment as positive factors; occurrence of adverse events as a negative factor.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Adherence to Ca/VitD supplementation was low. Organoleptic acceptability emerged as a critical determinant; an early interview after treatment initiation may facilitate formulation switching and prevent discontinuation. Chewable formulations with polyols appeared better tolerated. Patients on antiresorptives or long-term therapy may require targeted reinforcement strategies to maintain adherence.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gomez, D., Covadonga Iznaola, M., De Lorenzo Pinto, A., Rioja-Diez, Y., Carrillo Burdallo, A., Prieto Romero, A., Martin Bartolome, M., Sanjurjo-Saez, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.153</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.153</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-049 Formulation matters: organoleptic acceptability drives adherence to calcium/vitamin D supplements]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A75</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A75</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A75-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-050 Impact of clinical pharmacist-led intravenous to oral switch interventions on cost reduction in postoperative patients]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A75-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>The early transition from intravenous (IV) to oral (PO) medications in postoperative care is a well-recognised strategy to enhance recovery, minimise IV-related complications, and reduce healthcare costs. Clinical pharmacists play a pivotal role in this process by identifying eligible patients and recommending appropriate oral alternatives. However, evidence from low- and middle-income countries remains scarce.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the impact of clinical pharmacist-led IV to PO medication switch interventions on medication cost reduction in postoperative patients.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted at the Surgery Floor in an Oncology care hospital low- and- middle income country, covering the period from July 2023 to June 2025. All documented IV to PO switch interventions for adult elective surgical patients were included. Exclusion criteria were outpatient cases, non-surgical admissions, and undocumented or unanswered interventions. Data were extracted from the hospital information system and analysed using descriptive statistics to summarise intervention frequency, physician acceptance, medication types, and cost savings.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 641 interventions were recorded in 401 patients (65.1% female; mean age 43.2 years). Of these, 441 (68.8%) were accepted, 134 (20.9%) were unanswered, and 66 (10.3%) were rejected. The most frequently switched medications were paracetamol (53.7%), metoclopramide (17.6%), and omeprazole (13.7%). Common surgical procedures included colectomy/colorectal surgery (10.7%) and mastectomy (9.1%). The interventions resulted in an estimated cost saving of Rs. 92,035.45 (~287.61) during the study period. No adverse clinical outcomes were reported.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Clinical pharmacist-led IV to PO interventions achieved substantial cost savings without compromising patient safety. These findings underscore the importance of integrating pharmacists into surgical care teams to timely optimise postoperative IV to PO switch for per oral medication use and resource allocation, particularly in resource-limited settings.</p></sec><sec><st>Reference</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>4CPS-214 Improving intravenous to oral switch by identifying and tackling barriers perceived by physicians and nurses | European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy</p></li><li><p>https://academic.oup.com/jac/article/64/1/188/754145</p></li><li><p>https://doi.org/10.1177/20420986241260169</p></li><li><p>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsps.2021.03.006</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Acknowledgement</st><p>The authors acknowledge the contributions of the clinical pharmacy team and Management Information System team at Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre for their support in data collection and intervention documentation.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Siddiqui, A., Bhutta, O.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.154</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.154</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-050 Impact of clinical pharmacist-led intravenous to oral switch interventions on cost reduction in postoperative patients]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A75</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A76</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A76-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-052 Intravitreal dexamethasone implant for the treatment of diabetic macular oedema and macular oedema secondary to retinal vein occlusion: effectiveness evaluation]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A76-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Intravitreal dexamethasone implants are used in hospital settings to treat diabetic macular oedema (DME) and macular oedema secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO).</p><p>The implant provides sustained corticosteroid release, reducing inflammation and improving visual acuity.</p><p>Untreated DME and RVO may lead to severe vision impairment.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To analyse drug utilisation and to evaluate clinical effectiveness of intravitreal dexamethasone implants in our Hospital from 2023 to 2024.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Patients&rsquo; data were obtained from healthcare information systems: we created a database including eye identification, age, gender, diagnosis and date of administration.</p><p>We excluded patients managed outside the hospital or with overlapping diagnoses.</p><p>For hospital-managed patients with multiple dexamethasone administrations, the final visual acuity was compared to baseline.</p><p>The visual acuity was measured using the Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) scale.</p><p>We recorded the therapeutic switches during the study period.</p><p>Data were stratified by diagnosis.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>We analysed 59 eyes: 40 with DME (mean age 72 years, 50% female) and 19 with RVO (mean age 74 years, 70% male).</p><p>In the DME group, 16 eyes received dexamethasone monotherapy, 23 received combination therapy with anti-VEGF agents (aflibercept, bevacizumab or faricimab) and one eye received three treatments.</p><p>The average number of administrations over 2 years was 4.8 (range 2-10).</p><p>Mean visual acuity change was +0.08 (p&gt;0.05), 75% of eyes showed improvement.</p><p>Monotherapy eyes improved by +0.27 with 1.6 administrations per year, while multiple-treatment eyes showed a -0.05 change with three administrations per year.</p><p>In the RVO group, most eyes received combination treatment: three eyes received monotherapy, 13 eyes (68%) received combination therapy with antiproliferative drugs and three eyes received three treatments, with an average of seven administrations (range 2-16) and a mean visual acuity change of -0.03.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The intravitreal dexamethasone implant demonstrates effectiveness in stabilising or modestly improving visual acuity, particularly in DME patients, with a low number of treatments required.</p><p>Although variability limits statistical significance, even small gains or stabilisation can meaningfully improve patients&rsquo; quality of life by slowing disease progression and preserving vision.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sillano, S., Isoardo, A., Tibaldi, T., Del Monte, G., Poggio, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.155</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.155</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-052 Intravitreal dexamethasone implant for the treatment of diabetic macular oedema and macular oedema secondary to retinal vein occlusion: effectiveness evaluation]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A76</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A76</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A76-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-053 Reducing oxycodone prescription and use in orthopaedic patients after hip or knee arthroplasty: a pre-post intervention study]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A76-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Surgical procedures such as total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) are associated with risks of long-term opioid use. Implementing interventions that effectively reduce these risks remains a challenge.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To assess the effect of a multifaceted intervention at patient-, nurse- and prescriber-level on postoperative prescribing and use of oxycodone after discharge in TKA and THA patients.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A prospective monocentre pre-post intervention study was conducted. Patients &ge;18 years scheduled for TKA or THA between 17/03/2025-04/04/2025 (pre-intervention) and 06/05/2025-23/05/2025 (post-intervention) were included. The multifaceted intervention combined (i) intensifying patient education on opiate use by pharmacy assistants, (ii) extending postoperative pain-assessment by nurses and (iii) tailoring oxycodone-prescribing by physicians. Primary outcomes were postoperative opioid prescribing and -use (percentage of patients discharged with an oxycodone prescription and percentage of patients using oxycodone on the day of discharge, and on day 1-3-7-14 post-discharge). Secondary outcomes were postoperative pain (Numeric Rating Scale pain scores) on the prespecified days, prescription/refill requests, and leftover medication after discharge. Differences between pre- and post-intervention groups were analysed using an unpaired t-test or Chi-squared test. Changes in pain scores over time and differences in these changes between groups were analysed using Mixed Repeated Measures ANOVA.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Pre-intervention 34 patients were included, post-intervention 32 patients. Pre-intervention, 34/34 patients (100%) were discharged with oxycodone (immediate-release, IR), compared to 16/32 post-intervention patients (50%) (p&lt;0.0001). This reduction remained significant for THA and TKA patients separately (p&lt;0.0001 resp. p&lt;0.005). No significant reduction in opioid use after discharge was observed among those patients discharged with oxycodone. Pain scores did not significantly differ between the pre- and post-intervention groups. Among patients who were not discharged with oxycodone IR, only one requested a prescription, which was ultimately not used. Pre-intervention, 28/34 (82.4%) patients had surplus oxycodone tablets, post-intervention less, but still 14/34 (41.2%), patients reported having oxycodone tablets left.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The multifaceted intervention significantly reduced the proportion of THA and TKA patients postoperatively discharged with oxycodone IR without increasing postoperative pain after discharge. Nonetheless, post-intervention, 40% of patients had excess oxycodone tablets, indicating that there is room for further decrease of the availability of oxycodone and consequent risks of long-term use.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phaff, M., Geuze, R., Maat, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.156</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.156</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-053 Reducing oxycodone prescription and use in orthopaedic patients after hip or knee arthroplasty: a pre-post intervention study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A76</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A77</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A77-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-054 Effectiveness and safety of inclisiran in real-world clinical practice at 1 year]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A77-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction is essential for preventing cardiovascular morbidity and mortality associated with hypercholesterolaemia. Inclisiran, a small interfering RNA (siRNA)-based PCSK9 inhibitor, allows sustained LDL-C reduction with a biannual administration schedule. Although clinical trials have demonstrated its efficacy and safety, long-term evidence in real-world clinical practice remains limited.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To assess the effectiveness and safety of inclisiran at 12 months in patients with hypercholesterolaemia in real-world clinical practice.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective observational study was conducted at a tertiary hospital. Adults with hypercholesterolaemia who initiated inclisiran in 2024 were followed for 12 months. Demographics, prior lipid-lowering therapy, and treatment indications were collected. LDL-C was measured at baseline, 3 and 12 months, and percentage change from baseline was calculated. Categorical variables are presented as number and percentage (n (%)), and continuous variables as mean&plusmn;standard deviation.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Fifteen patients were included (40% women; 60&plusmn;7 years), all in secondary prevention. Inclisiran was indicated for failure to reach LDL-C targets despite optimal lipid-lowering therapy in 11 (73%) patients, and for statin intolerance in 4 (27%).</p><p>At baseline, 11 (73%) received statins (three monotherapy, five with ezetimibe, two with ezetimibe+omega-3, one with omega-3), two (13%) ezetimibe monotherapy, and one (7%) was untreated. Mean LDL-C at baseline was 119&plusmn;27mg/dL and after 3 months, it decreased to 54&plusmn;44mg/dL; 12 showed a reduction of 61% while in two patients increased by 9%, and one was undetermined due to hypertriglyceridemia (&gt;400mg/dL).</p><p>At 12 months, mean LDL-C was 64&plusmn;45mg/dL: nine maintained reduction (&ndash;54%), one patient had a 32% LDL-C increase after temporary discontinuation of statin, two had missing follow-up laboratory data and one discontinued treatment by own decision.</p><p>Adverse effects were reported in three (20%) patients: fatigue (1 (7%)), arthralgia (1(7%)), and headache (1 (7)).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Inclisiran was associated with sustained LDL-C reductions at 12 months and a favourable tolerability profile in real-world practice, as demonstrated in clinical trials. These findings support its efficacy in patients not achieving LDL-C targets with statins or with statin intolerance, although interpretation is limited by the small sample size and descriptive nature of the study. Prospective studies with larger cohorts are needed to confirm long-term effectiveness and safety.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gomez Salvany, M., Cardona Peitx, G., Garcia Gimenez, I., Carballo Martinez, N., Gil-Bardaji, R., Rodriguez Gonzalez, C., Coll-Vinent, M., Gali-Fortuny, J., Garcia-Xipell, S., Bocos-Baelo, A., Alvarez Martins, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.157</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.157</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-054 Effectiveness and safety of inclisiran in real-world clinical practice at 1 year]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A77</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A77</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A77-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-055 An exploration of renal pharmacist interventions in renal inpatients on the nephrology ward in a university teaching hospital]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A77-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) is defined as abnormalities of kidney structure or function, present for a minimum of 3 months and has a global prevalence of approximately 10%. Patients with CKD are at an increased risk of drug-related problems (DRPs) due to polypharmacy, comorbidity burden, reduced renal drug clearance, and frequent use of high risk or nephrotoxic medicines. Pharmacists&rsquo; interventions (PIs) support the safe and effective use of medicines in CKD patients and form an integral part of the renal multidisciplinary team.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The aim of this study was to evaluate DRPs and pharmacists&rsquo; interventions in renal inpatients, and to assess the perceived severity of DRPs identified.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A 2-week prospective observational study was conducted on the nephrology ward in a university teaching hospital. Inpatients with renal disease, admitted under a nephrologist were included. Renal pharmacists recorded DRPs identified and resultant interventions made using Microsoft Forms. DRPs were categorised by type and source of intervention, renal disease and drug class. Collected data were extracted to Microsoft Excel and analysed using descriptive statistics. The severity of DRPs was assessed using the Dean and Barber method. The Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated using SPSS version 29.0.1.0, to assess inter-rater reliability.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>80% (n=42) of eligible patients had DRPs recorded, with a mean of 3.2 (SD &plusmn;2.97) per patient. Mean DRP was highest among kidney transplant recipients and haemodialysis patients (5 (SD&plusmn;3.65) and 4.8 (SD &plusmn;2.59) respectively). &lsquo;Commence medication&rsquo; was the most frequent PI recorded (27%, n=44). 92% (n=154) of DRPs were identified by reviewing patients&rsquo; medicines and prescription record (MPAR) or medicines reconciliation. Cardiovascular drugs were most frequent drug class involved in DRPs (26%, n=43). 99% (n=163) of DRPs were classified as moderate or severe. 92% (n=152) of DRPs were resolved following PIs.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>This study highlights the pivotal role of renal pharmacists in the identification and resolution of DRPS in renal inpatients, with the majority of DRPs classified as moderate or severe and successfully resolved following pharmacist intervention. Future work should consider the economic benefits of the renal/specialist renal clinical pharmacy service and cost of administration errors.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Odonnell, J., Keating, A., Silvari, V., Flynn, M., Osullivan, T., Lynch, D., Burke, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.158</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.158</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-055 An exploration of renal pharmacist interventions in renal inpatients on the nephrology ward in a university teaching hospital]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A77</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A78</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A78-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-056 Effectiveness and safety of inclisiran in real-world evidence: a multicentre experience in patients with primary hypercholesterolaemia or mixed dyslipidaemia]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A78-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Inadequate control of LDL cholesterol persists in a considerable proportion of patients with dyslipidaemia despite intensive treatment with statins and ezetimibe. Inclisiran, a small interfering ribonucleic acid that inhibits hepatic synthesis of PCSK9, represents an innovative therapeutic alternative with a twice-yearly dosing schedule after the initial phase.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of inclisiran in patients with primary hypercholesterolaemia or mixed dyslipidaemia in real-world clinical practice.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective multicentre observational study including all patients who initiated treatment with inclisiran up to September 2025. Data collected in Excel included demographic variables, cardiovascular diagnosis, reason for initiation, previous use of PCSK9 inhibitors, statin intolerance, concomitant lipid-lowering therapies and adherence. The primary variables were the median and interquartile range (IQR) of percentage reduction from baseline in LDL cholesterol, total cholesterol, non-HDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol and triglycerides at 90 and 270 days after treatment initiation. Safety was assessed through reported adverse events and treatment discontinuations. Adherence to concomitant lipid-lowering therapies was evaluated according to dispensing records. Data were obtained from electronic medical records and hospital pharmacy databases.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 63 patients were included (mean age 64 &plusmn; 11 years; 63% male). At 90 days, the reduction in LDL cholesterol was 36% (IQR 6&ndash;62) and at 270 days 39% (IQR 26&ndash;51). Total cholesterol decreased by 23% (IQR 0&ndash;42) and 24% (IQR 17&ndash;34), respectively. Non-HDL cholesterol was reduced by 33% (IQR 1&ndash;56) at 90 days and 36% (IQR 19&ndash;50) at 270 days. HDL cholesterol remained stable with minimal changes (3% (IQR 0&ndash;11) and 0% (IQR 0&ndash;9)). Triglycerides showed median reductions of 12% (IQR 0&ndash;29) at 90 days and 7% (IQR 0&ndash;22) at 270 days. No serious adverse events were reported; however, 8% (5/63) experienced local injection site reactions and 3% (2/63) discontinued treatment due to lack of effectiveness. Adherence to concomitant lipid-lowering therapies was &gt;80% in 82% (52/63) of patients.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Inclisiran was associated with reductions in LDL cholesterol and total cholesterol in real-world clinical practice, with an acceptable safety profile. Nevertheless, the magnitude of LDL cholesterol reduction was lower than that reported in pivotal clinical trials.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sanchez Lobon, I., Corralez Paz, M., Dla Ocana De La Rosa, M., Alaejos, A. C., Fernandez Canabate, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.159</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.159</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-056 Effectiveness and safety of inclisiran in real-world evidence: a multicentre experience in patients with primary hypercholesterolaemia or mixed dyslipidaemia]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A78</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A78</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A78-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-057 Evaluation of argatroban dosing in critically ill patients: impact of organ dysfunction and extracorporeal support]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A78-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Argatroban, a direct thrombin inhibitor primarily metabolised in the liver, is widely used in the management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). In critically ill patients, dosing is complicated by organ dysfunction and altered pharmacokinetics. While hepatic impairment is an established determinant of dose adjustment, evidence on dosing in patients receiving extracorporeal support (ECMO, CRRT) remains limited.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This study aimed to evaluate the impact of organ dysfunction and extracorporeal support on argatroban dosing requirements in critically ill patients.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>We performed a retrospective, single-centre study of ICU patients treated with argatroban for &ge;24 hours between January 2015 and December 2024. Data included demographics, organ dysfunction, extracorporeal support, argatroban dosing, aPTT monitoring, and bleeding or thrombotic events. Argatroban doses were compared by organ dysfunction and extracorporeal support using the Mann&ndash;Whitney test. Independent predictors of mean argatroban dose were assessed by multiple linear regression.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 46 patients were included. The mean initial dose was 0.19&plusmn;0.28 mcg/kg/min, and the therapeutic dose (dose achieving two consecutive target aPTTs) was 0.38&plusmn;0.42 mcg/kg/min. Patients with hepatic dysfunction (n=28) required significantly lower therapeutic and mean doses than those without (<I>p</I>=0.023 and <I>p</I>=0.032, respectively). Renal dysfunction, ECMO, and CRRT did not significantly influence dosing, although higher aPTT values were observed in CRRT patients. Multivariate analysis confirmed the Child-Pugh score as an independent predictor of mean dose (<I>p</I>=0.018).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>In critically ill patients, argatroban should generally be initiated at &le;0.5 mcg/kg/min, with further reductions in hepatic dysfunction. Extracorporeal support did not significantly alter dosing requirements, reinforcing hepatic function as the key determinant for adjustment. These findings support individualised argatroban therapy and provide practical guidance for HIT management in the ICU.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ju, M., Lee, S., Yang, S., Choi, J., Han, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.160</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.160</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-057 Evaluation of argatroban dosing in critically ill patients: impact of organ dysfunction and extracorporeal support]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A78</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A78</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A79-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-058 Evolution of intravitreal therapy with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents in the last 5 years]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A79-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEFG) agents are the standard of care for neovascular retinal diseases such as age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), diabetic macular oedema (DME), and retinal vein occlusion (RVO). In the last 5 years, new molecules, extended dosing intervals, and real-world data have reshaped clinical practice.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To analyse the evolution of intravitreal anti-VEGF drugs in clinical practice in a secondary-level hospital over the last 5 years.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Retrospective observational study including all dispensations of aflibercept, brolucizumab, faricimab, and ranibizumab from 2020 to 2024. The number of patients and dispensations for each drug were analysed globally and by diagnosis, as well as the treatment cost per patient per year. Data were obtained from the outpatient dispensing record Farmatools and analysed in an Excel database.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Over the last 5 years, 18,735 intravitreal anti-VEGF doses were dispensed: 2020: 1,264; 2021: 3,637; 2022: 4,202; 2023: 4,710 and 2024: 4,922. The number of patients treated was 567, 716, 807, 860, and 929, respectively.</p><p>Classified by drug and year:</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>2020: aflibercept 369 patients (453 injections); ranibizumab 198 patients (811 injections).</p></li><li><p>2021: aflibercept 495 patients (2,617 injections); ranibizumab 221 patients (1,020 injections).</p></li><li><p>2022: aflibercept 612 patients (3,218 injections); brolucizumab three patients (11 injections); ranibizumab 192 patients (973 injections).</p></li><li><p>2023: aflibercept 739 patients (4,133 injections); brolucizumab three patients (20 injections); ranibizumab 118 patients (557 injections).</p></li><li><p>2024: aflibercept 806 patients (4,464 injections); brolucizumab three patients (10 injections); faricimab 94 patients (321 injections); ranibizumab 37 patients (127 injections).</p></li><li><p>Classified by most frequent diagnoses and drug:</p></li><li><p>Aflibercept: nAMD (44.7&ndash;53.9%), DME (24.7&ndash;33.9%), RVO (21.2&ndash;22.1%).</p></li><li><p>Ranibizumab: nAMD (60.1&ndash;71.1%), DME (18.4&ndash;25.9%), RVO (9.9&ndash;14.5%).</p></li><li><p>Brolucizumab (2022&ndash;2024): nAMD 66.7%, DME 33.3%.</p></li><li><p>Faricimab (2024): nAMD 56.4%, DME 43.6%</p></li></l></p><p>Annual treatment cost per patient was 854.6, 927.7, 1,204.7, 1,338.5, and 1,225.2 in 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, and 2024, respectively.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The number of patients has gradually increased, while the number of doses has almost quadrupled. By drug, aflibercept use has increased, ranibizumab use has declined, brolucizumab has shown only occasional use, and faricimab use cannot yet be assessed due to its recent introduction. It is necessary to evaluate real-world data and position the use of these drugs due to the ageing of the population, their chronic administration and the economic impact involve.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Garcia Lagunar, M., Martinez De Arriba, R., Martinez Alvarez, E., Fernandez Cordon, A., Gonzalez Franco, R., Garcia Mayo, M., Rodriguez Fernandez, Z., Guitian Bermejo, C., Ferreras Lopez, N., De La Nogal Fernandez, B., Rodriguez Maria, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.161</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.161</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-058 Evolution of intravitreal therapy with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents in the last 5 years]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A79</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A79</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A79-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-059 Analysis of antimicrobial stewardship team meetings in a district hospital: interventions and recommendations in 2024]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A79-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Antimicrobial resistance is a major public health concern, largely driven by inappropriate or prolonged use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP) have demonstrated benefits in improving clinical outcomes and promoting rational antibiotic use. Prospective audits with regular feedback represent a key tool to encourage appropriate prescribing practices in hospital settings.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To describe and assess the meetings of the ASP team conducted in a district hospital during 2024, focusing on antibiotic use, clinical cases discussed, and recommendations provided to prescribers.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective descriptive study was conducted using the official records of the weekly meetings of the Antimicrobial Stewardship Program, held every Friday during 2024. Prescriptions registered in the hospital pharmacy program and microbiology data from the clinical history were reviewed, and the frequency of each variable was manually counted. Totals were then calculated and summarised monthly. Data included the number of meetings, antibiotics reviewed, clinical indications, and proposed interventions: reduction, continuation, duration adjustment, discontinuation, or coverage recommendations.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 35 meetings were conducted in 2024, addressing 101 cases of bacteraemia. The most frequently reviewed antibiotics were ertapenem (96), meropenem (77), and linezolid (27). The most common interventions were continuation according to clinical evolution (159), de-escalation (74), and treatment discontinuation or completion (41). Duration adjustment was recommended in 23 cases, while coverage recommendations were less frequent (6). Five deaths were recorded during follow-up. Broad-spectrum carbapenems represented a substantial proportion of discussions (173), underlining their clinical relevance and the importance of ASP supervision.</p><p>Microbiological cultures with antibiograms were also analysed, highlighting the presence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing <I>E. coli</I> (20 isolates) and <I>Klebsiella pneumoniae</I> (17), multidrug-resistant <I>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</I> (10), <I>K. pneumoniae</I> KPC (4), <I>Proteus mirabilis</I> (4), <I>E. coli</I> AmpC (5), and methicillin-resistant <I>Staphylococcus aureus</I> (7). These findings emphasise the value of microbiological surveillance and its direct impact on therapeutic decision making during the meetings.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>ASP meetings provided a structured and systematic framework to optimise antibiotic use in hospitalised patients, particularly in severe infections. The frequent interventions demonstrate the active role of the team in guiding prescription practices. These results support the continuity of multidisciplinary ASP initiatives in hospitals and align with international recommendations.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Erdozain, S., Yerro Yanguas, A., Tejada Navas, D., Marin Marin, M., Preciado Goldaracena, J., Alzueta Isturiz, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.162</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.162</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-059 Analysis of antimicrobial stewardship team meetings in a district hospital: interventions and recommendations in 2024]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A79</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A80</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A80-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-060 Pharmacists as key players in fall prevention: evaluation of an algorithm-based risk score]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A80-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Falls among older adults represent a major public health issue, leading to more than 100,000 hospitalisations and over 10,000 deaths annually. In order to address this challenge, a multidisciplinary team at the hospital, developed a fall risk score combined with an algorithm to identify hospitalised patients with a high risk of fall (patients with a score &ge;4). Pharmacists receive a daily list of at risk patients to review prescriptions, detect inappropriate medications, and help reduce iatrogenic fall risk.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The objective of this study was to evaluate 12 months of implementation, focusing on the number of pharmaceutical interventions and the types of iatrogenic risks identified.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>The fall risk score integrates several clinical and therapeutic criteria: history of falls, balance disorders, assistance with hygiene, cognitive impairment, sedative or neuroleptic use, post-anaesthesia status, and environmental factors. Each item contributes a weighted score, with &ge;4 indicating high risk. This alert is included in the patient&rsquo;s medical record, allowing automatic extraction by the algorithm. Data were collected for all patients with a score &ge; 4, between April 2024 and April 2025, including age, sex, score, number of chronic medications, inappropriate prescriptions (based on institutional and international guidelines) and pharmaceutical actions taken.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 1149 patients were included (median age: 84 years; 50% men/50% women; median score: 6), with a median of 10 prescribed drugs. Overall, 37% had at least one inappropriate prescription. The most frequent issues were unnecessary proton pump inhibitors (74%), inappropriate doses of hypnotics (18%), and harmful drug associations (17%). Patients with inappropriate prescriptions were mainly hospitalised medical wards (73%), surgical/ambulatory units (19%), cardiac intensive care (6%), and intensive care (2%). Overall, 309 pharmaceutical interventions were made on prescriptions.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Future prospects include strengthening collaboration with prescribers through targeted training and evaluating the clinical outcomes of interventions. In addition, physicians are now required to justify the prescription of proton pump inhibitors upon hospital admission. Discharge letters will also include a dedicated section to alert community physicians to potential iatrogenic risks, ensuring continuity of care and supporting deprescribing strategies.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. https://academic.oup.com/ageing/article/50/4/1189/6043386</p><p>2. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33568364/</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Terra, L., Coquet, E., Falabregues, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.163</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.163</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-060 Pharmacists as key players in fall prevention: evaluation of an algorithm-based risk score]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A80</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A80</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A80-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-061 Effectiveness and persistence of secukinumab in psoriatic arthritis: comparison between biologic-nai&#x0308;ve and previously treated patients]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A80-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory disease affecting joints and skin, impacting patient-reported outcomes. Secukinumab, an anti-IL-17A antibody, has demonstrated efficacy, although response and persistence may vary by treatment line, as shown in several studies. Understanding the influence of biologic sequencing is important for optimising patient management.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate differences in the effectiveness and persistence of secukinumab according to prior biologic exposure (nai&#x0308;ve vs previously treated) and initial dosage.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective, observational study (January 2017-February 2025) was conducted including all PsA patients treated with secukinumab monotherapy.</p><p>Data were collected from electronic records and the pharmacy program, including the secukinumab treatment line (first-line to fourth-line), start/end dates, initial dosage, and prior biological treatments. One patient was excluded for missing data.</p><p>Effectiveness was assessed at 24 weeks, classifying patients as responders (clinical improvement) or non-responders (worsening), based on physician documentation. Persistence was estimated with Kaplan&ndash;Meier, defined as months from treatment initiation to discontinuation for any reason; patients still on treatment were censored. Differences in persistence by initial dosage (150 mg vs 300 mg every 4 weeks) and treatment line were compared using log-rank test. Statistical analysis was performed with R (v4.4.1).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Of the 61 patients, 6.6% received secukinumab as first-line therapy, 57.4% as second-line, 31.1% as third-line, and 4.9% as fourth-line. Overall, 74% achieved a clinical response at 24 weeks: 100% in first-line, 83% in second-line, 58% in third-line, and 3.3% in fourth-line.</p><p>The median overall persistence was 36.4 months (95% CI:20.3&ndash;NA); in nai&#x0308;ve patients, 36.8 months (range 10.5&ndash;53). No statistically significant differences in persistence were observed (95% CI:0.69&ndash;1.91; p=0.59) among patients previously exposed to one (40 months, range 1.5&ndash;98), two (27.7 months, range 0.9&ndash;93), or three biologics (31 months, range 4&ndash;31).</p><p>The 300 mg every 4 weeks regimen showed a trend towards higher persistence versus 150 mg (HR=0.76), although this was not statistically significant (95% CI: 0.4&ndash;1.5; p=0.44).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Secukinumab showed high overall effectiveness (74% response rate).</p><p>Treatment-nai&#x0308;ve patients had better outcomes, declining in later lines.</p><p>Treatment line and initial dose did not significantly affect persistence.</p><p>The position of secukinumab within the therapeutic sequence may be related to these outcomes, although larger prospective studies are needed to confirm this finding.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Munoz Villasur, M., Rodriguez-Tenreiro Rodriguez, C., Garcia Jimenez, V., Fadon Herrera, C., Diaz Romero, C., Maray Mateos, I., Gomez Mato, A., Latasa Berasategui, M., Esparrago Fernandez, C., Varela Ferreiro, M., Lozano Blazquez, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.164</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.164</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-061 Effectiveness and persistence of secukinumab in psoriatic arthritis: comparison between biologic-nai&#x0308;ve and previously treated patients]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A80</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A80</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A81-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-062 Beyond the airways: identifying predictors of cardiovascular events in severe T2 asthma]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A81-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Asthma is frequently associated with cardiovascular comorbidities, but the specific risk factors predisposing patients with severe asthma to cardiovascular events (CVE) remain poorly defined. Most clinical trials exclude patients with significant comorbidities, limiting applicability to real-world populations. Identifying biomarkers, comorbidities, and treatments linked to cardiovascular risk could guide preventive strategies in severe asthma management.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To determine clinical risk factors and determinants associated with CVE in patients with severe asthma with a T2 inflammatory phenotype, and to assess whether asthma treatments act as protective or risk markers for these events.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adults with severe T2 asthma managed at a hospital severe asthma care unit. All patients were receiving biologic therapy and high-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). Additional therapies analysed included oral corticosteroids (OCS), montelukast, and long-acting &beta;2-agonists (LABA). Patients with prior CVE before asthma diagnosis were excluded. Demographics, comorbidities, lung function, biomarkers (blood eosinophils, IgE), and treatments were collected from electronic medical records. CVE considered were myocardial infarction, angina requiring revascularisation, heart failure, supraventricular arrhythmia, stroke, or pulmonary embolism. Statistical analysis was performed using SAS 9.1.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 164 patients were included (135 women; mean age 57&plusmn;18 years). Sixteen patients (9.7%) experienced a CVE during follow-up. The most frequent comorbidities were obesity and allergic asthma. Significant associations with CVE were observed for eosinophilic asthma (OR=8.25, 95% CI 3.45&ndash;19.74; p&lt;0.001), nasal polyposis (OR=5.17, 95% CI 2.06&ndash;12.95; p&lt;0.001), and frequent exacerbations (OR=14.14, 95% CI 4.54&ndash;44.14; p&lt;0.001). Higher CVE risk was also found in patients treated with OCS (OR=38.89, 95% CI 13.31&ndash;113.63; p&lt;0.001), ICS (OR=32.50, 95% CI 6.70&ndash;157.44; p&lt;0.001), montelukast (OR=16.60, 95% CI 6.35&ndash;43.38; p&lt;0.001), and LABA (OR=5.65, 95% CI 2.15&ndash;14.80; p&lt;0.001). These associations likely reflect disease severity and treatment intensity rather than a direct causal effect of the medications.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>In severe T2 asthma, eosinophilic phenotype, nasal polyposis, and frequent exacerbations were strong clinical determinants of CVE. The association of CVE with asthma treatments underscores the importance of considering underlying disease severity when assessing cardiovascular risk in this population.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ibanez Ronco, M., Villamanan Bueno, E., Carrasco Cuesta, L., Mallon Gonzalez, S., Soto Rosa, A., Villarroya Peiro, E., Herrero Ambrosio, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.165</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.165</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-062 Beyond the airways: identifying predictors of cardiovascular events in severe T2 asthma]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A81</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A81</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A81-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-063 Late-onset ornithine transcarbamylase deficiency in a paediatric patient: successful management of a metabolic emergency -a case report]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A81-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Ornithine transcarbamylase deficiency (OTCD) is a rare X-linked urea cycle disorder that impairs ammonia detoxification, leading to hyperammonaemia, acute liver dysfunction and potentially life-threatening metabolic encephalopathy. Late-onset forms are often misdiagnosed due to non-specific symptoms, delaying treatment. Early diagnosis and pharmacological intervention are crucial to prevent neurological damage or death.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To describe the clinical management of a paediatric patient with late-onset OTCD and highlight the therapeutic role of hospital pharmacists in metabolic decompensations.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>An 11-year-old male was admitted with vomiting, somnolence, and hyperammonaemia (480 &micro;mol/L), alongside hyperlactacidaemia and hepatic dysfunction, with no relevant family history. On admission, he received hydroxocobalamin, biotin, and cerebral oedema management. Continuous veno-venous haemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) was initiated as an extracorporeal technique to achieve a rapid decrease in ammonia levels. Initial pharmacological therapy included sodium benzoate with sodium phenylacetate (alternated with phenylbutyrate), arginine, carnitine, carglumic acid, L-citrulline, paromomycin, and lactulose. Phenylbutyrate was discontinued due to nasogastric tube obstruction and replaced by sodium benzoate with phenylacetate. The hospital pharmacist adjusted and validated parenteral nutrition with protein restriction, compensated by higher carbohydrate intake to promote anabolism and protein synthesis, and provided basal fat to meet energy needs without overloading metabolism or causing acidosis/stress.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>CVVHDF rapidly reduced ammonia levels with clinical improvement, and pharmacological therapy helped maintain stable ammonia levels. Although genetic results were not yet available, diagnosis was supported by metabolic findings: marked elevation of urinary orotic acid, elevated glutamine, and decreased citrulline, leading to clinical suspicion of OTCD. Genetic testing later confirmed a hemizygote OTC gene mutation. Maternal testing revealed mutation G4A1V3, despite an uncomplicated pregnancy and delivery. Therapy was adjusted for outpatient management, maintaining phenylbutyrate, citrulline, and strict protein control. Regular monitoring of ammonia, amino acids, and liver enzymes was implemented. The patient remained stable, with no further metabolic decompensations and good adherence to treatment.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>OTCD can occur beyond the neonatal period with subtle or non-specific symptoms, delaying diagnosis. Early multidisciplinary intervention, including metabolic specialists and hospital pharmacists&ndash;who play a key role in the rapid initiation and adjustment of therapy and parenteral nutrition&ndash;is essential to secure favourable outcomes and avoid irreversible neurological damage.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ibanez Ronco, M., Arancon Pardo, A., Jimenez Nunez, C., Herrero Ambrosio, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.166</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.166</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-063 Late-onset ornithine transcarbamylase deficiency in a paediatric patient: successful management of a metabolic emergency -a case report]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A81</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A82</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A82-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-064 Eighteen-month descriptive analysis of early access authorisation and compassionate use authorisation drug preparations in a pharmacy at a cancer centre]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A82-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Early Access Authorisation (EAA) and Compassionate use authorisation (CUA) are key regulatory pathways to provide innovative medicines to patients. Hospital pharmacies are central to the preparation, traceability, and reporting of these drugs, which generates valuable real-world data.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The aim was to describe the characteristics of patients and medicines managed under EAA and CUA in our pharmacy at a cancer centre over 18 months.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>We retrospectively collected all drug preparations declared by our pharmacy under EAA or CUA between January 2024 and June 2025. Data included drug name, pharmaceutical class, route of administration, regulatory status (EAA or CUA), indication, and medical committee. Preparations were grouped by therapeutic area and analysed descriptively.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Over the study period, 4444 preparations were dispensed for 695 patients. A total of 28 drugs were used, mainly injectables (26/28). The main therapeutic classes were immunotherapies (16 drugs, 57%) and antibody&ndash;drug conjugates (five drugs, 18%), with smaller contributions from chemotherapies, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and others.</p><p>Most patients were treated in oncology-related committees: breast diseases (387 patients, 2635 preparations), haematology (54, 532), urology (55, 426), digestive tract (46, 201), chest diseases (58, 214), and gynaecology (37, 203). Paediatrics accounted for 58 patients (223 preparations). Endocrinology (3, 9) and dermatology (1, 1) represented minor activity.</p><p>Regulatory status covered 13 drugs in CUA and 19 in EAA; by June 2025, eight drugs had transitioned to routine care. In total, 50 different indications were managed, mainly in paediatrics (10), haematology (nine), digestive tract (eight), and breast diseases (five).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Our analysis highlights the major involvement of hospital pharmacy in EAA and CUA. This analysis is a first step to our future analysis of 5 years. Preparations allow to give access to 6% of our new patients to the most advance treatment. Paediatrics has the most indications; we will investigate this further. Beyond operational impact, these data could help anticipate transitions to routine care and support the collection of real-world evidence to complement clinical trial findings, thus contributing to drug evaluation and market access strategies.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cosme, E., Roy-Djordjevic, P., Denis, L., Annereau, M., Do, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.167</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.167</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-064 Eighteen-month descriptive analysis of early access authorisation and compassionate use authorisation drug preparations in a pharmacy at a cancer centre]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A82</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A82</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A82-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-065 Comparative efficacy and safety of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors and tricyclic antidepressants in management of depression cancer patients: a systematic review]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A82-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Depression and anxiety are common in cancer patients, adversely affecting treatment adherence, quality of life, and survival. Antidepressants such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), serotonin&ndash;norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), and tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) are frequently prescribed, yet their comparative efficacy and safety in oncology remain unclear.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of SSRIs, SNRIs, and TCAs in treating depression and anxiety among cancer patients.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases was conducted up to 2024. Eligible studies included adult cancer patients treated with SSRIs, SNRIs, or TCAs for depression or anxiety. Randomised controlled trials, cohort, and case&ndash;control studies were included. Data on study design, population, interventions, outcomes, efficacy, and safety were extracted and synthesized narratively.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Eight studies met inclusion criteria. SSRIs (fluoxetine, sertraline, escitalopram, citalopram) consistently improved depressive and anxiety symptoms with favourable tolerability. SNRIs, particularly venlafaxine and duloxetine, demonstrated efficacy for mood symptoms and neuropathic pain, but were associated with higher rates of adverse events such as nausea and hypertension. TCAs (eg, amitriptyline) showed modest benefit but were frequently limited by anticholinergic and cardiotoxic side effects, leading to higher discontinuation rates. Overall, SSRIs were most effective and best tolerated, SNRIs provided dual benefits in patients with concomitant pain, while TCAs had the least favourable safety profile.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>SSRIs represent the preferred first-line treatment for depression and anxiety in cancer patients due to their efficacy and safety. SNRIs are suitable alternatives, especially where pain syndromes coexist, whereas TCAs should be reserved for select cases given their adverse effect burden. These findings support individualised antidepressant selection in oncology to improve mental health outcomes and treatment adherence.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jabbari, S., Hashad, N., Fattouh, U., Owino, K., Maher, R., Ahmed, H., Arafat, K., Ghozlan, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.168</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.168</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-065 Comparative efficacy and safety of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors and tricyclic antidepressants in management of depression cancer patients: a systematic review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A82</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A82</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A83-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-066 Anti-angiogenic therapies in age-related macular degeneration: pharmaceutical intervention]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A83-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a leading cause of irreversible central vision loss. The exudative form, responsible for 90% of cases of severe vision loss, benefits from anti-angiogenic therapy, mainly aflibercept and bevacizumab, with faricimab as a second-line option. Personalised treatments and optimised vial compounding by pharmaceutical services is essential to maximise effectiveness and reduce treatment burden.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the use of anti-angiogenic agents in exudative AMD: identifying the most used drugs, administration patterns, and the rationale for therapeutic switches.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Retrospective observational study analysing NOA-Digital data from January to September 2025. The dataset included 2490 scheduled treatments in 417 patients. After the loading dose phase, therapeutic switches were further assessed in 47 patients. Data analysis was performed with Python.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Among 2490 intravitreal injections, 1063 were aflibercept 40 mg/mL, 308 bevacizumab 25 mg/mL, and 805 faricimab 120 mg/mL. Laterality was balanced (52% right vs 48% left eyes). Aflibercept was administered in 188 patients, with a mean of five injections per patient and a dosing interval of 7 weeks. Faricimab was used in 131 patients, 6 weeks average interval. Bevacizumab was less frequent (63 patients). A total of 147 therapeutic switches occurred, mainly from aflibercept to faricimab (n=45; 31%). After loading dose, dosing intervals extended from 5.5 to 7.4 weeks on average, with two patients reaching 12 weeks. Switches were mainly due to optical coherence tomography (OCT) fluid (n=39; 83%) and to extend intervals (n=7; 15%). Visual acuity improved in 25 patients (53,2%), remained stable in 11 (23,4%), and worsened in 11 (23,4%). Three uveitis cases with aflibercept were recorded: two resolved with anti-inflammatories, one progressed to retinal detachment requiring treatment discontinuation.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Aflibercept continues to be the first-line treatment, showing strong efficacy and safety. Switches highlight the value of individualised regimens. Faricimab is a promising option, enabling longer dosing intervals. OCT fluid remains the main criteria for therapeutic change. Hospital pharmacist validation and Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee approval ensure safety, equity, and optimal resource allocation.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Silva, C., Canario, C., Cabral, D., Mendo, I., Carreira, P., Duarte, H., Alcobia, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.169</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.169</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-066 Anti-angiogenic therapies in age-related macular degeneration: pharmaceutical intervention]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A83</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A83</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A83-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-067 Understanding severe asthma in women: towards a more precise and gender-sensitive management]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A83-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Asthma is a prevalent chronic respiratory disease with significant social impact. Although evidence highlights sex-related differences in prevalence, severity, and management, the underlying causes of these differences remain unclear from clinical, pharmacological, and quality of life perspectives. Assessing these aspects may support more personalised approaches to optimise disease control in both genders and improve quality of life in women.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The objective of this study is to analyse the distinctive aspects of severe asthma in women from clinical, pharmacological, and quality of life perspectives, and to evaluate whether differences exist between men and women in the control of this disease.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>This retrospective longitudinal observational study included patients with severe asthma followed at the Multidisciplinary Severe Asthma Clinic (MSAC) of a tertiary hospital in Spain and its pharmaceutical care consultation. Data from January to December 2024 were collected from the electronic medical record system (HCIS ), the Severe Asthma Unit database, the Single Prescription Module (MUP), and the Farmatools dispensing program to evaluate treatment regimens.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 223 patients with severe asthma were included (mean age 63 years; 70.4% women). The most frequent inhaled regimen was long-acting beta agonist and inhaled corticosteroids (LABA&ndash;ICS) 66.2% women vs 63.6% men. Poor adherence, defined as a medication possession ratio (MPR) of less than 50%, was observed in 24.2% of patients, more frequent in women (26% vs 15.4%; p&lt;0.05). Overuse of rescue inhalers was found in over 50% of patients, without sex differences. Oral corticosteroid use was higher in women (20.6% vs 15.1%; p&lt;0.05), as was antidepressant/anxiolytic treatment (63% of women vs 36.3% of men; p&gt;0.05). Biologic therapy was prescribed in 109 patients (68.8% were women), mostly mepolizumab, with similar rates between sexes. Biomarkers showed lower FeNO (33.5 vs 46.5; p&lt;0.05) and lower IgE (329.5 vs 431.5; p&lt;0.05) in women. Furthermore, women had a lower Asthma Control Test (ACT) score (18.3 vs 21.5; p&lt;0.05).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Sex differences in severe asthma are clinically and pharmacologically relevant. According to the analysis of the data collected, women show higher comorbidity burden, poorer disease control and worse adherence despite similar prescriptions. These findings support the need for gender-sensitive asthma management and further prospective studies.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carrasco, L., Villamanan, E., Ibanez, M., Carpio, C., Laorden, D., Bueno, S., Benito, E., Villarroya, E., Soto, A., Mallon, S., Herrero, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.170</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.170</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-067 Understanding severe asthma in women: towards a more precise and gender-sensitive management]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A83</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A83</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A83-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-068 Eighteen-month descriptive analysis of the paediatric population included in early access authorisation, compassionate use authorisation, compassionate program in a pharmacy at a cancer centre]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A83-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Early Access Authorisation (EAA), Compassionate use authorisation (CUA) and compassionate program (CP) are key regulatory pathways to provide innovative medicines to paediatric patients. Thanks to these programs many patients at our cancer centre have benefited from innovative treatments.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The aim was to describe the characteristics of paediatric patients and medicines managed under EAA, CUA and CP in our hospital pharmacy over 18 months.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>We retrospectively collected all drugs provided by our pharmacy under EAA, CUA, CP between January 2024 and June 2025. Data included drug name, route of administration, regulatory status (EAA, CUA, CP) at dispensation and on 30 June 2025, indication. Dispensations were grouped by therapeutic area and analysed descriptively.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Over the study period, 453 dispensations were done for 76 patients in the paediatrics committee (PC). This represents 8.6% of our population treated in these programs. A total of 10 drugs were used, mainly oral (9/10).</p><p>PC had the most indications of all our committee with 19 different indications. The second was chest disease (CD) (18 indications for 103 patients) and haematology the third (16 indications for 80 patients).</p><p>Regarding the regulatory status of dispensing, 12 indications were in CUA for PC (nine for CD , seven for haematology). This represented 12.2% of all our indications. As of 30 June 2025 we had still 12 indications in CUA (seven for CD, six for haematology).</p><p>Two indications were in EAA at dispensation (2% of all our indication) (five for CD and seven for haematology) and only one on 30 June 2025.</p><p>In PC, only one indication obtained reimbursement (two for CD and three for haematology).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Our analysis highlights the major difficulties for access market in the paediatric population. PC is the only committee in our hospital that has not seen a decrease in the number of indications. Plus, only 5.2% and the indication in PC obtained a reimbursement on 30 June 2025. This highlights the need to collect more real-world data in paediatrics to facilitate assessments and market access. The development of new pharmaceutical forms adapted to paediatrics by our pharmacy may also be a lever to facilitate market access.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cosme, E., Annereau, M., Denis, L., Blondel, L., Roy-Djordjevic, P., Do, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.171</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.171</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-068 Eighteen-month descriptive analysis of the paediatric population included in early access authorisation, compassionate use authorisation, compassionate program in a pharmacy at a cancer centre]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A83</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A84</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A84-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-069 Real-life experience with talquetamab in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: case report]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A84-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Talquetamab is a humanised bispecific antibody targeting CD3 on T-cells and GPRC5D on myeloma cells, used in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). While pivotal trials have shown promising results, real-world evidence remains essential to confirm effectiveness and safety in routine practice.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of talquetamab in RRMM patients treated in two general university hospitals.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Observational, descriptive, retrospective, multicentre study conducted between January 2023-September 2025. Patients received, at least, three prior treatment lines: an immunomodulatory agent, a proteasome inhibitor, an anti-CD38 antibody. Variables included sex, age, myeloma type, number of prior therapies, effectiveness (monoclonal component (MC), total proteins (TP), progression-free survival (PFS)) and safety (adverse events (AE)). Effectiveness was defined as achieving normal TP values (6-8.3mg/dl) and undetectable MC.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Six patients (mean age 77.6&plusmn;5 years) were included: three men (patients 1, 2, 6), three women (patients 3, 4, 5). Another patient was excluded due to use of talquetamab as bridging therapy before CAR-T. Patients 1, 2, 5 had MM IgG-lambda; patient 3 MM IgG-kappa; patient 4 MM IgA; patient 6 biclonal gammapathy IgG-kappa/lambda. Patients 2, 3, 6 were refractory to three prior lines; patients 4, 5 to five; patient 1 to four.</p><p>All received step-up dosing (0.01-0.8 mg/kg), except patient 5 due to cytomegalovirus reactivation. All achieved normal TP. Only patient 3 reached undetectable MC, remaining in complete remission after 28 cycles. Initially on biweekly 0.8mg/kg, from May 2025 her regimen was adjusted to every 21 days. The remaining patients discontinued due to progression (mean PFS 3.6&plusmn;2 months).</p><p>All patients required immunoglobulin supplementation due to infection risk. Patients 2, 3, 4 developed grade I cytokine release syndrome (CRS). Patient 4 also developed grade-II immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), treated with dexamethasone and tocilizumab. Patients 1, 5, developed grade-II CRS. Patient 5 received rasburicasa due to tumour lysis syndrome. Additional AEs: asthenia (100%), skin lesions and infections (57.1% each), hepatic, haematologic, digestive alterations (28.6% each), cardiac dysfunction and facial paralysis (14.3% each).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Only one patient achieved complete remission and continues treatment. The most common AEs were asthenia, skin lesions and infections. CRS and ICANS were successfully managed with supportive therapy. Larger real-world studies are needed to confirm these findings about safety and effectiveness of talquetamab.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Coiduras Del Olmo, L., Ortega Menendez, P., Pinilla Lebrero, G., Garcia Martin, E., Moraza, A. N., Loysele Susmozas, M., Martin Vega, E., Lopez Aspiroz, E., Martinez Hernandez, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.172</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.172</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-069 Real-life experience with talquetamab in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: case report]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A84</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A84</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A84-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-070 Characterisation of clinical trial units in the hospital pharmacy services of Spanish hospitals]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A84-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>In Clinical Trial Units within Spanish Hospital Pharmacy Services no staffing standard has yet been established in relation to the number and complexity of trials, teaching activities derived from investigational drug management. In 2018, an exploratory survey was conducted in Spain that described the increase in complexity and the need for more staff.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To analyse the current situation of clinical trial units within Spanish Hospital Pharmacy Services and the training provided to pharmacy residents (comprehensive teaching).</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>An online survey was distributed to pharmacists working in Hospital Pharmacy Services across Spain. It consisted of 17 questions covering hospital characteristics, clinical trial activities, working conditions, funding, and resident training. The survey was disseminated to all members of the Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacy between April-May 2025. Data analysis was performed using SPSS v26.0. Descriptive statistics were used for frequencies, and Chi-squared or Fisher&rsquo;s exact test were applied to compare qualitative variables.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>82 responses were collected, corresponding to 71 hospitals. Results revealed significant differences according to hospital size. Large centres (&gt;600 beds) represented 45.1% of the sample and showed greater research activity: 53.1% reported more than 250 active clinical trials, compared with 10.3% of small hospitals. Phase I research was also markedly more frequent in large hospitals (78.1% vs 23.1%). Specialised human resources were more frequently available in large centres: 65.6% employed &ge;3 pharmacists dedicated to clinical trials, versus 25.6% in smaller hospitals. Digital resources showed a similar gap: 78.1% of large hospitals had dedicated software compared with 41.7% of smaller centres. With regard to resident training in clinical trials, adequate comprehensive teaching was reported in 90.6% of large hospitals, compared with 61.5% of small hospitals. These findings highlight a correlation between hospital size, research volume, and availability of specialised resources.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Being competitive as a country in an increasingly challenging clinical research environment requires sufficient and specialised human resources, specific software, and an appropriate return on investment in Pharmacy Services. Furthermore, larger hospitals, due to their greater resource investment, tend to achieve more significant returns in terms of research output and quality, highlighting the importance of adequate infrastructure to strengthen clinical research.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tejedor-Tejada, E., Gonzalez-Perez, C., Villacanas Palomares, M., Garcia-Avello, A., Sanchez-Del Hoyo, R., Mullera, M., Serrano-Alonso, M., Dominguez Chafer, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.173</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.173</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-070 Characterisation of clinical trial units in the hospital pharmacy services of Spanish hospitals]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A84</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A85</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A85-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-071 Meropenem de-escalation: an approach against bacterial resistance]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A85-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Overuse of antibiotics increases resistance, prompting the World Health Organisation to create AWaRe guidelines that classify antibiotics into Access, Watch, and Reserve groups. Carbapenems, in the Watch group, require careful monitoring as part of antimicrobial resistance strategies. Used for specific infections, these broad-spectrum antibiotics should be de-escalated whenever possible to help prevent resistance.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The objective of this study is to evaluate the degree of de-escalation of a specific carbapenem, meropenem, in a secondary care hospital where 61 carbapenemases were isolated in 2024 (44 OXA48; 6 VIM; 3 KPC; 1 NDM; 4 OXA48 and NDM; 3 OXA48 and VIM).</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Descriptive, observational, retrospective study from the last quarter of 2024. It included all patients treated with meropenem who had an available antibiogram. Exclusion criteria were absence of culture, negative culture, or death during infection. De-escalation was considered indicated if the antibiogram showed sensitivity to a narrower-spectrum antibiotic to which the patient was not allergic and, in addition, the patient had not had a culture with a multidrug-resistant microorganism in the last 4 months.</p><p>To conduct the study, the patients&lsquo; electronic medical records were reviewed, collecting demographic variables (sex and age) and clinical variables (prescribing service, duration of treatment, and type of infection).</p><p>For quantitative variables, measures of central tendency and dispersion were used, and for categorical variables, absolute frequencies.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 192 patients were reviewed, of whom only 93 met the inclusion criteria, with a median age of 72 years (IQR: 58.75-83.25), 63.4% of them being men. The predominant type of infection was respiratory in origin 37/93 (39.8%), followed by urinary 23/93 (24.7%). The majority of prescriptions were from internal medicine (34.4%), followed by haematology and the ICU (8,6% each). The average treatment duration was 5 days (IQR: 2.83-8.23).</p><p>Of 93 patients, 11 (11.8%) were ineligible for de-escalation. Among eligible patients, only 61% underwent de-escalation, which means 32 (39%) completed treatment with meropenem even though a narrower-spectrum antibiotic was effective.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The results indicate that antibiotic de-escalation was not performed correctly in all patients analysed, which implies that antibiotic prescribing did not comply with the recommendations made by the AWaRe guidelines.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tabernero Sistines, I., Bajenaru, G., Raguan Yanez, G., Sanchez Navarro, I., Fernandez Arberas, N., Lopez Del Rio, A., Martin Rodriguez, M., Garcia Rojo Vaquez, L., Beltran Bellvis, M., Baldominos Utrilla, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.174</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.174</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-071 Meropenem de-escalation: an approach against bacterial resistance]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A85</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A85</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A85-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-072 Whos first? Prioritisation of prescription validation in the emergency room]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A85-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>WHO estimates a projected shortfall of 11 million health workers by 2030, mostly in low- and lower-middle income countries.</p><p>Therefore, tasks optimisation and/or prioritisation are necessary for the near future.</p><p>Chronic complex patients (CCP) are more likely to have worse health outcomes compared to the rest of the population.</p><p>High alert medications (HAM) are drugs that bear a heightened risk of causing significant patient harm when they are used in error.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>Evaluate the impact of an automatic prioritisation algorithm (APA) for prescription validation in the Emergency Room (ER).</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>An APA was available for the hospital pharmacy team from March 2025. Said APA lists patients according to clinical variables (renal failure, dyselectrolytaemia, etc.) and prescription reconciliation variables (omission of chronic medication, polypharmacy, omission of administration of relevant drugs, etc.), assigning a score. Theoretically, the higher the score, the higher the benefit of prescription validation.</p><p>We conducted the study in a non-monographic tertiary care hospital.</p><p>From June to September 2025, eight days were randomly chosen.</p><p>On four of those days, two pharmacists selected 10 patients per day from the morning shift in the ER, using the APA (APA group).</p><p>On the remaining 4 days, the same pharmacists randomly selected 10 patients per day from the same shift (random group).</p><p>Pharmacist interventions and presence of high alert medication were recorded and compared between the two groups using Chi-squared test in STATA. The APA also identified CCP.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Comparing the 40 patients in each group, APA group led to more interventions (13 vs 2, p&lt;0.01) and the patients had HAM prescribed more often (16 vs 7, p&lt;0.01).</p><p>22 CCP were identified pre-validation in the APA group while none were in the non-APA.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The use of the APA multiplied sixfold the number interventions per patient.</p><p>Since CCP were identified beforehand and more HAM were detected, interventions were made in better candidates using the APA.</p><p>If there is insufficient time to validate every prescription, this APA will maximise the impact of our work in the ER.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Morales Portillo, A., Cuy Bueno, M., Galindo Verdugo, A., Labrana Sanchez, C., Espada Marco, T., Couceiro Zamora, I., Porredon Antelo, C., Santos Rodriguez, C., Bardoll Cucala, M., Costa Perez, A., Del Amo Avila, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.175</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.175</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-072 Whos first? Prioritisation of prescription validation in the emergency room]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A85</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A86</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A86-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-073 Indications and dosing of gentamicin in a Norwegian hospital, areas for optimisation of treatment]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A86-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>In Norwegian guidelines, gentamicin combined with a narrow-spectrum penicillin is the first-choice antibiotic for a variety of hospital infections. Incorrect use of high risk drugs, as gentamicin, can lead to serious consequences and is therefore an important area for improvement to increase patient safety. To inform the development of a pharmacist-mediated digital screening tool for identifying inappropriate gentamicin treatments, we investigated current gentamicin use in our hospital.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Investigate whether gentamicin in our hospital was used and dosed according to guidelines.</p></li><li><p>Assess whether the presence of underweight or overweight status posed a risk of incorrect dosing.</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>In a retrospective observational study, adult patients (n = 150) who received a total of 158 gentamicin treatments over a 3-month period were included based on clinical data from the medication management system, visualised using Microsoft Power BI software. Information was complemented through a medical record review by a clinical pharmacist.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Most of the treatments were single doses (64%), almost a quarter (23%) comprised of two doses, while in a minority of the treatments (13%) three to seven doses were administered before gentamicin was discontinued. According to the guidelines, gentamicin was confirmed as the preferred antibiotic in most of the reviewed treatments (87%). However, in some cases, the indication was not described (8%) or gentamicin was not a proposed choice (4%) in the guidelines.</p><p>We calculated dosage per kg in 128 treatments, more than half were inappropriate: the first doses of gentamicin were too low (51%), while in a smaller portion (15%) the first dose was higher than recommendations in guidelines. In a majority of the treatments of overweight patients doses were too low (48 out of 79, 61%), while most underweight patients (5 out of 6, 83%) received too high doses.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The substantial portion of treatment that deviates from the <I>Norwegian</I> guidelines highlights a need for a digital screening tool that identifies the potential high risk patients on gentamicin for clinical pharmacist follow-up throughout the hospital. In addition, physicians should be educated in correct dosing of gentamicin according to height and weight.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Heier, K., Miljojkovic, S., Andersson, Y., Mathiesen, L., Haug, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.176</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.176</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-073 Indications and dosing of gentamicin in a Norwegian hospital, areas for optimisation of treatment]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A86</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A86</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A86-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-074 Assessment of elafibranor for the treatment of primary biliary cholangitis]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A86-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>The European Medicines Agency (EMA) has recently approved elafibranor (ELF) for the treatment of primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) in adults with an inadequate response to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), or as monotherapy in those unable to tolerate UDCA.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate whether elafibranor and the main current standard treatments are equivalent therapeutic alternatives (ETA) by performing an indirect treatment comparison (ITC).</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>In August 2025, a literature search was conducted in PubMed using the following criteria: treatment of PBC with ELF, obeticholic acid (OCA), or seladelpar (SEL) in PBC, either in combination with UDCA in patients with an inadequate response, or as monotherapy in those intolerant to UDCA. The comparison variable was biochemical response (BR) at week 52, defined as ALP &lt; 1.67<FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT>ULN with &ge;15% reduction from baseline and total bilirubin &lt; ULN. Absolute Risk Reduction (ARR) was used for the ITC, applying the Bucher method. The ETA guideline<sup>1</sup> was used to assess therapeutic equivalence. The non-inferiority delta value () was set at &plusmn;35%, and the Shakespeare method was used to estimate the probability of exceeding this threshold.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The comparison included one phase III study for each drug. The results of the clinical trials and the indirect comparison are presented below:</p><p><tbl id="T1" loc="float"><tblbdy top-stubs="2"><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>OBETICHOLIC ACID (</b>ARR = 37.0 (95% CI 23.7 &ndash; 50.3)<b>)</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>SELADELPAR (</b>ARR = 40.9 (95% CI 28.1 &ndash; 53.8)<b>)</b> </c></r><r><c cspan="3" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>ELAFIBRANOR (</b>ARR = 47.2 (95% CI 36.4 &ndash; 57.9)<b>)</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">ARR = 10.2 (-6.9 ; 27,3) p = 0.2424 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">ARR = 6.3 (-10.45 ; 23.05) p = 0.4611 </c></r></tblbdy></tbl></p><p>Both comparisons included the null value and were fully within the equivalence margin. The probability of exceeding the margin was 0.0%.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>In accordance with the ETA guideline, ELF can be considered ETA compared to OCA and SEL in terms of BR. OCA is included for reference only, as it is not currently authorised for clinical use. The choice between ELF and SEL should be based on toxicity profile and other response-related variables.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. Alegre Del Rey EJ, <I>et al. Med Clin (Barc)</I> 22 July 2014;<b>143</b>(2):85&ndash;90.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Saez Hortelano, J., Ozcoidi Idoate, D., Fernandez Vazquez, A., Ortiz De Urbina Gonzalez, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.177</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.177</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-074 Assessment of elafibranor for the treatment of primary biliary cholangitis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A86</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A87</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A87-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-075 Medication matters! Clinical pharmacists identify drug-related causes of emergency hospitalisations]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A87-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Drug-related problems (DRPs), including adverse events and medication errors, are responsible for about 15% of all hospital admissions. In addition to patient harm, DRPs can lead to high costs for healthcare systems. Despite various evidence supporting the role of clinical pharmacists in identifying DRPs, prospective analyses in emergency departments (EDs) remain scarce.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>We aimed to identify DRPs that potentially contributed to emergency hospitalisations and characterise them eg, according to their cause, severity, and preventability.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>This prospective evaluation was conducted in the ED of a tertiary hospital between April 1 and July 31, 2025. Four experienced clinical pharmacists performed type 2b medication reviews for patients who were hospitalised for &ge;1 day. Patients directly admitted to intensive care units were excluded. Severity of DRPs was assessed using the National-Coordinating-Council-for-Medication-Error-Reporting-and-Prevention-index (NCC-MERP). DRPs that potentially caused the hospitalisation were classified according to their cause, involved medications, acceptance of clinical pharmaceutical interventions, causality (World-Health-Organisation-Uppsala-Monitoring-Centre), and preventability (Hallas 1993) after reaching internal consensus.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Within 49 visits, clinical pharmacists reviewed the medication of 538 patients. In total, 418 DRPs were detected (mean 0.8 per patient). The majority of DRPs (69.1%, 289/418) were found reaching the patient without having caused harm (NCC-MERP C-D). Sixty-four DRPs were detected that potentially caused the hospital admission in 9.5% (51/538) of all patients. Thereof, main causes were &lsquo;adverse events&rsquo; (26), &lsquo;incompliance with guidelines&rsquo; (10), and &lsquo;overdoses&rsquo; (9). Most frequently involved drug classes involved were &lsquo;antithrombotic agents&rsquo;, &lsquo;psycholeptics&rsquo;, &lsquo;psychoanaleptics&rsquo;, and &lsquo;diuretics&rsquo;. In 75% (48/64) of DRPs, clinical pharmaceutical interventions were considered by ED-physicians. Thirty-six of these DRPs were rated as &lsquo;certain&rsquo; or &lsquo;probable&rsquo;, and 15 as &lsquo;definitely preventable&rsquo;.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Approximately 1 out of 10 emergency hospital admissions was potentially caused by DRPs. Strengths of our analysis include its prospective design and implementation in clinical routine by multiple pharmacists. Our results are in line with existing evidence, thereby indicating external validity. We anticipate even higher numbers of DRPs, as we performed type 2b medication reviews only and intensive care patients were not included. Clinical pharmacists play an essential role in identifying DRPs and should be regularly integrated within interprofessional ED-teams to optimise medication safety.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cuba, L., Palme, V., Rauber, C., Sanlioglu, C., Eisenburger, P., Zwiefler, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.178</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.178</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-075 Medication matters! Clinical pharmacists identify drug-related causes of emergency hospitalisations]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A87</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A87</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A87-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-076 Desensitisation to antineoplastic drugs: clinical efficacy analysis]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A87-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Hypersensitivity reactions to antineoplastic drugs are a major cause of treatment discontinuation and may negatively affect clinical outcomes, as patients may be forced to switch to less effective or less tolerated therapies. Drug desensitisation is a therapeutic strategy for sensitised patients. Desensitisation protocols involve administering the drug divided into several bags to be infused in sequence, with a dilution of 1:1000, 1:100, and 1:10 until the therapeutic dose is reached. This gradual increase in concentration modulates the immune response, inducing a transient tolerance that that prevents or minimises hypersensitivity reactions.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The aim of this study is to describe the use of desensitisation protocols in an oncology unit of a Tuscan hospital in the 2-year period 2023&ndash;2024 and to assess their clinical impact by evaluating how many patients were able to continue the planned antineoplastic therapy thanks to desensitisation.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective analysis was conducted on all oncology prescriptions sent to the antineoplastic drugs unit in 2023&ndash;2024. Data on each desensitisation procedure were extracted from the preparation logs generated by the clinical software for oncology protocol management. Variables collected included number of bags, drug type, dilution scheme, number of procedures per patient and treatment tolerance. All information was processed in a spreadsheet.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>During the study period, 932 bags were prepared for 229 desensitisation procedures involving 55 patients and 13 active ingredients. Most protocols required four bags (185 cases, 74.30%), while 64 (25.70%) used a three-bag scheme. Carboplatin was the most frequent drug (374 bags, 40.13%), followed by paclitaxel (207, 22.21%), oxaliplatin (92, 9.87%), rituximab (83, 8.91%) and atezolizumab (67, 7.19%). Among the 55 patients, 41 (74.55%) tolerated desensitisation and continued their planned therapy for at least one additional cycle, whereas 14 (25.45%) required treatment modification due to intolerance.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Desensitisation has proven to be a key therapeutic strategy for managing hypersensitivity to oncological drugs. With a favourable outcome in 74.55% of cases during 2023&ndash;2024, it allowed most patients to continue the best available therapeutic line, reducing hypersensitivity reactions and supporting treatment continuity. These procedures therefore improve the overall risk&ndash;benefit profile and have a meaningful positive impact on treatment outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rossi, L., De Luca, A., Jacopo, L., Orsi, C., Tosoni, F., Ballerini, R., Ianiello, V., Cecchi, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.179</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.179</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-076 Desensitisation to antineoplastic drugs: clinical efficacy analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A87</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A88</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A88-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-077 Effectiveness of faricimab treatment: real-world study in a tertiary hospital]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A88-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Faricimab is a bispecific monoclonal antibody approved for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and diabetic macular oedema (DME). Unlike previous anti-VEGF agents, faricimab targets both VEGFA and Ang-2, potentially allowing longer dosing intervals and sustained efficacy. Real-world data are essential to confirm whether these benefits translate into routine clinical practice.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the real-world effectiveness of faricimab in extending treatment intervals while maintaining visual outcomes in patients with nAMD and DME treated at a tertiary hospital.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective observational study was conducted including all patients treated with faricimab between January 2024 and March 2025. Data collected included demographics, diagnosis, previous anti-VEGF therapy, number of injections, maximum and current treatment intervals, best visual acuity with pinhole, and treatment modifications. Effectiveness was defined as the ability to maintain clinical response while extending dosing intervals. Data were obtained from Diraya and SIPCAD electronic health records.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>83 patients (92 eyes) were included (mean age 79 years; 47.8% female). Diagnoses: 86.9% nAMD, 10.6% DME, and 2.2% macular telangiectasia. The mean number of faricimab injections was 7.6 &plusmn; 2.75. Previous treatments included aflibercept (71.7%), brolucizumab (16.3%), ranibizumab (7.6%), and 4.3% were treatment-nai&#x0308;ve. Maximum treatment intervals achieved were 4 weeks (13%), 6 weeks (10.9%), 8 weeks (31.5%), 12 weeks (32.6%), and 16 weeks (11.9%). Compared with prior therapy, 67.4% of eyes achieved longer intervals. At the time of analysis, 48.9% maintained their maximum extension, whereas 50% required shortening. Mean visual acuity with pinhole was 0.39. Treatment was discontinued in 34.8% (62.5% switched to aflibercept 8 mg, 6.3% to Ozurdex, and 31.3% discontinued therapy). Overall, 65.2% continued faricimab with a mean interval of 9.2 &plusmn; 3.0 weeks.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>More than half of the treated eyes achieved longer treatment intervals than with previous anti-VEGF therapies, indicating that faricimab is effective for individualised dosing in real-world settings. However, about half of the patients could not maintain the maximum interval achieved, highlighting the need for close monitoring and individualised retreatment strategies.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Morillo, M., Sanchez Lobon, I., Garcia Fernandez, J., Mora Herrera, C., Rodriguez Garcia, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.180</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.180</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-077 Effectiveness of faricimab treatment: real-world study in a tertiary hospital]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A88</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A88</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A88-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-078 Outcomes at 40 weeks with faricimab: impact on heavily pretreated patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A88-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) is a leading cause of vision loss in older adults. Despite anti-VEGF therapies, some patients remain refractory, requiring frequent injections and showing persistent retinal fluid. Faricimab, a bispecific antibody targeting VEGF-A and Ang-2, shows promise in extending treatment intervals and improving anatomical outcomes. However, real-world data in heavily pretreated populations remain limited.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate whether treatment with faricimab in heavily pretreated nAMD patients enables extended dosing intervals (Q) and improves retinal anatomy, defined as the absence of intraretinal fluid (IRF) and subretinal fluid (SRF), at week 40.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Retrospective, observational, single-centre study including patients initiating faricimab between 30/10/2023 and 28/02/2025, with 40 weeks of follow-up. All patients were refractory to &ge;2 lines of anti-VEGF therapy per institutional criteria. A treat-and-extend regimen was applied, adjusting dosing intervals (Q, in weeks) based on disease activity. IRF and SRF were assessed via optical coherence tomography (OCT) as binary variables (presence/absence). Data were extracted from electronic medical records and analysed using Excel.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>46 patients (47 eyes) were included; 38 completed follow-up. Mean prior treatment lines: 2.13 &plusmn; 0.43; median prior injections: 29 (range 5&ndash;152). Baseline mean Q: 4.59 &plusmn; 1.23 weeks; at 40 weeks: 7.75 &plusmn; 2.85 weeks.</p><p>Q was extended in 76.32%, maintained in 15.79%, and shortened in 7.89%. At baseline 95.65% had intraretinal and/or subretinal fluid: 21.74% had both IRF and SRF, 23.91% IRF only, 50% SRF only, and 4.35% no fluid. At week 40, 55.26% showed no fluid; among them, 95.24% had Q extended. Of those with persistent fluid, 52.94% also achieved Q extension.</p><p>Subgroup analysis:</p><p><tbl id="T1" loc="float"><tblbdy top-stubs="2"><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Baseline</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>At week 40</b> </c></r><r><c cspan="2" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Fluid Type </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Patients (n) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Fluid Resolution </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Q extension in partial responders</b> </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">IRF + SRF </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>8</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">3 (37.5%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">3 of 5 (60%) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">IRF only </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>9</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">6 (66.66%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">2 of 3 (66.66%) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">SRF only </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>19</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">11 (57.89%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">2 of 8 (25%) </c></r></tblbdy></tbl></p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Faricimab enabled dosing interval extension and improved retinal anatomy in a majority of heavily pretreated nAMD patients. These findings support its use in clinical practice. Further controlled studies with larger sample sizes are warranted to confirm these outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rodriguez Quecedo, M., Santos Ibanez, A., Torio Alvarez, L., Viseda Torrellas, Y., Suarez Laguna, J., Carrera Garcia, N., Paredes Rodriguez, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.181</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.181</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-078 Outcomes at 40 weeks with faricimab: impact on heavily pretreated patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A88</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A89</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A89-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-079 Gender gap in ADHD treatment: analysis of paediatric methylphenidate prescriptions]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A89-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>ADHD shows gender differences in symptomatology and diagnostic pathways: males predominantly exhibit hyperactive/impulsive symptoms, whereas females often present inattentive or internalising forms, which are frequently underdiagnosed. Literature reports a male-to-female (M:F) ratio of approximately 3:1 among treated paediatric patients.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>Aim of the study is to analyse methylphenidate prescriptions in a Local Health Authority (LHA) in Northern Italy, with a focus on gender differences in patients &lt;18 years old, and to compare local data with international reports.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective analysis of territorial methylphenidate prescriptions in patients &lt;18 years old was conducted for the period January 2023&ndash;May 2025. The following were evaluated: prevalence, gender distribution, and consumption indicators (total DDDs, DDD/1000 inhabitants/day, average DDD per patient).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>During the observation period, 59 patients &lt;18 years were treated: 56 males (M) and three females (F), resulting in an M:F ratio of 19:1, markedly higher than literature reports (3:1). Overall paediatric DDDs remained stable (2710 in 2023, 3260 in 2024, 2245 in the first 5- months of 2025), corresponding to an average consumption of approximately 0.05 DDD/1000 inhabitants/day. Nearly all consumption was attributable to males (0.09&ndash;0.10 DDD/1000 inhabitants/day), with much lower values in females (&lt;0.01), confirming a pronounced gender gap. Annual DDDs per patient (&lt;18 years) averaged 90, suggesting predominantly intermittent use. Age stratification showed no treatments under 6 years; in the 6&ndash;11 year group, 29 M and 0 F were treated, while in the 12&ndash;17 year group, 34 M and 3 F were treated, indicating a particularly pronounced gender imbalance in early diagnosis. This pattern aligns with literature and, according to local child neuropsychiatrists, reflects phenotypic sex differences leading to lower clinical recognition of ADHD in females, and consequently, often delayed diagnosis.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The marked gender imbalance observed raises concerns about potential underdiagnosis and undertreatment of females with ADHD. The analysis highlights the need to raise awareness among paediatricians and child neuropsychiatrists regarding gender-specific clinical presentations, develop more equitable diagnostic and therapeutic pathways, and use prescription data not only to monitor appropriateness but also to assess equity in access to care.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>&bull; Salari. Global prevalence of ADHD in children and adolescents-2024 </p><p>&bull; Young. Females with ADHD: identification and treatment guidance-2020 </p><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Car, A., Dalise, E., Brustia, F., Abbiate, R., Puntoriere, M., Torti, U., Vighi, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.182</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.182</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-079 Gender gap in ADHD treatment: analysis of paediatric methylphenidate prescriptions]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A89</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A89</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A89-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-080 Prospective study on patient-reported outcomes associated with response to biologic therapies in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A89-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) have become valuable tools for assessing the quality of life as perceived by patients. Validated instruments such as the Psoriasis Symptoms and Signs Diary (PSSD) and EQ-5D-5L allow for standardised evaluation and support a multidisciplinary, patient-focused approach, enabling treatment optimisation.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The objectives are to evaluate disease control in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis treated with biologics and to analyse discrepancies between PROs and the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI). Additionally, to describe the profile of poorly controlled patients and identify factors related to therapeutic response.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>This is a single-centre, prospective, observational, and cross-sectional study, conducted between January and July 2025. It included patients aged &ge;18 years with moderate-to-severe psoriasis receiving biologic therapy for at least 6 months. Patients with language barriers or lost to follow-up were excluded.</p><p>Collected variables included demographics (age, sex), treatment-related data (duration, current therapy, treatment line), and efficacy measures (PASI, EQ-5D-5L). Good disease control was defined as PSSD &lt; 20 or PASI &lt; 10. A protocol was established with dermatology so that patients with PSSD &gt; 20 were referred by the pharmacist for reassessment. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS, with a significance level set at p &lt; 0.05.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 44 patients were included (54.5% male, 45.5% female; median age: 48 years). The median treatment duration was 25 months. 15 patients (34.1%) had a PSSD &gt; 20 and were referred. Among them, 61.4% were on adalimumab, and 54.5% were on first-line therapy. The median PASI score at the time of referral was 1. No significant correlation was found between PASI and PSSD (rho = 0.146; p = 0.487), nor were statistically significant associations observed with variables such as age (p=0.853), sex (Yates correction = 1), treatment or treatment line (Yates correction =1), treatment duration (p= 0.647), or EQ-5D-5L (p= 0.153).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Although PASI scores were low, nearly 40% of patients showed poor control according to the PSSD, highlighting a discrepancy between clinical assessment and patient perception. Incorporating the PSSD into routine clinical practice may facilitate the early detection of inadequate treatment response and support its optimisation.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Perez Ahijon, C., Jimenez Rivero, N., Arenas Villafranca, J., Nieto Guindo, M., Faus Felipe, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.183</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.183</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-080 Prospective study on patient-reported outcomes associated with response to biologic therapies in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A89</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A89</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A90-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-081 Real-world effectiveness of trastuzumab deruxtecan in HER2-positive and HER2-low metastatic breast cancer]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A90-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) is an antibody&ndash;drug conjugate with proven efficacy in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer and, more recently, in HER2-low disease. However, real-world data on its effectiveness outside clinical trials are limited. Assessing clinical outcomes in daily practice is essential to confirm its benefit and optimise therapeutic strategies for unresectable or metastatic breast cancer.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the real-world effectiveness of T-DXd in patients with unresectable or metastatic breast cancer, including HER2-positive and HER2-low subgroups. Primary objectives were to assess progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) and to compare outcomes between both indications.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective observational study was conducted including patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with T-DXd for approved indications: (1) HER2-positive unresectable or metastatic breast cancer after at least one prior anti-HER2 regimen, and (2) HER2-low unresectable or metastatic breast cancer after previous chemotherapy. Variables included, obtained from Farmatools (v.3) Outpatient Module and medical records, were: sex, age, treatment indication, treatment start date and date of progression or death. Qualitative variables were expressed as frequencies and percentages; quantitative variables as mean&plusmn;standard deviation or median (interquartile range). PFS and OS were estimated using the Kaplan&ndash;Meier method, and subgroup comparisons were performed with the log-rank test. Analyses were carried out using IBM-SPSS Statistics 28.0 for iOS.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Thirty-one women were included (mean age 61.47&plusmn;10.49 years); 15 (48.4%) had HER2-positive disease and 16 (51.6%) HER2-low disease. Median PFS was 5.0 months (95% CI: 3.66&ndash;6.35). By subgroup, median PFS was 10.0 months (95% CI: 6.02&ndash;13.98) in HER2-positive and 4.0 months (95% CI: 2.48&ndash;5.52) in HER2-low patients, with no statistically significant difference (p=0.336). Median OS was not estimable in either subgroup, and the comparison between indications showed no significant differences (p=0.930). However, patients treated in later therapy lines (&gt;3) had significantly longer OS than those treated in second&ndash;third lines (p = 0.024).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>In real-world practice, T-DXd demonstrated clinical activity in both HER2-positive and HER2-low metastatic breast cancer patients. Although no significant differences were observed between subgroups, later-line treatment was associated with improved survival. These findings support the effectiveness of T-DXd in a routine clinical setting and highlight the need for continued real-world evaluation to optimise patient outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gonzalez Gonzalez, C., Cardaba Garcia, M., Fijo Prieto, A., Fernandez Pena, S., Contreras Macias, E., Montero Lazaro, M., Maganto Garrido, S., Fernandez Prieto, M., Salvador Palacios, A., Sanchez Sanchez, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.184</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.184</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-081 Real-world effectiveness of trastuzumab deruxtecan in HER2-positive and HER2-low metastatic breast cancer]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A90</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A90</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A90-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-082 Evaluation of antimicrobial stewardship (PROA) interventions in sequential therapy through the WASPSS program in the general and digestive surgery department]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A90-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>In Spain, one of the main objectives of the National Plan against Antibiotic Resistance is to develop and implement tools that facilitate appropriate antimicrobial management. Accordingly, the WASPSS (Wise Antimicrobial Stewardship Program Support System) has been implemented in our Health Area. This digital tool generates predefined alerts used by Antimicrobial Stewardship (AS) teams&ndash;Pharmacy, Microbiology, and Infectious Diseases &ndash;to optimise various aspects of antimicrobial therapy, including sequential therapy (ST).</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the impact of AS interventions in antimicrobial sequential therapy based on alerts generated by the WASPSS tool in patients from the General and Digestive Surgery Department (GDS), aiming to promote the appropriateness of antimicrobial treatment through ST.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>This analysis included alerts related to intravenous antimicrobial therapy lasting more than 3- days with agents showing good oral bioavailability. Data were collected through WASPSS from March 2023 to March 2025. Alerts were categorised by patient, clinical department, treatment, alert type, and action taken. Patient identifiers were removed to ensure anonymisation.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>This study analysed 277 alerts (12.1% of 2,286 total) related to antimicrobial treatments exceeding 3 days and suitable for ST. The departments most frequently involved were GDS (45.5%), Internal Medicine (21.3%), and Haematology (10.1%). The main antibiotics were metronidazole (40.4%), levofloxacin (16.2%), and ciprofloxacin (12.6%). A total of 126 alerts from the surgery department were reviewed, mainly corresponding to diverticulitis (15.9%), cholecystitis (11.9%), and appendicitis (9.5%). When patients were stable and tolerated oral intake, ST was recommended; however, only seven of the 126 recommendations were accepted, though underreporting is possible. Among 47 patients with diverticulitis, cholecystitis, or appendicitis, five ST recommendations were accepted. In the remaining 42, non-implementation was mainly due to discharge within 24&ndash;48 hours (74.5%), clinical worsening (8.5%), or unspecified causes.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The WASPSS tool effectively identified candidates for oral switch in surgical patients. However, the low acceptance rate reveals opportunities to improve PROA integration in clinical workflows. In many cases, patient discharge within 48 hours may justify the decision not to perform the oral switch. These results highlight the importance of reinforcing team collaboration and implementing strategies that ensure a safer and more efficient use of antimicrobials.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sanchez Blaya, A., Portero Ponce, C., Najera Perez, M., Guillen Diaz, M., Martinez Orea, A., Palazon Gonzalvez, E., Alegria Samper, R., Cabezuela Baldueza, B., Clara Maria, G., Leon Villar, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.185</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.185</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-082 Evaluation of antimicrobial stewardship (PROA) interventions in sequential therapy through the WASPSS program in the general and digestive surgery department]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A90</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A90</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A91-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-083 Clinical experience with the combination of risankizumab and other biologic agents in patient with refractory inflammatory bowel disease: efficacy, disease course and safety profile]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A91-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Refractory inflammatory bowel disease is challenging to treat; IL-23 inhibitors offer new options, but their combination with other biologics lacks formal evidence and should be used cautiously with close monitoring due to the potential increased risk of immunosuppression.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To describe the clinical experience with the combination of risankizumab and other biologic drugs in patients with refractory inflammatory bowel disease, evaluating its clinical efficacy, progression, and safety profile.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective case series including patients diagnosed with inflammatory bowel disease who received combined treatment with risankizumab and another biologic drug between January 2024 and August 2025. Clinical and therapeutic data were collected from electronic medical records, including age, sex, disease duration, prior treatments, reason for combination, drugs and duration of combination, C-reactive protein (CRP) and faecal calprotectin levels, adverse events (AE), and treatment changes. Data were analysed descriptively clinical evolution and tolerability.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Five patients were included (median age: 62 years; 80% male), four with Crohn&rsquo;s disease and one with ulcerative colitis (UC). Most had ileal involvement, and three also had perianal disease, with a long disease course (median 26 years, range 10&ndash;44) and multiple prior biologic treatments (mean 3.2). The combination of risankizumab with another biologic was prescribed due to persistent inflammatory activity, using infliximab (n=3), adalimumab (n=1), or vedolizumab (n=1), for durations ranging from 3 to over 5 months. Faecal calprotectin decreased significantly by an average of 1420.33 points (range 533&ndash;1958) in 3 of 4 patients, although only one reached levels below 200; in the UC patient, levels increased. CRP decreased in all evaluable patients. No moderate or severe adverse reactions were recorded. At the end of follow-up, two patients continued on risankizumab monotherapy, while three maintained the combination therapy.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>In this case series, the combination of risankizumab with other biologic treatments showed a favourable clinical response in most patients, with good tolerability and no significant AEs. These results suggest that, in selected clinical situations, this combination could be considered as a rescue therapeutic option. Since there are no guidelines supporting this combination, its use should be individualised and carefully supervised, with the hospital pharmacist playing a key role in evaluation and monitoring.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Corrales, L., Calderon, C., Blazquez, N., Segura, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.186</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.186</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-083 Clinical experience with the combination of risankizumab and other biologic agents in patient with refractory inflammatory bowel disease: efficacy, disease course and safety profile]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A91</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A91</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A91-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-084 Carbon footprint, patients journeys time and cost impact through the cleanrooms implementation in the rural hospital]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A91-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>The transport of rural cancer patients to intravenous (IV) chemotherapy administration used to generate periodic greenhouse gas emissions. Rough mountain roads across a large territory forced patients to spend at least 2 hours daily travelling, indirectly contributing to depopulation. The Public Regional Health Area (PRHA) used to invest thousands of euros in driving them to corresponding oncohaematological Urban Hospitals. In March 2025, a new cleanroom was inaugurated in the Rural Hospital, improving access to care and service proximity.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>Analyse carbon footprint, travel time and cost impact during 2021-2024, evaluate savings between March-September 2025 and estimate potential savings during 2026-2030 at rural Hospital.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Carbon footprint calculation based on carbon dioxide (CO<SUB>2</SUB>) driving emissions between 13 urban Hospitals and the rural one. The institutions recruited 8% gasoline (134g CO<SUB>2</SUB>/km) and 92% gasoil taxis (174g CO<SUB>2</SUB>/km) for patients&rsquo; transportation, costing 0.73/km. Wasted time estimation is provided by the shortest standard inter-hospital routes, excluding harsh weather conditions delays, unexpected traffic events and waiting time in medical centres. The retrospective study based on PRHA data between 2021-2024, including patients &ge;18 years from 281 villages who received cancer treatment in metropolitan hospitals. Metastatic melanoma, osteosarcoma, germinal, neuroendocrine and neurologic tumour diagnoses excluded. Projections for 2026-2030 derived from soft saturation logistic model.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Between 2021-24, 191 candidates&rsquo; journeys were analysed: total of 80,093 kg CO<SUB>2</SUB> emitted, 6,381 travelled hours and transport cost 565,175. Between March-September 2025, eight referred patients benefited from 105 IV chemotherapy administrations in the Rural Hospital, saving 1,787 kg CO<SUB>2</SUB>, 142 hours of travel and 7,636. Extrapolation from 2026&ndash;2030, estimates potential savings of 190,784kg CO<SUB>2</SUB>, 15,110 h and at least 815,410, based on the estimated kilometres.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Local preparation and administration of IV chemotherapy at the Rural Hospital significantly reduce CO<SUB>2</SUB> emissions, patient travel time and cost pertinent. With increasing life expectancy and advances in early cancer detection, more patients are likely to benefit, suggesting current estimations are conservative with respect to the potential impact. More studies are needed to evaluate patients&rsquo; satisfaction.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. Guia de c&agrave;lcul d&rsquo;emissions de gasos amb efecte d&rsquo;hivernacle (GEH) 17 de juny de 2024 (Internet)</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gironella Torrent, A., Morales-Llombart, R., Cazalilla Chica, S., Grano Llordes, M., Moutinho Goncalves, P., Gonzalez Troncoso, R., Sanjurjo Golpe, E., Torres-Bondia, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.187</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.187</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-084 Carbon footprint, patients journeys time and cost impact through the cleanrooms implementation in the rural hospital]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A91</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A91</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A92-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-085 Characterisation of chronic toxicities after pembrolizumab therapy in a real-world cohort]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A92-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionised cancer treatment. However, chronic toxicities that persist beyond treatment discontinuation remain under-explored and insufficiently characterised in real-world settings. Pembrolizumab, an anti-programmed cell death protein 1 antibody, may induce long-term immune-related adverse events (irAEs) that impact patient quality of life and imply long-term clinical management.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>Characterise the prevalence, type and management of chronic toxicities associated with pembrolizumab.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Retrospective observational study including adult patients who discontinued pembrolizumab and remained alive &ge;12 months afterwards (from 01/2014 to 12/2022). Chronic toxicity was defined as any adverse event persisting &ge;12 weeks after discontinuation. Clinical data were retrieved from electronic medical records. Variables collected: demographic data, cancer type, pembrolizumab treatment duration, type and grade of chronic toxicity, management strategies and clinical outcomes. Results expressed as median and interquartile range (IQR).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>One hundred patients were included. Median age at treatment initiation 64.7 years (IQR 56.3&ndash;76.0) and median body mass index 24.8 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (IQR 22.0&ndash;28.1). Median treatment duration 9.3 months (IQR 3.7&ndash;24.7). Most patients were male (61%), and 9% had a pre-existing autoimmune disease. Pembrolizumab was mainly prescribed for lung cancer (59%) and melanoma (27%), with 14% other malignancies. At the time of pembrolizumab initiation, most patients had locally advanced or metastatic disease, with 75% presenting brain metastases.</p><p>Pembrolizumab discontinuation was due to disease progression (39%), immune-related toxicity (30%), treatment completion (20%) or other reasons (11%).</p><p>A total of 340 adverse events were recorded, of which 110 (32.4%) were chronic. Most frequent chronic toxicities: asthenia (n=25), endocrine (n=24), gastrointestinal (n=21), dermatological (n=16) and rheumatological (n=10). Less frequent chronic toxicities: pulmonary (n=5), renal (n=3), neurological (n=3), haematological (n=1) and other events (n=1). Median severity grade 2 (IQR 1&ndash;3). Chronic toxicities persisted for more than 6 months in 38.5% of cases.</p><p>Management strategies included corticosteroids in 17% of chronic toxicities (89% low-dose, 11% high-dose) and other immunosuppressants in 2%.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Chronic toxicities after pembrolizumab are common, often moderate, and may persist for months. Endocrine, gastrointestinal and rheumatological irAEs predominate, requiring long-term follow-up. Identifying their frequency and management is essential to optimise multidisciplinary care.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Del Barrio Buesa, S., Lucena Campillo, A., Gonzalez-Haba Pena, E., Martin Bartlome, M., Montes Gomez, J., Samitier Samitier, D., Carrillo Burdallo, A., Dominguez Chaparro, G., Gomez Costas, D., Herranz Alonso, A., Sanjurjo Saez, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.188</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.188</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-085 Characterisation of chronic toxicities after pembrolizumab therapy in a real-world cohort]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A92</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A92</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A92-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-086 A multi-phase study on the development of a paediatric high alert drugs calculator mobile application on medication errors in neonatal and paediatric intensive care units]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A92-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Dosage calculation errors involving high alert drugs are a significant cause of severe adverse drug events in paediatric and neonatal populations.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To develop Paediatric High Alert Drugs Calculator Mobile Application (PMA), a specialised mobile application engineered to ensure dosing accuracy and medication safety.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A multi-phase study was conducted. Phase1, a retrospective cohort study of infants admitted to the NICU of tertiary care hospital. The neonatal pharmacist participants on medication errors (ME) in pre- and post-ward-based settings were performed over a year. The incidence, severity, and type (95% CI) of ME were estimated for pre-post comparison. Descriptive statistics and inferential statistics were used to analyse the data. Phase 2, the empirical data and error patterns identified in Phase 1 served as the foundational evidence base for the architectural design and development of the PMA mobile application, Version 1.0. Phase 3, Implementation; Phase 4, a formal analysis of PMA Version 1.0&rsquo;s utility, adoption, and impact was conducted. Phase 5, the strategic development of PMA Version 2.0, incorporating user feedback and additional functionalities.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Phase 1: The results of 410 patients (5,482 patients-day) in pre- pharmacist, and 449 patients (5,848 patients-day) in post-pharmacist. The incidence rate (per 1,000 patient-days) increased from 23.5 times to 72.7 times post ward-based neonatal pharmacist participation 49.1 times increase (95% CI 41.13&ndash;57.16, p &lt; 0.001). The incidence rate ratio: 3.09, 95% CI 2.53-3.79. The incidence of ME after neonatal pharmacist participation was observed to increase from 71/410 (17.3%) to 132/449 (29.4%) (RR 1.70, 95% CI 1.31-2.19, p &lt; 0.001). Phase 2-5: The implementation of the PMA application yielded a profound reduction in its primary target: high alert medication dosage calculation errors decreased from 23.97% to 0.09%. End-user satisfaction was exceptional, achieving a mean score of 4.7 on a 5-point Likert Scale, which is categorised as the &lsquo;highest level&rsquo; of satisfaction (criteria: 4.21-5.00).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The PMA application has proven to be a useful clinical tool that directly enhances the core competencies of physicians, pharmacists, and nurses engaged in medication safety. The advantage of a ward-based neonatal pharmacy is necessary to protect patients from harm and the consequences of ME.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Raknoo, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.189</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.189</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-086 A multi-phase study on the development of a paediatric high alert drugs calculator mobile application on medication errors in neonatal and paediatric intensive care units]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A92</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A92</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A93-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-087 Optimising haemophilia management: enhancing treatment adherence and quality of life with innovative therapies]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A93-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Haemophilia is a chronic bleeding disorder that profoundly impacts patients&lsquo; physical health and overall quality of life. Managing this condition not only addresses treatment bleeding episodes but also supports long-term health and functioning.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate treatment adherence and quality of life in patients receiving clotting factors. The study aims to describe patient characteristics, assess treatment effectiveness, adverse effects and determine adherence levels and satisfaction.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Multicentre cross-sectional study that included all patients treated with clotting factors since their introduction in hospital guidelines. Data collected: sex, age, comorbidities, bleeding episodes, adherence (non-adherence: &lt;80% adherence rate)and adverse effects. Quality of life was evaluated using the WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire (26 items) and the Haem-A-Qol(46 items divided into 10 domains).Statistical analysis was performed using R software. Exclusion criteria were psychiatric disorders, psychiatric medication use or unwillingness to participate.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Forty-one male patients were analysed. Median age 35 years. Thirty-five had haemophilia A and 6 haemophilia B.Twenty-seven patients were on prophylactic treatment, while 14 received on-demand. Twelve patients were treated with emicizumab, six efmoroctocog alfa, six lonoctocog alfa, five turoctocog alfa, four albutrepenonacog alfa, three simoctocog alfa, two efanesoctocog, three nonacog and one heptacog. Comorbidities were diabetes mellitus (17.5%), hypertension (16.3%), hepatitis C (9.3%) and HIV (2.3%). Of the patients on prophylactic treatment, 98.7% were adherent. Median overall score of the WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire was 69, with the highest score in social relationships (65) and the lowest in psychological health (52). Haem-A-QoL assessment yielded an average score of 47.5 indicating a moderate impact of haemophilia on daily life. The best-rated domains were family interaction (12.0) and coping (14.2), suggesting strong social support and effective disease management. Cronbach&rsquo;s alpha was 0.75, indicating good internal consistency. Patients treated with emicizumab showed higher scores compared to the rest. In the WHOQOL-BREF, they achieved a median score of 75, with the highest in physical health (71). Similarly, in the Haem-A-QoL questionnaire, they obtained an average score of 42.3, indicating a lower impact of haemophilia on daily life.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Subcutaneous coagulation factor treatment, including emicizumab, improved adherence and quality of life in haemophilia patients, particularly in social and coping domains. Strong family support and effective coping strategies contributed to better well-being. The study supports the continued use of subcutaneous therapies for optimised patient care.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martin Roldan, A., Sanchez Suarez, M., Alarcon Payer, C., Maganto Garrido, S., Jimenez Morales, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.190</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.190</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-087 Optimising haemophilia management: enhancing treatment adherence and quality of life with innovative therapies]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A93</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A93</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A93-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-088 Pharmacist-led management of sirolimus-voriconazole interaction in a hypoalbuminemic paediatric liver transplant patient: a case report]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A93-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Sirolimus, a CYP3A4 substrate, is commonly used as an immunosuppressant after liver transplantation. Co-administration with voriconazole, a potent CYP3A4 inhibitor, markedly increases sirolimus plasma concentration, predisposing to toxicity. In hypoalbuminemia, the free (unbound) drug fraction rises due to reduced protein binding, resulting in exaggerated pharmacologic effects even within the normal therapeutic range. The complex interplay between metabolic inhibition and protein binding necessitates close monitoring. This report highlights the pharmacist&rsquo;s role in identifying and managing this interaction to prevent toxicity while maintaining therapeutic efficacy.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To describe the clinical pharmacist&rsquo;s intervention in managing sirolimus&ndash;voriconazole interaction in a paediatric liver transplant patient with hypoalbuminemia, emphasising therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) and individualised dose adjustment.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A 12-year-old girl (38 kg), 8 years post&ndash;liver transplantation, was admitted with suspected graft rejection. She received tacrolimus 0.25 mg/day (level 4.8 ng/mL) and voriconazole 100 mg twice daily (level 1.56 mg/L). Laboratory results showed albumin 14.9 g/L, elevated bilirubin, and liver enzyme abnormalities. Sirolimus 1 mg daily was initiated. After 5 days, the sirolimus trough level rose to 21.93 ng/mL, platelets decreased to 100,000/mm<sup>3</sup>, and albumin was 19.6 g/L. The pharmacist identified a CYP3A4-mediated interaction exacerbated by hypoalbuminemia and recommended holding sirolimus for 7 days, monitoring levels every 2&ndash;3 days. Once the trough decreased to 8.49 ng/mL, sirolimus was restarted at 0.5 mg every other day.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Sirolimus levels stabilised at 6.99 ng/mL (therapeutic range) by day 11, platelet count recovered, and no further adverse effects were observed. The pharmacist&rsquo;s proactive intervention prevented sirolimus toxicity and ensured effective immunosuppression.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>This case underscores the importance of pharmacist-led TDM in managing CYP3A4-mediated drug interactions, particularly in hypoalbuminemic paediatric transplant patients. Dose reduction of sirolimus by approximately 75% should be considered when co-administered with voriconazole. Continuous collaboration between pharmacists and physicians is crucial for optimising safety and therapeutic outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. Staatz CE, Tett SE. Sirolimus PK/PD in transplant. <I>Clin Pharmacokinet</I> 2014;<b>53</b>(10):849&ndash;72.</p><p>2. Neely M, <I>et al</I>. Voriconazole&ndash;immunosuppressant interaction in paediatrics. <I>Ther Drug Monit</I> 2015;<b>37</b>(6):822&ndash;8.</p><p>3. KDIGO Work Group. Kidney transplant guideline. <I>Am J Transplant</I> 2009;<b>9</b>(Suppl 3):S1&ndash;57.</p><p>4. PKP-013. Drug interactions with azole antifungals in transplants. <I>Eur J Hosp Pharm</I>. 2014;<b>21</b>(Suppl 1):A141.2.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Suppasittikulchai, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.191</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.191</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-088 Pharmacist-led management of sirolimus-voriconazole interaction in a hypoalbuminemic paediatric liver transplant patient: a case report]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A93</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A93</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A94-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-089 Use of a pharmaceutical interventions database to improve medication safety in a hospital-at-home setting]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A94-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Medication management in Hospital-at-Home (HaH) requires continuous assessment of prescriptions to ensure patient safety. The broad diversity of pathologies managed in HaH makes therapeutic optimisation complex and demands high versatility from healthcare teams. Pharmaceutical interventions (PIs) are key indicators for identifying risks and improving medication safety. However, they remain underused for this purpose.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This study aimed to evaluate and improve care practices by analysing all pharmaceutical interventions performed in an HaH service, in order to identify the main sources of medication related risk and define targeted corrective actions.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A prospective registry captured all PIs between June and December 2024 at any step of the medication process (reconciliation, prescribing, preparation, administration, monitoring). For each PI we recorded: care pathway, ATC class, problem type (eg, no indication, overdose, incompatibility, drug&ndash;drug interaction...), recommended action, acceptance, and clinical impact (Cl&eacute;o 0&ndash;4: minor to vital). Data were analysed descriptively to map risk clusters and prioritise improvement. Regular multidisciplinary reviews ensured consistent classification and fed back aggregated findings to prescribers.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>We recorded 188 PIs; the acceptance rate was 93%. Over half were minor (Cl&eacute;o 0&ndash;1), frequently arising during medication reconciliation. However, 25% were moderate (Cl&eacute;o 2), 17% major (Cl&eacute;o 3), and 4% vital (Cl&eacute;o 4). The most critical PIs (Cl&eacute;o 3&ndash;4) occurred mainly in infectious (50%) and post-surgical (18%) pathways and involved prescriptions without indication (29%), overdosing (14%), physicochemical incompatibilities (14%), and drug&ndash;drug interactions (29%). High-leverage ATC classes included B01 (antithrombotics), B05 (nutrition/solutions), M04 (antigout), and N02 (analgesics). </p><p>Corrective actions implemented, based on these findings: (1) prescriber training on decision support tools (dose adjustment, STOPP/START , PIM-CHECK ); (2) structured, multidisciplinary reviews of high risk cases; (3) focused workshops on critical ATC classes and incompatibilities; (4) local protocols for recurrent scenarios (eg, IV-to-oral switch, anticoagulant management); and (5) optimisation of interaction alerts and alert readability in the prescribing software.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>A structured PI database enabled real-time risk surveillance and targeted safety actions, with nearly half of PIs rated &ge;2 on the Cl&eacute;o scale. This approach strengthens safety culture in HaH and is readily reproducible. A planned follow-up will evaluate sustained effects on Cl&eacute;o &ge;2 incidence, alert handling, and protocol adherence.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Protzenko, D., Plan, A., Constans, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.192</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.192</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-089 Use of a pharmaceutical interventions database to improve medication safety in a hospital-at-home setting]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A94</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A94</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A94-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-090 Inadequacy 24-hour area under the curve during the initial days of intravenous vancomycin treatment]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A94-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Recent guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) recommend early vancomycin monitoring, adjusting the dose to achieve an AUC24h of 400&ndash;600 mg&middot;h/L. However, the time required for a patient to reach this target is not well established, despite its relevance to treatment efficacy and safety.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate AUC24h levels during the first three days of vancomycin treatment in patients managed according to routine clinical practice with pharmacokinetic monitoring.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Prospective, observational, single-centre study including 30 patients treated with vancomycin between January and February 2025. Data collected included weight, height, age, sex, serum creatinine (Scr) and administered doses. Individual pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using Abbott&rsquo;s PKS Bayesian software, and steady-state AUC24h was calculated to guide dosing recommendations. The pharmacokinetic profile was segmented by treatment days and digitally analysed using pixel quantification in a Python environment to determine actual AUC24h values during the first three days. The percentage of patients within the therapeutic range was calculated, with results expressed as mean and 95% confidence interval (CI 95%).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Among the 30 patients (mean age 66 years (59&ndash;73), height 167 cm (164&ndash;170), weight 69 kg (64&ndash;74), 27% female (14&ndash;45), Scr 0.9 mg/dL (0.8&ndash;1.0)), only 23% (8&ndash;38) received a loading dose. On day 1, 20% (CI95: 6&ndash;34) reached the target AUC24h; 67% (50&ndash;84) were underdosed, 13% (1&ndash;25) overdosed. On day 2, 70% (54&ndash;86) were within range; 13% (1&ndash;25) underdosed, 17% (3&ndash;30) overdosed. On day 3, 64% (47&ndash;82) had optimal levels; 7% (0&ndash;17) underdosed, 28.6% (12&ndash;45) overdosed. Mean AUC24h values were 372 (302&ndash;441), 513 (464&ndash;561), and 543 (502&ndash;583) mg&middot;h/L, respectively.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Despite pharmacokinetic monitoring, 80% of patients had inadequate dosing on day 1, and one-third remained outside the therapeutic range after 72 hours. These deviations may compromise treatment efficacy and safety during the early phase, highlighting the need for early optimisation through loading doses, pharmacist validation, and timely monitoring.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alba Galeote, A., Jimenez Rivero, N., Montero Salgado, B., Faus Felipe, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.193</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.193</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-090 Inadequacy 24-hour area under the curve during the initial days of intravenous vancomycin treatment]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A94</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A94</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A95-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-091 Correlation between antibiotic consumption and multidrug-resistant bacteria in an orthopaedic institute: a 3-year retrospective study]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A95-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>The emergence of multidrug-resistant bacteria (MDRB) represents a major public health challenge, often exacerbated by the inappropriate use of antibiotics (ATB).</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This study aimed to assess the relationship between antibiotic consumption and the evolution of MDRB rates in an orthopaedic institute over a 3-year period.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective study was conducted in the pharmacy department between January 2022 and December 2024. Data on antibiotic consumption were extracted from the STKMED software and expressed as Defined Daily Doses (DDD) per 1000 Hospitalisation Days (HD). Microbiological data were collected using the MicroScan WalkAway 40 plus system. Statistical analyses were performed with Excel 2021 and SPSS version 25. Pearson&rsquo;s correlation test was used to examine associations between antibiotic consumption and MDRB rates.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The overall MDRB rate over the 3-year period was 15.82%, peaking at 18.56% in 2024. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae were the most frequent isolates (40.58%). Antibiotic consumption reached its highest level in 2023, with 31,744.939 DDD/1000 HD.</p><p>The highest DDD values were observed for glycopeptides (23,592.466 DDD/1000 HD), followed by carbapenems (18,378.767 DDD/1000 HD).</p><p>MDRB distribution by department showed the highest rates in the infectious diseases unit (33.152%), followed by external consultation service (13.587%).</p><p>Antibiotic consumption was also highest in the infectious diseases unit (58,241.020 DDD/1000 HD), followed by the intensive care unit (6,197.793 DDD/1000 HD).</p><p>Significant correlations were found between MDRB rates and fluoroquinolone use (p&lt;0.01) as well as oxazolidinone use (p=0.014). Moreover, carbapenemase-producing <I>Klebsiella pneumoniae</I> correlated significantly with carbapenem consumption (p&lt;0.01), and methicillin-resistant <I>Staphylococcus aureus</I> (MRSA) rates were associated with glycylcycline use (p=0.041).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>This study highlights a concerning increase in MDRB rates in parallel with rising antibiotic consumption. These findings underscore the urgent need for implementing robust antimicrobial stewardship programs, reinforced by systematic pharmaceutical validation of prescriptions.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jegham, N., Miladi, H., Mahfoudhi, S., Kaoual, S., Ghariani, A., Laaribi, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.194</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.194</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-091 Correlation between antibiotic consumption and multidrug-resistant bacteria in an orthopaedic institute: a 3-year retrospective study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A95</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A95</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A95-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-092 Eligibility for self-management of medication in admitted patients: a flash mob study in hospitals nationwide: the Figaro study]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A95-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>When a patient is admitted to hospital, medication changes often occur. Furthermore, the responsibility for the use of the medication switches from patient to nurse. At discharge the patient is less comfortable in using medication possibly resulting in medication errors, reduction of adherence and discomfort for the patient. Self-Administration of Medication (SAM) can help patients in the use of their medication and contributes to a smoother discharge from hospital to home. At this moment it is unclear which patients are eligible to use SAM and this unclarity hinders implementation of SAM in hospitals.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The objective of this study is to assess the proportion of hospitalised patients eligible for SAM and to identify which patient-related and clinical factors may influence the use of SAM.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A descriptive, cross-sectional flash mob study was conducted in 35 hospitals in different departments in the period of 18-22 November 2024. Eligibility for SAM was assessed by nurses using a 7-question screening tool. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients eligible for SAM. Eligibility was expressed as a percentage using descriptive statistics. Uni- and multivariable logistic regression was used to analyse the association between eligibility for SAM and age, sex, number of medications, use of medication roll, opioid use, educational level, hospital type and ward type.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Of the 2,311 included patients, 1,403 (60.7%) were eligible for SAM. Eligibility rates for SAM varied significantly across patient groups. Women showed higher eligibility (63.5%) (adjusted OR: 1.35 (95% BI: 1.12 &ndash; 1.62)) compared to men (58.3%) (reference). The eligibility rate decreased with age: 70.6% (18-67 years) (reference), 62.1% (68-80 years) (adjusted OR: 0.87 (95% BI: 0.70 &ndash; 1.09)) and 46% (&gt; 80 years) (adjusted OR: 0.59 (95% BI: 0.46 &ndash; 0.77)). The eligibility rate differed between department type: departments with non- elective admissions (61.4%) (reference) versus departments with elective admissions (74.5%) (adjusted OR: 1.75 (95% BI: 1.40 &ndash; 2.19)) and high intensity care departments (31.3%) (adjusted OR: 0.37 (95% BI: 0.28 &ndash; 0.49)).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>A large proportion of hospitalised patients are eligible for SAM. These results support wider implementation of SAM in hospitals.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Van Vlijmen, B., Van Seyen, M., Bekker, C., Van Den Bemt, B., Derijks, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.195</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.195</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-092 Eligibility for self-management of medication in admitted patients: a flash mob study in hospitals nationwide: the Figaro study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A95</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A95</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A96-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-093 Impact of lipid formulation on liver complications associated with parenteral nutrition, influencing factors]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A96-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Parenteral nutrition is an essential tool in patients who are unable to receive oral or enteral nutrition.</p><p>However, its prolonged use is associated with hepatobiliary complications.</p><p>Recent studies suggest that the lipid composition could play a key role in preventing these disorders. Understanding how factors such as lipid type, body mass index, and duration of treatment influence liver function is essential for optimising therapy and reducing complications.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The primary goal is to determine whether changing the lipid composition of parenteral nutrition reduces hepatobiliary disorders.</p><p>Secondary goal is to study whether variables can influence liver damage caused by nutrition.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Retrospective observational study in a tertiary hospital including adults receiving nutritional support in 2021&ndash;2022 and 2024. Patients from 2021&ndash;22 received CL1 (refined olive + soybean oils); in 2024, CL2 added MCTs and omega-3 fish oils.</p><p>Data collected included sex, weight, height, BMI, energy requirements, stress factors, duration of support, and caloric/lipid intake. Hepatobiliary complications were assessed.</p><p>Statistical analysis: Stata 17; multivariate logistic regression identified factors associated with liver injury.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>151 nutritional cases were obtained, (52.98% women) with a median age of 70 years (range 55-77).</p><p>27.81% of patients received CL1.</p><p>The anthropometric data of the patients were: median weight of 66.4 kg (range 57-78.5), median height of 167 cm (range 160-173.5), and BMI of 23.7 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (range 21.2-27.2).</p><p>The mean caloric intake was 24.29 &plusmn; 6.22 kcal per kilogram of weight, and the mean lipid intake was 0.91 &plusmn; 0.22 grams of lipids per kilogram of weight.</p><p>31.20% of patients with CL1 had hepatic complications, compared with 31.7% in the case of CL2.</p><p>Logistic regression analysis showed that the new lipid formulation was not associated with significant changes (OR = 0.99; 95% CI: 0.46-2.14).</p><p>It could not be demonstrated that duration of nutrition (OR = 1.03; 95% CI: 0.98-1.08) was a risk factor.</p><p>Total caloric intake (OR = 1.09; 95% CI: 1.02-1.16) and lipid intake (OR = 10.78; 95% CI: 1.92-60.59) were shown to be risk factors.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>In our population, no change in hepatobiliary complications was observed with lipid composition changes. The sample size may have been insufficient.</p><p>Other variables like caloric and lipid intake seem to influence hepatobiliary complications.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fraile Rodriguez, C., Gonzalez Martinez, S., Delgado Latorre, A., De Amurisa Chicharro, N., Bartolome Garcia, E., Lopez Lopez, A., Garcia Del Barrio, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.196</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.196</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-093 Impact of lipid formulation on liver complications associated with parenteral nutrition, influencing factors]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A96</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A96</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A96-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-094 Prevalence and impact of medication discrepancies across care transitions: a prospective observational cohort study in hospitals]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A96-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Medication reconciliation (MR) by hospital pharmacy staff aims to reduce patient safety risks during care transitions. Incorrect medication information transfer often results in medication discrepancies (MDs), associated with patient harm, preventable hospitalisations, and increased costs. Unlike previous studies focusing on single transitions, this study assesses medication transfer across multiple transitions: hospital admission, discharge, outpatient clinics, and primary care.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This study primarily aimed to quantify the proportion of patients with &ge;1 MD or unintentional MD (UMD) across care transitions. Secondary aims included assessing the time required for MR and associated costs.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A prospective observational cohort study was conducted in two Dutch hospitals (July-September 2024). Adults (&ge;18 years) using &ge;3 prescribed medications were included. At admission and discharge, medication lists reconciled by pharmacy technicians were compared with the Nationwide Medication Record System (NMRS). Medication lists from community pharmacies, and general practitioners (GP) were obtained and compared to the reconciled hospital medication list at admission and discharge. For outpatient clinics, physicians&rsquo; medication lists were compared with the NMRS. In hospitals, UMDs were verified with treating physicians; this was not feasible for primary care. Primary outcome was the percentage of patients with &ge;1 UMD (admission, discharge, outpatient clinics) or &ge;1 MD (community pharmacies, GP records). Secondary outcomes were MR time and costs. Descriptive statistics were used.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 144 patients were included (82 (57%) female; median age 65 years, IQR 55-75). At admission 65 patients were included, at discharge 66, and at outpatient clinics 66.</p><p>At admission six (9%) patients had &ge;1 UMD; at discharge, nine (14%); and at outpatient clinics, 29 (44%) compared to the NMRS.</p><p>Compared to medication lists of community pharmacies, 47 (76%) patients at admission and 46 (78%) at discharge had &ge;1 MD. Compared to medication lists of GPs, these were 43 (78%) and 52 (90%), respectively.</p><p>Median MR time was 12 minutes at admission, 10 at discharge, and 1.4 at outpatient clinics, corresponding to costs of 6.00, 5.00, and 3.21 per patient.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>MDs are common, particularly where pharmacy technicians are not involved. The time and costs required highlight the need for improved medication information transfer.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Limmen, B., Van Broekhuizen, J., Abdulla, A., Duyvendak, M., Van Eikenhorst, L., Hek, K., De Ruijter-Van Dalem, J., Bemt, P. D., Karapinar, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.197</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.197</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-094 Prevalence and impact of medication discrepancies across care transitions: a prospective observational cohort study in hospitals]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A96</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A97</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A97-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-095 CDK4/6 inhibitors: real-world switch analysis and comparison with published data]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A97-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDKi) are a standard of care for HR+/HER2- breast cancer in combination with an aromatase inhibitor or fulvestrant. The three available CDKi, abemaciclib (Abe), palbociclib (Pal), and ribociclib (Rib) have distinct toxicity profiles that may require therapeutic switches or dose reductions.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>Analysis of therapeutic switches in a cohort of patients treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors to evaluate safety profiles in real-world practice and compare them with available evidence from the literature</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective analysis of CDK4/6 inhibitor prescriptions (01/2022&ndash;07/2025) was performed using institutional software. Annual patient numbers, therapeutic switches, and related clinical reasons were evaluated. A systematic literature review was also conducted to assess consistency between real-world therapeutic choices and available evidence, using the keywords &lsquo;abemaciclib OR ribociclib OR palbociclib OR CDK4/6 inhibitors&rsquo; AND &lsquo;toxicity&rsquo; OR &lsquo;adverse effects&rsquo; OR &lsquo;safety&rsquo; AND &lsquo;breast cancer&rsquo; OR &lsquo;breast neoplasms,&rsquo; restricted to systematic reviews published in the last 5 years.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The literature search identified 611 studies. After restriction, 38 systematic reviews (SRs) were retrieved, 10 fully analysed, with two deemed relevant as they included the main RCTs and safety comparisons of CDKi. In our cohort, 485 patients were treated: 213 with Pal, 140 with Abe, and 132 with Rib. Six therapeutic switches due to toxicity were recorded: three from Rib to Pal (G4 transaminitis, muscle spasms), two from Rib to Abe (G4 skin toxicity, nausea and ECG alteration), and one from Abe to Rib (G2 gastrointestinal toxicity). Dose reductions were required in 163 patients (34%).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Our findings are consistent with published evidence. Onesti<sup>1</sup> reported higher neutropenia rates with Pal and Rib, and more frequent diarrhoea with Abe. Other common toxicities include fatigue, hepatotoxicity, and rash. In line with Kappel,<sup>2</sup> we observed hepatotoxicity-related switching from Rib to Pal and GI-related switching from Abe to Rib, reflecting reported differences in safety profiles. Larger observational studies are warranted to identify additional adverse events not captured in registration trials, with potential implications for daily clinical practice.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. Onesti CE. CDK4/6 inhibitors: toxicity profiles. Breast Care. 2021.</p><p>2. Kappel C. Safety of CDK4/6 inhibitors. Cancers. 2023.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Colicchio, A., Lanzetta, V., Scarlattei, D., Lupoli, A., Cosma, M., Putaturo, I., Mantovani, B., Zuccheri, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.198</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.198</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-095 CDK4/6 inhibitors: real-world switch analysis and comparison with published data]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A97</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A97</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A97-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-096 The impact of pharmaceutical interventions on the management of hospitalised patients with cirrhosis: what role does the clinical pharmacist play?]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A97-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Cirrhotic patients, characterised by a hepatic impairment, are at higher risk of drug-related adverse events compared to the general population. Henceforth, when it comes to pharmacological treatments, choosing the right molecule and/or adapting the dose to the hepatic function should be at the forefront. However, the integration of clinical pharmacists into gastroenterology care, particularly for patients with hepatic insufficiency, is limited. The adaptation of drug dosages in the context of hepatic impairment is a complex issue that lacks comprehensive discussion in current literature and practice, pointing to a significant opportunity for advancing patient care through targeted pharmaceutical strategies.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This study aims to evaluate the impact of a clinical pharmacist on medication management for hospitalised cirrhotic patients.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>This prospective interventional study was conducted in a secondary care hospital over a period of 12 weeks. The study included 30 patients, predominantly male (53.3%), with an average age of 66 years. The primary aetiology of cirrhosis was alcohol-related (73.3%). Upon admission, 33.3% of patients were classified as Child A, 50% as Child B, and 16.7% as Child C. The pharmacist made daily recommendations to physicians in the gastroenterology department regarding their treatments, including PIs specific to hepatic impairment. The interventions were assessed by a committee of two experts - a hepatologist and a clinical pharmacist - using an adapted evaluation grid from the Society of Hospital Pharmacists of Australia.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 143 PIs were formulated, with an acceptance rate of 84% among clinicians. Among specific pharmaceutical interventions (PIs) for cirrhosis (n=58), high to very high risk intervention levels were assigned to 81.0% and 44.8% respectively. Most frequently involved drug classes were beta-blockers (36.2%), psycholeptics (13.8%) and hypolipidemic agents (12.0%).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>This study suggests a valuable contribution of a clinical pharmacist to the management of hospitalised cirrhosis patients. With an 84% acceptance rate by treating physicians and a high proportion of high risk interventions, PIs demonstrate clinical relevance and potential to prevent serious drug-related events in cirrhotic patients. The study advocates for greater integration of pharmacist-led interventions in gastroenterology and enhanced collaboration among healthcare professionals to ensure comprehensive patient care and adherence to established guidelines.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Casterman, A., Vandendriessche, V., Vandenberghe, A., Dubois, B., Dalleur, O., Yengue, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.199</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.199</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-096 The impact of pharmaceutical interventions on the management of hospitalised patients with cirrhosis: what role does the clinical pharmacist play?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A97</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A98</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A98-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-097 AUC based method to estimate overall survival benefit of inavolisib + palbociclib + fulvestrant versus palbociclib + fulvestrant]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A98-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Inavolisib has recently been approved in combination with palbociclib and fulvestrant for the treatment of adult patients with PIK3CA-mutated, oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive, HER2-negative, locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer, following recurrence during or within 12 months after completing adjuvant endocrine therapy.</p><p>In the pivotal INAVO120 trial, inavolisib demonstrated a benefit over palbociclib-fulvestrant, with a median overall survival (OS) of 34.0 vs 27.0 months (7.0-month difference) and a hazard ratio of 0.67 (95% CI, 0.48&ndash;0.94), with data maturity of 47.4%. However, the median OS may not fully represent clinical benefit, as it reflects only a single point on the survival curve and does not capture differences occurring earlier or later in follow-up.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To apply the modified Seruga&ndash;F&eacute;nix area under the curve (AUC) method to estimate mean OS from Kaplan&ndash;Meier data of the inavolisib trial and to compare the results with the median OS reported in the pivotal study.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Kaplan&ndash;Meier curves from the pivotal trial were digitised using WebPlotDigitizer v5, and AUCs were calculated for both the inavolisib and control arms. The reference area was defined as the rectangle bounded by the y-axis, the vertical cut-off line representing the minimum number of patients at risk (&ge;10 per group or &ge;30 in total), and the upper boundary of the survival curve. The mean OS values obtained were then compared with the published medians to assess possible over- or underestimation of survival benefit.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The total reference time was 52.8 months, and 79.7% of patients were included in the analysis (those with OS data).The estimated mean OS was 29.27 months for the inavolisib arm and 24.37 months for the control arm, a difference of 4.9 months, lower than the 7.0-month difference reported in the pivotal trial.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Inavolisib achieved a mean OS of 29.27 months compared with 24.37 months for the control arm in the AUC based method. Compared with the pivotal trial (34 vs 27 months), the AUC based method showed a smaller survival difference, suggesting that the pivotal trial measurements may be overestimating the clinical benefit.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. Fenix-Caballero S, <I>et al</I>. New graphic AUC based method to estimate overall survival benefit: pomalidomide reanalysis. <I>J Clin Pharm Ther.</I> 2016 Feb;<b>41</b>(1):1&ndash;3.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Heinz, S., Alegre-Del Rey, E., Fenix, S., Yuste, A., Martinez, M., Villacorta, P., Vela, A., Gonzalo, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.200</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.200</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-097 AUC based method to estimate overall survival benefit of inavolisib + palbociclib + fulvestrant versus palbociclib + fulvestrant]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A98</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A98</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A98-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-098 Adherence: observational study to assess guselkumab adherence in clinical practice after 12 months of treatment in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A98-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Discrepancies between clinical remission and patients&rsquo; perceptions of their symptoms are common in psoriasis. While clinical scores such as PASI provide objective measures of disease activity, they may not fully capture the patient experience. Integrating patient-reported outcomes (PROs) is essential to complement clinical assessments and monitor treatment effectiveness. Adherence to biologic therapies is a key factor influencing long-term outcomes, yet its relationship with PROs remains underexplored in real-world settings.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This study aimed to evaluate treatment adherence and explore its association with PROs in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis receiving guselkumab in routine clinical practice in Spain over a 12-month period.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>This was a prospective, observational, multicentre study including 269 adult patients across 39 Spanish dermatology centres. Baseline assessments included Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). Adherence was measured using Medication Possession Ratio (MPR &ge;90%) and the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8 &ge;6). PROs included the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and Psoriasis Signs and Symptoms Diary (PSSD).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>At baseline, mean age was 50.8 years, with a mean psoriasis duration of 16.5 years. Psoriatic arthritis was present in 35.3%, and 81.6% had prior biologic exposure. Mean PASI was 10.1, and DLQI was 9.8. At 12 months, 142 patients (52.8%) completed follow-up. Mean MPR was 96.7%, with 87.3% adherent by MPR and 96.5% by MMAS-8; 88.5% met both criteria. Concordance between MPR and MMAS-8 was low. At baseline, PROs were similar between adherent and non-adherent patients, except for HADS-anxiety (6.7 vs 10.4; p=0.007). At 12 months, trends favoured adherent patients in PSSD signs (21.1 vs 31.7; p=0.098) and HADS-anxiety (5.7 vs 7.9; p=0.076), though not statistically significant.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>High adherence to guselkumab was observed over 12 months. Preliminary findings suggest a potential association between adherence and improved patient-perceived outcomes, particularly anxiety and symptom burden. Combining objective and subjective adherence measures may enhance sensitivity in detecting these differences. These insights may inform strategies to optimise long-term psoriasis management.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>Corporate sponsored research or other substantive relationships:</p><p>D. Mart&iacute;nez-L&oacute;pez is an employee of Janssen-Cilag, the sponsor of this study. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Borras, J., Pages Puigdemont, N., Dominguez Senin, L., Gomez Zamora, M., Mercadal Orfila, G., Ortiz De Urbina, J., Martinez Lopez, D., Ramirez, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.201</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.201</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-098 Adherence: observational study to assess guselkumab adherence in clinical practice after 12 months of treatment in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A98</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A99</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A99-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-099 Machine learning decision model for predicting drug-related problems risks in the emergency department]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A99-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Drug-related problems (DRPs) are a common and preventable source of morbidity in emergency departments (EDs). Machine learning (ML) techniques may enhance early DRP detection and risk stratification, supporting clinical pharmacists in optimising patient safety.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To develop and validate the performance of three decision models for predicting DRPs in ED patients&ndash;comparing a conventional logistic regression model with two ML-based models&ndash;and to evaluate the potential of the best-performing model to prioritise valuable pharmacist-led interventions.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective observational study in the ED of a tertiary hospital (March&ndash;June 2025) was conducted. Adult patients (&ge;18 years) receiving &ge;1 prescribed medication during standard pharmacy working hours (Monday&ndash;Friday) were included. Predictors included demographics, frailty score, ED length of stay, triage level, admission diagnosis, planned hospital admission, high alert medications, and prior isolation of multidrug-resistant bacteria. A random forest (RF) model, a K-means clustering approach, and a multivariate logistic regression model were developed. Model performance was assessed in separate training (80%) and validation (20%) cohorts using area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. Shapley Additive explanations (SHAP) analysis was conducted to analyse the RF model, and values were used to interpret the most influential predictors.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Among 5064 patients (mean age 72.1 years; 53.6% female), 823 (16.2%) experienced &ge;1 DRP, most frequently medication reconciliation errors (45.5%). In the training cohort, decision models showed AUCs-ROC of 0.685 for logistic regression, 0.720 for RF, and 0.551 for K-means clustering. The RF model achieved the best balance of sensitivity (0.727) and specificity (0.529), modestly outperforming logistic regression (sensitivity 0.864; specificity 0.378). SHAP analysis confirmed frailty score, age, hospital admission prevision, chronic high alert medication and clinical presentation of heart failure decompensation or dyspnoea as key predictors.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Our study supports the integration of ML-based decision RF models into ED workflows to enhance the detection of DRPs, being a promising alternative to traditional scores based on logistic regression models. These tools could enable pharmacists to rapidly identify patients at higher risk of DRPs, prioritise interventions, and ultimately improve patient safety. Future research should evaluate external validation, and the impact of RF implementation on clinical outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martin Da Silva, I., Gene-Grasa, J., Plaza-Diaz, A., Castella-Rovira, M., Pedemonte I Pons, M., Dominguez-Navarro, A., Fuentes-Herrero, M., Juanes, A., Ruiz-Ramos, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.202</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.202</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-099 Machine learning decision model for predicting drug-related problems risks in the emergency department]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A99</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A99</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A99-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-100 Persistence, adherence, and safety of cabotegravir/rilpivirine in people living with HIV]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A99-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Long-acting antiretroviral therapy represents a major advance in HIV management by improving adherence and reducing treatment burden. Long-acting intramuscular cabotegravir and rilpivirine provide an effective and safe alternative to daily oral regimens, promoting treatment continuity and enhancing the quality of life of people living with HIV (PLHIV).</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To analyse the persistence, adherence, and safety of long-acting intramuscular cabotegravir/rilpivirine (CAB/RPV) in PLHIV.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>This was a retrospective, multicentre, observational study conducted in three hospitals. All patients who initiated long-acting CAB/RPV between July 2023 and March 2025 and received at least three doses were included. Collected data included demographic characteristics, previous antiretroviral therapy (ART), viral load (VL) and CD4+ cell count (both at baseline and last visit), and concomitant non-ART medications. Persistence was defined as the time (months) from treatment initiation to discontinuation; reasons for discontinuation were also recorded. Safety was assessed by the occurrence of adverse events (AEs), and adherence was measured as the proportion of injections administered within the recommended dosing window. Data were extracted from outpatient management software and electronic medical records.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Fifty-seven patients (17.5% women) were included, with a mean age of 53.1 &plusmn; 10 years. Prior to switching, 22 patients were on DTG/3TC, 13 on DTG/RPV, nine on RPV/FTC/TAF, eight on BIC/FTC/TAF, three on DRV/c, and two on RPV+ABC/3TC. All patients had VL &lt; 50 copies/mL. Median CD4+ cell count at baseline and last visit was 756.5 (560&ndash;973) and 646.5 (532&ndash;853) cells/&mu;L, respectively. Mean persistence was 9.6 &plusmn; 4 months. Reasons for discontinuation included virological failure (n=2; one developed resistance to RPV and one intermediate resistance to RPV and CAB), adverse reactions (n=5), loss to follow-up (n=2), and drug interaction with acenocoumarol (n=1). The most common AEs were local pain (61.4%), general malaise (12.3%), fever (2.5%), radiating pain (2.5%), vasovagal symptoms (1.7%), fatigue (1.7%), and headache (1.7%). A total of 322/325 (99%) injections were administered within the dosing window. No significant drug interactions were detected.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Long-acting intramuscular CAB/RPV appears to be an effective and safe strategy for PLHIV. Despite high adherence, close monitoring for adverse events and early detection of virological failure are essential to optimise long-term persistence.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marin Ventura, L., Lumbreras Martin, M., Perez Robles, Y., Tejedor-Tejada, E., Garcia-Lopez, L., Idiazabal Alfaro, J., Cores Rodriguez, I., Sanchez Sanchez, E., Fernandez Gonzalez, M., Herrero Bermejo, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.203</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.203</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-100 Persistence, adherence, and safety of cabotegravir/rilpivirine in people living with HIV]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A99</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A99</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A100-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-101 Real-world insights on analytical parameters and anti-TNF concentrations in inflammatory bowel disease]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A100-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is increasingly used to optimise anti-TNF therapy in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Nutritional status and systemic inflammation may influence drug clearance, but comparative real-world evidence between different anti-TNF is scarce.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the association between analytical parameters and trough concentrations of adalimumab and infliximab in routine clinical practice.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Retrospective observational study conducted over seven months in patients treated with adalimumab or infliximab for IBD. Analytical variables included serum albumin, C-reactive protein (CRP), faecal calprotectin, leukocytes, neutrophils, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Correlations between analytical parameters and trough concentrations were assessed, and multivariable linear regression was applied to explore independent associations.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>185 patients were analysed. Adalimumab cohort: 40 patients (42 determinations), mean age 44 &plusmn; 16 years (range 13&ndash;74), mean bodyweight 68 &plusmn; 12 kg; median trough 12.1 &micro;g/mL. Albumin correlated positively with trough concentrations (r = 0.41, p = 0.03) and remained significant after adjustment. CRP (r = &ndash;0.15, p = 0.45) and faecal calprotectin (r = &ndash;0.10, p = 0.62) were not significant. Infliximab cohort: 145 patients (420 determinations), mean age 47 &plusmn; 20 years (range 4&ndash;85); median trough 8.0 &micro;g/mL. Negative correlations were observed with CRP ( = &ndash;0.24, p &lt; 0.01), leukocytes ( = &ndash;0.31, p = 0.005) and neutrophils ( = &ndash;0.40, p &lt; 0.001), while albumin showed a non-significant positive trend ( = 0.11, p = 0.08). After multivariable adjustment for the aforementioned covariates, CRP, leukocytes, and neutrophils remained independently associated with lower infliximab levels.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>In this real-world IBD cohort, serum albumin was positively associated with adalimumab concentrations, whereas infliximab levels correlated inversely with systemic inflammatory markers (CRP, leukocytes, neutrophils). These findings support the value of routine analytical parameters in the interpretation of anti-TNF drug monitoring and highlight the need for prospective studies to confirm these associations and guide individualised treatment strategies.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fraga Diaz, S., Gonzalez Lopez, J., Ferreiro Iglesias, R., Baston Rey, I., Barreiro De Acosta, M., Calvino Suarez, C., Zarra Ferro, I., Mondelo Garcia, C., Fernandez Ferreiro, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.204</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.204</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-101 Real-world insights on analytical parameters and anti-TNF concentrations in inflammatory bowel disease]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A100</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A100</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A100-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-103 Impact of weekly antibiotic stewardship ward rounds on prescription quality in a cardiology department]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A100-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>In 2019, over 1.27 million deaths could be directly attributed to antimicrobial resistance. Antibiotic Stewardship (ABS) is a programmatic approach for the responsible use of antibiotics (AB)</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>ABS promotes the rational use of AB and reduces AB consumption. Continuous monitoring of prescription quality using process quality indicators (QI) is one of five core requirements for implementing ABS. The objective of this study was to analyse the effect of weekly ABS ward rounds on the quality of AB prescriptions.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Weekly ABS ward rounds were conducted in the cardiology wards (normal/intensive care wards) of a German university hospital starting in November 2024. Prescription quality was assessed using 17 QIs. Data was collected using point prevalence analyses (PPA) at four points in time: before the intervention (March/September 2023) and after the intervention (March/September 2024). Data on demographics, infections, diagnostics, and AB therapies was additionally recorded. A total of 253 patients were included in the study.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>In the wards visited by an ABS-Team, the performance of 14 out of 17 QIs improved between the baseline and the intervention phase. Only two QIs deteriorated, the performance of another QI remained the same. The number of QIs achieving a target performance of &gt; 85% increased from three to nine QIs. The five most frequently prescribed AB were analysed in the baseline and intervention phase. Before the implementation of the interventions (Day 1&ndash;2), the most frequently prescribed antibiotics were cefazolin (27.6%) and piperacillin/tazobactam (21.3%), followed by flucloxacillin (11.0%) and ampicillin/sulbactam (8.7%). Broad-spectrum agents such as meropenem (7.9%) and vancomycin (4.7%) were also used relatively frequently. After the interventions (day 3-4) the overall use of cefazolin (21.9%) and piperacillin/tazobactam (17.2%) decreased, while ampicillin/sulbactam (15.6%) and ciprofloxacin (9.4%) gained proportionally more frequent use. The use of meropenem slightly declined (from 7.9% to 6.3%), indicating reduced broad-spectrum exposure.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>ABS ward rounds measurably improve the quality of prescriptions, particularly in the areas of diagnostics and documentation. They make a relevant contribution to optimising the use of AB beyond reducing consumption. Overall, this illustrates the positive effect of ABS measures on the quality of prescriptions and supports safe patient care.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kainz, L., Rieg, S., Giesen, R., Hug, M., Fo&#x0308;rst, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.205</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.205</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-103 Impact of weekly antibiotic stewardship ward rounds on prescription quality in a cardiology department]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A100</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A101</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A101-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-104 Implementation of standardised dressing prescriptions in the emergency department: is there an impact?]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A101-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>In 2022&ndash;2023, an analysis of hospital prescriptions executed in community pharmacies for dressings revealed non-compliance in prescribing and dispensing, leading to a 31% overspending for the French National Health Insurance (FNHI &ndash; l&rsquo;Assurance Maladie). To enhance practice and optimise costs, Standardised Prescriptions (SP) for dressings&ndash;covering sutured wounds, dermabrasions, and burns&ndash;were implemented in the Emergency Department.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To assess the impact of implementing SP in the Emergency Department on prescription and dispensing compliance, as well as on overspending.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective comparative study was conducted. Thirty prescriptions from 2023 (before SP = group 1) and thirty prescriptions from 2025 (after SP = group 2) were provided by the FNHI, along with their billing data. Thirteen criteria from the PREDISPAD<sup>1</sup> methodology and three clinical criteria were analysed. A statistical analysis of Non-Compliances (NC) and overspending using the Z-test for the difference between two means in large independent samples (n &ge; 30) was performed.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The mean number of Prescription Non-Compliances (PNC) was 5.67 (&plusmn;2.71) for group 1 (n = 30) versus 2.2 (&plusmn;2.78) for group 2 (n = 30). The mean number of Dispensing Non-Compliances (DNC) was 1.8 (&plusmn;1.58) for group 1 and 0.67 (&plusmn;1.09) for group 2.</p><p>The mean Total Overspending (TO) per prescription was 23.17 (&plusmn;30.7) in group 1 versus 6.94 (&plusmn;12.3) in group 2. In group 1, Prescription Overspending (PO) and Dispensing Overspending (DO) averaged 13.94 (&plusmn;19.93) and 3.57 (&plusmn;11.2), compared with 4.58 (&plusmn;10.99) and 1.12 (&plusmn;3.81) in group 2. At a 5% significance level, differences between the groups were significant for overall NC, TO, and PO, but not for DO.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The introduction of SP in the Emergency Department significantly reduced PO and PNC, underscoring the value of standardised prescribing in improving efficiency and reducing unnecessary costs. The absence of a significant effect on DO may be attributed to the awareness campaign initiated by the FNHI in collaboration with community pharmacies since 2022, which likely minimised baseline dispensing variability. Future perspectives should explore the implementation of SP in surgical departments, where similar benefits in cost control and practice standardisation may be expected.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. Thomelin L. Etude PREDISPAD. 2022. &lt;dumas-03831075&gt;</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hahn, O., Treillard, C., Chastang, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.206</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.206</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-104 Implementation of standardised dressing prescriptions in the emergency department: is there an impact?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A101</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A101</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A101-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-105 Economic impact of a power outage on the pharmacy consultation for immune-mediated diseases]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A101-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Many drugs prescribed for immune-mediated diseases require refrigeration and are dispensed through the outpatient pharmacy for home administration, often covering 2 months of treatment. Exceptional situations, such as prolonged power outages, may compromise drug stability, causing patient concern and potential economic losses.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the economic impact of a 15-hour total power outage on the pharmacy consultation for immune-mediated diseases.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective observational study was conducted including all patients who contacted the pharmacy after the blackout, seeking advice on the stability of refrigerated drugs (2-8&deg;C) stored at home. For each patient, the following data were collected: sex, age, disease and dispensed drug.</p><p>Patients were asked to identify the drug, check the refrigerator temperature (using a digital thermometer with memory), report the number of stored units and provide the date of the next administration.</p><p>Drug stability was assessed by consulting the Summary of Product Characteristics and complementary data sources.</p><p>Qualitative variables were expressed as percentages; quantitative variables as median and range.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>49 patients were included (70% women), with a median age of 49 (9-90) years. Most cases corresponded to: Rheumatology (59%), Dermatology (33%) and Gastroenterology (8%). Rheumatoid arthritis was the most frequent diagnosis (30%).</p><p>Drugs involved: adalimumab (35%), etanercept (25%), certolizumab (8%), belimumab (6%), ixekizumab (6%), secukinumab (6%), dupilumab (4%), tocilizumab (4%), abatacept (2%), risankizumab (2%) and sarilumab (2%).</p><p>In 35% of cases, patients confirmed that their refrigerator maintained temperature during the outage. Patients stored a median of 3 (1-10) units at home.</p><p>According to data consulted, most drugs remained stable for up to 14 days at room temperature, although some had shorter stability periods (belimumab, risankizumab, secukinumab or ixekizumab).</p><p>Based on this, 82% of patients could safely use their medication. However, 43 units were discarded, 15 of them from 4 patients who had frozen the medication. This resulted in an estimated economic loss of 9.343. Advice on preventive measures was provided to all patients.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Power outages can generate uncertainty about thermolabile drug stability and lead to substantial financial losses. Pharmacist counselling and patient education are essential to ensure safe administration, minimise drug wastage and protect both clinical outcomes and healthcare resources.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Caina Lopez, S., Bartolome Figueroa, A., Veiga Villaverde, A., Crespo Diz, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.207</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.207</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-105 Economic impact of a power outage on the pharmacy consultation for immune-mediated diseases]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A101</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A101</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A102-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-106 Cost-effectiveness analysis of HIV antiretroviral therapy regimens: real-world evidence from the Italian Mosaico study]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A102-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>HIV treatment optimisation requires balancing clinical efficacy, tolerability, and economic sustainability. With multiple antiretroviral therapy (ART) options available, cost-effectiveness analysis using real-world data is essential to inform healthcare decision making and resource allocation in HIV care.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of different ART regimens using treatment durability as primary effectiveness measure, employing real-world data from MOSAICO: an Italian multicentre study on people with HIV (PWH) virus suppressed.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Cost-effectiveness analysis of 421 PLWH from the MOSAICO study with 24-month follow-up. Treatment durability was measured using restricted mean survival time (RMST). Monthly drug costs were standardised across regimens. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) were calculated using DTG/3TC as cost-minimising comparator. Bootstrap methodology (10,000 iterations) provided 95% confidence intervals accounting for people-level variability. In addition, the percentage of switches that saw the patient move to a lower-cost therapy than the previous one was calculated. Only therapies with at least 20 PLWH were selected.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>PWH were receiving the following therapies at baseline: B/F/TAF (n=21), DTG/3TC (n=65),TAF/FTC/EVG/COBI (n=47), TAF/FTC/RPV (n=102), DRV/COBI/FTC/TAF (n=51),ABC/3TC/DTG (n=77), FTC/TAF+RAL (n=20), FTC/TAF+DTG (n=38). Eight ART regimens were analysed. Compared to DTG/3TC, TAF/FTC/RPV showed favourable cost-effectiveness with ICER of 876 (95% CI: 714-1,259) per additional month of treatment durability gained (+2.81 months durability, +2,352 monthly cost). B/F/TAF resulted in ICER of 2,607 (95% CI: -14,677 to 17,557) per additional month (+1.12 months, +2,694). Triple therapy regimens (ABC/3TC/DTG, DRV/COBI/FTC/TAF) demonstrated negative durability differences (-1.15 and -1.80 months respectively) with higher costs, indicating dominance by DTG/3TC. FTC/TAF-based combinations showed reduced durability with mixed cost implications. Among 188 switches observed, 112 patients (59.6%) switched to less expensive therapies, suggesting a trend towards economic optimisation.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>DTG/3TC represents the most cost-effective option among analysed regimens, providing superior treatment durability at lowest cost. TAF/FTC/RPV offers reasonable cost-effectiveness for patients requiring alternative dual therapy. Notably, 59.6% of treatment switches were toward more economical regimens, indicating natural optimisation toward cost-effective options in clinical practice. Results support dual therapy strategies with significant potential for healthcare cost savings while maintaining clinical effectiveness. Narrow confidence intervals for TAF/FTC/RPV indicate robust cost-effectiveness estimates, while wide intervals for other regimens reflect greater outcome uncertainty. These real-world findings inform evidence-based HIV treatment guidelines and budget planning decisions.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Berti, G., Mengato, D., Michielan, S., Agnoletto, L., Cappellazzo, L., Silvani, M., Chiumente, M., Gregori, D., Mazzitelli, M., Venturini, F., Cattelan, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.208</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.208</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-106 Cost-effectiveness analysis of HIV antiretroviral therapy regimens: real-world evidence from the Italian Mosaico study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A102</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A102</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A102-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-107 Implementation of therapeutic drug monitoring as an integral part of clinical pharmaceutical care in a regional hospital]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A102-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>In the context of the hospital&rsquo;s accreditation process, we implemented therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) as an integral part of clinical pharmaceutical care, with the aim of optimising pharmacotherapy and enhancing patient safety. The focus was placed on aminoglycoside antibiotics, particularly gentamicin, which is frequently administered across hospital wards.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The aim was not only to establish a clinical pharmacy service, but also to evaluate the appropriateness of prescribed doses in relation to patients&lsquo; body mass index (BMI) and renal function. In addition, the rate of acceptance of pharmacists&rsquo; recommendations was assessed as an indicator of the quality of the clinical pharmacy service.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective observational study was conducted in a general hospital between September 2022 and August 2025. Pharmacists interpreted the results of drug level determinations provided by the clinical laboratory and subsequently prepared TDM reports, which were entered into the hospital information system. The TDM reports were generated using the MWPharm+ software.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Among the 201 patients included, only 22% (n = 45) received optimal doses of gentamicin, while 77% (n = 156) received inappropriate doses &ndash; 37% (n = 75) subtherapeutic and 40% (n = 81) supratherapeutic. In patients with creatinine below 45 &mu;mol/l (n = 42), overdose was prevalent, occurring in 76% (n = 32) of cases. Conversely, in patients with creatinine above 85 &mu;mol/l (n = 84), underdosing was observed in 48% (n = 40). Only 21% (n = 16) of patients with normal renal function received appropriate doses of gentamicin.</p><p>The highest number of inappropriate doses was found in obese patients with a BMI greater than 25 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (n = 107), of whom 52 (26%) received subtherapeutic and 55 (27%) supratherapeutic doses.</p><p>The acceptance rate of clinical pharmaceutical interventions increased significantly during the study period from 20% at baseline to 95% at the end of the study.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>In terms of achieving optimal gentamicin dosing, obese patients and patients with renal impairment were identified as groups at highest risk of incorrect dosing. Overall, TDM has become an integral part of clinical practice in our hospital and is increasingly recognised as a valuable tool in optimising drug therapy.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Komjathy, H., Horvathova, A., Dorsic, L., Kojnokova, B., Tothova, K., Zupcan Vicena, A., Tarnokova, D., Forro, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.209</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.209</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-107 Implementation of therapeutic drug monitoring as an integral part of clinical pharmaceutical care in a regional hospital]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A102</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A103</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A103-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-108 Rethinking ertapenem dosing in haemodialysis: three times per week or daily?]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A103-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Evidence on ertapenem adjustment in haemodialysis is scarce. The recommended regimen is 0.5 g/24h, although pharmacokinetic studies suggest 0.5&ndash;1 g/post-dialysis. Optimised dosing may reduce catheter use, dialysis centre visits and adverse events.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To compare effectiveness, safety, and resource utilisation of daily versus thrice-weekly administration.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>This retrospective study (2012&ndash;2024) assessed ertapenem in haemodialysis patients at a 420-bed hospital. A consensus protocol was developed recommending three thrice-weekly regimens: 0.5 g/post-dialysis, 1 g/post-dialysis, or 0.5&ndash;0.5&ndash;1 g/post-dialysis, individualised by physician. Patients were assigned to thrice-weekly or daily cohorts. Additional post-discharge visits for antibiotic administration were recorded. Data were expressed as percentages or medians (Q1&ndash;Q3) and analysed using Fisher&rsquo;s exact and Mann&ndash;Whitney U tests.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Thirty-one patients were included. Baseline demographics, comorbidities and infection sources were comparable:</p><p><tbl id="T1" loc="float"><tblbdy top-stubs="2"><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Group 1</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Group 2</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>p value</b> </c></r><r><c cspan="4" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Age</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">64,6 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">68,5 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0,57 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Women</b> (%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">25 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">75 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0,097 </c></r><r><c cspan="4" rspan="1">  <b>Comorbidities</b> (%) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Arterial hypertension </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">100 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">92,9 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0,452 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Hypertensive heart disease </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">70,6 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">42,9 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0,157 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Diabetes </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">64,7 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">64,3 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">COPD </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">17,6 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">14,3 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Immunosuppression </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">41,1 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">50 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0,537 </c></r><r><c cspan="2" rspan="1">  <b>Infection source</b> (%) </c><c cspan="2" rspan="1">0,222 </c></r><r><c cspan="2" rspan="1">Urinary tract </c><c cspan="2" rspan="1">41,2 </c></r><r><c cspan="2" rspan="1">Skin and soft tissue </c><c cspan="2" rspan="1">35,3 </c></r><r><c cspan="2" rspan="1">Nosocomial pneumonia </c><c cspan="2" rspan="1">11,8 </c></r><r><c cspan="2" rspan="1">Catheter-related bacteriemia </c><c cspan="2" rspan="1">5,9 </c></r></tblbdy></tbl></p><p>Median treatment duration was 13 (8&ndash;40.3) days. Causative microorganisms were similar: ESBL-producing <I>Klebsiella pneumoniae</I> (47.1% vs 42.9%), <I>Escherichia coli</I> (29.4% vs 35.7%), <I>Enterobacter cloacae</I> (6.2% vs 0%), ESBL-producing <I>Proteus mirabilis</I> (5.9% vs 0%). In the thrice-weekly cohort, regimens were 0.5 g (47.1%), 1 g in (35.3%), and 0.5&ndash;0.5&ndash;1 g (17.6%).</p><p>Clinical cure rates were comparable (88.2% vs 78.6%, p=0.636), with no adverse events in either group. Hospital stay was similar: 13 (8&ndash;40.3) vs 16.5 (8.5&ndash;30.8) days (p=0.681). However, among discharged patients, daily regimens required significantly more additional visits and vascular access manipulations: 0 (0) vs 2.5 (1.3&ndash;6.0) days (p=0.028).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Thrice-weekly ertapenem was effective and safe in haemodialysis patients. Compared with daily dosing, it reduced dialysis centre visits and intravenous access manipulation.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Echeverria-Esnal, D., Lopez Gonzalez-Quevedo, A., Comajuan Mendoza, C., De La Rosa-Maceda, I., Collado Nieto, S., Cao Baduell, H., Montero, M., Grau Cerrato, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.210</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.210</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-108 Rethinking ertapenem dosing in haemodialysis: three times per week or daily?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A103</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A103</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A103-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-109 Real-world retrospective analysis of ceftazidime-avibactam plus aztreonam in multidrug-resistant Gram-negative infections]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A103-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (GNB), including MBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae, are a growing global concern due to their increasing prevalence and limited treatment options. One available therapy is the ceftazidime-avibactam-aztreonam combination (ceftazidime is used due to aztreonam-avibactam being unavailable until 2025).</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To describe the utilisation profile of ceftazidime-avibactam-aztreonam in the treatment of multidrug-resistant GNB infections.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Retrospective study of patients with active infection treated with ceftazidime-avibactam-aztreonam (Jan 2022&ndash;Apr 2025). Sociodemographic, clinical/infection-related, and treatment data were collected. Quantitative data were expressed in mean and SD; qualitative in percentage with 95% CI. Analysis: M365 Copilot.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>104 patients received ceftazidime-avibactam-aztreonam: 19.2% (11.5-26.9) colonisations and 80.7% (73.1-88.5) infections.</p><p><tbl id="T1" loc="float"><no>Abstract 4CPS-109 Table 1</no><caption><p>Sociodemographic profile</p></caption><tblbdy top-stubs="2"><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Male gender  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">62.5% (52.9-72.1)  </c></r><r><c cspan="2" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Age (years)  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">68.7 (13.1)  </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Hospital stay (days)  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">50.2 (41.3)  </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Intensive care unit (ICU) admission  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">32.7% (24.0-42.3)  </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">ICU stay (days)  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">18.1 (31.1)  </c></r></tblbdy></tbl></p><p><tbl id="T2" loc="float"><no>Abstract 4CPS-109 Table 2</no><caption><p>Infection associated parameters</p></caption><tblbdy><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Infection Source:UrinaryAbdominalRespiratorySkin and Soft TissueEndovascularThoracicUnknown  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> 30.7% (22.1-39.4)24.0% (16.3-32.7)21.1% (13.5-28.8)6.7% (1.9-11.5)4.8% (1.0-9.6)1.2% (0.0-2.9)11.5% (5.8-18.3)  </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Another infection source  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">13.5% (7.7&ndash;20.2)  </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Sepsis  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">28.9% (20.2&ndash;37.5)  </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Polymicrobial infection  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">45.1% (35.6&ndash;54.8)  </c></r></tblbdy></tbl></p><p><tbl id="T3" loc="float"><no>Abstract 4CPS-109 Table 3</no><caption><p>Microbiological profile</p></caption><tblbdy top-stubs="4"><r><c cspan="2" rspan="1">Resistance mechanisms  </c></r><r><c cspan="2" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">ESBL+carbapenemase  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">56.6 (48.2-64.7)  </c></r><r><c cspan="2" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Carbapenemase  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">29.4 (22.4-37.6)  </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Multidrug-resistant  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">6.6 (3.5-12.1)  </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">ESBL  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">2.3 (0.8-6.3)  </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">ESBL+carbapenemase+AMPc  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.7 (0.1-4.0)  </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Carbapenem-resistant  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.7 (0.1-4.0)  </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Ausence  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">3.7 (1.6-8.3)  </c></r><r><c cspan="2" rspan="1">Carbapenemase  </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">OXA-48+NDM  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">48.3 (39.4-57.3)  </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">VIM  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">18.1 (12.2-26.1)  </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">IMP  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">10.3 (6.0-17.2)  </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">OXA-48  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">9.5 (5.4-16.2)  </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">NDM  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">6.9 (3.5-13.0)  </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">VIM+IMP  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">2.6 (0.9-7.3)  </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">VIM+KPC  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">2.6 (0.9-7.3)  </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">GES  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1.7 (0.5-6.1)  </c></r></tblbdy></tbl></p><p><tbl id="T4" loc="float"><no>Abstract 4CPS-109 Table 4</no><caption><p>Treatment-related data</p></caption><tblbdy top-stubs="2"><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Targeted treatment  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">83.7% (76.0&ndash;90.4)  </c></r><r><c cspan="2" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Treatment duration (days)  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">7.3 (3.2) days  </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Inappropriate renal dose adjustment  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">18.3% (11.5&ndash;26.0)  </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Treatment interruption reasons:Clinical/microbiological cureDe-escalation/optimisationNegative colonisation sampleDeathCeftazidime-avibactam-aztreonam resistance  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> 51.0% (41.3&ndash;60.6)24.0% (16.3&ndash;32.7)12.5% (6.7&ndash;19.2)11.5% (5.8&ndash;18.3)1.0% (0.1&ndash;2.9)  </c></r></tblbdy></tbl></p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Ceftazidime-avibactam-aztreonam has been predominantly used as targeted therapy in severe infections caused by multidrug-resistant GNB. A high prevalence of complex resistance mechanisms, including OXA-48 and NDM carbapenemases was detected. Despite the clinical complexity, over half of the patients achieved clinical or microbiological cure, highlighting the potential effectiveness of this combination. However, the notable rate of incorrect renal dose adjustments and its use in MBL-negative <I>Enterobacteriaceae</I> underscores the need for improved antimicrobial stewardship and dosing optimisation to maximise therapeutic outcomes and minimise resistance development.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ruiz Garcia, S., Calvo Garcia, A., Ibanez Zurriaga, A., Ramirez Herraiz, E., Perez Abanades, M., Serra Lopez-Matencio, J., Saez Bejar, C., Botica Moros, L., Aranguren Oyarzabal, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.211</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.211</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-109 Real-world retrospective analysis of ceftazidime-avibactam plus aztreonam in multidrug-resistant Gram-negative infections]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A103</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A104</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A104-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-110 Economic impact of weight-based dosing versus fixed dosing of pembrolizumab in a specialty hospital]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A104-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Pembrolizumab is a drug that has revolutionised oncology in recent years, becoming a standard therapy for multiple types of neoplasms and treatment lines, both in early-stage and advanced disease. The amount of pembrolizumab used in hospitals is steadily increasing and achieving cost savings in dosing while maintaining treatment efficacy could significantly contribute to the sustainability of the healthcare system.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To assess the economic impact, measured in direct costs, of using reduced dose pembrolizumab for the treatment of various cancer types.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>This descriptive observational retrospective study included 192 patients with various types of neoplasms. Pembrolizumab was administered at 2 mg/kg rather than the fixed 200 mg dose specified in the drug&rsquo;s Summary of Product Characteristics. All patients who received reduced doses of pembrolizumab were included, regardless of the number of treatment cycles completed. The mean patient weight was 66 kg.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Weight-based dosing of pembrolizumab during the study period resulted in a total direct cost saving of 515,862. The per patient savings ranged from 18 to 14,567. By cancer type, the patients treated with pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg included: 16 with head and neck cancer, nine with cervical cancer, six with colorectal cancer, two with endometrial cancer, two with gastric cancer, 29 with breast cancer, 17 with melanoma, 100 with non-small-cell lung cancer, and 11 with renal cancer. Reduced dose pembrolizumab was prescribed in 82% (192 out of 234) of total prescriptions.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Administering pembrolizumab at 2 mg/kg represents a highly efficient strategy, generating significant cost savings without compromising patient outcomes. This approach is particularly relevant for the sustainability of the healthcare system, especially in oncology, where innovation and treatment costs continue to rise.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lara Ramos, C., Ballesteros Fernandez, A., Tamayo Bermejo, R., Gallego Fernandez, C., Rouco Blanco-Rajoy, M., Valverde Alcala, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.212</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.212</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-110 Economic impact of weight-based dosing versus fixed dosing of pembrolizumab in a specialty hospital]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A104</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A104</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A104-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-111 Persistence of Janus kinase inhibitor therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A104-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi), such as baricitinib (BAR) and tofacitinib (TOF), are oral therapeutic options for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Evaluating treatment persistence, defined as the duration patients remain on therapy without discontinuation, is essential to understanding real-world effectiveness and long-term tolerability.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the persistence of BAR and TOF in patients with RA in routine clinical practice.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective observational study was conducted including all patients with RA who received BAR or TOF and were on treatment at any point until March 2025. Follow-up continued until March 2025 or treatment discontinuation.</p><p>Data collected from electronic medical records: age, sex, previous treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) -both conventional (csDMARDs) and biological (bDMARDs)-, concomitant corticosteroids, duration of JAKi therapy, treatment start and end dates and reasons for discontinuation.</p><p>Categorical variables were expressed as percentages; continuous variables as median with interquartile range. Treatment persistence was analysed using the Kaplan&ndash;Meier method.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>53 patients were included: BAR (n=36) and TOF (n=17); women: 75% and 82% of each group, respectively. Median ages (years): BAR 61 (24-80), TOF 56 (21-83). All received csDMARDs. Previous bDMARDs: BAR 78%, TOF 94%. Concomitant corticosteroid therapy: BAR 68%, TOF 82%.</p><p>Median treatment duration (months): BAR 38 (2&ndash;79), TOF 20 (4&ndash;79).</p><p>The cumulative probability of treatment persistence for BAR and TOF was 89% (95% CI 79-99) and 82% (95% CI 64-100) at 12 months and 78% (95% CI 65-92) and 75% (95% CI 54-96) at 24 months, respectively.</p><p>During the study, 18 patients (34%) discontinued therapy: 11 (61%) on BAR (seven due to lack of efficacy, four adverse events) and seven (39%) on TOF (all due to inefficacy).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Both JAKi showed high persistence rates during the first 24 months of therapy. BAR demonstrated numerically greater persistence than TOF, although differences were not statistically significant. Lack of efficacy was the main reason for discontinuation.</p><p>These findings support the real-world effectiveness and tolerability of JAKi in RA, highlighting the importance of persistence as an indicator of long-term treatment success.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Caina Lopez, S., Gonzalez Freire, L., Bartolome Figueroa, A., Barca Diez, C., Veiga Villaverde, A., Crespo Diz, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.213</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.213</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-111 Persistence of Janus kinase inhibitor therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A104</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A105</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A105-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-112 Economic impact of weight-based vs fixed-dose nivolumab dosing in a specialty hospital]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A105-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Nivolumab was the first anti-PD-1 drug to be marketed, marking a significant advancement initially in the treatment of melanoma and non-small-cell lung cancer. Since then, anti-PD-1 therapies have revolutionised cancer treatment. The hospital use of nivolumab continues to increase and optimising dosing strategies to reduce costs while maintaining efficacy can play an important role in supporting the sustainability of the healthcare system.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the economic impact, measured in direct costs, of using reduced dose nivolumab for the treatment of various cancer types.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A descriptive observational study was conducted, including 160 patients diagnosed with different types of cancer. These patients were administered nivolumab at a dose of 3 mg/kg instead of the fixed 240 mg dose specified in the drug&rsquo;s summary of product characteristics. All patients prescribed reduced dose nivolumab were included, regardless of the number of cycles received.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Weight-based dosing of nivolumab during the study period resulted in a total direct cost saving of 345,826. Per patient savings ranged from 39 to 16,551. By cancer type, patients treated with nivolumab at 3 mg/kg included: 13 with head and neck cancer, four with oesophageal cancer, 10 with gastric cancer, 39 with melanoma, 45 with non-small-cell lung cancer, 41 with renal cancer, seven with urothelial bladder cancer, and one with Hodgkin&rsquo;s lymphoma. Reduced dose nivolumab was prescribed in 100% of the cases during the study period. No reduction in treatment efficacy was observed in patients receiving nivolumab at 3 mg/kg.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Administering nivolumab at 3 mg/kg represents an efficient dosing strategy, resulting in substantial cost savings without compromising patient outcomes. This has significant implications for the sustainability of the healthcare system, particularly in oncology, where therapeutic innovation is rapidly evolving.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lara Ramos, C., Rouco Blanco-Rajoy, M., Valverde Alcala, E., Gallego Fernandez, C., Ballesteros Fernandez, A., Tamayo Bermejo, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.214</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.214</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-112 Economic impact of weight-based vs fixed-dose nivolumab dosing in a specialty hospital]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A105</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A105</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A105-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-113 Ceftazidime-avibactam plus aztreonam in multidrug-resistant bacterial infections: effectiveness, mortality and outcome predictors]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A105-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Ceftazidime-avibactam-aztreonam is used to treat infections caused by MBL-producing <I>Enterobacteriaceae</I>. Avibactam protects aztreonam from non-MBL &beta;-lactamases (Ambler class A/D). Ceftazidime is included due to the unavailability of aztreonam-avibactam until 2025.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the effectiveness (clinical cure, microbiological eradication, and recurrence), mortality, and outcome predictors in infections treated with ceftazidime-avibactam-aztreonam.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Retrospective study of patients with active infection treated with ceftazidime-avibactam-aztreonam (January 2022&ndash;April 2025). Sociodemographic, clinical, infection-related, and treatment data were collected. Outcomes included clinical/microbiological cure, 90-day clinical/microbiological recurrence, early (24&ndash;48h), 30-day, and intra-hospital mortality. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed. Quantitative data were expressed in mean and SD; qualitative in percentage with 95% CI. Analysis: M365 Copilot.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Eight-four patients received ceftazidime-avibactam-aztreonam.</p><p><tbl id="T1" loc="float"><no>Abstract 4CPS-113 Table 1</no><caption><p>Sociodemographic profile</p></caption><tblbdy top-stubs="2"><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Male gender  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">61.9% (51.2-72.6)  </c></r><r><c cspan="2" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Age (years)  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">70.9 (15.0)  </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Hospital stay (days)  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">51.8 (45.0)  </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Intensive care unit (ICU) admission  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">36.9% (26.2-47.6)  </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">ICU stay (days)  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">20.2 (36.4)  </c></r></tblbdy></tbl></p><p><tbl id="T2" loc="float"><no>Abstract 4CPS-113 Table 2</no><caption><p>Microbiological and infection associated parameters</p></caption><tblbdy><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Infection Source:UrinaryRespiratoryAbdominalSkin and Soft TissueEndovascularThoracicUnknown  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> 38.1% (27.4-48.8)21.4% (13.1-31.0)17.9% (9.5-26.2)8.3% (2.4-14.3)6.0% (1.2-11.9)1.2% (0.1-3.6)7.1% (2.4-13.1)  </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Another infection source  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">13.1% (6.0-20.2)  </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Sepsis  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">33.3% (23.8&ndash;44.1)  </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Polymicrobial infection  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">45.2% (34.5&ndash;56.0)  </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Carbapenemases:OXA-48+NDMVIMOXA-48NDMIMPGESVIM+IMP  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">57.6% (47.8-67.4)13.0% (6.5-20.7)11,9% (3.3-21.7)8.7% (3.3-15.2)5.5% (1.1-10.9)2.2% (0.1-5.4)1.1% (0.1-3.3)  </c></r></tblbdy></tbl></p><p><tbl id="T3" loc="float"><no>Abstract 4CPS-113 Table 3</no><caption><p>Treatment-related data</p></caption><tblbdy top-stubs="2"><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Targeted treatment  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">84.5% (76.2-91.7)  </c></r><r><c cspan="2" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Treatment duration (days)  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">7.3 (5.0)  </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Multi-antibiotic therapy  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">39.3% (28.6-50.0)  </c></r></tblbdy></tbl></p><p>Clinical and microbiological cure was achieved in 82.1% (73.8-90.5) and 56.6% (45.2-66.7) of patients, respectively. 90-day relapse rate was 23.7% (14.5&ndash;32.9).</p><p>Mortality rates: early 4.8% (1.2-9.5), 30-day 21.3% (12.5-30.0) and intra-hospital 32.1% (22.6-42.9).</p><p>Directed treatment was associated with higher infection cure rates (clinical and/or microbiological) (OR: 4.7; 95% CI: 0.9&ndash;25.4; p=0.04) and lower mortality (OR: 0.3; 95% CI: 0.1&ndash;1.2; p=0.04), while longer hospital stay correlated with reduced mortality (OR: 0.9; 95% CI: 0.9&ndash;0.9; p=0.02).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Ceftazidime-avibactam-aztreonam showed high clinical effectiveness in treating MBL-producing infections, despite moderate microbiological cure, notable relapse and mortality rates. Directed therapy significantly improved outcomes and reduced mortality, and prolonged hospitalisation correlated with lower mortality. These findings support its use while highlighting the need for further research to optimise outcomes and guide individualised treatment strategies.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Calvo Garcia, A., Ruiz Garcia, S., Ibanez Zurriaga, A., Saez Bejar, C., Perez Abanades, M., Ramirez Herraiz, E., Serra Lopez-Matencio, J., Botica Moros, L., Aranguren Oyarzabal, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.215</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.215</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-113 Ceftazidime-avibactam plus aztreonam in multidrug-resistant bacterial infections: effectiveness, mortality and outcome predictors]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A105</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A106</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A106?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-114 Pharmacist-patient consultations improve adverse event management and knowledge during oral antibiotic therapy for bone and joint infections: the EFIRAD prospective randomised trial]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A106?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Oral antibiotic therapy for bone and joint infections (BJIs) is often prolonged and frequently associated with adverse events (AEs), which can compromise adherence and clinical outcomes. Pharmacist involvement during the hospital to home transition may enhance patient safety and treatment continuity.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To assess, through a prospective randomised controlled trial, the impact of pharmacist&ndash;patient consultations (PCs) on AE management and patient knowledge during oral antibiotic therapy for BJIs.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>This prospective, randomised controlled trial (EFIRAD) included adults hospitalised for BJI, undergoing surgery, and discharged with a 4&ndash;12 week oral antibiotic prescription. Patients were randomised 1:1 to receive either a structured pharmacist&ndash;patient consultation (PC group) or standard discharge counselling (control). Telephone follow-ups were conducted at day 7 (D7) and day 14 (D14) to collect AEs and evaluate AE management, classified as optimal or non-optimal using a predefined decision tree. Patient knowledge was assessed using a validated 12-item questionnaire.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Eighty-four patients were included (PC: n=41; control: n=43), with comparable baseline characteristics. At D7, 74% of patients reported &ge;1 AE, mostly gastrointestinal (72%) and mild (grade I, 84%). Adverse event evolution between D7 and D14 was monitored, showing a decrease in overall AEs (74% vs 59%) and in gastrointestinal events (72% vs57%), but an increase in infectious AEs such as oral candidiasis and fungal infections (11.1% vs 3.5%). Optimal AE management was significantly higher in the PC group (95% vs 79%, p=0.03). Knowledge scores were greater in the PC group (p=0.0019), particularly regarding AE recognition, drug interactions, dosing, and appropriate responses. Non-optimal management in the PC group involved minor misuse of symptomatic treatment (n=1) or lack of medical consultation for hypersensitivity (n=1), while in controls it mainly included misuse or non-use of symptomatic treatments (n=7) and absence of medical contact (n=2). No AE required hospital readmission.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>This prospective randomised controlled trial demonstrates that pharmacist&ndash;patient consultations significantly improve AE management and patient knowledge during oral antibiotic therapy for BJIs. These results highlight the clinical relevance of pharmacist involvement in antimicrobial stewardship and support the integration of structured pharmacist-led interventions into post-hospital care pathways.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deschamps, M., Bricha, K., Houssen, M., Jossot, K., Ould-Ouali, T., Menigaux, C., Berdougo, J., Tritz, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.216</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.216</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-114 Pharmacist-patient consultations improve adverse event management and knowledge during oral antibiotic therapy for bone and joint infections: the EFIRAD prospective randomised trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A106</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A106</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A107-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-115 Evaluation of the adherence to empirical treatment protocols for hospital-acquired pneumonia in a tertiary care hospital]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A107-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) is a frequent infection associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Empirical antibiotic treatment should be guided by local protocols considering risk factors for resistant pathogens. Assessing the adequacy of empirical treatment protocols is essential to optimise antimicrobial stewardship and clinical outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the adherence to empirical treatment protocols for HAP in a tertiary care hospital.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective observational study was conducted including adult patients prescribed one of the available HAP empirical treatment protocols through the computerised physician order entry system between October 2022 and September 2025. Demographic (sex, age) and clinical variables (hospital stay after prescription, discharge or death) were collected, along with parameters related to protocol adequacy: &beta;-lactam allergy, severity (sepsis or septic shock), and risk factors (RF) for <I>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</I> (previous culture within 1 year, hospitalisation with antibiotics in the last 3 months, immunosuppression, chronic lung disease) and methicillin-resistant <I>Staphylococcus aureus</I> (MRSA) (haemodialysis, prior colonisation/infection, MRSA prevalence area &gt;20%). Adequacy was defined according to diagnosis, allergy, severity, length of stay, and RF for <I>P. aeruginosa</I> and/or MRSA. Categorical variables were expressed as frequencies (%) and quantitative ones as mean &plusmn; SD or median (IQR). Comparisons were made using Chi-squared or Mann&ndash;Whitney U tests. Statistical analysis was performed with Stata v15.1.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 52 protocols were prescribed to 50 patients (64.0% men; median age 76 (IQR 63&ndash;86) years). Only 9 (17.3%) prescriptions were adequate. Main causes of non-adherence (82.7%) were incorrect diagnosis (69.8%), severity mismatch (18.6%), and inadequate consideration of risk factors for <I>P. aeruginosa</I> (7.0%) or MRSA (2.3%). No significant differences were observed between adequate and non-adequate prescriptions in mortality (12.5% vs 16.3%; p=0.696) or length of stay (7 vs 9 days; p=0.537). The departments with the highest prescription rates were Emergency (51.9%), Internal Medicine (25.0%), and Pulmonology (5.8%).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Adherence to HAP empirical treatment protocols was low, mainly due to diagnostic inaccuracy. No significant differences in mortality or hospital stay were observed between adequate and non-adequate prescriptions. Incorporating treatment protocols for other infectious syndromes into the prescribing system and conducting educational interventions may improve adherence and antimicrobial use.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sevilla Alarcon, E., Lago Ballester, F., Bejar, A. V., Martinez Madrid, M., Moya Flores, J., Marin andreu, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.217</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.217</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-115 Evaluation of the adherence to empirical treatment protocols for hospital-acquired pneumonia in a tertiary care hospital]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A107</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A107</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A107-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-116 Impact of a antimicrobial stewardship teams (ASTs) intervention on antimicrobial use and microorganism isolated in biliary-origin bacteraemias]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A107-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>The intervention of a Antimicrobial Stewardship teams is useful in optimising antibiotic therapy in order to avoid antibiotic resistance.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To assess whether the 2016 ASTs (Antimicrobial Stewardship Program) intervention in a gastroenterology department continues to impact antimicrobial use patterns in 2023 and resistance profiles of pathogens involved in biliary-origin bacteraemia.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>This is a retrospective observational study comparing antimicrobial use and isolated microorganisms in 120 patients with biliary-origin bacteraemia between 2017 and 2023. The study was conducted in a 30-bed gastroenterology department of a tertiary public hospital with 888 beds, an average stay of 6.6 days, and a 70.3% occupancy rate. Antimicrobial consumption (ATC J01-J04 groups and metronidazole) was measured in defined daily doses (DDDs) per 100 bed-days (DDDs/100BD) using the WHO ATC/DDD system for 2023. Data were sourced from the Pharmacy Management System, Admission Service, and the ASTs team&rsquo;s microbiological database.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Total antimicrobial use increased slightly from 73.7 DDDs/100BD in 2017 to 77.5 DDDs/100BD (+5%) in 2023. The most frequently used antimicrobials in both years were ceftriaxone (11.9/19.2 DDDs/100BD), piperacillin/tazobactam (7.7/11.5), metronidazole (15/10.3), ciprofloxacin (9.9/8.8), amoxicillin/clavulanate (8.8/4.5), and meropenem (1.7/4), representing 74.5% and 75.2% of total consumption, respectively. The average hospital stay decreased by 7.5%, from 6.7 days in 2017 to 6.2 in 2023, while mortality decreased by 4% (3% vs 2.9%). Positive blood cultures increased from 73 to 120 (+64%). Notably, there were low rates of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) Gram-negative bacteria and methicillin-resistant Gram-positive organisms.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The positive impact of the 2016 ASTs intervention on antimicrobial consumption has persisted in 2023, with stable global usage and a predominant use of narrow-spectrum antibiotics such as ceftriaxone. The optimisation of antimicrobial use has not negatively affected hospital stay or mortality rates. Resistance rates have remained low, despite an increase in biliary-origin bacteraemia. The rise in piperacillin/tazobactam and meropenem use was not justified by the microbiological resistance profile. ASTs programs contribute to safe antimicrobial use, extending their efficacy and minimising resistance emergence. Ongoing monitoring is essential to evaluate the long-term impact of ASTs interventions.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ozcoidi, D., Saez Villafane, M., Fernandez Vazquez, A., Ayala Alvarez Canal, J., Flores Fernandez, M., Mira Bayon, L., Barba Llacer, M., Leon Sanchez, R., Rodriguez Chas, I., Saez Hortelano, J., Ortiz De Urbina Gonzalez, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.218</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.218</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-116 Impact of a antimicrobial stewardship teams (ASTs) intervention on antimicrobial use and microorganism isolated in biliary-origin bacteraemias]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A107</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A107</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A108-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-117 Rituximab and caplacizumab in thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura: 11 years of real-world evidence]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A108-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is a rare and serious disease. Initial treatment includes plasma exchange and corticosteroids, with relapses occurring in 20&ndash;50% of cases. Rituximab and caplacizumab (available since 2018) are currently used in clinical practice; however, real-world evidence remains limited.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The aim of this study is to analyse the effectiveness of these treatments in reducing relapses and length of hospitalisation in adult patients with TTP in a tertiary hospital setting.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Retrospective and observational study of patients diagnosed with TTP from 2014 to 2025. Collected variables were: demographic data (age, sex), treatment (drug, dosage, start date), effectiveness (relapse, retreatment, length of hospitalisation).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 30 episodes in 22 patients were included (2014&ndash;2017: 8; 2018&ndash;2025: 22). The mean age was 52.5 &plusmn; 13.8 years, and 54.5% (n=12) were women. All patients received one cycle of rituximab; it was administered a median of 6.3 days after admission in 27 episodes, while in three episodes it was given in the outpatient setting. The regimens used were four doses of: 375 mg/m<sup>2</sup> per week (n=23; 76.6%), 375 mg/m<sup>2</sup> every 4 days (n=4; 13.3%), and 100 mg/m<sup>2</sup> per week (n=3; 10.0%). Five patients (22.7%) experienced relapse, three of them had two relapse episodes each. Caplacizumab was used in addition to the initial treatment, in seven episodes (23.3%), a median of 4.7 days after admission. The regimen was daily (except for one patient every 48 h) with a mean duration of 19.5 days. The average length of hospitalisation was 20.4 days, with no differences between patients treated with caplacizumab and those who were not, from 2018 onwards (20.7 vs 19.8).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>In our cohort, rituximab did not show a clear reduction in relapse rates compared with those reported in the general TTP population and caplacizumab did not demonstrate a reduction in the length of hospitalisation. However, the small number of patients, particularly those treated with caplacizumab, limits the strength of these findings. Larger studies are needed to better define the role of these therapies in TTP management.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fuentes Herrero, M., Vallez-Valero, L., Medina-Catalan, D., Villamarin-Vallejo, L., Feliu-Ribera, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.219</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.219</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-117 Rituximab and caplacizumab in thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura: 11 years of real-world evidence]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A108</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A108</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A108-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-118 Y-site compatibility and interaction analysis of anticonvulsants and vasoactive agents in critical care settings]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A108-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Intensive Care Units (ICUs) manage critically ill patients, often with neurological conditions requiring anticonvulsant therapy. These patients frequently require concurrent administration of vasoactive agents to maintain haemodynamic stability. The compatibility and potential interactions between these drug classes are crucial to avoid adverse events in complex clinical settings.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To define Y-site compatibilities and pharmacological interactions between anticonvulsant and vasoactive drugs, enabling their co-administration in parenteral therapy.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A peer-reviewed literature search was conducted to evaluate Y-site compatibilities and drug interactions between anticonvulsants and vasoactive agents. For Y-site compatibility data, the web applications Stabilis and Micromedex were consulted, along with the databases PubMed, Google Scholar, and drug product information (SmPCs). Drug interaction data were retrieved from UpToDate, Drugs.com, and Micromedex, as well as PubMed and Google Scholar. Analysis was performed independently by author pairs to ensure methodological rigour and data reliability.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 63 Y-site compatibility combinations and 98 potential drug interactions were analysed between anticonvulsants (phenytoin, valproate, levetiracetam, phenobarbital, lacosamide, brivaracetam, topiramate, perampanel, tiagabine, and ethosuximide) and vasoactive drugs (adrenaline, noradrenaline, isoprenaline, dopamine, dobutamine, vasopressin, and phenylephrine).</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Y&ndash;site compatibility analysis revealed:</p><p><l type="circle"><li><p>28 compatible pairs (44.4%)</p></li><li><p>12 incompatible pairs (19.1%)</p></li><li><p>23 pairs with no available information</p></li></l></p></li><li><p>Interaction analysis showed:</p><p><l type="circle"><li><p>89 combinations without significant interactions</p></li><li><p>2 combinations requiring specific cardiac monitoring: vasopressin&ndash;lacosamide and propofol&ndash;vasopressin</p></li><li><p>7 combinations with insufficient data</p></li></l></p></li></l></p><p>Despite general compatibility, enhanced monitoring is recommended for phenytoin, valproic acid, and carbamazepine due to their enzyme induction/inhibition profiles (CYP3A4 &ndash; CYP450).</p><p>Based on the project, compatibility and interaction tables were developed as an information resource for critical situations in the pharmacy service.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Although data on Y-site compatibilities are limited, the co-administration of anticonvulsants and vasoactive agents appears to involve few clinically significant interactions. Nonetheless, a thorough pharmacological assessment is essential before parenteral co-administration. This review highlights the key role of hospital pharmacists in ICU settings to ensure the safe management of high risk medications, especially those with a narrow therapeutic index. Clinical decisions should always consider individual risk-benefit assessments.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tejedor-Tejada, E., Puebla Villaescusa, A., Nadal Portugues, N., Cores Rodriguez, I., Marin Ventura, L., Garcia-Lopez, L., Fernandez Gonzalez, M., Herrero Bermejo, S., Coloma Peral, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.220</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.220</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-118 Y-site compatibility and interaction analysis of anticonvulsants and vasoactive agents in critical care settings]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A108</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A108</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A108-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-119 Real-world clinical practice outcomes of atogepant in patients with migraine previously treated with anti-CGRP]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A108-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Atogepant is indicated for the preventive treatment of chronic migraine (CM), a highly prevalent and disabling neurological disorder. It is an orally administered drug that blocks the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor. In our healthcare setting, it is funded for patients who have failed &ge;3 prior prophylactic treatments and who experience &ge;8 monthly migraine days (MMD).</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of atogepant in real-world clinical practice in CM patients who had previously received another anti-CGRP drug, a cohort not represented in clinical trials.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Retrospective and observational study conducted at a tertiary hospital. We identified all CM patients who started treatment with atogepant between 04/2024&ndash;06/2025. We collected demographic (age, sex, comorbidities) and clinical data (MMD at baseline and at 3 months of follow-up, prior treatments, reason for discontinuation, and adverse events (AEs)).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 54 CM patients receiving atogepant were identified during the study period. Of them, 87% (n=47) were women and mean age was 50 years (range 23&ndash;79 years). The two most frequent comorbidities were anxiety (51.8%, n=28) and insomnia (35.2%, n=19). Patients had received a mean of 6.6&plusmn;2.9 preventive treatments prior to the first anti-CGRP therapy. Twenty-eight patients (51.8%) had received &ge;3 prior anti-CGRP treatments. At 3-months follow-up (n=35): a 74.3% of patients (n=26) had no improvement in MMD and a 25.7% (n=9) had a reduction in MMD (mean reduction: 3.6&plusmn;1.8 days). During the study period, 30 patients (55.6%) discontinued atogepant. The mean duration until discontinuation was 2.7&plusmn;1.7 months. The main reasons for discontinuation were: ineffectiveness (40.0%, n=12), AEs (33.3%, n=10), and both ineffectiveness and AEs (10.0%, n=3). Regarding the 13 cases of discontinuation related to intolerance, the AEs reported (patients could present more than one effect) were constipation (n=5), asthenia (n=3), gastrointestinal discomfort (n=3), dizziness (n=2), and allergic reactions (n=1).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The effectiveness of atogepant in patients pretreated with anti-CGRP therapies is limited, and tolerability issues led to treatment discontinuation in a relevant proportion of cases. It is necessary to determine the clinical benefit of atogepant in patients refractory to previous anti-CGRP treatments.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fuentes Herrero, M., Medina-Catalan, D., Masip, M., Riera, P., De Dios, A., Belvis, R., Morollon, N., Pages-Puigdemont, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.221</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.221</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-119 Real-world clinical practice outcomes of atogepant in patients with migraine previously treated with anti-CGRP]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A108</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A109</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A109-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-120 Impact of sequential therapy implementation in clinical practice: a comparative analysis between medical and surgical specialties]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A109-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Sequential therapy (ST), the early switch from intravenous to oral antimicrobial treatment, is a key strategy to optimise antimicrobial use, reduce complications associated with intravenous administration, and shorten hospital stays. Despite its proven clinical and economic benefits, implementation rates vary among different hospital departments. Understanding these differences is essential to identify barriers and improve adherence to antimicrobial stewardship recommendations.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the success and acceptance of pharmacist-led recommendations for ST involving antimicrobials with high oral bioavailability within an antimicrobial stewardship program. A comparative analysis was conducted between medical and surgical specialties to identify potential differences in acceptance and implementation rates.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective descriptive study was performed over a one-year period, including all hospitalised patients treated with intravenous antimicrobials for &ge;3 days who received an ST recommendation registered in an electronic stewardship tool. Data collected included type of antimicrobial, specialty (medical or surgical), acceptance or rejection of the recommendation, and cases without follow-up (end of treatment, discharge, or death). Antimicrobials considered for ST included levofloxacin, metronidazole, linezolid, clindamycin, fluconazole, ciprofloxacin, azithromycin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, doxycycline, moxifloxacin, and voriconazole.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 264 ST recommendations were recorded: 195 (73.8%) for medical specialties (MS) and 69 (26.2%) for surgical specialties (SS). The most frequently recommended antimicrobials were levofloxacin (35.2%), metronidazole (14.4%), clindamycin (13.6%), and linezolid (13.2%). In MS, follow-up was achieved in 124 cases; 79% were accepted. Ciprofloxacin, azithromycin, doxycycline, moxifloxacin, and voriconazole showed 100% acceptance. In SS, follow-up was possible in 40 cases; 55% were accepted, mainly with doxycycline, fluconazole, and voriconazole (100% acceptance).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Pharmacist-driven interventions within antimicrobial stewardship programs facilitate early implementation of ST, helping to reduce complications from intravenous therapy. However, acceptance was notably lower in surgical specialties, highlighting the need for targeted educational initiatives to improve awareness of ST benefits. Greater acceptance among medical specialties suggests that increased exposure and familiarity with stewardship interventions may enhance implementation success.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guzman Laiz, R., Herreros Fernandez, A., Anez Castano, R., Garcia Masegosa, I., Pascual Garcia, P., Santos Lopez, E., Almanchel Rivadeneyra, M., Urbieta Sanz, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.222</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.222</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-120 Impact of sequential therapy implementation in clinical practice: a comparative analysis between medical and surgical specialties]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A109</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A109</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A109-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-121 Beyond efficacy: real-world evaluation of immune-related toxicities in melanoma patients receiving ipilimumab-nivolumab combination]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A109-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Ipilimumab&ndash;nivolumab combination has reshaped advanced melanoma management, improving survival. Nevertheless, dual checkpoint blockade entails a high incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Early identification and coordinated management are crucial to balance efficacy and safety, where hospital pharmacists play an essential role in toxicity monitoring and optimisation.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To characterise the incidence, type, severity, and management of irAEs in melanoma patients receiving ipilimumab&ndash;nivolumab therapy.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective observational study was conducted including melanoma patients who initiated 3 mg/kg ipilimumab + 1 mg/kg nivolumab therapy between January 2021 and July 2025. Data were retrieved from electronic health records. Variables collected demographic data (age, sex, body weight), disease stage, prior therapy, number of cycles, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score. Toxicities were classified according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0, recording grade, time to onset, management strategy and hospitalisations. Results are expressed as median (interquartile range).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Thirty-six patients were included (58.3% male; median age 57.5 (48&ndash;69.5) years; median bodyweight 66.4 (57&ndash;73.5) kg). Median disease stage IV (4&ndash;4), first-line treatment (1&ndash;1), median two cycles (1&ndash;4), and ECOG 1 (1&ndash;2).</p><p>Overall, 64.7% (n=24) developed at least one irAE, and 55.6% (n=20) developed grade &ge;3 toxicity comprising hepatitis (n=10), colitis (n=4), pneumonitis (n=2), encephalitis (n=1), acute polyradiculopathy (n=1), bilateral neurosensory retinal detachment (n=1), and severe rash (n=1). Median onset time was 4 weeks (2.75&ndash;8.25). Twenty patients required corticosteroids; three mycophenolate mofetil, three infliximab, one vedolizumab, and one tocilizumab. Treatment interruption occurred in 20 patients due to irAE and four due to non-irAE causes; 12 switched to nivolumab monotherapy and eight underwent regimen changes. Twenty-five hospitalisations were recorded, 20 (80%) irAE-related. Most events resolved with immunosuppressive therapy, with no treatment-related deaths.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Ipilimumab&ndash;nivolumab combination in real-world practice was associated with a high incidence of irAEs, consistent with pivotal clinical trials. Early recognition and appropriate multidisciplinary management&ndash;where hospital pharmacists play a crucial role&ndash;are essential to optimise therapeutic outcomes, ensure treatment continuity, and minimise complications. Further multicentre studies are warranted to consolidate these findings and to develop evidence-based strategies for toxicity prevention and monitoring.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Montes Gomez, J., Gonzalez-Haba Pena, E., Lucena Campillo, M., Samitier Samitier, D., Dominguez Chaparro, G., Revuelta Herrero, J., Montero Anton, M., Del Barrio Buesa, S., Jimenez Villaron, C., Herranz Alonso, A., Sanjurjo Saez, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.223</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.223</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-121 Beyond efficacy: real-world evaluation of immune-related toxicities in melanoma patients receiving ipilimumab-nivolumab combination]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A109</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A110</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A110-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-122 Real-world outcomes with tezepelumab: effectiveness and safety in uncontrolled severe asthma]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A110-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Tezepelumab has demonstrated in clinical trials reductions in exacerbations and improved lung function in patients with uncontrolled severe asthma (USA). Nevertheless, practice-based evidence is still limited, and evaluation in routine clinical practice is needed to guide therapeutic decisions.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To assess the real-world effectiveness and safety of tezepelumab in patients with USA after 12 months of treatment.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective, observational study was conducted at a tertiary-level hospital, including patients who initiated treatment between November 2023 to September 2024. Data were obtained from electronic health records and included demographic variables (age, sex, body mass index (BMI), asthma phenotype and prior exposure to biologic therapy).</p><p>Effectiveness outcomes were assessed through forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV<SUB>1</SUB>,%), forced vital capacity (FVC,%), FEV<SUB>1</SUB>/FVC ratio, fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO, ppb), and blood eosinophil count (cells/&mu;L), as well as Asthma Control Test (ACT) scores, annualised exacerbation rate, and oral corticosteroid cycles. Safety was evaluated by recording treatment-emergent adverse events.</p><p>Statistical analyses were conducted with Stata v18. Parametric variables are expressed as mean&plusmn;standard deviation and compared using paired t-test, while non-parametric variables are expressed as median (interquartile range) and compared using the Wilcoxon test. p-value&lt;0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Thirty-four patients were included, 85.3% were women, age 60.15&plusmn;16.9, BMI 31.5&plusmn;6.9, 85.3% presented type 2 asthma. 44.12% had received biologic therapy. The main outcomes were:</p><p><tbl id="T1" loc="float"><tblbdy top-stubs="2"><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Pre-Treatment</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Post-Treatment</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>P-value</b> </c></r><r><c cspan="4" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>FEV<SUB>1</SUB>  </b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">72.56&plusmn;20.89 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">76.56&plusmn;20.89 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">&gt;0.05 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>ACT</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">12.67&plusmn;4.72 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">17.18&plusmn;4.72 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">&lt;0.05 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Corticosteroid cycles</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">2(1-2.75) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0(0-1) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">&lt;0.05 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>FVC</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">85(71.25&ndash;94) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">91(75&ndash;99.75) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">&lt;0.05 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>FEV<SUB>1</SUB>/FVC ratio</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">66.63(62&ndash;73.5) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">72(61.63&ndash;79) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">&lt;0.05 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>FeNO</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">15.5(8.93&ndash;22) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">9(5.75&ndash;15) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">&lt;0.05 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Eosinophils</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">200(0&ndash;350) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0(0&ndash;0) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">&lt;0.05 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Exacerbations</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1(0&ndash;2) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0(0&ndash;1) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">&lt;0.05 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Exacerbations requiring hospitalisation</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0(0&ndash;1) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0(0&ndash;0) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">&lt;0.05 </c></r></tblbdy></tbl></p><p>Regarding safety, a single case of lower limb pain was reported. Five interruptions were recorded: four due to lack of efficacy, and one due to patient decision.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>In real-world practice, tezepelumab was effective and tolerated, improving asthma control, reducing exacerbations and corticosteroid use, and decreasing inflammation biomarkers. Lung function showed a trend towards improvement without reaching statistical significance. Safety profile was favourable, although larger, controlled real-world studies are warranted to confirm these findings.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Montes Gomez, J., Lobato Matilla, M., Del Barrio Buesa, S., Dominguez Chaparro, G., Samitier Samitier, D., Romero Jimenez, R., Mata Alonso, J., Prado Lozano, A., Duran Garcia, M., Herranz Alonso, A., Sanjurjo Saez, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.224</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.224</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-122 Real-world outcomes with tezepelumab: effectiveness and safety in uncontrolled severe asthma]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A110</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A110</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A110-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-123 Real-world effectiveness and safety of rimegepant in migraine prophylaxis]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A110-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Rimegepant is a calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist indicated for migraine prophylaxis in adults with at least four migraine days per month.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This study aimed to evaluate the real-world effectiveness and safety of rimegepant in a tertiary-care hospital.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>We conducted a retrospective observational study of patients treated with rimegepant between January 2024 and July 2025. Demographic variables (sex, age), treatment regimen, duration, migraine attacks before/after treatment and previous prophylactic drugs were recorded. To assess the impact of migraine, the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6), the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) were used. Adverse events were also documented. Statistical analysis was performed using R 4.4.1 and Wilcoxon test.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 46 patients were included, 80.4% female, with a mean age of 44.0&plusmn;13.8 years. Chronic migraine was present in 23.9% and high-frequency episodic migraine (HFEM) in 76.1%. Patients had received a median of 5.0 (4&ndash;7) prior prophylactic drugs, among which the most common were amitriptyline (89.1%), flunarizine (78.3%), topiramate (76.1%), and zonisamide (50.0%). Prior biologic therapy included three agents in 13.0% of patients, two in 8.7%, and one in 10.9%. At baseline, the mean HIT-6 score was 62.0&plusmn;3.7 and the median VAS was 8 (7&ndash;9). Median treatment duration with rimegepant was 8.0 (4.6&ndash;13.6) months at the standard prophylactic dose of 75 mg every 48 hours.</p><p>The baseline median number of migraine attacks was 10 (8&ndash;11), which significantly decreased to four (3&ndash;8) with treatment (p&lt;0.001). Baseline PGIC was four (4&ndash;6), decreasing significantly to three (2&ndash;4) (p&lt;0.01). Treatment adherence was high (89.1%).</p><p>Adverse events occurred in 34.8% of patients, most commonly asthenia (25.0%), dyspepsia (18.8%), and nausea (12.5%). Discontinuation was reported in 23.9% (N=10) of patients, five of them due to adverse events.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Rimegepant appears to be an effective and safe option of treatment. In this study, it was associated with a reduction in migraine frequency and an improvement in patient-reported outcomes. Although a substantial proportion of patients experienced adverse events, these were mild and easily managed in most cases, with a safety profile consistent with that observed in clinical trials. Further studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up are needed to confirm these findings.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Moya Mangas, C., Amaro Alvarez, L., Cordero Ramos, J., Marcos Rodriguez, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.225</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.225</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-123 Real-world effectiveness and safety of rimegepant in migraine prophylaxis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A110</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A111</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A111-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-124 Off-label use of dalbavancin in real-world clinical practice: a retrospective observational study]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A111-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Dalbavancin is approved for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI). However, its prolonged half-life and activity against Gram-positive pathogens have led to growing off-label use in complex infections. There is limited real-world data describing such use, particularly in secondary-level hospitals. Understanding these practices may support optimised antimicrobial stewardship and resource use.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The primary objective was to describe off-label indications for dalbavancin and identify isolated microorganisms in patients treated at a secondary-level hospital. The secondary objective was to analyse patient characteristics and assess correlations between clinical variables and infection persistence or 90-day mortality.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective, observational study was conducted including all patients who received dalbavancin between January 2017 and January 2025. Data were collected on demographics, clinical indication, prescribing department, microbiological findings, and treatment modality. Off-label use was defined as any indication other than ABSSSI. A stepwise backward selection linear regression model was used to evaluate associations with infection persistence or 90-day mortality. Analyses were performed using STATA 17.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Thirty-seven patients were included; 97.3% (n=36) received dalbavancin off-label. The most frequent indications were prosthetic joint infection (29.7%), endocarditis and bacteraemia (16.2% each), spondylodiscitis (13.5%), and osteomyelitis (10.8%). Ambulatory consolidation therapy was used in 83.8% (n=31) following inpatient stabilisation. Gram-positive cocci were most frequently isolated: MRSA (24.3%), <I>S. epidermidis</I> (18.9%), <I>E. faecalis</I> (13.5%), MSSA (8.1%), and <I>E. faecium</I> (5.4%). Polymicrobial infections occurred in 24.3%. In regression analysis, only age remained in the final model (p=0.075), suggesting a trend toward persistent infection in older patients. The overall model was significant (p=0.0293).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Dalbavancin was predominantly used off-label, especially for osteoarticular and prosthetic infections. Its pharmacokinetics enabled outpatient management of severe infections, supporting continuity of care and hospital resource optimisation. Age showed a non-significant trend toward infection persistence. Despite a limited sample size, these findings highlight dalbavancin&rsquo;s utility in complex infections and reinforce the role of hospital pharmacists in promoting its rational, personalised use. </p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>The authors wish to acknowledge the invaluable collaboration of the Hospital Pharmacy Department and the participating clinical services, whose support in data collection and patient management was instrumental to the completion of this study.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vega Gonzalez, P., Garcia Martinez, D., Garrido Peno, N., Andrino Rodriguez, M., Fernandez Valencia, L., Gonzalez Fuentes, A., Carrera Sanchez, M., Manes Sevilla, M., Segura Bedmar, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.226</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.226</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-124 Off-label use of dalbavancin in real-world clinical practice: a retrospective observational study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A111</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A111</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A111-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-125 Treatment efficacy to risankizumab in Crohns disease patients with and without prior ustekinumab exposure]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A111-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Risankizumab (anti-IL23) and Ustekinumab (anti-IL12/23) are approved treatments for active Crohn&rsquo;s Disease (CD). Given the increasing use of sequential biologic therapies in CD, evaluating the role of Risankizumab after Ustekinumab is clinically relevant.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>Describe baseline characteristics and assess the efficacy of Risankizumab in patients with active CD, including both anti-IL23-nai&#x0308;ve individuals and those previously treated with Ustekinumab, in real-world clinical practice at a tertiary hospital.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Retrospective, observational, single-centre study including all CD patients treated with Risankizumab between November 2023-September 2025. Collected variables: age, sex and previous treatments. Efficacy was evaluated in patients completing &ge;24 weeks of treatment by comparing median stool frequency (SF) and faecal calprotectin (FC) levels before and after risankizumab using descriptive and comparative statistics. Data were obtained from electronic medical records and hospital prescription software.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>50 patients were included (52% female), median age 53 years (range 21-73). All had received prior biologic therapies (49 anti-TNF&alpha;, 18 ustekinumab, eight vedolizumab, five upadacitinib). Median SF per day and FC before and after risankizumab were four (interquartile range, (IQR) 2-6) vs 3 (IQR 1-6) and 629 &micro;g/g (IQR 276-2000) vs 323 &micro;g/g (IQR 83-1890), respectively. A trend toward FC reduction in anti-IL23-nai&#x0308;ve patients was observed (not statistically significant, p&gt;0.05). One-year persistence was 91.7% (33/36 evaluable). six patients discontinued after a median of 51 weeks (IQR 24-59) due to inadequate clinical-biochemical response (5/6) or adverse events (1/6); three had prior ustekinumab. No significant difference in discontinuation rates was observed between anti-IL23-nai&#x0308;ve and prior-ustekinumab groups (9.4% vs 16.7%, p=0.446). Treatment intensification was required in 22% overall (10/50 every 4 weeks; 1/50 every 6 weeks); 39% (7/18) prior-ustekinumab vs 12.5% (4/32) anti-IL23-nai&#x0308;ve patients. The need for intensification was significantly higher in previously exposed patients (relative risk 3.11; 95% confidence interval 1.08-8.95; p=0.031).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Prior ustekinumab exposure was associated with poorer response to risankizumab, requiring more frequent dose intensification. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings and clarify whether the number of previous treatment lines influences therapeutic outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>None</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dominguez, A., Esquivel Negrin, J., Gonzalez Chavez, J., Crespo Gonzalez, A., Penalver Ruiz, B., Calero Riveiro, A., Fumero Cruz, P., Ramos Santana, E., Suarez Gonzalez, M., Diaz Ruiz, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.227</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.227</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-125 Treatment efficacy to risankizumab in Crohns disease patients with and without prior ustekinumab exposure]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A111</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A112</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A112-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-126 Against the clock: impact of antibiotic administration, prescription and validation times on outcomes in the sepsis code]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A112-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Sepsis is a life-threatening condition with high morbidity and mortality. Prompt initiation of adequate antibiotic therapy is crucial, as delays beyond the first hour increase mortality. In 2018, a sepsis code protocol was implemented in Madrid to standardise early detection and treatment of sepsis.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>Primary objective: to analyse the percentage of patients receiving antimicrobial therapy within the first hour of sepsis code activation.</p><p>Secondary objective: to analyse the association between antibiotic prescription, validation, and administration times after sepsis code activation, and their impact on mortality, ICU admission/stay, and hospital stay.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective, single-centre, observational study was conducted in a tertiary hospital between February and April 2025. All patients with sepsis code activation were included. Variables collected: demographics, clinical outcomes (ICU admission, mortality, length of stay), and pharmacotherapy (prescription, validation, administration and sepsis code activation times). Times to administration, prescription and validation were measured from sepsis code activation and defined as early if &lt; 1 hour had passed. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics (median, interquartile range-IQR) and association tests (odds ratios-OR, Wilcoxon test, Spearman test).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 270 sepsis codes were included for analysis, corresponding to 261 patients (median age 70 years, 59% male). ICU admission occurred in 51.5% of cases, with an overall mortality of 19.5%. Median hospital stay was 8 days (IQR 5&ndash;18).</p><p>Regarding antibiotic therapy:</p><p><l type="tab"><li><p>&ndash; &nbsp;Administration time: median 61.8 minutes (IQR &ndash;25 to +233). Early administration: 12.36%.</p></li><li><p>&ndash; &nbsp;Prescription time: median 2.1 minutes (IQR &ndash;78.8 to +58.2). Early prescription: 19,35%.</p></li><li><p>&ndash; &nbsp;Validation time: median 74 minutes (IQR &ndash;17 to +222). Early validation: 11.64%.</p></li></l></p><p>5.96% of patients received both prescription and administration within the first hour after activation, and 2.1% also had pharmacist validation. Early antibiotic administration was associated with reduced hospital stay (rho=0.243; p&lt;0.01), lower ICU admission (OR 2.9; p&lt;0.01), and lower ICU length of stay (rho=0.247, p&lt;0.01), although not with mortality.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Antibiotic administration within the first hour after sepsis code activation is associated with reduced hospital stay and lower ICU admission/stay. However, adherence to the complete sequence (prescription&ndash;validation&ndash;administration &lt;1 hour) remains very low. Strengthening the involvement of hospital pharmacists in validation and protocol adherence could optimise antimicrobial stewardship and improve patient outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fernandez Romero, L., Torroba Sanz, B., Montes Gomez, J., Leal Pino, B., Echavarri De Miguel, M., Riva De La Hoz, B., Abril Cabero, A., Algarra Sanchez, E., Nieto Martil, E., Herranz Alonso, A., Sanjurjo Saez, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.228</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.228</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-126 Against the clock: impact of antibiotic administration, prescription and validation times on outcomes in the sepsis code]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A112</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A112</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A112-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-127 Pharmacokinetic monitoring and characterisation of linezolid in hospitalised patients]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A112-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is essential for antibiotics with a narrow therapeutic window, such as linezolid, where subtherapeutic exposure may compromise efficacy and overdosing increases the risk of haematological toxicity. Considerable interindividual variability in plasma trough concentrations (Cmin) has been described with standard dosing regimens. Understanding this variability is crucial for optimising dosing strategies and ensuring both efficacy and safety.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To analyse the pharmacokinetics and interindividual variability of linezolid in hospitalised adults and to evaluate the impact of pharmacokinetic monitoring on dose adjustment and haematological safety.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>An observational, descriptive, retrospective study was conducted in a tertiary hospital including all adult patients treated with linezolid from June 2023 to February 2025. Demographic, clinical and analytical data were collected: sex, age, weight, height, serum creatinine (Cr), creatinine clearance (ClCr), treatment indication (empirical/targeted), route of administration, initial dosing regimen and Cmin levels. Plasma concentrations were determined in the Pharmacy Department using ARK enzyme immunoassay, with a therapeutic range of 2&ndash;10 &micro;g/mL. Pharmacokinetic parameters&mdash;volume of distribution (Vd), clearance (Cl) and elimination constant (Ke)&ndash;were estimated using a one-compartment Bayesian model (PKS ). Continuous variables were expressed as mean &plusmn; SD, and categorical variables as frequencies and percentages.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Twenty-nine patients were included (75.8% male, mean age 55 &plusmn;15 years). Mean weight was 78.3 &plusmn;16.8 kg, height 172.5 &plusmn;7.9 cm, Cr 1.19 &plusmn;1.34 mg/dL and ClCr 54.7 &plusmn;3.7 mL/min; 86% were in intensive care. Linezolid was administered intravenously, initially at 600 mg/12h in 79.3% of patients. Estimated pharmacokinetic parameters were: Vd 30.4 &plusmn;3.7 L/70 kg, Cl 2.6 &plusmn;0.3 L/h/70 kg and Ke 0.084 h<sup>&ndash;</sup>  <sup>1</sup>. Mean Cmin was 3.55 &plusmn;4.28 &micro;g/mL; 62.1% were within the therapeutic range, 31% below and 6.9% above. Haematological toxicity occurred in 49.3% of patients. Dose adjustments were recommended in 34.5% of cases, achieving optimal concentrations in 82.7% after modification.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Linezolid exhibits high interindividual pharmacokinetic variability, often resulting in sub-therapeutic exposures at standard dosing. Pharmacokinetic monitoring allows for individualised dose optimisation, maintaining concentrations within the therapeutic range and potentially improving safety and efficacy.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martinez Azor, A., Beltran Bellvis, M., Marques Minana, M., Martin Cerezuela, M., Garcia Pellicer, J., Poveda Andres, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.229</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.229</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-127 Pharmacokinetic monitoring and characterisation of linezolid in hospitalised patients]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A112</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A113</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A113-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-128 Aflibercept schemes in a third-level hospital: real-word experience and cost analysis]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A113-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy is the standard of care for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Aflibercept 2 mg (AFLI2) is widely used but requires frequent administration, imposing a substantial treatment burden. The newer aflibercept 8 mg (AFLI8) formulation offers the potential to extend dosing intervals while maintaining therapeutic efficacy.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To analyse different aflibercept treatment schemes in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and compare their efficiency.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>This retrospective observational study was carried out in a tertiary hospital between January and September 2025. Patients were grouped according to treatment scheme: (1) aflibercept 2 mg (AFLI2), (2) aflibercept 8 mg (AFLI8-nai&#x0308;ve), (3) those transitioned from AFLI2 to AFLI8 (AFLI2+AFLI8). Data were extracted from electronic medical records and pharmacy dispensing databases, including demographic characteristics, treatment intervals, number of injections, and acquisition costs. Descriptive statistics were used for data analysis.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Sixty-seven patients were included (47,7% male), with a median age of 72 years (47&ndash;96).</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>AFLI2 group (13,4%): all received three monthly loading doses followed by 8&ndash;week intervals. Median number of injections: six (2&ndash;6); mean cost per patient: 1.537.</p></li><li><p>AFLI8&ndash;nai&#x0308;ve group (22,3%): all received loading doses; 46,6% followed a treat&ndash;and&ndash;extend regimen (26,6% every 12 weeks, 20% every 10 weeks). Median injections: three (2&ndash;4); mean cost: 864.</p></li><li><p>AFLI2+AFLI8 group (64,3%): 67,4% had an induction phase; 44,9% followed treat&ndash;and&ndash;extend (24,3% every 10 weeks, 20,6% every 12 weeks). The remaining 32,6% had no loading doses, with intervals of 14 (38,5%), 10 (30,8%), or 8 (30,7%) weeks. Median injections: three (2&ndash;5); mean cost: 810.</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>AFLI8 reduced injection frequency and mean treatment cost per patient compared with AFLI2, enabling longer treatment intervals through treat-and-extend regimens. These findings indicate that AFLI8 is an efficient therapeutic alternative, optimising healthcare resources and potentially enhancing patient quality of life. These real-world findings align with the results of the pivotal PULSAR trial.<sup>1</sup>  </p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. Lanzetta P, Korbelnik JF, Heier JS, Leal S, Holz FG, Clarck WL, Eichenbaum D, lida T, Xiaodong S, Berliner AJ, <I>et al</I>. Intravitreal aflibercept 8 mg in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (PULSAR): 48-week results from a randomised, double-masked, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial. <I>Lancet</I> 2024;<b>403</b>(10432):1141&ndash;1152.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Menasalvas, O., Navas Armero, E., Prieto Galindo, R., Garcia Perez, A., Gomez Calvo, L., Jimenez Mendez, C., Torralba Fernandez, L., Toledo Davia, M., Dominguez Barahona, A., Cuadros Martinez, C., Aguado Barroso, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.230</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.230</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-128 Aflibercept schemes in a third-level hospital: real-word experience and cost analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A113</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A113</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A113-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-129 Development of a pharmacokinetic simulation tool for ibrutinib to enable treatment individualisation]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A113-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Ibrutinib is a covalent Bruton&rsquo;s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor widely used in the treatment of B-cell malignancies. Its pharmacokinetics display marked inter- and intra-individual variability, influenced by multiple factors that may compromise therapeutic efficacy and safety. Currently, no accessible clinical tools allow individualised prediction of these parameters. The development of a pharmacokinetic simulator could support prediction of responses and toxicities, optimising therapy.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To develop a pharmacokinetic simulation tool for ibrutinib integrating cumulative modifiers of drug exposure, aiming to optimise therapeutic outcomes and support individualised treatment decisions.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A comprehensive literature review on ibrutinib population pharmacokinetics was conducted. The validated models by Marostica <I>et al</I>. and Al-Ghazawi <I>et al</I>. were selected as the basis for simulation. Using published parameters, a population pharmacokinetic model was implemented in R, incorporating clinical/lifestyle covariates (dose, hepatic impairment, CYP3A4 inhibitors/inducers, food intake, and smoking status). Multiple simulation scenarios were planned by combining these covariates. Simulations were deterministic and based entirely on published population parameters. Simulations generated key pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic outputs such us Cmax, AUC<SUB>0</SUB>&ndash;<SUB>2</SUB>  <SUB>4</SUB>h, BTK occupancy, and relative platelet count as a surrogate of haematological toxicity.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Simulations were performed across multiple virtual patient clinical scenarios (n=144) combining the main covariates influencing ibrutinib exposure. Under standard conditions (420 mg/day, fasting), predicted Cmax and AUC<SUB>0</SUB>&ndash;<SUB>2</SUB>  <SUB>4</SUB>h were 23.6 ng/mL and 265.2 ng&middot;h/mL, respectively, with BTK occupancy &gt;95% and platelets reduced to 89.7% of baseline. Strong and moderate CYP3A4 inhibitors increased Cmax by 172% and 65%, reducing platelet levels by 18% and 7%. Moderate hepatic impairment raised Cmax by 45%. Food intake enhanced bioavailability by 49%, with a 5.7% platelet decrease, while smoking reduced Cmax by 30%, compromising exposure. BTK occupancy remained &gt;95%, indicating maintenance of the efficacy threshold. Cumulative effects were assessed to derive dose adjustment recommendations by clinical context.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>This population-based simulation tool reliably reproduced published pharmacokinetic profiles and quantitatively illustrated the impact of clinical modifiers on ibrutinib exposure, efficacy, and safety. The model provides a practical instrument to support hospital pharmacists and clinicians in individualised ibrutinib dosing, enhancing therapeutic precision and minimising risk.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. Marostica E, <I>et al. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol</I>. 2015.</p><p>2. Al-Ghazawi M, <I>et al. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet</I>. 2021.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guerra Gomez, O., Carrasco Cuesta, L., Garcia Diaz, B., Dominguez Garcia, A., Zhan Zhou, E., Risco Martinez, S., Perez Encinas, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.231</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.231</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-129 Development of a pharmacokinetic simulation tool for ibrutinib to enable treatment individualisation]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A113</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A114</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A114-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-130 Pharmacoeconomic analysis of the pembrolizumab dosing regimen by bodyweight: a multicentre study in real-life]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A114-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Dose-response trials initially supported a weight-based dose of 2 mg/kg of pembrolizumab, however a fixed-dose of 200 mg was subsequently established.<sup>1</sup> The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of fixed doses and doses based on bodyweight are similar.<sup>2</sup> Various organisations such as the Canadian Agency for Drugs (CADTH) and Technologies in Health and the National Health Service in England (NICE) have recommended dosing pembrolizumab by weight.<sup>3 4</sup>  </p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To assess the economic impact of implementing a weight-based dosing protocol for pembrolizumab in our region, in comparison with the standard fixed-dose regimen.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A multicentric and retrospective study was carried out from September 2024 to September 2025. The variables collected were age, sex, weight, administered cycles and proportion of patients treated with weight-based dosing. All patients were undergoing treatment with pembrolizumab for an authorised indication. Cost of cycle using a fixed-dose regimen and without weight-based adjustment were determined. To estimate the economic impact, we compared the real cost of weight-adjusted pembrolizumab dosing, administered since protocol implementation (September 2024), with the projected cost of fixed dosing for the same patient cohort. Data collection was performed using program Farmatools and Excel.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 295 patients were included with median age 66 (34-93) years. There were 46.8% women and 53.2% men. The average weight was 77 (40-118) kg. Median total of cycles received was five (1-14). Patients on weight-adjusted dosing accounted for 65.8% of all those treated with pembrolizumab. In our patients, administering a weight-adjusted treatment cycle results in a 23% reduction in cost, which implied a mean of 497.6 euros per patient. Since the implementation of the protocol, the introduction of the weight-based dosage has led to a 9.4% reduction in expenditure, which translates into a total of 397,000.2 euros in our region.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Since the introduction of the protocol, weight-based dosing has been chosen in more than half of the patients treated with pembrolizumab. This strategy could be considered an efficient cost reduction measure that contributes to the sustainability of healthcare system.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. European Medicines Agency (EMA):EPAR. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/assessment-report/keytruda-epar-public-assessment-report_en.pdf</p><p>2. Freshwater T, <I>et al</I>. Evaluation of dosing strategy for pembrolizumab for oncology indications. doi:10.1186/s40425-017-0242-5</p><p>3. 3.CADTH: https://www.cda-amc.ca/sites/default/files/ou-tr/ho0008-dosing-timing-immuno-oncology-drugs.pdf</p><p>4. 4.NICE: https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/National-Dose-Banding-Table-Pembrolizumab-25mgmL-v3.pdf</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Moreno Ramos, C., Castillejo-Garcia, R., Lao-Dominguez, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.232</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.232</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-130 Pharmacoeconomic analysis of the pembrolizumab dosing regimen by bodyweight: a multicentre study in real-life]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A114</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A114</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A114-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-131 Effectiveness of immunotherapy according to time-of-day infusion]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A114-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Immunotherapy has become a cornerstone in the treatment of several cancers, particularly solid tumours. Recent evidence suggests that the timing of administration may impact treatment effectiveness, with improved outcomes observed when immunotherapy is administered in the morning.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the effectiveness of immunotherapy according to time-of-day of administration using real-world data.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A multicentre retrospective review was conducted, including all patients who received at least one dose of pembrolizumab, nivolumab, or atezolizumab as first-line treatment for metastatic disease between 01/01/2021 and 30/06/2025 in six hospitals, all of which use the same oncology information system to prescribe, prepare, and document administration of anticancer therapies.</p><p>Each registered administration was classified as morning (before 3 pm) or afternoon (after 3 pm). For each patient, the proportion of afternoon doses was calculated and used for categorisation: &lt;50% afternoon infusions vs &ge;50% afternoon infusions.</p><p>Variables collected: sex, age, diagnosis, treatment indication, date of diagnosis, date and time of infusion, and date of death.</p><p>Outcome: overall survival (OS), defined as the time from immunotherapy first administration in metastatic setting to death from any cause. The cut-off date for the analysis was 01/10/2025. Survival was estimated using Kaplan&ndash;Meier curves, compared by log-rank test, and hazard ratios calculated with Cox regression (R software).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 8.896 administrations in 1.175 patients were analysed (66.4% male, n=780; mean age 66 years, range 25&ndash;92). The most frequent diagnoses were non-small-cell lung cancer (54%, n=635) and small-cell lung cancer (12.7%, n=149).</p><p>Overall, 5.539 administrations (62.3%) were given in the morning. A total of 541 patients (46%) received &ge;50% of doses in the afternoon.</p><p>During follow-up, 428 deaths (36.4%) occurred. Median OS was not reached for patients receiving most infusions in the morning, compared with 28.6 months for those receiving most infusions in the afternoon (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.78; log-rank p&lt;0.0001).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Consistent with previous reports, this review found improved overall survival in patients with predominantly morning administration of immunotherapy. Whenever feasible, scheduling immunotherapy in the morning should be considered to optimise treatment outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Manso anda, S., Nigorra Caro, M., Romero Del Barco, R., Juez Santamaria, C., Siquier Homar, P., Rodriguez Cajaraville, L., Do Pazo Oubina, F., Martorell Puigserver, C., Azkarate Martinez, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.233</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.233</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-131 Effectiveness of immunotherapy according to time-of-day infusion]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A114</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A115</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A115-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-132 Understanding the types and causes of 177Lu-oxodotreotide regimen modifications to identify a typical patient profile]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A115-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>  <sup>177</sup>Lu-oxodotreotide is a radiopharmaceutical indicated to treat inoperable or metastatic gastro-enteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NETs) expressing somatostatin receptors. The standard treatment regimen consists of four 7.4 GBq administrations at 8 &plusmn; 1-week intervals. In certain cases, particularly because of biological toxicities, the regimen may be adapted by dose reduction, interval extension, or treatment discontinuation. These adjustments remain poorly documented in the literature, although they may concern a substantial proportion of patients.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To analyse all patients treated with <sup>177</sup>Lu-oxodotreotide at a single-centre to characterise treatment regimen modifications and develop a statistical model predicting the risk of regimen changes.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective single-centre study was conducted from May 2016 to October 2024, including all patients who received at least one cycle of <sup>177</sup>Lu-oxodotreotide for GEP-NETs, outside clinical trials or retreatment protocols. Collected data included demographic and biological characteristics, tumour-related information, and baseline laboratory parameters before each administration. Biological toxicities were graded according to NCI CTCAE v5.0. Baseline predictors of treatment modification were assessed via multivariate logistic regression. Survival was compared using a log-rank test.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>During the study period, 77 patients were treated with <sup>177</sup>Lu-oxodotreotide (M/F ratio: 1.57; mean age: 68 years). Of these, 82% had GEP-NETs and 18% had NETs of unknown or atypical origin. Treatment regimen modifications were identified in 24 patients, accounting for 38 adjustments. Nearly 25% (N=10) was toxicity-related, mainly haematologic (anaemia: 30%, thrombocytopenia: 40%, neutropenia: 10%) or renal (10%). Among inter-cycle delays (N=15), 46.7% were organisational, and 26.6% were due to toxicity. Of 13 treatment discontinuations, 53.9% were haematologic and 7.7% renal-related; two were due to newly diagnosed cancers. Neutrophil, lymphocyte, haemoglobin, platelet, albumin, and prothrombin levels, as well as bone metastases were significantly associated with the probability of treatment regimen modification. Overall survival was significantly reduced in patients with regimen modifications (log-rank p = 0.0001).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Nearly one-third of patients experienced treatment regimen modifications, primarily due to haematologic toxicities. In the predictive model, strongly associated baseline factors were bone metastases and low platelet, haemoglobin, and lymphocyte levels. Validation using independent datasets is required to confirm the model&rsquo;s reliability and potential utility in identifying patients at risk of regimen modifications.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Torchio, J., Rubira, L., Teruel, E., Gourgou, S., Deshayes, E., Fersing, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.234</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.234</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-132 Understanding the types and causes of 177Lu-oxodotreotide regimen modifications to identify a typical patient profile]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A115</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A115</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A115-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-133 Developing a reliable drug data resource for outpatient units: enhancing patient counselling and pharmacovigilance]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A115-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Outpatient hospital pharmacies dispense diverse medicines, making patient counselling and safety monitoring essential for effective care. Variability in available drug information can lead to inconsistent counselling, adverse events, and gaps in pharmacovigilance. A reliable, structured resource is needed to support healthcare providers in delivering accurate, standardised information.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This project aimed to develop a reliable drug data resource covering all medicines dispensed in outpatient units, providing pharmacists and healthcare providers with key counselling points, common side effects, and pharmacovigilance-relevant information. A secondary objective was to ensure adaptability for integration into digital applications or hospital information systems.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Drug lists from outpatient units were systematically reviewed, yielding 56 unique active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) across 62 medicines. For each API, critical patient counselling points, frequent adverse effects, and pharmacovigilance considerations were extracted from authoritative references and verified for accuracy. The information was compiled into a concise, standardised format to enable rapid access at the point of care.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The resource provides structured counselling data for oncology agents such as capecitabine, imatinib, temozolomide, vinorelbine, and cyclophosphamide, immunomodulators and biologics including adalimumab, secukinumab, natalizumab, and golimumab, and supportive therapies such as epoetin beta, darbepoetin alfa, morphine sulfate, and fentanyl. By consolidating this information, the tool enables consistent patient education, supports adverse event monitoring, and facilitates pharmacovigilance reporting. Its adaptable design allows implementation across hospital pharmacies and digital platforms.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Developing a reliable drug data resource enhances the consistency and quality of patient counselling while reinforcing pharmacovigilance practices. By offering rapid access to structured information on 56 APIs, this model supports improved patient safety, adherence, and therapeutic outcomes. It provides a transferable framework for hospital pharmacies internationally seeking to standardise counselling and monitoring practices.</p><p>This project demonstrates that a reliable drug data resource can standardise counselling and strengthen pharmacovigilance in outpatient units, providing an adaptable model for hospital pharmacies internationally.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[El Deeb, S., Bennani, I., Cherif Chefchaouni, A., Hajjaj, S., Alaoui, S., Moukafih, B., El Marrakchi, S., Bandadi, F., Harakat, W., Hafidi, Y., El Kartouti, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.235</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.235</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-133 Developing a reliable drug data resource for outpatient units: enhancing patient counselling and pharmacovigilance]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A115</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A116</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A116-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-134 Dosage adjustment of new beta-lactam antibiotics in patients with renal impairment]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A116-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Appropriate dosage adjustment of new beta-lactam antibiotics in patients with renal impairment is crucial to ensure both therapeutic effectiveness and safety. As these agents represent a significant advancement in the treatment of severe infections, precise dosing becomes especially important in these patients.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To review prescriptions of patients with renal impairment receiving new beta-lactam antibiotics in order to determine whether appropriate dosage adjustments are applied.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>An observational, descriptive, retrospective study was conducted from the introduction of new &beta;-lactam antibiotics at the hospital until September 2025. Patients with a glomerular filtration rate (GFR) &lt;50 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup> were selected from the overall treated population. Data collected: sex, age, GFR, actual prescribed dose and reason for treatment discontinuation. Dose adjustments were evaluated based on the 2025 Antimicrobial Therapeutic Guidelines. Antibiotics studied: aztreonam/avibactam, cefiderocol, ceftaroline, ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftobiprole, ceftolozane/tazobactam and meropenem/vaborbactam. Data were obtained from electronic medical records (DIRAYA) and electronic prescription program (PRISMA).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>100 patients were analysed; 33 had a GFR &lt;50 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup> (66.6% male; mean age 70.8 &plusmn; 11.4 years). 41 treatment lines with new &beta;-lactam antibiotics were recorded among these patients according to GFR variations during hospitalisation. Dose adjustments were observed in 28.6% of prescriptions for patients with a GFR of 30&ndash;50 mL/min; 28.6% for those with a GFR of 10&ndash;30 mL/min, and 40% for patients with a GFR &lt;10 mL/min. The proportion of appropriately adjusted prescriptions of each antibiotic was as follows: ceftobiprole 60.0%, ceftaroline 50.0%, ceftazidime/avibactam 25.0%, cefiderocol 16.7%, and ceftolozane/tazobactam 0%. Reasons for treatment discontinuation were: exitus (48.5%, n=16), clinical improvement (30.3%, n=10), switch to targeted therapy (9.1%, n=3), clinical deterioration (6.1%, n=2) and antibiotic adverse effect (3.0%, n=1). One patient remains on treatment.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The results demonstrate a persistent underutilisation of recommended renal dose adjustments for new beta-lactam antibiotics in everyday clinical practice, highlighting a clear opportunity to optimise patient management.</p><p>These findings may suggest that active involvement of pharmacists, as part of a multidisciplinary team, could play a key role in improving the review and adjustment of dosing regimens.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Romero Ruiz, A., Ponce Gonzalez, A., Rodriguez Pina, L., Paradela Garcia, E., Sanchez Del Moral, R., Santos Rubio, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.236</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.236</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-134 Dosage adjustment of new beta-lactam antibiotics in patients with renal impairment]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A116</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A116</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A116-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-135 Pharmacogenomics to practice concept: integrating pharmacogenetic data into clinical decision support for hospital pharmacists]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A116-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Adverse drug reactions are a major and largely preventable source of harm. Risk reflects the interplay of genotype with age, comorbidities, concomitant therapies, and route of administration. Pharmacogenomics can anticipate non-response and toxicity, informing drug choice, dose, and monitoring. In hospitals, pharmacists are pivotal in translating this evidence into timely, evidence-based decisions. Yet bedside adoption is hindered by non-uniform reporting, inconsistent diplotype-to-phenotype mapping, and limited interoperability with electronic health records (EHRs).</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To set out a pragmatic framework that makes pharmacogenetic results actionable within clinical decision support (CDS) in hospital pharmacy, and to prioritise high-impact gene&ndash;drug pairs for immediate implementation.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>We synthesised guidance from the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) and the Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group (DPWG), alongside regulatory sources from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA). The framework covers: (i) uniform reporting; (ii) curated diplotype-to-phenotype translation; (iii) computable artefacts using Health Level Seven Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (HL7 FHIR) and Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes (LOINC); and (iv) linkage to Computerised Physician Order Entry (CPOE). Exemplar use-cases were selected by clinical impact and feasibility in acute care.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>We outline CDS rules and pharmacist actions for five priority pairs:</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>CYP2C19&ndash;clopidogrel: in poor/intermediate metabolisers, prefer prasugrel or ticagrelor after percutaneous coronary intervention.</p></li><li><p>HLA&ndash;B*57:01&ndash;abacavir: pre&ndash;treatment testing; contraindicated if positive.</p></li><li><p>CYP2D6&ndash;codeine: avoid in ultra&ndash;rapid metabolisers and in paediatric or postpartum patients; favour non&ndash;prodrug analgesics.</p></li><li><p>DPYD&ndash;fluoropyrimidines: avoid or start at reduced dose with close monitoring.</p></li><li><p>SLCO1B1&ndash;statins: use lower dose or alternative agents in carriers at higher myopathy risk.</p></li></l></p><p>Embedding results as FHIR/LOINC resources makes genetic data queryable at order time, enabling real-time contextual alerts, dose suggestions, and monitoring pathways; this confers immediate operational relevance for the hospital pharmacist.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>A concise, standards-based pathway can convert static pharmacogenetic reports into pharmacist-mediated, real-time CDS at the bedside. Starting with a small set of high-yield gene&ndash;drug pairs delivers tangible safety gains while building the infrastructure for broader panels. Implementation should align with analytical quality (ISO 15189), informed consent, and data protection (GDPR), and be supported by reimbursement, interoperability, and ongoing training&ndash;priorities also recognised at the European Association of Hospital Pharmacists.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ferdinando, S., Ciancarelli, E., Tarantino, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.237</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.237</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-135 Pharmacogenomics to practice concept: integrating pharmacogenetic data into clinical decision support for hospital pharmacists]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A116</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A117</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A117-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-136 DeepPL guided in silico mutagenesis for precision Phage therapy in hospital pharmacy]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A117-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Multidrug&ndash;resistant (MDR) infections are rising while antibiotic options narrow. Phage therapy offers pathogen&ndash;specific killing, yet hospital pharmacy (HP) lacks sequence&ndash;level tools to verify lytic lifestyle and to anticipate whether single&ndash;nucleotide variants (SNVs) could shift predictions, with consequences for lot release and patient&ndash;tailored cocktails. We integrated DeepPL, a nucleotide&ndash;level classifier of phage lifestyle, with an in&ndash;silico mutagenesis module to bring genome&ndash;informed, auditable decisions into routine HP practice.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>Aims: </p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Classify phage lifestyle on curated GenBank datasets;</p></li><li><p>Quantify robustness to SNVs via in silico mutagenesis;</p></li><li><p>Deliver HP ready outputs (eligibility sheet, mutagenicity/robustness indices, and a lot release LIMS compliant dossiers);</p></li></l></p><p>To support precision phage therapy against MDR pathogens.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>DeepPL was used for phage lifestyle classification on GenBank sequences, integrating DNABERT embeddings within a PyTorch environment. Performance metrics (AUC, accuracy, F1) were computed at thresholds 0.015&ndash;0.016. In silico mutagenesis (&plusmn;5 nt windows, 2&ndash;128 SNVs/genome) and a greedy KL-filtered approach quantified p changes, mapping genomic regions influencing classification stability.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>DeepPL achieved AUC ~0.96 and accuracy ~0.87&ndash;0.90; the tuned threshold (~0.01508) closely matched the default 0.016. Across full predictions we observed 1,347 lytic (69%) and 598 lysogenic (31%) classes, with silhouette &gt;0.5 and intra&ndash;cluster variance &lt;1<FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT>10<sup>&ndash;</sup>  <sup>4</sup>. On a subset (n=584), macro&ndash;F1 was 0.88 and accuracy 0.90. In mutagenesis tests, high&ndash;confidence genomes were stable (only one class switch across runs). Borderline genomes showed a monotonic rise in switches as SNV counts increased. A case genome (57,677 nt) yielded ~173,000 possible single&ndash;base mutations; exhaustive scanning of the first 6kb required &gt;30h and revealed localised p spikes, which the greedy approach recovered at a fraction of the cost. A Machine Learning&ndash;driven baseline reached AUC ~0.96, accuracy ~0.90, with GC content, genome length and number of proteins as leading features.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Embedding DeepPL plus in&ndash;silico mutagenesis within HP enables reliable lifestyle assignment, quantitative robustness profiling, and traceable documentation for lot release and precision cocktail design against MDR pathogens&ndash;advancing antimicrobial stewardship with actionable, auditable evidence.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. Zhang Y, <I>et al</I>. DeepPL: A deep&ndash;learning&ndash;based tool for predicting phage lifecycles. <I>PLoS Comput Biol.</I> 2024.</p><p>2. Ji Y, <I>et al</I>. DNABERT: pre&ndash;trained bidirectional encoder representations for DNA sequences. <I>Bioinformatics</I> 2021.</p><p>3. WHO/Europe. Building evidence for the use of bacteriophages against antimicrobial resistance. 2024&ndash;2025.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ferdinando, S., Tarantino, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.238</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.238</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-136 DeepPL guided in silico mutagenesis for precision Phage therapy in hospital pharmacy]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A117</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A117</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A117-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-137 Correlation between relative dose intensity of chemotherapy and clinical variables in DLBCL patients receiving first-line therapy: a single-centre retrospective experience]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A117-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Standard first-line treatment for high risk DLBCL is R-CHOP/COMP or R-Pola-CHP (IPI 3-5). For patients &ge;80 years or those classified as frail (by CGA/EPI), guidelines recommend reducing chemotherapy dose by 50% or offering palliative care. Relative Dose Intensity (RDI)&ndash;the administered-to-planned dose ratio&ndash;is a key metric to balance therapeutic efficacy and toxicity.<sup>1</sup>  </p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This study retrospectively evaluated the impact of RDI of R-CHOP-like regimens (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin) and clinical variables (IPI, EPI, SGA) on Overall, Progression-Free, and Event-Free Survival (OS, PFS, EFS) in adult, newly diagnosed DLBCL patients (2018&ndash;2024). Exclusions: high-dose chemotherapy, Richter&rsquo;s, Primary Mediastinal, and CNS lymphomas.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Chemotherapy doses, extracted from software, were converted to mg/m2/week to calculate RDI.</p><p>A multivariate Cox regression (CR) was performed (R software, version 4.2.2) for OS, PFS, and EFS, using RDI of key agents and clinical variables (histology, IPI, EPI risk, SGA, age) as covariates.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The analysis of 182 patients (median age 78, 81 female) showed that higher RDI significantly improved survival.</p><p>Specifically: </p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Cyclophosphamide RDI favoured OS (HR 0.97,p 0.016).</p></li><li><p>Doxorubicin RDI benefited OS, EFS, and PFS (HR 0.75&ndash;0.82, p 0.03&ndash;0.075).</p></li><li><p>Conversely, poor prognosis factors worsened outcomes:</p></li><li><p>IPI score negatively impacted OS, EFS, and PFS (HR 1.31&ndash;1.57, p 0.018&ndash;0.086).</p></li><li><p>non&ndash;GCB histology worsened OS (HR 1.8, p 0.092).</p></li><li><p>SGA &lsquo;unfit&rsquo; classification significantly reduced EFS and PFS (HR 2.87&ndash;3.02, p 0.04&ndash;0.052).</p></li></l></p><p>EPI was not statistically significant.</p><p>These findings strongly support maintaining dose intensity in fit elderly patients.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>This study confirmed that RDI is a critical determinant of outcome. Higher RDI of doxorubicin (HR 0.75&ndash;0.82) and cyclophosphamide (HR 0.97) was significantly associated with improved OS, EFS, and PFS. This supports maintaining maximal feasible dose when patient fitness allows.</p><p>In sharp contrast, established prognostic factors showed a strong negative impact.</p><p>A high IPI score significantly worsened all survival endpoints (HR 1.31&ndash;1.57), and non-GCB histology negatively affected OS (HR 1.8).</p><p>These factors underscore the dual challenge in DLBCL: maximising therapeutic delivery while mitigating inherent disease and patient risks.</p><p>Crucially, frailty, as defined by an &lsquo;unfit&rsquo; SGA classification, was highly detrimental to EFS/PFS (HR 2.87&ndash;3.02).</p><p>These data underscore the need for careful geriatric assessment and individualised dosing to maximise RDI safely in fit elderly patients.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. Kwak LW, <I>et al. J Clin Oncol.</I> 1990 Jun;<b>8</b>(6):963&ndash;77.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Loiacono, S., Lucchini, E., Egidi, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.239</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.239</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-137 Correlation between relative dose intensity of chemotherapy and clinical variables in DLBCL patients receiving first-line therapy: a single-centre retrospective experience]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A117</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A118</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A118?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-138 Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a retrospective, relative dose intensity-based tree-structured analysis]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A118?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Building on Kwak&rsquo;s<sup>1</sup> work on Relative Dose Intensity (RDI, received dose/theoretical dose) in DLCL, our study refines a prognostic model. We conducted a tree-structured survival analysis integrating RDI with the clinical variables IPI, EPI, and SGA.</p><p>This approach identifies high risk patient subgroups by analysing the combined impact of chemotherapy delivery and clinical status.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The main objective is to use tree-structured survival analysis to determine an RDI cut-off and characterise patients below this threshold using the other covariates.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Chemotherapy doses, extracted from the Human Bimind software, were converted to mg/m2/week to calculate the RDI.</p><p>A tree-structured multivariate survival analysis (R software, version 4.2.2) was then developed with the dual aim of:</p><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Establishing a &lsquo;cut&ndash;off&rsquo; for RDI.</p></li><li><p>Profiling patients below this threshold using the remaining covariates.</p></li></l></p><p>Graphical analysis was performed for the three endpoints using the aforementioned covariates, employing both the multivariate model (presented here) and univariate models with single doses.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>In the multivariate model, the sole stratification factor for Overall Survival (OS) was the relative dose intensity (RDI) of doxorubicin (p&lt;0.001, <cross-ref type="fig" refid="F1">figure 1</cross-ref>).</p><p><fig loc="float" id="F1"><no>Abstract 4CPS-138 Figure 1</no><link locator="4CPS-138_F1"></fig></p><p>This RDI splits the population into two distinct groups:</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>&ge;71% RDI: median OS (mOS) was not reached (74&ndash; NA).</p></li><li><p>&lt;71% RDI: mOS is 32 months (16&ndash;NA).</p></li></l></p><p>For Event-Free Survival (EFS) and Progression-Free Survival (PFS), the first significant stratification factor was the IPI score (p=0.014).</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Patients with an IPI score &le;3 had a mPFS of 66 months (63&ndash; NA) and mEFS was not reached (64&ndash; NA).</p></li><li><p>For patients with an IPI score 4/5, further factors emerged:</p></li><li><p>For EFS: The RDI of cyclophosphamide was significant with a cut&ndash;off of 72.3% (p=0.02). Below this RDI, mEFS was 8 months (6&ndash;21) versus not reached (29&ndash; NA).</p></li><li><p>For PFS: The doxorubicin RDI cut&ndash;off at 68% split the population into two groups with mPFS of 7 months (4&ndash;21) and 29 months (20&ndash; NA).</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Maintaining a doxorubicin RDI &ge;71% is crucial for OS (mOS Not Reached vs 32 months).</p><p>For EFS/PFS, risk stratifies by IPI score, with high risk patients showing poorer outcomes linked to low cyclophosphamide (mEFS 8 vs NA) and doxorubicin RDI (mPFS 7 vs 29 months).</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. Kwak LW, <I>et al. J Clin Oncol.</I> 1990 Jun;<b>8</b>(6):963&ndash;77.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Loiacono, S., Lucchini, E., Egidi, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.240</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.240</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-138 Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a retrospective, relative dose intensity-based tree-structured analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A118</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A118</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A119-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-139 Effects of clinical alert program and multidisciplinary management to slow progression of chronic kidney disease in patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertension]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A119-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Chronic kidney disease is a major health problem. When chronic kidney disease progresses to stage 3, the risk of complications affecting various body systems, leading to illness and death. Using technology to assist in medical services, along with multidisciplinary management, will enable comprehensive patient care and slow progression of chronic kidney disease.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To study the effects of clinical alert program and multidisciplinary management to slow progression of chronic kidney disease in patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertension.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A quasi-experimental study was conducted in 162 patients with diabetes and hypertension and diagnosed with stage 1 to 3 chronic kidney disease. Using clinical alert program for alerting abnormalities of laboratory results related to chronic kidney disease. Data such as general patient information, blood pressure level, laboratory results and drug use were collected from electronic databases and medical records for 6 months prior to the program installation. Data were also collected on the day patients visited the diabetes and hypertension clinic within 6 months after program installation. The subjects were scheduled for blood and urine testing twice, 3 months apart. Program will alert if abnormalities of laboratory results were detected, which was followed by management by multidisciplinary team.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>After program implementation, subjects had a significant lower level of blood pressure, HbA1C and LDL (P&lt;0.05). Number of patients using NSAIDs and the number of patients not adjusted for metformin significantly decreased (P&lt;0.05). Glomerulus filtration rate, haemoglobin and the number of patients with negative urinary protein content significantly increased compared to those before the program (P&lt;0.05). However, bicarbonate and potassium levels before and after program were not different.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The clinical alert program helps multidisciplinary team identify abnormal patient data and enhance patient care by sends alerts via computer screens, which multidisciplinary team can access. This study different from previous studies in that it provides warnings about various laboratory values, including blood pressure, haemoglobin, haemoglobin A1C, cholesterol, serum potassium and bicarbonate, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), protein content in urine &ge;1+, receiving nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, metformin and allopurinol adjusted according to kidney function. Other studies only reported on GFR and adjusted medication according to kidney function.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mongkolsukontharuk, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.241</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.241</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-139 Effects of clinical alert program and multidisciplinary management to slow progression of chronic kidney disease in patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertension]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A119</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A119</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A119-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-140 Off-label use of sodium zirconium cyclosilicate in acute severe hyperkalaemia: evaluation of use conditions and effectiveness]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A119-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC) is authorised for the treatment of chronic hyperkalaemia in adult patients. In October 2024, the Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee at our centre approved its use for acute hyperkalaemia in emergency situations, in patients already receiving standard hyperkalaemia treatment who met the following criteria: serum potassium &gt;6.5 mmol/L, electrocardiographic changes, and intolerance to ion-exchange resins.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the conditions of use and effectiveness of SZC as an off-label treatment in acute severe hyperkalaemia.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Retrospective observational study including adult patients treated with SZC from October 2024 to May 2025 in a tertiary hospital. Data were collected through the electronic prescription registry and the electronic medical record system.</p><p>Demographic, clinical, laboratory, and pharmacotherapeutic variables were collected, including prior treatment with hypokalaemic agents (calcium gluconate, insulin and intravenous glucose) and whether the use of ion-exchange resins was considered inadequate. Effectiveness was measured as serum potassium reduction in 24 hours.</p><p>Continuous variables were expressed as median (interquartile range) and categorical variables as absolute number of cases (percentages).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Thirteen patients were included, all with acute hyperkalaemia secondary to renal failure. The median age was 64 years, and 11 (84.6%) were male.</p><p>Two patients (15.4%) met the criterion of serum potassium &gt; 6.5 mmol/L, and six patients (46.1%) presented electrocardiographic changes due to hyperkalaemia. Regarding prior treatments, nine patients (69.2%) had received calcium gluconate and eight (61.5%) insulin and intravenous glucose.</p><p>Median serum potassium levels were 6.1 mmol/L before SCZ treatment and 5.26 after 24 hours, with a median decrease of 0.79 mmol/L (IQR: 0.7). A patient was excluded from the effectiveness analysis due to death before the time of evaluation.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Some patients did not fully meet the approved prescription criteria at our centre, indicating suboptimal adherence to established guidelines and a tendency toward early treatment initiation.</p><p>SZC appears to be an effective adjunctive treatment for acute severe hyperkalaemia in patients with renal failure who are already receiving standard therapy, achieving near- normalisation of serum potassium within 24 hours.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hontalba, A., Marrero, P., Domenech, L., Juarez, J., Gorgas, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.242</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.242</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-140 Off-label use of sodium zirconium cyclosilicate in acute severe hyperkalaemia: evaluation of use conditions and effectiveness]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A119</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A119</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A120-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-141 Pharmacist-interpreted pcr diagnostics to enhance antimicrobial stewardship and therapeutic decision making in lower respiratory tract infections]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A120-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Lower respiratory tract infections are a leading cause of hospitalisation and antibiotic use, contributing to antimicrobial resistance and healthcare burden. Unlike conventional microbiological cultures that are often slow and less sensitive, PCR-based diagnostics enable rapid and highly sensitive detection of pathogens and resistance genes. When implemented within a pharmacist-led molecular diagnostics laboratory where results are interpreted collaboratively within a multidisciplinary team, these methods enable prompt, targeted antimicrobial optimisation and improved clinical outcomes</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To assess the value of pharmacist-interpreted PCR compared with conventional culture in optimising antibiotic therapy and improving laboratory outcomes in patients with lower respiratory tract infections.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective observational study was conducted at the University Clinic of Pulmonology and Allergology, including 74 hospitalised adults (&gt;18 years) with clinical signs of lower respiratory tract infection. Respiratory samples (sputum, bronchoalveolar lavage, and blood cultures) were analysed using both the BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia Panel Plus and conventional microbiological culture. Patient data, including infection biomarkers (C-reactive protein (CRP) and leukocytes) and length of hospital stay (LOS), were extracted from electronic medical records.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>PCR demonstrated higher diagnostic sensitivity than conventional culture, identifying 66 pathogens compared with 10 isolates. Pharmacist interpretation of PCR findings resulted in 18 antibiotic de-escalations and nine escalations, while culture-based results led to only two de-escalations and two escalations. At admission, median biomarker levels were leukocytes 12.43 (3.37&ndash;26.72) and CRP 37.70 (3.00&ndash;144.90). Following pharmacist-guided optimisation of therapy based on PCR results, these values improved to leukocytes 11.45 (5.49&ndash;19.15) and CRP 3.00 (1.50&ndash;63.40). The median LOS was 11 days (6&ndash;25). Patients positive for Human Rhinovirus, especially those with viral&ndash;bacterial co-infections, showed the strongest correlation with longer LOS (p&lt;0.001). Five patients who were negative for Human Rhinovirus/Enterovirus + bacteria on culture were identified as positive using PCR, underscoring its superior clinical relevance and the opportunity for early pharmacist-led therapeutic management.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Pharmacist-led PCR molecular diagnostics and result interpretation facilitate timely, evidence-based optimisation of antimicrobial therapy in patients with lower respiratory tract infections, strengthen antimicrobial stewardship efforts, enhance multidisciplinary teamwork, and lead to improvements in clinical outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Krstic Nakovska, O., Naumovska, Z., Grozdanova, A., Mihajloska, E., Dimkovski, A., Shuturkova, L., Tashkov, T., Lazarova, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.243</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.243</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-141 Pharmacist-interpreted pcr diagnostics to enhance antimicrobial stewardship and therapeutic decision making in lower respiratory tract infections]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A120</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A120</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A120-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-142 Proa paediatric quality indicator: longitudinal analysis of the prescription of central venous catheter seals with antimicrobials]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A120-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Central venous catheter (CVC)&ndash;related infections are a common complication in paediatric patients, increasing morbidity and mortality and often necessitating device removal. High concentration antimicrobial lock solutions can eradicate intraluminal biofilm.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This study aimed to evaluate, by the Antimicrobial Stewardship Program (ASP) team, the quality of antimicrobial lock therapy prescriptions and their adherence to the institutional protocol.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Retrospective observational study of paediatric inpatients (January 2022&ndash;December 2024) including all CVC antimicrobial lock therapy prescriptions (patient ages 0&ndash;18). Variables: age, device, lock agent, isolated microorganisms, institutional protocol adherence. Per protocol, vancomycin is first-line for suspected Gram-positives; ciprofloxacin is first-line for Gram-negatives (better biofilm penetration); amikacin is reserved for resistant strains. Also recorded in vitro susceptibility to the lock solution, antimicrobial changes per susceptibility, treatment duration, and discontinuation reasons. Descriptive analysis: absolute counts and percentages.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 117 prescriptions from 89 patients were included. Port-a-Cath (PAC) predominated (86.32%), followed by Hickman catheters (6.84%) and peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) (4.27%). Lock solutions were vancomycin (74.4%), amikacin (18.8%), ciprofloxacin (3.4%), and liposomal amphotericin B (3.4%). The most frequently isolated microorganisms were <I>Staphylococcus epidermidis</I> (41.88%), <I>Klebsiella pneumoniae</I> (8.55%) and <I>Escherichia coli</I> (5.98%). Analysis of protocol adherence showed that 44.4% of cases were infections caused by Gram-positive microorganisms, all treated with vancomycin (reflecting 100% adherence). Gram-negative infections accounted for 14.5% of cases: 88.2% were treated with amikacin and only 5.9% with ciprofloxacin, reflecting low adherence in the management of Gram-negative bacteria. In 90.6% the empirically lock solution was active according to susceptibility testing. Lock replacement after microorganism identification was required in only 5.98% of cases. Mean treatment duration was 7.43 days. Discontinuation reasons: negative microbiological results (48.72%), catheter removal due to clinical deterioration (39.32%) and death (1.71%).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Monitoring key indicators by Antimicrobial Stewardship Program (ASP) teams enables prioritisation of improvement areas, implementation of new therapeutic strategies and surveillance of microbiological resistance profiles to optimise treatment selection in paediatric patients with CVCs. The low use of ciprofloxacin for Gram-negative infections&mdash;despite its first-line status in the protocol&mdash;highlights a deviation in clinical practice that represents an opportunity for improvement, warranting prioritised educational initiatives within the involved clinical services.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Abril Cabero, A., Nieto Martil, E., Cuervas-Mons Vendrell, M., Garcia Acaso, M., Sanchez Garcia, A., Merino Pardo, A., Leal Pino, B., Echavarri De Miguel, M., Riva De La Hoz, B., Fernandez Romero, L., Pozas Del Rio, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.244</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.244</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-142 Proa paediatric quality indicator: longitudinal analysis of the prescription of central venous catheter seals with antimicrobials]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A120</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A120</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A121-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-143 DrugGPT: can a large language model match clinical pharmacists in DOAC prescription validation?]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A121-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT are increasingly used by healthcare professionals. While AI shows promise for decision support, its application in pharmaceutical validation, especially for high risk medications like Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs), remains largely unexplored in real-life settings.</p><p>The integration of generative AI in clinical settings has raised significant interest in its potential to support healthcare professionals.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This study assesses the ability of DrugGPT, a GPT-4-based language model trained on validated medical databases, to evaluate prescriptions of DOACs, a class of high risk medications, and compares its performance to that of hospital clinical pharmacists.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Between September and December 2024, 50 inpatient DOAC prescriptions were collected. Each prescription was independently assessed by a clinical pharmacist and three AI models: ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4o, and DrugGPT. The study evaluated sensitivity and clinical relevance of AI-generated interventions compared to pharmacist decisions, using concordance analysis.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>ChatGPT-3.5 achieved a sensitivity of 67% in identifying clinically relevant interventions, ChatGPT-4o improved to 83%, and DrugGPT reached 100% concordance with the clinical pharmacist&rsquo;s assessments across the 50 evaluated DOAC prescriptions. In a representative clinical case (elderly patient, apixaban underdosing), both ChatGPT-4o and DrugGPT provided recommendations aligned with pharmacist judgment, while ChatGPT-3.5 failed to identify the dosing error. Despite the improvements, AI models often lacked the capacity to provide pharmacologically justified reasoning or to contextualise recommendations based on full patient history.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>DrugGPT shows higher sensitivity and concordance with clinical practice compared to earlier GPT models, suggesting potential as an adjunct tool in pharmaceutical validation. However, limitations remain: AI models operate without access to EMRs, may generate hallucinations, and cannot assume legal or ethical responsibility. Further concerns include reproducibility, environmental impact, and the need for professional oversight. Responsible implementation, robust regulation, and targeted training are essential. DrugGPT exhibits promising capabilities in DOAC prescription validation, outperforming generalist models. Yet, it is not a substitute for clinical pharmacists. AI may serve as a valuable assistant within a supervised, regulated framework, but its integration into pharmaceutical care demands cautious, evidence-based deployment.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ennader, N., Collard, O., Coene, E., Dalleur, O., Van Eijgen, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.245</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.245</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-143 DrugGPT: can a large language model match clinical pharmacists in DOAC prescription validation?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A121</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A121</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A121-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-144 Evaluation of user satisfaction and preferences between oral and long-acting prep in an Italian reference centre]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A121-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) is a key HIV prevention strategy. The recent introduction of long-acting injectable cabotegravir (LA-PrEP) has expanded the available options beyond oral therapies. This innovation requires a deep understanding of user preferences to guide personalised therapeutic choices, improve adherence, and optimise the service. In this context, monitoring satisfaction and tolerability and ensuring the appropriate use of different formulations is a crucial activity</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To assess the degree of satisfaction, tolerability, and user preferences for different PrEP strategies (daily oral, on-demand oral, long-acting injectable) in order to identify user profiles and enhance the quality of care</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>An anonymous survey was administered via REDCap platform to all individuals receiving PrEP at our University Hospital. The questionnaire collected data on current and previous PrEP regimens. Satisfaction with effectiveness, ease of use, impact on daily life, and tolerability were measured using a 5-point Likert scale. Reasons for switching therapy and future preferences were also investigated. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and correlation tests.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Analysis of 282 responses (45% on daily oral PrEP, 12% on-demand, 44% on LA-PrEP) reveals distinct user profiles. LA-PrEP users are significantly older than on-demand users (36-55 age groups vs 26-35 for on-demand; p&lt;0.001) and are more likely to have previously switched regimens. Overall satisfaction is extremely high (97%). However, on-demand users report the lowest satisfaction with convenience and the greatest impact on sexual spontaneity. Consequently, they show the strongest future preference for LA-PrEP (85.7%). For LA-PrEP users, injection experience is positive (&gt;85%) and provides greater peace of mind (&gt;90%). While injection site pain is common, discomfort is considered acceptable by almost 90%.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The introduction of LA-PrEP effectively meets the needs of an older, experienced user seeking convenience. The younger, on-demand user represents the primary candidate for a future switch, driven by a desire for greater spontaneity. This tailored approach is fundamental for service sustainability, ensuring that the more resource-intensive LA regimen is directed towards the users who will benefit most. Synergy between the infectious disease specialist&rsquo;s and the hospital pharmacist&rsquo;s is therefore essential for optimising clinical outcomes while ensuring the long-term efficiency and viability of the PrEP program.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brunoro, R., Berti, G., Mengato, D., Barbaro, F., Varotto, A., Anna Maria, C., Venturini, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.246</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.246</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-144 Evaluation of user satisfaction and preferences between oral and long-acting prep in an Italian reference centre]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A121</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A121</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A122-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-145 Evolution of antibiotic consumption and ICU patient characteristics over the last decade in a secondary-level hospital]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A122-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Antimicrobial resistance is closely linked to antibiotic overuse, particularly in Intensive Care Units (ICUs), where critically ill patients often require broad-spectrum therapy. Monitoring trends in antibiotic consumption and patient profiles is essential for optimising antimicrobial stewardship.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To analyse the evolution of antibiotic and antifungal consumption and the clinical characteristics of ICU-admitted patients over the past 10 years in a secondary-level hospital.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective observational study including drugs from ATC groups J01 (antibiotics) and J02 (antifungals) from 2015 to 2024. Consumption data were obtained from the Farmatools program, expressed as defined daily doses (DDD) per 100 patient-days. Patient data were retrieved from the ICU ENVIN registry, including demographics, admission type, APACHE score, immunosuppression status, antibiotic use, length of therapy, and empirical treatment adjustments.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The number of patients included between 2015 and 2024 was 2706; median patient age increased (61 vs 64 years), as did APACHE scores (12.6 vs 15.1) and medical admissions (39.6% vs 62.6%),while surgical and coronary cases decreased. Immunosuppressed patients increased (9.1% vs 25.9%), whereas mortality decreased (14.4% vs 8.6%). Antibiotic use rose slightly (49.5% vs 56.8% of patients), with a total J01consumption increase from 131.5 to 148.0 DDD/100 patient-days. The most used agents were meropenem (3.9 vs 28.0), linezolid (5.9 vs 20.6), ceftriaxone(14.6 vs 15.3), piperacillin/tazobactam (11.7 vs 11.8), and vancomycin (12.3 vs9.9). For antifungals (J02), total consumption rose from 17.1 to 32.6 DDD/100 patient-days, mainly due to caspofungin (0.8 vs 7.7) and isavuconazole (introduced in 2021, 0.3 vs 7.8). Empirical therapy modifications decreased (20.4% vs 16.9%), while de-escalation after antibiogram increased (28.1% vs 61.8%). Treatment duration remained stable or slightly reduced for most agents.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The ICU patient profile has shifted toward more medically complex and immunocompromised cases, contributing to greater overall antimicrobial use. Despite this, antimicrobial stewardship indicators improved, with shorter treatment durations and higher de-escalation rates. Continued implementation of antibiotic optimisation programs is essential, given the expected rise in patient complexity and antimicrobial demand.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Serrano, M., Canivano Petrenas, L., Molina Montero, R., Gallego Garcia, S., Pintor, A. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.247</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.247</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-145 Evolution of antibiotic consumption and ICU patient characteristics over the last decade in a secondary-level hospital]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A122</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A122</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A122-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-146 Results of telepharmacy training programme for professionals]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A122-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Training programmes for professionals are essential for quality healthcare.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To describe the development of a multidisciplinary telepharmacy training programme (MTTP) and evaluate its results.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>MTTP was designed. Multidisciplinary team was composed of pharmacists, pharmacy technicians, and nurses. Three-phase professional training programme was designed: 1) training a reference pharmacist in telepharmacy, 2) training three other professionals to maintain continuous activity, 3) training as many professionals as possible through theoretical and practical sessions. Knowledge questionnaires (eight questions) were administered before and after the theoretical-practical sessions. Increase in professionals&rsquo; knowledge of telepharmacy was analysed using results of questionnaires with Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Patients included in telepharmacy service had clinically stable chronic disease treated for &gt;3 months, adequate tolerance to treatment, adherence &gt;90%, and limited mobility. Pharmacist collected information from patients&lsquo; electronic medical records on a worksheet. Following this document a week later, patients were contacted by telephone to perform the process of dispensing and informed delivery of medication at a distance (DIDM<SUB>distance</SUB>). After DIDM<SUB>distance</SUB>, patients included in telepharmacy service were able to collect their treatments at outpatient centres. Worksheet data: patients, drugs, prescribing medical service, interventions. Results of MTTP were assessed based on number and type of interventions performed from 1/1/2024 to 31/12/2024.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Twelve professionals were included in MTTP. Average score on professional questionnaires before theoretical-practical sessions was 2.72/8 points. Average score on questionnaires after sessions was 6.54/8 points. A statistically significant increase in telepharmacy knowledge was observed with theoretical-practical sessions (Wilcoxon signed-rank test p=0.0057). MTTP provided assistance to 538 patients. The most frequently dispensed drugs were: adalimumab (20.60%) and etanercept (12.40%). The most common prescribing medical services were: internal medicine (37.60%) and dermatology (17.70%). Healthcare professionals performed a total of 322 interventions. Types of interventions: promoting new medical assessments (37.3%), information on medication adherence (20.8%), closer pharmacotherapeutic monitoring due to risk of treatment ineffectiveness (12.1%), intervention related to adverse reactions (11.2%) and others (18.6%).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>MTTP enabled a gradual inclusion of professionals and improved their theoretical and practical telepharmacy knowledge. MTTP allowed professionals to perform a considerable number of interventions, which facilitated medical and pharmacotherapeutic monitoring of patients, adequate adherence and drug tolerance.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gil-Sierra, M., Briceno-Casado, M., Cano-Martinez, G., Ritore-Hidalgo, A., Rios-Sanchez, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.248</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.248</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-146 Results of telepharmacy training programme for professionals]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A122</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A122</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A122-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-147 Daratumumab as first-line treatment in transplant-ineligible patients with multiple myeloma: one step closer to chronicity]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A122-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Daratumumab in combination with lenalidomide-dexamethasone (DR-d) is considered one of the recommended regimens for transplant-ineligible (TIE) patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM).</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This study aimed to evaluate the real-world effectiveness of DRd for TIE patients with NDMM, compared with a historical cohort treated with Rd (lenalidomide, dexamethasone).</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>We conducted a retrospective, observational study at a tertiary hospital. We included TIE patients with NDMM who initiated DR-d or Rd between January 2019 and October 2024. Clinical data were extracted from electronic health records and the onco-haematology software Farmis-Oncofarm. Effectiveness was assessed by the 24-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate, and by the percentage of patients with complete response (CR) and very good partial response (VGPR).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 65 patients were analysed: 41 received DR-d and 24 received Rd. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the two groups were well balanced at baseline, as shown in the following table.</p><p><tbl id="T1" loc="float"><tblbdy top-stubs="2"><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>DR-d (N=41)</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Rd (N=24)</b> </c></r><r><c cspan="3" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="3" rspan="1">Median age (range)---yr </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">78(53-88) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">81(65-87) </c></r><r><c cspan="3" rspan="1">Age category &ndash;no.(%) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">&lt;65yr </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">2(5) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1(4) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">65-70yr </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">3(7) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">2(8) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">70-75yr </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">8(20) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">2(8) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">&ge;75yr </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">28(68) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">19(80) </c></r><r><c cspan="3" rspan="1">ISS disease stage --- no.(%) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">I </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">12(30) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">7(29) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">II </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">11(27) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">7(29) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">III </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">17(41) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">9(38) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Unknown </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1(2) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1(4) </c></r></tblbdy></tbl></p><p>At a median follow-up of 15.6 months, disease progression or death had occurred in 26 patients (7/41(17%) in the DRd group versus 19/24(79.2%) in the Rd group). The Kaplan&ndash;Meier estimate of the percentage of patients who were alive without disease progression at 24 months was 72.1% (95% confidence interval (CI),54.1&ndash;96.2) in the DR-d group and 45.8% (95% CI 29.7&ndash;70.8) in the Rd group. The hazard ratio for disease progression or death in the daratumumab group as compared with the control group was 0.32 (95% CI,0.13-0.79,<I>P</I>=0.014).</p><p>The percentage of patients with a CR or better was significantly higher in DR-d group than in Rd group (36% vs 12.5%), as was the percentage with VGPR or better (85% vs 59%)</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>In real-world practice, TIE patients with NDMM treated with DR-d showed significantly lower risk of progression or death compared with those receiving Rd. The DRd combination significantly increases the CR and VGPR compared to the Rd regimen.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Escario, M., Mateos Salillas, C., Garcia-Trevijano Cabetas, M., Herranz Munoz, C., Casado Abad, M., Sanchez-Rubio Fernandez, L., Mallon Gonzalez, S., Villarroya Peiro, E., Herrero Ambrosio, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.249</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.249</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-147 Daratumumab as first-line treatment in transplant-ineligible patients with multiple myeloma: one step closer to chronicity]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A122</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A123</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A123?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-148 Effectiveness and safety of atogepant in the preventive treatment of migraine]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A123?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Atogepant is a recently approved oral calcitonin gene-related peptide antagonist for migraine prophylaxis in adults. Real-world data on its efficacy and safety remain limited.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The objective of this study is to assess the effectiveness and safety of atogepant in real-world clinical practice.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective observational study was conducted on migraine patients who received atogepant between August 2024 and June 2025, with at least 3 months of treatment. Demographic and clinical data were collected. Treatment efficacy was measured by the reduction in monthly migraine days. To analyse atogepant&rsquo;s safety, adverse events related to this drug were recorded.</p><p>Patients were classified as non-responders (&lt;30% reduction in monthly migraine days), partial responders (30&ndash;50% reduction) or good responders (&gt;50% reduction).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>44 patients were included in the study: 100% female; mean age 46,5&plusmn;11,1 years; 40 (90,9%) with diagnosis of chronic migraine and 4(9,1%) with episodic migraine. 21 (47,7%) patients had been previously treated with monoclonal antibodies.</p><p>At treatment initiation, the median monthly migraine days was 13 (9,5&ndash;17), and the median monthly headache days was 20,5 (15,5&ndash;26).</p><p>Efficacy data: After 3 months of treatment (n=37), the median number of migraine days was 5 (3-9). 13 (35%) of patients were non-responders, 10 (27%) were partial responders, and 14 (38%) were good responders.</p><p>After 6 months (n=29), the median number of migraine days was 5 (3-9). The observed response rate was: 10 (34,5%) of patients were non-responders, 10 (34,5%) were partial responders, and 9 (31%) were good responders.</p><p>Safety data: Adverse events were reported in 86,4% of patients. The most common were: 65,9% gastrointestinal symptoms (constipation and nausea); 43,2% central nervous system symptoms (fatigue, somnolence, and insomnia); 22,7% decreased appetite and 9,1% weight loss.</p><p>7 (15,9%) patients discontinued treatment earlier due to intolerance.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>In our study, atogepant as a preventive treatment for patients with migraine significantly reduced the median number of monthly migraine days. At least two-thirds of the patients showed a clinical response, with a reduction greater than 50% achieved in one-third of them.</p><p>A high percentage of patients reported adverse effects, leading to treatment discontinuation in 16% of cases.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Llorente Gomez, M., Fernandez Pena, S., Cardaba Garcia, E., Montero Lazaro, M., Maganto Garrido, S., Pariente Junquera, A., Gomez Diaz, M., Guerreiro Caamano, A., Gonzalez, A. B., Martin Roldan, A., Sanchez Sanchez, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.250</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.250</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-148 Effectiveness and safety of atogepant in the preventive treatment of migraine]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A123</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A124</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A124-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-149 What do outpatients require from pharmaceutical care consultations?]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A124-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>The goal of pharmaceutical care is to provide patients with the support they need to ensure they can follow their treatment plan in a correct and safe manner.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To analyse structured data collected from outpatients pharmaceutical care consultations.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Observational, descriptive, retrospective study conducted in a secondary care hospital. All records of outpatient pharmaceutical care consultations between 2021 and 2024 were included. The following variables were collected from the electronic medical record: reason for consultation, service, type of drug and training for self-administration.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 4345 records were obtained: 22% belonged to internal medicine, 15% to oncology, 14% to dermatology and 13% to rheumatology departments.</p><p>The reason for consultation was initiation of a new drug treatment in 2801 cases (64%): 38% biological drugs (BIO), 22% oral antineoplastic drugs (ANEO), and 11% antiretroviral therapy (ART). The breakdown by specialty was: dermatology (19%), oncology (18%), internal medicine (13%), and rheumatology (11%). Follow-up consultations accounted for 9% of the total. There were 238 consultations for drug interactions: 48% in patients with ANEO and 20% with ART. Adherence to treatment resulted in 227 consultations: 69% in patients with ART followed by 13% in patients with BIO. In 74 cases, consultations were due to treatment tolerance issues: 23% of patients were taking antifibrotics, 14% ART, and 14% ANEO. The remaining reasons accounted for 15%.</p><p>Consultations relating to BIO occurred in 1515 cases. In 1066 cases, patients received training on how to use the delivery device. Only 3% consulted again due to problems with device management. Of the 879 consultations from patients with ART, 23% were related to PrEP and 18% to adherence problems. Of the 810 consultations related to ANEO, 14% were due to drug interactions. The remaining 26% corresponded to other drugs.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>This study shows that, within our population, the greatest demand for pharmaceutical care comes from patients undergoing BIO, followed by ART and ANEO. The most common reasons for consultation were initiating a new drug treatment, followed by follow-up consultations, drug interactions and adherence counselling. Self-administration training was provided in 25% of consultations.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Garcia Benayas, E., De La Cruz Vallejo, M., Pena Cabia, S., Diaz Gomez, E., Novo Gonzalez, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.251</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.251</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-149 What do outpatients require from pharmaceutical care consultations?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A124</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A124</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A124-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-150 Optimisation of antimicrobial use in a regional hospital: prescription and adequacy analysis]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A124-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Rational use of antimicrobials is essential to prevent resistance, improve clinical outcomes, and reduce healthcare costs. In regional hospitals, implementing antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP) is particularly relevant due to limited resources.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the adequacy of broad-spectrum antimicrobial treatments and analyse the pharmaceutical interventions performed.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective observational study was carried out at a regional hospital over a 4 month period (June-September 2025). All treatments involving the following antimicrobials under special control were reviewed: piperacillin-tazobactam, carbapenems, vancomycin, linezolid, daptomycin, voriconazole, and liposomal amphotericin B. Collected variables included: age, sex, renal clearance, prescribing service, clinical indication, prior and concomitant antibiotic use, adherence to clinical guidelines, microbiological cultures and results, as well as pharmaceutical interventions (de-escalation, dose adjustment, treatment duration, sequential therapy) and their acceptance by the medical team.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 196 patients (55% male) were included, with a mean age of 78.5 &plusmn; 13.5 years. The departments with the highest number of prescriptions were Internal Medicine (46%), Surgery (18%) and Oncology (13%). Piperacillin-tazobactam was the most frequently prescribed antimicrobial (59%), followed by meropenem (12%) and vancomycin (10%). Adherence to clinical guidelines was 64%. A total of 58 pharmaceutical interventions were made, with 80% accepted. The most common interventions were: de-escalation (62%), sequential therapy (17%), and dose adjustment (14%). In 85% of cases, initial treatment was started empirically without microbiological results available; the remaining prescriptions were adjusted after obtaining positive microbiological results, favouring therapeutic adequacy. These interventions optimised antimicrobial use, minimised adverse effects, and contributed to reducing bacterial resistance in the centre.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Active pharmaceutical monitoring of antimicrobial treatments allows identification of opportunities to improve prescribing practices, optimise pharmacotherapy, and reduce associated risks. The integration of hospital pharmacists into ASP demonstrates their significant contribution to enhancing care quality and patient safety. The high acceptance rate of interventions (80%) reflects effective multidisciplinary collaboration and demonstrates the feasibility of implementing optimisation strategies in regional hospitals.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gonzalez Escribano, M., Saiz Molina, J., Sanchez Luque, L., Hermida Perez, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.252</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.252</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-150 Optimisation of antimicrobial use in a regional hospital: prescription and adequacy analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A124</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A124</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A125-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-151 Effectiveness, safety, adherence, and treatment satisfaction in patients treated with long-acting cabotegravir/rilpivirine]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A125-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Long-acting injectable antiretroviral therapy (ART) offers an innovative approach to HIV management, reducing treatment burden and improving adherence. Cabotegravir plus rilpivirine (CAB/RPV LA) is the first complete long-acting regimen approved for maintenance therapy in virologically suppressed adults. Clinical trials confirmed its non-inferiority to oral ART and high patient satisfaction, but real-world evidence remains limited.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the effectiveness, safety, adherence, and treatment satisfaction of patients treated with CAB/RPV LA after 1 year.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective observational study included all patients receiving CAB/RPV LA at our hospital between July 2023 and December 2024. Variables included demographics, HIV duration, prior ART lines, last oral regimen, viral load (VL &lt;50 copies/mL; blip 50&ndash;200), and CD4+ count (baseline, weeks 8, 32, 48). Adverse events (AEs) and satisfaction (ESTAR questionnaire, score 0&ndash;6) were recorded.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Thirty-seven patients were included, 30 men, median age 51 years (24&ndash;65) and HIV duration 15 years (4&ndash;37). Before switching, 14 had &ge;4 prior ART lines, 9 three, 11 two, and 3 one. The last regimen was dual in 31 (83.8%) and triple in 6 (16.2%). All had undetectable VL at baseline; 36 (97.3%) maintained undetectable VL at week 8, all at week 32, and 34 (94.5%) at week 52, with 3 blips, none requiring modification. Median CD4+ counts were 856, 755, 778, and 810 cells/&micro;L at baseline, weeks 8, 32, and 52. Injection site pain occurred in 11 patients (29.7%), mainly moderate. Lipid levels remained stable. All attended visits, showing full adherence. Median ESTAR score was 6, with slightly lower ratings for side effects and flexibility.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Long-acting CAB/RPV maintained virological suppression, good safety, and excellent adherence after 1 year. High satisfaction supports this regimen as an effective and well-accepted maintenance option for virologically suppressed individuals. Continued monitoring is warranted to confirm long-term outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. Orkin C, <I>et al</I>. Long-acting cabotegravir and rilpivirine for HIV-1 treatment. <I>New England Journal of Medicine</I> 2021;<b>385</b>(7):640&ndash;649. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa21016022.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gonzalo Gonzalez, A., Gallego Casado, A., Rodriguez Carballo, J., Curras Varela, L., Fuertes Camporro, S., Martinez-Mugica Barbosa, C., Pampin Sanchez, R., Fernandez Vicente, M., Goenaga Ansola, A., Tembras Martinez, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.253</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.253</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-151 Effectiveness, safety, adherence, and treatment satisfaction in patients treated with long-acting cabotegravir/rilpivirine]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A125</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A125</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A125-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-152 Real-world effectiveness of sequential anti-CGRP therapy in migraine prophylaxis]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A125-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Migraine is a prevalent and disabling neurological disorder with major impact on quality of life and healthcare resources. Monoclonal antibodies targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway are effective and well tolerated in migraine prevention. However, many patients show limited response or intolerance to the first anti-CGRP agent, and evidence on switching between these therapies in clinical practice remains scarce. Understanding real-world outcomes of sequential anti-CGRP therapy may help guide personalised treatment strategies.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the real-world effectiveness of sequential anti-CGRP monoclonal antibody therapy as second-line preventive treatment after lack of efficacy or intolerance to galcanezumab.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective observational study was conducted from January 2020 to February 2025. Patients with chronic or high-frequency episodic migraine who started a second anti-CGRP monoclonal antibody after galcanezumab failure or intolerance were included. Eligible patients received second-line therapy for at least 6 months. Variables collected included demographic (age, sex), clinical (monthly migraine days (MMD), Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (MIDAS), Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6)) and treatment data (drug, duration). Effectiveness was defined as a &ge;50% reduction in MMD and/or improvement in HIT-6 or MIDAS scores versus pre-galcanezumab values.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Thirty-one patients were included (median age 55 years; 93.5% women); 28 (90.3%) had chronic and 3 (9.7%) high-frequency episodic migraine. Second-line treatment was erenumab in 30 patients (96.9%) and fremanezumab in one (3.2%). Median treatment duration was 16.8 months for first-line and 7.3 months for second-line therapy. Reasons for switching were lack of efficacy (n = 23), intolerance (n = 7), or both (n = 1). Four patients required erenumab dose escalation to 140 mg. A &ge;50% reduction in MMD was achieved in 10 patients (32.3%), all on erenumab; these and 17 others showed improvement in MIDAS or HIT-6 scores.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Sequential use of a second anti-CGRP monoclonal antibody after galcanezumab failure or intolerance was effective in a subset of patients, supporting its role as a therapeutic option. Further studies are needed to identify predictors of response and optimise individualised migraine management.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. L&oacute;pez-Moreno JA, <I>et al</I>. Switching between CGRP pathway monoclonal antibodies in migraine: a real-life experience. <I>Headache.</I> 2023;<b>63</b>(1):77&ndash;87. doi:10.1111/head.14432</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gonzalo Gonzalez, A., Curras Varela, L., Rodriguez Carballo, J., Gallego Casado, A., Fuertes Camporro, S., Pampin Sanchez, R., Goenaga Ansola, A., Fernandez Vicente, M., Martinez-Mugica Barbosa, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.254</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.254</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-152 Real-world effectiveness of sequential anti-CGRP therapy in migraine prophylaxis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A125</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A126</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A126-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-153 Development and validation of two Shiny applications for {beta}-lactam dose individualisation in critically ill patients]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A126-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>&beta;-lactam antibiotics are cornerstone agents in intensive care units, yet their pharmacokinetics show marked variability in critically ill patients, often resulting in suboptimal exposure. Population pharmacokinetic (popPK) models combined with Bayesian estimation can improve dosing precision; however, clinical implementation remains limited by the lack of user-friendly tools. Web-based applications may bridge this gap and support antimicrobial stewardship programs.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To develop two interactive Shiny applications based on published popPK models for meropenem and piperacillin-tazobactam, and to validate their predictive performance before and after Bayesian adjustment using real-world ICU data.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Two R Shiny applications, MeroDose-UCI and PiperDose-UCI, were developed to perform population simulations and Bayesian dose optimisation. Each integrates a published and externally validated popPK model (Boonpeng et al., 2022 for meropenem; Sukarnjanaset et al., 2019 for piperacillin-tazobactam). Retrospective validation was conducted using plasma concentration data from ICU patients. Predictive performance was assessed by comparing observed versus predicted concentrations for both population and individual (Bayesian) estimates. Accuracy and precision were evaluated using the coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>), mean absolute error (MAE) and mean relative error (MRE). Visual Predictive Checks (VPCs) were additionally performed to evaluate model predictive distribution against observed data.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Thirty-six plasma samples (14 meropenem and 22 piperacillin) from 26 patients (13 per antibiotic) were included.</p><p>Population model for meropenem: R<sup>2</sup> = 0.80, MAE = 3.61 &plusmn; 5.38 mg/L, MRE = 38.6 &plusmn; 22.8%; after Bayesian adjustment, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.95, MAE = 1.15 &plusmn; 1.80 mg/L, MRE = 11.5 &plusmn; 8.6%.</p><p>Population model for piperacillin-tazobactam: R<sup>2</sup> = 0.86, MAE = 9.31 &plusmn; 19.33 mg/L, MRE = 38.4 &plusmn; 19.5%; after Bayesian adjustment, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.99, MAE = 2.21 &plusmn; 4.43 mg/L, MRE = 9.1 &plusmn; 5.0%.</p><p>VPCs confirmed that both models adequately captured the central tendency and variability of observed concentrations.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Two Shiny applications were successfully developed and validated for Bayesian-guided TDM of meropenem and piperacillin-tazobactam. Bayesian adjustment and VPC analysis confirmed the robustness and predictive reliability of the implemented models. These validated tools provide a practical and innovative solution to support pharmacists in optimising &beta;-lactam therapy in critically ill patients.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Garcia Casanueva, J., Sanchez Hernandez, J., Roso Jimenez, N., Gomez Navas, R., Gallego Hernandez, G., Albarran Gomez, A., Aparicio Penacoba, R., Sanchez Arroyo, C., Zarzuelo Castaneda, A., Ballesteros Herraez, J., Otero Lopez, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.255</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.255</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-153 Development and validation of two Shiny applications for {beta}-lactam dose individualisation in critically ill patients]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A126</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A126</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A126-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-154 Implementation of a medication review process for complex chronic polymedicated patients]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A126-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>According to the Simpathy Consortium&rsquo;s Polipharmacy Management by 2030 document, 8.6 million admissions per year are recorded in Europe for adverse events (AE), 50% of which were preventable and 70% of which occurred in people over 65 years who were taking five or more medications.</p><p>Polypharmacy in complex chronic patients represents a challenge for healthcare systems, particularly due to the risk associated with prescribing potentially inappropriate medication (PIM), which negatively affects patient safety. This is particularly relevant in services with a high concentration of vulnerable patients, who are at greater risk of AE.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>Implementation of a medication review circuit to detect PIM in complex chronic polymedicated patients and to improve therapeutic adequacy, based on the best available evidence.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A prospective (March-September 2025) and multidisciplinary review process was designed, comprised of internists, nephrologists, and hospital pharmacists, at a first-level hospital.</p><p>All complex chronic polymedicated patients (&gt; 10 drugs prescribed for 6 months and presenting 2 or more morbidities) admitted to the Internal Medicine Service and those attending outpatient Nephrology consultations, were included. Terminally ill patients were excluded.</p><p>Data were obtained from the clinical history and the assisted electronic prescription program. PIM prescribed was reviewed following the Stopp/Start and Less-Chron criteria, Barthel, Braden, Downton and Pfeiffer scales and anticholinergic load.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>122 patients were included, with a mean age of 80 years. A total of 2,573 chronic medications were reviewed, with a median of 15 medications/patient (range: 11&ndash;24). PIM were considered treatments in which the risk outweighs the expected potential clinical benefit, when:</p><p><l type="tab"><li><p>&ndash; &nbsp;There are safer or more effective therapeutic alternatives;</p></li><li><p>&ndash; &nbsp;The drugs are used at higher doses/durations than indicated;</p></li><li><p>&ndash; &nbsp;The drugs are used with a high risk of interactions;</p></li><li><p>&ndash; &nbsp;There is duplication; or</p></li><li><p>&ndash; &nbsp;A clinically indicated medication is omitted.</p></li></l></p><p>In all patients at least one PIM was detected. A pharmaceutical intervention was performed and the prescribing physician was notified. Treatment modifications were made in 36% of patients.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The implementation of a medication review process allows the identification and significant reduction of PIM, improving patient safety. This multidisciplinary model is applicable to other departments with a high burden of complex patients.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rodriguez Moreta, C., Lopez Munoz, M., Varas Perez, A., Gonzalez Rosa, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.256</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.256</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-154 Implementation of a medication review process for complex chronic polymedicated patients]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A126</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A127</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A127-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-155 Efficacy of rimegepant and atogepant in migraine prophylaxis]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A127-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Rimegepant and atogepant have demonstrated efficacy in the prophylaxis of high-frequency episodic migraine (rimegepant and atogepant) and chronic migraine (atogepant), according to the ADVANCE and PROGRESS clinical trials (CT) for atogepant and BHV3000-301, -302, and -303 CT for rimegepant.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To assess the efficacy of rimegepant and atogepant in migraine prophylaxis among outpatients at a tertiary-level hospital.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective observational study was conducted from July 2024 to March 2025 including outpatients initiating treatment with gepants. Variables analysed were sex, age, treatment duration, number of prior non-biologic and biologic prophylactic drugs, monthly migraine days (MMD) before treatment, MMD after 9&ndash;12 weeks (MMDw9&ndash;12), treatment adherence, change in MMD, and the proportion of patients achieving &ge;50% MMDw9&ndash;12 reduction. Data were obtained from electronic medical records.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Forty-two patients were included: 18 treated with rimegepant and 24 with atogepant; (88.1% women). Median age was 45 years (IQR:34.7-54). Median treatment duration with rimegepant was 9.4 weeks (IQR:4.4-19.4), 4.4 (IQR:3.8-4.6) in early discontinuations, and 12.9 (IQR:5.5-19.4) in the remainder. For atogepant, median duration was 9.7 weeks (IQR:5.2-14), 6.1 (IQR:5-7.1) in early discontinuations, and 11.4 (IQR:5.4-15.6) otherwise. Median number of prior non-biologic prophylactics was 6.5 (IQR:5-7.5) for rimegepant and 6 (IQR:5-8) for atogepant. Regarding previous biologics, for rimegepant: 55.6% had none, 11.1% one, 16.7% two, 11.1% three, and 5.6% four; for atogepant: 33.3% none, 12.5% one, 20.8% two, 20.8% three, and 12.5% four. Median baseline MMD was 15.5 (IQR:10-30). MMDw9&ndash;12 was available for 24 patients (57.1%); data were missing due to early discontinuation in 7 (16.7%) and absent migraine calendars in 10 (23.8%). Median post-treatment MMD was 15 (IQR:6.5-20), with a median adherence of 91.55% (IQR:0.81-0.99). Median MMD change was &ndash;2.25 (IQR:(&ndash;10.1)-0); &ndash;2.5 (IQR:(&ndash;5.75)-0) for rimegepant and &ndash;2 (IQR:(&ndash;12)-0) for atogepant. A &ge;50% MMDw9&ndash;12 reduction was achieved by 25% overall, 25% with rimegepant, and 23.1% with atogepant.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Despite the small cohort, response variability and modest clinical benefit suggest uncertainty regarding efficacy, with no notable differences between both gepants. The variation in MMD and &ge;50% MMD reduction during weeks 9&ndash;12 were lower for both drugs than those reported in CT.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Corriente Gordon, I., Paradela Garcia, E., Romero Ruiz, A., Sanchez Gomez, E., Santos Rubio, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.257</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.257</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-155 Efficacy of rimegepant and atogepant in migraine prophylaxis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A127</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A127</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A127-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-156 Effectiveness and safety of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A127-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive subtype with limited treatment options and poor prognosis. Adding immune checkpoint inhibitors such as pembrolizumab to neoadjuvant chemotherapy has improved pathological response and survival in pivotal trials, becoming a new standard of care. Real-world data are needed to confirm these results in broader patient populations.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the effectiveness of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in patients with early-stage TNBC in a real-world setting and compare outcomes with the pivotal clinical trial (PCT).</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>This retrospective observational study included patients with stage II/III TNBC treated between June-22 and Aug-25. Sex, age, performance status, and stage at diagnosis were collected. The neoadjuvant regimen was pembrolizumab (200 mg/3 weeks, eight cycles) plus chemotherapy: paclitaxel (80 mg/m<sup>2</sup> weekly) and carboplatin (AUC 5 every 3 weeks) for four cycles, followed by doxorubicin (60 mg/m<sup>2</sup>) and cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m<sup>2</sup>) every 3 weeks for four cycles. Primary outcome was effectiveness, assessed by pathological response using the Residual Cancer Burden (RCB) classification: pCR (pathological complete response), RCB-I (minimal residual disease), RCB-II (moderate residual disease), and RCB-III (extensive residual disease). Safety was evaluated by treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Thirty-three women were included, median age 55 years (range 30&ndash;78), all with performance status 0. Stage: IIA, n=18 (54.5%); IIB, n=9 (27.3%); IIIA, n=4 (12.1%); IIIB, n=2 (6.1%). Pathological response: pCR, n=16 (48.5%); RCB-I, n=13 (39.4%); RCB-II, n=4 (12.1%); RCB-III, n=0. Most frequent TRAEs: fatigue (87.8%), nausea (60.6%), neutropenia (45.4%), infection (36.3%), diarrhoea (27.2%), anaemia (24.2%), fever (21.2%), dysgeusia (21.2%). In the PCT, pCR rate was 64.8%. Reported TRAEs included nausea (62.7%), alopecia (60.3%), anaemia (55.1%), neutropenia (46.7%), fatigue (41.1%), and diarrhoea (29.4%).</p><p>In the PCT, efficacy outcomes showed a pCR rate of 64.8% in the pembrolizumab-chemotherapy arm. Reported TRAEs included nausea (62.7%), alopecia (60.3%), anaemia (55.1%), neutropenia (46.7%), fatigue (41.1%), and diarrhoea (29.4%), among others.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>In this real-world cohort, neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy achieved a slightly lower pCR rate than in the PCT, though many patients had minimal residual disease. Safety results were consistent with pivotal data, supporting the clinical value of this regimen in early-stage TNBC.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Reyes De La Mata, Y., Frias-Ruiz, P., Mora-Cortes, M., Vazquez-Vela, V., Gil-Sierra, M., Martinez-Diaz, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.258</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.258</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-156 Effectiveness and safety of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A127</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A127</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A128-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-157 Effectiveness of datopotamab deruxtecan in metastatic non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer: real-world experience]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A128-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality in Spain. Despite significant therapeutic advances in recent years, the available therapeutic options remain limited. In this context, the antibody&ndash;drug conjugate Datopotamab-Deruxtecan (Dato-dx) has emerged as the current standard of care for patients with lung adenocarcinoma.</p><p>This drug hasn&rsquo;t been commercialised in Spain yet, so the access to it is made through the application &lsquo;Medicamentos en Situaciones Especiales&rsquo; of the Ministry of Health.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To analyse the effectiveness of Dato-dx versus Docetaxel-nintendanib in patients with metastatic non-squamous-NSCLC.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Observational, retrospective, single-centre study that included all patients with metastatic non-squamous-NSCLC who have received prior systemic therapy. Patients were treated with Dato-dx 6 mg/kg or Docetaxel-nintedanib 50 mg/m<sup>2</sup> one every three weeks and were followed-up until August-2024. Sociodemographic, clinical and treatment-related data were collected using the hospital&rsquo;s electronic medical record program and the Farmis-Oncofarm. The effectiveness variable used was the median of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival rate (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan&ndash;Meier method.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 21 patients were included; seven treated with Dato-DXd, with a median age of 65 years (55&ndash;76) and 50% of the patients ECOG 1. The median follow-up was 5.3 months (0.1&ndash;9.1) and the median number of cycles received was four (1&ndash;13). In the Docetaxel-nintedanib arm (n=14), the median age was 62 years (54&ndash;80), with 20.43% of the patients ECOG 1. The median follow-up was 2.03 months (0&ndash;19,1) and the median number of cycles received was five (1&ndash;39).</p><p>The median PFS was 6 months (95% CI, 2.3-NA) with Dato-DXd and 2.5 months (95% CI, 1.4 to 6.3) with docetaxel ((HR): 1.78 (95% CI 0.63-5.04); P = 0.277). The OS rate at 12 months was 57,1% (95% CI 30,1-100%) and 21.4% (95% CI, 7.9-58,4%) respectively.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Although the difference did not reach statistical significance the data suggest a favourable trend towards Dato-DXd, which could reflect its potential in terms of progression-free survival duration. These results suggest that Dato-DXd could be a promising therapeutic option for previously treated patients with metastatic non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Villarroya Peiro, E., Herranz Munoz, C., Mateos Salillas, C., Escario Gomez, M., Casado Abad, G., Garcia-Trevijano Cabetas, M., Sanchez-Rubio Ferrandez, L., Soto Rosa, A., Ibanez Ronco, M., Herrero Ambrosio, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.259</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.259</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-157 Effectiveness of datopotamab deruxtecan in metastatic non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer: real-world experience]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A128</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A128</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A128-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-158 Are we managing behaviour or overmedicating? A look at psychotropic use in intellectual disability]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A128-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>The prescription of psychotropic drugs in residents with intellectual disabilities is very common and it is frequently done to modify behavioural alterations. We want to analyse our data to see the way we are doing.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The aim is to know what type of psychotropic drugs are prescribed in our intellectual disability Centres.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Descriptive and cross-sectional study in two social-health centres for intellectual disabilities, in which the prescriptions of 140 residents are analysed. Demographic data, lines of treatment prescribed per resident, psychotropic drugs prescribed, most frequent subgroups as well as number and antipsychotics prescribed are collected.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>824 lines of pharmacological treatment were obtained in 140 residents of two centres, 94 of them men and 46 women. The average number of treatment lines per patient is 5.85.</p><p>84.51% of the residents are being treated with psychotropics (67.50% are men and 32.50% women). Among these, 31.54% are being treated with antipsychotics, 27.24% with antiepileptics, 15.05% with antidepressants, 8.96% with anxiolytics, 6.09% with analgesics, 5.73% with antiparkinsonian drugs (for reverse extrapyramidal symptoms) and 5.38% with hypnotics.</p><p>If we focus on antipsychotics, the most prescribed is risperidone (26.1%), followed by levomepromazine (14.5%), olanzapine (12.7%), quetiapine (10.4%) and clothiapine (9%). Point out that 59.09% of residents take one antipsychotic, 32.95% two, 4.55% three, and 3.41% four.</p><p>Regarding antiepileptics, valproate is the most prescribed (30.30%) followed by clonazepam (14.42%), phenobarbital (12.12%) and levetiracetam (11.36%). The high prescription of valproate could be justified by its off-label use as mood stabilisers and clonazepam by its anxiolytic effect.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The number of treatment lines per patient is a high 5.85 average.</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>The prescription of psychotropic drugs is very high (84.51%).</p></li><li><p>The most prescribed group are antipsychotics, with risperidone and levomepromazine being the most prescribed. Note that 32.95% of residents have been prescribed two antipsychotics.</p></li><li><p>Antiepileptics are the second most prescribed group; their justification could be due to their off&ndash;label use.</p></li><li><p>This review serves as a starting point to improve the therapeutic approach in residents with intellectual disabilities.</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Iriarte, M., Gascon, A., Satiro, A., Montoya, E., Navarro, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.260</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.260</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-158 Are we managing behaviour or overmedicating? A look at psychotropic use in intellectual disability]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A128</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A128</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A129-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-159 Real-world efficacy and safety of human CGRP receptor antagonists in migraine patients from two regional hospitals]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A129-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Migraine is a prevalent headache disorder with significant impact on quality of life. New oral CGRP receptor antagonists, including rimegepant and atogepant, have emerged as preventive treatments for patients with diagnosis of episodic and chronic migraine, respectively, but real-world data on their efficacy and safety remain limited.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the impact of rimegepant and atogepant on migraine frequency, quality of life, safety, tolerability, and treatment adherence at 3 and 6 months.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>This retrospective, single-cohort study included adult patients (&ge;18 years) with episodic or chronic migraine who initiated rimegepant or atogepant in 2025. Inclusion required minimum &ge;3 months of follow-up. Data on previous and concomitant treatments, monthly migraine days (MMD), headache intensity test (HIT-6), adverse events, adherence, and discontinuation were collected at 3 and 6 months. A descriptive statistical analysis was conducted.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Forty patients (77.5% women, mean age 53 years) were included. Eighteen received rimegepant and 22 atogepant, though one never initiated treatment. At baseline, atogepant patients had higher MMD (rimegepant 11.3&plusmn;2.2 vs atogepant 21.7&plusmn;6.4, p&lt;0.05) and HIT-6 scores (rimegepant 67.1&plusmn;5.9 vs atogepant 70.7&plusmn;5.9, p=0.0694). All patients had prior preventive treatments, 8 patients w/rimegepant and 10 w/atogepant followed concomitant prophylactics.</p><p>At 3 months, mean MMD decreased to 8.1&plusmn;3.7 w/rimegepant (n=14) and 15.1&plusmn;10.3 w/atogepant (n=16). HIT-6 scores improved to 63.6&plusmn;9.8 (n=14) and 64.1&plusmn;10.2 (n=10), respectively. Three patients in each group had &ge;50% reduction in MMD and/or &lt;4 MMD after 3-month treatment. One patient in each group were considered non-adherent. At 6 months, only four patients w/rimegepant reached follow-up; one discontinued and data was missing for three patients.</p><p>Treatment duration was longer w/rimegepant (3.5&plusmn;1.3 months vs 2.0&plusmn;1.0, p=0.025). Nine rimegepant patients discontinued due to lack of efficacy. Tolerability was generally good. For atogepant, six patients stopped due to adverse events, most commonly fatigue, constipation and other gastrointestinal symptoms. No cardiovascular events were reported.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Oral CGRP antagonists effectively reduced migraine frequency and improved quality of life in real-world settings. Atogepant showed better outcomes, while rimegepant had better tolerability. Discontinuations were mainly due to lack of efficacy (rimegepant) and adverse events (atogepant). Overall adherence remained high with no major safety concerns.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-022-01077-z</p><p>2. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2024.1431562</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Figueras Suriol, A., Lampreave Gebelli, M., Adell Ortega, V., Alba Aranda, G., Saavedra Mitjans, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.261</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.261</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-159 Real-world efficacy and safety of human CGRP receptor antagonists in migraine patients from two regional hospitals]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A129</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A129</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A129-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-160 Lokelma in heart failure patients: safety profile and tolerability -a real-world retrospective cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A129-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Managing hyperkalaemia in heart failure (HF) patients remains a clinical challenge, often limiting the use of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASi), essential for optimising HF therapy. Hospital pharmacists play a crucial role in clinical outcomes and drug monitoring. Lokelma (sodium zirconium cyclosilicate) has shown efficacy in controlled clinical trials; yet real-world evidence on safety and short-term outcomes is limited.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>Assess the real-world effectiveness of Lokelma in normalising serum potassium in HF patients, monitor its effects on renal function and magnesium levels, and describe its tolerability profile.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective, single-centre cohort including 46 adult HF patients started Lokelma therapy between January 2023 and September 2025. Demographic, laboratory, and dosing data were obtained from electronic medical records. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving serum potassium &lt;5.0 mmol/L at 30 days. Secondary endpoints were changes in eGFR and serum magnesium. Pre- and post-treatment values were compared with paired t-tests; 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated, and adverse events were identified through active pharmacovigilance during clinical record monitoring.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Mean age was 74.2 years, 56.5% male. At 30 days, 43.5% achieved target potassium &lt;5.0 mmol/L. Mean potassium decreased from 5.58 to 5.07 mmol/L (mean  = -0.51 mmol/L; 95% CI: -0.73 to -0.28; p &lt; 0.001). No significant change in renal function (mean eGFR: 39.5 vs 41.1 mL/min at baseline and 30 days;  = +1.55 mL/min; 95% CI: -1.84 to 4.93; p = 0.36) or serum magnesium (2.17 to 2.12 mg/dL;  = -0.04 mg/dL; 95% CI: -0.12 to 0.04; p = 0.29) was observed. Hypomagnesaemia (&lt;1.7 mg/dL) occurred in 11.6% of patients (two cases required supplementation). The safety profile was favourable: three patients (6.5%) had adverse events (two with mild gastrointestinal symptoms and one discontinuation due to intolerance, reported to the national system). No serious or fatal events occurred.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Lokelma was safe and effective for hyperkalaemia management in HF patients, with no renal toxicity or significant impact on magnesium homeostasis. Its low adverse event rate supports tolerability. Long-term data will clarify the clinical impact of RAASi titration and maintenance of foundational HF treatment.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lobo Alves, M., Andrade, R., Salvado, J., Rodrigues, C., Santos, M., Guerreiro, R., Fernandes, J., Araujo, I., Fonseca, C., Mirco, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.262</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.262</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-160 Lokelma in heart failure patients: safety profile and tolerability -a real-world retrospective cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A129</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A129</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A130-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-161 Prognostic value of first trans arterial chemoembolisation with hepatoma arterial-embolisation prognostic score in hepatocellular carcinoma: real-world data]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A130-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Trans arterial chemoembolisation (TACE) is the standard treatment for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), yet patient outcomes vary widely. The Hepatoma Arterial-embolisation Prognostic (HAP) score was developed to stratify prognosis based on baseline parameters, but its real-world predictive value remains uncertain.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the prognostic value of the HAP score in patients undergoing first-line TACE for HCC, and to explore its correlation with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in a real-world setting.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective study was conducted including patients diagnosed with HCC who underwent their first TACE between September/2023-September/2025. The HAP score was calculated based on baseline albumin, bilirubin, alpha-fetoprotein, and maximum tumour diameter. Patients were stratified into two groups (A+B and C+D, where A and B represent best prognosis). Survival outcomes were estimated using Kaplan&ndash;Meier analysis. Associations between HAP category and OS/PFS were assessed using log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards models.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Thirty-eight patients were included. The distribution of HAP categories was: A+B, 73.6% (N=28); C+D, 26.4% (N=10). Baseline characteristics are summarised in <cross-ref type="tbl" refid="T1">table 1</cross-ref>.</p><p><tbl id="T1" loc="float"><no>Abstract 4CPS-161 Table 1</no><caption><p>Baseline characteristics</p></caption><tblbdy top-stubs="2"><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>A+B</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>C+D</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c></r><r><c cspan="3" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Male sex (%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">85.7 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">80 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Median age (years, range) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">74.5 (58&ndash;88) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">73 (68&ndash;79) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Median albumin (g/dL, range) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">4 (2.9&ndash;7.1) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">3.8 (2.8&ndash;3.5) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Median total bilirubin (mg/dL, range) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.91 (0.21&ndash;3.06) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1.4 (1.2&ndash;3.6) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Median alpha-fetoprotein (ng/mL, range) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">3.9 (&lt;2&ndash;943.2) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">3.6 (&lt;2&ndash;181) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Median tumour size (cm, range) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">3.05 (1&ndash;7) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">3 (1.3&ndash;5.2) </c></r></tblbdy></tbl></p><p>Median PFS: 12.23 months (95% CI, 9.29&ndash;15.17) in group A+B and 6.53 months (95% CI, NR&ndash;NR) in C+D (HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.34&ndash;3.36; p = 0.895).</p><p>Median OS: 22.83 months (95% CI, NR&ndash;NR) in group A+B and 24.07 months (95% CI, NR&ndash;NR) in C+D (HR 1.69, 95% CI 0.14&ndash;19.71; p = 0.667).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>In this real-world cohort, the HAP score did not show a significant correlation with OS or PFS in patients undergoing first TACE for HCC. Although patients with better HAP categories (A+B) had numerically longer PFS, the difference was not statistically significant, likely due to small sample size and limited heterogeneity baseline characteristics. Larger prospective studies are needed to clarify the prognostic utility of the HAP score in clinical practice.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Reyes-De-La-Mata, Y., Pisarro-Baron, E., Frias-Ruiz, P., Martinez-Diaz, C., Gil-Sierra, M., Vazquez-Vela, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.263</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.263</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-161 Prognostic value of first trans arterial chemoembolisation with hepatoma arterial-embolisation prognostic score in hepatocellular carcinoma: real-world data]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A130</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A130</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A130-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-162 Real-world evidence with ofatumumab in multiple sclerosis]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A130-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Ofatumumab, an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, has shown high efficacy and a favourable safety profile in patients with Multiple Sclerosis (MS) in clinical trials. Real-world data are essential to assess its effectiveness, tolerability and persistence under routine clinical conditions.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the effectiveness, safety and persistence of ofatumumab in patients with MS treated in a tertiary hospital.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective observational study was conducted including all patients with relapsing-remitting or secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (RRMS; SPMS), who initiated Ofatumumab between January 2023 and August 2025 in a tertiary hospital. Demographic, clinical, and treatment-related data were obtained from electronic medical records. Variables included: age, sex, previous disease-modifying therapies (DMTs), treatment persistence, adverse events, reasons for discontinuation, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the data.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>54 patients were included (57% female; mean age 41.6&plusmn; 12.5 years), of whom two with SPMS. 48% patients were nai&#x0308;ve, but the majority had received &ge;2 prior DMTs , mainly interferons (41,3%), , dimethyl fumarate (34,5%), glatiramer acetate (31%), cladribine (20,7%), teriflunomide (17,2%) and natalizumab (6,9%). The main reasons for discontinuation were adverse events (40%), disease progression (13%), and JC virus positivity (3.7%), among other reasons. The criterion for starting or switching to ofatumumab was to have high disease activity or progression. It is noticed that two patients switched from ocrelizumab to ofatumumab: one due to infusion-related adverse effects and another for logistical difficulties attending the hospital. At data cut-off, 100% of patients remained on treatment, with an average persistence of 13.8 months and maintaining the stability of the EDSS with an average of 2. Ofatumumab was well tolerated in most cases: the most frequent adverse event was a flu-like syndrome (5.6%) and isolated local reactions (&le;2%).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>In this real-world cohort, ofatumumab showed good tolerability and sustained clinical stability. These findings reinforce ofatumumab as an effective and convenient treatment option, particularly for patients requiring self-administered anti-CD20 therapy.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gonzalez Chavez, J., Dominguez Hernandez, A., Hernandez Perez, M., Villar Van Den Weygert, C., Contreras Martin, Y., Sole Violan, C., Ramos Santana, E., Suarez Gonzalez, M., Diaz Ruiz, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.264</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.264</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-162 Real-world evidence with ofatumumab in multiple sclerosis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A130</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A130</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A131-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-163 Comorbidities, polytherapy and drug-drug interactions in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia treated with targeted therapy]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A131-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>The use of Bruton&rsquo;s tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi) and BCL2 inhibitors (BCL2i) has revolutionised chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) treatment. CLL typically occurs in older patients, who have comorbidities and multiple medications in therapy and consequently potential clinically significant drug-drug interactions (DDI), which may have adverse effects on outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The aim of the study is to assess comorbidity and polytherapy in CLL patients treated with BTKi and BCL2i. Another aim is to determine potential clinically significant DDIs of these drugs.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A single-centre study was conducted over a 2-month period. The pharmacist obtained medication history. Data on comorbidities were obtained from medical records. The Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS) was calculated for each subject. Medication use was divided into the following categories: low drug use (&lt; 5 medications), polytherapy (5-9 medications) and excessive polytherapy (&ge; 10 medications). DDIs were analysed using the UpToDate Lexidrug.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The study included 59 subjects receiving ibrutinib (40.7%), acalabrutinib (30.5%), zanubrutinib (3.4%) or venetoclax (25.4%). 91.5% of them had at least one comorbidity and the median number of comorbidities was three. High comorbidity burden (CIRS &ge; 7) was found in 45.7% of patients. The most common comorbidity was arterial hypertension (54.2%), which was severe according to CIRS scale (value 3) in 25.4% of subjects. The median number of medications per patient was seven. Polytherapy was identified in 45.8% of subjects, and excessive polytherapy in 33.9%. At least one potential clinically significant DDI of BTKi was identified in 70.5% of patients, predominantly (95.7%) of significance level C. The most common consequence of BTKi DDIs was an increased risk of bleeding, recorded in 65.9% of patients taking BTKi. The most common interactants in those interactions were nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, followed by antiplatelet drugs, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and anticoagulants. At least one potential clinically significant DDI involving venetoclax was identified in 26.7% of patients, of which the majority (71.4%) were interactions with antidiabetic agents of significance level C, as venetoclax may decrease their therapeutic effects.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The incidence of polytherapy and DDIs is significant and should be regularly analysed in prescribed pharmacotherapy of CLL patients treated with targeted therapy.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Palajsa, A., Kuruc Poje, D., Marinovic, I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.265</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.265</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-163 Comorbidities, polytherapy and drug-drug interactions in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia treated with targeted therapy]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A131</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A131</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A131-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-164 Allelic frequency of CYP2D6, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, and CYP3A4 genetic variants in patients treated with antipsychotics and antidepressants]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A131-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Pharmacogenetics evaluates the influence of genetic variants (GV) on drug response, supporting personalised therapy to improve efficacy and reduce toxicity, particularly in patients treated with antidepressants or antipsychotics, where it can affect these outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To identify the most relevant GV in genes encoding major psychotropic drug-metabolising enzymes in our study population and compare their prevalence with European and Spanish reference frequencies, to support the implementation of European guidelines in clinical practice.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Observational, descriptive, prospective, and multidisciplinary study conducted in patients referred from the Psychiatry Department between May 2024 and August 2025. Collected variables include age, sex, diagnosis and genotyping of CYP3A4, CYP2C19, CYP2D6 and CYP2C9.</p><p>The analysed variants included rs4244285(*2), rs4986893(*3), and rs12248560(*17) of CYP2C19; rs1799853(*2) and rs1057910(*3) of CYP2C9; rs35599367(*22) of CYP3A4; rs1135840, rs16947, rs35742686(*3), rs3892097(*4), rs5030655(*6), rs5030656(*9), rs1065852(*10), rs28371706(*17), rs28371725(*41) and rs59421388(*29) of CYP2D6.</p><p>DNA samples were extracted from peripheral blood using the SaMag-12 system. Genetic variants were analysed by real-time PCR with TaqMan probes(QS1).</p><p>Genotyping was performed for the following variants depending on the patient&rsquo;s treatment.</p><p>Statistical analysis was performed using Stata 13.1.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 52 patients were included (50% male). The median age was 51.5 years (IQR 40.0&ndash;59.0). The median number of variants analysed per patient was 14 (IQR 14&ndash;15). Bipolar disorder was the most frequent diagnosis (78.9%), followed by psychotic disorders (13.5%).</p><p>The genotypic population frequency of WT patients was:</p><p>CYP2C19*2: 67.3%, CYP2C19*3: 100.0%, CYP2C19*17: 63.5%; CYP2C9*2: 59.3%, CYP2C9*3: 94.4%; CYP3A4*22: 90.4%; CYP2D6(rs1135840): 30.8%, CYP2D6(rs16947): 42.3%, CYP2D6*3: 100.0%, CYP2D6*4: 61.5%, CYP2D6*6: 98.1%, CYP2D6*9: 92.3%, CYP2D6*10: 59.6%, CYP2D6*17: 100.0%, CYP2D6*41: 82.7%, CYP2D6*29: 100.0%.</p><p>Statistically significant differences were observed only for CYP2D6*4, with a higher heterozygous frequency in our patients (38.5% vs 23.4%; p=0.025), and CYP2C9*3, with a higher wild-type (94.4% vs 83.2%; p=0.039) than in the Spanish reference population. No significant differences were found when compared with the European population.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The results show that our population generally follows European and Spanish genetic trends, except for CYP2D6*<I>4 and CYP2C9*</I>3 when compared with the Spanish population, possibly due to the small sample size. These findings highlight the importance of incorporating the analysis of these GV to optimise psychiatric treatment and improve outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gallen Soria, D., Sanchez-Fortun Vazquez, L., Gil Candel, M., Sierra San Miguel, P., Rojo Bofill, L., Dominguez Carabantes, A., Solana Altabella, A., Arnau Blasco, B., Chovi Trull, M., Boso Ribelles, V., Poveda Andres, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.266</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.266</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-164 Allelic frequency of CYP2D6, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, and CYP3A4 genetic variants in patients treated with antipsychotics and antidepressants]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A131</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A132</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A132-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-165 Real-world effectiveness and patient perception of mavacamten in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A132-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) is characterised by dynamic obstruction of the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT), disabling symptoms, and an increased risk of cardiovascular events. Mavacamten, a selective cardiac myosin modulator, has demonstrated improvements in hemodynamic parameters, functional class, and quality of life in patients with HOCM.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of mavacamten in real-world clinical practice, as well as the patients perception and degree of treatment satisfaction.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A descriptive, observational, and retrospective study was conducted including all HOCM patients treated with mavacamten who had completed at least six months of therapy. Collected variables included age, sex, toxic habits, CYP2C19 phenotype, presence of pharmacological interactions, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), resting and Valsalva LVOT gradients, dose titration, and the patient&rsquo;s subjective clinical assessment obtained through pharmacist interview. Data were extracted from the electronic medical record (Diraya) and the institutional pharmacotherapeutic management software (Farmatools).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Thirty patients were included (mean age 61.6 years; 43% women, 57% men). Toxic habits were reported in 36.7%. CYP2C19 phenotypes were intermediate in 77%, rapid in 17%, none poor, and 6% without available results. The initial dose was adjusted according to CYP2C19 phenotype: 2.5 mg for patients pending genetic testing and 5 mg for those with available results. After 6 months, final doses were 2.5 mg (14%), 5 mg (60%), 10 mg (13%), and 15 mg (13%). Pharmacological interactions were present in 50%, mainly with omeprazole. Mean LVEF decreased from 72% to 62%. The mean resting LVOT gradient decreased from 39 to 24 mmHg, and the Valsalva-induced gradient from 70 to 42 mmHg. After 6 months, 60% of patients reported subjective improvement, whereas 40% reported clinical worsening. Two patients discontinued treatment due to a drop in LVEF &lt; 55%, and 10 reported increased dyspnoea or fatigue.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and relevance</st><p>Mavacamten was associated with functional improvement and a significant reduction of LVOT obstruction in real-world HOCM patients. More than half of the patients reported treatment satisfaction and no adverse reactions. These findings support its use under close medical and pharmaceutical supervision to optimise dose titration and pharmacotherapeutic follow-up.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Quiros Ales, S., Montero Martin, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.267</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.267</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-165 Real-world effectiveness and patient perception of mavacamten in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A132</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A132</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A132-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-166 Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on digital health use in ambulatory onco-haematology: a hospital pharmacy-led study]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A132-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Digital health tools have gained relevance in cancer care, allowing patients to access health information and communicate more effectively with professionals. The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated this digital transformation, yet the extent of adoption among oncology patients remains unclear. Patients with oncohaematological diseases require continuous and personalised care, where digital literacy and technology use are crucial for safe and efficient treatment follow-up. Understanding how patients&rsquo; digital habits have evolved before and after the pandemic can guide strategies to promote validated and user-friendly digital tools.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate changes in the use of digital technologies among ambulatory oncohaematological patients receiving active treatment, and to explore their awareness, preferences, and willingness to use mobile health applications as a communication and self-management tool.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A cross-sectional study was conducted between August and December 2023 in oncohaematological outpatients receiving chemotherapy, immunotherapy, targeted therapy, or hormone therapy. The same 31-item questionnaire used in a 2017 baseline study was administered, assessing sociodemographic characteristics, use of digital devices, communication preferences, and perceived impact of the pandemic. Exclusion criteria were age below 18 years and language or cultural barriers. Data were analysed using Chi-squared and t-tests, with p&lt;0.05 considered significant.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 690 questionnaires were collected (mean age 59 years, 56% female). Smartphone use for health information increased from 73% to 90% (p&lt;0.005), and health app use rose from 20% to 54% (p&lt;0.001). Awareness of mobile applications improved (68% to 76%), while digitally uninformed patients decreased (23% to 15%). Preference for video calls as a communication method increased (19% to 32%), while email use declined. Importantly, 72% of patients expressed willingness to use a health app recommended by a professional.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Digital engagement among oncology patients significantly increased after the COVID-19 pandemic. Hospital pharmacists can play a pivotal role in ensuring safe and effective integration of digital tools into oncology care. Expanding the implementation of the existing onco-haematology app (OncoSalud) and developing pharmacist-led digital literacy programmes may enhance patient adherence, safety, and communication continuity.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Prieto Romero, A., Collado-Borrell, R., Escudero-Vilaplana, V., Dominguez Chaparro, G., Villanueva Bueno, C., Montero Anton, M., Rioja Diez, Y., Carrillo Burdallo, A., Gomez-Costas, D., Herranz Alonso, A., Sanjurjo Saez, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.268</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.268</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-166 Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on digital health use in ambulatory onco-haematology: a hospital pharmacy-led study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A132</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A132</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A133-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-167 Pre-exposure prophylaxis: socio-economic analysis]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A133-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is an antiretroviral therapy containing emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil used to prevent HIV infection. It can be administered as continuous daily dosing or on-demand (event-driven).</p><p>In 2023, the Italian Medicines Agency approved the reimbursement of PrEP by the National Health Service (NHS) for individuals at high risk of infection, based on a therapeutic plan prescribed by an infectious disease specialist.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The study aims to analyse PrEP-related data and evaluate the economic impact of its provision through the NHS between November 2023 and April 2025.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Data were extracted from the hospital information system and recorded by the pharmacy service.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 127 patients were included in the analysis, of whom three women and 124 men. Among them, 76% used PrEP on-demand, and 22% on a daily regime. At the time of the most recent dispensing age distribution was: 12% aged 18&ndash;28 years, 48% aged 29&ndash;40, 26% aged 41&ndash;48, and 15% aged 49 or older. Over the study period, 378 dispensing were recorded, with a minimum in February 2024 (1) and a maximum in January 2025 (39). Monthly public expenditure was also analysed, showing two peaks: a negative peak in February 2024 and a positive peak in January 2025, with an expenditure of 1,260. The total expense in the period is 7,419.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Data analysis showed that most PrEP users were men aged 29&ndash;40 years, predominantly following an on-demand regimen. The number of dispensings showed an overall upward trend, with temporary declines in February and December 2024 due to temporary drug shortages. Pharmaceutical expenditure mirrored this pattern and was further affected by a supplier change that doubled the cost per package. The increasing use of PrEP indicates growing awareness and advancement in HIV prevention efforts.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tatti, N., Rivano, M., Mureddu, V., Bertolino, G., Deidda, R., Cadeddu, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.269</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.269</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-167 Pre-exposure prophylaxis: socio-economic analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A133</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A133</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A133-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-168 Effectiveness, quality of life and safety of atogepant for migraine prophylaxis]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A133-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Atogepant inhibits calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptors involved in migraine development.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate atogepant effectiveness, quality of life and safety for adult migraine prophylaxis. Secondary endpoint: to assess atogepant effectiveness as third-line treatment in patients with prior failure of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies (mAb-antiCGRP).</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>One-year ambispective longitudinal study of patients initiating atogepant (July 2024-2025). Approved by the Ethics Committee in collaboration with the Neurology Department. Data were analysed with Wilcoxon and Mann&ndash;Whitney-U tests in STATA v.16.0.</p><p>Data collected: demographics, migraine classification and previous preventive treatment (PPT). Prospective follow-up at weeks 0 and 12 assessed migraine days/month (MDM), acute treatment days/month (TDM), intensity (0-10) and Headache Impact Test (HIT-6&ge;60=very severe impact). Adverse events (AEs) and treatment discontinuation.</p><p>Primary effectiveness variable: median MDM reduction. Secondary variables:% responders (&ge;1-day MDM reduction) and% patients with &ge;50% MDM reduction (50% MDM). Quality of life:% patients with &ge;5 HIT-6 reduction.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Forty-two patients (81% women), median age of 49 years (IQR: 41-55), 81% with chronic migraine (CM). Median PPT was 6 (IQR: 5-8): antidepressants (95%), antiepileptics (95%), botulinum toxin (83%), beta-blockers (71%) and calcium-antagonists (64%). The 64% (n=27) previously received mAb-antiCGRP: 2 (IQR:1-3). Median duration was 22 weeks (IQR:15-34), 18 patients discontinued (15 therapeutic failure, 3 AEs).</p><p>The 90% (n=38) reached 12 weeks of treatment. MDM median baseline was 23 days (IQR:13-30) vs 10 (IQR:3-30) post-12 weeks, (p=0.0001). A 58% (n=22) were responders, with a median MDM reduction of -10 (IQR:-13-(-6)). Of these, 50% (n=11) were third-line responders, with no difference in MDM reduction by prior mAb-antiCGRP failure (p=0.125).</p><p>TDM median baseline vs post-12 weeks was 20 (IQR:13-30) vs 7 (IQR: 3-20) (p=0.0001), intensity 9 (IQR: 8-10) vs 8 (IQR: 6-9) (p=0.0043) and HIT-6 72 (IQR: 65-76) vs 63 (IQR: 56-72) (p=0.0002), respectively. The 50% (n=19) achieved &ge;50% MDM and 53% (n=20) reduced &ge;5 HIT-6.</p><p>The 64% (n=27) experienced AEs: constipation (33%), fatigue (31%), nausea (29%) and weight loss (17%).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Most patients were women with CM and prior mAb&ndash;antiCGRP failure.</p></li><li><p>Atogepant led to a significant but modest MDM/TDM reduction, consistent with pivotal trials.</p></li><li><p>In responders, prior mAb&ndash;antiCGRP failure did not appear to worsen atogepant response.</p></li><li><p>Half achieved &ge;50% MDM, though quality of life impact remained very severe.</p></li><li><p>AEs were frequent but generally mild and manageable.</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gavilan Gigosos, H., Casarrubios Lazaro, G., Horta Hernandez, A., Barbero Jimenez, D., Heras Hidalgo, I., Baldominos Cordon, A., Marin Espinosa, I., Corrales Krohnert, S., Domenech Millan, A., Gomez Manrique, O., Rodriguez Garcia, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.270</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.270</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-168 Effectiveness, quality of life and safety of atogepant for migraine prophylaxis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A133</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A133</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A133-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-169 Therapeutic appropriateness in oncologic immunotherapy: the role and value of the hospital pharmacist]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A133-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>The Healthcare Management of our Centre, in 2024, established a technical working group aimed at monitoring the appropriateness of therapeutic decisions in oncology and ensuring the efficient use of available economic resources.</p><p>The pharmacy department in collaboration with the oncology Unit defined as inappropriate those treatments administered to patients who died by the disease within 30 days after the initiation of immunotherapy. Accordingly, the following indicator was identified: the number of patients who died within 30 days of starting therapy divided by the total number of patients initiating immunotherapy.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The aim of this study was to assess therapeutic appropriateness and decision making through the selected indicator and to quantify the economic impact of treatments considered inappropriate, as they proved to be clinically ineffective.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Data from electronic medical records were analysed to identify nai&#x0308;ve patients who received immunotherapy during 2023, and these were compared with nai&#x0308;ve patients treated in 2024. An Excel file was generated reporting, for each active substance, the patients who initiated immunotherapy during 2023 and 2024, the number of administrations received and the date of death. Subsequently, using our inventory management system, the treatment costs for patients who died within 30 days from the initiation of therapy were calculated.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>In 2023 and 2024 we used seven immunotherapeutic drugs: pembrolizumab (230 patients), durvalumab (45 patients), atezolizumab (45 patients), cemiplimab (22 patients), dostarlimab (5 patients), avelumab (15 patients), nivolumab (95 patients), ipilimumab (49 patients), tremelimumab (6 patients). In 2023 and 2024, 214 and 246 patients, respectively, initiated immunotherapy. Of these, 45 (21.03%) and 21 (8,5%) patients, respectively, died within 30 days of treatment initiation. The cost for these patients in 2023 and 2024, respectively, was 5.41% and 2.5% of the cost for all nai&#x0308;ve patients.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Immunotherapy has revolutionised the treatment of cancer patients; however, to enable as many patients as possible to benefit from the available therapies, it is essential that prescribing appropriateness criteria are carefully observed. We have to find indicators to evaluate ineffectiveness treatment. In this study, monitoring the selected indicator led to a reduction in inappropriate treatments and a more efficient use of available economic resources.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Giorgetti, S., Mandolesi, N., Morichetta, A., Spaccesi, F., Cioppettini, S., Montecchia, J., Scoccia, L., Cifani, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.271</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.271</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-169 Therapeutic appropriateness in oncologic immunotherapy: the role and value of the hospital pharmacist]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A133</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A134</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A134-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-171 Importance and impact of pharmaceutical medication reconciliation at admission in elderly polypharmacologic patients]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A134-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Medication reconciliation is essential for improving patient safety, particularly among elderly patients exposed to polypharmacy.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To describe the implementation of a pharmacist-led medication reconciliation process at hospital admission and to identify the type and frequency of reconciliation errors in elderly polymedicated patients admitted to the Internal Medicine Department (IMD).</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A prospective study was conducted from December 2024 to January 2025 as part of a pharmacist-led medication reconciliation project for patients admitted to the IMD. Eligible patients were aged over 65 years and taking more than five prescribed medications. Upon admission, a clinical pharmacist compared patients&rsquo; usual medications, listed in updated electronic prescriptions and clinical histories, with those entered in the hospital electronic prescribing system. Discrepancies were identified, documented, and classified according to the Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacy (SEFH) Consensus on medication reconciliation terminology and classification. Errors were grouped into dosage discrepancies, omissions, commissions, continuation of non-indicated or contraindicated medications, incomplete prescriptions, drug interactions, and duplications.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Medication reconciliation was performed in 153 patients (52% female; mean age 83.5 years, range 65&ndash;98). The mean number of medications per patient was 10.3 (range 5&ndash;19). A total of 44 unjustified discrepancies were identified; 43 were communicated to the responsible physician, and 37 were accepted (acceptance rate 86% of communicated discrepancies, 84% overall). The main discrepancy types were dosage discrepancies (47.7%) and omissions (38.6%). Therapeutic groups most frequently involved were psychotropics (7), anticoagulants (6), treatments for metabolic diseases (5), neurological disease therapies (4), antibiotics (3), gastrointestinal agents (2), chronic kidney disease treatments (2), analgesics (2), anti-inflammatory drugs (2), and others (11).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Medication discrepancies were common among elderly polymedicated patients at hospital admission. The inclusion of a clinical pharmacist in the admission process supported the systematic identification and resolution of discrepancies through interprofessional collaboration. These findings underline the relevance of structured medication reconciliation in daily clinical practice. Further controlled studies are required to assess its quantitative impact and comparative effectiveness.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gomez, N., Filardo, H., Gonzalez, A., Iraolagoitia, A., Elola, M., Navarro, F., Belio, B., Inclan, M., Vara, M., Aguirrezabal, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.272</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.272</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-171 Importance and impact of pharmaceutical medication reconciliation at admission in elderly polypharmacologic patients]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A134</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A134</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A134-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-172 Evaluation of the effectiveness of carboxymaltose iron treatment at hospital discharge]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A134-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>The prescription of iron carboxymaltose upon discharge is common in hospitals. It improves adherence and iron bioavailability in patients compared to the oral pharmaceutical form. However, in many cases, follow-up is insufficient, making it challenging to assess its effectiveness.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>Evaluate the efficacy of carboxymaltose iron treatment at hospital discharge and assess the subsequent analytical and clinical follow-up of the patient.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Retrospective observational study conducted between January and December 2024, that included inpatients who were administered iron carboxymaltose upon discharge from the hospital. The data collected were: age, sex, hospital readmission, baseline haematological parameters (haemoglobin, iron, ferritin, transferrin) and immediately after administration and treatment with oral iron. Information was obtained from digital medical records (Diraya), Dominion Farma Tools and Modulab. Patients with complete assessments were defined as those for whom baseline and post-treatment analytical values were available.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Carboxymaltose iron was administered to 85 patients (56.5% men, mean age 70.2 years). Eight patients did not meet inclusion criteria and were excluded.</p><p>An increase in mean haemoglobin was observed in 89.6% of patients (2.7 g/dL compared to the mean baseline value of 8.8 g/dL) and anaemia was reversed in 29.8% cases. Baseline and final iron data were obtained in 23 patients with a mean increase of 46.3 &micro;g/dL (baseline 31.5 &micro;g/dL, final 77.8 &micro;g/dL). Ferritin increased in 23 patients by an average of 298.9 ng/mL (baseline mean 245 ng/mL, final mean 543.9 ng/mL). Eighteen patients with complete transferrin assessment were observed, with a mean decrease of 38.6 mg/dL (baseline mean 237.5 mg/dL, final mean 198.9 mg/dL). Regarding oral iron, 23 patients had it prescribed prior to admission and 33 after discharge. During the study period, 37 patients were readmitted of whom 10 died, but no interrelation was found.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>-Administration of iron carboxymaltose improved haemoglobin and serum iron levels. -In almost two-thirds of patients, the therapeutic goal of reversing anaemia was not achieved, justified by a low baseline haemoglobin level. -Incomplete assessment of iron metabolism hinders optimal analytical monitoring.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Elena, C., Manuel, C., Elisa, P., Gil-Sierra, M., Jorge, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.273</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.273</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-172 Evaluation of the effectiveness of carboxymaltose iron treatment at hospital discharge]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A134</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A135</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A135-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-173 Therapeutic drug monitoring of dalbavancin: a step forward in personalised long-term therapy]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A135-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Dalbavancin is a long-acting lipoglycopeptide active against Gram-positive bacteria exhibiting rapid bactericidal activity. For difficult-to-treat infections, different dosing regimens have been proposed but limited comparative clinical pharmacokinetic (PK) data are available.</p><p>Although with limited evidence, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has been employed to extend dosing intervals while ensuring optimal drug exposure.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate, in a pilot TDM study, whether dalbavancin maintains sufficient plasma concentrations (Cp) at different time points after administration, potentially allowing extended dosing intervals.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Prospective PK study conducted in a tertiary hospital including all patients with dalbavancin TDM (November 2024&ndash;August 2025).</p><p>Demographic, clinical, PK and microbiological data were collected. Blood samples were obtained at various time points post-administration: &le;1 week, 1&ndash;2 weeks, 2&ndash;3 weeks, and &gt;3 weeks. A validated UPLD-MS/MS method was used.</p><p>Preclinical data suggest that a PK/PD target Cp above 4&ndash;8 mg/L before the next dose is sufficient to ensure efficacy against staphylococci (MIC &le;0.125 mg/L).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Twenty-two patients were included (50% women). Characteristics (median (range)): age 72 (28&ndash;95) years, Body Mass Index: 26.6(17.8&ndash;38.8) kg/m<sup>2</sup>, Charlson Index: 2 (0&ndash;6), baseline glomerular filtration rate: 80(31&ndash;119) mL/min, serum creatinine: 0.9(0.5&ndash;1.7) mg/dL.</p><p>Infection sites: osteoarticular (72.7%) and endovascular (27.3%). Targeted therapy was used in 20 patients (90.9%), being polymicrobial infections in seven (31.8%). Main microorganisms were: coagulase-negative staphylococci in 12 (41.4%) patients, MRSA in seven (24.1%), <I>E. faecalis</I> in four (13.8%), and MSSA in three (10.3%). MIC data were available for eight isolates (36.4%), of which 87.5% showed MIC &lt;0.125 mg/L (EUCAST clinical breakpoint).</p><p>Eighteen (81,8%) patients received a single dose (<cross-ref type="tbl" refid="T1">table 1</cross-ref>), while four received multiple doses (three on suppressive therapy).</p><p><tbl id="T1" loc="float"><no>Abstract 4CPS-173 Table 1</no><caption><p>Dalbavacin Cp following a single dose at different sampling times</p></caption><link locator="4CPS-173_T1"></tbl></p><p>The three patients on suppressive regimens received: 500 mg/2 weeks, 1500 mg/2 weeks and 1500 mg monthly achieving Cp of 25, 51, and 28 mg/L, respectively, before next administration. The last patient received two 1500-mg doses one week apart, reaching a Cp of 55.8 mg/L measured two weeks after the second dose.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>In this pilot TDM study, dalbavancin Cp after single or multiple doses remained well above the established threshold (8 mg/L). These results support the potential for extending dosing intervals to optimise treatment outcomes, patient convenience, and healthcare costs.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Torra Garcia, J., Bueno Uceda, R., Gomez-Junyent, J., Barquin, R., Comas Serrano, M., Perez Prieto, D., Alier Fabrego, A., Sorli Redo, M., Luque, S., Juanes Borrego, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.274</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.274</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-173 Therapeutic drug monitoring of dalbavancin: a step forward in personalised long-term therapy]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A135</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A135</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A135-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-174 Effectiveness and safety of abemaciclib in women with hormone receptor-positive, her-2-negative metastatic breast cancer: results in routine clinical practice]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A135-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Breast cancer (BC) is the most common malignant tumour in women worldwide and in Spain, with an estimated 286,664 cases in 2024. Despite therapeutic advances, early-stage high risk HR+/HER2&ndash; BC patients still face a 40% risk of developing incurable metastatic disease over 20 years. CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy have doubled progression-free survival. Approved agents include abemaciclib, palbociclib, and ribociclib. In the MONARCH 2 trial, abemaciclib increased overall survival by 9.4 months and reduced progression or death risk by 44.7%, with no significant impact on quality of life. Main adverse events include neutropenia, diarrhoea, elevated aminotransferases, and venous thromboembolism.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of abemaciclib in women diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer, hormone receptor-positive (HR+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2&ndash;), treated at the Regional University Hospital of M&aacute;laga.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>An observational, retrospective, single-centre study was conducted at the Regional University Hospital of M&aacute;laga (Hospital Pharmacy Service) from January 2021 to December 2024. Inclusion criteria: women aged 18&ndash;60 years, any race, with HR+/HER2&ndash; metastatic BC. Exclusion criteria: age &lt;18, other BC subtypes, additional malignancies, or marker-modifying treatments. Variables included epidemiological and clinical data, disease stage (I&ndash;IV), HER2, HR, Ca 15.3 (&gt;30 uU/ml), Ki67, and metastatic involvement. Treatment was abemaciclib 150 mg/12h, alone or combined with anastrozole, letrozole, or fulvestrant. Efficacy outcomes: overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and duration of response (DoR). Safety outcomes: adverse event incidence, dose reductions, and treatment delays.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Among 77 patients treated with abemaciclib, 13 (17%) had metastatic BC. Mean age was 52 years, all ER-positive/HER2&ndash;. Seventy-seven percent received abemaciclib as first-line therapy, most frequently with fulvestrant. At data cut-off, median OS was not reached; PFS lower limit was 16 months, ORR 84.6%, and mean DoR 382 days. Adverse events occurred in 85%, mainly neutropenia (46%) and diarrhoea (38%), leading to dose reductions (50%) and treatment delays (38%).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Abemaciclib, in combination with hormone therapy, is an effective and well tolerated treatment for HR+/HER2&ndash; metastatic BC. Larger multicentre studies are needed to confirm these findings and strengthen the evidence base.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fernandez, A. B., Lara Ramos, C., Diaz Perales, R., Del Rio Valencia, J., Jurado Romero, A., Martin Clavo, S., Rouco Blanco-Rajoy, M., Gallego Fernandez, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.275</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.275</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-174 Effectiveness and safety of abemaciclib in women with hormone receptor-positive, her-2-negative metastatic breast cancer: results in routine clinical practice]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A135</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A136</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A136-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-175 Consumption of watch and reserve antibiotics: a retrospective study in intensive care units]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A136-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>The inappropriate and excessive use of broad-spectrum antibiotics represents a critical public health issue, contributing to the emergence and spread of antimicrobial resistance. Intensive care units (ICUs) are particularly affected due to the frequent use of high-potency antibiotics to manage severe infections. According to the WHO AWaRe classification, the WATCH and RESERVE groups require close monitoring because of their potential to select resistant strains. Understanding local antibiotic consumption patterns is essential for implementing effective antimicrobial stewardship strategies and preserving the efficacy of last-resort agents.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This study aimed to evaluate the consumption of antibiotics belonging to the WHO WATCH and RESERVE groups in ICUs. Specific objectives were to describe prescription patterns, identify infection sites and isolated pathogens, and assess the degree of microbiological documentation supporting antibiotic use.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective, descriptive, and analytical study was carried out over three months (January&ndash;March 2023). All ICU patients who received at least one antibiotic from the WATCH or RESERVE groups were included. Data were collected from medical records and pharmacy dispensing databases. Parameters analysed included demographic data, indications, bacterial isolates, and antibiotic consumption expressed as Defined Daily Doses (DDD) per 1000 patient-days, calculated according to WHO methodology.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 263 prescriptions were analysed. The mean patient age was 56 years; 39% were aged 30&ndash;60 and 49% over 60, with a sex ratio (M/F) of 1.5. Antibiotic therapy was prophylactic in 43%, empirical in 40%, and based on microbiological documentation in 17%. The most frequent infection sites were bacteraemia (39%) and respiratory infections (35%). A total of 157 bacterial strains were isolated, mainly <I>Acinetobacter baumannii</I> (18%), <I>Escherichia coli</I> (16%), and coagulase-negative staphylococci (14%). WATCH-group consumption was higher (375 DDD/1000 patient-days) than RESERVE (59.9). Ceftriaxone and teicoplanin were most used (61 each), followed by levofloxacin (59) and ertapenem (53). Tigecycline was the leading RESERVE antibiotic (27.8 DDD/1000 patient-days).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>WATCH-group antibiotics accounted for most ICU prescriptions, consistent with international trends. Although RESERVE-group use remained appropriately limited, the low microbiological documentation rate highlights the need to reinforce diagnostic support and stewardship programs. Rationalising antibiotic use is essential to reduce resistance emergence and preserve the effectiveness of last-resort molecules.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aiteddouni, H., Benabbes, M., Yachi, L., Alami Chentoufi, M., El Marnissi, S., Ait El Cadi, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.276</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.276</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-175 Consumption of watch and reserve antibiotics: a retrospective study in intensive care units]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A136</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A136</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A136-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-176 Broad-spectrum antibiotic use: how pharmacist-led real-time reviews improved a third of prescriptions at day 6]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A136-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>The use of broad-spectrum antibiotics (BSA) contributes to the selection of resistant strains and in many clinical situations, there are narrower-spectrum alternatives available. In the context of an antimicrobial stewardship project, real-time reviews by clinical pharmacists (CP) working alongside infectious diseases specialists (IDS) could improve BSA prescriptions</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>Our aim was to improve and reduce the use of BSA in hospital settings by implementing an interdisciplinary intervention involving a clinical decision support system (CDSS) to identify patients on five-day BSA therapies.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>This multicentre prospective study was conducted in a tertiary teaching hospital and a secondary hospital. Both centres routinely used the same CDSS to screen 799 and 212 beds, respectively, in adult wards. This CDSS identified patients with prescriptions of piperacillin/tazobactam, cefepime, and carbapenems (meropenem, ertapenem, and imipenem/cilastatin) for at least five days. After antibiotic appropriateness assessment, clinical pharmacists could suggest several interventions to prescribers or to IDS, using decision making algorithms validated by both CP and IDS for each BSA class. When appropriate, IDS provided consultations to prescribers.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Over a 6-month period, the BSA therapies of 442 patients were assessed. Among them, 61% were admitted to surgical wards and 61% had previously received an IDS consultation. The most frequent indications for BSA treatment were intra-abdominal infections (33%), community- or hospital-acquired pneumonia (17%), community- or hospital-acquired urogenital infections (10%), and skin and soft tissue infections (10%). Following the CP&rsquo;s assessment, 174 interventions were made either directly to the prescriber (30%) or through an IDS consult (70%) and 141 (81%) were accepted and implemented within 24 hours. On average, the CP spent 17 &plusmn; 5 minutes per patient and the IDS 15 &plusmn; 7 minutes. The most frequent interventions proposed were defining an antibiotic treatment duration (26%), stopping antibiotic treatment (21%), referring to an IDS (18%), and de-escalating antibiotics (16%). This interdisciplinary intervention improved 32% of BSA therapies for the 442 patients included.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Our study demonstrated that an intervention driven by a CDSS and led by clinical pharmacists in collaboration with infectious disease specialists is an effective approach to improve and to reduce the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics in a hospital setting.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Feka, A., Abouir, K., Bochatay, L., Barbay, E., Stroffolini, G., Bellini, C., Papadimitriou, M., Senn, L., Blanc, A., Widmer, N., Voirol, P., Perrottet, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.277</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.277</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-176 Broad-spectrum antibiotic use: how pharmacist-led real-time reviews improved a third of prescriptions at day 6]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A136</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A137</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A137-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-177 Real-world use, persistence, and adherence to biologic therapies in hidradenitis suppurativa]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A137-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, recurrent inflammatory skin disorder that significantly impacts both physical and psychological well-being. Adalimumab was the first biologic approved for HS, with newer agents such as secukinumab and bimekizumab targeting the IL-17 pathway. Adherence and persistence to treatment are crucial for ensuring therapeutic efficacy and optimising health outcomes in hospital pharmacy settings.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To describe the profile of patients with HS treated with adalimumab, secukinumab, or bimekizumab, and to assess the persistence of these biologic therapies in a tertiary care hospital.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>This is a retrospective, observational, single-centre study of patients treated with biologics (adalimumab, secukinumab, or bimekizumab) for HS from 5 August 2015, to 29 August 2025. Data collected included: sex, age, treatment initiation and cessation dates, reason for treatment change, and adherence (defined as a possession rate &ge;90% based on dispensing records).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 119 patients with a mean age of 44 &plusmn; 12.0 years were included; 74 (62.2%) were male.</p><p>Of these, 81 (68.1%) were on their first-line of treatment, 36 (30.3%) had received two lines, and 2 (1.7%) had received three lines due to ineffectiveness or lack of response.</p><p>Currently, 75 patients (63.0%) are on adalimumab, 39 (32.8%) on secukinumab, and five (4.2%) on bimekizumab. Among those on adalimumab, 96.0% follow a weekly regimen, while 4.0% receive it biweekly; 53.8% of patients on secukinumab follow a monthly regimen, 38.5% biweekly, and 7.7% weekly. Of the bimekizumab patients, three follow a biweekly regimen, one a monthly regimen, and one a bimonthly regimen.</p><p>Adherence rates were high for adalimumab (86.6%), secukinumab (97.7%), and bimekizumab (80.0%).</p><p>The median persistence for adalimumab was 441 days (95% CI 299.6-582.4), secukinumab 245 days (95% CI 171.3-318.7), and bimekizumab 190 days (95% CI 13.1-458.4).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Adalimumab remains the most widely used and persistent treatment, while secukinumab stands out for its high adherence. These findings highlight the importance of hospital pharmacy monitoring to optimise patient outcomes and inform clinical decision making in biologic therapy selection.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Simal Lopez, R., Pinilla Rello, A., Perez Huerga, M., Chilet Rodrigo, E., De La Fuente Meira, S., Fernandez Alonso, E., Gimeno Gracia, M., Navarro Pardo, I., Bandres, M. A., Lozano Ortiz, J., Salvador Gomez, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.278</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.278</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-177 Real-world use, persistence, and adherence to biologic therapies in hidradenitis suppurativa]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A137</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A137</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A137-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-178 Pharmaceutical interventions based on a proactive therapeutic drug monitoring strategy for infliximab, adalimumab and ustekinumab in the management of inflammatory bowel disease]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A137-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is broadly used in the management of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Proactive strategy, which involves regularly scheduled measurements of drug levels and anti-drug antibodies, even when the patient is asymptomatic, is increasingly used to guide dose adjustments, maintain optimal drug exposure, and prevent future treatment issues.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To analyse the experience of a proactive TDM approach for infliximab (IFX), adalimumab (ADA) and ustekinumab (UST) in patients with Crohn&rsquo;s disease (CD) or Ulcerative colitis (UC), and to assess the acceptance of the pharmaceutical recommendations.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Prospective, single-centre study including patients with IBD treated with IFX, ADA or UST from April 2025 to September 2025. TDM was performed using the population pharmacokinetic models of S&aacute;nchez-Hern&aacute;ndez (2019), S&aacute;nchez-Hern&aacute;ndez (2020) and Xu et al (2020) for IFX, ADA and UST, respectively, through the software PKS. Variables recorded: demographic (sex and age), drug, sort of intervention (reinduction, dose change, shorten the dosing interval, treatment switch, and to measure a new trough serum concentration), and acceptance rate of the pharmaceutical interventions.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>During the study period, 48 patients were included, 26 (54.2%) female. The median (interquartile range (IQR)) age was 47 (33-63) years. Most patients had CD (81.3%) and nine had UC. Twenty-seven patients were treated with IFX (56.3%), 12 with ADA (25.0%) and nine with UST (18.7%). The main interventions in patients treated with IFX were to shorten the dosing interval (37,0%), to measure an additional through level (33.3%), and to increase the dose (22,2%). In the case of ADA, the most repeated interventions were to measure a new trough serum concentration (33.3%), to shorten the dosing interval (33.3%) and to restart the drug (25.0%). In patients with ustekinumab, the main interventions were to shorten the dosing interval (55.6%) and to restart ustekinumab (33.3%).</p><p>The total degree of acceptance of the recommendations was 79.2%.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Proactive TDM approach involves a range of pharmaceutical interventions, with a high degree of acceptance among prescribing physicians. Future research will be essential in our hospital to determine whether proactive strategies effectively have an impact on pharmacological treatment outcomes in patients with IBD.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fernandez Rubio, B., Garcia Munoz, C., Vaquer Ferrer, C., Martinez De La Torre, F., Bertran De Lis Bartolome, B., Del Palacio Garcia, P., Ferrari Piquero, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.279</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.279</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-178 Pharmaceutical interventions based on a proactive therapeutic drug monitoring strategy for infliximab, adalimumab and ustekinumab in the management of inflammatory bowel disease]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A137</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A138</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A138-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-179 Real-world outcomes ibrutinib and venetoclax combination therapy in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A138-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Ibrutinib is a Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor, while venetoclax is a selective inhibitor of the anti-apoptotic protein B-cell lymphoma 2. The combination of ibrutinib and venetoclax (I+V) is approved for first-line treatment in adults with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL).</p><p>The complementary mechanism of action is based on ibrutinib mobilising leukaemic cells from lymph nodes to peripheral blood, where they are susceptible to venetoclax-induced apoptosis.</p><p>The I+V regimen consists of three 28-day cycles of ibrutinib monotherapy, followed by the addition of venetoclax from cycle four onwards, using a recommended dose ramp-up schedule. Treatment duration is fixed at 15 cycles (three of ibrutinib alone + 12 of I+V).</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>Given the limited availability of real-world data, this study aimed to evaluate response outcomes of I+V in clinical practice.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A prospective analysis was conducted on patients with CLL initiating I+V therapy across four hospitals between May 2023-August 2025. All patients meet treatment criteria as per the International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia (iwCLL2018).</p><p>Responses were evaluated every 3 months according to iwCLL2018 criteria, incorporating clinical, haematological, radiological, and minimal residual disease assessments. Responses were categorised as complete remission (CR), partial remission (PR), stable disease (SD), or progressive disease (PD).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Seventeen patients were included, with a median age of 66.5 years (range 43&ndash;84); 43.8% were over 70-years-old. Immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region mutation status was mutated in 31.25% of cases.</p><p>At the most recent evaluation 56.25% (n=9) achieved CR, 12.5% (n=2) achieved PR, one patient had SD, and one progressed, developing Richter&rsquo;s transformation. At the study cut-off date, it was not possible to assess the response in the two remaining patients, as the follow-up time is insufficient.</p><p>Among those who achieved CR, 33.3% reached it within 3 months from the start, 22.2% at 6 months, 22.2% at 12 months, 11.11% at 15 months, and 11.11% at 18 months.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The I+V regimen demonstrated high rates of complete and partial remission, consistent with clinical trial data regarding deep responses, minimal residual disease negativity, and durable survival outcomes. Ongoing follow-up will provide further insights upon treatment completion.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ortega, P., Caballero, J., Martos, R., Bermejo, L., Miranda, C., Perez, M., Becares, F., Cordoba, R., Bazan, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.280</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.280</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-179 Real-world outcomes ibrutinib and venetoclax combination therapy in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A138</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A138</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A138-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-180 Palivizumab vs nirsevimab: monoclonal antibodies for respiratory syncytial virus prophylaxis - a comparative analysis of consumption and costs in a hospital setting]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A138-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Palivizumab and nirsevimab are monoclonal antibodies for RSV prophylaxis, differing in mechanism, indications, duration, administration, and cost. Nirsevimab provides single-dose seasonal protection, simplifying logistics and increasing coverage.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To compare hospital consumption and direct pharmaceutical costs of palivizumab and nirsevimab in neonates, assessing economic efficiency. Clinical effectiveness and safety were not evaluated.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Retrospective pharmacoeconomic analysis over two RSV seasons. 2023/2024: 46 infants received palivizumab monthly for 5 months; 2024/2025: 292 infants received a single dose of nirsevimab. Drug consumption was measured as vials dispensed. Costs were based on hospital acquisition prices; only drug costs included.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Total expenditure for palivizumab (2023/2024) was 227,656 (77 vials 0.5 mL + 93 vials 1 mL). Nirsevimab (2024/2025) cost 75,900 (300 vials), representing 33.34% of palivizumab expenditure, a 72.5% reduction, while covering a 534% larger cohort.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Nirsevimab provides substantial budget savings and broader prophylaxis coverage compared with palivizumab. Its single-dose schedule demonstrates greater economic efficiency in the hospital setting, despite the absence of clinical outcome data.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Monti, I., Addeo, D., Filoso, I., Griffo, A., Di Girolamo, V., De Liso, M., Iacolare, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.281</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.281</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-180 Palivizumab vs nirsevimab: monoclonal antibodies for respiratory syncytial virus prophylaxis - a comparative analysis of consumption and costs in a hospital setting]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A138</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A138</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A139-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-181 Triplet versus doublet therapies in the treatment of de novo metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer according to tumour burden]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A139-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Triplet therapies combining darolutamide (ARASENS) or abiraterone (PEACE-1) with docetaxel and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) have shown improved survival versus doublet therapies in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC), particularly in de novo cases. However, subgroup analyses showed survival benefit mainly in patients with high tumour burden (CHAARTED criteria: &ge;4 bone metastases, &ge;1 outside the axial skeleton or visceral metastases), with no statistical differences compared to low tumour burden.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To compare the effectiveness of triplet therapies versus doublet therapies in de novo mHSPC, both overall and in high and low tumour burden subgroups (CHAARTED criteria).</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>We conducted a retrospective, observational, multicentre study at two tertiary hospitals (September 2015&ndash;September 2025). Patients with de novo mHSPC were included. Baseline variables included age, tumour burden, Gleason score, ECOG status, PSA, and treatment. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analysed using log-rank tests and Cox regression for subgroup analyses (SPSS ).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>114 patients were included: 74 received doublet therapies and 40 triplet therapies. Baseline characteristics were: age of 71 (65&ndash;78) vs 65 (59&ndash;71) years (p=0,041); high tumour burden in 69% vs 70% (p=0.91); Gleason &ge;8 in 63% vs 79% (p=0.086); ECOG &ge;2 in 12% vs 0% (p=0.025); baseline PSA of 73 (31-261) vs 48 (17-133) ng/mL (p=0.97). Among triplets, 73% received abiraterone and 27% darolutamide. Among doublets, 32% received abiraterone, 31% apalutamide, 26% enzalutamide, and 11% docetaxel. Median PFS and OS were 32 and 50 months, respectively, in the doublet group and were not reached in the triplet group. No significant differences were observed in OS (p=0.658) or PFS (p=0.285) between groups. Cox regression revealed no differences between high and low-burden subgroups (OS p=0.52; PFS p=0.277).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>In this cohort, no significant differences in PFS or OS were observed between triplet and doublet therapies, nor between high and low-burden subgroups. Therefore the benefit of triplet therapy in low-burden disease cannot be excluded. However, limited follow-up among triplet-treated patients is the main study limitation. Longer-term observational studies are warranted to further evaluate this hypothesis.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pena Ogayar, A., Calero Riveiro, A., Magdalena Perez, A., Garcia Gil, S., Morales Barrios, J., De Leon Gil, J., Fernandez Ferreiro, A., Gonzalez, A. C., Diaz Ruiz, M., Gutierrez Nicolas, F., Nazco Casariego, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.282</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.282</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-181 Triplet versus doublet therapies in the treatment of de novo metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer according to tumour burden]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A139</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A139</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A139-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-183 PENS BioWave in neuropathic and post-traumatic pain]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A139-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Non-invasive neuromodulation represents an emerging therapeutic option for chronic neuropathic and post-traumatic pain, offering clinically meaningful analgesia with fewer systemic adverse effects. The Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (PENS) BioWave System uses micro-piercing transcutaneous electrodes delivering alternating high-frequency impulses that generate an active low-frequency field capable of inhibiting pain transmission. Within the multidisciplinary pain team, the hospital pharmacist has a central role in reviewing analgesic therapy, supporting deprescribing, monitoring outcomes, and educating patients on safe medication use.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the BioWave PENS system over a 3-week treatment protocol regarding pain reduction, improvement of functional outcomes and activities of daily living (ADLs), patient satisfaction, and changes in analgesic consumption. A secondary objective was to describe the contribution of the hospital pharmacist in therapeutic optimisation, medication review, and follow-up.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>This open-label study was conducted from January 2024 to March 2025 in a tertiary Pain Therapy Centre (HUB). Three hundred patients with chronic pain were prescribed the non-invasive neuromodulation system and invited to participate in a structured 3-week follow-up. Collected outcomes included overall pain scores, patient satisfaction, intention to continue treatment, analgesic and opioid use, functional measures, and ADLs. The hospital pharmacist performed medication reconciliation, assessed appropriateness of analgesic therapy, monitored dosage adjustments, supported deprescribing where indicated, and documented changes in pharmacological burden and patient-reported outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Across the treated conditions&ndash;including back pain, pre-sacral pain, post-mastectomy pain, intractable headaches, post-herpetic neuralgia, trigeminal and facial neuralgia, cervicobrachialgia, diabetic neuropathy, and shoulder pain&ndash;the BioWave system produced a mean pain reduction of 65% for back pain and 50% across all other indications. A 45% reduction in opioid and analgesic consumption was observed, supported by pharmacist-led optimisation. Quality of life and ADL improvements were reported in 82.2% of patients.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The BioWave PENS system demonstrated meaningful clinical benefits in pain reduction, functional improvement, and reduction in medication burden. The hospital pharmacist&rsquo;s involvement was essential for optimising analgesic therapy, ensuring safe deprescribing, and integrating neuromodulation into personalised pain-management pathways</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. Knotkova H, <I>et al</I>. Neuromodulation for chronic pain-Rossi M, et al. A Novel Mini-invasive Approach to the Treatment of Neuropathic Pain: The PENS Study-Panchal, J. Pergolizzi.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Addeo, D., Iacolare, M., Monti, I., Filoso, I., Di Girolamo, V., De Liso, M., Perugini, D., Russo, M., Vaccarella, A., Vassetti, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.283</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.283</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-183 PENS BioWave in neuropathic and post-traumatic pain]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A139</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A140</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A140-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-184 Antidiabetic treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes: assessment of appropriateness to the latest national guidelines]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A140-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Recent guidelines for type 2 diabetes (T2D) have shifted from HbA1c-centred targets to drug selection based on the patient&rsquo;s predominant clinical condition to reduce morbidity and mortality. Nevertheless, many patients still receive outdated regimens not aligned with current recommendations.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the appropriateness of chronic antidiabetic treatment in adults with T2DM according to the most recent national guidelines, based on their predominant clinical condition.</p><p>To analyse whether differences in appropriateness exist depending on the predominant clinical condition.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A three-month prospective observational study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital. Inclusion criteria: adults with T2DM and a prescribed home antidiabetic treatment at admission. Variables: age, sex, BMI, history of cardiovascular disease (CVD), high cardiovascular risk (CVR), stroke, heart failure (HF), chronic kidney disease (CKD), frailty, estimated glomerular filtration rate, last HbA1c value, and prescribed antidiabetic drugs. High CVR was defined as &ge;3 of: hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia, smoking, albuminuria, or family history of CVD.</p><p>Patients were randomly selected from inpatients with T2DM under treatment. Clinical data and prescription drugs were retrieved from electronic health records.</p><p>Patients were classified into six groups according to their predominant condition: CVD/high CVR, HF, CKD, frailty, obesity, or none. Appropriateness was defined as concordance between prescribed drugs and recommendations of the 2023 Spanish redGDPS and the 2025 Spanish Society of Internal Medicine.</p><p>Data collection and analysis were performed using Excel. Categorical variables were statistically analysed with absolute frequencies; quantitative variables with mean or median depending on distribution (Kolmogorov&ndash;Smirnov test). Differences in appropriateness among groups were assessed with the Chi-squared test.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Among 124 patients (62.3% male, mean age 74.2 years &plusmn;11.4), overall appropriateness of antidiabetic treatment was 64/124 (51.6%).</p><p>Appropriateness by group was: CVD or high CVR 15/36, HF 6/10, CKD 10/21, frailty 10/21, obesity 6/10, and 17/20 for patients without any predominant condition. Significant differences (p = 0.0324; p &lt; 0.05) between groups.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Antidiabetic treatment showed a moderate degree of appropriateness to national guidelines, with particularly low rates in patients with comorbidities, especially CVD/high CVR, HF, and CKD. Significant differences between groups highlight the need to prioritise optimisation strategies in patients with lower adherence to recommendations to improve clinical outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martinez-Garcia, A., Perez Menendez-Conde, C., Rodriguez Sagrado, M., Alvarez-Diaz, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.284</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.284</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-184 Antidiabetic treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes: assessment of appropriateness to the latest national guidelines]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A140</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A140</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A140-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-186 Effectiveness, safety and patient-reported satisfaction of autologous serum eye drops in refractory ocular diseases: a real-world study]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A140-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Autologous serum eye drops (ASED) are a therapeutic option for severe ocular surface diseases, especially in patients unresponsive to conventional treatments. Their composition, similar to natural tears, promotes healing and symptom&rsquo;s relief. However, evidence on safety and patient satisfaction in real-world practice is scarce.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the impact of ASED on visual acuity (VA), ocular symptoms, safety, and patient-reported satisfaction in refractory ocular diseases in real-world practice.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Retrospective and observational study including patients &ge;18 years treated with ASED (August 2023&ndash;August 2024) for severe dry eye, Sjo&#x0308;gren&rsquo;s syndrome, corneal injury, or other refractory ocular diseases. Data collected: demographics, diagnosis, VA, ocular symptoms and adverse events (AE). Effectiveness was assessed through change in VA and patient-reported symptom improvement at baseline and after 6 months. Safety was evaluated via reported AE. Satisfaction was measured by the validated questionnaire Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM v1.4, Spanish version), via telephone, scoring four domains (effectiveness, side effects, convenience, global satisfaction; scale 0&ndash;100; positive &ge;75). Statistical analysis included descriptive measures and pre&ndash;post comparisons.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Thirty-nine patients were included (89.7% female; mean age 66 &plusmn; 11.5 years). Diagnoses: dry eye (n=22), Sjo&#x0308;gren&rsquo;s syndrome (n=7), corneal injury (n=7), others (n=2). Thirty-five patients had completed VA data. Overall, 40% showed general VA improvement and 40% remained stable. Symptom relief was reported by 71.8% of patients, including improvement in dryness (n=10), foreign body sensation (n=6), itching (n=4), pain (n=4), irritation (n=3) and corneal ulcers (n=1). No AE were reported. TSQM scores (n=34) were: effectiveness 76.8 &plusmn; 24.3 (67.6% &ge;75), side effects 100 &plusmn; 0.0 (100% &ge;75), convenience 77.8 &plusmn; 16.4 (58.8% &ge;75), global satisfaction 84.9 &plusmn; 23.8 (85.3% &ge;75).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>In real-world practice, ASED achieved high patient-reported satisfaction and significant symptom relief in refractory ocular diseases, with an excellent safety profile, even without measurable VA changes. These findings support ASED as a valuable therapeutic option for patients with limited alternatives and highlight the importance of incorporating patient-reported outcomes in routine ophthalmic care.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marquez-Seglar, C., Martinez-Rodriguez, L., Almendros-Abad, N., Segui Solanes, C., Fernandez-Navarro, A., Cano-Alonso, M., Val Prat, L., Rudi Sola, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.285</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.285</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-186 Effectiveness, safety and patient-reported satisfaction of autologous serum eye drops in refractory ocular diseases: a real-world study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A140</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A140</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A141-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-187 Integration of clinical pharmacists into the therapeutic education program of lung transplant patients: feedback and perspectives]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A141-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Clinical pharmacists play a key role in supporting complex patients such as lung transplant patients (LTPs).</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>We would like to describe the integration of clinical pharmacists in therapeutic patient education for LTPs through pharmaceutical consultations (PCs).</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>This is a retrospective study conducted from January to September 2025. We collected data on the characteristics of the PCs and the LTPs&rsquo; knowledge of their post-transplant treatment. Following multidisciplinary meetings, 3 PCs were implemented: PC1 was informative, using a table modelling an interactive medication plan; PC2 allowed patients to mobilise their knowledge using Barrows cards and PC3 provided medication information sheets before patients returned home.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>We included 35 patients, representing 100% of the cohort of patients who received a lung transplant during the study period. The male-to-female ratio was 1.9 and the average age was 57 years. 100% were on tacrolimus and corticosteroids and 97% were on mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). A total of 89 PC were conducted with an average of 2.5 PC per patient at 2 months post-transplant: 100% received a PC1, 91% a PC2, and 63% a PC3. Each of the three PC was performed with an average time of 43 minutes. During PC2, respectively 78% and 65% were aware of the importance of immunosuppressants and prophylaxis treatments. 87% were aware of how to take the medication and 90% of the importance of dosing and blood tests. The subject of procreation was discussed in 54% of women of childbearing age and men</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>All patients who had received a lung transplant were seen by the clinical pharmacist. Most of them were seen twice or more if necessary. PC3 was not conducted systematically as it was often combined with PC2. The key points concerning post-transplant medications were discussed and appear to have been well understood by patients following PC1. The subject of procreation was not discussed systematically, even though the majority of patients are on MMF and are concerned about its teratogenic risk. A review of the organisation should be carried out to enable all patients to benefit from at least two PC and to address the subject of procreation in a systematic manner.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Delmas Saint Hilaire, A., Kindele-Bamuadila, L., Le Grand, J., Veyrier, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.286</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.286</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-187 Integration of clinical pharmacists into the therapeutic education program of lung transplant patients: feedback and perspectives]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A141</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A141</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A141-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-188 Use of intranasal esketamine for treatment-resistant major depressive disorder]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A141-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Intranasal esketamine has been recently approved for the management of treatment-resistant major depressive disorder.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This study aimed to evaluate whether intranasal esketamine use met funding criteria and its combination with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) or selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) in adults aged 18&ndash;74 years unresponsive to at least three antidepressant strategies. Efficacy was assessed using the Montgomery-&Aring;sberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS scale) at baseline and treatment end. Outcomes were classified as failure (&lt;30% reduction), partial response (30&ndash;50%), or remission (score &le;10). Safety was evaluated by the percentage of patients experiencing adverse effects.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>This retrospective observational study included patients treated with intranasal esketamine at a tertiary hospital (December 2021&ndash;March 2024). Data collected were: age, sex, SSRI/SNRI combination, prior treatments, treatment duration, MADRS score, and adverse effects. Qualitative variables were reported as frequencies and percentages, and quantitative as median and interquartile range (IQR).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 30 patients were included: 19 (63.3%) completed treatment, 10 (33.3%) remained under treatment, and 1 (3.3%) awaited evaluation. Median treatment duration was 8 months (IQR: 0&ndash;13). 15 patients (50%) were women, and median age was 56 years (IQR: 28&ndash;76). 24 patients (80%) had received &ge;3 previous antidepressant lines. The median number of esketamine sessions was 24 (IQR: 2&ndash;34), and 13 (43.3%) received treatment for &gt;6 months. Almost all (90%) received intranasal esketamine with an SSRI or SNRI, most frequently venlafaxine (51.8%). Regarding efficacy, 13 (43.3%) showed no response, 4 (13.3%) partial response, and 5 (16.6%) remission; data were unavailable for 8 (26.6%). Regarding safety, the following adverse effects were reported: dizziness in 25 patients (83.3%), headache in 6 patients (20%), dissociation in 2 patients (6.6%), nausea and drowsiness, both in 11 patients (36.6%), vertigo in 1 patient (3.3%), and increased blood pressure in 10 patients (33.3%).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The use of intranasal esketamine in our hospital generally aligns with the established funding criteria. In terms of efficacy, although a significant proportion of patients did not achieve remission, a notable number showed partial responses. Regarding safety, while esketamine may represent a valid therapeutic option, its efficacy and safety profile should be carefully evaluated on a case-by-case basis.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barba Llacer, M., Gutierrez Gutierrez, E., Velilla Diez, L., Velez Blanco, A., Llamas Lorenzana, S., Ortega Valin, L., Casas Fernandez, X., Ayala Alvarez Canal, J., Flores Fernandez, M., Fernandez Vazquez, A., Ortiz De Urbina Gonzalez, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.287</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.287</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-188 Use of intranasal esketamine for treatment-resistant major depressive disorder]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A141</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A141</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A141-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-189 Pharmacological vitamin D substitution is required beyond standard nutrition formulas to correct hypovitaminosis in critically ill trauma patients]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A141-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Deficiency of vitamin D is common among severe injury victims and hypovitaminosis is associated to unfavourable outcome however, the need and method of regular vitamin D supplementation is not clear.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>Aim of our study was to assess the effect of standard clinical nutrition interventions on vitamin D levels during long-term clinical nutrition and to test a clinical pharmacologist initiated enteral supplementation formula to correct low vitamin D levels.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Single-centre, prospective, observational study. Only adult, major trauma patients admitted to intensive care unit and requiring long-term (&gt;2 weeks) clinical nutrition were involved. Demographic, clinical data, nutritional status (NRS-2002), method and length of clinical nutrition and outcome parameters were registered. Vitamin D level was measured by central lab (ABBOTT Immunoassay) at day 1, 7, 14, 28. Vitamin D supplementation was performed enterally by 100.000 international unit cholecalciferol (4x25.000 IU vitamin D3, Fresenius Kabi). Statistical analysis: Mann&ndash;Whitney test, Chi-squared test (p&lt;0.05).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>We enrolled 57 patients (84% men, median age 51, median BMI 26). Majority of them suffered major multiple trauma (median ISS: 25). Malnutrition (NRS &gt; 3) at admission was detected in 31% of patients. Median LOS in ICU was 13 days and a 25% mortality was observed. Enteral nutrition was applied in 94%, parenteral in 38% and oral supplementation in 38% of patients. Energy and protein goals were achieved in 82% and 75% of the treatment days. Standard, factory-based formulas were used. Vitamin D deficiency was detected in 39% of patients. Vitamin D level increased only in 45% of patients, but deficiency was corrected only in 35% of cases by standard care. In a subset of patients admitted with low vitamin D level (n=23; vitamin D = 21 nmol/l), a single dose of 100.000 unit cholecalciferol corrected the hypovitaminosis state in 22/23 patients within 5 days.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Vitamin D deficiency is common in intensive care unit. Standard clinical nutrition is sufficient to maintain normal vitamin levels, but unable to correct deficiency. Vitamin D therapy might be required in patients admitted with low vitamin D levels and a single dose of enteral 100.000 IU cholecalciferol seems to be efficient enough to normalise vitamin D levels in critically ill trauma patients.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nardai, G., Ferdinandy, C., Szilvay, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.288</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.288</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-189 Pharmacological vitamin D substitution is required beyond standard nutrition formulas to correct hypovitaminosis in critically ill trauma patients]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A141</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A142</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A142-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-190 Duration of hospital stay according to the timing of parenteral nutrition initiation in patients undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A142-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Patients undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) may experience post-chemotherapy mucositis and are at risk of protein-calorie malnutrition, thus requiring parenteral nutrition (PN). Scientific evidence in surgical patients suggests that early administration of PN tends to reduce hospital stay.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To analyse whether early initiation of parenteral nutrition influences the duration of hospital stay in patients undergoing allo-HSCT.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>An observational, analytical, ambispective study was conducted in the Pharmacy Department of a reference General Hospital from January 2023 to September 2025. Patients undergoing allo-HSCT and receiving PN were included. The following variables were recorded: demographic and anthropometric data, admission and discharge dates, date of haematopoietic stem cell infusion, start and end day of PN, and serum prealbumin measurements. Patients were divided into two groups: those who started PN within the first week post-infusion (early-PN) and those who started after one week (delayed-PN). The median and interquartile range (IQR) of hospitalisation days for both groups were calculated and statistical significance was analysed using the Mann&ndash;Whitney U test (SPSS v28).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 47 patients were enrolled in the study. In the early-PN group, 25 patients (72.0% male) were included, with a median age of 59 years (14&ndash;70), a mean BMI of 25.5 kg/m<sup>2</sup> &plusmn; 3.6 and a mean prealbumin level of 15 mg/dl &plusmn; 5. In the delayed-PN group, 22 patients (52.6% male) were included, with a median age of 61 years (24&ndash;69), a mean BMI of 23.7 kg/m<sup>2</sup> &plusmn; 5.5 and a mean prealbumin level of 15 mg/dl &plusmn; 5. The median hospital stay in the early-PN group was 34 &plusmn; 13 days and in the delayed-PN group 33 &plusmn; 4 days, with no statistically significant differences (p = 0.74).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>In this limited cohort, early initiation of parenteral nutrition in patients undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation wouldn&rsquo;t appear to influence the duration of hospital stay.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roso Jimenez, N., Lopez Alvarez, M., Perales Cia, I., Romera Perez, C., Lorenzo Vidal, L., Garcia Paris, I., Perez Lopez, R., Gonzalez Alvarez-Cedron, C., Gonzalez Zar, C., Rodriguez Sanchez, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.289</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.289</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-190 Duration of hospital stay according to the timing of parenteral nutrition initiation in patients undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A142</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A142</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A142-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-191 Steady-state concentrations of clarithromycin under different routes of administration in pneumonia: risk factors and clinical outcomes]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A142-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Appropriate antibiotic dosage is crucial for improving outcomes in critically ill patients facing pneumonia.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>Our research aimed to evaluate the development of the steady-state concentration (Css) of clarithromycin (CLAR) in this specific patient population with different routes of administration, to identify the influencing factors, and to examine the relationship between clinical outcomes and Css.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>This study was conducted as a single-centre prospective observational study in the ICU of a pulmonology department between 2 February 2025 and 30 September 2025. The study target group included all adult patients (n=65) treated primarily with empirical CLAR (500mg two times a day, n=63 cases; corrected to kidney function, n=2 cases) due to pneumonia. Blood sample collection was performed on day 3 of the CLAR administration, when 4 samples were taken as follows: at steady-state before drug administration and 1, 2, and 3 hours after intravenous (IV), oral (PO), and nasogastric (NG) drug administration. Determination of CLAR serum concentrations was determined by LC-MS/MS using a CLAR European Pharmacopoeia Reference Standard by Merck. The study received ethics approval (DE RKEB/IKEB: 7094-2025).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>CLAR serum levels followed the expected pharmacokinetics for all three routes of administration. The CLAR Css was 4.3-fold higher for PO (n=30) than for IV (n=20) administration and 2.99-fold higher for NG (n=15) administration (6.13 vs 1.41 &mu;g/ml and 6.13 vs 2.05 &mu;g/ml, p&lt;0.05). Severe reduction of CrCl (59-10 ml/min) increased serum levels for all administration routes. CLAR serum levels increased proportionally with increasing albumin serum levels (as the faster clearance of the free fraction resulted in lower serum levels, especially for IV) and with the increasing CCI (Charles Comorbidity Index). No significant difference in length of stay (LOS) and in survival was found between IV and PO administration (80 and 84%); however, the probability of survival was significantly lower (50%) in the case of NG administration.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>PO administration presented the highest Css levels. CrCl, albumin levels, and CCI were found to be influencing factors of Css. PO and IV administration resulted in similar clinical outcomes; however, the lower survival rate associated with higher Css values in the case of NG administration requires further investigation.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fesu&#x0308;s, A., Kovacs, E., Szilagyi, Z., Bak, I., Bacskay, I., Lekli, I., Vasko, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.290</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.290</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-191 Steady-state concentrations of clarithromycin under different routes of administration in pneumonia: risk factors and clinical outcomes]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A142</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A143</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A143-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-192 Effectiveness and safety of inclisiran in real clinical practice]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A143-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Inclisiran is a chemically synthesised small interfering RNA that inhibits PCSK9 synthesis, increasing LDL receptor recycling and expression, which reduces circulating LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. It is indicated for adults with primary hypercholesterolaemia (heterozygous familial and non-familial) or mixed dyslipidaemia.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of inclisiran in patients with primary hypercholesterolaemia or dyslipidaemia.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Retrospective observational study that included all patients who received inclisiran treatment from January 2024 to April 2025. Variables analysed included sex, age, medical history, prior biologic therapy, number of doses administered, baseline LDL-C, LDL-C at the time of the last available laboratory test, concomitant lipid-lowering treatments, and adverse events. Data were collected from medical records and the hospital outpatient medication program.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The study period was 16 months. A total of 38 patients were included: 81.6% (31) were male and 18.4% (7) were female. The mean age was 66 years, and the average number of doses administered during the study period was 2.6.</p><p>26 patients were diagnosed with ischaemic heart disease, and three with familial hypercholesterolaemia. Prior to inclisiran, 11 patients (28.9%) had been treated with evolocumab and 2 patients (5.3%) with alirocumab.</p><p>Concomitant treatments were as follows: 13 patients received statin+ezetimibe, 6 statin monotherapy, 5 bempedoic acid+ezetimibe, 4 received triple therapy with ezetimibe + statin + fenofibrate, 2 ezetimibe, 1 fenofibrate+statins, and 7 patients didn&rsquo;t receive treatment with lipid-lowering agents.</p><p>The mean baseline LDL-C was 101.7 mg/dL (SD: 51), and the mean LDL-C at the time of the last available blood test was 58.3 mg/dL (SD: 34), representing a mean reduction of 42.7%. These results are based on a sample of 31 patients, as follow-up LDL-C levels were not available for 7 patients.</p><p>In terms of safety, only one patient experienced gastrointestinal intolerance after the first dose, leading to treatment discontinuation.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Inclisiran showed substantial efficacy in reducing LDL-C levels with a mean LDL-C reduction of 42.7%. Most patients received concomitant statin-based therapy, either as monotherapy or in combination. The safety profile was favourable, with only one reported adverse event requiring treatment discontinuation. These findings support inclisiran as an effective and well tolerated therapeutic option for LDL-C control.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Contreras Collado, R., Garcia Gomez, N., Luque Jimenez, M., Chinchilla Alarcon, T., Munoz Cejudo, B., Gil Gonzalez-Carrascosa, G., Morales Rivero, B., Mora Mora, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.291</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.291</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-192 Effectiveness and safety of inclisiran in real clinical practice]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A143</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A143</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A143-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-193 Descriptive real-world outcomes with aflibercept 8 mg/0.07 ml in wet age-related macular degeneration and diabetic macular oedema]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A143-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Aflibercept is a recombinant fusion protein that functions as a receptor binding vascular endothelial growth factor A and placental growth factor with greater affinity than their natural receptors. Recently marketed in 2024 at a dose of 8 mg/0.07 mL, it is indicated for the treatment of wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and diabetic macular oedema (DME) in adults.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the use of aflibercept 8 mg/0.07 mL in real-world clinical practice in patients with wet AMD and DME, both naive patients and previously treated.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A unicentre, observational, descriptive, and retrospective study conducted from November 2024 to September 2025. Patients treated with aflibercept 8 mg/0.07 mL were included. Variables collected included demographics (age, sex), diagnosis, previous treatments, number and frequency of doses, reasons for discontinuation, and adverse events.</p><p>After the three monthly loading doses, treatment intervals could be extended to 8 weeks (Q8), 12 weeks (Q12), or 16 weeks (Q16) if improvement in visual or anatomical outcomes was observed. Previously treated patients could follow a treat-and-extend regimen directly. Data were extracted from medical records.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 566 patients (56% male, 44% female) with a mean age of 71 &plusmn; 11 years and 775 treated eyes were included.</p><p>Wet AMD: 42% (327 eyes). Naive eyes (24%; 84 eyes): 54% loading dose, 20% Q8, 15% Q12, 7% Q16, and 4% ineffective. Previously treated eyes (74%; 243 eyes): 26% loading dose, 49% Q8, 17% Q12, 3% Q16, and 3% ineffective.</p><p>DME: 58% (443 eyes). Naive eyes (21%; 95 eyes): 56% loading dose, 18% Q8, 14% Q12, 8% Q16, and 3% ineffective. Previously treated eyes (79%; 348 eyes): 41% loading dose, 39% Q8, 15% Q12, 2% Q16, and 3% ineffective.</p><p>Two patients reported adverse events of reduced visual acuity, ocular pain, and blurred vision.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Aflibercept 8 mg/0.07 mL showed effective outcomes and good tolerance in both naive and previously treated eyes with wet AMD and DME. In our real-world practice, most patients remain on Q8 intervals, with few yet reaching Q16&ndash;Q20 extensions as described in the product label. Continued follow-up is needed to assess longer-term interval outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gandullo Sanchez, E., Rodriguez Negrin, A., Espin Martinez, C., Garcia Navarro, V., Bordes Dominguez Del Rio, C., Godoy Gonzalez, J., Crespo Martinez, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.292</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.292</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-193 Descriptive real-world outcomes with aflibercept 8 mg/0.07 ml in wet age-related macular degeneration and diabetic macular oedema]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A143</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A144</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A144-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-194 Analysis of interventions implemented in an antimicrobial stewardship program in a surgical critical care unit]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A144-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>The appropriate use of antimicrobials remains a major challenge in critical care units, and antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP) are essential to improve clinical outcomes and reduce antimicrobial resistance. The involvement of the clinical pharmacist plays a key role in promoting the rational use of these agents.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To describe and analyze the interventions carried out within the ASP in the surgical intensive care unit (SICU) and post-anaesthesia recovery unit (PACU) of a tertiary hospital during 2023 and 2024.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A multidisciplinary ASP team was established in the SICU and PACU, comprising anaesthesiologists, an infectious disease specialist, and a clinical pharmacist. All ongoing antimicrobial treatments in the SICU and PACU were reviewed once a week, and those identified as candidates for intervention or optimisation were discussed with the prescribing physician, according to the empirical infection treatment protocol implemented in the hospital in 2024. All interventions recorded during 2023 and 2024 were included in this study.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>In 2023, 38 meetings were held, reviewing 177 treatments. A total of 101 interventions were performed, the most frequent being treatment discontinuation (50 cases, 49.5%), therapeutic de-escalation (21 cases, 20.7%), and therapeutic escalation (15 cases, 14.8%). The most frequently prescribed antimicrobials were piperacillin/tazobactam (18%), meropenem (16.8%), and metronidazole (12.4%), followed by ceftriaxone (9.1%).</p><p>In 2024, 44 meetings were held, reviewing 185 treatments. A total of 115 interventions were performed, the most frequent being therapeutic de-escalation (38 cases, 33%), treatment discontinuation (27 cases, 23.5%), and therapeutic escalation (25 cases, 21.7%). The most commonly prescribed antimicrobials were meropenem (16.6%), piperacillin/tazobactam (14.6%), and vancomycin (12.9%), followed by metronidazole (7.8%).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>A change in the antibiotic prescribing pattern was observed between 2023 and 2024. In 2023, the most frequent intervention was treatment discontinuation, likely due to a higher initial prescription of narrow-spectrum antibiotics. In contrast, in 2024, therapeutic de-escalation predominated, associated with increased initial use of broad-spectrum antibiotics such as vancomycin, probably related to its prioritisation in the new empirical infection treatment protocol. These findings highlight the crucial role of the clinical pharmacist in the ASP team, both in detecting opportunities for intervention and in ensuring the appropriate use of antimicrobials.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Couso Cruz, A., Nogue Pujadas, E., Batlle Perales, C., Parramon Vila, F., Dorda Benito, A., Gratacos Santanach, L., Vila Currius, M., Artime Rodriguez-Hermida, F., Martinez Diaz, E., Quinones Ribas, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.293</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.293</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-194 Analysis of interventions implemented in an antimicrobial stewardship program in a surgical critical care unit]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A144</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A144</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A144-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-195 Effect of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator modulators on the clinical course of patients with cystic fibrosis]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A144-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Cystic fibrosis (CF) is an autosomal recessive genetic disorder caused by mutations in the gene encoding the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) protein, which impair chloride and sodium transport across epithelial cell membranes. The F508del mutation is the most common. Clinical manifestations are predominantly respiratory involvement, gastrointestinal, reproductive and sweat gland dysfunction. Therapeutic strategies have evolved from symptomatic management to targeted modulation of the defective CFTR protein, particularly with the combination elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (Kaftrio ) and ivacaftor (Kalydeco ).</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To assess whether treatment with Kaftrio and Kalydeco in adult CF patients is associated with improvement in respiratory function and reduction in the number of exacerbations, intravenous antibiotic courses and hospital admissions, as well as evaluate the safety of these therapies.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective observational study was conducted including all patients aged 18 years or older who initiated Kaftrio and Kalydeco from their introduction until August 2025. Demographic, diagnostic and treatment data were collected. Sweat chloride concentration, faecal elastase, pulmonary function tests, the number of respiratory exacerbations, intravenous antibiotic cycles, and hospitalisations were compared between the 12 months before and after treatment initiation. Adverse reactions were also recorded.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Fifty-seven adult CF patients carrying at least one F508del mutation were included, of whom 38 received Kaftrio and Kalydeco between August 2024 and 2025. Sweat chloride concentration showed a mean decrease of 32.2 mmol/L. Pulmonary function demonstrated significant improvement, with mean forced expiratory volume increasing from 55% to 72% of the predicted value and forced vital capacity from 80% to 90%. Supportive therapy remained stable, but inhaled antibiotic and corticosteroid use decreased. Only two patients required intravenous antibiotics and one was hospitalised during the last 12 months. The most frequent adverse events were headache, mood changes, mild gastrointestinal symptoms, and skin rash.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Treatment with Kaftrio and Kalydeco showed significant clinical benefits, with improved respiratory function and reduced need for antibiotic therapy and hospital admissions. The safety profile was favourable, supporting the impact of these modulators as a major advancement in the management of adults with CF.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Santos, A., Silva, C., Ferreira, F., Rosario, I., Antunes, M., Costa, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.294</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.294</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-195 Effect of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator modulators on the clinical course of patients with cystic fibrosis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A144</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A145</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A145-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-196 Persistence of IL-17A inhibitors secukinumab and ixekizumab in real-world practice]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A145-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Interleukin-17A (IL-17A) is a key cytokine in the pathogenesis of immune-mediated diseases such as psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, and axial spondyloarthritis. Secukinumab, a fully human IgG1 antibody, and ixekizumab, a humanised IgG4 antibody, both neutralise IL-17A. Molecular differences may influence immunogenicity and persistence, supporting real-world studies of long-term outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To describe and compare treatment persistence and reasons for discontinuation of secukinumab and ixekizumab across all indications used in a regional hospital.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective review included patients treated with secukinumab or ixekizumab from January 2017 to September 2025. Collected data included age, sex, indication, treatment duration, and discontinuation reasons. Persistence was defined as a gap &gt;90 days.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 194 patients were included: 100 on secukinumab and 94 on ixekizumab. Indications were plaque psoriasis (n=80; 28/52), psoriatic arthritis (n=71; 41/30), and axial spondyloarthritis (n=43; 31/12). Median age was 49.7 years (10&ndash;79.3), 46.4% male. Median treatment duration was 24.3 months for secukinumab and 24.5 months for ixekizumab. Persistence at 12 months was 62% and 49%, and at 24 months 33% and 37.2%, respectively. Discontinuations occurred in 68 secukinumab patients (seven toxicity, 44 lack of efficacy, six patient decision, five pregnancy) and 37 ixekizumab patients (seven toxicity, 17 loss of response, one patient decision, three relocation, two comorbidities). Both were well tolerated, with mostly mild adverse events (upper respiratory infections, injection site reactions).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>In this real-world retrospective study, secukinumab and ixekizumab showed comparable persistence rates at 12 months and acceptable long-term safety across all indications. Although persistence decreased over time, both agents maintained similar patterns of discontinuation, mainly due to lack of efficacy, mild adverse events, or patient-related reasons. Overall, IL-17A inhibitors demonstrated sustained tolerability and adherence in clinical practice, supporting their continued use in the management of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. Agencia Espa&ntilde;ola de Medicamentos y Productos Sanitarios (AEMPS). Technical details of Cosentyx (secukinumab). Available in: CIMA. Accessed 8 October 2025. Agencia Espa&ntilde;ola de Medicamentos y Productos Sanitarios (AEMPS). Technical details of Taltz (ixekizumab). Available in: CIMA. Accessed 8 October 2025.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gomez Blasco, M., Correas Sanahuja, M., Martinez Martinez, I., Rodriguez Carballo, B., Borrell Garcia, M., Riera Magallon, A., Jolonch Santasusagna, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.295</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.295</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-196 Persistence of IL-17A inhibitors secukinumab and ixekizumab in real-world practice]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A145</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A145</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A145-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-197 Persistence and adherence to integrase inhibitors-based antiretroviral treatment in nai&#x0308;ve-HIV patients]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A145-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>The aim of antiretroviral therapy (ART) is to supress HIV replication, thereby reducing the risk of opportunistic infections and preventing transmission. Pharmacists play a key role in patient education, adherence support and monitoring treatment effectiveness and tolerance.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate persistence and adherence to ART based on integrase inhibitors in HIV-nai&#x0308;ve patients at 6 and 12 months. Additionally, the study aims to evaluate reasons for discontinuation and adverse events (AEs).</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>This was an observational and retrospective study conducted in a tertiary hospital with a multidisciplinary team including clinical pharmacists involved in the follow-up of HIV patients. We included patients who were diagnosed with HIV infection between 08/2022-07/2024 and who started integrase inhibitors-based ART. Data were collected from clinical records and pharmacy claims. Patients who moved to another healthcare centre within the first year of follow-up were excluded. To determine medication adherence, we measured the proportion of days covered (PDC), where a threshold &ge;90% is used to identify optimal adherence to ART according to Pharmacy Quality Alliance.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>We identified 69 nai&#x0308;ve patients who started ART treatment. At 6 months, 95.7% (n=66) remained on the initial ART regimen, while one patient required an ART switch due to drug resistance and two were lost to follow-up. At 12 months, 87.0% (n=60) were persistent to initial regimen, while four patients switched to long-acting regimens, one discontinued due to AE, and one was lost to follow-up. The mean adherence at 6 and 12 months was 97.5% and 96.4%, respectively. A 90.9% and 95.0% of patients achieved a threshold of &ge;90% PDC at 6 and 12 months, respectively. At 6 months, 71.2% (47/63) had undetectable viremia and 88.7% (55/62) had a CD4 lymphocyte count &ge;200 cells/mm<sup>3</sup>. At 12 months, these results were 85.5% (47/55) and 92.9% (52/56), respectively.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Our cohort of HIV-nai&#x0308;ve patients showed high levels of persistence and adherence to integrase inhibitor-based ART during their first year. These findings show the effectiveness and tolerability in nai&#x0308;ve patients in real-world conditions. They also suggest the benefits of follow-up by a multidisciplinary team.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Llop Ventura, M., Dominguez-Navarro, A., Neus, P., Puertas-Sanjuan, A., Mateo Garcia, G., Gutierrez Macia, M., Masip, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.296</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.296</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-197 Persistence and adherence to integrase inhibitors-based antiretroviral treatment in nai&#x0308;ve-HIV patients]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A145</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A145</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A146-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-198 Anticholinergic burden in older people living with HIV]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A146-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Anticholinergic burden (AB) in older people living with HIV (PLWHIV) is associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The primary objective was to assess AB in a cohort of older PLWHIV using different anticholinergic scales (AS) and to identify factors associated with AB. The secondary objective was to evaluate the level of agreement among AS.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective, cross-sectional, multicentre study was conducted. We included older PLWHIV (&ge;65 years) who received antiretroviral therapy (ART) from hospital pharmacies of ten Spanish public hospitals between 1 September and 31 December 2021. Demographic, clinical, and pharmacotherapeutic data were obtained from electronic medical records. AB was calculated using the Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden Scale (ACB), Anticholinergic Risk Scale (ARS), and Anticholinergic Drug Scale (ADS). Agreement between AS was assessed using Cohen&rsquo;s kappa coefficient. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify factors associated with AB.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 313 patients were included: 80.5% male, median age of 72 years (IQR 69-76). Median Veterans Ageing Cohort Study (VACS) Index was 39 (IQR 33-46.5). Patients presented a median of 4 non-HIV chronic comorbidities (IQR 3-6) and used a median of 5 non-ART chronic medications (IQR 3-7). Prevalence of any degree AB was 21.7% (n=68) with ACB, 9.9% (n=31) with ARS, and 28.4% (n=89) with ADS. When all three scales were considered simultaneously, AB was identified in 35.1% (n=110) of patients. Agreement between AS was moderate for ACB-ARS and ACB-ADS (k=0.404, p&lt;0.001; k=0.586, p&lt;0.001, respectively), and poor for ARS-ADS (k=0.199, p&lt;0.001). Factors associated with AB included older age (odds ratio (OR) 1.13, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07-1.20), higher number of non-ART chronic medications (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.23-1.50), female sex (OR 2.38, 95% CI 1.14-4.97), and presence of neuropsychiatric disorders (OR 7.37, 95% CI 3.90-13.94).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>A substantial proportion of older PLWHIV presented with AB, although prevalence estimates varied depending on the AS used. Factors associated with increased AB highlight patient groups in whom targeted medication review is particularly warranted. Given the limited agreement among AS, screenings for AB in PLWHIV should prefer the simultaneous use of different AS, as the choice of scale may influence the identification of at risk patients.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fernandez-Fradejas, J., Calleja-Fernandez, C., Velez-Diaz-Pallares, M., Delgado-Silveira, E., Gonzalez-Burgos, E., Alvarez-Diaz, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.297</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.297</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-198 Anticholinergic burden in older people living with HIV]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A146</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A146</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A146-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-199 Efficacy and safety of primary antifungal prophylaxis in paediatric patients undergoing an allogenic haematopoietic stell-cell transplantation]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A146-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Paediatric patients undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) require primary antifungal prophylaxis (PAP) until day +100 post-HSCT or until immune reconstitution is achieved. According to protocol, intravenous (IV) micafungin is administered during hospitalisation (until engraftment and oral tolerance is established). After discharge, different strategies may be employed: azole derivatives as first-line, IV amphotericin B twice weekly, or IV micafungin twice weekly.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate safety and efficacy of different PAP in HSCT paediatric patients after discharge.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Paediatric patients HSCT recipients between January 2022 and July 2025 were retrospectively studied by its demographics, their PAP, the prevalence of IFD and the associated side effects.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A sample of 30 patients was studied with an average age at HSCT of 8,7 years old (0,83-16,7) and 43,33% female; after the hospitalisation period, 93,33% (n=28) received oral posaconazole, 3,33% (n=1) IV amphotericin B twice weekly and 3,33% (n=1) oral voriconazole. All of them received the indicated dose for their weight.</p><p>Concerning patient safety, 50% (n=15) suffered side effects; Fourteen were patients treated prophylactically with oral posaconazole which developed hepatotoxicity and 10 of them required PAP switch. One of them developed nephrotoxicity due to voriconazole use and didn&rsquo;t require a treatment change.</p><p>In those patients who switched PAP due to toxicity (n=10) amphotericin B twice weekly or micafungine twice weekly were used depending on clinical status, desired spectrum or interactions risks. Five patients changed to micafungin and five to amphotericin B. From this last group of patients, two of them required a second switch due to nephrotoxicity: one patient restarted oral posaconazole and one patient changed to micafungin.</p><p>From those patients who switched PAP to IV micafungin 3-4 mg/kg twice weekly (n=6), none of them suffered side effects.</p><p>Concerning prophylaxis efficacy, 10% (n=3) of the whole sample suffered an IFD while on PAP. Two of these patients were receiving IV micafungin as PAP and the other one was receiving oral posaconazole.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>All PAP studied were effective. However, there&rsquo;s a high prevalence of side effects. Micafungin 3-4 mg/kg twice weekly is safe and could be the first option for patients sensitive to suffer side effects.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ferrando Riba, M., Panisello Cardona, M., Fernandez De Gamarra-Martinez, E., Lopez-Torija, I., Escribano Sanz, P., Feliu Ribera, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.298</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.298</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-199 Efficacy and safety of primary antifungal prophylaxis in paediatric patients undergoing an allogenic haematopoietic stell-cell transplantation]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A146</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A147</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A147-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-200 Inflammatory and nutritional prognostic score as a marker of outcomes in very elderly patients with non-small-cell lung cancer treated with immunotherapy]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A147-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Very elderly patients (&ge;80 years) with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) often present distinct clinical profiles, where inflammation and nutritional status may influence treatment outcomes. Identifying prognostic indicators in this frail population remains an unmet clinical need.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To assess the prognostic value of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), prognostic nutritional index (PNI), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels in very elderly NSCLC patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), and its association with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in a real-world clinical setting. These three variables are collectively referred to as the &lsquo;Inflammatory and Prognostic Score 3&rsquo; (IPS3).</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective observational included NSCLC patients aged &ge;80 years treated with ICIs between 2018 and 2024. Demographic, clinical, histopathological and baseline biochemical data were collected. Patients were stratified using the IPS3, a composite index combining neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and prognostic nutritional index (PNI), classifying patients into three groups: favourable (score 0), intermediate (score 1) and poor (score 2-3). OS and PFS were estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves and compared using the log-rank test (p&lt;0.05 considered significant).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Thirty-two patients (mean age 82.6 years, 81.3% male) were included. Adenocarcinoma was the most common histology (56.3%). PD-L1 &ge;50% was observed in 34% of patients, and 12.5% had CNS metastases. Treatments included pembrolizumab (71.9%), nivolumab (21.9%) and durvalumab (6.3%); 71.9% received monotherapy. Based on the IPS3, 15.6% were classified as favourable, 25.0% intermediate, and 56.3% as poor. Median OS was 8.0 months (95% CI 4.5-11.5) and PFS 7.0 months (95% IC 3.3-10.7). Median OS by prognostic group was 14.0, 6.0 and 6.0 months and PFS was 12.7, 2.0 and 4.0 months, respectively. Although not statistically significant (OS p=0.259, PFS p=0.465), a trend toward poorer survival with higher scores was observed. Grade &ge;3 immune-related toxicity occurred in 9.4% of patients.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The IPS3 composite score showed a consistent trend in predicting survival outcomes in very elderly NSCLC patients treated with ICIs. Despite limited statistical power, these parameters may support improved prognostic stratification in this vulnerable population.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Albarran Gomez, A., Gomez Navas, R., Lorenzo Vidal, L., Olivares Hernandez, A., Jimenez Cabrera, S., Otero Lopez, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.299</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.299</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-200 Inflammatory and nutritional prognostic score as a marker of outcomes in very elderly patients with non-small-cell lung cancer treated with immunotherapy]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A147</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A147</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A147-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-201 Real-world safety analysis of antifibrotic therapies in interstitial lung disease]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A147-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Pirfenidone and nintedanib are the main antifibrotic agents used for treating interstitial lung diseases (ILD). Although both demonstrate similar efficacy, therapeutic decisions often depend on their safety and tolerability profiles. Real-world evidence is essential to better understand adverse events, treatment adherence, and the need for therapeutic adjustments.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To assess the safety and tolerability of pirfenidone and nintedanib in patients with ILD, focusing on adverse events (AEs), time to dose reduction, treatment duration, drug switching, and discontinuation rates.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective analysis of electronic health records was conducted from August 2017 to August 2025. Demographic (sex, age) and clinical variables were evaluated. Adverse events were qualitatively classified based on patient reports and clinical documentation.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>In the pirfenidone group (n=103), patients were aged 48&ndash;90 years (61% male). Mean treatment duration was 391.45 days, with dose reduction occurring after a mean of 142.75 days. AEs were reported in 60.19% of patients, mainly gastrointestinal (19.42%) and dermatological (8.74%). There were 25 dose reductions, 21 switches to nintedanib, and 3 permanent discontinuations (66.7% associated with AEs).</p><p>In the nintedanib group (n=112), patients were aged 40&ndash;88 years (59% male). Mean treatment duration was 468.30 days, with dose reduction after 257.54 days. AEs occurred in 72.32% of patients, predominantly gastrointestinal (60.71%). There were 46 dose reductions, 15 switches to pirfenidone, and 8 permanent discontinuations (25% of these related to AEs).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Despite a higher incidence of AEs with nintedanib, it showed better tolerability, reflected in longer treatment duration and delayed dose reduction, suggesting improved adherence. Pirfenidone was associated with a higher rate of treatment discontinuation. These findings highlight the importance of continuous pharmaceutical monitoring to characterise the real-world safety profile of antifibrotic therapies and support personalised clinical decision-making.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bastos, S., Resende, B., Ferreira, T., Soares, A., Alcobia, A., Lourenco, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.300</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.300</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-201 Real-world safety analysis of antifibrotic therapies in interstitial lung disease]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A147</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A147</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A148-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-202 Impact of structured antibiotic stewardship ward rounds on anti-infective prescribing in cardiovascular surgery: a 12-month interventional study]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A148-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Suboptimal anti-infective (AI) prescribing remains a critical driver of avoidable adverse events, antimicrobial resistance (AMR), and escalating healthcare costs&ndash;particularly due to prolonged hospital stays and overuse of broad-spectrum agents. To counter this, antibiotic stewardship (ABS) ward rounds have emerged as a cornerstone strategy for optimising AI prescriptions in hospital settings.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This 12-month interventional study, conducted at University Hospital Freiburg, Germany, evaluated the impact of structured ABS ward rounds on prescription quality, frequency, and appropriateness in cardiovascular surgery.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>During weekly ward rounds on the cardiovascular surgery ward of a German university hospital, an interdisciplinary ABS team - comprising an ID specialist, clinical pharmacist, and microbiologist- reviews all AI-treated patients and advises the attending ward physicians on ABS-relevant patient cases. The recommended therapy optimisations are divided into six categories (de-escalation/therapy start, therapy duration/stop, oralisation, dosage, other, further recommendations). The measures implemented and the AIs affected are evaluated.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Within one year (April 2024-March 2025), 430 AI consultations were conducted. The average number of AIs administered on the ward decreased from 36,1% to 18,4% per month. In July 2024, 10.56% of all patients received piperacillin/tazobactam, dropping to 1.72% by March 2025; cotrimoxazole fell from 8.07% to 1.15%, and meropenem from 4.35% to 0.63%.</p><p>Most recommendations targeted &lsquo;de-escalation/start of therapy,&rsquo; &lsquo;therapy duration/stop,&rsquo; and &lsquo;further recommendations.&rsquo;. Notably, recommendations on therapy duration decreased from 3.11% to 1.89% and end of therapy fell from 2.48% to 0.57%. The frequency of the recommendation for an infectious disease consultation varied over time. Overall, the implementation rate of recommendations is consistently high at over 75%, demonstrating strong ward adherence.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Considerable potential for improvement in AI prescriptions was identified on the visited ward, especially regarding diagnostics, infection confirmations and treatment duration. Ward rounds had a demonstrable effect on prescribing practices: Prescription frequency and structure improved, and, over time, the need for recommendations by the ABS team decreased. It was also found that a change of personnel within the ABS team can impact the type of recommendations made. ABS ward rounds are a proven, high-impact intervention, but their long-term success hinges on continuous education and stable team composition.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kainz, L., Giesen, R., Rieg, S., Hug, M., Fo&#x0308;rst, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.301</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.301</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-202 Impact of structured antibiotic stewardship ward rounds on anti-infective prescribing in cardiovascular surgery: a 12-month interventional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A148</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A148</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A148-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-203 Long-term comparison of the efficacy of alirocumab and evolocumab: 8-year retrospective observational study]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A148-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>PCSK9 inhibitors (alirocumab and evolocumab) effectively reduce Low-density lipoprotein (LDLc) and cardiovascular risk, although evidence on their long-term real-world use remains limited.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The aim is to compare LDLc reduction with alirocumab and evolocumab at 6 months, 5 years, and 8 years, analyse the proportion of patients achieving LDLc &lt;55 mg/dL and &lt;70 mg/dL and describe the incidence of cardiovascular events during follow-up.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Retrospective observational study conducted in a tertiary hospital, including patients who started alirocumab 150 mg every 14 days, 300 mg monthly, or evolocumab 240 mg every 14 days, between 2016 and 2017. Demographic variables, follow-up duration, baseline LDLc, at 6 months, 5 years, and 8 years, as well as subsequent cardiovascular events, were recorded.</p><p>The primary objective was to study LDLc levels from baseline to 6 months, 5 years, and 8 years according to treatment (Student&rsquo;s t-test), and the reduction from baseline regardless of treatment (Friedman test). Secondary objectives included the proportion of patients achieving LDLc levels &lt;55 mg/dL and &lt;70 mg/dL at each time point according to treatment, as well as the incidence of cardiovascular events.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Data were collected from 30 patients, 25 men (83%) with a median age of 66 years (range 46&ndash;79) and a median follow-up of 8.6 years (range 3.5&ndash;9.4). Fifteen patients (50%) received alirocumab and fifteen, evolocumab.</p><p>LDLc levels decreased from 148 mg/dL at baseline to 72 mg/dL after 6 months of treatment, representing a mean reduction of 75.75 mg/dL (95% CI: 55.88&ndash;95.61; p &lt; 0.05), which was maintained at 8 years for both treatments. Both drugs showed similar and sustained long-term efficacy in LDLc reduction (p &gt; 0.05). (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F1">Figure 1</cross-ref>).</p><p>There were no statistically significant differences between the two treatments in the proportion of patients achieving LDLc &lt;55 mg/dL or &lt;70 mg/dL. (<cross-ref type="tbl" refid="T1">Table 1</cross-ref>).</p><p>Three cardiovascular events were observed in the group of patients treated with alirocumab and one in the evolocumab group.</p><p><tbl id="T1" loc="float"><no>Abstract 4CPS-203 Table 1</no><link locator="4CPS-203_T1"></tbl></p><p><fig loc="float" id="F1"><no>Abstract 4CPS-203 Figure 1</no><link locator="4CPS-203_F1"></fig></p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>In our cohort, both PCSK9 inhibitors achieved sustained LDLc reductions and similar proportions of patients reaching &lt;70 and &lt;55 mg/dL, with no significant differences between alirocumab and evolocumab, consistent with the ODYSSEY and OSLER/FOURIER studies.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sanchez Luque, L., Arnaiz Diez, S., Martinez Tomas, P., Ortoll Polo, M., Esteban Alonso, T., Benito Juez, P., Miguel Dominguez, A., Agueda Fernandez, J., Castano Rodriguez, B., Revilla Cuesta, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.302</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.302</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-203 Long-term comparison of the efficacy of alirocumab and evolocumab: 8-year retrospective observational study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A148</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A149</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A149-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-204 Effectiveness of dolutegravir/lamivudine dual therapy in HIV patients with suboptimal adherence rates]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A149-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Dolutegravir/lamivudine (DTG/3TC) dual therapy has emerged as an effective, well-tolerated option for HIV management, simplifying treatment and potentially improving adherence. However, few studies have assessed its performance in real-life settings among patients with suboptimal adherence, a group at higher risk of virological failure. Understanding its effectiveness in this population is essential to optimise treatment strategies and ensure long-term viral suppression.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This study aimed to evaluate adherence to DTG/3TC in HIV patients and its relationship with treatment effectiveness.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A single-centre, observational, retrospective study was conducted including all patients treated with DTG/3TC between January 2024 and January 2025. The mean medication possession ratio (MPR) was calculated using leftover medication counts across at least three consecutive bimonthly dispensations through the Prisma outpatient dispensing module. Patients were stratified into two adherence groups: &gt;90% and &lt;90%. Effectiveness was assessed by achieving an undetectable viral load (VL), with CD4+ T-cell counts above 500/mm<sup>3</sup> considered optimal. Data were obtained from the hospital&rsquo;s clinical laboratory services. Statistical analysis was performed to compare both adherence groups, calculating <I>p</I>-values to determine statistically significant differences in virological suppression and immunological response.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 346 patients were included, comprising 266 men (mean age 57.98 &plusmn; 9.83 SD) and 80 women (55.01 &plusmn; 11.96). Two adherence groups were analysed. Patients with adherence &gt;90% (n=284, 82.08%) showed a mean MPR of 91.6% &plusmn; 6.4, with 94.01% (n=267) achieving an undetectable viral load (VL) and 65.14% (n=185) presenting both undetectable VL and CD4+ &gt;500/mm<sup>3</sup>. Patients with adherence &lt;90% (n=62, 17.92%) had a mean MPR of 84.2% &plusmn; 5.8, with 93.55% (n=58) achieving an undetectable VL and 72.58% (n=45) showing undetectable VL plus CD4+ &gt;500/mm<sup>3</sup>. No statistically significant differences were observed between adherence groups in virological suppression (p=0.78) or in the proportion of patients achieving both undetectable VL and CD4+ &gt;500/mm<sup>3</sup> (p=0.32).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Dolutegravir/lamivudine showed high effectiveness in patients with adherence rates above 90%, and comparable virological suppression in those below 90%. These findings suggest that the regimen maintains robust viral control even with suboptimal adherence. Although confirmation in larger cohorts is needed, DTG/3TC appears to be a resilient therapeutic option across different adherence levels.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vaquer, C., Martinez De La Torre, F., Otero Galvan, B., Huecas Jimenez, F., Fernandez Rubio, B., Del Palacio Garcia, P., Bertran De Lis Bartolome, B., Ferrari Piquero, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.303</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.303</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-204 Effectiveness of dolutegravir/lamivudine dual therapy in HIV patients with suboptimal adherence rates]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A149</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A149</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A149-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-205 Antibiotic stewardship interventions in critically ill patients: acceptance rate and impact on therapy optimisation]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A149-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Antimicrobial stewardship programmes (ASP) have gained increasing relevance in recent years, particularly in critically ill patients admitted to intensive care units (ICU). These patients often receive multiple antibiotics due to their clinical complexity, which makes stewardship interventions essential for improving treatment adequacy and reducing unnecessary exposure.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the acceptance rate of antibiotic stewardship interventions in critically ill patients.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective, observational, single-centre study was conducted over six months (January&ndash;June 2024). All ASP interventions regarding antimicrobial therapy in ICU patients were included. Interventions were classified as antibiotic discontinuation, de-escalation, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (pK/pD) optimisation, escalation, and requests for additional diagnostic tests such as blood cultures.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 197 recommendations were issued, of which 84.7% (n=167) were accepted by treating physicians.</p><p>The most frequent intervention was antibiotic discontinuation (n=111), accepted in 82.9% (n=92) of cases. Agents most frequently discontinued were J01XX group antibiotics (linezolid, tedizolid, daptomycin) (n=46), with an acceptance rate of 82.6% (n=38).</p><p>De-escalation accounted for 19.8% (n=39) of interventions, with 82.1% acceptance (n=32). The most frequent targets were ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftazidime/avibactam, and ceftaroline (n=18), accepted in 66.7% (n=12), followed by carbapenems (n=10), accepted in 90% (n=9). pK/pD optimisation (n=14) achieved the highest acceptance rate among major interventions (85.7%, n=12). Escalation was proposed in 12 cases, accepted in 91.7% (n=11). Additional diagnostic tests were recommended in 13 cases, with full acceptance (100%).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Antibiotic discontinuation was the most frequent ASP intervention, whereas de-escalation and pK/pD optimisation achieved the highest acceptance rates. Overall, the high acceptance rate (84.7%) highlights the value of multidisciplinary stewardship teams in optimising antimicrobial therapy and ensuring adequate treatment of critically ill patients. The hospital pharmacist plays a key role in this team due to their knowledge of these medications.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bethencourt Barbuzano, E., Perez Martin, C., Madrueno Alonso, A., Viera Rosales, S., Betancor Garcia, I., Martinez Pinna, M., Nazco Casariesgo, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.304</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.304</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-205 Antibiotic stewardship interventions in critically ill patients: acceptance rate and impact on therapy optimisation]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A149</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A150</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A150-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-206 Real-world experience with ruxolitinib in philadelphia-negative chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A150-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Following the recent approvals of new JAKinhibitors (fedratinib/momelotinib) for the treatment of Philadelphia-negative chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN), it is essential to review the real-world experience with the first-in-class agent since its approval more than 10years ago.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To analyse the clinical characteristics, effectiveness and safety of all patients with MPN treated with ruxolitinib, as well as drug survival.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>An observational, retrospective and descriptive study was conducted including all patients with MPN treated with ruxolitinib. Demographic, clinical, and disease evolution variables were collected, along with outcome variables (haematocrit for polycythaemia vera (PV), spleen size for all MPN) and safety data. Drug survival was analysed using Kaplan&ndash;Meier plots. Statistical analysis was performed with STATA/IC-16.1.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Thirty-five patients were included (54.3% female; median age at ruxolitinib initiation, 69.8 years [57.1&ndash;76.4]): 45.7% PV, 31.4% secondary-myelofibrosis&ndash;essential thrombocythaemia, 17.1% primary-myelofibrosis, and 5.7% secondary-myelofibrosis&ndash;PV. The most frequent driver-mutation was JAK2 (85.7%). Bone marrow biopsy was performed at diagnosis in 71.4%.</p><p>The main reasons for starting ruxolitinib were splenomegaly (40.0%), followed by cutaneous toxicity due to hydroxyurea (17.1%), asthenia/constitutional syndrome (17.1%), or resistance to prior therapies (14.3%). At treatment initiation, 54.3% had splenomegaly (mean 5.2&plusmn;3.7cm). After 8 months of therapy, 84.2% achieved a &gt;50% reduction in spleen size.</p><p>In PV patients, before ruxolitinib, mean haematocrit was 45.7&plusmn;3.3%; 68.8% had haematocrit &gt;45% and 56.3% required phlebotomy in the previous 6 months. After 8 months of treatment, 81.3% achieved haematocrit control (haematocrit &lt;45%) and only 12.5% required phlebotomy. Haematocrit remained &lt;45% in 66.7% at 12 months and 75.0% at 24 months.</p><p>The most frequent adverse events were cytopenias (57.1%), asthenia (25.7%), and herpes-zoster reactivation (11.4%). Dose reduction was required in 54.3% of cases (57.9% due to anaemia). Treatment was discontinued in 28.6% (50.0% due to adverse events).</p><p>During follow-up, one PV patient progressed to myelofibrosis, seven patients with myelofibrosis progressed to acute-myeloid-leukaemia, and 11 (31.4%) died. Mean drug survival was 7.6years (95% CI 3.1&ndash;NR).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>In real-world clinical practice, ruxolitinib demonstrates sustained effectiveness in reducing splenomegaly and controlling haematocrit in MPN, with a manageable safety profile. The frequency of dose adjustments and cytopenias highlights the importance of close monitoring and individualised management. Despite its toxicity profile, in our experience, drug survival was higher than that reported in the literature (Palandri et al.).</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sanchez Lorenzo, M., Esteban Casado, S., Canamares Orbis, I., Tejedor Prado, P., Prieto Roman, S., Lopez Guerra, L., Arce Sanchez, M., Escobar Rodriguez, I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.305</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.305</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-206 Real-world experience with ruxolitinib in philadelphia-negative chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A150</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A150</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A150-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-207 A scoping review of advanced or specialist pharmacist roles in hospital outpatient settings]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A150-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Hospital pharmacists are increasingly taking on advanced and specialist roles in outpatient settings, yet the scope and impact of these roles remain unclear. Understanding these roles is essential for workforce planning, service optimisation, and improving patient outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To systematically map the global evidence regarding advanced or specialist pharmacist roles in hospital outpatient settings.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Guided by JBI methodology and a pre-registered protocol (https://osf.io/t6d3w), five electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Google Scholar) were searched from inception to February 2025. English language articles describing advanced or specialist pharmacist roles in hospital outpatient settings were included. Two reviewers independently screened all articles. Data extraction was undertaken by one reviewer using a structured tool, with 10% dual-extracted to ensure consistency. Extraction included study characteristics and information on scope of practice and service delivery. Descriptive statistics were performed, and findings were narratively synthesized.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>From 8064 studies screened, 126 were included. Most studies originated from the United States (<I>n</I>=93), the United Kingdom (<I>n</I>=12), and Canada (<I>n</I>=10). Almost two-thirds were descriptive case studies/practice reports (<I>n</I>=81), with only three randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Common practice areas included haematology and/or oncology (<I>n</I>=30), cardiology (<I>n</I>=26), endocrinology (<I>n</I>=12), and infectious diseases (<I>n</I>=11). Pharmacists had prescriptive authority in 69% of studies. Frequently reported tasks included initiating, modifying, discontinuing, or administering a medicine (88.1%), monitoring safety of drug therapy (84.9%), and patient/caregiver education (80.2%). Pharmacist education and/or training was reported in 51% of studies. Reported outcomes demonstrated broad impact across pharmacist productivity (<I>n</I>=84), patient measures (<I>n</I>=61), costs and resources (<I>n</I>=56), medication (<I>n</I>=46), and healthcare staff (<I>n</I>=6).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>This review has uniquely mapped the diverse tasks undertaken by advanced or specialist hospital pharmacists in outpatient settings and identifies key practice areas in which these roles exist. Reported outcomes demonstrate a wide spectrum of person-centred, clinical, and economic impact. These findings establish a benchmark for service development and highlight the need for further research, particularly in underrepresented regions beyond North America and the United Kingdom. Key recommendations for future research include providing more detailed accounts of pharmacist education and training and further RCT evidence to support role expansion.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mcmanus, E., Dalton, K., Keating, J., Colthorpe, A., Fleming, A., Mccarthy, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.306</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.306</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-207 A scoping review of advanced or specialist pharmacist roles in hospital outpatient settings]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A150</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A151</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A151-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-208 How certain are we of innovation? A review of clinical evidence of ema approved new indications in 2024]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A151-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Therapeutic innovation is continuously expanding leading to a growing number of new active substances (NAS) and indication extensions of prexisting medicines (IEPM) evaluated by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). The need for new therapeutic options has driven many approvals to occur under accelerated procedures or based on preliminary evidence. This raises questions regarding the maturity and robustness of clinical data supporting them. It&rsquo;s crucial to assess the quality of evidence behind these authorisations ensuring informed decision-making by emphasising hospital pharmacists&rsquo; role in evidence appraisal and real-world assessment.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>Characterise and assess the level of clinical evidence underlying all positive opinions issued by the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) in 2024 for NAS and IEPM</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Observational, descriptive, retrospective study including all NAS and IEPM receiving a positive CHMP opinion in 2024 [age-based extensions excluded.] Data were retrieved from the European Public Assessment Reports (EPARs). Collected variables included: active substance, therapeutic area, mechanism of action, regulatory classification (ORPHAN, PRIME), special conditions (conditional approval [CA], accelerated assessment [AA], exceptional circumstances [EC], additional monitoring [AM]), evaluated indication, study design characteristics, primary outcome, hazard ratio, &lsquo;first-in-class&rsquo; status, ESMO-MCBS score (when relevant), EPAR conclusions, study limitations, and study identifier.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 100 authorisations were included: 42 NAS (46 indications and 35.7% first-in-class) and 54 IEPM across 15 therapeutic areas and 23% held an orphan designation. The majority were supported by phase III (86%), randomised (85%), active-controlled (55%), open-label (49%). Additionally, 28,3% of the NAS were approved under special conditions (CA/AA/EC). Most frequent therapeutic areas were Oncology (45%), Haematology (16%) and Cardiovascular (6%). Among oncology therapies, 44% achieved an ESMO-MCBS score &ge;4 or A, indicating relevant clinical benefit, although 55,5% relied on surrogate endpoints and/or with immature overall survival data.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Most 2024 approvals were supported by phase III, randomised, active-controlled trials, however, a considerable proportion relied on preliminary data, particularly within oncology. Accelerated and conditional pathways highlight the need for systematic post-authorisation re-evaluation supported by real-world evidence to confirm clinical benefit and ensure rational use.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. European Medicines Agency. Human medicines in 2024. EMA; 2024.</p><p>2. Mart&iacute;nez-Barros H, <I>et al. Farmacia Hospitalaria.</I> 2024;<b>48</b>(6):272&ndash;7.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lourenco, M., Resende, B., Bastos, S., Ferreira, T., Soares, A., Alcobia, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.307</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.307</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-208 How certain are we of innovation? A review of clinical evidence of ema approved new indications in 2024]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A151</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A151</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A151-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-209 Retrospective monocentric study evaluating the proper use and effectiveness of TYRX absorbable antibacterial envelope in a rhythmology department]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A151-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>The TYRX antibacterial envelope is a class III active implantable medical device (IMD). Since September 2020, the National Authority for Health (HAS) has recommended its use to reduce infection risks from cardiac implantable electronic devices in high-risk subjects.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This study aimed to assess the proper use and efficacy of the envelope in a rhythmology department in current practice.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Implantation data and associated medical procedures were extracted from the Medical Information Department&rsquo;s traceability data between June 2021 and April 2024. The concordance between the indications recorded in the traceability data (CCAM procedures) and those in the electronic patient&lsquo;s medical record (ORBIS ) was verified individually. The indications reported in the medical records were classified according to those recommended by the HAS. The efficacy (rate of infection requiring rehospitalisation at one year) of TYRX was assessed using a patient&rsquo;s subgroup eligible for TYRX over a three-year period by comparing data from two cohorts: those not implanted with TYRX (Cohort A) and those implanted with TYRX (Cohort B).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 587 patients (=606 TYRX implants) was analysed, after excluding two failed implantations and thirteen devices reported twice. The mean age was 69&plusmn;16 years, and 64% (n=377) of the patients were male. In 12% (n=72) of cases, the CCAM procedure codes were discordant with the procedure truly performed. The indications were in line with the HAS recommendations in 96.8% (587/606) of cases. When devices were implanted off recommendations use, it corresponded to primary pacemaker implantations. Regarding efficacy, of the subgroup of patients eligible for TYRX (n = 568), one patient among 273 (0.37%) in &lsquo;cohort A&rsquo; had an mycosis infection (C. albicans) requiring rehospitalisation at one year. Among the 295 patients in &lsquo;cohort B&rsquo;, one material-related infection (E. dermatitidis) requiring rehospitalisation at one year was observed (0.34%).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Although there are coding inaccuracies that require staff awareness, the rythmology department&rsquo;s traceability rate remains high. Most implant indications comply with HAS guidelines. According to the WRAP-IT study, the 1 year infection rate among implanted patients is lower than expected (0.34% vs. 0.70%).</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benyahia, N., Gandjbakhch, E., Duthoit, G., Kane, A., Boughanem, C., Stephanie, M., Pieyre, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.308</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.308</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-209 Retrospective monocentric study evaluating the proper use and effectiveness of TYRX absorbable antibacterial envelope in a rhythmology department]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A151</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A152</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A152-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-210 Analysis of suspected digoxin toxicity with a gender perspective]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A152-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Digoxin is a high-risk medication frequently prescribed for heart failure and atrial fibrillation, but its narrow therapeutic index makes toxicity a persistent clinical concern, particularly among older patients. Previous evidence suggests potential sex-related differences in susceptibility to digoxin intoxication; however, data remain limited. A better understanding of these differences could help optimise dosing strategies and enhance patient safety.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate sex differences in digoxin intoxications in the emergency department of a tertiary hospital.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Single-centre retrospective study included all adult patients attending the emergency department with suspected digoxin intoxication between February 2021 and June 2025 in a tertiary hospital. Data collected included demographic (age, sex) and clinical data (diagnosis, digoxin blood levels, use of anti-digoxin antibodies, treatment changes at discharge, and 30-day readmissions). Proportions were compared using Chi-square tests, and means were compared using Student&rsquo;s t-tests.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 46 patients were included, with a mean age of 84.7 years; 38 (82.6%) were women and 8 (17.4%) were men. Mean age in women was 85,3&plusmn;6.9 years and in men 81,4&plusmn;8,9 years (p=0.174). Mean digoxin blood levels (nmol/L) were 3.6&plusmn;1.8 in women and 3.5&plusmn;2.1 in men (p=0.890). 24 women (63.2%) and 4 men (50.0%) had confirmed digoxin intoxications with blood levels over 2.6 nmol/L (p=0.487). Three women (7.9%) and one man (11.1%) (p=0.767) required anti-digoxin antibodies administration. At hospital discharge, 26 (68.4%) women and 5 (62.5%) men required treatment suspension (p=0.746). Only 5 patients (all women, 13.2%) required readmission.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>This study provides real-world evidence on sex differences in digoxin intoxications in a tertiary hospital. Although most cases occurred in women, no statistically significant differences were observed in digoxin levels, treatment adjustments, or antibody use. Nevertheless, there was a trend toward higher readmission rates among women, suggesting possible sex-related factors influencing follow-up outcomes. Larger studies are warranted to confirm these findings and better characterise sex-based differences in digoxin toxicity.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dominguez Navarro, A., Fuentes-Herrero, M., Amoros-Reboredo, P., Plaza-Diaz, A., Panisello Cardona, M., Marin De La Barcena Grau, C., Ruiz-Ramos, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.309</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.309</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-210 Analysis of suspected digoxin toxicity with a gender perspective]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A152</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A152</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A152-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-211 Real-world treatment persistence of biologic therapies in psoriasis]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A152-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Biologic therapies are central to the management of moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Treatment persistence reflects long-term efficacy, tolerability, and adherence. Real-world data are essential to understand therapeutic patterns and support clinical decisions.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To assess treatment persistence among biologic therapies used in moderate-to-severe psoriasis, comparing individual drugs and therapeutic classes based on their mechanism of action.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective analysis of electronic health records was conducted, covering the period from 2015 to the first semester of 2025, including patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis treated with biologic therapies. Treatment duration was calculated per patient and per drug, based on the interval between the first and last recorded administration dates. Biologics were grouped by therapeutic class: Anti-TNF, Anti-IL17, Anti-IL23, and Anti-IL12/23. Statistical comparisons of treatment persistence were performed using the Mann-Whitney U test. The analysis was conducted to support formulary decisions and therapeutic optimisation.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 346 patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis treated with biologics were included in the study, of which 286 are currently undergoing treatment. Mean number of biologics per patient was 1,39 (range: 1&ndash;5). The mean treatment duration per drug was (in months): <I>Etanercept</I>=40,9 (N=29); <I>Risankizumab</I>=24,5 (N=48); <I>Ustekinumab</I>=22,6 (N=39); <I>Guselkumab</I>=21,5 (N=23); <I>Ixekizumab</I>=19,1 (N=35); <I>Adalimumab</I>=17,6 (N=246); <I>Secukinumab</I>=16,2 (N=13); <I>Brodalumab</I>=14,4 (N=24) and <I>Tildrakizumab</I>=12,9 (N=23). Grouped by therapeutic class, the mean treatment duration (&plusmn; standard deviation) was: Anti-IL23 = 23,5 (&plusmn;16,6); Anti-IL17 = 17,0 (&plusmn;18,5); Anti-IL12/23 = 22,7 (&plusmn;34,6); and Anti-TNF = 20,0 (&plusmn;22,8).</p><p>There are significant differences in treatment duration between <I>Anti-IL23 vs Anti-IL17</I>: p=0,0146; <I>Risankizumab vs Ixekizumab</I>: p=0,0482; <I>Anti-IL12/23 vs Anti-TNF</I>: p=0,0480; <I>Risankizumab vs Ustekinumab</I>: p=0,0116. No significant differences were found between <I>Risankizumab vs Guselkumab</I> or <I>Ixekizumab vs Brodalumab</I>.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Treatment persistence varied across biologic classes and agents. Anti-IL23 therapies showed the longest and most consistent durations, while Anti-IL17 had shorter and more variable persistence. Ustekinumab showed high mean persistence with greater variability. Significant differences were found between specific drugs and classes, favouring Anti-IL23 and ustekinumab. Limitations include the unavailability of all biologics throughout the study period and the retrospective design based on dispensing data. These findings support the use of real-world evidence and pharmaceutical monitoring to guide biologic selection and optimise long-term psoriasis management.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Soares, A., Lourenco, M., Catarino, M., Resende, B., Ferreira, T., Bastos, S., Alcobia, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.310</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.310</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-211 Real-world treatment persistence of biologic therapies in psoriasis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A152</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A152</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A153-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-212 Antibiotic consumption and utilisation patterns in an emergency department: what can we improve?]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A153-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>The implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programmes (ASPs) is recognised as a priority to reduce infections caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria. Emergency departments (EDs) are among the most critical settings for implementing ASPs.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To assess antibiotic consumption and the appropriateness of antibiotic prescriptions in the ED of a tertiary care hospital.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Retrospective observational study conducted at a tertiary care hospital, assessing the evolution of ASP indicators in the ED over a three-year period (2022 &ndash; 2024).</p><p>Some of the indicators defined in the ASP panel for EDs, published in <I>Farmacia Hospitalaria</I>,<sup>1</sup> were selected and assessed. Consumption indicators included: defined daily doses per 1000 discharges (DDD/1000) of antibiotics (J01), carbapenems, fluoroquinolones, macrolides, third-generation cephalosporins (3GC) and anti-MRSA agents (vancomycin, daptomycin, teicoplanin, linezolid), as well as the amoxicillin-clavulanate (AC)/piperacillin-tazobactam (PTZ) ratio. Appropriateness indicators included:% of community acquired pneumonia (CAP) cases treated with amoxicillin, AC and fluoroquinolones;% of urinary tract infections (UTIs) treated with fosfomycin trometamol, AC and fluoroquinolones; and% of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations treated with AC and fluoroquinolones.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Total antibiotic consumption, expressed as DDD/1000, was 176.54 (2022), 179.01 (2023) and 170.26 (2024). By antibiotic class, DDD/1000 were 9.00, 9.46 and 9.71 for carbapenems; 21.94, 19.16 and 16.93 for fluoroquinolones; 13.14, 14.22 and 15.42 for macrolides; 35.42, 34.52 and 33.63 for 3GC; and 5.52, 6.05 and 6.55 for anti-MRSA agents. The AC/PTZ ratio was 3.83, 4.28 and 4.83.</p><p>Regarding prescription appropriateness, 18.18%, 13.19% and 22.90% of CAP cases were treated with amoxicillin; 42.42%, 47.25% and 41.22% with AC; and 28.79%, 28.57% and 25.95% with fluoroquinolones. For UTIs, 18.65%, 18.18% and 25.68% were treated with fosfomycin trometamol; 16.08%, 13.42% and 11.67% with fluoroquinolones; and 4.82%, 6.49% and 3.89% with AC. For COPD exacerbations, 48.15%, 36.84% and 36.36% were treated with AC; and 42.59%, 47.37% and 41.82% with fluoroquinolones.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Global antibiotic consumption in the hospital ED remained stable during the study period.</p><p>Targeted interventions are needed to optimise fluoroquinolone prescribing for respiratory infections.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. Ruiz-Ramos J, Santolaya-Perr&iacute;n MR, Gonz&aacute;lez-Del-Castillo J, Candel FJ, <I>et al</I>. Design of a panel of indicators for antibiotic stewardship programs in the emergency department. <I>Farm Hosp.</I> 2024 ;<b>48</b>(2):T57&ndash;T63.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Subirana Batlle, C., Toro Blanch, C., Gratacos Santanach, L., Vila Currius, M., Ametller, M. G., Ortuno Ruiz, Y., Martinez Diaz, E., Quinones Ribas, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.311</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.311</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-212 Antibiotic consumption and utilisation patterns in an emergency department: what can we improve?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A153</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A153</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A153-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-213 ABS ward rounds as an effective strategy for optimising antibiotic prescribing]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A153-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>In 2017, the WHO classified antibiotics into Access, Watch, and Reserve groups to promote global, resistance-aware antibiotic use!</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>Antibiotic stewardship (ABS) programs aim to promote rational antibacterial use and to reduce the prescription of Watch and Reserve antibiotics, as defined by the WHO AWaRe classification. According to the German ABS S3 guideline, ABS ward rounds represent one of three core strategies for improving prescribing behaviour. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of ABS ward rounds on antibiotic prescribing patterns.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A single-centre interventional study was conducted at a German university hospital, where weekly ABS ward rounds were implemented across eleven wards (including normal and intensive care units) starting in November 2023. Changes in antibiotic prescribing practices were assessed using point prevalence analyses (PPA) performed on days 1 and 2 in March and September 2023 (baseline, prior to ABS implementation) and on day 3 in March 2024 (post-intervention). Antibiotics were categorised as Access, Watch, or Reserve according to the WHO AWaRe classification. Prescription frequencies in the baseline phase (n = 1,163 therapies, 849 patients) and the intervention phase (n = 629 therapies, 466 patients) were compared. The Access-to-Watch ratio was calculated by dividing the number of prescribed Access antibiotics by the number of prescribed Watch antibiotics. Changes in this ratio between phases were quantified through analysis.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Prescriptions for Watch antibiotics decreased from 43.1% to 36.1%, while Reserve antibiotics showed a slight increase from 2.8% to 3.3%. Prescriptions for Access antibiotics increased from 43.2% to 48.5%. Analysis revealed a balanced Access-to-Watch ratio of 1.0 during the baseline phase, which was below the WHO target value (&ge; 1.5). During the intervention phase, the ratio increased significantly to 1.34, approaching the recommended prescribing practice (Access proportion &ge; 70%). Additionally, the proportion of intravenous administrations declined slightly from 68.8% to 67.2% over the study period.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Overall, the results demonstrate the beneficial effect of ABS ward rounds on antibiotic prescribing behaviour. Both the Access-to-Watch ratio and the proportion of oral antibiotic therapies increased significantly, indicating an improvement in antibiotic selection and a shift towards more rational prescribing practices as a result of the intervention.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kainz, L., Giesen, R., Rieg, S., Hug, M., Fo&#x0308;rst, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.312</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.312</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-213 ABS ward rounds as an effective strategy for optimising antibiotic prescribing]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A153</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A153</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A154-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-214 Impact of empirical antibiotic adequacy in patients with sepsis diagnosed in the emergency department]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A154-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Empirical antibiotic therapy plays a decisive role in the management of sepsis, where early and appropriate treatment is directly related to patient outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the adequacy of empirical therapy initiated in the emergency department (ED) influences hospital mortality and the need for admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). Secondary objectives included analysing the length of hospital stay and the impact of therapy adjustment after microbiological results became available.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>We conducted a retrospective observational study including patients diagnosed with sepsis in the ED between January and December 2024. Demographic data, source of infection, adequacy of initial empirical antibiotic therapy according to national and local guidelines, microbiological findings, and subsequent therapeutic adjustments were collected. Patients starting targeted therapy from the outset were excluded.</p><p>Primary outcomes were hospital mortality and ICU admission. The secondary outcome was hospital length of stay. Statistical analyses were performed using Chi-square tests for categorical variables and Mann&ndash;Whitney U tests for continuous variables.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 51 patients were included, of whom 26 (51.0%) received appropriate empirical therapy.</p><p>Overall hospital mortality was 19.6% (10/51). Mortality was significantly lower in the group with appropriate empirical therapy (3.9%, 1/26) compared with those receiving inappropriate therapy (36.0%, 9/25; p=0.001; OR 0.07; 95% CI 0.01&ndash;0.41).</p><p>ICU admission was required in 3 patients (5.9%), of whom 2 (66.7%) had received inappropriate empirical therapy. Differences were not statistically significant (p=1.00).</p><p>Median length of stay was 6 days in both groups (p=0.66).</p><p>After excluding patients with initially adequate empirical therapy, 36 cases were analysed. Antibiotic treatment was modified in 13 (36.1%), showing lower mortality (7.7% vs 52.2%) compared with non-adjusted patients (p=0.21; OR 0.19; 95% CI 0.02&ndash;1.76).<b>Conclusion and Relevance</b>  </p><p>In this cohort, appropriate empirical antibiotic therapy in the ED was associated with significantly lower hospital mortality in patients with sepsis. No significant differences were observed in ICU admission or hospital stay, likely due to the small number of events. Adjustment of therapy after microbiological confirmation showed a trend towards improved survival. These findings highlight the importance of optimising empirical antibiotic selection in the ED and reassessing adequacy once microbiological results are available.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alonso Salmeron, F., Puivecino Moreno, C., Castellanos Clemente, Y., Gil Moreno, C., Garcia Rebolledo, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.313</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.313</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-214 Impact of empirical antibiotic adequacy in patients with sepsis diagnosed in the emergency department]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A154</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A154</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A154-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-215 Adverse effects and their management in patients with pulmonary fibrosis treated with nintedanib]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A154-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Pulmonary fibrosis is a progressive disease, often treated with nintedanib. However, its use is frequently associated with adverse effects, necessitating careful management to optimise treatment outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the incidence and risk factors associated with adverse events related to nintedanib treatment in patients with pulmonary fibrosis. The secondary objective was to determine whether efficacy, measured by forced vital capacity (FVC) and carbon monoxide diffusion capacity (DLco), was maintained throughout follow-up.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>This was an observational, retrospective, single-centre study including patients with pulmonary fibrosis who initiated nintedanib treatment between July 2024 and July 2025. Demographic and clinical variables were collected: age, sex, smoking status, oxygen therapy, carob flour use, body mass index (BMI), FVC, DLco, and type of adverse reactions. <I>T-student</I> was applied for qualitative variables and <I>chi-square</I> test for qualitative ones.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Ninety-seven patients were included (64 women). Median age was 71 years [39-88], and median BMI was 28 [19-51]. Sixty-three (65%) had a history of smoking, and 28 (29%) were on oxygen therapy.</p><p>Median baseline FVC was 78% [40-109] and 74% [50-115] at the end of the study. Median DLco was 51% [27-75] at baseline and 49% [13-86] at study completion</p><p>Treatment persistence was 84.54%. Sixty-six patients (16.5%) maintained the full 300 mg/day dose, while 24.7% required dose reduction. Sixteen patients (16.5%) discontinued therapy due to gastrointestinal intolerance (56.3%), weight loss (6.3%), death (6.3%), patient decision (12.5%) or other causes (18.8%).</p><p>Thirty-five patients (36.1%) showed hepatic enzyme alterations. Fifty-nine (60.8%) had adverse gastrointestinal reactions: mainly diarrhoea (53.6%) and 15.46% nausea. Of these, 38.14% needed to include carob flour in their diet. Additionally, 38.1% presented other adverse events.</p><p>BMI and hepatic enzyme alterations showed a significant inverse correlation (p = 0.045), lower BMI was associated with more hepatic profile alteration. No other significant associations were found between clinical or demographic variables.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>During nintedanib therapy, active monitoring and management of adverse events are essential to sustain the treatment persistence. Among the variables analysed, body mass index (BMI) was the only factor significantly associated with adverse events. FVC and DLco values showed a modest decline during follow-up.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Comas-Sugranes, M., Gamarra Calvo, S., Murillo Moreno, E., Santos, M., Ribera Puig, C., Canedo Castelo, M., Vicens Zygmunt, V., Badia Tahull, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.314</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.314</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-215 Adverse effects and their management in patients with pulmonary fibrosis treated with nintedanib]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A154</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A154</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A155-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-216 Avoided drug cost derived from participation in clinical trials on transthyretin amyloidosis]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A155-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>The evaluation of avoided cost (AC) in investigational medicines addresses the economic dimension of clinical trials, an objectively quantifiable factor. Although sponsors are legally required to provide study drugs free of charge, this aspect remains under-reported in our setting. Quantifying AC is essential to assess the real economic impact of clinical trials, especially in diseases with high pharmaceutical expenditure such as transthyretin amyloidosis.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The aim of this study was to quantify the avoided drug cost associated with the participation of patients in clinical trials on transthyretin amyloidosis, in order to assess their real economic impact on the healthcare system.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective observational study was conducted in a tertiary hospital including clinical trials on transthyretin amyloidosis from 2019 to 2024. Trials were included if they were active during this period, investigated medicines already marketed by March 2025, and provided study drugs free of charge by the sponsor. Trials with no patients enrolled were excluded. Data were obtained from the institutional clinical trial management software and the pharmacy department database. For each trial, information was collected on protocol code, phase, scope, sponsor, investigational drug, number of enrolled patients, doses dispensed per patient, and drug cost (ex-factory price + VAT &ndash; applied discounts). The primary outcome was the total avoided cost over the period 2019&ndash;2024, while the secondary outcome was the mean avoided cost per patient. AC was calculated assuming patients would have received the same treatment, dose and regimen outside the clinical trial.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>During 2019&ndash;2024, two clinical trials on transthyretin amyloidosis were conducted; only one met the inclusion criteria. This was an international, multicentre, industry-sponsored phase III trial evaluating tafamidis in both hereditary and wild-type forms of the disease. The total avoided cost reached 9,710,268 over the study period, with a mean avoided cost per patient of 134,865, corresponding to an approximate annual saving of 1.9 million.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The participation of hospitals and patients in clinical trials contributes significantly to reducing direct drug costs associated with transthyretin amyloidosis. Beyond this economic impact, clinical trials also reinforce the sustainability of healthcare systems, foster scientific progress and facilitate early patient access to innovative therapies.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Torres-Perez, A., Gomez-Costa, E., Rabunal-Alvarez, M., Jimeno-Aguado, S., Sanchez-Carballo, P., Sanchez-Mira, E., Fernandez-Diz, C., Caeiro-Martinez, L., Calvin-Lamas, M., Mauriz-Montero, M., Margusino-Framinan, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.315</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.315</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-216 Avoided drug cost derived from participation in clinical trials on transthyretin amyloidosis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A155</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A155</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A155-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-217 Inclisiran in patients with hypercholesterolaemia: evaluation of effectiveness and safety in clinical practice]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A155-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Inclisiran is a small interfering (siRNA) that inhibits hepatic PCSK9 synthesis, thereby increasing LDL-C uptake. Its main advantage over anti-PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies is its long duration of action, requiring only two injections per year after initial dose. According clinical trials, it achieved a 28% to 55% reduction in LDL-C at 180 days compared to baseline</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of inclisiran in adults with primary hypercholesterolaemia (heterozygous familial or non-familial) or mixed dyslipidemia in clinical practice</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>This retrospective observational study involved patients treated with inclisiran from January 2020 to January 2025 at a tertiary hospital. Data collected: age, sex, lipid parameters (LDL, total cholesterol, non-HDL, triglycerides, atherogenic index, ApoB and HDL), cardiovascular events, concomitant therapies, and adverse events. Data were obtained from electronic health records and dispensing software (Glintt HealthCare )</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>54 patients (mean age 63.2&plusmn;11.00 years; 63.46% male) with non-familial/mixed (75.96%) or familial hypercholesterolaemia were treated with inclisiran. The median baseline values of lipid parameters were: LDL 108.75[130.25-84.45]mg/dL, total cholesterol 184.05[210.75-155.70]mg/dL, non-HDL cholesterol 131.55[170.3-111.3]mg/dL, triglycerides 117[174.25-84.75] mg/dL, atherogenic index 3.63[5.01-3.1], ApoB 89.75[120.08-77.53]mg/dL, and HDL 49.15[59.88-40.13]mg/dL. After the first dose, median values decreased to: LDL 55.25[86.78-30.6]mg/dL, total cholesterol 127.4[176.5-105.88]mg/dL, non-HDL 78.20[114.38-51.40] mg/dL, triglycerides 106[140-71.75] mg/dL, atherogenic index 2.45[30.2-2.11], ApoB 61.6[81.38-49.63] mg/dL, and HDL increased to 49.9[62.45-44.2] mg/dL. After the second dose, reduced to: LDL 47.85[74.33-24.33] mg/dL, total cholesterol 126.7[151.48-111.61] mg/dL, non-HDL 74.70[102.73-47.83] mg/dL, triglycerides to 97[129.25-74.5] mg/dL, atherogenic index 2.30[3-2], ApoB to 57.7 [70.95-40.8] mg/dL,and HDL increased to 53.43[62-39.9] mg/dL. 52 patients continued treatment, 2 discontinued for lack of efficacy. No cardiovascular events occurred during follow-up, 84.6% received concomitant lipid-lowering therapy, and no adverse effects related to drug administration were reported.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Inclisiran produced a sustained 49&ndash;56% reduction in LDL-C in our patients in clinical practice, along with decreases in ApoB, total cholesterol, and atherogenic index, with a slight increase in HDL. No cardiovascular events occurred, discontinuation due to lack of efficacy was low, and no drug-related adverse effects were reported, supporting its safety and tolerability, Overall efficacy was 96.3%, confirming inclisiran as an effective option for high cardiovascular risk patients.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>Clinical trial phase II ORION-1</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Perez Huerga, P., Fernandez Alonso, E., Merchante Andreu, M., Garcia Osuna, R., Chilet Rodrigo, E., Pinilla Rello, A., Patier Ruiz, I., Villora Molina, P., Gimeno Garcia, M., Lopez Nicolas, A., Salvador Gomez, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.316</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.316</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-217 Inclisiran in patients with hypercholesterolaemia: evaluation of effectiveness and safety in clinical practice]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A155</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A156</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A156-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-218 Prevalence and characteristics of complementary therapy use in patients undergoing oncological treatment]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A156-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Complementary therapies, including herbal products (HP), are frequently used by cancer patients. However, unsupervised use may compromise the efficacy and safety of anticancer treatment due to potential drug&ndash;herb interactions.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the prevalence of HP use in oncology patients treated at the Hospital Outpatient Clinic (HOC). Secondary objectives were to identify the most commonly used HP, assess patient&ndash;healthcare professional communication, and determine the main sources of patient information on these therapies.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Prospective longitudinal study in a tertiary hospital. Adult patients receiving oncological treatment in the HOC (April&ndash;June 2025) were included. Patients enrolled in clinical trials or with haematological malignancies were excluded. Socio-demographic and clinical variables were collected from the electronic health record (HCIS ), and treatment data from the electronic prescribing system (FarmaTools ). HP use was assessed through a 7-item survey designed by the research team based on validated questionnaires and administered during treatment at the HOC. Multiple responses were allowed.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 112 patients were included, 62 (55.4%) women, median age 64 (57&ndash;72) years. The most common cancer types were colorectal (28; 25.0%), breast (26; 23.2%) and non-small-cell lung cancer (20; 17.9%).</p><p>Overall, 104 (92.9%) patients reported HP use. 73 (70.2%) had not been asked about it by healthcare professionals, although 61 (58.7%) proactively informed about their own use. A total of 46 different HP were reported, the most frequent being garlic (75; 72.1%), pepper (75; 72.1%), oregano (74; 71.2%), thyme (57; 54.8%), rosemary (53; 51.0%), chamomile (50; 48.1%), ginger (42; 40.4%), cinnamon (36; 34.6%) and turmeric (35; 33.7%).</p><p>Main sources of information were healthcare professionals (49%), acquaintances (22%), internet (21%) and traditional use without a specific source (35%).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Oncology patients HP use is highly prevalent and may result in interaction risks. Healthcare professionals often do not enquire about it. Systematic recording and patient education are recommended to ensure safe treatment.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Calleja-Fernandez, C., Espadas-Hervas, N., Parro-Martin, M., Saez-De La Fuente, J., Sanchez-Cuervo, M., Acosta-Cano, C., Fradejas-Fernandez, J., Romero-Sepulveda, A., Arroyo-Chillaron, M., Dominguez-Mateo, M., Alvarez-Diaz, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.317</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.317</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-218 Prevalence and characteristics of complementary therapy use in patients undergoing oncological treatment]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A156</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A156</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A156-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-219 Neonatal seizures treatment protocol in a tertiary hospital: real-world use of lidocaine after protocol implementation]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A156-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Neonatal seizures are a frequent and challenging condition in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), due to their diverse etiologies and variable response to pharmacological treatment. Phenobarbital and levetiracetam are standard first- and second-line treatments. Recent evidence supports lidocaine as an effective third-line option for refractory seizures. Based on these findings, lidocaine was incorporated into our hospital&rsquo;s protocol in June 2022. Despite its therapeutic potential, clinical experience with lidocaine remains limited and underreported.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To describe the pharmacological management of neonatal seizures in our NICU and assess the effectiveness and safety of lidocaine after its inclusion in the treatment protocol.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective study was conducted in a tertiary hospital from December 2019 to November 2024. All neonates admitted to the NICU with a diagnosis or suspicion of seizures were included. Data collected included demographics, seizure aetiology, pharmacological treatments, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), therapeutic hypothermia, treatment at discharge and outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Thirty-nine patients were included, 19 before and 20 after the protocol change. Mean birth weight was 3.1 &plusmn; 0.56 kg, mean gestational age 39 &plusmn; 2 weeks, and 24 were female. The most common aetiology was hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy (n=19), followed by unknown cause (n=5), haemorrhages/vascular lesions (n=4), infections (n=3), metabolic disorders (n=3) and others (n=5). Therapeutic hypothermia was applied in 11 cases.</p><p>Five neonates did not receive pharmacological therapy. Among those treated, 14 received phenobarbital alone, while others required between 2 and 7 drugs. TDM was performed in 12 cases, mainly for phenobarbital (n=11). At discharge, 15 patients were medication-free, 10 were on monotherapy, and 1 was on dual therapy with lacosamide and oxcarbazepine; four patients were transferred to other centres and four died.</p><p>Since its introduction, lidocaine has been administered to six neonates, showing effectiveness and good tolerability. Of these, two were discharged on monotherapy with lacosamide/oxcarbazepine and remain seizure-free without treatment, one on dual therapy with lacosamide and oxcarbazepine and maintained on a single agent (valproate), one was transferred and two died.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Phenobarbital remains the first-line therapy in our NICU, followed by levetiracetam. Lidocaine has proven to be an effective and safe third-line therapy for refractory neonatal seizures.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Panisello Cardona, M., Fernandez De Gamarra Martinez, E., Moliner Calderon, E., Ferrando Riba, M., Dominguez Navarro, A., Fuentes Herrero, M., Garcia Borau, M., Salazar Quiroz, J., Feliu Ribera, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.318</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.318</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-219 Neonatal seizures treatment protocol in a tertiary hospital: real-world use of lidocaine after protocol implementation]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A156</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A157</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A157-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-220 Oral nonabsorbable antibiotics: a promising approach for prevention of recurrent cholangitis]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A157-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Recurrent cholangitis frequently affects patients with biliary comorbidities and is associated with severe infections. The usual approach is short antibiotics cycles at symptom onset. However, oral nonabsorbable antibiotics (ONA) (colistine, nystatin and tobramycin in suspension) constitute an alternative for prevention as off-label use.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of ONA in reducing cholangitis recurrences and to describe adverse reactions.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>An observational, retrospective study was conducted in a third-degree hospital, including patients with recurrent cholangitis who received ONA treatment between November 2018 and August 2025. We included patients with more than one ONA pharmacy dispensation.</p><p>Data were collected from the Electronic Medical Record and the Pharmacy Dispensing Program, including the number of episodes from the initial diagnosis to the study date (exitus or treatment discontinuation were registered as end date if applicable), resulting in a median of recurrences per 100 days, prior or in-treatment with ONA. Statistically significant differences between the two periods were assessed using the Wilcoxon test for nonparametric variables, considering total patients, sex, and treatment duration (&lt;1 year vs &ge;1 year).</p><p>Patients&lsquo; tolerability to the suspension was also registered, and whether it prompted any discontinuation.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Out of the 36 patients included, 29 were male (80.5%) and the median age was 68 years (58-78).</p><p>The median period of follow-up prior to ONA and once initiated were 40 months (7-72) and 8 months (4-16) respectively. During the latest, 23 (63.8%) of the patients presented at least one recurrence. Reduction of median episodes per 100 days after ONA start was statistically significant (0.72 (ICR 1.4) vs 0.46 (ICR 0.8), p=0.015). Although no statistically significant differences were observed between sexes, recurrences per 100 days did significantly increase beyond 12 months of treatment (p&lt;0.05).</p><p>Adverse events were reported in 7 patients: gastrointestinal (n=6) and cutaneous (n=1). There was one registered case of treatment discontinuation by patient decision due to severe diarrhoea.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>ONA significantly reduces cholangitis recurrences with an acceptable safety profile. However, as its effectiveness appears to decrease beyond 12 months of treatment, further studies are advisable to confirm long-term effectiveness.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Garcia-Guijas-Garcia, C., Esteban-Cartelle, B., Gemeno Lopez, E., Gomez Garcia, G., Saez De La Fuente, J., Velez-Diaz-Pallares, M., Fortun, J., Poveda-Escolar, A., Alvarez-Diaz, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.319</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.319</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-220 Oral nonabsorbable antibiotics: a promising approach for prevention of recurrent cholangitis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A157</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A157</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A157-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-221 Tezepelumab desensitisation protocol in a patient allergic to polysorbate: a case report]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A157-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Tezepelumab is an anti-TSLP monoclonal antibody used in uncontrolled severe asthma. Hypersensitivity to excipients in biological therapies is a significant clinical challenge, as many of these components are shared among these. In most cases, treatment is avoided unless no therapeutic alternatives exist. In this context, the hospital pharmacy plays a crucial role preparing desensitisation protocols, ensuring traceability and maintaining process safety.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To describe a subcutaneous desensitisation protocol to tezepelumab in a patient with severe asthma and polysorbate hypersensitivity, and to highlight the pharmacy service&rsquo;s contribution to preparation, quality control and patient safety.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A 48-year-old man with severe asthma allergic to polysorbate 80. Previous treatments included omalizumab (hypersensitivity in first dose) and dupilumab (both ineffective), benralizumab (discontinued due to an allergic reaction attributed to polysorbate 20), and reslizumab (ineffective, the only without polysorbate). Consequently, desensitisation to tezepelumab was proposed.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The content of the commercial pen (CP) (210 mg/1.91 mL pen) was withdrawn using a syringe. A stepwise desensitisation protocol was designed based on the preparation of dilutions from the marketed formulation. Three solutions were prepared: A (0,71 mL CP + 0,29 mL saline solution 0,9% (SS)), B (0,61 mL CP + 0,39 mL SS) and X (0,59 mL CP + 2,51 mL SS). From the X solution five dilutions were prepared.</p><p>Each dilution was administered subcutaneously every 20 minutes, with a total duration of 140 minutes and a cumulative dose of 210 mg. This process is repeated each 4 weeks. The solutions are prepared in a laminar flow cabin and it&rsquo;s necessary to make a quality control by visual inspection.</p><p>The patient initiated therapy with tezepelumab in 2023 with the first administration performed in the intensive care unit. To the date, he has completed 16 administrations and continues to receive the medication in the day hospital, maintaining adequate asthma control without severe hypersensitivity reactions.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The role of the pharmacy service was essential in the development of a desensitisation protocol that ensured patient safety and minimised manipulation. This protocol contributes valuable evidence in a field with limited published data and may serve as a model for future desensitisation strategies.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vazquez Vazquez, M., Feal Cortizas, M., Mateos Salvador, M., Calvin Lamas, M., Torres Perez, A., Neira Rodriguez-Hermida, M., Fernandez Diz, C., Gomez Costa, E., Caeiro Martinez, L., Margusino Framinan, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.320</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.320</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-221 Tezepelumab desensitisation protocol in a patient allergic to polysorbate: a case report]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A157</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A157</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A158-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-222 Use of dextromethorphan for treatment and prophylaxis of methotrexate-related neurotoxicity in a real-world paediatric cohort]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A158-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Methotrexate (MTX)&ndash;related neurotoxicity in children ranges from transient focal deficits and seizures to toxic leukoencephalopathy. Dextromethorphan (DXM), an N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA)-receptor antagonist, is used during acute episodes and as secondary prophylaxis to prevent recurrence after MTX re-exposure, but real-world paediatric evidence remains limited.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To describe the real-world use, effectiveness, and safety of DXM for treatment and/or prophylaxis of MTX-related neurotoxicity in a tertiary paediatric hospital.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Retrospective observational study of paediatric patients who received DXM with MTX between January/2020 and September/2025. Variables included demographics (age, sex, weight); DXM therapy (dose, duration, indication, adverse events (AEs)); MTX therapy (intrathecal(IT)/intravenous (IV)); timing from MTX to symptoms and from symptoms to first DXM dose; brain MRI; acute clinical resolution and neurological sequelae of previous or acute MTX-neurotoxicity at 3 and 12 months. Descriptive statistics are reported as median (range).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Thirty-two patients were included (female 59.4%). Age at DXM start was 9.23 (1.34&ndash;18.68) years; weight 35.3 (10.3&ndash;71.8) kg. Indication: treatment 20/32 (62.5%) and prophylaxis 12/32 (37.5%). Overall DXM dose was 40 (8&ndash;75) mg, 1.03 (0.33&ndash;1.67) mg/kg, for 6 (1&ndash;25) days. In treatment patients (n=20), dose was 41 (8&ndash;75) mg, 1.01 (0.33&ndash;1.63) mg/kg for 6.5 (1&ndash;25) days; in prophylaxis patients (n=12), 30 (25&ndash;60) mg, 1.04 (0.70&ndash;1.67) mg/kg for 4 (2&ndash;10) days. DXM-related AEs occurred in 1/32 (3.1%), non-serious. MTX route: IV 23/32 (71.9%), IT 9/32 (28.1%). Time from MTX to neurotoxicity was 5.5 (0&ndash;25) days (n=20). Time from symptom onset to first treatment DXM dose was 0 (0&ndash;3) days. Brain MRI was compatible with previous or acute MTX neurotoxicity in 13/21 (61.9%) among those with MRI performed. Clinical resolution of acute MTX-neurotoxicity was documented in 20/20 (100%) treatment patients. Persistent neurological sequelae of previous or acute MTX-neurotoxicity at 3 months were recorded in 6/32 (18.8%); at 12 months, 0/29 among those with available follow-up had persistent sequelae.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>In this real-world paediatric cohort, DXM appeared feasible and clinically useful for managing and preventing MTX-related neurotoxicity. Nonetheless, further prospective, controlled studies are necessary to corroborate and extend these results and to standardise response criteria.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Merino Pardo, A., Algarra Sanchez, E., Arce Abaitua, B., Gonzalez Rodriguez, M., Abril Cabero, A., Leal Pino, B., Nieto Martil, E., Fernandez Romero, L., Riva De La Hoz, B., Echavarri De Miguel, M., Pozas Del Rio, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.321</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.321</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-222 Use of dextromethorphan for treatment and prophylaxis of methotrexate-related neurotoxicity in a real-world paediatric cohort]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A158</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A158</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A158-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-223 Efficacy and safety of darolutamide in the routine clinical practice conditions]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A158-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Apalutamide, enzalutamide and darolutamide are oral treatments. They have been approved in combination with androgen deprivation therapy. The therapeutic efficacy and safety of darolutamide were established in two multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled phase III studies in patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) (ARAMIS) and metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) (ARASENS). Darolutamide was commercialised in 2020.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and safety of darolutamide in patients with mHSPC and nmCRPC in the routine clinical practice conditions.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Retrospective observational multicentre study. All patients with darolutamida and with at least 3 months of clinical follow-up in 3 public hospitals in Spain (Huelva, C&oacute;rdoba and Santa Cruz de Tenerife) were included. Data on age, diagnosis, disease volume (high/low), median PSA before darolutamide, median time from diagnosis to initiation of darolutamide, PSA decline after 3 y 12 months of darolutamide, patients continuing on treatment at 12 months, and reason for treatment discontinuation (toxicity or death/progression) were collected from digital medical records. A comprehensive descriptive statistical analysis was performed.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>51 patients were included with a median age of 77(IQR=71-84) years. 14 patients started darolutamide for mHSPC and the rest for nmCRPC. In 24 patients, the disease volume at diagnosis was high and the rest had undergone some prior treatment. The median pre-treatment PSA was 4,2(IQR=1,5-13,3) ng/ml and the median time from diagnosis to darolutamide was 3,45(IQR=1,5-31,6) months. After 3 months of treatment with darolutamide, 54,9% of patients achieved &gt;90% reduction in baseline PSA and 82,4% achieved &gt;50% reduction in PSA in real-world condition. After 12 months, 22 patients continued with darolutamide, 15 patients achieved &gt;90% reduction in baseline PSA. Only 7 patients discontinued treatment due to: disease progression(4), death(1), other reasons (1) and gastrointestinal toxicity(1).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Darolutamide shows high efficacy, reduction of PSA &gt;90% after 3 and 12 months of treatment, with an acceptable toxicity profile in routine clinical practice conditions. The inclusion of patients with and without metastases reinforces its therapeutic versatility and the possibility of integrating the drug into different stages of management.</p><p>This study provides real data from three Spanish public hospitals, providing local evidence on the efficacy and safety of darolutamide.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Loreto, D., Blanco-Espeso, T., Aparicio-Castellano, B., Esquivel Negrin, J., Corriente Gordon, I., Paradela Garcia, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.322</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.322</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-223 Efficacy and safety of darolutamide in the routine clinical practice conditions]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A158</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A158</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A159-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-224 Real-world effectiveness of neoadjuvant dual HER2 blockade in early-stage her2-positive breast cancer]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A159-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Treatment with dual HER2 blockade, combining Trastuzumab and Pertuzumab with chemotherapy, is currently the therapeutic option in the neoadjuvant setting for patients with early-stage disease and HER2 overexpression.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This study aimed to evaluate the use of dual HER2 blockade in real-world clinical practice. The primary objective was to determine the rate of pathological complete response (pCR). Secondary objectives included assessing factors influencing pCR, progression-free survival time and overall survival.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Patients with early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer treated between 2017 and 2024 were retrospectively analysed. Pathological complete response was evaluated, and the impact of various influencing factors was assessed using Pearson&rsquo;s Chi-squared or Fisher&rsquo;s exact tests, with p-values adjusted using the Benjamini&ndash;Hochberg method. Logistic regression was used to examine associations between pCR and significant variables. Statistical analyses were performed using R.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Of the 84 patients included, 44 (52.4%; 95% CI: 41.7%&ndash;63.1%) achieved a pCR. In the overall cohort, pCR was significantly associated with HR status (p = 0.0036) and HER2 expression (p = 0.00065), with lower pCR rates observed in HR-positive and HER2 IHC 2+/FISH+ tumours. In multivariable analysis, HR-negative status (OR: 7.6; 95% CI: 2.6&ndash;26.6) and HER2 IHC 3+ expression (OR: 6.6; 95% CI: 1.6&ndash;26.6) were independently associated with a higher likelihood of achieving pCR. Tumour size, nodal involvement, histological grade, Ki-67 expression, and menopausal status were not significantly associated with pCR. After a median follow-up of 45.9 months, the number of disease progression or death events was insufficient to estimate progression-free survival.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Approximately half of the patients achieved pCR with neoadjuvant dual HER2 blockade, showing a positive association between HR negativity and treatment response. Additionally, a significant correlation was observed between lower HER2 expression (IHC 2+/FISH+) and reduced response rates. The average follow-up duration has not yet allowed for the estimation of median progression-free survival or overall survival.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ferreira, T., Soares, A., Lourenco, M., Resende, B., Bastos, S., Alcobia, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.323</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.323</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-224 Real-world effectiveness of neoadjuvant dual HER2 blockade in early-stage her2-positive breast cancer]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A159</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A159</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A159-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-225 Impact of antimicrobial stewardship interventions on therapy optimisation and acceptance of recommendations in patients with bloodstream infections]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A159-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Bloodstream infections (BSI) are associated with high morbidity and mortality, requiring prompt and appropriate antimicrobial therapy. Antimicrobial Stewardship Programmes (ASPs) review positive blood cultures daily and provide recommendations to optimise treatment.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>Evaluate the impact of ASP interventions on optimising antimicrobial treatment in patients with BSI. To this end, we assessed the acceptance rate of ASP recommendations and analysed the association between acceptance (yes/no) and clinical outcomes: 30-day mortality, ICU admission, and hospital readmission.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>We conducted a retrospective observational study over four months (April&ndash;July 2025) in a tertiary care hospital. All episodes of BSI confirmed by blood culture were included. ASP interventions were prospectively recorded in an Excel database (type of recommendation, communication method, and acceptance). Demographic, clinical, microbiological, therapeutic, and outcome variables were retrospectively extracted from the electronic medical record.</p><p>Statistical analysis was performed using Excel . Descriptive statistics (means &plusmn; SD or medians [IQR] for continuous variables, percentages for categorical variables) and comparisons between groups were performed.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The study analysed 78 BSI episodes, predominantly in males (48) and the elderly (median age 76). The main origin was community (31), and the most frequent focus was Urinary (42%, 33). Most cases presented with severe infection (sepsis/septic shock: 32). The most isolated pathogens were E. coli (13) and K. pneumoniae (9). A high rate of MDR pathogens (31 isolates) was observed, primarily due to extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing bacteria (16). Notably, initial empirical treatment was inappropriate in the majority (47 vs. 31).</p><p>The ASP intervened in all 78 episodes, achieving an excellent 88% acceptance rate. The most common recommendations were escalation (63%) or de-escalation (32%) of therapy. Despite the high intervention acceptance, the overall 30-day mortality was 16.7% (13 deaths), ICU admission occurred in 9 patients, and hospital readmission within 30 days affected 10 patients (12.8%).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>ASP interventions are highly accepted and important for optimising antimicrobial therapy in patients with BSI, especially given the high rate of initial inappropriate treatment and MDR pathogens. Thirty-day mortality (16.7%) was similar to Garc&iacute;a-Rodr&iacute;guez et al. (17.4%), while 30-day readmission (12.8%) was lower than Gradel et al. (31.3%).</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. Garc&iacute;a-Rodr&iacute;guez JF, <I>et al</I>. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-023-08018-0</p><p>2. Gradel K, <I>et al</I>. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-025-05347-7</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gonzalez Romero, C., Garcia Gomez, C., Gil Palao, N., Urrea Tobarra, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.324</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.324</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-225 Impact of antimicrobial stewardship interventions on therapy optimisation and acceptance of recommendations in patients with bloodstream infections]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A159</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A159</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A159-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-226 Contributions of lithium pharmaceutical consultations in mental health institution]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A159-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Given the poor compliance with psychotropic treatments, in 2023 the French PIC (Psychiatric Information Communication) network published the first version of the lithium notebook for patients taking lithium, to improve their knowledge about the drug and reduce the risk of relapse.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The introduction of lithium pharmaceutical consultations in our establishment aims to assess the relevance of involving the clinical pharmacist in the care pathway of patients. This allowed us to establish an overview of the information provided during the prescription process.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Pharmaceutical consultations were offered to all accessible patients on lithium (whether lithium initiation or not), regardless of age or indication, except those in intensive care units. A summary of the knowledge acquired during the consultation or already assimilated by the patient was completed after each consultation, focusing on six main areas of knowledge (what to do in case of missed doses, adverse effects, pregnancy and contraception, drug interactions, signs of overdose and risk situations, and therapeutic follow-up).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>15 patients (sex ratio 1:1, average age 45.6 years) have been benefited from lithium pharmaceutical consultations. 40% (n=6) of consultations were conducted as part of treatment initiation and for 1 patient as part of lithium reintroduction. 100% of patients were taking Lithium LP 400mg, indicated in bipolar disorder. The mean consultation lasted 42.5 minutes. 100% of patients were informed for the first time during the consultation of the signs of overdose and risk situations, 86.6% (n=13) about drug interactions and about adverse effects and what to do if they miss a dose for 80% (n=12) (with respectively 13.3% (n=2) and 6.6% (n=1) of patients previously informed). Therapeutic follow-up is well understood : 73.3% of patients were previously informed. The four patients informed for the first time during the pharmaceutical consultation were those who had just started lithium treatment. All patients received the lithium notebook as a complement, and a consultation report was filed in the Electronic Medical Record.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The information provided to patients at the time of prescription appears to be insufficient. Pharmaceutical consultations seem to play a crucial role. These consultations often provide an opportunity for patients to ask questions.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Girard, E., Allout, L., Boudard, A., Berlaud, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.325</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.325</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-226 Contributions of lithium pharmaceutical consultations in mental health institution]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A159</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A160</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A160-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-227 Real-world experience with long-acting injectable cabotegravir/rilpivirine antiretroviral therapy in people living with HIV]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A160-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Long-acting injectable antiretroviral therapy (ART) with cabotegravir/rilpivirine (CAB/RPV) offers an alternative to daily oral treatment for people living with HIV (PLWHIV). It may improve adherence and patient satisfaction, supporting a person-centred approach. Real-world evidence outside clinical trials remains limited.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To describe the effectiveness of long-acting injectable CAB/RPV in PLWHIV in real-world clinical practice.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Single-centre, retrospective observational study at a secondary-level hospital including PLWHIV who initiated injectable CAB/RPV between January 2023-March 2025.</p><p>Collected variables: sex, age, years since diagnosis, weight/body mass index (BMI), baseline viral load (VL), CD4 count, CD4/CD8 ratio, previous ART regimen and medication possession ratio (MPR). Effectiveness was defined as achieving or maintaining undetectable VL (VL&lt;50 copies/mL). Only patients with &ge;12 weeks of therapy were included. Reasons for discontinuation were recorded.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>167 patients were included (92.4% male). Age 45&plusmn;12 years. Time since diagnosis 11&plusmn;6 years. Weight 77.9&plusmn;13.7 kg (n=161), BMI 25.8&plusmn;3.9 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (n=63).</p><p>At baseline, 94% (157/167) had undetectable VL, 6% detectable VL (mean 188&plusmn;251 copies/mL). Mean CD4 count 872&plusmn;385 cells/&micro;L; CD4/CD8 ratio 0.97&plusmn;0.48 (n=148).</p><p>Previous ART regimens: nucleotide/nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) + non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI): 32.9% (55/167), dual therapy: 32.3% (54/167), NRTI + integrase inhibitor: 28.2% (47/167), NRTI + protease inhibitor: 3.8% (6/167), others: 2.8% (5/167). No patient received prior oral CAB/RPV before starting the injectable regimen. Mean MPR was 94% (20&ndash;100%).</p><p>Effectiveness CAB/RPV:</p><p><l type="tab"><li><p>&ndash; &nbsp;Week 12&plusmn;8 (n=148), 89.2% undetectable VL; CD4 925&plusmn;478 (n=63). 10.8% VL &gt;50 copies/mL, mean VL 638 &plusmn;257 (median 77 copies/mL).</p></li><li><p>&ndash; &nbsp;Week 28&plusmn;8 (n=76), 86.8% undetectable VL; CD4 880&plusmn;429 (n=42). 13.2% VL &gt;50 copies/mL, mean VL 100&plusmn;46 (median 102 copies/mL).</p></li><li><p>&ndash; &nbsp;Week 44&plusmn;8 (n=23), 95.7% undetectable VL; CD4 785&plusmn;254 (n=14). 1 patient VL &gt;50 copies/mL, mean VL 116.</p></li></l></p><p>5.4% (9/167) discontinued treatment: 1.8% (3/167) due to adverse events (injection site reaction, local pain, dry skin) and 3.6% (6/167) by patient preference. No discontinuations related to virological failure.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Long-acting injectable CAB/RPV was effective and well-tolerated. Virological suppression at week 44 was similar to pivotal trials, despite including patients with VL &gt;50 copies/mL at baseline. Detectable viremia was rare and low-level. No treatment interruptions for lack of efficacy were observed, and discontinuations due to adverse events were minimal.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lasala Aza, C., Garcia Ruiz, M., Laguna Alcantara, A., Guijarro Herrera, S., Sanchez Yanez, E., Moya Carmona, I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.326</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.326</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-227 Real-world experience with long-acting injectable cabotegravir/rilpivirine antiretroviral therapy in people living with HIV]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A160</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A160</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A160-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-228 Effectivity and durability of intravitreal aflibercept in patients with age-related macular degeneration]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A160-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Aflibercept is an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor drug that prevents damaged blood vessels from leaking fluid into the macula. This helps to treat or prevent age-related macular degeneration (ARMD)</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the effectivity and durability of intravitreal aflibercept in treatment-nai&#x0308;ve and those switched from ranibizumab.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective observational study was conducted on ARMD patients treated with aflibercept treatment between April 2024 and April 2025, with at least a loading dose administered.</p><p>Data collected included demographics and clinical information: treatment-nai&#x0308;ve or prior switched from ranibizumab, number of previous intravitreal injections, baseline and final best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in logMAR scale, and the dosing interval (Q) in weeks before and after starting aflibercept therapy.</p><p>The statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 29.0</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>66 patients (60.6% female, mean age 79 &plusmn; 9.7 years) and 72 eyes were analysed: 22.2% nai&#x0308;ve and 77.8% switched. The mean number of prior injections of ranibizumab was 10.6 &plusmn; 9.5.</p><p>The mean overall BCVA was 0.508 &plusmn; 0.47 logMAR at baseline vs. 0.513 &plusmn; 0.52 logMAR at study end ([IC95% -0.005 (-0.11-0.10) p = 0.927)]. The difference between the final and baseline BCVA in nai&#x0308;ve and switched patients was -0.184 &plusmn; 0.63 log MAR and in +0.059 &plusmn; 0.4 logMAR, respectively.</p><p>In the switched group, the mean Q previous treatment with aflibercept was 6.01 &plusmn; 1.81 weeks (34% Q4W; 66% Q6&ndash;8W). At study end, the mean Q increased to 8.27 &plusmn; 2.77 weeks (8% Q4W; 64% Q6&ndash;8W; 28% &gt;Q10W).</p><p>In the nai&#x0308;ve group, the mean Q was 7.31 &plusmn; 3.99 weeks: Q: 33% Q4W; 26% Q6&ndash;8W; 41% &gt;Q10W.</p><p>7 (9.7%) patients discontinued treatment.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Retinal diseases are rapidly progressing pathologies that require prompt initiation of treatment at diagnosis. While overall visual acuity remained stable, treatment-nai&#x0308;ve patients experienced modest improvement in visual acuity. Aflibercept enabled extended injection intervals in both groups, particularly in nai&#x0308;ve patients. Larger real-world studies with longer follow-up are warranted to confirm these findings and to optimise treatment strategies.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gomez Diaz, M., Llorente Gomez, M., Verdugo, M., Maganto Garrido, S., Montero Lazaro, M., Martin Roldan, A., Guerreiro Caamano, A., Gonzalo, A. B., Pariente Junquera, A., De Frutos Soto, A., Sanchez Sanchez, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.327</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.327</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-228 Effectivity and durability of intravitreal aflibercept in patients with age-related macular degeneration]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A160</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A161</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A161-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-229 Immunotherapy time-of-day infusion, what about small-cell lung cancer?]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A161-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Relationship between circadian rhythm and anticancer immunotherapy has been studied in several solid tumours. Timing of infusion may influence treatment efficacy. One of the latest cancers treated with immunotherapy has been extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC).</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To assess whether the timing of atezolizumab infusions (early vs late) is associated with efficacy in ES-SCLC. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), response, and immuno-related adverse events (IR-AEs).</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Retrospective, observational, descriptive study in a tertiary hospital. We collected data from patient who received atezolizumab and were diagnosed with ES-SCLC between 2021 and 2024. Data cutoff was in July 2025. Patient data were collected from electronic medical record (HCIS&trade;). OS, PFS and response were determined by RECIST criteria; AE grade was determined using CTCAE v.5.0.</p><p>Time-of-day infusion was divided before 15:00h (early-infusion) and after 15:00h (late-infusion). Patients were classified into each group if they received more than 50% of infusions in this time-of-day.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The study included 83 SCLC-ES patients (men 59.0%; PS0&ndash;1, 72.3%), aged 47&ndash;84 years. Fourty patients received atezolizumab administrations before 15:00 (early-infusion group; PS0&ndash;1, 80.0%; brain and/or liver metastases 62.5%) and 43 after 15:00 (late-infusion group; PS0&ndash;1, 65.1%; brain and/or liver metastases 65.1%). Median PFS (95% CI) was 4.8 months (3.3&ndash;6.2) for early-infusion group and 3.9 months (2.9&ndash;4.9) for late-infusion one (p=0.056). Median OS was 7.8 months (4.6-10.9) and 6.7 months (3.9&ndash;9.4) for early-infusion and late-infusion group, respectively (p=0.842). Five patients (12.5%) have progression disease (PD) as response in early-infusion group, 32 (80.0%) partial response (PR) and 3 (7.5%) stable disease (SD); 12 (27.9%) patients have PD in late-infusion group, 21 (48.8%) RP and 10 (23.3%) SD (p=0.082).</p><p>Immune-related AE were more frequent in early-infusion group (n=10; 25.0%) than in late-infusion one (n=3; 7.0%) p=0.003. Six patients had IR-AEs grade 3-4 in early-infusion group. In late-infusion one, all IR-AEs were grade 1-2.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Early (before 15:00) atezolizumab infusions showed a numerical trend towards improved efficacy outcomes compared with late-infusions, but differences did not reach statistical significance. Furthermore, early-infusions were associated with a higher frequency and severe IR-AEs.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Espadas, N., Calleja-Fernandez, C., Martin-Rufo, M., Sanchez Cuervo, M., Carrasco-Corral, T., Martinez-Garcia, A., Fernandez-Fradejas, J., Alvarez-Diaz, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.328</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.328</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-229 Immunotherapy time-of-day infusion, what about small-cell lung cancer?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A161</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A161</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A161-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-230 Interprofessional collaboration in hospitals: insights from the 'stationsapotheker: in NRW project]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A161-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Clinical pharmacists are essential for improving medication safety and PLAY an important role in the interprofessional collaboration in hospitals. Pharmacists can help manage complex medication regimens and ensure continuity of care. Despite their proven benefits, their implementation in Germany remains inconsistent, with limited data on their prevalence, roles, and contributions to patient care. The &lsquo;Stationsapotheker:in NRW&rsquo; project systematically fills gaps in data of clinical pharmacists in hospitals across North Rhine-Westphalia (NRW) and the perception from collaborating physicians.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The study aims to assess the current state of clinical pharmacist implementation in hospitals, analyse their roles and activities, and identify factors influencing effective interprofessional collaboration with physicians.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A mixed-methods approach was employed, comprising three phases: (1) an online survey with 780 participants to assess the prevalence and tasks of clinical pharmacists, (2) 13 semi-structured interviews with interprofessional teams to explore collaboration dynamics and identify success factors, and (3) a follow-up survey to validate findings, refine activity profiles and collaboration settings. Qualitative data was analysed using Kuckartz&rsquo;s content analysis method with MAXQDA software.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The survey revealed that clinical pharmacists are present in approximately 33% of hospital sites in NRW, with significant variability in their clinical tasks and the resources available for this purpose. Pharmacists are an integral part of the medication process, substantially contribute to medication safety through therapy reviews, and provide critical support to physicians in optimising treatment regimens. Interviews identified key enablers of collaboration, including mutual trust, respect, and effective communication. The surveys and interviews show that the majority of participating physicians value their collaboration with clinical pharmacists and perceive pharmaceutical support in everyday clinical practice as a necessary complement to ensuring drug therapy safety.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The results highlight the need for wider introduction of clinical pharmacists in hospitals as part of an interprofessional team to optimise the medication process. Removing barriers and leveraging identified success factors can provide strategies for optimising their integration into healthcare teams. These findings provide starting points for promoting the role of clinical pharmacists in Germany and highlight existing potential.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>We thank the participating physicians and clinical pharmacists for participating in our healthcare research project.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Liekweg, A., Faehrmann, L., Wimber, S., Podlogar, J., Dehnst, J., Macher-Heidrich, S., May, P., Muth, C., Viefhues, S., Woermann, A., Schwalbe, O.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.329</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.329</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-230 Interprofessional collaboration in hospitals: insights from the 'stationsapotheker: in NRW project]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A161</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A162</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A162-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-231 Evaluating adherence to prescribing guidelines for co-amoxiclav oral tta post-ED admission]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A162-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>The appropriate use of antibiotics in emergency departments (EDs) is critical to combat antimicrobial resistance and ensure optimal patient outcomes. Co-amoxiclav, a commonly prescribed broad-spectrum antibiotic, is frequently included in TTA (To Take Away) prepacks to facilitate early treatment of infections after ED discharge. However, its use must align with established clinical guidelines to prevent unnecessary exposure and resistance development.</p><p>In our Trust, the prescribing of co-amoxiclav has increased threefold over the past decade, reflecting a significant rise in its use (Define (C) and Antimicrobial Usage Reports, NHS Digital, 2023-2024). This surge underscores the importance of evaluating adherence to local and national guidelines in the ED setting. Studying compliance with these guidelines will help identify gaps in practice, optimise antibiotic stewardship, and improve patient safety.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To identify guideline compliance when prescribing oral Co-amoxiclav to take home after emergency department admission.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Retrospective analysis of adult patients admitted and discharged from two emergency departments over a consecutive 7-day period, who were prescribed oral co-amoxiclav.</p><p>Inclusion criteria: Adult patients admitted to and discharged from the emergency department with a prescription for oral co-amoxiclav as part of their antibiotic therapy.</p><p>The clinical indication and rationale for selecting co-amoxiclav from the antimicrobial storage cabinet were reviewed. Prescribing decisions at discharge were evaluated against current antimicrobial guidelines to assess compliance.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 100 patients were identified, 50 in QEQM and 50 in WHH (acute sites of East Kent University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust.</p><p>Guideline&rsquo;s compliance was found in 34% of the prescriptions.</p><p>The main indication Co-amoxiclav was prescribed for was for community acquired pneumonia (40%), followed by facial injury prophylaxis (12%) and intra-abdominal infection (12%).</p><p>Over 20% of the indications showed no guidelines were available and 46% of the prescriptions did not follow microbiology guidelines.</p><p>Community acquired pneumonia is an indication with clear microbiology guidelines in the Trust and only 23% of the prescriptions followed guidelines Between 12-15 different indications were found in each site. .</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>A collaborative approach is required to understand the lack of guidelines compliance.</p><p>Pharmacy presence in emergency departments could help guidelines compliance.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>ESPAUR report 2023 to 2024</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chorro-Mari, V., Willson, W., Parmar, R., Yan, S., Dalton, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.330</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.330</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-231 Evaluating adherence to prescribing guidelines for co-amoxiclav oral tta post-ED admission]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A162</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A162</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A162-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-232 Evaluation of the pharmacist intervention form: a descriptive analysis and future perspectives]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A162-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>The electronic medical record includes a template, the Pharmacist Intervention Form, used to document pharmaceutical interventions during the prescription verification. However, inappropriate and incomplete filling of this form reduces data quality and limits evaluation of its clinical impact.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the use and relevance of the Pharmacist Intervention Form. The goal is to identify areas for improvement. These improvements are intended to enhance data consistency and support the use of collected information as clinical activity indicators.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A descriptive analysis was conducted on all Pharmacist Intervention Forms documented over a 15-day period (May 11&ndash;25, 2025). Collected data included structured fields (drug involved, drug-related problem, type of action and intervention acceptance) and free-text entries (intervention description). Intervention acceptance was determined by reviewing subsequent prescriptions in the patient&rsquo;s medical record.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 201 forms were analysed. Only 12 of the 24 predefined drug-related problems were used. The most frequent were drug duplication (46.3%), inappropriate dosing (16.4%), and the &lsquo;Other&rsquo; category (21.4%). The type of action taken following the drug-related problem is documented in only 1.5% of cases (2 out of 17 possible types), highlighting a major documentation gap. Acceptance rates varied by problem category, from 51.1% for &lsquo;Other&rsquo; to 100% for contraindications. Additional issues included overuse of the &lsquo;Other&rsquo; category, frequent misclassification (28 forms), and inconsistent documentation practices.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>These findings highlight the need for two key improvements: (1) revision of the Pharmacist Intervention Form, including optimisation of the categories based on a parallel review of the literature, to retain only relevant and commonly used fields; and (2) promotion of consistent and complete documentation by users. These changes are essential to improve data consistency and maximise the form&rsquo;s utility as a clinical activity indicator. Improvement strategies will be reassessed in future evaluations.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Demuysere, M., De Keyser, A., Dalleur, O., Desmedt, S., Quennery, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.331</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.331</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-232 Evaluation of the pharmacist intervention form: a descriptive analysis and future perspectives]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A162</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A163</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A163-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-233 Evaluation of hyperkalaemia management in the emergency department of a tertiary hospital]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A163-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Management of acute hyperkalaemia requires specific measures including fast-acting therapies, potassium-excreting therapies, and adjustment of chronic medications. The Spanish Societies of Cardiology (SEC), Endocrinology and Nutrition (SEEN), Internal Medicine (SEMI), Emergency Medicine (SEMES) and nephrology (SEN) provides a consensus document on its management.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To assess the adequacy of hyperkalaemia management according to the consensus of five Spanish medical societies, and to identify areas for improvement.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Observational, retrospective study conducted in the Emergency Department (ED) of a tertiary hospital (January 2025).</p><p>Inclusion Criteria: ED patients with hyperkalaemia (K&gt;5,5 mmol/L). A simple random sample of ~50% of eligible cases was analysed.</p><p>Exclusion Criteria: haemolysed sample</p><p>Variables: sex, age, serum potassium, hyperkalaemia manifestations (muscle weakness, electrocardiogram changes), acute kidney injury or gastrointestinal bleeding, comorbidities (heart failure, chronic kidney disease, diabetes), chronic drugs that may increase kalemia, time until resolution, in ED hyperkalaemia treatment. Classification of hyperkalaemia (mild, moderate and severe).</p><p>Two pharmacists and one emergency physician retrospectively reviewed the treatments. Management was considered <I>adequate</I> when it complied with the consensus recommendations.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Hyperkalaemia was detected in 142 patients, 73 were randomly selected and 17 of them were excluded. Of the 56 patients, 30 were women (53.6%). The median age was 83 years (IQR: 71.75-90).</p><p>Median potassium level at admission: 5,8 mmol/L (IQR:5.6-6.4). Potassium &gt;6,5 mmol/L:11/56 patients (19.6%).</p><p>Classification: 37 severe (66.1%), 17 mild (30.3%), 2 moderate (3.6%).</p><p>Manifestations: electrocardiographic abnormalities (5.4%), muscular weakness (1.8%), Comorbidities: chronic kidney failure (44.6%), heart failure (41.1%) diabetes (37.5%). acute kidney failure (32.1%), gastrointestinal bleeding (10.7%),</p><p>Drugs: 44 patients had at least one active prescription of betablockers (35.7%), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (32.1%), angiotensin II receptor antagonists (25.0%), aldosterone antagonists (21.1%) or ACE inhibitors (17.9%).</p><p>Treatment: Severe hyperkalaemia were treated with rapid therapies that promote cellular potassium uptake (35.7%), antagonise potassium toxicity (16.1%), or enhance potassium elimination (sodium zirconium cyclosilicate 21.4%, calcium polystyrene sulfonate 12.5% diuretics 16.1%, haemodialysis 8.9%).</p><p>Subsequent tests were performed in 38 (67.9%) patients, with potassium normalising on an average of 23.2 hours.</p><p>Treatment adequacy: adequate in 43/56 (76.8%) and optimisable in 13/56 (23.2%).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>In this retrospective cohort, ED hyperkalaemia management deviated from consensus recommendations in about one quarter of cases, highlighting opportunities for hospital pharmacists to optimise treatment and reinforce protocol adherence.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. Consensus document on the management of hyperkalaemia. <I>Nefrolog&iacute;a,</I> 2023;<b>43</b>(4):299&ndash;310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nefro.2023.05.004</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gomez Garcia, G., Garcia-Guijas-Garcia, C., Munoz-Garcia, M., Delgado-Silveira, E., Zamorano-Serrano, M., Vicente-Oliveros, N., Alvarez-Diaz, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.332</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.332</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-233 Evaluation of hyperkalaemia management in the emergency department of a tertiary hospital]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A163</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A163</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A163-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-234 Avatrombopag versus eltrombopag: comparative analysis of efficiency and safety in patients with chronic primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP)]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A163-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Thrombopoietin receptor agonists represent a therapeutic tool in patients with chronic primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) who are refractory to conventional treatments. Among them, eltrombopag and avatrombopag have demonstrated significant efficacy in increasing platelet counts, including favourable outcomes in patients with previous eltrombopag failure. However, they present differences in pharmacological profile, safety and cost, which may influence therapeutic selection.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To compare the effectiveness, safety, and economic impact of avatrombopag versus eltrombopag in adult patients with chronic ITP treated at a tertiary hospital, as well as to estimate the potential savings derived from a sequential use strategy.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective observational study that included all adult patients receiving active treatment with avatrombopag between January and September 2025.</p><p>Data were obtained from electronic medical records and the pharmacy dispensing system, recording the following:</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Number of active patients.</p></li><li><p>Previous exposure to eltrombopag.</p></li><li><p>Reason for switching to avatrombopag.</p></li><li><p>Platelet response.</p></li><li><p>Adverse events.</p></li><li><p>Cost.</p></li></l></p><p>A cost simulation was performed assuming that patients initially treated with avatrombopag had instead received eltrombopag.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>In 2025, 39 active patients treated with avatrombopag, with two lost to follow-up due to death. Only 33% had previously received eltrombopag. The switch to avatrombopag occurred in 50% of cases due to loss of platelet response and in the remaining 50% for other reasons: 40% due to dietary restrictions and 10% due to adverse reactions (elevated liver enzymes or thrombocytosis). The platelet response rate (&ge;50<FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT>10<sup>9</sup>/L) was 64%, with an interval from treatment initiation to the next blood test of 23.8 days (range: 7&ndash;60), consistent with data reported in pivotal trials (65.6% at 8 days). The economic simulation, considering a monthly cost of 44.7 for eltrombopag and 547.54 for avatrombopag, showed that if 67% of patients had started treatment with eltrombopag, the estimated annual savings would amount to 120.672.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Avatrombopag and eltrombopag show comparable efficacy and safety profiles. Therapeutic choice should be based on tolerability and individual patient characteristics, reserving avatrombopag for cases of intolerance, adverse reactions or loss of response to eltrombopag. The implementation of a sequential strategy could optimise resource utilisation in the hospital setting, maintaining therapeutic efficiency and reducing costs.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guillen Diaz, M., Martinez Orea, A., Clavijos Bautista, S., Portero Ponce, C., Sanchez Blaya, A., Palazon Gonzalvez, E., Alegria Samper, R., Cabezuelo Baldueza, B., Gea Munoz, C., Leon Villar, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.333</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.333</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-234 Avatrombopag versus eltrombopag: comparative analysis of efficiency and safety in patients with chronic primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A163</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A164</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A164?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-235 Comparison of STOPPCog and STOPP criteria in cognitively vulnerable older adults hospitalised in an acute geriatric unit]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A164?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>STOPPCog criteria were recently developed and validated for deprescribing of potentially inappropriate prescriptions (PIPs) in cognitively vulnerable older adults. However, their effectiveness in real-world clinical practice has not yet been evaluated.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To compare the number of patients with PIPs detected using STOPPCog versus STOPP criteria applied in cognitively vulnerable older adults admitted to an Acute Geriatric Unit (AGU).</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Observational, retrospective study in a tertiary hospital.</p><p>Inclusion criteria: Inpatients in the AGU with mild to very severe cognitive impairment in January 2024.</p><p>Demographic variables, degree of cognitive impairment by the Global Deterioration Scale(GDS) of Reisberg and number of PIP detected using STOPP and STOPPCog criteria (drug name and specific criteria) were collected from electronic clinical record (HCIS). Medication conciliation was obtained from electronic prescription service, patient/caregiver interviews and clinical records.</p><p>Statistical analysis was conducted using the &lsquo;Graphpad&rsquo;. For quantitative variables, median or mean was used depending on the distribution. Normality analysis: Shapiro&ndash;Wilk. Analytical variance: Mann&ndash;Whitney. Significance level: p&lt;0,05.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Patients included: 48. Median age: 95 years (range: 84&ndash;107); 42 (71.2%) female.</p><p>Cognitive impairment: GDS 3&ndash;5:60.4%; GDS 6&ndash;7:39.5%</p><p>STOPP Criteria: </p><p><tbl id="T1" loc="float"><tblbdy top-stubs="2"><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Drug</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Number of patients with PIP</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>STOPP criteria</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Description</b> </c></r><r><c cspan="4" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Quetiapine </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">9(18.8%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">D15 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Chronic neuroleptics for behavioural symptoms of dementia. </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Benzodiazepines </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">8(16.7%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">D8 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Benzodiazepines &gt;4 weeks </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Bladder antimuscarinics </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">2(4.2%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">D14 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Drugs with anticholinergic effects in dementia </c></r></tblbdy></tbl></p><p>STOPPCog Criteria:</p><p><tbl id="T2" loc="float"><tblbdy top-stubs="2"><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Drug</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Number of patients with PIP</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>STOPPCog criteria</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Description</b> </c></r><r><c cspan="4" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Vitamins/Minerals </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">13 (27.08%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">F4 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Long-term preventive drugs for conditions other than dementia without intrinsic symptom relief properties (No proven benefit in advanced dementia). </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Antiplatelet agents </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">7 (14.6%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Anticoagulants </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">7 (14.6%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Statins </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">7 (14.6%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Antihypertensives </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">10 (20.8%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Opioids </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">10 (20.8%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">D1 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Opiods for chronic pain </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Quetiapine </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">9 (18.8%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">A5 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">First and second-generation antipsychotics (anticholinergic properties) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Benzodiazepines </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">8 (16.7%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">B1/B2 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Benzodiazepines (sedative properties) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Bladder antimuscarinics </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">2 (4.2%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">A2 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Bladder antimuscarinics (anticholinergic effects) </c></r></tblbdy></tbl></p><p>No statistically significant differences were found between STOPP and STOPPCog in GDS 3-5 patients (p= 0.3525). In contrast, more PIPs were detected using STOPPCog in patients with GDS 6&ndash;7 (p&lt;0.0001).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>STOPPCog criteria add value to the STOPP criteria and represent a useful tool for detecting PIP, particularly in older patients with advanced to very severe cognitive impairment, especially regarding long-term preventive medications (STOPPCog F4 criteria) and opioids (STOPPCog D1 criteria).</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gomez Garcia, G., Garcia-Guijas-Garcia, C., Delgado-Silveira, E., Molina-Mendoza, M., Munoz-Garcia, M., Montero Errasquin, B., Gomez Sacristan, S., Alvarez-Diaz, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.334</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.334</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-235 Comparison of STOPPCog and STOPP criteria in cognitively vulnerable older adults hospitalised in an acute geriatric unit]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A164</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A165</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A165-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-236 Potential interactions between herbal products and oncological treatment in a hospital outpatient clinic]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A165-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Complementary therapies, particularly herbal products (HP), are frequently used by oncology patients. However, unsupervised consumption may result in interactions that compromise the efficacy and safety of anticancer treatments (AT).</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The primary objective was to identify HP with the highest potential for interaction with oncological treatment. Secondary objectives: to detect AT most frequently involved, to describe the most common AT&ndash;HP associations, and to assess their potential clinical consequences.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>We conducted a prospective longitudinal study in a tertiary hospital. Adult patients receiving oncological treatment at the Hospital Outpatient Clinic (HOC) (April&ndash;June 2025) were included. Patients enrolled in clinical trials or with haematological malignancies were excluded. Socio-demographic data were collected from the electronic health record (HCIS ), and treatment-related data from the hospital prescribing system (FarmaTools ).</p><p>HP consumption was assessed through a 7-item questionnaire designed by the research team based on validated surveys and completed during treatment. Potential interactions were analysed using recognised bibliographic sources.<sup>1-4</sup>  </p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 112 patients were included: 62 (55%) women, median age 64 (IQR 57&ndash;72) years. A total of 104 patients (92.9%) reported HP consumption, leading to 443 potential interactions identified in 95 (91.3%) patients. These interactions involved 29 (64.4%) AT and 25 (55.6%) HP.</p><p>The AT most frequently involved was paclitaxel (50; 11.3%), followed by cyclophosphamide (37; 8.4%), doxorubicin (35; 7.9%), and docetaxel (34; 7.7%). The HP with the highest number of potential interactions were garlic (11.5%), turmeric (10.2%), rosemary (7.7%), pepper (7.2%), chamomile (6.5%) and cayenne (5.9%). The most frequent associations were pepper&ndash;carboplatin (16; 15.4%), garlic&ndash;carboplatin (15; 14.4%), chamomile&ndash;carboplatin (13; 12.5%), thyme&ndash;carboplatin (13; 12.5%), oregano&ndash;carboplatin (12; 11.5%) and pepper&ndash;bevacizumab (12; 11.5%), mainly increasing bleeding risk.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Drug&ndash;herb interactions are frequent among oncology patients. Paclitaxel was the AT with the highest number of potential interactions, whereas carboplatin-related associations affected the largest number of patients. Systematic identification of HP consumption and patient education are essential to ensure treatment safety.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. https://gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/gedefo/muro-solidario</p><p>2. 2017;<b>56</b>(4):317&ndash;337. doi:10.1007/s40262-016-0450-z</p><p>3. 2023;<b>149</b>:2855&ndash;2882. doi:10.1007/s00432-022-04172-1</p><p>4. https://www.sefh.es/bibliotecavirtual/interacc2014/InteraccionesFarmacoloigicas_pr.pdf</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Calleja-Fernandez, C., Espadas-Hervas, N., Parro Martin, M., Saez-De La Fuente, J., Sanchez-Cuervo, M., Martin Rufo, M., Santamaria-Rodriguez, I., Sanchez-Heras, M., Alvarez-Diaz, A., Palacios-Morales, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.335</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.335</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-236 Potential interactions between herbal products and oncological treatment in a hospital outpatient clinic]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A165</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A165</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A165-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-237 Centred analysis of pharmaceutical interventions on high-alert medications in an emergency department]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A165-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>High-Alert Medications (HAMs) carry a heightened risk of significant patient harm when they are used in error.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To analyse pharmaceutical interventions (PIs) involving HAMs upon admission.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Prospective interventional study of patients admitted to the Emergency Department who received pharmaceutical care (PC) from 20-01-2025 to 07-03-2025.</p><p>Demographic data, drugs, PIs and acceptance rate were obtained from electronic medical records and healthcare activity. PIs related to HAMs from hospital drug (HAM-H) and chronic pathology (HAM-C) lists of the Institute for Safe Medication Practices were analysed.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>139 patients received PC: 69% women, median age 73 (interquartile range [IQR]=66-85) years and 14 (IQR=11-17) drugs in e-prescribing. Fifty-three (38.1%) patients had any PIs (n=110, median=2 interventions/patient (IQR=1-2)), 88.2% were accepted. Thirty-seven PIs related to HAMs were found in 32 patients (23%). Of all PIs, 20.0% (n=22/110) were related to HAM-H and 31.8% (n=35/110) to HAM-C.</p><p>Therapeutic groups linked to PIs on HAM-H list were A (alimentary tract and metabolism) =50.0%, B (blood and haematopoietic organs) =22.7%, N (nervous system) =18.2% and C (cardiovascular system) =9.1%. Drugs mainly involved were insulins (38.1%), oral anticoagulants (OAC=19%), opioids (14.3%) and oral antidiabetics (9.5%). PIs on the HAM-H list were mainly related to reconciliation, 78.9% were reconciliation errors (RE). PIs due to reconciliation (n=19/22) were omission (54.5%), different regimen (18.2%), incomplete regimen (9.1%) and commission (4.5%); other PIs (n=3/22) were interaction (4.5%), contraindication (4.5%) and age/renal adjustment (4.5%).</p><p>Therapeutic groups linked to PIs on the HAM-C list were N=40.0%, A=37.1%, B=11.4%, M (musculoskeletal system) =5.7%, C=2.9% and L (antineoplastic/immunomodulators) =2.9%. Drugs mainly involved were insulins (22.9%), benzodiazepines (20.0%), OAC (11.4%), opioids (8.6%), long-term corticosteroids (8.6%), antipsychotics (8.6%), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (8.6%), digoxin (2.9%) and narrow therapeutic index antiepileptics (2.9%). PIs on the HAM-C list were mainly related to reconciliation, 86.7% were RE. PIs due to reconciliation (n=30/35) were classified as omission (60.0%), different regimen (14.3%), incomplete regimen (2.9%) and commission (8.6%); other PIs (n=5/35) were interactions (8.6%) and contraindications (5.7%).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>PIs on HAMs in ED are mainly RE, the most frequent is omission. PIs mainly involve insulins, benzodiazepines, OAC, and opioids.</p><p>These findings highlight the need to reduce HAM-related errors and PC potential optimising pharmacotherapy.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fernandez Martinez, C., Rey Montalban, R., Sanchez Gundin, J., Aznar De La Riera, M., Fernandez Martinez, V., Gomez Ramos, A., Andres Lacalle, M., Collagar Gomez, D., Valero Dominguez, M., Perez Hernandez, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.336</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.336</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-237 Centred analysis of pharmaceutical interventions on high-alert medications in an emergency department]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A165</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A166</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A166-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-238 Pharmaceutical care programme for patients undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (PHARALLO): impact on clinical outcomes]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A166-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Patients undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) require complex pharmacotherapeutic regimens for disease treatment and complication prevention. International recommendations, such as those from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT), emphasise the integration of clinical pharmacists into transplant teams to optimise therapy and enhance patient outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The primary objective was to explore whether a pharmacist-driven program (PHARALLO) impact on the cumulative incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) by day +100 post-transplant.</p><p>Secondary objectives included survival outcomes, incidence of acute renal/liver failure, total and aGVHD-related readmissions, length of hospital stay and time to platelet/neutrophil engraftment by day +100.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Prospective, interventional study with a historical control group over a 12-month period, comparing a pharmacist-driven intervention (2024) versus standard care (2022) in patients receiving allo-HSCT. Inclusion criteria: patients &ge;18 years undergoing allo-HSCT. Exclusion criteria: lack of informed consent, study withdrawal and death/loss to follow-up before transplantation.</p><p>The pharmaceutical follow-up consisted of three periods: 1) medication reconciliation in a pre-HSCT-interview), 2) daily review of pharmacotherapy to detect drug-related-problems (DRPs) during hospital stay; and 3) biweekly clinical interviews from discharge until day +100 to reinforce medication knowledge, adherence and detect DRPs.</p><p>Demographic and clinical data were collected from electronic medical records.</p><p>aGVHD-cumulative-incidence was compared between groups using Chi-square or Fisher&rsquo;s exact test. Survival outcomes were analysed with multivariable Cox regression. Other categorical and continuous variables were compared using appropriate parametric/non-parametric tests (Chi-square, Fisher&rsquo;s exact, Wilcoxon). Statistical analysis was performed by the statistical program STATA; p&lt;0.05 was considered significant.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>67 patients were included (37 intervention; 30 control).</p><p>The cumulative incidence of aGVHD by day +100 was reduced by 13.4% in the intervention group (p=0.52). aGVHD-free survival improved by 21.7% (p=0.05). Progression-free and overall survival improved by 9.9% (p=0.31) and 12.6% (p=0.23) respectively. Reductions were observed in acute renal failure (7.8%, p=0.57), liver failure (7.9%, p=0.13) and readmissions (total 10.4%, p=0.1; aGHVD-related 11.3%, p=0.23). Length of hospital stay decreased by 6.3 days (p=0.018). Platelet/neutrophil engraftment occurred 5 days earlier (p=0.022).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The integration of the clinical pharmacist into the TCMH team showed favourable trends towards improved outcomes, reduced complications, shorter hospital stays and faster grafting. These findings suggest the potential value of pharmaceutical care in post-transplant treatment and support the need for further prospective studies.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guijarro Martinez, P., Sanchez Cuervo, M., Martin, M. P., Herrera Puente, P., Chinea Rodriguez, A., Luna De Abia, A., Alvarez Diaz, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.337</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.337</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-238 Pharmaceutical care programme for patients undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (PHARALLO): impact on clinical outcomes]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A166</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A166</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A166-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-239 Role of the hospital pharmacist in optimising antimicrobial use within the antimicrobial stewardship program]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A166-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Antimicrobial resistance is a major global health threat in the world. Hospital pharmacists play a key role in antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP), promoting the rational use of antimicrobials and improving clinical outcomes. Evaluating the acceptance of pharmacist-led interventions is essential to assess their clinical impact and identify opportunities for improvement within multidisciplinary teams.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To analyse and evaluate the acceptance rate of interventions performed by hospital pharmacists within the Antimicrobial Stewardship Program (ASP) during February 2025.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective descriptive study was conducted in a tertiary hospital to assess pharmacist interventions within the ASP team and their acceptance by clinicians. Patients prescribed restricted broad-spectrum antimicrobials (carbapenems, aztreonam, tigecycline, daptomycin, last-generation cephalosporins, linezolid and echinocandins) were included. Two pharmacists reviewed prescriptions daily using the electronic prescribing system, collecting microbiological, analytical and clinical data. Cases were discussed in daily meetings with the infectious disease specialist, based on the hospital&rsquo;s antimicrobial guidelines and current literature. Collected variables included demographics (age, sex), type of therapy (empirical, targeted or prophylactic), concomitant antibiotics, type of infection, intervention and acceptance.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>97 patients were included (61.9% male; mean age 71.8 years). A total of 146 restricted antimicrobials were reviewed, mainly meropenem (39.7%), ertapenem (21.2%) and linezolid (6.2%). Most treatments were empirical (52.4%) or targeted (42.7%). Concomitant non-restricted antibiotics were used in 32 patients, mainly piperacillin/tazobactam (15.6%), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (12.5%) and vancomycin (12.5%). The most frequent infections were urinary and respiratory (15.5% each), followed by intra-abdominal, bacteraemia (14.7%), skin and soft tissue infections (11.6%) and sepsis (10.9%). Overall, 41.9% of prescriptions were inappropriate, leading to 69 pharmacist interventions, of which 56.5% were accepted. The most frequent interventions were de-escalation (40%), dose adjustment (24.2%), optimisation of duration (14.5%) and discontinuation of unnecessary antimicrobials (8.1%). The highest acceptance rates were seen for de-escalation (68%), duration optimisation (66.7%) and discontinuation of unnecessary antibiotics (60%).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>This study highlights the key role of hospital pharmacists in the ASP team, with over half of pharmacist interventions accepted by clinicians. High acceptance of de-escalation, treatment duration optimisation and antimicrobial discontinuation underscores the pharmacist&rsquo;s contribution to clinical decision making and supports continued reinforcement of stewardship activities to ensure rational antimicrobial use.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rodriguez Sanchez-Laulhe, B., Beltran Garcia, M., Fernandez-Villacanas Fernandez, P., Moya Mangas, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.338</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.338</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-239 Role of the hospital pharmacist in optimising antimicrobial use within the antimicrobial stewardship program]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A166</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A167</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A167-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-240 Biologics in paediatric severe asthma: real-world evidence from a specialised unit in a tertiary paediatric hospital]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A167-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Severe paediatric asthma is associated with frequent exacerbations, healthcare burden, and impaired quality of life. Biologic therapies have changed the management of these patients, but real-world paediatric evidence remains limited. Hospital-based specialised severe asthma units are multidisciplinary teams in which pharmacists play a key role in treatment optimisation, safety monitoring, and adherence support. In Spain, paediatric specialised units are scarce.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To describe real-world characteristics and outcomes of paediatric patients receiving biologic therapy in a Paediatric Severe Asthma Unit (PSAU), including pharmacist-led pharmaceutical care activity, adherence, adverse reactions, and healthcare utilisation before and after initiation.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Retrospective observational study. It included all patients with severe asthma treated with biologics in a PSAU of a tertiary paediatric hospital from January/2017 to June/2025.</p><p>Collected variables: demographics (sex, age, weight, comorbidities), biologic therapy (type, adherence, adverse reactions), pharmacist-led follow-up (pharmaceutical care consultations), and healthcare utilisation in the year prior to and after initiation (emergency visits and hospital admissions). Descriptive statistics are reported as median (range).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>44 patients were included, 59.1% female. Median age at initiation was 11.3 years (3.0&ndash;18.1) and median weight 41.6 kg (13.5&ndash;101.7). Almost all patients (97.7%) presented at least one comorbidity: 58.1% allergy, 41.9% allergy and atopic dermatitis. Biologics prescribed were omalizumab (61.4%), dupilumab (22.7%), mepolizumab (11.4%), and tezepelumab (4.5%). 308 pharmaceutical care consultations were carried out. Adherence was high, with median of 100% (84.85&ndash;100). Adverse reactions were reported in 6 patients (13.6%), including local injection site reactions, pruritus and headache. Healthcare utilisation decreased after initiation: annual emergency visits fell from 1(0&ndash;13) to 0(0&ndash;7), and hospital admissions from 0(0&ndash;6) to 0(0&ndash;4).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>In this real-world paediatric cohort, biologic therapy initiation was associated with high adherence and a marked reduction in exacerbation-related emergency visits and hospital admissions, with few, non-severe adverse reactions. Nearly all patients had relevant comorbidities, predominantly allergy with or without atopic dermatitis. These findings reinforce the benefit of biologics in severe paediatric asthma and highlight the critical role of hospital pharmacists, in a PSAU, in patient monitoring and support. Further studies should incorporate long-term outcomes, lung function, and patient-reported measures to strengthen evidence for clinical practice.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Merino Pardo, A., Algarra Sanchez, E., Garcia Rodriguez, M., Riva De La Hoz, B., Matilla Garcia, E., Leal Pino, B., Nieto Martil, E., Echavarri De Miguel, M., Abril Cabero, A., Fernandez Romero, L., Pozas Del Rio, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.339</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.339</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-240 Biologics in paediatric severe asthma: real-world evidence from a specialised unit in a tertiary paediatric hospital]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A167</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A167</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A167-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-241 Evaluation of the profile of patients treated with tezepelumab in severe asthma and assessment of real-world response]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A167-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>People with asthma always have some underlying inflammation in the airway that can usually be treated with a combination of quick-relief and long-term controller medicines. But some people may not respond well to inhaled corticosteroids or other long-term controller medicines, a sign that they may be suffering from severe asthma.</p><p>In that case we may use Tezepelumab a monoclonal antibody directed against thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), preventing its interaction with the TSLP heterodimeric receptor.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the clinical and demographic characteristics of patients with uncontrolled severe asthma who were candidates for tezepelumab treatment, and to analyse their response in a real-world clinical setting.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Observational, retrospective and single-centre study included patients with severe asthma treated with tezepelumab between November 2023 and July 2024.</p><p>Demographic and clinical variables were collected from the electronic health record (HCIS), and the severe asthma unit database. We used the Unified Prescription Module (MUP) for dispensing records.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Thirty-six patients were included, 77% of whom were women. The median age at tezepelumab use initation was 62 years (range: 18-83).</p><p>Regarding adherence to maintenance inhaled therapy, 63% of patients demonstrated good adherence defined by an adherence rate over 80%.</p><p>The reasons for starting tezepelumab treatment were: Failure of a previous biologic in 57% of cases, overlapping phenotypes or pathogenic pathways in 28%, non-T2 asthma in 6%, and adverse events to previous biologics in 9%.</p><p>Among patients with a prior biological treatment, 47% had received only one, 32% two, and 21% three biological drugs.</p><p>Before starting treatment with tezepelumab, 89% of patients received oral corticosteroids (OCS) as maintenance therapy. However, only 49% of them continued OCS after treatment initiation.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Tezepelumab was mainly selected in cases of prior biological treatment failure.</p><p>Patients with uncontrolled severe asthma who was treated with tezepelumab showed improvement in disease control, as evidenced by a reduction in OCS use.</p><p>These findings suggest that tezepelumab represents a promising therapeutic option for uncontrolled severe asthma, particularly in patients with a history of inadequate response to other biologics.</p><p>Continuous follow-up is warranted to assess its long-term impact on disease control.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Soto Rosa, A., Villamanan Bueno, E., Garcia Lopez, L., Collada Sanchez, V., Alvarez Criado, J., Mallon Gonzalez, S., Villarroya Peiro, E., Benito Arribas, E., Herrero Ambrosio, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.340</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.340</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-241 Evaluation of the profile of patients treated with tezepelumab in severe asthma and assessment of real-world response]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A167</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A168</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A168-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-242 Melanoma and immunotherapy: clinical aspects and feedback on medico-economic challenges in a hospital centre]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A168-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>The rise of immunotherapy has transformed the management of melanoma, raising new medico-economic challenges.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This study compares the costs of various therapeutic strategies according to disease stage, with the aim of optimising expenditures.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>This is a retrospective, single-centre study including patients who received an immunotherapy protocol for melanoma in 2024. Data were extracted from the Chimio software. Patients were divided into two groups: adjuvant treatment vs. metastatic treatment, and analysed based on the protocols used.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>In the adjuvant setting, 38 patients were treated (35 with Pembrolizumab 400 mg, 3 with Nivolumab 480 mg). Twelve patients were excluded due to ongoing treatment. Among patients receiving Pembrolizumab (n=23, median age: 73 years), the average number of cycles was 7.7, with a mean cost of 77,484 per patient. For those treated with Nivolumab (n=3, median age: 76 years), the average number of cycles was 12.3, with a cost of 66,037&ndash;representing a cost difference of 11,447 in favor of Nivolumab.</p><p>In the metastatic setting, 7 patients received monotherapy. Patients treated with Pembrolizumab (n=5, median age: 86 years) received an average of 4 cycles (cost: 40,058), compared to 25 cycles for those on Nivolumab (n=2, median age: 93 years; cost: 133,863).</p><p>Combination therapy was administered to 24 patients:</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>10 received Ipilimumab 3 mg/kg + Nivolumab 1 mg/kg, followed by Nivolumab 480 mg (standard protocol; median age: 65 years; 3.1 induction cycles + 7.6 maintenance cycles; cost: 81,997).</p></li><li><p>14 received Ipilimumab 1 mg/kg + Nivolumab 3 mg/kg, followed by Nivolumab 480 mg (inverted&ndash;dose protocol, for frail patients; median age: 80 years; 3.3 induction cycles + 10.4 maintenance cycles; cost: 79,406).</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Immunotherapy has significantly improved melanoma prognosis, albeit at high drug-related costs. In the adjuvant setting, our analysis highlights an average cost saving of 11,000 per patient when using Nivolumab instead of Pembrolizumab, with equivalent efficacy. This finding supports a review of prescribing practices in collaboration with clinicians. In the metastatic setting, the inverted-dose combination therapy appears to be better tolerated, with a lower cost, and remains a relevant cost-effective option for frail patients. For monotherapy, the difference in the average number of cycles per patient could not be explained.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pantanella, M., Reitter, D., Dumas, M., Chouaou, N., Mellouki, N., Gaudron, S., Coulon, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.341</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.341</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-242 Melanoma and immunotherapy: clinical aspects and feedback on medico-economic challenges in a hospital centre]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A168</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A168</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A168-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-243 Use and effectiveness of jak inhibitors in ulcerative colitis: a real-world observational analysis]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A168-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Ulcerative colitis (UC) can be treated with Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) when conventional therapies fail to control the disease. Evaluating real-world effectiveness and safety is key to improve their use.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>Describe and evaluate the use, effectiveness and safety of JAKi in UC in a tertiary hospital.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Retrospective observational study involving adult UC patients with JAKi treatment during 2024 at the Pharmacy department. Patients with &le;1 year of treatment at data cut-off were excluded.</p><p>Data collected: sex, age, body mass index(BMI), disease extension, prior exposure to monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), JAKi prescribed, and concomitant mAb therapy. Effectiveness was assessed by clinical (CR; Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index(SCCAI)&le;3) and biochemical remission(BR; C-reactive protein(CRP)&lt;5mg/L and faecal calprotectin(FC)&lt;500&micro;g/g) at baseline and after one year. Analytical parameters (FC, CRP, transaminases, cholesterol, and haemoglobin), adverse events (AEs), and persistence were also recorded.</p><p>Quantitative variables were expressed as mean&plusmn;standard deviation(SD) or median/interquartile range, and qualitative variables as frequency and percentage. Wilcoxon, McNemar and Mann-Whitney U tests were applied, considering significance as p&lt;0.05(SPSSv23).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Forty-four patients were included, 52.3% women, mean age 27.8&plusmn;1.9 years, mean BMI 24.4&plusmn;0.5 kg/m2, and 65.9% presenting pancolitis. 81.8% of patients had been treated with mAbs, mainly infliximab(38.4%) and adalimumab(24.7%).</p><p>Twenty-one patients received upadacitinib(47.7%), 15 tofacitinib(34.1%), and 8 filgotinib(18.2%). Thirteen patients (29,5%) received concomitant treatment with mAbs (11 from upadacitinib group).</p><p>Median SCCAI at baseline and after one year of treatment was 5(4&ndash;7) and 1(0&ndash;1), respectively(p&lt;0.001). CR increased from 18.2% (n=8) to 86.4% (n=38)(p=0.000), and BR from 18.2% (n=8) to 79.5% (n=35)(p=0.001). Upadacitinib, tofacitinib and filgotinib achieved BR of 85.7%, 86.7% and 50.0%, respectively(p=0.043).</p><p>All patients had similar analytical parameters at baseline and after one year of treatment(p&gt;0.05), except for cholesterol(p=0.023). Moreover, cholesterol values at 1 year differed between upadacitinib 228mg/dL(198&ndash;267) and tofacitinib 197mg/dL(165-233)(p=0.010), but not filgotinib 180mg/dL(168&ndash;198)(p&gt;0.05).</p><p>AEs occurred in 21 patients (47.7%), mainly dermatological(n=9), infectious (n=7) and metabolic(n=8). 95.5% of patients remained on JAKi therapy at the end of the study, with only two discontinuations due to pregnancy and malignancy.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>JAKi significantly improved CR and BR after one year, although BR was lower with filgotinib. Upadacitinib was associated with increased cholesterol values compared with tofacitinib. Despite half of patients showed AEs, treatment persistence remained high, with nearly all patients maintaining therapy.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arnau Blasco, B., Cuellar Monreal, M., Albert Mari, M., Chovi Trull, M., Gallen Soria, D., Ferrando Barbera, P., Beltran Garcia, I., Taberner Bonastre, P., Edo Solsona, M., Poveda Andres, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.342</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.342</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-243 Use and effectiveness of jak inhibitors in ulcerative colitis: a real-world observational analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A168</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A169</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A169-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-244 Adherence to inhalers and effectiveness of biologics in severe uncontrolled asthma]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A169-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Severe uncontrolled asthma (SUA) significantly impairs quality of life and increases healthcare resource use. Assessing adherence to inhaled therapy through the Test of Adherence to Inhalers (TAI) and dispensing data is essential before initiating biologic therapy, as adherence ensures treatment effectiveness.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate adherence to inhaled therapy and the effectiveness of biologic treatment in adult patients with SUA.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective observational study was conducted in adult patients diagnosed with SUA who started funded biologic therapies between March 2022 and September 2025. Variables included age, sex, asthma type, comorbidities, biologic treatment, TAI score and percentage of inhalers dispensed during the six months prior to biologic initiation. Effectiveness variables were Asthma Control Test (ACT), forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV<SUB>1</SUB>), and FEV<SUB>1</SUB>/FVC ratio, measured six months before and after treatment initiation.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Forty-one patients were included, 63.4% (26/41) women, mean age 60 &plusmn; 15 years and 48.7% (20/41) had mixed asthma. Comorbidities included rhinitis 65.8% (27/41), anxiety and/or depression 41.4% (17/41), atopic dermatitis 29.2% (12/41) and nasal polyposis 29.2% (12/41). Biologic therapies used were dupilumab 48.7% (20/41), benralizumab 24.4% (10/41), tezepelumab 12.2% (5/41), mepolizumab 12.2% (5/41), and reslizumab 1 patient. Mean TAI score was 52.1 &plusmn; 3.5 points. Median percentage of inhalers dispensed in the six months before biologic therapy was 83.3% (IQR 66.6&ndash;100%). Median ACT improved from 9 (IQR 8&ndash;15) to 21 (IQR 17.5&ndash;23) after six months of biologic treatment. Mean spirometric values before and after therapy were FVC 81.6 &plusmn; 14.2% vs 89.2 &plusmn; 18.6%, FEV<SUB>1</SUB> 71.8 &plusmn; 21.3% vs 82.7 &plusmn; 18.3%, and FEV<SUB>1</SUB>/FVC 75.1 &plusmn; 20.3% vs 79.7 &plusmn; 17.2%.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>In patients with SUA, adherence to inhaled therapy was intermediate to high according to both TAI scores and dispensing data. The introduction of biologics was associated with improved asthma control and lung function. These findings highlight the importance of assessing adherence before initiating biologics and support their effectiveness in real-world clinical practice.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa, M. O. D. L., Sanchez Lobon, I., Rivero Garcia, M., Manzano Martin, M., Ramos Guerrero, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.343</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.343</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-244 Adherence to inhalers and effectiveness of biologics in severe uncontrolled asthma]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A169</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A169</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A169-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-245 Real-world incidence and management of hypothyroidism secondary to apalutamide in patients with prostate cancer]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A169-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Apalutamide is an androgen receptor inhibitor, widely used in prostate cancer (PC). Hypothyroidism is a recognised adverse event; however, its incidence and clinical management in real-world practice remain underreported.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the incidence, management, and outcomes of hypothyroidism in PC patients treated with apalutamide.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>This retrospective observational study included all PC patients treated with apalutamide between 1 August 2020, and 30 September 2025. Collected variables included age, oncologic diagnosis, TSH, T4, time to thyroid alteration, prior hypothyroidism, endocrine diagnoses and thyroid treatment during follow-up. Data were obtained from SIGLO, Farmis, and Mambrino XXI.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Eighty-five men were included, median age 73 years, (IQR 52&ndash;91); 97.6% had metastatic castration-sensitive PC and 2.4% non-metastatic castration-resistant PC. Six patients had pre-existing hypothyroidism.</p><p>Hypothyroidism occurred in 27.8% patients without prior thyroid disease (12.7% subclinical, 15.2% primary iatrogenic). Median time to detection was 68 days (IQR 12&ndash;880). Median TSH increase was 7.34 mU/L (IQR 1.41&ndash;21.36) in patients with prior hypothyroidism versus 3.15 mU/L (IQR 2.12&ndash;5.64) in those without.</p><p>Levothyroxine was initiated in 72.7% patients without prior hypothyroidism (100% of primary iatrogenic, 40% of subclinical cases). Among treated patients, TSH normalised in 75% with primary hypothyroidism and 50% with subclinical disease.</p><p>All patients with pre-existing hypothyroidism required initiation or adjustment of levothyroxine.</p><p>Seven patients on levothyroxine discontinued apalutamide due to progression or toxicity; After discontinuation 85.7% maintained the same dose of levothyroxine. Two of them developed suppressed TSH.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Apalutamide&ndash;induced hypothyroidism in our cohort was higher than reported in the label (8%), particularly in patients without prior thyroid disease. Most cases occurred within the first months of therapy, although late onset was also observed, highlighting the need for long&ndash;term monitoring.</p></li><li><p>Patients with pre&ndash;existing hypothyroidism require closer monitoring, as all needed levothyroxine initiation or dose adjustment.</p></li><li><p>Levothyroxine effectively managed primary hypothyroidism, while outcomes in subclinical cases were less consistent in clinical practice.</p></li><li><p>Reassessment of thyroid function after apalutamide discontinuation is recommended to avoid unnecessary therapy.</p></li><li><p>Implementing standardised protocols for diagnosis, monitoring, treatment initiation, and post&ndash;discontinuation management through multidisciplinary collaboration (Urology, Oncology, Endocrinology, Primary Care) could optimise patient care.</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. AEMPS. <I>Erleada 60 mg &ndash; Product label (apalutamida)</I> (CIMA); 2025 https://cima.aemps.es/cima/dochtml/ft/1181342001/FT_1181342001.html</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baldominos Cordon, A., De Juan-Garcia Torres, P., Corrales Krohnert, S., Calero Rodriguez, G., Marin Espinosa, I., Heras Hidalgo, I., Gavilan Gigosos, H., Domenech Millan, A., Horta Hernandez, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.344</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.344</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-245 Real-world incidence and management of hypothyroidism secondary to apalutamide in patients with prostate cancer]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A169</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A170</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A170-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-246 Diagnostic and therapeutic value of monitoring free valproic acid in patients with hypoalbuminaemia]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A170-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Valproic acid (VA) binds strongly to albumin. In hypoalbuminaemia, the free valproic acid fraction (FVPA) &ndash; the pharmacologically active form &ndash; increases, raising efficacy and toxicity risks. Determining FVPA concentration is therefore crucial for monitoring, dose adjustment, and treatment safety.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The primary objective was to evaluate the influence of hypoalbuminaemia on the relationship between total VA and FVPA concentrations. Secondarily, a proposed formula for the theoretical calculation of FVPA was compared with measured values.<sup>1</sup>  </p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Retrospective and descriptive study was conducted on patients treated with VA, between January 2024 and September 2025 at a tertiary hospital.</p><p>Data were extracted from Orion Clinic and Gestlab systems, including demographic (sex, age), anthropometric (weight, height), and biochemical parameters (VA, FVPA, albumin, and total proteins). Patients were classified as normoalbuminaemic (&ge; 3.5 g/dL), mildly hypoalbuminaemic (2.5&ndash;3.4 g/dL), or severely hypoalbuminaemic (&lt; 2.5 g/dL).</p><p>According to the literature, a target therapeutic range was established at 5-15 mcg/mL and 50-10 mcg/mL for FVPA and VA, respectively.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 31 patients were included, 65% women, with an average age of 58 &plusmn; 17 years. Distribution by albumin status was 61.5% (19) normal, 32% (10) mild, and 6.5% (2) severe hypoalbuminaemia, analysing a total of 48 samples.</p><p>Regarding FVPA concentration, supratherapeutic levels were observed in 41.9% (13) of patients, 69.2% (9) of whom were hypoalbuminaemic &ndash; 53.8% (7) mildly and 15.4% (2) severely. Notably, several patients exhibited FVPA levels above the therapeutic range despite total VA concentrations within or below the recommended range. 30.8% (4) had total VA concentrations at the lower limit or subtherapeutic range.</p><p>Comparison of measured FVPA concentrations versus the ones calculated with the proposed formula revealed a mean difference of 4.96%.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>More than half of the patients with supratherapeutic FVPA concentrations were hypoalbuminaemic, often with total VA below the target range. All cases of severe hypoalbuminaemia showed elevated FVPA concentrations. These results underscore the importance of directly measuring FVPA in hypoalbuminaemic patients to optimise dosing, clinical interpretation and prevent toxicity.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. Pretorius E, van Zyl P, Joubert G. Therapeutic drug monitoring for valproate: deriving a novel formula for calculation of free concentration. <I>Eur J Clin Pharmacol.</I> 2024;<b>80</b>(11):1751&ndash;9. doi:10.1007/s00228-024-03741-2</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lumbreras Such, M., Yago Gimenez, M., Garcia Zafra, V., Peral Ballester, L., Miralles Andreu, G., Murcia Lopez, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.345</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.345</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-246 Diagnostic and therapeutic value of monitoring free valproic acid in patients with hypoalbuminaemia]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A170</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A170</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A170-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-247 From a basic to a streamlined centre for medicines information service: introducing electronic health record-based inquiries and an internal pharmacy questioning database]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A170-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Prescribing errors remain common in hospitals, often linked to limited drug knowledge and poor access to reliable information. Centres for Medicines Information (CMIs), often led by pharmacists, provide timely, evidence-based answers to pharmacotherapeutic questions, which healthcare professionals (HCPs) perceive as supporting clinical decision and as having potential to improve patient outcomes. Efficient CMIs rely on expert input, structured documentation, and digital integration.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This study evaluates the implementation of a streamlined CMI service at a tertiary care centre, aiming to improve efficiency, knowledge management, and accessibility through digital tools and standardised processes.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A descriptive service evaluation was conducted over 8 months (October 2024&ndash;May 2025) in a tertiary care hospital, where the CMI is run by pharmacists. All pharmacotherapeutic inquiries from HCPs submitted to the CMI were included. Inquiries were received via telephone, email, or a new Electronic Health Record (EHR) consult feature and documented in a newly developed internal pharmacy database containing all inquiries and responses, with links to the patient&rsquo;s EHR when relevant. The database tracks duplicate submissions and records pharmacist-led response validation and follow-up actions for frequently recurring or clinically severe inquiries. Data on inquiry characteristics, validation, duplicates, and follow-up actions were analysed descriptively.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Over 8 months, the CMI handled 375 pharmacotherapeutic inquiries (47/month), mostly from physicians (43%) and nurses (36%), with 93% submitted by phone. Most responses were documented in the EHR (77%) and related to administration (34%), IV (in)compatibilities (22%), and dosage (13%). Validation was completed for 99% of inquiries, with 54% validated by any CMI pharmacist and the rest by specifically assigned teams or individuals based on expertise. Ninety-five percent of inquiries were approved, 4% not approved and 1% pending. A total of 38 parent issues were identified in the database, grouping 110 inquiries, and revealing 72 duplicate entries. Actions were taken for 62% of inquiries, primarily pharmacist guideline development (35%) and Frequently Asked Question page documents preparation (26%).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The streamlined CMI service optimised inquiry handling and enhanced information management, thereby facilitating informed clinical decision-making. A future study should evaluate whether streamlined CMIs support safer and more effective pharmacotherapy and provide evidence of a return on investment.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Van Den Broucke, E., Deleenheer, B., De Rijdt, T., Weekers, F., Quintens, C., Spriet, I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.346</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.346</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-247 From a basic to a streamlined centre for medicines information service: introducing electronic health record-based inquiries and an internal pharmacy questioning database]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A170</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A171</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A171-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-248 Analysis of genetic variants in dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase and dosage management and toxicity in patients treated with fluoropyrimidines]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A171-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Fluoropyrimidines are used in cancer treatment but show variability in tolerance, with one of the main causes being the deficiency of the enzyme dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), encoded by the dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPYD) gene, responsible for the drug&rsquo;s metabolism. This deficiency can reduce drug elimination and increase toxicity risk.</p><p>Genetic testing before treatment allows dose individualisation, optimising efficacy and reducing toxicity.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The study aimed to determine the prevalence and types of DPYD variants in patients at our centre and to analyse how initial doses were managed and adjusted based on tolerance.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>An observational, retrospective, descriptive study included patients tested for DPYD gene variants before treatment (May 2021&ndash;December 2024). A 50% dose reduction is recommended for heterozygous variants 2A and 13, 75% for other heterozygous variants, and treatment is contraindicated for homozygous 2A and 13 variants.</p><p>Frequency distribution was used for qualitative variables and prevalence measures for quantitative variables.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 816 requests were made; 98.4% (803) were performed. Determinations were done by an external laboratory until November 2021, then began to be done at our centre.</p><p>95.1% (764) of patients showed no variants, while 4.9% (39) had variants: DPYDIVS10 in 51.3% (20), DPYDD949V in 23.1% (9), DPYD2A in 20.5% (8), and DPYD13 in 2.6% (1) and one homozygous variant DPYD*D949V in 2.6% (1).</p><p>Among these patients, 48.7% (19) started fluoropyrimidines: 52.6% (10) started with capecitabine, 26.3% (five) combined with oxaliplatin, 15.8% (three) started 5-fluorouracil combined with oxaliplatin, and 5.3% (one) in combination with oxaliplatin and irinotecan.</p><p>89.5% (17) patients started with a reduced dose, 23.5% (four) developed diarrhoea, one also neutropenia, although dose reductions were not necessary. Among the patients on treatment, 79,0% (15) had a progressive dose increase, and 46.7% (seven) reached a dose of 70-85%.</p><p>After escalation, 53.3% (eight) developed gastrointestinal toxicity, hand-foot syndrome, or mucositis, requiring dose reduction in two and discontinuation in three.</p><p>The prevalence of variants associated with partial reduction in DPYD activity was approximately 5%, the most common being the DPYDIVS10 variant.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>DPYD screening effectively identified patients at risk of fluoropyrimidine toxicity, allowing individualised dosing. Initiation with reduced doses was well tolerated, supporting dose escalation. The observed prevalence aligns with literature. This study highlights the importance of pharmacogenetic testing in improving efficacy and safety of fluoropyrimidine treatment.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jimenez Rivero, N., Alvaro Sanz, E., Perez Ahijon, C., Alba Galeote, A., Faus Felipe, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.347</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.347</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-248 Analysis of genetic variants in dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase and dosage management and toxicity in patients treated with fluoropyrimidines]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A171</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A171</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A171-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-249 Defibrotide prophylaxis in high-risk paediatric patients undergoing haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: real-world cohort]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A171-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) is a potentially life-threatening complication after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Defibrotide, an endothelial-protective agent, is established for SOS treatment and has been used prophylactically in high-risk paediatric subgroups; however, its prophylactic role is not well defined, and real-world paediatric evidence remains limited.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To describe patient characteristics and SOS outcomes at days +30 and +100 in paediatric HSCT patients, at a tertiary paediatric hospital, who met SOS risk criteria and received defibrotide prophylaxis.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Retrospective cohort of paediatric patients undergoing HSCT between January 2023 and June 2025 fulfilling &ge;1 SOS-risk criteria (high-risk neuroblastoma, adrenoleukodystrophy, prior HSCT, prior SOS, iron overload, exposure to inotuzumab/gemtuzumab ozogamicin). Variables: sex, age, diagnosis, transplant type, risk factors. Outcomes: cumulative incidence of SOS by day +30 and day +100 from HSCT, and severity grade per EBMT criteria. Descriptive statistics are reported as median (range).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Thirty-three children were included (60% girls) and the median age was 10.7 years (1.0&ndash;19.3). Diagnoses were B-ALL 10/33 (30.3%), neuroblastoma 9/33 (27.3%), AML 6/33 (18.2%), adrenoleukodystrophy 3/33 (9.1%), and other conditions 5/33 (15.2%). Transplant type was allogeneic in 22/33 (66.7%) and autologous in 11/33 (33.3%). Prophylaxis regimen was defibrotide 6.25 mg/kg every 6 hours for 21 days. Cumulative SOS incidence was 6/33 (18.2%) by day +30 and 9/33 (27.3%) by day +100. Among the nine SOS cases, severity was mild in 4/9 (44.4%), moderate in 3/9 (33.3%), and severe in 2/9 (22.2%). The table details SOS development by risk-factor category.</p><p><tbl id="T1" loc="float"><tblbdy top-stubs="4"><r><c cspan="2" rspan="1">  <b>Risk factor (n/N,%)</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>SOS by day +30</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>SOS by day +100</b> </c></r><r><c cspan="4" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">High-risk neuroblastoma  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">9/33 (27.3%)  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">3/9 (33.3%)  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">3/9 (33.3%)  </c></r><r><c cspan="4" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Adrenoleukodystrophy  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">3/33 (9.1%)  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0/3 (0%)  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0/3 (0%)  </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Prior HSCT  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">10/33 (30.3%)  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1/10 (10.0%)  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">2/10 (20%)*  </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Prior SOS  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">3/33 (9.1%)  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0/3 (0%)  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0/3 (0%)  </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Iron overload  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">4/33 (12.1%)  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0/4 (0%)  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1/4 (25%)  </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Inotuzumab exposure  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">9/33 (27.3%)  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1/9 (11.1%)  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">3/9 (33.3%)*  </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Gemtuzumab exposure  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1/33 (3.0%)  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1/1 (100%)  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1/1 (100%)  </c></r></tblbdy><tblfn><p>*One SOS case had two risk factors: prior HSCT and inotuzumab exposure.</p></tblfn></tbl></p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Evidence for defibrotide prophylaxis in high-risk paediatric HSCT remains limited. This study offers a real-world perspective and underscores the importance of standardised risk assessment and close multidisciplinary monitoring. Further research is needed to define the role of defibrotide prophylaxis, identify which paediatric subgroups benefit most, and assess its comparative effectiveness against alternative strategies.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Algarra, E., Merino Pardo, A., Gonzalez Rodriguez, M., Arce Abaitua, B., Fernandez Romero, L., Leal Pino, B., Riva De La Hoz, B., Echavarri De Miguel, M., Abril Cabero, A., Nieto Martil, E., Pozas Del Rio, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.348</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.348</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-249 Defibrotide prophylaxis in high-risk paediatric patients undergoing haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: real-world cohort]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A171</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A172</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A172-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-250 Pharmaceutical intervention in optimising the perioperative management of home medication in surgical patients during hospitalisation]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A172-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Proper management of chronic medication in surgical patients is essential to ensure their safety during hospitalisation.</p><p>Pharmaceutical intervention, integrated into the multidisciplinary team, is key to medication reconciliation upon admission. Additionally, postoperative pharmacotherapeutic follow-up performed by the pharmacist is essential to assess and adjust the usual chronic treatment according to the patient&lsquo;s new clinical situation, especially in those with comorbidities such as hypertension or diabetes mellitus.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the impact of pharmaceutical intervention on optimising the perioperative management of home medication in surgical patients during hospitalisation.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A prospective, longitudinal study was conducted in a tertiary hospital, including all patients reconciled from January 2024 to August 2025.</p><p>After preoperative management of the patient&lsquo;s pharmacotherapeutic history, the pharmacist carried out daily clinical follow-up to optimise home treatment by adjusting the dosage, after reviewing the blood pressure and blood glucose values in hypertensive and/or diabetic patients.</p><p>Demographic (age, sex, length of stay, clinical service), clinical (number of chronic medications, pharmacotherapeutic objectives), and safety variables (adequacy of treatment and clinical impact of the pharmaceutical intervention) were collected.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 363 patients were reconciled, whose mean age of 71&plusmn;14 years, with women predominating 59.2% (215). Most patients belonged to the Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology clinical service 89.8% (326), followed by Neurosurgery 8.3% (30) and Urology 1.9% (7). The average hospital stay was 7&plusmn;7 days.</p><p>Patients were taking a mean of 7&plusmn;4 chronic medication. Depending on comorbidities, follow-up was performed to optimise home medication.</p><p>75.5% (274) of patients required pharmacotherapeutic follow-up: 39.4% (143) focused on blood pressure control, 6.1% (22) on glycaemic monitoring and 30% (109) on both parameters. The remaining 24.5% (89) did not require follow-up regarding home medication management.</p><p>Of the patients we followed up for proper perioperative pharmacotherapeutic optimisation, 31.3% (86) underwent a dosage adjustment of antihypertensive medication or insulin based on clinical findings. This adjustment allowed for the correction of parameters in 58.1% (50). In the remaining patients, due to clinical instability despite the adjustment of their home treatment, consultation with the Internal Medicine Continuity of Care Unit was requested.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Pharmaceutical intervention, integrated within the multidisciplinary team, ensures proper reconciliation and optimisation of perioperative management of chronic medication in surgical patients during hospitalisation.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carreno Dato, I., Macia Soriano, S., Garcia Zafra, V., Matoses Chirivella, C., Gutierrez Palomo, S., Murcia Lopez, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.349</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.349</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-250 Pharmaceutical intervention in optimising the perioperative management of home medication in surgical patients during hospitalisation]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A172</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A172</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A172-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-251 Atogepant in clinical practice: persistence and reasons for discontinuing treatment]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A172-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>In recent years, monoclonal antibodies targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) have provided a new alternative for the preventive treatment of migraine in patients who have experienced multiple previous therapeutic failures. The recent approval of atogepant, a new oral anti-CGRP, offers advantages in terms of convenience, adherence, and costs reduction. Nevertheless, several cases of treatment discontinuation have been identified by the Pharmacy Department.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The aim of this study is to evaluate the persistence of atogepant in a real-life setting and to identify the main reasons for discontinuing treatment.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Observational, descriptive and retrospective study, which included patients who started treatment with atogepant between July 2024-November 2024.</p><p>Variables collected were: sex, age, diagnosis (chronic or episodic migraine), previous anti-CGRP treatments, adverse reaction (AR), date and reason for discontinuing treatment. Persistence was defined by the length of time between the first dispensation, to treatment discontinuation or the end of follow-up in September 2025. Continuous variables are expressed as median while categorical variables as frequency and percentage. All information was collected from electronic medical records and analysed using the R statistical programme (v.4.2.2).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 55 patients were included, 43 (78,2%) women, with a median age of 49 years. 50 (90,9%) were diagnosed with chronic migraine and 30 (54,5%) had previously been treated with an anti-CGRP monoclonal antibody, 23 (41,8%) with galcanezumab and 7 (12,7%) with erenumab.</p><p>At the end of the follow-up 39 (70,9%) patients had discontinued the treatment with atogepant, with a median persistence of 176,6 days. Half (53,8%) had been treated previously with monoclonal antibody. The main reasons for discontinuation were AR (56%) and lack of effectiveness (42%). The most common AR were nausea 30,9%, constipation 29,1% and fatigue 25,5%.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Atogepant showed limited persistence, most of the patients discontinuing treatment within the first 6 months, mainly due to AR and lack of effectiveness. Although oral administration represents a convenient alternative to monoclonal antibodies, further studies are needed to better select patients who could benefit from this therapy.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Diaz Romero, C., Fadon Herrera, C., Garcia Jimenez, V., Rodriguez-Tenreiro Rodriguez, C., Munoz Villasur, M., Latasa Berasategui, M., Gomez Mato, A., Varela Ferreiro, M., Esparrago Fernandez, C., Lozano Blazquez, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.350</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.350</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-251 Atogepant in clinical practice: persistence and reasons for discontinuing treatment]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A172</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A173</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A173-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-252 Effectiveness of atogepant after anti-CGRP monoclonal antibody: patient-reported outcomes on quality of life]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A173-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Preventive migraine therapies aim to reduce attack frequency and severity and improve quality of life (QoL). Atogepant, an oral anti-CGRP, is accessible in Spain for preventive treatment in patients with high-frequency episodic migraine (HFEM) and chronic migraine (CM).</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the effectiveness of atogepant after anti-CGRP monoclonal antibody treatment, using a validated QoL questionnaire, and to describe its safety in real-world practice.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A prospective observational study was conducted between 08/24-09/25. Data were collected from electronic medical records: sex, age, previous therapy, migraine type, treatment duration, discontinuation and concomitant botulinum toxin use. QoL was assessed at baseline week 0 (W0) and week 12 (W12) using the Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire version 2.1 (MSQ), comprising three domains: Role Function&ndash;Restrictive (RFR), Role Function&ndash;Preventive (RFP), and Emotional Function (EF). Scores range from 0 to 100, higher scores indicating better QoL. The primary endpoint was the percentage of responders in the RFR domain, defined as patients with &ge;25% mean improvement from baseline to W12, considered clinically relevant in the ADVANCE trial. Secondary endpoints were mean changes in each MSQ domain and total score. Adverse events (AEs) were obtained from medical records.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Thirty patients were included, 93.3% (n=28) women, median age 47 years (36&ndash;61). All had previously received fremanezumab; 80% (n=24) had CM and 20% (n=6) HFEM. Median treatment duration was 5 months (1&ndash;13). Twelve patients (40%) discontinued, four before W12. Three patients combined atogepant with botulinum toxin.</p><p>Atogepant was effective in 30% (n=9), 20% (n=6) showed partial improvement, and 50% (n=15) had no or negative change.</p><p>Detailed MSQ scores and domain changes are presented in <cross-ref type="tbl" refid="T1">table 1</cross-ref>:</p><p><tbl id="T1" loc="float"><tblbdy top-stubs="2"><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Domain/Week</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>RFR</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>RFP</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>EF</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Total</b> </c></r><r><c cspan="5" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">W0 (mean &plusmn; SD) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">28.2 (&plusmn;18.2) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">32.5 (&plusmn;19.9) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">19.9 (&plusmn;18.3) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">27.6 (&plusmn;16.8) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">W12 (mean &plusmn; SD) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">40.2 (&plusmn;26.7) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">44 (&plusmn;29) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">29.9 (&plusmn;29.6) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">38.9 (&plusmn;26.4) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Difference (W12&ndash;W0) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">12 (&plusmn;29.2) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">11.5 (&plusmn;29.7) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">10.1 (&plusmn;24.6) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">11.3 (&plusmn;26.9) </c></r></tblbdy></tbl></p><p>AEs occurred in 76.7% (n=23): constipation (47.8%), hyporexia (43.5%), nausea (34.8%), and weight loss (13.6%).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The effectiveness of atogepant following anti-CGRP monoclonal antibody treatment, measured by QoL improvement, was limited, with one-third of patients achieving clinically relevant benefit. All MSQ domains showed minimal changes. Gastrointestinal adverse events were frequent. Larger studies with longer follow-up are needed to confirm these findings.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cano Martinez, G., Gil-Sierra, M., Mora-Cortes, M., Dominguez-Santana, C., Dominguez-Cantero, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.351</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.351</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-252 Effectiveness of atogepant after anti-CGRP monoclonal antibody: patient-reported outcomes on quality of life]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A173</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A173</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A173-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-253 Experience in the pharmacokinetic monitoring of posaconazole in oral suspension as prophylaxis in immunocompromised paediatric patients]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A173-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>The Paediatric Antimicrobial Stewardship Program promotes rational antifungal use and monitoring of antifungals.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To describe the experience with pharmacokinetic monitoring of posaconazole suspension in immunocompromised paediatric patients, and to evaluate its effectiveness and safety.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective study was conducted in a tertiary hospital (January 2017&ndash;December 2023). Immunocompromised patients under 18-years-old receiving posaconazole suspension prophylaxis with at least one plasma concentration (Cp) determination were included. Initial dosing was posaconazole 4 mg/kg/8h if &lt;34 kg, or 200 mg/8h if &gt;34 kg; in chronic granulomatous disease, dosing was every 12h. Therapeutic range considered was 0.7&ndash;2.5 &micro;g/ml. To ensure steady-state, measurements were obtained at least 7 days after treatment initiation.</p><p>Demographic, clinical, and pharmacological variables were collected. Quantitative variables were expressed as median &plusmn; interquartile range (IQR), and qualitative variables as number (%). Statistical analysis was performed using SAS software.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Seventy-one patients were included (67.6% male), with a median age of 4.8 (IQR 2.4&ndash;8.9) years. Main underlying conditions were primary immunodeficiencies (23/71, 32.4%), bone marrow failure/myelodysplastic syndrome (15/71, 21.1%), acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (14/71, 19.7%), and acute myeloid leukaemia (8/71, 11.3%).</p><p>In total, 373 Cp were collected: 178 (47.8%) were therapeutic, 187 (50.1%) subtherapeutic, eight (2.1%) supratherapeutic. Median daily dose was 13.4 (IQR 12&ndash;18.4) mg/kg/day; prophylaxis duration was 209 (IQR 91&ndash;444) days. No significant correlation was observed between dose and Cp (r=-0.9584), and no significant differences in dose were found between therapeutic and supratherapeutic Cp (p=0.0614).</p><p>Six (8.5%) patients developed breakthrough invasive fungal infections (IFI): three proven, three probable. Median time to IFI was 78.6 (IQR 51&ndash;140) days, 11/16 (68.7%) Cp were subtherapeutic. Among patients without IFI, 176/357 (49.2%) Cp were subtherapeutic. Despite the higher proportion of subtherapeutic Cp, the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.128). Prophylaxis was discontinued in four (5.6%) patients due to suspected adverse events: transaminase elevation, gastrointestinal disorders, and skin reactions.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Pharmacokinetic monitoring of posaconazole suspension in immunocompromised paediatric patients is essential and necessary to optimise antifungal prophylaxis. The standard prophylactic dose of posaconazole may be insufficient to achieve therapeutic Cp, as evidenced by the high percentage of subtherapeutic Cp. Overall, posaconazole was well tolerated in most patients.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guembe, B., Alvarez De Toledo Lopez-Herrera, M., Barenblit Mas, L., Larrosa Garcia, M., Oliveras Arenas, M., Renedo Miro, B., Mendoza Palomar, N., Hontalba Rifa, A., Soler Palacin, P., Fernandez Polo, A., Garcia Garcia, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.352</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.352</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-253 Experience in the pharmacokinetic monitoring of posaconazole in oral suspension as prophylaxis in immunocompromised paediatric patients]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A173</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A174</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A174-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-254 Effectiveness of switching between calcitonin gene-related peptide ligand antagonist (anti-CGRP) drugs in migraine]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A174-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Migraine causes sensory and digestive symptoms; preventive treatment reduces attack frequency and severity, improving patients&rsquo; overall quality of life.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the effectiveness of anti-CGRP therapies as prophylactic treatment in patients with chronic and high-frequency episodic migraine following treatment switching.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A descriptive, observational and retrospective study was conducted including all patients with chronic or high-frequency episodic migraine who underwent treatment switching with different anti-CGRP therapies at our centre between August 2020 and December 2024.</p><p>Data obtained from electronic medical records included age, sex, migraine type, days of migraine per month (DMM) at baseline and at 3 and 6 months, treatment and adverse drug reactions (ADR). Patients were classified as non-responders (NR), moderate responders (MR, DMM reduction &ge;30%), or good responders (GR, DMM reduction &ge;50%). Statistical analysis used measures of central tendency and dispersion for quantitative variables and absolute frequencies for qualitative variables.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Forty-one patients (89% women) with chronic (93%) and episodic (7%) migraine were included, with a mean age of 44 [range 23&ndash;62] years. All started treatment with galcanezumab and after evaluating the effectiveness of the last cycle received, the first switch was to erenumab (except in one patient) and the second to eptinezumab. The main reason for switching was the ineffectiveness of the previous treatment, except for ADR in three patients. The results are summarised in <cross-ref type="tbl" refid="T1">table 1</cross-ref>.</p><p><tbl id="T1" loc="float"><no>Abstract 4CPS-254 Table 1</no><caption><p>Effectiveness of anti-CGRP therapies following treatment switching</p></caption><tblbdy top-stubs="2"><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Anti-CGRP</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Evaluated patients</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Evaluation time (months)</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>GR (%)</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>MR (%)</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>NR (%)</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Not evaluated</b> </c></r><r><c cspan="7" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Galcanezumab </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">41 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">3 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">12% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">10% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">68% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">10% </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">6 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">7% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">5% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">51% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">37% </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Erenumab </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">40 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">3 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">13% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">18% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">64% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">5% </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">6 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">15% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">23% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">35% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">27% </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Eptinezumab </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">24 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">3 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">17% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">50% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">25% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">29% </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">6 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">17% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">37% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">17% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">29% </c></r></tblbdy></tbl></p><p>ADR were recorded in 25 patients, the main one being constipation (25%), most frequent for erenumab (31%), followed by galcanezumab (27%) and eptinezumab (15%).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Treatment effectiveness was observed to progressively decrease when switching from one drug to another, especially in patients undergoing a third treatment. Additional, longer-term studies are needed to determine the optimal sequence of therapeutic switching to maximise effectiveness in these patients.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gomez, R., Gallego Hernandez, G., Cillero Martin, M., Roso Jimenez, N., Otero Lopez, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.353</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.353</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-254 Effectiveness of switching between calcitonin gene-related peptide ligand antagonist (anti-CGRP) drugs in migraine]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A174</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A174</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A174-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-255 Real-world use of niraparib in epithelial ovarian cancer]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A174-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Niraparib is a selective inhibitor of PARP-1 and PARP-2 that represents a therapeutic alternative as monotherapy for the maintenance treatment of adult patients with advanced high-grade epithelial ovarian cancer (OC) who have achieved a complete or partial response following first-line platinum-based chemotherapy.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the real-world effectiveness and safety of niraparib as maintenance monotherapy in adult patients with high-grade epithelial OC treated at a tertiary hospital.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective observational study was conducted including all patients diagnosed with epithelial OC who received niraparib between January 2021 and December 2024 at a tertiary hospital. Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary endpoint to assess effectiveness. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS, Kaplan&ndash;Meier method), previous treatment lines, starting dose, and toxicity leading to dose reduction or discontinuation. Data were collected from electronic medical records and prescription software. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS v.29.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Fifty-five women with stage III/IV OC were included, with a median age at treatment initiation of 64 years (27&ndash;86). In 80% of patients, niraparib was administered as first-line maintenance therapy after platinum-based chemotherapy. The initial dose was 200 mg once daily in most patients 89% (49), except for those weighing more than 77 kg, who received 300 mg daily 11% (6). After a median follow-up of 22.85 months, median PFS was 8.34 months (95% CI 4.97&ndash;11.22) and OS was 31.86 months (95% CI 27.08&ndash;36.65). Regarding safety, dose reduction was required in 69% (38) of patients, and treatment discontinuation due to toxicity occurred in 10.9% (6), mainly haematologic.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The observed effectiveness was lower than that reported in PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 (PFS: 8.34 vs 13.8 months). However, adverse events leading to dose reduction (69% vs 71.7%) or discontinuation (10.9% vs 16.3%) were consistent with clinical trial data. Considering the limited sample size, inter-trial differences, and relatively short follow-up, further larger real-world studies are warranted to assess the impact of niraparib in clinical practice.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Teran Ceballos, A., Gamiz Rejano, A., Guevara Madrid, G., Lopez-Herrero Lopez, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.354</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.354</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-255 Real-world use of niraparib in epithelial ovarian cancer]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A174</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A175</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A175-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-256 Effectiveness and safety of fidaxomicin as first-line therapy for Clostridioides difficile infection]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A175-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>  <I>Clostridioides difficile</I> infection (CDI) is a major cause of healthcare-associated diarrhoea, associated with high morbidity, mortality, and frequent recurrences. Fidaxomicin, a narrow-spectrum macrocyclic antibiotic, has shown comparable efficacy to vancomycin with lower recurrence rates and is recommended as first-line therapy for patients at high risk of recurrence. However, real-world evidence on its effectiveness and safety as initial treatment remains limited.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of fidaxomicin as first-line treatment for <I>Clostridioides difficile</I> infection in real-world clinical practice.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective descriptive study was conducted including patients treated with fidaxomicin 200 mg every 12 hours for 10 days as first-line therapy for CDI. Data were obtained from the digital medical record (Diraya). Variables collected included sex, age, recurrence risk, antibiotic use within 3 months prior to diagnosis, active proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy, clinical cure, recurrence or reinfection, and complications. Effectiveness was defined as clinical cure (absence of symptoms 48 hours after the end of treatment) and recurrence (within 8 weeks) or reinfection (beyond 8 weeks). Safety was assessed by recorded adverse events.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 61 patients were included (mean age 62 &plusmn; 20 years; 59% male). Regarding the main recurrence risk factors: 64% (39/61) were immunosuppressed and 44% (27/61) were older than 65 years with severe disease. 75% (46/61) had received antibiotics within 3 months before diagnosis, of which 61% (28/46) were considered high risk. At diagnosis, 56% (34/61) were on active antibiotic therapy, which was discontinued in 56% (19/34) of cases. 80% (49/61) were on PPIs at diagnosis, which were discontinued in 65% (32/49) of patients. Clinical resolution was achieved in 87% (53/61), with recurrence in 5% (3/61) and no reinfections reported. Clinical complications occurred in 20% (12/61): 18% (11/61) pseudomembranous colitis and 1% (1/61) paralytic ileus. No adverse events were reported.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Fidaxomicin as first-line therapy showed high effectiveness and a favourable safety profile in real-world clinical practice, with high cure rates and low recurrence. These findings support its use as a preferred therapeutic option in patients with recurrence risk factors or significant comorbidities.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rivero Garcia, M., Sanchez Lobon, I., Rosa, M. O. D. L., Manzano Martin, M., Rodriguez Mateos, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.355</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.355</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-256 Effectiveness and safety of fidaxomicin as first-line therapy for Clostridioides difficile infection]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A175</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A175</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A175-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-257 Comparison of ferric carboxymaltose administration regimens according to haemoglobin]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A175-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) is indicated when rapid iron replenishment is required. The maximum cumulative weekly dose is 1000 mg. Although medium-term effects on haemoglobin (Hb) are well characterised, short-term response remains underexplored.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate different FCM administration protocols according to Hb changes at days 1 and 5-7 post-infusion, and to assess associations between patient related covariates and Hb increase (Hb).</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective observational study was conducted at a tertiary hospital (January&ndash;August 2025). Data were collected from Orion Clinic and analysed using RStudio. Variables included total dose, sex, baseline Hb (Hb0), Hb day1(Hb1) and days 5-7 (Hb5&ndash;7) post-infusion, Hb, bleeding presence, postoperative status, transfusions and age.</p><p>Administration protocols were:</p><p>G0=1000 mg single dose</p><p>G1=500 mg single dose</p><p>G2=500+500 mg on consecutive days</p><p>G3=500+500 mg on non-consecutive days</p><p>Missing data were addressed using multiple imputation by chained equations (MICE). Hb was analysed using ANCOVA, adjusting for Hb0, bleeding, surgery, transfusions and age. Estimated marginal means were compared with Tukey&rsquo;s adjustment (TK).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 158 patients (58% women), mean age 66.0&plusmn;20.4 years, mean Hb0=8.69g/dL, were included.</p><p>A bleeding was reported in113 patients had bleeding and in 61 patients FCM was required after a surgery. 58 patients required transfusion.</p><p>Group distribution:</p><p>G0: n=54</p><p>G1: n=53</p><p>G2: n=19</p><p>G3: n=32</p><p>Adjusted analyses revealed no significant differences in Hb at day 1 or 5&ndash;7 between groups (p&gt;0.05). A non-significant trend towards higher Hb was observed in G3 compared to G0 (p=0.09), not maintained persisting after TK (p&gt;0.33).</p><p>Hb0 was inversely associated with Hb in days 1 and 5-7(p&lt;0.001). Bleeding was positively associated with greater Hb (day1: p = 0.009; day5&ndash;7: p = 0.011). No other covariates were significant.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p><l type="unord"><li><p>No significant short&ndash;term differences in Hb were found between FCM administration regimens. Therefore, dose fractionation may not provide additional short&ndash;term benefit in terms of Hb recovery.</p></li><li><p>Hb0 seems to influence treatment response, due to higher Hb0 showed smaller short&ndash;term increases</p></li><li><p>Bleeding was associated with greater Hb, highlighting the importance of the follow&ndash;up of these patients.</p></li><li><p>Limitations such as patient follow&ndash;up, uncontrolled bleeding and retrospective data collection may have influenced results. Future studies of Hb after FCM could optimise treatment strategies and patient selection.</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yago Gimenez, M., Lumbreras Such, M., Castejon Grao, I., Matoses Chirivella, C., Peral Ballester, L., Murcia Lopez, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.356</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.356</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-257 Comparison of ferric carboxymaltose administration regimens according to haemoglobin]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A175</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A176</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A176-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-258 Effectiveness of tezepelumab in the treatment of severe asthma in allergic and eosinophilic phenotypes]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A176-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Severe asthma (SA) is a heterogeneous disease characterised by different inflammatory phenotypes that influence treatment response. Tezepelumab, has shown efficacy across phenotypes, but real-world data comparing its effectiveness by phenotype is still limited. Evaluating this variability is essential to optimise personalised therapy and clinical outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the effectiveness of tezepelumab in patients with SA based on the asthma phenotype.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Retrospective, observational study (October -2023 to September-2025) in patients with AS treated with tezepelumab. Variables: age, sex, asthma phenotype, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FENO), Asthma Control Test (ACT) score; dyspnoea (mMRC scale), number of glucocorticoid cycles (GC), number of emergency visits/hospitalisations (EH). Clinical effectiveness based on asthma phenotype was measured by comparing data at baseline and 10 months of treatment. Statistical analysis was performed in R software using Student&rsquo;s t-test. P &lt;0.05 was considered statistical significance.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Thirty-four patients with SA treated with tezepelumab were included; 81.2% women, 52 years (sd: 15), 66.7% allergic-phenotype (AP), and 33.3% eosinophilic-phenotype (EP).</p><p>In AP, mean baseline: FEV1: 74.9% (sd: 28.0), FENO 42.9 ppb (sd: 49.8); ACT 11 (sd: 5). At 10 months: FEV1: 88.5% (sd: 17.8), FENO 30.5 ppb (sd: 30.3); ACT 17 (sd: 6).</p><p>In EP, mean baseline: FEV1 75.6% (sd: 20.8), FENO 30.2 ppb (sd: 26.1); ACT 11 (sd: 4). At 10 months: FEV1 81.4% (sd: 17.1%), FENO 22.3 ppb (sd: 18.5); ACT 13 (sd: 5).</p><p>During treatment, GC decreased from 3.6 to 0.6 in AP and from 5.6 to 3.6 in EP. Dyspnoea improved one point on the mMRC scale in both groups, from II to I in AP and from III to II in eosinophilics. EH decreased by 80.1% in allergics and 75.0% in eosinophilics.</p><p>Comparing both phenotypes, statistically significant differences were observed in FENO with a mean reduction of 19.8 ppb greater in the EP (p=0.008) and a mean increase of 4.5 points more in the ACT in AP vs. EP (p=0.033).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Tezepelumab improved lung function, asthma control, and decreased the GC and emergencies/hospitalisations in both phenotypes. However, greater improvements in asthma control in AP and the airway inflammation in EP were observed.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Morales Rivero, B., Plaza Arbeo, A., Abenza Guardiola, A., Barbero Hernandez, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.357</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.357</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-258 Effectiveness of tezepelumab in the treatment of severe asthma in allergic and eosinophilic phenotypes]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A176</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A176</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A176-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-259 Impact of switching to biosimilar etanercept in rheumatoid arthritis patients followed in pharmaceutical consultations at a tertiary hospital]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A176-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic, autoimmune, systemic joint disease. Although disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) remain the first-line treatment for RA control, biological therapies have changed the treatment paradigm, with etanercept (Enbrel ) being the first approved for moderate-to-severe RA. With the emergence of biosimilars as a more sustainable alternative for healthcare systems, Benepali and Erelzi were introduced at our hospital, prompting patient switches in 2019 and 2024, respectively. The implementation of the Immunotherapy Pharmaceutical Consultation (IPC) in 2024 aimed to provide patients with the information and training for managing their medication, as well as to mitigate the nocebo effect, thereby ensuring the rational use of resources and the safety and effectiveness of therapies.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To analyse the impact of switching between etanercept formulations in RA patients and the role of IPC follow-up, particularly regarding treatment persistence, pharmacovigilance, and patient-reported quality of life data.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Patients treated with etanercept between 2016 and 2024 were identified using the hospital&rsquo;s pharmaceutical management system. Data from medical records and results from the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire, applied during IPC visits, were collected using Google Forms and analysed using Excel.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Among the 124 RA patients analysed, 50 initiated therapy with Enbrel and 74 with Benepali. Following the Erelzi introduction in 2024, none of the six patients who switched from Enbrel progressed to a subsequent treatment line (STL). However, of those who switched from Benepali , six progressed to STL and one reverted to the previous formulation. Regarding the 15 patients who underwent two consecutive switches (Enbrel -&gt; Benepali -&gt; Erelzi ), four progressed to STL. According to the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire, 26% reported no change, 31% improvement, and 43% worsening in perceived health status post-switch to Erelzi. Ten suspected adverse drug reactions were reported since IPC implementation, with some patients requiring additional consultations due to clinical events.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The switching process proved to be safe and effective, without compromising treatment efficacy, with transitions to subsequent therapy lines likely associated with the natural progression of the disease. The IPC was essential in monitoring the switch, identifying clinical events, and ensuring the rational and safe use of biological therapies in RA.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carvalho, M., Lopes Calvo, A., Oliveira, J., Vaz, M., Ferreira, M., Soares, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.358</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.358</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-259 Impact of switching to biosimilar etanercept in rheumatoid arthritis patients followed in pharmaceutical consultations at a tertiary hospital]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A176</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A176</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A177-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-261 Bevacizumab and trifluridine-tipiracil for metastasic colorectal cancer: retrospective analysis in a second-level hospital]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A177-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>The addition of bevacizumab to trifluridine/tipiracil (Bev-TAS) treatment has shown improved survival compared to monotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Bev-TAS in clinical practice at a second-level hospital.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Observational, retrospective study including patients with mCRC treated with Bev-TAS between 19/01/2023-25/09/2025.</p><p>Data collected form electronic medical records included: demographic (age, sex), clinical (date of diagnosis, stage, location, mutations, metastases, previous treatments and ECOG), treatment-related (start/end dates, number of cycles), effectiveness [response rate per RECIST V1.1, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS)] and safety (adverse reactions (ARs) per NCI-CTCAEv.5, dose reductions and discontinuations). Effectiveness was assessed by Kaplan-Meier method, using SPSS v1.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Thirty-seven patients were included (27 men); median age was 76 years (IQR 66-75,5). Primary tumour was in colon in 75,7% (left: 18, right: 9, unknown: 1) and 24,3% in rectum. Mutations were found in 59,5% (51,4% KRAS, 5,4% NRAS, 2,7% BRAF V600E). The most frequent metastases sites were liver (n=25), lungs (n=16) and peritoneum (n=6). The median previous treatments received was two (IQR 2-2) and the ECOG was 1 (n=32), 0 (n=3) and 2 (n=2). Median follow-up after treatment initiation was 12 months (IQR 6&ndash;22).</p><p>The median number of Bev-TAS cycles was five (IQR 3-11). Best response was: 13,5% partial response, 46% stable disease, 35,1% progressive disease and 5,4% not evaluable. The disease control rate was 59,5%.</p><p>Median PFS was 5 months (95% CI 2,4-7,6) and OS was 12 months (95% CI 9,5-14,6).</p><p>ARs occurred in 89,2% of patients, mostly grade (G) 1-2: Asthenia (n=19), nausea/vomiting (n=9), diarrhoea (n=7), neutropenia (n=6) and thrombopenia (n=4). G3-4 included: Neutropenia (n=9), asthenia (n=4), hypertension (n=1), thrombopenia (n=1).</p><p>Treatment delays due to ARs occurred in 51,4% (median 7 days (IQR 7&ndash;17,5)) and dose reductions in 18,9%. Treatment was discontinued in 70,3%, due to progression (n=21), ARs (n=4) and clinical deterioration (n=1).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Our study showed effectiveness and safety outcomes consistent with those reported in the pivotal SUNLIGHT trial, supporting the benefit of adding bevacizumab to trifluridine/tipiracil in real-world practice. Safety profile and dose reductions were also comparable, with the most frequent ARs being haematological and gastrointestinal disorders.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lores Tojeiro, V., Gonzalez Furelos, T., Lopez Sandomingo, L., Granero Lopez, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.359</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.359</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-261 Bevacizumab and trifluridine-tipiracil for metastasic colorectal cancer: retrospective analysis in a second-level hospital]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A177</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A177</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A177-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-262 Efficacy and safety of eptinezumab in chronic and high-frequency episodic refractory migraine]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A177-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Eptinezumab is a calcitonin gene-related peptide antagonist (anti-CRGP) funded by the national health system for the following indications: patients with &ge;8 migraine days/month (MMD), high-frequency episodic migraine (HFEM) and in patients with chronic migraine (CM) and &ge;3 failures of previous treatments used for at least 3 months, one of which was botulinum toxin in the case of CM.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the real-world efficacy and safety of eptinezumab in our hospital.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>An observational, descriptive, and retrospective study was conducted that included all patients with CM (&ge;15 MMD) or HFEM (10-15 MMD) who received at least one dose of eptinezumab at our hospital between April 24 and June 25.</p></sec><sec><st>The following data were collected</st><p>age, sex, migraine type, number of migraine-nai&#x0308;ve patients, number of patients receiving botulinum toxin, MMD at baseline and week 12, prior treatments, and adverse reactions (ADR). The efficacy variables analysed were MMD reduction at week 12, the percentage of patients with &ge;75% MMD reduction, and &ge;50% MMD reduction.</p><p>Data were analysed using measures of central tendency and dispersion for quantitative variables and absolute frequencies for qualitative variables. Differences between quantitative variables were analysed using the Wilcoxon test using IBM SPSS.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Thirty-eight patients (89% women) with CM (95%) and HFEM (5%) were included, with a median age of 45 [range 17-80] years. Only 16% of patients were treatment-nai&#x0308;ve, and the remaining 71% had previously received other anti-CRGP agents. All patients with CM had received botulinum toxin.</p><p>The overall median at baseline was 20 MMD (95% CI: 13,53 to 26,47), and at week 12, a significant reduction to 11.5 MMD (95% CI: 4,52 to 18,48) was observed; p&lt;0.0001. 2/38 patients had a &ge;75% reduction in MMD, and 13/38 had a &ge;50% reduction at week 12.</p><p>7/38 patients experienced mild and transient ADR, the most notable being fatigue (9%).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The reduction in MMD at week 12 of treatment is significant; however, further studies are needed to confirm the validity of the long-term results. Eptinezumab was well tolerated, with most reported adverse effects being mild.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gomez, R., Albarran Gomez, A., Gallego Hernandez, G., Lorenzo Vidal, L., Garcia Paris, I., Rodriguez Sanchez, A., Gonzalez Zar, C., Gonzalez Alvarez-Cedron, C., Jerez Fajardo, I., Calzada Lopez, T., Garcia Casanueva, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.360</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.360</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-262 Efficacy and safety of eptinezumab in chronic and high-frequency episodic refractory migraine]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A177</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A177</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A178-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-263 Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies (MABS) for the treatment of migraine at a central hospital]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A178-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Migraine is one of the leading causes of disability in working-age adults, ranking second globally and first among young women, with a significant impact on quality of life and productivity.<sup>1</sup> Monoclonal antibodies targeting CGRP or its receptor (anti-CGRP mAbs) have shown efficacy and safety as preventive options and are now recommended as first-line therapies.<sup>2</sup> Real-world data confirm sustained reductions in migraine days with treatment.<sup>3</sup>  </p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of chronic migraine patients treated with anti-CGRP mAbs in clinical practice at a central hospital.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective observational study including patients who initiated anti-CGRP mAbs between January 2019 and May 2025. Demographic and clinical data were collected: age, gender, treatment duration (TT), migraine days per month (MDM), and adverse events (AE). Descriptive statistics summarised the cohort. Efficacy was evaluated by the change in MDM from baseline to 6 months ( = baseline&ndash;6M) and by responder rate (&ge;50% reduction). Paired t-tests or Wilcoxon tests were used according to data distribution. Safety was analysed by AE incidence. Data were extracted from electronic health records and analysed using Microsoft Excel for Microsoft 365 with Analysis ToolPak and Real Statistics add-ins.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Ninety-two patients were included (Galcanezumab 56; Erenumab 23; Fremanezumab 13); 90.0% were women, mean age 45.1 years, and mean TT 12.6 months. AEs were reported by 18.5% (17/92): mainly injection site reactions (galcanezumab and fremanezumab) and constipation (erenumab). In the subset with 6-month paired data (n=48: Galcanezumab 29; Erenumab 11; Fremanezumab 8), 89.6% were women, mean age 46.6 years and mean TT 20.0 months (erenumab), 12.9 months (fremanezumab) and 19.0 months (galcanezumab). Mean MDM reduction was: galcanezumab &ndash;7.3 days/month (p&lt;0.0001), erenumab &ndash;5.9 (p=0.001), and fremanezumab &ndash;3.5 (p=0.0078). Responder rates (&ge;50% reduction) were 82.8%, 90.9%, and 63.0%, respectively.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>In real-world clinical practice, anti-CGRP mAbs were associated with significant reductions in migraine frequency after 6 months. Galcanezumab showed the greatest mean reduction, while response rates were particularly high for galcanezumab and erenumab. The safety profile was favourable, consistent with literature data [3] and current recommendations supporting these agents as first-line preventive therapies [2]. Further prospective studies with larger cohorts are warranted.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. J Headache Pain 2020 Dec 2;<b>21</b>(1).</p><p>2. Headache 2024 Apr;<b>64</b>(4).</p><p>3. Cephalalgia 2025 Aug;<b>45</b>(8).</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alcobia, A., Silva, A., Brito, A., Mendes, T., Duarte, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.361</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.361</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-263 Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies (MABS) for the treatment of migraine at a central hospital]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A178</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A178</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A178-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-264 Analysis and 10 year comparison of intravenous immunoglobulins utilisation in a tertiary hospital: evaluation of clinical appropriateness and economic impact]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A178-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg) are used across diverse clinical conditions, including primary and secondary immunodeficiencies, autoimmune, neurological, and haematological disorders. Despite expanding applications, approved (on-label) indications remain limited. Given its substantial cost and limited global supply, evaluating prescribing practices is essential to support evidence-based use and optimise healthcare resources.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This study aimed to characterise IVIg utilisation in inpatient and outpatient settings at a tertiary hospital over one year (September 2024&ndash;September 2025) and compare findings with institutional data from 2014. Objectives included assessing adherence to approved indications, quantifying off-label and non-recommended use, and evaluating economic impact.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective observational study was conducted using data from electronic health records and pharmacy information systems. Patient demographics, IVIg indications, and direct treatment costs were analysed. Indications were classified according to the <I>British Clinical Guidelines for Immunoglobulin Use</I> (3rd edition, 2021). Comparative analysis was performed against data from 2014.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 153 patients received IVIg during the study period (median age: 65 years; 50.9% female), with 40.3% managed as inpatients. On-label indications accounted for 72.5% of prescriptions, most commonly common variable immunodeficiency (48/153, 31.4%) and secondary immunodeficiency (26/153, 17.0%). Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP, 16/153, 10.5%) and multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN,1/153, 0.7%) were newly classified as on-label. Evidence-supported off-label use represented 20.3%, with myasthenia gravis being the most common indication (13/153, 8.5%). While unsupported off-label and non-recommended indications accounted for 4.6% and 2.6%, respectively.</p><p>Compared to 2014, the number of patients treated increased by 10.9%. On-label use improved (67.4% in 2014 vs. 72.5% in 2024), with reductions in non-recommended indications.</p><p>Despite increased patient volume, IVIg expenditure declined from 1,730,002 to 1,681,662, reflecting enhanced cost-efficiency and prescribing behaviour.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>This analysis shows a positive trend toward more appropriate and economically sustainable IVIg use in comparison with 2014. The formal inclusion of CIDP and MMN as on-label indications, alongside enhanced guideline adherence and reduced unsupported use, reflects effective stewardship. Reduced expenditure despite increased utilisation underscores improved resource management, optimising healthcare expenditure.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guerreiro Caamano, A., De Frutos Soto, A., Gonzalo, A. B., Maganto Garrido, S., Montero Lazaro, M., Llorente Gomez, M., Gomez Diaz, M., Prol Da Costa, V., Garcia, A. L., Pariente Junquera, A., Sanchez Sanchez, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.362</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.362</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-264 Analysis and 10 year comparison of intravenous immunoglobulins utilisation in a tertiary hospital: evaluation of clinical appropriateness and economic impact]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A178</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A178</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A179-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-265 Deprescribing in practice: multidisciplinary review of low therapeutic value drugs in elderly patients]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A179-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Pluripathological Patients (PP) frequently experience extreme polypharmacy, leading to an increased unnecessary medication burden.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To analyse low therapeutic value drug (LTVD) prevalence in patients attending the multidisciplinary Pharmacy-Internal Medicine PP consultation. To describe the pharmaceutical interventions (PIs) and their acceptance (by internist and patient), and to assess the polypharmacy degree in the sample.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>This was a retrospective descriptive study (28 March 2023, to 7 March 2025) of patients who attended the PP consultation at least once. Variables collected from the electronic medical record included demographics, follow-up parameters, the number of chronic medications, and key pharmacological data (LTVD use, category, duration, and PIs). LTVD examined were psychoanaleptics, SYSADOAs, vasoprotectors, topical NSAIDs, peripheral vasodilators, mucolytics, prokinetics, antioxidants and phytotherapeutics.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>141 patients were included (mean age 83,8 &plusmn; 6,6 years; 36,9% women), with a median follow-up of 4,7 months. The mean number of chronic medications was 12,7&plusmn;4,0. Extreme polypharmacy (&ge;10 drugs) was observed in 113 patients (80,1%), polypharmacy (5&ndash;9 drugs) in 26 patients (18,1%) and absence of polypharmacy (&lt;5 drugs) in two patients (1,1%). The prevalence of patients using LTVD was 24 (17%). Treatment duration data were available for 18 patients, with a median of 346 days (6&ndash;4657 days). The most frequently prescribed LTVD were mucolytics (13 cases, 48,1%) and peripheral vasodilators (five cases, 20,8%). Acetylcysteine was the most commonly used mucolytic (11 cases). Other LTVD categories had isolated prescriptions (one case each): topical NSAIDs, vasoprotectors, psychoanaleptics, prokinetics, phytotherapeutics and antioxidants. Twenty patients on LTVD had extreme polypharmacy. Sixteen PIs recommending deprescribing were conducted and all proposals were accepted by the internist and the patient. Deprescribing included six mucolytics and one case each of topical NSAID, antioxidant, phytotherapeutic, psychoanaleptic and vasoprotector.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The multidisciplinary approach between Pharmacy and Internal Medicine enabled the identification of LTVD prescriptions in 20% of patients, being mucolytics the most frequently prescribed category. Despite their low therapeutic value, some treatments were used long-term. The high prevalence of extreme polypharmacy suggests that deprescribing LTVD is an effective, simple strategy to reduce pharmacological burden, as it requires no tapering. Furthermore, these deprescription proposals were highly accepted by both internists and patients.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Miron, G., Menendez, L., Torio, L., Paredes, E., Aznal, M., Bascones, J., Fernandez, H., Urrejola, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.363</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.363</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-265 Deprescribing in practice: multidisciplinary review of low therapeutic value drugs in elderly patients]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A179</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A179</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A179-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-266 Interventions in response to computerised decision support alerts on antithrombotics: a nationwide flashmob study in Dutch hospital-based outpatient pharmacies and community pharmacies]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A179-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Adverse drug events (ADEs) can result in severe patient harm or even death. Antithrombotics are frequently implicated in (fatal) ADEs. In Dutch pharmacies, computerised decision support systems (CDSS) generate medication safety alerts to help prevent ADEs. However, current CDSS have low specificity. The extent to which this hampers CDSS efficiency remains largely unexplored in hospital-based outpatient and community pharmacies.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To determine the proportion of CDSS alerts on antithrombotics and any medication that result in an intervention in Dutch hospital-based outpatient pharmacies and community pharmacies.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A multicentre, single-day, cross-sectional observational study was conducted using a flashmob design. All hospital-based outpatient and community pharmacies in the Netherlands were invited to participate. Pharmacy staff collected the number and type of CDSS alerts on antithrombotics and on any medication, the number of performed interventions, and the estimated time spent on assessing alert relevance. An intervention was defined as an action in response to an alert (eg, call physician, educate patient). The primary outcome was the efficiency of alerts on antithrombotics, defined as the proportion of alerts needing an intervention. Secondary outcomes included the efficiency of alerts on any medication, the efficiency per alert type and the estimated time spent on assessing the alert relevance. Descriptive statistics were used for data analysis.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Of the 2004 pharmacies invited (76 outpatient, 1928 community), 82 pharmacies participated (response rate 4.1%). Eventually, 80 pharmacies (32 outpatient, 50 community) were included. A total of 2,463 antithrombotic alerts were reported (median 25 per pharmacy, interquartile range (IQR) 42) and 36,508 alerts for any medication (median 382 per pharmacy, IQR 369). CDSS efficiency was 0.0% (IQR 2.4%) for antithrombotic alerts and 1.9% (IQR 2.9%) for alerts on any medication. For alerts on any medication, drug-drug interaction alerts showed the highest efficiency (4.0%, IQR 9.5%). The estimated time spent on assessing alert relevance was almost 2 hours per pharmacy (01:54h, IQR 01:38).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>This study shows that the efficiency of CDSS alerts on both antithrombotics and on any medication is very low in hospital-based outpatient and community pharmacies. Optimisation of CDSS efficiency is necessary to improve efficiency and patient safety in hospitals and primary care.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Graafsma, J., Agterhuis, S., Borgsteede, S., Van Dijk, L., Klopotowska, J., Karapinar-Carkit, F., Van Den Bemt, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.364</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.364</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-266 Interventions in response to computerised decision support alerts on antithrombotics: a nationwide flashmob study in Dutch hospital-based outpatient pharmacies and community pharmacies]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A179</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A180</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A180-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-267 Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PREP) for HIV: effectiveness, safety, and incidence of STIS in a tertiary hospital]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A180-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a proven biomedical strategy to prevent HIV infection in high-risk populations, particularly men who have sex with men (MSM). It is considered a key public health intervention, especially when combined with routine sexually transmitted infection (STI) screening and risk-reduction counselling. Standardised protocols are essential to ensure consistent care, monitor safety, and promote adherence. Nonetheless, concerns persist regarding increased risk-taking behaviours and the potential rise in STI incidence among PrEP users.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness, tolerability, and adherence to PrEP in a tertiary hospital. Additionally, it sought to assess the incidence and recurrence of STIs during the follow-up period.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective descriptive study was conducted between November 2021 and July 2025, involving 71 patients enrolled in the PrEP program. Data collected included demographic characteristics, clinical records, pharmacy dispensation, and laboratory findings. Adherence was assessed indirectly using pharmacy refill records, pill counts and SMAQ questionnaire. Safety was evaluated through side effect reports and biochemical alterations (renal function). Routine STI screenings were performed throughout follow-up.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Of the 71 patients, 98.6% were male, with a median age of 38 &plusmn; 10 years. Mean treatment adherence was 98%, and the median duration of PrEP use was two years. No cases of HIV seroconversion were observed. Side effects were reported by 43.7% of patients, predominantly mild, transient gastrointestinal symptoms occurring early in treatment. Biochemical abnormalities, mainly decreased glomerular filtration rate or proteinuria, were noted in 21.1% of patients; however, no discontinuation of treatment was required. A total of 145 STIs were recorded during follow-up; 83.1% of patients had at least one, and 20.4% had more than three. The most frequently detected pathogens, in descending order of incidence, were <I>Neisseria gonorrhoeae</I>, <I>Ureaplasma urealyticum</I>, and <I>Chlamydia trachomatis</I>  </p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>PrEP was highly effective and well tolerated. The high incidence of STIs highlights the need for ongoing screening and behavioural counselling. While the hospital protocol demonstrated safety and efficacy, enhanced follow-up and strengthened STI prevention measures are necessary to optimise long-term outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Llorente Gomez, M., Guerreiro Caamano, A., Gonzalo, A. B., De Frutos Soto, A., Abad Lecha, E., Pariente Junquera, A., Montero Lazaro, M., Maganto Garrido, S., Gomez Diaz, M., Fijo Prieto, A., Sanchez Sanchez, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.365</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.365</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-267 Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PREP) for HIV: effectiveness, safety, and incidence of STIS in a tertiary hospital]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A180</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A180</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A180-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-268 Health technology assessment of disposable preoperative cleansing wipes: cost-effectiveness and impact on SSI reduction]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A180-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Surgical site infections (SSIs) are among the most common postoperative complications, associated with prolonged hospitalisation, increased antibiotic use, and higher healthcare costs. Conventional preoperative cleansing with soap and water is time-consuming, inconsistent in quality, and may expose patients to cross-contamination. Disposable preoperative cleansing wipes provide a standardised, safe and efficient alternative.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This study evaluated the safety, clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and organisational impact of disposable cleansing wipes compared with traditional washing, to support their evidence-based adoption in surgical practice.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A structured HTA was conducted in line with the eight core domains (technical, safety, clinical effectiveness, economic, organisational, social, ethical and legal). The comparison drew on technical specifications, safety data, evidence from published literature, simplified economic modelling and organisational outcomes. The evaluation involved hospital pharmacists, surgical teams, and infection control specialists.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Disposable wipes were well tolerated, with no reported skin irritation, and ensured standardised cleansing procedures that reduced cross-contamination risks. Evidence from published literature reported up to a 20% reduction in SSI incidence with wipes compared with traditional soap and water washing. The average cost was 3 per pack (48 wipes), corresponding to ~0.50 per patient (eight wipes), versus ~0.03 per patient for 2&ndash;3 doses of liquid soap diluted in water (500-ml bottle). Despite an incremental cost of 0.47 per patient, the use of wipes is economically justified by the significant savings associated with SSI prevention. A simplified economic model applied to a 100-patient cohort predicted the prevention of one SSI&ndash;considering that SSI management in Italy/Europe averages 4,000&ndash;9,000 per case and 7&ndash;13 additional hospital days&ndash;resulting in net savings of 3,950&ndash;8,953. Wipes also reduced preparation time to 5 minutes per patient compared with 15&ndash;20 minutes with soap and water, releasing 16&ndash;25 nursing hours per 100 patients and improving efficiency in high-intensity surgical settings.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Disposable cleansing wipes are a safe, effective and cost-efficient option for preoperative hygiene. Although they involve a slightly higher per patient expenditure, this is outweighed by savings from SSI prevention, reduced hospital stays and optimised staff resources. Multidisciplinary evaluation confirmed their clinical, economic and organisational benefits, supporting evidence-based integration into surgical protocols.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Faitelli, B., Crivelli, B., Pieri, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.366</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.366</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-268 Health technology assessment of disposable preoperative cleansing wipes: cost-effectiveness and impact on SSI reduction]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A180</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A180</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A181-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-269 Atogepant and rimegepant for migraine prevention: effectiveness and safety in clinical practice]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A181-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Oral calcitonin gene-related peptide(CGRP) antagonists have recently been approved for chronic migraine(CM) and high-frequency episodic migraine(HFEM) prophylaxis.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>Describe their effectiveness and security in clinical practice and assess any differences between patients previously treated with anti-CGRP antibodies (G1) and nai&#x0308;ve (G2).</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A single-centre retrospective observational study was carried out, including patients receiving atogepant or rimegepant during 08/2024-01/2025, with efficacy/safety evaluation after 12 weeks.</p><p>Variables: age, sex, migraine classification, nonspecific prophylactic treatments, anti-CGRP antibody treatment history, medication (atogepant/rimegepant), response rate (complete [CR]: &ge;50% reduction in monthly migraine episodes; partial [PR]: 30-49% reduction; no response [NR]: &lt;30% reduction; and qualitative [QR]: no reduction in frequency but decreased pain intensity), adverse effects (AE), discontinuation, discontinuation cause and treatment duration.</p><p>Quantitative variables: mean&plusmn;standard deviation (normal distribution), median and interquartile range (non-normal distribution), qualitative variables as frequencies. Differences among groups: Student&rsquo;s T-test (quantitative variables, normal distribution), Mann-Whitney U test (quantitative variables, non-normal distribution), Pearson&rsquo;s Chi-square/Fisher&rsquo;s exact test (qualitative variables).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>65 patients were included: 58 women (89.2%), age 43 years (IQR 33.0-51.0). 48 patients (73.8%) had MC and 17 (26.2%) ME-AF. They had 5.65&plusmn;1.92 previous nonspecific treatments. 25 patients (38.5%) had used anti-CGRP antibodies. Treatment: 56 (82.6%) atogepant and nine (13.8%) rimegepant.</p><p>Response rate: 18 (28.1%) had CR, six (9.4%) presented PR, 28 (43.7%) showed NR and 12 (18.8%) had QR. One patient discontinued treatment before evaluating response.</p><p>Safety: 35 patients (53.8%) reported AEs 17 (48.6%) anorexia, 13 (37.1%) constipation, 14 (40.0%) nausea, four (11.4%) vomiting, three (8.6%) weight loss, two (5.7%) dizziness, four (11.4%) other digestive symptoms, and three (8.6%) central nervous system manifestations. 31 (47.7%) treatment discontinuations occurred: 23 (74.2%) due to ineffectiveness, six (19.4%) from AEs and two (6.5%) caused by pregnancy. Treatment duration, if discontinued for any reason, was 107&plusmn;44.1 days.</p><p>G1vs G2 showed statistically significant differences in gender (100% vs 82.5% women), migraine classification (HFEM 11.8% vs 88.2%; p=0.008) and number of previous nonspecific prophylactic treatments (6.4&plusmn;2.31 vs 5.03&plusmn;1.33; p=0.002). There were no statistically significant differences in response rate (CR 25.0% vs 30.0%; PR 0.0% vs 15.0%; NR 50.0% vs 40.0%; QR 25.0% vs 15.0%; p=0.178), in safety-related variables nor in the remaining variables studied.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Almost a third of the patients showed complete response. Almost half of the patients, however, did not experience changes in migraine frequency or intensity. More than half of the patients suffered AEs, mostly digestive, being the most reported anorexia, constipation and nausea. There were no differences in response rate between the patients previously treated with anti-CGRP antibodies versus nai&#x0308;ve.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lopez, L., Canamares Orbis, I., Esteban Casado, S., Esteban Alba, C., Prieto Roman, S., Sanchez Lorenzo, M., Arce Sanchez, M., Escobar Rodriguez, I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.367</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.367</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-269 Atogepant and rimegepant for migraine prevention: effectiveness and safety in clinical practice]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A181</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A181</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A181-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-270 Clinical effectiveness of biologic and JAK inhibitor therapies in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A181-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease characterised by eczematous lesions and intense pruritus. Conventional management includes skin care, topical agents, and, in severe cases, systemic therapy or phototherapy. Recent advances have led to the development of biologic and oral targeted therapies acting on specific molecular pathways. In our hospital, available options include the biologics dupilumab, tralokinumab, lebrikizumab, and the Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors upadacitinib, baricitinib and abrocitinib.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The study aimed to evaluate the real-world effectiveness of these targeted therapies under pharmaceutical supervision, stratify patients according to the Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacy&rsquo;s CMO model, and describes the current therapeutic landscape in our centre.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>This retrospective observational study was conducted in a secondary-level hospital including 115 patients with moderate-to-severe AD who completed at least 24 weeks of treatment in 2025. Collected variables included demographics, comorbid immune-mediated and Th2-related diseases, treatment line and efficacy outcomes. Effectiveness was measured using EASI (Eczema Area and Severity Index), BSA (Body Surface Area affected), as well as NRS (Numerical Rating Scale) for itch (NRS-P) and sleep disturbance (NRS-S).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Of 115 patients, 47.8% were female, mean age 40 years; 85.2% were CMO-3. 65.2% were on first-line therapy. Efficacy parameters for the studied drugs were reported as median values with corresponding ranges (minimum&ndash;maximum).</p><p><tbl id="T1" loc="float"><no>Abstract 4CPS-270 Table 1</no><tblbdy top-stubs="2"><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Drug</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>EASI (Baseline)</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>EASI (Follow-up)</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>BSA (Baseline)</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>BSA (Follow-up)</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>NRS-S (Baseline)</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>NRS-S (Follow-up)</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>NRS-P (Baseline)</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>NRS-P (Follow-up)</b> </c></r><r><c cspan="9" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Abrocitinib</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">21 (16&ndash;35) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">4.5 (10&ndash;35) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">12 (10&ndash;60) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">4.5 (0&ndash;80) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">7.5 (0&ndash;10) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0 (0&ndash;10) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">8.5 (3&ndash;10) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">3.5 (0&ndash;10) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Baricitinib</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">22 (21&ndash;40) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1 (0&ndash;18) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">16 (5&ndash;40) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1 (0&ndash;10) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">6 (0&ndash;1) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0 (0&ndash;1) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">8 (0&ndash;5) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0 (0&ndash;5) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Dupilumab</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">24 (10&ndash;50) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">2 (0&ndash;25) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">20 (3&ndash;90) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1 (0&ndash;20) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">8 (0&ndash;10) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0 (0&ndash;6) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">8 (0&ndash;10) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">2 (0&ndash;10) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Lebrikizumab</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">22.5 (18&ndash;30) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">7 (5&ndash;35) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">19 (10&ndash;50) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">10.5 (1&ndash;40) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">7.5 (5&ndash;10) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">5.5 (0&ndash;10) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">9 (5&ndash;10) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">6 (4&ndash;10) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Tralokinumab</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">22.5 (16&ndash;35) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">5.5 (0&ndash;35) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">25 (10&ndash;60) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">5 (0&ndash;30) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">8.5 (0&ndash;10) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">2 (0&ndash;10) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">8.5 (3&ndash;10) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">5 (0&ndash;10) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Upadacitinib</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">21 (2&ndash;35) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1 (0&ndash;28) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">13.5 (1&ndash;65) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1 (0&ndash;50) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">8.5 (0&ndash;10) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0 (0&ndash;9) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">10 (3&ndash;10) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1 (0&ndash;10) </c></r></tblbdy></tbl></p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Biologics and JAK inhibitors treatments significantly improved all efficacy parameters, ensuring effective, sustained, and safe disease control, representing the present and future of AD management.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Quiros Ales, S., Cabrera Menacho, A., Huelamo Moruno, C., Sanchez Yanez, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.368</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.368</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-270 Clinical effectiveness of biologic and JAK inhibitor therapies in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A181</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A182</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A182-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-271 Therapeutic drug monitoring of cefepime and ceftazidime in critically ill patients: a key tool for preventing hidden neurotoxicity]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A182-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>For antipseudomonal cephalosporins, the therapeutic goal is to maintain plasma levels at least four times above the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the target pathogen, while avoiding toxic concentrations (&gt;35 &micro;g/mL for cefepime and &gt;80 &micro;g/mL for ceftazidime). Standard dosing regimens of 6 g per day may result in toxic levels and subsequent adverse effects in certain patients depending on their clinical characteristics.</p><p>Cefepime- and ceftazidime-induced neurotoxicity is an underdiagnosed adverse effect in critically ill patients, particularly in those under sedoanalgesia. In this context, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) enables the identification of supratherapeutic plasma concentrations that can guide therapy optimisation and prevention of neurotoxicity.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The aim of this study is to describe the relevance of performing TDM of antipseudomonal cephalosporins to achieve pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) targets whilst detecting drug-related neurotoxicity in critically ill patients, where neurological symptoms may remain unnoticed because of concomitant sedoanalgesia.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>This is a descriptive, single-centre study conducted over 9 months in critically ill patients in a third-level hospital.</p><p>Baseline demographic and clinical data were collected, including age, sex, type of infection, causative microorganism, antibiotic choice, treatment regimen, plasma levels, renal function and neurotoxicity symptoms.</p><p>Outcome included dose adjustments following TDM, and its correlation with neurotoxicity symptoms.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>34 patients were included in the study, of which 82% (n=28) were male. The mean age was 64 (range 28-79). 94% (n=32) received continuous infusion and 68% (n=23) were empiric treatments. 44% (n =15) had supratherapeutic levels of which 66% (n=10) had developed neurotoxicity.</p><p>100% (n=15) of patients with supratherapeutic levels had their dose reduced following TDM recommendation.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Supratherapeutic plasma levels of cefepime and ceftazidime were significantly correlated with the occurrence of neurotoxicity in critically ill patients (p = 0.000023).</p><p>TDM proved to be a valuable tool to identify patients at risk and to optimise antibiotic dosing.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. Roger C, <I>et al</I>. Beta-lactams toxicity in the intensive care unit: an underestimated collateral damage? <I>Microorganisms</I> 2021.</p><p>2. Guilhaumou R, <I>et al</I>. Optimization of the treatment with beta-lactam antibiotics in critically ill patients-guidelines from the French society of pharmacology and therapeutics and the French society of anaesthesia and intensive care medicine. <I>Critical Care</I> 2019.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martinez Pinna, M., Perez Martin, C., Betancor Garcia, I., Bethencourt Barbuzano, E., Martin Lopez, A., Diaz Gonzalez, C., Lopez Meier, P., Gutierrez-Nicolas, F., Nazco Casariego, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.369</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.369</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-271 Therapeutic drug monitoring of cefepime and ceftazidime in critically ill patients: a key tool for preventing hidden neurotoxicity]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A182</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A182</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A182-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-272 Medication prescribing among the elderly in Catalonia]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A182-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Population growth presents major challenges, particularly the rise in frailty among older adults, which is often associated with multiple chronic diseases and the use of several medications. This situation increases the risk of adverse drug events and interactions.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The objective of this study is to evaluate the use of dispensed medications in older adults in Catalonia, based on their frailty status.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A multicentre, multidisciplinary, and longitudinal (1 year: 2021) study was conducted using retrospective data collection. Data were obtained from Programme for Data Analytics for Research and Innovation (PADRIS), Agency for Health Quality and Assessment of Catalonia (AQuAS). The study included Catalan population aged &ge;65 years. The variables were: sociodemographic (age and sex); drug dispensed; and e-SIF criteria (electronic instrument that categorised frailty status in non-frail (robust, pre-frail) and frail (moderately or severely frail).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The population included 1.564.611 individuals and the number of dispensed packs was 63.866.572. The annual average number of drugs dispensed per person was 6.5 (6.7 women, 6.2 men). In the frail group, the average was 9.8 drugs; while in the non-frail group was 5.7.</p><p>46.6% of population were dispensed &ge;5 drugs/year (48.7% women, 43.8% men). 32.6% of people aged 65&ndash;69 were dispensed &ge;5 drugs/year, 42.0% between 70&ndash;74, 50.6% between 75&ndash;79, 57.4% between 80&ndash;84, 60.6% between 85&ndash;89, 60.2% between 90&ndash;94, and 54.9% of people aged &ge;95. 39.3% of non-frail (31.1% robust, 68.9% pre-frail) and 84.5% of frail (65.1% moderately frail, 34.9% severely frail) people were dispensed &ge;5 drugs/year.</p><p>14.4% of the population were dispensed &ge;10 drugs/year (15.8% women, 12.6% men). 7.1% of people aged 65&ndash;69 were dispensed &ge;10 drugs/year, 10.9% between 70&ndash;74, 15.9% between 75&ndash;79, 21.1% between 80&ndash;84, 23.6% between 85&ndash;89, 22.7% between 90&ndash;94, and 17.8% of people aged &ge;95. 8.3% of non-frail (14.3% robust, 85.7% pre-frail) and 46.7% of frail (57.6% moderately frail, 42.4% severely frail) people were dispensed &ge;10 drugs/year.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Medication use tends to increase with age and is more frequent among individuals with frailty. These findings highlight the importance of conducting regular medication reviews and implementing deprescribing strategies, particularly in frail older adults.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Perez Cordon, L., Garcia Javier, B., Lopez Vinardell, L., Cabre Roure, M., Sala Pinol, F., Sancho Riba, M., Serra-Prat, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.370</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.370</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-272 Medication prescribing among the elderly in Catalonia]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A182</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A183</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A183-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-273 Deprescribing in the emergency department for elderly adults: a systematic review]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A183-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Older adults frequently present to emergency departments (EDs) with polypharmacy and high-risk or unnecessary medications, increasing their risk of adverse drug events, falls, and unplanned healthcare utilisation. Deprescribing (the supervised dose reduction or discontinuation of medications) has been addressed in the literature as a means of optimising medication safety in the ED.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate and synthesize the available evidence on deprescribing activities among older adults (&ge;65 years) in the ED, focusing on the characteristics, processes, and outcomes of such interventions.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A systematic search following PRISMA guidelines of PubMed, EBSCOhost (CINAHL, Medline, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts), ProQuest, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar was conducted for studies published from 2015 to date. Eligible articles were peer-reviewed primary research (qualitative or quantitative) addressing deprescribing in EDs for older adults. Data extraction captured study design, intervention characteristics, specialties involved, tools/frameworks used, outcomes, and implementation determinants. Study quality was appraised according to design.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Seven studies met inclusion criteria. Studies were cohort (n=2), qualitative (n=2), before-after observational (n=2) and randomised controlled trial (n=1). Clinical pharmacists were central in nearly all interventions, with few studies describing physician and nurse involvement. Common deprescribing tolls included the Screening Tool of Older Persons&rsquo; Prescriptions/Screening Tool to Alert to Right Treatment (STOPP/START) and the American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria. Reported benefits included substantial reductions in potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs), decreased medication burden after hospital discharge, improved post-ED primary care follow-up, and targeted deprescribing of high-risk fall-related drugs. Evidence for clinical outcomes&ndash;such as fewer ED revisits, readmissions, mortality, or recurrent falls&ndash;was inconsistent or statistically non-significant across most studies. Qualitative analyses highlighted time pressures, incomplete medication histories, fragmented transitions, and patient resistance as barriers, whereas pharmacist expertise, structured tools, interprofessional rounds, and clear post-discharge communication emerged as facilitators.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>ED-based deprescribing is feasible and consistently reduces exposure to PIMs, yet robust evidence for improving clinical outcomes is limited. Described activities were mainly led by pharmacists, supported by validated screening tools, and integrated with primary-care follow-up. There is a need for Large multicentre studies to determine effects on re-admissions, adverse events, and patient-centred outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hashad, N., Al Hajri, L., Ali, A., Alnemer, F., Al Nuaimi, J., Salmin, M., Alawadhi, N., Stad, S., El Lababidi, R., Abidi, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.371</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.371</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-273 Deprescribing in the emergency department for elderly adults: a systematic review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A183</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A183</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A183-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-274 Nutritional and inflammatory prognostic factors in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A183-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>The prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and the geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) have been used to assess the nutritional and inflammatory status of cancer patients. These biomarkers have been shown to be associated with the prognosis of patients receiving cancer treatment. However, the association of these biomarkers with the prognosis of patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is not fully understood.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The objective of this study was to evaluate whether pretreatment prognostic factors of nutritional and inflammatory status can predict the prognosis of lung cancer (LC) patients treated with ICIs.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A multicentre and multidisciplinary team performed a systematic review of the literature. This study was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations and the Cochrane Guidelines. A MEDLINE search was conducted for all relevant English-, and Spanish-language studies until March 2023. Cohort and randomised studies including patients treated with ICIs for LC were included. The outcomes of interest were the association between pretreatment PNI and GNRI and the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The results were summarised narratively.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 118 studies were identified and 15 were included (13 retrospective and two prospective studies), of which 13 evaluated the prognostic value of PNI (11 for PFS and 12 for OS). Pre-treatment PNI was significantly associated with PFS (n=6/10) and OS (n=8/10) in univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, PNI was significantly associated with PFS (n=6/8) and OS (n=6/9). Two studies evaluated the prognostic value of GNRI for both PFS and OS, observing a statistically significant association between pre-treatment GNRI and PFS (n=2/2) and OS (n=2/2) in univariate analysis and with PFS (n=1/2) and OS (n=2/2) in multivariate analysis.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Some studies showed that PNI could be a prognostic marker for patients with LC treated with ICIs. In the case of GNRI only few studies are available, and more evidence is needed to determine its potential as prognostic factor. However, future studies are needed to provide greater knowledge and evidence on the evaluation of these biomarkers and their validation in clinical practice.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Perez Cordon, L., Marin Rubio, S., Punti Brun, L., Cercos Lleti, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.372</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.372</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-274 Nutritional and inflammatory prognostic factors in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A183</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A183</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A184-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-275 Adaptation and simulation of an azathioprine pharmacokinetic model]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A184-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Azathioprine is a non-specific immunosuppressor of narrow therapeutic range (0.157-0.3mg/L), used in inflammatory bowel disease. Its metabolism includes enzymes as TPMT and NUDT15, which polymorphisms can diminish its clearance. A 30&ndash;80% dose reduction is recommended in patients with heterozygous mutant genotype.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To perform population-based simulations using an azathioprine pharmacokinetic model to narrow down the dose adjustment in patients with TPMT or NUDT15 polymorphisms.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A literature search was conducted in PubMed and Embase databases. Only one population pharmacokinetic model was found, published by Lin et al. It included 100 patients and studied different covariates that influenced clearance, finding three that generated statistically significant differences: body weight (BW), TPMT heterozygous variant, and concomitant mesalazine treatment. They found no differences in plasma clearance as a result of NUDT15 mutation. They obtained a monocompartmental pharmacokinetic model with first-order kinetics, interindividual variability (CL) 0.342 and residual variability 0.054.</p><p>The model by Lin et al. was adapted by adding the absorption phase, using a Ka from the literature of 7.12 h<sup>&ndash;</sup>  <sup>1</sup>.</p><p>Population-based Monte Carlo simulations were performed for 100 patients, and a dose of 50 mg of azathioprine every 24h, obtaining mean plasma concentrations and 5<sup>th</sup>-95<sup>th</sup> percentiles. R was used for performing the simulations, with mrgsolve language package and ggplot to create the graphics representing azathioprine plasma levels versus time. A Shiny app was also created.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A bicompartmental pharmacokinetic model with first-order pharmacokinetics was obtained, with the differential equation: Dxdt_Cp=7.12 h^(-1) x C_gut-[(11.6 x (BW/70)^0.625 x_TPMT x_MESALAZINE xe^CL)/(809(V))]xCp. Non-mutated TPMT (nm-TPMT)=1, mutated (m-TPMT)= 0.515, no mesalazine treatment (n-MESA)=1 and treated with mesalazine (t-MESA)=0.802.</p><p>Simulations results are expressed as mean trough concentration in steady state (m-TCSS), (5<sup>th</sup>-95<sup>th</sup> percentiles):</p><p><l type="tab"><li><p>&ndash; &nbsp;BW=70 kg, nm&ndash;TPMT, n&ndash;MESA: 0.16 (0.08&ndash;0.32 mg/L)</p></li><li><p>&ndash; &nbsp;BW=50 kg, nm&ndash;TPMT, n&ndash;MESA: 0.15 (0.08&ndash;0.28 mg/L)</p></li><li><p>&ndash; &nbsp;BW=70 kg, m&ndash;TPMT, n&ndash;MESA: 0.31 (0.18&ndash;0.46 mg/L)</p></li><li><p>&ndash; &nbsp;BW=70 kg, nm&ndash;TPMT, t&ndash;MESA: 0.20 (0.11&ndash;0.31 mg/L)</p></li><li><p>&ndash; &nbsp;BW=70 kg, m&ndash;TPMT, t&ndash;MESA: 0.37 (0.22&ndash;0.51 mg/L)</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The mean concentrations obtained with the adapted model can provide a more accurate estimate of the starting dose of azathioprine for patients according to body weight, TPMT polymorphism, and treatment with mesalazine than previous recommendations. However, interindividual variability is substantial, and further studies are required to confirm it. If upheld, azathioprine might be considered for pharmacokinetic monitoring given its narrow therapeutic range.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lopez, L., Aguilar Duque, E., Abril, M. T., Dominguez Garcia, A., Pena Cabia, S., Garcia Diaz, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.373</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.373</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-275 Adaptation and simulation of an azathioprine pharmacokinetic model]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A184</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A184</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A184-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-276 A qualitative theoretical exploration of the use of immersive technology in pharmacy practice]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A184-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Immersive technology is a fast-evolving technology that allows interactive experience for users. Its use has recently expanded to include multiple specialities in healthcare system; of special importance its use in supporting medication adherence, management of anxiety and pain, potentially leading to better health outcomes. Yet, evidence of employment in pharmacy practice is limited.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To explore stakeholder&rsquo; perspectives on using immersive technologies in pharmacy practice, evaluating current status, future perspective, possible challenge to implementation and potential outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with potential stakeholders including informatics vendors, informatics pharmacists and practicing pharmacists. An interview guide was developed based on an initial literature search and the Non-adoption, Abandonment, Scale-up, Spread and Sustainability (NASSS) framework. This framework specifically targets sustainability of technologies in a continuously evolving complex healthcare system. Purposive and snowball sampling were used to recruit participants via a LinkedIn professional network. Thematic analysis using NASSS framework as a coding tree was conducted.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Ten participants were interviewed. Immersive technology is not currently applied in the healthcare system, yet it has been presented at different platforms as a possible healthcare solution. Majority of participants had positive views about the potential of this technology in pharmacy practice. Immersive technology can be used while the patients are visiting the healthcare facility or at a distance from their home to counsel them on new medications or disease conditions, or even review their medical profile for potential medication intervention. It can also be employed in training pharmacists on workflow or new automation technologies in the pharmacy. The technology was considered expensive according to participants yet worth investing in it given the potential positive outcome including better medication adherence, less medication errors, increased patient satisfaction. According to participants, thorough pharmacist training is required along with continuous support and education.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The use of immersive technology in pharmacy practice can have a great positive impact on the development of the profession, availing more time for the pharmacist to conduct clinical tasks and support pharmacist training at workplace. It also has a huge positive impact on patient experience and involvement in self-management of their medical conditions.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hashad, N., Jabbari, S., Magoury, M., Alshehhi, A., Alketbi, F., Mohammad, M., Alali, Q., Alblooshi, S., Hussain, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.374</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.374</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-276 A qualitative theoretical exploration of the use of immersive technology in pharmacy practice]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A184</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A184</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A185-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-277 Real-world survival and cost analysis of antifibrotic therapy in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a multicentre retrospective study]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A185-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive, fatal interstitial lung disease with a median survival of 2&ndash;5 years from symptom onset. Antifibrotic agents&ndash;nintedanib and pirfenidone&ndash;slow disease progression and may extend survival. However, real-world data on survival outcomes and treatment costs remain limited.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To compare overall survival (OS) in patients with IPF treated with nintedanib versus pirfenidone, and to assess associated treatment costs.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective observational study was conducted across six public hospitals, including patients aged &ge;18 years diagnosed with IPF and receiving antifibrotic therapy (nintedanib or pirfenidone) between January 2016 and December 2024. Collected variables, obtained from the national electronic prescription system, included sex, age, treatment, treatment line, and dispensing records.</p><p>Overall survival (OS) was assessed from treatment initiation using Kaplan&ndash;Meier analysis and the log-rank test. To reduce cross-over bias, only patients treated with a single antifibrotic were included in the comparative analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using R software, version 4.5.1.</p><p>The economic analysis comprised: (1) Theoretical annual treatment cost (ATC) per patient based on NHS list prices (2018&ndash;2024), reflecting price evolution and the impact of generic launches (2) Real-world mean annual cost per patient, calculated from dispensing records and treatment duration. Costs were compared before (2016&ndash;2022) and after (2023&ndash;2024) generic pirfenidone entry.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 244 patients were included; 102 died, and 142 (58.2%) were censored at study end. Adjusted mean OS from treatment start was 4 years 8 months. Among 207 monotherapy patients, 82 (39.6%) died&ndash;52.4% on pirfenidone and 31.2% on nintedanib. Median OS was 6 years 9 months for nintedanib and 3 years 8 months for pirfenidone (HR = 1.33; 95% CI 0.85&ndash;2.07; p = 0.097). Pirfenidone patients were older (70.5 vs 66.4 years; p = 0.0003). Given the association between advanced age and mortality, this imbalance may partly explain the numerical survival difference.</p><p>From 2018 to 2024, theoretical annual costs fell from 17,222.9 to 744.8 (pirfenidone) and 17,196.1 to 10,638.7 (nintedanib). Mean real-world annual cost declined 48.2% post-generic</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Although not statistically significant, a survival trend favouring nintedanib was observed. Generic pirfenidone substantially reduced treatment costs, supporting its value in reducing the economic burden of IPF</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Garcia, T., Gonzalez Morcillo, G., Zaforteza Dezcallar, M., Carrillo Lopez, V., Martorell Puigserver, C., Garcia-Calvo Navarro, J., Freites Nava, R., Caballero Sanchez, M., Galindo San Segundo, D., Aguasca Adrover, M., Padilla Castano, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.375</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.375</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-277 Real-world survival and cost analysis of antifibrotic therapy in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a multicentre retrospective study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A185</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A185</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A185-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-278 Optimisation of beta-lactam therapeutic drug monitoring in critically ill patients]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A185-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Pharmacokinetic monitoring of &beta;-lactam antibiotics is becoming increasingly more relevant, particularly in critically ill patients whose condition entails major physiological alterations.</p><p>Variability in volume of distribution, renal impairment, and rising resistance rates leading to higher minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC), making it essential to evaluate whether PK/PD targets are being achieved.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The objective of this retrospective study is to highlight the relevance of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of &beta;-lactam antibiotics in achieving PK/PD targets, improving treatment efficacy and microbiological eradication, and reducing the risk of adverse effects.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A total of 45 adult patients admitted to an intensive care unit and treated with a &beta;-lactam antibiotic were included between February and September 2025 (9 months).</p><p>Pharmacokinetic monitoring was performed in patients with septic shock, altered renal function, immunosuppression, complicated infections, or infections caused by microorganisms with elevated MICs.</p><p>Trough levels were obtained in patients on extended infusion, as well as steady-state concentrations in those receiving continuous infusion. After the first 24 hours, doses were adjusted according to renal function in patients with reduced renal clearance or undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT).</p><p>Data collected included age, sex, type of infection, antibiotic used, type of infusion, plasma concentration, and pharmacist intervention.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>45 patients were included, of which 66% (n=30) were male. Mean age was 70 (). 49% (n=22) of patients received empirical treatment, whilst 51% (n=23) received targeted therapy. 15 patients received cefepime, of which 53% (n=8) required dose adjustment, and 6% (n=1) required a type of infusion change to continuous infusion.</p><p>Two patients received ceftazidime, of which 50% (n=1) required dose reduction. 27 patients received meropenem, of which 18% (n=5) required dose reduction and 7% (n=2) required dose increase. One patient on ampicillin required dose reduction.</p><p>Out of all patients, an overall of 40% (n=18) required dose adjustment.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of &beta;-lactam antibiotics is essential to optimise antibiotic therapy in critically ill patients with complicated infections. Despite the use of maximum recommended doses, some patients required even higher doses to achieve therapeutic targets.</p><p>A considerable proportion of patients required dosage adjustments based on pharmacokinetic results.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martinez Pinna, M., Perez Martin, C., Martin Lopez, A., Betancor Garcia, I., Bethencourt Barbuzano, E., Diaz Gonzalez, C., Lopez Meier, P., Gonzalez Garcia, J., Nazco Casariego, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.376</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.376</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-278 Optimisation of beta-lactam therapeutic drug monitoring in critically ill patients]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A185</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A185</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A186-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-280 A qualitative exploration of physicians knowledge and perception about the use of medical cannabis]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A186-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>In recent years, the legal status of medical cannabis (MC) has changed significantly, making it accessible to many patients worldwide. However, in many countries, its use remains prohibited creating the need to explore its potential use in this region targeting the challenges of integration into the healthcare system.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This study aims to explore physicians&rsquo; knowledge, perception and willingness to prescribe MC in the healthcare system.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with physicians from specialities where there is a potential for prescribing MC. The interview guide was developed based on a literature search and the integrated &ndash; Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (i-PARIHS) framework. Purposive and snowball sampling were used to recruit participants via LinkedIn professional network. Thematic analysis using i-PARIHS framework as a coding tree was conducted.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Nine interviews were conducted with multiple specialities. Participants had positive views about the use of MC in the healthcare system despite variable cultural and religious challenges, suggesting the establishment of robust implementation infrastructure. The need for structured training and education for physicians arose given the general lack of knowledge about the employment of MC in clinical practice.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>This study explored physicians&rsquo; perspectives on MC use. The importance of careful planning and infrastructure development was emphasised along with creating strategies that align international guidelines with local needs. These insights offer guidance for policymakers and healthcare administrators to develop evidence-based, culturally appropriate frameworks allowing MC integration in the healthcare system.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hashad, N., Mohamed, H., Al Hajri, L., Almaazmi, A., Almehairi, M., Alraeesi, S., Alzarooni, R., Alkhaldi, S., Ahmed, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.377</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.377</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-280 A qualitative exploration of physicians knowledge and perception about the use of medical cannabis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A186</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A186</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A186-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-281 Pharmacist-led medication review to prevent polypharmacy errors in elderly trauma patients]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A186-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Polypharmacy in elderly trauma patients exposes them to significant risks of adverse drug events (ADEs), drug&ndash;drug interactions, and functional decline. This population often receives complex, overlapping therapies for chronic comorbidities and acute injuries. Clinical pharmacist-led medication reviews have proven to optimise therapy, reduce potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) and improve collaboration between prescribers and pharmacists. However, few data are available in trauma units regarding their direct clinical impact on medication safety.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The study aimed to assess the impact of pharmacist-led medication reviews on the detection and resolution of PIMs and drug interactions in elderly trauma inpatients. Secondary objectives were to evaluate the acceptance rate of pharmacist recommendations and to measure the change in ADE incidence following pharmacist interventions.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A prospective evaluation was conducted over 2 months in 2025, including 72 trauma patients aged &ge; 65 years. Each treatment was reviewed by a clinical pharmacist using STOPP/START criteria and validated drug interaction databases. Medications were classified according to the WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification system to identify high-risk pharmacological groups. Interventions were discussed with prescribers, and all modifications were recorded. Statistical analysis (descriptive and comparative) was performed using acceptance rate and change in ADE frequency as key outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Among 72 patients, 34 (47%) had at least one PIM, and 19 (26%) experienced significant drug interactions. A total of 61 therapeutic recommendations were made by the pharmacist, of which 52 (85%) were accepted and implemented. Following these interventions, the ADE rate decreased by 31% compared with the previous quarter. ATC analysis identified PIM prevalence mainly in C (Cardiovascular system), N (Nervous system), and B (Blood and blood-forming organs) classes.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Pharmacist-led medication review is an effective, low cost approach to optimise prescribing and minimise ADEs in elderly trauma patients. Integration of ATC-based evaluation strengthens detection of high-risk classes. Routine implementation of this clinical service should be encouraged to promote safe pharmacotherapy in geriatric trauma care.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. O&rsquo;Mahony D, <I>et al</I>. STOPP/START criteria for potentially inappropriate prescribing in older people: version 2. <I>Age Ageing.</I> 2015;<b>44</b>(2):213&ndash;8.</p><p>2. Spinewine A, <I>et al</I>. Appropriate prescribing in elderly people: how well can it be measured and optimised? <I>Lancet.</I> 2007;<b>370</b>(9582):173&ndash;84.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guibane, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.378</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.378</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-281 Pharmacist-led medication review to prevent polypharmacy errors in elderly trauma patients]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A186</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A186</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A186-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-282 Unmasking adherence in type 2 diabetics: a comprehensive study using analysis of metformin plasma concentrations]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A186-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Metformin belongs among the first-line drugs in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Patient compliance with metformin is not optimal, especially owing to frequent gastrointestinal side effects. However, accurate and objectively validated compliance data are thus far not available.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The aim of our study was to evaluate the adherence to metformin treatment by determining its plasma concentrations during a routine outpatient control.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>641 T2D outpatients from a diabetes centre and outpatient clinic using standard or XR (sustained release) form of metformin were included in the study. Blood sampling for metformin, together with a short questionnaire on its use, was performed during a regular visit. Hydrophilic interaction chromatography (HILIC) and high resolution mass spectrometry (Q Exactive Plus instrumentation) were used to quantify metformin concentrations. Values below 100 ng/ml were deemed subtherapeutic.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Of the 641 patients, subtherapeutic concentrations were measured in 7.6%, of whom in 1.9% the concentration was not detectable at all (&lt;1 ng/ml). The presence of subtherapeutic concentrations was not affected by the administration of the XR form (7.5 vs. 8.5% for standard vs. XR form, n.s.). With increasing number of metformin doses per day the occurrence of subtherapeutic concentrations decreased (15.1% one dose vs. 2.2% 3 doses, p &lt; 0.001), although these patients reported the highest frequency of dose omitting in the questionnaire. However, fasting blood glucose and glycated haemoglobin increased with increasing number of metformin doses per day (both p &lt; 0.001). Metformin serum concentration increased with increasing duration of diabetes (p &lt; 0.001). No significant relationship was found between metformin concentration and fasting blood glucose, HbA<SUB>1c</SUB> or any of the self-reported demographic and lifestyle factors.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>In our study, adherence based on the measurement of metformin concentrations reached 92.4%. The lowest incidence of metformin subtherapeutic levels was detected in patients taking highest number of metformin doses per day. Plasma analysis using LC-MS methods may serve as a robust tool for adherence assessment, identifying patients suitable for more detailed pharmacotherapeutic revision to increase adherence and therapeutic effect of treatment.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. Czech MOH (NU20-01-00186); EXCELES (LX22NPO5104); CZ&ndash;DRO (IKEM, IN 00023001); Charles University (SVV 260 785).</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Miskova, I., Antalova, S., Skop, V., Mraz, M., Lankova, I., Mala, K., Maly, J., Pelikanova, T., Cajka, T., Haluzik, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.379</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.379</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-282 Unmasking adherence in type 2 diabetics: a comprehensive study using analysis of metformin plasma concentrations]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A186</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A187</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A187-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-283 Pharmaceutical consultation in outpatient care: experience in the follow-up of patients with prostate cancer]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A187-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Pharmaceutical consultation(PC) plays a essencial role in optimising patient follow-up through active monitoring of drug&ndash;drug interactions (DDIs), therapeutic adherence and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) &ndash; critical factors for treatment safety and efficacy.<sup>1</sup> In oncology, where patients receive complex regimens and multiple medications, pharmacist-led interventions can improve outcomes and prevent medication-related harm.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To describe the implementation and impact of PC in the outpatient management for prostate cancer patients, assessing the frequency and severity of DDIs, adherence, and ADRs detected.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective observational study was conducted between February 2023 and June 2025, including 88 prostate cancer patients who started outpatient treatment. The PC process comprised collection of the Best Possible Medication History, DDI assessment using <I>UpToDate</I>, validation of clinical parameters (weight, height, laboratory tests), and patient education. Follow-up PC were conducted 15&ndash;30 days after treatment initiation to assess ADRs and adherence, and periodic consultations tailored to drug and patient profile. Severe DDIs and ADRs were communicated to the physician and documented in the clinical diary.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Of 88 patients (mean age 76.9 &plusmn; 8.2 years), 70 received abiraterone, 8 apalutamide, six enzalutamide, three darolutamide, and one olaparib. A total of 294 consultations were performed (mean = 3.34 per patient). Thirty-six DDIs were identified: six class X, five class D, 25 class C. Class X interactions led to therapy modification. Overall, 30.5% were clinically relevant (classes D and X). Poor adherence (dispensation &lt; 90% of prescribed medication) occurred in six patients, one due to ADRs. Thirty-eight patients experienced ADRs, mainly xerostomia (n=4), hepatic transaminase elevation (n=4; leading to drug discontinuation), peripheral oedema (n=9), gastrointestinal symptoms (n=10), urinary complaints (n=5), asthenia/myalgia (n=7), and rash (n=2). Nineteen patients remain under follow-up; 67 were discharged due to stability, progression, ADRs, death, or loss to follow-up.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>PC in oncology outpatients enables early detection of DDIs and ADRs and improves therapeutic adherence, contributing to safer and more effective pharmacotherapy. The structured follow-up process strengthens collaboration between pharmacists and physicians and reinforces the pharmacist&rsquo;s role in optimising cancer care.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. Herborg H, Haugb&oslash;lle LS, Fr&oslash;kj&aelig;r B, <I>et al</I>. Pharmacist-led medication review in outpatient clinics: a systematic review. <I>Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol.</I> 2018;<b>122</b>(5):518&ndash;28.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brito, A., Fernandes, A., Mendes, T., Alcobia, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.380</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.380</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-283 Pharmaceutical consultation in outpatient care: experience in the follow-up of patients with prostate cancer]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A187</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A187</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A187-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-284 Systematic pharmacokinetic monitoring of ustekinumab in inflammatory bowel disease: a retrospective study]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A187-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of biologic therapies such as ustekinumab is increasingly recognised as a valuable tool in the management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Insufficient serum concentrations and the formation of anti-drug antibodies (ADA) can impair treatment efficacy and patient safety. Nevertheless, routine ustekinumab monitoring has not yet been widely implemented, and data supporting its systematic use remain limited. Characterising pharmacokinetic variability and immunogenicity may help optimise therapeutic outcomes and enhance disease control.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of systematic pharmacokinetic monitoring of ustekinumab in IBD, focusing on the detection of ADA, identification of trends in drug levels, and assessment of clinical and biomarker responses after therapeutic adjustments.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective observational study was conducted in a tertiary hospital between January 2023 and March 2025. Adult patients treated with ustekinumab for Crohn&rsquo;s disease or ulcerative colitis were included. Demographic and clinical data (disease duration, smoking history, previous surgery, and perianal involvement) were recorded. Ustekinumab and ADA serum concentrations, faecal calprotectin (FC), C-reactive protein (CRP), and Harvey-Bradshaw Index (HBI) were collected. Therapeutic regimens, interventions after reduced drug levels, and subsequent biomarker evolution were analysed. Quantitative variables were expressed as mean&plusmn;SD and qualitative variables as frequencies or percentages.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>20 patients (55% female, mean age 51.4&plusmn;16.7 years) were included; 70% had Crohn&rsquo;s disease and 30% ulcerative colitis, with a mean disease duration of 12.0&plusmn;8.7 years. All patients had undetectable ADA (&lt;0.3 AU/mL). 16/20 (80%) presented reduced ustekinumab levels (mean 0.21&plusmn;0.17 &micro;g/mL) accompanied by elevated FC (1502.5&plusmn;2024.7 &micro;g/g) and CRP (9.4&plusmn;9.5 mg/L). After dose intensification or intravenous reinduction, FC and CRP decreased in 20% and 30% of patients, respectively, and 90% achieved higher ustekinumab levels post-intervention.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Although ADA were absent, subtherapeutic ustekinumab concentrations were frequent and associated with inflammatory activity. Routine pharmacokinetic monitoring may facilitate early detection of reduced exposure, guide individualised dose optimisation and improve treatment efficacy.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Beltran Bellvis, M., Martinez Azor, A., Martin Cerezuela, M., Fernandez Megia, M., Maria Remedios, M., Garcia Pellicer, J., Jose Luis, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.381</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.381</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-284 Systematic pharmacokinetic monitoring of ustekinumab in inflammatory bowel disease: a retrospective study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A187</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A188</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A188-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-285 Description and follow-up of the use of fidaxomicin in a tertiary care hospital]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A188-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Clostridioides difficile is the leading cause of nosocomial diarrhoea, with an increasing incidence in community settings. The infection is strongly associated with prior antibiotic exposure, particularly in hospitalised patients or those with significant comorbidities.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To describe the use of fidaxomicin in a tertiary care hospital, analysing its utilisation pattern, patient characteristics, and clinical outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>An observational, descriptive, retrospective, single-centre study was conducted. All patients with a microbiological sample positive for Clostridioides difficile toxin treated with fidaxomicin between January 2024 and February 2025 were included. Collected variables included demographics, received treatments (vancomycin and fidaxomicin), C. difficile-related hospital admissions, recurrences, prior antibiotic exposure, fidaxomicin units consumed, and associated cost (MFP). Data were obtained from the electronic medical record and the electronic prescribing system of the hospital. A descriptive statistical analysis was performed, expressing quantitative variables as median and range, and qualitative variables as absolute and relative frequencies (%).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Seventy-five patients were included, with a median age of 65 years (range 2&ndash;89); 62.7% were male. Previous oral vancomycin treatment was recorded in 66.7% of cases, and all patients received oral fidaxomicin (62.7% standard 10-day regimen, 37.3% extended regimen). 84% had received systemic antibiotics in the 12 months prior to fidaxomicin administration, with a median of three courses. The most frequent antibiotic classes were cephalosporins and carbapenems (56%), penicillins and fluoroquinolones (45%), glycopeptides (24%), and oxazolidinones or sulfonamides (13%). Fidaxomicin was used for mild primary infection in 20 cases, severe primary infection in 28, first recurrence in 20, and second or later recurrences in 7. Only six patients (8%) experienced recurrence within one year, and sixteen (21.3%) required hospitalisation. A total of 1,570 units of fidaxomicin were used, with an estimated cost of 114,316.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Fidaxomicin has become a preferred therapeutic option over vancomycin for Clostridioides difficile infection, particularly in patients at high risk of recurrence. Despite its higher direct cost, the reduction in recurrences and hospital admissions may translate into an overall clinical and economic benefit. These findings support the implementation of evidence-based pharmacotherapeutic protocols and an individualised treatment selection.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Molina Guerrero, M., Florit Sanchez, M., Rouco Blanco Rajoy, M., Gallego Fernandez, C., Asensi Diez, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.382</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.382</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-285 Description and follow-up of the use of fidaxomicin in a tertiary care hospital]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A188</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A188</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A188-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-286 World health organisation aware classification for antimicrobial stewardship: a hospital-based consumption analysis and benchmarking versus national data]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A188-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Antimicrobial resistance represents a critical public health threat across Europe. The World Health Organization (WHO) developed the AWaRe classification as a stewardship tool, categorising antibiotics into Access, Watch, and Reserve groups to optimise prescribing patterns. Systematic monitoring remains essential to identify prescribing gaps and guide interventions.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This study aimed to evaluate antibiotic consumption patterns at a public hospital using the AWaRe framework, assess alignment with national benchmarks.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective analysis of systemic antibiotic consumption (ATC J01) throughout 2023 was benchmarked versus the national medicines agency annual report on antibiotic use (2023). Analysis focused on the top 10 systemic antibiotics, classified according to AWaRe groups. Statistical comparisons were performed using t-test or Mann-Whitney test based on data distribution. Results were expressed as percentage deviation from national consumption rates.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Significant overutilisation of Watch group antibiotics was observed compared to national averages (t(9)=2.32, p=0.045), while Access and Reserve groups showed no overall significant differences, although particularly elevated usage levels emerged for specific Reserve agents. Within the Access group, highest consumption increases versus national data included metronidazole (+415.26%), ampicillin/sulbactam (+367.20%), and amikacin (+177.96%), while lowest consumption was observed for oxacillin (-87.63%), ampicillin (-54.47%), and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (-53.99%). In the Watch group, vancomycin (+510.44%), meropenem (+459.47%), and teicoplanin (+344.31%) showed highest consumption, whereas azithromycin (-94.04%) and cefixime (-39.64%) showed lowest utilisation. Among Reserve antibiotics, cefiderocol demonstrated the highest deviation (+979.16%), followed by meropenem/vaborbactam (+421.29%) and ceftazidime/avibactam (+356.11%), while ceftaroline (-86.54%), daptomycin (-84.35%), and linezolid (-82.39%) showed lower consumption. Therapeutic category comparison revealed significant differences versus national averages (W=284, p=0.023), with marked increases in carbapenems, other cephalosporins and penems, glycopeptides, and third/fourth-generation cephalosporins.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The findings, indicating excessive reliance on Watch antibiotics and selective, potentially inappropriate use of Reserve agents that deviate from WHO recommendations, will be evaluated by the hospital antimicrobial stewardship committee. These patterns underscore critical prescribing gaps requiring strengthened antimicrobial stewardship programs. Hospital pharmacists play a strategic role in implementing AWaRe-guided protocols, monitoring consumption patterns, and promoting evidence-based prescribing, thereby contributing substantially to antimicrobial resistance containment within European healthcare systems.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cruciata, N., Alba, A., Mendola, A., Maggio, G., Leonardi, D., Polidori, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.383</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.383</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-286 World health organisation aware classification for antimicrobial stewardship: a hospital-based consumption analysis and benchmarking versus national data]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A188</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A189</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A189-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-287 Conversion from tacrolimus to belatacept in kidney transplant recipients: real-world outcomes from a retrospective observational study]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A189-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) toxicity remains a major cause of chronic graft dysfunction and loss after kidney transplantation. Belatacept provides an alternative immunosuppressive strategy without direct nephrotoxicity. However, its use is restricted in our country as it is not currently funded by the national health system. A multidisciplinary protocol for belatacept use in kidney transplant recipients was approved by Nephrology and Pharmacy departments to select appropriate patients for treatment. Real-world evidence in this context is limited in Europe, especially under non-funded conditions.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To describe patient characteristics, indications for conversion, persistence, graft and patient survival at 12 months, and safety outcomes in kidney transplant recipients converted from tacrolimus to belatacept in clinical practice.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Retrospective, single-centre, observational study (February 2019&ndash;June 2025). All Epstein&ndash;Barr virus (EBV)-positive adult kidney transplant recipients converted from tacrolimus to belatacept were included. Data collected: demographics, number of transplants, donor characteristics, cold ischaemia time, time to conversion, reason for conversion, graft and patient survival (12 months and last follow-up), discontinuation and safety. Descriptive analysis was performed using standard statistical methods.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Twenty-four patients were included (n=14 male; mean age 57 years). Most were first transplants (n=20/24) and received kidneys from expanded-criteria donors (n=10/24). Median cold ischaemia time was 16 h. Conversion was mostly late (&gt;6 months post-transplant) (n=20/24; median 36 months post-transplant). Main reasons of conversion: CNI-related toxicity or intolerance (n=16), arteriolar hyalinosis (n=5), antibody-mediated rejection (n=3). Sixteen patients had more than 12 months of follow-up. Among them, graft survival was 94% (15/16) and two patient deaths. Belatacept persistence was 67% (n=16/24). Discontinuations occurred due to graft failure (n=4), rejection (n=2), or death (n=2). No adverse events attributable to belatacept were reported.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>In a non-funded national setting, conversion from tacrolimus to belatacept under a multidisciplinary protocol was feasible and safe, achieving high graft and patient survival and good tolerability. Despite the small sample, this experience provides valuable real-world evidence supporting belatacept as a rescue strategy after CNI intolerance. Multicentre studies are warranted to confirm these findings and guide implementation in similar healthcare systems.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Freites Nava, R., Arrufat Goterris, G., Cabello Pelegrin, S., De Zarate Lupgens, Z., Gonzalez Perez, E., Garcia Ruiz, T., Galindo San Segundo, D., Aguasca Adrover, M., Martorell Puigserver, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.384</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.384</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-287 Conversion from tacrolimus to belatacept in kidney transplant recipients: real-world outcomes from a retrospective observational study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A189</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A189</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A189-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-288 Implementation of a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic-guide linezolid monitoring protocol in a secondary care hospital]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A189-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Linezolid monitoring is crucial to prevent toxicity and optimise efficacy, especially in renal impairment. Implementing a pharmacokinetic protocol ensures standardised, individualised, and safer antibiotic therapy.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>Analysis of determinations after implementing a protocol for pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) monitoring of linezolid.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A 9 month ambispective study (12/1/2024&ndash;09/30/2025) included all patients with linezolid plasma level monitoring request.</p><p>Variables collected in the study based on the recently implemented PK/PD protocol were: sex, age, indication, dosage, pharmacotherapeutic adjustments, and PK/PD parameters. Renal function was categorised as hyperfiltration (eGFR &gt;100 mL/min) or impairment (eGFR &lt;60 mL/min), and liver function was assessed via transaminases. Data were collected from Selene and Servilab, and analysed with Excel.</p><p>The protocol, developed by the Hospital Pharmacy Department with the Clinical Analysis Department and reviewed by the Antimicrobial Stewardship Team (AST), recommends measuring a trough concentration after the third dose in patients with impaired renal or hepatic function or severe infections.</p><p>Patient selection was performed by the pharmacokinetics pharmacist and the AST team. After determining plasma levels, dosing recommendations were provided through electronic health record, and pharmacokinetic analyses were conducted using MwPharm++ .</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Among 457 patients treated with linezolid, plasma levels were requested for 45. After excluding cases due to sampling errors, analytical issues, or pharmacy delays, 25 patients underwent pharmacokinetic monitoring. Of these, 80% were male, with a mean age of 72.5 years. Indications included skin and soft tissue infections (60%), respiratory (28%), and urinary (12%). Directed therapy represented 66.6% of cases, mainly targeting <I>Staphylococcus aureus</I>. The initial regimen was 600 mg every 12 hours, administered intravenously or orally.</p><p>All monitored patients had alterations: 76% renal impairment, 8% haemodialysis, 8% augmented clearance, 8% hepatic impairment.</p><p>Trough levels: 60% supratherapeutic, 37% within range, 3% subtherapeutic; AUC0&ndash;24/MIC below target in 16%, above in 50%.</p><p>A total of 36 interventions were performed, all accepted: 50% discontinuation of therapy, 33.3% dose reduction to 600 mg every 24 h, and 16.6% maintenance of the original regimen.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Linezolid plasma monitoring is essential in hospitalised patients, especially those with renal impairment. The high rate of supratherapeutic levels (63%) reflects reduced clearance in this population. PK/PD-guided dosing enables individualised therapy, improving antibiotic safety and effectiveness.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Risco Martinez, S., Gomez, O. G., Sanz Marquez, S., Sanz Sanchez, C., Zamorano Mendez, P., Moreno Nunez, L., Valverde Canovas, J., Vegas Serrano, A., Perez Encinas, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.385</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.385</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-288 Implementation of a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic-guide linezolid monitoring protocol in a secondary care hospital]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A189</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A190</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A190-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-289 Disease is rare, suffering is for everyone: a case report]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A190-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>CLN2 disease (Neuronal Ceroid Lipofuscinosis Type 2) is an ultra-rare, neurodegenerative lysosomal storage disease, caused by an enzyme deficiency of tripeptidyl peptidase 1 (TPP1). Lack of disease awareness and the non-specificity of presenting symptoms often leads to delayed diagnosis. It has a devastating impact on children and families, leading to rapid functional decline and early death without effective treatment: early diagnosis and treatment of CLN2 disease are therefore vital to preserve function and slow decline for as long as possible. Cerliponase alfa, a recombinant form of the human TPP1 enzyme, is designed to replace the missing or deficient TPP1 enzyme in patients with CLN2 disease.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This report will discuss the case of a patient who is responding to treatment, initiated in 2021.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>The patient is a little woman born in 2005. It was created of a custom pharmacological protocol, with continuous monitoring parameters vital, before during and after drug administration.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The drug is stored at -20&deg;C. Cerliponase alfa is administered, by clinician, by means of intracerebroventricular (ICV) infusion. The standard regimen involves a dose of 300 mg infused over approximately 4 hours, every 2 weeks. After verifying the clinical conditions, the doctor proceeds to prescribe the drug on the information system, on the date scheduled for administration. The treatment is taken care of and prepared at the Clinical Pharmacy laboratory. Once the chemical characteristics of the finished product have been verified, it is delivered to the department for subsequent administration.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The Clinical Pharmacy Laboratory guarantees sterility and asepticity in the preparation of the drug. Administration is bimonthly, but temporary suspensions due to infections have occurred: the ICV delivery system, in fact, involves potential risks, in particular device-related complications, such as infections, which may require antibiotic treatment or device replacement. Despite this, the patient, in accordance with registered studies, appears to show a slower worsening of symptoms. This confirms the importance of encouraging and supporting clinical research, especially in rare diseases, which are often difficult to recognise and treat.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Naturale, M., Brescia, A., Esposito, S., Zito, M., Monopoli, C., Alcaro, M., Casuscelli, D., De Fina, M., Marrazzo, G., Spinoso, B., De Francesco, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.386</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.386</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-289 Disease is rare, suffering is for everyone: a case report]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A190</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A190</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A190-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-290 Real-world experience with abemaciclib in HER2 negative advanced luminal breast cancer: effectiveness evaluation]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A190-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Abemaciclib is a CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDKi) currently indicated for treatment of HER2 negative (HER2-) advanced luminal breast cancer (ALBC), besides adjuvant therapy.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate abemaciclib&rsquo;s effectiveness among several indicators: objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Design: multicentric, observational, descriptive and retrospective study.</p></li><li><p>Inclusion criteria: C&aacute;ceres and Badajoz patients who started abemaciclib during 1/7/17&ndash;31/3/24.</p></li><li><p>Exclusion criteria: early&ndash;stage patients starting adjuvant treatment.</p></li><li><p>Follow&ndash;up period: from 1/7/17 to 31/3/25.</p></li><li><p>Data: age and date at abemaciclib beginning, progression date, death date, best response reached (complete response (CR), partial response (PR)), best response date, last observation date, abemaciclib ending date.</p></li><li><p>Data collection and processing: electronic health record, FarmaTools, Excel and SPSS (Kaplan&ndash;Meier test).</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p><l type="unord"><li><p>64 patients met the inclusion criteria and finally 30 women resulted after exclusion criteria applied.</p></li><li><p>Median age at beginning: 59 years (interquartile range IQR: 55.25&ndash;71.5).</p></li><li><p>PFS: the mean was 29.8 months (95% CI: 21&rsquo;86&ndash;37&rsquo;7) and median was 31 months (95% CI not reached).</p></li><li><p>OS: the mean was 33&rsquo;8 months (95% CI:26&rsquo;6&ndash;41&rsquo;1) and median was not reached.</p></li><li><p>ORR% (CR+PR) = 46&rsquo;7% (95% CI:30&rsquo;2&ndash;63&rsquo;9).</p></li><li><p>DoR = 32&rsquo;4 months (95% CI: 22&rsquo;3&ndash;42&rsquo;4).</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Despite the limited sample size, the results suggest that abemaciclib&rsquo;s effectiveness seems consistent with MONARCH-3 results:</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Median PFS in MONARCH&ndash;3: 28.2 months. Our own results are similar.</p></li><li><p>Median OS in MONARCH&ndash;3: 66.81 months. Our own results do not reach the median.</p></li><li><p>ORR in MONARCH&ndash;3: 49.7%. Our own results are similar.</p></li><li><p>DoR in MONARCH&ndash;3: 27.4 months. Our own results seem to be higher.</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Castillo Medrano, M., Fernandez Galan, R., Ferrer Pena, A., Banez Rivera, I., Fernandez Lison, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.387</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.387</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-290 Real-world experience with abemaciclib in HER2 negative advanced luminal breast cancer: effectiveness evaluation]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A190</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A191</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A191-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-291 Nutritional management in a systemic lupus erythematosus patient: case report]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A191-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease characterised by multisystem involvement, inflammation, and tissue damage. Patients with renal and metabolic complications require complex therapeutic management. Severe hypertriglyceridemia and renal dysfunction can complicate parenteral nutrition, making individualised pharmaceutical intervention essential to ensure metabolic safety and adequate nutritional support.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To describe the clinical management and pharmaceutical intervention in a patient with newly diagnosed SLE, acute renal failure, and severe hypertriglyceridemia requiring total parenteral nutrition (TPN).</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A 32-year-old female patient was admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) in March 2025 with mixed shock and acute renal failure (glomerular filtration rate 17 mL/min). Immunological testing confirmed SLE (anti-dsDNA, anti-Sm, anti-histone, and low complement levels). The patient presented severe hypertriglyceridemia (617 mg/dL) and mucositis with poor oral tolerance, requiring TPN initiation. The pharmacy service collaborated with the endocrinology and nutrition teams to calculate energy requirements (1980 kcal/day, stress factor 1.5). A customised TPN was designed to cover 75% of caloric needs to prevent refeeding syndrome, with restricted protein (0.8 g/kg) and no lipids due to renal impairment and elevated triglycerides respectively. After clinical improvement and normalisation of renal function, TPN was reformulated to provide 1.5 g/kg protein and full caloric requirements.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>After 7 days of TPN, the patient showed progressive improvement in renal function and inflammatory parameters. Triglyceride levels decreased, and oral tolerance improved. TPN was discontinued, and oral lipid-free nutritional supplements were initiated. The multidisciplinary approach allowed for close metabolic monitoring and individualised adjustment of macronutrients, ensuring nutritional adequacy and treatment safety.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>This case illustrates the crucial role of hospital pharmacists in optimising parenteral nutrition for complex autoimmune patients with renal and metabolic complications. The pharmaceutical intervention ensured safe TPN formulation, minimised metabolic risks, and supported clinical recovery. Multidisciplinary collaboration between pharmacy, nutrition, and medical teams is essential for improving outcomes in critically ill patients with SLE and severe dyslipidaemia.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Corriente Gordon, I., Ponce Gonzalez, A., Alvarado Fernandez, M., Santos Rubio, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.388</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.388</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-291 Nutritional management in a systemic lupus erythematosus patient: case report]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A191</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A191</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A191-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-292 Plasma omalizumab levels and fc{varepsilon}RI expression: tools for optimising asthma therapy]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A191-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Omalizumab is approved for chronic use; however, in patients with clinical remission, dose reduction may be feasible. Plasma omalizumab concentration and FcRI receptor levels, related to free IgE, may help guide dosing optimisation.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>We aimed to assess the utility of plasma omalizumab and FcRI levels as tools to optimise therapy in asthmatic patients in clinical remission.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>This study was a secondary analysis of the multicentre clinical trial OPT-OMA-ASTHMA (EuCT-number: 2025-520782-48-00). Patients with severe asthma on stable omalizumab therapy who had achieved clinical remission were included. Participants were assigned to two final dose reduction strategies: 25% (FDR-25%) or 50% (FDR-50%).</p><p>Trough plasma concentrations (Cp) of omalizumab and FcRI levels were measured at baseline and at 24, 48, and 96 weeks. Plasma concentrations were quantified using a commercial ELISA kit.</p><p>Demographic variables, asthma duration, omalizumab treatment persistence, and mean dose per administration (Dm) were collected. Clinical (ACT score, exacerbations) and functional variables (FEV<SUB>1</SUB>% predicted) were also recorded.</p><p>Statistical analysis: qualitative variables were expressed as counts and frequencies, and quantitative variables as mean (&plusmn;standard deviation).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 25 patients were included: 12 in the FDR-25% group and 13 in the FDR-50% group.</p><p>The mean age was 49 (&plusmn;18) years; 10 patients (46%) were women, 20 (91%) were Caucasian, and the mean BMI was 27 (&plusmn;5) kg/m<sup>2</sup>. The mean time since severe asthma diagnosis was 6 (&plusmn;6) years, with a mean omalizumab treatment persistence of 5 (&plusmn;4) years and a Dm of 477 (&plusmn;115) mg. No significant differences were observed between groups.</p><p><tbl id="T1" loc="float"><no>Abstract 4CPS-292 Table 1</no><tblbdy top-stubs="2"><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Basal</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Week-24</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Week-48</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Week-48</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Week-96</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Week-96</b> </c></r><r><c cspan="7" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">FDR-25% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">FDR-50% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">FDR-25% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">FDR-50% </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Cp (&micro;g/mL) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">96(&plusmn;69) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">63(&plusmn;37) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">53(&plusmn;29) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">44(&plusmn;16) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">49(&plusmn;24) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">36(&plusmn;18) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">FcRI (Number of receptors/cell) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">29986(&plusmn;12703) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">27463(&plusmn;17763) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">25315(&plusmn;12371) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">21906(&plusmn;9140) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">18736(&plusmn;7558) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">24728(&plusmn;5827) </c></r></tblbdy></tbl></p><p><fig loc="float" id="F1"><no>Abstract 4CPS-292 Figure 1</no><link locator="4CPS-292_F1"></fig></p><p>  <b></b><FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT> = Patients excluded</p><p>No asthma exacerbations were recorded, and clinical and functional stability was maintained throughout the study. Three patients discontinued treatment (one at week 20 and two at week 48) due to poor asthma control. The latter two presented low Cp.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Plasma omalizumab concentration and FcRI levels could be two complementary tools to monitor and adjust dosing in asthmatic patients in clinical remission.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Navarrete Rouco, M., Gimeno, R., Garcia, A., Admetllo, M., Luengo, O., Basagana, M., Soto, D., Bravo, D., Ausin, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.389</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.389</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-292 Plasma omalizumab levels and fc{varepsilon}RI expression: tools for optimising asthma therapy]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A191</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A192</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A192-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-293 Importance and role of the research pharmacist in evaluating the temperature storage report of investigational products]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A192-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Continuous monitoring and management of storage temperature throughout all stages of the life cycle of investigational products (IPs) in clinical trials is essential to ensure their efficacy and safety. In accordance with GCP (Good Clinical Practice), temperature control is a critical phase that must be monitored and recorded from the moment the IPs arrive at the trial site.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>Analyse the reports extracted from the TempTale associated with the shipment of IPs conducted in 2024 at a university hospital.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>The information extracted from the study protocols (Eudract code, phase, therapeutic area), pharmacy manuals (IP management, storage temperature (t)), and all information extracted from the qualitative and quantitative control of the documentation relating to receipts was collected in a database. The data were stratified according to storage temperature: 2-8 &deg;C vs. 15-25 &deg;C.A search was conducted on current legislation to support the drafting of management procedures requiring quality control of the temperature recorded during transport upon arrival at the pharmacy. Through the extrapolation of data from the continuous monitoring device (data logger), the temperature range settings and alarm values were analysed and evaluated.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>In 2024 110 clinical trials were conducted and 3425 IPs received. Standard procedure was applied to 273 IP receipts (64.10% controlled vs. 35.90% environment). Analysis of temperature traces extrapolated from data loggers was possible in 60.07% of cases. The t range and alarm value settings were correct in 19.41% of cases, while in 40.66% of cases the alarm values set were incorrect, with an error range between -20&deg;C and +60&deg;C. 25.17% of IPs related to clinical studies in the field of oncology. Careful evaluation of the recorded temperature graph revealed four cases of alarm status that were not detected due to an error in the settings.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Simply visually checking a data logger set to an incorrect range would not have triggered the alarm for the temperature increase. TempTales provides essential data, but this data must be interpreted correctly. The qualitative and quantitative checks carried out by the clinical pharmacist are indispensable and important, as they ensure the proper management of the clinical trial and patient safety.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[De Fina, M., Zito, M., Monopoli, C., Esposito, S., Naturale, M., De Francesco, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.390</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.390</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-293 Importance and role of the research pharmacist in evaluating the temperature storage report of investigational products]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A192</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A192</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A192-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-294 Suspected adverse drug reactions in the emergency setting: analysis for identification of high risk populations as possible targets for pharmacist intervention]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A192-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Suspected adverse drug reactions (sADRs) represent a significant cause of Emergency Department (ED) visits and hospitalisations, with a significant clinical and economic impact. Continuous investigation of sADRs enables the identification of risk patterns, particularly in high-risk populations, due to age or polypharmacy.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To describe the characteristics of sADRs leading to ED visits in a University Hospital and to identify high-risk populations as potential targets for pharmacist interventions.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>All sADR reports submitted by the ED to the National Pharmacovigilance Network from January 2023 to July 2025, involving adult patients, were analysed. Data included age, sex, suspected drugs, PT Terms, seriousness, causality (Naranjo algorithm), hospitalisation, polypharmacy (&ge;5 medications), and potential inappropriateness (Beers Criteria for &ge;65 years). Categorical variables were expressed as frequencies and percentages; continuous variables as means and standard deviations.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>416 reports were identified, accounting for a total of 712 sADRs. Patients&lsquo; mean age was 61&plusmn;21 years; 207 patients (50%) were &ge;65 years old, and 57% were female. 287 sADRs (40%) were classified as serious, and causality was assessed as probable in 64% and as possible in 36% of serious sADRs. The most commonly suspected drugs were amoxicillin/clavulanate, amoxicillin, rivaroxaban, apixaban and ibuprofen; most frequent PT terms included allergic reactions, haemorrhage, nausea and rectorrhagia. Regarding high-risk populations, 72 patients (17%), accounting for a total of 132 sADRs (19%), required hospitalisation; of these, 107 sADRs (81%) were classified as serious. Among hospitalised cases, 48 (12%) were on polypharmacy, while 16 (4%) were &ge;65 years old with potentially inappropriate medications according to Beers Criteria. Causality assessment for sADRs related to polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate medications was probable in 36% and 35%, and possible in 64% and 65% of serious cases, respectively. The most commonly suspected drugs involved were rivaroxaban, warfarin and dabigatran, while the most frequent PT terms included cerebral haemorrhage, rectorrhagia, melena.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Characterisation of ED sADRs was essential to detect high-risk populations as possible targets for pharmacist interventions. Approximately 16% of all ED sADRs requiring hospitalisation (12% related to polypharmacy and 4% to potentially inappropriate prescriptions) could represent potential targets for such interventions. Anticoagulants would be the main drug class to attention.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cadore, A., Durighetto, R., Camuffo, L., Faoro, S., Ferri, N., Venturini, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.391</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.391</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-294 Suspected adverse drug reactions in the emergency setting: analysis for identification of high risk populations as possible targets for pharmacist intervention]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A192</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A193</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A193-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-295 Real-world experience with sodium zirconium cyclosilicate for hyperkalaemia management in hospitalised patients: a retrospective study from a Portuguese district hospital]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A193-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC) is a fast-acting potassium ion-exchange agent, indicated for treating hyperkalaemia in adults. The recommended dosage is 10 g three times a day (correction phase) for up to 72 hours. Normokalaemia is usually achieved within 24&ndash;48 hours. If serum potassium remains elevated after 72 hours, alternative therapies should be considered, due to the increased risk of electrolyte disturbances.<sup>1</sup>  </p><p>The recommended maintenance therapy dosage is between 5 g and 10 g daily. Adverse effects include peripheral oedema and gastrointestinal symptoms. Close monitoring of serum potassium is recommended throughout treatment<sup>1</sup>.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To assess the appropriateness and guideline compliance of SZC prescriptions, considering the patients&rsquo; clinical status.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Retrospective observational study including patients treated with SZC between June 2024 and September 2025. Demographic and clinical data, dosing regimen, duration of the correction/maintenance phases, and serum potassium monitoring were analysed. Prescription compliance was defined based on the duration of the treatment phases, guidelines adherence and frequency of potassium monitoring<sup>1</sup>.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 87 patients were included, predominantly elderly, with 79% over 65 years old and 46% over 80.</p><p>After 24 hours of treatment, potassium levels decreased in 60 patients. Hyperkalaemia persisted in 45 patients at 24 hours and in only 15 at 48 hours.</p><p>Prescription analysis revealed that 40% were not compliant with the guidelines<sup>1</sup>. Among these, seven patients were eligible for therapy switching and two should have initiated treatment with a correction dose. Potassium levels were not measured in 8, 10, and 25 patients at 24, 48, and 72 hours, respectively.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>These results are align with published data, which indicate normokalaemia is typically achieved within 24 to 48 hours, and highlight the importance of aligning SZC prescribing with the current guidelines to reduce deviations in the correction phase, optimise transition to maintenance therapy, and improve safety and effecacy<sup>1</sup>.</p><p>Hospital pharmacists can play a key role, assisting the clinical team by ensuring adherence to dosing and monitoring recommendations, enhancing both safety and therapeutic outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Sodium zirconium cyclosilicate for treating hyperkalaemia. NICE Technology Appraisal Guidance. London: 2022.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Da Silva, S., Macieira, D., Daniela, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.392</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.392</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-295 Real-world experience with sodium zirconium cyclosilicate for hyperkalaemia management in hospitalised patients: a retrospective study from a Portuguese district hospital]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A193</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A193</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A193-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-296 Thirty-month real-world impact of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor on pulmonary, nutritional and metabolic outcomes in cystic fibrosis]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A193-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a multisystem disease associated with malnutrition, chronic inflammation, and progressive lung decline. Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) has transformed disease management, yet long-term effects on nutrition, metabolism, and liver health in homogeneous cohorts remain underexplored.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the 30-month impact of ETI on pulmonary function, nutritional status, metabolic profile, inflammation, and hepatic safety in patients with CF homozygous for F508del, highlighting clinical benefits and emerging risks.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective, single-centre cohort study was conducted at a Regional Reference CF Centre. Patients &gt;12 years, who initiated ETI between July 2021 and December 2024 were included. Clinical, spirometric, and biochemical data were collected at baseline and 6, 12, 24, and 30 months. Outcomes included lung function (ppFEV1), BMI, inflammatory markers, lipid profile, glycemic status, fat-soluble vitamins, liver function, and pulmonary exacerbations (12 months pre- and post-ETI). Longitudinal changes were analysed using Friedman tests with post hoc comparisons; subgroup differences were assessed with Mann-Whitney U tests.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>112 patients (49% female, median age 31 years) were included; 83 were modulator-nai&#x0308;ve and 29 pre-treated. ETI led to rapid and sustained pulmonary improvement: mean ppFEV1 increased by +10 points at 6 months and stabilised around +15 points above baseline through 30 months (p&lt;0.001). Exacerbations declined by 85% post-ETI (72 vs 9 events). Nutritional status improved markedly: BMI increased by +1.7 kg/m<sup>2</sup> in the first year (p&lt;0.001), with underweight prevalence dropping from 12.5% to 1.8%, while overweight rose from 15.2% to 27.7%. Adolescents showed significant weight-for-age Z-score gains. Lipids increased (total cholesterol +13%, LDL+15%) but remained within normal ranges; triglycerides, HDL, and glycaemic control remained stable, with no new diabetes cases. Vitamin D levels improved. CRP fell by 80% at 6 months and remained reduced. Liver enzymes showed transient mild elevations in &lt;5% of patients, with no fibrosis progression.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>ETI provides durable multisystem benefits, improving lung function, nutrition, and systemic inflammation while maintaining a favourable safety profile. However, the shift toward overweight/obesity and modest rises in cholesterol highlight evolving cardiometabolic risks. These findings support early ETI initiation and reinforce the need for updated CF care strategies including nutritional counselling, metabolic monitoring, and liver surveillance to mitigate long-term complications.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Perrotta, N., Fiorito, L., Virgilio, A., Amato, G., Servidio, C., Coluccia, A., Cimino, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.393</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.393</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-296 Thirty-month real-world impact of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor on pulmonary, nutritional and metabolic outcomes in cystic fibrosis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A193</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A194</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A194?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-297 Evolution of clinical trials with advanced therapy medicinal products at a tertiary care centre: experience 2022-2025]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A194?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products (ATMPs) are innovative medicines for human use and are classified into three main categories:</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Gene therapy: uses recombinant genes created in the laboratory to treat, prevent or diagnose diseases.</p></li><li><p>Somatic&ndash;cell therapy: contains manipulated cells or tissues with altered characteristics or new functions, used for treatment, diagnosis or prevention.</p></li><li><p>Tissue&ndash;engineered: use modified cells or tissues to repair, regenerate or replace human tissue. Over the past few years, we have witnessed substantial growth in the number of clinical trials (CT) in this field.</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the growth and identify emerging trends in the development of ATMPs at our hospital during the last few years.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Observational, descriptive, and retrospective study with a comparative analysis of the evolution of CT in ATMPs at a tertiary care hospital between 2022-2025. The variables analysed included the number of CT of ATMPs, type of ATMPs (gene therapy, somatic-cell therapy or tissue-engineered), number of patients per trial and per therapy type during the specified period.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>We participated in 38 CT with ATMPs, 28 of them were conducted between 2022-2025 (<cross-ref type="tbl" refid="T1">table 1</cross-ref>):</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>46.5% Gene therapy: 53.8% RNAm, 38.5% viral vectors and 7.7% others.</p></li><li><p>53.5% Somatic&ndash;cell therapy: 60.0% Chimeric Antigen Receptor T&ndash;cell (CAR&ndash;T), 13.3% tumour&ndash;infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL), 13.3% Mesenchymal Stromal Cells (MSC), 6.7% lymphocyte T&ndash;citotoxic (LTC) and 6.7% Autologous Engineered Macrophages (AEM).</p></li><li><p>We have not participated in any CT involving tissue&ndash;engineered.</p></li></l></p><p>We treated 55 patients with ATMPs between 2022-2025 (<cross-ref type="tbl" refid="T2">table 2</cross-ref>):</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>54.5% Gene therapy: 53.8% RNAm, 38.5% viral vectors and 7.7% others.</p></li><li><p>45.5% Somatic&ndash;cell therapy: 63.6% CAR&ndash;T, 4.5% TIL, 22.7% MSC, 4.5% LTC and 4.5% AEM.</p></li></l></p><p><tbl id="T1" loc="float"><no>Abstract 4CPS-297 Table 1</no><caption><p>CT with ATMPs between 2022 and 2025</p></caption><link locator="4CPS-297_T1"></tbl></p><p><tbl id="T2" loc="float"><no>Abstract 4CPS-297 Table 2</no><caption><p>Patients included in CT with ATMPs between 2022&ndash;2025</p></caption><link locator="4CPS-297_T2"></tbl></p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>A substantial increase was observed in both the number of CT and patients treated with ATMPs. mRNA and CAR-T therapies showed the most pronounced growth starting from 2024. In contrast, viral vectors, MSC, and LTC exhibited declining trends. Notably, in 2025, the centre engaged in an increasing number of novel therapies, including TILs and AEMs, reflecting diversification and consolidation of expertise across advanced therapeutic modalities. The slight decline in 2025 is likely due to the pending completion of the final quarter.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lavandeira Perez, M., Poveda-Escolar, A., Quesada-Munoz, L., Rodriguez-Tierno, S., Acosta-Cano, C., Cabello-Bravo, A., Alvarez-Diaz, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.394</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.394</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-297 Evolution of clinical trials with advanced therapy medicinal products at a tertiary care centre: experience 2022-2025]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A194</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A195</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A195?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-298 Improving safety and efficiency in cytotoxic compounding through pharmaceutical interventions]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A195?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Pharmaceutical Interventions (PI) reduce medication errors and improve the safe use of antineoplastic agents. However, the lack of standardised documentation limits impact assessment. In our country, the limited published evidence highlights the need for structured recording systems to ensure visibility and measurability of these contributions.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To implement a standardised tool for documenting Drug-Related Problems (DRP) and associated PI within a Cytotoxic Production Unit (CPU), and to evaluate DRP types, PI characteristics, and acceptance rates.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A single-centre, prospective observational pilot study was conducted in the CPU, focusing on antineoplastic preparations for adult oncology patients (&ge;18 years). A Microsoft Forms questionnaire, based on The PCNE Classification V 9.1, was developed to record DRP and PI. Three trained pharmacists used the tool during routine operations from 1 February to 31 August 2025. Prescription validation data were extracted from the Integrated Medication Circuit Management System (SGICM) and cross-checked with free-text notes. Descriptive analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Of 8,157 prescription validations, 257 DRP were identified: 51.0% adverse drug reactions and 35.8% suboptimal effects. 79.8% were resolved; 4.3% remained unresolved, mainly due to prescriber interface issues. Leading causes included inappropriate drug prescribed according to guidelines/formulary (17.5%) and low dosage (13.6%). 315 PI were performed: 84.8% at healthcare professional level (78.3% physicians; 15.7% nurses; 5.2% pharmacists; 0.7% technicians); 2.5% at patient level; 12.7% other. Of 212 medication-change PI, dose adjustment (41.5%) and drug discontinuation/interruption (25.5%) were most frequent. Among 180 proposals to physicians, 93.9% were accepted.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The implemented tool enabled consistent, quantifiable DRP/PI documentation in the CPU. High acceptance and DRP resolution rates suggest clinical benefits. However, downstream outcomes weren&rsquo;t assessed and only a small share of validations had recorded DRP/PI, so unit-wide impact is unclear. The low rate may reflect missed entries at peak times, narrow antineoplastics focus or already optimised prescribing. Limitations include single-centre design, short study duration, and limited user base. Future steps involve expanding tool usage across the team, integrating feedback for refinement, set local improvement targets and embedding PI documentation into patient clinical records to enhance continuity of care.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Costa, M., Antunes, M., Cunha, E., Madeira, O., Martins, M., Lebre, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.395</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.395</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-298 Improving safety and efficiency in cytotoxic compounding through pharmaceutical interventions]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A195</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A195</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A196-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-299 Development and evaluation of a pharmacist-led monitoring model for topical ruxolitinib: feasibility, adherence, safety, and patient empowerment in Apulian community pharmacies with European applicability]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A196-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Non-segmental vitiligo is a chronic autoimmune disorder leading to progressive skin depigmentation and significant psychological and social impact. The introduction of topical ruxolitinib 1.5%, the first selective JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor, has represented a major therapeutic advancement for patients unresponsive to conventional treatments.</p><p>Hospital pharmacists play a crucial role in promoting appropriate drug use, therapeutic education, and early detection of adverse events. To date, no pharmacist-led follow-up model specific to topical ruxolitinib has been implemented in Europe, capable of being adapted and shared across different healthcare systems.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This study aimed to evaluate the impact of pharmacist-led monitoring for patients treated with topical ruxolitinib in a community pharmacy belonging to a Local Health Authority in Apulia, Italy.</p><p>The objectives were to:</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>analyse therapeutic adherence, adverse event reporting, and patient empowerment level;</p></li><li><p>identify strengths and weaknesses of the local model;</p></li><li><p>propose a structured European pharmacist&ndash;led follow&ndash;up model for topical ruxolitinib, integrable into pharmacovigilance and hospital telemonitoring systems.</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Between June 2024 and March 2025, patients using topical ruxolitinib participated in a pharmacist-led programme including counselling, adherence and satisfaction questionnaires, and quarterly follow-ups on adherence, adverse events, and satisfaction, to develop a standardisable European monitoring model.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Thirty-seven patients were enrolled (eight males, 29 females; mean age 45 years). Mean treatment adherence was 94%, with visible pigmentation improvement in 78% of cases. Ninety-six percent of participants reported high satisfaction with pharmacist-led support. Five mild adverse events (erythema, pruritus) were recorded, none leading to treatment discontinuation. Qualitative analysis indicated greater adherence among patients receiving regular pharmacist contact and digital support.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The pharmacist-led monitoring of topical ruxolitinib proved feasible, effective, and well accepted by patients, enhancing adherence, perceived safety, and therapeutic awareness. Findings suggest that active pharmacist involvement in dermatologic treatment management adds value in terms of care quality and sustainability. Based on the Apulian experience, the adoption of a shared European pharmacist-led follow-up model for topical ruxolitinib is proposed, integrable into pharmacovigilance platforms and digital monitoring systems, to harmonise clinical management and promote patient safety across Europe.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. Tavoletti G, <I>et al</I>. Topical ruxolitinib: A new treatment for vitiligo. <I>J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol.</I> 2023;<b>37</b>:2222&ndash;2230.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tripaldi, F., Sonnante, F., Amendolagine, S., Antonacci, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.396</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.396</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-299 Development and evaluation of a pharmacist-led monitoring model for topical ruxolitinib: feasibility, adherence, safety, and patient empowerment in Apulian community pharmacies with European applicability]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A196</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A196</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A196-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-300 Targeting high-risk patients to optimise clinical pharmacist interventions in a trauma department]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A196-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Drug-related problems (DRPs) are common among hospitalised trauma patients and represent a significant threat to medication safety. Clinical pharmacists play a key role in identifying and resolving DRPs; however, the growing shortage of clinical pharmacy workforce across Europe poses an increasing challenge to ensuring optimal pharmaceutical care. Efficient allocation of limited pharmacist resources &ndash; both in terms of personnel and time &ndash; has therefore become essential.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This study aimed to identify patient groups at higher risk of DRPs in a trauma department, using the categorisation and analysis of DRPs and associated pharmacist interventions as a tool to support targeted allocation of clinical pharmacy resources.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A prospective observational study was conducted between 1 June and 30 June 2024, in a 30-bed trauma department. DRP types, causes, and pharmacist interventions were classified according to the Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe (PCNE) classification 9.1 system. Demographic characteristics and active substances (recorded at the 7th level of the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification) were collected. Student&rsquo;s <I>t</I>-test was used to compare continuous variables, and the Chi-square test for categorical variables.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 131 patients (men 42.0%, women 58.0%) were included, with a mean age of 69.9 years (SD = 16). The median number of regularly taken medications was four. Overall, 99 DRPs were identified in 67 patients (51.1%). The most frequent DRPs were dosing problems (PCNE C3; 43.4%) and inappropriate drug selection (C1; 29.3%). Patients requiring pharmacist interventions had a higher median number of medications (5 vs. 3; <I>p</I> &lt; 0.01). DRP occurrence was significantly associated with age (affected: 73.8 years; unaffected: 65.8 years; <I>p</I> &lt; 0.001). DRPs were identified in 56.4% of patients on anticoagulant therapy, in contrast to 48.9% of patients not receiving it.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The prevalence of DRPs in trauma care is considerable. It is essential to prioritise elderly patients, those receiving multiple medications, and individuals on anticoagulant therapy. Future research should aim to broaden the identification of high&ndash;risk groups in trauma care.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kiss, A., Szilvay, A., Gyimesi, N., Nagy, E., Bor, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.397</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.397</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-300 Targeting high-risk patients to optimise clinical pharmacist interventions in a trauma department]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A196</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A196</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A197-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-301 Efficacy of combination of anti-PD-1/l1 agents with chemotherapy in advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer with deficient mismatch repair: an indirect treatment comparison]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A197-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Several drugs targeting the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) or its ligand 1 (PD-L1), in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy (ChT), are under evaluation for the treatment of recurrent or advanced endometrial cancer (EC) with deficient mismatch repair (dMMR). However, there are no head-to-head trials comparing these regimens, which limits their therapeutic positioning.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate whether pembrolizumab, dostarlimab, durvalumab, durvalumab plus olaparib, and atezolizumab &ndash;each in combination with chemotherapy&ndash; can be considered equivalent therapeutic alternatives (ETAs) for patients with advanced or recurrent dMMR EC, through an adjusted indirect treatment comparison (ITC).</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A systematic bibliographic search for clinical trials (CTs) was conducted in PubMed. Inclusion criteria: phase II/III, randomised trials with comparable populations, follow-up durations, common comparator and definition of recurrent or advanced EC. Efficacy outcomes used for comparison: Hazard ratio (HR) for progression-free survival (PFS) and for overall survival (OS). Indirect treatment comparison (ITC) was conducted using Bucher method, employing dostarlimab plus chemotherapy as the reference treatment, selected for showing the best numerical HR value vs standard chemotherapy, among those that add a single drug to chemotherapy. The delta value (, maximum acceptable difference used as a clinical criterion of equivalence) was derived according to the ETA guidelines<sup>1</sup> based on the threshold HR of 0.65 considered by the ESMO-MCBS (form 2b) as representing substantial clinical benefit. Accordingly, equivalence margin was set between 0.65 and its inverse, 1.54.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Five clinical trials were identified. Results of the adjusted indirect comparison are shown in the <cross-ref type="tbl" refid="T1">table 1</cross-ref>.</p><p><tbl id="T1" loc="float"><no>Abstract 4CPS-301 Table 1</no><tblbdy top-stubs="2"><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Treatment</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">PFS H.R (95% CI) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">OS H.R (95% CI) </c></r><r><c cspan="3" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Dostarlimab+ChT </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Reference </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Reference </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Pembrolizumab+ChT </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0,8 (0,381-1,678) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0,526 (0,172-1,608) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Atezolizumab+ChT </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0,778 (0,379-1,597) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0,73 (0,255-2,1) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Durvalumab </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0,667 (0,284-1,565) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0,882 (0,255-3,054) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Durvalumab+ChT+Olaparib </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0,683 (0,293-1,593) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1,071 (0,297-3,865) </c></r></tblbdy></tbl></p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>ITC showed no statistically or clinically significant differences among the five therapies. Nevertheless, pembrolizumab showed clinically relevant difference compared to the reference treatment, but no statistically significant improvement in OS in the clinical trial. Furthermore, durvalumab plus olaparib, which add two drugs to chemotherapy was consequently associated with higher toxicity.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. Alegre-Del Rey EJ, F&eacute;nix-Caballero S, Casta&ntilde;o-Lara R, Sierra-Garc&iacute;a F. Assessment and positioning of drugs as equivalent therapeutic alternatives. <I>Med Clin(Barc).</I> 2014;<b>143</b>(2):85&ndash;90.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mora Cortes, M., Cano Martinez, G., Fenix Caballero, S., Alegre-Del Rey, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.398</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.398</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-301 Efficacy of combination of anti-PD-1/l1 agents with chemotherapy in advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer with deficient mismatch repair: an indirect treatment comparison]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A197</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A197</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A197-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-302 Intravenous sedation: impact on mechanically ventilated critically ill patients]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A197-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Intravenous sedation (IS) is routinely used in critically ill patients (CIP) requiring invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). Selecting an appropriate sedative regimen (SR) is essential to optimise ventilation and reduce complications. Evidence on which SR minimises adverse events and improves extubation success remains limited.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic use of intravenous SR in CIP undergoing IMV. Primary objective: to assess the association between intravenous SR and IMV duration. Secondary objectives: to evaluate the association between SR use and extubation success, as well as the incidence of SR related complications (agitation, delirium, hypotension and bradycardia).</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Retrospective, observational, and descriptive study from January-March 2025, including adult patients admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) who required IVM and received continuous IS. Sedation included midazolam (in combination with propofol, dexmedetomidine, or as monotherapy) and regimens without midazolam (propofol alone or with dexmedetomidine).</p><p>Inclusion criteria were: treatment with one of the above intravenous SR, ICU stay longer than 48-hours, IVM, ability to discontinue sedation, and being candidates for extubation during the ICU stay, whether successful or not.</p><p>The following variables were analysed: SR used, age, SAPS-III at admission, target sedation level, IVM duration, successful extubation (no-reintubation within 48-hours), complications during ICU stay (agitation, delirium, hypotension and bradycardia).</p><p>Continuous variables were analysed using Mann&ndash;Whitney-U test and categorical variables by <sup>2</sup>-test (p&lt; 0.05). Data were analysed using SPSSv27.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>51 patients were included: 28 (55%) received midazolam-based SR and 23 (45%) without midazolam. The mean age (years) was 66.6 (SD 15.0), and 66.7% were aged &ge;65. The overall mean SAPS-III score at admission was 48.8 (SD 12.1).</p><p>Median IVM duration was statistically higher in midazolam group compared to non-midalozam group: 8.5 days [IQR 19,5&ndash;4]) vs 2 days[IQR 4&ndash;1];( p&lt;0.001).</p><p>Extubation success rate was higher in non-midazolam group (88.6% vs 63%).</p><p>SR related complications were higher in the midazolam group: agitation (50% vs 47,8%), delirium (25% vs 4,3%), hypotension (53.6% vs 21, 7, 1%) and bradycardia (35.7% vs 26,1).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Regimens including midazolam were associated with significantly longer IVM duration compared to regimens without midazolam and higher rate of complications.</p><p>Our results support current recommendations regarding avoidance of benzodiazepines in CIP&rsquo;s sedation as far as possible and implement new modalities such as inhaled sedation and other intravenous strategies.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Solis Cunado, S., Cavada Carranza, I., Martin Zaragoza, L., Molina Garcia, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.399</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.399</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-302 Intravenous sedation: impact on mechanically ventilated critically ill patients]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A197</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A198</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A198-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-303 Dose reduction of ibrutinib in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: real-world experience in a primary hospital]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A198-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Although ibrutinib (IBR) is effective across all treatment lines for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL), its use is frequently limited by adverse events leading to discontinuation or dose reduction. Evidence suggests that lowering the dose may preserve efficacy while improving tolerability.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To describe the real-world experience of CLL patients treated with reduced doses of IBR in a primary care hospital. Calculate the economic savings derived from this dose reduction.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective observational study was conducted including CLL patients treated with IBR who required dose reduction below 420 mg/day due to toxicity, interactions, or physician decision once disease control was achieved. All patients who received ibrutinib at our centre since we have records, in 2016, were recruited. We obtained information from the pharmaceutical care program and from the medical history. The economic calculation was made based on the cost of each container at the time of purchase, taking into account price changes.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Seventy patients were included, with a median age of 73 years (IQR 29&ndash;88). The IBR dose was reduced in 56 patients (80%), mainly due to physician decision (50%), toxicity (43%), or interactions (7%). Patients who maintained the full dose had received more prior treatment lines and more often presented TP53 mutations. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.7 years (95% CI: 3.1&ndash;6), and median time to next treatment (TTNT) was 5.7 years (95% CI: 4.0&ndash;not reached). In patients with dose reductions, median PFS was 5.3 years (95% CI: 3.8&ndash;6.6), with no statistically significant difference versus those without reductions (p=0.0594). Estimated annual cost savings were 687,040.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>IBR dose reduction in CLL patients appears to maintain clinical efficacy while improving tolerability and reducing costs. Further studies with larger samples and refined methodology are warranted to confirm these findings and assess new therapeutic strategies such as IBR&ndash;venetoclax combinations.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Varas Perez, A., Gonzalez Rosa, V., Rodriguez Moreta, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.400</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.400</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-303 Dose reduction of ibrutinib in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: real-world experience in a primary hospital]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A198</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A198</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A198-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-304 Persistence analysis with anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide prophylactic treatments in patients with migraine]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A198-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Monoclonal antibodies against CGRP (fremanezumab, galcanezumab, eptinezumab) or its receptor (erenumab) and the recently approved oral CGRP receptor antagonists (atogepant, rimegepant) are drugs indicated in migraine prophylaxis in adults. These treatments have proven effective in reducing both the frequency and severity of migraine episodes.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To compare the persistence of different anti-CGRP treatments in patients with migraine.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective, non-interventional, longitudinal study was conducted including patients with chronic or episodic migraine treated with an anti-CGRP drug at our centre. Persistence was defined as the duration of time from treatment initiation to discontinuation (last dispensing or end of follow-up in September 2025).</p><p>Covariates collected from medical records were age, sex, line of therapy and medication possession ratio.</p><p>Kaplan&ndash;Meier survival analysis was performed and differences were evaluated using the log-rank test. Data were analysed using SPSSv27.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>285 patients were included (84.9% female, 15.1% male); age (mean&plusmn;SD) was 49.8&plusmn;11.9 years.</p><p>Treatment distribution was: fremanezumab 51.2%, erenumab 19.6%, galcanezumab 8.4%, eptinezumab 14.4%, atogepant 6.0% and rimegepant 0.45%.</p><p>Overall, median persistence duration was 451 days (CI 95% 311&ndash;590): females 490 days (CI 95% 345&ndash;635), males 260 days (CI 95% 159&ndash;360). According to treatment: fremanezumab 464 days (CI 95% 258&ndash;669), erenumab 246 days (CI 95% 75&ndash;417), galcanezumab 172 days (CI 95% 0&ndash;609), eptinezumab 581 days (CI 95% 458&ndash;703), atogepant 311 days (CI 95% 147&ndash;475) and rimegepant 326 days (not reached). According to treatment line: first 464 days (CI 95% 283&ndash;645), second 356 days (CI 95% 0&ndash;716), third 490 days (CI 95% 356&ndash;624), and fourth 221 days (CI 95% 94&ndash;348).</p><p>There were no statistically significant differences between the groups.</p><p>In the subcutaneous group (fremanezumab, erenumab, galcanezumab; n=226), 84.1% were female and 15.9% male; 64.6% received fremanezumab, 24.8% erenumab, 10.6% and galcanezumab; 75.7% were on first-line therapy, 21.7% second-line and 2.7% third-line.</p><p>Significant differences were found between erenumab and fremanezumab (HR = 0.53; 95% CI 0.32&ndash;0.89; p=0.015).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>There were no statistically significant differences in persistence between anti-CGRP therapies in our study. Higher persistence rates were observed for eptinezumab and fremanezumab. Among subcutaneous agents, fremanezumab demonstrated significantly greater persistence compared with erenumab.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maraver Villar, A., Gomez Bermejo, M., Sanchez-Rubio Ferrandez, J., Onteniente Gonzalez, A., Molina Garcia, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.401</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.401</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-304 Persistence analysis with anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide prophylactic treatments in patients with migraine]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A198</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A198</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A199-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-305 Classification of patients with suspected hepatitis C with a machine learning model]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A199-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Early diagnosis of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is essential to prevent progression toward advanced liver disease. Machine learning (ML) offers new possibilities for clinical prediction based on biomarkers.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This study presents the performance of the Random Forest model applied to a clinical dataset, aiming to evaluate its classification ability for patients with different stages of liver involvement.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>The dataset used was obtained from the University of California-Irvine Machine Learning Repository, comprising 589 individuals classified into five groups: blood donors, suspected cases, hepatitis, fibrosis, and cirrhosis. Variables included age, sex, and liver biochemical parameters (albumin, alkaline phosphatase, aminotransferases, bilirubin, cholinesterase, cholesterol, creatinine, GGT, and total proteins). The model was trained using k-fold cross-validation (k=10). Area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity were recorded in each iteration. Variable importance was analysed through model performance and the Kruskal-Wallis test.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Of the 589 patients, 533 were healthy blood donors (90.5%), 24 (4.1%) had cirrhosis, 12 (2%) fibrosis, and 20 (3.4%) hepatitis. The median age was 47 years. 363 patients (59%) were male. Inferential statistical analysis revealed significant differences (p&lt;0.05) in the following variables:</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Albumin, median: 42 (g/L); p=0.01</p></li><li><p>GGT, median: 21.3 (U/L); p=0.020</p></li><li><p>Cholinesterase, median: 5.45 (U/mL); p=0.0004</p></li><li><p>Cholesterol, median: 5.4 (mmol/L); p=0.0081</p></li><li><p>Creatinine, median: 78 (&micro;mol/L); p=0.011</p></li><li><p>Total proteins, median: 71.2 (g/L); p=0.016</p></li></l></p><p>For the remaining variables, no statistically significant differences were observed among patients.</p><p>The Random Forest model showed a median AUC of 0.9435, sensitivity of 100%, and specificity of 90.95%, with no false negatives in cross-validation.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Random Forest demonstrated high classification accuracy in patients with suspected HCV infection, confirming the value of combining liver biomarkers with ML to improve diagnosis. This approach could optimise screening tools in hospital settings. However, prospective studies incorporating additional clinical variables are needed, as the model was based on historical data without real-world validation.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. Lichtinghagen R, Klawonn F, Hoffmann G. HCV data [Dataset]. UCI Machine Learning Repository. (2020). https://doi.org/10.24432/C5D612</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Boardman Gonzalez, D., Martin Nino, M., Garcia Lopez, E., Martinez Ruiz, B., Picazo Sanchiz, G., Martinez Valdivieso, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.402</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.402</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-305 Classification of patients with suspected hepatitis C with a machine learning model]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A199</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A199</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A199-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-306 Semaglutide in obese haemodialysis patients with chronic kidney disease: a case series]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A199-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Obesity and type 2 diabetes are common in advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD), increasing cardiovascular risk and limiting access to kidney transplantation. Semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, improves glycaemic control, promotes weight reduction, and reduces cardiovascular risk in the general population. However, evidence in haemodialysis patients is scarce, emphasising the need for real-world data.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To describe changes in renal and cardiovascular parameters in obese stage V CKD patients undergoing haemodialysis treated with semaglutide, and to characterise their clinical profile and concomitant therapies.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective case series was conducted between January 2022 and March 2025. Nine haemodialysis patients receiving subcutaneous semaglutide were included. Data extracted from electronic medical records included demographics, comorbidities, concomitant treatments, and duration of therapy. Renal parameters were serum creatinine, urea, and glomerular filtration rate (GFR, CKD-EPI). Cardiovascular parameters included HbA1c, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and cardiovascular events. Statistical analysis was performed using RStudio v2024.12.1.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Nine patients (55% female, median age 71 years (interquartile range (IQR): 61-75)) were included; 89% had type 2 diabetes and all had stage V CKD. Median treatment duration was 325 days (range 33&ndash;1047). Concomitant treatments included lipid-lowering agents (89%), antihypertensives (78%), insulin (67%), and oral antidiabetics (56%). Frequent comorbidities were dyslipidaemia (89%), hypertension (78%), heart failure (44%), atrial fibrillation (22%), and ischaemic heart disease (22%).</p><p>Renal outcomes: creatinine decreased from 8.07 to 6.87 mg/dL (&ndash;14.9%, p=0.07), urea from 134.9 to 101.4 mg/dL (&ndash;23.8%, p=0.003), GFR showed no significant change (6.89-&gt;7.33 mL/min, p=0.426).</p><p>Cardiovascular outcomes: HbA1c decreased from 6.89% to 6.22% (&ndash;9.7%, p=0.066), SBP from 140.7 to 125.8 mmHg (&ndash;14.9 mmHg, p&lt;0.001), DBP remained unchanged. One cardiovascular event occurred after 51 days of treatment.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Treatment with semaglutide in obese patients on haemodialysis was associated with slight stabilisation of renal function, a significant reduction in serum urea, and improved blood pressure, as well as moderate glycaemic improvement. These findings suggest potential cardio-renal benefits in a population often excluded from clinical trials. Larger prospective studies are warranted.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marin Espinosa, I., Blazquez Romero, C., Carrasco Corral, T., Corrales Krohnert, S., Heras Hidalgo, I., Gavilan Gigosos, H., Gomez Manrique, O., Alvarez Perez, P., Baldominos Cordon, A., Horta Hernandez, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.403</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.403</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-306 Semaglutide in obese haemodialysis patients with chronic kidney disease: a case series]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A199</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A199</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A200-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-307 Comparative analysis of quality of life outcomes reported by patients with atopic dermatitis treated with dupilumab or tralokinumab attending pharmaceutical care consultations]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A200-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease with heterogeneous clinical manifestations depending on age and severity. It typically follows a relapsing course characterised by intense pruritus and eczematous lesions. Beyond skin involvement, AD affects patients&rsquo; quality of life(QoL) due to persistent itching and sleep disturbances among other factors. According to national guidelines, therapeutic positioning of biological therapies (BT) remains uncertain.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The primary objective was to assess QoL of patients with moderate-to-severe AD treated with dupilumab or tralokinumab that were attended in pharmaceutical care consultations (PCC) and to analyse differences between the two treatment groups. Secondary objective was to compare the rate of treatment switching to another BT between the above groups of treatment.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A multicentre, observational, retrospective study was conducted including patients with AD treated with dupilumab or tralokinumab for at least 3 months that were attended in PCC at the participating centres. Sociodemographic characteristics were collected from medical records (age, sex, obesity). QoL was assessed using the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), while pruritus and sleep quality were measured through the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). Questionnaires were collected during PCC, either in paper format or through a pseudonymised QR code. Ordinal-variables were analysed using Mann&ndash;Whitney-U test and categorical variables by <sup>2</sup>-test (p&lt; 0.05). Data were analysed using SPSSv27.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>35 patients were analysed. The 54.3% were male. The mean age (years) was 40.6 (DE&plusmn;16). The 65.7% were treated with dupilumab and 34.3% received tralokinumab. The 14.8% were obese (BMI&gt;30Kg/m2).</p></sec><sec><st>QoL results</st><p>  <b>Dupilumab</b> group:</p><p><l type="tab"><li><p>&ndash; &nbsp;DLQI: no effect(43.5%), mild (26.1%), moderate (21.7%), severe (8.7%)</p></li><li><p>&ndash; &nbsp;Pruritus NRS: no impact (17.4%), mild (56.5%), moderate (21.7%), severe (4.3%)</p></li><li><p>&ndash; &nbsp;Sleep NRS: no impact (43.5%), mild (47.8%), moderate (4.3%), severe (4.3%)</p></li></l></p><p>  <b>Tralokinumab</b> group:</p><p><l type="tab"><li><p>&ndash; &nbsp;DLQI: no effect (16.7%), mild (25.0%), moderate (33.3%), severe (25.0%)</p></li><li><p>&ndash; &nbsp;Pruritus NRS: no impact (0%), mild (33.3%), moderate (41.7%), severe (16.7%), very severe (8.3%)</p></li><li><p>&ndash; &nbsp;Sleep NRS: no impact (0%), mild (75.0%), moderate (8.3%), severe (16.7%)</p></li></l></p><p>Statistically significant differences were observed in pruritus NRS (p=0.014) and sleep NRS (p=0.017).</p><p>No statistically significant differences were observed concerning DLQI scores.</p><p>Treatment switching occurred in 17.1% of the overall study population: 17.4% in dupilumab group and 16.7% in tralokinumab group.</p><p>No statistically significant differences were observed in treatment switching between tralokinumab and dupilumab.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Patients treated with dupilumab reported significantly greater QoL with regard to pruritus and sleep outcomes compared with those treated with tralokinumab.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maraver Villar, A., Raguan Yanez, G., Solis Cunado, S., Onteniente Gonzalez, A., Sanchez-Rubio Ferrandez, J., Molina Garcia, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.404</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.404</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-307 Comparative analysis of quality of life outcomes reported by patients with atopic dermatitis treated with dupilumab or tralokinumab attending pharmaceutical care consultations]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A200</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A200</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A200-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-308 Analysis of the effectiveness and safety of fruquintinib in metastatic colorectal cancer in real-world clinical practice]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A200-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Fruquintinib is a selective inhibitor of VEGFR-1, 2, and 3 tyrosine kinase. It is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who have previously received fluoropyrimidine-, oxaliplatin-, and irinotecan-based chemotherapy, anti-VEGF and/or anti-EGFR therapies, and have progressed or are intolerant to trifluridine-tipiracil (TAS-102) or regorafenib.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of fruquintinib in adult patients with mCRC treated at three tertiary hospitals.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Observational, retrospective, multicentre study was conducted in adult patients with mCRC treated with fruquintinib between December 2024 and September 2025. The primary endpoints for effectiveness were median progression-free survival (PFS) and median overall survival (OS). Additional data collected included demographics (gender, age), KRAS mutation status, prior treatments, treatment initiation date, duration of treatment, dose reductions, and adverse events (AEs).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Thirty-one patients (58% male) with a mean age of 66.9 years (range 52&ndash;77) were included. KRAS mutations (KRASm) were present in 58% of cases. The median number of prior treatment lines was four. Prior to fruquintinib, 22 patients had received TAS-102 plus bevacizumab, eight received TAS-102 monotherapy, and eight received regorafenib. Patients received a median of three treatment cycles (range: 1&ndash;7). At the data cut-off, disease progression was observed in nine patients (67% KRASm), with the median PFS not yet reached. Six-month PFS was 74.2%. Five patients (all KRASm) had died, with a 6 month OS rate of 83.8%.</p><p>Adverse events were reported in 87.1% of patients. The most common AEs were asthenia (58%), hypertension (45%), hand-foot syndrome (16%), and diarrhoea (13%). Dose reductions were required in 48% of patients&ndash;most commonly due to asthenia (n=6), hypertension (n=5), gastrointestinal symptoms (n=3), and hyperbilirubinemia (n=1). Three patients discontinued treatment due to AEs (two due to hypertension and one due to elevated transaminases).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Fruquintinib demonstrated limited effectiveness in a heavily pre-treated real-world mCRC population, with poorer outcomes observed in patients with KRAS mutations. Its safety profile was consistent with known toxicities and required frequent dose modifications. Larger studies with extended follow-up are warranted to validate these findings.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robles-Munoz, M., Lopez, A. G., Cano Dominguez, S., Cabeza Barrera, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.405</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.405</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-308 Analysis of the effectiveness and safety of fruquintinib in metastatic colorectal cancer in real-world clinical practice]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A200</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A201</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A201-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-309 Evaluation of the impact of a prioritised antibiotic dispensing algorithm on therapeutic continuity in haematology-oncology]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A201-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Patients in haemato-oncology are at high risk of severe infections due to neutropenia, immune deficiencies, and the use of invasive devices. Irregular availability of essential antibiotics compromises both the speed and standardisation of treatment.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This study examines the effectiveness of a priority dispensing algorithm to strengthen therapeutic continuity and patient safety.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A prospective quasi-experimental study was conducted over eight weeks (May&ndash;June 2025) in the haemato-oncology department . Antibiotics were classified by criticality (essential, important, reserve). A decision-making dispensing algorithm was developed, including alternatives in case of shortages and standardised dosing. The algorithm was evaluated using three indicators:</p><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Coverage of critical clinical situations;</p></li><li><p>Reduction of dispensing delays (&gt;2 hours);</p></li><li><p>Decrease in non&ndash;standardised substitutions.</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Among the 12 antibiotics analysed, 4 (33%) essential drugs were initially out of stock. After implementing the algorithm, coverage of critical clinical situations reached 100%. The average dispensing time decreased from 3.5 hours to 1.2 hours (<I>p</I> &lt; 0.05), and the rate of unvalidated substitutions dropped from 18% to 4%. Pharmacists also reported a 40% improvement in traceability and a significant reduction in potential dispensing errors.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The prioritised dispensing algorithm proved to be an effective tool to improve patient safety in haemato-oncology, standardise antibiotic dispensing, and reduce the impact of drug shortages. Its integration into pharmacy practice could serve as a model for other high-risk infectious disease units.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. Freifeld AG, Bow EJ, Sepkowitz KA, Boeckh MJ, Ito JI, Mullen CA, <I>et al</I>. Clinical practice guideline for the use of antimicrobial agents in neutropenic patients with cancer: 2010 update by the infectious diseases society of America. <I>Clin Infect Dis.</I> 2011;<b>52</b>(4):e56&ndash;93.</p><p>2. European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO). Management of febrile neutropenia: ESMO clinical practice guidelines. <I>Ann Oncol.</I> 2022;<b>33</b>(12):1213&ndash;24.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Elmajdouli, H., Saad, Z.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.406</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.406</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-309 Evaluation of the impact of a prioritised antibiotic dispensing algorithm on therapeutic continuity in haematology-oncology]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A201</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A201</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A201-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-310 Evaluation of pharmaceutical interventions in hospitalised patients receiving high-risk medications]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A201-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>High-risk medications are closely associated with patient safety incidents, as dosing or administration errors may cause serious adverse outcomes. Therefore, pharmaceutical validation should prioritise these treatments to minimise harm.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate pharmaceutical interventions (PIs) related to high-risk medications in chronically ill patients and to determine their acceptance rate by prescribers.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A prospective interventional study was conducted from July to October 2024.Hospitalised patients with prescriptions for high-risk drugs were included when prescribing errors were detected during routine pharmaceutical validation. Variables analysed were demographic (sex, age), clinical (inpatient services) and pharmacotherapeutic (high-risk drugs according to the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification, ATC). Interventions were recorded via e-prescribing software and categorised as reconciliation PIs (dosage discrepancy, omission) or adequacy PIs (duplication, analytical monitoring, prescription errors, allergies). Data were obtained from Diraya and Athos Prisma digital records and processed using SPSS.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Thirty-seven patients were selected from all patients reviewed in the hospital&rsquo;s unit-dose system during the study period (56.8% male; 43.2% female). Median age: 69.1 years (IQR:63.0&ndash;78.5).</p><p>Clinical services involved: Internal Medicine (29.7%), Traumatology (16.2%) and ICU (8.1%), followed by Urology, Cardiology, Vascular Surgery, Gastroenterology and Pneumology (each 5.4%), and other specialties including Anaesthesiology, Psychiatry, Medical Emergencies, General Surgery, Gynaecology, Oncology and Otorhinolaryngology (each 2.7%).</p><p>According to the ATC classification, PI were mainly related to Anticoagulants (45.9%), Beta-blockers (13.5%), Analgesics (10.8%) and Diuretics (8.1%). Less frequent categories included Antiplatelet Agents, Immunosuppressants, Thyroid Hormones, Antiarrhythmics, Antipsychotics and Antiepileptics (each 2.7%).</p><p>Most interventions (51.4%) involved drugs acting on the blood and haematopoietic system (n=19), primarily anticoagulants (n=17) and antiplatelet agents (n=2), followed by cardiovascular drugs (24.3%; beta-blockers [n=5], diuretics [n=3], antiarrhythmics [n=1]), nervous system drugs (16.2%; analgesics [n=4], antipsychotics [n=1], antiepileptics [n=1]) and thyroid therapy (2.7%).</p><p>During hospitalisation, 94.6% PIs (n=35) were accepted. Of all interventions, 70.3% were adequacy-related (duplication [n=19], prescription errors [n=4], analytical monitoring [n=2], allergies [n=1]), while 29.7% were reconciliation-related (dosage discrepancies [n=6], omissions [n=5]).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Pharmaceutical interventions in chronically ill hospitalised patients receiving high-risk drugs mainly targeted blood and cardiovascular agents, with a high acceptance rate. These findings suggest that routine pharmaceutical validation may contribute to safer and more effective medication use.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ponce Gonzalez, A., Guzman Ramos, M., Rodriguez Molins, E., Corriente Gordon, I., Santos Rubio, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.407</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.407</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-310 Evaluation of pharmaceutical interventions in hospitalised patients receiving high-risk medications]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A201</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A202</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A202-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-311 Osilodrostat in the treatment of ectopic cushings syndrome. a case report]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A202-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Ectopic Cushing&rsquo;s Syndrome (ECS) is a low-incidence manifestation of high morbidity and mortality, which occurs with hypercortisolism caused by uncontrolled secretion of adrenocorticotropin (ACTH) associated with tumours, including pulmonary origin. The condition often presents with severe metabolic disturbances, making early diagnosis and management essential. To treat endogenous Cushing&rsquo;s syndrome, drugs such as metyrapone, ketoconazole, and osilodrostat are available to control hypercortisolism. In this case, this treatment has been extrapolated to this patient to treat ECS of pulmonary origin.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>Effectiveness of osilodrostat, an 11 b hydroxylase inhibitor (enzyme responsible for the final step of cortisol biosynthesis in the adrenal gland) in a patient with Cushing&rsquo;s syndrome secondary to ECS of pulmonary origin.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Retrospective and descriptive study of a patient with ECS of pulmonary origin treated with osilodrostat. Data were obtained from the digital medical record. A literature review was conducted in PubMed and UptoDate.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A 72-year-old patient was admitted with ACTH levels of 142 pg/ml (normal range: 7.2 - 63.3 pg/ml), basal cortisol levels of 97.7 mcg/dl (normal range 4.82 -19.5 mcg/dl), and potassium levels of 2.5 mEq/L (normal range: 3.5-5.1 meq/L). The patient was diagnosed with cortisol overproduction secondary to ectopic ACTH production of pulmonary origin. The Endocrinology Department contacted the Hospital Pharmacy Department for joint therapeutic management. Metopirone was ruled out due to the risk of worsening hypokalaemia, and a decision was made to initiate a request for ketoconazole as a foreign medication, since osilodrostat should be used if other alternatives fail. After requesting it, we were informed that ketoconazole was rejected due to the presence of a marketed domestic therapeutic alternative, osilodrostat. Treatment was therefore initiated with osilodrostat 20 mg/12 h concomitantly with hydroaltesone due to the risk of adrenal insufficiency due to complete inhibition of cortisol synthesis. Currently on treatment with osilodrostat 20 mg/12 h with normalised levels: cortisol 7.55 mcg/dl; Corticotropin: 79.6 pg/ml, potassium 4.5 meq/L (normal range: 3.5-5.1 meq/L). Given clinical stability, oncologic treatment has been initiated.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Treatment with osilodrostat for pulmonary ECS has proven to be effective in controlling hypercotisolism. Coordination and cooperation between the Pharmacy and Endocrinology departments is essential for optimal therapeutic management.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Morales Rivero, B., Banegas Moreno, J., Oya Alvarez DE Morales, B., Jerez Rojas, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.408</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.408</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-311 Osilodrostat in the treatment of ectopic cushings syndrome. a case report]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A202</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A202</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A202-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-312 Clinical and economic impact of cefiderocol monitoring through a national registry: a pre-post real-world evaluation supporting antimicrobial stewardship]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A202-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a major global threat to patient safety and healthcare sustainability. The spread of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria has limited treatment options and increased costs. Cefiderocol, a siderophore cephalosporin with a unique iron-transport mechanism, is among the few &lsquo;reserve&rsquo; antibiotics for infections caused by carbapenem-resistant organisms. Real-world data on its utilisation, appropriateness and economic impact under registry-based monitoring remain scarce. Evaluating these aspects is essential to determine whether registries enhance antimicrobial stewardship and support sustainable access to high-cost, last-resort antibiotics.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate clinical outcomes, prescriptive appropriateness and economic impact of cefiderocol before and after implementation of a national monitoring registry designed to optimise antimicrobial use in hospital settings.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective observational study included adult inpatients treated with cefiderocol before (Mar 2022&ndash;Feb 2023; n=19) and after (Mar 2023&ndash;Feb 2024; n=16) registry implementation. Collected data: infection type, ward distribution, renal function&ndash;based dosing adjustments, therapy duration, discharge or death, vials used and drug expenditure. The economic evaluation was conducted from a healthcare system perspective, considering direct medical costs related to drug acquisition and reimbursement mechanisms.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Thirty-five patients were analysed: nineteen in the pre-registry period and sixteen post-registry. Mortality was 21.1% (4/19) pre-registry and 43.8% (7/16) post-registry. After registry activation, no patient exceeded 21 days of therapy (registry limit), and a reduction in median treatment duration was observed. Renal function&ndash;based dose adjustments became more frequent. Vials used decreased from 1,403 to 752 (&ndash;46%), and total drug expenditure fell from approximately 2.8 million to 1.5 million. In the post-registry phase, cefiderocol was fully reimbursed through an innovative medicines fund, reducing direct hospital expenditure.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Registry-based monitoring of cefiderocol improved governance and supported cost containment without limiting patient access. Eligibility criteria and controlled duration within registries promoted appropriate antibiotic use and helped contain antimicrobial resistance. In 2025, the regulator expanded this model by creating a dedicated fund for reserve antibiotics and extending registry monitoring. These findings emphasise hospital pharmacists&rsquo; role in registry-based stewardship and show registries serve as ongoing real-world studies, enabling evaluation of appropriateness, outcomes and sustainability of last-resort antibiotics.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nigri, N., Tavoletti, S., Calzola, M., Di Marco, S., Bartolini, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.409</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.409</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-312 Clinical and economic impact of cefiderocol monitoring through a national registry: a pre-post real-world evaluation supporting antimicrobial stewardship]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A202</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A202</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A203-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-313 Impact of biological drugs for severe asthma on oral corticoid consumption]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A203-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Biological treatments used in severe asthma aim to reduce exacerbations, usually defined as emergency visits/hospitalisations and/or the use of systemic corticosteroids, whose consumption associated with the appearance of significant adverse events. More real-life studies are needed to determine what OGC reduction these biologics produce.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and objectives</st><p>To evaluate the effectiveness of biologics in patients with severe uncontrolled asthma (SUCA) in terms of reducing OGC consumption.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and methods</st><p>A retrospective observational study was carried out on patients with SUCA on biological treatments (omalizumab, mepolizumab, benralizumab and/or dupilumab) who had been on treatment for at least 1 year in our hospital. If they had received more than one biologic, the last treatment was analysed. Baseline OGC consumption was retrospectively collected during the 12 months prior to the start of the biological and compared with the consumption of 12 months later. This data was obtained from microstrategy application, expressed as defined daily doses (DDD) consumed during 1 year, corresponding to the dispensations carried out in the pharmacy. The variable analysed was the percentage of dose reductions and/or interruptions of OGC treatment.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>62 patients were included, of whom 27 were excluded for not completing 1 year of biological therapy. 35 patients met the study criteria and were analysed: 14 mepolizumab (40%), nine benralizumab (26%), six dupilumab (17%), and six omalizumab (17%). The average DDD of OGC received was 18.3 (2-182) mg. A total of 24 patients required baseline OGC, 12 of these patients (50%) were able to discontinue treatment and five patients (20.8%) reduced the dose. The biologic that achieved the greatest number of discontinuations and/or dose reductions was benralizumab (35.3%), followed by mepolizumab (29.4%), dupilumab (17.6%) and omalizumab (17.6%). Of the 35 patients, 22 (62.9%) did so in first-line (15 were corticosteroid dependent) and 13 (37.1%) in second or subsequent lines (nine corticosteroid dependent). The percentage of dose reduction and/or suspension of OGC among first-line corticosteroid dependents was: benralizumab (40%), omalizumab (30%), dupilumab (20%) and mepolizumab (10%). While the patients in second or successive lines: mepolizumab (57.1%), benralizumab (28.6%) and dupilumab (14.3%), there were no patients with omalizumab.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>70.8% of corticosteroid dependent patients managed to reduce or interrupt treatment with OGC, which confirms, in our sample, the relevant effectiveness of biological treatments in reducing dependence on OGC.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Varas Perez, A., Sanchez De Toro, M., Dominguez Rivas, Y., Gonzalez Rosa, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.410</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.410</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-313 Impact of biological drugs for severe asthma on oral corticoid consumption]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A203</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A203</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A203-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-314 Real-world effectiveness, safety, and adherence of nintedanib in a tertiary care hospital]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A203-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Diffuse interstitial lung diseases (DILD), including idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and progressive fibrosing lung disease (PFLD), may evolve into a fibrotic phenotype with functional decline. Antifibrotic therapy, particularly nintedanib, has significantly improved management by slowing forced vital capacity (FVC) decline.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate efficacy, safety, and adherence with nintedanib in patients with pulmonary fibrosing disease in a tertiary hospital.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Observational, retrospective, single-centre study. Patients who started nintedanib between January 2020 and March 2025 were included. Variables: age, sex, diagnosis, prescribing service, duration of treatment and FVC, DLCO, and walking test at baseline, 6 and 12 months; adherence (considering adherent patients if possession rate was &ge;90%), dose reduction or withdrawal, concomitant medication, and hospital admissions. Information was obtained from pharmacy dispensing records and Electronic Health Records.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Thirty-three patients were included, 21 (63.6%) male, with a mean age of 69&plusmn;15 years. Sixteen patients (48.5%) had IPF, 15 (45.5%) PFLD, and two (6%) interstitial lung disease secondary to scleroderma.</p><p>Prescribing departments were Pneumology (67%), Rheumatology (18%), and Internal Medicine (15%).</p><p>The mean treatment duration was 636&plusmn;487 days.</p><p>FVC remained stable at 6 months in 48.5% of patients, 18.2% worsened, and 33.3% were non-assessable. At 12 months, 36.4% were stable, 21.2% worsened, and 42.4% were non-assessable.</p><p>By diagnosis, stable FVC was observed in 27.3%, 21.2%, and 18.2% of IPF patients at baseline, 6, and 12 months, compared with 18.2%, 12.1%, and 15.1% in PFLD.</p><p>DLCO decreased &ge;3 points in 51.5% patients, improved &ge;3 points in 15.1%, showed no change in 18.2% and 15.2% had missing data at 6 and 12 months. The walking test was stable, though data were unavailable in 48.5% and 60% of the patients at 6 and 12 months.</p><p>Adherent patients were 87%. Treatment discontinuation occurred in 36%: death (18%), diarrhoea (15%), and due to lung transplantation (3%). Dose reduction was required in 33%.</p><p>Concomitant therapy included prior mycophenolate in 18% and &ge;5 drugs in 73%. Hospitalisations occurred in 45%.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Nintedanib slows progression of pulmonary fibrosis, promoting clinical stability. Diarrhoea was the most significant adverse effect, leading to dose reductions or discontinuation. Advanced age, polymedication (73% of patients), and clinical vulnerability reinforce the need for close monitoring by hospital pharmacies.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Simal Lopez, R., Pinilla Rello, A., Garcia Osuna, R., Gimeno Gracia, M., Fernandez Alonso, E., Arenere Mendoza, M., Salvador Gomez, T., Gracia Tello, B., Peralta Gines, C., Elosua Prats, L., Charlam Burdzy, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.411</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.411</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-314 Real-world effectiveness, safety, and adherence of nintedanib in a tertiary care hospital]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A203</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A204</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A204-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-315 Real-world evaluation of off-label fampridine use in cerebellar ataxia: safety and effectiveness in a tertiary hospital]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A204-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Cerebellar ataxias are a heterogeneous group of neurological disorders characterised by impaired coordination and balance. Pharmacological options are limited. Fampridine, a potassium channel blocker approved for gait improvement in multiple sclerosis, is being used off-label in ataxia despite limited clinical evidence. Real-world data are needed to clarify its therapeutic value and safety profile.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the real-world effectiveness and safety of off-label fampridine in patients with cerebellar ataxia, describe their baseline characteristics, and identify potential predictors of treatment response.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective observational study included 30 patients with different forms of cerebellar ataxia who initiated off-label fampridine. Inclusion criteria were estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) &gt;50 mL/min and prescription made between October 2021 and October 2025, following internal committee approval. Follow-up mean time was 14 &plusmn; 12 months. Effectiveness was assessed using the Timed 25-Foot Walk Test (T25-FWT) at baseline and after 2 weeks of treatment. Safety outcomes included treatment discontinuation rate, duration of therapy, and adverse drug reactions (ADRs).</p><p><tbl id="T1" loc="float"><no>Abstract 4CPS-315 Table 1</no><caption><p>Baseline characteristics</p></caption><tblbdy top-stubs="2"><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Characteristics</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>N= 30</b> </c></r><r><c cspan="2" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Age </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">64 +- 12,15 (<I>SD</I>) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Sex (male) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">19 (63%) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Type of ataxia </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> - <I>Idiopathic</I> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">11 (36,7%) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <I> - CANVAS (RFC1 mutation)</I> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">5 (16,7%) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <I> - SCA27B (FGF14 expansion)</I> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">9 (30%) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <I> - Episodic type 2</I> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1 (3,3%) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <I> - MSA-cerebellar</I> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1 (3,3%) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <I> - SPG7-related paraparesis</I> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">3 (10%) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Alcohol consumption </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">9 (30%) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Nystagmus </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">20 (66,67%) </c></r></tblbdy></tbl></p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Among 30 patients (mean age 64 &plusmn; 12 years; 63% male), 16 (53.3%) showed improvement in T25-FWT at 2-weeks, with a mean reduction of 2.4 seconds (range &ndash;0.7 to &ndash;9.0). At data cut-off, treatment was discontinued in 21 patients (70%), with a median (IQR) duration of 90 (30-271) days. ADRs occurred in 50% of patients, mainly insomnia, gastrointestinal discomfort and dizziness.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Fampridine may provide functional benefits in cerebellar ataxia, but its real-world use is limited by high discontinuation rates and frequent ADRs. Close monitoring and pharmacy-led review of off-label prescriptions are essential to ensure safe and effective therapy. Further controlled studies are needed to confirm these findings.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Saiz Martinez, C., Nunez Manjarres, G., Latasa Berasategui, A., Zipitria Sinde, I., Sanchez Monasterio, I., Ugartetxea Arakistain, N., Salegi Ansa, M., Simon Castelruiz, L., Murua Etxarri, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.412</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.412</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-315 Real-world evaluation of off-label fampridine use in cerebellar ataxia: safety and effectiveness in a tertiary hospital]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A204</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A204</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A204-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-316 Indirect treatment comparison of anti-PD-1/L1 plus chemotherapy in advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer with proficient mismatch repair]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A204-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>For recurrent or advanced endometrial cancer (EC) with proficient mismatch repair (pMMR), several immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting PD-1 or PD-L1 are being investigated in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy (ChT). The absence of direct comparative studies limits informed decision-making regarding their relative clinical benefit.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To explore the comparative efficacy of immunotherapy-based combinations with chemotherapy &ndash;specifically those including pembrolizumab, dostarlimab, durvalumab, durvalumab plus olaparib, and atezolizumab&ndash;, in the treatment of pMMR EC, through an adjusted indirect treatment comparison (ITC) for assessing their potential equivalence as equivalent therapeutic alternatives (ETAs).</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A structured search strategy was applied in PubMed to identify phase II/III randomised clinical trials assessing immune checkpoint inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced or recurrent EC with pMMR. Eligible studies requirements: comparable populations, consistent definitions of disease stage, common comparator and similar follow-up durations. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), both expressed as hazard ratio (HR), were selected as the outcomes for efficacy comparison. ITC was conducted using Bucher method, using dostarlimab plus chemotherapy as the reference treatment for showing the best numerical HR value vs standard chemotherapy, among those that add a single drug to chemotherapy. Clinical equivalence margin () was established between 0.65 and its reciprocal, 1.54, in accordance with the ETA guideline<sup>1</sup> and the ESMO-MCBS (form 2b), which considers a HR of 0.65 indicative of substantial clinical benefit.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Five clinical trials met the eligibility criteria. Findings from the adjusted indirect comparison are summarised in the <cross-ref type="tbl" refid="T1">table 1</cross-ref>.</p><p><tbl id="T1" loc="float"><no>Abstract 4CPS-316 Table 1</no><tblbdy top-stubs="2"><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Treatment</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>PFS HR (95% CI</b>  <b>)</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>OS HR (95% CI</b>  <b>)</b> </c></r><r><c cspan="3" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Dostarlimab+ChT </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Reference </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Reference </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Pembrolizumab+ChT </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1,027 (0,741-1,423) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0,912 (0,578-1,441) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Atezolizumab+ChT </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0,826 (0,587-1,162) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0,73 (0,463-1,151) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Durvalumab+ChT </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0,987 (0,698-1,397) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0,802 (0,49-1,313) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Durvalumab+ ChT+Olaparib </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1,101 (0,7-1,733) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1,058 (0,636-1,761) </c></r></tblbdy></tbl></p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>No clinically or statistically meaningful differences were observed between the evaluated PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor combinations in patients with pMMR advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer. Among them, the regimen combining durvalumab and olaparib showed a higher toxicity over the others options which only add one drug to chemotherapy, suggesting limited added clinical value.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. Alegre-Del Rey EJ, F&eacute;nix-Caballero S, Casta&ntilde;o-Lara R, Sierra-Garc&iacute;a F. Assessment and positioning of drugs as equivalent therapeutic alternatives. <I>Med Clin(Barc).</I> 2014;<b>143</b>(2):85&ndash;90.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mora Cortes, M., Fenix Caballero, S., Reyes-De La Mata, Y., Cano Martinez, G., Alegre-Del Rey, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.413</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.413</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-316 Indirect treatment comparison of anti-PD-1/L1 plus chemotherapy in advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer with proficient mismatch repair]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A204</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A205</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A205-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-317 Measuring the administrative impact of a specialist clinical pharmacist at a neonatal intensive care unit of a teaching hospital in Oman using key performance indicators]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A205-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>The neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) is a high-risk environment where medication management requires precision, evidence-based protocols and interdisciplinary collaboration. The integration of clinical pharmacists into the NICU team has been shown to optimise pharmacotherapy and improve therapeutic outcomes, however, their administrative impact is under studied.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This study aimed to measure the administrative impact of specialist clinical pharmacist using defined key performance indicators (KPIs) that reflect contribution beyond direct patient care.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>This study took place at Sultan Qaboos University hospital (SQUH), a tertiary care teaching institution, with a 24-bed NICU. A retrospective review of pharmacist led initiatives over a period of 18 months (Jan 2024 - Jun 2025) was conducted using targeted KPIs. These KPIs were based on existing SQUH pharmacy practice standards and were adopted from international standards (eg, ASHP, ISMP). Data across five administrative domains including: formulary additions, guideline development, staff education, pharmacovigilance and Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) prophylaxis planning were captured. Data were collected from pharmacy &amp; therapeutics committee records and electronic patient records (EPR). Descriptive statistics (frequencies and percentages) were used to analyse KPI metrics.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Five new key neonatal medications were added to formulary including: probiotics (Proprems sachets), 40% oral glucose gel, injection bumetanide, sirolimus solution and ready to mix standard total parenteral nutrition (TPN) solutions. Six neonatal clinical guidelines were developed during the study period; HIV prophylaxis, probiotics prescribing and administration, management of hypoglycaemia, inhaled steroids prescribing, fluconazole prophylaxis and TPN administration guide. Twenty ADRs were detected and documented on a designated form within the EPR, primarily involving caffeine (N=4, 20%), and fluconazole (N=2, 10%). The pharmacist coordinated RSV prophylaxis protected 152 at risk infants during the RSV seasons, and enabled accurate forecasting of palivizumab requirements for the next season with 10% estimation margins. A structured course on TPN was designed and delivered to nurses and dietitians, with pre- and post-course assessments showing an increase in knowledge scores in 88%, and improved confidence in TPN management in 96% of the participants (N=57).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The use of targeted KPIs provides objective evidence of the administrative impact of a specialist clinical pharmacist in the NICU.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. https://doi.org/10.1136/ejhpharm-2017-001432</p><p>2. https://doi.org/10.18549/PharmPract.2022.3.2708</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taqi, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.414</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.414</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-317 Measuring the administrative impact of a specialist clinical pharmacist at a neonatal intensive care unit of a teaching hospital in Oman using key performance indicators]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A205</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A205</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A205-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-318 Database discordance in oncohematology drug interactions: a four-source comparison]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A205-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Drug&ndash;drug interactions (DDIs) are a major safety concern in oncology. These interactions may arise from pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic mechanisms, potentially compromising the efficacy and safety of both anticancer and concomitant therapies. Although several studies have compared drug interaction databases or focused on oral antineoplastic agents, there is still no universal or standardised tool to comprehensively assess DDIs.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The aim of this study is to compare the identification and classification of potential DDIs between oncohematological treatments and patients&rsquo; chronic medications across four commonly used databases.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A prospective study with retrospective data collection was conducted. A total of 386 oral and intravenous oncohematological prescriptions were recorded in August 2025, and the 40 most frequently prescribed active ingredients (AIs) were selected. Concomitant chronic medications were obtained from electronic prescription records, identifying the 20 most commonly prescribed AIs. Each home medication was systematically compared with the 40 oncohematological agents in four databases (DrugBank , OncoAssist , UpToDate and Micromedex ). All identified interactions were recorded and classified according to severity (major, moderate, minor) and clinical consequence (reduced effectiveness or increased risk of toxicity). The Fleiss&rsquo; kappa coefficient was used to assess the strength of agreement in DDI severity classification among the four databases and it was interpreted according to Landis and Koch&rsquo;s criteria.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A summary table including the 40 oncohematological and 20 chronic medication AIs was created. DrugBank detected the largest number of DDIs (261: 86 minor, 85 moderate, 90 major), followed by OncoAssist (156: 16 minor, 100 moderate, 40 major). UpToDate detected 67 DDIs (7 minor, 58 moderate, 2 major), and Micromedex detected 28 (5 moderate, 23 major). Regarding clinical consequences, DrugBank reported 217 DDIs associated with increased toxicity and 44 with reduced effectiveness; OncoAssist reported 123 and 33, UpToDate 41 and 31, and Micromedex 20 and 8, respectively. The Fleiss&rsquo; kappa coefficient for DDI detection was 0.145 (95% CI: 0.126&ndash;0.165; p&lt;0.001), indicating slight inter-database agreement.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>There is considerable variability among DDI databases regarding the detection and classification of potential interactions in oncohematological prescriptions. To ensure patient safety, a multidisciplinary, case-by-case evaluation is crucial to support safe and individualised therapeutic decisions.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Txintxurreta, A., Perez Cordon, L., Merino Mendez, R., Sancho Riba, M., Vilurbina Perez, J., Tincu, S., Sala Pinol, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.415</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.415</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-318 Database discordance in oncohematology drug interactions: a four-source comparison]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A205</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A206</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A206-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-319 Impact of tezepelumab on oral corticosteroid-treated exacerbations and hospitalisations in severe asthma: real-world single-centre data]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A206-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Tezepelumab blocks thymic stromal lymphopoietin and reduces severe asthma exacerbations across phenotypes. Real-world data help quantify effectiveness in routine practice.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To assess changes in oral corticosteroid (OCS)&ndash;treated exacerbations and hospitalisations during the first year after tezepelumab initiation in clinical practice.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Retrospective, single-centre cohort of adults who initiated tezepelumab from November 2023 to September 2025. Demographics, dispensing dates, line of biologic therapy, glucocorticoid-treated exacerbations, identified by pharmacy prescription-claim refills for oral corticosteroid (OCS) bursts in the year before and the first year after initiation, and asthma-related hospitalisations were extracted from electronic records. Within-patient pre/post comparisons were summarised overall and in a predefined subgroup with &ge;12 months&rsquo; follow-up.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Fifty-one patients were included (mean age 58.5&plusmn;13.2 years; 62.7% male). Tezepelumab was used as first-line in 25/52 (48.1%), second-line in 15/52 (28.8%), and third-line or later in 12/52 (23.1%). Median time of treatment prescription was 12.6 months (IQR 4&ndash;17.2).</p><p>Overall (paired n=51), the annualised OCS-treated exacerbations rate decreased from 2 to 0.49 events/patient-year (nai&#x0308;ve rate ratio [RR] 0.25). Among those with &ge;12 months&rsquo; follow-up (n=22), OCS-treated exacerbations fell from 1.5 to 0.41 (RR 0.27). After one year, 68.6% had zero OCS-treated exacerbations and 84.1% achieved &ge;50% reduction. Hospitalisations (mean per patient over each 1-year window) were 0.52 before vs 0.19 after overall; in the &ge;12-month subgroup, 0.23 before vs 0.05 after. Thirteen patients (25.0%) discontinued tezepelumab; 7/52 (13.5%) initiated another biologic &ndash;omalizumab (n=3), dupilumab (n=2), mepolizumab (n=1), and benralizumab (n=1). One death unrelated to tezepelumab occurred during follow-up.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>In this single-centre cohort, tezepelumab was associated with substantial reductions in OCS-treated exacerbations during the first treatment year and with concurrent decreases in asthma-related hospitalisations, with effects evident among patients followed for &ge;12 months. Larger, multicentre studies with longer follow-up are warranted.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baez, N., Nunez Garcia, M., Rodriguez Ramallo, H., Gonzalez Martinez, M., Sierra Sanchez, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.416</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.416</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-319 Impact of tezepelumab on oral corticosteroid-treated exacerbations and hospitalisations in severe asthma: real-world single-centre data]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A206</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A206</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A206-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-320 The role of artificial intelligence in the control of antibiotic resistance]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A206-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Antibiotic resistance is a phenomenon associated with the inappropriate use of antibiotics, whereby microorganisms acquire resistance to the pharmacological mechanism of action, making the resulting infections more difficult to treat. To address this issue, the World Health Organization (WHO) has released the AWARE manual, which classifies antibiotics into three categories: Access (antibiotics with a narrow-spectrum of activity and a favourable safety profile, recommended for the treatment of common infections), Watch (broad-spectrum antibiotics reserved for specific clinical scenarios) and Reserve (antibiotics used as a last-resort for infections caused by multidrug-resistant organisms).</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The general objective of this study is to counteract antibiotic resistance by promoting appropriate prescribing practices through the adoption of targeted models and the implementation of effective control measures. The specific objective is to reduce bacterial resistance and healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) by encouraging the use of artificial intelligence (AI) by clinicians and pharmacists as a decision support tool aimed at minimising prescribing errors.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>In the last quarter of 2025, the prescribing trends of antibiotics such as piperacillin/tazobactam and ceftriaxone were evaluated in the general surgery and internal medicine departments during the period prior to the implementation of antibiotic request forms. The analysis revealed an increase in prescriptions for pneumonia and sepsis, with a total of 45 requests for piperacillin/tazobactam and 121 for ceftriaxone. The objective was to assess prescribing appropriateness and the corresponding antibiogram in collaboration with clinicians, in order to prevent resistance phenomena and inappropriate prescriptions.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Following the implementation of these prescription request protocols, a significant reduction of approximately 50% in prescriptions for the two antibiotics evaluated was observed relative to the preceding period. In a near-future scenario, the integration of artificial intelligence in diagnostic processes is projected to result in a 25.4% decrease in antibiotic prescriptions, thereby mitigating the issue of overprescribing.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Digital platforms and mobile applications represent the future for enhancing therapeutic decision-making; however, they will never replace the decisions made by the Infection Control Team (CIO) in ensuring the most appropriate therapeutic approach.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gargiulo, L., Izzo, M., Fico, R., Cantone, R., Di Paola, M., Dacunzo, A., Marotta, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.417</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.417</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-320 The role of artificial intelligence in the control of antibiotic resistance]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A206</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A206</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A207-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-321 Serotonin syndrome in an elderly patient on dual antidepressant therapy: a case report]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A207-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Serotonin syndrome (SS) is an uncommon potentially life-threatening adverse drug reaction caused by excessive serotonergic activity, usually related to drug interactions or high-dose antidepressant therapy. In older adults, diagnosis is particularly challenging due to atypical presentations, multiple comorbidities, and polypharmacy. Pharmacists play a key role in identifying drug-related risks and supporting early recognition.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To describe the case of an 81-year-old man admitted after traumatic brain injury associated with hypotension, with a history of atrial fibrillation on rivaroxaban and bisoprolol, hypertension, prior ischaemic stroke without sequelae, and depression treated with clomipramine 150 mg/day and venlafaxine 300 mg/day. Relevant comorbidities included benign prostatic hyperplasia and orthostatic hypotension.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>During hospitalisation, the patient developed fever &gt;39 &deg;C, progressive somnolence, generalised tremor, and rigidity. Laboratory tests showed CK 9100 U/L, AST 883 U/L, ALT 391 U/L, creatinine 1.87 mg/dL, and hypernatraemia. EEG excluded seizures. Considering his medication history, SS was suspected. Neuroleptic malignant syndrome was considered less likely due to the absence of antipsychotics, though CK elevation and rigidity raised diagnostic uncertainty. Empirical therapy with oral cyproheptadine (12 mg initial dose followed by 2 mg every 2 h, maximum 32 mg/day) was started together with supportive measures. Bromocriptine was later added to cover potential diagnostic overlap.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Over the following days, the patient showed progressive clinical improvement: fever resolved, myoclonus decreased, consciousness and orientation improved, and CK values declined. After psychiatric consultation, antidepressant therapy was switched to desvenlafaxine due to its lower risk of orthostatic hypotension and serotonergic toxicity. Beta-blocker therapy was also adjusted to minimise hypotensive episodes. The patient continued recovery in a rehabilitation unit.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>This case highlights the diagnostic complexity of SS in geriatric patients under polypharmacy, particularly when dual antidepressant therapy is involved. Clinical overlap with other syndromes, such as neuroleptic malignant syndrome, can delay recognition. Pharmacist involvement in medication review was crucial to identify the causative agents and propose safer alternatives. Early detection and tailored pharmacological management are essential to reduce morbidity in this vulnerable population.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Reyner Parra, A., Gozalo Esteve, I., Martinez Puig, P., Cabrera Pajaron, M., Perez Contel, A., Bueno Uceda, R., Rueda Perez, M., Gomez-Valent, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.418</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.418</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-321 Serotonin syndrome in an elderly patient on dual antidepressant therapy: a case report]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A207</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A207</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A207-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-322 Longitudinal analysis of lipid trends in severe hypercholesterolaemia treated with evinacumab: an eighteen-month observational cohort]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A207-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Severe hypercholesterolaemia often persists despite maximally tolerated lipid-lowering therapy. Evinacumab, an anti-angiopoietin-like protein 3 monoclonal antibody, lowers LDL-C via an LDL receptor&ndash;independent pathway. Real-world evidence from hospital practice remains limited.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To quantify longitudinal changes in lipid parameters with evinacumab in routine care and explore differences between monotherapy and combination therapy (statins/ezetimibe/PCSK9 inhibitors).<sup>1</sup>  </p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Single-centre, retrospective observational cohort at a tertiary-level hospital, including all patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (HoFH) treated with evinacumab 15 mg/kg IV every 4 weeks between February 2024 and September 2025. Patients were assessed at baseline (T0) and approximately 6, 12 and 18 months (T6, T12, T18). Outcomes were LDL-C (primary), total cholesterol (TC), HDL cholesterol (HDL-C) and triglycerides (TG). Statistical analysis used the Friedman test for repeated measures (T0&ndash;T18), paired Wilcoxon for T6/T12/T18 vs T0, and Mann-Whitney U tests for LDL-C% change between monotherapy and polytherapy (two-sided &alpha;=0.05). Mean (SD) is reported for continuous variables.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Thirteen patients were included. Mean LDL-C fell from 283.7&plusmn;87.8 mg/dL (T0) to 148.0&plusmn;78.3 (T6), 121.6&plusmn;44.5 (T12) and 101.0&plusmn;36.5 (T18); Friedman <sup>2</sup>=14.953, p=0.0019. Median paired change vs T0: T6 &ndash;80 mg/dL (&ndash;49.5%), p=0.0010; T12 &ndash;133 mg/dL (&ndash;57.7%), p=0.0020; T18 &ndash;180 mg/dL (&ndash;64.6%), p=0.0156. TC decreased from 364.1&plusmn;119.8 to 188.3&plusmn;78.3, 158.9&plusmn;45.9 and 139.0&plusmn;38.0 mg/dL (<sup>2</sup>=15.469; p=0.0015), with significant paired reductions at all timepoints (all p&le;0.001 except T18 p=0.0156). HDL-C declined from 42.7&plusmn;12.0 to 30.3&plusmn;7.0, 28.2&plusmn;7.3 and 28.3&plusmn;6.0 mg/dL (<sup>2</sup>=8.773; p=0.0325); paired changes were significant at T6 (&ndash;15 mg/dL, &ndash;30.7%, p=0.0068) and T12 (&ndash;15 mg/dL, &ndash;38.9%, p=0.0049). TG decreased from 85.1&plusmn;52.4 to 49.5&plusmn;21.4, 45.9&plusmn;20.3 and 47.9&plusmn;24.6 mg/dL (<sup>2</sup>=7.836; p=0.0495), with significant paired reductions at T12 (p=0.041) and T18 (p=0.031). Percentage LDL-C reduction did not differ significantly between monotherapy and polytherapy at T12 (median &ndash;54.1% [n=2] vs &ndash;58.1% [n=9]; p=0.909) or T18 (&ndash;67.0% [n=2] vs &ndash;64.3% [n=5]; p=0.857).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Evinacumab produced large and statistically significant LDL-C and TC reductions up to 18 months. Percentage LDL-C lowering appeared similar in monotherapy and polytherapy, although subgroup sizes were small. These findings support evinacumab as an effective option for severe hypercholesterolaemia and warrant confirmation in larger cohorts with systematic safety capture and predefined lipid targets.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. Cuchel M, <I>et al.Eur Heart J.</I> 2023;<b>44</b>:2277&ndash;2293.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Perrotta, N., Fiorito, L., Casini, G., Coluccia, A., Amato, G., Scopetti, C., Centioni, G., Polito, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.419</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.419</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-322 Longitudinal analysis of lipid trends in severe hypercholesterolaemia treated with evinacumab: an eighteen-month observational cohort]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A207</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A208</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A208-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-323 Evaluation of factors affecting meropenem exposure and target attainment in critically ill patients on ECMO]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A208-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) may impact the pharmacokinetics of &beta;-lactams and dose adjustments might be necessary to achieve therapeutic target attainment (TA).</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To assess variables influencing meropenem pharmacokinetics and TA in critically ill patients undergoing ECMO.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Adult ICU patients (&gt;18 years) at a tertiary hospital receiving meropenem 2g q8h(3h-infusion) under ECMO were prospectively enrolled (May 2022-August 2025). Trough serum concentrations (Cmin) at steady-state were measured using High-Performance Liquid Chromatography-Ultraviolet. TA was defined as Cmin&gt;16 mg/L (4x minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) for <I>Acinetobacter spp</I>, according to EUCAST breakpoints). Results are reported as n(%) for categorical variables and median (IQR) for continuous variables. Statistical analyses were conducted with Jamovi software using t-test or Mann&ndash;Whitney U, and with chi-square or Fisher&rsquo;s exact test.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 23 patients (56.5% male) were included. Eight patients (34.8%) achieved TA, and within this group, 62.5% were female. For analysis, patients were classified according to target attainment: TA group(Cmin 32.3[26.1&ndash;51.8]) and non-TA group(Cmin 6.7[3.9&ndash;8.3]).</p><p>No significant differences were found between TA and non-TA groups in sex (37.5% vs 66.7% male), age (55.7[53.1-62.7] vs 46.0[37.2-57.8] years), BMI (29.0[25.6-29.0] vs (26.9[23.6-30.5]), ECMO type (75% vs 93,3% veno-venous), or sampling time relative to meropenem initiation and circuit change. Clinical factors (obesity, mechanical ventilation, vasopressor use) showed no impact on TA, with similar outcomes in ECMO and 30-day mortality. Significant differences in serum creatinine (1.24 mg/dL TA vs 0.55 mg/dL non-TA; p=0.003) were observed between groups. Glomerular filtration rate(GFR) was estimated using CKD-EPI, Cockcroft-Gault, and MDRD-6 equations. CKD-EPI showed the strongest, though weak,inverse correlation with Cmin (r = &ndash;0.390), suggesting it only partially explained the variability. No patients with GFR&gt;130 mL/min achieved TA, likely due to an augmented renal clearance. Diuresis was approximately twice as high in the non-TA group compared to the TA group (3186 mL/day vs 1657 mL/day; p=0.01). All patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy achieved TA.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Results show that TA achievement is mainly influenced by renal function parameters, with higher GFR and increased diuresis associated with non-TA. These findings suggest that many patients may be underdosed, highlighting the need for further research on optimal dosing strategies in ECMO patients.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Moreno-Pena, N., Pau-Parra, A., Domenech-Moral, L., Nuvials-Casals, X., Sosa-Garay, M., Hontalba-Rifa, A., Castellote-Belles, L., Villena-Ortiz, Y., Gorgas-Torner, M., Riera-Del Brio, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.420</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.420</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-323 Evaluation of factors affecting meropenem exposure and target attainment in critically ill patients on ECMO]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A208</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A208</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A208-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-324 Effectiveness and safety of weight-based pembrolizumab dosing in the neoadjuvant treatment of triple-negative breast cancer: real-world evidence versus pivotal trials]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A208-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Pembrolizumab, an anti&ndash;PD-1 monoclonal antibody, has demonstrated a significant improvement in pathological complete response (pCR) rates, assessed by the residual cancer burden (RCB) index, when used in the neoadjuvant treatment of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) at a fixed dose (200 mg every 3 weeks) in pivotal trials such as KEYNOTE-522.</p><p>In our routine clinical practice, pembrolizumab is administered using a weight-based regimen (2 mg/kg every 3 weeks), a strategy that may optimise drug exposure and healthcare resource use while maintaining clinical efficacy and safety.</p><p>However, comparative real-world data on this dosing strategy are remain limited.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To assess the effectiveness and safety of weight-based pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced or early-stage TNBC with high recurrence risk, and to compare these real-world outcomes with those reported in pivotal fixed dose trials.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective, observational study was conducted at a tertiary hospital between October 2023 and September 2025. All patients receiving neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy for TNBC were included. Clinical data were obtained from electronic medical records and the hospital prescribing system.</p><p>Effectiveness was evaluated by pCR rate using the RCB index. Safety was assessed by recording adverse events and grading them according to CTCAE v5.0.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Forty-three female patients were included, with a median age of 55 years (range 27&ndash;81). At data cut-off, 34 patients had completed neoadjuvant therapy and surgery.</p><p>The pCR rate (RCB 0) was 65%; 6% had minimal residual disease (RCB 1), 20% moderate (RCB 2) and 9% extensive (RCB 3).</p><p>Grade &ge;3 toxicities occurred in 65% of patients, mainly neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anaemia and mucositis, leading to cycle delays in 59% of patients and dose reductions in 20%.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Weight-based pembrolizumab dosing achieved pCR and safety results consistent with those from the KEYNOTE-522 trial using fixed dosing. This supports weight-based dosing as a clinically effective and economically sustainable approach for neoadjuvant TNBC treatment in European real-world settings.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bodas, S., Guerrero, M., Rosado, M., Lara, C., Olaizola, I., Jerez, P., Bernardez, M., Yuste, D., Pinel, A., Miguelez, M., Ruiz, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.421</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.421</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-324 Effectiveness and safety of weight-based pembrolizumab dosing in the neoadjuvant treatment of triple-negative breast cancer: real-world evidence versus pivotal trials]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A208</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A209</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A209-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-325 Results of implementing an efficiency-based migraine treatment protocol]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A209-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Migraine is one of the main pathologies in hospital pharmaceutical expenditure. Due to the high cost of these drugs, the increase in diagnoses, and the marketing of new therapeutic alternatives, hospital pharmacists must play a very important role in creating protocols that guarantee budgetary sustainability.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>Analyse the degree of compliance with the migraine protocol established in a hospital following the introduction of the oral anti-migraine drug Rimegepant and the economic impact of implementing the protocol.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>All migraine medication prescriptions between March 2023 and March 2025 were retrospectively analysed and a comparative study was conducted between the periods with and without the protocol (April 2023 to March 2024 versus April 2024 to March 2025).</p><p>The protocol established the first-line use of rimegepant, followed by eptinezumab, fremanezumab, erenumab, and galcanezumab.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>During the period without a protocol, 26 treatments were initiated(8 with eptinezumab, 6 with erenumab, 9 with fremanezumab, and 3 with galcanezumab). Subsequently, with the protocol in place, treatment was initiated in 30 patients (20 with rimegepant, 5 with eptinezumab, 3 with fremanezumab, and 2 with galcanezumab). In terms of treatment changes after implementation, there were 8 line changes to rimegepant: 5 changed from erenumab, 2 from galcanezumab, and 1 from galcanezumab. There were 11 line changes to eptinezumab: 5 from erenumab, 4 from galcanezumab, and 2 from fremanezumab. Theoverall degree of compliance with the protocol was 66.67%, and the savings, the cost of choosing thebest option, have been 20,480 since the implementation of theprotocol in the study period.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Our results show a high degree of compliance with the protocol as well as significant economic savings based on its implementation. In addition, the conditions of many patients already undergoing treatment improved when switching from subcutaneous to oral treatment.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Castillejo, R., Lao Dominguez, F., Moreno Ramos, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.422</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.422</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-325 Results of implementing an efficiency-based migraine treatment protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A209</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A209</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A209-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-326 Pharmaceutical optimisation of anticonvulsant therapy in critically ill trauma patients]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A209-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>The trauma intensive care unit (ICU) is a complex environment for the management and prevention of seizures due to safety of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and pharmacokinetic changes of the targeted population.</p><p>These AEDs are known for clinically significant adverse effects, especially with drugs that have narrow therapeutic range such as sodium valproate, thus requiring therapeutic drug monitoring. On the other hand, drugs like phenobarbital and carbamazepine are potent enzyme inducers of many molecules and therefore can alter the pharmacokinetics of co-administered drugs.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To describe and evaluate pharmaceutical interventions related to antiepileptic therapy in trauma ICU patients.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>We conducted a prospective observational study over a period of six months in a trauma ICU. The pharmaceutical interventions related to AEDs therapy were documented and discussed with the medical team, with the acceptance rate recorded. We categorised interventions as drug addition, discontinuation, substitution, drug monitoring, adverse effect management, and formulation switch. Drug-related problems were classified as issues related to dosing problem, drug&ndash;drug interactions, drug monitoring, inappropriate formulation, and therapeutic inefficacy. Interventions were documented and analysed in an Excel sheet.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The pharmacist performed 64 interventions related to antiepileptic therapy on 33 patients (85% male, median age 30.5 [24, 52.5] years). The most frequent categories included dose adjustment (48.5%), drug discontinuation (20%), and addition of an antiepileptic (12.5%). Among drug problems that were recorded we mention primarily therapeutic inefficacy (28%), drug-drug interactions (28%) and adverse drug reactions (19%). Antiepileptic drugs that were involved in these drug problems were represented majorly by sodium valproate (32%), phenobarbital (31%) and levetiracetam (22%). The acceptance rate for these interventions was approximately 90%.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>In our study, the pharmacist helped with antiepileptic challenges when it comes to therapeutic inefficacy by either adding another antiepileptic, or adjusting to a higher dose. Drug-drug reactions were frequently seen with the association of sodium valproate and carbapenems, which led to inefficacy of the antiepileptic and required substitution with another antiepileptic like levetiracetam. Our findings show the importance of integrating a clinical pharmacist in a multidisciplinary ICU team to ensure efficacy and safety of antiepileptics in a sensitive population.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hida, A., Benabbes, M., Alami Chentoufi, M., Aberouch, L., Faroudy, M., El Alaoui, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.423</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.423</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-326 Pharmaceutical optimisation of anticonvulsant therapy in critically ill trauma patients]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A209</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A210</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A210-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-327 Implementation of clinical pharmacy in oncology: a good practice to optimise treatment safety and efficacy]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A210-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Clinical pharmacy has become an essential component of multidisciplinary care, improving treatment safety and therapeutic outcomes across various medical fields, including oncology. However, in many settings, prescriptions are still validated without direct pharmacist involvement, which may increase the risk of medication errors and drug-related problems (DRPs), especially among polymedicated and immunocompromised patients. Implementing clinical pharmacy services in oncology can help bridge this gap by ensuring safer prescribing practices and adherence to therapeutic guidelines.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To assess the impact of integrating a clinical pharmacist into the oncology care team on the identification and resolution of drug-related problems (DRPs), and to promote safe, evidence-based prescribing practices</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A prospective study was conducted between March and September 2024. A clinical pharmacy intern performed daily prescription reviews using a validated analysis tool. Interventions were carried out both reactively (suggesting changes after prescription) and proactively (discussing treatments during multidisciplinary rounds). All pharmaceutical interventions (PIs) were documented, classified according to DRP type and drug class, and acceptance by physicians was recorded.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 456 prescriptions were analysed, leading to 278 PIs (intervention rate 61%). Physicians accepted 77% of PIs, of which 32% were proactive. The most frequent DRPs concerned guideline non-compliance (24%), adverse effects (18%), and untreated indications (16%). Anti-infectives (41%) and antineoplastics (19%) were the most implicated drug classes. The integration of clinical pharmacy demonstrated measurable benefits in medication safety and adherence to therapeutic standards.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>This pilot implementation highlights the feasibility and clinical relevance of integrating clinical pharmacy in oncology within a low-resource setting. The initiative improved prescribing safety and interprofessional collaboration, in line with EAHP Statement 4.1. Sustainability will require formal pharmacist positions, ongoing training, and the extension of this model to other hospital departments.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benmoussa, I., Bourhafour, M., Sahraoui, S., Mrani Alaoui, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.424</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.424</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-327 Implementation of clinical pharmacy in oncology: a good practice to optimise treatment safety and efficacy]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A210</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A210</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A210-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-328 Developing a screening toll for fall-risk-increasing drugs in a Danish hospital]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A210-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>At least one in four adults aged 65 or older experience a fall every year making falls a major health problem. Many factors can influence the risk of falling; among them is medication one of the adjustable factors. Identifying at-risk patients may prevent medication-related falls. We aimed to develop a list of FRIDs, which can be used as a screening tool to identify patients at risk of falling in Danish hospital.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The study aimed to develop a screening tool of fall-risk-increasing drugs (FRIDs) to be used in medication reviews. A systematic review was conducted to identify FRIDs to be included in the tool.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A systematic review was performed using PubMed and Embase including studies that developed, updated, or validated tools, models, or guidelines with FRIDs. To enhance applicability in Danish healthcare setting, only drugs used by &ge;2.500 people in Denmark in 2024 were included. The identified drugs were scored (max 6 points) based on strength of evidence and fall-related side effects listed in Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPCs). Evidence was rated by frequency of mention of drugs, recency, and tool methodology. Drugs cited in &ge;10 tools and supported by both predictive and consensus methods received the highest evidence score. The selection of fall-related side effects was based on those identified in previous studies that assessed fall risk through SmPCs.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 15 different tools, models, and recommendations assessing FRIDs were identified. The developed FRIDs screening tool contained 113 drugs. The majority affects the central nervous system (52.2%) or the cardiovascular system (27.4%). The FRIDs were grouped by their potential to cause falls. In total 53 (46.9%) drugs were classified as low risk FRIDs, 26 (23.0%) drugs as medium risk FRIDs and 34 (30.1%) drugs as high risk FRIDs.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>This developed FRIDs screening tool may help reduce medication-related falls. The screening tool should be tested in a Danish hospital. Potentially through integration in the electronic health record, where it could provide trigger alerts for patients prescribed multiple fall-risk-increasing drugs.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Schlu&#x0308;nsen, M., Julie, S., Kjeldsen, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.425</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.425</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-328 Developing a screening toll for fall-risk-increasing drugs in a Danish hospital]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A210</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A210</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A211-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-329 Evaluation of adherence to apalutamide treatment in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A211-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Adherence to oral oncologic therapy is crucial to achieve therapeutic goals. However, long-term treatments in elderly patients may reduce adherence, particularly when the dosing regimen is complex.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The objective of this study was to assess whether simplifying the dosing regimen (four 60 mg tablets vs one 240 mg tablet once daily) could influence adherence to apalutamide treatment in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC).</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A single-centre observational study was conducted between April and December 2024. Patients diagnosed with mHSPC receiving full-dose apalutamide and followed in the outpatient oncology pharmacy unit were included if they initially received the 60 mg presentation (four tablets daily) and later switched to the 240 mg presentation (1 tablet daily).Exclusion criteria were: language barrier, end-of-life situation, treatment change due to disease progression, and dose reduction due to toxicity.Sociodemographic (age) and pharmacotherapeutic data (treatment duration, polypharmacy, adverse reactions, adherence, administration) were collected through in-person or telephone interviews with patients and/or caregivers, and by reviewing electronic medical records.Adherence was assessed using the Morisky-Green questionnaire (MMAS-4). Patients were considered adherent if they answered correctly to all four questions (No/Yes/No/No). The questionnaire was first administered with the 60 mg presentation and later after switching to the 240 mg tablet. In non-adherent patients, adherence-enhancing strategies were implemented (pill organisers, mobile phone reminders).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>37 patients were interviewed, with a median age of 71 years (interquartile range 66&ndash;78). The mean duration of apalutamide treatment was 773 days. Polypharmacy was observed in 84% of patients, 81% were over 65 years old, and 35% reported adverse reactions, mainly fatigue, hot flashes, and pruritus.According to Morisky-Green questionnaire responses, adherence was 81% with the 60 mg (four-tablet) presentation and 89% with the 240 mg (1 tablet) presentation. Regarding administration, 100% of patients reported greater convenience with the single-tablet regimen and no difficulty swallowing it, despite its larger size compared with the 60 mg tablets.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Optimising the dosing regimen by reducing tablet burden, together with the use of adherence-enhancing strategies, may have positively contributed to improved treatment adherence.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. EuropeanPublicAssessmentReport(EPAR) de Erleada (apalutamida). Procedimiento: EMEA/H/C/004452/II/0001. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/variation-report/erleada-h-c-4452-ii-0001-epar-assessment-report-variation_en-0.pdf</p><p>2. Ficha t&eacute;cnica de Erleada (apalutamida). https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/erleada-epar-product-information_es.pdf</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martinez Madrid, M., Sevilla Alarcon, E., Bejar, A. V., Lago Ballester, F., Moya Flores, J., Marin andreu, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.426</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.426</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-329 Evaluation of adherence to apalutamide treatment in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A211</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A211</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A211-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-330 Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in oncology: improving outcomes]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A211-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>The risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), in cancer patients is approximately 2-6 times higher than in the general population. This risk is multifactorial and varies with tumour location and type, administered therapy, and patient characteristics.</p><p>Chemotherapy increases this risk by 6,5 times, having a significant impact on quality of life, disease prognosis, and the ability to adhere to the treatment plan. To reduce the incidence of VTE and as part of the responsibility of the Hospital Pharmacist to contribute to achieving optimal health outcomes, the use of the Khorana Risk Score (KRS) has been implemented for all patients with gastric or pancreatic cancer undergoing chemotherapy in our institution.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>Pharmacist-led evaluation and analysis of VTE risk in patients with gastric or pancreatic cancer using the KRS;</p><p>Optimisation of prophylactic VTE therapy for high-risk oncological patients.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Were included patients with stomach or pancreatic cancer undergoing treatment from Feb. 2022 to Jan. 2025 in the oncology day hospital.</p><p>The VTE was assessed using the KRS. For patients with a KRS &ge;3, it was verified through the clinical process whether they were or were not under prophylactic therapy for VTE.</p><p>In patients with an indication and without therapy, the physician was contacted to initiate therapy, provided there were no clinical contraindications.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>105 patients were enrolled: 64 males and 41 females, with a mean age of 68 years, comprising 76 with gastric cancer and 29 with pancreatic cancer.</p><p>Among the 105 patients, 48 had a KRS &ge; 3, yet only 17 of these were undergoing prophylactic anticoagulant or lacked an indication for it.</p><p>27 pharmaceutical interventions were implemented with the aim of thromboprophylaxis.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>It is recommended to assess the risk of VTE in all cancer patients before starting treatment and periodically throughout.</p><p>The therapeutic criteria for VTE prophylaxis and its duration in cancer patients are needs to be consensual, and models need to be developed, and independently validated.</p><p>It is crucial to raise awareness among the entire multidistiplinary team about this issue and to establish a uniform and structured record of VTE risk assessment within the institution, aiming to promote a culture of patient safety.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Caine, G., Landeira, N., Pereira, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.427</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.427</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-330 Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in oncology: improving outcomes]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A211</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A211</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A212-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-331 Post-implantation patient education on implantable medical devices by hospital pharmacists: a systematic review]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A212-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>According to the French Society of Clinical Pharmacy, pharmaceutical consultations are structured exchanges between patients and pharmacists, aimed at collecting relevant clinical information and reinforcing counselling, prevention, and therapeutic education. These consultations empower patients to actively manage their condition and improve understanding of their disease and their medical care. They are increasingly implemented in postoperative settings, particularly following transplantation. As patients implanted with medical devices present similar needs, extending pharmacist-led consultations to this population appears relevant.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the content, feasibility, and impact of hospital pharmacist-led education provided to patients after implantation of medical devices.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A systematic review was conducted in June 2025 in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the French University Documentation System. Eligible studies included pharmacist-led interventions addressing implantable devices, surgery, and patient education, published in English or French within the past 20 years. Studies were excluded if pharmacists were not involved in post-implantation education.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The search retrieved 3,438 records. 11 studies met the inclusion criteria: two published in English, four in French journals, four French pharmacy theses, and one conference abstract. All were single-centre prospective studies, including four with a comparative design. All studies were conducted in France, with durations ranging from 3 to 6 months. Implants included orthopaedic devices (8), cardiac devices (4), PICC-Lines (2), neurostimulators (1) and Port-a-Cath (1).</p><p>On average, 91 patients were eligible per study, with 48 included, mainly due to limited pharmacist availability. Mean patient age was 64 years. Consultations lasted on average 44 minutes (18&ndash;105 minutes) and were conducted between day 1 and 7 post-implantation. Follow-up evaluations occurred between 2 days and 3 months post-consultation, using questionnaires of 6 to 40 items covering implant knowledge, postoperative care, and potential complications. Educational tools included informational booklets and implant cards. Patient satisfaction was consistently high (95%).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>This review highlights the feasibility and value of hospital pharmacist-led post-implantation education. Consultations were well accepted and highly appreciated by patients, despite modest improvements in knowledge and limited pharmacist availability. Standardised educational approaches are needed to strengthen evidence and optimise the pharmacist&rsquo;s role in the postoperative care pathway.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Boughanem, C., Micard, S., Pieyre, M., Antignac, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.428</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.428</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-331 Post-implantation patient education on implantable medical devices by hospital pharmacists: a systematic review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A212</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A212</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A212-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4CPS-332 Less is more - deprescribing in the cardiac surgery department]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A212-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Patients undergoing cardiac surgery frequently present with multiple comorbidities. Given their average age of 66 years and the fact that they are prescribed numerous concomitant medications, they are consequently at heightened risk of adverse drug reactions.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The primary objective was to enhance the safety of pharmacotherapy by resolving drug-related problems. The secondary objective was to identify the most frequent and effective interventions undertaken by clinical pharmacists in the Cardiac Surgery Department.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Two clinical pharmacists conducted medication reviews over a six-month period (from 1.03.2025 to 31.08.2025) for 322 patients in the Cardiac Surgery Department.</p><p>All identified drug-related problems were classified according to the PCNE (Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe) system. Recommended interventions were discussed directly with cardiac surgeons and, if accepted, implemented.</p><p>The pharmacists also delivered 12 training sessions to the cardiac surgery team. The level of satisfaction with the collaboration between the cardiac surgery team and the pharmacists was assessed using a survey.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 268 interventions were made for 113 patients. 209 patients needed no intervention. Deprescribing was one of the most effective interventions, accounting for 40% of all interventions (106 in total) and resulting in a reduced medication list for 66 patients. Additionally, 11% of all interventions involved medication substitution (i.e. deprescribing and prescribing a more suitable medication).</p><p>The three most frequently deprescribed medication groups were as follows:</p><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Hypnotics and anxiolytics (particularly benzodiazepines and non&ndash;benzodiazepine "Z&ndash;drugs&rsquo;) &ndash; 25% (27 interventions)</p></li><li><p>Antihypertensives &ndash; 12% (13 interventions)</p></li><li><p>Antibiotics &ndash; 9% (10 interventions)</p></li></l></p><p>27% (n=29) of deprescribing interventions were related to duplication of therapeutic groups or active ingredients, or to the use of unnecessary drugs for the same indication.</p><p>88% (n=93) of deprescribing interventions were accepted and implemented.</p><p>88% (n=7) of the cardiac surgery team members assessed the influence of clinical pharmacists on improving the quality of pharmacotherapy as very positive or positive.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Integrating clinical pharmacists into the healthcare team can significantly improve pharmacotherapy for cardiac surgery patients, particularly by supporting effective deprescribing. The findings may be applied in other surgical departments to help improve the safety and effectiveness of pharmacotherapy.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lopata, M., Naw&#x0142;oka, M., Wrobel, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.429</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.429</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4CPS-332 Less is more - deprescribing in the cardiac surgery department]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A212</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A212</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A213-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-001 Statin potential deprestscription in institutionalised elderly patients]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A213-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Mortality reduction observed with statin lipid-lowering therapy for secondary prevention is not observed in primary prevention in patients over 75 years of age. Adverse reacctions are dose-dependent and may be more significant in the elderly.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>Review statin treatment in institutionalised elderly patients to identify prescriptions that meet institucional deprescription program criteria.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>An observational, cross-sectional study on July 2023, including all patients over 75 years of age institutionalised in a public nursing home, who are receiving statin treatment.</p><p>Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were collected using the computerised prescription program and electronic medical records. Indications and treatment doses were reviewed. The institucional deprescription program criteria excluded patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection and those diagnosed with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia. In patients with cardiovascular risk factors diagnosed with diabetes mellitus (DM) and/or arterial hypertension with chronic kidney disease (AHCKD), deprescription is not considered, but rather a reduction in therapy intensity.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Were on statin treatment 65 patients: 11 patients under 75 years of age (16.9%) were excluded, so 54 patient treatment was reviewed, 39 women (72%) with a mean age of 87 years.</p><p>Met the institucional deprescription criteria 20 of 54 reviewed patients (37%), all treatments indicated for primary prevention: 2 with high-intensity therapy, 9 with moderate-intensity, and 9 with low-intensity.</p><p>In 26 of 34 patients (48.1%) due to cardiovascular risk factors, deprescription was not considered , but intensity reduction was. Were indicated for primary prevention 19 treatments: 4 high-intensity treatments (2 DM diagnosed and 2 DM with AHCKD) and 10 moderate-intensity treatments (2 DM diagnosed, 4 with AHCKD and 4 with both pathologies). Were indicated for secondary prevention 7 treatments: 2 moderate-intensity treatments (DM diagnosed, and DM with AHCKD diagnosed) and 5 high-intensity treatment (AHCKD diagnosed and one of them also with DM diagnosed).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>More than 30% of reviewed treatments were prescribed for the primary prevention of cardiovascular events due to hypercholesterolaemia, where there is no evidence that statins reduce mortality, myocardial infarctions, or strokes; so they were susceptible to deprescription. Deprescribing these statin treatments would reduce the risk of adverse effects and interactions, and improve patients&lsquo; quality of life and system efficiency.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martinez Alvarez, E., De La Nogal Fernandez, B., Fernandez Cordon, A., Martinez, R., Alvarez Nunez, N., Garcia Lagunar, H., Garcia Mayo, M., Gonzalez Franco, R., Ferreras Lopez, N., Rodriguez Maria, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.430</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.430</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-001 Statin potential deprestscription in institutionalised elderly patients]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A213</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A213</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A213-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-002 Twelve years of clinical pharmacist-led adverse drug reaction reporting in oncology patients at a university hospital]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A213-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Pharmacovigilance is a key component of good clinical practice, particularly in the post-marketing phase when rare or unexpected adverse drug reactions (ADRs) may occur. Systematic ADR reporting is essential for patient safety in complex hospital care, where the risk is increased by polypharmacy and novel therapies used. Clinical pharmacists are well positioned to detect and report suspected ADRs, supporting early identification of safety signals, high-risk drugs, and vulnerable patient groups.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To describe and analyse the spectrum, frequency, and clinical relevance of suspected ADRs reported by a clinical pharmacist over twelve years in oncology patients in a tertiary care hospital, focusing on trends, most implicated drugs, and patient outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective analysis was conducted of all suspected ADRs in oncology patients that were identified and reported by a clinical pharmacist to the Czech State Institute for Drug Control between November 2013 and April 2025. Collected data included patient demographics, cancer type, drug and therapy category, ADR type and severity, clinical outcomes, and annual reporting trends. Descriptive statistics were applied for the analysis.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 217 ADRs were reported: 62% in females, 38% in males. The most affected age group was 60&ndash;79 years (62%). Main therapies were chemotherapy (38%), immunotherapy (31%), biological therapy (21%), and other (9%). Most implicated drugs were nivolumab, ipilimumab, carboplatin, paclitaxel, oxaliplatin, and pembrolizumab. Common ADRs included allergic reactions/drug intolerance (35%), diarrhoea/colitis (13%), exanthema (8%), nephrotoxicity (6%), hematotoxicity (6%), hepatotoxicity (6%), pneumonitis (3%), and neurotoxicity (2%). About 40% of ADRs were serious (hospitalisation, life-threatening events, death); most patients fully recovered. An increasing proportion of immunotherapy-related ADRs was observed in recent years.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Twelve years of systematic ADR reporting by a clinical pharmacist generated valuable real-world pharmacovigilance data in oncology patients. Allergic and immune-related reactions were the most frequent and clinically significant. Continuous monitoring and systematic reporting should be an integral part of clinical pharmacy practice, especially in the post-marketing phase. Despite demonstrated benefits, underreporting persists due to limited access to patient/product data, time constraints, and insufficient awareness of post-marketing safety monitoring.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>Thanks to co-authors for their support and collaboration.</p><p>Supported by Charles University grant SVV 260 785.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Novosadova, M., Rozsivalova, P., Jirsova, E., Havlicek, D., Kopecky, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.431</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.431</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-002 Twelve years of clinical pharmacist-led adverse drug reaction reporting in oncology patients at a university hospital]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A213</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A213</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A214-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-003 Effectiveness of artificial intelligence-based clinical decision support system in reducing medication errors: a breakthrough innovation for community hospital safety]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A214-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Medication errors represent a critical global healthcare challenge, ranking third in mortality causes with over 200,000 annual deaths in the United States. Literature demonstrates 39% of adverse drug events result from preventable medication errors, significantly impacting patient safety and healthcare costs. Existing clinical decision support systems show limited effectiveness due to poor integration, complex interfaces, and inadequate real-time capabilities. Community hospitals face additional challenges including limited resources, insufficient pharmaceutical expertise, and lack of accessible technology solutions. Despite advances in artificial intelligence and digital health platforms, no comprehensive AI-based Clinical Decision Support System integrated with social messaging platforms has been developed for resource-limited healthcare settings, representing a critical unmet need.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To develop and evaluate an AI-powered clinical decision support system using LINE Official Account that reduces medication errors and improves decision-making efficiency in community hospitals. Secondary objectives included measuring system accuracy, response times, and user satisfaction.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Quasi-experimental one-group pre-post design conducted over six months. Forty healthcare professionals (7 physicians, 7 pharmacists, 26 nurses) recruited using stratified random sampling. AI-based CDSS featured ten modules: five core clinical modules (drug safety screening, drug interaction checking, dose calculation, pregnancy/lactation safety, cross-allergy prevention) and five supportive modules (medication reminders, pharmacy locator, adverse drug reaction reporting, health product complaints, disease surveillance). Primary outcomes included medication error rates per 1000 patient-days, response time, and accuracy rates.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>AI-based CDSS significantly reduced medication error incidents from 26.17&plusmn;2.46 to 8.75&plusmn;1.82 events per month per 1000 patient-days, representing 66.6% reduction (p&lt;0.001). System accuracy achieved 96.9% overall. Response time improved from 8.0&plusmn;2.8 minutes to 0.4&plusmn;0.167 minutes (86.5% improvement, p&lt;0.001). Core modules responded within 24 seconds, supportive modules within 1.2 minutes. This resulted in 6.3 hours daily time savings. User satisfaction reached 4.8/5.0, exceeding target of 4.21.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>This study presents first successful AI-based CDSS integrated with social messaging platform, demonstrating remarkable 66.6% medication error reduction. High accuracy rates and efficiency improvements validate artificial intelligence potential in resource-limited settings. Findings have significant implications for global digital health transformation, creating scalable worldwide implementation model addressing medication safety challenges while improving healthcare quality and accessibility.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niloh, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.432</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.432</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-003 Effectiveness of artificial intelligence-based clinical decision support system in reducing medication errors: a breakthrough innovation for community hospital safety]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A214</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A214</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A214-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-004 Analysis of the influence of inflammation criteria as a risk factor for voriconazole intoxication]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A214-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>The clearance of certain drugs may be modified in inflammatory processes and therefore there may be situations of intoxication by certain drugs such as voriconazole.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To analyse the influence between C-reactive protein (CRP) values and the presence of elevated plasma levels of voriconazole.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Observational and retrospective study where voriconazole determinations were collected in patients from June 2021 to June 2023 in a tertiary level hospital. Patients included: patients with voriconazole treatment with a prescribed maintenance dose of 4 (&plusmn;1) mg/kg/12h. Patients with concomitant pharmacokinetic modifying drugs (enzyme inducers/inhibitors) and with alanine aminotransferase values &gt;110 IU/L were excluded. The plasma concentration of voriconazole was determined by homogeneous enzyme immunoassay. CRP values were collected at the time of voriconazole determination. Statistical analysis: logistic regression test for the odds ratio between inflammation and voriconazole intoxication. ROC curve (defined by AUC and Youden index) to establish the cut-off point of CRP as a criterion for inflammation and Cmin&gt;5 mg/L was considered as voriconazole intoxication. The statistical analyses were assessed with SPSS V25.0.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The number of total determinations was 164, of which a total of 53 were excluded (22 due to non-compliance with dosing and 31 due to elevated GPT values). The final total number of determinations was 111, with a total of 46 patients, 67% of whom were men and a median age of 78 [18-87] years. The calculated AUC was 0.712 &plusmn;0.69 (95% CI: 0.448-0.795), the Youden index was 0.489 and the optimal cut-off point for the CRP value was 78.7 mg/L (sensitivity: 0.691 and specificity: 0.705). The logistic regression test obtained an OR = 6.89 (95% CI: 2.89-25.81).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>A CRP value&gt;78.7 mg/L is associated as a risk factor for voriconazole intoxication according to the logistic regression test; provided that they meet the correct dosage, which in our study was 4 (&plusmn;1) mg/kg/12h, there is no presence of interacting drugs and liver function is preserved.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Toledo Davia, M., Jimenez-Mendez, C., Prieto-Galindo, R., Garcia-Perez, A., Mensalvas-Canadilla, O., Gomez-Calvo, L., Torralba-Fernandez, L., Cuadros-Martinez, C., Golnabi-Dowlatshahi, F., Aguado-Barroso, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.433</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.433</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-004 Analysis of the influence of inflammation criteria as a risk factor for voriconazole intoxication]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A214</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A214</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A215-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-005 Edoxaban and dabigatran dosage: is the estimating creatinine clearance formula important?]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A215-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Our medical record estimate creatinine clearance (Cl<SUB>CR</SUB>) only according to CKD-EPI formula. However, according to edoxaban and dabigatran product information, Cockcroft-Gault formula should be used to estimate Cl<SUB>CR</SUB> and possible dose adjustments.</p><p>For edoxaban, dose adjustment according to Cl<SUB>CR</SUB> is specified, while for dabigatran, the only clearly established indication is the contraindication when Cl<SUB>CR</SUB>&lt;30 mL/min.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To identify discrepancies between the recommended dose of edoxaban and dabigatran depending on the formula used to estimate Cl<SUB>CR</SUB>.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Cross-sectional observational study. Adult patients treated with edoxaban or dabigatran for atrial fibrillation (AF) in July 2025 were included. Data collected age, sex, weight, serum creatinine (Scr), Cl<SUB>CR</SUB> according to CKD-EPI, dialysis treatment and concomitant treatments with cyclosporine, dronedarone, erythromycin or ketoconazole (P-glycoprotein inhibitors). Cl<SUB>CR</SUB> was calculated using Cockcroft-Gault. Patients with weight and/or Scr records prior to August 2024 and those who were treated with edoxaban weighting &le;60 kg or receiving concomitant treatment with P-glycoprotein inhibitors were excluded.</p><p>Anticoagulant doses were calculated based on both estimating formulas, and differences were checked.</p><p>Edoxaban differences were classified as: overdose, underdose, should be contraindicated, should not be contraindicated. For dabigatran: should be contraindicated, should not be contraindicated.<b>Results</b>  </p><p>We included 2493 patients (35.7% women), median age 79 years (range 40&ndash;101). Approximately 2/3 were treated with edoxaban (65.4%), while 34.6% were in treatment with dabigatran. No patients were on dialysis.</p><p>In 1449 patients treated with edoxaban (88.9%) the dose did not change regardless of the formula used. In the remaining patients (181; 11.1%) dose should be reduced from 60 to 30 mg (123; 68.0%) or increased from 30 to 60 mg (58; 32.0%).</p><p>In any case, the contraindication recommendations varied according to the formula used in patients treated with edoxaban or dabigatran.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Using CKD-EPI formula instead of Cockcroft-Gault, 11.1% patients treated with edoxaban for AF would be over (2/3 patients) or under-dosed (1/3) according to the estimating formula. No contraindication recommendation differences were found in patients treated with dabigatran or edoxaban.</p><p>It would be advisable for regulatory agencies to issue clear recommendations on dosing with the available estimation formulas.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rodriguez Esquiroz, A., Goni Zamarbide, O., Garcia Lopez, L., Gorricho Mendivil, J., Echeverria Gorriti, A., Marin Marin, M., Fernandez Gonzalez, J., Sanz Alvarez, L., Garjon Parra, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.434</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.434</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-005 Edoxaban and dabigatran dosage: is the estimating creatinine clearance formula important?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A215</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A215</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A215-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-006 Improving patient safety: the role of hospital pharmacists in perioperative antithrombotic therapy]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A215-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Hospital pharmacists enhance perioperative safety by preventing medication errors and optimising high-risk drug management. Despite guidelines, deviations persist due to polypharmacy and clinical complexity, highlighting the need for pharmacist involvement in surgical teams.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The primary objective was to evaluate the impact of hospital pharmacists&rsquo; interventions in reducing surgery cancellations related to medication errors. Secondary objectives were to describe and quantify interventions across perioperative phases and to identify patient or surgical factors associated with increased risk of errors.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>We conducted a prospective observational study (2021&ndash;2024) in a tertiary hospital in Spain. Adult surgical patients on chronic anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy were included. Pharmacists performed structured consultations at three stages: preoperative review (including medication reconciliation and patient education), inpatient reconciliation, and post-discharge follow-up. Interventions were recorded in electronic health records. Collected variables included demographics, comorbidities, pharmacological profiles, and surgical data. Statistical analysis included descriptive summaries and multivariate logistic regression to identify predictors of medication errors and pharmacist interventions, with significance set at p &lt; 0.05.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 1,141 patients were included, mean age 73.1 years, with predominance of males (67.1%). Patients received a mean of 9.1 chronic medications, with most being polymedicated. Anticoagulants were prescribed in 79.1% and antiplatelets in 16.1%.</p><p>In the preoperative phase, 26.2% of patients did not adequately understand treatment management, leading to 346 pharmacist interventions, 25.7% involving high-risk drugs. Surgery was postponed in 8.4% of cases (1.3% pharmacological). Risk factors for poor comprehension included advanced age, diabetes, polypharmacy, rivaroxaban/edoxaban, and longer intervals between anesthesiology consultation and surgery.</p><p>During admission, reconciliation was accurate in 69.8% of cases. However, 30.2% of patients had at least one error, with 223 errors prevented, mainly related to anticoagulants. Polypharmacy was the main independent predictor.</p><p>At discharge, 39.1% failed to recall recommendations, resulting in 255 errors prevented. Risk factors included polypharmacy and higher pain scores, while female sex was protective. Interventions focused on adherence (66.6%), coordination with professionals (21.2%), and emergency referral (6.7%). Patient satisfaction was very high (9.8/10).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Pharmacist-led perioperative interventions reduced medication errors and surgery cancellations. Polypharmacy, age, and comorbidities were key risk factors, highlighting the pharmacist&rsquo;s role in optimising patient safety.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Montero Anton, M., Ribed Sanchez, A., Rioja Diez, Y., Gomez Costas, D., Manzorro, A. G., Taladriz Sender, I., Prieto Romero, A., Carrillo Burdallo, A., Martin Bartolome, M., Herranz Alonso, A., Sanjurjo Saez, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.435</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.435</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-006 Improving patient safety: the role of hospital pharmacists in perioperative antithrombotic therapy]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A215</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A215</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A216-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-007 Pharmacist-led monitoring of 12 quality domains in hospital pharmacy: a framework to enhance patient safety and care]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A216-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Hospital pharmacists are central to patient safety, antimicrobial stewardship and continuity of care. Few programmes integrate multiple services under one monitoring framework aligned with standards of care.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate pharmacy quality and safety indicators across 12 domains, comparing interim 2025 outcomes with 2024 baselines, and to show how pharmacist-led monitoring improves patient care.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Observational evaluation of predefined indicators in 12 domains: clinical pharmacy, antimicrobial stewardship (ASP), pharmaceutical care (PCP), oncology, medication errors, pharmacovigilance, surgery, high-risk/LASA medicines, compounding, storage, academic/scientific activity and nuclear medicine. In 2024, 43 indicators were monitored; tracking continued in 2025. Prospective data were obtained from pharmacist-led audits, pharmacy records and point-prevalence surveys, with quarterly reporting. Results combine 2024 full-year baselines and 2025 interim data (Q1&ndash;Q2).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Clinical effectiveness: Acceptance of pharmacist interventions was high (93.8% in 2024; 86.5% in 2025). Oncology follow-up within 3 days improved from 68.8% to 93.3%, enabling detection of adverse reactions in 64.3% of patients. Correct redosing of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis rose from 92% to 100% of audited cases (n=78). Patient safety: ASP optimal prescribing declined from 80.6% to 67.1%; selective antibiogram reporting reached 50%; and only 11.6% of penicillin-treated patients received recommended allergy testing. Medication error reporting reached 155 cases in early 2025, with &gt;97% low-impact (A&ndash;D) and two moderate events managed without harm. Pharmacovigilance remained strong (95&ndash;100% on-time reporting; 100% in clinical trials). Continuity of care: PCP retention stayed high (90.4% vs 88.9%) with &gt;94% intervention acceptance. Compounding defect rates remained &lt;1% with 100% quality checks of external raw materials. Availability of essential medicines decreased from 100% to 93% in early 2025. Nuclear medicine began in 2025 with 100% documentation of pharmacist interventions (10 prescriptions).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>A pharmacist-led, multi-domain monitoring framework delivered measurable benefits in patient safety, antimicrobial stewardship and continuity of care. Year-to-year comparisons show gains in oncology follow-up and perioperative prophylaxis, stable strengths in pharmacovigilance and compounding, and ongoing challenges in antibiotic prescribing, allergy testing and essential-medicine availability. This model is reproducible and can help hospital pharmacies embed continuous quality improvement into daily practice.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zavaleta, E., Fallas-Mora, A., Rojas-Chinchilla, C., Diaz-Madriz, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.436</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.436</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-007 Pharmacist-led monitoring of 12 quality domains in hospital pharmacy: a framework to enhance patient safety and care]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A216</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A216</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A216-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-008 Comprehensive evaluation of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis in clinical practice: a multivariable approach to the determinants of use]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A216-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>PrEP has established itself as a fundamental HIV prevention strategy in high-risk populations.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The primary objective is to evaluate the efficacy and adherence to PrEP. Secondary objectives include characterising the clinical profile of patients, verifying eligibility criteria, analysing comorbidities, examining the incidence of STIs, and determining the safety of treatment.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Observational and retrospective study of PrEP users between January 2022 and December 2024. Variables included demographic data, eligibility criteria, comorbidities, analytical and microbiological follow-up, adherence, interactions, and tolerance.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>47 users, mostly male (95.7%), with a median age of 35 years (24-57). All reported sex with men; 6.38% engaged in prostitution, and 14.89% practiced chem-sex. Common comorbidities were dyslipidaemia (10.64%), hypertension (4.26%), and diabetes (4.26%). 12% percent had nephropathy before starting PrEP. Serum creatinine (0.95 &plusmn; 0.46 g/dL) and phosphorus (3.43 &plusmn; 1.76 g/dL) remained stable (p &gt; 0.05). No patient had a history of neoplasms, liver disease, or major cardiovascular events. Charlson index was &lt;1; Profund index identified social vulnerability in 4.26%. 97.87% met criteria to start PrEP. 53.19% had at least one STI in the last year, notably gonorrhoea (43.33%), chlamydia (20%), and syphilis (20%). A downward STI trend was noted: anal swabs from 6.38% to 8.7%, throat swabs from 8.51% to 0%, urethral swabs from 6.38% to 4.35%, total positive STIs from 12.77% to 9.38%. Swab performance decreased (anal 4.26% vs. 13.04%; nasopharyngeal 8.51% vs. 8.7%). Time from infectious disease consult to prophylaxis start was 12.11 &plusmn; 8.63 days. Treatment persistence averaged 14.74 &plusmn; 10.5 months. Average adherence was 90.66%, with 23.4% lost to follow-up due to low adherence (14.89%), missing labs (6.38%), or missed visits (2.13%). PrEP discontinuation was 8.51%. Home treatment was reported by 63.3%. Polypharmacy and drug interactions (NSAIDs) occurred in 10.64%. Adverse effects in 42.55% included gastrointestinal discomfort (27.66%), insomnia (6.38%), headache (4.26%), facial tingling (2.13%), and nightmares (2.13%).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>This study confirms the effectiveness and safety of PrEP in preventing HIV in a high-risk population, with high but improvable adherence. The incidence of STIs highlights the importance of optimising microbiological monitoring and sex education. Adverse effects were minor and manageable.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Varela Fernandez, R., Llamas-Lorenzana, S., Dios-Diez, P., Romero Calvo, A., Ortiz De Urbina Fernandez, P., Ana, F., Garcia Mieres, N., Ortega Valin, L., Ortiz De Urbina Gonzalez, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.437</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.437</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-008 Comprehensive evaluation of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis in clinical practice: a multivariable approach to the determinants of use]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A216</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A216</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A217-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-009 Communication between a pharmacist and a patient with hearing loss - prospective study]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A217-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Competent communication is not only vital in daily human interaction but is also an essential component in the exchange of information between healthcare professionals &ndash; including pharmacists &ndash; and their patients.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The primary objective of this study was to evaluate, based on the results of a prospective, anonymous questionnaire- based survey, the communication competencies of pharmacists in interactions with patients experiencing varying degrees of hearing impairment.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>This study was approved by the appropriate bioethics committee. It was designed as a prospective, anonymous, questionnaire-based survey conducted among 130 pharmacists. The questionnaire was distributed as a printed document for manual completion as well as an interactive online form. The survey consisted of 19 questions, of which 18 were closed-ended and one was open-ended.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The first group of questions addressed pharmacists&rsquo; communication skills. The second group pertained to adverse drug reactions associated with ototoxicity and to patient populations at increased risk of developing hearing loss. The third group focused on resources (including training) and technological tools that facilitate communication with individuals with hearing impairments. Analysis of responses from the 130 pharmacists revealed that the majority (52.31%) believed their previous training had not adequately prepared them to work with patients experiencing hearing loss. One-third of respondents indicated that information regarding adverse drug reactions affecting hearing should be more prominently emphasised in patient-facing educational materials provided within pharmacies. This finding underscores the need for enhanced inclusion of such information in materials related to medications with ototoxic effects and improved adaptation to the specific needs of hearing-impaired patients. 49.23% of respondents rated their ability to convey information to hearing-impaired patients as average, while 28.46% assessed their competencies as poor.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The findings suggest that pharmacists perceive their communication skills with hearing-impaired patients as insufficient. Nevertheless, they are generally able to identify medicinal products with potential ototoxic effects and recognise patient groups in which underlying health conditions may elevate the risk of hearing loss. Deficits in training, education (particularly regarding communication strategies), and the availability of supportive materials and technologies are perceived as major obstacles to effective communication with hearing-impaired patients.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Skarzynska, M., Chodkowska, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.438</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.438</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-009 Communication between a pharmacist and a patient with hearing loss - prospective study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A217</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A217</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A217-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-012 Anticipating risk in medication logistics: FMECA applied to the restocking automation of a 25-operating room surgical unit]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A217-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>The consolidation of four hospitals into a single campus of 986 beds with 25 operating rooms prompted the integration of automated dispensing systems&ndash;unit-dose clipping, over-packaging machines, robotic storage, rotating cabinets, and drop-to-light reconciliation stations&ndash;managed through a warehouse management system (WMS). Despite planning and prior evaluations this integration was met with early operational challenges and reliance on manual overrides.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>Those challenges motivated the creation of a risk assessment task force to ensure safe and reliable medication restocking in the Interventional and Operative Technical Platform (PTIO).</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A system-oriented Failure Modes, Effects, and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) was conducted by a multidisciplinary working group composed of 3 pharmacists, a technician, and a quality specialist. Five plenary and one individual scoring sessions allowed the group to identify and describe 25 failure modes across five sub-systems using mind mapping and some &lsquo;Healthcare Failure Mode and Effect Analysis&rsquo; (HFMEA) principles, including the detection of Single Points of Failure (SPFs). A locally validated criticality grid guided quantitative scoring and the prioritisation of risk-reduction measures</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Twenty-five failure modes were mapped; seven reached intermediate or high criticality. Four SPFs were highlighted: two related to discrepancies between digital and physical inventory, one storage-robot malfunction, and one over-packaging bottleneck. Nineteen corrective actions were defined. After one month, twelve were implemented, five were in progress, and two awaited initiations. Average risk scores for inventory SPFs decreased from 14 to 7.3, while the robot and over-packaging SPFs dropped from 8 to 4 and 15 to 6, respectively with a score below 8 defined as &lsquo;low risk.&rsquo;</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Applying FMECA prior to full automation facilitated the identification and mitigation of critical vulnerabilities in a complex medication circuit. Our study also suggests that engagement of IT specialists dedicated to the pharmacy is recommended to address unresolved high-criticality issues and improve responsiveness in an ever more technical environment. Although resource-intensive, targeted FMECA enhances change management, supports staff engagement, and strengthens patient-safety outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Desplanques, P., Tassin, O., Brosteau, C., Noto, M., Ficart, F., Van Wetter, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.439</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.439</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-012 Anticipating risk in medication logistics: FMECA applied to the restocking automation of a 25-operating room surgical unit]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A217</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A217</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A218-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-013 CRS induced by bispecific antibodies and car-t cells in clinical trials at our university hospital]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A218-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>In a rapidly evolving therapeutic landscape marked by the rise of next-generation immunotherapies, our university hospital is involved as a sponsor of clinical trials on both CAR-T cell therapies and bispecific antibodies (BsAbs), actively contributing to the development and evaluation of these innovations for the benefit of patients. Both BsAbs and CAR-T cells can trigger CRS through T-cell activation, but comparative data remain scarce. CRS results from massive immune activation following CAR-T cell infusion, leading to excessive release of cytokines, particularly interleukin-6 (IL-6). This inflammatory reaction can rapidly progress to severe multiorgan failure, requiring urgent treatment.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To assess frequency, timing, and management of CRS associated with BsAbs versus CAR-T therapy in clinical trials at our centre.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>All adults receiving investigational BsAbs or CAR-T cells from January 2018 to July 2025 were retrospectively analysed. CRS episodes were graded using ASTCT criteria; therapeutic treatment, grade and outcomes were collected.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 91 patients were included: 51 received BsAbs and 40 received CAR-T therapy. CRS occurred in 9/51 (17.6%) BsAb patients and 20/40 (50%) CAR-T patients. Mean onset was earlier for BsAbs (25.7 h vs 112.2 h). Most events were grade 1&ndash;2 (BsAbs: 100% [grade 1: 22.2%; grade 2: 77.8%]; CAR-T: 90% [grade 1: 65%; grade 2: 25%]). Tocilizumab was used less frequently for BsAb-related CRS (77.8% vs 100%). Corticosteroid use was low in both groups. Resolution was achieved in all cases.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>CRS was more frequent with CAR-T cells than with BsAbs in clinical trials, but onset occurred earlier with BsAbs. The CRS grade appeared to be more severe with BsAbs.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Blaisonneau, E., Hamon, C., Wilson, R., Le Bras, N., Jaspart-Le Du, V., Chanat, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.440</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.440</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-013 CRS induced by bispecific antibodies and car-t cells in clinical trials at our university hospital]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A218</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A218</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A218-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-014 Post cart-T cells crs: clinical trials vs real life]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A218-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Our university hospital has been involved as a sponsor since the early stages of CAR-T clinical trial development, allowing us to put our experience into perspective and illustrate the central role we play in this therapeutic innovation. CAR-T cell therapy is a major breakthrough in the management of haematologic malignancies, but its use is associated with severe adverse events requiring specific management. One of the most frequent and potentially serious complications is cytokine release syndrome (CRS). CRS results from massive immune activation following CAR-T cell infusion, leading to excessive cytokine release, particularly interleukin-6 (IL-6). This inflammatory reaction can rapidly progress to severe multiorgan failure, requiring urgent treatment.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To compare the incidence, severity, and management of CRS after CAR-T infusion in clinical trials versus standard-of-care patients at our university hospital.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>We retrospectively reviewed all patients who received CAR-T therapy between 1 January 2020 and 1 July 2025, distinguishing participants in clinical trials (n = 40) from real-life patients (n = 361). Demographics, indications, the occurrence of adverse events (CRS, ICANS), and their management (tocilizumab, corticosteroids) were analysed.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>CRS occurred in 50% (20/40) of trial patients and 83.9% (303/361) of real-life patients. The mean onset was earlier in clinical trials (1.55 days) than in real life (2.64 days). Duration was shorter in trials (3.67 days) than in routine care (6.65 days) (p = 0.0001). Grade &ge; 3 CRS was uncommon in both groups (10% in trials vs 1% in real life). Tocilizumab was administered in all trial cases (20/20) versus 66% (200/303) in routine care, with a longer delay to the first dose in clinical trials (3.7 vs 2 days). Five patients died in the real-life group whereas none in clinical trials. The number of tocilizumab doses differed significantly (2.5 per patient in trials vs 1.9 in routine care; p = 0.0031) with a similar dosage (555.2 mg vs 581.3 mg).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>CRS incidence and severity after CAR-T therapy were broadly comparable between clinical trials and real-life practice, but supportive measures were implemented later outside</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Blaisonneau, E., Hamon, C., Wilson, R., Le Bras, N., Jaspart-Le Du, V., Chanat, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.441</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.441</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-014 Post cart-T cells crs: clinical trials vs real life]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A218</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A218</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A218-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-015 When seizures persist: exploring novel therapeutic options in aicardi syndrome - case report]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A218-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Aicardi syndrome is a rare neurodevelopmental disorder characterised by agenesis of the corpus callosum, chorioretinal lacunae, and seizures. No treatments are approved specifically for this condition, and seizure control is complex. Drug-resistant epilepsy carries high morbidity and mortality, with few effective interventions once standard therapies fail.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To describe the clinical evolution of a paediatric patient with Aicardi syndrome and drug-resistant epilepsy, and the impact of cannabidiol and fenfluramine treatment supported by hospital pharmacy intervention. The patient, a female diagnosed at 2 months of age, presented with epileptic seizures unresponsive to multiple anti-seizure medications and dietary therapies.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>From 2010-2024, the patient underwent sequential treatment with lamotrigine, valproic acid, vigabatrin, levetiracetam, primidone, ketogenic diet, rufinamide, topiramate, zonisamide, perampanel, and hydrocortisone, with insufficient seizure control. Hospital pharmacy prepared evidence-based reports to justify the off-label use of cannabidiol (Epidyolex ) and fenfluramine, based on literature in severe epileptic syndromes and clinical need. Dosing was titrated under multidisciplinary follow-up, with seizure frequency, intensity, and tolerability assessed during routine visits.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Cannabidiol initiation (December 2022) achieved marked reduction in tonic&ndash;clonic seizures, with sustained partial benefit over 2 years. Persistent reflex seizures prompted dose optimisation and withdrawal of perampanel. Fenfluramine was introduced in 2024 but discontinued after 10 months due to lack of clinical benefit. Cenobamate was also trialled without improvement. No severe adverse effects were observed with cannabidiol or fenfluramine.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Cannabidiol provided substantial early seizure reduction with sustained partial benefit over more than 2.5 years of continuous treatment &ndash; a follow-up period exceeding that reported in the published literature for Aicardi syndrome and most other epileptic encephalopathies. This long-term observation highlights both the potential durability of cannabidiol&rsquo;s effect and the need for systematic studies beyond 48 weeks. Fenfluramine use in Aicardi syndrome, with no robust evidence base, was ineffective in our patient. Similarly, cenobamate lacks supporting data in this population and did not improve seizure control. This case underlines the critical role of hospital pharmacy in bridging evidence gaps, enabling access to novel therapies, and ensuring rigorous monitoring in highly refractory contexts. Continuous reassessment and long-term data collection are essential to advance the therapeutic landscape for rare epilepsies.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Garcia Martinez, D., Calderon-Acedos, C., Corrales-Perez, L., Gonzalez-Fuentes, A., Fernandez-Valencia, L., Carrera-Sanchez, M., Andrino-Rodriguez, M., Vega-Gonzalez, P., De-Miguel-Ruiz, S., Martinez-Ferrero, A., Segura-Bedmar, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.442</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.442</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-015 When seizures persist: exploring novel therapeutic options in aicardi syndrome - case report]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A218</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A219</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A219-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-016 Analysis of the response to migraine prophylaxis treatments in a second-level hospital]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A219-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>CatSalut Pharmacotherapeutic Harmonisation Program (PHP) guarantees equity in access to hospital medications, taking into account the optimisation of resources in public healthcare system.</p><p>PHP considers a responder patient to migraine prophylaxis treatment when, 3 months after initiation, he achieves 50% reduction in monthly migraine days (MMDs) or 30% reduction with a decrease of HIT6 scale.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>Analyse response to migraine prophylaxis treatments, according to PHP criteria.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Retrospective cross-sectional observational study analysing response to migraine prophylaxis treatments initiated since 2019.</p><p>Patient demographic variables, episodic or chronic migraine (EM/CM), treatments, MMDs and HIT6 score in baseline and month-3 were recorded.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>73 treatments were initiated, of which 67 were included in study.</p><p>16(24%) EM and 51(76%) CM treatments were recorded.</p><p>Regarding EM, response data were obtained in 81% (N=13) of treatments: 2 atogepant, 1 erenumab, and 10 fremanezumab. A mean of 11 MMDs and 52 HIT6 score were recorded at beginning of treatment. 3 months after, a mean of 3 MMDs and 24 HIT6 score were recorded. 62% (N=8) of treatments were responders: 1/2 atogepant, 1/1 erenumab, and 6/10 fremanezumab. 38% (N=5) were non-responders: 4/10 fremanezumab and 1/2 atogepant.</p><p>Regarding CM, response data were obtained in 84% (N=43) of treatments: 9 atogepant, 7 erenumab, 16 fremanezumab, and 11 galcanezumab. A mean of 19 MMDs and 61 HIT6 score were recorded at beginning of treatment. 3 months after, a mean of 10 MMDs and 47 HIT6 score were recorded. 65% (N=28) of treatments were responders: 4/9 atogepant, 6/7 erenumab, 13/16 fremanezumab, and 5/11 galcanezumab. 35% (N = 15) were non-responders: 5/9 atogepant, 1/7 erenumab, 3/16 fremanezumab and 6/11 galcanezumab.</p><p>64% of the 56 treatments initiated (in wich a response was recorded) atachieved objectives set by PHP to be responder.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>64% of migraine prophylaxis treatments were responders. Of the first-line drugs, fremanezumab showed a 73% response rate; followed by atogepant with 45%. Galcanezumab, most frequently used in second-line treatment, showed a 45% response rate, and erenumab, the least used due to its safety profile, showed an 87% response rate.</p><p>Actually, therapeutic options have expanded, and a deeper understanding of them is needed to aid in decision-making process, ensure rational drug use and equity in access of hospital medicines.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carrascosa, O., Xu, Y., Barguilla, A., Barrera, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.443</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.443</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-016 Analysis of the response to migraine prophylaxis treatments in a second-level hospital]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A219</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A219</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A219-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-017 A hospital-wide prospective re-audit on adult thromboprophylaxis and therapeutic anticoagulation prescribing and administration practices in a large academic hospital]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A219-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Guideline non-adherence regarding anticoagulant prescribing and administration was highlighted in a previous local audit. A re-audit was required to address medication errors and reduce the risk of VTE, haemorrhage, and cerebral accidents.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Conduct a prospective hospital&ndash;wide re&ndash;audit on inpatient adult thromboprophylaxis and therapeutic anticoagulation prescribing and administration practices</p></li><li><p>Assess compliance with local guidelines and quality improvements (QI) from a previous audit</p></li><li><p>Develop further QI to optimise patient care</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>This audit was approved by the local Clinical Audit Committee and conducted over 5 weeks in quarter 4 2024 gathering information from adult inpatient&rsquo;s drug charts, clinical notes, laboratory results, and communicating with nurses/doctors/pharmacists/patients as required. A Chi-Square test of contingency was used to compare audit results from 2024 and 2022. Generated data were anonymous and securely stored. Independent analysis was conducted by two data collectors to confirm reliability of results.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>219 inpatients were reviewed comprising 51% on thromboprophylaxis, 30% on therapy, 14% on no anticoagulation, and 5% on anticoagulation on hold. Patient specialty comprised 36% medical, 36% surgical, 18% oncology, and 10% haematology. 29% of inpatients not prescribed anticoagulation required same and 90% of this cohort had no thromboprophylaxis risk assessment complete. All inpatients were appropriately prescribed as per indication. &gt;92% were prescribed at the correct dose, frequency, and time, and in the correct section of the chart. 23% of inpatients on therapy were prescribed antiplatelets, mostly aspirin, appropriately. 33% with therapy on hold were inappropriately held and 50% were prescribed a prophylactic dose in replacement. Statistical significance was observed regarding the correct thromboprophylaxis dose/frequency in comparison to 2022. Reduced dose omissions were identified as well as improvements in thromboprophylaxis prescribed in the correct section of the drug chart and administered at the correct time. With regard to therapeutic anticoagulation, statistical significance was found in the documentation of indications, the absence of dose omissions, and adherence to correct dosing/frequency guidelines.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Results demonstrate an improvement in practice. Continuous education focusing on assessing inpatients on no anticoagulation is ongoing. Local guidelines on perioperative/periprocedural anticoagulation management were updated in July 2025 and have been widely disseminated. An audit re compliance is planned for 2026.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hogan-Murphy, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.444</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.444</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-017 A hospital-wide prospective re-audit on adult thromboprophylaxis and therapeutic anticoagulation prescribing and administration practices in a large academic hospital]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A219</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A220</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A220-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-018 Optimising patient safety and quality of care: a medical gas cylinder storage audit in a university hospital]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A220-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Medical gases such as oxygen are classified as therapeutic products and follow current European or national guidelines and standards.</p><p>They are routinely used in hospitals therefore cylinders are stored in various clinical departments. Safety rules must be followed from the receipt of cylinders to the administration to patients. Proper storage conditions and an efficient medical gas cylinder (MGC) distribution system are essential to ensure the safety of healthcare professionals and patients, the quality of care, and to prevent theft.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The purpose of the audit was to collect data on MCG (oxygen and EMONO) storage, on transport by staff members and healthcare professionals training regarding MGC.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Data collection was carried out by completing a grid with 23 questions, created by two pharmacists and reviewed by 2 healthcare professionals.</p><p>76 clinical departments were audited, spread across 3 sites of our hospital, over a period of 2 months. The departments that used the most MGC were prioritised first. Health workers from each department were present during each audit.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Regarding storage in a secure room, 32% of departments (23/72) stored oxygen cylinders in a secure room and 61% (20/33) for EMONO cylinders.</p><p>For 44% of departments (32/72) all oxygen cylinders were stored securely (67% (22/33) for EMONO). For 14% of departments (10/72) no oxygen cylinders were attached (18% (6/33) for EMONO).</p><p>For only 19% of departments (13/68), the type of gas was verified by reading the MGC label before storing them. For 43% of departments (29/68), the general condition of MGC was checked.</p><p>For all departments, medical gas cylinders were transported using an appropriate transport trolley to and from the pharmacy. Among the professionals transporting medical gas cylinders, no one had any training on medical gas safety.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Following this audit, storage equipment was purchased to securely stored MGC. To improve the quality and safety of care, it is necessary to inform and train professionals in best practices and safety rules regarding medical gases. Specially before using or storing the cylinders, professionals must check the good condition of the cylinders and identify MCG by reading the cylinder label.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dupuis, A., Ahmad-Ali, L., Berho, O., Fouassin, X., Guihenneuc, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.445</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.445</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-018 Optimising patient safety and quality of care: a medical gas cylinder storage audit in a university hospital]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A220</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A220</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A220-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-019 Evaluation and influence of vitamin d levels in oncohematological patients with parenteral nutrition]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A220-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Oncohematological patients (OHP) often have very low vitamin D(VitD) levels (&lt;20 ng/dL), which is associated with higher morbi-mortality. Many OHPs have a non-functioning gastrointestinal tract due to the toxicity of the treatments they receive, limiting oral absorption and requiring the use of parenteral nutrition(PN). VitD replacement is an added complication due to factors such as bioavailability and route of administration.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>Analyse VitD levels and assess the differences in analytical requests in OHP with PN. Study the frequency and effectiveness of the use of different VitD formulations as restorative treatment.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Retrospective observational study of OHP with PN from 2023 to July 2025. Based on medical records and the PN formulation program, the following data were recorded in a database: sex and age, anthropometric parameters, diagnosis, number of days with PN and days elapsed until the request for levels during NP, date and value of all blood VitD levels; evolution and reason for suspension of PN; administration of VitD. Literature review using the keywords, PN, VitD and OHP.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 177 OHPs with PN were included, as described in <cross-ref type="tbl" refid="T1">table 1</cross-ref>. The main indications for PN were related to complications secondary to digestive cancer. The average number of days with PN was 11, and it took 1 day to request levels. Levels were requested in 76% of OHP(12&plusmn;7 ng/dl), falling within the deficiency range(&lt;20 ng/dl). The most frequent reason for ending PN was progression to oral nutrition(59%). The administration of different VitD formulations was analysed, but their use was negligible.</p><p><tbl id="T1" loc="float"><no>Abstract 5PSQ-019 Table 1</no><caption><p>Description of patients</p></caption><link locator="5PSQ-019_T1"></tbl></p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in OHP with PN is evident, highlighting the need to standardise testing and optimise levels through a joint protocol with prescribers. This situation represents a significant clinical burden in the course of the disease and suggests that VitD supplementation through PN could be explored as an additional strategy.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Losada Gomez, J., Moreno Banegas, J., Fernandez Mimbrera, M., Morales Rivero, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.446</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.446</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-019 Evaluation and influence of vitamin d levels in oncohematological patients with parenteral nutrition]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A220</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A221</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A221-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-020 Study on the use of ferric carboxymaltose according to the parmacoclinical protocol in tertiary hospital]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A221-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>There is a need to evaluate the adequacy of ferric carboxymaltose prescriptions in relation to the actual analytical requirements of each patient. According to the technical data sheet (TDS), ferric carboxymaltose (Fe) is indicated for the treatment of iron deficiency when rapid administration is necessary, or when the oral route cannot be used or has proven ineffective.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate ferric carboxymaltose (FC) prescriptions made by different clinical services in a tertiary care hospital, according to compliance with the pharmacotherapeutic protocol approved by the hospital&rsquo;s Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective, observational study conducted between January and December 2024. All ferric carboxymaltose prescriptions requested through a dynamic form in the FarmaTools software were evaluated daily to validate their appropriateness according to the established protocol. Inclusion criteria: anaemic patients scheduled for major potentially bleeding surgery with Hb&lt;13 g/dl, previous oral iron treatment and/or need for a rapid response, along with an iron saturation (IST) &lt;20%. Variables collected: sex, requesting department, prior oral iron treatment, Hb levels before and after administration, IST, request status (approved or rejected), and reason for rejection.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 476 requests were reviewed, of which 88.65% (422) were approved. Distribution by sex: 57.35% women and 42.64% men. Distribution by departments: Emergency (18.27%), Gastroenterology (16.80%), Traumatology (16.59%), Coloproctology and Digestive Surgery (15.75%), Cardiology (13.65%), Internal Medicine (10.71%), Hepatobiliary Surgery (9.24%), and 7.35% other departments. 18.48% had previously received oral iron and the mean Hb before administration was 8.61 g/dl. Post-administration Hb values showed a mean increase of 3.31 g/dl. The mean IST in approved requests was 29.68%. A total of 54 requests were rejected due to IST &gt;20% (81.20%) or absence of prior oral iron treatment (18.80%).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Parenteral administration of FC provides better tolerability compared to oral administration, although it is not free from adverse effects. This study demonstrates that the pharmaceutical intervention prevented the inappropriate use of FC in patients eligible for its administration who presented analytical values above those established in the protocol and/or lacked prior oral iron treatment. Pharmaceutical intervention was key to ensuring that patients receive medication appropriate to their clinical and analytical needs.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martinez Ortega, L., Zambrano Croche, M., Vazquez Velazquez, H., Torres Zaragoza, L., Navarro Ruiz, A., Suarez Morillas, M., Izquierdo Pajuelo, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.447</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.447</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-020 Study on the use of ferric carboxymaltose according to the parmacoclinical protocol in tertiary hospital]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A221</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A221</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A221-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-021 Implementation of ugt1a1 genotyping prior to sacituzumab govitecan treatment: a need in real-world clinical practice]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A221-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Sacituzumab govitecan is an antibody&ndash;drug conjugate indicated for metastatic breast cancer, whose active metabolite is SN-38. Like irinotecan, this metabolite is cleared by the UGT1A1 enzyme. Although genetic variants with level 1A evidence significantly affect enzymatic activity, systematic UGT1A1 genotyping prior to sacituzumab govitecan treatment is not currently implemented.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To assess the clinical relevance of UGT1A1 variant genotyping in routine practice and analyse its potential impact in patients with breast cancer receiving sacituzumab govitecan.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>We conducted a retrospective study in two phases. First, a cohort of patients treated with irinotecan (2021&ndash;2023) was analysed to identify the prevalence of UGT1A1 variants (*6, *28, *37) compared with reference populations (1000 Genomes Project, gnomAD). Second, we examined a group of metastatic breast cancer patients treated with sacituzumab govitecan who developed severe toxicities (grade &ge;3, CTCAE v5.0). Genotyping was performed using QuantStudio&trade; 12K-Flex (Applied Biosystems) and KlusterCaller software (LGC Genomics). Statistical analyses employed chi-square or Fisher&rsquo;s exact test in R v4.3.2.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>We observed a statistically significant difference in the rs4148323 (UGT1A1<I>6) variant in the cohort of patients treated with irinotecan guided by UGT1A1 testing (n=120) compared with the global population (MAF=0</I>  <I> vs. Global MAF=0.034; p=0.0005). Moreover, 55%</I>  <I> of irinotecan-treated patients carried UGT1A1 variants that required therapeutic recommendations. Among the breast cancer patients treated with sacituzumab govitecan who developed severe toxicities (n=12), four had the UGT1A1</I>28/<I>28 genotype and two had UGT1A1</I>1/*28, classified as poor and intermediate metabolisers, respectively. Two of these patients required hospitalisation, one in intensive care and the other in the oncology ward.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>UGT1A1 genotyping prior to initiating sacituzumab govitecan treatment appears to be as important, if not more, for preventing severe adverse reactions as in patients treated with irinotecan. This strategy could help prevent serious toxicities, optimise clinical management, and improve therapeutic safety in these patients. Based on its prevalence, UGT1A1*6 genotyping is less relevant in our population compared with the global population.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martinez, M., Nieto-Sanchez, M., Robles-Munoz, M., Torres-Garcia, A., Moron, R., Diaz-Villamarin, X.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.448</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.448</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-021 Implementation of ugt1a1 genotyping prior to sacituzumab govitecan treatment: a need in real-world clinical practice]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A221</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A222</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A222-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-022 Analysis of exposure to QT-prolonging drugs in lung transplant patients]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A222-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Drug-induced QT interval prolongation is a relevant safety concern. In lung transplant patients, polypharmacy combined with predisposing factors such as hypokalaemia further increases the risk of developing these electrocardiographic alterations.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The objectives of this study were to evaluate the exposure to drugs with a risk of QT interval prolongation in lung transplant patients and to identify clinical factors associated with increased susceptibility to this alteration.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A single-centre, retrospective, observational study was conducted in a tertiary hospital. All patients &gt;18 years who underwent de novo lung transplantation between October 2023 and December 2024 were included, excluding re-transplantations. Variables collected from electronic medical records were: age, sex, indication for transplantation, treatment received, and clinical factors associated with QT risk (female sex, age &gt;65 years, insomnia, thyroid disorders, grapefruit juice intake, hypomagnesaemia, hypokalaemia, hypocalcaemia, obesity). Drugs were classified according to the Arizona Centre for Education and Research on Therapeutics (AZCERT) into high risk (HR), possible risk (PR) and conditional risk (CR). Data were analysed using descriptive statistics.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Seventy-one patients were included (24 women, 33.8%) with a mean age of 60.4 years (SD 8.2). Main indications were COPD (32, 45.1%), pulmonary fibrosis (19, 26.8%), interstitial lung disease (7, 9.6%) and emphysema (5, 7.1%). Forty-seven patients (66.2%) received &ge;1 HR drug, 71 (100%) &ge;1 PR drug and 71 (100%) &ge;1 CR drug. The most frequent HR drugs were azithromycin (30, 42.3%) and domperidone (22, 31.0%); among PR drugs, tacrolimus (71, 100%); and among CR drugs, amphotericin B (70, 98.6%), pantoprazole (52, 73.2%) and furosemide (41, 57.7%). Polyexposure was common: 24 patients (34%) received &ge;2 HR/PR drugs and 48 (68%) &ge;3 CR drugs. The most prevalent risk factors were age &gt;65 years (25, 35.2%), female sex (24, 33.8%) and hypomagnesaemia (20, 28.2%).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Lung transplant patients showed high exposure to QT-prolonging drugs, with frequent polyexposure and coexistence of risk factors such as age &gt;65 years, female sex and hypomagnesaemia. This combination increases the likelihood of severe arrhythmias and potentially fatal events. These findings highlight the need for systematic pharmacotherapeutic review and close clinical monitoring, in which hospital pharmacists play a key role in optimising patient safety.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Escobar Hernandez, L., Correa Ballester, M., Fernandez Megia, M., Martin Cerezuela, M., Rodenas Rovira, M., Zhu, S., Arnau, B., Chovi Trull, M., Monte Boquet, E., Garcia Pellicer, J., Poveda Andres, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.449</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.449</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-022 Analysis of exposure to QT-prolonging drugs in lung transplant patients]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A222</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A222</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A222-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-023 Evaluating the performance of two OpenAI models for clinical decision-making in hospital pharmacy]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A222-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used to support clinical decision-making in hospital pharmacy. However, different AI models may affect reliability and safety in high-risk settings. This study compares two OpenAI models&ndash;ChatGPT-Instant (GPTI) and ChatGPT-Thinking (GPTT)&ndash;in solving clinical queries in hospital pharmacy.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To compare two AI models, GPTI and GPTT, evaluating accuracy and response time (RT) to determine their suitability for pharmaceutical practice.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Eighty questions were designed and grouped into four thematic blocks of 20 questions each: (B1) availability of the medicine in the hospital and therapeutic alternatives; (B2) posology; (B3) intravenous compatibility and (B4) administration via nasogastric tube (NGT). Both models received identical questions with the memory function disabled. A hospital pharmacist assessed responses as correct/incorrect, missing information, and measured RT. Agreement in correct/incorrect responses between models was analysed using McNemar&rsquo;s test per block.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>GPTI showed a mean RT of 7.8 seconds in B1 and B3, 6.3 seconds in B2, and 4.3 seconds in B4. GPTT exhibited longer times: 123.6 seconds in B1, 85.5 seconds in B2, 84.5 seconds in B3, and 160.9 seconds in B4. GPTI achieved 80% correct in B1, 90% in B2 and B4, and 45% in B3; GPTT achieved 95% correct in B1, B2, B3, and 100% in B4. Missing information for GPTI was 5% in B2 and B3 and 20% in B4, whereas GPTT showed missing information only in B1 (5%). McNemar p-values: B1 p=0.375; B2 p=1.0; B3 p=0.002; B4 p=not defined, as the GPTT variable was constant in this block.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>GPTT outperformed GPTI in reliability across all clinical tasks, with statistically significant differences in intravenous compatibility. GPTI was comparable to GPTT in Blocks 2 and 4, with shorter RTs. GPTI was faster across all areas but had higher error rates and more missing information. GPTT is therefore more suitable for assisting with clinical queries; however, its RT require improvement.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lago Ballester, F., Lazaro Cebas, A., Bejar, A. V., Martinez Madrid, M., Sevilla Alarcon, E., Moya Flores, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.450</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.450</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-023 Evaluating the performance of two OpenAI models for clinical decision-making in hospital pharmacy]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A222</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A222</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A223-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-024 Agreement among drug interaction databases for direct oral anticoagulants]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A223-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are widely prescribed in various clinical settings.Their potential to interact with other drugs is a significant concern. Multiple druginteraction databases are consulted in clinical practice, though agreement between themin classifying DOAC interactions is largely unknown.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To assess inter-database agreement in the classification of interaction severity for each DOAC.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A cross-sectional observational study was conducted using four drug interaction databases (Lexicomp, Medinteract, Micromedex, and Drugs.com). All interactions for apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban were retrieved. Severity ratings from each database were harmonised into four categories:</p><p><tbl id="T1" loc="float"><tblbdy top-stubs="2"><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Clasification</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Lexicomp</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Medinteract</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Micromedex</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Drugs.com</b> </c></r><r><c cspan="5" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Severe</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">X, D </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Grave </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Contraindicated, Major </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Major </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Moderate</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">C </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Moderada </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Moderate </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Moderate </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Minor</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">B </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Leve </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Minor </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Minor </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Undetermined</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">A </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">No determinado </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">- </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Unknown </c></r></tblbdy></tbl></p><p>Agreement was assessed at two levels: global (four databases) using Gwet&rsquo;s AC (quadratic weights) with Fleiss&rsquo; Kappa as sensitivity, and pairwise using Cohen&rsquo;s Kappa. Interpretation followed Altman&rsquo;s thresholds: &le;0.20 poor, 0.21&ndash;0.40 fair, 0.41&ndash;0.60 moderate, 0.61&ndash;0.80 good, 0.81&ndash;1.00 excellent agreement.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 1,992 drug interactions were analysed: apixaban 531 (26.7%), dabigatran 492 (24.7%), edoxaban 411 (20.6%), rivaroxaban 558 (28.0%). Agreement coefficients by DOAC were:</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Apixaban: Gwet&rsquo;s AC = 0.29, Fleiss&rsquo; Kappa = 0.17.</p></li><li><p>Dabigatran: Gwet&rsquo;s AC = 0.17, Fleiss&rsquo; Kappa = 0.15.</p></li><li><p>Edoxaban: Gwet&rsquo;s AC = 0.15, Fleiss&rsquo; Kappa = 0.11.</p></li><li><p>Rivaroxaban: Gwet&rsquo;s AC = 0.28, Fleiss&rsquo; Kappa = 0.15.</p></li></l></p><p>Apixaban and rivaroxaban had slightly higher agreement values, but all results remained between the &lsquo;poor&rsquo; and &lsquo;fair&rsquo; range.</p><p><tbl id="T2" loc="float"><no>Abstract 5PSQ-024 Table 1</no><tblbdy top-stubs="2"><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b> ACOD</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b> Lexicomp vs Medinteract</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b> Lexicomp vs Micromedex</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b> Lexicomp vs Drugs.com</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b> Medinteract vs Drugs.com</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b> Medinteract vs Micromedex</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b> Micromedex vs Drugs.com</b> </c></r><r><c cspan="7" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> Apixaban  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> 0.27  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> 0.39  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> 0.11  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> 0.07  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> 0.24  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> 0.12  </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> Dabigatran  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> 0.11  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> 0.18  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> 0.25  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> 0.16  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> 0.15  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> 0.14  </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> Edoxaban  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> 0.22  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> 0.14  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> 0.11  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> 0.10  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> 0.22  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> 0.00  </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> Rivaroxaban </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> 0.23  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> 0.32  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> 0.11  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> 0.10  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> 0.17  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> 0.12  </c></r></tblbdy></tbl></p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Agreement between drug interaction databases for DOACs is consistently poor, regardless of weighting method, with minimal variation among agents. Slightly higher concordance for apixaban and rivaroxaban suggests more consistent evidence or criteria for these drugs, while dabigatran and edoxaban showed the lowest agreement. Clinicians should consult multiple sources when evaluating DOAC interactions, and efforts to standardise classification systems could enhance consistency and patient safety.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Garcia Martinez, D., Irene, M., Pousada Fonseca, A., Gonzalez Fuentes, A., Carrera Sanchez, M., Laura, F., Mercedes, A., Pablo, V., Alberto, M., Sergio, D., Segura Bedmar, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.451</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.451</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-024 Agreement among drug interaction databases for direct oral anticoagulants]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A223</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A223</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A223-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-025 Medication reconciliation in the emergency department performed by pharmacists]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A223-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Since 2005, the Spanish Ministry of Health has promoted the Patient Safety Strategy within the National Health System (SNS) to improve patient safety culture. Strategic Line 2 focuses on safe clinical practices, including medication reconciliation to ensure safe medication use. In 2025, Garc&iacute;a Orcoyen Hospital implemented medication reconciliation for patients admitted to emergency department in observation beds.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>Determine the incidence and types of medication discrepancies in observation bed patients. Analyse discrepancy types and physicians&rsquo; responses. Assess prescribing quality and the reconciliation process.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective observational study was conducted in a regional hospital on patients admitted to emergency observation beds from January to July 2025, in whom medication reconciliation was performed. Data collected included: the number of reconciled medications, types of discrepancies (justified/unjustified), and physician responses (reconciliation error, justified, no response).</p><p>To assess prescribing quality, the following indicators were evaluated: medications with reconciliation errors (RE) (%) (number of RE/number of reconciled medications). RE per patient (number of RE/number of patients with &ge;1 RE)</p><p>To evaluate the quality of the medication reconciliation process, the following was assessed: detected RE (number of RE/number of discrepancies requiring clarification)</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 183 patients were reconciled, 45% of whom were men. The mean age was 70.6 years (IC95% 68,1-73); 1,000 discrepancies (55%) were detected, with 81.5% justified. Of the unjustified discrepancies, 20% were later justified by physicians. No discrepancies remained without medical response.</p><p>Of unjutified discrepancies (185), 148 of 185 discrepancies (80%) were RE. The most affected drug groups were (number, percentage): central nervous system drugs (37, 25%), varius (36, 24,3%), cardiovascular therapy (30, 20.3%), ocular therapy (15,10.1%), hormonal therapy (7,4.7%), NSAIDs/antirheumatics therapy (6,4.1%), antidiabetics (5,3.4%), respiratory therapy (5,3.4%), antithrombotics therapy (4,2.7%), cytostatics/immunosuppressants/corticosteroids (2,1.4%), and antibiotics (1,0.7%).</p><p>Prescribing quality: 8.14% (148/1819) of medications had RE, averaging 0.81 errors per patient.</p><p>Quality of the medication reconciliation process: There were 0.80 medication errors (148/185) per patient.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>A high number of RE were detected. Detecting and correcting these errors is crucial to prevent patient harm, improve pharmacotherapeutic continuity, and optimise treatment. Pharmacist intervention is key to promoting patient safety.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. https://www.sefh.es/bibliotecavirtual/conciliacion/Libro_consenso_terminologia_conciliacion.pdf</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cabia, L., Garcia, P., Idoate, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.452</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.452</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-025 Medication reconciliation in the emergency department performed by pharmacists]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A223</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A224</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A224-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-026 Efficacy and safety of trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab versus trifluridine/tipiracil monotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A224-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>According to SUNLIGHT phase III trial, the combination of trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD-TPI) in addition to bevacizumab (BEV) has demonstrated to have the potential to extend progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) more than FTD-TPI alone in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To assess the efficacy and security of FTD-TPI plus bevacizumab versus FTD-TPI monotherapy in patients with mCRC.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Retrospective and observational study of patients treated between January 2023 and September 2025.</p><p>The following data were collected: demographics (sex, age), cancer localisation, presence of RAS/BRAF mutations, line of treatment, ECOG performance status at the beginning of treatment, number of chemotherapy cycles administered, adverse events (AEs) and their grade, PFS and OS.Data were analysed using SPSS statistical software.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 35 patients were included: 13 women and 22 men. Of these, 23 received FTD-TPI and 12 received FTD-TPI plus BEV. The mean age was 67 years, and the most prevalent tumour location was the sigmoid colon adenocarcinoma (49%), followed by the rectum, right colon, caecum, ascending colon, and transverse colon adenocarcinoma. Furthermore, only 22 patients had undergone genetic testing, standing out two cases of BRAF mutation and nine cases of RAF mutation.</p><p>Both drug regimens were mainly used as a third-line treatment (89%) for patients with ECOG performance status of 0-1 (86%) primarily. The average number of cycles administered was 4 [1-21], and adverse events (AEs) grade 2-4 were reported in 65% of patients receiving monotherapy and 50% of those receiving combination therapy (predominantly asthenia and haematological toxicity, followed by nausea, hepatotoxicity, and skin toxicity). FTD-TPI treatment had to be discontinued due to adverse effects in two cases.</p><p>For the FTD-TPI group, the median PFS was 4 months (95% CI: 2,8-5,2) and the median OS was 7 months (95% CI: 4,4-9,6). For the FTD-TPI+BEV group, the median PFS was 5 months (95% CI: 3,6-6,4) and the median OS was 8 months (95% CI: 4,3-11,7). At the end of the study, 25% of patients were still undergoing treatment.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Better outcomes were found in the FTD-TPI + BEV, obtaining better PFS and OS results than monotherapy with FTD-TPI without interfering in therapy safety.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Torres Zaragoza, L., Zambrano Croche, M., Velazquez Vazquez, H., Navarro Ruiz, A., Martinez Ortega, L., Suarez Morillas, M., Carmona Carmona, D., Izquierdo Pajuelo, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.453</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.453</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-026 Efficacy and safety of trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab versus trifluridine/tipiracil monotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A224</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A224</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A224-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-027 Compliance with herpes zoster vaccination recommendations in patients treated with JAK kinase inhibitors]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A224-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Patients in treatment with janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) have an increased risk of herpes zoster virus (HZV) infection. Since March 2021, a document on HZV vaccination recommendations has been available in our country, recommending vaccination of patients receiving JAKi therapy.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The purpose was to analyse the degree of compliance with these recommendations in rheumatologic and digestive patients receiving JAKi therapy in a regional hospital.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective and observational study of patients diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), Crohn&rsquo;s disease (CD), or ulcerative colitis (UC) who received JAKi treatment was performed from March 2021 to March 2025. Variables analysed were: age, sex, diagnosis, anti-JAK treatment received, HZV vaccination, and HZV infection as a side effect.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 79 JAKi treatments were analysed, corresponding to 70 patients: 46 women with a median age of 55 (24&ndash;95) years. Forty patients were diagnosed with RA, 12 (17%) with AS, 8 with UC, 7 with PsA, and 3 with CD. Regarding treatment, 90% of patients received a single JAKi, 7% have received two JAKi, and another 7% have received three. Drugs used were: upadacitinib (40%), baricitinib (35%), tofacitinib (24%), and filgotinib (11%). Regarding HZV vaccination, 31 patients were given the opportunity to be vaccinated following the established recommendations, 14% before starting JAKi and 25% after starting them. The degree of acceptance was 80%. The 61% of patients did not have the option of vaccination. Regarding HZV infection as a side effect, two patients who had not been vaccinated developed HZV infection and discontinuation of JAKi was required.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The degree of compliance with HZV vaccination recommendations in patients with rheumatic and/or digestive diseases receiving JAKi is relatively low in our hospital. Although the incidence of HZV infection observed in our patients was very low and similar to that described in various studies, discontinuation of treatment was required in both patients. This implies that HZV vaccination is essential. A vaccination protocol must be established in collaboration with Preventive Medicine Service to comply with these recommendations and to reduce the incidence of HZV in these patients.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Preciado Goldaracena, J., Alzueta Isturiz, N., Tejada Marin, D., Magallon Martinez, A., Erdozain Sanclemente, S., Yerro Yanguas, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.454</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.454</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-027 Compliance with herpes zoster vaccination recommendations in patients treated with JAK kinase inhibitors]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A224</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A224</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A225-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-028 Manipulation of enalapril tablets for paediatric patients - to crush or not to crush?]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A225-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Manipulation of tablets (eg, splitting, crushing and/or dispersing in water) to achieve paediatric doses is common in paediatric wards.<sup>1</sup> Studies on dose accuracy after manipulation have shown large variations depending on formulation and method of manipulation.<sup>2</sup> Previous observations on paediatric wards have shown enalapril tablets being crushed and dispersed in water as a common method of manipulation.<sup>3</sup>  </p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To investigate dose accuracy obtained after manipulation of enalapril tablets using clinically relevant methods of manipulation.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Enalapril tablets: <I>Enalapril Krka 5</I>  <I> mg</I>, Krka Sverige AB. Instrument: HPLC-system from Shimadzu Corp (Nexera, with Prominence DAD-detector). Analytical column: Supelcosil<sup>TM</sup> LC-8, 5 &mu;m, 250x4 .6 mm (Supelco , Merck KGaA). Analytical assay: Enalapril Maleate Tablets, USP.</p><p>  <I>Disintegration time:</I> Whole tablets were added to 10 ml water in a medicine cup. Time until full disintegration of the tablet while stirring intermittently was recorded.</p><p>  <I>Dose accuracy study:</I> Tablets (one or two) were crushed and dispersed in 10 ml water in a medicine cup (n=6). After 30 seconds of stirring, samples of 1 ml, 5 ml or 8 ml were withdrawn with an oral syringe, extracting partial doses of 10%, 50% and 160% of a tablet. Tablets were also dispersed whole in 10 ml water and 5 ml withdrawn (50% of a tablet) after five minutes of intermittent stirring (n=6), regardless of full dispersal of the tablet.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>  <I>Enalapril Krka 5</I>  <I> mg</I> had an average disintegration time of 13 minutes (12-14 minutes). <cross-ref type="tbl" refid="T1">Table 1</cross-ref> shows a summary of dose accuracy after manipulation for both methods of manipulation.</p><p><tbl id="T1" loc="float"><no>Abstract 5PSQ-028 Table 1</no><caption><p>Dose accuracy after manipulation of Enalapril Krka 5 mg; average (min-max)</p></caption><tblbdy top-stubs="2"><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Method of manipulation</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Partial dose</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>% of intended dose</b> </c></r><r><c cspan="3" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Crushed </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">10% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">96.0% (91.7-103.2%) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Crushed </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">50% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">100.5% (98.7-102.2%) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Crushed </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">160% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">98.1% (97.3-99.1%) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Dispersed whole </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">50% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">78.2% (73.-82.2%) </c></r></tblbdy></tbl></p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Long disintegration time confirmed why enalapril tablets consistently were crushed in the ward. Crushing before dispersing tablets of enalapril provides accurate partial doses. It&rsquo;s important to ensure that the whole tablet is dispersed in the liquid before extracting a dose.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. Bjerknes, <I>et al. Acta Paediatrica.</I> 2017;<b>106</b>:503&ndash;508.</p><p>2. Brustugun, <I>et al. Eur J Hosp Pharm.</I> 2021;<b>28</b>:76&ndash;82.</p><p>3. Svendsen, <I>et al.</I> (under review).</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Svendsen, R., Abdi, A., Fischer, S., Hagesaether, E., Tho, I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.455</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.455</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-028 Manipulation of enalapril tablets for paediatric patients - to crush or not to crush?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A225</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A225</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A225-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-029 Medical gases in hospital setting: a questionnaire-based study to assess healthcare professionals knowledge and behaviours]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A225-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Medical gases such as oxygen are classified as therapeutic products and follow current European or national guidelines and standards. They are routinely used in various clinical departments in hospitals and healthcare personnel must know how to handle and administer gases safely.</p><p>Understanding their properties and potential hazards is essential to ensure the safety of healthcare professionals and patients, and the quality of care.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The purpose of this study was to assess caregivers&rsquo; knowledge of medical gases and behaviours when administering them to patients, in order to prioritise future training programs to be implemented in our hospital.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>This cross-sectional study was carried out in a French university hospital from March, 3<sup>rd</sup> to May 31<sup>st</sup>, 2025. The 10-question survey was designed by two pharmacists and reviewed by 2 caregivers, and was given to healthcare professionals in paper format to complete anonymously. This questionnaire was intended for healthcare professionals administering medical gases; physicians were excluded.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 546 participants took part in the survey in 57 departments of a University hospital in France, including 299 (54.6%) state-registered nurses and 182 (33.3%) nursing assistants. 87.9% of participants (480/546) stated that oxygen is a medication. Before administration, 60.8% of participants reported always verifying the type of gas by reading the label, and 34.4% by checking the colour of the cylinder. However, 30.9% reported always or often taking the gas cylinder without reading the label. 24.7% of participants reported always informing the patient about the safety measures to be followed when inhaling medical gases. 49.8% of professionals (272/546) reported having received training in the handling and use of medical gases.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>These findings on the knowledge and practices of health professionals regarding medical gases helped identify obstacles and drivers, and underscore the need to offer appropriate training in line with best practices and to ensure the quality of care related to medical gas administration. In addition, measures must be taken to improve patient information with traceability of this information in patient records.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dupuis, A., Berho, O., Xavier, F., Guihenneuc, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.456</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.456</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-029 Medical gases in hospital setting: a questionnaire-based study to assess healthcare professionals knowledge and behaviours]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A225</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A225</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A225-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-030 Educational videos for training hospital pharmacy staff in sterile compounding: a practical initiative]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A225-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Training in hospital pharmacy demands precision, continuous updating, and strict compliance with safety and quality standards. Traditional face-to-face teaching has been limited by instructor availability and the variability of prior preparation, making it challenging to ensure a consistent skill level among staff.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To standardise training, enhance process safety, and promote ongoing learning, a practical initiative was developed: concise educational videos focusing on critical compounding techniques in sterile settings. This approach aims to provide an innovative, accessible, and effective educational tool for pharmacist with basic prior training.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Most common topics were selected, including proper gowning, ophthalmic solutions, intravitreal injections, parenteral nutrition, and cytotoxic drug handling. 17 short videos (2&ndash;5 minutes each) were produced internally and made available through the hospital intranet, accessible on any device. To evaluate their impact, 16 pharmacists completed pre- and post-viewing questionnaires, rating knowledge from 1 (none) to 5 (high).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Before watching the videos, participants reported intermediate knowledge, with average score of 2.7 (&plusmn;1.45 Standard desviation (SD)) reflecting limited or partial training. The weakest areas were ophthalmic preparations and intravitreal injections, where confidence was particularly low. For parenteral nutrition and cytotoxic handling, variability was high, with some reporting basic knowledge and others minimal preparation. The only maximum score was given to the perceived usefulness of videos as a training format.</p><p>After viewing, scores increased substantially across all areas, reaching averages close to 4.3 (&plusmn;0,81 SD). Pharmacists reported greater clarity in the steps required for laminar flow cabinet work and improved confidence in preparing ophthalmic solutions, intravitreal injections, and parenteral nutrition, even in on-call situations. The video format was highly rated for clarity, structure, applicability, and accessibility, with mean scores around 4.5 (&plusmn;0.7 SD).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Educational videos proved to be an effective strategy to strengthen knowledge, enhance safety, and standardise hospital pharmacy practices. Given their versatility, low cost, and transferability, they represent a good practice model applicable to other hospitals. This initiative may serve as the first step toward a more comprehensive online training program for new staff without prior knowledge, integrating audiovisual resources with theoretical content and competency-based assessment.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guerrero Feria, I., Sanchez Pascual, B., Santiago Prieto, E., Alcaraz Lopez, J., Mora Amago, C., Perez Garcia, E., Martin Santamaria, A., De Espana Zaforteza, P., Herrero Collado, L., Calvo Salvador, M., Sanchez Guerrero, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.457</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.457</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-030 Educational videos for training hospital pharmacy staff in sterile compounding: a practical initiative]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A225</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A226</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A226-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-031 Evaluation of drug-related risk factors for patient-specific prioritisation in hospitalised elderly patients]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A226-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>The growing complexity of healthcare underscores the need for patient-centred medication reviews to ensure safe drug use. Pharmacist interventions in older adults (&ge;65 years) have been shown to significantly reduce hospital readmissions and emergency visits. To deliver effective and timely medication reviews, it is essential to evaluate patient-specific risk factors and establish strategies that prioritise high-risk patients for pharmacist-led interventions.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This study aimed to evaluate associations between patient-specific risk factors and drug-related problems (DRPs), with the goal of developing criteria to identify high-risk patients for targeted pharmacist interventions.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>This retrospective single-centre study included patients aged &ge;65 years who were hospitalised at Asan Medical Centre in March 2025. Patient-specific risk factors and DRPs were assessed, and their associations were analysed to identify predictors and selection criteria for high-risk patients.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Among 2,574 patients, 313 (12.2%) had DRPs and 2,261 (87.8%) did not. A total of 578 pharmacist interventions were recorded, most commonly related to potentially inappropriate medications (19.0%), laboratory-based dose adjustments (12.0%), and therapeutic duplication (12.0%). Significant associations were observed between DRPs and most patient-specific risk factors, excluding selected laboratory abnormalities. Independent predictors of DRPs included: Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS &ge;5, OR 6.203, 95% CI 4.562&ndash;8.436, p&lt;0.001), impaired renal function (eGFR &lt;30;, OR 1.944, 95% CI 1.229&ndash;3.075, p=0.005), polypharmacy (&ge;5 drugs;, OR 2.409, 95% CI 1.500&ndash;3.865, p&lt;0.001; &ge;10 drugs;, OR 9.162, 95% CI 5.604&ndash;14.978, p&lt;0.001), &ge;2 opioids (OR 1.853, 95% CI 1.072&ndash;3.203, p=0.027), &ge;1 TDM drug (OR 1.751, 95% CI 1.061&ndash;2.891, p=0.028), and therapeutic duplication (OR 1.641, 95% CI 1.158&ndash;2.326, p=0.005).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Patient-specific risk factors, including polypharmacy, frailty, impaired renal function, opioid use, TDM drugs, and therapeutic duplication, were significantly associated with increased risk of DRPs. These findings highlight the importance of incorporating risk factor-based criteria into patient selection strategies for pharmacist-led interventions. Further multicentre, prospective studies are warranted to strengthen the evidence base and refine prioritisation frameworks.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gong, S., Han, S., Yang, S., Choi, J., Han, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.458</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.458</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-031 Evaluation of drug-related risk factors for patient-specific prioritisation in hospitalised elderly patients]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A226</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A226</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A226-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-032 Pre-dispensing errors involving high-alert medications among inpatients in a tertiary care hospital: a retrospective analysis]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A226-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Medication errors during the pre-dispensing stage pose a serious risk when high-alert medications (HAMs) are involved. These errors may compromise patient safety and lead to increased healthcare costs. International guidelines emphasise the importance of system-level safeguards for HAMs.<sup>1</sup>  </p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This study aimed to describe the frequency, types, and monthly trends of pre-dispensing errors involving HAMs among inpatients, and to examine whether error patterns varied across pharmacy working shifts.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective descriptive study was performed using pharmacy error records from October 2024 to July 2025. All inpatient orders containing HAMs with identified pre-dispensing errors were included. Errors were classified (wrong instructions, wrong drug/item, wrong strength, etc.). Chi-square tests were used to assess the association between detailed error types and working shifts. To address low cell counts, error types were grouped into high-frequency and low frequency categories and analysed using Fisher&rsquo;s exact test. A p-value &lt; 0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 130 pre-dispensing errors were identified. The most common error categories were wrong instructions (26.9%), wrong drug/item (22.3%), wrong quantity (20.0%), and wrong strength (15.4%). The Chi-square test did not demonstrate a significant association between error type and shift (<sup>2</sup> = 6.46, df = 4, p = 0.167). However, when dichotomised into high- vs. low frequency categories, Fisher&rsquo;s exact test showed a significant association (<sup>2</sup> = 6.08, df = 2, p = 0.048), with low frequency errors (eg, wrong dosage form) occurring predominantly during evening and night shifts.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Pre-dispensing errors involving HAMs continue to be a persistent challenge. While frequent errors were evenly distributed across all shifts, rare error types appeared disproportionately during off-peak shifts, suggesting that contextual factors, such as staffing and fatigue, may have contributed to this discrepancy.<sup>2</sup> These findings support the need for both systemic safeguards and shift-specific interventions to enhance patient safety in hospital pharmacy.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP). ISMP list of high-alert medications in acute care settings. Horsham, PA: ISMP; 2023.</p><p>2. Phansalkar S, Hoffman JM, Murff HJ, Ash JS, Desai AA, Bell DS, Middleton B. Pharmacist workload and fatigue as potential contributors to medication errors. <I>J Patient Saf.</I> 2013;<b>9</b>(3):154&ndash;160.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phokinboonyasit, T., Wongwejwiwat, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.459</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.459</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-032 Pre-dispensing errors involving high-alert medications among inpatients in a tertiary care hospital: a retrospective analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A226</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A227</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A227-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-033 Medication reconciliation outcomes with digital support (PHARMS): evidence from 2025 at a tertiary hospital]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A227-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Medication reconciliation (MR) is a crucial safety strategy to prevent medication discrepancies during transitions of care. Delays and incomplete MR can lead to preventable harm. Digital tools, such as PharMS, have been developed to support pharmacists in performing MR more efficiently.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate MR outcomes with PharMS during a full fiscal year (October 2024 &ndash; September 2025), focusing on timeliness, discrepancy detection, and patient safety.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective observational study was conducted, encompassing all inpatients who underwent MR during the study period. The primary outcome was the proportion of MRs completed within 24 hours of admission. Secondary outcomes included MR processing time, number and type of discrepancies detected, the proportion of preventable errors resolved, and severity of errors based on NCC MERP categories. Descriptive statistics with 95% confidence intervals were reported, and proportions were compared with the previous year where relevant.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 18,288 patients underwent MR.</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Timeliness: 90.6% (16,551/18,288) of patients received MR within 24 hours (95% CI: 90.2&ndash;90.9%), exceeding the 80% target. Average MR completion time was 56 minutes, a 32% reduction compared with baseline, while the PharMS&ndash;assisted digital comparison step required 27 seconds on average (57% reduction).</p></li><li><p>Discrepancies: Pharmacists detected 120 discrepancies, most frequently duplication (40.7%; 95% CI: 31.5&ndash;49.9%) and omission (37.0%; 95% CI: 28.7&ndash;45.7%).</p></li><li><p>Error prevention: 90.0% (108/120; 95% CI: 83.2&ndash;94.7%) of discrepancies were prevented or resolved. This represented a significant increase compared to the previous year (71.4%; z = 3.11, p = 0.0019).</p></li></l></p><p>Patient safety: Most discrepancies were intercepted before reaching patients (NCC MERP level B). Only two cases (0.011%) resulted in level E harm, both related to warfarin, corresponding to an incidence of ~1.1 per 10,000 MR cases (95% CI: 0.13&ndash;3.9).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>PharMS-supported MR in 2025 achieved high timeliness, improved efficiency, and enhanced detection of discrepancies, with a significantly higher proportion of preventable errors resolved. Serious harm events were infrequent. These findings demonstrate the impact of digital support systems in strengthening medication safety and ensuring timely MR in hospital practice.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Samsri, P., Wongwejwiwat, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.460</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.460</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-033 Medication reconciliation outcomes with digital support (PHARMS): evidence from 2025 at a tertiary hospital]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A227</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A227</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A227-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-034 Tecovirimat against monkeypox: safety, efficacy and patient feedback]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A227-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>In July 2022 and August 2024, WHO declared monkeypox (MPOX) outbreaks as public health emergencies. Currently, in September 2025, cases remain uncontrolled in central-eastern Africa, and therapeutic options are almost non-existent.</p><p>Tecovirimat, active against <I>Orthopoxvirus,</I> inhibits p37 protein, preventing viral envelope formation. In our country, it is only available via special import authorisation.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate tecovirimat&rsquo;s safety and efficacy through clinical data and patient feedback from MPOX cases treated at our centre.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>We analysed clinical and demographic data from patients treated between June 2022 and September 2025 at a tertiary hospital. Satisfaction was assessed using TSQM 1.4 (Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication). All participants gave informed consent; protocol was approved by the ethics committee.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Fourteen patients were treated (13 men, 1 trans woman; median age 36). Seven (50%) were HIV-positive, five of whom had good virological and immunological control while two had viral loads of 1,300,000 and 49,800 c/mL and CD4 + 158 and 166 per &micro;L, respectively. Only one had previously received the MPOX vaccine.</p><p>Tecovirimat was prescribed in severe cases: Among HIV+ patients, 3 had ocular lesions, 2 had poor immune control, 1 presented a polymicrobial septic shock. Among immunocompetent patients, 5 had ocular lesions (57.1% overall), 1 had brain involvement. In addition, one patient in each group didn&rsquo;t respond to symptomatic treatment.</p><p>Most (57.1%) received 600 mg/12h for 14 days. Two had shorter courses (5 and 7 days), the first due to early recovery (vaccinated) and the other due to an adverse event. Two received 28-days treatments (ocular lesions and dosing error) and the last two received five 14-day cycles (both with ocular lesions).</p><p>TSQM scores (n=13) were effectiveness 81.7%, convenience 93.8%, global satisfaction 75.3%. Six patients (42.9%) reported mild adverse effects (stomach ache, nausea, diarrhoea); one (7.1%) developed probable toxic hepatitis (Naranjo score 5/13), requiring treatment discontinuation.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Tecovirimat was generally safe and well tolerated, though close monitoring is advised. Vaccination may help prevent complications. Further research is needed to confirm efficacy and explore new treatments.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vargas Guerras, P., Roman, A. G., Alberdi Lema, C., Nos Cifre, I., Rial Dominguez, Y., Torrent Rodriguez, A., Castella Kastner, M., Peraita Ezcurra, M., Tuset Creus, M., Blanco Arevalo, J., Soy Muner, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.461</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.461</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-034 Tecovirimat against monkeypox: safety, efficacy and patient feedback]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A227</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A228</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A228-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-035 Challenges in conducting paediatric clinical trials: lessons from healthcare providers experiences]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A228-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Paediatric clinical trials are essential for developing evidence-based treatments tailored to children&rsquo;s needs. However, their implementation is often limited by ethical, logistical and communication challenges. Understanding the perspectives of healthcare providers (HCP) involved in such trials is critical to improving trial design, patient recruitment, and retention.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This study aimed to explore the attitudes of HCP (physicians and hospital pharmacists) towards paediatric clinical trials and to identify the main barriers they encounter in practice.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 10 HCPs affiliated with a university hospital in Plovdiv, Bulgaria. Data collection focused on perceived challenges, ethical concerns and recommendations for improvement. Responses were assessed using thematic analysis.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>HCP reported that parental distrust was the most frequent barrier to paediatric clinical trial participation, often driven by fears of children being treated as &lsquo;test subjects.&rsquo; Informed consent was challenged by parental anxiety and the difficulty of presenting complex medical information in accessible language. HCP highlighted the value of involving adolescents in decision-making to improve engagement. Ethical concerns centred on safety, particularly regarding severe adverse events and long-term effects of investigational drugs. Logistical challenges included excessive documentation and frequent hospital visits, which increased the burden on families. Suggested improvements included simplified educational materials, reduced administrative tasks, and transparent communication, alongside broader public awareness campaigns to strengthen trust and participation.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>HCP recognise the value of paediatric clinical trials but face substantial challenges related to parental trust, ethical concerns, and trial logistics. Addressing these issues through simplified communication, family-centred trial designs, and transparent collaboration could foster greater participation and improve the overall quality of paediatric research. These insights may inform future strategies to optimise trial feasibility and patient engagement.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stoynova, H., Staynova, R., Kafalova, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.462</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.462</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-035 Challenges in conducting paediatric clinical trials: lessons from healthcare providers experiences]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A228</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A228</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A228-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-036 Individualised use of intramuscular levothyroxine in refractory hypothyroidism: case report]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A228-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Oral levothyroxine is the standard treatment for hypothyroidism. However, some patients present refractory disease despite high oral doses. Intramuscular (IM) administration of levothyroxine may provide a therapeutic alternative to these patients; nonetheless, its evidence is very limited. We present a case of difficult to control hypothyroidism, successfully treated with a weekly regimen of IM levothyroxine.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To describe the clinical course of a 31-year-old woman with hypothyroidism refractory to high oral doses of levothyroxine. The patient had a history of Graves&rsquo; disease treated with iodine-131.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Routine analytical tests were performed, revealing elevated thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) levels (&gt;200 mU/L) despite treatment with oral levothyroxine at a dose of up to 1000 &micro;g/week, with adequate adherence and administration technique. The levothyroxine absorption test showed an increase in free thyroxine (FT4) &gt;100% after administration of 900 &micro;g orally, ruling out malabsorption. After administration of 400 &micro;g of intravenous (IV) levothyroxine, the patient reported significant clinical improvement, so it was decided to start treatment with IM levothyroxine, with clinical and biochemical monitoring every 6-8 weeks.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Treatment began in June 2024 with 200 &micro;g/week of IM levothyroxine. Doses were progressively titrated (250 -&gt; 375 -&gt; 500 -&gt; 650 -&gt; 800 &micro;g/week) based on symptoms and biochemical findings. The patient reported substantial improvement in energy, mood, and functional capacity. Serial laboratory monitoring confirmed a gradual TSH reduction and stabilisation of FT4 in the low-normal range:</p><p>18/06/2024:TSH 192.98;FT4 0.3</p><p>04/10/2024:TSH 127;FT4 0.54</p><p>31/01/2025:TSH 23;FT4 0.88</p><p>25/08/2025:TSH 17;FT4 1</p><p>The treatment was well tolerated, with no adverse reactions observed. Adherence was excellent, supervised by healthcare professionals and family members.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Weekly IM levothyroxine successfully stabilised thyroid function and improved clinical status in a patient with refractory hypothyroidism. Although not included in current clinical guidelines, this approach may serve as a valuable option in selected cases. Further studies are required to establish long-term safety, efficacy, and standardised treatment protocols.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. Grebe SK, Cooke RR, Ford HC, Fagerstro&#x0308;m JN, Cordwell DP, Lever NA, <I>et al</I>. Treatment of hypothyroidism with once weekly thyroxine. <I>J Clin Endocrinol Metab.</I> 1997;<b>82</b>(3):870&ndash;5.</p><p>2. Koulouri O, Auldin MA, Agarwal R, Murray RD. Intramuscular and subcutaneous levothyroxine: a successful treatment for non-compliance. <I>Endocrinol Diabetes Metab Case Rep.</I> 2013;<b>2013</b>:130060.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Erdozain, S., Yerro Yanguas, A., Tejada Navas, D., Preciado Goldaracena, J., Alzueta Isturiz, N., Marin Marin, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.463</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.463</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-036 Individualised use of intramuscular levothyroxine in refractory hypothyroidism: case report]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A228</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A229</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A229-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-037 Quality of life in patients with suppurative hidradenitis]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A229-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Suppurative hidradenitis (SH) is a chronic, immune-mediated, systemic, progressive, and suppurative inflammatory skin disease.</p><p>SH impacts quality of life socially and sexually due to odour and disfigurement, professionally by increasing the risk of social exclusion, and psychologically as it is associated with anxiety and depression.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To analyse the impact of SH on the quality of life of patients undergoing biological therapy. We also evaluated mental health status and characterised the sociodemographic profile through validated questionnaires.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Prospective, observational, single-centre study in SH adult patients receiving biological treatment (adalimumab, secukinumab or bimekizumab) at a general hospital (March-June 2025).</p><p>Those unable to complete questionnaires, unable to understand Spanish or includedin clinical trials were excluded.</p><p>Hospital health system&rsquo;s digital medical program, Pharmacy software, excel and SPSS were used.</p><p>Patients who provided informed consent, recieved an information sheet, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and the HS-specific quality of life questionnaire (HSQoL-24).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p><tbl id="T1" loc="float"><no>Abstract 5PSQ-037 Table 1</no><caption><p>Sociodemographic profile</p></caption><tblbdy top-stubs="2"><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>n</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Median age</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Adalimumab</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Secukinumab</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Median disease duration (year)</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Median treatment Duration (month)</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Hurley stage II</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Hurley stage III</b> </c></r><r><c cspan="8" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">19 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">45 (25.00-58.00) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">14 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">5 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">5.5 (3.25-8.75) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">17 (7.00-36.00) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">6 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">11 </c></r></tblbdy></tbl></p><p>Disease progression was assessed using severity index for SH and CRP, showing reductions with biological treatment (p&lt;0.05).</p><p>The most prevalent risk factors were smoking (52.63%) and overweight/obesity (63.16%). Comorbidities such as acne and anxiety were also present.</p><p>HSQoL-24 results showed severe impact in the psychosocial (57.89%) and relational (63.16%) domains. The occupational domain was more evenly distributed, with 31.58% reporting no impact. Most patients did not report significant impact in economic (47.37%), clinical (52.63%), or personal (42.10%) domains. Overall, 52.63% showed severe quality of life impairment.</p><p>Subgroup analysis revealed differences in smokers regarding depression, occupational impact, and overall impact, and in patients with anxiety regarding psychosocial and overall impact (p&lt;0.05).</p><p><tbl id="T2" loc="float"><no>Abstract 5PSQ-037 Table 2</no><caption><p>Mental health</p></caption><tblbdy top-stubs="2"><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Hads</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Severity</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Patients</b> </c></r><r><c cspan="3" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">ANSIETY </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Normal </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">11 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Mild </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">5 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Moderate/severe </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">3 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">DEPRESSION </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Normal </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">14 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Mild </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">4 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Moderate/severe </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1 </c></r></tblbdy></tbl></p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Over half of the patients smoke and were overweight/obese.</p><p>More than 50% of patients showed no signs of anxiety, and around 75% do not exhibit depressive patterns. However, mild and severe cases should be considered.</p><p>SH severely affects patients&lsquo; quality of life, being the most affected psychosocial and relational domains.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ramirez Herraiz, E., Perez Abanades, M., Serra Lopez-Matencio, J., Calvo Garcia, A., Collado Mohedano, A., Ibanez Zurriaga, M., Ruiz Garcia, S., Alvarez Yuste, A., Delgado Jimenez, Y., Aranguren Oyarzabal, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.464</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.464</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-037 Quality of life in patients with suppurative hidradenitis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A229</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A229</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A229-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-038 Extended antibiotic prescriptions in hospitals : prescriptions compliance and the impact of infectious disease specialists opinions]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A229-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Prolonged antibiotic therapy increases the risk of bacterial resistance, adverse effects, and additional hospital costs. Despite the recommendations (reassessment at 48-72 hours and shortest possible durations), many prescriptions exceed 7 days. In this context, the pharmacist analyses prescriptions exceeding 7 days daily basis to assess their compliance.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To assess the relevance of hospital prescriptions for antibiotics &gt; 7 days (01/01-31/12/2024) and the impact of the infectious disease specialist&rsquo;s opinion on their compliance.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Compliance was assessed according to three criteria: indication, duration, and justification in the Electronic Health Record (EHR). A prescription is non-compliant when at least one criterion is not met. The data were obtained from Excel, prescription software, the institution&rsquo;s antibiotic guide, and the literature. The impact of the infectious disease specialist&rsquo;s opinion was measured using the Chi-square test and relative risk (RR) calculation.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>871 prescriptions &gt; 7 days were analysed, with an average duration of 21 days. The main indications were urology (32.8%), pulmonary infections (13.2%), and systemic infections (9.0%). The non-compliance rate was 12.7%, mainly due to excessive duration (73.2%), inadequacy for the indication (16.2%), and lack of justification in the EHR (10.6%). The association between the presence or absence of an infectious disease specialist&rsquo;s opinion and prescription compliance is statistically significant (p &lt; 0.05). The relative risk is 2.37.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Despite the recommendations, inappropriate prescriptions persist, mainly due to excessive duration. The absence of an infectious disease specialist&rsquo;s opinion increases the risk of non-compliance by a factor of nearly 2.5 (RR = 2.37), highlighting its essential role. The evaluation of the &lsquo;treatment reassessment&rsquo; criterion difficult to use due to the lack of a consistent definition within the pharmaceutical team, which limits its interpretation. In addition, the prescribed duration does not always correspond to the actual duration of administration, leading to a probable overestimation of treatments &gt; 7 days. Systematic reassessment at 48-72 hours and then on day 7, combined with reminders of good practices via the antibiotic guide, would reduce antibiotic resistance, limit adverse effects, and generate economic and ecological benefits.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bersinger, S., Coquet, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.465</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.465</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-038 Extended antibiotic prescriptions in hospitals : prescriptions compliance and the impact of infectious disease specialists opinions]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A229</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A230</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A230-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-039 Impact of added lipid-lowering therapy on control of LDL cholesterol levels in patients receiving alirocumab or evolucumab: a comparative analysis in real-world clinical practice]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A230-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Maintaining a calculated level of LDL cholesterol (cLDL) below 70 mg/dL is a minimum goal in patients at high cardiovascular risk to reduce the likelihood of further events. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors (PCSK9i), such as alirocumab and evolocumab, effectively manage cLDL levels. However, the relative efficacy of combining these drugs with other lipid-lowering therapies is less well-known.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This study aims to describe cLDL control in patients treated with PCSK9i for the prevention of secondary cardiovascular events or strokes and to evaluate the impact of adjunctive lipid-lowering therapy on cLDL levels.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A cross-sectional study was conducted among patients receiving evolocumab or alirocumab. We recorded age, sex, cLDL level, the use of additional lipid-lowering therapy, and adherence to it (defined as dispensing 80% of planned packages). Eligible patients included those on active secondary prevention treatments, with cLDL measurements taken at least two months post-PCSK9i initiation. Patients with cLDL &lt;10 mg/dl or &gt;200 mg/dl were excluded. Participants were categorised into four groups based on their added lipid-lowering treatments: no added therapy, high-efficacy statin (atorvastatin/rosuvastatin) and ezetimibe, high-efficacy statin alone, and ezetimibe alone. Patients with poor adherence were assigned to the no added therapy group. We used the Kruskal-Wallis and Fisher tests to compare mean cLDL levels and the proportion of patients achieving cLDL&lt;70 mg/dl, respectively.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Among 138 analysed patients (31% women, mean age 65.8&plusmn;10.9 years), 71% of cases had cLDL&lt;70 mg/dl and mean cLDL levels were 57.1&plusmn;22.7 mg/dl; these levels varied significantly among groups: 48.4&plusmn;16.3 mg/dl for statin plus ezetimibe (n=77), 56.27&plusmn;25.8 mg/dl for statin alone (n=15), 69.9&plusmn;14.9 mg/dl for ezetimibe alone (n=8), and 72.4&plusmn;25.1 mg/dl for no added treatment (n=38) (p&lt;0.0001). The control rates were 88.3%, 66.7%, 50.0%, and 42.1%, respectively (p&lt;0.0001). Patients on a statin plus ezetimibe had double the likelihood of achieving control (RR = 2.1, 95% CI:1.4-3.1). We did not find differences in the primary outcomes between patients treated with alirocumab or evolucumab.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Overall, more than two-thirds of the patients had their cLDL levels under control, with those adhering to a high-efficacy statin plus ezetimibe treatment regimen demonstrating significantly better outcomes compared to other treatment groups.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Schoenenberger Arnaiz, J., Bardoll-Cucala, M., Nevot-Blanc, M., Couceiro-Zamora, I., Worner-Diz, F., Mauri-Capdevila, G., Santos-Rey, M., Torres-Cortada, G., Gomez-Arbones, X., Torres-Bondia, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.466</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.466</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-039 Impact of added lipid-lowering therapy on control of LDL cholesterol levels in patients receiving alirocumab or evolucumab: a comparative analysis in real-world clinical practice]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A230</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A230</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A230-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-040 Safety profile analysis of ruxolitinib in patients with graft-versus-host disease: real-world data]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A230-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Graft-versus-host disease(GvHD) is a serious complication after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation(allo-HSCT). Ruxolitinib is effective in refractory cases, but real-world safety data are limited.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the safety of ruxolitinib in patients with acute GvHD and chronic GvHD refractory to corticosteroids after allo-HSCT.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Observational, descriptive, retrospective study, (July 2017&ndash;August 2025) including patients authorised to receive ruxolitinib by the Committee for Rational Use of Medicines and Medical Devices.</p><p>Demographic, clinical (underlying disease, donor type, conditioning regimen, GvHD type), and treatment-related (dose, start/end dates, adverse drug reaction [ADR], grade, dose adjustments, reasons for discontinuation, mortality) variables were analysed. Data were obtained from electronic medical records and the software for management of oncology patients. ADRs were graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Thirty-six patients were included (61% male, median age 52 years). The most common underlying diseases were acute myeloid leukaemia (36.1%) and acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (16.7%). A total of 47.2% received a related donor transplant (70.6% HLA-identical) and 31% of patients underwent myeloablative conditioning. A total of 41.7% had aGvHD and 58.3% had cGvHD.</p><p>Of the 36 patients included, two were excluded for not starting treatment.</p><p>The initial dose was 5 mg every 12 h in 41.2% of patients; median treatment duration was 15.7 months (95% CI:6.83&ndash;50.8).</p><p>ADRs were observed in 20 patients (58.8%), most frequently anaemia (n=10), thrombocytopenia (n=7), neutropenia (n=6), and renal impairment (RI)(n=4).</p><p>Thirty-four ADRs were identified; 20.6% required dose reduction, mainly for RI, liver test abnormalities, and thrombocytopenia.</p><p>Three patients required temporary treatment discontinuation due to cytopenias and renal impairment.Toxicity led to permanent discontinuation in 8 patients (23.5%): RI(n=2), anaemia (n=3), neutropenia (n=2), headache(n=1) and thrombocytopenia (1).</p><p>Three patients experienced grade 2&ndash;3 ADRs (two with thrombocytopenia, one with thrombocytopenia and anaemia), and two patients developed grade 4 neutropenia.</p><p>Eleven deaths were recorded, all due to transplant-related complications, and none drug-related. Among them, seven patients had aGvHD, four cGvHD.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Ruxolitinib showed a high incidence of ADRs in real-world practice, affecting more than half of patients.This affected treatment continuity, causing dose reductions and permanent discontinuations in nearly a quarter of patients. Predominant toxicity was hematologic (anaemia, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia).</p><p>Most adverse events were manageable, with some grade 3&ndash;4 ADRs, but no drug-related deaths occurred.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Munoz Villasur, M., Rodriguez-Tenreiro Rodriguez, C., De La Fuente Villaverde, I., Diaz Romero, C., Fadon Herrera, C., Esparrago Fernandez, C., Gomez Mato, A., Latasa Berasategui, M., Varela Ferreiro, M., Ordonez Fernandez, L., Lozano Blazquez, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.467</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.467</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-040 Safety profile analysis of ruxolitinib in patients with graft-versus-host disease: real-world data]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A230</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A231</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A231-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-041 Transforming discharge medication services: reducing waiting times and errors through technology]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A231-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Discharge medication services at a tertiary hospital faced significant challenges from manual prescription processing during limited hours (11:30&ndash;13:00), resulting in patient waiting times of 45&ndash;90 minutes and pharmacy overcrowding. The medication error rate reached 6.62 pre-dispensing errors (PDE) per 1,000 patient-days, raising critical patient safety concerns. These challenges necessitated urgent system redesign using technology-driven interventions and value stream mapping methodology to streamline workflow and enhance medication safety.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate and compare waiting times and medication error rates before and after implementing a technology-enhanced discharge medication system.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective descriptive study was conducted December 1&ndash;26, 2025, involving 360 discharged inpatients. The intervention included prescription scanning, semi-automated dispensing cabinets, smart shelving, and QR code-based medication collection. Primary outcomes were waiting time at pharmacy counter, medication processing time, and total time from physician order to medication collection. Secondary outcomes were prescribing errors (PE) and pre-dispensing errors (PDE) per 1,000 patient-days. Data from hospital information systems were analysed using paired t-tests and chi-square tests (p &lt; 0.05).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Post-intervention mean waiting time was 6.71 minutes, processing time 37.66 minutes, and total time 157.54 minutes. Medication error rates were 2.45 PE and 0.88 PDE per 1,000 patient-days. No significant association existed between number of medications and processing time (p = 0.126). Workflow redesign reduced waiting time from 45&ndash;90 minutes to 6.71 minutes (p &lt; 0.001). PE increased by 0.57 due to improved error detection, while PDE decreased from 6.62 to 0.88 per 1,000 patient-days (p &lt; 0.001), indicating enhanced safety. Further improvements eliminated three non-value-added steps. Computerised Physician Order Entry (CPOE) integration and bedside counselling reduced total processing time from 157.54 to 66.03 minutes.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Technology-driven redesign with value stream mapping achieved 86% reduction in waiting time and 87% reduction in PDE, demonstrating significant clinical impact. The PE increase reflected improved error detection rather than quality deterioration. This study provides a replicable model for hospitals facing similar challenges, showing that systematic workflow analysis combined with appropriate technology dramatically improves efficiency and safety while enhancing patient-centred care and satisfaction.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chandaval, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.468</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.468</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-041 Transforming discharge medication services: reducing waiting times and errors through technology]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A231</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A231</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A231-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-042 Eosinophilic pneumonia associated with daptomycin: a disproportionality analysis from ten years of pharmacovigilance data]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A231-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Daptomycin is a cyclic lipopeptide antibiotic widely used for treating serious gram-positive bacterial infections. While generally well-tolerated, evidence<sup>1</sup> suggests potential pulmonary toxicity, including eosinophilic pneumonia, a rare but serious adverse reaction characterised by eosinophil accumulation in lung tissue. Eosinophilic pneumonia represents a significant clinical concern due to its potential severity and the need for prompt recognition and management.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To assess the association between daptomycin use and eosinophilic pneumonia through disproportionality analysis of real-world pharmacovigilance data.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>The analysis was performed by extracting suspected adverse drug reaction cases from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) Public Dashboard. Data were extracted and filtered to identify reports of eosinophilic pneumonia (coded according to Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities v27.0) in association with daptomycin. The disproportionality analysis was conducted using IBM SPSS Modeler 15.0. The evaluated time period spanned approximately 10 years, from January 2015 to June 2025. Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Chi-squared statistics, and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. The criteria defined by Evans<sup>2</sup> were applied to assess signal detection: PRR&gt;2, Chi-squared&gt;4, and at least 3 cases (n&gt;2).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The disproportionality analysis demonstrated a statistically significant association between daptomycin and eosinophilic pneumonia. The calculated disproportionality measures were PRR 830.9 (95% CI: 731.575-943.611), ROR 907.5 (95% CI: 791.75-1040.281), and Chi-squared 180895.4.</p><p>According to the criteria of Evans this combination of drug and adverse event is considered &lsquo;likely an adverse reaction&rsquo;.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>According to our analysis, daptomycin is probably associated with eosinophilic pneumonia. These findings support the need for pulmonary monitoring during therapy and underscore the key role of hospital pharmacists in detecting rare adverse reactions and enhancing patient safety through active pharmacovigilance.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. Nota Informativa Importante su Daptomicina (Cubicin) (21/01/2011) - AIFA Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco:https://www.aifa.gov.it/-/nota-informativa-importante-su-daptomicina-cubicin-21-01-2011-. Last accessed:September 2025</p><p>2. Evans SJ, <I>et al</I>. Use of proportional reporting ratios (PRRs) for signal generation from spontaneous adverse drug reaction reports. <I>Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf.</I> 2001;<b>10</b>(6):483&ndash;486.doi: 10.1002/pds.677.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Castellana, E., Cestino, D., Tarozzo, A., Viglianti, R., Bagnasco, L., Molon, C., Chiappetta, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.469</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.469</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-042 Eosinophilic pneumonia associated with daptomycin: a disproportionality analysis from ten years of pharmacovigilance data]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A231</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A232</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A232-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-043 Rare adverse event monitoring: nonarteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy associated with tirzepatide - a pharmacovigilance disproportionality study]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A232-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Nonarteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy (NAION) represents the most common acute optic neuropathy in patients over 50 years, potentially causing permanent vision loss. Recent pharmacovigilance signals have emerged regarding Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and ocular adverse events. While semaglutide has been studied, limited data exist on tirzepatide&rsquo;s association with NAION. Given tirzepatide&rsquo;s increasing clinical use, investigating potential ocular safety signals is crucial for patient safety.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This study aimed to investigate the association between tirzepatide and NAION through disproportionality analysis using real-world pharmacovigilance data. The primary objective was assessing reporting patterns and statistical significance of ischaemic optic neuropathy (ION) events in patients receiving tirzepatide compared to other medications.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective disproportionality analysis was conducted using Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) Public Dashboard from January 1, 2022, to June 30, 2025. The study focused on reports containing tirzepatide as suspected drug and &lsquo;Ischaemic optic neuropathy&rsquo; as adverse event, since NAION is not included in Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities version 27.0. Analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Modeler 15.0. Multiple disproportionality measures were calculated: Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), and Chi-squared statistics. Evans<sup>1</sup> criteria (n &gt; 2, chi-square &gt; 4, PRR &gt; 2) were applied to assess drug adverse event association probability.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The analysis revealed significant statistical associations between tirzepatide and ischaemic optic neuropathy. Results were: PRR (95% CI): 2.49 (1.68&ndash;3.68), ROR (95% CI): 2.49 (1.68&ndash;3.69), and Chi-squared: 20.72. All parameters exceeded Evans&rsquo; thresholds, indicating that the combination is &lsquo;likely an adverse reaction.&rsquo;</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>This pharmacovigilance analysis provides evidence for significant disproportionality between tirzepatide and ischaemic optic neuropathy in FAERS database. According to Evans criteria, the association suggests a probable adverse drug reaction. These findings extend safety observations beyond semaglutide to tirzepatide. Healthcare providers should consider this potential risk when prescribing tirzepatide, particularly in patients with ocular risk factors. Further prospective studies are needed to establish causality and define clinical risk magnitude.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. Evans SJ, <I>et al</I>. Use of proportional reporting ratios (PRRs) for signal generation from spontaneous adverse drug reaction reports. <I>Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf.</I> 2001;<b>10</b>(6):483&ndash;486. doi: 10.1002/pds.677.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Castellana, E., Cestino, D., Tarozzo, A., Viglianti, R., Bagnasco, L., Molon, C., Chiappetta, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.470</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.470</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-043 Rare adverse event monitoring: nonarteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy associated with tirzepatide - a pharmacovigilance disproportionality study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A232</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A232</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A232-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-044 Pharmacovigilance of the anti-Mpox vaccine: clinical experience in a hospital setting]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A232-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Mpox is a zoonotic viral infection caused by the monkeypox virus, a member of the Poxviridae family. In humans, it is characterised by fever, rash, and varying degrees of asthenia. While zoonotic transmission is predominant, human-to-human spread may also occur through close contact with symptomatic cases. To limit viral spread, and in accordance with Italian Ministerial Circular 35365 (August 5, 2022), vaccination was made freely available to selected groups, including laboratory staff and individuals engaging in high-risk sexual behaviours. The vaccine is based on an attenuated virus obtained after more than 500 passages in chicken embryo fibroblast (CEF) cells. In our hospital vaccination centre, its administration was accompanied by dedicated pharmacovigilance monitoring</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This study aimed to review reports collected between August 2022 and April 2025 and to compare them with national trends</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>We extracted the total number of patients treated and the doses administered from the institutional vaccination platform for the period between August 16, 2022, and April 15, 2025. Concurrently, adverse reactions (ADRs) reported in the pharmacovigilance network were analysed and classified by severity and System Organ Class (SOC)</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Over the study period, 561 vaccine doses were administered. A total of 325 patients were treated, with a mean age of 42 years. Of these, 95% received two doses, while the remaining 5% received only one, thus not completing the vaccination schedule. In the same time frame, 2.6% of the 561 administered doses resulted in an adverse reaction report. All ADRs were non-serious and were classified as systemic disorders (60%), skin disorders (25%), and musculoskeletal disorders (15%). Notably, one case of psoriasis flare-up was observed in a 50-year-old man, occurring 14 days after the first dose. The classification of events according to SOC indicates that our findings are consistent with trends observed at the national level</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Our centre contributed significantly to national monitoring, generating 35.7% of the adverse reaction reports recorded in Italy and subsequently included in the National Pharmacovigilance Network. The pharmacovigilance activity we conduct aims to systematically improve understanding of the tolerability of the Mpox vaccine and to investigate in detail its risk&ndash;benefit profile</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dauria, M., Barbato, I., Musella, F., Pistucci, M., Dapice, R., Spatarella, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.471</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.471</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-044 Pharmacovigilance of the anti-Mpox vaccine: clinical experience in a hospital setting]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A232</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A233</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A233-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-045 Boosting medication safety in intensive care units: application of a tailored self-assessment tool]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A233-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Medication errors are more frequent and potentially more harmful in Intensive Care Units (ICUs) due to patient complexity, the use of high-risk drugs, and the need for rapid clinical decision-making. The Spanish Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP) has created a specialised self-assessment tool for ICUs to evaluate medication safety.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>Our hospital has chosen to implement the ISMP tool in the ICU to identify potential risks and recommend strategies for improvement. The objective was to develop a specific action plan aimed at enhancing safety and reducing the likelihood of medication-related errors.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>In September 2023, the hospital established a multidisciplinary task force that included intensive care physicians, a specialist pharmacist, nursing staff, and the Quality and Patient Safety Coordinator. This task force completed the ISMP self-assessment tool, recorded their responses, and analysed the results. Throughout 2024, the task force held six meetings to review the scores and identify priority areas that received values below 50%. They proposed several improvement strategies based on their findings.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The overall score was 47.75%, which is below the average of 55% for comparable hospitals. The results were particularly poor in several key areas: patient and medication information (34.44%), pharmacist recruitment (29.05%), staff competency and training (38.46%), and quality and risk management programs (26.92%).</p><p>To tackle these issues, several measures have been proposed, including:</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Implementing medication reconciliation and stockout management protocols</p></li><li><p>Actively recruiting pharmacists for smart infusion pump management teams</p></li><li><p>Developing training and onboarding protocols that focus on medication safety</p></li><li><p>Integrating medication safety objectives into the ICU&rsquo;s strategic plan</p></li><li><p>Creating a program for error detection, reporting, and analysis</p></li></l></p><p>Although the ICU has already begun to implement many of these actions, it is essential to introduce a new questionnaire to evaluate their effectiveness.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The self-assessment questionnaire is an important tool for identifying gaps in medication safety within intensive care units. The interventions identified through this process can be implemented across other hospital services, thereby enhancing the culture of safety and quality of care in critical environments.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. Cuestionario de autoevaluaci&oacute;n de la seguridad de los SMI [Internet]. [citado 6 de septiembre de 2025]. Disponible en: http://apps.ismp-espana.org/smi/</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martinez, B., Balsera-Garrido, B., Badia-Castello, M., Urrea-Allue, S., Teixine-Martin, A., Caballero-Lopez, J., Nevot-Blanc, M., Martinez-Sogues, M., Cuy-Bueno, M., Servia-Goixart, L., Schoenenberger-Arnaiz, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.472</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.472</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-045 Boosting medication safety in intensive care units: application of a tailored self-assessment tool]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A233</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A233</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A233-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-046 Adverse drug reactions and prescribing cascades reported by healthcare professionals and patients]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A233-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Prescribing cascades occur when an adverse drug reaction (ADR) of a first medication (index medication) is treated with a second medication (marker medication). They can result in polypharmacy and harm. While various interventions are recommended in literature to prevent harm, it is unknown which are implemented in daily practice.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the type of interventions implemented for ADRs.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>This descriptive, cross-sectional study analysed secondary data from spontaneous ADR reports submitted to the Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb between 2019 and 2025. ADR reports were included if the ADR was suspected to be caused by an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) and if an intervention was documented. The primary outcome was the frequency of reported ADRs treated with 1) dose reduction of the index medication, 2) discontinuation of the index medication, 3) discontinuation of the index medication followed by medication to treat the ADR, 4) a switch of index medication, or 5) addition of a marker medication. The secondary outcome was the proportion of ADRs resolved at the time of the ADR report.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 902 spontaneous ADR reports were included. The most frequent interventions were discontinuation of the index medication followed by introducing additional medication to treat the ADR (42.5%) and discontinuation of the index medication only (20.6%). These interventions resulted in the largest proportions of resolved ADRs (46.5% and 50.0%, respectively). However, a considerable number of spontaneous reports included prescribing cascades (11.9%). This was the least effective strategy, resolving ADRs in only 25.2% of cases.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Using real-world pharmacovigilance data, this study offers a valuable insight into the treatment of ADRs, caused by ACE inhibitors and ARBs, in daily practice. Further research is needed to establish the most effective interventions for specific types of ADRs.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Spronk, S., Nielen, Y., Heier, L., Jessurun, N., Kant, A., Karapinar, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.473</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.473</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-046 Adverse drug reactions and prescribing cascades reported by healthcare professionals and patients]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A233</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A234</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A234-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-047 Participation of the hospital pharmacist in a multidisciplinary dysphagia unit: a descriptive study]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A234-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Dysphagia units are multidisciplinary teams aimed at optimising the care of patients with swallowing disorders. However, the presence and role of the hospital pharmacist within these teams have been scarcely described in the literature, and little is known about their specific interventions.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To describe the activities carried out by the hospital pharmacist within a multidisciplinary dysphagia unit.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A descriptive observational study was conducted to characterise the activities of the hospital pharmacist within a multidisciplinary dysphagia unit. The unit was established in 2021 and integrated the hospital pharmacist from its inception. Data were collected from institutional records, internal documentation, and activity logs of the unit. Both qualitative information (type of interventions, role within the team) and quantitative data (number of courses delivered, participants trained, and case consultations resolved) were analysed. Activities were classified into four domains: education and training, development of guidance tools, case-based consultations, and therapeutic optimisation in polymedicated patients with dysphagia.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The hospital pharmacist participated in four key activities within the dysphagia unit:</p><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Training: Design and delivery of educational sessions focused on drug administration and nutritional management in dysphagia, including 8 training courses, with a total of 156 participants.</p></li><li><p>Development of guidance tools: Elaboration of a medication management guideline, integrated into electronic prescribing systems and nursing administration planning with 987 drugs reviewed.</p></li><li><p>Case consultations: Resolution of specific clinical queries related to nutrition and medication in dysphagic patients.</p></li><li><p>Therapeutic optimisation: Review and optimisation of treatment regimens in polymedicated patients with dysphagia, based on individualised clinical cases.</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The integration of the hospital pharmacist into the dysphagia unit highlights the clinical and educational relevance of pharmaceutical interventions in the multidisciplinary management of dysphagia. The pharmacist contributes to improved medication safety, nutrition management, and therapeutic optimisation, reinforcing the value of including pharmacy services in these specialised units.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gea Rodriguez, M., Avellanet, M., Pages, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.474</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.474</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-047 Participation of the hospital pharmacist in a multidisciplinary dysphagia unit: a descriptive study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A234</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A234</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A234-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-048 9-month outcomes of a pharmaceutical intervention to reduce exceeding maximum dose prescriptions in elderly people]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A234-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>In October 2024, a semi-automated process was implemented in nursing homes (NH) to detect and reduce potentially inappropriate prescriptions (PIPs) that exceed the maximum recommended dose: omeprazole, esomeprazole and rabeprazole &ge; 40 mg/day, pantoprazole &ge; 80 mg/day, lansoprazole &ge; 60 mg/day (PPIs); zolpidem &gt; 5 mg/day (ZLP); acetylsalicylic acid &gt; 100mg/day (AAS); citalopram &gt; 20 mg/day, escitalopram &gt; 10 mg/day (SSRIs); iron &gt; 200mg/day (Fe). After the pharmaceutical intervention (PI), PIPs were reduced by 66.5%. Long-term follow-up is crucial to assess the intervention.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To analyse the number of PIPs exceeding maximum doses nine months after the PI, assess changes within each PIP group, and identify the reasons for those changes.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Automatic data extraction was used to analyse the intervened population.</p></li><li><p>Reasons for changes in each PIP group were examined.</p></li><li><p>Alternative drugs were identified for each PIP group:</p></li><li><p>a. PPIs: antacids</p></li><li><p>b. ZLP: hypnotics/anxiolytics</p></li><li><p>c. AAS: antiplatelets</p></li><li><p>d. SSRIs: antidepressants</p></li><li><p>e. Iron: anti&ndash;anaemic agents</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>After the PI in October 2024, 158 patients had PIPs; nine months later, 123 patients had PIPs. During this period, 35 patients died.</p><p><tbl id="T1" loc="float"><no>Abstract 5PSQ-048 Table 1</no><caption><p>Results of PIP number</p></caption><tblbdy top-stubs="2"><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> PPIs </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> ZLP </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> AAS </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> SSRIs </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> Fe </c></r><r><c cspan="6" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Number of PIPs (October 2024)(n=158) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> 20  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> 20 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> 1 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> 8 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> 5 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Number of PIPs (July 2025) (n=123) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> 17  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> 14 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> 1 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> 8 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> 2 </c></r></tblbdy></tbl></p><p>Reasons for changes in each PIP group:</p><p>PPIs: 5 deaths, 2 restarted for gastrointestinal symptoms</p><p>ZLP: 7 deaths, 1 restarted for unknown reasons</p><p>AAS: no changes observed</p><p>SSRIs: no changes observed</p><p>Fe: 4 deaths, 1 restarted for unknown reasons</p><p>Alternative treatments:</p><p>ZLP: diazepam (n=1)</p><p>SSRI: vortioxetine (n=1) and paroxetine (n=1)</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The reduction in PIPs exceeding maximum doses was largely maintained nine months after the PI, with minimal use of alternative treatments.</p><p>This approach supports safer prescribing and represents a practical tool for optimising pharmacotherapy in NH patients.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zipitria Sinde, I., Ros Olaso, A., Martiarena Ayestaran, A., Barral Juez, I., Sanchez Monasterio, I., Salegi Ansa, M., Ugartetxea Arakistain, N., Murua Etxarri, L., Simon Castelruiz, L., Saiz Martinez, C., Latasa Berasategui, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.475</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.475</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-048 9-month outcomes of a pharmaceutical intervention to reduce exceeding maximum dose prescriptions in elderly people]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A234</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A235</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A235-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-049 Photographic control in parenteral nutrition: added value compared to gravimetric and visual inspection]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A235-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>According to the Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP), parenteral nutrition (PN) is a high-risk medication due to its complex composition and preparation process. Standard quality controls include gravimetric verification and visual inspection of the tray containing all components required for PN compounding. However, some errors may remain undetected by these methods. The implementation of a photographic process could provide an additional layer of traceability, reinforce safety and reduce risk of medication errors. To date, limited data have been published on the systematic use of photographic documentation in PN quality assurance.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of a photographic process control system in PN compounding in a hospital pharmacy and to determine its added value compared with gravimetric and visual inspection.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A prospective observational study was conducted from May to September 2025 in the pharmacy department of a tertiary hospital. All PN preparations for adult and paediatric patients were included. Gravimetric and visual controls were performed, followed by photographic documentation throughout all steps of the compounding process. Photographs were reviewed to detect discrepancies not identified by conventional controls. Data collected included number of PN preparations, patient group, error type, and whether the error was detected only by photographic review.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>During the study period, 2566 PN admixtures were compounded, with 54 errors detected (2.1%), mainly related to incorrect dosing. The photographic system identified 27 additional dosing-related errors (50.0% of total) that were not identified by gravimetric or visual methods. In the adult population, 1564 admixtures were prepared (313/month; 10.4/day). Twenty-seven errors were reported (1.7%), of which 12 (44.4%) were identified exclusively by the photographic system. In the paediatric population, 1002 admixtures were compounded (200/month; 6.7/day). Twenty-seven errors were also reported (2.7%), of which 15 (55.5%) were detected only through photographic documentation. The photographic control was properly integrated into routine workflow.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Photographic process control improved error detection in PN, complementing gravimetric and visual methods. It enhanced traceability and provided a &lsquo;proof-of-process&rsquo; for quality assurance. These results support its integration as a feasible tool to increase PN safety in hospital pharmacy practice.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Prado Lozano, A., Mata Alonso, J., Jimenez Villaron, C., Dominguez Chaparro, G., Alonso Perez, L., Garcia Moreno, F., Ruiz Briones, P., Pernia Lopez, M., Romero Jimenez, R., Herranz Alonso, A., Sanjurjo Saez, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.476</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.476</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-049 Photographic control in parenteral nutrition: added value compared to gravimetric and visual inspection]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A235</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A235</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A235-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-050 Revisiting insulin prescribing, administration, and glucose monitoring practices in a hospital setting]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A235-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Insulins are high-alert critical medicines which have been identified as a significant medication safety issue nationally and locally. Annual insulin audits have been conducted locally since 2022 to evaluate use and develop QI including the appointment of a diabetes pharmacist, updated insulin charts, a bespoke eLearning module for the safe use of insulin, and continuous education.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To conduct a similar audit to assess performance and develop further QI as needed.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>This audit was conducted over one day in May 2025 using the SMART criteria, approved by the local Clinical Audit Committee, piloted, and communicated to 25 interprofessional data collectors. Generated data were anonymous and securely stored. Independent analysis was conducted by three researchers to confirm reliability of results.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>575 inpatients were reviewed on 24 wards. 7% were prescribed insulin, 22% had an Insulin and Glucose Monitoring Record, and 18% had a documented history of diabetes of whom 36% were treated with insulin. 80% of inpatients on insulin were living with T2DM. Patient speciality comprised 74% medical and 26% surgical. Prescribing errors comprised 53% of records, a significant improvement from previous audits. &gt;90% of prescribers clearly documented the correct insulin name, dose, and administration times; signed each prescription; and documented a medical council registration number, bleep, or name for contact purposes. Administration errors comprised 85% of records, similar to previous audits. 9% of insulin entries were administered when not prescribed, 11% were not double-checked, and 42% administration times were not documented. The diabetes team reviewed 62% inpatients on regular insulin. 38% inpatients had changes made to their insulin doses of whom 77% were reviewed by the diabetes team. 9% had a single omission of long-acting insulin (all with T2DM), 9% required the perioperative/fasting protocol which was followed correctly, and 9% had episodes of hypoglycaemia with no subsequent omission of insulin.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Results were positive and an improvement from previous audits. QI include reviewing the current practice of prescribing insulin daily to a longer duration and the implementation of ePrescribing in the future. All Irish hospitals have been encouraged to conduct a standardised national annual insulin audit to optimise patient care.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hogan-Murphy, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.477</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.477</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-050 Revisiting insulin prescribing, administration, and glucose monitoring practices in a hospital setting]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A235</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A236</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A236-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-051 Multidisciplinary approach to telepharmacy: implantation medication access through coordinated pharmaceutical and nursing care]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A236-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Telepharmacy is a service aimed at improving access to medication and continuity of pharmaceutical care, especially for vulnerable patients who are unable to visit hospital pharmacies.Proper assessment of patient frailty by the nursing team is crucial. Hospital-use medications require specialised supervision, making a safe and standardised procedure necessary.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To standardise medication delivery from hospital to community pharmacies, identify eligible patients via the nursing team and unify inclusion criteria for Telepharmacy.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Patients request inclusion during their hospital pharmacy visit, where pharmacists assess their vulnerability. High-risk patients are referred to a nursing team that applies the EPADI-ANTEQUERA frailty scale,considering factors such as age, cognitive impairment(Pfeiffer test), dependency level(Barthel scale), comorbidities (Charlson Comorbidity Index) and socio-family conditions. Patients with an EPADI score &ge;7(high frailty) are eligible Additionally, the patient&rsquo;s difficulty in accessing the hospital due to distance or geographic location will be considered.</p><p>A report is recorded in the digital medical record, allowing the pharmacist to determine patient eligibility and issue an inclusion document for the Telepharmacy service. With this document, tthe patient requests medication delivery from their community pharmacy 3&ndash;5 days prior to depletion of supply. The process ensures anonymity and traceability through a coded labelling system that maintains proper storage conditions.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>53 patients were evaluated, 60.3% were women, with a median age of 62 years (IQR 53-73). The most common conditions: rheumatoid arthritis (16.9%), psoriatic arthritis (7.5%), ankylosing spondylitis (11.3%), anaemia in chronic kidney disease patients (9.4%), multiple sclerosis (7.5%), and Crohn&rsquo;s disease(7.5%). The most frequently involved medications included adalimumab(13.2%), darbepoetin(9.4%), and abatacept, tocilizumab and mepolizumab (5.6% each). Median in the Charlson Comorbidity Index was 2(IQR 0-3), the Pfeiffer test 1.6(IQR 0-4), the Barthel scale 80(IQR 57.5-100), and the EPADI-ANTEQUERA Frailty Scale 5(IQR 2-6). 77.3% of patients had difficulties accessing the hospital due to mobility or transportation issues, while 13.2% were at social risk. 83% of patients were included in the Telepharmacy service, with no incidents in medication delivery and a 94.3% patient satisfaction rate.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The standardised Telepharmacy service improved medication access and continuity of care for vulnerable patients. Nurses&rsquo; frailty assessments were essential in identifying high-risk individuals. Expanding it could further benefit patients with mobility and transportation challenges.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maganto Garrido, S., Sanchez Suarez, M., Martin Roldan, A., Montero Lazaro, M., Sanchez Sanchez, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.478</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.478</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-051 Multidisciplinary approach to telepharmacy: implantation medication access through coordinated pharmaceutical and nursing care]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A236</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A236</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A236-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-052 Analysis of the frequency of administration of ranibizumab0.165 mg syringe and aflibercept3.6 mg syringe in age-related macular degeneration and diabetic macular oedema: resource management implications]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A236-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>AMD and DME are leading causes of vision loss, with <b>ranibizumab</b> and <b>aflibercept</b> as key treatments. However, frequent monthly injections create a significant burden on healthcare systems and patients. While clinical trials provide standard dosing, real-world data on treatment frequency is limited. This study aims to assess visit frequencies and their impact on healthcare resources, with the goal of optimising treatment intervals to reduce strain while maintaining efficacy.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>Ranibizumab and aflibercept are indicated, among others, for the treatment of adult patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and visual impairment due to diabetic macular oedema (DME). This study aimed to analyse the frequency of patient visits to achieve therapeutic effects for both treatments in these indications, assessing the workload and optimising resource management.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>This was a retrospective observational study included patients treated for AMD and DME with ranibizumab and aflibercept over one year (January 2024 to December 2024). Dispensing data from the pharmacy was reviewed, and patients were categorised by administration frequency: monthly, every month and a half, bimonthly, quarterly, and every four months, following the &lsquo;treat and extend&rsquo; regimen.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 529 AMD and 261 DME patients were analysed. In AMD, 276 patients were treated with aflibercept and 253 with ranibizumab; for DME, 138 received aflibercept and 123 ranibizumab.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The frequency of visits is similar for both treatments in AMD and DME. To achieve therapeutic outcomes, patients must attend consultations with a frequency of less than or equal to 1 month for both indications. While clinical trials provide important data, only real-world evaluations can ensure the effective implementation of results. Given the high percentage of monthly visits observed, an appropriate option would be to explore longer intervals of efficacy or to seek therapeutic alternatives that allow for spacing out doses</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martinez Orea, A., Guillen Diaz, M., Sanchez Blaya, A., Portero, C., Palazon Golzalvez, E., Alegria Samper, R., Cabezuelo Baldueza, B., Gea Munoz, C., Ventura Lopez, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.479</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.479</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-052 Analysis of the frequency of administration of ranibizumab0.165 mg syringe and aflibercept3.6 mg syringe in age-related macular degeneration and diabetic macular oedema: resource management implications]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A236</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A236</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A237-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-053 Implementation of a personalised telepharmacy model in oncological patients]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A237-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Oncology treatment requires continuous monitoring and appropriate pharmacotherapeutic management. Telepharmacy offers an innovative alternative to provide pharmaceutical care without the need for travel, which is especially beneficial for immunocompromised patients or those with mobility difficulties.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the effectiveness of personalised telepharmacy in improving treatment adherence and safety, as well as patient acceptance.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A telepharmacy program was implemented in the oncology pharmacy consultation. Patients were selected based on criteria such as patient frailty, distance from home to hospital and disease stability. Scheduled calls were conducted to address aspects such as adherence, occurrence of adverse effects, patient education on treatment, and resolution of doubts. Impact indicators such as adherence rates and patient satisfaction were measured. The satisfaction patient degree was evaluated with a numerical result from 1 (minimum satisfaction) to 10 (maximum satisfaction).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 76 patients were included in the telepharmacy program, 80% were men. The average age was 78 years (standard deviation 5.65). Among them, 65% had prostate cancer, 10% gastric cancer, 10% breast cancer, and 5% had ovarian, renal or lung cancer. The involved drugs were: enzalutamide(25), apalutamide(14), abiraterone (9), abemaciclib(6), capecitabine(6), osimertinib(5), imatinib(5), olaparib(2), pazopanib(2), and sunitinib(2). 152 pharmaceutical interventions were recorded, averaging two per patient. The main interventions were related to education on pathology and oral chemotherapy administration (40%), management of concomitant medications (28%), detection of potential drug interactions (10%), identification of adherence issues (12%), and management of adverse effects (10%). The most frequent adverse events were fatigue (20%), gastrointestinal intolerance (15%), and rash (10%), all managed through telepharmacy follow-up without treatment discontinuation.</p><p>The leading causes of non-adherence were forgetfulness (45%), underestimation of treatment importance (35%), and gastrointestinal intolerance(20%). Following individualised follow-up, adherence improved from 82% at baseline to 95% at three months. Patient satisfaction was high: 90% reported being &lsquo;very satisfied&rsquo; with the accessibility and pharmacist support, achieving a mean satisfaction score of 9.2&plusmn;0.7.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Personalised telepharmacy in oncology is an effective strategy to optimise pharmaceutical care, improving adherence and treatment safety. Its implementation in clinical practice can contribute to a better quality of life for oncology patients by facilitating access to continuous and specialised follow-up.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sanchez Suarez, M., Martin Roldan, A., Alarcon Payer, C., Maganto Garrido, S., Jimenez Morales, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.480</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.480</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-053 Implementation of a personalised telepharmacy model in oncological patients]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A237</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A237</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A237-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-054 From reaction to tolerance: hospital pharmacy experience with chemotherapy desensitisation]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A237-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Chemotherapy desensitisation (CD) enables safe re-administration of oncological drugs in patients with previous hypersensitivity reactions (HSR). These reactions often lead to discontinuation of first-line therapies, so implementing CD protocols allows patients to receive optimal therapy while minimising risk. However, evidence in routine clinical practice remains limited. In our hospital, CD is performed according to the standard Boston (Castells et al.) 12-step, 3-bag rapid desensitisation protocol, with progressive concentrations of 1:100, 1:10, 1:1. All infusions are prepared and verified by the Hospital Pharmacy Service.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The primary endpoint was to evaluate the safety and tolerance of CD, defined as the completion of planned cycles. The secondary endpoint was to analyse the relationship between allergy testing and the indication for desensitisation.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Observational, descriptive and retrospective study including patients with HSR to chemotherapy who subsequently received CD, between January 2012-July 2025, in a university hospital. Variables included age, sex, tumour type, drug desensitised, HSR type, cycles prior to HSR, tolerance (based on cycles under CD and reason for discontinuation) and allergy testing results.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>106 patients were included (mean age 58&plusmn;12.6 years), 89 women (84%), 17 men (16%). Tumour distribution was breast (31.1%), gynaecological (31.1%), digestive (27.4%), pulmonary (7.5%), head and neck (1.9%) and sarcoma (0.9%). The most frequently desensitised drugs were paclitaxel (45.4%), oxaliplatin (24.5%), carboplatin (14.1%), docetaxel (9.4%), cisplatin (4.7%), others (&lt;1% each). 96 patients (90.6%) suffered an immediate HSR, 10 patients (9.4%) a delayed HSR. Mean cycles prior to HSR were 2&plusmn;1.8, mean cycles under CD were 4&plusmn;3.2.</p><p>Regarding tolerance, 42 patients (39.6%) successfully completed the planned cycles, 11 (10.4%) discontinued due to HSR despite desensitisation, and 53 (50%) interrupted the treatment due to progression or death. Concerning allergy testing, 95 patients (89.6%) were tested before CD, with only 16 (16.8%) positives.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>CD showed to be a safe strategy, enabling patients with HSR to continue first-line treatments. The low correlation between allergy test results and indication for CD supports its use based on clinical judgement rather than test positivity. These findings emphasise the value of structured desensitisation protocols and highlight the essential role of hospital pharmacists in ensuring treatment continuity and safety.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Coiduras Del Olmo, L., Pinilla Lebrero, G., Garcia Martin, E., Loysele Susmozas, M., Martin Vega, E., Anaya Garcia, J., Fuente Irigoyen, R., Garcia De Santiago, B., Martinez Hernandez, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.481</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.481</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-054 From reaction to tolerance: hospital pharmacy experience with chemotherapy desensitisation]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A237</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A237</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A238-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-055 Maintenance therapy adherence and the effectiveness of tezepelumab in severe asthma]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A238-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Tezepelumab, a monoclonal antibody against thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), is indicated as maintenance therapy in addition to high-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in severe asthma. Adherence to maintenance therapy is a determining factor in disease control, and suboptimal adherence has been observed in up to 50% of patients.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate clinical outcomes of tezepelumab in severe asthma patients according to adherence to ICS maintenance therapy.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective, observational study was conducted at a tertiary hospital (November 2023&ndash;July 2025). Patients with uncontrolled severe asthma receiving at least 3 months of tezepelumab were included. Baseline and last available data were extracted from medical records: sex, age, smoking status, prior biologics, oral corticosteroid use, emergency visits, ICS dispensation, forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), and the FEV1/FVC ratio Adherence to ICS was assessed using pharmacy dispensing records.</p><p>The data were processed using LibreOffice Calc and SPSS Statistics version 25. Quantitative variables were expressed as mean and standard deviation (SD), and qualitative variables as frequencies (%). A statistical significance level of p&lt;0.05 was established.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Forty five patients were included. ICS adherence: 71% adherent vs 39% non-adherent. Women: 71% vs 65%; mean age 63.2&plusmn;12.8 vs 56.3&plusmn;9.9 years; smokers: 18% vs 42%; prior biologics: 36% vs 50%; oral corticosteroids: 39% vs 61%; emergency visits: 17% vs 39%.</p><p>Spirometry: FEV1 baseline 78.1&plusmn;25 vs 72.0&plusmn;24.8%; FEV1 final 84.0&plusmn;24.6 vs 74.2&plusmn;26.7%; FVC baseline 90.4&plusmn;21.7 vs 88.0&plusmn;18.6%; FVC final 95.6&plusmn;22.9 vs 89.2&plusmn;16.8%; FEV1/FVC baseline 85.8&plusmn;15.1 vs 82.0&plusmn;16.5%; FEV1/FVC final 88.8&plusmn;16.9 vs 83.3&plusmn;17.8%. No statistically significant differences (p&gt;0.05).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Patients treated with tezepelumab showed improvements in lung function in both groups, although these were not statistically significant. Patients who did not adhere to ICS treatment showed greater dependence on oral corticosteroids, more emergency room visits, and attenuated functional gains, confirming the negative clinical impact of non-adherence from other studies. However, the small sample size limits the generalisability of these findings, and larger real-world studies are needed.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Diaz Lopez, M., Roman Marquez, E., Sierra Garcia, F., Molina Cuadrado, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.482</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.482</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-055 Maintenance therapy adherence and the effectiveness of tezepelumab in severe asthma]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A238</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A238</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A238-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-056 Pharmaceutical interventions and toxicity monitoring in patients with melanoma treated with encorafenib and binimetinib]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A238-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>The combination of encorafenib and binimetinib is a standard option for BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma. However, its clinical management is complex due to the risk of class-related toxicities. Pharmaceutical care may play a key role in early identification of adverse effects, supporting treatment adjustments and improving patient safety.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To describe pharmaceutical interventions made during treatment with encorafenib/binimetinib and analyse their association with the occurrence of toxicities, treatment duration and therapeutic outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Multicentre, retrospective study that included all patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma treated with encorafenib/binimetinib since their introduction in hospital guidelines. Data collected: sex, age, treatment duration and outcomes (partial/complete response, stable disease, or tumour progression), reported toxicities (hepatic, muscular, renal, cutaneous) and pharmaceutical interventions. Data were collected from medical electronic record system and analysed using R commander.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 38 patients were included (84% male) with a median age of 63 years (IQR 47&ndash;73). BRAF V600E mutation was present in 89.4% of cases. Prior treatment had been received by 64.8% of patients: nivolumab in 92.1% and dabrafenib/trametinib in 7.9%. The most frequent metastatic sites were lung (36.8%), lymph nodes (31.5%), peritoneum (21.1%), and brain (21.1%). Median treatment duration with encorafenib/binimetinib was 22.5 months (IQR 12&ndash;37). Clinical outcomes included complete response in 42.1%, partial response in 36.8%, and stable disease in 10.5%. The most common toxicities were muscular (57.8%), cutaneous (31.5%), renal (26.3%), hepatic (26.3%), and ophthalmologic (26.3%).</p><p>Overall, 73.6% of patients required a pharmacist intervention, most frequently for monitoring adverse effects (63.1%), providing additional patient information (31.5%), dose adjustment recommendations (26.3%), drug&ndash;drug interaction management (21.1%), medication error prevention (21.1%), and medication reconciliation (10.5%). The acceptance rate of interventions was 89.4%. Following these interventions, 36.8% of patients experienced improved adverse effects, optimised dosing (21%), enhanced patient understanding and adherence and improved coordination of care (26.3%). 31.5% of patients required a dose adjustment of binimetinib, and 21% discontinued treatment, with only one discontinuation due to toxicity.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Pharmaceutical interventions were frequent and essential in patients treated with encorafenib/binimetinib. Their role in monitoring toxicities and supporting treatment adjustments highlights the value of integrating pharmacists into multidisciplinary care teams for melanoma management.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sanchez Suarez, M., Martin Roldan, A., Alarcon Payer, C., Gomez Diaz, M., Jimenez Morales, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.483</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.483</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-056 Pharmaceutical interventions and toxicity monitoring in patients with melanoma treated with encorafenib and binimetinib]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A238</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A239</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A239-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-057 Case report: combination therapy with mogamulizumab and DA-EPOCH chemotherapy in refractory sezary syndrome]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A239-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>S&eacute;zary syndrome (SS) is a leukaemic variant of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. After failure of first- and second-line therapies, treatment options remain limited. Evidence supporting the use of mogamulizumab in combination with chemotherapy is scarce and outcomes are variable.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The aim is to evaluate the clinical efficacy and tolerability of mogamulizumab, a humanised anti-CCR4 monoclonal antibody, combined with DA-EPOCH polychemotherapy in a 67-year-old female patient with refractory SS following failure of methotrexate and doxorubicin monotherapy.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>We reviewed the clinical course of a patient treated for her dermatology and haematology clinic at a secondary-level hospital. The patient was diagnosed with stage IVA2 SS, presenting with diffuse erythroderma, lymphadenopathy, and documented clonal T-cell population. Mogamulizumab was initiated as third-line therapy subsequent to disease progression. Due to a suboptimal clinical response, mogamulizumab was consequently combined off-label with DA-EPOCH chemotherapy. Clinical outcomes were assessed using PET/CT imaging, symptom evolution, pruritus control, and safety profile</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>After two cycles of combined mogamulizumab and DA-EPOCH chemotherapy, the PET/CT scan demonstrated a partial metabolic response with a Deauville score of 3 and a measurable reduction in both nodal and cutaneous disease burden. Compared with the limited benefit observed with mogamulizumab monotherapy, the combination produced improved lesion regression and partial resolution of erythroderma. The patient also reported marked symptomatic relief, including reduced fatigue, improved functional status, and notably decreased pruritus. The latter was managed with the off-label use of aprepitant and low-dose naltrexone, both approved by the hospital pharmacy committee. No grade 3/4 toxicities were observed. The patient successfully completed the planned cycles without dose delays or hospital readmissions, and the response was sustained at the next scheduled follow-up.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>In this heavily pretreated patient, the off-label addition of DA-EPOCH chemotherapy to mogamulizumab provided enhanced clinical benefit compared with prior monotherapy regimens. Improvements were achieved in both metabolic and symptomatic parameters, including a significant reduction in pruritus and lymphadenopathy. These findings support further investigation of this combination as a therapeutic alternative in refractory SS, pending validation in larger clinical settings.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. Kim YH, Bagot M, Pinter-Brown L, <I>et al</I>. Mogamulizumab versus vorinostat in previously treated cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. <I>Lancet Oncol.</I> 2018;<b>19</b>(9):1192&ndash;1204.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guerrero Herrera, C., Perez Cruz, J., Robles Munoz, M., Arcos Alvarez, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.484</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.484</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-057 Case report: combination therapy with mogamulizumab and DA-EPOCH chemotherapy in refractory sezary syndrome]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A239</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A239</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A239-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-058 Evaluation of adherence to the venous thromboembolism prophylaxis protocol in medical inpatients]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A239-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a preventable in-hospital cause of morbidity and mortality. Evaluating <b>adherence to thromboprophylaxis protocols</b> is essential for patient safety.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>  <b>To evaluate</b> adherence to the VTE prophylaxis protocol in medical inpatients.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A cross-sectional, descriptive, retrospective study was conducted in a 450-bed university hospital. <b>Three-point prevalence assessments</b> were conducted between November 2024 and January 2025 in medical wards. Patients in ICU, semi-critical, psychiatry, or same-day discharged were excluded. Clinical records were reviewed to collect demographic and anthropometric data, renal function, department and admission date, baseline treatment, and thromboprophylaxis (drug, regimen, and start date). Prescriptions were assessed for adequacy according to the institutional protocol. In patients not receiving prophylaxis, <b>thrombotic risk</b> was calculated using the <b>Padua scale</b>, and <b>contraindications</b> for pharmacological thromboprophylaxis were reviewed. Complex cases were discussed by a multidisciplinary team.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 100 patients were included (59% male, mean age 69 &plusmn; 15 years). The main admission services were: internal medicine (32%); onco-haematology (15%); infectious diseases (14%); neurology (11%); digestive (10%); cardiology (9%), and pulmonology (9%). Thirty-one percent received chronic oral anticoagulation: 26 continued treatment on admission, 4 discontinued it for clinical reasons, and one was not prescribed without justification. One patient started anticoagulation therapy during hospitalisation for pulmonary thromboembolism. Sixty-eight patients were candidates for VTE prophylaxis: <b>24/68 (35.3%) received tromboprophylaxis</b>, 11 of whom initiated it on the admission day. <b>Prescriptions were appropriate in 15 cases and inadequate in 9, mainly (6/9) due to suboptimal enoxaparin dosing</b> in relation to their weight or body mass index.<b> Among the 44 patients without prophylaxis, 29/44</b>  <b> (65.9%) had a justified omission:</b> 16 with Padua scale values&lt;4 and 13 with contraindications to thromboprophylaxis (5 with high bleeding risk procedures, 4 with thrombocytopenia or risk thereof and 4 other reasons). Thromboprophylaxis was omitted without clinical justification in 15 of 44 indicated cases (34.1%). Overall, <b>adherence</b> to the thromboprophylaxis protocol <b>was 64.7</b>  <b>%</b>.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Adherence to the institutional thromboprophylaxis protocol <b>was moderate</b>. An <b>electronic calculation tool</b> is being developed to enhance current thromboprophylaxis practices and optimise dosing based on patient parameters. The <b>small eligible population</b>, mainly due to baseline anticoagulation, was the <b>principal study limitation</b>.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tenas, B., Mensa, M., Salazar, F., Vazquez, I., Garcia, C., Insense, V., Lopez De La Fuente, M., Barreiro Lopez, B., Nicolas, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.485</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.485</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-058 Evaluation of adherence to the venous thromboembolism prophylaxis protocol in medical inpatients]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A239</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A240</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A240-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-059 Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome in CAR-T therapy: incidence, features, and outcomes in a tertiary hospital]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A240-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy has improved outcomes in relapsed or refractory haematological malignancies. Nevertheless, immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) is a relevant complication, frequently associated with cytokine release syndrome (CRS), and may lead to intensive care unit (ICU) admission or death.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To describe the incidence, characteristics, and outcomes of ICANS in patients treated with CAR-T therapy, focusing on the most prevalent diagnoses and products.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Observational, retrospective study including all patients receiving CAR-T therapy between January 2020 and April 2025. Data were collected from electronic health records (OrionClinic). Variables: demographics, diagnosis, CAR-T product, hospital stay, CRS, ICANS (incidence, duration, relapses, treatment and response, CRS concomitance), ICU admission and ICANS-related mortality. Continuous variables were expressed as median (interquartile range, IQR), and categorical variables as absolute and relative frequencies. Statistical analysis was performed with R v.4.4.3</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Seventy patients were included, median age 61 years (52&ndash;68), 54% men. Main diagnoses: diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL, n = 53, 76%), acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL, n = 6, 9%), and multiple myeloma (MM, n = 6, 9%). CAR-T products: axicabtagene ciloleucel (n = 37, 53%), tisagenlecleucel (n = 20, 29%) and ciltacabtagene autoleucel (n = 5, 7%), other academic or commercialised products (11%).</p><p>ICANS occurred in 26 patients (37%), developing at 6.5 days (4.25&ndash;8.0) post-infusion, lasting 2 days (1&ndash;3). Grades: 10 patients (38.5%) grade 1, 3 (11.5%) grade 2, 9 (34.6%) grade 3, and 4 (15.4%) grade 4; 50% were severe (grade 3&ndash;4). CRS occurred in 60 (86%), concomitant with ICANS in 10 (14%). Relapses occurred in 9 (13%). Corticosteroids were the main treatment; anakinra was reserved for refractory cases. ICU admission due to ICANS was required in 20 (29%). Mortality directly related to ICANS was 1 case.</p><p>By product, ICANS incidence was: axicabtagene ciloleucel 23/37 (62%) vs tisagenlecleucel 0%. By main diagnosis: DLBCL 23/53 (43%), ALL 1/6 (17%) and MM 0%.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>ICANS occurred in over one-third of patients, especially in DLBCL treated with axicabtagene ciloleucel, while none were reported with tisagenlecleucel. Despite low mortality, relapses increased clinical complexity and ICU requirements. Continuous monitoring and early management are essential to optimise outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chovi Trull, M., Vazquez Polo, A., Lopez Briz, E., Padilla Lopez, A., Bono Sanchez, C., Rodenas Rovira, M., Escobar Hernandez, L., Roldan Martinez, S., Gallen Soria, D., Garcia Pellicer, J., Poveda Andres, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.486</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.486</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-059 Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome in CAR-T therapy: incidence, features, and outcomes in a tertiary hospital]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A240</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A240</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A240-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-061 Study of the physico-chemical stability of cefotaxime in elastomeric devices at 32{degrees}C]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A240-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Cefotaxime is a 3rd-generation cephalosporin, a time-dependant antibiotic whose efficacy is optimised by continuous infusion.If treatment can be continued at home, the portable device, a passive system, is the preferred administration device. To limit the number of nursing visits, stability data are needed to enable the total daily dose to be administered in 1 to 2 infusions per day. The stability of a molecule in a portable device must be achieved between 32-37&deg;C, as this device is positioned close to the patient. Temperature is a factor influencing molecule stability. Loeuille <I>et al</I>  <I>.</I> demonstrated a physical instability of cefotaxime 25 mg/mL at 37&deg;C diluted in 0.9% sodium chloride (0.9% NaCl) and dextrose in water (D5W) in portable device after 6 hours&lsquo; storage.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The aim was to study the stability of 12.5 mg/mL cefotaxime solutions diluted in 0.9% NaCl or D5W in elastomeric devices, at 32&deg;C. Stability is tested after preparation and after 8, 12, 24 hours.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Three devices per condition were prepared. At each analysis time, 3 samples from each device were analysed using a validated high-performance liquid chromatography analytical method. pH was measured a each analysis time. Physical stability was assessed by visual and subvisual examination. The solution is considered stable when it retains more than 90% of its initial concentration (Ci), with a maximum pH variation of 1 unit, no significant visual change, and compliant subvisual examination.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Diluted in D5W, cefotaxime solutions at a concentration of 12.5 mg/mL retained 97%&plusmn;2% of Ci after 12 hours and 81%&plusmn;1% after 24 hours (percentages calculted by averaging the results of the 3 devices prepared for one condition). In 0.9% NaCl, solutions of cefotaxime at a concentration of 12.5 mg/mL retained 94%&plusmn;1% of Ci after 12 hours and 79%&plusmn;3% after 24 hours. pH variation was below 1 unit.Visual inspection of cefotaxime solutions diluted in each solvent is satisfactory after 24 hours. Subvisual examination was in accordance with European Pharmacopoeia monograph 2.9.19.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>At 12.5 mg/mL, diluted in 0.9% NaCl or D5W, cefotaxime can be administered continuously via a portable device up to 12 hours, enabling patients to be managed on an outpatient basis.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Boutouha, I., Dhuart, E., Blaise, F., Marquet, C., Sobalak, N., Charmillon, A., Demore, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.487</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.487</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-061 Study of the physico-chemical stability of cefotaxime in elastomeric devices at 32{degrees}C]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A240</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A240</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A240-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-062 Integration of a clinical pharmacist into a general and digestive surgery team: impact on patient safety and quality of care]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A240-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Medication reconciliation is a key strategy for enhancing patient safety, particularly in surgical units where frequent care transitions increase the risk of errors. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), over 40% of medication errors are linked to inadequate reconciliation, resulting in significant morbidity and increased healthcare costs. Integrating a clinical pharmacist into surgical teams can optimise pharmacological therapy, prevent medication-related errors, and improve patient outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the impact of incorporating a clinical pharmacist into a general and digestive surgery unit, focusing on patient safety and quality of care.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A prospective interventional study was conducted over six weeks (January&ndash;February 2025) in the general and digestive surgery unit of a regional hospital. The pharmacist-led intervention included:</p><p><l type="tab"><li><p>&ndash; &nbsp;Medication reconciliation at admission, during hospitalisation, and at discharge.</p></li><li><p>&ndash; &nbsp;Pharmacotherapeutic follow&ndash;up: prescription validation, dose adjustments, antimicrobial stewardship, thromboprophylaxis review, and nutritional support.</p></li><li><p>&ndash; &nbsp;Pharmaceutical interventions aimed at therapy optimisation.</p></li><li><p>&ndash; &nbsp;Documentation and assessment of interventions and their clinical impact.</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Inclusion criteria</st><p>Hospitalised patients with a length of stay &gt;48 hours and active pharmacological treatment.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 119 patients were reviewed (mean age: 67 years; average of 11 medications; Charlson Comorbidity Index: 6).</p><p>In total, 398 pharmaceutical interventions were performed, averaging 3.4 interventions per patient and 12 per day. Intervention breakdown:</p><p><l type="tab"><li><p>&ndash; &nbsp;50.5% (n=201): treatment continuity issues</p></li><li><p>&ndash; &nbsp;7.2% (n=29): overdosing</p></li><li><p>&ndash; &nbsp;7.8% (n=31): sequential therapy (IV to oral switch)</p></li><li><p>&ndash; &nbsp;6.2% (n=25): excessive treatment duration</p></li><li><p>&ndash; &nbsp;2.5% (n=10): thromboprophylaxis adjustment</p></li><li><p>&ndash; &nbsp;25.8% (n=102): other (unnecessary therapy, untreated indications, underdosing, insufficient duration)</p></li></l></p><p>The most impacted therapeutic areas were antibiotics, antihypertensives, antiplatelets, antidepressants, and analgesics. Pharmacist involvement reduced reconciliation errors, prevented omission of chronic treatments, and facilitated optimisation of administration routes post-surgery. A reduction in medical consultations for treatment review was also observed.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The integration of a clinical pharmacist into surgical teams significantly improved patient by reducing reconciliation errors and optimising pharmacotherapy. Medication reconciliation should be a core strategy in surgical units to enhance care quality and minimise adverse drug events.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brady, A., Mercadal-Orfila, G., Blasco-Mascaro, I., Alcaide-Matas, F., Garcia-Perez, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.488</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.488</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-062 Integration of a clinical pharmacist into a general and digestive surgery team: impact on patient safety and quality of care]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A240</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A241</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A241-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-063 Antibiotic prophylaxis in cardiac surgery: are we following the rules?]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A241-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Antibiotic prophylaxis in cardiac surgery is a key strategy for preventing surgical site infections (SSIs), achieved through intravenous administration of antibiotics, according to specific protocols within the hospital. According to international and national guidelines, antibiotics should be administered within 30&ndash;60 minutes before surgical incision and discontinued within 24-48 hours after surgery. Appropriate agent selection and precise timing are crucial to ensure effectiveness and reduce infectious complications. Due to their complexity and frequent use of implantable devices, cardiac surgeries are considered high-risk for SSIs and require mandatory prophylaxis.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The aim of this study was to evaluate adherence to the institutional antibiotic prophylaxis protocol in adult and paediatric patients who underwent cardiac surgery, focusing on antibiotic selection, timing of administration, and duration, with the objective of identifying areas for improvement in antimicrobial stewardship.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>This retrospective study included all adult and paediatric patients who underwent cardiac surgery in our hospital from January 2022 to June 2025. Adherence to the institutional prophylaxis protocol was assessed based on three parameters: antibiotic selection, timing of administration (within 60 minutes before incision), and duration (&le;24 hours). Data were extracted from electronic medical records and evaluated by a multidisciplinary team including an anesthesiologist, clinical pharmacist, operating room nurse, and health informatics specialist.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 4.276 patients were included (3.636 adults; 640 paediatric). High adherence was observed in antibiotic selection (adults: 96,9%; paediatric: 92,3%). Timing of administration was also satisfactory (adults: 96,6%; paediatric: 80,9%). However, prophylaxis duration&ndash;assessed from 2024&ndash;showed lower adherence, particularly in paediatric patients (adults: 80,2%; paediatric: 37,5%). The extended duration in the paediatric group likely reflects a more cautious clinical approach due to the perceived higher infection risk in younger, often complex congenital cases. The lack of paediatric-specific evidence and protocols may also contribute to this trend.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Adherence to the antibiotic prophylaxis protocol was generally good, especially in terms of selection and timing. However, prolonged prophylaxis beyond 24 hours, mainly in paediatric patients, indicates the need for targeted interventions. Implementing automated electronic alerts to support timely discontinuation may enhance compliance and strengthen antimicrobial stewardship practices.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Volpi, E., Benassi, I., Lo Surdo, G., Alduini, S., Cossu, M., Mangione, M., Lorenzini, M., Furfori, P., Del Sarto, P., Baroni, M., Biagini, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.489</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.489</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-063 Antibiotic prophylaxis in cardiac surgery: are we following the rules?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A241</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A241</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A241-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-064 Immunomediated toxicity associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A241-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy can cause toxicities known as immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which are similar to autoimmune diseases because they arise from the immune system attacking healthy tissues.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To describe and analyse the incidence of irAEs in patients receiving treatment with ICIs.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective, descriptive and, observational study was performed in cancer patients with ICIs (nivolumab, pembrolizumab, ipilimumab, cemiplimab, durvalumab, atezolizumab, and avelumab). Inclusion criteria: Patients who had received at least two cycles with a PCI between February 2024 and February 2025. Variables collected were: age, sex, treatment discontinuation and reason, irAEs experienced, severity (according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0), and management (treatment delay or discontinuation).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Seventy-two patients (65.3% men) were included, median age of 69 years (37&ndash;88). A 47.2% of patients experienced an irAE, excluding elevated liver enzymes and mild, transient hyperglycemia (grade 1). IrAEs were observed in 40% of patients receiving atezolizumab, 55.5% receiving nivolumab, 47.1% receiving pembrolizumab, 50% receiving durvalumab, 25% receiving cemiplimab, 66.7% receiving avelumab, and 60% receiving the ipilimumab and nivolumab. A 61.5% of irAEs were grade 2 (31.9% of patients) and 9.6% were grade 3 (5.5%). No grade 4 or 5 irAEs were recorded. A 3.8% of irAEs required admission to an inpatient unit, 9.6% treatment delay and 17.3% discontinuation. A 13.9% of patients experienced elevated liver enzymes (one developed hepatitis). Fifteen patients presented hyperglycemia (five developed diabetes). A 20.8% presented an altered thyroid profile, (12.5% hypothyroidism and 12.5% hyperthyroidism). Ten patients presented some immune-mediated skin reaction. Four patients presented colitis and all had to discontinue treatment. Two patients presented grade 2 renal toxicity (one discontinue treatment). Three patients presented arthritis (one discontinue treatment). Two patients presented myositis (one required a delay and other permanent discontinuation). Other irAEs observed were: grade-2 adrenal insufficiency, pancreatitis requiring treatment discontinuation, gastritis requiring hospitalisation, hypoparathyroidism, grade-2 ocular xerosis, and peripheral polyneuropathy.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Our experience reveals a new spectrum of toxicities associated with ICIs that are different from those of conventional chemotherapy. However, toxicity is not the main reason for discontinuation. IrAEs complexity requires numerous specialists to detect and manage them correctly.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legaria Gaztambide, E., Alzueta Isturiz, N., Tejada Marin, D., Preciado Goldaracena, J., Yerro Yanguas, A., Erdozain Sanclemente, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.490</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.490</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-064 Immunomediated toxicity associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A241</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A242</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A242-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-065 Endophthalmitis as an adverse reaction to intravitreal administration of aflibercept and ranibizumab]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A242-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Intravitreal injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents, such as aflibercept and ranibizumab, are widely used. Although generally safe, they carry a risk of endophthalmitis, a rare but severe adverse event. Understanding its incidence is essential to enhance patient safety.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To determine the incidence of endophthalmitis as an adverse reaction following intravitreal injection of prefilled syringe formulations of aflibercept and ranibizumab.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective descriptive study was conducted including patients treated with aflibercept or ranibizumab between January 2021 and August 2025. They were identified using the hospital pharmacy dispensing software, filtered by indications: age-related macular degeneration (AMD), diabetic macular oedema (DMO), choroidal neovascularisation (CNV), retinal vein occlusion (RVO) and other eye diseases.</p><p>Suspected cases of endophthalmitis were identified by searching for compounded ceftazidime and vancomycin eye drops or intravitreal syringes, both used in initial endophthalmitis management.</p><p>Electronic medical records were reviewed to confirm the diagnosis and clinical courses.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>We identified 2019 patients treated with aflibercept and 1689 with ranibizumab. Among 101 patients who received compounded ceftazidime and vancomycin, 12 had previously been treated with anti-VEGF agents (2 aflibercept only, 4 ranibizumab only and 6 with both).</p><p>6 confirmed cases of post-injection endophthalmitis were detected (4 women, 2 men), with a median age of 82.5 (55-94) years. Details of cases (case number, indication, anti-VEGF agent, onset of symptoms in days, previous injections of aflibercept/ranibizumab):</p><p><l type="ord"><li><p>CNV, aflibercept, 3, 9/2</p></li><li><p>DMO, aflibercept, 5, 9/1</p></li><li><p>RVO, ranibizumab, 7, 0/13</p></li><li><p>AMD, aflibercept, 28, 10/6</p></li><li><p>AMD, ranibizumab, 7, 0/6</p></li><li><p>AMD, aflibercept, 7, 14/6</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Endophthalmitis represents a low-incidence adverse event associated with intravitreal anti-VEGF injections for AMD, DMO, CNV and RVO.</p><p>No apparent differences were observed between aflibercept and ranibizumab regarding endophthalmitis occurrence. Ongoing pharmacovigilance and aseptic technique remain essential to ensure safe clinical practice.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Caina Lopez, S., Bartolome Figueroa, A., Rodriguez Rodriguez, A., Crespo Diz, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.491</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.491</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-065 Endophthalmitis as an adverse reaction to intravitreal administration of aflibercept and ranibizumab]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A242</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A242</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A242-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-066 Evaluation of antibiotic prophylaxis in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A242-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a key diagnostic and therapeutic technique in biliary and pancreatic pathologies, whose most prevalent complication is cholangitis, with high morbidity and mortality. Proper antibiotic prophylaxis reduces the risk of infection.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To analyse the criteria for prescribing antibiotic prophylaxis in patients undergoing ERCP and the degree of compliance with clinical recommendations.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Retrospective observational study conducted in a secondary-level hospital (January/2024-July/2025), including 67 hospitalised patients.</p><p>The clinical variables (age, sex, reason for admission, ALT/AST values), type and duration of the antibiotic were collected from the Mambrino electronic medical records. Transaminase values were classified as normal, mild(&lt;5USN), moderate(5-15USN) and severe(&gt;15USN).</p><p>The statistical analysis was carried out using the SPSS program, including descriptive statistics for qualitative and quantitative variables, chi-square test for associations between antibiotic and clinical variables (choledocholithiasis, cholangitis and ALT/AST transaminase levels), logistic regression models to identify predictors of cholangitis and choledocolitiasis.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The mean age was 76&plusmn;14 years, with a predominance of females (53.7%). The most commonly used antibiotics were ciprofloxacin (CIP,47.8%), Piperacillin/Tazobactam (PTZ,20.9%), PTZ+Amoxicillin/Clavulanic Acid in de-escalation (PTZ+AMC,16.4%) and PTZ+CIP in de-escalation (4.5%).</p><p>CIP was administered mainly to patients with choledocholithiasis (68.7%) without cholangitis, with normal transaminases (65.6%). Average duration: 4.3 days.</p><p>PTZ was prescribed mainly in cholangitis (57.1%), with mild elevation of transaminases (64.3%). Average duration: 9.6 days.</p><p>PTZ+AMC were mainly used in cholangitis (72.7%), with a higher proportion of normal ALT/AST (72.7%). Average duration: 12.1 days.</p><p>PTZ+CIP was administered predominantly in choledocholithiasis with recent history of cholangitis (&lt;1 month) and mild elevation of transaminases (66.7%). Mean duration: 16.5 days.</p><p>Significant associations were found between the prescribed antibiotic and the presence of cholangitis (p&lt;0.001).</p><p>There was no relationship between the prescribed antibiotic and previous hospitalisation (p=0.924), previous biliary prosthesis (p=0.945), AST elevation (p=0.514) or ALT (p=0.954). Logistic regression identified AST elevation as predictor of cholangitis (OR=38.6;p=0.017), without significant predictors for choledocholithiasis (2=9.87;p=0.196).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>CIP is suitable for mild choledocholithiasis, while PTZ or combinations such as PTZ+CIP are reserved for cholangitis or at-risk patients. The duration of treatment increases significantly in the presence of cholangitis, consistent with clinical guidelines and the individualisation of antibiotic management according to risk and severity.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martinez Ruiz, B., Rubio Alonso, L., Picazo Sanchiz, G., Perez Cano, E., Martin Nino, I., Martinez Valdivieso, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.492</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.492</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-066 Evaluation of antibiotic prophylaxis in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A242</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A243</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A243-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-067 Effectiveness of botulinum toxin infiltration in the treatment of post-mastectomy pain syndrome]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A243-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Post-mastectomy Pain Syndrome (PMPS) is characterised by chronic neuropathic and musculoskeletal pain following breast surgery. In the early stages, pain can be temporarily managed with analgesics.</p><p>Botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT-A), by inhibiting the release of acetylcholine and reducing muscle contraction, offers a longer-lasting effect.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the effectiveness of BoNT-A in pain control in patients with PMPS.</p><p>Analyse the variability between different BoNT-A presentations.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Retrospective observational study in a secondary-level hospital between February/2019-August/2025, including patients treated with BoNT-A for pain relief by PMPS.</p><p>Data were obtained from the FarmaTools Outpatient Dispensing module and the Mambrino XXI electronic medical record. Demographic variables, toxin presentation and dose, dose variations, number of infiltrations, frequency of administration, previous analgesics and clinical improvement were recorded.</p><p>Data were analysed statistically using the SPSS program. Categorical variables (including dichotomous variables) were expressed as frequency and percentage, and continuous quantitative variables were expressed as median and interquartile range. Spearman&rsquo;s correlation was used to assess associations between age, prior analgesic use, and frequency injection.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>We included 32 patients, all women, with a median age of 50&plusmn;10 years.</p><p>The majority received Xeomin (62.5%, 127.5&plusmn;50Ul), Botox (25%, 116&plusmn;50Ul); Dysport (12.5%, 500Ul). Regarding dose evolution, 59.4% maintained the same dose throughout treatment, while 18.6% needed higher doses and 21.9% needed lower doses during treatment.</p><p>The median infiltrations were 2 (IQR 1.75) and median administration interval was 5 months (IQR 7.75), with a maximum of 36 months, with a maximum interval between sessions of 36 months.</p><p>Regarding clinical evolution, 57.3% reported excellent improvement after 1&deg;infiltraci&oacute;n, 30.2% acceptable and 12.5% without improvement, trends maintained in successive infiltrations (42.9% excellent).</p><p>Spearman showed no significance between age and clinical effectiveness.</p><p>In contrast, there was a negative correlation between the frequency of administration and previous analgesics (rho=-0.894; p&lt;0.05), with a lower number of previous analgesics being associated with a higher frequency of infiltrations.</p><p>Finally, Kruskal-Wallis showed no statistically significant differences between clinical improvement and BoNT-A presentation (p=0.523).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>BoNT-A showed high efficacy in pain control in PMPS, with significant improvement after the first and successive infiltrations, consistent with other related studies.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martinez Ruiz, B., Marti Gil, C., Boardman Gonzalez, D., Blanes Sanchez, N., Martin Nino, I., Martinez Valdivieso, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.493</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.493</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-067 Effectiveness of botulinum toxin infiltration in the treatment of post-mastectomy pain syndrome]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A243</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A243</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A243-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-068 Evaluation of methotrexate prescriptions in primary care: identification of patients without folic acid supplementation]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A243-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Methotrexate (MTX) is widely used in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases and often requires long-term administration. Folic acid supplementation is recommended to minimise adverse effects such as hepatotoxicity, gastrointestinal discomfort, and cytopenias. However, omission of folic acid remains a frequent prescribing error in clinical practice. Early detection of these cases is essential to prevent avoidable harm and to enable targeted pharmaceutical interventions.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To identify primary care patients from our health area receiving MTX without folic acid supplementation and to describe their treatment characteristics.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective descriptive study was conducted including 82 patients with active MTX prescriptions in August 2025 from the primary care population of our health area diagnosed with immune-mediated diseases. Variables collected included pharmaceutical form (oral or intramuscular), diagnosis, weekly MTX dose, and folic acid co-prescription status. Patients with oncohematologic diagnoses were excluded.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 82 patients were analysed, of whom 60 (73.2%) lacked folic acid supplementation. The mean weekly MTX dose was 10.6 mg in patients without folic acid and 13.2 mg in those supplemented. Thirty patients (36.6%) received high-dose MTX (&ge;15 mg/week), 19 of whom (63.3%) did not have folic acid prescribed. Among those without folic acid, MTX was mainly administered orally (33/60, 55%) or intramuscularly (26/60, 43%). The most common diagnoses were rheumatoid arthritis (37/60, 61.7%) and psoriatic arthritis (11/60, 18.3%).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The majority of primary care patients in our health area receiving MTX lacked adequate folic acid supplementation, including those on high-dose regimens. These findings highlight the importance of systematic review of MTX prescriptions and active involvement of hospital pharmacy services in detecting and correcting potential prescribing omissions to improve patient safety.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guzman Laiz, R., Selvi Sabater, P., Garcia Masegosa, I., Anez Castano, R., Herreros Fernandez, A., Santos Lopez, E., Pascual Garcia, P., Urbieta Sanz, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.494</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.494</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-068 Evaluation of methotrexate prescriptions in primary care: identification of patients without folic acid supplementation]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A243</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A244</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A244-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-069 Portability of a text mining algorithm for detecting adverse drug reactions in electronic health records across diverse patient groups in two Dutch hospitals]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A244-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) pose a significant challenge in healthcare.<sup>1</sup> While structured documentation of ADRs in electronic health records (EHRs) enables automated alerting, many ADRs are recorded as unstructured free-text, limiting detection.<sup>2 3</sup>Text mining (TM) shows potential for extracting clinically relevant data from unstructured text. However, the portability of TM algorithms across different institutions and departments remains uncertain, due to variations in EHR structures and documentation practices.<sup>4</sup> To enhance these general-purpose algorithms, evaluating their portability is essential for ensuring effective performance across diverse clinical settings.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the portability of a previously developed TM-based ADR identification algorithm by assessing its performance using EHRs from two different departments in two different hospitals.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>EHR free-text data from 62 hospitalised patients in the geriatric and orthopaedic departments of two Dutch teaching hospitals were reviewed for ADRs via manual review and the TM algorithm. Performance was evaluated using F-score, sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV), with comparisons across hospitals and departments.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Manual review identified 359 unique ADRs. The TM algorithm detected 534 potential ADRs, 286 of which overlapped with manual review, yielding an F-score of 0.64, sensitivity of 80% and PPV of 54%. Performance was consistent across hospitals and departments. Notably, 26 ADRs identified by the algorithm were clinically relevant yet missed in manual review.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>This study demonstrates portability of the TM algorithm by identifying pADRs across different hospitals and departments without adaptations. These findings support its broader implementation potential for ADR detection in diverse healthcare settings</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. Lazarou J, 1998. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9555760/</p><p>2. McLachlan G, 2023. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34930047/</p><p>3. Van Der Linden CMJ, 2013. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25083253/</p><p>4. Sun W, 2018. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29849998/</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Van De Burgt, B., Jessurun, N., Van Seyen, M., Van Marum, R., Van Wensen, R., Van Der Linden, C., Grouls, R., Bouwman, A., Korsten, E., Egberts, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.495</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.495</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-069 Portability of a text mining algorithm for detecting adverse drug reactions in electronic health records across diverse patient groups in two Dutch hospitals]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A244</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A244</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A244-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-070 Safety analysis of dose-dense chemotherapy in breast cancer treatment]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A244-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Dose-dense (DD) chemotherapy has been incorporated into breast cancer management with the objective of enhancing therapeutic efficacy by reducing administration intervals to two weeks, without increasing cumulative dose or toxicity.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This study evaluates the safety profile of the epirubicin-cyclophosphamide (EC) followed by paclitaxel (P), both given in DD regimens, used as neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective observational study was conducted in a tertiary hospital including patients treated between January 2024 and September 2025. Collected data included demographic characteristics, disease stage, treatment type, number of cycles administered, treatment completion, delays or dose reductions, and adverse events (AEs). Data sources were the electronic health record Diraya and the prescription system Farmis_Oncofarm .</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Thirty-seven patients were included, with a median age of 51 years; two were male. Disease stages included 49% stage III, 41% stage II, and 10% stage I. Regarding molecular subtype, 65% were Luminal B, 27% Luminal A, and 5% Triple Negative. Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered in 62% of cases, while 38% received neoadjuvant therapy.</p><p>During EC administration, the most frequent AEs were asthenia (81%), nausea (54%) and mucositis (35%). Eight patients required cycle spacing: five due to recovery from previous infections and two due to myelotoxicity. Epirubicin dose was reduced in seven patients, primarily due to asthenia or nausea. One patient discontinued treatment after ischaemia secondary to chemotherapy-induced vasospasm.</p><p>During P administration, neurotoxicity was the predominant AE(68%), followed by asthenia (57%) and nausea (24%). Five patients required cycle delays: four due to myelotoxicity and one following an anaphylactic reaction. Paclitaxel dosage was adjusted in sixteen cases, mostly for neurotoxicity. Four patients continued with weekly P due to intolerance and eleven patients did not complete paclitaxel: four due to severe infusional reaction, two due to myelotoxicity, two owing to neurotoxicity and three still on treatment at data cutoff.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>In conclusion, gastrointestinal toxicity and asthenia were more frequent during EC, whereas neurotoxicity predominated with P. Myelotoxicity was the main cause of cycle delays despite prophylactic administration of colony-stimulating factors. Although the absence of a comparator and limited sample size restrict generalisability, the findings support that DD chemotherapy presents an acceptable and manageable safety profile in breast cancer.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paradela Garcia, E., Ponce Gonzalez, A., Corriente Gordon, I., Camacho Parreno, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.496</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.496</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-070 Safety analysis of dose-dense chemotherapy in breast cancer treatment]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A244</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A245</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A245-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-071 Atogepant in migraine: persistence and safety in a tertiary hospital]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A245-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Migraine is one of the leading causes of disability worldwide and requires effective and safe long-term treatments. Atogepant, an oral CGRP receptor antagonist, has shown clinical efficacy, but assessing its persistence, meaning the time patients remain on therapy and safety in real-world practice is essential.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To determine persistence and safety of atogepant used in the prophylaxis of chronic and episodic migraine.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Observational, retrospective study in a tertiary hospital, including patients with migraine who started treatment with atogepant between July and December 2024. Follow-up was conducted during the first 3 months of treatment. Clinical and demographic data were consulted in the computerised medical record.</p><p>Treatment persistence and adherence were measured using Kaplan-Meier curves as a measure of effectiveness, and safety was analysed by recording adverse events (AEs), classified according to severity (severe or mild). Severe AEs were those that led to hospitalisation or discontinuation of treatment. Statistical analysis was performed using R software.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>63 patients were included, with a mean age of 49 (21&ndash;73) years, of whom 56 were women (88.9%). Regarding diagnosis, 58 (92.1%) patients had chronic migraine, while 5 (7.9%) patients had episodic migraine. Regarding previous treatments, 56 (88.9%) patients had received anti-CGRP antibodies before starting atogepant.</p><p>Three months after starting treatment, 40 (63.5%) patients continued to take it, while 23 (36.5%) had discontinued it. The reasons for discontinuation were 74% lack of confidence due to AEs and 26% ineffectiveness. Adherence was greater than 80% in all cases, with a mean of 97.9% (63.6%-100%).</p><p>In total, 55.5% of patients experienced AEs, 17 (48.6%) patients experienced severe AEs and 18 (51.4%) patients experienced mild AEs. The most frequent AEs were digestive (nausea, vomiting, and constipation), which affected 27 (43%) patients, and neurological (headache, dizziness), reported in 6 (9.5%) patients.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Atogepant achieved good adherence and moderate persistence for migraine prevention in this real-world cohort. Gastrointestinal EAs were frequent but mostly mild and concerns about EAs was the main reason for discontinuation. However, longer-term studies are needed to confirm sustained benefit and safety.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ibanez Elcano, L., Elorza Odriozola, N., Elcano Aguirre, I., Lacalle Fabo, E., Beloqui Lizaso, J., Sarobe Carricas, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.497</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.497</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-071 Atogepant in migraine: persistence and safety in a tertiary hospital]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A245</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A245</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A245-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-072 Evaluation of intravenous immunoglobulin use in autoimmune diseases: are prescriptions aligned with current recommendations?]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A245-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg) are widely used for the treatment of autoimmune and immune-mediated diseases. However, their high cost and limited supply require rational and evidence-based use. Current guidelines from regulatory agencies define specific approved indications, yet off-label use remains common. Evaluating prescribing patterns helps to identify deviations from recommendations and promote appropriate utilisation of IVIg therapy.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To assess the appropriateness of IVIg prescriptions for autoimmune diseases by comparing actual clinical use with indications approved by the national regulatory authority. Secondary objectives included analysing treatment duration, clinical response, adverse effects, and prescribing medical specialties.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A four-year retrospective observational study (January 2020&ndash;December 2024) included all patients who initiated IVIg therapy during the study period. Data were collected from electronic medical records and pharmacy intravenous preparation management software. Variables included sex, age, weight, indication, treatment duration, clinical improvement, adverse effects, and prescribing department. Indications were classified as &lsquo;on-label&rsquo; (according to the approved product information) or &lsquo;off-label.&rsquo;</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 98 patients were included, 50% female, with a mean age of 61&plusmn;18.3 years and mean weight of 75.2&plusmn;16.6 kg. The mean treatment duration was 3.1&plusmn;5 days. Adverse reactions occurred in 9 cases (9.1%), mainly mild to moderate headache (7 cases), paraesthesia (1), and non-pruritic rash (1). Prescribing departments were neurology (47%), internal medicine (34.6%), pneumology (5.2%), emergency (5.2%), nephrology (3%), rheumatology (3%), traumatology (1%), and infectious diseases (1%). On-label indications accounted for 69 prescriptions (70.4%), including immunodeficiency syndromes (46.4%), Guillain-Barr&eacute; syndrome (20.3%), chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (15.9%), immune thrombocytopenia (8.7%), multifocal motor neuropathy (7.3%), and Kawasaki disease (1.4%). Clinical improvement was documented in 49 cases, while 8 showed no improvement; data were missing in 12. Off-label use (29.6%) included myasthenia gravis (51.7%), lupus erythematosus (6.9%), neuromyelitis optica (6.9%), and other rare conditions (34.5%). Clinical improvement was recorded in 14 off-label cases.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Most IVIg prescriptions were in line with approved indications, possibly influenced by product shortages during the study period. Off-label use was frequent in conditions with substantial supporting evidence, particularly myasthenia gravis. Outcomes were favourable despite documentation gaps. IVIg showed good safety with mild adverse events, supporting its use in selected patients.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guzman Laiz, R., Pascual Garcia, P., Santos Lopez, E., Garcia Masegosa, I., Herreros Fernandez, A., Anez Castano, R., Almanchel Rivadeneyra, M., Urbieta Sanz, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.498</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.498</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-072 Evaluation of intravenous immunoglobulin use in autoimmune diseases: are prescriptions aligned with current recommendations?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A245</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A246</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A246-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-073 Galenic validation of a 5% and 20% acetylcysteine eye drop compounding for the treatment of dry keratoconjunctivitis]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A246-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>According to the literature, a 5% and 20% acetylcysteine (Hidonac ) eye drop compounding was prepared using a solution of artificial tears, containing 1.4% polyvinyl alcohol and 0.005% benzalkonium chloride (Liquifilm tears ), in low-density polyethylene (LDPE) dropper bottles for the treatment of dry keratoconjunctivitis. To evaluate stability, a 30-day galenic validation was performed, storing the eye drops under refrigeration (2&ndash;8&deg;C).<sup>1</sup>  </p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>Optimise and study the stability through galenic validation of 5% and 20% acetylcysteine eye drops formulated with a solution of artificial tears in LDPE dropper bottles.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A 5% acetylcysteine eye drop solution was prepared using a solution of artificial tears, and a 20% acetylcysteine eye drop solution. All samples were prepared in a horizontal laminar flow cabinet, following the Good-Practice-Guidelines for sterile drug preparation. A 30-day galenic validation was performed, monitoring clarity, color, pH, osmolality, and microbiological stability on days 0, 1, 2, 7, 15, 22, and 30. Three units were tested per sampling point, in accordance with European Pharmacopoeia.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The 5% acetylcysteine solution showed pH values between 6.83&ndash;7.32 (maximum deviation of 6.70% compared to day 0) and osmolality values of 786&ndash;839 mOsm/kg (maximum deviation of 6.74% compared to day 0). All samples presented a transparent and homogeneous appearence with no visible particles, except on the last day of the galenic validation, when a precipitate was observed that did not redisperse after shaking. No microbiological growth was detected throughout the galenic validation period.</p><p>The 20% acetylcysteine solution showed pH values between 6.48&ndash;6.84 (maximum deviation of 5.27% compared to day 0). Osmolality was not measured because the equipment available in our hospital cannot measure such high values (theoretical osmolarity: 3800mOsm/L).</p><p>On day 22, a precipitate was observed that did not redisperse after shaking. No microbiological growth was detected throughout the galenic validation period.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Although both concentrations remained within the ocular pH tolerance range(3.5&ndash;10.5), precipitates were observed during galenic validation. Therefore, the 14-day validity period was determinated.</p><p>Galenic validation is essential to ensure the properties of a compounding, as well as to detect stability issues.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. Anaizi N, <I>et al</I>. Stability of acetylcysteine in an extemporaneously compounded ophthalmic solution. <I>American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy</I>  <b> 54</b>(5):549&ndash;553. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/54.5.549</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arce Sanchez, M., Izquierdo Garcia, E., Montero Pastor, B., Lopez Guerra, L., Sanchez Lorenzo, M., Prieto Roman, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.499</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.499</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-073 Galenic validation of a 5% and 20% acetylcysteine eye drop compounding for the treatment of dry keratoconjunctivitis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A246</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A246</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A246-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-074 Real-world evaluation of ocrelizumab: efficacy and safety in patients with multiple sclerosis]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A246-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic autoimmune disease that causes inflammation and neurodegeneration in the central nervous system, leading to physical and cognitive disability. Despite available treatments, there is a need for therapies that effectively slow disease progression with a good safety profile. Ocrelizumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting CD20-positive B cells, is used in MS, but real-world data on its efficacy and safety remain limited.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the real-world efficacy and safety of ocrelizumab in MS patients. The study aimed to assess treatment impact on disability progression, measured by confirmed disability progression (CDP), as well as on relapse rates and the incidence of adverse events during at least 12 months of therapy.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective study was conducted on MS patients treated with ocrelizumab between January 2018 and March 2025, with &ge;1 year of follow-up. Efficacy was evaluated through relapse rates and disability outcomes using EDSS and CDP, defined by EMA criteria as an increase of &ge;1.0 point from baseline if &le;5.5, or &ge;0.5 if &gt;5.5. Safety assessments included laboratory parameters, infections, neoplasms, and severe lymphopenia (&lt;200 cells/&mu;L).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Since 2018, 82 patients started ocrelizumab. Five who received one dose were excluded, leaving 77 for the final analysis, with a mean follow-up of 2.1 &plusmn; 1.6 years. Mean age at initiation was 43.8 &plusmn; 8.8 years, and 63.2% were women. CDP was observed in 29 of 77 patients (37.7%) during follow-up. Mean relapse rate was 0.14 &plusmn; 0.68. Infections occurred in 64 patients (83.1%). Among infected patients, respiratory infections were most frequent (71.9%), followed by urinary tract (48.4%) and herpetic (9.4%). As patients could present more than one type, percentages are not mutually exclusive. No elevated liver enzymes or severe lymphopenia (&lt;200/&micro;L) were observed. However, lymphocyte counts significantly decreased at 12 months (mean &ndash;284.1 &plusmn; 871.7/&micro;L, p = 0.024). Neoplasms were reported in 5.2% (two breast, one lung, one testicular).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Ocrelizumab demonstrated clinical stability with low relapse rates and moderate disability progression. Infections were frequent but manageable, and no severe hepatic or haematologic toxicity was observed. The incidence of neoplasms highlights the need for continued long-term safety monitoring in real-world practice.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maganto Garrido, S., Fernandez Pena, S., Montero Lazaro, M., Varas Martin, E., Abad Lecha, E., Tellez Lara, M., Mulero Carrillo, P., Chavarria Miranda, A., Neri Crespo, M., Sanchez Sanchez, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.500</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.500</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-074 Real-world evaluation of ocrelizumab: efficacy and safety in patients with multiple sclerosis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A246</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A247</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A247-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-075 Impact of medication reconciliation at hospital admission and discharge in elderly polymedicated patients]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A247-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Elderly patients frequently present multimorbidity and polypharmacy, which increases the risk of medication errors and adverse drug events. Care transitions, such as hospital admission and discharge, are especially critical points for the occurrence of discrepancies. Medication reconciliation, when systematically implemented with the involvement of a clinical pharmacist, allows early detection and resolution of such discrepancies, ensuring therapeutic continuity and improving patient safety.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To describe the types of discrepancies and their frequency, as well as the acceptance of pharmacist interventions.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Retrospective study in a tertiary hospital from 1 January to 1 September 2025, including patients aged &ge;75 years with &ge;8 chronic treatments hospitalised in the orthopedic and trauma surgery Service. Medication reconciliation compared chronic therapy with hospital prescriptions at admission and discharge. Discrepancies were analysed and classified as omission, unjustified initiation, wrong dose/frequency/route, duplication, incomplete prescription or interaction. Physician acceptance of pharmacist interventions was recorded. A statistical analysis of results was performed, expressing continuous variables as mean &plusmn; standard deviation.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 188 patients were included; 71.3% women. Age was 83.0 &plusmn; 8.4 years, with 10,8 &plusmn; 3.4 chronic treatments.</p><p>At admission, 208 discrepancies were identified in 117 patients, with physician acceptance of 72.6%. The most frequent were unjustified differences in dose, frequency or route (39.9%), omission of treatment (33.7%) and unjustified initiation (16.3%). Other discrepancies included interactions (4.8%), duplications (2.9%), unjustified substitutions (1.9%) and incomplete prescriptions (0.5%).</p><p>At discharge, 111 discrepancies were detected in 73 patients. The distribution by type showed that most were incomplete prescriptions (61.3%), followed by unjustified differences in dose, frequency or route (28.8%), unjustified initiation (9.0%) and duplications (0.9%). Physician acceptance was 96.4%.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Medication reconciliation detected numerous discrepancies at admission and discharge in elderly polymedicated patients, most of which required clarification. The high level of physician acceptance, particularly at discharge, reflects the clinical relevance of pharmacist interventions. These results highlight the importance of a multidisciplinary approach, including collaboration with the Geriatric and Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Services, to improve medication safety and optimise pharmacotherapy in this vulnerable population.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maganto Garrido, S., Fernandez Lastras, S., Montero Lazaro, M., Martin Roldan, A., Gomez Diaz, M., Llorente Gomez, M., Gonzalo, A. B., Guerreiro Caamano, A., Garcia, A. L., Prol Da Costa, V., Sanchez Sanchez, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.501</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.501</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-075 Impact of medication reconciliation at hospital admission and discharge in elderly polymedicated patients]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A247</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A247</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A247-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-076 Identifying barriers and opportunities for improvement in nurses use of automated dispensing cabinets: a focus group study]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A247-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Automated dispensing cabinets (ADCs) are increasingly implemented in European hospitals. Their purpose is to improve medication safety and to optimise management and availability of medications. Several studies have examined return on investment, barriers and facilitators during implementation and impact on drug administration errors and process efficiency.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This qualitative study explored the experiences of nurses, the main end users, several years after ADC implementation in a University Hospital and across diverse clinical environments. The objective was to identify difficulties encountered by this population and to highlight targeted improvement measures.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A focus group methodology was adopted. The COREQ checklist guided transparent reporting of the study. Twenty-seven nurses from twenty care units participated in four 90-minute focus groups sessions, one of them involving nurse managers. A structured interview guide standardised discussions, organised into three main steps: identification of issues, prioritisation of themes, and suggesting solutions. Participants wrote ideas on post-its, grouped by themes on a board.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Priority themes identified by nurses included incorrect dosage interpretations by the system, overrides, and additional time required when using ADCs. Other frequently reported issues concerned the limitations of the dispensing process and misunderstandings of its features, the management of unused drug returns, and the storage space recovery procedures. At least one group also mentioned the global search function and the lack of standardised training. Proposed solutions included regular training sessions, extension of dispensing hours, and enhancing the system&rsquo;s interpretation of prescriptions.</p><p>Among nurse managers, the top concern was the management of discrepancies involving controlled substances. Two further priorities emerged: staff training and management of access rights. Suggested solutions included clarification of discrepancy resolution labels, systematic team training, and automation of access rights allocation.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Several years after implementation, ADCs remain associated with persistent challenges in nursing practice. These findings align with literature highlighting both safety benefits and persistent limitations related to overrides and controlled substance management. Standardised training, technical optimisations, and clarified procedures were identified as corrective measures and are consistent with recommendations. Future work should assess their impact on nursing practices, medication safety, and process efficiency.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Troudi, R., Troudi, R., Francois, O., Massebiaux Bazerque, C., Bonnabry, P., Bonnabry, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.502</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.502</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-076 Identifying barriers and opportunities for improvement in nurses use of automated dispensing cabinets: a focus group study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A247</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A248</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A248-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-077 Review of atenolol use in patients with heart failure]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A248-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Beta-blockers are indicated for chronic heart failure. Bisoprolol, metoprolol, carvedilol, and nebivolol are the beta-blockers that have an approved indication in their technical documentation for use in heart failure; however, atenolol does not have this indication.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To identify hospitalised patients on atenolol who have chronic heart failure, inform the responsible physician that there is no approved indication for atenolol in heart failure, and assess the level of acceptance of the pharmaceutical intervention.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A cross-sectional study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital, including patients treated with atenolol from December 2024 to April 2025. The pharmacist reviewed whether patients prescribed atenolol had heart failure. If so, the physician was informed that atenolol is not indicated for chronic heart failure and advised to consider substituting it with another beta-blocker that has an approved indication at an equivalent dose. Subsequently, the acceptance level of this intervention was evaluated.</p><p>Demographic data (gender and age), clinical data (clinical service involved, cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF)), pharmacological data (daily dose of atenolol and prior prescriptions before admission), and response to the pharmaceutical intervention were collected.</p><p>Qualitative variables were expressed as absolute frequencies and percentages, while quantitative variables were expressed as means and standard deviations.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 52 patients on atenolol were included, with 32 being men (62.8%), and a mean age of 72 &plusmn; 10.7 years. The mean dose of atenolol was 51 &plusmn; 23mg. The patients&lsquo; CVRF included: 35 (68.6%) hypertension, 16 (31.4%) dyslipidemia, 16 (31.4%) diabetes, 13 (25.5%) atrial fibrillation, 6 (11.8%) heart failure. The physician was informed about the unapproved use of atenolol for heart failure; in 5 patients, the physicians substituted it with another beta-blocker that has an approved indication (83.33%), and in one case (16.67%), atenolol was discontinued. Of these 6 patients, 4 were from the Internal Medicine Service. Additionally, among these 6 patients, 3 had one CVRF, 2 had two CVRF, and 1 had three.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>In our hospital, nearly 1 in 10 patients on atenolol had heart failure. The review of treatment by the pharmacist allowed for the detection of these cases, which were fully accepted by the responsible physicians.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Flores Fernandez, M., Garcia Gonzalez, D., Ayala Alvarez Canal, J., Fernandez Vazquez, A., Ozcoidi Idoate, D., Barba Llacer, M., Mira Bayon, L., Tejada Garcia, M., Arenos Monzo, M., Ortiz De Urbina Gonzalez, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.503</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.503</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-077 Review of atenolol use in patients with heart failure]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A248</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A248</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A248-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-078 Performance of ChatGPT-4o versus ChatGPT-5 in summarising adverse drug reactions]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A248-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Hospital pharmacists frequently assess adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in patients, a task that is time consuming and requires expert knowledge, especially in patients with polypharmacy. Large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT may accelerate the assessment of ADRs. With each new release of LLMs, performance is expected to improve, but systematic evaluation is lacking.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The aim of this study was to investigate the performance of ChatGPT-4o compared to ChatGPT-5 in producing an accurate overview of ADRs.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Thirty commonly prescribed cardiovascular drugs were analysed using an engineered prompt restricting both models to a national drug database. Across five iterations per drug, each model extracted ADRs and categorised them as common (1&ndash;10%) or very common (&gt;10%). Outputs were manually validated.</p><p>Accuracy (correct ADRs vs database), hallucinations (false ADRs), and omission errors (missed ADRs) were calculated. Descriptive statistics were used, and mean accuracy between ChatGPT releases was compared using independent t-tests.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>ChatGPT-5 substantially outperformed ChatGPT-4o. The mean accuracy of correctly summarising ADRs was 77.9% (SD 21.7%) for ChatGPT-4o vs. 97.4% (SD 5.6%) for ChatGPT-5 (p&lt;0.001). In ChatGPT-4o, 7 of 30 drugs (23.3%) were fully accurate across all iterations compared to 21 drugs (70%) in ChatGPT-5.</p><p>The most common errors were omissions in ChatGPT-4o (mean 19.4%, SD: 19.5%) vs 2.5% (SD: 5.5%) in ChatGPT-5. Hallucination errors (mean 0.5%, SD: 1.8%) only occurred in ChatGPT-4o.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>ChatGPT-5 clearly outperformed ChatGPT-4o in summarising ADRs of the tested drugs. Omission errors were the most frequently occurring errors, with less errors in ChatGPT-5. Hallucinations were not observed with ChatGPT-5. These findings suggest that ChatGPT-5, may offer a possible reliable tool for hospital pharmacists in detecting ADRs. Future research should address other medication groups and evaluate real-world clinical application.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Van Der Zanden, R., Slikkerveer, M., Gu&#x0308;ndogan, R., Abdulla, A., Karapinar-Carkit, F., Driessen, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.504</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.504</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-078 Performance of ChatGPT-4o versus ChatGPT-5 in summarising adverse drug reactions]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A248</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A248</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A249-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-079 Clinical pharmacists perspectives on recording drug hypersensitivities in patient health records: implications for patient safety]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A249-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Accurate recording of drug hypersensitivities (DHs) is essential for patient safety, yet challenges persist, including incomplete patient health records, lack of standardised terminology coding, and excessive alerts through computerised decision support. Clinical pharmacists share responsibility for managing and documenting DHs, but little is known about their needs and priorities in this role. Understanding their perceptions and workflow is crucial to optimise DH documentation practices, prevent DH reactions, and reduce medication errors.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To qualitatively explore clinical pharmacists&rsquo; perceptions, needs, and experiences regarding DH management and documentation after implementing a structured, coded DH documentation tool in the electronic health record of a university hospital.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>We conducted a prospective, single-centre study using a generic qualitative research methodology. Clinical pharmacists were recruited via purposeful sampling between December 2024 and February 2025. Semi-structured face-to-face interviews (~1 hour) were conducted following informed consent. Participants were asked about their perceptions of DH management and documentation, workflow, structured tool, and potential improvements. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and thematically analysed in NVivo using an inductive, iterative approach, exploring both semantic and latent features within a pragmatic perspective. Ethical approval was obtained from the ethics committee (BUN:B1432024000241).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Ten clinical pharmacists were interviewed (eight women; mean experience 7.2 years, range: 0-18). Three key themes emerged: (i) Working context: Pharmacists reported encountering DHs during medication validation, consultations, and penicillin de-labelling, emphasising collaboration when problems arose. DH management was expressed as primarily a physician&rsquo;s responsibility, while nurses should be trained to recognise DHs at bedside. Verification was described as mostly verbal, mainly for high-risk drugs. (ii) Barriers: Participants indicated that time constraints, unclear responsibilities, hesitancy to modify records, and reliance on patient self-reporting could compromise DH documentation accuracy. (iii) Improvement strategies: Pharmacists suggested updating coded terminologies and integrating allergy consult requests in the tool, providing practical, case-based training, establishing clear workflow and referral agreements, and developing context-aware, severity-based decision support with colour coding and de-labelling functionalities.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>While comprehensive DH recording requires multidisciplinary effort, clinical pharmacists play a key role in improving accuracy. Addressing persistent barriers through clearer roles, practical training, and digital support tools can enhance DH documentation and reduce medication errors.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shiwa, V., El Haddadi, W., Cornu, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.505</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.505</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-079 Clinical pharmacists perspectives on recording drug hypersensitivities in patient health records: implications for patient safety]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A249</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A249</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A249-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-080 Improving insulin safety in a university hospital: prescribing error analysis and standardisation of use]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A249-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Insulin is among the drugs most frequently implicated in medication errors across Europe. As a high-alert drug, it may cause serious adverse events, especially in hospitalised patients, since poor glycaemic control is associated with a worse prognosis, particularly in perioperative and acute care settings. This highlights the need for safer insulin management. In our institution, recurrent insulin-related incidents were found during pharmaceutical review. The multidisciplinary diabetology team reported similar findings across prescribing, administration, and dosage errors, highlighting the need for a structured evaluation.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and objectives</st><p>Our objectives were to identify and classify the most frequent and clinically relevant insulin prescribing errors to develop safer prescribing protocols, and to implement a training programme to strengthen pharmacists&rsquo; knowledge of insulin.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and methods</st><p>Over four weeks (February&ndash;March 2025), insulin prescriptions from adult medical wards (excluding intensive care and paediatrics) were reviewed in the electronic prescribing software (DxCare). Each day, 10&ndash;15 random prescriptions were analysed by a clinical pharmacist. Errors were classified into three categories: confusions between rapid-acting insulins, therapeutic redundancies, and dose/timing errors.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 275 prescriptions were analysed, of which 51 contained at least one error (18.5%). Confusions between rapid-acting insulins accounted for 24 cases (47%), mainly between insulin aspart and fast-acting insulin aspart. In some cases, prescription misunderstanding led to inappropriate suspension of rapid insulin, with risk of poor glycaemic control. Therapeutic redundancies with basal insulins (6 cases, 12%) included concomitant glargine use or combinations with other long-acting insulins. A frequent example was co-prescription of infusion via syringe pump with basal insulin, increasing hypoglycaemia risk. Other errors in dose/timing (21 cases, 41%) included omissions and wrong schedules. The most frequent error was inappropriate use of corrective insulin alone, prescribed routinely or for longer than recommended. Two standardised protocols were developed: &lsquo;meal insulin&rsquo; and &lsquo;correction insulin&rsquo; with a strict 48-hour limit. A pharmacist training programme was introduced, including reminders on insulin types, dose adjustment and interactive case-based learning.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>One in five insulin prescriptions contained errors, mainly rapid-acting insulin confusions. Error classification supported standardised protocols and targeted pharmacist training, offering a transferable strategy to reduce risks, improve prescribing practices, and optimise patient safety in hospitals.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bouvet, A., Boschetti, E., Berchoux, E., Creton, C., Guerci, B., Demore, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.506</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.506</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-080 Improving insulin safety in a university hospital: prescribing error analysis and standardisation of use]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A249</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A249</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A250-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-081 Nintedanib safety profile and treatment persistence in patients with fibrosing interstitial lung disease: a single-centre retrospective analysis]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A250-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Nintedanib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor with antifibrotic activity, is approved for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and chronic progressive fibrosing interstitial lung diseases (ILD). Clinical trials demonstrated efficacy, while placebo-controlled studies showed gastrointestinal events, especially diarrhoea, as the most frequent adverse events (AEs). Real-world evidence on safety and persistence remains scarce. Describing AEs in therapy management is essential for optimising antifibrotic treatment.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the incidence, type and clinical impact of AEs associated with nintedanib and analyse treatment persistence in patients with IPF or ILD under routine practice.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Retrospective observational study conducted in a tertiary hospital including all patients starting nintedanib for IPF or ILD between March 2015 and August 2025 with at least one follow-up. Demographics, lung function and treatment data (initial dose, dose reduction, interruption, withdrawal) were collected. AEs were classified by organ system (gastrointestinal, hepatic, cardiovascular, others) and specific AE (diarrhoea, weight loss, nausea, etc.). Persistence was described at 6, 12 and 24 months. Medians and interquartile ranges were used for quantitative variables; means for time to discontinuation and interruption.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Thirty-nine patients were included (median age 72 [66&ndash;76], 69% male) with basal FVC 66% [56&ndash;84] and diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO) 41% [31&ndash;51].</p><p>IPF was diagnosed in 72% of the patients and other ILDs in the 28%. Initial doses were 150 mg/12h for 92% and 100 mg/12h for 8%.</p><p>Dose reduction was required in 38.5% (median time to reduction 182 [71&ndash;302] days), temporary interruption in 10.3% (mean time to interruption 59,8 and median time of interruption 62 [43,2&ndash;77] days), and discontinuation in 23.1% (mean time to discontinuation 349.8 days).</p><p>Overall, 64.1% of the patients developed &ge;1 AE: gastrointestinal in 46.2%, hepatic 12.8%, cardiovascular 2.6% and others. Classified by AE: diarrhoea represented 35.9%, weight loss 12.8%, nausea 10.3%, elevated liver enzymes 7.7%. Diarrhoea was the main AE causing reduction (22.2%) and toxicity-related withdrawal (66.7%). Treatment persistence at &ge;6 months was 84.6%, at &ge;12 months 74.4% and at &ge;24 months 53.8%.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Nintedanib showed frequent but manageable toxicities, mainly gastrointestinal. Diarrhoea was the main cause of dose modification and withdrawal. Results highlight the need for proactive AE management to optimise treatment persistence.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vazquez Majo, I., Oliver Cervello, M., Tenas Rius, B., Garcia Navarro, C., Insense Urbano, V., Nicolas Pico, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.507</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.507</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-081 Nintedanib safety profile and treatment persistence in patients with fibrosing interstitial lung disease: a single-centre retrospective analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A250</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A250</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A250-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-082 Medico-economic impact of Rotapro and Shockwave in the management of complex coronary lesions]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A250-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Calcified coronary lesions complicate percutaneous interventions and increase cardiovascular risk. Specific lesion preparation is essential, with rotational atherectomy and intravascular lithotripsy now central approaches. Their rising use raises medico-economic concerns.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This study assessed the medico-economic impact of Rotapro and Shockwave in complex coronary lesions, focusing on device consumption, related costs, and compliance with CE-marked indications.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective observational study was carried out in 2024. Device consumption and costs were collected for Rotapro burrs and Shockwave catheters. Nineteen Rotapro and nineteen Shockwave procedures were reviewed for clinical indications versus CE marking, as well as the homogeneous group of stays (GHS) associated with each procedure. Data were collected and analysed using Pharma (a medication consumption tracking software), Qcare (an electronic medical record system), and Excel.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>In 2024, 98 Rotapro burrs and 32 Shockwave catheters were used. CE-compliant indications were found in 74% of Rotapro cases (mean age 73 years) and 68% of Shockwave cases (mean age 72 years). The mean GHS was 2,220 for Rotapro and 1,974 for Shockwave . Additional sterile medical devices cost 372 on average for Rotapro (excluding the generator) and 36 for Shockwave .</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Adoption of both devices has grown since 2021, but their economic profiles diverge: Shockwave (2,160 per device) exceeds the average GHS tariff, while Rotapro benefits from reimbursement through the List of Reimbursable Products and Services (LPPR). These findings emphasise the need to optimise valorisation through the French Medical Information System (PMSI), raise surgeons&rsquo; awareness of costs, and further explore compliance with CE-marked indications, given that nearly one-quarter of prescriptions were non-conforming.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Terra, L., Leiszt, C., Metz, V., Spychaj, J., Coquet, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.508</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.508</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-082 Medico-economic impact of Rotapro and Shockwave in the management of complex coronary lesions]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A250</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A250</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A250-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-083 Ofatumumab exposure until early pregnancy in a woman with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a case report]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A250-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) often affects women of childbearing age. Disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) have improved prognosis but pose challenges when pregnancy is planned. Anti-CD20 therapies such as ofatumumab are effective; however, their safety during pregnancy remains uncertain. Regulatory agencies recommend discontinuation once pregnancy is confirmed due to the risk of B-cell depletion in neonates. Published data are scarce, mainly limited to individual case reports and registry updates, making each new case valuable for clinical decision-making.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To describe the maternal and neonatal outcomes in a patient with RRMS exposed to ofatumumab until conception and early pregnancy.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>The patient was a 33-year-old woman, diagnosed with RRMS in 2012. She had previously received several DMTs (interferon beta-1a, natalizumab, alemtuzumab). Given disease stability, ofatumumab was initiated in June 2023. Treatment was well tolerated, with no relapses or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) activity. The last injection was administered on 18 November 2024. The patient herself notified the Neurology and Hospital Pharmacy departments of her pregnancy on 19 December 2024 (approximately 2&ndash;3 weeks after conception). Ofatumumab was discontinued immediately following pharmacist and neurologist counselling. The patient underwent regular neurological and obstetric follow-up.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The pregnancy was uneventful, with no clinical relapses or MRI activity reported. At 39 weeks of gestation, an urgent caesarean section was performed due to fetal distress. A healthy male infant was born in August 2025 (Apgar scores 9/10, normal anthropometric measurements, and no congenital malformations detected). Breastfeeding was initiated but discontinued after the first week. The mother restarted ofatumumab therapy postpartum without adverse events. Neonatal laboratory tests, including lymphocyte counts, were within normal ranges; no infections were observed during the early follow-up period.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>This case contributes to the limited evidence on ofatumumab use in women with MS planning pregnancy. Exposure limited to the preconception period and very early gestation was not associated with maternal disease reactivation, obstetric complications, or neonatal abnormalities. Nevertheless, current guidelines recommend discontinuation of ofatumumab once pregnancy is confirmed, and neonatal monitoring (especially B-cell counts and vaccination schedule) is advised. Reporting such cases to registries is crucial to strengthen evidence and guide clinical recommendations.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pineda Sanchez, A., Aznar De La Riera, M., Sanchez Gundin, J., Gomez Gomez, D., Illaro Uranga, A., Gomez Ramos, A., Sanchez Fernandez, B., Valero Dominguez, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.509</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.509</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-083 Ofatumumab exposure until early pregnancy in a woman with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a case report]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A250</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A251</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A251-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-084 Analysis of benzodiazepine use after hospital discharge in elderly patients]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A251-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Benzodiazepines are widely prescribed in elderly patients despite the associated risks of falls, cognitive impairment and dependence. Hospital admission represents a potential point to reassess chronic benzodiazepine use.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>Determine whether the prescription of benzodiazepines during hospital admission influences their prescription upon discharge.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>An observational, descriptive and retrospective study was conducted in patients aged &ge; 65 years hospitalised in surgical wards who were discharged home during July 2024. Exclusion criteria were hospital death and discharge to other healthcare centres. Benzodiazepine use was recorded during admission (via hospital prescription sheet) and at discharge, 3 and 6 months post-discharge (via electronic prescriptions). Benzodiazepine use during admission was considered non-existent when they were prescribed only as preoperative anxiolytics. Demographic data (age, sex, Adjusted Morbidity Group [AMG]), length of stay and the most frequently prescribed benzodiazepines before, during and after admission were also analysed.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Of 161 eligible patients, 139 were analysed (143 admissions). The population included 65 women (45.5%) and 78 men (54.5%), with a median age of 75.6 years, mean AMG 2.9 and mean length of stay 7.8 days. Lorazepam was the most frequently prescribed benzodiazepine. Although benzodiazepine use was 2.9 times more likely at discharge among those exposed compared to those not exposed, 2.4 times more likely at 3 months and 2 times more likely at 6 months, no patients without a prior benzodiazepine prescription received them at discharge. Conversely, there were 3 patients with a benzodiazepine prescription at admission who discontinued treatment at discharge. In addition, 6 patients required a change in their home benzodiazepine to adapt it to hospital&rsquo;s pharmacotherapy guidelines.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Based on the results obtained, it appears that hospital benzodiazepine exposure was not associated with new prescriptions at discharge among patients without previous use. These results suggest that hospital admission could be a key opportunity to review chronic benzodiazepine treatment and promote safer prescribing in elderly patients. Broader studies including other medical services are needed to validate these observations.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. Bell CM, Fischer HD, Gill SS, Zagorski B, Sykora K, Wodchis WP, Herrmann N, Bronskill SE. Initiation of benzodiazepines in the elderly after hospitalization. <I>J Gen Intern Med.</I> 2007 Jul;<b>22</b>(7):1024&ndash;9.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gallego Casado, A., Rodriguez Carballo, J., Gonzalo Gonzalez, A., Fuertes Camporro, S., Curras Varela, L., Fernandez Gonzalez, A., Goenaga Ansola, A., Fernandez Vicente, M., Martinez-Mugica Barbosa, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.510</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.510</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-084 Analysis of benzodiazepine use after hospital discharge in elderly patients]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A251</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A251</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A251-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-085 Monitoring the consumption of reserve group antibiotics: a retrospective study]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A251-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Monitoring antibiotic consumption is essential to rationalise their use and limit the emergence of antibiotic resistance. The AWaRe (Access, Watch, and Reserve) classification aims in particular to promote the appropriate use of these molecules. In this context, we studied the consumption of Reserve group antibiotics to describe prescribing practices and identify their determinants.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The aim of this retrospective study was to describe the consumption and prescribing practices of Reserve group antibiotics during 2024. We analysed prescriptions to identify the most commonly used antibiotics, their indications, the clinical departments involved, and factors influencing their use.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>This descriptive retrospective study was conducted from January to December 2024 in a tertiary hospital in Morocco. Prescriptions for Reserve group antibiotics were analysed using departmental medication distribution sheets and corresponding medical records extracted from the hospital information system. The quantitative analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel 2025.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 187 prescriptions were analysed. Among the four families identified, polymyxins (colistin) were the most prescribed (55.6%), followed by oxazolidinones (linezolid) (21.9%). The majority of prescriptions came from the intensive care unit (64.1%). The indication was specified in 49.2% of cases, mainly for respiratory (21.9%) and urinary tract infections (8%). Combination therapy was used in 26.7% of prescriptions, mainly for synergistic purposes. An antibiogram was available for 28.8% of patients. The most frequent samples were urine (5.8%) and bronchial secretions (3.7%). The most isolated bacteria were Acinetobacter spp (12.8%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (11.2%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (4.8%). Total consumption was 8.1 DDD/1000 patient-days for colistin, 2.3 DDD/1000 patient-days for linezolid, and 2.8 DDD/1000 patient-days for ceftazidime-avibactam.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The predominant use of polymyxins reflects their role against multidrug-resistant bacteria in intensive care. The high frequency of respiratory infections indicates the prevalence of nosocomial infections. Combination therapies aimed to optimise treatment despite risks. Limited availability of antibiograms led to reliance on empirical therapy, restricting targeted prescriptions. Low DDD values suggest cautious use of last-resort antibiotics. The high use of Reserve antibiotics highlights the pressure from multidrug-resistant infections in intensive care, emphasising the need for strict stewardship and enhanced clinical microbiology to slow resistance spread.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yousra, B., Benabbes, M., Alami Chentoufi, M., Aiteddouni, H., Larsa, F., El Marnissi, S., Alaoui, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.511</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.511</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-085 Monitoring the consumption of reserve group antibiotics: a retrospective study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A251</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A252</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A252?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-086 Safety of hormone therapy with abemaciclib in HER2 negative advanced luminal breast cancer]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A252?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Abemaciclib is a CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDKi) indicated for treatment of HER2 negative (HER2-) advanced luminal breast cancer (ALBC). Its safety profile is decisive in clinical practice.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To analyse abemaciclib&rsquo;s safety and its impact on treatment course of patients with HER2- ALBC.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Design: multicentric, observational, descriptive and retrospective study.</p></li><li><p>Inclusion criteria: C&aacute;ceres and Badajoz patients who started abemaciclib during 1/7/17&ndash;31/3/24.</p></li><li><p>Exclusion criteria: early&ndash;stage patients starting adjuvant treatment.</p></li><li><p>Follow&ndash;up period: from 1/7/17 to 31/3/25.</p></li><li><p>Data: age at abemaciclib beginning, medical history, adverse events (AEs) classified per Common Terminology Criteria for AE (CTCAE), treatment suspensions, dose reductions and switches to another CDKi.</p></li><li><p>Data collection and processing: electronic health record, FarmaTools and Excel .</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p><l type="unord"><li><p>64 patients met the inclusion criteria and finally 30 women resulted after exclusion criteria applied.</p></li><li><p>Median age at beginning: 59 years (interquartile range IQR:55.25&ndash;71.5).</p></li><li><p>Comorbidities included hypertension (10), dyslipidemia (10), smoking (10), cardiovascular events (4), diabetes (4), other neoplasms (6), and one immune&ndash;mediated disease.</p></li><li><p>Recorded AEs by grade (<cross-ref type="tbl" refid="T1">table 1</cross-ref>):</p></li></l></p><p><tbl id="T1" loc="float"><no>Abstract 5PSQ-086 Table 1</no><caption><p>Recorded AEs by grade</p></caption><tblbdy top-stubs="2"><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Adverse Event </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Grade &lt;3 (%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Grade &ge;3 (%) </c></r><r><c cspan="3" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Diarrhoea </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">46.7 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">10.0 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Asthenia/Fatigue </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">30.0 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">6.7 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Hyporexia/Anorexia </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">20.0 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Anaemia </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">16.7 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">3.3 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Skin Rash </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">16.7 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">6.7 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Infections </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">16.7 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">6.7 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Hypertransaminasaemia </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">13.3 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">6.7 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Nausea </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">10.0 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">3.3 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Thrombocytopenia </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">10.0 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">3.3 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Musculoskeletal Pain </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">10.0 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">3.3 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Onychopathy </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">10.0 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Neutropenia </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">10.0 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">3.3 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Vomiting </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">&lt;7 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Constipation </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">&lt;7 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">3.3 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Alopecia </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">&lt;7 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Headache </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">&lt;7 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Dysgeusia </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">&lt;7 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Lymphoedema </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">&lt;7 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Renal Damage </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">&lt;7 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">3.3 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Pneumonitis </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">&lt;7 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Epigastric Pain </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">&lt;7 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Hyperbilirubinaemia </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">6.7 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Pulmonary Thromboembolism (PTE) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">3.3 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Fever </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">3.3 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Dyspnoea </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">3.3 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Arterial Hypotension </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">3.3 </c></r></tblbdy></tbl></p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Implications of these AEs during the course of therapy:</p></li><li><p>o Dose reductions due to toxicity: 33.3% of cases.</p></li><li><p>o Temporary suspensions due to toxicity: 43.3% of cases.</p></li><li><p>o Permanent suspensions due to toxicity: 23.3% of cases, of which 85.7% switched to another CDKi.</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p><l type="unord"><li><p>The most common AEs of any grade was diarrhoea, followed by asthenia/fatigue.</p></li><li><p>Serious but uncommon AEs included PTE, neutropenia, pneumonitis.</p></li><li><p>These AEs meant that more than 40% of patients had to temporarily suspend treatment, in more than 30% the dose was reduced, and more than 20% permanently suspended treatment to switch to another CDKi.</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Castillo Medrano, M., Fernandez Galan, R., Ferrer Pena, A., Banez Rivera, I., Fernandez Lison, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.512</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.512</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-086 Safety of hormone therapy with abemaciclib in HER2 negative advanced luminal breast cancer]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A252</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A253</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A253-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-087 Comparative safety analysis of JAK inhibitors in the treatment of atopic dermatitis: based on the FAERS database]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A253-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors have expanded treatment options for atopic dermatitis (AD). However, safety concerns necessitate rigorous post-marketing evaluation.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This study aimed to compare the safety profiles of abrocitinib, baricitinib, tofacitinib, and upadacitinib using adverse event reports (AERs) from the Food and Drug Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Data of JAK inhibitors were collected from the FAERS database covering the period from first quarter of 2004 to the fourth quarter of 2024. Disproportionality signals were detected using the Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Multi-item Gamma Poisson Shrinker (MGPS). The definition relied on system organ class (SOCs) and preferred terms (PTs) by the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA). And we assessed the temporal distribution patterns.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>We analysed 5,231 JAK inhibitors-related AERs extracted from the FAERS database. Baricitinib was associated with an elevated risk of cardiac disorders (ROR=12.07, 95% CI: 7.4-19.68) and pregnancy-related toxicity (ROR=17.08, 95% CI 6.33-46.1). Upadacitinib showed strong signals related to surgical/procedural events, including therapy interruption (ROR=13.56, 95% CI: 10.56-17.42) and surgery (ROR=4.02, 95% CI: 3.06&ndash;5.28). Abrocitinib was characterised by nausea (ROR=5.29; 95% CI 4.01-6.97) and therapeutic product effect incomplete (ROR=20.74; 95% CI 16.87-25.5), while tofacitinib exhibited prominent off-label use signals (ROR=22.94; 95% CI 16.77-31.38). All agents except tofacitinib showed a significantly increased mortality risk. Adverse events (AEs) displayed a distinct biphasic temporal pattern: AER frequency peaked in the initial treatment phase (0-30 days and 31-60 days), and cumulative AEs reached another peak during the mid-to-long-term phase of continuous treatment (181-365 days and &gt;365 days).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>JAK inhibitors display distinct organ-specific safety profiles in AD management. This study establishes the first comparative safety framework for personalised JAK inhibitor selection in AD, providing clinicians with a basis for tailoring treatment strategies to individual patients.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Song, Z., Xu, X.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.513</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.513</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-087 Comparative safety analysis of JAK inhibitors in the treatment of atopic dermatitis: based on the FAERS database]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A253</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A253</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A253-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-088 Evolution of ceftazidime/avibactam utilisation following antimicrobial stewardship consolidation in a tertiary hospital]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A253-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA) is a combination antibiotic considered restricted use due to the low prevalence of resistance. Its use is justified as targeted therapy for infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative aerobic bacteria, in accordance with the hospital&rsquo;s antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) protocol.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the evolution of CZA prescribing after the consolidation of an ASP in a tertiary hospital, comparing two periods and assessing the appropriateness of therapy.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Observational, retrospective, and descriptive study of CZA use across two periods (December 2021&ndash;December 2022 and December 2023&ndash;June 2025), including 46 and 40 patients, respectively, in a tertiary hospital.</p><p>Data collected from medical records included sex, age, prescribing service, microorganism, type of therapy (empirical or targeted), microbiological isolation, indication, and clinical outcome.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 46 patients were analysed in Period 1 and 40 in Period 2. The values of the included variables were: female patients 26% vs. 32%; mean age 60.17&plusmn;15.64 vs. 56&plusmn;18.27 years, respectively; mortality 35% vs. 26%.</p><p>Empirical treatments accounted for 52% vs. 38%, of which non-resistant cases represented 37% vs. 26%. Treatments with prior microbiological isolation were 48% vs. 62%, prescriptions by the Infectious Diseases service were 10% vs. 22%. Targeted CZA prescriptions against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria accounted for 28% vs. 55%.</p><p>  <b>Targeted treatments of period 1</b>  </p><p>20% of Gram-positive</p><p>1 <I>Staphilococcus petrasii</I>  </p><p>5 <I>Stahilococcus epidermidis</I> SARM</p><p>2 <I>Staphilococcus haemoliticum</I> SARM</p><p>1 <I>Staphilococcus aureus</I> SARM</p><p>28% of Gram-negative</p><p>7 <I>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</I> mR</p><p>1 <I>Escherichia coli</I> OXA-48</p><p>1 <I>Klebsiella pneumoniae</I> BLEA</p><p>1 <I>Enterococcus faecium</I> VanR</p><p>3 <I>Stenotrophomonas maltophila</I>  </p><p>  <b>Targeted treatments of period 2</b>  </p><p>7% of Gram-positive</p><p>2 <I>Enterococcus faecium</I>  </p><p>55% of Gram-negative</p><p>9 <I>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</I> mR</p><p>1 <I>Escherichia coli</I> BLEE</p><p>2 <I>Klebsiella pneumoniae</I> BLEE</p><p>1 <I>Klebsiella. pneumoniae</I> OXA-48</p><p>2 <I>Stenotrophomonas maltophila</I>  </p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The study evidenced a 27% improvement in prescription appropriateness after ASP consolidation of implemented measures, including daily multidisciplinary team meetings and online alerts from the ASP, although empirical use and prescriptions for Gram-positive isolates remain outside hospital protocol.</p><p>CZA is regarded as an antibiotic of very restricted use, reserved for situations with antibiogram confirmation or sepsis codes involving multidrug-resistant Gram-negative organisms.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Diaz Lopez, M., Roman Marquez, E., Gazquez Perez, R., Cifuentes Cabello, S., Molina Cuadrado, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.514</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.514</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-088 Evolution of ceftazidime/avibactam utilisation following antimicrobial stewardship consolidation in a tertiary hospital]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A253</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A254</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A254-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-089 Impact of proton pump inhibitor exposure on progression-free and overall survival in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A254-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have become a standard treatment in multiple malignancies. However, their efficacy may be influenced by concomitant medications that alter the gut microbiome. Among them, proton pump inhibitors (PPI), widely prescribed, have been associated in retrospective studies with reduced immunotherapy efficacy. Nevertheless, results from real-world cohorts remain heterogeneous.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate whether PPI use within 30 days prior to pembrolizumab initiation or during treatment impacts progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung adenocarcinoma (NSCLC) with PD-L1 expression &ge;50%.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective, observational study was conducted at a tertiary hospital. Patients with metastatic NSCLC and PD-L1 &ge;50% treated with pembrolizumab monotherapy in first-line between January 2019 and September 2025 were included.</p><p>Collected variables were demographics, smoking status, ECOG, treatment dates, PPI use (obtained from pharmacy dispensing records), date of progression, and death. PFS was defined as the time from pembrolizumab initiation to disease progression, and OS as the time to death. Medians were estimated using Kaplan&ndash;Meier survival curves. Patients were stratified according to PPI exposure, either within 30 days prior to or during treatment. For categorical variables such as sex and smoking, Fisher&rsquo;s exact test was applied.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 44 patients were included.</p><p><l type="tab"><li><p>&ndash; &nbsp;PPI use within 30 days prior to pembrolizumab: median PFS was 7.0 months in users vs 10.0 months in non&ndash;users; median OS was 11.0 vs 25.0 months.</p></li><li><p>&ndash; &nbsp;PPI use during pembrolizumab: median PFS was 9.1 vs 10.8 months; median OS was 10.6 months in users, while not reached in non&ndash;users.</p></li></l></p><p>No significant differences were found between groups regarding sex (p=0.49) or smoking status (p=0.14), indicating adequate baseline balance.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>In real-world clinical practice, concomitant PPI exposure may negatively impact both PFS and OS in patients treated with pembrolizumab. These findings, consistent with previous literature, highlight the importance of critically evaluating PPI prescriptions in oncology patients. Avoiding unnecessary PPI use may contribute to improved immunotherapy outcomes.</p><p>Further multicentre prospective studies are needed to confirm these observations.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Diaz Lopez, M., Nieto Guindo, P., Romero Carreno, E., Martinez Velasco, E., Cifuentes Cabello, S., Molina Cuadrado, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.515</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.515</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-089 Impact of proton pump inhibitor exposure on progression-free and overall survival in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A254</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A254</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A254-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-090 Physicochemical stability of voriconazole at 1 mg/ml in polypropylene syringes for intravitreal injection]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A254-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Voriconazole can be administered intravitreally to treat fungal endophthalmitis. To our knowledge, there is no licensed, ready-to-use antifungal formulation for intravitreal administration on the market. To address this unmet need, hospital preparations can be compounded in syringes, commonly made of polypropylene. In the absence of stability data for this container type, we conducted a stability study in polypropylene syringes.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the physicochemical stability of voriconazole at 1 mg/mL in polypropylene syringes, diluted in 0.9% sodium chloride (NaCl), after preparation and after 1, 3, 7, 14, and 28 days of storage at 2&ndash;8 &deg;C, protected from light.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Three 60 mL polypropylene syringes containing voriconazole at 1 mg/mL in 0.9% NaCl were prepared. Chemical stability was assessed by pH measurement and high-performance liquid chromatography validated according to the International Conference on Harmonisation Q2(R1). The solution was chemically stable if it retained more than 90% of its initial concentration, with the appearance of any degradation products monitored, and if the pH variation was less than one unit. Physical stability was evaluated by visual and subvisual inspection using a particle counter according to European Pharmacopoeia monographs 2.9.20 and 2.9.19. Solutions were considered physically stable if no precipitate, aggregation or colour change was observed, and if each sample contained fewer than 6000 particles of 10 &micro;m and fewer than 600 particles of 25 &micro;m.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>After 28 days, voriconazole concentrations remained between 96.3% and 102.2% of the initial value. pH variations ranged from &ndash;0.21 to +0.58 compared with baseline, confirming chemical stability. No visual changes were observed. Subvisible particle counts remained within limits, with maxima of 2540 particles of 10 &micro;m (at day 1) and 160 particles of 25 &micro;m (at day 28), demonstrating physical stability.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Voriconazole at 1 mg/mL in polypropylene syringes diluted in 0.9% NaCl is physicochemically stable for 28 days when stored at 2&ndash;8 &deg;C, protected from light. From a stability perspective, these findings support the hospital preparation of voriconazole in polypropylene syringes for intravitreal injection, and the 28-day stability enables advance preparation, ensuring rapid availability for patients.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daval, A., Dhuart, E., Blaise, F., Marquet, C., Sobalak, N., Demore, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.516</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.516</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-090 Physicochemical stability of voriconazole at 1 mg/ml in polypropylene syringes for intravitreal injection]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A254</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A254</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A255-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-091 Precision medicine: pharmacogenetic profiling and therapeutic drug monitoring as an integrated approach to breast cancer treatment]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A255-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) represent the standard of care for patients with HR+/HER2- breast cancer. The main CDK4/6i critical issue is toxicity development due to individual variability in plasma concentration. An alternative to standardised dose reduction, which could lead to underdosing and ineffectiveness, is a combined approach of pharmacogenetic &lsquo;<I>a priori</I>&rsquo; and pharmacokinetics &lsquo;<I>a posteriori</I>&rsquo; analysis to define the dose based on CDK4/6i metabolism genes polymorphisms and plasma levels, respectively.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The aim is to study individual genetic factors that may impact CDK4/6i bioavailability and systemic concentration in relation to clinical outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>The pilot ambispectic project enrols patients with HR+/HER2- breast cancer treated with abemaciclib or ribociclib, according to clinical practice. A baseline blood sample was collected for pharmacogenetic profiling and, in the case of prospective patients, subsequent samples have been collected according to the Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM) programme for pharmacokinetic analysis. Genomic DNA sequencing allows the investigation of polymorphisms in genes involved in the metabolism and toxicity of CDK4/6i, while TDM allows the determination of plasma drug concentration at each administration.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>As of July 2025, 90 patients had been recruited, 47 (52%) of whom candidates for ribociclib treatment, whose main toxicity is neutropenia. Heterozygous carriers of the TTT haplotype for the three polymorphisms in the ABCB1 gene, which encodes for a membrane transporter, have a higher risk of developing severe neutropenia on day 15 of the first treatment cycle (C1G15). 58% of patients developed neutropenia at C1G15, 11% of whom had severe/serious (G3/G4) neutropenia. 67% of patients carrying the predictive haplotype present the expected phenotype, with 19% of G3/4 neutropenia manifestations. Moreover, G3/4 neutropenia is associated with an increased ribociclib plasma concentration.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Individuals affected by same neoplasm differently respond to same treatment because multiple genetic and non-genetic factors influence treatment outcomes. The combined approach of pharmacogenetic profiling and TDM provides the basis for extrapolating predictive factors for toxicity development. The identification of gene variants associated with pharmacokinetics could provide physicians with a tool to personalise CDK4/6i doses to achieve optimal plasma levels, avoiding the risk of adverse reactions and improving patients&lsquo; quality of life.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2023.115479. PMID:37734262</p><p>2. doi:10.3390/ijms21176350. PMID:32883002</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Crivellaro, G., Zorzetto, G., Curtarello, M., Maccari, E., Cazzador, F., Capolongo, F., Guarneri, V., Coppola, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.517</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.517</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-091 Precision medicine: pharmacogenetic profiling and therapeutic drug monitoring as an integrated approach to breast cancer treatment]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A255</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A255</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A255-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-092 Physical health assessment in patients with psychotic disorders]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A255-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Antipsychotic medication alleviates symptoms of psychosis, support improvements in daily functioning, and reduces mortality risk in patients with psychotic disorders. The use of antipsychotic medication is hampered by side effects, including metabolic syndrome and life-threatening arrhythmias. According to clinical guidelines, physical health assessments including health history, electrocardiogram (ECG), body weight, blood pressure, and blood lipid measurements should be performed prior to start of antipsychotic medications to reveal cardiac and cardiovascular risk factors. While the available literature primarily focuses on laboratory monitoring, little is known about the extent to which review of patient&rsquo;s medical and family history of diabetes and heart disease are reviewed, and whether ECGs are performed when recommended.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The aim of the study was to investigate to what extent physical health assessements recommended by guidelines for treatment of psychosis were documented in patient records in mental health specialist services.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>In a cross-sectional study in 16 units in community mental health centres and hospitals treating patients with psychosis, adherence (fidelity) to guideline recommendations was assessed using four criteria from The Antipsychotic Medication Management Fidelity Scale. Two fidelity raters reviewed 10 randomly selected patient records in each unit (N=147 valid patient records) using a checklist. All the criteria were answered by dichotomous judgements (yes/no), indicating whether the specific criteria was fulfilled or not.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Information about patients&rsquo; medical history and family history regarding diabetes and heart disease was documented in 7 (5%) of the 147 patient records. Recordings of blood pressure, weight and body mass index were documented in 18 (12%) and blood lipids in 36 (25%) patient records. Electrocardiogram (ECG), if recommended for the chosen medication or medical history indicated possible heart disease, was documented in 31 (21%) patient records.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Our study showed that physical health assessments before the start of antipsychotic medications were frequently not documented in patient records, implying that the degree of adherence to national and international guideline recommendations is low. Systematic quality improvement efforts to increase the frequency of recommended systematic somatic assessments may reduce the risk of undesired medication side effects such as cardiac arrythmias and metabolic syndrome in patients with psychosis.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Skaare-Fatland, K., Hermann, M., Miriam, H., Biringer, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.518</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.518</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-092 Physical health assessment in patients with psychotic disorders]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A255</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A255</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A256-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-093 Myocarditis-myositis-myasthenia gravis overlap syndrome: an emerging severe adverse reaction among immune checkpoint inhibitors. Analysis of reports in the Spanish adverse reactions database (FEDRA)]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A256-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Summaries of drug characteristics of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) include myositis, myocarditis and myasthenia gravis as adverse drug reactions (ADR). These drugs are increasingly being used in oncology. Since 2020, the rare but life-threatening myositis-myocarditis-myasthenia gravis overlap syndrome has been described in medical literature as an ADR of ICIs in which the three conditions appear simultaneously. Suspected ADR documented in FEDRA database provides a valuable resource for post-marketing pharmacovigilance assessment. After receiving four reports of this syndrome (two with mortal outcome) as a suspected ADR of different ICIs (nivolumab, pembrolizumab and nivolumab+ipilimumab) within 2 months in the regional Pharmacovigilance Centre, we decided to analyse the reports received for this ADR and these drugs in FEDRA.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To analyse the outcome and reporting trend of myocarditis-myositis-myasthenia gravis overlap syndrome in reports of suspected ADR of nivolumab, pembrolizumab and ipilimumab in FEDRA and their correlation with those published in PubMed.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>We performed a descriptive study based on pharmacovigilance data retrieved from Individual Case Safety Reports identified in FEDRA since 2011, marketing year of ipilimumab, of suspected ADR reports for pembrolizumab, nivolumab and ipilimumab using MedDRA Preferred Terms: Myositis/autoimmune myositis/immune-mediated myositis and myocarditis/autoimmune myocarditis/immune-mediated myocarditis and myasthenia gravis/immune-mediated myasthenia gravis or myositis-myocarditis-myasthenia gravis overlap syndrome.</p><p>We have also searched in Pubmed for published articles with the term myocarditis-myositis-myasthenia gravis overlap syndrome.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p><tbl id="T1" loc="float"><no>Abstract 5PSQ-093 Table 1</no><tblbdy top-stubs="2"><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>DRUG (cases (mortal outcome))</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>2011-</b>  <b>2019</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>2020</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>2021</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>2022</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>2023</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>2024</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>2025</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Total</b> </c></r><r><c cspan="9" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Pembrolizumab </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">2(1) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">2(2) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">2(1) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">2(1) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">10(4) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">18(9) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Nivolumab </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">2(2) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">2(2) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Nivolumab+Ipilimumab </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1(1) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">5(1) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">8(2) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">28 (13) </c></r></tblbdy></tbl></p><p><tbl id="T2" loc="float"><no>Abstract 5PSQ-093 Table 2</no><tblbdy top-stubs="2"><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>2020</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>2021</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>2022</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>2023</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>2024</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>2025</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Total</b> </c></r><r><c cspan="8" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Number of Articles with the Term </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">2 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">4 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">2 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">7 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">6 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">16 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">37 </c></r></tblbdy></tbl></p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Myositis-myocarditis-myasthenia gravis overlap syndrome is a rare but life-threatening emerging ADR to ICIs that should be taken into account by clinicians in the management of these treatments. Pharmacovigilance is crucial in identifying ADR and promoting patient safety and the rational use of medicines.The major limitation of pharmacovigilance is the underreporting of rare adverse events. There is an urgent need to encourage consumers and health care professionals to report suspected ADR to Pharmacovigilance National Systems.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[De Agapito Vicente, C., Elizondo Rivas, G., Garcia Tinoco, C., Elcano Aguirre, I., Artieda Urdanoz, I., Moreno Compains, L., Tirapu Nicolas, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.519</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.519</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-093 Myocarditis-myositis-myasthenia gravis overlap syndrome: an emerging severe adverse reaction among immune checkpoint inhibitors. Analysis of reports in the Spanish adverse reactions database (FEDRA)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A256</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A256</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A256-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-094 Real-world effectiveness and treatment patterns of faricimab in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a one-year retrospective study]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A256-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) is a chronic, progressive retinal disease and one of the leading causes of vision loss in older adults. Although anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapies have improved outcomes, there remains a need for treatments that provide both high efficacy and extended durability. Faricimab, a bispecific antibody targeting VEGF-A and Ang-2, offers the potential for longer treatment intervals, but real-world data remain limited.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the real-world effectiveness of faricimab in patients with nAMD, analysing visual outcomes and treatment patterns over one year.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective study was conducted including patients with nAMD treated with faricimab between July 2024 and July 2025 in a tertiary hospital. Eligible patients had completed at least three loading doses. Data collected included the number of patients and treated eyes, demographic characteristics, treatment status (nai&#x0308;ve or switch), and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA, logMAR) at baseline, after loading (4 months), and at the last ophthalmology visit. The dosing interval (in weeks) at the last visit was also recorded.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 92 eyes from 82 patients were analysed. Mean age was 79.9 &plusmn; 6.5 years, and 48.9% were female. Overall, 93.5% were switch and 6.5% nai&#x0308;ve at faricimab initiation. Mean BCVA (logMAR) was 0.42 &plusmn; 0.31 at baseline, 0.40 &plusmn; 0.26 after loading (~4 months), and 0.41 &plusmn; 0.30 at the last visit. The mean injection interval at the last visit was 7.9 &plusmn; 2.5 weeks. Grouped by regimen, Q4&ndash;Q6W included 29 eyes (31.5%), Q8W 35 eyes (38.0%), and Q10&ndash;Q12W 25 eyes (27.2%). In three eyes (3.3%) treatment was not continued: two switched to another anti-VEGF and one was suspended due to patient fragility.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>In real-world clinical practice, our study showed that faricimab maintained stable visual outcomes over one year, with a mean treatment interval shorter than those reported in pivotal clinical trials. The effectiveness and durability observed in our cohort were lower than those seen in controlled studies, reflecting the variability encountered in everyday clinical settings. Larger real-world studies with longer follow-up are warranted to confirm these findings and to optimise treatment strategies.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maganto Garrido, S., Verdugo, M., Lopez Minarro, I., Montero Lazaro, M., Anton Martinez, M., Fijo Prieto, A., Guitian Bermejo, C., Sanchez Sanchez, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.520</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.520</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-094 Real-world effectiveness and treatment patterns of faricimab in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a one-year retrospective study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A256</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A257</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A257-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-095 Evaluation of sex differences in discharge medication prescriptions following acute coronary syndrome]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A257-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Current guidelines on acute coronary syndrome (ACS) recommend management that does not differ by patients&rsquo; sex. However, several studies show that, in clinical practice, prescribed discharge medications and dosages do vary by sex, with women being undertreated.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate sex-related differences in discharge treatment following acute myocardial infarction.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective observational study was conducted at a tertiary hospital, including patients diagnosed with acute myocardial infarction (ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) or Non-ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NSTEMI)) from April-July 2025. Data on demographic, comorbidities, and discharge treatment were collected.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>One hundred ninety-seven patients were included, of these, 77.7% (n=153) were men and 22.3% (n=44) were women, with a median age of 63 years (range: 36-92) and 72 years (range: 44-93), respectively. The most frequent presentation in the study population was STEMI (56.9%), and 76.1% (n=150) of all patients were classified into Killip Class I on admission. Regarding cardiovascular risk factors, a higher proportion of men were current or former smokers compared to women (59.5% vs 43.2%; p&lt;0.01), In contrast, hypertension (81.8% vs 54.2%; p&lt;0.01) and chronic kidney disease (18.2% vs 7.2%; p&lt;0.05) were more prevalent among women. Dyslipidemia (62%) and diabetes mellitus (28%) were the most common comorbidities, affecting both sexes similarly.</p><p>Among discharge medications, aspirin (96.14% in men vs. 95.5% in women; <I>p</I>=1) and statins (98.7% vs. 95.5%; <I>p</I>=0.2) were prescribed similarly for both sexes. In contrast, P2Y12 inhibitors (iP2Y12) were more frequently prescribed to men than to women (92.2% vs. 79.5%; <I>p</I>&lt;0.05). Despite having an indication for dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) according to the CRUSADE score (&lt;30), women were treated less frequently than men (3.92% vs. 9.16%; p=1). Among the 12.2% of patients anticoagulated for atrial fibrillation, appropriate therapy (triple or dual therapy with iP2Y12 plus oral anticoagulant) was given to 93.8% of men vs 75% of women, p=0.3.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Although some differences in discharge treatment between men and women were observed (eg, DAPT and anticoagulation), these were not statistically significant. The lack of significance may be related to the limited sample size. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cremades, C., Ruiz-Boy, S., Rial Dominguez, Y., Alberdi-Lema, C., Coll-Vinent, B., Gonzalez Roman, A., Vargas Guerras, P., Roque Moreno, M., Andrea Riba, R., Soy Muner, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.521</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.521</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-095 Evaluation of sex differences in discharge medication prescriptions following acute coronary syndrome]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A257</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A257</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A257-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-096 Medication reconciliation in hip fracture patients: role of the hospital pharmacist]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A257-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Medication reconciliation is the process of comparing a patient&lsquo;s medication orders to all of the medications that the patient has been taking. This reconciliation is done in order to avoid medication errors such as omissions, duplications, dosing errors, or drug interactions. It is a critical process in every transition of care.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To quantify and analyse medication reconciliation errors (MREs) and the pharmacist&rsquo;s interventions, as well as the prescriber&rsquo;s acceptance of these interventions, during the medication reconciliation process at hospital admission in patients admitted with hip fracture.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Retrospective study conducted between February and August 2025 in patients admitted with hip fracture. Upon admission, the pharmacist performed an interview with each patient to obtain a complete list of their current home medications. A pharmacotherapeutic report was then prepared and addressed to the prescribing physician, including recommendations to optimise the treatment.</p><p>Collected data included demographic variables (sex, age), MREs (classified as medication omission, drug substitution, or incorrect dosage), type of error according to pharmacological group, and the acceptance rate of the pharmacist&rsquo;s interventions.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>129 patients were included (69% women and 31% men; median age: 78 years). 220 MREs were identified in 107 patients (82.9% of the total). The types of errors were: 73.18% medication omission, 16.36% incorrect dosage, and 10.46% wrong medication. The most frequent reconciliation errors involved cardiovascular drugs (30.91%), lipid-lowering agents (12.27%), and antidepressants (15.91%).</p><p>A total of 220 pharmaceutical interventions were carried out, of which 154 (70%) were accepted by the prescribing physician.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Pharmacist intervention in medication reconciliation is essential to prevent reconciliation errors resulting from the absence of patient interviews at admission.</p><p>In our study, the high acceptance rate of interventions upon admission highlights the need for a formal medication reconciliation process within the hospital, to improve the quality of pharmacotherapeutic histories and reduce medication errors generated during prescribing across different levels of care.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dominguez Valle, Y., Ortiz Latorre, J., Morillo Mora, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.522</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.522</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-096 Medication reconciliation in hip fracture patients: role of the hospital pharmacist]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A257</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A257</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A257-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-097 Do we report everything we do? A pharmaceutical intervention report]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A257-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Computerised provider order entry (CPOE) with pharmaceutical validation is widely used for hospitalised treatments. However, a gap may persist between interventions performed by pharmacists and the real modifications recorded in CPOE, which may underestimate the true impact of pharmaceutical validation.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To compare pharmacist performed interventions with treatment modifications effectively implemented and captured in the CPOE program (FarmaTools ), and to identify the most affected therapeutic groups.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Retrospective observational study in a tertiary hospital over two months (01 April 2025&ndash;31 May 2025). On the one hand, all pharmacist-driven treatment modifications in prescriptions were retrieved from the CPOE program and reviewed. On the other hand, all pharmacist interventions registered in CPOE were reviewed. Modifications were classified as: addition of a new medication (eg, medication reconciliation), modification of a pre-existing medication (eg, route change, dose adjustment, Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs [ASP]), and suspension/discontinuation. The primary outcome was the Documentation Rate (DR) = (CPOE-recorded interventions/real-life-performed interventions) <FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT> 100. Analyses were stratified by ATC and type of modification.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 1,947 potential treatment modifications were analysed, of which 535 were recorded interventions. The overall Documentation Rate was 27.48%. Documentation rates by categories were similar: additions=29.37%, modifications=26.85% and discontinuations=28.95%. Among registered interventions, 25.1% were ASPs (ATC J01, J02, J03). IV to oral switches (IVOS) were 44.67%, mainly Analgesics (N02, 29.53%) and Drugs for acid-related disorders (A02, 15.14%). Considering all pharmacist performed prescription modifications, 23.73% were ASPs (DR = 27.92%); IVOS were 17.1% (DR = 72%); antithrombotic agent modifications were 7.65% (DR = 16.1%); medications not included in the hospital-formulary were 9.09% (DR = 20.7%); and intravenous fluid therapy&ndash;related changes were 6.68% (DR = 1.5%).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Relevant differences exist between reported interventions and real modifications recorded in the system. The largest differences occurred after rapid physician consults (eg, phone-calls), like antithrombotic dose adjustments or fluid-management changes. These findings underscore the importance of improving the documentation of interventions, with special attention to quick consults. Due to the continuous clinical workload, expanding the workforce is essential to ensure ensure proper documentation. The main limitations were the limited study period and a single-centre design which may require confirmation in additional studies.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Perea Perez, A., Aznar Garcia, M., Gimenez Carbelo, N., Faura Salas, A., Castano Munoz, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.523</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.523</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-097 Do we report everything we do? A pharmaceutical intervention report]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A257</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A258</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A258-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-098 Medication-related problems as a reason for consultation in the emergency department]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A258-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Medication-related problems (MRPs) are situations in the process of using medicines or healthcare products (HCPs) that cause or may cause a negative medication-related outcome (NMRO). These errors can occur due to omissions, duplications, incorrect doses or adverse reactions. In Spain, they account for 10-30% of emergency department (ED) visits, causing high morbidity and mortality among patients and significant economic costs for the national health system for preventable reasons</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>Analyse PRMs in patients attending the emergency department for observation</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Retrospective observational study of patients who attended for observation between 01/01/2025 and 19/09/2025 whose reason for consultation was PRM. Demographic (age, sex), clinical (reason for attending the emergency department), pharmacological (medication reconciled, drug involved and its ATC classification), PRM (classification according to the Second Granada Consensus on PRM) and type of adverse reaction (RAM) according to the organ affected (classification from the technical data sheet). The data were extracted from the medical record, from consultations with the pharmacy, and from the list of medications on the electronic prescription</p><p>Both quantitative and qualitative variables were expressed as absolute frequencies and percentages</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>99 patients presented with PRM, of whom 52 (53%) were women. The median age was 78 years (RI: 22-103). 19.72% of patients who attended the emergency department did so because of PRM</p><p>72% PRM due to non-quantitative insecurity, 14% quantitative insecurity, 7% quantitative inefficiency, 6% did not receive necessary treatment, and 1% received unnecessary treatment.</p><p>29% of ADRs affected the digestive system, 11% affected electrolyte imbalances, 10% affected infections, 10% affected renal disorders, and 10% affected respiratory disorders. 30% affected other systems.</p><p>According to the ATC classification, 28% of the drugs involved belong to the nervous system group, 15% to the alimentary tract and metabolism group, 14% to the cardiovascular system group, 9% to the anti-infective group, 9% to the antineoplastic group, and 25% to other ATC groups</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Early detection of medication errors reduces the problems arising from them, improving safety and clinical outcomes, reducing the burden of care in emergency departments due to preventable causes, and reducing hospital admissions</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mira Bayon, L., Barba Llacer, M., Casas Fernandez, X., Lopez Suarez, D., Suarez Alonso, M., Jimenez Lozano, M., Ozcoidi, D., Leon Sanchez, R., Ortiz De Urbina Gonzalez, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.524</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.524</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-098 Medication-related problems as a reason for consultation in the emergency department]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A258</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A258</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A258-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-099 From prescription to personalisation of linezolid]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A258-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Linezolid is an antibiotic indicated for severe infections, but its high pharmacokinetic variability may compromise both efficacy and safety. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) can optimise dosing and reduce the risk of adverse effects.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To analyse the use of linezolid in hospitalised patients and assess the proportion of prescriptions meeting criteria for TDM, based on the expert consensus statement on Exper consensus statement on therapeutic drug monitoring and individualisation of linezolid (doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.967311).</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Retrospective observational study in a tertiary hospital including all patients prescribed linezolid from January to March 2025. Data were obtained from the hospital&rsquo;s electronic prescribing system.</p><p>Collected variables included demographics (sex, age), clinical data (route of administration, treatment duration), and TDM criteria: critical illness, paediatrics (&lt;12 years), renal impairment (eGFR &lt;60 mL/min), hepatic impairment (AST/ALT &gt;5<FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT>ULN), elderly (&gt;75 years), obesity (BMI &gt;30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), or drug interactions (clarithromycin, proton pump inhibitors, amiodarone, amlodipine, calcium channel blockers, rifampicin, phenobarbital, levothyroxine). Prescriptions were classified according to the presence of one or more TDM criteria.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 236 patients were included (70% male, median age 73 [1-99] years), with 266 prescriptions (83% intravenous, 17% oral). The median treatment duration was 7 [3-26] days; prescriptions &le;2 days were excluded due to lack of steady-state achievement. TDM criteria were met in 99% of prescriptions. The most frequent criterion was drug interaction (35%), mainly with proton pump inhibitors, followed by amlodipine, levothyroxine, and amiodarone; however, most were low risk. Rifampicin was identified in 1% of cases and was the only interaction significantly reducing linezolid levels. Additional TDM criteria were: elderly patients (16%), critically ill (16%), renal impairment (16%), obese (12%), hepatic impairment (2%), and paediatric (2%).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Nearly all linezolid prescriptions met at least one criterion for TDM, with around 60% involving factors that significantly affect pharmacokinetics. These findings support the need for implementing standardised TDM protocols to ensure safe and effective use of linezolid in clinical practice.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gomez-Calvo, L., Toledo-Davia, M., Prieto-Galindo, R., Garcia-Perez, A., Menasalvas-Canadilla, O., Jimenez-Mendez, C., Torralba-Fernandez, L., Golnabi-Dowlatshahi, F., Dominguez-Barahona, A., Gomez-Fernandez, E., Aguado-Barroso, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.525</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.525</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-099 From prescription to personalisation of linezolid]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A258</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A259</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A259-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-100 Risk of agranulocytosis associated with metamizole: a real-world pharmacovigilance study in Northern European populations]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A259-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Metamizole (dipyrone) is a non-opioid analgesic widely used for pain and fever. Although effective, its association with blood dyscrasias&ndash;particularly agranulocytosis&ndash;led to withdrawal in several countries. In Southern Europe, however, its safety remains widely accepted. Evidence suggests possible ethnic or genetic susceptibility, especially among Northern Europeans, but real-world data are scarce. Clarifying this risk is essential to improve pharmacovigilance, ensure patient safety, and guide appropriate analgesic use in diverse populations.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This study aimed to estimate the incidence and relative risk of metamizole-induced agranulocytosis or neutropenia, comparing adults of Northern versus Southern European origin, and to identify possible ethnic differences in adverse reactions using hospital and outpatient real-world data.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective observational study was conducted in five regional health departments with a high Northern European resident population. Data from 2016&ndash;2017 were obtained using the <I>Alumbra</I> platform, identifying hospital admissions in the CMBD database with ICD-10 codes for drug-induced neutropenia or agranulocytosis (D70.2, D70.8, D70.9, and related T39 codes). Patients &gt;45 years exposed to metamizole within one month before admission were included. Cases with neoplastic, haematologic, or infectious causes were excluded. Each case was reviewed individually. Incidence was expressed per 100,000 DDD and per 1,000 treated patients.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 555 hospitalisations were identified; 41 met inclusion criteria. Of these, 26 were of Northern European origin and 11 of Southern European origin. The incidence of agranulocytosis was 39.8 vs. 0.33 cases per 100,000 DDD (RR = 120.6). Nine deaths occurred, seven among Northern European patients.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Real-world data revealed a significantly higher relative risk of agranulocytosis associated with metamizole in Northern European origin patients. Although the absolute incidence remains low, the findings support targeted pharmacovigilance, genetic susceptibility research, and cautious prescribing in susceptible populations.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. Ib&aacute;&ntilde;ez L, Vidal X, Ballar&iacute;n E, Laporte JR. Agranulocytosis associated with metamizole. <I>Eur J Clin Pharmacol.</I> 2005;<b>60</b>:821&ndash;9.</p><p>2. Stammschulte T, Ludwig WD, Mu&#x0308;hlbauer B, <I>et al.</I> Metamizole-associated agranulocytosis: analysis of spontaneous reports 1990-2012. <I>Eur J Clin Pharmacol.</I> 2015;<b>71</b>:1129&ndash;38.</p><p>3. Vlahov V, Bacracheva N, Tontcheva D, <I>et al</I>. Genetic factors and risk of agranulocytosis from metamizole. <I>Pharmacogenetics.</I> 1996;<b>6</b>:67&ndash;72.</p><p>4. Shah RR. Metamizole-induced agranulocytosis: does risk vary by ethnicity? <I>J Clin Pharm Ther.</I> 2018;<b>43</b>:556&ndash;64.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bourgon, L., Perez-Castello, I., Trillo-Mata, J., Liu, X., Marco-Garbayo, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.526</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.526</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-100 Risk of agranulocytosis associated with metamizole: a real-world pharmacovigilance study in Northern European populations]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A259</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A259</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A259-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-101 Evaluation of thrombocytopenia in patients treated with linezolid in a tertiary hospital]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A259-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia is a clinically relevant adverse reaction in hospitalised patients, particularly during prolonged treatment. It often necessitates treatment modification or discontinuation by hospital pharmacy services. Given the platelet lifespan (7&ndash;10 days), understanding the temporal relationship between linezolid exposure and platelet decline is crucial for effective monitoring and management.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To determine the incidence of thrombocytopenia (&lt;150 <FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT> 10<sup>9</sup>/L) in patients treated with linezolid and to identify associated risk factors.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective, observational study was conducted in a tertiary hospital from October 2024 to February 2025.Hospitalised adults who received linezolid for &ge;48 hours were included. Data collected included demographic, clinical, and laboratory variables: baseline and final platelet counts, serum creatinine, treatment duration, clinical indication, isolated microorganisms, and plasma linezolid levels (when available). Patients with pre-existing thrombocytopenia were excluded. Statistical analysis was performed using the Wilcoxon paired test.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Of 314 patients identified, 164 met the inclusion criteria (mean age 75 years; 52% women). Eighteen patients (11%) developed thrombocytopenia during therapy. Mean treatment duration was 10 days (standard deviation 3.4).Renal function worsened in 61% of thrombocytopenic patients, with a mean 9% increase in serum creatinine (final mean creatinine 0.7 mg/dL). No patients with thrombocytopenia had plasma linezolid concentrations measured. A significant reduction in platelet count was observed at the end of treatment (p &lt; 0.001). The main prescribing departments were Pneumology (33%), Traumatology (22%), Internal Medicine (17%), Solid Organ Transplantation (11%), and others (17%).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Linezolid-associated thrombocytopenia occurred in approximately 11% of treated patients, mainly among those with renal impairment. Although incidence was moderate, regular platelet monitoring and individualised renal assessment are recommended, especially in prolonged or high-risk treatments. Determining plasma linezolid concentrations in selected patients could enhance treatment safety and optimise therapeutic outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lara, C., Mesa, C., Bodas, S., Jerez, P., Bernardez, M., Yuste, D., Olaizola, I., Pinel, A., Miguelez, M., Ruiz, L., Rosado, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.527</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.527</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-101 Evaluation of thrombocytopenia in patients treated with linezolid in a tertiary hospital]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A259</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A260</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A260-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-102 Strategic plan for improving paediatric prescribing: baseline for an improvement intervention]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A260-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Patient safety is paramount in the healthcare system, as hospitalised patients, especially paediatric patients, are particularly susceptible to medication errors (MEs). Strategies to reduce MEs, such as clinical decision support systems (CDSS), have the potential to substantially reduce the rate of MEs and consequently improve patient safety.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To improve paediatric patients safety by identifying critical points in the medication process and implementing improvement actions to reduce MEs.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>We conducted a scoping review (SR) to assess the impact of CDSS on MEs, ADEs and other patient outcomes at hospitalary setting.</p><p>A multidisciplinary working group (pharmacists, paediatricians, nurses, IT specialists and the quality department) was created to make a risk map to identify critical points in the mediaciton process and design intervention points.</p><p>We prospectively collected MEs in paediatric patients treated at our hospital between June and September 2025. A data collection sheet was designed to record information about the patient and their illness, the drug involved in the ME and the type of error.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Five of the 43 articles retrieved in the SR were related to paediatric patients, all of which showed statistically significant reductions in different MEs. The five studies were based on the implementation of CDSS consisting of dose range checking.</p><p>The multidisciplinary team held three meetings in which they identified and prioritised areas.</p><p>83 MEs were identified. Most of patients were oncohematological and surgical, and the drugs most frequently involved were acetaminophen (n=8), metamizole (n=6) and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (n=5); the most frequent MEs were infradosing (n=23), overdosing (n=18), and drug needed (n=12).</p><p>We have decided to implement a paediatric dose calculator and improve aspects related to drug preparation, by clearly indicating dilution options (compatibility, concentration range, volume restrictions) and administration instructions.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p><l type="tab"><li><p>&ndash; &nbsp;Teamwork is essential for implementing improvements.</p></li><li><p>&ndash; &nbsp;Patient safety is crucial, especially for vulnerable populations such as children.</p></li><li><p>&ndash; &nbsp;It is essential to develop strategies to reduce MEs.</p></li><li><p>&ndash; &nbsp;The implementation of a dose calculator and the proposed improvments in preparation and administration are expected to substantially reduce MEs in paediatric patients at our hospital.</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Molins Castiella, E., Riaza Gomez, M., Ortega Eslava, A., Delgado Latorre, A., Botran Prieto, M., Berisa Prado, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.528</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.528</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-102 Strategic plan for improving paediatric prescribing: baseline for an improvement intervention]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A260</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A260</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A260-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-104 Smart alerts, safer doses: revolutionising antimicrobial therapy with renal function-driven clinical rules]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A260-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Antimicrobial resistance is a leading global health threat driven by inappropriate antimicrobial use, especially in hospitals. Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programs aim to optimise therapy, with dosing adjustment based on renal function being critical to prevent treatment failure and toxicity. However, incorrect dosing remains common due to complex manual prescription reviews. To address this, our institution developed a Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS) that integrates clinical data to provide real-time, patient-specific alerts based on pre-defined clinical rules (CRs).</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The present study aimed to design and evaluate the clinical impact of a bundle of CRs within our CDSS to identify patients requiring antimicrobial dose adjustment according to estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), with the goal of optimising antimicrobial therapy, supporting AMS teams in individualised dosing, and preventing adverse drug events (ADEs).</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A multidisciplinary team of 6 clinical pharmacists specialised in infectious diseases, nephrology, and critical care performed a literature search and designed CRs to identify patients with augmented or impaired renal clearance requiring antimicrobial dose adjustment.</p><p>Each CR was provided with adjustment recommendations according to the indication. These rules were embedded into the CDSS and piloted over six months. Alerts were reviewed by pharmacists, and clinical interventions were registered. To evaluate the clinical impact, we analysed the positive predictive value (PPV) of each CR (accepted interventions/generated alerts).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The team defined 57 CRs. During the study period, the CDSS generated 492 alerts (3.94 alerts per working day). Pharmacist-led intervention occurred in 37% of alerts (180/492), with 66% (120/180) resulting in modified antimicrobial therapy to prevent potential ADEs.</p><p>The overall PPV of the rules was 0.24. The CRs with the highest PPV were &lsquo;Ceftazidime IV/IM and eGFR &lt;50 mL/min&rsquo; (PPV=1) and &lsquo;Amoxicillin/Clavulanate IV and eGFR &lt;30 mL/min&rsquo; (PPV=0.67).</p><p>Intervention acceptance rates were highest in medical units (73%), followed by surgical (67%) and critical care units (55%).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The integration of renal function-based CRs into a CDSS significantly enhanced antimicrobial dosing precision and supported AMS efforts. The pharmacist-led review process enabled timely, clinically relevant interventions that reduced the risk of ADEs.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Garcia Souto, A., Torroba Sanz, B., Ibanez Garcia, S., Nunez-Nunez, M., Velasco-Garcia, M., Cabrer Barcelo, R., Dominguez Chaparro, G., De La Rosa Trivino, J., Herranz Alonso, A., Sanjurjo Saez, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.529</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.529</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-104 Smart alerts, safer doses: revolutionising antimicrobial therapy with renal function-driven clinical rules]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A260</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A261</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A261-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-105 Prolonged menstrual bleeding associated with atogepant: a case report]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A261-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) antagonists represent a major advance in the preventive treatment of chronic migraine, particularly for patients who have not responded to conventional therapies. Atogepant, an oral CGRP receptor antagonist, has demonstrated good efficacy and tolerability in clinical trials. However, as a recently marketed drug, its safety profile in real-world use remains under continuous evaluation. To date, menstrual disorders have rarely been described as adverse drug reactions (ADRs) related to CGRP antagonists. Reporting such unexpected events is essential to expand current knowledge and ensure safer use of these agents in women of reproductive age.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To describe a case of prolonged menstrual bleeding associated with the use of atogepant in a patient treated for chronic migraine</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>This descriptive case report was identified through the Outpatient Pharmaceutical Care Unit of a tertiary hospital. The suspected ADR was notified to the Pharmacovigilance System for Medicines for Human Use (PVS-H). Causality was assessed using the Naranjo algorithm. Clinical data were obtained from medical records and patient interviews.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A 32-year-old woman, non-smoker and without relevant medical history, was followed by the Neurology Department for chronic migraine since 2021. After failure of amitriptyline, flunarizine, topiramate, and botulinum toxin, atogepant 60 mg daily was initiated in August 2024. Three months later, migraine frequency had improved, but the patient reported continuous menstrual bleeding since treatment onset. No concomitant medications or lifestyle changes were identified. Atogepant was discontinued in November 2024, and bleeding resolved within days. The event was classified as a probable ADR according to Naranjo&rsquo;s scale and reported to PVS-H. Subsequent treatment with fremanezumab caused mild local reaction, and erenumab was later introduced with good efficacy and safety.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Spontaneous reporting of suspected ADRs is crucial to detect and assess rare or previously unreported effects of new therapies. This case highlights a potential association between atogepant and prolonged menstrual bleeding, underlining the importance of post-marketing pharmacovigilance to better define the safety of CGRP antagonists.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baltasar, A., Elorza Odriozola, N., Ibanez Elcano, L., Elcano Aguirre, I., Tirapu Nicolas, B., De Agapito Vicente, C., Elizondo Rivas, G., Sarobe Carricas, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.530</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.530</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-105 Prolonged menstrual bleeding associated with atogepant: a case report]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A261</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A261</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A261-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-106 Evolution of antibiotic prescribing appropriateness according to who aware criteria in urinary tract infections of home catheterised patients]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A261-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>International guidelines discourage the routine use of antibiotics during bladder catheter replacement in asymptomatic home-care patients, yet inappropriate use persists, contributing to antibiotic resistance. WHO AWaRe recommendations classify antibiotics into ACCESS, WATCH, and RESERVE to guide appropriate prescribing in urinary tract infections (UTIs).</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To assess the evolution of antibiotic prescribing appropriateness according to AWaRe criteria in UTIs of patients with home bladder catheters, quantifying prescribing patterns including Defined Daily Doses (DDD), and comparing data from 2023-2024 to detect progress in antibiotic stewardship.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Retrospective analysis of home bladder catheter patients, reviewing AWaRe prescriptions for UTIs in 2224 subjects in 2023 and 2264 in 2024. Distribution by gender, amount of antibiotics prescribed in DDD, and percentage reduction in antibiotic use between periods were evaluated.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Total antibiotic volume decreased by 57%, from 33,465 DDD in 2023 to 14,380 DDD in 2024. Overall AWaRe antibiotic use dropped from 87.9% to 34.3% of patients, with a 60.2% decrease. Among AWaRe categories, ACCESS antibiotics increased from 12.6% to 18%, driven by nitrofurantoin (3.81% -&gt; 6%) and sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (8.79% -&gt; 12%). WATCH antibiotics declined from 36.65% to 34%, with reductions in fluoroquinolones such as ciprofloxacin (20% -&gt; 18%) and levofloxacin (14.36% -&gt; 14%). Significant decreases were observed for amoxicillin/clavulanate (from 8,337 DDD, 24.91%, to 4,375 DDD, 30%) and fosfomycin (from 7,680 DDD, 22.95%, to 2,266 DDD, 16%). This improvement resulted from: healthcare worker training; updated protocols with clinical evidence prioritising ACCESS antibiotics and reducing fluoroquinolones; non-pharmacological strategies (antimicrobial catheters and rigorous hygiene); and microbiological assessment for targeted antibiotic therapy. Gender analysis indicated a more personalised, evidence-based prescribing approach.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Integrated stewardship actions led to a substantial quantitative reduction (-57% total DDD) and qualitative improvement in antibiotic prescribing in patients with home catheters, representing a crucial step toward limiting antibiotic overuse and preventing antibiotic resistance in this vulnerable population.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. Linea Guida Regionale per la prevenzione delle infezioni da catetere urinario. 2024.</p><p>2. World Health Organization. WHO AWaRe Antibiotic Book. Linee guida per la prescrizione degli antibiotici, 2022.</p><p>3. Rete Infettivologica Italiana. Infezioni delle vie urinarie e catetere vescicale: gestione e trattamento. Aggiornamento 2022.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lapenna, M., Chiara, L., Raffaele, P., Renato, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.531</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.531</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-106 Evolution of antibiotic prescribing appropriateness according to who aware criteria in urinary tract infections of home catheterised patients]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A261</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A262</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A262-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5Psq-107 Microbiological Stability Risk Assessment of Sterile Hospital Preparations]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A262-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>The implementation of microbiological stability studies for hospital sterile preparations is challenging due to the heterogeneity of these products and the technical limitations of hospital pharmacy facilities. Furthermore, the concept of a batch is specific in this context, as preparations are often produced in small quantities under individualised conditions.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This study aims to assess the risks associated with the microbiological stability of sterile hospital preparations, by identifying and analysing the key factors that influence their stability.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A targeted Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) was developed to identify organisational, human, material, and environmental factors, and to prioritise those most critical to the microbiological stability of sterile hospital preparations.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The analysis identified exposure temperature, container integrity, quality of sterile devices, and staff training as the main risk factors with criticality scores ranging from 80 to 120. The aseptic filling process validation and the composition of the mixtures were also crucial to maintaining microbiological stability. Corrective measures included tighter raw material control, enhanced preventive maintenance, and operator microbiological validation through media-fill tests.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>By focusing on influencing factors rather than the process, this analysis identified key critical control points. The next step is to design a pragmatic decision-making algorithm to estimate the microbiological stability of sterile hospital preparations.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Safae, A., Bennani, I., Hajjaj, S., Cherif Chefchaouni, A., El Deeb, S., Boufares, S., Hafidi, Y., El Marrakchi, S., Moukafih, B., Bandadi, F., El Kartouti, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.532</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.532</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5Psq-107 Microbiological Stability Risk Assessment of Sterile Hospital Preparations]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A262</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A262</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A262-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-108 Analysis of incidents during the validation of intravitreal therapies]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A262-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>In May 2025, following the introduction by the Pharmacy Department (PD) of the new prefilled syringe formulations of faricimab 120 mg/mL and aflibercept 114.3 mg/mL, a joint consensus was developed with the Ophthalmology Department (OD) to establish an agreement on the therapeutic positioning of intravitreal therapies.</p><p>During the pharmaceutical validation process, the PD verifies the indication of the prescribed drug and the dosing interval. When any error is detected, an incident report form is completed, indicating the patient&rsquo;s appointment date, medical record number, and the problem identified. This report is sent to the OD, which subsequently informs the PD whether the proposed intervention is accepted or rejected.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The purpose of this study is to describe the incidents detected during the validation of intravitreal therapies following the implementation of the PD&ndash;OD consensus, as well as to analyse the types of interventions performed and the acceptance rate by the OD.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A descriptive, observational, and retrospective study was conducted between June and September 2025. An Excel database was used to record the type of incident, the intervention proposed by the PD, and whether it was accepted or rejected by the OD.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 38 incidents were detected during the pharmaceutical validation process, related either to the dosing interval or to the prescription of a drug without indication for the target pathology. Of these, 45% were due to incorrect dosing intervals and 55% to inappropriate drug indication. The interventions derived from these incidents consisted of extending the dosing interval or substituting the drug, in accordance with the established consensus. All interventions proposed by the PD were accepted by the OD (100%).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The implementation of a PD&ndash;OD consensus has enabled the standardisation of intravitreal therapy use, facilitating the detection, communication, and correction of incidents during pharmaceutical validation. All interventions were accepted by the OD, demonstrating an improvement in the safety of intravitreal pharmacotherapy for patients.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Portero Ponce, C., Sanchez Blaya, A., Guillen Diaz, M., Martinez Orea, A., Palazon Gonzalvez, E., Alegria Samper, R., Cabezuelo Baldueza, B., Gea Munoz, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.533</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.533</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-108 Analysis of incidents during the validation of intravitreal therapies]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A262</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A262</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A262-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-109 Performance assessment of automated dispensing systems in the handling and control of high-risk medications]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A262-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Automated medication dispensing systems (AMDS) have improved high-risk medication (HRM) management, but challenges in transaction accuracy and patient identification persist.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the quality of dispensation performed by AMDS in managing HRMs.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective observational study analysed HRM dispensations recorded by AMDS from January 1 to August 31, 2025, in a tertiary hospital. The study included all HRMs stocked in four AMDS(Omnicell ) in the ICU, Surgical Block (SB), Observation (OBS), and Emergency Department (ED). HRMs were classified by therapeutic group. Variables collected included total dispensations (TD), dispensation to identified patients (ID), and dispensation to generic patient profiles (GP).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p><tbl id="T1" loc="float"><no>Abstract 5PSQ-109 Table 1</no><tblbdy top-stubs="4"><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="3" rspan="1">  <b>OBS</b> </c><c cspan="3" rspan="1">  <b>ICU</b> </c><c cspan="3" rspan="1">  <b>ED</b> </c><c cspan="3" rspan="1">  <b>SB</b> </c></r><r><c cspan="13" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>THERAPEUTIC GROUP</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>TD</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>ID(%)</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>GP(%)</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>TD</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>ID(%)</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>GP(%)</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>TD</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>ID(%)</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>GP(%)</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>TD</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>ID(%)</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>GP(%)</b> </c></r><r><c cspan="13" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Adrenergic Agonists (IV) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">163 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">23.9 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">76.1 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">158 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">98.1 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1.9 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">45 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">84.4 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">15.6 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">582 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">29.4 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">70.0 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">General Anaesthetics (Inhaled/IV) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">395 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">24.3 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">75.7 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">4032 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">98.0 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">2.0 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">2454 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">33.2 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">63.5 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Adrenergic Antagonists (IV) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">118 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">26.3 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">73.7 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">105 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">100.0 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.0 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">7 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">14.3 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">85.7 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">200 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">26.5 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">66.5 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Antiarrhythmics (IV) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">289 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">22.2 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">76.5 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">360 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">100.0 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.0 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">167 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">19.8 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">80.2 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">920 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">32.2 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">67.8 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Anticoagulants (O) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">644 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">44.4 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">55.3 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">8 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">100.0 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.0 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">12 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">25.0 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">83.3 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Antidiabetics (O) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">37 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">32.4 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">67.6 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Neuromuscular Blockers </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">55 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">20.0 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">80.0 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">372 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">100.0 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.0 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">874 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">58.2 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">18.0 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Heparins </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1834 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">42.6 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">57.4 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1732 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">97.6 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">2.3 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">443 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">23.0 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">77.0 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">108 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">26.9 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">73.1 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Other Antithrombotic Agents </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">2 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.0 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">100.0 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Inotropes (IV) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">349 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">35.8 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">64.2 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">14 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">100.0 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.0 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">32 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">3.1 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">96.9 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">12 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">50.0 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.0 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Opioids </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">2406 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">39.2 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">60.8 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1580 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">99.3 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.7 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1584 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">27.9 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">65.5 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">2782 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">34.6 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">65,4 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Sedatives (IV) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">2435 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">30.9 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">69.1 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">903 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">95.3 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">5.0 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">4181 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">23.2 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">79.3 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">889 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">3.3 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">7.6 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Hypertonic Glucose(&ge;20%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">141 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">24.1 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">75.9 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">93 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">97.8 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.0 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">56 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">26.8 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">73.2 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">22 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">22.7 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">77.3 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Thrombolytics- Fibrinolytics </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">29 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">48.3 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">51.7 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">20 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">100.0 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.0 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Insulins </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">51 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">29.4 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">70.6 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">14 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">100.0 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.0 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Other </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">591 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">26.4 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">74.8 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">178 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">100.0 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">0.0 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">21 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">19.0 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">81.0 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">219 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">57.1 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">42.9 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">TOTAL </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">9539 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">35.2 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">76.1 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">9555 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">98.1 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1.9 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">6548 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">24.6 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">75.4 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">9076 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">33.2 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">66.8 </c></r></tblbdy></tbl></p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>AMDS use in the ICU ensures high traceability and safety in HRM management. However, high generic dispensations in other areas reveal the need for stronger controls and staff training. Hospital pharmacy is essential for leading efforts in safety strategies and educational programs to improve HRM management and patient safety across all departments.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Castano, J., Faura, A., Jimenez, N., Aznar, M., Martin, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.534</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.534</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-109 Performance assessment of automated dispensing systems in the handling and control of high-risk medications]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A262</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A263</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A263?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-110 Deprescribing of potentially inappropriate medication in complex chronic patients]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A263?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Potentially inappropriate medication (PIMs) are those prescribed without clinical justification, either by omission or by inappropriate inclusion. Complex chronic patients have evolving therapeutic needs that require continuous reassessment, making them particularly susceptible to PIMs. Deprescribing is a planned and supervised process of reducing or discontinuing medications to improve health outcomes and reduce the risk of adverse side effects.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the impact of a Comprehensive Pharmacotherapy Assessment Program (CPAP) on the prevalence and total number of PIMs in intervention patients, before and after the intervention.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Prospective interventional study conducted in the Emergency Department of a tertiary hospital between January 2023 and November 2023. Inclusion criteria: Complex chronic patients attending the Emergency Department who were non-institutionalised and non-palliative. CPAP was performed by a pharmacist in &lt;24 h/48h in the Emergency Department and included medication reconciliation, pharmacotherapy review and pharmacotherapeutic recommendations report. <b>Variables</b>: age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index, polypharmacy, hyperpolypharmacy, number of patients with PIMs, total number of PIMs before and after intervention, number of PIMs consistent with STOPP-START criteria, and pharmacotherapeutic groups most frequently associated with PIMs.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>  <b>Intervention group (151):</b> Age: 82.9. Sex: 79 male (52.3%). Charlson index: 7. Polypharmacy: 142 (94.0%). Hyperpolypharmacy: 81 (57.4%).</p><p>At baseline, 146 patients (96.7%) had at least one PIM (545 PIMs; 3.58 PIMs/patient). Of these, 138 (91.4%) were consistent with STOPP-START criteria. At discharge, 88 patients (77.2%) had PIMs (307 total; 3.42 PIMs/patient). Among these, 57 (47.5%) were consistent with STOPP-START criteria.</p><p>Statistically significant differences were found between baseline and discharge in the number of patients with PIMs (p=0.015), the total number of PIMs (p=0.008), and those consistent with STOPP&ndash;START criteria (p=0.015).</p><p>Pharmacotherapeutic group most frequently associated with PIMs: proton pump inhibitors 64 (11.7%) and vitamins 49 (9.0%).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Nearly all of the patients presented at least one PIM, highlighting a significant safety concern.</p></li><li><p>The implementation of CPAP was associated with a significant reduction in PIMs, suggesting a positive impact on pharmacotherapy optimisation. CPAP reduced by almost 50% the number of PIMs consistent with STOPP&ndash;START criteria.</p></li><li><p>The most common pharmacotherapeutic group associated with PIMs were proton pump inhibitors and vitamins.</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Acosta Cano, C., Munoz-Garcia, M., Delgado-Silveira, E., Molina-Mendoza, M., Martin, M. P., Zamorano-Serrano, M., Greciano-Greciano, V., Lopez-Diaz, E., Alvarez-Diaz, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.535</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.535</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-110 Deprescribing of potentially inappropriate medication in complex chronic patients]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A263</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A263</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A264-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-111 Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T-cell) therapy effectiveness and safety: real-world experience in a tertiary hospital]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A264-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell(CAR T-cell) therapies have demonstrated effectiveness in hematologic malignancies in pivotal trials. However, real-world evidence remains limited.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To describe real-world-clinical-outcomes and the toxicity profile of CAR-T-cell therapy at a tertiary hospital.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Retrospective analysis of patients treated with commercial CAR-T between July 2022 and March 2025. Variables collected included comercial CAR-T, age, sex, diagnosis, ECOG, prior lines of therapy, disease status and prior transplantation.</p><p>Outcomes analysed were overall response rate (ORR), complete remission (RC), partial remission (RP) and progression-free survival (PFS) at +30, +90 days and 6 months, cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune-effector-cell-associated-neurotoxicity-syndrome (ICANS), Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission and median stay, prolonged cytopenias (&gt;30 days post-CAR-T) and length of hospitalisation.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>  <b>Baseline characteristics: </b>  <b>34 patients</b> received commercial CAR T-cell therapy.</p><p>Axicabtag&eacute;n ciloleucel(Yescarta ) was administered in <b>80.8%,</b> brexucabtag&eacute;n autoleucel(Tecartus ) in <b>11.5%,</b> and Tisagenlecleucel(Kymriah ) in <b>7.7</b>  <b>%</b> of patients. The <b>median age</b> was<b> 67.5 years</b>  <b> (IQR 58.8&ndash;</b>  <b>72.0),</b> and<b> 73%</b>  <b> were male</b>.</p><p>The diagnoses were diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in 82.4%, mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) in 14.7%, and primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (LBMP) in 2.9% of patients.</p><p>ECOG performance status was 0 in 80.8%, 1 in 15.4%, and 2 in 3.8% of patients.</p><p>Patients had received the following number of prior lines of therapy: 1 line (11.5%), 2 lines (73.1%), and &ge;3 lines (15.4%).</p><p>  <b>69.2% of</b> patients had <b>progressive disease</b> and<b> 30.8%</b>  <b> relapsed disease.</b>  </p><p>Prior transplantation was performed in 30.8% of patients.</p><p>  <b>Effectiveness</b>  </p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Day +30: ORR 92.3% (CR 57.7%, PR 34.6%), PFS 91,2%</p></li><li><p>Day +90: ORR 61.5% (CR 50.0%, PR 11.5%), PFS 70,6%</p></li><li><p>Month +6: ORR 50.0% (CR 46.2%, PR 3.8%), PFS 64,7%</p></li></l></p><p>  <b>Safety</b>  </p><p>All patients developed CRS (23.1% grade I<b>, 61.5% grade II,</b> and<b> 15.4% grade III). ICANS</b> occurred in 53.8%<b> (26.9% grade I, 7.7</b>  <b>% grade II, 7.7</b>  <b>% grade III, and 11.5</b>  <b>% grade IV).</b> 65.4% required ICU admission<b> (median stay:3 days</b>  <b>; IQR 3&ndash;</b>  <b>10).</b> Prolonged <b>cytopenias</b> were documented in 28% of patients. The median length of hospitalisation was 23.5 days (IQR 17-28).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>CAR T-cell therapy in real-world-practice achieves high early response rates, although effectiveness decreases over time. Toxicity remains a significant challenge, particularly CRS and ICANS, underscoring the need for optimised supportive care and long-term follow-up strategies.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guijarro Martinez, P., Sanchez Cuervo, M., Espadas Hervas, N., Martin Rufo, M., Fernandez Fradejas, J., Carral Fernandez, L., Luna De Abia, A., Chinea Rodriguez, A., Alvarez Diaz, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.536</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.536</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-111 Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T-cell) therapy effectiveness and safety: real-world experience in a tertiary hospital]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A264</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A264</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A264-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-112 Immune-mediated hepatitis and encephalitis with ipilimumab/nivolumab in clear cell carcinoma after a single dose: a case report]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A264-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Ipilimumab/nivolumab is the first-line treatment for adults with advanced clear-cell renal carcinoma at intermediate/high risk. This case describes severe immune-mediated toxicity after one dose of ipilimumab (1 mg/kg) and nivolumab (3 mg/kg) in a stage IV patient who developed immune-mediated hepatitis and encephalitis. A complete review of the clinical record was conducted, and causality was assessed using the Naranjo algorithm.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>Ipilimumab/nivolumab can cause severe, potentially life-threatening immune-mediated adverse reactions. Early identification of the immune-mediated origin of hepatic and neurological alterations optimised corticosteroid therapy and improved patient safety.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Ipilimumab/nivolumab can cause severe, potentially life-threatening immune-mediated adverse reactions. Early identification of the immune-mediated origin of hepatic and neurological alterations optimise corticosteroid therapy and improve patient safety.</p><p>Toxicities were graded and managed following ASCO guidelines.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p><l type="unord"><li><p>14/08/25: Fever hours after infusion, no infection source. Discharged with amoxicillin&ndash;clavulanate.</p></li><li><p>20/08/25: New fever, mild C&ndash;reactive protein increase (8.9 mg/dL) and bilateral infiltrates on chest X&ndash;ray suggesting atypical pneumonia. Negative viral tests. Discharged with levofloxacin.</p></li><li><p>24/08/25: Non&ndash;pruritic erythematous rash (grade 1). Treated with oral antihistamines.</p></li><li><p>26/08/25: Readmitted for fever and worsening imaging. Chest CT showed bilateral ground&ndash;glass opacities suggesting grade 2 immune&ndash;mediated pneumonitis. Labs: AST 368, ALT 615, GGT 99; negative viral serologies. Diagnosis: grade 3 immune&ndash;mediated hepatitis. Prednisone 0.5 mg/kg initiated. Improvement and discharge (02/09/25).</p></li><li><p>18/09/25: After cytoreductive nephrectomy, readmitted to intensive care for partial epileptic seizure (levetiracetam 1500 mg), immune&ndash;mediated encephalitis grade 3&ndash;4, acute hepatitis (AST 318, ALT 548, GGT 1025, bilirubin 3.45 mg/dL), and stage 2 acute kidney injury. Treated with methylprednisolone pulses (1 g/5 days) followed by prednisone 30 mg, achieving recovery.</p></li><li><p>06/10/25: Mild transaminase increase, improved creatinine (1.32 mg/dL) and bilirubin (2.42 mg/dL). Asymptomatic. Plan: prednisone 30 mg/day for 2 weeks, then 15 mg/day.</p></li></l></p><p>Causality scored 7 (probable).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Severe immune-mediated hepatitis and encephalitis occurred after a single cycle. Discontinuation of immunotherapy and corticosteroid therapy led to full recovery. The early onset (&le;12 days) and corticosteroid response confirmed a probable autoimmune mechanism. The next steps include strengthen pharmacovigilance for immune-mediated toxicities, train healthcare teams in early recognition, evaluate continuation of immunotherapy after &ge;grade 3 events and share similar cases to expand knowledge on ipilimumab/nivolumab toxicities.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guillen Diaz, M., Martinez Orea, A., Titos Arcos, J., Sanchez Blaya, A., Portero Ponce, C., Palazon Gonzalvez, E., Alergia Samper, R., Cabezuelo Baldueza, B., Gea Munoz, C., Hernandez Sanchez, M., Leon Villar, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.537</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.537</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-112 Immune-mediated hepatitis and encephalitis with ipilimumab/nivolumab in clear cell carcinoma after a single dose: a case report]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A264</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A265</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A265-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-113 Audit of infusion set-up in intensive care: towards optimisation and safety enhancement]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A265-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Parenteral administration of drugs is a pivotal part in patient&rsquo;s hospital journey. Therefore infusion set-up errors can expose patients to adverse clinical complications, especially for those who are in Intensive Care Units (ICU).</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To minimise errors and secure infusion set-up, an analysis of existing practices in ICU will be carried out. Several approaches for improvement will be suggested, as optimising infusion set-up, in accordance to the Infusion Therapy Standards of Practice (ITSP).</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Over a month, a multidisciplinary team (eg pharmacist, hygiene specialist nurse, ICU nurse) registered data on an pre-established analysis framework with 5 main criteria among which can be found characteristics of the access route (infusion mode, catheter type, insertion site), infusion set-up architecture and therapies administered. Each framework was specific to the intravascular device used. Data were analysed and linked with medical prescriptions from the ICU software.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>42 patients were audited and had 59 intravascular devices of which 58% of Peripheral Intravenous Catheter (PIV), 30% of Central Venous Catheter (CVC), 10% of MIDlines, 2% of PICClines and 0% of implantable ports with a total of 327 infusion lines (110 main lines (ML), 217 secondary lines (SL)). The ICU has its own infusion set-up protocol for 4-lumen CVC, ensuring unicity. 100% of parenteral nutrition were given in accordance to the ITSP. However, 91% of lines didn&rsquo;t include a non-return valves (NRV). Afterwards, the analysis of medical charts confirmed the consistency between prescriptions and observed treatments and highlighted 10 drug incompatibilities.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The care of patients in ICU is complex and their clinical conditions can change very quickly. Infusion set-up are replaced at least every 5 days. The absence of NRV is due to absence of this MD in their ward stock. They will be provided soon, along with a training of their management. A table of physical and chemical incompatibilities (IPC) of Y-site injectables was drawn up according to the main therapies used in ICU. As a result of this work, a new infusion protocol for CVC will be created collaboratively by a multidisciplinary team including the ICU team.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Salou, E., Gillette, A., Hurlupe, C., Pouzet, A., Chantereau-Jansen, C., Vinatier, I., Lacherade, J., Le Bigot, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.538</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.538</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-113 Audit of infusion set-up in intensive care: towards optimisation and safety enhancement]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A265</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A265</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A265-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-114 Analysis of the use of ferric carboxymaltose in digestive patients]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A265-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Iron deficiency anaemia (IDA) is the most prevalent nutritional anaemia globally. Although oral iron remains the first-line treatment, absorption is often compromised in patients with gastrointestinal disorders. In such situations, intravenous Ferric Carboxymaltose (FCM) enables a rapid rise in haemoglobin levels. Nevertheless, FCM can cause hypophosphataemia, frequently overlooked due to absent phosphate monitoring. Therefore, regular evaluation and biochemical follow-up are essential to ensure patient safety.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>Analyse the use of intravenous FCM in digestive patients, evaluating their clinical indications, haematological response and the frequency of phosphate monitoring.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>An observational, retrospective and descriptive study was conducted including all patients from the Digestive Department who received intravenous FCM between January and September 2025. Analytical and treatment-related data were obtained from electronic medical records. The variables collected included sex, age, diagnosis, transferrin saturation index (TSI), haemoglobin before (Hb1) and after treatment (Hb2), administered FCM doses, and whether serum phosphate was measured. For the descriptive analysis, categorical variables were expressed as absolute frequencies and percentages, and continuous variables as medians.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 58 patients were included: 58,6% men and 39,7% women, with a mean age of 63,9 years. The main indications for FCM were gastrointestinal bleeding (12%), inflammatory bowel disease (3%), and chronic multifactorial anaemia (4,5%). Mean baseline TSI and Hb1 values were 12,5% and 9,08 g/dL, respectively. Most patients (87,9%) received a single 1000 mg FCM dose, six (10,3%) received 1500 mg, and one (1,8%) received 3000 mg as a cumulative dose. After FCM treatment, haemoglobin increased to 10,14 g/dL (Hb2), with a mean increase of +1,05 g/dL. Serum phosphate was measured before infusion in only seven patients (12,1%), despite the known risk of hypophosphataemia.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>FCM administration in digestive patients was effective in increasing haemoglobin levels. However, the absence of phosphate monitoring is concerning, as hypophosphataemia is a clinically relevant and potentially underdiagnosed adverse effect. It is recommended to implement a monitoring protocol that includes serum phosphate assessment before and after intravenous iron administration, ensuring safer and more comprehensive management of patients receiving FCM.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pascual Garcia, P., Sanchez Martinez, I., Santos Lopez, E., Guzman Laiz, R., Garcia Masegosa, I., Anez Castano, R., Herreros Fernandez, A., Caballero Requejo, C., Urbieta Sanz, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.539</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.539</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-114 Analysis of the use of ferric carboxymaltose in digestive patients]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A265</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A265</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A266-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-115 Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in the era of pre-exposure prophylaxis: effectiveness, safety, and patient outcomes]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A266-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>PEP is a key strategy to prevent HIV infection after accidental exposure. Unlike pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), which is indicated for individuals at ongoing risk, PEP is prescribed for those exposed to a single high-risk event. Although its effectiveness is well documented, real-world evidence on adherence, safety, and identifying candidates for transitioning to PrEP remains limited</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of PEP in individuals treated during 2023. Secondary objectives were to analyse prescribing patterns, patient characteristics, reasons for initiating PEP, and the proportion of patients who were eligible for PrEP after completing PEP.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective, observational study was conducted including all individuals who initiated PEP between January and December 2023. Data collected from electronic medical records included demographics, psychiatric history, reason for exposure, baseline and follow-up renal and hepatic function, HIV serology, sexually transmitted infections (STIs), adverse drug reactions (ADRs), and completion of treatment.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Seventy-six patients received PEP. Most were men (67.1%), with a median age of 32 years (IQR 22&ndash;45.5). The main reasons for initiation were unprotected sex (42.1%), biological accidents (26.3%), sexual assault (17.1%), and condom failure (14.5%). The most frequent regimen was tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine plus raltegravir (94.7%). Alternative regimens were prescribed in cases of renal impairment, lactose intolerance, or intolerance to the standard regimen. PEP was initiated within 24 hours in 71.1% of cases. Completion rate was 97.4%, with 100% negative HIV serology at 4 and 12 weeks. A transient increase in ALT was observed at week 4 (p=0.004), which normalised by week 12. No significant changes in creatinine were detected. Four patients (5.2%) were diagnosed with STIs during follow-up. Fifteen patients (19.7%) were referred for PrEP after completing PEP.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>PEP is well-tolerated and highly adhered to when initiated promptly. Standard regimens are effective and require minimal adjustment. Monitoring for liver function is advisable due to transient ALT changes. Follow-up care is essential for STI detection and to identify candidates for ongoing prevention strategies like PrEP. These findings support the importance of timely intervention and comprehensive post-exposure management.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guerrero Feria, I., Perez Garcia, E., Sanchez Cervino, A., Martin Santamaria, A., De Espana Zaforteza, P., Herrero Collado, L., Folguera Olias, C., Diaz De Santiago, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.540</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.540</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-115 Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in the era of pre-exposure prophylaxis: effectiveness, safety, and patient outcomes]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A266</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A266</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A266-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-116 Tracking implants: a face-off between digital and paper traceability]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A266-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>The medical device process, from order to use, involves multiple stages and actors, all potential sources of errors. A study on the implantable medical device (IMD) process was conducted at our hospital. IMD traceability is managed in two ways: a digital traceability process (DTP) using the unique device identifier (UDI) in Cardiology, and a manual traceability process (MTP) in the operating theatre.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The objective is to assess the actual implementation of the IMD process according to the traceability method used.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>An audit grid proposed by OMEDIT Ile-de-France<sup>1</sup> was employed. One pharmacist and two residents conducted the audit over four months. The patient-tracer methodology was applied to evaluate the entire process, including document management, supervision, reception, storage, and the use of equipment by medical staff (MS) and paramedical staff (PS), as well as patient information and traceability.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Fifty-six individuals were audited: 14 in the DTP, including 2 patients, and 42 in the MTP, including 6 patients. The DTP outperformed the MTP across most audited stages: reception procedures were fully compliant in the DTP (100%) compared with 86% in the MTP. Performance during the pre-implantation phase by PS was also higher in the DTP (63% vs 50%), as well as during implantation and post-implantation by MS (84% vs 69%). Patients recalled the implant card in the DTP (100%), versus 56% in the MTP. Storage managed by pharmacy staff showed higher performance in the MTP (88% vs 75%), and document management was identical in both processes (80%). Supervision performance was moderate in both processes, with no improvement observed using the UDI (44% vs 53%). Patients were not always clearly informed about discharge documents: only 3 of 8 recalled the implant card before discharge.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Digitalisation of the traceability process using the UDI allows better control of the IMD process and improves patient information. Both processes share common improvement areas, including staff training and proficiency in adverse event reporting and medical device vigilance. To address these gaps, an interactive Wooclap training for healthcare professionals was developed along with a project to implement pharmaceutical consultations at discharge to reinforce patient education on implant cards.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. https://www.omedit-idf.fr/webinaire-regional-outils-danalyse-des-risques-appliques-au-circuit-dispositifs-medicaux-implantables-dmi-05-12-2024/</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Belkai&#x0308;d, N., Choulet, E., Cauchetier, E., Belliard, A., Pons, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.541</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.541</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-116 Tracking implants: a face-off between digital and paper traceability]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A266</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A266</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A267-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-117 Medical devices incident reports: an Italian experience]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A267-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Dispovigilance is the Italian Ministry of Health&rsquo;s database supporting the National Vigilance Device Network since October 2022. It is an essential tool in the reporting system for serious and non-serious incidents, as well as safety actions related to medical and in vitro diagnostic devices (MDs and IVDs). The National Classification of Medical Devices (CND) groups MDs into homogeneous categories for similar diagnostic and/or therapeutic intervention. The European Medical Device Nomenclature (EMDN), established by Regulations 2017/745 and 2017/746, is based on the Italian CND. The Regulations also classify MDs into different risk classes.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The purpose was to investigate MDs involved in incidents that occurred at an Italian hospital, in order to provide real-world evidence.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>This study was performed on incident reports collected through Dispovigilance between January 2022 and December 2024. CND, risk class (I, IIA, IIB, III) and reporter were analysed.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 104 reports were collected: 17 (16%) originated in 2022, 36 (35%) in 2023, and 39 (38%) in 2024. According to the CND, the most frequently reported MDs belonged to &lsquo;A, Devices for Administration, Withdrawal and Collection&rsquo; (23 cases, 22%), &lsquo;C, Cardiocirculatory System Devices&rsquo; (21 cases, 20%), and &lsquo;P, Implantable Prosthetic and Osteosynthesis Devices&rsquo; (13 cases, 12%). Regarding risk classification, 10 medical devices were classified as Class I, 34 as Class IIA, 31 as Class IIB, and 19 as Class III. The majority of incidents were reported by clinicians (40 cases), followed by nurses (16) and pharmacists (7 cases, all occurring between 2022 and 2024).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Analysis shows an increasing trend in reports from 2022 to 2024, likely due to the introduction of Dispovigilance, although underreporting persists, especially for low risk devices. Most reports concern medium- and high-risk devices. According to the CND classification, categories C and P are frequently reported, possibly reflecting greater focus on these high-risk devices. Clinicians are the main reporters, followed by nurses, healthcare professionals, and pharmacists, directly involved in device management. Notably, pharmacist reports have declined sharply over time, indicating increased awareness and targeted training among primary device users on the front lines of reporting. This study underscores the essential role of medical device vigilance.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zero, C., Dallaglio, M., Cervi, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.542</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.542</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-117 Medical devices incident reports: an Italian experience]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A267</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A267</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A267-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-118 Temporary systolic blood pressure elevations following norepinephrine syringe replacements with sterilised ready-to-administer syringes in critically ill patients]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A267-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Syringe replacement during norepinephrine administration is a critical process and may cause hemodynamic instability. Since our hospital switched from aseptically prepared ready-to-administer syringes (A-RTA-S) to sterilised ready-to-administer syringes (S-RTA-S), safety incidents of systolic blood pressure elevations were reported.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The aim of this study was to assess the frequency, cause, and magnitude of these changes in systolic blood pressure after using S-RTA-S.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>First, a retrospective clinical study was conducted to quantify the number of patients with clinically relevant blood pressure elevations following syringe replacements with A-RTA-S and S-RTA-S. Then, laboratory flow rate measurements were performed while simulating syringe replacements. Finally, a laboratory root cause analysis was conducted to determine the effects of variations in various parameters that affect peak flow rate. Peak flow rate directly after the syringe pump picked up the plunger was defined as bolus 1; peak flow rate minus set flow rate directly after start of infusion was defined as bolus 2.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>In the study period a total number of 59 patients received norepinephrine at ICU of which 35 patients with S-RTA-S and 24 patients with A-RTA-S. The mean elevation of systolic blood pressure after syringe replacement was 22.9 mmHG in the S-RTA-S group and 3.9 mmHG in the A-RTA-S group. Clinically relevant blood pressure elevations of &ge; 30 mmHG occurred in 10/35 (28.6%) patients in the S-RTA-S group and in none (0%) of the patients in the A-RTA-S group (n=24;p=0.004). These blood pressure elevations were observed after 15 (29.4%) of S-RTA-S replacements (n=51) versus 0 (0%) of A-RTA-S replacements (n=31;p=0.001). Peak flow rate bolus 1 was significantly higher in S-RTA-S than in A-RTA-S (13.7&plusmn;5.5 ml/hour versus 1.8&plusmn;1.3 ml/hour;p=0.003). For bolus 2, peak flow rates were 23.5&plusmn;3.5 ml/hour versus 2.0&plusmn;3.4 ml/hour, respectively (p&lt;0.001). Peak flow rate was impacted most by height of the pump in relation to simulated bed height.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Significant temporary increases in blood pressure occurred in 29% of patients after syringe replacement with norepinephrine using sterilised syringes. These increases were caused by the observed boluses with S-RTA-S. The first bolus following syringe replacement can be neutralised by placing the syringe pump equal to bed height.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Manten, T., Wessels-Basten, S., van Hauwe, M., Koning, T., Larmene-Beld, K., Peeters, C., van Wezel, R., Deenen, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.543</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.543</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-118 Temporary systolic blood pressure elevations following norepinephrine syringe replacements with sterilised ready-to-administer syringes in critically ill patients]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A267</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A268</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A268-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-119 Monitoring, analysis, and prevention of medication errors in critical care units during 2025]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A268-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Continuous evaluation of medication errors in critical care units is essential to strengthen patient safety, reduce adverse events, and optimise pharmacotherapy outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To describe medication incidents reported in the critical care units between January and October 2025, identifying the most frequent types, the most severe events, and the corrective or preventive actions implemented.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A descriptive analysis was conducted based on reported medication errors. Variables such as care area, error risk, professional category, patient age, error process, severity, and implicated drugs were evaluated, especially high-risk medications. Severe errors were defined as those causing temporary or permanent harm requiring immediate intervention. Improvement actions implemented and conclusions drawn from each incident were systematically reviewed.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 80 incidents were recorded: 52 (65.0%) in paediatric and 28 (35.0%) in adult critical care. By risk level, incidents were mostly low risk (55.0%), followed by moderate (21.0%), very low (21.0%), and high (3.0%). The most affected age groups were patients under one year (22.5%) and 61&ndash;70 years (15%). The majority of incidents were reported by nursing staff (69.9%), followed by physicians (7.9%).Most errors occurred during administration (42.9%), followed by preparation (11.1%) and dispensing (6.3%). Regarding severity, no-harm events represented 54% of incidents, notifiable circumstances 26.0%, and near misses 5%. Twelve cases (15.0%) resulted in patient harm, predominantly of moderate severity (66.7%); no severe events were reported. Overall, 33.8% of incidents involved high-risk medications, mainly opioids and vasoactive drugs. Moderate and high-risk errors mainly involved morphine and fentanyl infusion pumps, including replacements beyond stability limits that led to expired drug administration. Other drugs related to harm included dopamine, furosemide, amiodarone, and fluid therapy solutions. Improvement strategies focused on process standardisation, double-check controls, and effective communication of safety procedures among healthcare professionals. These initiatives led to safer medication use, emphasising the value of sustained training programs and consistent evaluation of protocol compliance.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Most medication incidents were low risk and related to administration. Implemented measures showed positive outcomes in reducing errors and improving adherence. Continuous training, standardised protocols, and regular audits remain key to minimising preventable harm and promote a robust culture of patient safety in critical care units.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Llata Ortega, J., Raventos Aymar, C., Nuvials Casals, X., Vidal Tarrason, L., Pau Parra, A., Bernabe, A., Guerra Gonzalez, M., Vallve Alcon, E., Lopez Martinez, R., Gorgas Torner, M., Domenech Moral, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.544</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.544</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-119 Monitoring, analysis, and prevention of medication errors in critical care units during 2025]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A268</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A268</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A268-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-120 Automated nominative preparation of treatments: formalise corrective actions in case of non-conformities]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A268-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>According to the Good Practice Recommendations for Automated Dose Dispensing (ADD) issued by the Club of Pharmacy Automation Users (CUAP), the management of non-conformities (NC) throughout the process must be based on written procedures. In our hospital pharmacy equipped with a repackaging robot, the management of production NC and their associated corrective actions relied on pharmacists&rsquo; verbal instructions. This led to heterogeneous practices, inefficiency, and insufficient process safety.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>Formalise the procedures to follow when production NC occur, in order to harmonise practices, improve efficiency, and strengthen process safety.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A revision of the severity rating grid for production NC in pill dispensers was carried out based on a analysis of NC reported in 2024/2025. The rating is based on potential clinical impact: minor (no consequence), moderate (treatment delay or omission), and major (overdose or inappropriate administration). NC monitoring was extended to the entire production process, including the preparation of pill dispenser cabinets and the manual preparation of patient-specific medication pouches for treatments outside the robot. Corrective actions associated with these NC were defined through collaborative work with the production team, complemented by a literature review.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The new grid lists 21 NC (compared to 11 initially): 14 related to pill dispensers (addition of two NCs concerning labelling and distinction between &lsquo;several identical tablets in the sachet&rsquo; and &lsquo;several different tablets&rsquo;), 5 related to patient-specific medication pouches, and 2 related to cabinets. Three NC were classified as major, twelve as moderate, and six as minor. Minor and moderate NC can be corrected autonomously by staff, while major NC require pharmacist intervention. A decision flowchart was designed to illustrate the appropriate actions according to the detected NC, and the control procedure was revised to include this new model.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Formalising procedures for managing NC standardises handling, reduces decision variability, and promotes staff autonomy. This approach enhances the reliability of the final control step in ADD, thereby strengthening overall process safety.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. Armand-Branger S. Recommandations de bonnes pratiques de pr&eacute;paration des doses &agrave; administrer en pharmacie hospitali&egrave;re &agrave; l&rsquo;aide d&rsquo;automates de surconditionnement ou d&rsquo;automates de reconditionnement des formes orales s&egrave;ches. Le Pharmacien Hospitalier et Clinicien. (2021).</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bah, H., Moine, M., Chiron, F., Shaddoud, O., Jerome, J., Bonan, B., Madar, O.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.545</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.545</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-120 Automated nominative preparation of treatments: formalise corrective actions in case of non-conformities]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A268</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A268</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A269-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-121 Patient safety at hospital discharge: prescription-related medication problems and pharmaceutical interventions in bone marrow transplantation]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A269-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Patient safety is a critical concern during hospital discharge. For patients undergoing Bone Marrow Transplantation (BMT), therapeutic complexity highlights Prescription-Related Medication Problems (PRMPs) as markers of vulnerability in the transition of care. The pharmacist acts as a crucial barrier for preventing failures, contributing to the safety and continuity of treatment.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To identify and classify prescription PRMPs at hospital discharge for BMT patients, assessing the impact of pharmaceutical interventions on safety and continuity of treatment.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>This was a retrospective, descriptive, real-world, observational study conducted at a large public, university-affiliated, tertiary hospital. Discharge prescriptions for patients over 18 years old between March and December 2023, related to BMT or post-transplant complications, were included. PRMPs were identified, classified according to standardised categories (necessity, effectiveness, and safety), and quantified by frequency and type of pharmaceutical intervention performed.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 97 discharges were evaluated, of which 84 (86.6%) included pharmaceutical counselling. The mean age was 45.5 &plusmn; 13.2 years, with 57.1% male (n=48). Among the discharges, 55 (65.5%) were autologous transplants, 27 (32.1%) were allogeneic, and 2 (2.4%) were CAR-T Cell therapy.</p><p>PRMPs were identified in 42.9% (n=36) of the prescriptions, with 100% of pharmaceutical interventions accepted by the medical team. In total, 44 PRMPs were classified as: 90.9% (n=40) related to necessity, 6.8% (n=3) to effectiveness, and 2.3% (n=1) to safety. The most frequent causes included absence of necessary medication therapy during the transition of care (63.6%), inadequate substitution of medicines (21.2%), and lack of antifungal validation by the hospital infection control committee (18.2%).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>PRMPs at hospital discharge for post-BMT patients highlight significant vulnerabilities in care continuity. The presence of the clinical pharmacist during medication reconciliation and discharge counselling reduces risks, increases adherence, and strengthens safety during the hospital-to-home transition. The study reinforces the need for systematic integration of pharmaceutical assessment into the hospital discharge process, especially in high-complexity populations like onco-haematology.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Diniz, A., Santos, C., Santos, G., Fernandes, T., Lima, A., Moraes, C., Camara, C., Martins, M., Sforsin, A., Barbosa Pinto, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.546</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.546</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-121 Patient safety at hospital discharge: prescription-related medication problems and pharmaceutical interventions in bone marrow transplantation]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A269</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A269</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A269-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-122 Impact of using adjusted ideal weight for carboplatin dosing in overweight oncology patients: a retrospective analysis]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A269-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Carboplatin is widely used in standard chemotherapy regimens. Its dosage is calculated using the Calvert formula, which incorporates the area under the curve (AUC) and glomerular filtration rate, estimated using creatinine clearance (Cr) via the Cockcroft-Gault equation. As overweight patients were underrepresented in its validation, several scientific societies recommend using adjusted ideal weight (AIW) in these patients to avoid carboplatin overdose and associated toxicity.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>Retrospectively analyse carboplatin dosing in cancer patients to determine whether overweight patients were overdosed by comparing actual weight prescribed dose (<SUB>AR</SUB>dose) and AIW calculated dose (<SUB>AIW</SUB>dose). In addition, study the possible relationship between overdose and toxicity onset.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>All patients receiving paclitaxel-carboplatin every 21 days, whose first cycle of chemotherapy occurred between 01/06/2024-31/03/2025, were studied.</p><p>Data collected from Farmis-oncofarm and Orion clinic included:sex, age, weight, height, body mass index (BMI), <SUB>AR</SUB>dose in cycle 1, Cr, AUC and percentage of prescribed dose. Patients were classified as BMI&lt;25 or BMI&ge;25 (overweight). The <SUB>AIW</SUB>dose was calculated using AIW and the same values for the variables mentioned. Variation between <SUB>AR</SUB>dose and <SUB>AIW</SUB>dose in overweight patients was calculated as: [(<SUB>AR</SUB>dose-<SUB>AIW</SUB>dose)/<SUB>AIW</SUB>dose]x100; positive value indicates overdose.</p><p>Dose reductions and their causes were recorded. If dose reduction was due to toxicity and overweight, the relationship with overdose was studied.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Thirty-eight patients were included, with a median of 65(18) years, 24(63.2%) of whom were women. The mean weight and height were 73.5(12.6)kg and 161.3(7.9)cm, respectively. Twenty-nine(76.3%) patients were overweight (BMI&ge;25). The mean <SUB>AR</SUB>dose in the first cycle was 564.7(116.7)mg, with Cr 0.8(0.2)mg/dL; AUC used was: 4(5.3%), 5(84.2%), 6(10.5%).</p><p>For overweight patients, the mean <SUB>AR</SUB>dose was 567.0(123.8)mg, the mean <SUB>AIW</SUB>dose 501.8(118.4)mg, and the mean variation 13.7(8.8)%.</p><p>In 16/38(42.1%) patients there was a dose reduction: 1/16(6.3%) due to worsening Cr, 6/16(37.5%) due to weight change, 7/16(43.8%) due to toxicity, and 2/16(12.5%) due to the latter two factors.</p><p>Of the 9/38 patients with toxicity, 7/9(77.8%) were patients with a BMI&ge;25.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>In the population studied, the difference between <SUB>AR</SUB>dose and <SUB>AIW</SUB>dose indicates overdose in overweight patients. Most carboplatin-related toxicity cases occurred in these patients. These findings suggest that using AIW for dosing may reduce toxicity risk and warrant prospective confirmation.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Castejon Grao, I., Garcia Zafra, V., Carreno Dato, I., Jimenez Pulido, I., Matoses Chirivella, C., Murcia Lopez, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.547</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.547</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-122 Impact of using adjusted ideal weight for carboplatin dosing in overweight oncology patients: a retrospective analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A269</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A269</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A270-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-123 Effect of fortifier addition on the osmolality of donated breast milk]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A270-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Fortification of breast milk (BM) is routinely implemented to meet the nutritional requirements of preterm infants. Clinical guidelines recommend a safe osmolality range of 400&ndash;600 mOsm/kg for infant feeds. Exceeding this limit may increase the risk of gastrointestinal intolerance and necrotising enterocolitis in neonates.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This study aimed to determine the osmolality of donated breast milk (DBM) from a tertiary hospital milk bank before and after fortification according to the manufacturer&rsquo;s instructions, and to assess whether the resulting values exceeded the recommended safety range.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>DBM samples from three healthy donors were analysed in unfortified and fortified states. Fortification consisted of adding 1 g of fortifier per 25 mL of milk, as specified by the manufacturer. Osmolality was measured in duplicate at 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24 hours after preparation using a freezing-point osmometer. Samples were stored under refrigeration throughout the study period. Data were obtained from the milk bank traceability system and analysed with statistical software.</p><p>The study was conducted in collaboration with the Pharmacy, Neonatology, and Clinical Analysis Departments of the hospital.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of six samples (84 measurements) were analysed.</p><p>The mean osmolality of unfortified DBM at t = 0 h was 299.3 &plusmn; 4.2 mOsm/kg, increasing slightly to 301.0 &plusmn; 3.5 mOsm/kg after 24 h.</p><p>Fortified DBM showed higher values: 385.7 &plusmn; 7.8 mOsm/kg at t = 0 h, rising to 417.0 &plusmn; 8.2 mOsm/kg after 24 h.</p><p>Osmolality increased significantly after fortification (p &lt; 0.001). During storage, unfortified DBM remained stable (p = 0.59), whereas fortified samples showed a significant increase (p = 0.009).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Fortifier addition significantly increased human milk osmolality, although all values remained within the recommended safety range. Storage for up to 24 hours led to a further osmolality increase only in fortified samples. Mean post-fortification osmolality was slightly higher than that reported by the manufacturer. Larger studies are warranted to confirm these findings and to further investigate the effect of storage time on osmolality.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Prieto Galindo, R., Lopez De Abechuco Ruiz, M., Menasalvas Canadilla, O., Garcia Palomo, M., Diaz Martin, M., Garcia Perez, A., Gomez Calvo, L., Jimenez Mendez, C., Toledo Davia, M., Torralba Fernandez, L., Aguado Barroso, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.548</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.548</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-123 Effect of fortifier addition on the osmolality of donated breast milk]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A270</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A270</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A270-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-124 Study of the use of idarucizumab in real-world clinical practice]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A270-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Idarucizumab is indicated in patients treated with dabigatran who must undergo emergency surgery or who have uncontrolled bleeding.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This study seeks to analyse the effectiveness and safety of idarucizumab use in a tertiary care hospital.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Retrospective observational study of the use of idarucizumab from May-2016 to May-2024. Data were obtained from electronic medical records. The variables collected were: sex, age, creatinine, dabigatran indication, dabigatran treatment dose, continuation of dabigatran treatment during the year following the event studied, and idarucizumab indication. Effectiveness was measured by improvement in bleeding or possibility of surgical intervention. Safety was studied as the incidence of death during the 5 days after idarucizumab dosing and the incidence of thromboembolism and/or bleeding at 90 days.</p><p>Qualitative variables were expressed as percentages, continuous quantitative variables were expressed as median and interquartile range.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Thirty patients were analysed. The median age was 80 (68.5-91.5) years. 70% were men. All patients were being treated with dabigatran for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism secondary to AF. The median creatinine level was 1.26(0.11-2.41) mg/dL, 67% received 110mg/12h , 30% received 150mg/12h, and 3% received 75mg/12h. The indication for idarucizumab use was: 56% uncontrolled bleeding, 34% emergency surgery, 7% dabigatran overdose and 3% multiple organ shock. The dose of idarucizumab administered was 5g in 100% of patients. In the 100% of the cases, surgery could be performed or bleeding reduced. One death was recorded during the first 5 days after the idarucizumab dose. At 90 days, 17% of incidents of thromboembolism and/or bleeding were recorded. After treatment with idarucizumab, 43% of patients discontinued treatment with dabigatran. Among them, 37% were switched to acenocoumarol, 25% to an anti-Xa agent, and 25% to heparin. The remaining 13% had their anticoagulant treatment permanently discontinued.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Idarucizumab was used in 90% of patients under indications approved in the summary of product characteristics. Its effectiveness in these patients was 100%. One death was reported in the first 5 days after administration of idarucizumab and 17% of thromboembolic events and/or bleeding at 90 days. Two out of five patients treated with idarucizumab changed or discontinued anticoagulant therapy.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carrillo Garcia, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.549</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.549</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-124 Study of the use of idarucizumab in real-world clinical practice]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A270</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A270</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A270-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-125 The application of pharmacogenetic analysis in a hospital in a Italian region]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A270-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Pharmacogenetic analysis plays a key role in targeted therapy, especially in oncology and haematology. According to the &lsquo;Recommendations for Pharmacogenetic Analysis&rsquo; (AIOM-SIF), it is necessary to evaluate if there are mutations in the DPYD and UGT genes in patients eligible for fluoropyrimidine- and irinotecan-based therapies. In the case of heterozygous or homozygous polymorphisms in the DPYD and UGT genes, the oncologist may reduce the dose by 50% to 85%.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The study compares pharmacogenetic analyses of the DPYD and UGT genes from January 1 to June 20, 2022 and 2023, at an italian hospital.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>The Hospital started a process for the implementation of pharmacogenetic testing, which involves the Hospital Pharmacy&rsquo;s collaboration with the Genetics Laboratory and the Oncology Department. Upon receiving the patient, the oncologist requests a pharmacogenetic analysis from the Genetics Laboratory to identify any polymorphisms. The test is performed using real-time PCR, and is processed within 48 hours. The prescriptions are sent electronically to the pharmacist, who evaluates the formalities and appropriateness before proceeding with the treatment.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>From 2020, genotyping tests was performed on 454 patients. In 2022, 78 patients with DPYD: 84.6% wild-type genotype and administration of 100% of the standard dose; 11.5% heterozygous DPYD*6 mutation when the dose was reduced to 85%; 2.6% DPYD*2 and D949V mutations when the dose was reduced to 50%; and 1.3% homozygous mutation. In 2023, out of 48 patients, 77% had a wild-type genotype, 14.5% had a heterozygous DPYD*6 mutation, 2.1% had a heterozygous mutation for the IVS10C&gt;G polymorphism and a 50-75% dose reduction, 2.1% were homozygous for the IVS10C&gt;G polymorphism,the remainder had a heterozygous mutation D949V. In 2022, for the UGT1A gene, out of 58 patients, 46.55% were wild-type, 38% had a heterozygous polymorphism, administering 100% of the dose, and 15.45% had a homozygous mutated genotype with a 70% dose reduction. In 2023, out of 22 patients: 59% were wild-type, 36.4% had heterozygous polymorphism, 4.56% had homozygous mutation</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Pharmacists play a key role in the application of pharmacogenetic analyses for resource management purposes. Pharmacogenetic analysis is important for pharmacological and clinical perspective,allows for rational resource management improving patient compliance.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. https://www.aiom.it</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Del Pizzo, M., Milone, L., Carlo, C., Giannelli, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.550</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.550</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-125 The application of pharmacogenetic analysis in a hospital in a Italian region]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A270</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A271</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A271-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-126 Comparative in vitro study of nasogastric tube administration methods on the dissolution of cilostazol sustained release pellets]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A271-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Cilostazol is highly effective for preventing recurrent non-cardioembolic ischaemic strokes, offering more therapeutic benefits and a lower risk of major bleeding compared to long-term aspirin use. The medication is formulated as a sustained-release (SR) capsule containing small pellets. For patients with swallowing difficulties, such as those requiring a nasogastric (NG) tube, administering these pellets directly is a potential alternative. However, there is limited data on whether removing the pellets from the capsule affects the drug&rsquo;s dissolution profile, which could impact its overall efficacy and safety.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This in vitro study aimed to compare the dissolution profile of cilostazol SR pellets administered via an NG tube against that of an intact capsule.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>The study simulated conditions of the stomach and intestines using four different buffer systems (0.1 N HCl pH 1.2, 1 M acetate buffer pH 4.5, 1 M phosphate buffer pH 6.8, 900 mL of 0.30% SLS in water). The amount of cilostazol in the dissolution medium from both the pellets alone and the whole capsule was measured by UV-Vis spectrophotometer at 5-, 15-, 30-, 60-, 120-, and 240-minutes post-initiation.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The results demonstrated that the release profiles were nearly identical, confirming their pharmaceutical equivalence. The similarity factor (f2) across all buffer systems was well within the acceptable range (99.89, 97.64, and 96.93). Furthermore, the pellets passed through the NG tube completely, confirming the feasibility of this administration method.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Administering Cilostazol SR pellets through an NG tube does not alter the drug&rsquo;s dissolution profile. This finding supports its use as a safe and effective alternative administration route for stroke patients who are unable to swallow capsules.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Suansanae, T., Gondee, N., Keeratiurai, S., Nosoongnoen, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.551</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.551</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-126 Comparative in vitro study of nasogastric tube administration methods on the dissolution of cilostazol sustained release pellets]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A271</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A271</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A271-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-127 Evaluation of professional practices in enteral nutrition: between guidelines and reality]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A271-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Enteral nutrition (EN) is a therapeutic alternative when oral intake is impossible or insufficient, provided the digestive tract is functional. While offering numerous benefits, EN also carries risks, requiring rigorous training and supervision to ensure safety and efficacy.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To assess the compliance of professional practices related to EN in our institution, in accordance with the institutional procedure based on official guidelines.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>The study was conducted over two months (27 June to 31 August 2025). An audit was performed in each ward with patients receiving EN, in collaboration with the dietetic team. Data were collected and analysed using a spreadsheet. Evaluated criteria included indication appropriateness, route of administration, prescription, monitoring, hygiene, safety, traceability, knowledge of complications, and drug administration. A practice was considered non-compliant if any criterion was not met.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The audit covered nursing practices in 12 wards and 34 patient records. Only 18% (n=6) of cases fully complied with recommendations. Major non-compliances included absence of prescription in 73% (n=25), tubing changes more than once per 24 hours in 82%, use of inappropriate tube sizes (CH14&ndash;CH18) in 89%, and the use of adapters/connectors for tubes without EnFit connections. Conversely, some aspects were well managed, including route selection, indication relevance (ear, nose and throat cancer or intubation), and regular reassessment of nutritional needs by the dietetic team. Traceability was a critical issue, particularly regarding start and end times, flow rate, and documentation of water and drug administration. Overall monitoring was satisfactory, including patient weight, absence of infection signs, tube patency, and fixation, though knowledge of refeeding syndrome was limited (12%). Drug administration was non-compliant in 97% of cases due to systematic mixing of all medications prior to administration.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>This audit reveals overall insufficient compliance with recommended EN practices, despite good adherence to certain items. It highlights the need for enhanced training and harmonised practices. The persistent use of inappropriate tube sizes and non-EnFit connections underscores the need for better coordination with the hospital pharmacy. Results will be presented to the committee, and a review of EN tubes listed in the hospital pharmacy will be conducted to optimise patient care and safety.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Choulet, E., Belliard, A., Belkaid, N., Cauchetier, E., Pons, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.552</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.552</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-127 Evaluation of professional practices in enteral nutrition: between guidelines and reality]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A271</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A272</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A272-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-128 Pupillary seclusion as a probable adverse effect of brimonidine treatment: a case report]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A272-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Brimonidine is a selective &alpha;<SUB>2</SUB>-adrenergic receptor agonist that lowers intraocular pressure by inhibiting aqueous humour production and increasing uveoscleral outflow. It is commonly prescribed for glaucoma management. According to its data sheet, reported adverse effects include allergic conjunctivitis, ocular hyperaemia, and blurred vision. However, pupillary seclusion has not been previously described. Hospital pharmacovigilance systems play a key role in identifying and reporting such unexpected adverse reactions to improve patient safety.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To analyse the possible causal relationship between pupillary seclusion and chronic brimonidine use, and to describe the multidisciplinary approach implemented for its management.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>We conducted a retrospective study of an 87-year-old man with glaucoma who had been using brimonidine since 2023. Data were extracted from the electronic clinical history system (Diraya). The safety profile was reviewed in the DS, and the Orange algorithm was applied to assess causality between brimonidine and the observed adverse effect. The algorithm consists of 10 questions with three possible responses: Yes (+1), No (0), and Unknown (0). Based on the final score, causality is categorised as: &ge;9 = definite, 5&ndash;8 = probable, 1&ndash;4 = possible, 0 = doubtful ADR.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>In May 2024, the patient presented to the ophthalmologic emergency department with decreased visual acuity in his left eye. Extensive synechiae were observed on physical examination, and he was diagnosed with pupillary seclusion. Brimonidine was immediately discontinued, and a YAG iridotomy was performed, successfully restoring visual acuity. The hospital pharmacy was consulted to evaluate the probability of an adverse drug reaction. Their investigation, including a review of the literature and the DS, found no previously reported cases. Given the high likelihood of an adverse effect, the event was reported to the PS. The patient scored 5 points on the Orange algorithm, indicating a probable causal relationship with brimonidine.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>This case demonstrates a rarely reported adverse reaction to brimonidine, pupillary seclusion, highlighting the importance of multidisciplinary management for early detection and reporting of adverse effects. This integrated approach is essential for accurately establishing causality and ensuring optimal patient safety.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rivero Garcia, M., Garcia Fernandez, J., Rosa, M. O. D. L., Manzano Martin, M., Salmeron-Navas, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.553</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.553</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-128 Pupillary seclusion as a probable adverse effect of brimonidine treatment: a case report]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A272</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A272</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A272-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-129 Effectiveness and need for retreatment with anti-CGRP antibodies in patients with chronic and episodic migraine]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A272-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p></p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>Analyse the effectiveness, safety, and need for retreatment with monoclonal antibodies against calcitonin gene-related peptide (anti-CGRP) in patients with chronic or episodic migraine after completion of a first therapeutic cycle.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Observational, retrospective, single-centre, multidisciplinary study in patients who started treatment with anti-CGRP (galcanezumab/erenumab/fremanezumab/eptinezumab) between February 2022 and February 2024 in a tertiary hospital. Demographic variables: sex, age, and type of migraine. To assess effectiveness, monthly migraine days (MMD), HIT-6 and MIDAS scales were analysed at baseline and at 12 months of follow-up after the first cycle, as well as at the start of retreatment and at 6 months. Treatment duration and time to retreatment were taken into account. Safety was assessed by the incidence of adverse reactions (AR).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 124 patients were included, 88% (109) were women, with a median age of 46 years. 79% (98) were diagnosed with chronic migraine. 37.9% (47) received galcanezumab, 44.4% (55) fremanezumab, 15.3% (19) erenumab, and 2.4% (3) eptinezumab.</p><p>First cycle efficacy: The median baseline MMD was 12 (10&ndash;15.5), HIT6 was 67 (65.5&ndash;74), and MIDAS was 63 (26.5&ndash;110.5). The response at 12 months was 5 (-58.3%), 48 (-32.8%), and 22 (-65%), respectively.</p><p>75.8% (94) patients completed treatment according to protocol criteria. 15.3% (19) discontinued due to lack of efficacy and 8.87% (11) for other reasons. Of the 94 patients, 89.4% (84) required retreatment with a median time of 3.4 months. (3 &ndash; 3.7)</p><p>Regarding restarting treatment, the median baseline MMD was 11.56 (9-14.5) (-3.7% from baseline), HIT6 64.4 (60.75-68) (-3.9%), and MIDAS 48.85 (19.5-90) (-22.5%). Six-month follow-up data were available for 73% of patients: 5 (4-6) (-56.77%), 58.6 (55-62.75) (-9.1%), and 23.67 (11-30) (-51.55%), respectively.</p><p>16.13% (20) experienced adverse reactions, mainly gastrointestinal (45%, 9), followed by neurological (20%, 4) and dermatological (35%, 7). Six patients discontinued treatment due to adverse effects.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The treatment is well tolerated and effective; however, once it is discontinued, its effectiveness is not maintained, and 90.48% of patients must restart treatment.These findings support the need for more individualised strategies in migraine management with anti-CGRP.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chilet Rodrigo, E., Fernandez Alonso, E., Gimeno Gracia, M., Vinuesa Hernando, J., Santos Lasaosa, S., Del Pozo Para, E., Pinilla Rello, A., Perez Huerga, M., Simal Lopez, R., Lopez Nicolas, A., Salvador Gomez, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.554</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.554</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-129 Effectiveness and need for retreatment with anti-CGRP antibodies in patients with chronic and episodic migraine]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A272</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A273</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A273-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-130 Evaluation of safe practices in high-alert medications: areas for improvement and optimisation proposals]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A273-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>High-alert medications (HAMs) are those that, if used improperly, can cause serious harm or even death. Their appropriate management is a priority in healthcare due to their significant impact on patient safety. In this context, current practices related to the handling of HAMs were evaluated as a basis for implementing improvement actions.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the degree of implementation and compliance with safe practices in HAMs use in a tertiary care hospital. Moreover, identify areas with the greatest potential for improvement, and propose optimisation actions within the Pharmacy Department.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Descriptive, cross-sectional study conducted in a tertiary hospital to assess the implementation of safety measures using a five-level evaluation scale. Data were collected through a questionnaire validated by the national institute for medication safety, which includes eight sections:one covering general practices for all high-risk medications and seven addressing specific safety practices for prioritised high-risk drug groups&ndash;neuromuscular blocking agents, intravenous potassium, insulin, non-oncological methotrexate, oral and parenteral antineoplastics, anticoagulants, and opioids.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>An uneven level of implementation was observed across drug groups. Antineoplastic agents showed the highest compliance (69.6%), followed by anticoagulants (62.8%), opioids (54.5%), and insulins (47.8%). General practices demonstrated moderate adherence (44.5%), while non-oncological methotrexate showed the lowest (8.7%). The main areas for improvement identified were the accurate identification and labelling of HAMs in ward stock, enhancement of prescribing alerts, and strengthening of staff education and training programs to reinforce medication safety across the institution.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The analysis revealed specific shortcomings in certain areas. Notable proposals for improvement include the parameterisation in the electronic prescription module of the weekly regimen for non-oncological methotrexate, with alerts that detect prescriptions without folate supplementation. Improvements were also implemented in the storage and labelling circuit for intravenous potassium. This analysis has been very useful in order to detect critical points and to implement some of these improvements, thus contributing to strengthening patient safety from the Pharmacy Service.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. Institute for Safe Medication Practices. ISMP List of High-Alert Medications in Acute Care Settings. 2023. https://www.ismp.org</p><p>2. Institute for Safe Medication Practices&ndash;Spain. High-Alert Medications Safety Self-Assessment Questionnaire. Madrid: Ministry of Health, Institute for Safe Medication Practices; 2024. https://apps.ismp-espana.org/mar/ficheros/cuestionario_mar_2024.pdf</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gonzalo, A. B., De Frutos Soto, A., Martin Roldan, A., Guerreiro Caamano, A., Llorente Gomez, M., Montero Lazaro, M., Gomez Diaz, M., Maganto Garrido, S., Garcia, A. L., Prol Da Costa, V., Sanchez Sanchez, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.555</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.555</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-130 Evaluation of safe practices in high-alert medications: areas for improvement and optimisation proposals]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A273</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A273</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A273-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-131 Effectiveness and durability of faricimab in diabetic macular oedema in real-world clinical practice]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A273-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Diabetic macular oedema (DME) represents the most common cause of vision loss in diabetic patients. It&rsquo;s characterised by retinal thickening in the macular area as a result of microvascular changes. Faricimab is one of the latest therapeutic strategies, making it relevant to evaluate its effectiveness in real-world clinical practice.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the effectiveness and durability of intravitreal faricimab in patients with DME who received a loading phase of at least three injections, those who received a single dose or those that maintained the prior anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) interval.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Retrospective observational study of patients with DME treated with faricimab between February 2024 and August 2025 at a tertiary hospital. Demographic variables (age and sex), therapeutic history (nai&#x0308;ve or switch) and effectiveness-related clinical variables (best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in logMAR scale before and after faricimab treatment, optical coherence tomography (OCT) findings and weeks dosing intervals (Q)) were collected. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSSv.22.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 38 patients (50% women) and 49 eyes were included, with a median age of 72 years (range 39&ndash;84). All patients were switched. Thirty eyes received three or more faricimab injections as a loading phase, ten received a single dose and nine maintained the prior anti-VEGF interval after the switch. The mean pre-treatment BCVA (LogMAR) was 0.40 &plusmn; 0.33 and post-treatment BCVA (LogMAR) was 0.38 &plusmn; 0.32 with no significant improvement (&ndash;0.01 [95% CI: &ndash;0.06 to 0.03]), nor within any subgroup. OCT showed anatomical improvement in 74.4% of treated patients. The mean inyection interval was 6.5 &plusmn; 2.1 weeks. A total of 84.1% of patients maintained an interval &le;Q8, 6.8% &ge;Q10 and 3 patients (6.8%) discontinued treatment due to good outcomes. Only one patient required switching back to the prior anti-VEGF due to worsening.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Faricimab demonstrated stability in visual acuity and short-term anatomical improvement on optical coherence tomography in most patients with diabetic macular oedema. The treatment interval of &le;Q8 reflects adequate drug durability. However, studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods are needed, as well as further research on different treatment regimens to optimise its effectiveness in real-world clinical practice.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Montero Lazaro, M., Hernando Verdugo, M., Lopez Minarro, I., Maganto Garrido, S., Llorente Gomez, M., Martin Roldan, A., Anton Martinez, M., Guitian Bermejo, C., Prol Da Costa, V., Garcia, A. L., Sanchez Sanchez, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.556</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.556</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-131 Effectiveness and durability of faricimab in diabetic macular oedema in real-world clinical practice]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A273</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A273</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A274-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-132 Safety of axicabtagene ciloleucel in clinical practice for the treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma after >= 2 lines of systemic therapy]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A274-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common lymphoproliferative neoplasm among non-Hodgkin lymphomas, characterised by clinical aggressiveness and biological heterogeneity. Autologous Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies targeting CD19, such as Axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel), have emerged as a promising treatment option. However, evidence on their safety in real-world settings remains limited.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the safety of axi-cel as third-line or later therapy in patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Observational, retrospective, descriptive and multicentre study including patients treated after at least two prior lines of therapy with axi-cel between April2019-May2025. Variables: demographic (age, sex), clinical (disease type, ECOG, transplant previous, treatment line, time to axi-cel infusion from relapse, therapy follow-up) and safety: adverse events (Cytokine Release Syndrome [CRS] and Immune-effector Cell-Associated Neurotoxicity Syndrome [ICANS], stratified according to the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation consensus of 2018; plasma alterations, infections, CMV reactivations, secondary malignancies, mortality).</p><p>Data were obtained from medical records and prescription systems, and analysed using descriptive statistics.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 37 patients (mean age 54.1&plusmn;15.8 years; 59.7% male) were analysed, 83,78% DLBCL, 6 patients with transformed follicular lymphoma. ECOG: 0(35.1%; 13), 1(64.9%; 24). Seven had prior transplants: 5 autologous. Axi-Cel was: 78.4% third-line; 18.9% fourth-line, 2.7% sixth-line. Median of 2.7 months since last relapse. Median therapy follow-up:15.7 (0.4-62.2) months.</p><p>CRS: 100% (G1:15 patients, G2:18, G3:4), median onset 1 day, duration 5 days; 37.8% required corticosteroids and 73% tocilizumab (median:2; max:4 doses). ICANS:70.3% (G1:6 patients, G2:7, G3:6 y G4:7), median onset 6 days, duration 5 days; treatment: dexamethasone (20 patients), methylprednisolone (6), anakinra (10; median: 7 doses), and siltuximab (2). No tumour lysis or macrophage activation syndromes were seen. ICU admission: 37.8%.</p><p>Plasma alterations: 13.5% hypofibrinogenemia, and 48.6% hypogammaglobulinemia, with corresponding supportive therapies.</p><p>Infections: virals (48.6%), bacterials (48.6%), fungals (8.1%), parasitics (2.7%). Notably: COVID-19 (33.3%), CMV reactivation (27.8%), <I>Clostridium difficile</I> (38.9%).</p><p>Secondary malignancies: 5.4% (therapy-related myelodysplastic syndromes).</p><p>Mortality: 13 patients (35.1%). Causes:6 progression, 4 early and 3 late complications.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>In this real-world cohort, axi-cel showed predictable but significant toxicity, including universal CRS and cytopenias, frequent ICANS and infections, and substantial supportive care needs. These results highlight the importance of close monitoring, multidisciplinary management, and long-term follow-up for patients undergoing CAR-T therapy.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Diaz Perales, R., Ortega De La Cruz, C., Ballesteros Fernandez, A., Del Rio Valencia, J., Gallego Fernandez, C., Tortajada Goitia, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.557</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.557</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-132 Safety of axicabtagene ciloleucel in clinical practice for the treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma after >= 2 lines of systemic therapy]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A274</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A274</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A274-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-133 Evaluation of intravenous ferric carboxymaltose utilisation in a tertiary care hospital]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A274-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) is an injectable iron formulation indicated for the treatment of iron deficiency when oral preparations are ineffective, cannot be used, or when rapid administration is required.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The aim of this study was to describe the use of FCM and to assess its indication according to the approved prescribing information.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A cross-sectional observational study was conducted including all patients treated with FCM between 15 February and 7 March 2025. Demographic (age), clinical (prescribing department and comorbidities), analytical (haemoglobin [Hb], transferrin saturation index [TSAT], and ferritin), and treatment-related variables (previous, concomitant, and/or subsequent oral iron use; FCM dose) were collected.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Seventy-six patients were included, with a mean age of 73 years (range 28&ndash;98). Of these, 20 (26%) were prescribed in the Surgery Department, 19 (25%) in Internal Medicine, 9 (12%) in Gastroenterology, and 7 (9%) in the Emergency Department. The most frequent comorbidities were oncological disease (29%), infection (28%), chronic heart failure (22%), chronic kidney disease (18%), and immune-mediated disease (4%). Seventy-four patients (97%) had Hb levels &le;14 g/dL, which dropped to &le;10 g/dL in 48 patients (63%). Among the 27 patients with an available iron profile, 24 had ferritin &le;30 &micro;g/L and TSAT &le;23%. Twelve patients (16%) had previously received oral iron, 2 (3%) received it concomitantly, and 20 (26%) continued it afterwards. Of the 76 prescriptions, 50 (66%) were not justified: 35 cases (46%) lacked an iron profile request, 50 patients (66%) had not received prior oral iron therapy, and in 50 (66%) cases the administration was not considered urgent.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>A high proportion of patients received FCM in situations not aligned with its approved indications. These findings suggest the need to develop and implement a hospital-specific protocol for intravenous iron use, to ensure appropriate prescribing and to enable subsequent evaluation of outcomes following its implementation.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alfaro Inigo, Y., Escalada Espiga, A., Lizama Gomez, N., Sainz De Rozas Aparicio, C., Lapena Motilva, J., Espino Revilla, P., Perez Lapido, M., Roa Ruiz, N., Delgado Garcia, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.558</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.558</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-133 Evaluation of intravenous ferric carboxymaltose utilisation in a tertiary care hospital]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A274</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A274</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A275-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-134 Identification of safe perioperative pharmacotherapy in a patient with alpha-gal syndrome: a case report]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A275-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Alpha-gal syndrome (AGS) is an IgE-mediated hypersensitivity reaction to the oligosaccharide galactose-&alpha;-1,3-galactose, typically acquired after tick bites. It is characterised by delayed allergic reactions (2&ndash;6 hours) after ingestion of mammalian meat or derived products, which may progress to anaphylaxis. In the hospital setting, AGS poses an additional challenge because many drugs and excipients (eg, gelatin, lactose, magnesium stearate, glycerol) are of animal origin. Published evidence is scarce and mainly limited to case reports, which increases uncertainty when managing surgical procedures.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>We report the case of a 58-year-old male, diagnosed with AGS in 2010 after multiple allergic reactions to tick bites and red meat ingestion. His home medication included simvastatin, omeprazole, bromazepam and an emergency epinephrine autoinjector. He tolerated some animal-derived excipients such as lactose and magnesium stearate. He was scheduled to undergo mechanical aortic valve replacement.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>The anesthesiology team requested a comprehensive perioperative medication review by the hospital pharmacy service. A total of 65 medications (anaesthetics, antibiotics, analgesics, anticoagulants, supportive therapies) were screened for potentially unsafe excipients using manufacturer data and excipient databases, verifying hospital-available specialties as excipients may vary among formulations. A premedication protocol with intravenous hydrocortisone and dexchlorpheniramine was established. Heparin safety was assessed with a provocation test prior to surgery, which was well tolerated, although alpha-gal contamination may vary between batches.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>During surgery, the patient received hydrocortisone, a heparin test dose, and subsequent full heparinisation with the same batch. Perioperative treatment included drugs previously determined to be safe: cefazolin, tranexamic acid, dexmedetomidine, opioids, benzodiazepines and others. The surgical procedure was performed without complications. Postoperatively, anticoagulation was initiated with fondaparinux (synthetic agent) as bridging therapy, followed by acenocoumarol containing magnesium stearate, which was accepted based on prior tolerance.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>This case illustrates the critical role of hospital pharmacists in ensuring safe drug use in AGS, where published evidence remains very limited. Assessment of active ingredients and excipients, consideration of individual tolerance and close multidisciplinary collaboration allowed a safe perioperative course. The development of standardised protocols for the management of AGS patients is essential to enhance patient safety and provide guidance for future clinical practice.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neira Rodriguez-Hermida, M., Caeiro Martinez, L., Albinana Perez, M., Vazquez Vazquez, M., Fernandez Diz, C., Torres Perez, A., Gomez Costa, E., Lopez, O. P., Margusino Framinan, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.559</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.559</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-134 Identification of safe perioperative pharmacotherapy in a patient with alpha-gal syndrome: a case report]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A275</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A275</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A275-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-135 Therapeutic drug monitoring in opat: a prospective pilot of a pharmacist-led workflow and early outcomes]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A275-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) is expanding, yet pharmacokinetic variability and complex dosing may compromise target attainment and remain poorly characterised in this setting.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>Aim: to evaluate a pharmacist-led therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) workflow in OPAT. Objectives: (i) describe feasibility and dosing strategies, including continuous infusion; (ii) characterise first-sample concentrations by agent; (iii) quantify TDM frequency per patient; and (iv) report clinical and microbiological outcomes and adverse events (AEs).</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Single-centre prospective pharmacokinetic pilot. All consecutive OPAT patients for whom clinicians requested TDM were included. Dosing used intermittent or continuous infusion as indicated. Courses were prescribed by infectious diseases physicians with initial renal function&ndash;adjusted doses. After case review, a clinical pharmacist issued dosing recommendations that the responsible physician implemented. Clinical and microbiological outcomes and AEs were prospectively recorded.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Thirty-one patients were monitored: median age 66 years (IQR 55&ndash;83), Charlson 4 (IQR 2&ndash;7), baseline creatinine 0.92 mg/dL (IQR 0.77&ndash;1.81) and eGFR 71 mL/min (IQR 37&ndash;99). Indications: complicated UTI 29.0%, respiratory 19.4%, skin/soft-tissue 16.1%, osteo-articular 12.9%, renal cysts 9.7%, Campylobacter enteritis 6.5%, pancreatic abscess 3.2%, and candidemia 3.2%; bacteraemia 12.9%. Agents monitored: ertapenem 29.0%, piperacillin 19.4%, ceftazidime 16.1%, cefepime 6.5%, ceftolozane 6.5%, linezolid 6.5%, meropenem 3.2%, vancomycin 3.2%, amikacin 3.2%, anidulafungin 3.2%, aztreonam 3.2%. Continuous infusion was used in 51.9% of evaluable courses (14/27). TDM frequency: 7 patients had two measurements, 4 had three, and 2 had four. Clinical cure occurred in 87.1% (27/31). Among 25 with follow-up cultures, microbiological eradication was 72.0%. Treatment cessation was most often planned end of therapy 74.2%; other reasons: sequencing 9.7%, surgery 6.5%, resistant microorganism 3.2%, neurotoxicity 3.2%, and ertapenem resistance 3.2%. AEs included three neurologic events and one leukopenia. First-sample concentrations showed wide dispersion; drug-specific medians (p25&ndash;p75, mg/L): ertapenem 6.6 (3.7&ndash;17.7), piperacillin 59.15 (22.1&ndash;59.4), cefepime 64.8 (29.9&ndash;99.7), ceftazidime 59.4 (32.6&ndash;73.2); single values: ceftolozane 53.4, aztreonam 36.5, meropenem 29.3, vancomycin 10.1, amikacin trough 2.04, anidulafungin 7.6.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>A pharmacist-led TDM workflow in OPAT was feasible and safe, supported dose optimisation, and achieved high clinical cure with low toxicity. The marked interpatient variability observed at first sampling supports routine TDM, particularly with continuous infusions and in patients with renal impairment.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sabate, R., Brase, A., Petit, I., Velarde, M., Sorli, L., Estevez, P., Hermida, A., Torra, J., Juanes, A., Luque, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.560</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.560</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-135 Therapeutic drug monitoring in opat: a prospective pilot of a pharmacist-led workflow and early outcomes]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A275</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A275</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A276-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-136 Evaluation of ISMP guidelines in the identification of intravenous infusions: a call for standardisation and risk reduction]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A276-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Numerous organisations emphasise the importance of proper identification of intravenous preparations to minimise administration errors. The minimum information that should be included is: patient identification details (name, medical record number, and location), active ingredient, dose, and route of administration. For intravenous infusions, additional details should include: final volume, infusion rate and infusion time, preparation date and time, stability or expiration if less than 24 hours.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the identification of intravenous infusions in healthcare units according to the recommendations of the Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP).</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>An observational, descriptive, cross-sectional, and multidisciplinary study conducted in a regional hospital in October 2024.</p><p>All intravenous infusions administered in the medical and surgical adult inpatient units were evaluated. The following variables were collected: patient identification details, infusion type (continuous or intermittent), active ingredient, dose, and start and end time of the infusion.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 107 intravenous infusions were analysed: 65 continuous and 42 intermittent.</p><p>Regarding continuous infusions, 14 (21.5%) included all patient identification details, and 31 (47.7%) specified whether or not an active ingredient was present (17 indicated that it was, and 14 indicated it was not). For the infusions where the active ingredient was listed, 10 specified the dose, 1 did not, and 6 were unknown. The start and end time were listed in 52 (80%) infusions.</p><p>As for intermittent infusions, none included all patient identification details, and 37 (88.1%) indicated the presence of an active ingredient. Among the infusions where the active ingredient was listed, 21 specified the dose. The start time was listed in 3 (7.1%) infusions, and no infusion included the end time.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The identification of intravenous infusions in our centre does not comply with the ISMP recommendations. Improvement actions should be implemented to standardise labelling and identification protocols for these preparations, in order to minimise the risk of administration errors. Additionally, further studies will be necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of the measures adopted.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sancho Riba, M., Merino Mendez, R., Rubi Montserrat, N., Vilurbina Perez, J., Txintxurreta Albizua, A., Tincu, S., Sala Pinol, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.561</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.561</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-136 Evaluation of ISMP guidelines in the identification of intravenous infusions: a call for standardisation and risk reduction]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A276</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A276</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A276-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-137 Audits on medication preparation and administration: a cross-sectional observational study in a mother-child university hospital centre]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A276-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Safe management of the medication use process is a key priority in hospitals and is subject to specific requirements from Accreditation XXX. Regular audits help identify strengths and areas for improvement in medication preparation and administration practices.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To assess compliance with medication preparation and administration practices in a mother-child university hospital and identify key areas requiring improvement.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>This cross-sectional observational study was conducted between April and June 2025 across 21 care units (inpatient wards, intensive care, and outpatient clinics). A total of 42 trained auditors performed 436 direct observations across all work shifts. A standardised 82-item checklist, covering preparation, administration, hygiene, labelling, and documentation, was used including criteria related to hazardous drugs (G1, G2, G3). Each item was rated as <I>compliant</I>, <I>non-compliant</I>, or <I>not applicable</I>. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and compared with previous audits (Student&rsquo;s <I>t</I> test and chi-square test,<I> p</I>&lt;0.05).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Most observed healthcare professionals were nurses (82.5%). Routes of administration were enteral (52.3%) and parenteral (47.7%). Compliance ranged from 37% to 100%, with 75.6% of criteria showing rates &ge;75%. The most compliant practices included selecting the correct medication (100%), performing double checks (98%), using smart infusion pump libraries (98%), and verifying the expiration date and integrity of the medication (97%). Recurrent weaknesses included work surface hygiene (37%), communication of adverse effects (44%), hand hygiene after handling hazardous drugs (41%) and validation of patient or parent understanding of the medication (66%). For hazardous drugs (G1&ndash;G3), which represented 9% of observations, several critical steps showed low compliance: cleaning of the preparation surface (19%), timely use of personal protective equipment (49%), and use of appropriate preparation areas (72%). Interruptions were absent in 57% of observations but occurred one or more times in 43% of cases.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The audit revealed overall high compliance and consolidation of several practices but highlighted persistent deficiencies. Non-compliance related to hazardous-drug handling, insufficient hand hygiene and work-surface cleaning, frequent interruptions, and limited patient communication should be prioritised in future action plans to further strengthen medication safety and compliance with Accreditation XXX standards.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lardeux, L., Escoffier, G., Atkinson, S., Duval, S., Pelchat, V., Bussieres, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.562</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.562</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-137 Audits on medication preparation and administration: a cross-sectional observational study in a mother-child university hospital centre]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A276</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A276</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A277-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-138 Clinical risk in clinical trials: what role does the pharmacist play in the management of investigational products?]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A277-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Monitoring and managing storage temperatures during the shipment of investigational products (IPs) in clinical trials is essential to ensure the efficacy and safety of the IP. In accordance with GCP (Good Clinical Practice), temperature control is a critical phase that must be monitored and recorded.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>Prepare a Risk Management Tool (RMT) and assess the clinical risk of experimental studies underway in 2024 at the University Hospital.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Literature review was conducted to classify the risk class and complexity of investigational products (IPs). Search terms (investigational product, clinical trial, risk management, risk assessment) was appropriately combined with Boolean operators. An RMT was prepared. Clinical Trial Information was organised in a database: protocol (study design (phase, specific web-based management system, type of IP, route of administration, dosage); IP management (management, therapeutic area, storage temperature (t)); preparation (dose customisation, preparation procedure, customised administration). The application of the RMT to the database made it possible to assign and analyse the respective risk classes.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The literature review reveals eight studies useful for assigning and stratifying clinical trials into risk classes (high, medium, or low). These were used to structure an RMT as an objective tool for risk classification.In our hospital, 110 experimental trials are active in 2024 (3.63% PHASE I; 16.36% PHASE II; 69.02% PHASE III and 10.99% with medical devices (MD)). The application of the RMT classifies them as follows: 32.33% high risk; 25.62% medium risk; and 34.57% low risk. High-risk clinical trials: dosing once or more times/day = 46.36% and IPs attributable to ATC-L (44.54%). Medium-high risk: storage temperature 2-8&deg;C (55.46%). 13.64% (15/110) of clinical trials were considered high risk due to the simultaneous management of IPs to be stored at 2-8&deg;C and 15-25&deg;C, vs 41.82% at medium risk (t=2-8&deg;C). In relation to the route of administration, the risk was: high (22.72%), medium (35.45%), and low (41.82%). Dose customisation and personalised administration (high risk) accounted for 26.36%.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Pharmacists play an essential role in the multidisciplinary team involved in clinical trials. The assessment, monitoring, and constant review of a predictive risk management model guarantee the quality of the investigational product.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[De Fina, M., Zito, M., Monopoli, C., Esposito, S., Naturale, M., Porcelli, A., Sardella, S., De Francesco, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.563</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.563</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-138 Clinical risk in clinical trials: what role does the pharmacist play in the management of investigational products?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A277</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A277</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A277-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-139 Enhancing implant safety through patient implant cards: an audit-based assessment of traceability practices in orthopaedic surgery]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A277-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Implantable medical devices (IMDs) play a central role in orthopaedic surgery, yet post-operative complications and device recalls highlight the critical need for robust traceability. International safety frameworks &ndash; including the EU Medical Device Regulation and FDA&rsquo;s Unique Device Identification (UDI) initiative &ndash; emphasise the mandatory use of patient implant cards (PICs) to ensure device traceability and patient safety. Nevertheless, implementation remains inconsistent, with limited data on real-world adherence and distribution of PICs.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This study aimed to evaluate the status of implant traceability and the distribution rate of patient implant cards in orthopaedic units, to identify gaps in workflow, professional training and supplier compliance, and to propose actionable recommendations for standardisation and digital integration of PIC processes.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A cross-sectional observational audit was performed over a three-month period in 2024. Data were collected from 1 240 orthopaedic implant files, responses of 40 healthcare professionals, and information from 7 medical device suppliers. Structured questionnaires were used, and data were analysed using SPSS v26 with chi-square and ANOVA tests (significance p &lt; 0.05). Key variables included PIC availability, staff awareness of PIC obligations, supplier performance, and existence of digital traceability systems.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The global availability rate of PICs was 29%. Among professionals, 53% were unaware of the regulatory requirement to provide PICs, while 47% acknowledged responsibility but reported absence of standard protocols. Supplier compliance differed significantly (p = 0.02), with larger suppliers more likely to provide complete PIC documentation. No unified digital traceability platform was in use; traceability was managed via paper logbooks, contributing to inconsistencies.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Significant deficiencies in implant traceability pose risks to patient safety and regulatory compliance. The adoption of a standardised PIC model, integration of UDI data into electronic health records, and development of a digital e-PIC system can strengthen traceability, enhance postoperative surveillance, and align local practice with international standards. Ongoing professional training and supplier accountability are essential to sustain improvements.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. Vaillant T, <I>et al. Pharm Hosp Clin.</I> 2018;<b>53</b>(1):3&ndash;9.</p><p>2. Kozak K, et al. <I>JMIR Med Inform.</I> 2023;<b>11</b>:e41614. https://doi.org/10.2196/41614</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guibane, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.564</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.564</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-139 Enhancing implant safety through patient implant cards: an audit-based assessment of traceability practices in orthopaedic surgery]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A277</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A277</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A278-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-140 Beliefs, practices and knowledge regarding the use and risks of opioids among clinicians]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A278-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Opioid prescriptions increased significantly between 2008 and 2017, raising concerns about misuse and leading to the development of prescribing guidelines and awareness efforts. Previous studies mainly explored opioid prescribing for chronic non-malignant pain in primary care. However, less is known about the beliefs, practices and knowledge of secondary care clinicians.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This study aimed to provide an overview of the perspectives among secondary care clinicians, distinguishing between different pain types and comparing perspectives with those in primary care.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A prospective quantitative study was conducted at a large teaching hospital, using a self-developed, anonymous questionnaire, based on the Health Belief Model and available literature, to assess clinicians&rsquo; beliefs, practices, and knowledge regarding opioid prescribing and (mis)use. The 38-item questionnaire compromised three domains and distinguished between three types of pain: acute and post-operative pain (APOP), chronic non-malignant pain (CNMP), and cancer pain (CP). In addition, an indirect comparison was made between primary and secondary care prescribers with regard to CNMP. Data were analysed descriptively.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>168 of 668 of the invited clinicians completed the questionnaire for at least one type of pain (response rate 25.1%). Most responses concerned APOP (n=133), followed by CNMP (n=49) and CP (n=30). Clinicians managing CNMP reported less confidence and greater caution when prescribing opioids compared to those treating APOP or CP. Clinicians treating CP perceived fewer barriers and greater benefits of opioids, whereas those treating APOP mainly considered opioids primarily for short-term pain management. Across all pain types, 70.5% of clinicians reported low confidence in recognising symptoms of misuse. Clear agreements on opioid refills within specialties (26%) or between specialties and general practitioners (GPs) (18%) were rare. Finally, GPs reported greater confidence in their skills in prescribing opioids for CNMP than secondary care clinicians (61.2% vs. 34.7%).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Clinicians&rsquo; beliefs regarding opioid prescribing vary by pain type, with those treating CNMP expressing more concerns and less confidence than those managing APOP or CP. Recognising opioid misuse is a challenge for all clinicians. GPs seem more confident in managing CNMP than clinicians in secondary care. Finally, there seems to be room for harmonisation of responsibilities regarding opioid refills.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Smit, M., Jansen, M., Maat, B., Jaspers, T., Geuze, R., Jansen, D., Hees Van, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.565</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.565</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-140 Beliefs, practices and knowledge regarding the use and risks of opioids among clinicians]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A278</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A278</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A278-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-141 Risk assessment and incidence of cardiovascular adverse events associated with oral antineoplastic agents in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A278-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Oral antineoplastic agents used in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), particularly vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors and RAF/MEK pathway inhibitors, are associated with significant cardiovascular risks. The European Cardio-Oncology Guidelines recommend assessing baseline cardiovascular risk using the Heart Failure Association-International Cardio-Oncology Society (HFA-ICOS) tool and monitoring the QT interval before and during treatment.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To assess baseline cardiovascular risk in patients with NSCLC initiating treatment with oral antineoplastic agents and to determine the incidence of cardiovascular adverse events during therapy.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective observational study was conducted at a quaternary-care hospital, including patients with NSCLC who initiated treatment with oral antineoplastic agents between July and December 2023, with follow-up until February 2025. Baseline clinical variables were collected (age, sex, cardiovascular risk factors [CVRFs], and cardiovascular history), along with treatment data and associated cardiovascular adverse events. Patients receiving VEGF or RAF/MEK inhibitors were stratified using the HFA-ICOS tool. The risk of QT interval prolongation associated with oncologic treatment was also assessed and considered moderate to high when other QT-prolonging drugs were co-administered.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 44 patients (43% female) were included, with a median age of 74.5 years. The most frequently prescribed therapies were osimertinib (n=24), alectinib (n=9), and nintedanib (n=5). At baseline, 84% presented with at least one CVRF, and 27% had a history of cardiovascular disease. Among the 6 patients treated with VEGF or RAF/MEK inhibitors, 3 had high cardiovascular risk and one had moderate risk. Twenty-eight patients received antineoplastic drugs associated with QT prolongation, of whom 8 were classified as having moderate to high risk. After a median follow-up of 22.3 months, 8 patients (18%) developed cardiovascular (n=6) or thromboembolic (n=2) events leading to temporary treatment interruption, although permanent discontinuation was not required. All but one of these patients had CVRFs and/or a cardiovascular history.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Patients with NSCLC treated with oral antineoplastic agents exhibit a high baseline cardiovascular risk, which contributes to an increased incidence of cardiovascular adverse events during cancer treatment. Therefore, close clinical monitoring throughout oncologic therapy is warranted.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lorenzo Vidal, L., Garcia Paris, I., Vicente Gonzalez, B., Valverde Merino, M., Martin Garcia, A., Roso Jimenez, N., Otero Lopez, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.566</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.566</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-141 Risk assessment and incidence of cardiovascular adverse events associated with oral antineoplastic agents in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A278</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A278</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A279-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-142 Efficacy, safety and adherence of systemic lupus erythematosus treatment with belimumab supported by a mobile app developed by hospital pharmacy department]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A279-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a rare disease with highly variable manifestations. New therapies such as belimumab appear to reduce cumulative organ damage and disease flares, improving patient&rsquo;s quality of life.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness, safety and adherence of belimumab, supported by a mobile application for pharmacological follow-up.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A descriptive, observational, retrospective, single-centre study was conducted including all SLE patients treated with belimumab between 2013 and 2024, excluding clinical trials. Demographic, clinical, and biochemical data were collected, while safety and adherence information were obtained through a mobile app developed by the Pharmacy Department. Evaluations were performed at weeks 24, 52, 104, 208, and at study completion. Statistical analyses were conducted using STATA v18.0. Qualitative variables were expressed as percentages (frequency) and quantitative variables as median (interquartile range).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>46 patients without renal involvement were included, predominantly female (94.9%), with a mean age of 44.6(12,13) years. The Rheumatology Department prescribed most treatments (64.8%). Median treatment duration was 28.9 (40,21) months. Joint involvement (65.9%) and cutaneous symptoms (45.5%) were most frequent. Anti-dsDNA antibodies were positive in 91.1%. Before belimumab, 71.7% received hydroxychloroquine, 39.1% methotrexate, 26.1% azathioprine, 26.1% mycophenolate, 30.0% rituximab, and 17.4% cyclophosphamide.</p><p>Baseline SLEDAI was 8.4 (4,15). At week 24, 78.6% achieved SLEDAI &lt;4, increasing to 89.3% at week 52. Corticosteroid reduction was notable: 32.6% used &le;5 mg/day prednisone at baseline versus 78.3% at week 24 and 95.6% by week 208. Complement levels improved (C3 +9.3%; C4 +13.8%) and anti-dsDNA (-28.6%) and IgM (-19.1%) decreased at week 24, with sustained improvement through week 208.</p><p>Patients provided informed consent to participate via a mobile app that issued medication reminders, recorded adverse reactions in real time, collected quality of life (EQ-5D-5L, 52.2%) and adherence (Morisky&ndash;Green, 60.9%) questionnaires, and allowed direct communication with pharmacists 24 hours. 100% patients adhered to the prescribed dosing schedule. The most frequent adverse events, all registered through the app, were recurrent infections (47.9%), headache (26.8%), and allergic reactions (14.1%).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Belimumab effectively reduced SLE activity, corticosteroid dependence, and biochemical markers of organ damage. The mobile app improved adherence, quality of life assessment, and the detection and management of adverse reactions.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dominguez Chaparro, G., Chamorro De Vega, E., Duran Garcia, E., Lavilla Olleros, C., Torroba Sanz, B., Samitier Samitier, D., Herranz Alonso, A., Sanjurjo Saez, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.567</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.567</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-142 Efficacy, safety and adherence of systemic lupus erythematosus treatment with belimumab supported by a mobile app developed by hospital pharmacy department]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A279</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A279</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A279-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-143 Assessment of anticholinergic risk in complex chronic patients in an intermediate care hospital]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A279-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Anticholinergic burden (AB) is a predictor of cognitive and physical impairment, particularly in elderly populations, and it has been associated with an increased risk of falls, cognitive decline, and higher mortality rates. Although there is substantial evidence of the negative impact of high AB in elderly and complex chronic patients (CCP) in primary care, there are few studies specifically examining AB in intermediate care hospitals (ICH).</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To assess the AB risk in the treatment of CCP aged &ge;65 years admitted to an ICH and to underscore the role of the hospital pharmacist as a key member of the multidisciplinary team.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in a 99-bed ICH.</p><p>Inclusion criteria were: patients aged &ge;65 years and classified as CCP (defined as having multiple chronic conditions with frequent decompensations and a high risk of functional decline).</p><p>The following information was collected from the electronic health record: active treatment, age and sex.</p><p>AB was assessed using the following validated scales: Serum Anticholinergic Activity (CHEW), Anticholinergic Drug Scale (ADS), and Drug Burden Index (DBI).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>80 patients met the inclusion criteria, with a mean age of 84 years (&plusmn;7.7); 60.8% were female. Globally, 173 different active substances were identified, of which 58 (33.5%) had anticholinergic properties.</p><p>The mean number of prescriptions per patient was 14 (&plusmn;4), being 5 (&plusmn;2) anticholinergic drugs.</p><p>The most frequently prescribed anticholinergic drugs were: quetiapine (20.3%), furosemide (12.2%), metformin (4%), sertraline (2.7%), and prednisone (2.7%). The active substances with the highest AB included: cetirizine, clomipramine, clonazepam, citalopram, digoxin, famotidine, fentanyl, hydroxyzine, mirtazapine, prednisone, quetiapine.</p><p>Anticholinergic risk varied depending on the scale used. The proportion of patients with moderate-high risk was 35% according to the CHEW scale, 72.6% with the ADS scale, and 86.3% with the DBI scale.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Anticholinergic risk in CCP aged &ge;65 years admitted to an ICH is high. The level of risk varies depending on the scale used. However, one-third of patients showed moderate-high risk, even exceeding 70% according to the ADS and DBI scales. These findings support the inclusion of hospital pharmacists in the multidisciplinary team to optimise pharmacotherapy, reduce adverse events, and improve patient safety.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ruiz Roig, M., Crespi Cifre, M., Sanz Munoz, M., Tajadura Larrea, B., Caballero Sanchez, M., Talavera Merino, L., Company Bezares, F., Vilanova Bolto, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.568</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.568</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-143 Assessment of anticholinergic risk in complex chronic patients in an intermediate care hospital]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A279</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A279</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A280-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-144 Exposure incidents involving injectable anticancer drugs in clinical units: current situation and prospects for improvement]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A280-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>In a University Hospital Centre preparing 70,000 injectable anticancer drugs per year, several recent exposure incidents revealed insufficient mastery of the internal procedure among healthcare professionals.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This observation prompted a situational assessment aimed at evaluating knowledge and proposing appropriate actions to optimise the management of these incidents.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>An analysis of adverse events and materiovigilance reports published between January 2022 and July 2025 was conducted to identify incidents involving chemotherapy spills. Subsequently, a 1 month survey was carried out among nursing staff handling injectable anticancer drugs. The questionnaire (39 items) assessed their knowledge regarding risks and guidelines in the event of an incident, and collected their experiences, concerns, and needs.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The 25 incidents reported during the study period were detected during the administration (n=18; 72%) and storage stages (n=7; 28%) in clinical units. Around 75% of incidents were related to defective packaging or administration devices, and 25% to human error. Twelve departments participated in the survey, providing 45 responses (84% nurses). Respondents handled chemotherapy at least weekly (67% daily), but only 24% reported knowing the appropriate recommendations for accidental spills, and 33% the related risks. Among the 18 professionals knowing the existence of an internal procedure, only 10 knew its location. Only 11% reported having received training on risks and none on incident management. Although infrequent, accidental exposure was feared by 64% of respondents, mainly due to perceived health risks and insufficient training. Most of them requested training on risks (89%) and incident management (98%), preferring video resources (64%), printed materials (58%), and oral presentations (56%). Overall, 46% expressed interest in simulation-based training. Eighty-seven percent requested a ready-to-use decontamination kit and a quick-reference sheet.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>These results were shared with nursing and pharmacy teams to reinforce safety awareness during administration and dispensing. Specific actions were defined to prevent and manage exposure incidents involving injectable anticancer drugs: reissuing the procedure, staff training and implementing decontamination kits including a quick-reference sheet. These measures will be led by a multidisciplinary team (nurse managers, pharmacists, oncologists) and evaluated subsequently. Involving healthcare professionals in this process is crucial to improve adherence and engagement with the targeted measures.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ledard, M., Kimbidima, R., Cerfon, M., Cerutti, A., Vantard, N., Baudouin, A., Rioufol, C., Ranchon, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.569</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.569</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-144 Exposure incidents involving injectable anticancer drugs in clinical units: current situation and prospects for improvement]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A280</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A280</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A280-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-145 Advancing into the formal quality of informed consent process of clinical trials with medicinal products approved by the ethics committee at a university hospital]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A280-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Clear, comprehensive, and structured information directed to the participants is essential to ensure voluntariness and ethical validity in their potential clinical trial participation. Previous analyses revealed formal deficiencies in informed consent documents, highlighting the need for continuous monitoring and updated evaluation tools to strengthen transparency in medicine development communication.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To assess the formal quality of participant information sheets (PIS) and informed consent forms (ICF) in clinical trials with medicinal products, to identify and update new areas of the PIS/ICF checklists and propose corrective measures to enhance documentation quality.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Single-centre, descriptive cross-sectional study including 60 clinical trials with medicinal products approved by a university hospital ethics committee in 2023. Sixty pairs of PIS and ICF were systematically evaluated using two previously validated checklists, based on The Spanish Agency of Medicines and Medical Devices (AEMPS) Annex VIIIA Guideline. Compliance was calculated as the mean percentage of fully met formal items. Descriptive statistics were applied, and targeted improvement actions were proposed for implementation by ethics committees and sponsors.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Overall compliance: 92.4% (PIS) and 79.9% (ICF). Main deficiencies: incomplete description of study benefits (48.3% compliance), insufficient mention of confidentiality in secondary data use (70%), and omission of detailed schedules (71.7%). Variability across sponsors persisted, with compliance ranging from 61% to 96.4%. Identified weaknesses were recurrent, mostly linked to non-harmonised templates.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Evaluation confirmed persistent weaknesses in ICF structure despite generally high compliance. Standardisation of templates and periodic updates of evaluation checklists aligned with current AEMPS guideline are required. Proposed actions include: (1) structured feedback protocol between ethics committees and sponsors; (2) training programme on informed consent writing; and (3) annual quality review system. These strategies are expected to prevent recurrence of deficiencies and ensure sustained improvement in participant information formal quality.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Igual Garcia, M., Redondo-Capafons, S., Ha&#x0308;yrinen, N., Braza Reyes, A., Vinas-Bastart, M., Figueiredo-Escriba, C., Sureda-Rosich, M., Lastra, C., Marino, E., Modamio, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.570</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.570</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-145 Advancing into the formal quality of informed consent process of clinical trials with medicinal products approved by the ethics committee at a university hospital]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A280</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A280</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A281-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-146 Penicillin allergy de-labelling service follow-up evaluation]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A281-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Patients report an allergy to penicillin but few have a confirmed allergy. Many can be de-labelled using a formal assessment by an allergist (high risk of allergy likelihood/severe reaction probability) or non-allergists including clinical pharmacists (low risk of allergy likelihood).</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the outcome of penicillin allergy de-labelling on patient allergy status documentation. Objectives were to ascertain the outcome of the de-labelling at point of discharge and to follow-up, identify and understand the current allergy status as documented in the primary care general practice (GP) electronic health record (EHR).</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Mixed-method evaluation using retrospective EHR review of patients who were de-labelled using oral penicillin challenge by hospital clinical pharmacist and semi-structured interview with GP staff. De-labelled patient list was provided by the de-labelling service team. The documented allergy status was reviewed on the hospital EHR. A follow-up interview was arranged with the GP staff to ascertain allergy status as documented in primary care, and explore workflow, digital system or patient related factors for any disparities between the de-labelling outcome recommendation. Descriptive statistics were used for numbers of patients and change to allergy status; interviews were analysed using inductive thematic analysis.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Forty patients were de-labelled between March 2022 to November 2024. Six patients were excluded (five died, one record not available). 34 patients&lsquo; hospital EHR were reviewed and showed de-labelling outcomes. In two cases, the patients were noted to request the label remained due to intolerances. Follow-up interviews took place with four GP practices, involving eight patients. The remaining practices indicated not enough time to participate or patient no longer registered. Four out of eight (4/8) patient&rsquo;s records had no change in allergy status as the practice report no communication received of successful de-labelling; two patients&rsquo; allergy status were changed, two records noted the de-labelling outcome but no change was made to allergy status. Key influencing factors were mode of communication (digital interface or electronic letter), prominence of the change, and individual responsibility of updating.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Non-allergist de-labelling by hospital clinical pharmacists was successful but variably sustained in the primary care record. Further policy, communication and education efforts are needed for whole system improvement.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jani, Y., Panesar, P., Cooper, E., Das, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.571</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.571</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-146 Penicillin allergy de-labelling service follow-up evaluation]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A281</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A281</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A281-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-147 Ventilator-associated pneumonia outbreak caused by acinetobacter baumannii in a burn unit: a case report]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A281-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>  <I>Acinetobacter baumannii</I> is an emerging nosocomial pathogen associated with both endemic and epidemic outbreaks, particularly in intensive care and burn units. It commonly affects the respiratory tract and surgical wounds and may progress to sepsis. Its multidrug resistance poses a major therapeutic challenge. This report describes a ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) episode caused by <I>A. baumannii</I> in a burn patient that triggered a small outbreak within the unit.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To describe the clinical evolution and antimicrobial management of a critically burned patient who developed <I>A. baumannii</I> VAP, and to outline the infection control measures that successfully contained the subsequent outbreak.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A 36-year-old male with 55% total body surface area burns following a wildfire accident was admitted to the burn unit in August 2025. The patient required multiple debridements, central and arterial catheterisation, mechanical ventilation (tracheostomy on 25 September), and enteral nutrition. Empirical therapy with meropenem, linezolid, and amphotericin B was initiated. After a period of stability without systemic antimicrobials, the patient developed fever on 14 September. Cultures from tracheal aspirate and abdominal exudate were positive for <I>A. baumannii</I>. Ampicillin&ndash;sulbactam (6 g/3 g every 8 h, 4 h extended infusion) was started according to susceptibility results (MIC &lt; 2 mg/L). Two additional patients in the same unit were subsequently identified with <I>A. baumannii</I> infection.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>All three patients received ampicillin&ndash;sulbactam for 14 days with favourable clinical outcomes and culture negativisation after 7 days. No adverse reactions were reported. Reinforcement of hygiene and isolation measures prevented further cases. Environmental sampling yielded negative results. The index patient recovered and was transferred from the intensive care unit after infection control was achieved.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>This case illustrates the high transmissibility of <I>A. baumannii</I> in critical care environments and the importance of early microbiological identification. Targeted therapy with ampicillin&ndash;sulbactam, even against susceptible strains, proved effective in controlling infection and preventing spread. Continuous surveillance, strict adherence to infection control protocols, and antimicrobial stewardship are key to preventing outbreaks in high-risk hospital areas.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bernardez, M., Lara, C., Mesa, C., Bodas, S., Jerez, P., Olaizola, I., Yuste, D., Miguelez, M., Pinel, A., Garcia Pastor, C., Cores, I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.572</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.572</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-147 Ventilator-associated pneumonia outbreak caused by acinetobacter baumannii in a burn unit: a case report]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A281</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A281</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A282-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-148 Can artificial intelligence assist in identifying drug interactions in critically ill patients? ChatGPT vs standard clinical practice]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A282-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Artificial intelligence (AI) is progressively being integrated into daily clinical practice, including hospital pharmacy. However, rigorous validation is necessary to guarantee its reliability and clinical applicability.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the capability of a generative AI model to detect drug-drug interactions (DDIs) compared to databases commonly used in standard clinical practice (SCP).</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>This observational retrospective study included hospitalised patients in critical care units (ICU and PACU) with &ge;5 prescribed drugs on admission during January&ndash;February 2025. DDIs were analysed using two methods:</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>AI model: Customised ChatGPT&ndash;4.0 analysed screenshots of prescribed medications and answered classification queries.</p></li><li><p>Reference method: Manual consultation of UpToDate and Medscape databases.</p></li></l></p><p>Interactions were classified according to LEXICOMP: contraindicated (X), therapy modification (D), and therapy monitoring (C). Variables recorded included patient count, admitting unit, total drugs analysed, mean drugs per patient, and mean DDIs per patient. Statistical analysis used Stata 16.0 with Student&rsquo;s t-test, Z-test, and Fisher&rsquo;s exact test (p&lt;0.05).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Thirty patients (15 ICU/15 PACU) and 293 drugs were analysed (mean 9.8 drugs/patient, 95% CI: 8.9&ndash;10.7). AI identified a mean of 7.3 (6.3&ndash;8.3) interactions per patient, UpToDate 5.5 (4.2&ndash;6.9), and Medscape 5.6 (3.9&ndash;7.2); differences were not statistically significant.</p><p>AI detected 218 interactions: 92.2% type C, 7.3% type D, and 0.5% type X.</p><p>UpToDate identified 166 interactions:</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>74.7% type C (20% fewer than AI, p&lt;0.05)</p></li><li><p>24.1% type D (16.8% more than AI, p&lt;0.05)</p></li><li><p>and 1.2% type X (no significant difference)</p></li></l></p><p>Medscape detected 167 interactions:</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>70.7% type C (20% fewer, p&lt;0.05)</p></li><li><p>24.6% type D (17.3% more, p&lt;0.05)</p></li><li><p>4.8% type X (4.3% more, p&lt;0.05)</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>No significant difference in total DDIs detected between methods was observed. However, AI overrepresented type C interactions and underreported clinically impactful interactions (types D and X). The low frequency of type X interactions warrants larger studies. AI&rsquo;s variability and lack of reproducibility limit widespread clinical application. While AI shows promise as a DDI detection tool, understanding its limitations and validating its outputs remain crucial.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martinez Tomas, P., Benito Juez, P., Sanchez Luque, L., De Frutos Del Pozo, M., Rodriguez Fernandez, Z., Miguel Dominguez, A., Esteban Alonso, M., Castano Rodriguez, B., Revilla Cuesta, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.573</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.573</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-148 Can artificial intelligence assist in identifying drug interactions in critically ill patients? ChatGPT vs standard clinical practice]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A282</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A282</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A282-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-149 Safety management of cytotoxic chemotherapy preparation processes and the pharmacoeconomic impact of reconstitution residual]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A282-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>During the process of reconstituting cytotoxic chemotherapies, quality control of the preparation is a crucial step in patient care, both for the efficacy of the preparation and for the safety of patients and healthcare personnel.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To assess current practices related to the reconstitution and handling of cytotoxic chemotherapies within the Medical Oncology Department of Oran University Hospital (CHU Oran). To estimate the economic impact of residuals from the reconstitution of cytotoxic chemotherapies.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Type of study: Descriptive, prospective study conducted from 15 January 2022, to 15 April 2022. Study site: Medical Oncology Department, CHU Oran. Target population: Personnel handling cytotoxic chemotherapy preparations.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Routes of administration: Infusions and IV boluses were the most recommended, representing 43.48% and 36.96%, respectively. In practice, IV boluses (44.57%) and infusions (40.22%) were the most frequently used. Personnel and training: Most preparations were carried out by untrained biologists (87%), who were not adequately aware of the specific risks associated with cytotoxic drugs. Instances were observed where preparers did not respect prescribed doses &ndash; for example, when a dose of 5-FU 609 mg was prescribed, only 600 mg was prepared to avoid opening a new vial. This highlights the importance of recruiting pharmacists to ensure prescription accuracy and compliance with oncologists&rsquo; orders Economic impact: The financial losses resulting from the preparation of anticancer drugs amounted to 1,521,890.82 Algerian Dinars ( 4.94%) of the total drug consumption cost. Although protocol-based preparation scheduling helped reduce wastage, losses remained significant, mainly due to non-compliance with good preparation practices.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The centralisation of cytotoxic drug preparation, supervised by qualified personnel with appropriate training and pharmacological guidance throughout the reconstitution process, appears to be the most effective means of reducing staff and environmental exposure to these toxic substances. Furthermore, managing chemotherapy residuals (leftovers) can lead to significant cost savings for healthcare institutions.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. French National Authority for Health (HAS). <I>Tools for Securing and Self-Assessment of Medication Administration.</I> 2013.</p><p>2. Bonan-Hayat, B. <I>Securing the Chemotherapy Circuit in Hospital Settings: Application to the Production of Anticancer Drugs.</I>  </p><p>3. Committee on the Evolution of Pharmaceutical Care Practices, Qu&eacute;bec. <I>Report.</I> 2016.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Amara, N., Fetati, H., Toumi, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.574</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.574</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-149 Safety management of cytotoxic chemotherapy preparation processes and the pharmacoeconomic impact of reconstitution residual]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A282</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A282</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A283-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-150 Hospital-origin antibiotic prescriptions dispensed in community pharmacies: national/regional overview and comparison with community consumption dynamics]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A283-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Antibiotic consumption in both hospitals and community is well documented and represents a major challenge for appropriate use. In the interface area of these two sectors of care, hospital-origin prescription dispensed in community pharmacies (HPCP) remain underexplored, although they may represent a strategic lever for antimicrobial stewardship.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The objective was to quantify, characterise, and compare for antibiotics (ATC J01), the contribution of HPCP to community consumption at both national and regional levels, with a specific focus on the three largest university hospitals in our country (UH): UH-1, UH-2, and UH-3.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>From 2021 to 2024, antibiotic dispensing data were extracted from national reimbursement databases. Consumption was converted into defined daily doses (DDD) following World Health Organization methodology and standardised per 1,000 inhabitants using annual regional population data for interregional comparison. For 2024, HPCP were analysed at national and regional levels (with a focus on the UHs). Finally, temporal trends (2021-2024) were assessed for selected antibiotic classes and molecules of clinical interest: quinolones, third-generation cephalosporins, amoxicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, macrolides and doxycycline.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>In 2024, HPCP accounted for 11.4% of the total DDD dispensed in community, corresponding to 64.5 million DDD. When adjusted for regional populations, HPCP varied considerably across regions (from 770 DDD/1,000 inhabitants to 1,268 DDD/1,000 inhabitants). In their respective regions, the share of prescriptions from the three largest UH reached 7.0% for UH-1 (612.2 DDD/1,000 inhabitants), 2.4% for UH-2 (230.2) and 2.8% for UH-3 (209.4). Nine out of 48 molecules belonging to the ATC J01 class accounted for 89.4% of the HPCP (57.6 million DDD). Overall, UH-1 followed trends similar to the other two UHs, but with higher consumption levels. Notable differences in prescribing patterns between hospital and community prescribers were observed, particularly for doxycycline (consumption increased at UH-1 while decreasing in its region) and for macrolides (in 2022, consumption increased at UH-2 while decreasing in its region).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Hospital prescribers have a major role to play in rationalising outpatient antibiotic use. Disseminating these results to local (antimicrobial committees) and regional (regional antibiotic centres) bodies could foster a joint dynamic, aimed at supporting appropriate antibiotic prescribing and improving hospital-community coordination.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[De Reviers De Mauny, P., Siorat, V., Tano, M., Ribault, M., Paubel, P., Parent De Curzon, O., Degrassat Theas, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.575</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.575</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-150 Hospital-origin antibiotic prescriptions dispensed in community pharmacies: national/regional overview and comparison with community consumption dynamics]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A283</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A283</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A283-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-151 From moral intention to clinical action: evaluating ethical integration in trauma pain care]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A283-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Effective pain management in trauma and burn settings depends not only on pharmacological efficacy but also on ethical soundness. Ethical principles&ndash;autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice&ndash;should guide therapeutic decisions, yet their consistent application remains uncertain in high-pressure clinical environments. The concept of <I>ethical potency</I> refers to the strength of ethical principle implementation in daily practice. Assessing its alignment with pharmacological decisions is essential to ensuring ethically balanced, patient-centred pain care.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This study aimed to evaluate the degree of alignment between ethical principles and pharmacological practices in pain management within trauma and burn units. Secondary objectives included identifying barriers and facilitators influencing ethical decision-making among physicians and paramedics.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A cross-sectional audit was conducted between September and December 2024. Sixty-four healthcare professionals (32 physicians, 32 paramedics) completed a validated questionnaire assessing knowledge and implementation of ethical principles in pain-related clinical scenarios. The survey explored perceptions of autonomy, informed consent, and treatment refusal, as well as workload, organisational support, and access to ethics training. Statistical analysis was performed using chi-square tests (p &lt; 0.05). Pharmacological categories were mapped using the WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>While 78% of respondents were aware of core ethical principles, only 45% reported consistent application (p = 0.045). Physicians showed higher alignment (90% knowledge/60% practice) compared with paramedics (70%/ 35%, p = 0.03). In end-of-life contexts, 57% of physicians respected treatment refusal, versus 85% of paramedics who attempted persuasion (p = 0.044). Key barriers included lack of ethics training (54% paramedics vs 29% physicians) and work overload (76% vs 11%). Access to ethics resources was the most cited facilitator (p &lt; 0.05).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Ethical potency in pain management mirrors pharmacological potency: both require structured systems, continuous education, and institutional commitment. Disparities between professionals underscore the necessity of integrating ethics into pain management protocols. Strengthening ethical competencies through inter-professional training and clinical ethics support can improve quality of care, patient safety, and professional accountability.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. Loeser JD. Pain and ethics: balancing relief and responsibility. <I>Pain Med.</I> 2021;<b>22</b>(2):285&ndash;9.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guibane, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.576</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.576</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-151 From moral intention to clinical action: evaluating ethical integration in trauma pain care]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A283</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A283</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A284-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-152 Evaluation of a tool to detect emergency department visits due to adverse drug events]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A284-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Adverse drug events (ADEs) are a frequent cause of visits to emergency departments (EDs). The utilisation of tools designed to enhance detection of ADE, represents a valuable strategy for prioritising interventions aimed at optimising pharmacotherapy and preventing further visits due to ADEs.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the utility of a tool based on localisation of trigger diagnoses related to ADE in order to detect these events in patients attending the ED.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A prospective, observational, descriptive study was conducted including all patients attended in the ED and reviewed by the emergency pharmacist according to institutional protocols between June and September 2025.</p><p>Trigger diagnoses were obtained from the ICD-10 diagnosis list. The selection was based on prior associations between these diagnoses and ADEs that were described in scientific literature<sup>1</sup>: glycaemic decompensation, electrolyte disorders (hyponatraemia, hyperkalaemia, hypokalaemia), hypertensive crisis, hypotension, bradycardia, constipation, seizures, and gastrointestinal bleeding. It was required that they be recorded as either primary or secondary diagnoses in the ED episode. The confirmation of ADEs was based on ED discharge reports.</p><p>The efficacy of the tool to detect ADEs was determined by calculating the positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV). Statistical analysis was performed using the Chi-square test, considering p&lt;0.05 statistically significant. Data were analysed using SPSS version 24.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Our study included 1012 patients (52.5% male; mean age 72.7 &plusmn; 17.7 years). The prevalence of ADEs was 6.5%.</p><p>Of the total number of patients, 118 were classified with a trigger diagnoses, the 28% of them had an ADE. In contrast, among the rest of patients (894), ADEs were identified in 3.7%.</p><p>Patients identified by the tool had a significantly higher probability of presenting an ADE (OR =10.13; 95% CI 5.95&ndash;17.24; p&lt;0.001). The tool demonstrated a PPV of 28% and an NPV of 96%.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The implementation of a trigger diagnosis detection tool in the ED allows more effective detection of ADE-related visits, with a high negative predictive value. This approach could enable early identification of patient with ADE in high-pressure care environments such as emergency services.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. PMID:36934016</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Garzo Bleda, C., Hijazi-Vega, M., Gomez-Bermejo, M., Molina-Garcia, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.577</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.577</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-152 Evaluation of a tool to detect emergency department visits due to adverse drug events]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A284</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A284</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A284-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-153 Predictive factors of response to ustekinumab and vedolizumab: development of machine learning algorithms for clinical response prediction in patients with inflammatory bowel disease]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A284-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>The optimisation of biological therapy in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) remains a challenge in clinical practice. Identifying predictive factors of therapeutic response could guide individualised treatment decisions and improve long-term outcomes. Artificial intelligence tools, such as machine learning (ML), offer new opportunities to integrate complex clinical and biochemical data for precision medicine in IBD.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To determine clinical response rates at week 26 and response and remission rates at weeks 52 and 104 in IBD patients treated with ustekinumab or vedolizumab, to identify predictive factors of response, and to develop ML-based predictive models of clinical outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>An observational, single-centre, retrospective study was conducted in IBD patients treated with ustekinumab or vedolizumab at Virgen Macarena University Hospital between January 2017 and December 2021. Logistic regression analyses were used to identify variables associated with clinical response. ML algorithms were developed using routinely available clinical and laboratory data to build predictive models of treatment response. Model performance was evaluated using the F1-score metric.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 228 patients were included (136 ustekinumab, 92 vedolizumab). Clinical remission rates at weeks 52 and 104 were 51.5% and 45.8% for ustekinumab, and 58.7% and 55.4% for vedolizumab, respectively. In Crohn&rsquo;s disease, prior infliximab use, male sex, and longer disease duration were associated with greater likelihood of response to ustekinumab, while smoking predicted poorer response. For vedolizumab, left-sided ulcerative colitis, colonic Crohn&rsquo;s disease, and male sex were associated with response, whereas previous exposure to infliximab or corticosteroids predicted poorer outcomes. The presence of extraintestinal manifestations negatively impacted response in both treatment groups. ML models integrating 26 clinical and analytical variables achieved robust predictive performance (F1=0.86). Nutritional parameters positively influenced response, while markers of inflammation showed a negative association.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Ustekinumab and vedolizumab are effective therapeutic options for IBD. Specific clinical and biochemical features act as predictive factors of biological therapy response. ML-based models demonstrated good predictive accuracy and may support personalised treatment strategies in routine hospital pharmacy and gastroenterology practice.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cordero, J., Amaro-Alvarez, L., Moya-Mangas, C., Vias-Parrado, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.578</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.578</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-153 Predictive factors of response to ustekinumab and vedolizumab: development of machine learning algorithms for clinical response prediction in patients with inflammatory bowel disease]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A284</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A284</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A285-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-154 Antibiotic strategies and microbiological patterns in implant-associated osteoarticular infections: insights from a trauma surgery audit]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A285-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Implant-associated osteoarticular infections (IAOIs) remain one of the most serious complications in orthopaedic and trauma surgery. They result from complex host&ndash;pathogen interactions and may lead to prolonged disability, revision surgery, and high treatment costs. The 2018 Association for Osteosynthesis consensus defines these infections as those involving prosthetic implants or osteosynthesis devices. Their prevention and management require accurate microbiological diagnosis and rational antibiotic use, both crucial to patient safety and infection control standards.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This audit aimed to assess the incidence of IAOIs, describe the microbial spectrum, and evaluate antibiotic prescribing patterns to identify areas for optimisation of antimicrobial stewardship and interprofessional coordination.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective descriptive study was performed from January to December 2023. Data were retrieved from antibiotic prescription charts and the STKMED software for all patients with documented implant-related infections. Demographic variables, implant type, isolated pathogens, and antibiotic regimens were recorded. Data were analysed using Microsoft Excel, and antibiotic choices were compared with evidence-based guidelines. Antibiotics were classified according to the WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) system.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Thirty-four patients met the inclusion criteria, corresponding to an infection incidence of 1.17%. Median age was 56 years (sex ratio 0.8). Prosthesis-related infections accounted for 35%, and osteosynthesis-device infections for 65%. Gram-positive cocci predominated (76.5%), with <I>Staphylococcus aureus</I> isolated in 50.6% of all cultures; Gram-negative bacilli represented 14.7%, mainly <I>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</I> and <I>Enterobacter cloacae</I>. Antibiotic therapy was documented in 57% of cases. The most frequent combinations were fluoroquinolone + rifamycin (67.6%), glycopeptide + rifamycin (20.6%), and glycopeptide + fosfomycin (11.8%). Although quinolone&ndash;rifamycin regimens were consistent with guidelines for staphylococcal infections, sub-optimal documentation and lack of multidisciplinary validation limited overall therapeutic optimisation.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>IAOIs require integrated management between surgeons, infectious disease specialists and pharmacists. The predominance of <I>S. aureus</I> highlights the need for systematic bacteriological testing and guideline-based antibiotic review. Strengthening antibiotic documentation, implementing stewardship dashboards, and fostering interprofessional review meetings would enhance safety, reduce recurrence, and align practice with international standards.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. Metsemakers W-J, <I>et al</I>. Infection after fracture fixation: current surgical and microbiological concepts. <I>Injury.</I> 2018;<b>49</b>(3):511&ndash;522.</p><p>2. Zimmerli W, Trampuz A. Prosthetic-joint-associated infections. <I>N Engl J Med.</I> 2004;<b>351</b>(16):1645&ndash;1654.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guibane, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.579</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.579</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-154 Antibiotic strategies and microbiological patterns in implant-associated osteoarticular infections: insights from a trauma surgery audit]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A285</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A285</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A285-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-155 Midlines versus short peripheral intravenous catheters: which device is more sustainable?]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A285-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Short peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVCs) and midlines (MIDs) are medical devices (MDs) used for peripheral intravenous drug administration. Their role in patient management is now well established, but little is known about their environmental impact.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To calculate the carbon footprint (CF) of PIVC and MID insertion and use in our hospital, based on a patient cohort.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>The list of MDs required for PIVC and MID insertion was established. Data required for a simplified life cycle assessment were collected from suppliers, including materials, mode of transport, and manufacturing, assembly, and sterilisation sites. Each MD component was weighed by material type, and the CF was determined using the Carebone tool, a life cycle assessment instrument developed by the <I>Assistance Publique&ndash;H&ocirc;pitaux de Paris</I> (AP-HP). A model was developed to estimate CF according to catheter dwell time and treatment duration, and to identify the treatment length beyond which MID use becomes more sustainable than PIVC. The calculation was then applied to a cohort of 315 patients who received a MID in 2024, allowing estimation of the overall CF.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Seventeen MDs were required for MID insertion versus eight for PIVC insertion. The CF of a single PIVC insertion was 2.1 kgCO2e, while that of a MID was 7.3 kgCO<SUB>2</SUB>e. The CF of the cohort was 4619 kgCO<SUB>2</SUB>e. The mean dwell time was 2 days for PIVCs and 10 days for MIDs. The model showed that for 9 days of treatment, MID use is more sustainable than repeated PIVC insertions. In this cohort, MID use reduced the overall CF by 2355 kgCO<SUB>2</SUB>e by avoiding repeated PIVC insertions. From an environmental perspective, MIDs are therefore advantageous for long-term treatments, or when PIVC dwell time is short, particularly in patients with poor venous access.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The choice between MIDs and PIVCs cannot be based solely on environmental criteria, but sustainability can be added to the existing selection factors. A reasoned and thoughtful approach to the use of catheters&ndash;and medical devices in general&ndash;is essential to reduce the environmental impact of healthcare and to help preserve the environment.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Boutin, A., Gnamien Clermont, S., Gramer, M., Todeschi, A., Greve-Heurtier, S., Pottier, C., Espinasse, F., Huynh Raphae&#x0308;l, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.580</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.580</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-155 Midlines versus short peripheral intravenous catheters: which device is more sustainable?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A285</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A285</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A286-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-156 Impact of hospital clinical decision support systems on medication errors, adverse drug events or other patient outcomes. A scoping review]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A286-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and importance</st><p>Patient safety is paramount and hospitalised patients are particularly susceptible to adverse drug events (ADEs), including medication errors (MEs). The high rate of MEs in hospitals is a significant and well-recognised problem. Strategies to reduce MEs have the potential to substantially reduce ADEs and improve patient safety. One such strategy is the implementation of Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSSs).</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and objectives</st><p>To review the impact of CDSS within electronic prescribing (EP) on reducing MEs, ADEs, and/or improving other patient outcomes in hospital setting, to have an overview of CDSS impact on safety, and to identify where their implementation may be most relevant and evidence needs.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and methods</st><p>A scoping review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA-Scr guidelines. Searches were performed in Medline (PubMed), Cochrane Trials, and Cochrane Reviews up to March 2024. Studies were selected based on a PICO framework and their quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute tools.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Forty-three studies were included from the 2,425 records identified and categorised into seven areas. Six of the 43 studies were randomised controlled trials (RCT). Thirty-two studies were of high quality in their category.</p><p>Of the 12 studies evaluating ADEs, seven reported statistically significant reductions, especially those related to anti-infective therapy or paediatrics. Forty studies analysed MEs, and all reported statistically significant reductions. These were particularly relevant anti-infective prescribing (CDSS increased appropriate antibiotic selection, dose and duration, among others), in the elderly (a decrease in potentially inappropriate medication was observed in all articles), in paediatrics (the dosing error rate was reduced by half or more), and in targeted medications (doses exceeding the daily limit of five high-alert medications and inappropriate haloperidol prescriptions for high-risk patients decreased, and electrolyte supplementation in patients with recently reported hypokalaemia and hypomagnesaemia increased).</p><p>Nineteen studies evaluated other outcomes, eg, length of stay, mortality, and readmission rates, with mixed or non-significant results.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Published evidence supports that CDSS integrated into EP are effective in improving patient safety by reducing MEs and ADEs, especially those related to antimicrobials and in elderly or paediatric patients. Evidence on other patient outcomes remains less robust. Further RCT are needed to validate these findings.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Molins Castiella, E., Aquerreta Gonzalez, I., Blazquiz Ibero, E., Berisa Prado, S., Ortega Eslava, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.581</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.581</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-156 Impact of hospital clinical decision support systems on medication errors, adverse drug events or other patient outcomes. A scoping review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A286</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A286</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A286-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-157 Development of an excel dashboard for monitoring environmental microbiological surveillance trends in radiopharmacy]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A286-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Environmental microbiological surveillance (EMS) is a key component in ensuring the quality and safety of sterile injectable preparations. The identification of critical contamination points relies on risk assessment and continuous monitoring.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The objective is to develop a tool for monitoring EMS trends, enabling dynamic visualisation of results. This dashboard allows tracking of contamination points and aims to support the adaptation of the sampling plan according to observed trends.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Environmental monitoring data from grade A and grade C areas were collected between 17/07/2024 and 31/07/2025. Data were analysed using Visual Basic for Applications (VBA) macros and PivotTables in Excel . The developed automations include:</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Display of daily positivity rates (PR) in grade A</p></li><li><p>Generation of an alert when a sampling point remains positive for three consecutive days in grade A</p></li><li><p>Identification of the three most recent positive sampling points in grade A.</p></li><li><p>Definition of vigilance (11&ndash;25 CFU) and alert (&gt;25 CFU) thresholds for grade C samples.</p></li></l></p><p>These elements are integrated into an interactive dashboard for real-time visualisation and simplified interpretation.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The dashboard provides a 30-day visualisation of sampling trends and includes :</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Six boxes summarising overall PR.</p></li><li><p>Six dynamic arrow gauges comparing weekly PR (Week N versus Week N&ndash;1) : green for improvement, orange for stability, red for deterioration.</p></li><li><p>An ellipse highlighting points positive for three consecutive days.</p></li><li><p>A colour&ndash;coded rectangle displaying vigilance (orange), alert (red), and acceptable (green) thresholds</p></li><li><p>A frame listing the three most recent positive samples.</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>A trend analysis tool is essential for monitoring and improving SME. It is suitable for use in hospital, easy to adapt, and transferrable to various pharmaceutical technology. Its implementation in radiopharmacy will help optimise the sampling plan and enhance staff awareness.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. Good Preparation Practices 2023.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Leurs, C., Dekyndt, B., Duclos, J., Leblond, R., Vasseur, M., Legrand, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.582</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.582</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-157 Development of an excel dashboard for monitoring environmental microbiological surveillance trends in radiopharmacy]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A286</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A286</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A287-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-158 Autoimmune pneumonitis as a fatal adverse reaction to durvalumab and tremelimumab in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a case report]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A287-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Durvalumab and tremelimumab are monoclonal antibodies used as first-line systemic immunotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). These agents are known to cause immune-mediated adverse drug reactions (ADRs), including severe pneumonitis, which can be life-threatening. Published reports on fatal autoimmune pneumonitis following this combination in HCC patients remain scarce. This case report describes a case of immune-mediated pneumonitis with fatal outcome.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>A 58-year-old male with obesity (history of sleeve gastrectomy), resolved diabetes and hypertension), NSAID allergy, and prior heavy smoking was diagnosed with a nodule of HCC in 11/2024 following investigations for abnormal liver function tests. After multidisciplinary evaluation, he underwent transarterial radioembolisation (TARE) as neoadjuvant treatment to surgery (01/2025). In the following month he experienced atrial fibrillation and a right-sided lacunar stroke, requiring apixaban. Further cardiac assessment in 05/2025 did not reveal significant coronary disease. HCC revaluation after TARE showed disease progression.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>In 06/2025, the patient began treatment with tremelimumab and durvalumab. Three weeks after the first cycle he developped cough and desaturation. When evaluated in the clinic for the second cycle of therapy, the patient was heavily symptomatic and was sent to ER. He underwent bronchoscopy and TC-scan revealing a bilateral interstitial pneumonitis. High-dose methylprednisolone and broad-spectrum antibiotics were initiated. Despite therapy, progressive respiratory failure required invasive ventilation in the ICU (07/2025). A clinical pharmacological evaluation was performed through a detailed medication review to identify potential drug interactions.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Despite therapies and respiratory support, the patient&rsquo;s condition deteriorated. Radiologic follow-up revealed increasing pulmonary consolidation, pericardial effusion, ascites, and futher worsening of HCC (TC-scan on 15/07/2025). Further escalation of vital support was excluded after multidisciplinary evaluation and the patient died on 18/07/2025. The Naranjo algorithm scored 6, indicating a probable causality for an immune-mediated ADR. No alternative causal factors emerged.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>This case details fatal immune-mediated pneumonitis as an adverse reaction to tremelimumab and durvalumab in HCC. The chronology, diagnostic exclusion, pharmacovigilance actions and medication review collectively reinforce the evidence for an immune-mediated mechanism. This case highlights the role of pharmacovigilance and systematic medication review in identifying and managing serious ADRs during cancer immunotherapy to enhance patient safety in these clinical settings.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Toma, D., Chiara, T., Alessandra, B., Marco, B., Giovanna, F., Donatella, M., Elisa, S., Giorgio, V., Annalisa, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.583</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.583</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-158 Autoimmune pneumonitis as a fatal adverse reaction to durvalumab and tremelimumab in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a case report]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A287</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A287</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A287-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-159 Pharmacogenetic variability in Spanish patients: results from a clinical implementation program]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A287-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Pharmacogenetics (PGx) enables the identification of genetic variants that influence drug metabolism, efficacy, and safety. Implementation of pharmacogenetic testing in clinical practice allows optimisation of pharmacotherapy, particularly in polymedicated patients. In Spain, initiatives such as the CSVS and CEGEN-CNIO projects have promoted the development of population-specific PGx databases. However, real-world data from hospital settings remain limited.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To describe the demographic and pharmacogenetic profile of patients analysed in the Spanish Hospital as part of the national pharmacogenetic implementation project, in order to evaluate the frequency of actionable variants and identify potential clinical relevance.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>An observational descriptive study was conducted including patients with available pharmacogenetic testing performed at CEGEN-CNIO using Illumina Infinium technology. Demographic variables (age, sex, diagnosis, medication) and pharmacogenetic results (genotype and phenotype of key pharmacogenes) were analysed. Descriptive statistics were performed using R and RStudio V4.5.1.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 40 patients were included (70% male; mean age 40 years, range 25&ndash;75). The most frequent diagnoses were gastritis (22.5%), oesophagitis (7.5%), hypertension (7.5%), hypercholesterolaemia (5%) and major depression (5%). The mean number of concomitant drugs per patient was 2.1 (maximum 12). Across the pharmacogenetic panel, 196 phenotypes were classified as normal metabolisers, 56 as intermediate, 39 as poor, and 11 as rapid metabolisers. Approximately one-third of patients carried at least one actionable variant.Interestingly, the overall prevalence of altered phenotypes was slightly lower than that reported in broader European cohorts (where up to 90&ndash;99% of individuals carry at least one actionable variant), suggesting possible population-specific differences or the effect of sample selection. This reinforces the need for local pharmacogenetic studies integrated into hospital practice.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Our findings highlight relevant interindividual variability in drug metabolism, although with a lower frequency of altered genotypes compared to European reference populations. This underlines the importance of implementing pharmacogenetic testing within hospital settings to ensure accurate, population-adapted precision medicine strategies. Proactive integration of PGx results into electronic health records could enhance therapeutic safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness within the Spanish National Health System.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cordero, J., Amaro-Alvarez, L., Monino-Dominguez, L., Moya-Mangas, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.584</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.584</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-159 Pharmacogenetic variability in Spanish patients: results from a clinical implementation program]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A287</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A287</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A288-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-160 Technological promises and reality: challenges in deploying automated unit dose dispensing systems in a hospital pharmacy]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A288-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Automated unit dose dispensing systems aim to improve efficiency, traceability, and medication safety. A custom hybrid version of ACCED v3 (Deenova) was implemented, representing the only deployment of this configuration. Previous reports focus mainly on expected performance, but few describe real-life use. Assessing the gap between expected and observed performance was necessary to address organisational and technical issues.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the implementation of ACCED v3 Hybrid (Deenova) in a hospital pharmacy, focusing on technical performance, organisational impact, and medication safety in a long-term care unit.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective observational study was conducted from 4 February to 4 September 2025 in a 52-bed Long-Term Care Unit (USLD). Three hybrid systems produced weekly nominative booklets (about 3100 sachets/week). Two hybrid workflows (v1 and v2) were used during the study. Outcomes included incidents, non-conformities, productivity indicators, and IT issues; outcomes focused on technical performance, organisational impact, and medication safety.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Expected picking productivity (300 sachets/h) was not reached: v1 achieved 270 sachets/h with manual corrections for missing sachets; v2 reached 170 sachets/h without missing sachets. Filling productivity was 480 doses/h versus 500 expected. From June to August, 184 incidents were recorded: 51.6% technical filling, 3.8% IT filling, 28.3% technical picking, and 16.3% IT picking. Hotline response time exceeded 2 hours. Thirty-seven bug types were identified; 12 persisted. Data extraction was incomplete due to software limitations. Non-conformities decreased from 1% (33% of patients) to 0.3% (8%). Nurse-detected errors were 0.03%. Non-conformity types fell from 11 to 3. Preparation time increased sixfold, and nurses&rsquo; rounds doubled. The supplier estimated 0.5 full-time equivalent (FTE) was needed, but 2 FTE were required. Consumable costs averaged 470/month; ~3100 sachets/week were discarded.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>  <I>These observations are consistent with limited published data on hybrid automated dispensing systems, highlighting similar operational constraints in real-life settings.</I> Implementation revealed gaps between expected and observed performance. Scaling to 1200 patients was not achieved. Software limitations, increased workload, and incident persistence were observed. Three different systems have been used since deployment. Hybrid models presented maintenance and monitoring constraints; appropriate version selection, clinical team involvement, and on-site technical support were required. Shifting to a non-hybrid version is under consideration.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mohamed Ala-Eddine, L., Salhi, M., Galo Blandin, A., Bourgault, G., Chaumont, C., Simoens, X.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.585</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.585</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-160 Technological promises and reality: challenges in deploying automated unit dose dispensing systems in a hospital pharmacy]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A288</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A288</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A288-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-161 nPEP in the prep era: assessing the impact of pre-exposure prophylaxis on the use of non-occupational post-exposure prophylaxis in HIV prevention]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A288-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Non-occupational Post-Exposure Prophylaxis (nPEP) is an effective HIV <I>(human immunodeficiency virus)</I> prevention strategy administered after potential exposure. HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) is also a highly effective preventive intervention designed to reduce HIV transmission in individuals with high-risk sexual behaviours.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>Investigated whether the introduction of PrEP (since 2021) has influenced the demand for nPEP at our centre. To characterise and evaluate both prevention strategies in terms of demographic profiles, exposure types and clinical follow-up.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>This observational, retrospective, and comparative study between nPEP usage (number of prescriptions per month) before availability of PrEP (P1=2015-2021) and after its introduction (P2=2021-2025). Comparisons between periods were conducted using a two-sample test of proportions, statistical significance set at <I>p&lt;0.05</I>. Analyses were performed using RStudio for Windows (v4.4.1).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>There were 22 nPEP-prescriptions in P1 and 51 during P2. The demand for nPEP increased significantly (by 342.21%) from 0.289 prescriptions per month in P1 to 0.989 in P2, when PrEP was more available (p-value 0.002).</p><p>The characteristics of all nPEP users (P1+P2) were statistically comparable to those of PrEP users (<I>p-value &lt;0.05</I>). A PrEP-gap transition was identified between the two strategies.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The increase in nPEP use may reflect heightened awareness of HIV prevention and knowledge of available interventions, as well as exposure scenarios not preventable by PrEP alone.</p><p>Currently, many individuals who could benefit from PrEP remain underserved due to structural and social barriers. Strengthening care coordination and the integrating both strategies&ndash;particularly through rapid-start protocols (PEP-to-PrEP)&ndash;are essential in bridging the PrEP-gap and further reducing HIV transmission.</p><p><tbl id="T1" loc="float"><no>Abstract 5PSQ-161 Table 1</no><tblbdy top-stubs="2"><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <I>Number (proportion%)</I> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>nPEP-P1</b>(n=22) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>nPEP-P2</b> (n=51) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>  <I>p-value</I>  </b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>nPEP P1+P2)</b>(n=73) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>PrEP-users (</b>n=47) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>  <I>p-value</I>  </b> </c></r><r><c cspan="7" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Age, years</b>  <I> (median (IQR)*)</I> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">34(27-39) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">31(27-38) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <I>0.413</I> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">32(27-39) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">35(29-43) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <I>0.0619</I> </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Gender</b>  MenWomenTransgender-women </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> 20(90.91%)1(4.55%)1(4.55%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> 34(66.67%)14(27.45%)3(5.88%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <I>0.078</I> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> 54(73.97%)15(20.54%)4 (5.48%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> 45(95.74%)-2 (4.26%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <I>0.003</I> </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Men who has sex with men (MSM)</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> 8 (36,36%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> 23 (45,10%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <I>0.174</I> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> 22(30,13%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> 47(100%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <I>0.0005</I> </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Risky sexual intercourse</b>    <b>Sexual assault</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> 15(68.18%) - </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> 39(76.47%) 11(21,57%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <I>0.497</I> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> 54(73.97%) 11(21,57%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> - </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <I>-</I> </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>nPEP &lt;24 h initiation</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> 9(40.91%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> 28(54.90%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <I>1</I> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> 37(50.68%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> - </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <I>-</I> </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Weekend exposition</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <I>8</I>  <I>(36.36%)</I> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <I>28</I>  <I>(54.09%)</I> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <I>0.2307</I> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <I>36</I>  <I>(49.32%)</I> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> - </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <I>-</I> </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>ITS*</b>    <b>Follow-up adherence</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> 3(13.64%) 9(40.91%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> 8(15.69%) 25(49.02%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <I>1</I> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> 11(15.07%) 34(46.58%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> 29(61.70%) 35(85.71%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <I>0,0359</I> </c></r></tblbdy><tblfn><p>*ITS: Sexually Transmitted Infections. IQR: Interquartile Range</p></tblfn></tbl></p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>SiPrEP. UNAIDS. SEIMC. SEFH.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ana, F., Dios Diez, P., Ortega Valin, L., Buitrago Rocha, Y., Ozcoidi Idoate, D., Varela Fernandez, R., Gutierrez Gutierrez, E., Llamas Lorenzana, S., Velez Blanco, A., Ortiz De Urbina Gonzalez, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.586</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.586</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-161 nPEP in the prep era: assessing the impact of pre-exposure prophylaxis on the use of non-occupational post-exposure prophylaxis in HIV prevention]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A288</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A289</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A289-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-162 Are we meeting the vitamin D requirements of our patients through parenteral nutrition?]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A289-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Vitamin D plays a crucial role in calcium and phosphorus homeostasis, bone metabolism, immune regulation and overall metabolic health. Hospitalised patients are particularly susceptible to deficiency due to limited sunlight exposure, hepatic and renal dysfunction and inadequate nutritional intake.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This study aimed to assess baseline and follow-up vitamin D levels in patients receiving parenteral nutrition (PN) containing 200 IU of ergocalciferol, in order to identify deficiencies and establish supplementation protocols.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective, observational, single-centre study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital during 2024. All adult inpatients treated with PN who had at least one vitamin D measurement were included. The variables collected from the electronic prescription software were: demographic, anthropometric and analytic variables, PN formulation and duration and additional oral or parenteral supplementation of vitamin D.</p><p>Vitamin D deficiency was classified according to the 2022 ESPEN micronutrient guidelines, as mild (&lt;20 ng/mL) or severe (&lt;12 ng/mL) based on plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations.</p><p>Position measures were used for quantitative variables and number and percentage for qualitative variables.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>57 patients were included (27 females, 47.4%), with a median age of 70 years, a median BMI of 23.1 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, and a median PN duration of 19.4 days. Eight patients were excluded due to inappropriate measurement of vitamin D levels. Among 49 evaluable patients, the median 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels was 12.7 ng/ml, 79.6% of the patients presented mild (43.6%) or severe (56.4%) deficiency, while only 23% of them received additional supplementation.</p><p>Vitamin D levels were monitored during PN in 38.6% of the cases. At the weaning off PN, only one patient with baseline deficiency achieved levels above 20 ng/ml. Among those with adequate baseline levels, five developed new-onset deficiency during PN treatment (two severe, three mild), which could be a sign of insufficient supply.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Vitamin D deficiency was highly prevalent among PN patients reflecting an inadequate supply. The vitamin D content of current PN formulations seems insufficient to meet clinical requirements. The implementation of standardised supplementation and monitoring protocols is therefore crucial to optimise patient management and prevent deficiency. Early assessment and proactive correction are necessary to improve patient outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Valenzuela Puig, A., Garcia Del Valle, I., Perez Quiros, M., Blazquez Vidal, M., Ruiz Rey, M., Sin Martinez, A., Cortes Lopez, S., Morla Clavero, G., Marcos Pascua, P., Sanmartin Suner, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.587</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.587</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-162 Are we meeting the vitamin D requirements of our patients through parenteral nutrition?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A289</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A289</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A289-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-163 Daratumumab-based regimens in patients aged >=80 years with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: real-world outcomes]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A289-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Multiple myeloma (MM) is the second most common haematologic malignancy, with an increasing incidence in patients over 75 years. Frail individuals who are ineligible for autologous stem cell transplantation require effective and safe therapeutic strategies to delay disease progression. The addition of daratumumab (D) to standard first-line regimens&ndash;VMP (bortezomib/melphalan/prednisone) and Rd (lenalidomide/dexamethasone)&ndash;has shown improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in pivotal trials (<I>ALCYONE</I> and <I>MAIA</I>).</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This study aimed to evaluate the real-world effectiveness and safety of daratumumab-based regimens in patients aged &ge;80 years with newly diagnosed MM (NDMM).</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective, observational study was conducted including NDMM patients aged &ge;80 years treated with daratumumab from its introduction until January 2025. Baseline variables included ISS/R-ISS stage, cytogenetics, renal function, albumin, and &beta;2-microglobulin. Effectiveness was assessed by progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and progression rate using Kaplan&ndash;Meier analysis. Safety was evaluated according to CTCAE v5.0 and treatment-related modifications.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>33 patients (mean age 84.1&plusmn;3.7 years; 51.5% female) were analysed: 60.6% received D-VMP, 30.3% D-Rd, and 9.1% D-VCP. Median treatment duration was 16.8&plusmn;14.4 months, and median follow-up was 5.4 years. Seven patients (21.2%) progressed and seven (21.2%) died, three due to disease progression. Median PFS was 40.7 months (95% CI: 36.8&ndash;NA); 1-year PFS was 88.6%, and 2-year PFS was 79%. Median OS was not reached; 1-year OS was 78%, and 2-year OS was 73.4%. Adverse events (AEs) occurred in 85.8% of patients, predominantly grade 1&ndash;2 (87.3%). The most frequent AEs were haematologic (32.7%; anaemia 20%, neutropenia 5.5%), infectious (29.1%; pneumonia 16.4%), and neurological (18.2%; sensory neuropathy). Severe AEs included grade 4 cholestasis and grade 5 fatal septic shock. Treatment adjustments were required in 53.8% of cases, mainly temporary interruptions or drug discontinuations.</p><p><fig loc="float" id="F1"><no>Abstract 5PSQ-163 Figure 1</no><link locator="5PSQ-163_F1"></fig></p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Daratumumab-based triplet or quadruplet regimens demonstrated favourable safety and effectiveness in patients &ge;80 years with NDMM, with toxicity predominantly mild to moderate. Outcomes were consistent with pivotal trials, supporting daratumumab as a viable treatment option for this vulnerable population.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. Mateos MV, Spencer A, <I>et al. Haematologica.</I> 2020;<b>105</b>(2):468&ndash;477.</p><p>2. Moreau P, Facon T, <I>et al. Leukemia.</I> 2025:10.1038/s41375-024-02506-1.</p><p>3. Dimopoulos MA, Moreau P, <I>et al</I>. Multiple myeloma: EHA-ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines. <I>Ann Oncol</I>. 2021;<b>32</b>(3):309&ndash;22.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fernandez Vazquez, A., Martin Garcia, A., Gonzalez Perez, M., Escalante Barrigon, F., Saez Hortelano, J., Ozcoidi Idoate, D., Flores Fernandez, M., Matilla Fernandez, M., Rodriguez Garcia, J., Ortiz De Urbina Gonzalez, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.588</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.588</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-163 Daratumumab-based regimens in patients aged >=80 years with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: real-world outcomes]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A289</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A290</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A290?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-164 Effectiveness of axicabtagene ciloleucel in clinical practice for the treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma after >= 2 lines of systemic therapy]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A290?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common lymphoproliferative neoplasm among non-Hodgkin lymphomas, characterised by clinical aggressiveness and biological heterogeneity. Autologous Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies targeting CD19, such as axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel), have emerged as a promising treatment option. However, evidence on their effectiveness in real-world settings remains limited.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the effectiveness of axi-cel as a third-line or later therapy in patients (p) with relapsed/refractory DLBCL.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Observational, retrospective, descriptive and multicentre study including patients treated after &ge;2 therapy lines with axi-cel between April 2019-May 2025. Variables: demographic (age/sex), clinical (disease type, ECOG, transplant previous, treatment line, time to infusion from relapse, therapy follow-up) and effectiveness at different assessment points (median follow-up/1/3/6/12/18 months [mo]): response (Overall-Objective-Response [ORR], Complete Response [CR], Partial Response [PR], Non-Estudied-Response [NOE], Stable-Disease [SD], Progression), Time-Maintenance-Response (TMR), mortality, median Survival-Free-Progression (mSFP), median Overall Survival (mOS).</p><p>Data were collected from medical records/prescriptions, and analysed using descriptive and survival (Kaplan&ndash;Meier) analysis.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 37p (mean age 54.1&plusmn;15.8 years; 59.7% male) were analysed, 83,78% DLBCL, 6p with transformed follicular lymphoma. ECOG: 0 (35.1%; 13p), 1 (64.9%; 24p). Seven had prior transplants: five autologous. Axi-cel was: 78.4% third-line; 18.9% fourth-line, 2.7% sixth-line. Median of 2.7 mo since last relapse. Median therapy follow-up:15.7 mo (0.4-62.2).</p><p><tbl id="T1" loc="float"><no>Effectiveness analysis:</no><tblbdy top-stubs="2"><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Time\Out-comes</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>ORR [n(%)]</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>CR [n(%)]</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>PR [n(%)]</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>SD [n(%)]</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Progress-ion</b>    <b>[n(%)]</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>NER[ n(%)]</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Deaths [n(%)]</b> </c></r><r><c cspan="8" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Median:15.7 mo</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">23 (62.2) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">18 (48.6) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">5 (13.5) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1 (2.7)* </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">11 (29.7) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">2 (5.4)** </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">13 (35.1)*** </c></r><r><c cspan="8" rspan="1">  <b>Assessment points</b> </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>1mo</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">13(35.1) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">8(21.6) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">5(13.5) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">&ndash; </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">4(10.8) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">20(54.1) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1(2.7) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>3mo</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">26(70.3) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">16(43.2) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">10(27.1) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1(2.7) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">8(21.6) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">2(5.4) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">7(18.9) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>6mo</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">26(70.3) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">16(43.2) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">10(27.1) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1(2.7) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">8(21.6) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">2(5.4) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">9(24.3) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>12mo</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">24(64.9) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">18(48.7) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">6(16.2) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1(2.7) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">10(27.0) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">2(5.4) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">10(27.0) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>18mo</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">23(62.2) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">17(46.0) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">6(16.2) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1(2.7) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">11(29.7) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">2(5.4) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">10(27.0) </c></r></tblbdy><tblfn><p>*Patient who died with DS.</p></tblfn><tblfn><p>**Patients who died before response determination.</p></tblfn><tblfn><p>***3p died after 18 mo of infusion.</p></tblfn><tblfn><p>Mortality (35.1%;13p) causes were: progression (6p), early (4p) and late (3p) complications.</p></tblfn><tblfn><p>Median TMR: 14.0mo (IQR:12.8 mo; [0-61.3]).</p></tblfn><tblfn><p>Estimated mPFS: 27.7mo (7.6-NA). mOS estimation not possible with the follow-up (19.4-NA). However, OS were: 75.7-73.0-73.0% at 6-12-18 mo.</p></tblfn></tbl></p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Axi-cel has demonstrated significant real-world effectiveness, with ORR/CR rates and mPFS higher than those described in ZUMA-1 (pivotal trial). These results suggest a faster, deeper, and more sustained response, likely influenced by baseline profile, use of bridging therapy and different eligibility criteria. Overall, the data confirm the high effectiveness and reinforce its role as one of the most effective strategies available in this context.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Diaz Perales, R., Ortega De La Cruz, C., Rouco Blanco Rajoy, M., Ballesteros Fernandez, A., Del Rio Valencia, J., Gallego Fernandez, C., Tortajada Goitia, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.589</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.589</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-164 Effectiveness of axicabtagene ciloleucel in clinical practice for the treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma after >= 2 lines of systemic therapy]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A290</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A291</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A291-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-165 Analysis and implementation of a specialised pharmaceutical care model for the geriatric hemato-oncology patient]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A291-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Elderly individuals constitute a significant percentage of patients with malignant haematological diseases, a proportion anticipated to increase due to population ageing and the emergence of novel therapeutic targets that manage and chronify the disease. These patients frequently present with cognitive impairment, malnutrition, physical dependency, and polypharmacy, necessitating a comprehensive, multidisciplinary approach.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To design a specialised pharmaceutical care model for the geriatric haemato-oncology patient and evaluate its clinical outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A prospective observational study was conducted from March 2023 to September 2025 within the Pharmaceutical Care Consultation for oncohaematology patients at a primary care hospital. The haematologist selected the frailest patients, identified using the G8 scale and those with the highest number of comorbidities (assessed via the CIRS-G scale), referring them to the Pharmacy consultation. The dedicated pharmacist performed a pre-evaluation of home medication, self-medication, and alternative medicine. This screening aimed to detect drug interactions, therapeutic duplications, inappropriately prescribed medications (using the STOPP-START criteria), assess for potential deprescribing of polypharmacy, and evaluate adherence via the Morisky-Green Test. If any errors in medication intake, interactions, or adverse drug reactions were detected, pharmaceutical interventions were formally documented in the patient&lsquo;s Clinical History.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The new working model provided care for 49 patients (median age 80 years; 64% male, 36% female). Adherence to haemato-oncology treatment was successfully improved in 90% of the patients. A total of 31 pharmaceutical interventions were performed:</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Four related to dosage or administration method.</p></li><li><p>Eight concerning pharmacological interactions that required substituting a medication.</p></li><li><p>Five due to therapeutic duplications.</p></li><li><p>Six regarding interacting herbal products or multivitamin complexes.</p></li><li><p>Three due to failure to attend a medical review in 2 years.</p></li><li><p>Five involving the prescription of medications with low therapeutic value and high anticholinergic burden, which were subsequently suspended.</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The hospital pharmacist plays a crucial and significant role in the pharmaceutical care of the geriatric haemato-oncology patient by establishing a multidisciplinary working model in collaboration with the haematologist. This collaborative effort ensures the provision of personalised and specialised treatment.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Varas Perez, A., Gonzalez Rosa, V., Rodriguez Moreta, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.590</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.590</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-165 Analysis and implementation of a specialised pharmaceutical care model for the geriatric hemato-oncology patient]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A291</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A291</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A291-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-166 Serotonin syndrome in an elderly patient: a case report]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A291-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Serotonin syndrome (SS) is a rare but potentially life-threatening condition caused by excessive serotonergic activity, usually triggered by drug interactions; in renal insufficiency, drugs and metabolite accumulation may exacerbate it. Diagnosis in older patients is especially challenging, as atypical presentations and cognitive impairment can obscure recognition. Hospital pharmacists play a decisive role by identifying drug-related risks, supporting early diagnosis, and guiding therapy.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To present the case of a 78-year-old man with stage 5 chronic kidney disease on haemodialysis and multimorbidity (diabetes mellitus with microangiopathy and recurrent foot infections, epilepsy on levetiracetam, ischaemic heart disease, prior gastrointestinal bleeding and chronic anaemia) and polypharmacy, admitted following a recent course of antibiotics. The patient had experienced previous episodes of transient neurological symptoms with negative stroke workup and levetiracetam adjustment.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>On admission, he presented with slurred speech and aphasia, without fever or trauma. Initial cranial CT excluded acute stroke, and levetiracetam dose was decreased (500 mg/48h) as it can cause lethargy. Within 24h, he deteriorated to stupor (Glasgow Coma Scale 4), responding only to painful stimuli, with generalised rigidity. Repeat CT again excluded acute pathology. Differential diagnosis included seizure, metabolic encephalopathy, drug-induced toxicity, and infection. Laboratory tests revealed hyperkalaemia (8.6 mmol/L), elevated lactate (73 mg/dL), leukocytosis (13.24 <FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT>10<sup>9</sup>/L), and normal creatin kinase (54 U/L). Medication review revealed concurrent treatment with linezolid, sertraline and fentanyl. Naloxone was ineffective, prompting discontinuation of linezolid, sertraline, and fentanyl; raising suspicion of SS.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Following discontinuation of serotonergic agents, the patient progressively improved, regaining consciousness, verbal responsiveness, and mobility within 48h. Other diagnoses were excluded, and SS was diagnosed clinically as an exclusion, supported by recovery after drug withdrawal.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>This case illustrates the complexity of diagnosing SS in elderly patients, where nonspecific symptoms, multimorbidity, and cognitive impairment hinder early recognition. Polypharmacy and altered pharmacokinetics increase vulnerability to drug interactions. Medication reviewed by hospital pharmacists is decisive for establishing the diagnosis and achieving recovery. Early recognition and prompt withdrawal of causative drugs are essential to prevent complications and reduce morbidity and mortality. Increased awareness among clinicians and hospital pharmacists is crucial to improve safety and prevent SS in this vulnerable population.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Reyner Parra, A., Gozalo Esteve, I., Martinez Puig, P., Torrente Jimenez, I., Perez Contel, A., Bueno Uceda, R., Hernandez Rodriguez, L., Gomez-Valent, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.591</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.591</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-166 Serotonin syndrome in an elderly patient: a case report]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A291</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A292</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A292-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-167 Implementation of intravenous workflow technology for paediatric chemotherapy: enhancing safety, compliance, and operational efficiency]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A292-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Paediatric chemotherapy compounding requires precision due to patient vulnerability. Manual workflows like pull-back syringe verification risk errors and poor documentation. IV workflow technology improves safety, compliance, and traceability. This study evaluates its impact on paediatric oncology compounding, where data remain limited.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This study evaluated IV workflow technology&rsquo;s impact on safety, compliance, and efficiency in paediatric chemotherapy compounding. It compared barcode scanning and image capture to manual pull-back verification and assessed remote pharmacist verification&rsquo;s role in optimising workflows and meeting USP &lt;797&gt; and &lt;800&gt; standards.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>This prospective evaluation was conducted in a paediatric hospital pharmacy following the implementation of intravenous (IV) workflow technology for chemotherapy compounding. The intervention included barcode scanning for drug and diluent verification and image capture of each preparation step. Pharmacists performed in-line verification remotely, outside the cleanroom, using a secure interface that allowed real-time review of scanned data and preparation images. Outcome measures included the number and type of scan alerts, pharmacist interventions based on image review, preparation throughput, and adherence to USP &lt;797&gt; and &lt;800&gt; documentation standards.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Over 180 days, 150 paediatric chemotherapy doses were compounded using IV workflow technology. Barcode scanning prevented 25% drug/diluent errors. Image-supported verification reduced waste by 98%, catching errors before completion. Remote pharmacist review increased clinical time by 35% by eliminating cleanroom entry. Automated documentation ensured consistent USP &lt;797&gt;/&lt;800&gt; compliance. No adverse events occurred. The technology significantly enhanced safety, efficiency, and regulatory adherence in a high-risk paediatric oncology setting.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>This study demonstrated that implementing IV workflow technology in paediatric chemotherapy compounding significantly improved safety, compliance, and operational efficiency. Real-time barcode scanning and image capture enabled early identification of drug and diluent errors, while in-line verification reduced waste of high-cost medications. Remote pharmacist verification contributed to improved workflow and increased time for clinical activities. These findings support broader adoption of IV workflow systems in high-risk compounding environments and highlight their potential to enhance patient safety and pharmacy practice.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. Batson S, Mitchell SA, Lau D, Canobbio M, de Goede A, Singh I. Automated compounding technology and workflow solutions for the preparation of chemotherapy: a systematic review. <I>Eur J Hosp Pharm</I>. 2020;<b>27</b>(6):330&ndash;336. https://ejhp.bmj.com/content/27/6/330</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kuchik, N., Rogers, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.592</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.592</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-167 Implementation of intravenous workflow technology for paediatric chemotherapy: enhancing safety, compliance, and operational efficiency]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A292</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A292</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A292-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-168 Monitoring of plasma concentrations of nebulised antibiotics in critically ill patients treated with vancomycin and tobramycin]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A292-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Nebulised antibiotics in respiratory infections increase lung exposure while minimising systemic effects.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>Evaluate systemic exposure after nebulised vancomycin and tobramycin in critically ill patients.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Observational study in adults treated with nebulised vancomycin and tobramycin (March 2022&ndash;March 2025). Biodemographic, clinical, and laboratory data were collected, including trough plasma concentrations of vancomycin (Cp_vanco) and tobramycin (Cp_tobra). Continuous variables were expressed as mean&plusmn;SD or median (interquartile range) and categorical as counts (%). Concentrations were compared with t-test or Mann&ndash;Whitney U, and proportions with Chi-square or Fisher&rsquo;s exact test.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>We obtained 24 Cp_vanco in 15 patients, (60% male, mean age 54,2&plusmn;17,1 years). Vancomycin (125 mg/12 hours) showed minimal systemic absorption (Cp_vanco &gt; 0.1&micro;g/mL) in 20 patients (80%), measured after 7 (4&ndash;10) days, with mean 0,9&plusmn;0,7 &micro;g/mL. Nineteen patients (79%) required mechanical ventilation (MV) and five (21%) MV+extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), with no significant difference (mean 1,1 vs 0,9 &micro;g/mL; p=0,57). Patients with glomerular filtration rate (GFR) &lt; 60 mL/min (25%) had higher exposure (1,7 vs 0,9 &micro;g/mL; p=0,008).</p><p>For tobramycin, 36 Cp_tobra were obtained from 29 patients (72% male, mean age 56,2&plusmn;20,1 years). Tobramycin (300 mg/12 h) showed systemic absorption (Cp_tobra &gt; 0,1&micro;g/mL) in 31 (86%), 17 (55%) were therapeutic (Ctrough &gt; 0,5 &micro;g/mL). Mean Cp_tobra, measured 6 (3-15) days after initiation, was 0,5 (0,2-1,5) &micro;g/mL. Respiratory support was MV in 24 (77%) and high-flow oxygen therapy (HFOT) in 7 (23%). Mean Cp_tobra was higher in MV (0,7 vs 0,2 &micro;g/mL; p=0,03), with a greater proportion of seric concentrations &gt; 0,5 &micro;g/mL in VM (67% vs 14%; p=0,03). No differences were found by renal function, with median Cp_tobra of 0,4 &micro;g/mL in patients with GFR &gt; 60 mL/min and 0,6 &micro;g/mL in those with GFR &lt; 60 mL/min (p = 0,23).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Systemic exposure after nebulised vancomycin is minimal, not reaching therapeutic plasma levels (Cp_vanco&gt;5 &micro;g/mL), although renal impairment may contribute to higher exposure.</p><p>Nebulised tobramycin achieves trough concentrations comparable to those expected with intravenous multiple-dose regimens, particularly in mechanically ventilated patients (greater proportion of Cp_tobra&gt;0.5 &micro;g/mL).</p><p>Further studies are needed to assess the impact of this exposure on resistance development.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martinez Soler, C., Pau Parra, A., Domenech Moral, L., Garcia Garcia, S., Torres Navarro, M., Papiol Gallofre, E., Diez Poch, M., Nuvials Casals, F., Villena Ortiz, Y., Castellote Belles, L., Gorgas Torner, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.593</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.593</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-168 Monitoring of plasma concentrations of nebulised antibiotics in critically ill patients treated with vancomycin and tobramycin]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A292</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A293</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A293-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-169 Atypical neuroleptic malignant syndrome in an elderly patient: a case report]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A293-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) is a rare but potentially life-threatening adverse drug reaction, most frequently associated with antipsychotics. It typically presents with altered mental status, muscle rigidity, hyperthermia and autonomic dysfunction. In elderly patients, however, clinical manifestations may be atypical and less evident, delaying diagnosis. Hospital pharmacists play a role in supporting timely recognition and optimising pharmacological management.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To report an atypical case of NMS in an 87-year-old institutionalised woman with advanced dementia, severe cognitive impairment, and high dependency. Her medical history included hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease, dyslipidaemia, chronic anaemia, dysphagia, sacral pressure ulcer, and recent MRSA nasal colonisation. She was receiving long-term risperidone therapy for behavioural symptoms of dementia.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>The patient was admitted for dyspnoea, hypoxaemia, fever and a positive PCR test for influenza A. During hospitalisation she developed nocturnal agitation and received a single subcutaneous dose of haloperidol 2.5 mg. The following day, she presented with persistent fever (38 &deg;C), unresponsiveness to verbal and motor stimuli, generalised rigidity and disorientation. Laboratory tests showed no creatine kinase elevation. After excluding alternative diagnoses, NMS was suspected as the fever did not respond to antipyretics, suggesting a central origin. Interventions included risperidone withdrawal, intravenous hydration, physical cooling measures and benzodiazepines. Intravenous diazepam was administered (initial 2.5 mg, titrated to 10 mg daily for 2 times).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Following diazepam treatment, the patient progressively improved. Fever decreased gradually, rigidity lessened, and consciousness returned to baseline. Laboratory tests normalised, no infectious focus was identified, and blood cultures remained negative. After 1 week of stabilisation, she was discharged back to her nursing home.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>This case illustrates the diagnostic complexity of NMS in geriatric patients, where atypical presentations (absence of CK elevation, nonspecific symptoms) are common, especially in the presence of cognitive impairment, and may hinder timely recognition. A thorough medication history and a high index of suspicion are essential. A multidisciplinary approach involving physicians and pharmacists facilitated accurate diagnosis and tailored treatment. In emergency settings, neuroleptic use should be carefully evaluated due to potential clinical implications. Early recognition and adequate management are crucial to prevent complications and improve outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Reyner Parra, A., Gozalo Esteve, I., Martinez Puig, P., Torrente Jimenez, I., Bueno Uceda, R., Perez Contel, A., Gomez-Valent, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.594</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.594</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-169 Atypical neuroleptic malignant syndrome in an elderly patient: a case report]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A293</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A293</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A293-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-170 Factors affecting the efficacy of proton pump inhibitor administration via post-pyloric feeding tubes (nasojejunal, PEG-J, and jejunostomy)]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A293-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are commonly administered via feeding tubes. Their gastric delivery may cause drug degradation, while narrow jejunal tubes risk blockage. Identification of all factors affecting administration and their optimisation is essential for safety and therapeutic efficacy.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of delivering different PPI formulations via various jejunal access devices by assessing physical compatibility, transit through tubes of different diameters, and the effect of different media on formulation integrity and flow.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Several marketed PPI formulations, including omeprazole, pantoprazole, esomeprazole, and lansoprazole, as enteric-coated tablets or pellet-filled capsules, were tested. Pellets were suspended in apple juice or sucrose syrup, while tablets were crushed and/or dispersed in normal saline or 8.4% sodium bicarbonate solution. Administration was simulated using nasojejunal, PEG-J, and jejunostomy tubes (6Fr&ndash;20Fr). The fraction of formulation delivered and the incidence of tube obstruction were used as indicators of administration feasibility.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Completely unobstructed delivery (100%) was achieved for all tested pellets when administered through 20Fr tubes. High passage efficiency (90&ndash;97%) was observed in PEG-J and jejunostomy tubes &ge;14Fr but was markedly reduced (0&ndash;10%) in low-profile and narrow tubes (&le;10Fr). Crushed tablets passed through all tube types without obstruction, although 5&ndash;15% dosage loss occurred due to enteric coating damage. Sodium bicarbonate improved tablet dispersion compared with saline, while apple juice facilitated pellets flow. Suspensions of pellets in viscous sucrose syrup resulted in almost complete delivery (~100%) through wider tubes.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Crushed enteric-coated tablets were the most feasible formulation for jejunal PPIs administration, passing through all tested tube types without obstruction. However, partial material loss and damage to the enteric coating may affect dose accuracy. Enteric-coated pellets frequently blocked narrow and low-profile tubes, limiting their use in clinical practice. Delivery rate strongly correlated with tube size and formulation type.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Piergies, M., Krupa, K., Kvinta, U., Hodurek, A., Hliabovich, D., Florek, G., Brniak, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.595</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.595</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-170 Factors affecting the efficacy of proton pump inhibitor administration via post-pyloric feeding tubes (nasojejunal, PEG-J, and jejunostomy)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A293</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A294</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A294-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-171 When prophylaxis complicates treatment: dapsone-induced methemoglobinemia in a patient with adult-onset stills disease and macrophage activation syndrome]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A294-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Adult-onset Still&rsquo;s disease (AOSD) is a rare autoinflammatory disorder that may present with life-threatening complications such as interstitial lung disease and macrophage activation syndrome (MAS), which occurs in only 8-14% of patients. Management is challenging due to disease relapses, multimorbidity, and drug-related toxicities. <I>Pneumocystis jirovecii</I> pneumonia (PJP) prophylaxis is required in immunosuppressed patients, although contraindications to first-line agents may force the use of alternatives with potential toxicity.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>We report the case of a 72-year-old woman with AOSD (involving skin, lungs and eyes) on long-term anakinra treatment who developed severe dapsone-induced metahemoglobinemia. In May 2025, glucocorticoid therapy was initiated for pulmonary disease progression. Due to history of cotrimoxazole-induced Stevens-Johnson syndrome, cotrimoxazole was contraindicated for PJP prophylaxis and dapsone was prescribed instead after confirming normal glucose-6-dehydrogenase (G6PD) activity. After 5-6 weeks of treatment the patient presented to the emergency department with fever, respiratory failure, cyanosis, anaemia and livedo reticularis.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Laboratory tests on admission showed leukocytosis, thrombocytopenia, and elevated inflammatory markers. Methemoglobinemia reached 22%. She was diagnosed of dapsone-induced methemoglobinemia. Therefore, dapsone was discontinued and metahemoglobinemia treated with IV methylene blue and ascorbic acid, showing rapid improvement. During hospitalisation, she developed MAS with hyperferritinemia (117,200 ng/mL), hypertriglyceridemia (393 mg/dL), hypofibrinogenemia (1,64 g/L), and cytopenias (Hb 88 g/L, platelets 10<FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT>10^9/L) and plasma sCD25 levels of 4165 UI/mL. For MAS treatment, she required intensive care treatment with high-dose methylprednisolone (500 mg/day for 3 days, followed by oral corticosteroids in a tapering regimen at 1 mg/Kg/day), tocilizumab (8 mg/kg), and anakinra (200 mg/day). The clinical pharmacist followed the patient throughout admission, supporting immunosuppressive adjustments, and contributing to the therapeutic consensus that ensured an individualised treatment.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The patient achieved clinical remission of MAS after intensive immunosuppressive therapy. At discharge, anakinra was switched to monthly tocilizumab due to persistent thrombocytopenia. For PJP prophylaxis, the patient is currently treated with monthly inhaled pentamidine. Treatment was tolerated without further adverse events.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>This case highlights the complexity of AOSD treatment in fragile elderly patients, where overlapping diseases, prophylactic constraints and drug toxicities complicate management. Pharmacist involvement is essential to identify safer prophylactic alternatives, optimise immunomodulation, and support multidisciplinary decision making.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Reyner Parra, A., Ortonobes Roig, S., Rama Sanchez, L., Redondo Capafons, S., Gonzalez Navarro, M., Bueno Uceda, R., Gomez-Valent, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.596</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.596</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-171 When prophylaxis complicates treatment: dapsone-induced methemoglobinemia in a patient with adult-onset stills disease and macrophage activation syndrome]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A294</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A294</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A294-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-172 From global audit to target safety: rationalising the use of blue dyes in a regional hospital centre]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A294-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Medical dyes are widely used in surgery and diagnostics for visualisation and detection purposes. In practice, these products were often grouped and referred to by their colour, such as &lsquo;the blues&rsquo;, without clear distinction between their specific indications or regulatory status. This confusion, shared by prescribers and pharmacists, led to off-label use and avoidable costs, highlighting the need to strengthen pharmaceutical knowledge and formulary governance to ensure patient safety.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The aim was to evaluate compliance and the pharmaco-economic impact of dye use, identify off-label practices, harmonise usage, optimise formulary management, and reinforce patient safety.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Consumption data for 2024 were extracted from the PHARMA software and analysed using a pharmaco-economic approach combining cost and volume assessment with compliance mapping by indication and ward typology. This methodology enabled systematic identification of services and dyes most exposed to inappropriate use. In parallel, awareness tools were developed, including eight good-use sheets, pharmacist training, and stock reviews based on expected outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>In 2024, the 36 hospital wards using dyes consumed 8,200 units (86,000). The audit confirmed proper use of five dyes but revealed confusion over the three blue ones, representing 1,300 units (46,000; 53% of the annual dye budget), heterogeneous allocations, and the absence of a medical device alternative covering several indications. The critical issue concerned methylene blue (MB) antidote (70 units, 16,000), used off-label in 70% of cases, although authorised exclusively for the treatment of methemoglobinaemia. Corrective actions included introducing methylene blue as a medical device with broader indications, adding the antidote to the controlled medicines list requiring pharmacist validation, and reviewing allocations. Dissemination of good-use sheets improved awareness and consistency among clinical teams. Since March 2025, 67 pharmacist-validated dispensations have shown 100% compliance, confirming complete correction of previous off-label use. This initiative achieved an estimated 25% saving on the annual dye budget.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>This initiative corrected methylene blue misuse and confirmed other dye compliance. Patent blue is under review, and this approach now applies to controlled drugs like broad-spectrum antibiotics where misuse drives costs and resistance.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marques, M., Klein, J., Rondelot, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.597</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.597</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-172 From global audit to target safety: rationalising the use of blue dyes in a regional hospital centre]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A294</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A295</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A295-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-173 Impact of long-acting octreotide on the quality of life of patients with bleeding from intestinal angiodysplasias]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A295-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Retrospective study of patients treated with Octreotide-LAR from 2021 to 2024.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>Analysis of the efficacy and safety of long-acting octreotide (Octreotido-LAR) in patients with recurrent bleeding from intestinal angiodysplasias and its impact on quality of life.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>All patients who had received at least 12 monthly administrations of the drug were included. The number of endoscopic procedures, the need for blood transfusions and iron therapy, and hospital admissions in the year before and after the start of therapy were recorded.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>44 patients received Octreotide-LAR during the study period. 17 patients were included in the analysis, seven men (41.18%) and 10 women, with a mean age of 80 years (SD 7.50).In the year prior to treatment with Octreotide-LAR, 14 of the 17 patients had at least one endoscopic intervention. A total of 28 endoscopic interventions were performed in the year before and eight in the year after, with 11 patients not requiring endoscopic treatment. The mean baseline haemoglobin level in the year prior was 9.4&plusmn;1 g/dL, which increased to 11&plusmn;2 g/dL in the year following treatment. Regarding the need for iron therapy, 65 units of iron were administered in the prior year and 35 units in the year after, representing a reduction of 1.8 &plusmn; 2.6 units of iron per patient. The need for blood transfusions decreased 5.4 &plusmn; 5.3 per patient (from 162 to t1). In the year prior to treatment with Octreotide-LAR, all patients had at least one hospital admission related to bleeding. In total, the 17 patients had 40 admissions compared to 23 in the post-treatment year, with five patients having no hospital admissions.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>In our cohort, Octreotide-LAR at a dose of 20 mg/month was safe and effective in reducing transfusion requirements, hospital admissions, and endoscopic treatments, which translated into an improvement in patients&lsquo; quality of life.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Iraolagoitia Fraile, A., Gomez Echevarria, N., Filardo Lopez, H., Navarro Hernandez, F., Elola Plazaola, M., Gonzalez Mena, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.598</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.598</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-173 Impact of long-acting octreotide on the quality of life of patients with bleeding from intestinal angiodysplasias]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A295</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A295</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A295-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-174 Pharmacist intervention to reduce potentially inappropriate medication use in hospitalised elderly patients using the Beers criteria]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A295-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>As the population ages globally, medication safety for the elderly is a growing concern. The use of potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) is common and increases the risk of adverse drug events. This study aimed to implement a pharmacist-led intervention to systematically identify and correct PIM use in hospitalised older patients.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The main objectives were twofold: First, to assess the prevalence of PIM use among hospitalised patients aged 65 years and older. Second, to evaluate the effectiveness and feasibility of the pharmacist intervention in optimising prescriptions using the American Geriatrics Society&rsquo;s Beers Criteria.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective review of hospitalised patients aged over 65 years was conducted (January 2024&ndash;June 2025). Patient medication data were systematically accessed via the hospital&rsquo;s Pharmacy-Note system and then screened using an assessment form primarily structured by the Beers Criteria. Pharmacists identified PIM issues and initiated targeted consultations with attending physicians, proposing recommendations for prescription adjustments. The study analysed the types of PIMs identified, the categories of consultation issues, and the physician acceptance rates of the recommendations as the primary outcome measure.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The review included 2,018 hospitalised elderly patients, identifying a total of 3,306 PIM instances. On average, patients were prescribed 8.8 medications and had 1.1 PIMs. The most frequent PIM drug classes were proton pump inhibitors (28%), benzodiazepines (16%), and antipsychotics (11%). Among the 117 consultations, medication duplication was the most common issue (42%), followed by inappropriate indications (14%), formulations (11%), and dosages (11%). The physician acceptance rate for the recommendations was 93.16%.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Pharmacist intervention based on the Beers Criteria is highly effective and practical in improving medication safety for hospitalised elderly patients, confirmed by the high acceptance rate (93.16%). The findings highlight the critical need to address prevalent PIMs (PPIs, benzodiazepines) and medication duplication. Formal integration of this structured review into clinical workflow is recommended to enhance patient safety and guide future efforts to assess long-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Weng, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.599</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.599</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-174 Pharmacist intervention to reduce potentially inappropriate medication use in hospitalised elderly patients using the Beers criteria]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A295</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A295</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A296-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5PSQ-175 Digital health and multidisciplinary medication review: a practical model for medication review and deprescribing in long-term care facilities of a Veneto region health authority]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A296-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Frail institutionalised older adults frequently receive 10 or more medications, exposing them to clinically relevant drug&ndash;drug interactions, dosing errors and unnecessary treatments. Published evidence shows that structured medication review reduces inappropriate prescribing, but real-world practice often lacks standardised data collection and consistent multidisciplinary evaluation. A practical model capable of identifying specific medication-related problems and enabling rapid corrective action is needed to improve safety and optimise therapy in this population.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The aim was to implement and assess a digital, stepwise medication review process in long-term care residents. Objectives were: (1) detect concrete prescribing problems; (2) apply targeted interventions such as deprescribing, dose correction or therapy substitution; (3) standardise the review process across clinicians; (4) evaluate early changes in medication appropriateness and regimen complexity.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A four-step operational workflow was used.</p><p><l type="ord"><li><p>Data collection: A structured digital form captured comorbidities, functional and cognitive status, lab results, complete medication list, therapeutic indication for each drug, and previous ADRs.</p></li><li><p>Medication analysis: Each drug was assessed for indication, dose, frequency, interactions, contraindications and duplication using Summary of Product Characteristics, three interaction checkers, BEERS, START/STOPP and Anticholinergic Burden score. For every issue, a specific action (eg, reduce dose, discontinue, replace, modify timing, initiate monitoring) was documented.</p></li><li><p>Multidisciplinary teleconsultation: Pharmacist, physician and geriatrician reviewed each proposal and approved final therapeutic changes.</p></li><li><p>Follow&ndash;up: At 3, 6 and 12 months, Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI), adherence indicators, tolerability data and new interactions were reassessed.</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Nine residents completed the full review. Median medication count was 11. All residents had at least one inappropriate prescription. Issues identified included lack of indication (38%), dosing errors (45%), clinically relevant interactions (52%) and duplication (31%). All residents received concrete interventions: deprescribing of unnecessary drugs, dose adjustments, therapy substitutions or scheduling changes. No unexpected adverse events occurred during early follow-up. Initial reassessment shows reduced regimen complexity and improved MAI scores.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The workflow proved directly applicable in routine practice, producing measurable corrections to therapy and structured deprescribing. Early data show improved medication appropriateness and reduced pharmacological burden. The model is operational, reproducible and suitable for wider use in long-term care settings.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Falvo, M., Schievenin, F., Conati, G., Zorzetto, G., Coppola, M., De Marco, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.600</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.600</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5PSQ-175 Digital health and multidisciplinary medication review: a practical model for medication review and deprescribing in long-term care facilities of a Veneto region health authority]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A296</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A296</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A296-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[6ER-001 Assessment of herbal and non-prescription drug use in an underserved patient population]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A296-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Understanding how herbal remedies and dietary supplements are used has been an important concern for public health for many years. Although the demographics of users in the United States are shifting, there remains a notable gap in research specifically addressing underserved groups.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The objective of this study was to assess the prevalence of herbal and non-prescription medication use in an underserved patient population.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Data were collected from 1 January 2022, to 30 August 2024, from electronic medical records of patients attending a student-run free medical clinic. Each drug item identified in the records was classified such as vitamins, herbals, supplements, and additional groups of non-prescription medicines. The study also examined how frequently these medicines were used by gender and age groups, with statistical tests performed to determine any significant differences.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 640 incidents of herbal and non-prescription drug use were identified. The most widely used medicines were vitamins (28%), non-prescription pain medicines (23.8%), supplements and minerals (20.6%), gastrointestinal non-prescription medicines (10.9%), non-prescription allergy medicines (8.0%), and other non-prescription medicines. Female patients were more likely to use herbal and non-prescription medicine (79.5%) than male patients (20.5%). Herbal and non-prescription drugs used by females were 4.10 &plusmn; 3.48 per patient, whereas for males, it was 2.34 &plusmn; 1.94 per patient. Younger adults under the age of 40 years were less likely (18.9%) to use herbal and non-prescription medicines than older adults (24.1%) over the age of 60 years. Limitations of this research are that the student-run free clinic is visited more by females than by males.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Individuals receiving care at student-run free clinics often rely heavily on herbal and non-prescription medications to manage their health on a regular basis. Commonly used products include vitamins, dietary supplements, and over-the-counter pain relievers. The data suggest that female patients and those aged between 41 and 60 years are especially likely to use these types of treatments within underserved populations.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. Sanchez ESS, Fernandez-Cerezo FL, Diaz-Jimenez J. Consumption of over-the-counter drugs: prevalence and type of drugs. <I>Environmental Research and Public Health</I> 2021;<b>18</b>:5530.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Clark, J., Baribault, S., Romero, F., Zainab, J., Bransford, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.601</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.601</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[6ER-001 Assessment of herbal and non-prescription drug use in an underserved patient population]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 6: Education and research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A296</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A297</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A297-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[6ER-002 Evolving the 'E in entrustable professional activities: mapping entrustment across the pharmacy degree]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A297-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Standards for initial education and training of pharmacists recognise the role of experiential learning (EL) in practice settings in enhancing preparedness for practice. Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs), provide a method of evaluating student evolving competence in practice activities and represent what the practice of a &lsquo;safe beginner&rsquo; pharmacist should look like, regardless of area of practice. The retrospective entrustment scale has been adapted from the literature, offering five choices; from, 2a, activity was not completely independently, to 3c, practice supervisor (PS) ready to step in if needed. Students complete progressively more complex EPAs as they increase in confidence and competence with each academic year for example, medication history in year 2, progressing to medicines reconciliation and medication review in year 3 and prescribing in year 4.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To explore the evolution of pharmacy student ability to complete authentic pharmacist tasks in secondary care with increasing independence and responsibility, as judged by entrustment decisions by PSs on EPAs.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>All entrustment decisions on all EPAs completed by pharmacy undergraduates in the academic year 2024-2025 by PSs in using the country Entrustment Scale were reviewed in May 2025. Where EPAs were completed in two academic years, the results were compared using descriptive statistics.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 3,753 entrustment decisions made on 692 pharmacy students from year 2, year 3 and year 4 were reviewed. 17% of year 2 students received an entrustment level of 3c when completing a medication history, compared to 21% of year 3 students. 13% of year 3 students received an entrustment level of 3c when completing medication review compared to 23% of year 4. 19% of year 2 received an entrustment level of 3c when evaluating and managing clinical improvement or worsening compared to 31% of year 4. 60% of Year 4 students received 3b for their prescribing skills, a further 26% received 3c.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>As pharmacy students&rsquo; progress through the MPharm, acquiring knowledge, skills and engaging in more EL, EPA performance demonstrates their ability to complete authentic pharmacist tasks in secondary care with increasing trust, independence and responsibility, as judged by the country entrustment scale.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ohare, R., Oboyle, N., Davidson, E., Larkin, U., Lennon, L., Lynch, C., Smith, M., Hughes, F., Abuelhana, A., Smith, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.602</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.602</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[6ER-002 Evolving the 'E in entrustable professional activities: mapping entrustment across the pharmacy degree]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 6: Education and research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A297</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A297</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A297-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[6ER-003 Artificial intelligence in hospital pharmacy literature: exploratory linguistic trends and authorship transparency]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A297-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>In early 2024, Springer Nature released an AI tool (formerly &lsquo;Geppetto&rsquo;) to detect AI-generated text in manuscripts, later donated to the STM Integrity Hub. Large Language Models such as ChatGPT have rapidly entered scientific publishing, yet explicit disclosure of their use remains rare. Understanding AI adoption and transparency in hospital pharmacy literature is important for research integrity.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To analyse the evolution of ChatGPT associated terms in hospital pharmacy literature compared with global scientific publications. To determine whether hospital pharmacy articles explicitly report AI use in manuscript drafting or data analysis.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective analysis was conducted in PubMed (2005&ndash;2025). Using a direct query, ChatGPT-4.0 suggested English and Spanish terms representative of its style (&lsquo;delve&rsquo;, &lsquo;meticulous&rsquo;, &lsquo;realm&rsquo;, &lsquo;underscore&rsquo;, &lsquo;meticuloso&rsquo;). Two datasets were analysed: publications in 15 hospital pharmacy journals and publications without journal restriction. Only articles containing &ge;1 target term were included. A Chi-squared test compared the proportion of 2024 articles using these terms with each of the previous 20 years, applying Holm&rsquo;s correction for multiple comparisons. From January 2023 to March 2025, hospital pharmacy articles were qualitatively screened for explicit AI use disclosure. ChatGPT was also used to refine manuscript drafting.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Globally, target-term frequency rose from 1,173 articles in 2005 to 26,112 in 2024, with marked increases since 2020 (3,986) and 2023 (8,317). The 2024 increase was statistically significant versus each of the previous 20 years (p&lt;0.001, Holm-adjusted). In hospital pharmacy journals, annual counts were &le;6 until 2022, peaking at 15 in 2024. Among 24 hospital pharmacy articles (2023&ndash;2025), only one (4.2%) explicitly acknowledged AI-assisted drafting. The hospital pharmacy year-to-year comparison was not significant, consistent with small sample sizes.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>There has been a significant change in the frequency of ChatGPT-associated terms in the global literature, with a structural break from 2023 onwards, coinciding with ChatGPT&rsquo;s widespread adoption. A similar, smaller signal appears in hospital pharmacy journals. Explicit disclosure of AI use in manuscript preparation is rare, revealing a transparency gap. As an exploratory study, the presence of these terms&ndash;identified by ChatGPT as characteristic of its style&ndash;should not be seen as proof of AI use but as a possible linguistic footprint of its growing influence.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Garcia Martinez, D., Pousada Fonseca, A., Miranda-Del-Cerro, A., Vazquez-Quiroga, S., Dominguez-Garcia, A., Gonzalez-Fuentes, A., Fernandez-Valencia, L., Carrera-Sanchez, M., andrino-Rodriguez, M., Vega-Gonzalez, P., Segura-Bedmar, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.603</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.603</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[6ER-003 Artificial intelligence in hospital pharmacy literature: exploratory linguistic trends and authorship transparency]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 6: Education and research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A297</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A297</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A298-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[6ER-004 Local delivery of steroids to inner ear via medical device incat (the inner ear catheter) in partial deafness patients during cochlear implantation - preliminary results]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A298-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Intracochlear steroid administration may be beneficial in partial hearing loss during cochlear implantation (CI)</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The aims were to assess the effectiveness and safety of using steroids and inner ear catheter (INCAT) in PDT patients who underwent CI and the assessment of the impact of the depth of INCAT on HP after CI.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>The inclusion criteria: adult patients, qualification for CI and severe or profound hearing loss according to partial deafness treatment classification. Exclusion criteria: age below 18 years; comorbidities; other pharmacological treatment which may interact with steroids. The study was approved by the ethics committee. Ten patients (five women and five men), aged between 40 and 70 years, were enrolled to this study. Their mean age was 53.2 years. Three different algorithms of using steroids: (1) Methylprednisolone 62.5 mg/ml (solution) &ndash; three patients; (2) Methylprednisolone 40 mg/ml (suspension) &ndash; four patients and (3) dexamethasone 4 mg/ml (solution) &ndash; three patients. The study took place at an International Centre of Hearing and Speech in Kajetany in Poland. The Shapiro&ndash;Wilk test &ndash; to assess if the assumption of normality for the variables was met. The Wilcoxon test for paired samples &ndash; to compare hearing thresholds before CI and at the CI activation. The t-test for paired samples - to compare impedance on the implant electrodes. The 2 test &ndash; to assess the relationship between the HP and using steroids, as well as between HP and the depth of the insertion. Statistical significance (p &lt; 0.05).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>HP in all patients at the CI activation was as follows: complete hearing preservation (CHP): two patients (20%), partial HP in five patients (50%), and minimal HP in three patients (30%). The most favourable outcomes were observed in the methylprednisolone 40 mg/ml group in, where two patients (50%) achieved CHP, two patients (50%) had partial HP, and no one in this group had minimal HP. The results in the dexamethasone group were less favourable. The least favourable outcomes were in the methylprednisolone 62.5 mg/ml group. A shorter INCAT insertion depth is better than a longer one.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Our results suggest that methylprednisolone 40 mg/ml may give better hearing outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Skarzynska, M., Skarzynski, P., Gos, E., Lorens, A., Walkowiak, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.604</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.604</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[6ER-004 Local delivery of steroids to inner ear via medical device incat (the inner ear catheter) in partial deafness patients during cochlear implantation - preliminary results]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 6: Education and research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A298</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A298</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A298-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[6ER-005 Impact of prolonged linezolid treatment on mitochondrial function and proteome of peripheral blood mononuclear cells]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A298-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Linezolid is an oxazolidinone antibiotic active against resistant Gram-positive bacteria. Although use beyond 28 days is not usually recommended by the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) due to haematological toxicities, prolonged treatment may be necessary, requiring therapeutic drug monitoring to mitigate adverse effects and ensure therapeutic success.</p><p>While linezolid does not affect human cytoplasmic ribosomes, it can impair mitochondrial protein synthesis, leading to side effects such as lactic acidosis and hypoglycaemia. Toxic levels affecting mitochondria are higher than those needed for antibacterial efficacy. A reduction in mitochondrial protein synthesis has been documented in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), mainly impacting complex IV of the respiratory chain.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate mitochondrial function in PBMCs from patients treated with linezolid for different durations (1&ndash;7, 7&ndash;14, and &gt;14 days) and to perform proteomic analysis of these cells.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Blood samples were collected in EDTA tubes from healthy subjects (n=14) and linezolid-treated patients (n=40). PBMCs were isolated using the autoMACS Pro system and stored in liquid nitrogen until analysis.</p><p>Mitochondrial respiration was assessed with Seahorse XF assays (n=8 controls, n=22 patients) using the Cell Mito Stress Kit. Two-way ANOVA corrected with Dunnett&rsquo;s multiple comparisons test was performed. For proteomics, PBMCs (n=6 controls, n=18 patients) were processed with the PreOmics Kit and analysed by LC-MS/MS. Differential protein expression was evaluated in R, with Volcano plots and protein&ndash;protein interaction networks (STRING). Proteins with fold-change &ge;1.5 and false discovery rate (FDR)-adjusted p&lt;0.05 were considered significant.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Mitochondrial function declined progressively with longer treatment duration, with maximal respiratory capacity as the most affected parameter (p&lt;0.05*) (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F1">figure 1</cross-ref>). These findings suggest a dysfunction at the level of substrate oxidation and/or the electron transport chain. Proteomic profiling corroborated functional impairment, showing downregulation of proteins involved in electron transport&ndash;coupled proton transport, along with 27 of the 61 proteins associated with Complex I.</p><p><fig loc="float" id="F1"><no>Abstract 6ER-005 Figure 1</no><caption><p>Mitochondrial function as determined in our study</p></caption><link locator="6ER-005_F1"></fig></p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Prolonged linezolid treatment is associated with progressive mitochondrial dysfunction in PBMCs, reflected at both the functional and proteomic levels. The concordance between respiration assays and protein expression patterns highlights mitochondrial involvement as a key mechanism underlying linezolid-related toxicity. These findings support the importance of therapeutic monitoring during extended treatments.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cajade-Pascual, F., Martinez-Guitian, M., Cuartero-Martinez, A., Castro-Fernandez, D., Fernandez-Castro, I., Molinos-Castro, S., Fernandez-Ferreiro, A., Mondelo-Garcia, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.605</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.605</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[6ER-005 Impact of prolonged linezolid treatment on mitochondrial function and proteome of peripheral blood mononuclear cells]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 6: Education and research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A298</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A299</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A299-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[6ER-006 Fact-finding survey on the use of artificial intelligence in hospital pharmacy practice]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A299-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Artificial intelligence (AI) represents a revolutionary new technology with a wide scope of application, including healthcare and hospital pharmacy. However, AI models use in clinical and pharmaceutical practice is facing critical challenges, i.e. data privacy, cybersecurity threats, potential algorithm biases, and ethical concerns.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The aim of the study was to investigate whether and how AI models are currently employed in hospital pharmacy practice, analysing also educational aspects and hospital pharmacists&rsquo; (HPs) attitudes to more consistent AI use in pharmacy practice.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>An anonymous questionnaire, consisting of 11 multiple-choice items, was developed and made available online for HPs and resident HPs in hospital pharmacy. A total of 65 respondents answered the questionnaire in a 3 month period, from June 2025 to August 2025; the data were extrapolated and analysed using a spreadsheet.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Results showed that 56/65 of respondents use AI models in daily hospital pharmacy practice (41/65 use generative AI; 14/65 use predictive AI); however, only 4/65 attended educational activities concerning AI before use.</p><p>A relevant percentage of respondents have knowledge of two critical issues concerning AI models, i.e. &lsquo;AI hallucination&rsquo; phenomenon (59/65) and incomplete reliability of AI outputs due to inaccuracies, biases, or inconsistencies in training datasets (51/65). The survey revealed that 55/64 of respondents verify AI conclusions or predictions.</p><p>According to the survey, the respondents, who principally employ AI tools that use text as input (like ChatGPT; 53/63), defined their AI use as: &lsquo;occasional&rsquo; (31/65), &lsquo;moderate&rsquo; (14/65), &lsquo;regular&rsquo; (13/65).</p><p>The survey revealed the principal uses of AI tools include: data analysis and elaboration (25/62), search for characteristics of pharmaceutical products (25/62) and medical device (13/62), translation of scientific texts (21/62).</p><p>Moreover, 44/62 of respondents are not worried about the risk of decline in healthcare employment due to increase of AI use and express confidence in the regulatory processes.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>A substantial percentage of respondents (61/65) are favourably disposed to educational activities that aim to guide and support pharmacists on the effective and ethical use of AI technologies. Although the critical challenges, the integration of AI systems into healthcare could represent a huge opportunity to improve clinical and pharmaceutical practice.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baiamonte, C., Cancellieri, G., Polidori, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.606</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.606</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[6ER-006 Fact-finding survey on the use of artificial intelligence in hospital pharmacy practice]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 6: Education and research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A299</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A299</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A299-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[6ER-007 Cost-effectiveness of novel therapies in cardio-renal-metabolic syndrome: a systematic review]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A299-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Cardio-renal-metabolic syndrome (CRM) is a multifactorial disorder linking cardiac, renal, and metabolic dysfunction, with high clinical burden and economic impact from hospitalisations, end-stage renal disease, and cardiovascular complications.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To assess the cost-effectiveness of CRM therapies, focusing on sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA), and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA).</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A systematic review (SR) was performed in PubMed, according to the PRISMA guidelines, for studies published between 8 August 2020, and 8 August 2025. Two search strategies combined cost-effectiveness terms with diabetes, heart failure (HF), chronic kidney disease (CKD), and CRM. Eligible outcomes included healthcare economic indicators such as the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), quality-adjusted life years (QALY), life years gained, direct costs, and hospitalisations.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The search identified 1920 articles, of which 381 were published in the last 5 years. A total of 57 full texts were assessed, and 17 were ultimately considered relevant. SGLT2i (dapagliflozin, empagliflozin, canagliflozin) produced incremental gains of 0.06-1.22 QALY per patient, with ICERs generally below willingness-to-pay thresholds. Dapagliflozin was cost saving in type 2 diabetes (T2D) in the United Kingdom (UK) and Spain, reducing HF hospitalisations and slowing renal decline; it was also cost-effective in CKD, with increased QALY and sub-threshold ICER in the UK, Germany, and Spain. In non-diabetic CKD in the United States (US), it yielded +2.0 life years and +1.3 QALY with an ICER60.000$/QALY (threshold 100.000-150.000$/QALY), while reducing renal replacement therapy. Empagliflozin added to standard therapy in CKD was dominant in Europe (France, UK, and the Netherlands), delaying renal progression and reducing HF hospitalisations and dialysis. GLP-1RA were not cost-effective as first-line therapies for T2D at current US prices. However, semaglutide was cost-effective in selected high-risk contexts (cardiovascular disease, obesity), with an ICER136.271$/QALY. MRA, particularly finerenone, reduced cardio-renal events and was cost-effective in patients with CKD and T2D: it was found dominant in the Netherlands and with ICERs below thresholds elsewhere (eg, 8.808&pound;/QALY in England and Wales).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Our analysis confirms that treatments, in the medium to long-term, may reduce costs related to hospitalisations, cardiovascular and renal complications, and loss of quality of life. These findings underscore the need for an integrated therapeutic approach to CRM management.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Di Cesare, I., Colicchio, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.607</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.607</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[6ER-007 Cost-effectiveness of novel therapies in cardio-renal-metabolic syndrome: a systematic review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 6: Education and research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A299</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A300</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A300-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[6ER-008 Reducing workload in systematic reviews on medication management]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A300-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Systematic reviews are essential for evidence-based decision making in hospital pharmacy but require labour intensive manual screening prone to error. Large language models have enabled artificial intelligence (AI) tools such as active learning (AL)-assisted screening. AL-assisted screening ranks abstracts by inclusion probability, updating as decisions are made, and allowing reviewers to focus on likely relevant abstracts. This may reduce workload, yet AL-assisted screening has not been validated for medication management systematic reviews.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>We aimed to validate AL-assisted screening compared with manual screening in reducing the number of abstracts screened. Secondary objectives included detecting relevant abstracts missed by human error.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>We simulated screening of four large systematic review datasets (3475&ndash;16,218 abstracts; 0.08&ndash;1% included) using ASReview, an open-source AL tool. The systematic reviews focused on prescribing cascades, adverse drug reactions/events, hospital pharmacy interventions on length of stay, and pharmacy technician interventions on wards.</p><p>ASReview parameters were systematically varied, including labelling strategies. In title/abstract labelling, inclusion for full-text decisions are based on the title/abstract, which can be error-prone (&lsquo;noisier&rsquo;). In full-text labelling, inclusion is determined after reading the complete article. Since ASReview improves with each new labelled record, accurate labelling is critical for model learning.</p><p>In addition, ASReview was trained with 1% of random abstracts, and including at least one relevant article. Project leads reassessed the top 100 records to detect missed inclusions. Primary outcome was screening efficiency; secondary outcome was error detection. Descriptive analysis was used.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>ASReview reduced records to screen by ~90% while maintaining sensitivity. For three datasets, optimal performance (100% full-text includes, 89&ndash;90% screening reduction) was achieved with recommended ASReview parameters and full-text labelling. For the largest dataset (16,218 abstracts, 0.08% includes), 87% of full-text includes were detected with this setup, but 100% detection was achieved using simpler models with title/abstract labelling. In two datasets, ASReview identified an additional article inclusion missed during manual screening.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>ASReview markedly reduced workload in medication management systematic reviews without loss of accuracy and while detecting some human errors. Optimal parameters depend on dataset characteristics: full-text labelling is best for most, but title/abstract labelling with simpler models may be preferable when the overall proportion of includes is very low.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Verdonschot, R., Dilles, T., Cahir, C., De Graef, M., Vesela Holis, R., Frydenlund, J., Denig, P., Grimes, T., Schor, M., Karapinar, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.608</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.608</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[6ER-008 Reducing workload in systematic reviews on medication management]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 6: Education and research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A300</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A300</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A300-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[6ER-009 Clinical benefit of new therapies indicated in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A300-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) and the European Haematology Association (EHA) recently developed and validated the Magnitude of Clinical Benefit (BC) Scale in Haematology (MCBS:H), a standardised, objective, and reproducible tool that quantifies the expected BC of treatments for haematologic malignancies.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To assess the BC of recently approved DLBCL therapies and compare it with current therapeutic positioning.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Observational, retrospective study (March 2025) evaluating studies supporting recent DLBCL therapy approvals using ESMO-MCBS:H. Variables: therapy, indication, funding, BC assessment, trial, study type, form, efficacy, safety, QoL, and score. Sources: PubMed and Ministry of Health Therapeutic Positioning Reports.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Evaluated:</p><p><tbl id="T1" loc="float"><tblbdy top-stubs="2"><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Therapy</b>  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Indication (line)</b>  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Funding-Status</b>  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Clinical-Trial</b>  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Type of Form (ESMO-MCBS:H)</b>  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Interested Outcomes</b>  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>BC Assessment</b>  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Score</b>  </c></r><r><c cspan="8" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Axicabtagene Ciloleucel</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Second</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Yes</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">ZUMA-7:Randomised/phase III/multicentre/open-label/controlled vs.ASCT</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">2A (improved OS)</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Improved mPFS at 13 mo (HR=0.51); significant OS improvement at &ge;16.1 mo (FU 47.2 mo); no QoL adjustment*</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Demonstrated superiority</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">4</c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Tisagenlecleucel</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Third/higher</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Yes</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">C2201:Phase II/multicentre/open-label/single-arm</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">3</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">ORR=44.6%; RD&ge;10 mo; QoL improved at 3 mo (secondary endpoint)</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Without evidence of improved ORR vs. historical cohorts</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">4</c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Polatuzumab-Vedotin/Rituximab/Bendamustine</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Second(not eligible-ASCT)</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Yes</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">GO29365:Multicentre/open-label/phase Ib/II vs.Rituximab/bendamustine</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">2A (OS improvement)</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Improved mPFS by 5.8 mo(HR=0.36); no QoL adjustment*</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">In non-candidates for ASCT/CAR-T</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">4</c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Polatuzumab-Vedotin/R-CHP</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">First</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Not</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">GO39942(POLARIX):Phase III/multicentre/randomised/double-blind vs.R-CHOP</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">2B (OS diff. not significant)</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">PFS &ge;5% increase; HR=0.73; no QoL adjustment**</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Results do not support substitution for vincristine</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1</c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Tafasitamab/Lenalidomide</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Second(not eligible-ASCT)</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Yes</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">MOR208C203(L-MIND):Phase II/open-label/single-arm</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">3</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">ORR=56.8%; median RD=34.3 mo; no QoL adjustment***</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">With certain limitations; alternative for ineligible patients</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">3</c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Epcoritamab</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Third/higher</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Yes</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">GCT3013-01(EPCORE-NHL1):Open-label/multicentre/phase I/II/single-arm</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">3</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">ORR=61.9%; median RD=15.5 mo; no QoL adjustment***</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">With limitations; convenient alternative to IV therapies</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">3</c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Loncastuximab-Tesirine</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Third/higher</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Not</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">LOTIS-2:Phase II, multicentre, open-label, single-arm</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">3</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">ORR=48.3%; median RD=13.37 mo; no QoL adjustment***</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">For patients ineligible/refractory CAR-T</c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">3</c></r></tblbdy><tblfn><p>* NO reduction in grade 3-4 toxicity (QoL impact).</p></tblfn><tblfn><p>** NO: Only improved PFS or increased toxicity/QoL improvement/Early crossover/PFS improvement sustained for 3 years.</p></tblfn><tblfn><p>*** NO: QoL improvement; Phase IV results/&ge;30% grade 3-4 toxicities (affecting well-being).</p></tblfn></tbl></p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The ESMO-MCBS: H proved a reliable and objective tool, validating BC assessments and supporting clinical decisions. CAR-T therapies and Polatuzumab-R/Bendamustine showed substantial benefit, unlike Polatuzumab-R-CHP, consistent with its non-funding. The scale is useful but requires critical appraisal of study design.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Diaz Perales, R., Lopez Bautis, B., Alamino Arrebola, E., Espinosa Bosch, M., Tortajada Goitia, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.609</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.609</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[6ER-009 Clinical benefit of new therapies indicated in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 6: Education and research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A300</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A301</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A301?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[6ER-010 Am I a pharmacist yet? Building undergraduate pharmacy students sense of professional identity during experiential learning (EL) in hospital pharmacy]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A301?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Professional identity (PI) formation is an essential aspect of developing as future pharmacist. PI is considered to be a multifaceted interaction between an individual&rsquo;s perception of themselves and their career. Students with a strong sense of PI can reportedly transition more readily into the workplace, have greater self-confidence in fulfilling their requirements of their role, particularly more complex and uncertain aspects of practice. EL during the pharmacy degree offers an opportunity for students to engage in real-life practice and interact with role models, helping to shape their understanding of their future role as a pharmacist.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To explore opinions of year 2, 3 and 4 students on whether their recent period of hospital EL made them feel more like a pharmacist.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Year 2, year 3 and year 4 pharmacy students from both schools of pharmacy in this country participate in EL in a hospital during their pharmacy degree. All students who completed EL were invited to complete an evaluation questionnaire with Likert style questions. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Response rates to the evaluation questionnaires; year 2: 72% (202/279), year 3: 66% (161/245) and year 4:65% (160/245).</p><p>&lsquo;I felt part of the hospital pharmacy team in the clinical area I was allocated during hospital EL&rsquo;; year 2, 80% strongly agreed (SA) or agreed (A); year 3, 87% SA or A and year 4, 89% SA or A.</p><p>&lsquo;I felt inspired by the pharmacists that I interacted during my hospital EL&rsquo;; year 2, 76% SA or A; year 3, 95% SA or A and year 4, 92% SA or A.</p><p>&lsquo;After my hospital EL, I feel better prepared to be a pharmacist&rsquo;; year 2, 96% SA or A; year 3, 98% SA or A and year 4, 97% SA or A.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Experiential learning in hospital practice during the pharmacy degree offers pharmacy undergraduates the opportunity to develop their professional identity by completing authentic pharmacist activities and interacting with pharmacist role models. Students in all 3 year groups studied reported feeling part of the team, being inspired by the pharmacists they met and feeling more like a pharmacist, increasing as they moved through the degree.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ohare, R., Larkin, U., Smith, K., Smith, M., Lynch, C., Davidson, E., Ferguson, L., Lennon, L., Oboyle, N., Hughes, F., Abuelhana, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.610</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.610</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[6ER-010 Am I a pharmacist yet? Building undergraduate pharmacy students sense of professional identity during experiential learning (EL) in hospital pharmacy]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 6: Education and research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A301</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A302</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A302-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[6ER-011 Influence of JAK/STAT single nucleotide polymorphisms and cardiovascular events during treatment of rheumatoid arthritis patients in a tertiary level hospital]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A302-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are at higher risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) due to systemic inflammation and treatment-related factors. The JAK/STAT signalling pathway plays a central role in immune modulation. Genetic variability in this pathway may influence cardiovascular outcomes during treatment in RA patients.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the potential association between five single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (rs10119004, rs7857730, rs2274472, rs2230722, rs2230724) in JAK2 gene involved in the JAK/STAT pathway and the development of cardiovascular disease during treatment in patients diagnosed with RA.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Ambispective observational cohort study in 115 RA patients who had been treated with JAKi. Genotypes were determined by Taqman PCR Real Time. Quantitative variables: age, body mass index (BMI), disease duration, previous biologic therapies (BTs), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Qualitative variables: sex, first JAKi used, rheumatoid factor, anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody (ACPA, development of CVD during treatment, previous hypertension or antihypertensive treatment. Data were collected from electronic prescriptions and medical records, and analysed with R Commander. A retrospective bivariate analysis was conducted on genotyped patients. The occurrence of cardiovascular disease during treatment was analysed against specific SNP genotypes using Fisher&rsquo;s exact test. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to estimate the strength of associations.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>115 patients were analysed; 94 women (81.7%) median age 43 years [33&ndash;51] and median disease duration of 12 years [8&ndash;20]. Most patients were ACPA-positive (82.6%) and RF-positive (74.8%). Median CCI was 1.5 [0&ndash;3], and median BMI 27.3 [24.3&ndash;31.2]. Patients had received two prior biologic therapies [1.0-3.2] with median treatment duration 21 months [13-40]. Previous hypertension was present in 34 patients (29.5%) with 29 (25.2%) receiving antihypertensive therapy prior to JAKi treatment. The bivariate analysis revealed that patients with rs2230722 SNP in JAK2 gene showed a statistically significant association with cardiovascular outcomes. Patients carrying the T allele had a notably lower risk of developing cardiovascular disease compared to those with the C allele (p = 0.002; OR = 8.44; 95% CI 95%: 2.26&ndash;55.02).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Our findings suggest that certain polymorphisms within the JAK/STAT pathway, may influence the risk of CVD during treatment. These preliminary results support further investigation into pharmacogenetic profiling as a tool to stratify cardiovascular risk in RA patients and guide personalised therapeutic strategies.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martin Roldan, A., Marquez Pete, N., Sanchez Suarez, M., Jimenez Morales, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.611</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.611</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[6ER-011 Influence of JAK/STAT single nucleotide polymorphisms and cardiovascular events during treatment of rheumatoid arthritis patients in a tertiary level hospital]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 6: Education and research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A302</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A302</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A302-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[6ER-012 Comparative effectiveness of avatrombopag and eltrombopag in immune thrombocytopenia: real-word data from a tertiary hospital]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A302-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune disorder characterised by low platelet counts and increased bleeding risk. Thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TRAs) are commonly used second-line therapies. Real-world data comparing these agents are limited and needed to guide clinical decision making.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate and compare the real-world effectiveness and safety of avatrombopag and eltrombopag in adult patients with treated ITP.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Retrospective observational study conducted in all patients with ITP treated with either avatrombopag or eltrombopag from the inclusion of drugs in the pharmacotherapeutic guide until May 2025. Variables collected: sex, age, prior therapies, platelet response at 3, 6 and 12 months, concomitant medications, adverse events and treatment duration. Data were collected from medical electronic record systems and analysed using R commander.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Seventy-three patients were included (avatrombopag n=28, eltrombopag n=45). Mean age in avatrombopag group was 47.8 years and 64 years in eltrombopag cohort. Prior treatments: corticosteroids (100%), immunoglobulins (67.9% avatrombopag, 44.4% eltrombopag) and romiplostim (25% avatrombopag, 6.7% eltrombopag). At 3 months, median platelet levels were 124.6 <FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT>10<sup>3</sup>/mm<sup>3</sup>[39.0&ndash;207.5] in the avatrombopag group versus 64.0 <FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT>10<sup>3</sup>/mm<sup>3</sup>[35.0&ndash;96.0] in the eltrombopag group. This difference persisted at 6 months (235.0 <FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT>10<sup>3</sup>/mm<sup>3</sup> vs 111.0 <FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT>10<sup>3</sup>/mm<sup>3</sup>) and remained evident at 12 months, mean platelet counts of 157.6&plusmn;107.1 <FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT>10<sup>3</sup>/mm<sup>3</sup> in avatrombopag group and 140.1&plusmn;64.5 <FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT>10<sup>3</sup>/mm<sup>3</sup> in eltrombopag group. The difference at 12 months was statistically significant (p = 0.005). Despite a notably shorter median treatment duration with avatrombopag (7 months [IQR 4&ndash;11.5]) compared to eltrombopag (56 months [IQR 29.5&ndash;113.5]), 46.4% of patients in this group were able to discontinue at least one concomitant ITP therapy. However, treatment failure was more frequent with avatrombopag (17.9%) than eltrombopag (6.7%). Adverse events were more frequent with eltrombopag (15.6%) compared to avatrombopag (7.2%).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Both avatrombopag and eltrombopag proved effective in achieving platelet responses in real-world ITP management. Avatrombopag was associated with a faster initial response and reduction in concomitant therapies, while eltrombopag had longer usage duration and fewer non-responders. These findings support the individualised selection of TPO-RAs, reinforcing the role of hospital pharmacists in optimising ITP therapy.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martin Roldan, A., Sanchez Suarez, M., Alarcon Payer, C., Montero Lazaro, M., Jimenez Morales, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.612</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.612</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[6ER-012 Comparative effectiveness of avatrombopag and eltrombopag in immune thrombocytopenia: real-word data from a tertiary hospital]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 6: Education and research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A302</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A303</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A303-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[6ER-013 Indirect comparison of pembrolizumab plus enfortumab vedotin and nivolumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin in urothelial carcinoma]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A303-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>The European Medicines Agency recently approved new treatments such as enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab (EV-Pembrolizumab) and nivolumab in combination with gemcitabine-cisplatin (Nivolumab-CT) for urothelial carcinoma (UC). Indirect comparisons between these regimens might support the therapeutic positioning of the schemes in this clinical context.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate whether EV-pembrolizumab and nivolumab-CT are equivalent therapeutic alternatives (ETA) in untreated carcinoma patients with UC through an indirect comparison.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A bibliographic search was conducted in PubMed database until September-2025. Inclusion criteria: phase III, randomised clinical trials (RCTs) involving untreated patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic UC. Exclusion criteria: RCTs without a comparator common to alternatives considered. Overall survival (OS) was selected as the main variable. We conducted adjusted indirect comparison using Bucher method. ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale was used to define the maximum acceptable difference as a clinical non-inferiority standard Delta (). Selected  margins were 0.70 and 1.43. To establish positioning, the criteria of the ETA guidelines were applied.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Two RCTs were found. EV-302 trial evaluated EV-pembrolizumab vs chemotherapy (HR 0.47; 95% CI 0.38-0.58; p &lt;0.001) and CheckMate 901 trial assessed Nivolumab-CT vs chemotherapy (HR 0.78; 95% CI 0.63-0.96; p=0.02). Chemotherapy (gemcitabine plus cisplatin) was adopted as common comparator. Limitations identified in the RCTs: follow-up (17.2 months in EV-302 trial and 33.6 months in CheckMate 901 trial), patients over 65 years of age (67.47% and 49.70%, respectively) and metastatic stage (95.20% and 85.90%, of patients). Indirect comparison obtained a value of HR 0.60 (95% CI, 0.45-0.81; p=0.0009) between EV-Pembrolizumab versus Nivolumab-CT. According to the ATE guide, these treatments presented a degree of equivalence F (probably relevant difference), since statistically significant and clinically relevant differences were found (most of the 95% CI is outside the equivalence interval).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Our indirect comparison provides comparative efficacy data between therapeutic alternatives for untreated patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic UC. EV-pembrolizumab and nivolumab-CT showed clinically relevant differences and could not be considered ETA.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Moreno Ramos, C., Briceno-Casado, M., Gil-Sierra, M., Castillejo-Garcia, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.613</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.613</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[6ER-013 Indirect comparison of pembrolizumab plus enfortumab vedotin and nivolumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin in urothelial carcinoma]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 6: Education and research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A303</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A303</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A303-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[6ER-014 Treatments for PIK3CA-mutated in advance or metastatic breast cancer: a systematic review]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A303-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Alterations in components of the PI3K pathway are frequently observed in oestrogen receptor (ER) positive. Mutations in PIK3CA (PIK3CA+), which encodes the alpha isoform of the catalytic subunit of PI3K, are detected in over 40% of ER+ breast cancers (BC).</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To develop a systematic review of therapies for advanced and metastatic BC with PIK3CA-mutated (PIK3CA+).</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology, a search was conducted in PubMed database until September 2025. Filter &lsquo;Randomised Controlled Trial&rsquo; was combined with the following search terms: <I>[PI3K AND breast cancer AND treatment]</I>. Inclusion criteria: randomised clinical trials (RCTs) enrolling patients diagnosed with ER+, HER2- and PIK3CA+ advanced and/or metastatic BC. The study population could be previously at least one endocrine-based regimen treated patients. Efficacy outcomes considered were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR). The following data were recorded: publication date, study design, tumour stage, sample size, population follow-up, treatments and efficacy results.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Seventy-three studies were reviewed and 11 met the inclusion criteria. Publication dates were between May 2016 and October 2024. Study design: seven randomised phase III and four randomised phase II. All studies were placebo-controlled. Patients with advanced BC were included in 18.2% of CTs and advanced or metastatic disease in 81.8%. The sample sizes comprised between 28-516 patients. Median follow-up ranged from 8 to 54 months. Treatments assessed: alpelisib plus fulvestrant, buparlisib with paclitaxel, buparlisib plus fulvestrant, capivasertib with paclitaxel, capivasertib plus fulvestrant, ipatasertib with paclitaxel, pictilisib plus fulvestrant and taselisib with fulvestrant. The highest numerical efficacy results were obtained with alpelisib plus fulvestrant [OS=39.3 months (95% CI 24.4-44.9); PFS=11.0 months (95% CI 7.5-14.5); ORR=not available] and capivasertib plus fulvestrant [OS=38.9 months (95% CI 23.3-50.7); PFS=12.8 months (95% CI 6.6-18.8); ORR=not available]. Buparlisib plus fulvestrant presented the next best numerical efficacy [OS=33.6 months (95% CI 23.8-40.0); PFS=7.0 months (95% CI 5.0-10.0); ORR=18.4% (95% CI 10.9-28.1)].</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Eight regimens with combinations of drugs for the treatment of advanced or metastatic BC with PIK3CA+ were found. Capivasertib plus fulvestrant and alpelisib plus fulvestrant suggested a similar efficacy result.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Moreno Ramos, C., Gil-Sierra, M., Briceno-Casado, M., Castillejo-Garcia, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.614</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.614</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[6ER-014 Treatments for PIK3CA-mutated in advance or metastatic breast cancer: a systematic review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 6: Education and research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A303</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A304</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A304-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[6ER-015 Pieces of the whole: an indirect comparison of finerenone and spironolactone]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A304-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Finerenone, a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, is the first in its class to show benefit in heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction. In FINEARTS-HF,<sup>1</sup> it reduced the composite of worsening heart failure and cardiovascular death, mainly through fewer hospitalisations (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.74&ndash;0.95). A decade earlier, spironolactone showed no benefit in TOPCAT<sup>2</sup> for its composite of cardiovascular death and HF hospitalisation/events (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.77&ndash;1.04). These discrepancies may reflect trial design and endpoint definitions rather than pharmacological differences.<sup>3</sup>  </p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To compare the efficacy of finerenone and spironolactone through indirect adjusted comparisons (ICs) of the individual components of the primary composites from FINEARTS-HF and TOPCAT.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Both trials were reviewed. Two components were analysed: HF hospitalisation/events and cardiovascular death. When both trials reported the same estimator (eg, hazard ratio [HR]), that was used; otherwise, a rate ratio (RR) was calculated from trial data using the comparator trial&rsquo;s analytic approach. ICs used the Bucher method, with finerenone as reference. A delta margin () = 0.80 (inverse 1.25) defined clinical irrelevance, based on values used in both trials for sample size calculations (19&ndash;20%). Clinical equivalence required a 95% CI entirely within 0.80&ndash;1.25.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>For cardiovascular death, both trials reported HRs and were non-significant: HR 0.90 (0.73&ndash;1.12) in TOPCAT and 0.93 (0.78&ndash;1.11) in FINEARTS-HF. The indirect HR was 0.97 (0.73&ndash;1.28), outside the 0.80&ndash;1.25 equivalence bounds on both sides.</p><p>For HF hospitalisation/events, FINEARTS-HF reported RR 0.82 (0.71&ndash;0.94) and TOPCAT HR 0.83 (0.69&ndash;0.99). To enable a like-for-like comparison, a TOPCAT RR was calculated from total HF hospitalisations and person-time (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.71&ndash;0.94). The indirect RR was 1.00 (0.82&ndash;1.21), within equivalence.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>ICs of individual components showed no statistically significant differences. Both drugs were clinically equivalent for HF hospitalisation/events, the main driver of outcomes. Both were neutral for cardiovascular death, with both equivalence margins exceeded, indicating no benefit in favour of either drug. This supports the view that discrepancies in the composite endpoint are due to trial design (higher power, larger sample, and fewer patients with LVEF &ge;60% in FINEARTS-HF). Limitations include discordant primary outcomes, population differences, and geographic and temporal variability.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39225278/</p><p>2. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24716680/</p><p>3. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39813655/</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pousada Fonseca, A., Pedreira Bouzas, J., Garcia Martinez, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.615</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.615</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[6ER-015 Pieces of the whole: an indirect comparison of finerenone and spironolactone]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 6: Education and research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A304</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A304</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A304-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[6ER-016 Lost in translation: how databases disagree on clinically relevant drug-drug interactions with direct oral anticoagulants]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A304-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) use is widespread and expected to grow with generic entry and lower prices, making knowledge of drug&ndash;drug interactions essential. In clinical practice, only those deemed clinically relevant are of concern, as they directly affect efficacy and safety. Several drug&ndash;interaction databases are available, but their consistency in classifying clinically relevant interactions has not been systematically assessed.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To identify the clinically relevant interactions with DOACs reported by four interaction databases and to evaluate the level of agreement among them.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A cross-sectional observational study was performed using Lexicomp, Medinteract, Micromedex, and Drugs.com. All reported interactions for apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban were retrieved. Severity ratings were dichotomised as clinically relevant (X/D, major, contraindicated/major) or not clinically relevant (C, moderate; B, minor; A, undetermined/unknown). Interactions classified as clinically relevant in at least one database were analysed. Overall agreement was defined as the average pairwise percent agreement among the four databases; full consensus required unanimous classification as clinically relevant. Agreement was assessed using Gwet&rsquo;s AC, with Fleiss&rsquo; kappa as sensitivity analysis. Interpretation followed Altman&rsquo;s thresholds: &le;0.20 poor, 0.21&ndash;0.40 fair, 0.41&ndash;0.60 moderate, 0.61&ndash;0.80 good, &ge;0.81 excellent. Analyses were conducted with Stata 17.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 1,088 interactions were considered clinically relevant by at least one database: dabigatran 314 (28.9%), edoxaban 271 (24.9%), rivaroxaban 258 (23.7%), and apixaban 245 (22.5%). Overall agreement was low (percent agreement 49.1%; 95% CI 48%&ndash;50%). Full consensus across the four databases was achieved in only 69 interactions (6.3%; 95% CI 4.9%&ndash;7.9%). Gwet&rsquo;s AC was 0.0218 (95% CI 0.006&ndash;0.037; p=0.006). Fleiss&rsquo; kappa was negative, indicating disagreement beyond chance. According to Altman&rsquo;s thresholds, concordance was poor.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Many DOAC interactions are potentially clinically relevant. Major databases show poor agreement, with full concordance in only 6.3% of cases. This inconsistency challenges pharmacists, who should consult more than one source to optimise safety and avoid both undertreatment and unwarranted restrictions.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pousada Fonseca, A., Morona Minguez, I., Garcia Martinez, D., Gonzalez Fuentes, A., Carrera Sanchez, M., Fernandez Valencia, L., Vega Gonzalez, P., Andrino Rodriguez, M., Segura Bedmar, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.616</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.616</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[6ER-016 Lost in translation: how databases disagree on clinically relevant drug-drug interactions with direct oral anticoagulants]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 6: Education and research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A304</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A304</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A305-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[6ER-017 Gepotidacin, a newly first-in-class FDA approved antibiotic for treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infection]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A305-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>According to WHO, antimicrobial resistance is one of the top public health threats world- wide. Antimicrobial resistance is caused mainly by the overuse and/or misuse of antimicrobials, leading to an ongoing need to develop novel antibiotics.<sup>1</sup> Gepotidacin is a first-in-class oral antibiotic that was approved recently by the FDA on 25 March 2025 to treat uncomplicated urinary tract infections (UTIs).<sup>2</sup> While several clinical trials demonstrate promising results related to gepotidacin efficacy and safety, further analysis is needed to assess its benefits, tolerability, and resistance risk in order to improve treatment outcomes and support antimicrobial stewardship.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This study aims to review the clinical literature related to gepotidacin with a focus on it evaluating its spectrum of activity, tolerability, efficacy, safety. The study objectives include analysing gepotidacin&rsquo;s clinical outcomes, assessing its effectiveness against resistant pathogens, and identifying its future directions for its therapeutic use.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A comprehensive literature review was conducted across five electronic databases: EBSCOhost, ProQuest, PubMed, Science Direct and Google Scholar. The studies included were those involving healthy volunteers or patients and published in the English language in the past 15 years, from 2010 to 2025. The content of the selected publications related to the use of gepotidacin were reviewed by two reviewers to confirm compliance with the inclusion criteria followed by data extraction.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>In total, 18 clinical studies were identified that investigated gepotidacin efficacy in human healthy volunteers or patients. These studies reported gepotidacin&rsquo;s tolerability, promising pharmacokinetic profile and lack of major drug-drug interactions. In patients with hepatic or renal impairment, minimal dose adjustments were required. In addition to the efficacy of gepotidacin in managing UTIs, its potential for treating drug-resistant gonorrhoea and Gram-positive acute bacterial skin was reported.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Beyond its effectiveness in treating UTI, gepotidacin is a promising antibiotic with the potential in managing drug-resistant infections. Gepotidacin opens the door for a new generation of antibiotics with novel mechanism of action capable of addressing antimicrobial resistance.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. World Health Organization. (2023, November 21). Antimicrobial resistance [Fact sheet]. https://www.who.int/newsroom/fact-sheets/detail/antimicrobial-resistance.</p><p>2. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2025). Novel drug approvals 2025. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/novel-drug-approvals-fda/novel-drug-approvals-2025.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aburahma, M., Hashad, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.617</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.617</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[6ER-017 Gepotidacin, a newly first-in-class FDA approved antibiotic for treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infection]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 6: Education and research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A305</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A305</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A305-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[6ER-018 Therapeutic strategies in cardio-renal-metabolic syndrome: a systematic review]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A305-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Cardio-Renal-Metabolic syndrome results from interactions between cardiovascular, metabolic, and renal risk factors, causing multi-organ dysfunction, increased morbidity, and premature mortality. Sodium&ndash;glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists (GLP-1RA), and Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists (MRA) exert pleiotropic effects and improve cardiovascular and renal outcomes beyond glycaemic control.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To compare the risk&ndash;benefit profile of currently available pharmacological therapies, with a specific focus on their clinical efficacy and safety.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A systematic review (SR) was conducted by searching PubMed, according to the PRISMA guidelines, for studies published between 8 August 2015 and 8 August 2025. Search terms combined &lsquo;SGLT2 inhibitors&rsquo;, diabetes, &lsquo;chronic kidney disease&rsquo;, cardiovascular disease&rsquo;, and &lsquo;CRM syndrome&rsquo;. Eligible outcomes included major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), renal outcomes, and safety.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The search retrieved 1.335 articles; 778 were screened after applying filters for the last 10 years and selecting only systematic reviews, reviews, meta-analyses, and RCT. Thirty-six full texts were assessed, resulting in 12 RCT included studies and eight additional articles identified through reference mining. Dapagliflozin reduced the risk of cardiovascular (CV) death or hospitalisation for heart failure (HF) by 29% [HR 0.71; 95% CI 0.55&ndash;0.92] and slowed kidney disease progression by 24% [HR 0.76; 95% CI 0.67&ndash;0.87]. Canagliflozin reduced the composite renal outcome [HR 0.66; 95% CI 0.53&ndash;0.81], HF hospitalisations [HR 0.61; 95% CI 0.47&ndash;0.80], and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) [HR 0.80; 95% CI 0.67&ndash;0.95]. Empagliflozin lowered MACE [HR 0.86; 95% CI 0.74&ndash;0.99], all-cause mortality (&ndash;32%), and CKD progression [HR 0.72; 95% CI 0.64&ndash;0.82], while ertugliflozin demonstrated non-inferiority for MACE and reduced HF hospitalisations by 30%. Consistently, semaglutide (GLP-1RA) and finerenone (MRA) also showed favourable effects: semaglutide reduced MACE by up to 26% [HR 0.74; 95% CI 0.51&ndash;1.08], whereas finerenone decreased HF hospitalisations by 17% [HR 0.83; 95% CI 0.75&ndash;0.92] and the composite renal outcome by 20% [HR 0.80; 95% CI 0.72&ndash;0.90].</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Our analysis confirms the role of SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists in the management of CRM syndrome, demonstrating cardiovascular and renal benefits, improved survival and quality of life, and a favourable safety profile.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Colicchio, A., Di Cesare, I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.618</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.618</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[6ER-018 Therapeutic strategies in cardio-renal-metabolic syndrome: a systematic review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 6: Education and research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A305</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A305</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A306-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[6ER-019 Implementing and sustaining a national standardised safe prescribing simulation programme for international medical graduates in [country]: a review of experiences to date]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A306-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Medication safety is a national priority. International medical graduates (IMGs) represent a substantial share of the country&rsquo;s workforce. Many begin practice unfamiliar with local formularies, documentation, and workflows. To reduce early prescribing errors and accelerate safe integration, the National Simulation Office (NSO), in partnership with pharmacists and other stakeholders, is developing a standardised simulation-based induction programme.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To describe the work, time, and resources required to design and implement a national safe prescribing simulation; to assess feasibility and acceptability across diverse hospital contexts; and to identify barriers and enablers to sustainable scale-up.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>The 2-year project uses interactive simulated scenarios that mirror a patients&rsquo; journey, targeting full roll-out by July 2026. Four domains are addressed: (1) safe prescribing; (2) core procedural skills; (3) immersive management of sepsis, the deteriorating patient, haemorrhage, and delirium; (4) communication using simulated patients. Governance is provided by the Simulation Education Induction Working Group, comprising 35 interprofessional members.</p><p>A mixed-methods, plan&ndash;do&ndash;study&ndash;act approach is applied.</p><p>Six high-risk prescribing areas are targeted: antimicrobials, anticoagulants, insulin, analgesia, high-alert medications, and time-critical medicines. Learners complete local prescription documentation, apply national and local guidelines, and receive immediate feedback. Content is co-designed by pharmacists, doctors, nurses, educationalists, and simulationists. Data include feasibility metrics, qualitative learner/faculty feedback, and descriptive outputs.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The programme was piloted across 16 hospitals in January and July/August 2025. Sessions typically required three pharmacists to deliver plus additional preparation time. Learners reported high relevance, realism, and immediate applicability. Pharmacist facilitators valued the programme but highlighted significant time burden and challenges reconciling national standardisation with local prescribing variations (paper vs electronic systems, differing processes). Barriers included lack of protected IMG and pharmacist time, inconsistent management buy-in, and limited local leadership in education and simulation. Enablers included NSO-provided equipment, consumables funding, staff buy-out, and co-design through SEIKO.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>This programme is feasible and valued but resource-intensive and constrained by system heterogeneity and service pressures. Sustainability will require protected time for IMGs and pharmacists, executive sponsorship, alignment of prescribing templates, and stronger leadership for education and simulation. Iterative development in 2025&ndash;26 will expand participation, refine resources, and embed consistent standards to support safer prescribing from day 1.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hogan-Murphy, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.619</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.619</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[6ER-019 Implementing and sustaining a national standardised safe prescribing simulation programme for international medical graduates in [country]: a review of experiences to date]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 6: Education and research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A306</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A306</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A306-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[6ER-020 Climate change and medicine storage: understanding patient practices and safety risks]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A306-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>The majority of medicines are licensed for storage at temperatures up to 25&deg;C, a condition carefully maintained throughout the pharmaceutical supply chain to ensure efficacy and safety. However, once medicines reach patients&rsquo; homes, temperature control can no longer be guaranteed, exposing medicines to potential degradation. Despite this, there is limited evidence regarding public awareness of proper medicine storage conditions. Concurrently, rising domestic temperatures<sup>1</sup> linked to climate change are increasing the risk of medicines being stored in suboptimal environments. Understanding how patients store medicines at home, and their awareness of storage guidelines, is therefore critical to maintaining medicine stability and safeguarding patient health.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The study investigated how participants 18 years and older store medicines at home in England, exploring their awareness of storage guidelines.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A prospective cross-sectional survey was conducted in August 2024 using a self-administered, mixed-method questionnaire. The tool included multiple-choice and closed-ended questions across four domains: demographics, storage behaviours, awareness of storage guidance, and engagement with healthcare professionals. Participants were recruited in August 2024 via convenience sampling according to the inclusion criteria, and no identifiable data were collected.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A survey of 283 participants found that over two-thirds stored medicines in designated areas, most commonly kitchens (63.6%), bedrooms (32.5%), and bathrooms (18.7%) all environments prone to heat and humidity. Although most medicines were kept in their original packaging, only one in three participants regularly reviewed storage instructions, and nearly half had never received any formal guidance from healthcare professionals. While many expressed willingness to adopt correct practices, a majority (60.8%) demonstrated limited or no awareness of the risks of improper storage.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>As climate change increases the frequency of heatwaves<sup>2</sup> and indoor humidity fluctuations,<sup>3</sup> these findings underscore the need for clear, consistent storage guidance in pharmacy consultations and public health messaging. Enhancing public understanding of safe medicine storage is essential to preserve medicine efficacy and ensure patient safety in a warming climate, particularly among vulnerable populations with chronic conditions or complex therapies. Integrating this topic into routine patient counselling could provide a practical and sustainable strategy to mitigate climate-related risks.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. https://www.theccc.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Addressing-overheating-risk-in-existing-UK-homes-Arup.pdf</p><p>2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.10.021</p><p>3. https://www.gov.wales/sites/default/files/publications/2024-01/factsheet-3b-considering-summertime-relative-humidity-in-older-properties.pdf</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Coombes, S., Guan, R., Do Nascimento, S., Hards, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.620</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.620</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[6ER-020 Climate change and medicine storage: understanding patient practices and safety risks]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 6: Education and research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A306</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A306</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A307-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[6ER-021 Securing radiopharmaceuticals preparation practices through a scenario-based training program]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A307-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>The preparation of radiopharmaceuticals (RPs) is a critical step in their overall workflow and must comply with strict quality and safety standards. As part of a continuous improvement approach to professional practices, we developed an innovative training program based on scenario analysis.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To strengthen the competencies of operators working in the RPs preparation laboratory, ensuring both process safety and optimal preparation quality.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>An interactive training module was designed as a slideshow incorporating an initial knowledge assessment using an online quiz application, with 10 questions (nine multiple- or single-choice and one open-ended). The topics covered included controlled atmosphere areas (CAA) (n = 3), hygiene and personal protective equipment (PPE) (n = 1), good preparation practices (GPP) (n = 3), and radioactivity (n = 3). Videos recorded within the CAA illustrating common errors served as the basis for scenario analysis. During a collective debriefing session, participants identified these errors and received complementary theoretical input covering the same topics. Knowledge reassessment will be performed four weeks after the session, and both the content and format of the training were evaluated using a satisfaction questionnaire.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Two 1 hour sessions were conducted, including eight radiologic technologists (RTs), one pharmacy technician, and one supervisor. Only RT results were analysed. The mean score was 7.5/10 &plusmn; 0.67 (range: 6.5&ndash;8.7). During debriefing, participants actively identified procedural errors and expressed strong interest in this pedagogical approach. The rates of correct answers were 83% for CAA, 76% for radioactivity, 70% for GPP, and 63% for hygiene/PPE. A detailed comparison of pre- and post-training results will be presented on the poster. Overall, participants rated the content, duration, and format of the session as highly satisfactory.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>This training successfully increased awareness among operators of Good Preparation Practices, hygiene protocols, and essential safety measures to minimise errors and ensure compliance with procedures. Its interactive format, combined with video-based analysis of real-life scenarios, was particularly well received. To further consolidate this continuous improvement initiative, an audit of GPP compliance and hygiene practices will soon be conducted to assess the training&rsquo;s practical impact in the workplace.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Soualy, Y., Renaud, S., Torchio, J., Rubira, L., Fersing, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.621</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.621</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[6ER-021 Securing radiopharmaceuticals preparation practices through a scenario-based training program]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 6: Education and research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A307</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A307</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A307-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[6ER-022 The role of the pharmacist in clinical trials of medicines - the perspective of hospital pharmacists - a survey study]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A307-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Clinical trials (CTs) of medicines are complex and require the involvement of different healthcare professionals, including pharmacists.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The aim of the study was to know the opinions of hospital pharmacists regarding their participation in CTs, taking into account the benefits of their presence in the research team and the obstacles that limit their greater involvement. To the authors&rsquo; knowledge, it was the first survey conducted in our country among hospital pharmacists to examine their opinions on this subject.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>An anonymous online survey (Microsoft Forms) was distributed to 684 hospital pharmacies via email. The survey structure was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee (118.0043.1.221.2024). The data were collected from September 2024 to January 2025. The survey comprised multiple-choice along with open comment sections for selected questions. The data were analysed using descriptive statistics, primarily presenting the parameters as the number and percentage of responses given in relation to the total number of responses.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>170 hospital pharmacists responded to the survey. Among them 73 (43%) work in CT centres, while 97 (57%) in hospitals that are not CT centres (<cross-ref type="tbl" refid="T1">table 1</cross-ref>). 161 (95%) respondents think that the participation of pharmacists in CTs is important (97%-I group, 93%-II group). 151 (89%) agree that pharmacists should be more involved (89% for both groups). 137 (81%) consider that pharmacists have the appropriate competence (92%-I group, 72%-II group). 112 (66%) think that pharmacists should be able to be a principal investigator (59%-I group, 71%-II group). The benefits identified by respondents included improvements in: management (78%) and monitoring (73%) of the investigational medicinal product, education of healthcare professionals (66%), involvement of clinical pharmacists (65%), and patient compliance (53%). The obstacles include a lack of: adequate resources (71%), time (60%), relevant knowledge (25%), and motivation (23%).</p><p><tbl id="T1" loc="float"><no>Abstract 6ER-022 Table 1</no><tblbdy top-stubs="2"><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Characteristics of hospitals (n=170)</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>CT centre (n=73, I group)</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>No CT centre (n=97, II group)</b> </c></r><r><c cspan="3" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Hospital location:</b>  MunicipalDistrictRegionalClinical  </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> 12(16%)8(11%)23(32%)  <b>30</b>  <b>(41%)</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> 23(24%)  <b>60</b>  <b>(62%)</b>  12(12%)2(2%) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Hospital profile:</b>  SpecialistOncologyPaediatricSingle-profile </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>50</b>  <b>(68%)</b>  10(14%)9(12%)4(5%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>81</b>  <b>(84%)</b>  1(1%)015(15%) </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Number of beds in the hospital:</b> up to 200201-500501-1000&gt;1000 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> 13(18%)  <b>29</b>  <b>(40%)</b>  24(33%)7(10%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>55</b>  <b>(57%)</b>  36(37%)6(6%)0 </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Number of pharmacists employed in the hospital pharmacy:</b>  2-56-1011-15&ge;16 </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>28</b>  <b>(38%)</b>  22(30%)12(16%)11(15%) </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>93</b>  <b>(96%)</b>  4(4%)00 </c></r></tblbdy></tbl></p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The vast majority of respondents agree that the participation of pharmacists in CTs is important and support even greater involvement. Respondents pointed out the numerous benefits, both for patient safety and CT quality.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jucha, W., Rapacz, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.622</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.622</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[6ER-022 The role of the pharmacist in clinical trials of medicines - the perspective of hospital pharmacists - a survey study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 6: Education and research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A307</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A308</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A308-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[6ER-023 Integrating FDA approved app based prescription digital therapeutic apps into clinical practice]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A308-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>FDA approved Prescription Digital Therapeutics (PDTx) presents an innovative category of professionally endorsed software designed for treatment of various medical disorders. App only PDTx provides a distinctive opportunity to deliver approved therapies, via mobile phones, either as a standalone or alongside the traditional pharmaceuticals. For pharmacists, this shift in disease management necessitates moving beyond traditional pharmacotherapy management and requires new competencies in patient counselling for digital products.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This review aims to identify and categorise FDA approved, PDTx that are app based, and are exclusively developed for management of health conditions. Special focus is given on the therapeutic applications, clinical benefits, reimbursement pathways, and incorporation of PDTx in the domain of patient care. In addition to that, the critical role of hospital/community pharmacists in the initiation and patient education for these novel digital therapies will be outlined.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A targeted search for FDA-cleared app based PDTx was performed to identify PDTx approved from 2015 to 2025. The search was conducted using PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, FDA databases and manufacturers websites. The obtained data related to therapeutic targets, treatment modality, duration, and contraindications was analysed. The extracted data was structured to support pharmacy practice and highlight the pharmacy-led monitoring requirements.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The review identified nine key FDA approved app based PDTx that included reSET (Substance use disorder), reSET-O (Opioid use disorder), Somryst (Chronic insomnia), Rejoyn (Major depressive disorder), CT-132 (Episodic migraine), DaylightRx (Generalised anxiety disorder), Mahana IBS (Irritable bowel syndrome), Regulora (Irritable bowel syndrome), AspyreRx&trade; (Type 2 diabetes). Their main therapeutic modality is based on cognitive behavioural therapy, brain-training exercises, and gut-directed hypnotherapy. Since App-based PDTx are not typical pharmaceutical agents; they may create complexities related to pharmacist consultations and related patient care.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>FDA approved app based PDTx propose an effective, patient-centric alternative solution to traditional healthcare. However, their successful adoption into practice requires a clear understanding and education for patients, physicians and pharmacists.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. Watson A, Chapman R, Shafai G, Maricich YA. FDA regulations and prescription digital therapeutics: evolving with the technologies they regulate. <I>Front. Digit. Health</I> 2023;<b>5</b>:1086219.</p><p>2. Docherty JP, Colbert BM. The evolution of psychotherapy: from Freud to prescription digital therapeutics. <I>Front. Psychiatry</I> 2024;<b>15</b>:1477543.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aburahma, M., Zahid, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.623</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.623</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[6ER-023 Integrating FDA approved app based prescription digital therapeutic apps into clinical practice]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 6: Education and research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A308</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A308</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A308-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[6ER-024 Evaluation of a pharmacist-infectiologist partnership for medical training in infectious diseases: a winning pair?]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A308-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>For many years, we have been observing an increasing need for interdisciplinary collaboration in our hospital. In order to maintain continuous training for doctors and promote the proper use of drugs, a partnership between an infectiologist and a hospital pharmacist for medical training was established.</p><p>In our country, although pharmacists are often involved in many committees related to antibiotic therapy, their participation in medical training on this subject has not yet been reported in the scientific literature.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>We evaluated the impact of our training to highlight the relevance of the newly implemented pharmacist&ndash;infectiologist partnership. Doctors&rsquo; satisfaction and added value of the hospital pharmacist were also assessed.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A prospective, observational study was conducted in a geriatric ward to evaluate the conformity of diagnostic and drug management practices. Two audits were performed: first, prior to training, to assess current practices. Then, the pharmacist&ndash;infectiologist pair provided training on diagnosis and pharmacological management of urinary tract infections. The second audit allowed for a comparison of results in order to evaluate the training&rsquo;s impact on current practices. The audits assessed compliance of antibiotic prescriptions with national recommendations, documentation of indications, treatment durations and requests for specialised opinions. A satisfaction questionnaire was also distributed regarding the training and the pharmacist&rsquo;s contribution to medical training.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Each audit included 30 prescriptions. All prescriptions were justified. Nine out of 10 geriatricians attended the training session. Compliance with the indication (70% vs 80%), compliance with the duration of therapy (50% vs 70%) and seeking specialised advice (13% vs 23%) improved. No statistically significant differences were observed between the two audits, although favourable trends were noted. The satisfaction questionnaire indicated a highly positive reception of the training; all of the geriatricians were highly positive about the pharmacist&rsquo;s participation.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>This study suggests the relevance of medical training delivered by a pharmacist-infectiologist pair. We observed high satisfaction with the training and the contribution of a pharmacist despite the absence of statistically significant differences. The positive trends of our training encourage us to continue and expand this approach.</p><p>Other wards have already contacted us to develop a special training program for them.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Goldblatt, J., Pigeon, V., Gellis, C., Morisot, J., Chastang-Chung, C., Plats, D., Larnaudie, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.624</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.624</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[6ER-024 Evaluation of a pharmacist-infectiologist partnership for medical training in infectious diseases: a winning pair?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 6: Education and research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A308</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A309</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A309-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[6ER-025 Healthcare professionals views and awareness of anticholinergic burden: a national cross-sectional survey]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A309-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Anticholinergic burden (ACB) is associated with several adverse outcomes, including cognitive decline, falls, and prolonged hospital stays. Despite the known harms, there remains a high prevalence of patients with a problematic ACB from their medications. As such, it is unclear how aware healthcare professionals (HCPs) are of ACB and HCPs&rsquo; abilities to identify and manage ACB-related issues in practice.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p> To explore the views and knowledge of HCPs regarding ACB.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>An anonymous online survey was piloted with various HCP types and then distributed to HCPs via email and social media between March and August 2025. Descriptive statistics were performed on all survey questions, which included multiple choice and Likert scale questions.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 250 valid responses were received, from pharmacists (81.6%), nurses (7.2%), doctors (4.4%), and other HCPs (6.8%). Most respondents agreed that identifying anticholinergic medications is important for patient safety (97.6%), and that they can play a role in identifying anticholinergic medications (97.6%) and managing ACB (90.7%). However, a large proportion were <I>&lsquo;slightly&rsquo;</I> or &lsquo;<I>not at all&rsquo;</I> confident in their ACB knowledge (40%), identifying strong anticholinergic medications (32%), and calculating an ACB score (50.4%). While nearly two-thirds indicated that identifying potential anticholinergic side effects is a priority in their day-to-day roles (65.9%), over one third were <I>&lsquo;slightly&rsquo;</I> or <I>&lsquo;not at all&rsquo;</I> confident in their ability to recognise adverse anticholinergic effects (36.1%).</p><p>Nearly all reported that being informed of an ACB score would impact their approach to care (98%), but only half were aware of ACB scoring systems (50.8%); among these, 48% reported seldom use, 6.3% reported once-off use, and 20.5% reported never using them in practice. While nearly two-thirds were aware of steps that can be taken to reduce ACB (64.7%), 92% indicated they would like additional training to identify anticholinergic side effects and ACB in their patients.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>This study has uniquely highlighted deficiencies in HCPs&rsquo; knowledge and abilities to manage ACB. The findings demonstrate a need for further ACB education and training, particularly enhanced awareness regarding ACB scoring systems, which should aid HCPs in identifying patients with problematic ACB and ultimately help reduce patient harm.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Obrien, C., Odriscoll, M., Byrne, S., Dalton, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.625</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.625</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[6ER-025 Healthcare professionals views and awareness of anticholinergic burden: a national cross-sectional survey]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 6: Education and research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A309</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A309</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A309-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[6ER-026 Data-informed clinical competency committee: a single-centre deliberative study revealing ceiling effects and missing longitudinal signals in workplace-based assessment]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A309-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Since July 2022, the Taiwan Society of Hospital Pharmacists has promoted Competency-Based Pharmacy Education (CBPE). In November 2023, the Education Development Committee established a national framework integrating pharmacists&rsquo; six core competencies with a 2 year training curriculum through the implementation of Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs).</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>Following the initial implementation, the first CCC was convened to review learners&rsquo; performance and calibration across assessment tools. This study aimed to examine the agreement between traditional workplace-based assessments and CCC entrustment decisions, and to identify the key sources of discrepancy related to assessment design, rater variability, and contextual limitations.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>This single-centre deliberative study analysed data from the first CCC convened after the implementation of CBPE. The participants were pharmacy trainees enrolled in the 2 year postgraduate year training program, evaluated during the final phase of their training (approximately 20&ndash;24 months after program entry). The CCC reviewed each trainee&rsquo;s performance using multiple workplace-based assessments, including the Mini-CEX, DOPS, ad-hoc EPAs, OSCE, and longitudinal learning portfolios. Quantitative analyses examined the agreement between these assessment tools and CCC entrustment decisions using weighted kappa coefficients, McNemar tests, and descriptive statistics. Qualitative thematic analysis of CCC meeting transcripts was conducted to identify sources of discrepancy, focusing on assessment design, rater calibration, and contextual factors influencing entrustment judgements.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Twelve pharmacy trainees were evaluated during the final phase of the 2 year PGY program. All trainees passed the Mini-CEX, DOPS, and portfolios, while 10 of 11 passed the OSCE. In the ad-hoc EPA for medication dispensing, all reached Level 4 and one achieved Level 5. However, only 10 trainees (83.3%) were judged as entrustable by the CCC. Agreement rates between traditional assessments and CCC decisions were moderate (83.3%;  = 0.00&ndash;0.40), suggesting ceiling effects and limited discrimination. The portfolio trend, reflecting longitudinal progress, showed the highest agreement (91.7%;  = 0.63), indicating that continuous monitoring of learning trajectories provided stronger evidence for entrustment than single-point &lsquo;pass/fail&rsquo; assessments.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Data-informed CCC reviews highlight the need for longitudinal, evidence-based assessment to guide training improvement. Future training should integrate continuous, data-informed EPA assessments to enhance entrustment decision quality.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chang, K., Kuo, Y., Tang, Y., Chen, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.626</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.626</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[6ER-026 Data-informed clinical competency committee: a single-centre deliberative study revealing ceiling effects and missing longitudinal signals in workplace-based assessment]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 6: Education and research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A309</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A309</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A310-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[6ER-027 Research in hospital pharmacy departments: a national service evaluation]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A310-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>The European Society of Clinical Pharmacy define clinical pharmacy as <I>&lsquo;both a professional practice and a field of research&rsquo;</I>.<sup>1</sup> The European Statements of Hospital Pharmacy state that <I>&lsquo;hospital pharmacists should actively engage in and publish research&rsquo;</I>.<sup>2</sup>  </p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p><l type="roman"><li><p>Evaluate national practice relating to research within hospital pharmacy.</p></li><li><p>Outline barriers to pharmacist research.</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A national online survey was developed. This was distributed to hospital pharmacy managers between May and August 2025 inclusive, via central mailing lists and contacts of the research team.</p><p>Survey questions addressed</p><p><l type="roman"><li><p>Staffing structures.</p></li><li><p>Current levels of research conducted.</p></li><li><p>The type of research being conducted.</p></li><li><p>Barriers to conducting research.</p></li></l></p><p>Responses results were analysed descriptively.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Fifty-five (65%) hospitals responded. Key findings included:</p><p><l type="roman"><li><p>Only 8% of departments had a dedicated research pharmacist.</p></li><li><p>Conference abstracts were produced by 63% of hospitals. In contrast, only 32% had published in peer&ndash;reviewed publications.</p></li><li><p>Most institutions produce quantitative (66%), qualitative (61%), or mixed&ndash;methods (45%) research.</p></li><li><p>Only 46% of participants agreed that engaging in research is an &lsquo;expectation of pharmacists&rsquo;.</p></li><li><p>However, 62% of participants agreed that research is encouraged in training, should be a requirement for specialist validation and should be embedded into job descriptions.</p></li><li><p>Dissemination of research would encourage others to conduct research according to 92% of participants.</p></li></l></p><p>Barriers to increased engagement in research included</p><p><l type="roman"><li><p>protected time.</p></li><li><p>workload pressures.</p></li><li><p>insufficient mentorship.</p></li><li><p>limited funding opportunities.</p></li></l></p><p>Respondents emphasised the need for structural-level changes within the education of pharmacists should engagement in research activities become embedded within pharmacists&rsquo; roles.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Low levels of engagement with, and the absence of a standardised approach to research was common, as were structural barriers to increased pharmacist engagement. Strategic investment, protected dedicated posts, and academic partnerships are required to strengthen research, in line with the European Statements of Hospital Pharmacy (2).</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. Dreischulte T, van den Bemt B, Steurbaut S; European Society of Clinical Pharmacy. European Society of Clinical Pharmacy definition of the term clinical pharmacy and its relationship to pharmaceutical care: a position paper. <I>Int J Clin Pharm.</I> 2022 Aug;<b>44</b>(4):837&ndash;842. doi: 10.1007/s11096-022-01422-7. Epub 2022 Jun 6. PMID: 35668277; PMCID: PMC9393137.</p><p>2. The European Statements of Hospital Pharmacy. <I>European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy</I> 2014;<b>21</b>:256&ndash;258.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>Corporate sponsored research or other substantive relationships:</p><p>No conflicts relevant to this abstract.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fitzgerald, I., Obrien, C., Richardson, M., Deasy, E., Sykes, R., Fenton, S., Marshall, S., Griffin, M., Nolan, O., Walsh, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.627</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.627</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[6ER-027 Research in hospital pharmacy departments: a national service evaluation]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 6: Education and research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A310</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A310</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A310-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[6ER-028 Education in hospital pharmacy departments: a national service evaluation]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A310-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>The European Statements of Hospital Pharmacy recommend <I>&lsquo;A European-wide framework for initial post graduate education and training in hospital pharmacy with an assessment of individual competence is essential&rsquo;</I>.<sup>1</sup> To facilitate the development of evidence-informed recommendations for improving hospital pharmacist education, national data outlining current practice were required.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p><l type="roman"><li><p>Evaluate current standards of practice relating to education within hospital pharmacy.</p></li><li><p>Outline perceived barriers to pharmacist engagement in education.</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A national online survey was developed and distributed to hospital pharmacy managers between May and August 2025 inclusive. The survey was distributed via various methods, including central emailing lists and contacts of the research team.</p><p>Survey questions addressed</p><p><l type="roman"><li><p>Staffing structures.</p></li><li><p>Current levels of education provided.</p></li><li><p>Types of educational activities conducted.</p></li><li><p>Perceived gaps in hospital pharmacist education.</p></li><li><p>Barriers to engagement in pharmacist education.</p></li></l></p><p>Responses results were analysed descriptively.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Fifty-five (65%) pharmacy managers responded. Key findings included:</p><p><l type="roman"><li><p>Only 27% of participants reported having a pharmacist responsible for education.</p></li><li><p>Almost two&ndash;thirds (63%) reported having a structured induction for pharmacists.</p></li><li><p>Pharmacist induction included dispensary training (91%), clinical training (85%), and corporate induction (79%).</p></li><li><p>Over three&ndash;quarters (79%) of inductions lasted &lt;6 weeks.</p></li><li><p>Seventy percent (70%) provided ongoing departmental education, most through journal clubs (77%), case presentations (60%), and near&ndash;miss/error meetings (57%).</p></li><li><p>Over two&ndash;thirds (69%) of institutions currently support pharmacists on postgraduate courses, mostly in clinical pharmacy (86%)</p></li><li><p>Formal education was provided by pharmacy to nursing (88%), medical (76%) and allied health professionals (33%), as well as undergraduate (47%) and postgraduate (27%) pharmacy students.</p></li><li><p>Perceived gaps in hospital pharmacy education included advanced practice, inpatient and outpatient medication reviews, and clinical skills.</p></li><li><p>Reported barriers to hospital pharmacy education include lack of funding, time constraints, workload and lack of a structured competency framework specific to hospital pharmacy practice.</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Hospital pharmacy departments display significant commitment to, and engagement with, education activities nationally. Efforts to introduce a standardised hospital-specific competency framework for new-to-hospital pharmacists, and validated accreditation for advanced practice will help further facilitate this.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. The European Statements of Hospital Pharmacy. <I>European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy</I> 2014;<b>21</b>:256&ndash;258.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>Conflict of interest</p><p>Corporate sponsored research or other substantive relationships:</p><p>No conflicts of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Seoighe, A., Jeremiah, O., Mcauliffe, C., Odea, E., Brown, S., Tedford, K., Mcmahon, N., Walsh, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.628</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.628</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[6ER-028 Education in hospital pharmacy departments: a national service evaluation]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 6: Education and research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A310</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A311</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A311-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[6ER-029 Sustainable mobility patterns among hospital pharmacy professionals]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A311-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Mobility among healthcare staff has both environmental and organisational implications. Understanding commuting patterns and their carbon footprint allows identification of actions to enhance sustainability.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To analyse commuting habits and estimate the carbon footprint of Pharmacy Service staff in a tertiary hospital, identifying areas to improve sustainability and transport efficiency.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A cross-sectional descriptive study was performed through a voluntary, anonymous, self-administered survey distributed in September 2024. The questionnaire contained 22 multiple-choice items and one open-ended question addressing demographics, professional category, transport modes, commuting frequency, vehicle features, parking times, and improvement proposals. Data were collected over 90 days using a QR-linked Google Form and analysed with Microsoft Excel. Results were extrapolated to estimate the annual carbon footprint of the entire Pharmacy Service.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Fifty-five professionals participated (response rate 52,3%): 45,5% pharmacists, 34,5% technicians, 18,2% residents, 10,9% administrative staff, 7,3% students, and 1,8% orderlies. Most were aged 20&ndash;49 years (90,9%) and worked morning shifts (92,7%), commuting five days a week (96,4%). Regarding transport, 67,3% used only walking or public transport, 20,0% combined modes including private cars, and 12,7% relied exclusively on private vehicles. Among public transport users, trains were most frequent (36,7%), followed by buses (34,7%) and metro (28,6%). Overall, 32,7% used private cars at least occasionally; half owned &lsquo;C&rsquo; label vehicles, 5% had ECO cars, and 75% drove cars older than 5 years. All travelled alone. Fuel type was equally distributed between diesel and petrol, and 70% of cars had manual gearboxes. Seventy percent used hospital parking, with 57,1% spending more than 10 minutes to find a spot. Suggested improvements included higher train frequency, a nearer metro station, car-sharing programmes, greater public transport subsidies, new cycle lanes, and better hospital access. The estimated annual carbon footprint for the Pharmacy Service was 39,03 tonnes of CO<SUB>2</SUB>eq.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Over two-thirds of the staff commute sustainably, mainly using public transport. However, nearly one-third still depend on private, low-occupancy, and non-eco vehicles, contributing significantly to emissions and congestion. The 39,03 tonnes of CO<SUB>2</SUB>eq per year highlight the need for targeted interventions to promote sustainable commuting, including improved transport connectivity, incentives for active mobility, and awareness campaigns that can rapidly modify individual behaviour.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Velez-Diaz-Pallares, M., Martin Sanz, P., Perez Menendez-Conde, C., Palomar Fernandez, C., Igartua Pascual, I., Ruiz Prieto, R., Rodriguez Sagrado, M., Alvarez-Diaz, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.629</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.629</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[6ER-029 Sustainable mobility patterns among hospital pharmacy professionals]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 6: Education and research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A311</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A311</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A311-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[6ER-030 Smarter, safer, faster: audiovisual training for pharmacy technicians using automated dispensing cabinets]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A311-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Automated dispensing cabinets (ADC) are increasingly implemented in hospitals to enhance safety, improve efficiency and simplify pharmacy task management. Their success depends not only on the technology but also on the competence of pharmacy technicians. Audiovisual training offers a dynamic, accessible approach that can improve understanding, reinforce correct procedures, and facilitate safer and autonomous use of these medication systems.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To assess the impact of audiovisual resources on pharmacy technicians&rsquo; knowledge, safety perception, autonomy, and usability when using ADC.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A survey was conducted among pharmacy technicians, collecting data on age, sex and prior experience with ADC. After viewing audiovisual materials, they rated the difficulty of tasks (restocking, adding new medications, stock control, reallocation, medication removal, expirations and system restart) on a 5-point scale, where 5 indicated the most favourable response. The same 1&ndash;5 scale was also applied to assess their perceptions of safety, autonomy, intuitiveness/ease and efficiency.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Thirty-one pharmacy technicians completed the survey. Most participants were between 18-44 years old (83,9%). Overall, 93,5% had prior ADC experience; among them, 83,9% had &ge;1 years of experience. Additionally, 87,1% received previous ADC-training.</p><p>Following audiovisual resources, most tasks were rated easy/very easy: restocking (96,8%), expirations (96,8%), medication removal (90,3%) and stock adjustment (83,9%). Adding new medications, reallocation, and system restart were slightly more challenging but still rated manageable.</p><p>Perceptions improved significantly: 61,3% reported feeling very safe and 29% safe, while 64,5% rated themselves very autonomous and 25,8% autonomous using ADC. Intuitiveness and ease of use were highly rated (58,1% very intuitive/easy), and efficiency received positive ratings from 35,5% as very efficient and 51,6% as efficient.</p><p>Older pharmacy technicians (&ge;45 years, n=5) reported equal or higher confidence than younger staff, and technicians without prior ADC experience (n=2) showed similar improvements after watching the videos.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Audiovisual training significantly improved pharmacy technicians&rsquo; perception of safety, autonomy, ease of use and efficiency when handling ADC. These findings highlight the relevance of audiovisual resources as a practical complement to traditional training, promoting safer and more autonomous system management. Broader implementation may further optimise professional performance, reduce errors, and enhance the adoption of ADS into clinical practice.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Estrada, L., Martinez Segura, M., De Los Santos Capdevila, A., Perez-Ricart, A., Aulet Lucas, S., Escrich Navarro, R., El Amrani Aulad, N., Gonzalez Lopez, M., Canales Ibanez, I., Rodriguez, C., Alvarez Martins, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.630</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.630</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[6ER-030 Smarter, safer, faster: audiovisual training for pharmacy technicians using automated dispensing cabinets]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 6: Education and research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A311</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A312</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A312-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[6ER-031 Relationship between price of purchase and quality of oral antidiabetic drugs in Sub-Saharan Africa: the diabdaf study]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A312-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Falsified and substandard medicines remain a major challenge in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), affecting the quality of care for non-communicable diseases such as diabetes. While medicine pricing is often used as a proxy for quality, the actual relationship between the cost and quality of oral antidiabetic drugs (OAD) in SSA remains poorly explored.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>We conducted a post hoc analysis of the DIABDAF study to examine the relationship between OAD prices of purchase and their quality in Africa.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>OAD were chosen by investigators as those frequently prescribed in SSA: one biguanide (metformin) and three sulfonylureas (glyburide, gliclazide, glimepiride). Drugs were collected from licensed pharmacies and street markets in capital and border cities of seven countries. Prices of purchase were converted into international dollars (int$) using purchasing power parity to ensure comparability across countries. Quality of drugs was assessed based on active pharmaceutical ingredient content (APIC), impurity level, or both (composite quality criteria). A multivariate analysis using a mixed-effects linear model was fitted, with two random effects (pharmaceutical batch and country of purchase), using R (v4.4.3).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Overall, 610 samples with a price of purchase were collected from seven countries. Prices ranged from 0.06 int$ to 1.92 int$. Mean prices were 0.43&plusmn;0.26 int$ for metformin (n=220, 36%), 0.40&plusmn;0.39 int$ for glyburide (n=80,13%), 0.91&plusmn;0.33 int$ for glimepiride (n=180, 30%) and 1.25&plusmn;0.54 int$ for gliclazide (n=130, 21%). Branded medicines had a mean price of 0.92&plusmn;0.54 int$, and 0.57&plusmn;0.40 for generics.</p><p>In univariate analysis price was significantly associated with quality according to APIC (p=0.004) and composite quality criteria (p=0.003): poor-quality drugs were less expensive than good-quality drugs, but not quality according to impurity level (p=0.869).</p><p>In multivariate analysis, drug status (generics being less expensive, p=0.001) and INN (p&lt;0.001) remained significantly associated with price. There was a significant interaction between drug quality and place of manufacture (p=0.002). Specifically, poor-quality drugs produced in Asia were about 4.6% less expensive than good-quality ones (p=0.001), whereas no significant difference was observed for drugs produced in Europe or Africa.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>This large study of 610 samples supports a price&ndash;quality association of OADs in SSA, influenced by drug, status and manufacturing origin.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40823495/</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thery, A., Nguetta, R., Secretan, P., Dia, M., Boukhary Ould, E., Grandjean, L., Cavagna, P., Empana, J., Mbaye, M., Jouven, X., Antignac, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.631</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.631</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[6ER-031 Relationship between price of purchase and quality of oral antidiabetic drugs in Sub-Saharan Africa: the diabdaf study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 6: Education and research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A312</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A312</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A312-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[6ER-032 Access to medicines across 14 Sub-Saharan African countries: a pharmacists perspective from the PHARMAF study]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A312-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Access to medicines remains a global challenge in low- and middle-income countries, with Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) facing specific barriers. This issue is often examined through five key dimensions: availability, affordability, accessibility, acceptability, and quality of medicines.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The PHARMAF study aimed to describe hospital pharmacists&rsquo; roles and assess key barriers to medicine access in SSA.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Between January and May 2025, semi-structured interviews were conducted with hospital pharmacists. Data analysis used R (v4.5.0). Fisher&rsquo;s exact test compared availability, affordability, accessibility, and quality variables by hospital type (university vs non-university) and country income level (low vs middle income).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Twenty-four pharmacists from 14 countries (10 low- and 14 middle-income) participated. Availability of medicines emerged as a major concern. Essential medicines such as analgesics, anti-infectives, and anaesthetics were available in all hospitals (100%). However, anticancer medicines were available in only 43% (10/23), and oral antidiabetics in 74% (17/23). In 58% (14/24) of cases, respondents indicated certain medicines were unavailable in their country (with inconsistent responses from four countries), and 29% (7/24) reported shortages. Anticancer and anaesthesia-related drugs were the most cited as desired but unavailable. Regarding accessibility, the mean number of pharmacists per 100 beds was 2.0&plusmn;3.3, non-medical pharmacy staff averaged 2.9&plusmn;4.2 per 100 beds. Hospitalised patients often retrieved and paid for their own medicines from the hospital pharmacy. Affordability remained a key issue: 33% (8/24) reported medicines were inaccessible in their country due to high cost. Most hospitals 67% (16/24) required external patients to pay the full cost of treatment; only 25% (6/24) had any health system coverage. Quality control was mainly through visual inspection (88%, 21/24), with one pharmacist reporting spectrophotometric analysis. In all hospitals, there was a formal reception committee composed of a pharmacist and a finance representative to verify deliveries and prevent theft or mismanagement. Statistical analysis test showed no significant differences by hospital type or country income level regarding the availability, affordability, accessibility, and quality control variables presented above.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Despite an adequate pharmacist-to-bed ratio, access to medicines remains limited across SSA, with affordability and availability being key concerns. Findings highlight the urgency of regionally adapted strategies to improve access to medicines.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Grandjean, L., Okiemy, E., Fall, M., Youl, E., Keumoe, F., Thery, A., Cavagna, P., Jouven, X., Antignac, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.632</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.632</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[6ER-032 Access to medicines across 14 Sub-Saharan African countries: a pharmacists perspective from the PHARMAF study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 6: Education and research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A312</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A313</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A313-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[6ER-033 Interventions to improve adherence to oral antineoplastic treatment in patients with haematological neoplasms: a systematic review]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A313-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Oral antineoplastic agents have transformed the management of haematological malignancies, increasing patient autonomy and convenience. However, adherence remains a major challenge as patients assume greater responsibility for their own treatment. While there is some evidence on interventions to improve adherence, findings for haematological cancer populations are limited and heterogeneous.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The objective of this systematic review is to analyse current scientific evidence on strategies to improve adherence to oral antineoplastic therapy in patients diagnosed with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia, chronic myeloid leukaemia, or multiple myeloma.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A systematic review was conducted in June 2025 according to PRISMA criteria. The search was carried out in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and EMBASE. Studies were included if they were original publications (controlled clinical trials, cohort studies, case-control, or prospectively/retrospectively designed) in English or Spanish published in the last 10 years, focused on adult patients with haematological malignancies receiving oral antineoplastic therapy, that evaluated interventions to improve adherence. Risk of bias was evaluated using RoB-2, ROBINS-I, NOS, and CHEERS tools.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Of 215 records identified (98 published in the last 5 years), after screening, six studies met inclusion criteria, investigating the impact of: educational programmes, pharmacist-led follow-up, medication diaries, blister pack use, and smart pill bottle technologies. All interventions demonstrated improvements in adherence versus control. Statistically significant results were observed for pharmacist-managed follow-up among patients with medication possession rates below 90% (p&lt;0.0446). Multidisciplinary interventions increased adherence by 1.5% (p=0.04). The combined use of smart dosing systems and pharmacist involvement achieved median adherence of 100% (p=0.001). Medication diaries enabled adherence rates exceeding 95% in intervention groups, with significant differences compared to control(p=0.001). Blister packaging and multidisciplinary programmes likewise enhanced adherence and proved cost-effective in some settings. Quality appraisal revealed five studies had high or serious risk of bias, largely due to issues with participant selection and confounding variables. Although interventions consistently improved adherence, current evidence is constrained by methodological limitations.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Educational and technological strategies, especially pharmacist-led multidisciplinary programmes, appear effective in improving adherence to oral antineoplastic agents among haematological patients. Higher-quality randomised trials are needed to clarify effects on adherence and related clinical and economic outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Garcia Lopez, E., Martin Nino, I., Perez Cano, E., Ruiz Arca, G., Cebrian Carrascosa, C., Martinez Valdivieso, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.633</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.633</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[6ER-033 Interventions to improve adherence to oral antineoplastic treatment in patients with haematological neoplasms: a systematic review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 6: Education and research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A313</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A313</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A313-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[6ER-034 Real-life experience with emicizumab: clinical outcomes and an exceptional case of type III von Willebrand disease with inhibitor]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A313-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Emicizumab is a humanised bispecific monoclonal antibody that mimics the cofactor function of activated factor VIII and is primarily indicated for the prophylactic treatment of patients with haemophilia A, irrespective of the presence of inhibitors. While its use in other hereditary bleeding disorders, such as von Willebrand disease, remains off-label and limited, it is increasingly being explored as a therapeutic alternative. We report our real-world experience from a tertiary care centre, highlighting a notable case of type III von Willebrand disease with an inhibitor, in which the use of emicizumab yielded promising clinical outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and clinical applicability of emicizumab in patients with hereditary coagulopathies, with a particular focus on a case of type III von Willebrand disease with an inhibitor.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>This is a single-centre, retrospective observational study involving eight patients treated with emicizumab between December 2019 and May 2025. Clinical, genetic, and follow-up variables were collected, including diagnosis, age at treatment initiation, presence of inhibitors, history of bleeding episodes, post-treatment bleeding events, surgical or invasive interventions and adverse reactions.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The cohort included seven patients with severe haemophilia A (one with an inhibitor) and one patient with type III von Willebrand disease with an inhibitor. The mean age at treatment initiation was 22 years (range: 5&ndash;40). All patients had a history of clinically significant bleeding episodes. Following the initiation of emicizumab, six patients did not experience any further bleeding episodes. Mild episodes (epistaxis and muscular hematoma) were recorded in two cases, none of which required additional treatment.</p><p>The 19-year-old patient with von Willebrand disease, who had a history of epistaxis and deep haematomas, showed a favourable response, with only one mild epistaxis episode during follow-up. No serious adverse effects were reported, with only one patient experiencing transient mild headache.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Emicizumab proved to be effective and safe in this cohort of patients with haemophilia A, including those with inhibitors. Notably, the case of the patient with type III von Willebrand disease and an inhibitor demonstrated excellent tolerability and bleeding control. These findings support the potential role of emicizumab as a prophylactic treatment in bleeding disorders beyond haemophilia A.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lopez, A. M., Morales Rivero, B., Moreno Banegas, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.634</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.634</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[6ER-034 Real-life experience with emicizumab: clinical outcomes and an exceptional case of type III von Willebrand disease with inhibitor]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 6: Education and research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A313</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A314</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A314-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[6ER-035 Implementation of antimicrobial resistance education in medicine, pharmacy and nursing undergraduate curricula - a national cross-sectional survey]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A314-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) represents one of the most significant threats to global public health, making it essential that future healthcare professionals are adequately prepared to combat this challenge. Despite the publication of the World Health Organization (WHO) curricula guide for training and education of health workers in AMR, there is currently a limited understanding of how AMR education is integrated within healthcare curricula across Higher Education Institutions (HEIs).</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To explore the current state of integration of AMR education in undergraduate medicine, pharmacy and nursing curricula across HEIs.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A cross-sectional survey (mix of open and close ended questions) was developed and adapted from the WHO AMR curricula guide exploring (1) the integration of core knowledge of AMR in curricula, (2) the pedagogic approaches and assessment strategies and (3) the facilitators and barriers influencing this integration. Survey was reviewed for face and content validity by experts on the topic then piloted to test for reliability. Teaching-faculty and programme heads/chairs/deans from nationally accredited medicine, pharmacy and nursing programmes in HEIs were approached through work emails provided by the regulatory body during August and September 2025. Descriptive statistical analysis was employed.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 18 responses out of 27 programmes were received (Medicine (n=6), Pharmacy (n=6) and nursing (n=6)), majority of which reported inclusion of AMR foundation and appropriate use of antimicrobials, yet only 30% addressed diagnostic stewardship and ethics, leadership and governance. Both didactic (72%) and interactive lectures (67%) were frequently reported, while less use of case-based approach (50%), simulation (28%) and interprofessional education (22%) were reported. Assessment included written exams (78%), objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) (44%) and placements&rsquo; evaluation (50%). Barriers reported include limited curriculum time (43%), limited clinical exposure (23%) and resource constraints (12%). While facilitators included: integration with clinical courses (19%), access to guidelines (14%), collaboration with hospitals (12%) and faculty development programmes (8%).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The integration of AMR topics is evident across reviewed programmes yet remains uneven. There is a need to collaborate with hospitals to enhance students&rsquo; learning through clinical exposure. Additionally, facilitating access to the required guidelines and support for faculty development can foster AMR education.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hashad, N., Abdulrazzaq, N., Tonna, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.635</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.635</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[6ER-035 Implementation of antimicrobial resistance education in medicine, pharmacy and nursing undergraduate curricula - a national cross-sectional survey]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 6: Education and research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A314</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A314</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A314-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[6ER-036 Incidence and risk factors for recurrent stroke within 2 years after hospital discharge]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A314-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Stroke is a major cause of disability and death worldwide. Survivors remain at risk for recurrent events that increase morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Reported recurrence rates range from 5&ndash;15% within the first year, with the highest risk occurring shortly after hospital discharge. Although secondary prevention strategies are available, evidence in Thai patients is limited. This gap hinders the identification of high-risk groups and the development of effective interventions. Addressing it is essential to improve follow-up care and reduce recurrence.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This study aimed to determine the 2 year incidence of recurrent stroke after hospital discharge and to identify risk factors associated with recurrence in Thai patients.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective analytical study was conducted among patients admitted with ischaemic stroke between January and October 2022. Patients were classified into two groups: those who developed recurrent stroke after discharge (followed until recurrence) and those without recurrence (followed for 24 months after discharge). Patients with incomplete follow-up data were excluded. Baseline characteristics were collected, including vascular risk factors. Logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with recurrence. Variables included in the model were sex, age, BMI, alcohol use, smoking status, history of stroke, HbA1c, and LDL. Results were reported as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 219 patients were followed for 306.4 person-years. During the 24-month follow-up, 27 patients (12.3%) experienced recurrent ischaemic stroke, corresponding to an incidence rate of 8.8 per 100 person-years. The median time to recurrence was 131 days (IQR 17&ndash;394). Notably, 37% of recurrences occurred within the first month after discharge, equivalent to 66 per 100 person-years. Logistic regression analysis identified obesity (BMI &ge;30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) as a significant risk factor (OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.2&ndash;8.2). Other variables&ndash;including sex, age, smoking, alcohol consumption, prior stroke, HbA1c, and LDL&ndash;showed no significant association with recurrence.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Recurrent ischaemic stroke occurred most frequently in the first month and continued to accumulate over 2 years. Obesity was the only significant risk factor. These findings underscore the need for both early and sustained secondary prevention, structured follow-up, and targeted weight management in Thai stroke patients.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wongwian, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.636</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.636</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[6ER-036 Incidence and risk factors for recurrent stroke within 2 years after hospital discharge]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 6: Education and research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A314</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A315</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A315-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[6ER-037 Development of a training video library for hospital pharmacy: experience in a tertiary hospital]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A315-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Training in hospital pharmacy involves multiple complex technical procedures, such as sterile preparations, parenteral nutrition, cytotoxic drug handling, automated dispensing, and logistics. Variability in training can result in errors and reduced adherence to protocols. A standardised, easily accessible educational resource was required to improve resident training and provide professionals with a quick-reference tool.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To design and implement a structured video library for training in key technical processes in hospital pharmacy, aiming to standardise education, enhance resident confidence, and improve safety and efficiency.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Educational videos were produced for specific areas of hospital pharmacy. Each followed a detailed technical and regulatory script.</p><p><l type="unord"><li><p>Content development: Scripts were based on internal protocols and regulations. Videos included:</p><p><l type="circle"><li><p>Sterile preparations: intravitreal injections, analgesia pumps, intrathecal preparations, ophthalmic solutions, subcutaneous and intravenous repackaging.</p></li><li><p>Parenteral nutrition: adult and neonatal.</p></li><li><p>Cytotoxics: intravenous, subcutaneous, chemoembolisation particles, elastomeric devices, intrathecal preparations.</p></li><li><p>Quick guide for laminar flow cabinet operation.</p></li><li><p>Tutorials for pharmacy software (mixtures, nutrition, cytotoxics).</p></li><li><p>Automated dispensing systems: Athos, carousels, outpatient robot (remote access, optimisation, lists, dispensing).</p></li><li><p>Logistics management: order creation, release, and forecast lists.</p></li></l></p></li><li><p>Validation and pilot phase: Videos were reviewed by pharmacists and residents to ensure accuracy and relevance.</p></li><li><p>Implementation: Materials were uploaded to the hospital&rsquo;s internal shared platform with controlled access for staff and residents. Their use was promoted in training sessions and daily practice.</p></li><li><p>Evaluation: Satisfaction surveys and monitoring of procedural execution were conducted.</p></li></l></p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>After 1 year, 85% of users reported that the videos facilitated learning and knowledge retention. All residents (100%) reported increased confidence when performing procedures. The video library improved standardisation of training and supported rapid access to updated resources.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The training video library proved to be a valuable educational tool in hospital pharmacy. While it does not replace supervised hands-on training, it complements it effectively. Limitations include time and resource requirements for new productions and the need for periodic updates. The model is replicable in other hospital pharmacy departments and may contribute to improved quality and safety in pharmaceutical care.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. Special thanks to the residents and pharmacy staff whose feedback was essential to create and improve the video library</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fernandez Lopez, E., Santos Fagundo, A., Esquivel Negrin, J., Gonzalez Crespo, A., Magdalena Perez, A., Diaz Ruiz, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.637</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.637</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[6ER-037 Development of a training video library for hospital pharmacy: experience in a tertiary hospital]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 6: Education and research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A315</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A315</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A315-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[6ER-038 Can we reduce costs with the use of aflibercept 8 mg in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (NAMD) and diabetic macular oedema (DME)? An economic analysis from Spain]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A315-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Treatment burden in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and diabetic macular oedema (DME) is an issue for patients and healthcare systems in Spain.<sup>1</sup> Newly approved treatment options, such as aflibercept 8 mg, have the potential to be administered at longer treatment intervals and reduce treatment burden and cost.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>Estimate the overall treatment costs and economic savings with the use of aflibercept 8 mg (AFL-8) compared to faricimab 6 mg (FAR) and aflibercept 2 mg (AFL-2).</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Clinical trial data of phase III studies PULSAR, PHOTON (AFL-8), ALTAIR (AFL-2) were used to determine the mean number of injections through 2 years. We selected the comparator arm or study with the best response in terms of treatment extensions. A cost-minimisation analysis was performed considering the drug cost and costs related to monitoring and administration for FAR, AFL-2 and AFL-8. For pharmacological cost, the list public price in Spain available at the Comisi&oacute;n Interministerial de Precios de Medicamentos was used: 742, 843, and 843 for AFL-2, FAR and AFL-8, respectively. For FAR, the lowest list price was considered. The calculated administration and monitoring cost is 277 per injection, the same for all treatments and indications.100% adherence was assumed.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The mean number of injections/year was 5.45, 5.50 and 4.0 for AFL-2, FAR and AFL-8, respectively. The total annual cost, including both pharmacological and administration costs, was 5,556, 6,163 and 4,483 for AFL-2, FAR and AFL-8, respectively. We calculated that the use of AFL-8 if 100 eyes were treated, represents potential cost savings of 19.3% (107,348) compared to AFL-2, and 27.3% (168,094) compared to FAR.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Treatment with AFL-8 allowed for the extension of treatment intervals in clinical trials and appears to be potentially the most economical option for the treatment of nAMD and DME. AFL-8 has the potential to meaningfully reduce costs by decreasing the number of injections and associated visits, and these findings reinforce AFL-8 as potentially the most efficient treatment option.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. Pina Mar&iacute;n B, Gajate Paniagua NM, G&oacute;mez-Bald&oacute; L, Gallego-Pinazo R. Burden of disease assessment in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration in Spain: results of the AMD-MANAGE study. <I>European Journal of Ophthalmology</I> 2022;<b>32</b>(1):385&ndash;394. https://doi.org/10.1177/11206721211001716</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>Corporate sponsored research or other substantive relationships: Bayer</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Calleja Hernandez, M., Gismero Moreno, S., Puigcerver Huerta, M., Gonzalez Pueyo, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.638</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.638</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[6ER-038 Can we reduce costs with the use of aflibercept 8 mg in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (NAMD) and diabetic macular oedema (DME)? An economic analysis from Spain]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 6: Education and research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A315</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A316</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A316-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[6ER-039 Professional communication skills of clinical pharmacists in Vietnam: current status and training need]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A316-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Effective communication is a key competency of clinical pharmacists (CPs), contributing to patient safety, adherence, and interdisciplinary collaboration. However, in Vietnam, professional communication skills (PCS) have not been formally integrated into pharmacy curricula or continuous education programs, and national data on current competencies are lacking.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To describe the current status of PCS among CPs in Vietnam and identify communication skills training needs as a basis for developing standardised communication training modules.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A multicentre cross-sectional survey was conducted from July to August 2025. An anonymous online questionnaire (Microsoft Forms) was performed to collect information of demographics, self-assessment of PCS with patients and healthcare professionals, previous training experience, and training needs.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 355 clinical pharmacists from 63 provinces, representing public and private hospitals at all levels, participated. Among of them, 74.4% were female and 25.6% male; 36.1% worked full-time as CPs, 63.9% had additional responsibilities. More than 66% are older than 30 years old. Most participants (60%) had less than 5 years of experience. Overall, 96% of the respondents recognised PCS as essential to patient care. More than 40% of CPs reported low satisfaction with their communication skills toward patients, mostly in tense situations or sensitive scenarios. This figure toward physicians and nurses was lower, at 31% and 17%, respectively. Only 48% had ever received formal PCS training. The respondents also claimed that 31% of them should identify communication barriers better. 90.3% expressed strong interest in further training and education in communication skills, focusing on scenario-based simulation.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>This first nationwide study highlights that Vietnamese CPs value communication yet demonstrate variability and unmet training needs. The results underscore the urgency of developing a standardised, practice-based PCS training program integrating simulation and feedback to enhance clinical effectiveness and patient safety.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. https://www.jbclinpharm.org/articles/enhancing-patient-safety-through-effective-pharmacistpatient-communication-13075.html</p><p>2. https://cdyduocsaigon.edu.vn/ky-nang-giao-tiep-cua-duoc-si-voi-benh-nhan/</p><p>3. https://www.pharmacytimes.com/view/communication-skills-are-crucial-for-patient-safety?utm_source=www.pharmacytimes.com&amp;utm_medium=viewNext</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phan, Q., Nguyen, T., Nguyen, L., Nguyen, T., Dong, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.639</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.639</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[6ER-039 Professional communication skills of clinical pharmacists in Vietnam: current status and training need]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 6: Education and research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A316</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A316</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A316-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[6ER-040 Development of a python script for automated data extraction from pharmaceutical articles and comparison of ChatGPT 4.5 and 5.0 model performance]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A316-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Automating the extraction of scientific data represents a key challenge to accelerate literature reviews in pharmacy. In summer 2025, a preliminary study demonstrated that a conversational agent (ChatGPT 4.0) could extract data from pharmaceutical articles with an average accuracy of 85 &plusmn; 13% based on 23 predefined criteria used for populating the <I>Impact Pharmacie</I> platform.<sup>1</sup>  </p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To develop a Python script interfaced with the ChatGPT API and compare the data extraction accuracy of models 4.5 and 5.0, in both French (Fr) and English (En), against human analysis.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A descriptive comparative study was conducted on 26 interventional pharmacy studies. A Python script, based on a standardised 23-question prompt, generated responses from ChatGPT 4.5 and 5.0. Five pharmacy students independently assessed compliance (accurate, inaccurate, incomplete) for each question according a standardised operating procedure. The outputs generated by ChatGPT were organised into an Excel spreadsheet (Microsoft, Seattle, WA, USA) for subsequent analysis.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>For ChatGPT 4.5, mean compliance reached 72 &plusmn; 9% (Fr) and 77 &plusmn; 8% (En). The lowest-performing items (&lt; 60%) concerned the formulation of secondary objectives, intervention description, and study duration. ChatGPT 5.0 significantly improved performance, achieving 86 &plusmn; 8% (Fr) and 87 &plusmn; 9% (En). Differences between languages were minimal (&lt;2%). Model 5.0 showed enhanced identification of study design, evaluation parameters, and methodological limitations. As an example, the query processed with ChatGPT 5.0 required 3,422,364 tokens, corresponding to a total computation time of 380 minutes and a cost of CAD $18.18. Remaining errors were mainly related to secondary objectives and intervention duration. Non-compliance may be partly attributed to an insufficient token limit or to instructions that were not specific enough regarding the expected level of detail in the responses.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Integrating a Python script with the ChatGPT API enables reliable, bilingual automated extraction of scientific data from article PDFs. ChatGPT 5.0 demonstrated a 13 to 15-point improvement in compliance compared with version 4.5, supporting its use in the development of standardised pharmaceutical data analysis tools. The findings support the potential automation of updates to the Impact Pharmacie platform.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. Impact Pharmacie: Home [Internet]. [cited 2025 Oct 8]. Available from: https://impactpharmacie.org/index.php?p=greeter.php</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mutin, J., Lardeux, L., Annane, M., Vate, C., Escoffier, G., Martin, C., Bussieres, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.640</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.640</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[6ER-040 Development of a python script for automated data extraction from pharmaceutical articles and comparison of ChatGPT 4.5 and 5.0 model performance]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 6: Education and research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A316</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A317</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A317-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[6ER-041 Observational study of clinical trials involving drug repositioning]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A317-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Drug repositioning is a recent and growing concept involving the research of new indications for a drug at a lower development cost. Thalidomide is an example of a successful drug repositioning.<sup>1</sup>  </p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The objective was to analyse clinical trial data in order to describe the characteristics of repurposing clinical trials in comparison with other trials.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>All drug-related clinical trials were extracted from clinicaltrials.gov. For each drug, key pharmacological and administrative data were retrieved from Drugbank. A drug was considered repurposed if the protocol submission date was over 20 years after its patent date. Main trial features (phases, age, number of subjects, funding, study status and ATC class) were compared between repurposed and non-repurposed drugs.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>In total, 96705 trials were extracted from the database of which 21361 were repositioning studies. The distribution of repositioning clinical trials was similar across all trial phases (from 1 to 4).</p><p>The proportion of clinical trials involving children was similar for repurposing clinical trials compared to other clinical trials. The same was true for clinical trials involving only adults.</p><p>The average number of participants was 2632 &plusmn; 189 in repositioning studies, compared to 871 &plusmn; 34 (p&lt;0.001).</p><p>Only 12% of industry studies corresponded to repositioning, compared with 27% for other funding sources (p&lt;0.001).</p><p>Less studies involving repositioned drugs were completed (41%) compared to other trials (66%) (p&lt;0.001).</p><p>We looked at ATC class (level 3). The most represented classes (antineoplastics had the most studies with 22887 trials, followed by antidiabetics, antivirals, etc.) were different from classes most frequently repositioned (anthelmintics 61% of the time, followed by antiinflammatory products, stomatological preparations, etc.).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Our study has limitations, particularly with regard to the method used to define a repositioning study. Nevertheless, certain factors studied were surprisingly similar such as study phase and age of patients.</p><p>However, the completion levels were much lower with repositioning studies. Industry funding was also much lower. This suggests lower funding in repositioning studies.</p><p>Differences in ATC class illustrate a gap between traditional research and repurposing of older molecules.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. Jourdan J-P, <I>et al</I>. Drug repositioning: a brief overview. <I>J. Pharm. Pharmacol.,</I> 2020;<b>72</b>(9):1145&ndash;1151.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bourguignon, E., Talocci, M., Djeghroud, M., Bourguignon, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.641</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.641</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[6ER-041 Observational study of clinical trials involving drug repositioning]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 6: Education and research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A317</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A317</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A317-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[6ER-042 Pharmacy students and professionals knowledge, perception and attitude regarding environmental sustainability in pharmacy practice: a systematic review]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A317-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>The environmental impact of healthcare systems, especially the pharmaceutical sector, represents a significant global challenge. Evaluating how pharmacy students and professionals understand and perceive sustainable practices is crucial for reducing the healthcare industry&rsquo;s ecological footprint.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This review aims to systematically synthesize evidence on the knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of pharmacy students and professionals regarding environmental sustainability (ES) in pharmacy practice, in addition to identifying factors influencing their engagement.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Seven databases were searched using a pre-specified search string, for studies published, in English, between 2011 and 2024. Quality assessment was performed using the NHLBI tool for cross-sectional studies, COREQ checklist for qualitative research and MMAT for mixed-methods studies. Data were synthesized narratively due to methodological heterogeneity.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Fifteen studies from 11 countries were included. While most pharmacy students and professionals recognised environmental risks associated with pharmaceutical waste, significant knowledge gaps existed regarding proper disposal practices, ecopharmacovigilance and broader ES concepts. Despite positive attitudes toward ES, participants often struggled to translate awareness into action, citing barriers such as lack of formal training, unclear guidelines, and limited systemic support. Both students and professionals expressed strong interest in enhancing ES education and training.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>This review highlighted the need for comprehensive integration of ES principles in pharmacy education and practice using a structured approach. Additionally, future efforts should focus on developing clear guidelines, enhancing professional training, and establishing supportive infrastructure for ES in pharmacy practices.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hashad, N., Jabbari, S., Fahmy, A., Ahmed, H., Debelic, I., Arafat, K., Cortes-De Guzman, K., Abohabsa, M., Ghozlan, S., Hussien, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.642</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.642</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[6ER-042 Pharmacy students and professionals knowledge, perception and attitude regarding environmental sustainability in pharmacy practice: a systematic review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 6: Education and research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A317</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A318</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A318-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[6ER-043 Complexity of clinical trials in a paediatric hospital: impact on the pharmacy service]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A318-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Regulation No. 1901/2006 of the European Parliament and the Council requires pharmaceutical companies to develop a Paediatric Investigation Plan to ensure the authorisation of medicines in paediatrics . This has led to an increase in paediatric clinical trials (CTs) and greater involvement of the Pharmacy Service (PS) in managing investigational medicinal products.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The aim of this study is to describe the characteristics of active CTs in the PS of a tertiary paediatric hospital and to classify their complexity using the scale developed by Calvin-Lamas et al.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A retrospective observational study was conducted in a paediatric monographic hospital. All active CTs in the PS clinical trial unit in March/2025 were included.</p><p>Variables collected: trial phase, department, blinding, number of drugs, storage, special conditioning, drug preparation, personnel involved, dispensing method, and use of interactive web response systems (IWRS).</p><p>Complexity was assessed with the Calvin-Lamas et al. scale: Level 1 (low: 6&ndash;10 points), Level 2 (moderate: 11&ndash;19), and Level 3 (high: 20&ndash;33). Descriptive statistics included mean, standard deviation, and frequency distribution.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p></p></sec><sec><st>Eighty-three clinical trialswere identified</st><p>Almost half of the CTs required special conditioning (49%) and drug preparation in the PS (48%), often involving both pharmacists and pharmacy nurses. Direct-to-patient dispensing was reported in 89% of CTs, while 76% used IWRS for drug management.</p><p><tbl id="T1" loc="float"><no>Abstract 6ER-043 Table 1</no><tblbdy top-stubs="2"><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Trial phase</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Department</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Blinding</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>N&deg;drugs</b> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">  <b>Storage</b> </c></r><r><c cspan="5" rspan="1"><bottom-border>    </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Phase III: 42% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Oncology: 57% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Open-label: 51% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">&ge;3 drugs: 55% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Refrigerated: 49% </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Phase I&ndash;II: 23% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Neurology: 8% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Double-blind: 29% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">2 drugs: 27% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Room temperature: 46% </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Phase II: 23% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Gastroenterology: 7% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Open-label w/commercial drugs:19% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">1 drug:18% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Frozen: 5% </c></r><r><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1">Others: 28% </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c><c cspan="1" rspan="1"> </c></r></tblbdy></tbl></p><p>The mean complexity score, according to the Calvin-Lamas et al. scale, was 14.9 points (SD 4.2), classifying most CTs as Level 2 (67%). 19% were classified as Level 1 and 13% as Level 3.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The application of the Calvin-Lamas et al. scale allowed us to quantify the workload of the PS clinical trials unit, with particular impact on drug preparation, dispensing, and monitoring, which in paediatrics require highly individualised attention and rigorous dose control. A validated paediatric-specific scale would be necessary to more robustly confirm the complexity of CTs in this population.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. Calvin-Lamas,Marta, <I>et al</I>. A complexity scale for clinical trials from the perspective of a pharmacy service. <I>European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy</I> 2018.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Algarra, E., Merino Pardo, A., Siguero Gomez, C., Fernandez Rubio, B., Hernandez Ramos, J., Echavarri De Miguel, M., Leal Pino, B., Nieto Martil, E., Abril Cabero, A., Martin Prado, S., Pozas Del Rio, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.643</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.643</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[6ER-043 Complexity of clinical trials in a paediatric hospital: impact on the pharmacy service]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 6: Education and research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A318</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A318</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A318-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[6ER-044 Evaluation of health and economic impacts of vein-to-vein time in the treatment of B-cell lymphoma with chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies: a systematic review]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A318-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies have transformed the treatment landscape of relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma (r/r LBCL). However, their clinical success poses new challenges in expanding indications, sustainability, and manufacturing optimisation. Evidence suggests that extended vein-to-vein time (V2Vt) may compromise clinical efficacy and economic value.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of V2Vt on both clinical and economic outcomes in the treatment of r/r LBCL with currently approved CAR T-cell therapies.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A literature review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines using the PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases. Studies published between 2020 and 2025 reporting quantitative data on the association between V2Vt and economic or survival outcomes, such as life years (LYs), quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and cost-effectiveness analyses, were included. Data were extracted, analysed, and qualitatively synthesized.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Five studies met the inclusion criteria. In the &gt;3-line setting, reducing V2Vt from 54 to 24 days was associated with a gain of 3.2 LYs and 2.4 QALYs per patient, with an incremental cost of USD 92,587 per QALY gained for axicabtagene ciloleucel compared with tisagenlecleucel. Even smaller reductions in V2Vt, from 37 to 24 days, were clinically relevant, translating into an additional 2.5 LYs and 1.9 QALYs. Similarly, in the second-line setting, axicabtagene ciloleucel, characterised by a higher prevalence of short V2Vt (&lt;36 days), demonstrated an incremental gain of 0.56 QALY compared with lisocabtagene maraleucel, along with a total cost reduction of USD 13,156. Moreover, economic models with a 50-year time horizon identified axicabtagene ciloleucel as a dominant treatment option, with a net monetary benefit of USD 96,407 at a willingness-to-pay threshold of USD 150,000 per QALY.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Available evidence demonstrates that reducing V2Vt not only improves survival and quality of life but also represents a key determinant of the economic sustainability of CAR-T therapies. Therefore, implementing procurement strategies aimed at accelerating manufacturing and logistic processes is essential to secure timely and efficient therapy delivery.</p></sec><sec><st>References and/or Acknowledgements</st><p>1. Locke FL, <I>et al</I>. Impact of Vein-to-vein Time in Patients With R/R LBCL Treated with Axicabtagene Ciloleucel. <I>Blood Adv.</I> 2025 Jun 10;<b>9</b>(11):2663&ndash;2676. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2024013656.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gallina, M., Marengo, G., Bonanno, S., Barberi, I., Musso, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.644</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.644</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[6ER-044 Evaluation of health and economic impacts of vein-to-vein time in the treatment of B-cell lymphoma with chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies: a systematic review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 6: Education and research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A318</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A319</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A319-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[6ER-045 Adherence and persistence to heart failure guideline-directed medical therapy and their link to clinical outcomes]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A319-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Sustained adherence to guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in heart failure (HF) management is essential, with non-adherence being associated with worse clinical outcomes&ndash;including increased hospitalisations, readmissions, and mortality.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To synthesize evidence on the association between adherence and/or persistence to HF GDMT and clinical outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>A systematic review was conducted in September 2024, following PRISMA guidelines. The literature was searched across PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Scopus databases using terms related to medication adherence, persistence, HF, and electronic health databases (EHDs). Observational studies of adults with HF using EHDs that assessed medication adherence or persistence and their association with clinical outcomes were included.</p><p>Collected variables included study characteristics, adherence/persistence measures, and clinical outcomes related to adherence/persistence.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 14 studies were identified: 13 measuring adherence and one measuring persistence to GDMT. Among the 13 adherence studies, 11 used threshold-based definitions; good adherence was commonly defined as proportion of days covered (PDC) &ge;80% (n=6), &ge;75% (n=1), or &ge;90% (n=1); other definitions included medication possession ratio (MPR) &gt;80%, fill frequency &ge;80%, and Patient Adherence Index &ge;50%. Two studies evaluated adherence as a continuous variable using PDC (n=1) or MPR (n=1). Across studies, higher adherence was associated with improved outcomes, including lower all-cause mortality (9/13), fewer cardiovascular and HF hospitalisations (7/13), and fewer readmissions (3/13). Effect estimates for adherent versus non-adherent patients ranged from HR 0.72 to 0.85; conversely, non-adherence was associated with increased risk (HR 1.8&ndash;3.0). The single persistence study found that non-persistence&ndash;defined as a &ge;90-day gap between refills&ndash;was associated with higher mortality for renin&ndash;angiotensin&ndash;aldosterone system inhibitors (HR 1.37; 95% CI 1.31&ndash;1.42) and &beta;-blockers (HR 1.25; 95% CI 1.19&ndash;1.32).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>In real-world HF cohorts, better adherence to GDMT is consistently associated with improved clinical outcomes. Hospital pharmacists should prioritise adherence-supportive strategies (medication review, counselling, discharge reconciliation, early follow-up and refill coordination) and implement routine real-world monitoring to identify early declines and target support to high-risk patients.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baez Gutierrez, N., Rodriguez Ramallo, H., Gonzalez Martinez, M., Galindo Garcia, C., Sierra Sanchez, J., Sanchez Fidalgo, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.645</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.645</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[6ER-045 Adherence and persistence to heart failure guideline-directed medical therapy and their link to clinical outcomes]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 6: Education and research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A319</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A319</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A319-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[6ER-046 Deprescribing medications in the outpatient setting: an integrative review to underpin pharmaceutical practice]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A319-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>The growing number of patients with multiple comorbidities leads to increased polypharmacy.</p><p>Deprescribing, defined as the safe and supervised discontinuation of unnecessary medications, is a crucial strategy to mitigate risks, reduce adverse events, and enhance patient safety. However, its proactive implementation in routine outpatient clinical practice, particularly within a teaching hospital, remains a challenge.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>This study aimed to contextualise the deprescribing practices observed in recent literature to refine this strategy and support beneficial pharmaceutical interventions for outpatient clinic patients.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>An integrative literature review was conducted, including articles published between 2017 and 2022. The research was performed in key digital databases: PubMed, BVS, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus.</p><p>Inclusion criteria prioritised articles addressing deprescribing in clinical and/or pharmaceutical practice contexts, with mandatory full-text access.</p><p>The search employed the descriptors: &lsquo;deprescribing&rsquo;, &lsquo;outpatient clinics&rsquo; and &lsquo;general practice,&rsquo; combined with terms such as &lsquo;comorbidities&rsquo;, &lsquo;polypharmacy&rsquo;, and &lsquo;adverse events&rsquo;, utilising Boolean operators (&lsquo;AND&rsquo;/&rsquo;OR&rsquo;) across Portuguese, English, and Spanish languages.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Twenty-three articles were selected. Analysis of the studies revealed that reactive deprescribing, and the occurrence of adverse drug reactions, is the most frequent, with the majority of interventions concentrated among geriatricians and elderly patients.</p><p>Eight articles, involving 3,417 patients, identified 673 medications as eligible for discontinuation. On average, 67.43 medications were successfully deprescribed, with a low reintroduction rate. The most frequently deprescribed medications included: vitamins and supplements (41%), proton pump inhibitors (31.8%), benzodiazepines and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (27%), in addition to cardiovascular and neuropsychiatric agents.</p><p>Overall, deprescribing proved to be successful and well-accepted by patients, with success often associated with the involvement of an interdisciplinary team.</p><p>In this process, the pharmacist acts as a protagonist in identifying and recommending deprescribing, contributing to the safety and rationality of therapy.</p><p>Key reported clinical benefits included reduction of adverse events, improved treatment adherence, and patient satisfaction.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>The results confirm the relevance and benefits of deprescribing demonstrating that a significant portion of outpatient prescriptions contained potentially unnecessary medications.</p><p>The evidence obtained provides support for the implementation of safe deprescribing practices, highlighting the essential role of the pharmacist as an intervention agent to optimise treatment and ultimately benefit the patient.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martins, M., Chaves, C., Juliano, R., Nunes, M., Honorio, P., Vanusa, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.646</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.646</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[6ER-046 Deprescribing medications in the outpatient setting: an integrative review to underpin pharmaceutical practice]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 6: Education and research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A319</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A320</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A320-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[6ER-047 Towards comparable outcomes in antimicrobial stewardship studies]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A320-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP) are widely recognised as essential interventions in combating resistant bacteria. However, comparability of their impact remains challenging. This issue is particularly concerning in systematic reviews, which represent high-level evidence and play a crucial role in policy and practice decisions.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>The aim of this study is to describe the reported outcomes in reviews on ASP interventions.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>An umbrella review was conducted. Searches were performed using PubMed,Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases from inception to May 2024, with peer-based data screening, collection and quality assessment using the modified AMSTAR-2 (MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews) tool. Study protocol: osf.io/qy9r5. PRISMA-ScR procedure was applied.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>From 1208 citations, 1099 reviews were eligible for inclusion summarising a total of 54 articles. Hard outcome, such as mortality, was reported in 35 (64,8%) reviews, with 8 (14,8%) in-hospital mortality, 6 (11,1%) specifying 30-day mortality, 5 (9,2%) all-cause mortality, 3 (5,5%) ICU mortality, 2 (3,7%) 15-day mortality, and in 19 (35,2%) reviews the type of mortality was not specified. Only 14 (25,9%) of the reviews identified studies where a significant reduction in mortality was observed, while the remaining reviews reported that the intervention was not significantly associated with changes in mortality. Readmission rates were reported in 11 (20,4%) and length of stay 31 (57,4%) were adherence to guidelines and adverse events respectively were citated in15 (27,4%), 9 (16,7%), 16 (29,6%). However, no statement on patient and public involvement was identified in the reviews. High inconsistences across other outcomes definition and measures related to prescription appropriateness or process indicators were identified. The overall quality was low or critically low 50 (92,6%) and only 2 reviews (3,7%) were classified as high quality. The most loss-making domains involve the lack of measuring the risk of bias (RoB) with an appropriate tool or to explicitly state that review methods were previously established among others.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>To assess the real impact of ASP interventions, the quality and comparability of the studies need to improve. Future research should focus on harmonising outcomes definitions and foster research integrity aspects.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Garcia-Gimenez, I., Robles-Munoz, M., Fernandez, M. U., Nunez Nunez, M., Bueno-Cavanillas, A., Cabeza Barrera, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.647</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.647</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[6ER-047 Towards comparable outcomes in antimicrobial stewardship studies]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 6: Education and research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A320</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A320</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A320-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[6ER-048 Pharmacoeconomic value of mathematical models, artificial intelligence and computational phantoms in preclinical studies of radiopharmaceuticals: a systematic review]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A320-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and Importance</st><p>Radiopharmaceutical development costs 2-5 million USD per preclinical candidate with 90-95% failure rates. Traditional approaches face challenges including complex dosimetry, radioprotection constraints, and limited animal model translatability. Computational technologies offer promising alternatives to optimise resource allocation.</p></sec><sec><st>Aim and Objectives</st><p>To systematically evaluate the pharmacoeconomic value of mathematical models, artificial intelligence (AI), and computational phantoms in preclinical radiopharmaceutical development.</p></sec><sec><st>Material and Methods</st><p>Systematic review following PRISMA guidelines, searching PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase (2014-2024). Inclusion criteria: studies evaluating economic, temporal, or predictive impact of in silico models in preclinical radiopharmaceutical development. Quality assessment utilised Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and CHEERS checklist. Economic data normalised to 2024 USD. Meta-analysis performed using random effects models.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>From 3,847 references, 52 studies were included (38 with quantitative data): 31 mathematical models (59.6%), 24 AI applications (46.2%), 19 computational phantoms (36.5%).</p><p>PBPK Mathematical Models: Reduced animal studies by 40-60% (95% CI: 38.2-56.4%), generating savings of 500,000-1.2 million USD per candidate. Preclinical timeline shortened from 3-4 years to 1.5-2.5 years. Predictive accuracy: R<sup>2</sup>=0.82-0.94 for pharmacokinetics. Phase I success rate improved from 54% to 72%.</p><p>Artificial Intelligence: Accelerated lead identification from 3-5 years to 6-12 months (70% reduction). Reduced screening compounds by 85% while improving hit rates from 2-5% to 15-25%. Average savings: 4.2 million USD per project (95% CI: 2.8-5.9 million).</p><p>Computational Phantoms (MIRD): Eliminated 30-45% of experimental dosimetry studies, reducing costs by 200,000-400,000 USD per candidate. Dosimetry predictions showed 12-18% mean error versus clinical data.</p><p>Integrated Approaches: Demonstrated 2.5-4 fold improved cost-effectiveness ratio, with 15-25% enhanced net present value per year gained.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and Relevance</st><p>Computational technologies transform radiopharmaceutical development economics, offering 30-60% cost reductions, 50-75% timeline acceleration, and improved clinical predictability. Hospital pharmacists should advocate for adoption of these approaches in academic-industrial collaborations to optimise resource allocation, reduce animal experimentation, and accelerate patient access to innovative radiopharmaceuticals.</p></sec><sec><st>Conflict of Interest</st><p>No conflict of interest</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eddahoumi, Y., El Qabissi, O., Qajia, H., Yachi, L., Mousannif, S., Bouatia, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.648</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.648</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[6ER-048 Pharmacoeconomic value of mathematical models, artificial intelligence and computational phantoms in preclinical studies of radiopharmaceuticals: a systematic review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Section 6: Education and research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A320</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A320</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A321?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Author index]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/Suppl_1/A321?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T01:47:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-eahp.authorindex</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-eahp.authorindex</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Author index]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Author index</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>Suppl_1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>A321</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>A341</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueName>EAHP Congress 2026Barcelona, Spain18-19-20 March 2026Diverse tasks [bull  ] One team ensuring excellence for all patients</prism:issueName>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/2/99?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Thirty congresses: What a journey!]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/2/99?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wiffen, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-23T00:47:05-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-004979</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2026-004979</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Thirty congresses: What a journey!]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Editorial</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>99</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>99</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/2/100?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Evaluation of the impact of NOAC underdosing and exploration of bleeding risk factors in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation: artificial intelligence-based approach]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/2/100?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Atrial fibrillation in elderly patients increases the risk of thromboembolism, necessitating long-term anticoagulation. While non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are generally preferred, appropriate dosing in older patients who are frail remains a challenge. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of NOAC underdosing and identify bleeding risk factors using artificial intelligence in a local elderly population.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A retrospective study was conducted that included 119 patients with atrial fibrillation who were treated with apixaban or rivaroxaban between October 2020 and May 2022. Patients were categorised based on whether NOAC prescriptions were in accordance with dosing recommendations. Bivariate analyses and univariable logistic regression were performed to assess associations with clinical outcomes. To identify bleeding risk factors, a combination of stepwise logistic regression, learning vector quantisation and variable permutation was used. These risk factors were then used to develop supervised machine learning models to predict bleeding risk, for interpretation purposes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Significant differences in bleeding and thrombotic events were observed between patients with guideline-concordant and underdosed prescriptions. Using univariable logistic regression, underdosing NOACs was associated with a lower risk of bleeding (OR 0.3) but a higher risk of thrombosis (OR 6.7). In the multivariable analysis, guideline adherence, sex and NOAC choice were identified as key predictors of bleeding events. Guideline-concordant prescriptions were independently associated with an increased bleeding risk.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Underdosing NOAC was associated with a reduced bleeding risk but at the cost of a markedly increased thrombosis risk. Guideline-concordant dosing was also associated with higher bleeding risk in the multivariable model. Overall, the results do not support systematic underdosing of NOACs in elderly patients. These findings were shared with local prescribers to reinforce appropriate dosing practices and to improve follow-up for patients identified as being at increased bleeding risk.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Protzenko, D., Berard, C., Hoang, V., Hache, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-23T00:47:05-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004610</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004610</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 4: Clinical Pharmacy Services]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Evaluation of the impact of NOAC underdosing and exploration of bleeding risk factors in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation: artificial intelligence-based approach]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>100</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>105</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/2/106?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Impact of centralised reconstitution of biological medicines on the amount and costs of medicine waste]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/2/106?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To evaluate the impact of centralising the reconstitution of biological medicines from hospital wards to a hospital pharmacy aseptic facility on the amount and costs of medicine waste.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Data from 1 January 2021 to 30 November 2021 were collected from an electronic patient record system, including dose, timing and site of the administration of infliximab, rituximab and vedolizumab across 31 wards. The average wholesale prices were obtained from the Finnish national database. Three hypothetical models were compared. In Model A, the medicine residual was discarded after reconstitution on the ward. In Model B, the medicine residual was reused on the ward within the next 12 hours for the subsequent reconstitutions. In Model C, all medicine reconstitutions were centralised. Mean medicine waste costs were calculated and compared between models. Regression analysis was conducted to assess the relationship between ward size and medicine waste costs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The total calculated medicine waste costs at wholesale prices were higher in decentralised models (Models A and B) compared with the centralised model (Model C). The largest cost savings between Models A and C were observed with rituximab (110 012), while the smallest were with vedolizumab (46 162). Comparing Models B and C, rituximab also had the greatest savings (73 524), with infliximab showing the least (23 014). The number of reconstituted medicines was associated with higher waste costs. A 10% increase in reconstituted medicines led to a 3.1% decrease in relative waste costs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Centralisation may reduce the amount and costs of medicine waste. However, other associated factors should also be considered, such as transport and storage of ready-to-administer medicines, personnel costs and the impact on the quality and safety of care.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tolonen, H. M., Vaarala, K., Eestila&#x0308;, S., Rantsi, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-23T00:47:05-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004382</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2024-004382</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 3: Production and Compounding]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Impact of centralised reconstitution of biological medicines on the amount and costs of medicine waste]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>106</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>110</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/2/111?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The impact of type of delivery method on medicine waste in households: a questionnaire-based study on outpatients receiving cost-free medicine in the North Denmark Region]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/2/111?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>The increasing number of patients challenges healthcare and drives demand for home-based treatments. In the North Denmark Region, outpatients can acquire their hospital medication as &lsquo;cost-free medicine&rsquo; through home delivery or medication pickup lockers. With a focus on home-based treatments and limited household medicine tracking, investigating medicine waste is crucial for resource optimisation. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of excess medication among outpatients in the North Denmark Region, whether there was an association between excess cost-free medicine and type of delivery method, and reasons for the excess.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>This study included outpatients from the Department of Neurology or Department of Gastroenterology at Aalborg University Hospital receiving cost-free medication from March to October 2023. Eligible outpatients received a questionnaire via Digital Post. As medicine waste is difficult to measure directly, excess medication was used as a surrogate measure. Patient data were acquired through Apovision and stored in REDCap. Pearson&rsquo;s <sup>2</sup> test was performed to examine the difference in excess medicine between medication pickup locker and home delivery.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>52.8% (233/441) of outpatients reported excess cost-free medication at home. Medication pickup lockers, where 58.9% (132/224) reported an excess, were associated with larger medicine stocks at home compared with home delivery where 46.5% (101/217) reported excess (p=0.009). For 45.5% (106/233) of medicine pickup locker users and 24% (56/233) of home delivery users, the excess was planned with the hospital department. If the excess was not planned with the department, most users reported receiving too much medicine (23/76) or &lsquo;Other&rsquo; (42/76).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Over half of the outpatients reported excess cost-free medication, with the largest excess linked to medication pickup lockers. Patients managing their own pickup tend to accumulate more. To minimise accumulation of medicine for personal use, it may be worth investigating whether deliveries through medication pickup lockers should be scheduled at fixed intervals.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Olesen, A. E., Wisby, H. B., Mejlholm, M. B., Eisenhardt, M. V. G., Andersen, I. B., Routhe, L. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-23T00:47:05-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004420</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2024-004420</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 2: Selection, Procurement and Distribution]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The impact of type of delivery method on medicine waste in households: a questionnaire-based study on outpatients receiving cost-free medicine in the North Denmark Region]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>111</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>116</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/2/117?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Nine years experience of an educational programme for patients treated with oral anticoagulants in a cardiology department]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/2/117?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Oral anticoagulants present significant risks of iatrogenic complications. An educational programme dedicated to patients treated with vitamin-K antagonists (VKAs) or direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) was set up in our cardiology department in 2013. The aim of this study is to describe and assess our programme&rsquo;s effectiveness, through evaluation of patients&rsquo; skills and adherence, and to identify associated factors.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Skills were assessed through a questionnaire designed by our multidisciplinary team, targeting different items, and a global score was rated from 0 to 1. Adherence was assessed using a validated tool. Data from patients educated between January 2013 and December 2021 were collected retrospectively. R software was used for statistical analysis, performing Student or <sup>2</sup> tests for comparison of variables and univariate linear regression analysis for identification of variability factors. A value of p&lt;0.05 was considered significant.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Since 2013, 934 patients were educated, representing 14.7% of patients with oral anticoagulants in cardiology units. Mean&plusmn;SD age was 68.7&plusmn;16.4 years and the proportion of men was 58.9%. After hospital discharge, skills were assessed for 334 patients: mean score was 0.80&plusmn;0.17 (minimum 0.1 to maximum 1). Younger patients presented higher scores than older ones (p&lt;0.001). Adherence was assessed for 331 patients: levels were high, medium and low for 58%, 31.4% and 10.6% of them, respectively. Women presented higher adherence than men (p=0.01). Neither oral anticoagulant type (VKA or DOAC) nor characteristics of educational sessions presented significant association with skills or adherence.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Our programme educated a large number of patients and seems to fit with VKAs and DOACs. Improvement areas could be to increase patient assessment and to reinforce education of elderly patients.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Leclerc, E., Cavagna, P., Cuquel, A.-C., Chung, C., Gauthier, V., Lastennet, D., Fernandez, C., Brito, E., Cohen, A., Antignac, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-23T00:47:05-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004372</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2024-004372</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 4: Clinical Pharmacy Services]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Nine years experience of an educational programme for patients treated with oral anticoagulants in a cardiology department]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>117</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>125</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/2/126?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The FUSION Study: compatibility of antibiotics with commonly used medication infusions in a paediatric intensive care unit]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/2/126?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Beta-lactams and vancomycin often require extended or continuous infusion strategies for antibiotic optimisation in the paediatric intensive care unit (PICU). Simultaneous administration of multiple drugs through a single lumen via a Y-site connector is utilised with uncertainty due to limited intravenous access and the common need for sedative-analgesic infusions in critical illness. The compatibility data supporting antibiotics and sedative-analgesics co-administration is lacking. This study describes the physicochemical compatibility between antibiotics and sedative-analgesics commonly prescribed in the PICU.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Admixtures of cefotaxime, meropenem, piperacillin-tazobactam and vancomycin with fentanyl, midazolam and morphine were examined for physicochemical compatibility at 6 hours after mixing. Fifty drug combinations at different nominal concentrations and two mixing ratios were analysed in triplicates against standards set out by the UK National Health Service Yellow Cover Document and the European Pharmacopoeia. Physical compatibility was assessed by visual inspection and subvisible particle counting, and chemical compatibility using pH measurements and content by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography. Deviation of drug concentrations after mixing (assayed vs nominal) within 10% was defined as chemically compatible. Overall compatibility was described as &lsquo;compatible&rsquo; when all criteria were met, and as &lsquo;incompatible&rsquo; when at least one criterion was not met.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Y-site compatibility was demonstrated across all concentrations of fentanyl (10 to 50 &mu;g/mL) and morphine (0.1 to 1 mg/mL) with the study antibiotics. Concentration-dependent compatibility of midazolam with cefotaxime, meropenem and piperacillin-tazobactam was observed. Compatibility was exhibited at a midazolam concentration of 0.2 mg/mL but not at concentrations of 1 and 2.5 mg/L. Vancomycin was compatible across the midazolam concentration range.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This study describes the favourable compatibility of fentanyl, morphine and vancomycin admixtures with the study drugs. It highlights the incompatibility of midazolam when co-infused with beta-lactam antibiotics. Clinicians must exercise caution when co-administering prolonged infusions of antibiotics to minimise the risk of antibiotic ineffectiveness.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tu, Q., Won, H., Sime, F. B., Raman, S., Cotta, M. O., Wallis, S. C., Marjanovic, D., Stacey, S., Schlapbach, L., Roberts, J. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-23T00:47:05-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004450</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2024-004450</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The FUSION Study: compatibility of antibiotics with commonly used medication infusions in a paediatric intensive care unit]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>126</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>136</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/2/137?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Exposure to potentially harmful excipients in neonates admitted to intensive care units using compounded medicines]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/2/137?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Compounding allows the use of medicines in paediatric patients that are not always available in appropriate dosages. Some of the commonly used excipients have been associated with toxicity events in neonates.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To evaluate the exposure to potentially harmful excipients (PHEs) in neonates using compounded medicines and admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) of a university hospital in Portugal.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Observational study with neonates using the 10 most prescribed compounded liquid oral medicines with a PHE in a hospital NICU. The daily intake of excipients listed in the European Study of Neonatal Exposure to Excipients (ESNEE) was calculated in NICU newborns (September 2019 to August 2020) by summing the daily dose of excipients in the compounded and all commercial medicines prescribed (Ethics CHUSJ CE-OP84-2021).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>65 neonates used the 10 most prescribed compounded medicines containing a PHE. These neonates had 629 prescriptions, with 139 containing at least 1 PHE (31 different compounded or commercial medicines), resulting in 241 exposures to an ESNEE PHE: 125 propylparaben (89.9% of the prescriptions), 98 propylene glycol (70.5%), 6 benzyl alcohol (4.3%), 5 ethanol (3.6%), 4 sodium benzoate (2.9%), 2 sorbitol (1.4%) and 1 polysorbate 80 (0.7%). Excessive daily intakes of propylene glycol were found in 49 newborns (75.4%), followed by benzyl alcohol in 5 newborns (7.7%). One neonate was exposed to an excessive amount of 5 ESNEE PHEs and 2 other neonates to 3 ESNEE PHEs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The frequent use of PHEs in compounded medicines for neonates was identified, and neonates were exposed to PHEs exceeding the maximum recommended daily intake. Propylene glycol was the excipient most associated with these events.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barbosa, R., Sampaio, C., Sousa, L., Fraga, S., Soares, P., Baltazar, F., Fernandez-Llimos, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-23T00:47:05-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004340</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2024-004340</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 3: Production and Compounding]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Exposure to potentially harmful excipients in neonates admitted to intensive care units using compounded medicines]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>137</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>141</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/2/142?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Paracetamol loading dose administration in children: a retrospective study]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/2/142?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To determine the extent to which recommended paracetamol loading doses are administered in an academic paediatric hospital and to determine whether paracetamol loading doses are necessary to achieve the therapeutic target concentration of 10 mg/L in (pre)term neonates and children.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A retrospective study was performed including (pre)term neonates and children who were hospitalised between 1 January 2023 and 1 January 2024 and received at least one dose of intravenous or rectal paracetamol. The number of treatments with and without a paracetamol loading dose was evaluated. Pharmacokinetic simulations were performed to determine the effect of the loading dose on paracetamol steady-state concentrations (C<SUB>ss</SUB>).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>We included 911 intravenous and 1402 rectal treatment periods, with loading doses administered in 21% and 1% of the cases, respectively. Pharmacokinetic simulations show that an intravenous or rectal loading dose reaches C<SUB>ss</SUB> concentrations within the first dose, while without a loading dose, C<SUB>ss</SUB> is only reached after 12 hours for intravenous and 18 hours for rectal administration.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Our results indicate that in most cases, paracetamol loading doses are not administered in an academic paediatric hospital, which will strongly delay paracetamol C<SUB>ss</SUB>. We conclude that the treatment of (pre)term neonates and children with paracetamol can and should be improved.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[de Groot, A. D. E., van der Wagt, M. A. J., Punt, N. C., Touw, D. J., Verkade, H. J., Mian, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-23T00:47:05-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004496</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004496</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 1: Introductory Statements and Governance]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Paracetamol loading dose administration in children: a retrospective study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>142</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>148</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/2/149?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Involvement of the hospital pharmacist in securing the chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell circuit]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/2/149?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>The introduction of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapies to the Belgian market represents a major revolution in patient treatment but also poses a challenge for hospitals to adapt. The medicinal status of CAR-T cells means that hospital pharmacists are legally responsible for managing this drug. In Belgium, due to infrastructure and expertise barriers, the hospital pharmacist&rsquo;s responsibilities are often delegated to the cell therapy units in many hospitals. This delegation of tasks effectively excludes the hospital pharmacist from the CAR-T cell circuit.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>The aim of the study was to measure the impact of the hospital pharmacist in securing the CAR-T cell circuit using the Failure Mode, Effects and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) method.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The process map and FMECA were performed by a multidisciplinary team. Criticality indices were calculated before and after the implementation of corrective and preventive actions by the hospital pharmacist.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The FMECA identified 114 failure modes. Thirteen (11.5%) failure modes were assessed as high criticality, 47 (41.23%) as moderate criticality and 54 (47.8%) as low criticality. The most critical stages highlighted by this study are pharmacovigilance and tarification. The hospital pharmacy played a central role in ensuring the safety of the circuit, being involved in the implementation of 28 corrective and preventive actions, which represent 53% of the FMECA actions. These actions led to a 77% reduction in high-criticality failure modes and a 49% reduction in moderate-criticality failure modes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This study enabled us to identify the potential risks of the CAR-T cell circuit at the Jules Bordet Institute. The hospital pharmacy was involved in resolving 54% (62/114) of the failure modes. This confirms the hospital pharmacist&rsquo;s central role in ensuring the safety of the CAR-T cell circuit.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bryla, A., Lorent, S., Vervacke, A., Scolas, G., Alexandre, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-23T00:47:05-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004454</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2024-004454</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 5: Patient Safety and Quality Assurance]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Involvement of the hospital pharmacist in securing the chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell circuit]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>149</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>153</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/2/154?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Development and validation of a feasible questionnaire to assess pharmacists attitudes to documenting and classifying pharmaceutical interventions in hospital settings]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/2/154?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Significant efforts have been directed towards systematically documenting and classifying pharmacist interventions (PIs), generating relevant data for professionals&rsquo; practice and improving the quality of patient care and health outcomes. However, the paucity of PI evaluation tools hinders data generation, harmonisation and sensible application.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>This study aimed to develop and validate a comprehensive questionnaire to assess pharmacists&rsquo; opinions and practices concerning documenting and classifying PIs in Portuguese hospital settings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>The tool development underwent face, content, construct validity procedures and scale reliability calculations grounded in the attitudinal framework. An exploration of the instrument dimensionally was accomplished through factor analysis. Face validity, content validity, construct validity and scale reliability were the selected validation parameters.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Result</st>
<p>A 37-item scale was developed comprising an initial sociodemographic section (8 items) and three explanatory attitudinal-based domains: Cognitive (6 items), Behavioural (14 items), and Affective (9 items). The scale showed adequate overall psychometric properties. Within the Affective domain, factor analysis revealed three latent explanatory factors: Process (4 items), Outcome (3 items) and Satisfaction (2 items).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This newly developed tool can contribute to assessing pharmacists&rsquo; perspectives and routines in documenting and classifying PIs within hospital environments.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Machado, S., Falcao, F., Cavaco, A. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-23T00:47:05-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004371</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2024-004371</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 4: Clinical Pharmacy Services]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Development and validation of a feasible questionnaire to assess pharmacists attitudes to documenting and classifying pharmaceutical interventions in hospital settings]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>154</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>159</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/2/160?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Implementation of pharmaceutical infusion management to reduce incompatibilities and fluid overload: a retrospective observational study in a paediatric intensive care unit]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/2/160?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Fluid overload is associated with increased morbidity in patients in paediatric intensive care units (PICUs). This study aimed to evaluate pharmaceutical infusion management as a quality assurance measure to reduce fluid overload in routine paediatric intensive care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>This was a retrospective observational study in a PICU with two periods: a control period and a period after the implementation of pharmaceutical infusion management (PharmInfuManagement period). Pharmaceutical infusion management consisted of two components carried out simultaneously: the creation of flushing schedules to reduce incompatibilities and flushing volume and the reduction of dilution volume for six non-continuous intravenous (IV) drugs to reduce fluid intake because of IV drugs. The primary outcome was the number of patients with &ge;5% fluid overload. In addition, daily furosemide dose (mg/kg/day), non-continuous IV drug volume (mL/kg/day), flushing volume (mL/kg/day) and number of incompatibilities were evaluated.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Sixty-six patients were included in each period. Fluid overload of &ge;5% occurred in 52% of patients in the control period and in 29% of patients in the PharmInfuManagement period (p=0.01). Flushing volume decreased from 0.7 mL/kg/day (median Q25/Q75 0.4/1.4) to 0.3 mL/kg/day (median Q25/Q75 0.1/0.7) (p&lt;0.001) after implementation. During the PharmInfuManagement period, potentially incompatible drug combinations were reduced from 17.1% (86/504) to 8.2% (43/523) (p&lt;0.001). The volume required for reconstitution and dilution of non-continuously administered IV drugs was reduced from 8.8 mL/kg/day (median Q25/Q75 7.1/12.6) to 6.8 mL/kg/day (median Q25/Q75 5.5/8.0) (p=0.02).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Pharmaceutical infusion management reduces incompatibilities and fluid overload in PICU patients.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kleinlein, M., Stuebinger, K., Hoeckel, M., Neininger, M. P., Bertsche, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-23T00:47:05-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004492</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004492</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 4: Clinical Pharmacy Services]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Implementation of pharmaceutical infusion management to reduce incompatibilities and fluid overload: a retrospective observational study in a paediatric intensive care unit]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>160</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>165</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/2/166?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Patient experience in healthcare interventions: PROM and PREM evaluation in patients with multiple sclerosis after switching administration route of natalizumab]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/2/166?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Natalizumab is a disease-modifying drug approved for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. It is available as vials for intravenous administration and in 2021 was approved as syringes for the subcutaneous route; both have to be administered in a daycare unit in the hospital. Some studies have addressed the cost-effectiveness of changing the route of administration from intravenous to subcutaneous, but the Patient Reported Outcomes Measures (PROMs) and Patient Reported Experience Measures (PREMs) regarding this change have not yet been studied. The objective of this work is to assess switching from the intravenous route to the subcutaneous route in our centre through the evaluation of PROMs and PREMs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>An implementation study was conducted to evaluate the PROMs and PREMs of patients after changing the route of administration of natalizumab from intravenous to subcutaneous. An ad hoc questionnaire was developed, in consensus with the neurology team, which was performed by telephone to patients who agreed to participate in the study. The questionnaire was divided into three fields: pain during administration for both routes, patient satisfaction and adverse events of subcutaneous administration.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Forty-seven patients participated in the study. They reported greater pain with subcutaneous administration, but no patient defined it as unbearable. The subcutaneous route was preferred by 97.9% of patients, who stated that this route of administration was less time consuming than the intravenous route. Regarding adverse events, 94.5% patients reported none, and itching was the most common local adverse event reported (29.8%).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This is a novel experience in our setting of collaboration between pharmacy and neurology services to implement PROMs and PREMs in the evaluation of a health intervention. Patients expressed satisfaction with changing the route of administration of natalizumab. This study has enabled us to detect interventions to use to achieve a better patient experience.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fernandez-Cuerva, C., Linares-Alarcon, A., Morales Lara, M. J., Alonso Torres, A. M., Reyes-Garrido, V., Urbaneja, P., Sanchez-Guijo Benavente, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-23T00:47:05-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004378</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2024-004378</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 4: Clinical Pharmacy Services]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Patient experience in healthcare interventions: PROM and PREM evaluation in patients with multiple sclerosis after switching administration route of natalizumab]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>166</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>170</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/2/171?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Physical compatibility of ceftazidime-avibactam with selected intravenous antimicrobials in simulated Y-site administration]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/2/171?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the physical compatibility of ceftazidime-avibactam with selected intravenous antimicrobials during simulated Y-site administration.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Ceftazidime-avibactam (25 mg/mL) was mixed with select intravenous antimicrobials (tigecycline, metronidazole, meropenem, imipenem and cilastatin, fosfomycin, aztreonam and vancomycin) at an equal volume and evaluated using simulated Y-sites. Each admixture was evaluated immediately (0 hour) and after 1, 2, and 4 hours at room temperature (approximately 22&deg;C) for visual characteristics, Tyndall beam, turbidity, pH, spectroscopic absorption of 550 nm and particle counts. If an admixture failed any one of these six assessments, it was considered incompatible.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>No evidence of incompatibility was observed between the combinations of ceftazidime-avibactam and the seven intravenous antimicrobials in simulated Y-site experiments.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Ceftazidime-avibactam was physically compatible with the selected intravenous antimicrobials (tigecycline, metronidazole, meropenem, imipenem and cilastatin, fosfomycin, aztreonam and vancomycin) in simulated Y-site administration.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chen, F., Ding, H., Liu, S., Chen, Z., Tang, L., Tong, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-23T00:47:05-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004358</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2024-004358</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 3: Production and Compounding]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Physical compatibility of ceftazidime-avibactam with selected intravenous antimicrobials in simulated Y-site administration]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>171</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>175</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/2/176?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Organisational impact of in vivo gene therapies at two French injection centres]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/2/176?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>The aim of this study was to estimate the main hospital organisational impacts of in vivo gene therapy medicine (GTM) deployment, experienced during clinical trials, with a focus on hospital pharmacy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Interviews were performed with 11 healthcare professionals involved in three clinical trials, as was an active field observation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Interviews showed high impact for the management of hospital beds and human resources. Moderate impact concerned facilities/equipment, coordination between stakeholders and training/software. The total cumulative working time of the pharmacy staff, estimated at 11.12 and 11.67 hours in the two centres for a single GTM, has been identified as the main limiting factor for the pharmacy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This study showed that major organisational impacts of in vivo GTMs in injection centres concern hospital bed and pharmaceutical staff management, rather than technical and operational aspects. Overall, no more than 150 GTMs could be prepared each year by one pharmacist and one technician.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Auvity, S., Bienvenot, F., Pallard, F., Mammar, N., Famelart, V., Rudant, J., Cormier, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-23T00:47:05-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004370</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2024-004370</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Editor''s choice, EAHP Statement 3: Production and Compounding]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Organisational impact of in vivo gene therapies at two French injection centres]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Short report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>176</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>179</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/2/180?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A single harmonised pharmacy process to improve clinical trial set-up times]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/2/180?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The UK has fallen from fourth to 10th place in the global ranking for clinical trial activities in the past 6 years. Due to the limited capacity of the clinical trial pharmacy workforce and delays in providing pharmacy approvals, pharmacy has been identified as one of the constraining services that delays the set-up and delivery of clinical trials. To tackle this problem, we developed a single pharmacy review process for multicentre trials across Greater Manchester (GM) and tested its feasibility and implementation in our region. A survey completed by each GM Trust suggests that this harmonised pharmacy review process for multicentre studies would expedite trial set-up time at each pharmacy site and standardise the pharmacy review process in GM. We therefore believe that this harmonised review process could potentially reduce pharmacy set-up time and reposition the UK in the global market for clinical trials.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lettieri, M., Boydell, S., Chivu, A., Fallon, S., Ustianowski, A., Cien, M., Cole, C., Burgess, S., Davies, C., Keatley, C., Peers, A.-M., Syme, M., Sutton, D., Hermitage, N., Sutherland, L., Beecroft, M., Aghabeigi, A., Duran Jimenez, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-23T00:47:05-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004215</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2024-004215</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 4: Clinical Pharmacy Services]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A single harmonised pharmacy process to improve clinical trial set-up times]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Short report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>180</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>182</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/2/183?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Drugs associated with tachyphylaxis: results from a retrospective pharmacovigilance study using disproportionality analysis]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/2/183?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Tachyphylaxis is the rapid development of drug tolerance following repeated administration.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To evaluate the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (USFDA AERS) data for drugs significantly associated with tachyphylaxis using disproportionality analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Disproportionality analysis was used for detecting safety signals for identifying drugs associated with tachyphylaxis. Frequentist and Bayesian statistical methods were employed to detect signals, identifying anesthetics, immunosuppressants, antineoplastics, and psychoactive drugs with positive associations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Data from 29,153,222 reports between 2004 and 2024 were examined, and 242 reports of tachyphylaxis included. Tachyphylaxis was observed with corticosteroids, opioids, antihistamines, psycholeptics, nitroglycerin, antineoplastics, immunosuppressants, sympathomimetics, psychoanaleptics and psycholeptics that are well documented. Tachyphylaxis was also observed with propofol, cisatracurium, oxcarbazepine, and cabergoline emphasizing the need for further investigation. Hospitalization was reported in 16.9% of cases, with 5% leading to disability and 2.5% resulting in death.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>While this study provides valuable insights into drug-related tachyphylaxis, limitations such as underreporting and lack of detailed clinical context exist. Future research should focus on understanding underlying mechanisms and developing strategies to mitigate tachyphylaxis in long-term treatments.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sridharan, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-23T00:47:05-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004353</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2024-004353</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Drugs associated with tachyphylaxis: results from a retrospective pharmacovigilance study using disproportionality analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Short report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>183</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>186</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/2/187?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Pharmacotherapy of carbamazepine-treated patient after bariatric surgery: a complex interplay between altered absorption and drug-drug interactions]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/2/187?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Changes in absorption and bioavailability of drugs have been described after bariatric surgery, especially shortly after the procedure. When a significant drug&ndash;drug interaction also occurs, it is difficult to predict the final combined effect of the surgery and the interaction. In this article, we present a case report of a patient with chronic psychiatric poly-medication including carbamazepine, a strong cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) inducer. Significant changes in serum drug concentrations were observed during the 6 months after the surgery, including increased levels of quetiapine and trazodone, that cannot be attributed to the post-surgical alteration of absorption from the gastrointestinal tract. The influence of fluctuating carbamazepine levels on concomitant medication seemed to outweigh the effect of reduced absorption after surgery. This report highlights the need for careful pre-surgical evaluation of the patient&rsquo;s pharmacotherapy and pre- and post-operative therapeutic drug monitoring to prevent destabilisation of chronic conditions.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pilkova, A., Hartinger, J., Slanar, O., Matoulek, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-23T00:47:05-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004236</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2024-004236</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Pharmacotherapy of carbamazepine-treated patient after bariatric surgery: a complex interplay between altered absorption and drug-drug interactions]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Case report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>187</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>190</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/2/191?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Taking care of caregivers: enhancing proper medication management for palliative care children with polypharmacy]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/2/191?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mengato, D., Zanin, A., Russello, S., Baratiri, F., Roverato, B., Realdon, N., Benini, F., Venturini, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-23T00:47:05-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004282</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2024-004282</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Taking care of caregivers: enhancing proper medication management for palliative care children with polypharmacy]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>PostScript</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>191</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>191</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/2/192?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Retrospective service evaluation of clinical pharmacist involvement in a critical care COVID-19 rehabilitation clinic]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/2/192?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sapsford, D., Dufton, H., Trivedi, M., McPeake, J., Conway Morris, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-23T00:47:05-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004396</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2024-004396</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[COVID-19]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Retrospective service evaluation of clinical pharmacist involvement in a critical care COVID-19 rehabilitation clinic]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>PostScript</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>192</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>193</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/2/193?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Pharmacist-led patient education improves medication self-management and adherence in chronic hepatitis D virus patients: insights from the EXPLAIN project]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/2/193?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mengato, D., Trivellato, S., Pedrolo, C., Russo, F. P., Venturini, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-23T00:47:05-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004170</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2024-004170</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Pharmacist-led patient education improves medication self-management and adherence in chronic hepatitis D virus patients: insights from the EXPLAIN project]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>PostScript</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>193</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>195</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/2/193-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Adverse drug reactions in paediatric age: analysis of spontaneous reports and reasons for under-reporting in a Local Health Unit in Veneto region]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/2/193-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Draghi, E., De Rossi, V., Gallo, U., Bertin, R., Bano, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-23T00:47:05-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004335</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2024-004335</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Adverse drug reactions in paediatric age: analysis of spontaneous reports and reasons for under-reporting in a Local Health Unit in Veneto region]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>PostScript</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>193</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>193</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/2/195?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Clinical and economic benefits of expanded access programs: should we strengthen these pharmacist-led initiatives?]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/2/195?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mezza, M., Brunoro, R., Iadicicco, G., Miscio, M., Mengato, D., Gregori, D., Venturini, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-23T00:47:05-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004258</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2024-004258</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Clinical and economic benefits of expanded access programs: should we strengthen these pharmacist-led initiatives?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>PostScript</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>195</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>196</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/2/195-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Appropriate therapeutic drug monitoring of vancomycin improves outcomes of patients with bacterial infection in ICU]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/2/195-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zhou, X., Ji, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-23T00:47:05-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004299</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2024-004299</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Appropriate therapeutic drug monitoring of vancomycin improves outcomes of patients with bacterial infection in ICU]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>PostScript</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>195</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>195</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/1/1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Is one enough?]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/1/1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wiffen, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-23T00:45:26-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004876</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004876</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Is one enough?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Editorial</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>1</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/1/2?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cardiovascular events in EGFR-mutation non-small-cell lung cancer patients on osimertinib]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/1/2?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>There have been cases of cardiotoxicity induced by osimertinib in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, limited data exist for a comprehensive cardiotoxicity profile analysis for osimertinib use in NSCLC patients. The aim of this study was to report the entire profile of cardiotoxicities after the initiation of osimertinib in consecutive patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation at a single health system.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The data were retrospectively collected from electronic medical records for all patients who were started on osimertinib for NSCLC at West Virginia University Health System. Prevalence of heart failure (HF), atrial fibrillation, and prolonged QT before and after starting osimertinib were calculated.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>This study had 116 participants and the median age was 72 years. The frequency of each new cardiotoxicity was between 6% and 9%, and the overall percentage of patients who had developed any of the four cardiotoxicities while on osimertinib was 19.9%. The median time of follow-up was 477 days and the median time on osimertinib for all patients was 390 days. The strongest risk factor in predicting a new onset cardiac event was hypertension with a hazard ratio (HR) of 6.35 (confidence interval (CI) 1.48 to 27.23, p=0.013) and HR 5.36 (CI 1.23 to 23.39, p=0.025) in univariate and multivariate analysis respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Osimertinib appears to be associated with an increase in cardiac abnormalities. Given the association between this medication exposure and the observed cardiac toxicities, use of osimertinib may entail closer cardiac monitoring of electrocardiogram (ECG) and echocardiogram abnormalities.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mensah, S. A., Ahmad, S., Alruwaili, W., Raval, R., Gonuguntla, K., Patel, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-23T00:45:26-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004319</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2024-004319</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 5: Patient Safety and Quality Assurance]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cardiovascular events in EGFR-mutation non-small-cell lung cancer patients on osimertinib]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>2</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>6</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/1/7?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Improve quality of care in hospital-at-home by implementing medication reconciliation on admission: a retrospective observational study]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/1/7?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Medication reconciliation (MR) has been identified by the French High Health Authority (HHA) as an advanced criterion for improving the quality of care. Although this activity has been widely developed and evaluated in conventional establishments, few studies have looked at its implementation in &lsquo;hospitalisation at home&rsquo; (HAH) settings. HAH is considered to be an alternative to conventional hospitalisation that requires slight changes to be made to the medication process, such as the prominent role of the patient and their caregivers, the intermittent presence of numerous members of multidisciplinary staff in the home environment, and the patient&rsquo;s own home. So, this study aims to provide an overview of the implementation of MR in our HAH using activity indicators, and to measure the clinical impact of the pharmaceutical procedures carried out as part of this activity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A retrospective observational study was conducted. A process and MR materials were developed based on HHA tools. The clinical impact of the pharmaceutical procedure was determined using the Clinical Economic and Organisational (CLEO) scale.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>29 patients benefited from MR on admission, carried out by a pharmacy intern with a pharmacy assistant. A total of 38 unintentional discrepancies were identified. The average number of unintentional discrepancies per patient with at least one unintentional discrepancy in their MR was 2.1. The mean time to complete MR was 2.5 hours. 30 (79%) pharmaceutical procedures were accepted by the clinicians, of which 6 (20%) were considered to have a major clinical impact.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>MR for hospitalised patients at home is valuable to ensure safe medication management at this stage of the care pathway. Despite the small sample size of our study, each pharmaceutical procedure has a significant clinical impact. This activity contributed to the certification of our home care facility by the French HHA.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Billotte, J., Ramambason, C., Marquet, D., Foucault-Fruchard, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-23T00:45:26-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004326</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2024-004326</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 4: Clinical Pharmacy Services]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Improve quality of care in hospital-at-home by implementing medication reconciliation on admission: a retrospective observational study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>7</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>12</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/1/13?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[K-means clustering to identify high risk of early revisits in patients with drug-related problems attending the emergency department]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/1/13?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Drug-related problems (DRPs) are a frequent reason for visits to the emergency department (ED). However, data about the characteristics associated with early revisits are limited. We aimed to identify clinical phenotype clusters of patients admitted to emergency rooms due DRPs to identify those patients with the highest risk of new visits.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We included consecutive patients admitted to EDs due DRPs (February 2021 to December 2022), including DRP admissions in 2023 as validation cohort. We employed K-means clustering to group patients according to adjusted morbidity groups (GMA), age, and number of drugs at admission. To determine the optimal number of cluster centres, we used the elbow method. The impact of 30-day revisits in each cluster was assessed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>1611 patients (mean (SD) age 75.0 (15.1) years) were included. We identified six clusters, with 30-day revisits rates ranging from 14.8% to 24.5%. The main groups of drugs implicated in the DRP episodes were diuretics (190 patients; 11.8%). The most common DRP diagnoses were constipation (191; 11.9%) and gastrointestinal bleeding (158; 9.8%). Six clusters of patients were identified. Significantly higher 30-day revisits in patients identified in cluster 4 (24.5% vs 17.5%; p=0.007). The highest revisit rate was observed in the cluster including patients with a higher number of drugs and GMA status.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Patients admitted to the ED due DRPs exhibit varying revisit rates across different clinical phenotypes. K-means clustering aids in identifying patients who derive the greatest rates of readmission, and is a useful tool to prioritise interventions in these units.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ruiz-Ramos, J., Plaza-Diaz, A., Puig-Campmany, M., Sampol-Mayol, C., Blazquez-Andion, M., Serrano-Garcia-Calvo, A., Sanz-Lopez, N., Acebes-Roldan, X., Juanes-Borrego, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-23T00:45:26-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004414</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2024-004414</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 5: Patient Safety and Quality Assurance]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[K-means clustering to identify high risk of early revisits in patients with drug-related problems attending the emergency department]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>13</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>18</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/1/19?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Ceftaroline combination therapy for methicillin resistant coagulase negative Staphylococcus bacteraemia and endocarditis]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/1/19?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>We report our experience with the use of ceftaroline in combination with daptomycin or vancomycin for methicillin resistant coagulase negative <I>Staphylococcus</I> bacteraemia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A multicentre retrospective study was carried out at three institutions of adult patients with methicillin resistant <I>S. epidermidis</I> or <I>S. lugdunensis</I> bacteraemia who were managed with either daptomycin or vancomycin in combination with ceftaroline.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Twelve patients met the inclusion criteria. All patients who received combination therapy had sterile blood cultures on the subsequent blood cultures drawn following ceftaroline initiation. Those who received ceftaroline combination within 7 days had a faster time to blood culture sterilisation than those who received ceftaroline combination therapy after 7 days (6 (3&ndash;7) days vs 17 (12&ndash;19) days, p=0.031).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The results from this case series support the use of ceftaroline combination therapy in patients with methicillin resistant coagulase negative <I>Staphylococcus</I> bacteraemia whose blood cultures failed to sterilise with vancomycin or daptomycin alone.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shah, S., Clarke, L., Padival, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-23T00:45:26-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004334</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2024-004334</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 1: Introductory Statements and Governance]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Ceftaroline combination therapy for methicillin resistant coagulase negative Staphylococcus bacteraemia and endocarditis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Short report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>19</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>21</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/1/22?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescriptions identified using screening tools in paediatric patients: a systematic review]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/1/22?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Inappropriate prescriptions are known to cause medication-related problems, but little is known about the prevalence of this issue in paediatric patients. This systematic review provides an overview of the prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescriptions identified through tools developed for the paediatric population and delineates the strengths and limitations of the identification tools.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Literature from PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane database and Google Scholar was searched with a combination of medical subject headings (MeSH) and free-text terms related to inappropriate prescriptions, paediatrics and potentially inappropriate prescription tools. Studies reported in English and published from inception of the databases until May 2023 were selected based on fulfilment of eligibility criteria. All eligible articles were assessed for methodological quality and examined using thematic analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria. The majority of the studies were of high quality. Four themes emerged&mdash;namely, evaluation tools and calculation methods of inappropriate prescriptions, prevalence of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) and potential prescribing omissions (PPOs), and predictors of PIM and PPO in children. Among the nine tools identified, the original and modified version of the POPI tool was most commonly used. The prevalence of PIM and PPO ranged from 0.04% to 69% and from 1.5% to 55.9%, respectively. Age was the most common predictor reported, whereby PIMs and PPOs were more likely in children aged 2&ndash;6 and 6&ndash;12 years, respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Potentially inappropriate prescriptions in paediatric patients is highly prevalent, despite the wide variation in the reported prevalence range and limited implementation of the available tools in practice. Future efforts need to be focused on the development and implementation of age-, disease- or country-specific tools to effectively evaluate and further determine the economic impact of PIMs in children.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Balan, S., Ibrahim, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-23T00:45:26-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004169</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2024-004169</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Editor''s choice, EAHP Statement 4: Clinical Pharmacy Services]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescriptions identified using screening tools in paediatric patients: a systematic review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Systematic review</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>22</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>28</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/1/29?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Use of design thinking to develop a benchmarking tool to assess documentation procedures in a hospital pharmacy aseptic compounding unit: a case study]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/1/29?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This paper combines the concepts of design thinking and benchmarking in an aseptic manufacturing context. Design thinking is a problem-solving approach that aims to understand user needs, generate ideas, prototypes and test solutions. There are no published examples in the Irish healthcare setting. There are also no national legislative frameworks in Ireland for compounding medicine in unlicensed hospital aseptic compounding units (ACUs). This study aims to apply design thinking principles to the development of a benchmarking process in the absence of existing frameworks.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A literature review of design thinking research and international best practice guidelines regarding sterile product manufacture documentation was undertaken to develop an initial prototype benchmarking tool. Design thinking principles were implemented by recruiting and empathising with key senior stakeholders (N=5). Semistructured interviews were conducted with these stakeholders to aid the defining, ideation and optimisation of the prototype tool. The optimised tool was then prototyped and tested in practice by end users (N=11), within an Irish ACU. End users were interviewed regarding their experience of using the tool. Transcripts of interviews were coded, and thematic analysis was undertaken to generate overarching themes to support its further development.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The design thinking approach enabled the development of a benchmarking tool, which was optimised by empathising with key stakeholders. Through the process of empathising, defining, ideation, prototyping and testing, a useful benchmarking tool was developed which was deemed appropriate and accepted by its users.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Design thinking provides a platform for collaboration to deliver innovation and drive quality improvement in healthcare settings. The design thinking process was successful in delivering a user-centred tool for documentation procedures in an aseptic unit, which was accepted for use by end users. When exisiting guidleines and regulations are considered, design thinking shows promise as an innovation tool in Irish aseptic units, manufacturing facilities and the wider healthcare context.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Murphy, N., Garvey, E., Naughton, B. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-23T00:45:26-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004178</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2024-004178</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 3: Production and Compounding]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Use of design thinking to develop a benchmarking tool to assess documentation procedures in a hospital pharmacy aseptic compounding unit: a case study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>29</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>36</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/1/37?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Monitoring of occupational exposure to hazardous medicinal products in robotic compounding]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/1/37?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>This study aims to evaluate the risk of occupational exposure to hazardous medicinal products (HMPs) when utilising robotic compounding systems for the preparation of antineoplastic sterile medications. Specifically, it assesses the levels of HMPs present on the surfaces of ready-to-use preparations and on the gloves worn by personnel involved in the compounding process.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The study was conducted over three consecutive days during routine production with a robotic compounding system. Each day, wipe samples were collected from the surfaces of 20 HMPs preparations and from the gloves of the operator involved in the compounding process. Analyses were performed using an Ultra-High Performance Liquid Chromatography (UHPLC) system to detect and quantify 25 commonly used anticancer molecules in hospital pharmacies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Throughout the study, the robot compounded 60 bags of 19 different drugs, including 5-fluorouracil, bevacizumab, carboplatin, cisplatin, cyclophosphamide, docetaxel, doxorubicin, eribulin, etoposide, gemcitabine, irinotecan, nivolumab, oxaliplatin, paclitaxel, panitumumab, pembrolizumab, pemetrexed, trastuzumab, and vinorelbine. Only negligible amounts of gemcitabine, below the quantification limit (&lt;0.0025 ng/cm&sup2;), were detected on the surfaces of 10 out of the 60 bags and on two of the operator&rsquo;s gloves.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The results demonstrate that surface contamination levels of HMPs in robotic compounding are exceedingly low and, in most cases, undetectable. Occupational exposure to HMPs remains consistently below 0.1 ng/cm<sup>2</sup>, a threshold deemed safe according to various studies. These findings assure the safety of compounding personnel and other hospital staff involved in cancer treatment.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Riestra, A. C., Urretavizcaya, M., Ferro Uriguen, A., Olariaga Sarasola, O., Iglesias, A., Camba, Y., Asensio Bermejo, A., Tames, M. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-23T00:45:26-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004294</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2024-004294</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 3: Production and Compounding]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Monitoring of occupational exposure to hazardous medicinal products in robotic compounding]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>37</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>44</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/1/45?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Influence of volume and citrate on perceived pain in patients treated with adalimumab]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/1/45?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) are a group of disorders characterised by acute or chronic inflammation. Adalimumab and infliximab are the cornerstones of their pharmacotherapy. This study aimed to determine whether variations in the volume and citrate content of different subcutaneous adalimumab formulations result in differences in pain perception during administration.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A retrospective, cross-cohort study was conducted. Patients who had experienced a change in subcutaneous adalimumab formulation in the past year were recruited. Pain perception was evaluated using a visual analogue scale ranging from 1 to 10 points. Patients were assigned to three groups based on the type of formulation change they experienced: reduction in citrate and volume, reduction in volume only or reduction in citrate only. Data were analysed via ANOVA to determine if there were differences in perceived pain among the three patient groups.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 68 patients were included, of whom 39 (57.4%) experienced a reduction in both volume and citrate, 20 (29.4%) experienced only a reduction in volume and 9 (13.2%) experienced only a reduction in citrate. Analysis showed that all three groups experienced a reduction in perceived pain during administration: 2.46&plusmn;0.24, 0.3&plusmn;0.57 and 0.66&plusmn;1.11 points, respectively (p&lt;0.001).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Our results show that in all three scenarios, perceived pain was reduced. If both volume and citrate are reduced, this effect is greater. Therefore, it is recommended to use formulations with the lowest citrate buffer concentration and the lowest possible volume to minimise pain during adalimumab administration.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Misa-Garcia, A., Ferro-Rodriguez, S., Haro-Martin, L., Cavero-Redondo, I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-23T00:45:26-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004379</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2024-004379</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 5: Patient Safety and Quality Assurance]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Influence of volume and citrate on perceived pain in patients treated with adalimumab]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>45</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>49</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/1/50?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Evaluation of statin-induced muscle and liver adverse drug reactions in the Chinese population: a retrospective analysis of clinical trial data from 1992 to 2023]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/1/50?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study addressed the gaps in the disclosure of statin-associated adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in China&rsquo;s official database and the inadequacy of cases reported relative to the population size in public ADR databases.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>To address these limitations, we conducted a retrospective trial-based analysis using data from Chinese journals to comprehensively assess statin-associated ADRs from 1992 to 2023, focusing on liver (2895 studies, n = 163 810) and muscle (2888 studies, n = 161 714) related outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>For large sample size clinical trial analysis (n&ge;100), our analysis encompassed data from 31 763 participants for muscle-related ADRs (incidence rate: 0.004&ndash;0.006, common effect model; 0.002&ndash;0.006, random effects model) and 31 281 participants for liver-related ADRs (incidence rate: 0.004&ndash;0.006, common effect model; 0.003&ndash;0.006, random effects model), covering various statins, including atorvastatin, simvastatin, rosuvastatin, fluvastatin, pitavastatin, pravastatin and lovastatin. Notably, muscle-related ADRs, particularly rhabdomyolysis, were most prevalent with fluvastatin, lovastatin and pravastatin, showing rates of 0.90%, 0.74% and 0.53%, respectively. Pitavastatin and atorvastatin were frequently associated with liver-related ADRs such as abnormal liver function and elevated enzymes, with rates of 5.36% and 1.819%, respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This study underscores significant variations in ADR incidence among different statins in the Chinese population, providing critical insights for healthcare professionals and policymakers to enhance patient safety and optimise clinical decisions regarding statin therapy.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tsui, L., Wang, D., Fan, C., Huang, Y., Zhang, Z., Fang, Z., Xie, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-23T00:45:26-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004352</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2024-004352</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 5: Patient Safety and Quality Assurance]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Evaluation of statin-induced muscle and liver adverse drug reactions in the Chinese population: a retrospective analysis of clinical trial data from 1992 to 2023]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>50</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>55</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/1/56?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Adherence and persistence rates for antidiabetic treatments in type 2 diabetes: a real-world study in an Italian region]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/1/56?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Achieving glycaemic control is essential to avoid disease progression and diabetes-related complications. Non-adherence and discontinuity in diabetic therapy are major barriers to optimal glycaemic control. The aim of this study was to evaluate adherence, persistence and therapy switching over 1 year in real-life conditions in patients with type 2 diabetes within an Italian region.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A retrospective, observational, non-interventional study was conducted, analysing patients treated with Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) Classification A10B drugs dispensed by pharmacies under the local health authority (ASL) of the Umbria region from 1 January 2022 to 31 December 2023. Adherence was measured using the Proportion of Days Covered (PDC), while persistence was calculated as the duration between the start and end of therapy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 6928 patients with type 2 diabetes were analysed. After 1 year, the overall adherence rate was 0.78, with 58% (4017/6928) of patients having adherence greater than 0.80. The lowest adherence was observed in patients treated with metformin +dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) inhibitors, with a mean adherence of 0.71 and 36% (142/395) of patients achieving adherence greater than 0.80. Conversely, the highest adherence was seen in patients on sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, with a mean adherence of 0.91 and 97% (473/487) of patients achieving adherence greater than 0.80. Persistence data showed concerning results, with less than 10% of patients remaining on treatment for 1 year across all drug classes. Among patients initially treated with metformin (n=4427), there was a substantial loss to follow-up, with 3582 patients (81%) discontinuing treatment within the first year.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The 1 year data on adherence and persistence for antidiabetic drugs revealed concerning trends. These findings underscore the need for targeted interventions, involving clinicians and pharmacists, to improve adherence and persistence in patients with type 2 diabetes, ultimately ensuring better disease management and reducing long-term healthcare costs.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Romagnoli, A., Savoia, M., Papini, G., Caprodossi, A., Bartolini, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-23T00:45:26-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004383</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2024-004383</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 1: Introductory Statements and Governance]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Adherence and persistence rates for antidiabetic treatments in type 2 diabetes: a real-world study in an Italian region]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>56</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>61</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/1/62?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Development of a 50% (w/v) aluminium chloride hexahydrate solution as haemostatic agent]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/1/62?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Acceleration of the haemostasis process after dermatological surgery predominantly relies on mechanical methods, such as the use of sutures or staples. To our knowledge, there is currently no commercialised haemostatic agent for this specific application. Due to the protein precipitation properties of the 50% (w/v) aluminium chloride hexahydrate solution, its physicochemical stability and maintenance of sterility over a 6 month period were assessed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Aluminium chloride hexahydrate was dissolved in sterile water to obtain a 50% (w/v) solution, which was subsequently sterilised through filtration. The solution was then placed in brown glass vials and kept at 20&ndash;25&deg;C. The physicochemical stability and sterility of the solution were assessed at four different time points (D0, M1, M3 and M6). At each time point, pH and osmolality were measured, the chloride concentration of the sample was evaluated using the Mohr method, and aluminium identification was carried out through a precipitation method. In addition, the sterility of the solution was also assessed at each time point, according to the European Pharmacopoeia method.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The pH, osmolality and chloride concentration values remained stable and were concordant with the expected values throughout the study. Aluminium was identified in each sample. The sterility of the solution was maintained over the study period.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The physicochemical stability and sterility of the 50% (w/v) aluminium chloride hexahydrate solution were maintained for 6 months. These results indicate that the solution can be prepared in advance.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Briot, C., Cassier, P., Fredenucci, I., Ehmke, A., Durupt, F., Merienne, C., Briot, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-23T00:45:26-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004356</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2024-004356</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 3: Production and Compounding]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Development of a 50% (w/v) aluminium chloride hexahydrate solution as haemostatic agent]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>62</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>66</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/1/67?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Stability study of topotecan in ophthalmic prefilled syringes for intravitreal delivery]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/1/67?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Intravitreal and intracameral administration of melphalan and topotecan (TPT) has shown its efficacy in the treatment of retinoblastoma over the last few years. Due to rapid hydrolysis, melphalan must be administered within the hour following reconstitution. With improved stability at room temperature and reduced ocular toxicity, TPT seems to be a promising candidate for production of prefilled syringes in terms of safety and efficiency of preparation and treatment administration. Due to the lack of TPT stability data, the stability of TPT at 20 &micro;g/mL and 200 &micro;g/mL in prefilled syringes was evaluated in three different storage conditions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The stability of TPT in prefilled syringes was assessed via reversed-phase liquid chromatography coupled to a diode array detector analytical platform. The physicochemical stability of TPT in prefilled syringes in both concentrations, stored at 30&plusmn;2&deg;C with a relative humidity (RH) of 65&plusmn;5%, 5&plusmn;3&deg;C, and &ndash;20&plusmn;5&deg;C, was evaluated over 12 months including visual inspection and pH measurement.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>TPT solution in syringes at 20 &micro;g/mL and 200 &micro;g/mL was stable at 5&plusmn;3&deg;C and &ndash;20&plusmn;5&deg;C for up to 12 months, with no precipitate and no significant change in pH and concentration. A TPT-related degradant, 8-methoxy-TPT, was detected at &lt;0.5% only in 30&plusmn;2&deg;C (65&plusmn;5% RH) after 3 months.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This study demonstrated that TPT solutions at 20 &micro;g/mL and 200 &micro;g/mL conditioned in BBraun Omnifix syringes could be stored at 5&plusmn;3&deg;C for 12 months for safe and secure administration to patients.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bello, W., Hosotte, C., Stampfli, C., Pierrot, A., Munier, F. L., Berger-Gryllaki, M., Pezzatti, J., Carrez, L., Sadeghipour, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-23T00:45:26-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004346</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2024-004346</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 3: Production and Compounding]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Stability study of topotecan in ophthalmic prefilled syringes for intravitreal delivery]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>67</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>72</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/1/73?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Physical compatibility of insulin aspart, lidocaine, alprostadil and vancomycin with individualised two-in-one parenteral nutrition used in the neonatal intensive care unit]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/1/73?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Critically ill newborn infants often require simultaneous administration of multiple intravenous (IV) solutions through the same catheter lumen, making compatibility of these solutions crucial in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). This study aimed to investigate the physical compatibility of insulin aspart, lidocaine, alprostadil and vancomycin with individualised two-in-one parenteral nutrition (PN).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The study was conducted at the hospital pharmacy&rsquo;s drug compounding facility of the University Medical Centre Utrecht. Two PN formulations were prepared with different electrolyte concentrations (PN1 with high electrolytes and PN2 with low electrolytes), each with either 0% or 30% w/v glucose, resulting in four solutions for testing. Each solution was then mixed with the selected IV drugs in a 1:1 ratio. Compatibility was assessed through visible particle testing, pH measurements and subvisible particle testing at multiple time points (T=0, T=1, T=4 hours).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>No visible particles were detected in any combinations. However, insulin and lidocaine combinations exceeded the subvisible particle threshold of 6000 particles &ge;10 &micro;m per container volume at T=0 hours, with insulin also exceeding the threshold in a specific PN combination at T=4 hours. pH measurements indicated minimal shifts in the PN solutions, suggesting significant buffering capacity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Alprostadil and vancomycin IV solutions are physically compatible with two individualised neonatal PN solutions, with high as well as low glucose concentrations. Combinations of PN with lidocaine or insulin form subvisible particles, which could have clinical implications if administered in large volumes over extended periods of time. In clinical scenarios where there is no other option but to administer lidocaine or insulin through the same catheter lumen as PN using a Y-site connector, the use of an in-line filter is advised. Our study adds important compatibility data that can guide clinical practice in NICU settings. However, the broader application of these results requires careful consideration of the unique characteristics of each neonatal PN solution and drug combination.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Van Gelder, T. G., Vergoossen, D., Zonnenberg, I. A., Lalmohamed, A., Koole-Oostveen, M. I., van Reij, E. M. L., van Loon, A., Egberts, T. C. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-23T00:45:26-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004300</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2024-004300</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 5: Patient Safety and Quality Assurance]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Physical compatibility of insulin aspart, lidocaine, alprostadil and vancomycin with individualised two-in-one parenteral nutrition used in the neonatal intensive care unit]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>73</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>79</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/1/80?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Stability of dexmedetomidine, ketamine and lidocaine combined injectable solution for analgesia]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/1/80?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>In the context of the opioid epidemic, it is indispensable to reduce the use of opioids and develop new therapeutic alternatives. The combined use of ketamine, lidocaine and dexmedetomidine has been studied for opioid-free anaesthesia and the management of pain to reduce the use of opioids. An opioid-free anaesthesia mixture in one syringe for multimodal anaesthesia has been used in case series and is currently being studied in clinical trials. However, there are no data evaluating the compatibility of the admixture of these three drugs in syringes. The objective of this study was to evaluate the physicochemical stability of the combination of dexmedetomidine, ketamine and lidocaine.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The formulation combining the three active drugs was prepared at a final concentration of 1 &micro;g/mL of dexmedetomidine, 1 mg/mL of ketamine and 10 mg/mL of lidocaine. The formulation was conditioned in syringes; three syringes were placed at 21&deg;C and three others at 5&deg;C. The concentration and the particle count were evaluated at predetermined time points up to 9 days. A validated stability-indicating HPLC method was developed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The study demonstrated the stability of ketamine (1 mg/mL) and lidocaine (10 mg/mL) in the injectable formulation when stored in polypropylene syringes at 5&deg;C and 21&deg;C for up to 9 days. However, dexmedetomidine (1 &micro;g/mL) was stable for 9 days at 5&deg;C, but only for 3 days when stored at 21&deg;C. Therefore, the injectable formulation containing the three active compounds should be stored at 5&deg;C in order to remain stable for 9 days. The particle count was below the threshold for injectable solution for 9 days at both temperatures.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This study demonstrated the stability of dexmedetomidine (1 &micro;g/mL), ketamine (1 mg/mL) and lidocaine (10 mg/mL) when stored in a polypropylene syringe at 5&deg;C for up to 9 days.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[St-Jean, I., Hachemi, D., Friciu, M., Forest, J.-M., Belliveau, M., Williamson, D., Leclair, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-23T00:45:27-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004177</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2024-004177</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 3: Production and Compounding]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Stability of dexmedetomidine, ketamine and lidocaine combined injectable solution for analgesia]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>80</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>85</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/1/86?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Clopidogrel-induced thrombotic microangiopathy: a case report]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/1/86?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Thrombotic microangiopathy is a serious condition that can be precipitated by exposure to certain medications. Although rare, it is life threatening and requires a high index of clinical suspicion, appropriate laboratory testing and immediate cessation of the offending agent. We present a case of a 75-year-old man with a history of ischaemic heart disease treated with clopidogrel and aspirin. One month after initiating the treatment he developed microangiopathic haemolytic anaemia and thrombocytopenia. Extensive clinical and laboratory investigations suggested thrombotic microangiopathy secondary to clopidogrel. The drug was immediately discontinued and treatment with intravenous corticosteroids was started. Within a week the patient&rsquo;s laboratory parameters normalised, indicating successful recovery. This case highlights the role of early detection and immediate discontinuation of suspected medication in the effective management of clopidogrel-induced thrombotic microangiopathy. Healthcare professionals should consider drug-induced thrombotic microangiopathy as a possible diagnosis in patients receiving clopidogrel who present with thrombocytopenia and microangiopathic haemolytic anaemia.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lizondo Lopez, T., Font i Barcelo, A., Garcia Gutierrez, C., Blasco, M., Grafia, I., Bastida, C., Castro-Rebollo, P., Soy-Muner, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-23T00:45:27-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004209</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2024-004209</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Clopidogrel-induced thrombotic microangiopathy: a case report]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Case report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>86</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>89</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/1/90?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support: a case of neutropenia caused by argatroban anticoagulation]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/1/90?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>We present the case of a man in his 70s admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) after mitral valve replacement and coronary artery bypass graft surgery requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support due to haemodynamic instability. He received anticoagulation therapy with heparin sodium and, after 5 days, the patient presented with thrombocytopenia and deep venous thrombosis. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia was suspected based on a positive 4T score and confirmed by antiplatelet factor 4/heparin antibodies, so argatroban was initiated as an alternative anticoagulation therapy. In the following days the patient developed severe neutropenia requiring discontinuation of argatroban and the administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. According to the Naranjo Adverse Drug Reaction Probability Scale, this event would be classified as a &lsquo;probable&rsquo; argatroban-related adverse event. Argatroban should be conisdered as a possible cause of neutropenia and appropriate interventions need to be implemented due to the gravity of this adverse event in the ICU.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gomez-Alonso, J., Martinez Martinez, M., Bonilla Rojas, C. A., Garcia Diaz, H. C., Riera del Brio, J., Gorgas Torner, M. Q., Domenech-Moral, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-23T00:45:27-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2023-003914</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2023-003914</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support: a case of neutropenia caused by argatroban anticoagulation]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Case report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>90</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>93</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/1/94?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Extravasation of brentuximab vedotin, an antibody-drug conjugate, in a patient with anaplastic large cell lymphoma]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/1/94?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Brentuximab vedotin (BV) is an antibody-drug conjugate, consisting of a CD30-directed antibody, conjugated by a protease-cleavable linker to a microtubule disrupting agent auristatin E (MMAE). Although the safety datasheet of BV does not warn of severe toxic effects of extravasation, we report a third case of a patient with anaplastic large cell lymphoma who developed severe epidermal necrosis after extravasation. The reason for what happened could be attributed to the fact that MMAE belongs to the group of vinca alkaloids so it should be handled like other tissue-necrotising chemotherapeutics. Reporting of all cases of extravasation involving new conjugated chemotherapeutic drugs is of the utmost importance to be able to develop updated guidelines. Hospital pharmacists can provide information on how to manage extravasation, assess the potential risk, and have a crucial role in drafting hospital protocols.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rivasi, M., Porretta Serapiglia, C., Medici, G., Ricchi, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-23T00:45:27-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004089</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2024-004089</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Extravasation of brentuximab vedotin, an antibody-drug conjugate, in a patient with anaplastic large cell lymphoma]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Case report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>94</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>97</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/1/98?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Comment on: Retrospective study of patient characteristics and treatment for mucormycosis in post-COVID-19 population]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/33/1/98?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daungsupawong, H., Wiwanitkit, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-23T00:45:27-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004273</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2024-004273</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[COVID-19]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Comment on: Retrospective study of patient characteristics and treatment for mucormycosis in post-COVID-19 population]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>PostScript</prism:section>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>98</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>98</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/6/493?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Medication adherence interventions: where are we and where do we go?]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/6/493?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eriksson, T., Midlo&#x0308;v, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-10-24T00:45:36-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004650</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004650</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Medication adherence interventions: where are we and where do we go?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Editorial</prism:section>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>493</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>494</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/6/495?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Pharmacoeconomic and clinical impact of pharmaceutical service in the intensive care unit: a systematic review]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/6/495?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Clinical pharmacy is a fast-growing discipline in Europe, ensuring optimisation and a guarantee of safety in therapeutic management. Within a hospital the intensive care unit (ICU) typically admits the most severely ill patients who require expensive medications. These patients may be at risk for potentially serious adverse events, especially when medication errors occur. This study aims to evaluate the pharmacoeconomic and clinical impact of pharmaceutical care and service within ICUs. A systematic review of the literature following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 methodology was conducted to identify pharmacoeconomic studies published from 2017 to 2021 in Pubmed, Web of Science, and Science Direct. A qualitative methodological assessment of the studies was made using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) grid. Among the 525 articles identified from the databases, 11 were selected. Clinical benefits were mostly measured in terms of a reduction in the risk of adverse events related to care and reductions in the duration of mechanical ventilation and in-ICU and in-hospital length-of-stays. No impact on the mortality rate was demonstrated. All studies reported cost-benefit ratios ranging from 2.48 to 24.20 per 1 invested. The avoided costs per patient ranged from 29.73 to 194.24 per day of hospitalisation. The mean CHEERS compliance score was 63%&plusmn;17%, demonstrating the heterogeneous quality of these analyses. International pharmacoeconomic evaluations on the impact of the clinical pharmacist operating in the ICU revealed both economic and clinical benefits for the patient. Larger randomised studies are required to confirm the major role of the pharmacist in the ICU.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Simonetti, L., Lefrant, J.-Y., Cireasa, B., Poujol, H., Leguelinel-Blache, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-10-24T00:45:36-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004208</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2024-004208</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Editor''s choice, EAHP Statement 4: Clinical Pharmacy Services]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Pharmacoeconomic and clinical impact of pharmaceutical service in the intensive care unit: a systematic review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Systematic review</prism:section>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>495</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>500</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/6/501?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Investigating the capabilities of advanced large language models in generating patient instructions and patient educational material]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/6/501?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Large language models (LLMs) with advanced language generation capabilities have the potential to enhance patient interactions. This study evaluates the effectiveness of ChatGPT 4.0 and Gemini 1.0 Pro in providing patient instructions and creating patient educational material (PEM).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A cross-sectional study employed ChatGPT 4.0 and Gemini 1.0 Pro across six medical scenarios using simple and detailed prompts. The Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Print materials (PEMAT-P) evaluated the understandability, actionability, and readability of the outputs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>LLMs provided consistent responses, especially regarding drug information, therapeutic goals, administration, common side effects, and interactions. However, they lacked guidance on expiration dates and proper medication disposal. Detailed prompts yielded comprehensible outputs for the average adult. ChatGPT 4.0 had mean understandability and actionability scores of 80% and 60%, respectively, compared with 67% and 60% for Gemini 1.0 Pro. ChatGPT 4.0 produced longer outputs, achieving 85% readability with detailed prompts, while Gemini 1.0 Pro maintained consistent readability. Simple prompts resulted in ChatGPT 4.0 outputs at a 10th-grade reading level, while Gemini 1.0 Pro outputs were at a 7th-grade level. Both LLMs produced outputs at a 6th-grade level with detailed prompts.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>LLMs show promise in generating patient instructions and PEM. However, healthcare professional oversight and patient education on LLM use are essential for effective implementation.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sridharan, K., Sivaramakrishnan, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-10-24T00:45:36-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004245</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2024-004245</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Investigating the capabilities of advanced large language models in generating patient instructions and patient educational material]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>501</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>507</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/6/508?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[An essential component of antimicrobial stewardship during the COVID-19 pandemic in the intensive care unit: de-escalation]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/6/508?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>The antimicrobial de-escalation strategy (ADE) plays a crucial role in antimicrobial stewardship, reducing the likelihood of bacterial resistance. This study aims to evaluate how often the intensive care unit (ICU) used ADE for empirical treatment during COVID-19.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Materials</st>
<p>Adult ICU patients receiving empirical antimicrobial therapy for bacterial infections were retrospectively studied from September 2020 to December 2021. ADE was defined as (1) discontinuation of an antimicrobial in case of empirical combination therapy or (2) replacement of the antimicrobial to narrow the antimicrobial spectrum within the first 3 days of therapy, according to the test results and clinical picture.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 99 patients were included in the study. The number of patients who received empirical combined therapy (38.4%) was lower than those who received monotherapy (61.6%). The most preferred monotherapy (45.9%) was piperacillin-tazobactam, while the most preferred in combination treatment (22.7%) was meropenem. Within the first 3 days of admittance to the ICU, 3% of patients underwent ADE for their empirical antimicrobial therapy, 61.6% underwent no change, and 35.4% underwent change other than ADE. Procalcitonin levels were below 2 &micro;g/L on the third day of treatment in 69.7% of the patients. Culture or culture-antibiogram results of 50.5% of the patients were obtained within the first 3 days of empirical therapy. There was no growth in the culture results of 21 patients (21.2%) during their ICU stay.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>In this study, ADE practice was much lower than expected. In order to reduce the significant differences between theory and reality, clinical, laboratory, and organisational conditions must be objectively assessed along with patient characteristics.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pehlivanli, A., Ozgun, C., Sasal-Solmaz, F. G., Yuksel, D., Basgut, B., Ozcelikay, A. T., Unal, M. N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-10-24T00:45:36-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2023-004053</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2023-004053</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 4: Clinical Pharmacy Services, COVID-19]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[An essential component of antimicrobial stewardship during the COVID-19 pandemic in the intensive care unit: de-escalation]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>508</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>513</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/6/514?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Appropriateness of antithrombotics in geriatric inpatients with atrial fibrillation: a retrospective, cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/6/514?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Atrial fibrillation occurs in nearly half of geriatric inpatients and is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Suboptimal anticoagulation use is an important concern in this population. This study aimed to evaluate the appropriateness of antithrombotic therapies in this patient cohort.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A retrospective analysis was conducted on the geriatric wards of a teaching hospital in Belgium, on a background of clinical pharmacy services. The first 90 atrial fibrillation patients from 2020 to 2022 were included if they received an oral anticoagulant. We assessed utilisation and appropriateness of antithrombotics at discharge, examined reasons for guideline deviations, and explored factors associated with underdosing. Temporal associations for appropriateness and type of anticoagulant (vitamin K antagonist (VKA) vs direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC)) were assessed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The mean age of patients was 86.5 (&plusmn;5.3) years and the median CHA<SUB>2</SUB>DS<SUB>2</SUB>-VASc score was 5 (interquartile range (IQR) 4&ndash;6). At discharge, 256 (94.8%) patients used a DOAC; nine (3.3%) used a VKA; one (0.4%) a DOAC-antiplatelet combination, and in four patients (1.5%) all antithrombotics were discontinued. The majority (64.4%) of patients received reduced DOAC doses with apixaban prescribed in 40.7%. In 39 (14.4%) patients, antithrombotic use was considered inappropriate, mostly without a rationale (23/39). Year 2022 (odds ratio (OR) 0.104; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.012&ndash;0.878) was the sole determinant for underdosing. No significant differences were found with respect to appropriateness (p=0.533) or anticoagulant class (p=0.479) over time.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Most geriatric inpatients received a justified reduced DOAC dose. A significant proportion was managed inappropriately with underdosing (= unjustified reduced dose) being most common. Frequently no rationale was provided for deviating from trial-tested doses.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vanderstuyft, E., Hias, J., Hellemans, L., Van Aelst, L., Tournoy, J., Van der Linden, L. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-10-24T00:45:36-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2023-004033</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2023-004033</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 4: Clinical Pharmacy Services]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Appropriateness of antithrombotics in geriatric inpatients with atrial fibrillation: a retrospective, cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>514</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>521</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/6/522?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Pharmaceutical care in the screening process of phase I oncohaematological clinical trials]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/6/522?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To determine the pharmaceutical interventions in patients eligible for phase I cancer clinical trials, focusing specifically on exclusion criteria related to medication or relevant interactions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>Descriptive, observational study conducted at a comprehensive cancer centre. Patients undergoing screening for phase I clinical trials (March 2019&ndash;December 2022) were included. The pharmacist reviewed concomitant medication and provided a recommendation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The concomitant medication of 512 patients eligible to participate in 84 phase I clinical trials was analysed. In 230 (44.9%) patients, the clinical trial treatment included oral medication. The median number of concomitant medications was 5 (IQR 3&ndash;8) per patient.</p>
<p>A total of 280 pharmaceutical interventions were performed in 140 (27.3%) patients: 240 (85.7%) were due to interactions in 124 (24.2%) patients, and 40 (14.3%) were due to exclusion criteria in 34 (6.6%) patients. Interactions and exclusion criteria were detected in 18 (3.5%) patients. The main groups of drugs involved were 68 (24.3%) antacids and antiulcer drugs, 28 (10.0%) antidepressants and 26 (9.3%) opioids. Acceptance analysis of the recommendation was applicable in 215 cases; in 208 (96.7%), the pharmaceutical intervention was accepted.</p>
<p>Differences were identified for exclusion criteria (7 vs 27) and interactions (37 vs 87) between parenteral and oral clinical trial medication (p&lt;0.001).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The pharmacist&rsquo;s review of concomitant medication during the screening period in phase I clinical trials enables the detection of prohibited medication or relevant interactions, potentially avoiding screening failures and increasing the efficacy and safety of treatments.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rodriguez-Mauriz, R., Gonzalez-Laguna, M., Perayre-Badia, M., Lozano-Andreu, T., Miquel-Zurita, M. E., Canizares-Paz, S., Santulario-Verdu, L., Millan-Coll, M., Fontanals, S., Clopes-Estela, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-10-24T00:45:36-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004168</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2024-004168</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Pharmaceutical care in the screening process of phase I oncohaematological clinical trials]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>522</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>527</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/6/528?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Selection of initiatives to improve the management of patients with hereditary angioedema by the hospital pharmacy using the nominal group technique]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/6/528?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To identify and promote hospital pharmacy initiatives to improve the management of patients with hereditary angioedema (HAE) within the Spanish healthcare system.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>A panel of experts comprising hospital pharmacists, an allergist and a nurse/member of the Spanish Hereditary Angioedema Association (Asociaci&oacute;n Espa&ntilde;ola de Angioedema Familiar) highlighted initiatives to improve care for patients with HAE after identifying, evaluating and prioritising them. Prioritisation was assessed based on the impact on patient care and the feasibility of their implementation on a scale of 1&ndash;5.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Seven key areas of activity for the role of hospital pharmacists in the management of patients with HAE were identified: evaluation and selection of medicines; hospital pharmacy dispensation and telepharmacy; pharmacotherapy follow-up and telemedicine; coordination with other healthcare teams involved in the care of patients with HAE; patient health education and training; research on HAE; and continuous education and training of hospital pharmacy service personnel. Ten initiatives with a mean impact score of 5 and a mean feasibility score of &ge;4.1 were considered as high-priority initiatives. Half of the initiatives belong to the area concerning patient education and training (50%), followed by care coordination initiatives (30%) and continuous education and training (20%).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Ten high-priority initiatives for the management of patients with HAE were identified by a panel of experts. The implementation of such initiatives by the hospital pharmacy service should enhance the management of patients with HAE in the Spanish healthcare system.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Montoro Ronsano, J. B., Martinez Sesmero, J. M., Cortes, I., Lleonart, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-10-24T00:45:36-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2023-004046</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2023-004046</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 4: Clinical Pharmacy Services]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Selection of initiatives to improve the management of patients with hereditary angioedema by the hospital pharmacy using the nominal group technique]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>528</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>533</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/6/534?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Inpatient case characteristics of SGLT2 inhibitor-associated diabetic ketoacidosis: a retrospective study]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/6/534?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) is a serious complication in patients treated with sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i). The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between SGLT2i and the risk of DKA, and to identify high-risk groups and characteristics that should be emphasised.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A retrospective case series study was conducted to collect medical records of inpatients diagnosed with DKA and using SGLT2i before the onset of the disease from September 2022 to September 2023 in a tertiary hospital in Shanghai. Cases that met the inclusion criteria were retrieved through the electronic medical record system. Information was collected to compare the risk of DKA in patients with different characteristics.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 21 patients (12 men and 9 women) met the criteria for SGLT2i-associated DKA. The mean diabetes duration was 10.4 years, with 47.6% (10/21) of patients diagnosed with euglycaemic DKA. The drug treatment regimen most commonly used was the combination of SGLT2i and metformin, representing 52.4% (11/21) of cases. The most common clinical symptoms were nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain and malaise. Common predisposing factors were acute infections, acute pancreatitis (predominantly hyperlipidaemic type), dietary inappropriateness, acute cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events and surgery. 71.4% of patients (15/21) had multiple risk factors.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The use of SGLT2i in diabetic patients is associated with an increased risk of DKA, particularly in the presence of predisposing factors such as infection. Furthermore, long diabetes duration, decreased pancreatic &beta;-cell function and the combined use of metformin may also contribute to the risk of DKA in patients treated with SGLT2i. The findings of this study provide valuable insights for better identification and management of DKA risks associated with SGLT2i in clinical practice.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yang, Z., Zhang, W., Chen, H., Peng, Q.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-10-24T00:45:36-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004124</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2024-004124</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 5: Patient Safety and Quality Assurance]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Inpatient case characteristics of SGLT2 inhibitor-associated diabetic ketoacidosis: a retrospective study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>534</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>538</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/6/539?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Physical compatibility of ceftriaxone and cefepime in 0.45% sodium chloride, Ringers lactate solution, and Plasma-Lyte A]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/6/539?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>The compatibility of intravenous fluids with medications is of paramount concern to pharmacists and is an imperative component of ensuring patient safety. Data regarding the physical compatibility of medications with intravenous fluids has not been examined, or published with conflicting results or the concentrations studied were not consistent with current practice. Our objective was to determine the physical compatibility of ceftriaxone and cefepime in 0.45% sodium chloride, Ringer&rsquo;s lactate solution, and Plasma-Lyte A.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>An in vitro analysis of the physical compatibility of ceftriaxone and cefepime at 10 mg/mL, 20 mg/mL, and 40 mg/mL concentrations was conducted in 0.45% sodium chloride, Ringer&rsquo;s lactate solution, and Plasma-Lyte A. Admixtures were evaluated in triplicate at hours 0, 1, 5, 8, and 24. Physical compatibility was assessed by visual inspection, spectrophotometry, and pH analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Ceftriaxone 40 mg/mL was found to be physically incompatible in 0.45% sodium chloride and Ringer&rsquo;s lactate solution beyond 5 hours and in Plasma-Lyte A beyond 8 hours. Cefepime was found to be physically incompatible with all fluids and in all concentrations beyond 1 hour.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This work contributes to the body of literature dedicated to the evaluation of intravenous drug and fluid physical compatibility by identifying demonstrable changes in admixtures containing 0.45% sodium chloride, Plasma-Lyte A, and Ringer&rsquo;s lactate solution. Ceftriaxone should not be administered with 0.45% sodium chloride, Ringer&rsquo;s lactated solution, or Plasma-Lyte A at selected concentrations and time points and cefepime is not considered to be physically compatible at 10 mg/mL, 20 mg/mL, or 40 mg/mL in any of the studied fluids beyond 1 hour.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kelley, M., Spooneybarger, C., Howard, M., Reinert, J., Churchwell, M. D., Baki, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-10-24T00:45:36-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004128</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2024-004128</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 3: Production and Compounding]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Physical compatibility of ceftriaxone and cefepime in 0.45% sodium chloride, Ringers lactate solution, and Plasma-Lyte A]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>539</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>543</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/6/544?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Stability of clozapine tablets repackaged in dose administration aids using repackaging machines]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/6/544?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>The use of dose administration aids in automated ward dispensing devices requires the repackaging of medications, which may impact their stability compared with the original manufacturer&rsquo;s packaging.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study aimed to assess the physical and chemical stability of clozapine tablets for up to 84 days after repackaging.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A total of 900 tablets of clozapine 100 mg (Viatris) were repackaged and stored under five different conditions to conduct physical and chemical stability tests on days 0, 28, 56 and 84. The results were compared with control tablets in their original packaging. Visual inspections of tablet appearance were performed. Physical tests included assessments of mass uniformity, friability and resistance to crushing, following the standards of the European Pharmacopoeia 11th edition. The chemical stability was determined using ultra-high performance liquid chromatography with tandem-mass spectrometry detection (UHPLC-MS/MS) to measure clozapine concentration, N-desmethyl-clozapine, and monitor clozapine degradation to detect formation of any degradation products other than N-desmethyl-clozapine.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Visual examination showed changes in the appearance of tablets only in those stored under UV light. Mass uniformity met standards for all tablets over 84 days. None passed the friability test due to tablet cracking after tumbling. A gradual deterioration in tablet hardness was observed with the resistance to crushing test. In terms of chemical stability, N-desmethyl-clozapine was undetected in any of the tablets stored under all conditions, and the mean concentration of clozapine remained within the target range over 84 days.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>N-desmethyl-clozapine was not detected and clozapine concentrations remained stable under all storage conditions. The tablets were compliant with the mass uniformity test in each condition. However, the tablets were cracked in the friability test and gradual deterioration in tablet hardness was observed. In the light of these results, the Vinatier Hospital pharmacy has chosen to establish a shelf life for clozapine tablets of 84 days.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Emonet, M., Citterio-Quentin, A., Bourgeois, S., Godard, V., Boidin, C., Barratier, C., Boisrame, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-10-24T00:45:36-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2023-004036</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2023-004036</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Stability of clozapine tablets repackaged in dose administration aids using repackaging machines]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>544</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>549</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/6/550?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Stability of intravenous medicines - evidence of maximum temperature reached in both summer and winter within soft shell elastomeric pumps]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/6/550?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Elastomeric devices or pumps are a valuable tool to deliver outpatient parenteral therapy and have been used for administration of chemotherapy, antibiotics and pain medication. A key determinant of effective treatment is to consider the stability of medicines within these devices. It is widely known that an increase in temperature positively correlates to an increase in drug degradation. The objective of our work was to measure the temperature within soft shell elastomeric devices, under simulated outpatient treatment conditions in summer and winter months, and to determine the maximum temperature reached within these periods of use.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Thermocouples were inserted within soft shell Easypump II (B Braun Medical, Sheffield, UK) elastomeric pumps and the temperature was monitored under simulated outpatient conditions during cold and warm weather with different fill volumes. Temperature monitoring was also conducted with varying levels of insulation around the devices.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Our results show that internal temperatures remained below 32&deg;C&plusmn;1&deg;C in winter and summer months, including during times defined as a heatwave. Fill volume and ambient temperature were shown to be significant factors affecting the internal temperatures reached.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>A soft shell Easypump II elastomeric pump, if used within its carry pouch, will maintain the internal solution below a temperature of 32&deg;C&plusmn;1&deg;C if patients correctly adhere to handling guidance. Our results show that further improvements to the insulation material used in carry pouches can significantly restrict the rate of temperature rise within the pumps and will give more assurance in relation to preventing degradation especially considering the increases in extreme weather conditions observed in recent years due to global warming.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[van der Merwe, S. M., Boyd, N., Mavhunga, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-10-24T00:45:36-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004276</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2024-004276</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 1: Introductory Statements and Governance]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Stability of intravenous medicines - evidence of maximum temperature reached in both summer and winter within soft shell elastomeric pumps]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>550</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>556</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/6/557?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effect of a smart temperature logger on correctly storing biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs at home: a pre-post study]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/6/557?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) require specific storage temperatures, but are frequently stored outside the recommended range of 2&ndash;8&deg;C. As incorrect storage may affect therapy effectiveness and consequently lead to higher disease activity, compliance with recommended storage temperatures should be improved. eHealth interventions can provide insight into storage temperatures and alerts in case of deviations from recommended temperatures. Therefore, this study aims to assess the effect of a smart temperature logger on correctly storing bDMARDs at home by patients with rheumatic diseases.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A pre-post study was performed in a hospital in the Netherlands. The baseline period consisted of 12 weeks of storage temperature measurement with a passive temperature logger, and the intervention period consisted of 12 weeks of storage temperature measurement with a smart temperature logger. This smart logger included a smartphone application which provided insight into storage temperatures and real-time alerts when exceeding recommended temperatures. The main outcome measure was the difference in the number of patients who stored their bDMARDs correctly between baseline and intervention. Secondary outcomes were the difference in the proportion of measurement time within 2&ndash;8&deg;C between baseline and intervention, the distribution of measurement time among temperature categories, and the patient&rsquo;s acceptance measured using a questionnaire based on the Technology Acceptance Model.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>In total, 48 participants (median age 55 years (IQR 47&ndash;64), 53% male) were analysed. The proportion of participants correctly storing bDMARDs increased from 18.8% (n=9) during baseline to 39.6% (n=19) during intervention (p=0.004). The median proportion of measurement time between 2&ndash;8&deg;C improved by 6% (IQR 0&ndash;34%) (p&lt;0.0001). Technology acceptance was scored as moderate.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Temperature monitoring and real-time feedback with a smart temperature logger shows potential to improve at-home storage of bDMARDs, provided that continuous connection is realised to ensure real-time alerts and data collection.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Haegens, L. L., Huiskes, V. J. B., Bekker, C. L., van den Bemt, B. J. F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-10-24T00:45:36-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2023-004028</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2023-004028</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 1: Introductory Statements and Governance]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effect of a smart temperature logger on correctly storing biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs at home: a pre-post study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>557</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>563</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/6/564?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Comparing visual inspection methods for parenteral products in hospital pharmacy: between reliability, cost, and operator formation considerations]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/6/564?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The COVID-19 pandemic has led to unforeseen and novel manifestations, as illustrated by the management of drug shortages through the development of hospital production of sterile pharmaceutical preparations (P2S). Visual inspection of P2S is a release control whose methods are described in monographs of the European Pharmacopoeia (2.9.20) and the United States Pharmacopeia (1790). However, these non-automated visual methods require training and proficiency testing of personnel. The main objective of this work was to compare the reliability and speed of analysis of two visual methods and an automated method for detecting visible particles by image analysis in P2S. Furthermore, these methods were used to evaluate sources of particulate contamination during pre-production processes (washing, disinfection, depyrogenation) and production (filling, capping).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Materials and methods</st>
<p>Three pharmacy technicians examined 41 clear glass vials of type I, 10 and/or 50 mL through manual visual inspection (MVI), semi-automated (SAVI), and automated (AVI) inspection. The vials were distributed as follows: (i) 16 vials of water for injection containing either glass particles (224 &micro;m or 600 &micro;m), stopper fragments, or textile fibres; (ii) five sterile injectable specialties; (iii) 20 vials of water for injection prepared under different pre-production conditions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results and discussion</st>
<p>MVI and SAVI detected 100% of visible particles compared with 28% for AVI, which showed a deficiency in detecting textile fibres. All three methods correctly analysed P2S that did not contain visible particles. The three methods detected particles in vials maintained under International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 9 pre-production conditions. However, detections by (i) MVI and SAVI, and by (ii) AVI of particles contained in vials maintained under ISO 8 pre-production conditions were deemed satisfactory and unsatisfactory, respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The importance of visual inspection of P2S requires rapid, sensitive, and reliable detection methods. In this context, MVI and SAVI have proven to be more effective than AVI for a more competitive financial, training, and implementation investment.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jambon, A., Forat, M., Marchand, C., Morel, C., Merienne, C., Filali, S., Pirot, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-10-24T00:45:36-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004143</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2024-004143</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 3: Production and Compounding]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Comparing visual inspection methods for parenteral products in hospital pharmacy: between reliability, cost, and operator formation considerations]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>564</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>571</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/6/572?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The environmental impact of inhalers: a framework for sustainable prescription practices in Spain]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/6/572?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>The healthcare sector contributes significantly to global greenhouse emissions, with inhalers being major contributors.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To develop a framework for reducing the environmental footprint of inhalers in Spain by implementing greener prescription practices.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A multidisciplinary working group was formed, including hospital pharmacists, pulmonologists, and environmental experts. We created a comprehensive database on the environmental impact of inhalers marketed in Spain, incorporating product specifications and environmental data from the Spanish Agency of Medicines and Medical Devices and pharmaceutical companies. We developed a decision-making algorithm integrating clinical and environmental criteria and performed scenario projections to estimate potential benefits of transitioning from pressurised metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs) to dry powder inhalers (DPIs) and other eco-friendly alternatives. Scenarios included global and individual projections, as well as comparisons between sustainable prescriptions and waste-management strategies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The national database revealed significant variability in the carbon footprint across inhaler types, with pMDIs showing the highest emissions. A shift of 10% from pMDIs to DPIs could reduce CO<SUB>2</SUB> emissions by approximately 40 000 tonnes/year, and a 50% shift by up to 200 000 tonnes. The decision-making algorithm effectively combined clinical and environmental considerations, facilitating the selection of more sustainable inhalers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The study highlights the importance of incorporating environmental criteria into inhaler prescribing choices to reduce healthcare&rsquo;s carbon footprint. Transitioning from pMDIs to DPIs when clinically indicated offers considerable environmental benefits without compromising patient health. The developed decision-making algorithm provides a practical tool for healthcare professionals, balancing clinical efficacy with sustainability. Future research should refine these practices and explore their application in other medical devices.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Garin, N., Zarate-Tamames, B., Lertxundi, U., Martin da Silva, I., Orive, G., Crespo-Lessmann, A., De la Rosa, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-10-24T00:45:36-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004402</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2024-004402</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 4: Clinical Pharmacy Services]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The environmental impact of inhalers: a framework for sustainable prescription practices in Spain]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>572</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>579</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/6/580?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Antifungal prophylaxis against invasive Candida and Aspergillus infection in adult heart transplant recipients: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/6/580?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Invasive fungal infections (IFI) can contribute to increased mortality and morbidity rates after heart transplant in adults. The most common causes are <I>Aspergillus</I> and <I>Candida</I> species. There is uncertainty on how effective antifungal prophylaxis is against <I>Candida</I> spp infections and limited guidance on the prevention of <I>Aspergillus</I> spp infections. This systematic review and meta-analysis will assess the literature to see if antifungal prophylaxis reduces the incidence of IFI after heart transplant in adults.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This systematic review protocol follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta Analysis guidelines. A systematic search of the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, MEDLINE, and Proquest databases will be undertaken. Reference lists of retrieved publications and conference abstracts will also be searched. Title, abstract and full-text screening will be undertaken by two reviewers. Discrepancies will be resolved by a third reviewer. Studies with paediatric patients, multi-organ transplants, or patients with a second heart transplant will be excluded, along with those who do not have clear definitions and diagnostic criteria for IFI. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool and the Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies of Interventions tool. A meta-analysis will be carried out, but if studies are not deemed to be sufficiently similar, only a narrative synthesis will be undertaken.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval is not required for this systematic review as primary data will not be collected. The results of the review will be disseminated through publication in an academic journal and scientific conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Prospero registration number</st>
<p>CRD42024516588.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Irshad, Z., Jenkins, A., Lim, H. S., Maidment, I. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-10-24T00:45:36-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004266</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2024-004266</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Antifungal prophylaxis against invasive Candida and Aspergillus infection in adult heart transplant recipients: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Protocol</prism:section>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>580</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>584</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/6/585?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Harm to a child caused by the off-label use of prochlorperazine maleate tablets due to the discontinuation of licensed prochlorperazine mesilate liquid in the UK]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/6/585?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Prochlorperazine is a commonly used medicine to treat nausea and vomiting. The only liquid formulation in the UK was discontinued in November 2022 due to safety concerns. One alternative option available is to use crushed tablets instead. Crushing and mixing tablets in water to produce a liquid is a widespread practice in paediatrics. However, there is often little evidence to support this practice.</p>
<p>In this case report, a patient established on liquid prochlorperazine mesilate who was switched to crushed prochlorperazine maleate tablets experienced significant harm. The child&rsquo;s vomiting became uncontrolled and led to multiple healthcare attendances and a prolonged hospital admission. Control was re-established by increasing the prochlorperazine dose to accommodate for loss of drug during preparation. Care should be taken when converting prochlorperazine mesilate liquid doses to crushed prochlorperazine maleate tablets, and the doses used should not be treated as equivalent.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Morris, S., Salm, V., Salm, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-10-24T00:45:36-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2023-003791</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2023-003791</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Harm to a child caused by the off-label use of prochlorperazine maleate tablets due to the discontinuation of licensed prochlorperazine mesilate liquid in the UK]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Case report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>585</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>588</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/6/589?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Pharmacist educators: empowering pharmacists for medical education]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/6/589?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shao, S.-C., Chang, K.-C., Liao, S.-C., Chang, Y.-C., Chien, R.-N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-10-24T00:45:36-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004512</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004512</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Pharmacist educators: empowering pharmacists for medical education]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>PostScript</prism:section>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>589</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>590</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/6/590?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Optimising adalimumab administration to improve patient experience and treatment adherence in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/6/590?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Misa Garcia, A., Ferro Rodriguez, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-10-24T00:45:36-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004229</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2024-004229</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Optimising adalimumab administration to improve patient experience and treatment adherence in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>PostScript</prism:section>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>590</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>590</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/5/397?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Improving patient outcomes during cancer drug shortages: the role of patient education]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/5/397?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pathak, N., Shrestha, R., Shrestha, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-08-21T00:45:34-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004548</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2025-004548</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Improving patient outcomes during cancer drug shortages: the role of patient education]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Editorial</prism:section>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>397</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>398</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/5/399?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Economic impact of a clinical pharmacist in the orthopaedic sector: a review of the literature]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/5/399?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This review of the literature aimed to evaluate the economic impact of a clinical pharmacist in the orthopaedic sector.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The review followed the PRISMA recommendations. A bibliographic search was conducted on 23 June 2023 using PubMed, Cochrane Library and Web of Science. All articles in French or English with economic data on clinical pharmacy activities in orthopaedics were included. Articles not mentioning the term &lsquo;orthopaedics&rsquo; and those published prior to 1990 were excluded. Data from the studies were compiled in an Excel table. A bias analysis using the ROBINS-I Cochrane tool was performed. The methodology of the studies was compared and weighted using the CHEERS and STROBE checklists.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Among 529 articles initially identified, 10 were included in the review. The cost&ndash;benefit ratio of a clinical pharmacist in orthopaedics ranged from 0.47:1 to 28:1. The maximum savings reached US$73 410 /year in the American study and 1 42 356 /year in the French study. For three studies, the cost of a clinical pharmacist was not evaluated. Eight studies showed a positive economic impact. The Dutch study showed a balance and the Danish study showed a negative economic impact of 3442/month.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This literature review has shown an economic benefit of a clinical pharmacist in the orthopaedic sector despite several biases and methodological limitations. The two studies that did not confirm this benefit only evaluated a limited number of expected benefits. Nevertheless, the economic impact of the clinical pharmacist in the orthopaedic sector seems positive and undervalued.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dray, J., Soubieux, A., Chenailler, C., Varin, R., Dujardin, F., Curado, J., Barat, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-08-21T00:45:34-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2023-003727</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2023-003727</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 4: Clinical Pharmacy Services]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Economic impact of a clinical pharmacist in the orthopaedic sector: a review of the literature]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Systematic review</prism:section>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>399</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>406</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/5/407?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Development of hospital clinical pharmacy services in Denmark from 2008 to 2023]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/5/407?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>The role of the hospital pharmacist is evolving, and in many countries pharmacists play an increasingly patient-centred role in healthcare. This study aimed to investigate the development of Danish hospital clinical pharmacy services from 2008 to 2023 and compare their current state to the European Association of Hospital Pharmacists (EAHP) statements of clinical pharmacy services.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Four Danish reports describing the current state of clinical pharmacy in Danish hospitals released in 2008, 2013, 2019 and 2023 were analysed and compared. The reports&rsquo; data were obtained through questionnaires sent to all hospital pharmacies in Denmark. Data on staff resources and the clinical pharmacy services provided by all hospital pharmacies were extracted, analysed using descriptive statistics and compared with the EAHP statements of hospital clinical pharmacy services.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The number of clinical pharmacists increased by 85% from 2008 to 2023, and the number of pharmaconomists (Danish title of a healthcare professional with responsibilities comparable to a pharmacy technician) increased by 59% from 2013 to 2023. In 2023, there were 2.77 pharmaconomists for every pharmacist employed. The pharmaconomist ratio/100 beds increased from 1.93 in 2013 to 3.92 in 2023. The pharmacist ratio/100 beds increased from 0.54 in 2008 to 1.41 in 2023. In 2023, the main patient-level services provided by pharmacists were medication reviews, medication histories and reconciliation, and dispensing and administration. The main pharmaconomist services were dispensing and administration, medication histories and reconciliation, and prescription reviews. The time spent on clinical pharmacy services shifted towards patient-level services over the years. Furthermore, clinical pharmacy services shifted towards greater fulfilment of the EAHP statements.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>By providing an overview and comparing Danish clinical pharmacy services to the EAHP statements, we have identified areas for further development, such as the hospital pharmacist being an integral part of all patient care teams, to guide future research and practice.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bech, C. F., Kart, T., Kjeldsen, L. J., Petersen, M. B., Andersen, T. R. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-08-21T00:45:34-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004226</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2024-004226</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 4: Clinical Pharmacy Services]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Development of hospital clinical pharmacy services in Denmark from 2008 to 2023]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>407</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>412</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/5/413?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Evolution of hospital clinical pharmacy services in Finland in the period 2017-2022: the third nationwide follow-up survey]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/5/413?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background and objectives</st>
<p>Pharmacists&rsquo; involvement in patient care became more common in Finnish hospitals during the period of 2011&ndash;2016. The first national survey was conducted in 2011 and repeated using the same method in 2016. This development was in accordance with patient safety policy initiatives and European hospital pharmacy statements. This study aimed to conduct the third national follow-up survey on hospital clinical pharmacy services in Finland in 2022 and compare the results with those in 2016.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The study was conducted in 2022 as a national online survey targeting hospital pharmacies (n=22) and smaller-scale, independently operating medicine dispensaries (n=23). Descriptive statistics and qualitative content analysis were used for the data analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The response rate was 64% (n=29/45), accounting for 19/22 hospital pharmacies and 10/23 medicine dispensaries. Clinical pharmacy services were provided in 83% (n=24/29) of the responding units. The clinical pharmacy staff increased between 2017 and 2022 and services became more common, particularly at admission units (eg, emergency departments) and outpatient clinics. In some units (25%, n=6/24), services were also available in the evenings and in one unit during weekends. Similar to 2016, system-based medication safety risk management was also highlighted in this survey, and the first medication safety officer positions (n=8/24) were created. The most increased tasks were medication reviews and medication safety audits, while in 2016 the most increased task was medication reconciliation. Pharmacist participation in patient discharge had decreased. Despite the increasing prevalence of automation technology and pharmacy assistants, logistical tasks decreased only slightly.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Finnish hospital clinical pharmacy services have continued to expand in accordance with national and international guidelines, and have become increasingly concentrated on medication safety risk management. They currently engage in admission and outpatient units, but effort should also be put into discharge.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Schepel, L. L., Kunnola, E., Airaksinen, M., Aronpuro, K., Kvarnstro&#x0308;m, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-08-21T00:45:34-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004312</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2024-004312</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Evolution of hospital clinical pharmacy services in Finland in the period 2017-2022: the third nationwide follow-up survey]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>413</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>420</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/5/421?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Patient reported medication-related problems, adherence and waste of oral anticancer medication over time]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/5/421?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Patients on oral anticancer therapy regularly experience medication-related problems (MRPs), potentially leading to non-adherence and medication waste. Most studies reporting these experiences have cross-sectional designs. The aim of our study was to explore patient reported MRPs, adherence and waste of oral anticancer medication over time.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A prospective longitudinal quantitative interview study with 4 months follow-up was performed among patients on oral anticancer medication (mainly tyrosine kinase inhibitors, (anti)hormonal therapy, pyrimidine antagonists) using a semi-structured questionnaire. Patients from two Dutch university medical centres were included from March to December 2022 after informed consent was given. Four interviews were performed with 1 month in between. All interviews were audiotaped, after which the data were entered into an electronic case report form. The primary outcome was the mean number of MRPs per patient per interview round. Secondary outcomes were the proportion of patients with at least one MRP, types of MRPs, perceived non-adherence, medication waste (both in general and specifically for anticancer medication), costs of anticancer medication waste, and factors associated with medication waste as mentioned by the patient. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Forty patients were included with a mean (SD) age of 64 (9) years; 43% were male. The mean number of MRPs per patient was 2.1 in the first interview and 1.2, 1.0 and 0.9 in the second, third and fourth interviews, respectively. Adverse drug reactions were the most frequently reported type of MRPs (30 (75%) patients in the first interview and 19 (65%) in the last interview). Unintentional non-adherence was regularly reported, especially in the first interview. Medication changes were frequent and associated medication waste was mentioned in all interviews.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Many patients using oral anticancer treatment report MRPs and this number remains substantial over time.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[van den Bemt, P. M. L. A., Blijham, M. Y., ten Broek, L., Hugtenburg, J. G., Pouls, B. P. H., van Boven, J. F. M., Bekker, C. L., van den Bemt, B., van Dijk, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-08-21T00:45:34-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004205</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2024-004205</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Editor''s choice, EAHP Statement 5: Patient Safety and Quality Assurance]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Patient reported medication-related problems, adherence and waste of oral anticancer medication over time]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>421</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>426</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/5/427?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Natural language processing assisted detection of inappropriate proton pump inhibitor use in adult hospitalised patients]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/5/427?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To establish a clinical application monitoring system for proton pump inhibitors (PPI-MS) and to enhance the detection and intervention of inappropriate PPI use in adult hospitalised patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Natural language processing technology was applied to indication recognition of therapeutic PPI applications and the assessment of admission record recognition for preventive PPI applications. Symptom judgement was based on the tense-negation model and regular expressions. Evidence-based rules for clinical PPI application were embedded for the construction of PPI-MS. A total of 9421 patient records using PPI from July 2022 to July 2023 were analysed to validate the performance of the system and to identify common issues related to inappropriate clinical PPI use.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Out of 9421 hospitalised patients detected using PPI, 4736 (50.27%) were used for prophylaxis and the rest for therapeutic use. Among the prophylactic medications, 2274 patients (48.02%) were identified as receiving inappropriate prophylactic PPI. The main reasons were inappropriate prophylaxis without indication. Additionally, 258 cases of inappropriate therapeutic PPI use were identified, mainly involving the use of esomeprazole for peptic ulcers and Zollinger&ndash;Ellison syndrome. The efficiency of the PPI rational medication monitoring system, when coupled with human involvement, was 32 times that of manual monitoring. Among cases of inappropriate prophylactic PPI use, 45.29% were due to lack of indications, 28.34% involved inappropriate administration routes, 15.74% were related to inappropriate dosing frequencies and 10.62% were attributed to inappropriate drug selection. There were 933 cases related to the use of antiplatelet and anticoagulant drugs and 708 cases related to the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. The overall accuracy of the PPI-MS system was 88.69%, with a recall rate of 99.33%, and the F1 score was 93.71%.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Establishing a PPI medication monitoring system through natural language processing technology, while ensuring accuracy and recall rates, improves evaluation efficiency and homogeneity. This provides a new solution for timely detection of issues relating to clinical PPI usage.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yan, Y., Ai, C., Xie, J., Ji, Z., Zhou, X., Chen, Z., Wu, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-08-21T00:45:34-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004126</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2024-004126</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Natural language processing assisted detection of inappropriate proton pump inhibitor use in adult hospitalised patients]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>427</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>431</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/5/432?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The frequency and impact of drug-related problems with postoperative medication reported by orthopaedic patients after discharge]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/5/432?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Following orthopaedic surgery, medication is vital for recovery and preventing complications, however drug-related problems (DRPs) can hinder medication use. The prevalence, types, and impact of DRPs on patients' activities of daily living (ADL) and the medication involved are unknown. Insight is needed for targeted interventions.</p>
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>Our study had four aims to assess 1) the prevalence and types of DRPs with postoperative medication in orthopeadic patients 6 weeks after discharge; 2) the perceived impact of the reported DRPs on patients&rsquo; ADL; 3) the postoperative medication most frequently causing DRPs; and 4) the association between DRP numbers and patient- and disease-related characteristics.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A cross-sectional study at a tertiary centre surveyed adult orthopaedic surgery patients 6 weeks post-surgery. Patients reported on demographics, DRPs and their ADL impact, health literacy, and medication beliefs. Clinical factors and medication use were extracted from medical records. Descriptive statistics and linear hierarchical regression analysis were conducted.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Out of 484 patients (mean (standard deviation (SD)) age 61.1 (&plusmn;12.7) years, 61.6% female), 87.4% reported at least one DRP, with 39.7% indicating it impacted ADL. The most frequent DRPs involved inadequate drug use, including intentionally used less (49.8%) and stopped earlier (44.6%). The most impactful DRPs involved negative experiences, including insufficient effect (69.3%) and side effect (57.6%). Opioids caused the most DRPs, averaging 1.8 per patient. Impactful DRPs were associated with female sex, knee and spine surgery, medication concerns, and younger age.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Most patients experienced at least one DRP within 6 weeks post-discharge, with nearly half reporting an impact on ADL. Inadequate drug use and negative experiences, particularly with opioids, are the most urgent DRPs to address.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Melis, E. J., van den Bemt, B. J., Schrander, D. E., Vriezekolk, J. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-08-21T00:45:34-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004328</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2024-004328</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 5: Patient Safety and Quality Assurance]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The frequency and impact of drug-related problems with postoperative medication reported by orthopaedic patients after discharge]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>432</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>438</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/5/439?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Impact of the use of a drug-drug interaction checker on pharmacist interventions involving well-known strong interactors]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/5/439?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Several drug&ndash;drug interaction (DDI) checkers such as DDI-Predictor have been developed to detect and grade DDIs. DDI-Predictor gives an estimate of the magnitude of an interaction based on the ratio of areas under the curve. The objective of the present study was to analyse the frequencies of DDIs involving well-known strong interactors such as rifampicin and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), as reported by a clinical pharmacy team using DDI-Predictor, and the pharmacist intervention acceptance rate.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The pharmacist intervention rate and the physician acceptance rate were calculated for DDIs involving rifampicin or the SSRIs fluoxetine, paroxetine, duloxetine and sertraline. The rates were compared with a bilateral <sup>2</sup> test or Fisher&rsquo;s exact test.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of the 284 DDIs recorded, 38 (13.4%) involved rifampicin and 78 (27.5%) involved SSRIs. The pharmacist intervention rate differed significantly (68.4% for rifampicin vs 48.8% for SSRIs; p=0.045) but the physician acceptance rate did not (84.6% for rifampicin vs 81.6% for SSRIs; p=1). Pharmaceutical interventions for SSRIs were more frequent when the ratio of the area under the drug concentration versus time curve in DDI-Predictor was &gt;2. Pharmacists were more likely to issue a pharmacist intervention for DDIs involving rifampicin because of a high perceived risk of treatment failure and were less likely to issue a pharmacist intervention for DDIs involving an SSRI, except when the suspected interaction was strong.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>DDI checkers can help pharmacists to manage DDIs involving strong interactors. DDIs involving strong inhibitors versus a strong inducer differ with regard to their intervention and acceptance rates, notably due to the estimation of the magnitude of the DDI.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Moreau, F., Decaudin, B., Tod, M., Odou, P., Simon, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-08-21T00:45:34-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2023-004052</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2023-004052</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 4: Clinical Pharmacy Services]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Impact of the use of a drug-drug interaction checker on pharmacist interventions involving well-known strong interactors]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>439</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>443</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/5/444?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Study of therapeutic patient education practices in French renal transplantation centres]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/5/444?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Therapeutic patient education (TPE) plays a critical role in the management of kidney transplant recipients. However, discrepancies exist in the guidance provided regarding the usage of immunosuppressants across different kidney transplant centres in France.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>To assess the current landscape of TPE practices in this patient population, an online questionnaire consisting of 51 questions was distributed to 32 French renal transplantation centres.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The participation rate in our survey was 96.9%, (31 of the 32 centres contacted). The respondents had diverse professions: they were nurses (15/31), physicians (9/31) and pharmacists (7/31). Virtually all institutions have implemented TPE initiatives, with an implementation rate of 93.5% (29/31). The topic of anti-rejection medication was consistently addressed, with only one centre not providing support at the conclusion of these sessions. However, the content of the sessions varied significantly from one centre to another, particularly regarding the proper management of anti-rejection medications. Only 19.4% (6/31) of the centres provided the correct recommendation regarding fasting when taking tacrolimus. Dietary guidance was a topic covered in 89.7% (26/29) of the centres, but significant divergences were also observed. TPE teams primarily consisted of nurses, with pharmacists present in only 51.6% (16/31) of the centres. We also observed limited involvement of patient partners, with just 9.7% (3/31) of the centres including them in their programme.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>These findings highlight considerable variability in the approach towards TPE among kidney transplant centres. Addressing counselling variability and increasing pharmacist and patient partner involvement is an essential step to improving the quality and effectiveness of TPE. By establishing a standardised and comprehensive approach to patient education, healthcare providers can ensure that kidney transplant recipients receive information that will ultimately help them improve their health and well-being.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Boissiere, C., Rallon, T., Vigneau, C., Demay, E., Chatron, C., Bacle, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-08-21T00:45:34-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2023-004006</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2023-004006</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 4: Clinical Pharmacy Services]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Study of therapeutic patient education practices in French renal transplantation centres]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>444</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>449</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/5/450?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Haemodynamic effects of intravenous acetaminophen in critically ill paediatric patients: a retrospective chart review]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/5/450?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Haemodynamic changes following intravenous acetaminophen are well studied in adults. Limited data are published in critically ill paediatric patients, especially from the Middle East. We aim to investigate haemodynamic effects and incidence of hypotension with intravenous acetaminophen in critically ill children, with a focus on understanding factors influencing these effects.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We retrospectively reviewed patients who received intravenous acetaminophen between July and December 2022. A haemodynamic event was defined as drop of &gt;15% in systolic blood pressure (SBP) or mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) within 120 min after drug administration. Hypotension was defined as either drop in SBP below the 5th percentile for age, or a haemodynamic event associated with tachycardia, increased lactate or treatment with fluid/vasopressors. Logistic regression was performed to quantify relationships between patients&rsquo; characteristics and the occurrence of haemodynamic event and hypotension.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A haemodynamic event was observed in 50/156 patients (32%) post-acetaminophen. Mean MAP (SD) before and after acetaminophen was 69.6 mm Hg (14.8) and 67.4 mm Hg (13.9), respectively (p=0.001). Mean SBP (SD) before and after acetaminophen was 95.4 mm Hg (18.2) and 92.8 mm Hg (19.2), respectively (p=0.006). Baseline MAP, median (interquartile range (IQR)) was 76.0 (64.0&ndash;85.3) and 66.0 (57.0&ndash;74.5) in patients with and without haemodynamic events, respectively (p=0.004). Only 38/156 patients (24%) met the definition for hypotension. Baseline MAP, median (IQR) was 62.0 (51.8&ndash;79.0) in patients with, and 68.5 (62.0, 79.3) in patients without hypotension (p=0.036). Baseline shock, vasoactives, mechanical ventilation and paediatric sequential organ failure assessment were not significantly associated with hypotension. Only MAP was found to be associated with both haemodynamic event (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 1.05, 95% CI 1.02&ndash;1.10) and hypotension (AOR 1.06, 95% CI 1.02&ndash;1.10) even after controlling for other confounders.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Administration of intravenous acetaminophen in critically ill children can lead to haemodynamic changes, including clinically significant hypotensive events.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mohammad, L., Al Naeem, W., Ramsi, M., Al Neyadi, S., Abdullahi, A., Rahma, A., Dawoud, T. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-08-21T00:45:34-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2023-004048</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2023-004048</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 4: Clinical Pharmacy Services]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Haemodynamic effects of intravenous acetaminophen in critically ill paediatric patients: a retrospective chart review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>450</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>455</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/5/456?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Comparison of sodium zirconium cyclosilicate and sodium polystyrene sulfonate in the treatment of acute hyperkalaemia]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/5/456?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Sodium polystyrene sulfonate (SPS) and sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC) have been used for treating acute hyperkalaemia. The pharmacodynamic properties of SZC suggest greater theoretical utility in the acute setting than SPS, but there is no clear guidance on an optimal potassium binder. This study evaluated the efficacy of SZC and SPS in the treatment of acute hyperkalaemia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>This retrospective cohort study included adult hospitalised patients who had acute hyperkalaemia (serum potassium level &ge;5.5 mmol/L) and were treated with either SZC or SPS from April 2021 to August 2023. The primary outcome was time to first occurrence of potassium normalisation which was evaluated using Cox regression analysis. Secondary outcomes included potassium normalisation, serum potassium level trends, newly initiated dialysis following acute hyperkalaemia, in-hospital death and adverse events.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The study included 46 patients with 17 in the SZC group and 29 in the SPS group. Potassium normalisation was attained in 16 (94%) in the SZC group and 27 (93%) in the SPS group and, of those, five (29%) in the SZC group and five (17%) in the SPS group attained normal potassium levels within 8 hours (HR 1.91, 95% CI 0.55 to 6.56).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Statistically, neither SZC nor SPS was more efficacious; however, the quicker onset of SZC could provide a clinically meaningful difference in the treatment of acute hyperkalaemia.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thai, T., Hong, L., Hauschild, C., Iso, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-08-21T00:45:34-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004374</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2024-004374</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 4: Clinical Pharmacy Services]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Comparison of sodium zirconium cyclosilicate and sodium polystyrene sulfonate in the treatment of acute hyperkalaemia]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>456</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>460</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/5/461?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Combination of a propofol emulsion with alpha-2 adrenergic receptor agonists used for multimodal analgesia or sedation in intensive care units: a physicochemical stability study]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/5/461?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To assess the physicochemical stability of the combination of a propofol emulsion with an alpha-2 (&alpha;2) adrenergic receptor agonist (&alpha;2A; clonidine or dexmedetomidine) under conditions mimicking routine practice in an intensive care unit or in multimodal analgesia procedures.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We developed and validated three stability-indicating methods based on high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet (HPLC-UV) detection. Eight different conditions per combination were evaluated in triplicate, with variations in the simulated, bodyweight-adjusted dose level and the drugs&rsquo; flow rate. The drugs were mixed in clinically relevant concentrations and proportions and then stored unprotected from light, in clear glass vials at room temperature for 96 hours. At each sampling point, we assessed the chemical stability (the HPLC-UV drug level, pH, and osmolality) and physical compatibility (visual aspect, zeta potential (ZP), mean droplet diameter (MDD, Z-average) and polydispersity index (PDI)). We validated our stability findings in positive and negative control experiments.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Over the 96-hour test, the concentrations of propofol, clonidine and dexmedetomidine did not fall below 90% of the initial value, and the pH and osmolality were stable. The visual aspect of the mixed propofol emulsions did not change. The MDD remained below 500 nm (range 165&ndash;195 nm). The PDI was always below 0.4; 78.7% of the measurements were below 0.1 and 21.3% were between 0.1 and 0.4. The ZP measurements (&ndash;31.3 to &ndash;42.9 mV) suggested that the emulsion was stable. The MDD and PDI increased slightly at 96 hours under some conditions, which might indicate early destabilisation of the emulsion. Given that the MDD remained below 500 nm, these emulsions are compatible with intravenous administration.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Our results demonstrate the chemical and physical compatibility of propofol-&alpha;2 agonist mixtures at concentrations and in proportions representative of standard protocols when stored unprotected from light at room temperature for 96 hours.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roche, M., Rousseleau, D., Danel, C., Henry, H., Lebuffe, G., Odou, P., Lannoy, D., Simon, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-08-21T00:45:34-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2023-004027</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2023-004027</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 3: Production and Compounding]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Combination of a propofol emulsion with alpha-2 adrenergic receptor agonists used for multimodal analgesia or sedation in intensive care units: a physicochemical stability study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>461</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>467</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/5/468?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Evaluation of the appropriateness of vancomycin therapeutic drug monitoring in the intensive care unit with a clinical pharmacy approach, a cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/5/468?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Vancomycin, a glycopeptide antibiotic has antibacterial activity against Gram-positive bacteria and is frequently used in the intensive care unit (ICU). Inappropriate therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of vancomycin is a common problem encountered in hospital daily practice. The aim of this study was to evaluate the appropriateness of vancomycin trough-guided TDM in patients treated in the ICU using a clinical pharmacy approach.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The study was conducted retrospectively in patients over 18 years old who had at least one vancomycin trough level and who had received intravenous (IV) vancomycin for &ge;3 days between 1 November 2020 and 1 April 2022. The study included 137 patients. Patient demographics and relevant vancomycin TDM data were collected from medical records. The appropriateness of TDM was evaluated according to the criteria established based on the monitoring recommendations specified in consensus guidelines for therapeutic drug monitoring of vancomycin published by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) in 2009 and 2020.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of a total of 238 vancomycin trough levels measured in patients, 32.4% were collected at an inappropriate time. When patients were evaluated in terms of TDM appropriateness according to vancomycin level ranges (&lt;10 &micro;g/mL, 10&ndash;20 &micro;g/mL and &gt;20 &micro;g/mL), we found the appropriate TDM was significantly higher in the therapeutic range (10&ndash;20 &micro;g/mL) (p &lt;0.001). Of the total 238 vancomycin trough concentrations taken from patients, 77 (32.4%) were measured at an inappropriate time. This caused dose withholding, wrong adjustments and therapy failure. The total TDM appropriateness of vancomycin was significantly higher in the therapeutic range defined as 10&ndash;20 &micro;g/mL when evaluated based on &lsquo;TDM appropriateness criteria&rsquo; (p &lt;0.001).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Our study shows that appropriate vancomycin TDM increases the likelihood of achieving target trough concentrations. Involvement of clinical pharmacists in TDM management may prevent the development of adverse reactions by ensuring appropriate sampling time and appropriate interpretation of vancomycin levels.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dincel, S., Demirpolat, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-08-21T00:45:34-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2023-004073</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2023-004073</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 4: Clinical Pharmacy Services]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Evaluation of the appropriateness of vancomycin therapeutic drug monitoring in the intensive care unit with a clinical pharmacy approach, a cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>468</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>473</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/5/474?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Losartan potassium liquid formulation for paediatric hospital use: development and stability evaluation]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/5/474?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study aimed to develop a liquid oral formulation containing losartan potassium, an angiotensin II receptor antagonist drug used for its antihypertensive activity, and to perform a preliminary stability assessment under different temperatures and packages to ensure paediatric therapeutic adherence and facilitate the hospital routine.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A syrup containing losartan potassium (1.0 and 2.5 mg/mL) (excipients: potassium sorbate, sucrose (85%), water, citric acid and raspberry flavouring) was prepared. The packaging was carried out in amber polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and amber glass bottles (in triplicate) under the following conditions: (a) room temperature (15&ndash;30&deg;C); (b) refrigeration (2&ndash;8&deg;C); and (c) oven temperature (40&deg;C) for 28 days. An analytical method by high performance liquid chromatography using a reverse-phase column was also developed and validated for quantitative determination of the drug in the formulations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The analytical method showed satisfactory linearity, detection and quantification limits, precision, accuracy and robustness. Samples at room temperature maintained content values between 90% and 110% for 7 days, while those stored under refrigeration maintained a homogeneous appearance and content between 90% and 110% for a period of 21 days. Values of pH stayed in a narrow range. Viscosity results were between 40.1 and 49.2 centipoise (cp) for glass bottles and 42.4 and 54.7 cp for PET bottles.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>A simple and economical losartan potassium liquid formulation was produced and was shown to be stable under refrigeration for 21 days in both PET and glass packages.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Corte, A. C., Gobetti, C., Carlos, G., de Oliveira Almeida, S. H., Ayres, M. V., Steppe, M., Garcia, C. V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-08-21T00:45:34-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2023-004026</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2023-004026</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 3: Production and Compounding]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Losartan potassium liquid formulation for paediatric hospital use: development and stability evaluation]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>474</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>478</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/5/479?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Physicochemical stability of pevonedistat at 50, 100 and 200 {micro}g/mL diluted in 0.9% sodium chloride and at 10 mg/mL in partially used vials]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/5/479?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Pevonedistat is a new cytotoxic used in association with azacitidine for the treatment of acute myeloid leukaemia and high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. The manufacturer indicates an 18-hour stability after dilution in dextrose 5% or 0.9% sodium chloride (0.9% NaCl) at 2&ndash;8&deg;C. No information is given for re-using vials of pevonedistat.</p>
<p>Our objectives were to study the physico-chemical stability of 50 and 200 &micro;g/mL pevonedistat diluted in 0.9% NaCl, in glass tubes, 100 &micro;g/mL in 0.9% NaCl in polyolefin infusion bags, and 10 mg/mL partially used vials with a Spike. All preparations were stored at 2&ndash;8&deg;C, protected from light.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Materials and methods</st>
<p>Due to the limited quantity of pevonedistat available for this study, we prepared test solutions at 50 and 200 &micro;g/mL in glass tubes in a small volume of 20 mL. Inorder to verify the absence of a sorption phenomenon of the molecule onto polyolefin, we prepared two infusion bags at 100 &micro;g/mL. We tested concentrated solution at 10 mg/mL. At each analysis time, we tested three samples of each condition by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) coupled with a photodiode array detector. Physical stability was evaluated by a visual and sub-visual inspection. We measured pH at each analysis time.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Diluted solutions at 50 and 200 &micro;g/mL in tubes and at 100 mg/mL in infusion bags retained more than 95% of the initial concentration for 14 days, the concentrated solution at 10 mg/mL did so for 7 days. No physical changes were detected visually or sub-visually. We found that pH values remained stable.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>All diluted solutions remained physically and chemically stable for 14 days, the concentrated solution did so for 7 days. No interactions between the polyolefin bag and pevonedistat were demonstrated. This new data allows re-using the concentrated solution of pevonedistat in a commercial glass vial with a Spike, and storing a preparation in case of non-administration.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doncheva, R., D'Huart, E., Sobalak, N., Vigneron, J., Demore, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-08-21T00:45:35-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2023-003884</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2023-003884</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EAHP Statement 3: Production and Compounding]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Physicochemical stability of pevonedistat at 50, 100 and 200 {micro}g/mL diluted in 0.9% sodium chloride and at 10 mg/mL in partially used vials]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>479</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>484</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/5/485?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Neutropenia possibly caused by cefoperazone/sulbactam]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/5/485?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Neutropenia is a rare complication of drug therapy and is usually underdiagnosed. Cefoperazone/sulbactam is a combination of broad-spectrum antibacterial agents. Data on cefoperazone/sulbactam-induced neutropenia are limited. Herein, we report the case of a 35 year-old female patient who was admitted to the hospital due to an appendiceal abscess. After anti-infective treatment with cefoperazone/sulbactam, the patient developed neutropenia on day 4. After discontinuing treatment with cefoperazone/sulbactam, the patient&rsquo;s white blood cells and neutrophils gradually returned to normal. Hence, clinicians should monitor changes in neutrophil count during cefoperazone/sulbactam therapy and provide timely treatment.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Li, Y., He, X. F., Wang, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-08-21T00:45:35-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004188</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2024-004188</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Neutropenia possibly caused by cefoperazone/sulbactam]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Case report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>485</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>487</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/5/488?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Therapeutic drug monitoring of inhaled tobramycin in a patient with chronic kidney disease]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/5/488?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This case report investigates elevated serum concentrations of inhaled tobramycin in a patient with chronic kidney disease. The patient, a man in his early 80s with complex comorbidities, underwent tobramycin inhalation therapy for chronic respiratory infections caused by <I>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</I>. Despite the strategic localised treatment approach, unexpectedly high plasma tobramycin concentrations were observed. After a dosage adjustment guided by a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model, a final inhalation dose of 300 mg of tobramycin was determined at a 24-hour interval. This case report underscores the need for rigorous monitoring of plasma tobramycin levels in patients with renal impairment undergoing inhaled tobramycin therapy, advocating for enhanced pharmacokinetic models to improve the safety and efficacy of the treatment.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anez-Castano, R., Iniesta-Navalon, C., Almanchel-Rivadeneyra, M., Garcia-Villalba, E., Oliver-Galera, E., Rentero-Redondo, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-08-21T00:45:35-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2023-004075</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2023-004075</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Therapeutic drug monitoring of inhaled tobramycin in a patient with chronic kidney disease]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Case report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>488</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>490</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/5/491?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Beyond conventional dosing: tailoring antimicrobial regimens for cachexia]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/5/491?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kilinc, E. E., Bayraktar, I., Kara, E., Demirkan, K., Akova, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-08-21T00:45:35-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004250</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2024-004250</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Beyond conventional dosing: tailoring antimicrobial regimens for cachexia]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>PostScript</prism:section>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>491</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>492</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/5/491-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Insights on afatinib and toxic epidermal necrolysis/Stevens-Johnson syndrome]]></title>
<link>http://ejhp.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/32/5/491-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Castellana, E., Chiappetta, M. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-08-21T00:45:35-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004463</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:ejhpharm;ejhpharm-2024-004463</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Insights on afatinib and toxic epidermal necrolysis/Stevens-Johnson syndrome]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>PostScript</prism:section>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>491</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>491</prism:endingPage>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>